Previous Article | Next Article 
Molecular and Cellular Biology, September 2000, p. 6695-6703, Vol. 20, No. 18
0270-7306/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
DNA Excision Repair and DNA Damage-Induced
Apoptosis Are Linked to Poly(ADP-Ribosyl)ation but Have Different
Requirements for p53
Ralph
Beneke,1
Christoph
Geisen,1
Branko
Zevnik,1
Thomas
Bauch,2
Wolfgang-Ulrich
Müller,2
Jan-Heiner
Küpper,3 and
Tarik
Möröy1,*
Institut für Zellbiologie
(Tumorforschung), IFZ,1 and Institut
für Medizinische Strahlenbiologie,2
Universitätsklinikum Essen, D-45122 Essen, and Institut
für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen,
D-72076 Tübingen,3 Germany
Received 17 April 2000/Returned for modification 1 June
2000/Accepted 9 June 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) is a DNA binding zinc finger
protein that catalyzes the transfer of ADP-ribose residues from
NAD+ to itself and different chromatin constituents,
forming branched ADP-ribose polymers. The enzymatic activity of PARP is
induced upon DNA damage and the PARP protein is cleaved during
apoptosis, which suggested a role of PARP in DNA repair and DNA
damage-induced cell death. We have generated transgenic mice that lack
PARP activity in thymocytes owing to the targeted expression of a
dominant negative form of PARP. In the presence of single-strand DNA
breaks, the absence of PARP activity correlated with a strongly
increased rate of apoptosis compared to cells with intact PARP
activity. We found that blockage of PARP activity leads to a drastic
increase of p53 expression and activity after DNA damage and correlates with an accelerated onset of Bax expression. DNA repair is almost completely blocked in PARP-deficient thymocytes regardless of p53
status. We found the same increased susceptibility to apoptosis in PARP
null mice, a similar inhibition of DNA repair kinetics, and the same
upregulation of p53 in response to DNA damage. Thus, based on two
different experimental in vivo models, we identify a direct,
p53-independent, functional connection between poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation and the DNA excision repair machinery. Furthermore, we propose a
p53-dependent link between PARP activity and DNA damage-induced cell death.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP)
is rapidly activated during the cellular response to DNA damage and is
part of a large network of safeguard mechanisms protecting cells from
genotoxic damage (7, 8, 14, 15, 21). Upon DNA damage, PARP
binds to DNA at the sites where double-strand breaks emerge and
catalyzes the formation of branched ADP-ribose polymers from
NAD+. PARP has a molecular mass of 116 kDa and contains two
zinc fingers located at the N terminus next to a bipartite nuclear
localization signal sequence which form a DNA binding moiety that
functions as a sensor for single- and double-strand DNA breaks. The
central part of the enzyme contains the automodification domain, and
the C terminus harbors the NAD+ binding site. Physiological
substrates for polymer attachment are DNA binding proteins such as
histones and PARP itself (7).
The localization of PARP and its activity to modify chromatin
constituents after genotoxic stress have prompted speculations about
its function in DNA repair, DNA recombination, and the maintenance of
genomic integrity (15, 37). In addition, PARP function has
been associated with apoptosis because it is cleaved during apoptosis
into two subfragments of 89 and 24 kDa (5, 44). To shed more
light on the role of PARP and its role in apoptosis and DNA repair,
several experimental approaches have been followed. One that involves
the inhibition of PARP has been addressed by the use of either
antisense strategies or 3-aminobenzamide, which is a competitor for
NAD+ (25, 41, 42, 44), or by the expression of
the DNA binding domain (DBD) of PARP, which acts as a dominant negative
inhibitor (16, 17, 18, 29, 35, 39). With the latter
strategy, the activity of PARP to synthesize poly(ADP-ribose) is
inhibited by interfering with the ability of endogenous PARP to bind to DNA strand breaks. Experiments with 3-aminobenzamide or the PARP DBD
have produced similar results and demonstrated that the absence of PARP
activity renders cells more susceptible to apoptosis upon DNA damage
either by irradiation or by treatment with alkylating agents such as
N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine
(MNNG), which predominantly induces DNA single-strand breaks. However,
these experiments did not provide direct evidence for a role of PARP or
its activity in DNA repair and did not clarify the molecular basis of a
function of PARP in apoptosis. The second approach to elucidate the
mechanisms that mediate the observed effects of PARP used gene
targeting. To date, three groups have inactivated the PARP gene in mice
but have obtained different results (8, 26, 51, 52). One
group reported enhanced sensitivity of these mice toward alkylating
agents and a decreased DNA excision repair rate of PARP null cells
(8, 49). In this experiment only the coding region for the
second zinc finger was disrupted, leaving the potential to express a
truncated PARP protein with residual function. However, further
analysis showed that the fourth exon of the PARP gene, which comprises
the DBD and nuclear localization signal, was partially disrupted and
not expressed in the PARP null mice generated by de Murcia et al.
(8). The second group did not observe any effect on DNA
damage-induced apoptosis or DNA repair; however, no analysis of DNA
break resealing was done in the latter study (51, 52),
leaving the question of PARP function unresolved. In addition, the role
that p53 and its effectors play in DNA damage-induced apoptosis or DNA
repair with regard to PARP function has not been established.
To clarify the role of PARP and p53 in DNA repair and DNA
damage-induced apoptosis, we have chosen an approach which allows inhibition of PARP activity in vivo in a particular cell type. We used
the lck promoter to express the PARP DBD in T cells of transgenic mice and were able to successfully block
poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation in these cells. We report here that the absence
of PARP activity clearly enhances apoptosis upon DNA damage. We
demonstrate that susceptibility to apoptosis is mediated through the
activation of p53 and an accelerated upregulation of Bax. Further, we
demonstrate that DNA excision repair is almost completely inhibited in
T cells with inactive PARP and that this lack of repair capacity is
independent of p53.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Generation of transgenic mice.
The construct used to
generate lck-PARP DBD transgenic mice is shown schematically
in Fig. 1a. The construct was obtained by inserting a
fragment encoding the human PARP (hPARP) DBD into the lck
vector. The vector contained the proximal lck promoter and
the genomic sequence of the human growth hormone (hGH) gene in a
pBluescript backbone and has been used extensively for the generation
of transgenic mice with expression targeted to the T-cell compartment.
The construct was freed from backbone sequences, purified, and injected
into fertilized mouse oocytes essentially as described elsewhere
(12). The fertilized mouse oocytes were derived from matings
between (C57BL/6 × C3H)F1 mice. Successful integration of the injected DNA was monitored by Southern analysis of
tail tip DNA as described elsewhere (12). All transgenic mouse lines were maintained by breeding the obtained founders for three
or more generations with inbred C57BL/6 animals. Preparation of genomic
DNA from tail tips and DNA blotting were performed as described
elsewhere (12, 36). The PARP probe was the 1.2-kb PARP DBD
cDNA fragment (14).

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Introduction of a functionally active dominant negative
mutant of PARP into the germ line of transgenic mice. (a) Schematic
representation of the construct used to express the DBD of PARP in T
cells of transgenic mice. (b) Expression of the lck-PARP DBD
transgene in extracts from thymi of mice from four different transgenic
lines (lck-PARP DBD lines 1, 2, 3, and 4). The level of
transgene expression was measured by direct scanning of the ECL-treated
membrane after blotting with a video camera and subsequent analysis by
the AIDA software (Raytest, Straubenhardt, Germany) on a Fuji
phosphorimager. PARP DBD expression was found to be higher in lines 1 and 2 than in lines 3 and 4. The PARP DBD protein was detected with the
monoclonal antibody CII10, which recognizes the hPARP transgene and the
endogenous mPARP. Relative expression levels are given in arbitrary
units (au) obtained through the scanning procedure. (c) Dominant
negative effect of the expression of the PARP DBD in T cells.
Thymocytes from wild-type and lck-PARP DBD transgenic mice
were treated with MNNG, and the formation of poly(ADP-ribose) was
followed by immunofluorescence. Compared to nontransgenic (non tg)
controls, thymocytes from lck-PARP DBD transgenic mice lack
detectable polymer formation after MNNG treatment. (d) Expression level
of the PARP DBD in different organs of a transgenic mouse of
lck-PARP DBD line 2. As a control, an extract from a
nontransgenic thymus was loaded. The PARP DBD protein was detected with
the monoclonal antibody CII10, which recognizes the hPARP transgene and
the endogenous mPARP. The relative amount of PARP DBD protein
expression in splenocytes is detectable but very low (data not
shown).
|
|
Cell extracts and immunoblotting.
Extracts from thymi were
separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
(SDS-PAGE) and transferred onto membranes, and the hPARP DBD protein or
the intact and cleaved mouse PARP (mPARP) was detected with mouse
monoclonal antibody CII10, against the DBD, and a secondary antibody
carrying horseradish peroxidase. hPARP DBD protein alone was probed
with mouse monoclonal antibody FI23 and the appropriate secondary
antibody. Enzymatic activity was detected using an ECL kit (Amersham)
according to the specifications of the manufacturer. Equal and
homogeneous transfer of proteins from the gel to membranes was
routinely controlled by Ponceau staining of the membrane. For extract
preparation, thymocytes were explanted from animals upon autopsy in 5 ml of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), collected by centrifugation, and
lysed in 100 µl of extraction buffer (50 mM HEPES [pH 7.8], 20 mM
NaF, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 1 mM sodium molybdate, 450 mM NaCl, 0.2 mM EDTA, 25% glycerol, 1 µg of aprotinin/µl, 1 µg of
leupeptin/µl, 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 mM
dithiothreitol, 1% NP-40). The lysate was cleared by centrifugation;
the supernatant was separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred onto a
nitrocellulose membrane. The membrane was blocked for 1 h in PBS
with 3% skim milk and then incubated overnight in blocking solution
containing the appropriate antibodies at 0.3 µg/ml. Blots were
developed with appropriate secondary antibodies and ECL detection
reagents (Amersham) as proposed by the manufacturer.
Antibody staining procedures and quantification of apoptotic
cells.
Single-cell suspensions were prepared as described
previously (30) at the time of autopsy from thymus in PBS
supplemented with 0.5% fetal calf serum (staining solution). Cells
were washed in this solution and incubated on ice for 30 min with
antibodies directly conjugated with fluorochromes. For propidium iodide
labeling and quantification of cell death, cells were washed once with cold PBS and fixed with ethanol overnight at
20°C. The cells were
again washed and then incubated in propidium iodide (2 µg/ml; Sigma)
in PBS-RNase (10 µg/ml) for 30 min at room temperature and analyzed
by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS).
Detection of poly(ADP-ribose).
To analyze poly(ADP-ribose)
formation, cells from thymi of wild-type and lck-PARP DBD
transgenic mice were sedimented for 15 min onto polylysine
(Sigma)-pretreated coverslips, washed with PBS, and treated with 50 µM MNNG (Sigma)-PBS supplemented with 1 mM CaCl2 at
37°C for 20 min. After being washed with PBS, the cells were fixed
with 10% ice-cold trichloroacetic acid and subjected to PARP-specific
immunofluorescence as described elsewhere (18).
DNA fragmentation assay.
Isolated thymocytes were treated
with 40 µM MNNG or X irradiation (2 Gy); after incubation for 4 h, the cells were harvested and lysed with proteinase K for 2 h at
56°C. Proteins were extracted with phenol-chloroform, and the DNA was
precipitated with 3 volumes of 100% ethanol. After a wash with 70%
ethanol, the pellet was resolved in Tris-EDTA buffer, and DNA content
was measured at 260 nm. DNA was subjected to agarose gel
electrophoresis and analyzed by ethidium bromide staining under a
standard UV transilluminator.
Comet assay.
A 100-µl aliquot of a cell suspension was
mixed with 500 µl of 0.75% agarose and spread on microscope slides
precovered with 0.1% agarose. After gelling at 0°C, the cells were
lysed in a 2.5% SDS solution (pH 9.5) for 15 min. Following a 5-min
wash in distilled water, electrophoresis was carried out in
Tris-borate-EDTA buffer (pH 8.3) for 5 min on a modified flat-bed
electrophoresis apparatus with an electric field of 2.5 V/cm (current,
15 to 18 mA). Under these conditions, the DNA of each cell forms a
comet-shaped structure with a head and a tail portion. The tail size
correlates with the induced DNA damage and chromatin unfolding. DNA
repair can be estimated by the shrinkage of the comet tail over time. To examine the individual comets, the slides were stained with a
fluorescent dye (propidium iodide). For the measurement of the comets,
a fluorescence microscope was coupled with an intensified target
camera, and an interactive digital image analysis system was
established (2, 3, 31).
Transient transfection assays.
EL-4 T cells (2 × 107) were electroporated at 950 µF and 200 V with 2 µg
of human MDM2 (hMDM2) or mutant
MDM2-luciferase reporter plasmid (53) and 13 µg
of lck-PARP DBD expression construct or empty lck
vector as a control. After 14 h, the transfected cells were
treated for 20 min with 40 µM MNNG in PBS, then transferred into
fresh medium, and incubated for another 4 h before luciferase activity was determined. Other portions of transfected cells were either irradiated with 2 Gy and then incubated in medium for 4 h
or treated for 2 h with 50 µM etoposide. After treatment,
extracts were prepared and luciferase activity was determined with a luminometer.
 |
RESULTS |
We have generated transgenic mice that overexpress the DBD of
PARP, which comprises the N terminus of the PARP protein from amino
acids 1 to 376 (Fig. 1), with the intention to block the enzymatic
activity of the endogenous PARP in a dominant negative manner. It has
been demonstrated that the expression of this PARP DBD can efficiently
block PARP activity in cell lines (16, 17, 18, 29, 35, 39).
Thus, the human cDNA coding for the PARP DBD was placed between the
proximal lck promoter and genomic sequences derived from the
hGH gene (Fig. 1a) to target expression of the transgene to the
T-lymphoid lineage. Mice of two transgenic lines (lck-PARP
DBD lines 1 and 2) expressed the PARP DBD transgene at highest levels
in the thymus (Fig. 1b) and other T-cell-containing tissues such as
spleen and lymph nodes, but not in other organs (Fig. 1d), and at
levels significantly higher than the endogenous PARP level (Fig. 1b and
d); these mice were chosen for further investigation. To test if the
overexpression of this dominant negative PARP mutant can inhibit the
enzymatic activity of the endogenous PARP, thymocytes from line 2 transgenic mice were treated with the monofunctional alkylating agent
MNNG, which causes DNA single-strand breaks. Cells were then checked
for the formation of ADP-ribose polymer by immunofluorescence analysis.
This experiment demonstrated clearly the absence of PARP activity in
the transgenic thymocytes compared to wild-type thymocytes, indicating
the functionality of the transgene and the validity of the chosen
approach (Fig. 1c). Similar results were obtained for cells from
transgenic line 1 but not for the lines 3 and 4 (data not shown), which
express lower levels of the PARP DBD, suggesting that a threshold level is necessary for the DBD to exert its dominant negative effect on the
endogenous PARP.
Next we tested the cell death rates of thymocytes from
lck-PARP DBD transgenic mice upon the induction of DNA
damage by treatment with MNNG or after a single 2-Gy dose of X
irradiation, both of which predominantly cause DNA single-strand
breaks. This was measured by counting the percentage of cells that
contain sub-G1 amounts of propidium iodide-stained DNA
after ethanol fixation by FACS (6, 34, 47). Comparing
thymocytes from lck-PARP DBD transgenic animals with cells
from nontransgenic controls, we found that PARP DBD expression
correlated with a significantly higher cell death rate upon both
irradiation and MNNG treatment (Fig. 2a and b). Similar
results were obtained with etoposide (Fig. 2c). The presence of
nucleosomal DNA degradation and cleavage of endogenous PARP (Fig.
3) confirmed that the stimuli used indeed caused
apoptotic cell death. As extracts from the same number of cells were
loaded per lane, the higher sensitivity of PARP DBD-expressing
thymocytes to DNA damage is again reflected by larger amounts of
degraded DNA as well as by the earlier cleavage of endogenous PARP
(Fig. 3). In contrast, this enhanced sensitivity for DNA damage-induced apoptosis by the PARP DBD was completely lost in thymocytes from mice
that carried the lck-PARP DBD transgene and lacked the p53 gene (Fig. 2a and b). The cell death rate of cells from these combinatorial mutant mice after treatment was indistinguishable from
rates obtained from untreated nontransgenic controls or from treated
p53-deficient thymocytes (Fig. 2a and b).

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Thymocytes expressing PARP DBD or lacking the PARP gene
are more sensitive to apoptosis upon DNA damage only in the presence of
p53. (a to c) Thymocytes were explanted from lck-PARP DBD
transgenic mice and from nontransgenic (non tg) controls and were
either irradiated (2 Gy) (a) or treated with MNNG (40 µM) (b) or
etoposide (50 µM) (c). Before treatment and at different time points
thereafter, samples were analyzed for the percentage of apoptotic
cells. Shown are mean values with standard deviations representative of
three independent sets of experiments. Each data point represents an
average value with standard deviation obtained from measurements of
three different mice. (d) Thymocytes were explanted from PARP null mice
(PARP / ), from mutant mice that are PARP null and
express the PARP DBD (PARP / , lck-PARP-DBD) from mice
that are deficient for both PARP and p53 (PARP / ,
p53 / ), and from nontransgenic controls and were
irradiated with a single pulse of 2 Gy. Before treatment and at
different times thereafter, samples were analyzed for the percentage of
apoptotic cells. Shown are mean values with standard deviations
representative of three independent sets of experiments. Each data
point represents an average value with standard deviation obtained from
measurements of three different mice.
|
|

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Accelerated apoptosis in thymocytes from
lck-PARP DBD transgenic mice is reflected by earlier
cleavage of endogenous PARP and increased DNA laddering. (a) To monitor
endogenous PARP cleavage, thymocytes of lck-PARP DBD
transgenic mice and nontransgenic (non tg) littermates were cultured
and either left untreated or irradiated with a single dose of 2 Gy.
Samples were taken at the indicated time points after the stimulus and
were analyzed by Western blotting. Equal loading of each lane was
controlled by Ponceau staining (not shown). (b) To confirm that both X
irradiation and treatment with MNNG induce apoptosis, genomic DNA
prepared from thymocytes of lck-PARP DBD transgenic and
nontransgenic control mice after treatment with MNNG was analyzed on
agarose gels. The presence of nucleosomal DNA degradation indicates
apoptosis.
|
|
Next, we compared the sensitivity of thymocytes from
lck-PARP DBD transgenic mice upon a single dose (2 Gy) of X
irradiation with that of cells from PARP-deficient mice generated by
gene targeting (51, 52) as well as combinatorial mutant mice
that lack both PARP and p53 or lack PARP but express the PARP DBD
transgene (Fig. 2d). Cells from PARP-deficient mice showed the same
sensitivity for cell death as cells from lck-PARP DBD mice
and cells from mice lacking PARP and expressing the DBD transgene (Fig.
2d). In addition, the absence of p53 rescued thymocytes from apoptosis even in the absence of PARP (Fig. 2d). This demonstrates that thymocytes expressing PARP DBD cannot be distinguished from PARP null
cells with regard to a heightened sensitivity for p53-dependent apoptosis in response to DNA damage. Furthermore, we have investigated whether the inactivation of PARP can interfere with DNA repair processes in our transgenic model. The formation of single-strand breaks and subsequent strand break resealing was stimulated by treatment of cells with MNNG or by X irradiation (2 Gy). The repair rate (i.e., resealing of broken DNA ends and chromatin condensation) of
these cells was measured by the comet assay (2, 3, 31), which represents one of the most sensitive methods available to quantify DNA repair activity in living cells. Allowing different time
periods for repair after the initial stimulus, thymocytes were embedded
in agarose, spread on microscope slides, lysed in SDS buffer (pH 9.5),
subjected to single-cell gel electrophoresis in buffer (pH 8.3), and
stained with propidium iodide. Under these conditions, the DNA of those
cells that harbor the induced DNA strand breaks migrates toward the
anode and appears as a comet. The total fluorescence of an individual
comet is measured, and the fluorescence signals of the head and tail
portions are calculated. The tail/head ratio of fluorescence is used as
a measure of the individual DNA damage by incision/unwinding and for
the resealing-condensation activity.
Clearly, thymocytes from both line 1 and line 2 of lck-PARP
DBD transgenic mice displayed a significant inhibition of DNA repair
activity upon MNNG treatment over a time period of 180 min compared to
cells from nontransgenic controls (Fig. 4). Strikingly, this block of DNA resealing was not affected by the absence of p53 in
cells from lck-PARP DBD transgenic/p53 null mice (Fig. 5a). Cells from p53 null mice with intact PARP activity
showed wild-type repair kinetics (Fig. 5a). In a second set of
experiments, the comet assay was performed on thymocytes that were
irradiated with 2 Gy. Immediately after this radiation pulse, repair
kinetics were taken over a period of 120 min. Similarly to the
MNNG-treated cells, thymocytes from lck-PARP DBD transgenic
mice showed a strong reduction in the ability to reseal DNA strand
breaks and to condense chromatin structure upon X irradiation (Fig.
5b). Again, this reduction did not appear to depend on p53, since
irradiated thymocytes from lck-PARP DBD/p53 null mice showed
the same degree of repair inhibition as cells from lck-PARP
DBD with an intact p53 gene (Fig. 5b). In contrast, thymocytes from
p53-deficient mice that did not carry the lck PARP DBD
transgene repaired DNA lesions at a wild-type rate (Fig. 5b).

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Inhibition of poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation inhibits DNA strand
break resealing upon MNNG treatment or X irradiation. Comet assays were
performed to assess the effects of PARP DBD expression on the resealing
of DNA strand breaks. Thymocytes of lck-PARP DBD transgenic
mice and age-matched nontransgenic (non tg) control littermates were
prepared, treated with 40 µM MNNG for 20 min, stained with propidium
iodide, and analyzed for comet formation. Given are average values with
standard deviations from 40 cells per sample and time point against
elapsed time after the stimulus. In each case, a representative of
three independent experiments is depicted. For measurement of the
comets, a fluorescence microscope was coupled with an intensified
target camera, and an interactive digital image analysis system was
established.
|
|

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Influence of p53 and PARP on DNA resealing after
induction of damage by MNNG treatment and X irradiation. (a) Comet
assay to compare DNA repair kinetics after MNNG treatment between cells
from lck-PARP DBD mice, p53-deficient animals, mice that are
both p53 deficient and carry an lck-PARP DBD transgene, and
age-matched nontransgenic (non tg) littermate controls. (b) Comet assay
to compare DNA repair kinetics after X irradiation with a single dose
of 2 Gy between cells from lck-PARP DBD mice, p53-deficient
animals, mice that are both p53 deficient and carry an
lck-PARP DBD transgene, and age-matched nontransgenic
littermate controls. Given are average values with standard deviations
from 40 cells per sample and time point against elapsed time after the
stimulus. In each case, a representative of three independent
experiments is depicted. For measurement of the comets, a fluorescence
microscope was coupled with an intensified target camera, and an
interactive digital image analysis system was established.
|
|
We next wished to investigate whether cells that lack PARP function due
to the overexpression of the dominant negative PARP mutant behave
differently from cells of mice that are PARP deficient due to gene
targeting. We found that thymocytes lacking PARP function due to either
gene disruption or DBD expression showed significantly inhibited repair
kinetics (Fig. 6). In addition, the lack of p53 did not
alter DNA repair under the conditions used regardless of whether PARP
was functional (Fig. 6). Expression of a PARP DBD in PARP null
thymocytes still showed unaltered inhibition of DNA repair (Fig. 6a).
This suggests that the expression of a PARP dominant negative mutant is
comparable to the lack of PARP due to gene disruption with regard to
DNA single-strand break repair and the requirements of p53 in this
process. The finding that lack of PARP activity leads to a
sensitization of cells for apoptosis upon DNA damage in a
p53-dependent manner prompted us to test the effect of the
dominant negative PARP mutant on the activity and the expression of p53
in T cells. To measure p53 activity, we transiently transfected a
reporter gene construct containing a luciferase gene driven by the
350-bp fragment of the hMDM2 intronic promoter that includes
the p53 response element (53) into EL-4 T cells. After
transfection, the cells were either irradiated with 2 Gy or treated
with 40 µM MNNG for 20 min, harvested after 4 h, and checked for
luciferase activity. Transfection of the lck-PARP DBD
construct stimulated transcription from the reporter a further two- to
fourfold after MNNG treatment or
irradiation compared to cells that
were transfected with the empty lck vector and were treated
likewise (Fig. 7a and b). Western blot analysis showed
that the block of poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation through the PARP DBD mutant
protein provoked a much higher induction of p53 expression levels in
lck-PARP DBD-transfected EL-4 cells than is reached in
irradiated cells transfected with the vector control (Fig. 6b). This
demonstrated that inhibition of poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation could potentiate
p53 activity significantly by allowing or stimulating a strongly
increased accumulation of p53 protein levels (23, 42, 43).

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Influence of p53 and PARP deficiency on DNA resealing
after induction of damage by X irradiation. (a) Comet assay to compare
DNA repair kinetics after X irradiation with a single dose of 2 Gy
between cells from nontransgenic (non tg) controls, PARP null mice
(PARP / ), lck-PARP DBD mice, and mutant mice
that both lack the PARP gene and express the PARP DBD transgene
(lck-PARP DBD, PARP / ). (b) Comparison of DNA repair
kinetics from PARP null mice (PARP / ), p53-deficient
animals (p53 / ), mice that are both p53 deficient and
PARP null (p53 / , PARP / ), and
age-matched nontransgenic littermate controls. Given are average values
with standard deviations from 40 cells per sample and time point
against elapsed time after the stimulus. In each case, a representative
of three independent experiments is depicted. For measurement of the
comets, a fluorescence microscope was coupled with an intensified
target camera, and an interactive digital image analysis system was
established.
|
|

View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
Expression and activity of p53 upon DNA damage depend on
poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation. (a) Luciferase activity (in relative
light units [RLU]) after transient transfection of EL-4 T cells with
the lck-driven PARP DBD (lck-PARP-DBD) or the empty
lck vector. Transcriptional transactivation of the
MDM2 reporter was measured in untreated cells or upon
treatment with MNNG (left) or after X irradiation (2 Gy; right). Given
are average values with standard deviations from three independent
transfections. (b) Immunoblot analysis of p53 expression levels. EL-4 T
cells were transiently transfected with either the empty lck
vector or the lck-PARP DBD expression construct and left
untreated or irradiated (2 Gy). After 4 h of exposure to the
stimulus, cell extracts were prepared and analyzed by Western blotting.
Equal loading of each lane was controlled by Ponceau staining (not
shown).
|
|
A number of potential direct or indirect downstream effectors of p53
have been identified, among them the proapoptotic protein Bax (27,
28). Thymocytes from lck-PARP DBD transgenic,
p53
/
, and PARP
/
mice, combinatorial
lck-PARP DBD/PARP
/
and
PARP
/
/p53
/
mutants, and nontransgenic
controls were X irradiated with a single dose of 2 Gy and checked for
p53 and Bax protein expression and N-terminal PARP/DBD cleavage by
Western blotting. p53 as well as Bax expression is slightly induced in
wild-type thymocytes 3 h after 2-Gy irradiation (Fig.
8). However, thymocytes with a p53 wild-type gene but
disrupted PARP function, due to either gene targeting or DBD
expression, showed higher levels of p53 and Bax protein 3 h after
2-Gy irradiation compared to wild-type controls (Fig. 8). This effect
was not observed in thymocytes that were p53 deficient. This suggests
that one effect of the loss of PARP function is a premature activation
and accumulation of p53, which in turn may provoke an accelerated
upregulation of Bax protein levels (23, 27, 43). In
addition, the p53-dependent increase of Bax protein level is
accompanied by an accelerated cleavage of endogenous PARP or of both
endogenous PARP and PARP DBD in those thymocytes which expressed the
transgene (Fig. 8).

View larger version (73K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 8.
Expression levels of PARP, the PARP DBD transgene, p53,
and Bax upon X irradiation in transgenic, null, and combinatorial
mutant mice. The immunoblot shows expression levels of the proteins in
thymocytes from the indicated mice 3 h after X irradiation (2 Gy).
Equal loading of each lane was controlled by Ponceau staining (not
shown).
|
|
Next, we wanted to test whether the higher rate of apoptosis and the
lack of DNA repair in PARP DBD-expressing cells are influenced by the
antiapoptotic factor Bcl-2. To this end, the lck-PARP DBD transgenic mice were crossed with Eµ bcl-2 transgenic
animals, which express high levels of Bcl-2 in all lymphoid cells,
which protect them from various apoptotic stimuli with the exception of
Fas triggering (13, 40). Thymocytes from animals carrying both lck-PARP DBD and Eµ bcl-2 alleles were
fully protected from DNA damage-induced death by 40 µM MNNG (Fig.
9a) or 2-Gy irradiation (not shown). The effect of the
PARP DBD was eliminated, and the cells from doubly transgenic animals
were protected to the same degree as cells expressing only Bcl-2.
However, the presence of Bcl-2 did not alter repair kinetics of
thymocytes treated with MNNG or with 2-Gy X irradiation (not shown) and
did not affect the inhibitory activity of PARP DBD on DNA repair (Fig.
9b).

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 9.
High levels of Bcl-2 block sensitization of thymocytes
for apoptosis by PARP DBD but do not interfere with DNA repair. (a)
Thymocytes were explanted from lck-PARP DBD, Eµ
bcl-2, or double-transgenic mice and from nontransgenic (non
tg) controls and were treated with MNNG (40 µM). Before treatment and
at different times thereafter, samples were analyzed for the percentage
of apoptotic cells. Shown are mean values with standard deviations
representative of three independent sets of experiments. (b) Comet
assay to compare DNA repair kinetics after MNNG treatment between cells
from lck-PARP DBD mice, Eµ bcl-2 animals, and
mice carry both an lck-PARP DBD transgene and an Eµ
bcl-2 transgene (cells from age-matched nontransgenic
littermate controls behaved like cells from Eµ bcl-2 mice
[not shown]). Given are average values with standard deviations from
40 cells per sample and time point against elapsed time after the
stimulus. In each case, a representative of three independent
experiments is depicted.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Our finding that thymocytes from PARP DBD-expressing transgenic
mice have a drastically reduced repair rate of DNA single-strand breaks
(Fig. 3) is in complete agreement with data generated by Trucco et al.
with fibroblasts from their PARP-deficient mice (49). In
contrast, the Wang group did not find alterations in the expression of
reporter genes from damaged plasmid DNA transfected in cells derived
from their PARP null mice (51). Although the authors
conclude from this that PARP is not involved in DNA repair, their
experimental design may have been not sensitive enough to detect a role
of PARP in DNA single-strand break repair. The fact that comet assays
with cells from the PARP null mice of Trucco et al. (49) and
with thymocytes from our PARP DBD transgenic mice both show drastically
reduced DNA repair indicates that expression of a PARP DBD in
transgenic mice creates a phenotype that is identical to the one found
in animals with targeted deletions of the PARP gene. Moreover, our own
experiments in which we compare thymocytes from PARP null mice from
Wang et al. (51) with thymocytes from our
lck-PARP DBD mice also showed a similar strong reduction of DNA repair rates. In addition, our data are similar to a number of
experimental findings with PARP inhibitors or with PARP antisense strategies (9). Thus, we conclude that our strategy to
inactivate only one function of PARP, namely, its enzymatic activity,
and leave its DNA binding ability intact by expressing the PARP DBD was
successful in generating a bona fide alternative knockout model. This
model not only allows study of a distinct PARP function but may also
serve to resolve discrepancies that have arisen between different PARP
knockout models generated by gene targeting (8, 51, 52).
The higher rate of DNA damage-induced apoptosis that we observe in
cells that lack PARP activity is in agreement with findings from PARP
null mice generated by the de Murcia group (8) but is at
variance with the first results on PARP-deficient mice obtained by Wang
et al. (51). However, Wang and coworkers reported in a
subsequent study a significantly increased sensitivity of PARP null
animals toward alkylating agents without looking at a particular cell
type (52). It has been demonstrated (references 4,
8, 22, and 52 and this study) that
different cell types of PARP knockout mice behave differently with
regard to apoptosis and necrosis. It is possible that fibroblasts or
myeloid cells may need an early burst of poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation to
undergo apoptosis (44). However, in our study using
thymocytes, the situation is very likely to be different, and the
absence of poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation clearly sensitizes cells for
apoptosis regardless of whether the lack of PARP activity is due to a
targeted knockout of the PARP gene or expression of the PARP DBD.
Our data demonstrate a strict requirement of p53 for accelerated cell
death after DNA damage in PARP DBD-expressing thymocytes and show that
Bcl-2 overexpression inhibits this sensitization. Mice that express a
PARP DBD but lack p53 allowed us to study the role of p53 and PARP in
the DNA excision repair process of single-strand breaks and to clarify
the question of whether a functional connection exists between p53
activation and poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation. Comet assays demonstrated that
the inactivation of PARP and the loss of the ability to react to DNA
damage with poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation dramatically reduce the DNA repair
capacity of cells regardless of whether p53 or Bcl-2 is present. This
was true for thymocytes from PARP null mice and from
lck-PARP DBD transgenic mice. Both stimuli used here, X
irradiation and MNNG treatment, are known to induce the DNA excision
repair pathways in cells (18, 29, 50). Our results suggest
that these DNA excision repair processes require poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation
but are completely independent of the presence or activation of Bcl-2
or p53. This is a novel and unexpected finding which makes a role of
p53 in base excision repair processes very unlikely, while it is well
established that p53 is required for other repair pathways (45,
50). As expected, Bcl-2 acts downstream of DNA damage and
excision repair as an antiapoptotic molecule that does not protect from
damage but inhibits apoptosis, most likely by counteracting Bax-induced apoptosis.
The upregulation of p53 expression and activity and the accelerated
induction of Bax expression strictly correlated with the expression of
the PARP DBD but also with the absence of PARP in cells from PARP null
mice and thus with the lack of poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation. This offers an
explanation for our findings that thymocytes from lck-PARP
DBD mice and from PARP null mice undergo apoptosis much more rapidly
than cells with intact PARP. The cause for this upregulation of p53 and
Bax and for the observed sensitization for apoptosis by PARP inhibition
could be the lack of DNA repair and an increased persistence of DNA
strand breaks in cells with no PARP activity. However, we cannot rule
out that the PARP DBD used here has other, unknown functions besides
blocking poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation that may interfere with apoptosis and
DNA repair. Although it has not been demonstrated unequivocally, PARP
is thought to dissociate from DNA after automodification and the
modification of other chromatin constituents (1, 32, 33,
38). It is possible that the PARP DBD molecule remains bound to
DNA (46) and blocks DNA break resealing, which would exclude
a direct role of PARP or poly(ADP-ribose) in the repair
process. However, in light of our findings with cells from PARP
knockout mice, we consider this unlikely and favor a model with a
direct role of PARP and the poly(ADP-ribose) polymer in DNA
damage-induced apoptosis and DNA break rejoining for several reasons.
The published PARP knockout study that analyzed DNA resealing in
fibroblasts clearly demonstrated an inhibition of DNA repair in the
absence of PARP (49). The experiments presented here, using
thymocytes from PARP-deficient mice or PARP DBD-expressing mice, as
well as experiments where PARP was depleted by antisense RNA expression
(9) confirm this. All of these findings suggest a dependence
of DNA resealing on the ADP-ribose polymer since in different
experimental strategies lack of repair correlates with the absence of
polymer. In addition, Lee et al. (19, 20) showed that PARP
could act as an inhibitor of simian virus 40 DNA replication in vitro
when only the DNA polymerase
-primase (monopolymerase) system was
used. This inhibition was due to binding of PARP to the ends of nascent
DNA chains rather than to its ability to synthesize poly(ADP-ribose).
However, when a dipolymerase system including the proliferating
cellular nuclear antigen (PCNA) and polymerase
was used, PARP was
displaced from the strand breaks and both leading- and lagging-strand
synthesis could occur (10). Interestingly, it was shown
recently that both PCNA and polymerase
participate in DNA base
excision repair (48). Thus, it is conceivable that a PARP
DBD molecule is replaced from a DNA break by the base excision repair
machinery. Furthermore, we show that p53 levels as well as Bax levels
rise well above control levels in PARP DBD-expressing thymocytes as
well as in PARP-negative thymocytes upon DNA damage. It is generally
accepted that DNA strand breaks serve as a sensor for the induction of
p53 expression. Hence, it is unlikely that the PARP DBD remains
irreversibly bound to DNA strand breaks since this may interfere with
the strong induction of p53 expression levels observed here.
Taken together, the data presented here provide direct
experimental evidence for a connection between PARP activity and DNA base excision repair that is independent of p53 and for a second link
between PARP and DNA damage-induced apoptosis that requires p53 and is
inhibited by Bcl-2. Our findings favor a model that would integrate
poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation and the ADP-ribose polymer itself into the
signaling of DNA damage-induced cell death and the execution of DNA
base excision repair and place it as a regulatory element upstream of
p53 and Bax. All experimental data that support this model were
gathered in primary murine thymocytes. Although it is possible that
this model holds generally, we cannot rule out that alternative
mechanisms prevail in other cell systems.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank R. Perlmutter for the lck-hGH expression
vector and W. Deppert for the intact and mutant
hMDM2-luciferase reporter gene constructs. We are indebted
to X.-Z. Wang, Lyon, France, for the gift of PARP null mice.
This work was supported by grant Mo 435/9-1 from the Deutsche
Forschungsgemeinschaft and by the Fond der chemischen Industrie.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Institut
für Zellbiologie (Tumorforschung), IFZ,
Universitätsklinikum Essen, Virchowstrasse 173, D-45122 Essen,
Germany. Phone: 49 (201) 723-3380. Fax: 49 (201) 723-5904. E-mail:
moeroey{at}uni-essen.de.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Althaus, F. R.,
L. Hofferer,
H. E. Kleczkowska,
M. Malanga,
H. Naegeli,
P. L. Panzeter, and C. A. Realini.
1994.
Histone shuttling by poly ADP-ribosylation.
Mol. Cell. Biochem.
138:53-59[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Böcker, W.,
T. Bauch,
W. U. Müller, and C. Streffer.
1997.
Technical report: image analysis of comet assay measurements.
Int. J. Radiat. Biol.
72:449-460[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Böcker, W.,
W. Rolf,
T. Bauch,
W. U. Müller, and C. Streffer.
1999.
Automated comet assay analysis.
Cytometry
35:134-144[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Burkart, V.,
Z.-Q. Wang,
J. Radons,
B. Heller,
Z. Herceg,
L. Stingl,
E. F. Wagner, and H. Kolb.
1999.
Mice lacking the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase gene are resistant to pancreatic beta-cell destruction and diabetes development induced by streptozocin.
Nat. Med.
5:314-319[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 5.
|
D'Amours, D.,
M. Germain,
K. Orth,
V. M. Dixit, and G. G. Poirier.
1998.
Proteolysis of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase by caspase 3: kinetics of cleavage of mono(ADP-ribosyl)ated and DNA-bound substrates.
Radiat. Res.
150:3-10[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Darzynkiewicz, Z.,
S. Bruno,
G. DelBino,
W. Gorzyca,
M. A. Hotz,
P. Lassota, and F. Traganos.
1992.
Features of apoptotic cells measured by flow cytometry.
Cytometry
13:795-808[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 7.
|
de Murcia, G., and J. Menissier de Murcia.
1994.
Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase: a molecular nick-sensor.
Trends Biochem. Sci.
19:172-176[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 8.
|
de Murcia, J. M.,
C. Niedergang,
C. Trucco,
M. Ricoul,
B. Dutrillaux,
M. Mark,
F. J. Oliver,
M. Masson,
A. Dierich,
M. LeMeur,
C. Walztinger,
P. Chambon, and G. de Murcia.
1997.
Requirement of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase in recovery from DNA damage in mice and in cells.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:7303-7307[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Ding, R.,
Y. Pommier,
V. H. Kang, and M. Smulson.
1992.
Depletion of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase by antisense RNA expression results in a delay in DNA strand break rejoining.
J. Biol. Chem.
267:12804-12812[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Eki, T., and J. Hurwitz.
1991.
Influence of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase on the enzymatic synthesis of SV40 DNA.
J. Biol. Chem.
266:3087-3100[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Enoch, T., and C. Norbury.
1995.
Cellular responses to DNA damage: cell cycle checkpoints, apoptosis and the roles of p53 and ATM.
Trends Biochem. Sci.
20:426-430[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Hogan, B.,
R. Beddington,
F. Costantini, and E. Lacy.
1994.
Manipulating the mouse embryo, a laboratory manual, 2nd ed.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 13.
|
Huang, D. C.,
M. Hahne,
M. Schroeter,
K. Frei,
A. Fontana,
A. Villunger,
K. Newton,
J. Tschopp, and A. Strasser.
1999.
Activation of Fas by FasL induces apoptosis by a mechanism that cannot be blocked by Bcl-2 or Bcl-x(L).
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
96:14871-14876[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Jackson, S. P.
1996.
The recognition of DNA damage.
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
6:12-25[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Jeggo, P. A.
1998.
DNA repair: PARP another guardian angel?
Curr. Biol.
8:R49-R51[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Küpper, J. H.,
G. de Murcia, and A. Bürkle.
1990.
Inhibition of poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation by overexpressing the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase DNA-binding domain in mammalian cells.
J. Biol. Chem.
265:18721-18724[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 17.
|
Küpper, J. H.,
M. Müller, and A. Bürkle.
1996.
Trans-dominant inhibition of poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation potentiates carcinogen induced gene amplification in SV40-transformed Chinese hamster cells.
Cancer Res.
56:2715-2717[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Küpper, J. H.,
M. Müller,
M. K. Jacobson,
J. Tatsumi-Miyajima,
D. L. Coyle,
E. L. Jacobson, and A. Bürkle.
1995.
trans-dominant inhibition of poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation sensitizes cells against -irradiation and N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine but does not limit DNA replication of a polyomavirus replicon.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15:3154-3163[Abstract].
|
| 19.
|
Lee, S. H.,
T. Eki, and J. Hurwitz.
1989.
Synthesis of DNA containing the simian virus 40 origin of replication by the combined action of DNA polymerases alpha and delta.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
86:7361-7365[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Lee, S. H.,
A. D. Kwong,
Y. Ishimi, and J. Hurwitz.
1989.
Studies on the DNA elongation inhibitor and its proliferating cell nuclear antigen-dependent control in simian virus 40 DNA replication in vitro.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
86:4877-4881[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
Lindahl, T.,
M. S. Satoh,
G. G. Poirier, and A. Klungland.
1995.
Post translational modification of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase induced by DNA strand breaks.
Trends Biochem. Sci.
20:405-411[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Love, S.,
R. Barber, and G. K. Wilcock.
1999.
Increased poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation of nuclear proteins in Alzheimer's disease.
Brain
122:247-253[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Lu, X., and D. P. Lane.
1993.
Differential induction of transcriptionally active p53 following UV or ionising radiation: defects in chromosome instability syndromes?
Cell
75:765-778[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Malanga, M.,
J. M. Pleschke,
H. E. Kleczkowska, and F. R. Althaus.
1998.
Poly(ADP-ribose) binds to specific domains of p53 and alters its DNA binding functions.
J. Biol. Chem.
273:11839-11843[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Masutani, M.,
T. Nozaki,
K. Wakabayashi, and T. Sugimura.
1995.
Role of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase in cell-cycle checkpoint mechanisms following gamma-irradiation.
Biochimie
77:462-465[Medline].
|
| 26.
|
Masutani, M.,
K. Suzuki,
N. Kamada,
M. Watanabe,
O. Ueda,
T. Nozaki,
K. Jishage,
T. Watanabe,
T. Sugimoto,
H. Nakagama,
T. Ochiya, and T. Sugimura.
1999.
Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase gene disruption conferred mice resistant to streptozotocin-induced diabetes.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
96:2301-2304[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 27.
|
Miyashita, T., and J. C. Reed.
1995.
Tumor suppressor p53 is a direct transcriptional activator of the human bax gene.
Cell
80:293-299[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 28.
|
Miyashita, T.,
S. Krajewski,
M. Krajewska,
H. G. Wang,
H. K. Lin,
D. A. Liebermann,
I. B. Hoffman, and J. C. Reed.
1994.
Tumor suppressor p53 is a regulator of bcl-2 and bax gene expression in vitro and in vivo.
Oncogene
6:1799-1805.
|
| 29.
|
Molinete, M.,
W. Vermeulen,
A. Bürkle,
J. Menissier-de Murcia,
J. H. Küpper,
J. H. Hoeijmakers, and G. de Murcia.
1993.
Overproduction of the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase DNA-binding domain blocks alkylation-induced DNA repair synthesis in mammalian cells.
EMBO J.
12:2109-2117[Medline].
|
| 30.
|
Möröy, T.,
A. Grzeschiczek,
S. Petzold, and K. U. Hartmann.
1993.
Expression of a pim-1 transgene accelerates lymphoproliferation and inhibits apoptosis in lpr/lpr mice.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
90:10734-10738[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 31.
|
Müller, W. U.,
T. Bauch,
C. Streffer,
F. Niedereichholz, and W. Böcker.
1994.
Comet assay studies of radiation-induced DNA damage and repair in various tumour cell lines.
Int. J. Radiat. Biol.
65:315-319[Medline].
|
| 32.
|
Panzeter, P. L.,
B. Zweifel,
M. Malanga,
S. H. Waser,
M. Richard, and F. R. Althaus.
1993.
Targeting of histone tails by poly(ADP-ribose).
J. Biol. Chem.
268:17662-17664[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 33.
|
Realini, C. A., and F. R. Althaus.
1992.
Histone shuttling by poly(ADP-ribosylation).
J. Biol. Chem.
267:18858-18865[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 34.
|
Rowan, S.,
R. L. Ludwig,
Y. Haupt,
S. Bates,
X. Lu,
M. Oren, and K. Vousden.
1996.
Specific loss of apoptotic but not cell-cycle arrest function in a human tumor derived p53 mutant.
EMBO J.
15:827-838[Medline].
|
| 35.
|
Rudat, V.,
J. H. Küpper, and K. J. Weber.
1998.
Trans-dominant inhibition of poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation leads to decreased recovery from ionizing radiation-induced cell killing.
Int. J. Radiat. Biol.
73:325-330[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 36.
|
Sambrook, J.,
E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis.
1989.
Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 37.
|
Satoh, M. S., and T. Lindahl.
1992.
Role of poly(ADP-ribose) formation in DNA repair.
Nature
356:356-358[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 38.
|
Satoh, M. S.,
G. G. Poirier, and T. Lindahl.
1994.
Dual function for poly(ADP-ribose) synthesis in response to DNA breakage.
Biochemistry
33:7099-7106[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 39.
|
Schreiber, V.,
D. Hunting,
C. Trucco,
B. Gowans,
D. Grunwald,
G. de Murcia, and J. Menissier-de Murcia.
1995.
A dominant-negative mutant of human poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase affects cell recovery, apoptosis, and sister chromatid exchange following DNA damage.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92:4753-4757[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 40.
|
Sentman, C. L.,
J. R. Shutter,
D. Hockenbery,
O. Kanagawa, and S. J. Korsmeyer.
1991.
Bcl-2 inhibits multiple forms of apoptosis but not negative selection in thymocytes.
Cell
68:879-888.
|
| 41.
|
Shiokawa, D.,
H. Maruta, and S. Tanuma.
1997.
Inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase suppress nuclear fragmentation and apoptotic-body formation during apoptosis in HL-60 cells.
FEBS Lett.
413:99-103[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 42.
|
Simbulan-Rosenthal, C. M.,
D. S. Rosenthal,
R. Ding,
K. Bhatia, and M. E. Smulson.
1998.
Prolongation of the p53 response to DNA strand breaks in cells depleted of PARP by antisense RNA expression.
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
253:864-868[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 43.
|
Simbulan-Rosenthal, C. M.,
D. S. Rosenthal,
R. Luo, and M. E. Smulson.
1999.
Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation of p53 during apoptosis in human osteosarcoma cells.
Cancer Res.
59:2190-2194[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 44.
|
Simbulan-Rosenthal, C. M.,
D. S. Rosenthal,
S. Iyer,
A. H. Boulares, and M. E. Smulson.
1998.
Transient poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation of nuclear proteins and role of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase in the early stages of apoptosis.
J. Biol. Chem.
273:13703-13712[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 45.
|
Smith, M. L.,
I. T. Chen,
Q. Zhan,
P. M. O'Connor, and A. J. Fornace.
1995.
Involvement of the p53 tumor suppressor in repair of u.v.-type DNA damage.
Oncogene
10:1053-1059[Medline].
|
| 46.
|
Smulson, M. E.,
D. Pang,
M. Jung,
A. Dimtchev,
S. Chasovskikh,
A. Spoonde,
C. Simbulan-Rosenthal,
D. Rosenthal,
A. Yakovlev, and A. Dritschilo.
1998.
Irreversible binding of poly(ADP)ribose polymerase cleavage product to DNA ends revealed by atomic force microscopy: possible role in apoptosis.
Cancer Res.
58:3495-3498[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 47.
|
Sofer-Levi, Y., and D. Resnitzki.
1996.
Apoptosis induced by ectopic expression of cyclin D1 but not cyclin E.
Oncogene
13:2431-2437[Medline].
|
| 48.
|
Stucki, M.,
B. Pascucci,
E. Parlanti,
P. Fortini,
S. H. Wilson,
U. Hübscher, and E. Dogliotti.
1998.
Mammalian base excision repair by DNA polymerases delta and epsilon.
Oncogene
17:835-843[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 49.
|
Trucco, C.,
F. J. Oliver,
G. de Murcia, and J. Menissier-de Murcia.
1998.
DNA repair defect in poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-deficient cell lines.
Nucleic Acids Res.
26:2644-2649[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 50.
|
Wang, X. W.,
H. Yeh,
L. Schaeffer,
R. Roy,
V. Moncollin,
J. M. Egly,
Z. Wang,
E. C. Freidberg,
M. K. Evans, and B. G. Taffe.
1995.
p53 modulation of TFIIH-associated nucleotide excision repair activity.
Nat. Genet.
10:188-195[Medline].
|
| 51.
|
Wang, Z. Q.,
B. Auer,
L. Stingl,
H. Berghammer,
D. Haidacher,
M. Schweiger, and E. F. Wagner.
1995.
Mice lacking ADPRT and poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation develop normally but are susceptible to skin disease.
Genes Dev.
9:509-520[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 52.
|
Wang, Z. Q.,
L. Stingl,
C. Morrison,
M. Jantsch,
M. Los,
K. Schulze-Osthoff, and E. F. Wagner.
1997.
PARP is important for genomic stability but dispensable in apoptosis.
Genes Dev.
11:2347-2358[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 53.
|
Zauberman, A.,
D. Flusberg,
Y. Haupt,
Y. Barak, and M. Oren.
1995.
A functional p53-responsive intronic promoter is contained within the human mdm2 gene.
Nucleic Acids Res.
23:2584-2592[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Molecular and Cellular Biology, September 2000, p. 6695-6703, Vol. 20, No. 18
0270-7306/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Alvarez-Gonzalez, R.
(2007). Genomic Maintenance: The p53 Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation Connection. Sci Signal
2007: pe68-pe68
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Fisher, A. E. O., Hochegger, H., Takeda, S., Caldecott, K. W.
(2007). Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase 1 Accelerates Single-Strand Break Repair in Concert with Poly(ADP-Ribose) Glycohydrolase. Mol. Cell. Biol.
27: 5597-5605
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Susse, S., Scholz, C.-J., Burkle, A., Wiesmuller, L.
(2004). Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP-1) and p53 independently function in regulating double-strand break repair in primate cells. Nucleic Acids Res
32: 669-680
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Oliver, A. W., Ame, J.-C., Roe, S. M., Good, V., de Murcia, G., Pearl, L. H.
(2004). Crystal structure of the catalytic fragment of murine poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-2. Nucleic Acids Res
32: 456-464
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ishizuka, S., Martin, K., Booth, C., Potten, C. S., de Murcia, G., Burkle, A., Kirkwood, T. B. L.
(2003). Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 is a survival factor for radiation-exposed intestinal epithelial stem cells in vivo. Nucleic Acids Res
31: 6198-6205
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Flohr, C., Burkle, A., Radicella, J. P., Epe, B.
(2003). Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation accelerates DNA repair in a pathway dependent on Cockayne syndrome B protein. Nucleic Acids Res
31: 5332-5337
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Wieler, S., Gagne, J.-P., Vaziri, H., Poirier, G. G., Benchimol, S.
(2003). Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase-1 Is a Positive Regulator of the p53-mediated G1 Arrest Response following Ionizing Radiation. J. Biol. Chem.
278: 18914-18921
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Le Page, F., Schreiber, V., Dherin, C., de Murcia, G., Boiteux, S.
(2003). Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase-1 (PARP-1) Is Required in Murine Cell Lines for Base Excision Repair of Oxidative DNA Damage in the Absence of DNA Polymerase beta. J. Biol. Chem.
278: 18471-18477
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Schreiber, V., Ame, J.-C., Dolle, P., Schultz, I., Rinaldi, B., Fraulob, V., Menissier-de Murcia, J., de Murcia, G.
(2002). Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase-2 (PARP-2) Is Required for Efficient Base Excision DNA Repair in Association with PARP-1 and XRCC1. J. Biol. Chem.
277: 23028-23036
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Los, M., Mozoluk, M., Ferrari, D., Stepczynska, A., Stroh, C., Renz, A., Herceg, Z., Wang, Z.-Q., Schulze-Osthoff, K.
(2002). Activation and Caspase-mediated Inhibition of PARP: A Molecular Switch between Fibroblast Necrosis and Apoptosis in Death Receptor Signaling. Mol. Biol. Cell
13: 978-988
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Samper, E., Goytisolo, F. A., Murcia, J. M.-d., Gonzalez-Suarez, E., Cigudosa, J. C., de Murcia, G., Blasco, M. A.
(2001). Normal telomere length and chromosomal end capping in poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-deficient mice and primary cells despite increased chromosomal instability. JCB
154: 49-60
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Rieber, M. S., Zangemeister-Wittke, U., Rieber, M.
(2001). p53-independent Induction of Apoptosis in Human Melanoma Cells by a bcl-2/bcl-xL Bispecific Antisense Oligonucleotide. Clin. Cancer Res.
7: 1446-1451
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Murcia, J. M.-d., Mark, M., Wendling, O., Wynshaw-Boris, A., de Murcia, G.
(2001). Early Embryonic Lethality in PARP-1 Atm Double-Mutant Mice Suggests a Functional Synergy in Cell Proliferation during Development. Mol. Cell. Biol.
21: 1828-1832
[Abstract]
[Full Text]