Previous Article | Next Article 
Molecular and Cellular Biology, September 2000, p. 6996-7006, Vol. 20, No. 18
0270-7306/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
A Human Condensin Complex Containing hCAP-C-hCAP-E
and CNAP1, a Homolog of Xenopus XCAP-D2, Colocalizes with
Phosphorylated Histone H3 during the Early Stage of Mitotic
Chromosome Condensation
John A.
Schmiesing,1
Heather C.
Gregson,1
Sharleen
Zhou,2 and
Kyoko
Yokomori1,*
Department of Biological Chemistry, College
of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, California
92697-1700,1 and Howard Hughes
Medical Institute, Department of Molecular and Cell Biology,
University of California, Berkeley, California
94720-32022
Received 11 January 2000/Returned for modification 9 February
2000/Accepted 15 June 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
Structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) family proteins play
critical roles in structural changes of chromosomes. Previously, we
identified two human SMC family proteins, hCAP-C and hCAP-E, which form
a heterodimeric complex (hCAP-C-hCAP-E) in the cell. Based on the
sequence conservation and mitotic chromosome localization, hCAP-C-hCAP-E was determined to be the human ortholog of the
Xenopus SMC complex, XCAP-C-XCAP-E. XCAP-C-XCAP-E is a
component of the multiprotein complex termed condensin, required for
mitotic chromosome condensation in vitro. However, presence of such a
complex has not been demonstrated in mammalian cells.
Coimmunoprecipitation of the endogenous hCAP-C-hCAP-E complex from
HeLa extracts identified a 155-kDa protein interacting with
hCAP-C-hCAP-E, termed condensation-related SMC-associated protein 1 (CNAP1). CNAP1 associates with mitotic chromosomes and is homologous to
Xenopus condensin component XCAP-D2, indicating the
presence of a condensin complex in human cells. Chromosome association
of human condensin is mitosis specific, and the majority of condensin
dissociates from chromosomes and is sequestered in the cytoplasm
throughout interphase. However, a subpopulation of the complex was
found to remain on chromosomes as foci in the interphase nucleus.
During late G2/early prophase, the larger nuclear condensin
foci colocalize with phosphorylated histone H3 clusters on partially
condensed regions of chromosomes. These results suggest that
mitosis-specific function of human condensin may be regulated by cell
cycle-specific subcellular localization of the complex, and the nuclear
condensin that associates with interphase chromosomes is involved in
the reinitiation of mitotic chromosome condensation in conjunction with
phosphorylation of histone H3.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Structural maintenance of
chromosomes (SMC) family proteins play critical roles in various
nuclear events that require structural changes of chromosomes,
including mitotic chromosome organization, DNA recombination and
repair, and global transcriptional repression (for reviews, see
references 9, 12, and 18). The
SMC proteins are conserved in eukaryotes as well as in prokaryotes,
underscoring their essential roles in the cell. The impairment of SMC
function in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes leads to mitotic chromosome segregation defects, suggesting a critical function for SMC family proteins in mitotic chromosome dynamics.
The protein structure of SMC family members is reminiscent of a
myosin-like motor protein; it contains conserved head and tail regions
with a nucleotide-binding site in the N terminus and a coiled-coil
central domain. At least four SMC family proteins are conserved in
eukaryotes. For example, the SMC family gene products termed
Smc1, Smc2, Smc3, and Smc4 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae are
equivalent to Xenopus SMC1 (XSMC1), Xenopus
chromosome-associated protein E (XCAP-E), XSMC3, and XCAP-C, and human
SMC1 (hSMC1), hCAP-E, hSMC3, and hCAP-C, respectively (9,
12, 18, 22). XCAP-C and XCAP-E form a heterodimeric complex
(XCAP-C-XCAP-E), which is part of the condensin multiprotein complex
shown to be required for mitotic chromosome condensation in an in vitro
embryonic Xenopus extract system (11). The hCAP-E
and hCAP-C proteins also form a stable complex (hCAP-C-hCAP-E), which
is the human ortholog of XCAP-C-XCAP-E as determined by its amino acid
sequence similarity with XCAP-C-XCAP-E and specific localization to
mitotic chromosomes (22). However, the presence of a
higher-order complex equivalent to Xenopus condensin has not
been demonstrated in human cells.
The mechanism of SMC-mediated chromosome condensation in the cell is
not well understood. The studies using purified Xenopus condensin complex revealed that the complex utilizes its ATPase activity and introduces writhe in naked supercoiled plasmid DNA (15, 16). Although this may explain the basic mechanism of condensation, condensation of chromatin fibers in the cell at the
correct stage in the cell cycle most likely requires additional highly
regulated molecular events. For example, it has been demonstrated that
the mitosis-specific phosphorylation of condensin components by Cdc2
kinase is required for the function of Xenopus condensin in
chromosome condensation (14). The presence of histones on DNA is also an important factor that most likely influences condensin function. Phosphorylation of a specific serine residue in the histone
H3 tail is initiated from pericentromeric regions of chromosomes at the
end of G2 phase and spreads over the entire chromosome, closely correlating with mitotic chromosome condensation
(8). It was shown recently that this phosphorylation is
required for proper condensation and segregation of chromosomes
(24). The role of this phosphorylation at the molecular
level is not understood. A possible recruitment of condensation
factors, such as the condensin complex, by this modified H3 tail has
been suggested. However, no direct evidence of such an interaction has
been demonstrated.
In human cells, the hCAP-C-hCAP-E heterodimeric complex is expressed
throughout the cell cycle, suggesting the complex is regulated
posttranslationally in order to perform its mitosis-specific role
(22). To address the mechanism and regulation of
hCAP-C-hCAP-E function, cellular factors that interact with
hCAP-C-hCAP-E were purified by coimmunoprecipitation with the
endogenous hCAP-C-hCAP-E from HeLa cells. Here we report the
identification of the condensation-related SMC-associated protein 1 (CNAP1), which forms a complex with hCAP-C-hCAP-E. CNAP1 was found to
be the human homolog of Xenopus condensin component XCAP-D2
(10, 14), suggesting the presence of a human condensin complex equivalent to the Xenopus condensin. To understand
the cell cycle-specific regulation of human condensin, comparative immunolocalization analyses of CNAP1 and hCAP-C-hCAP-E and
biochemical analysis of the complex at different cell cycle stages were
performed using HeLa cells. The results revealed that human condensin
is present throughout the cell cycle, but its subcellular
localization is cell cycle regulated. The majority of the interphase
condensin complex is sequestered in the cytoplasm, while a
subpopulation of the complex was found to remain on chromosomes as
distinct foci in the interphase nucleus. Biochemical studies revealed
that the condensin complex interacts with histone H3 in a
DNA-independent manner, suggesting that the chromosome association of
condensin is at least partly mediated by the interaction with core
histones. Importantly, condensin forms larger foci that colocalize with clusters of phosphorylated histone H3 (phosphor-H3) on locally condensed chromatin during the G2/M transition. This is the
first evidence that demonstrates a direct link between the condensin complex and mitotic phosphorylation of histone H3 and suggests that the
interphase nuclear condensin plays a critical role in reinitiation of
mitotic chromosome condensation together with phosphor-H3. In this
paper, the human condensin complex has been identified and
systematically characterized during the cell cycle, providing the basis
for understanding SMC-mediated mitotic chromosome condensation in the cell.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Cell lines.
HeLa cells were grown in Dulbecco's modified
Eagle medium (DMEM; Sigma Chemical Co.) supplemented with 10% fetal
bovine serum, L-glutamate, and penicillin-streptomycin.
Antibody.
Rabbit polyclonal antibodies raised against
recombinant polypeptides corresponding to the middle subdomains of
hCAP-C and hCAP-E expressed in Escherichia coli were
described previously (22). Antibodies were also raised
against bacterially expressed amino-terminal (amino acids 1 to 241) and
carboxyl-terminal (amino acids 997 to 1401) subdomains of CNAP1.
Antibodies were subsequently affinity purified using antigen affinity
columns. Similarly, a guinea pig antibody against the middle domain of
hCAP-E was prepared. The specificity of each antibody was verified by
Western blot analysis of HeLa cell extracts. Rabbit polyclonal antibody
specific for the phosphor-H3 tail (Upstate Biotechnology, Lake Placid, N.Y.) was used for colocalization and interaction studies. Human CREST
autoimmune serum that contains a mixture of antibodies against the
centromeric proteins CENP-A, -B, and -C was used to visualize centromeric regions (kindly provided by W. R. Brinkley at Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex.) (2, 5, 19). Goat
anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody conjugated with Cy3
(Jackson Laboratories, West Grove, Pa.), horse anti-guinea pig IgG
antibody conjugated with fluorescein (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame,
Calif.), and goat anti-human IgG antibody conjugated with Cy3 (Jackson
Laboratories) or fluorescein (Vector Laboratories) were used as
secondary antibodies.
Coimmunoprecipitation.
HeLa cell extracts were prepared as
previously described (25). Antibody was prebound to protein
A-Sepharose beads (Amersham-Pharmacia Biotech). Cell extracts were then
added to antibody-protein A beads and incubated for 3 h at 4°C.
The antibody-protein complex was washed in HEMG buffer (25 mM HEPES
[pH 7.6], 12.5 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM EDTA, 10% glycerol)
containing 0.1 and 1.0 M KCl in the presence of 0.1% Nonidet P-40.
Bound proteins were eluted from the beads by washing with 2 M
guanidine-HCl. Proteins were precipitated with trichloroacetic acid
(TCA), and the recovered pellet was washed with acetone before
resuspension in sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) sample buffer. Precipitated proteins were
separated by SDS-PAGE and analyzed by silver staining or Western
blotting. For a large-scale purification of the complex, antibody was
cross-linked to protein A beads and subjected to multiple rounds of
immunopurification. The washing conditions were the same as described
above. The bound materials were eluted with glycine, neutralized, and
immediately dialyzed against HEMG buffer with 0.1 M KCl. Dialyzed
samples from each immunopurification were pooled and TcA precipitated
prior to preparative SDS-PAGE.
Peptide sequencing.
After the immunopurified
hCAP-C-hCAP-E-containing complex was resolved by SDS-PAGE, the
proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose membrane, visualized by
Ponceau S staining, and excised. Each polypeptide species on the
membrane was subjected to trypsin digestion, and digested polypeptides
were separated by reverse-phase high-pressure liquid chromatography and
sequenced as described previously (22).
Western blot analysis.
HeLa cell extracts or
immunoprecipitated protein complexes were subjected to SDS-PAGE and
then transferred to nitrocellulose membranes as described previously
(22). The membranes were blocked with 5% milk or 3% bovine
serum albumin (BSA)-0.05% Tween 20 in phosphate-buffered saline
(PBS). The primary antibody was incubated in 3% BSA-0.05% Tween 20 in PBS for 1 h to overnight, followed by three washes in
PBS-0.05% Tween 20. The secondary antibody conjugated with alkaline
phosphatase (Promega, Madison, Wis.) was incubated in 3% BSA-0.05%
Tween 20 in PBS for 1 h at room temperature. The filter was then
washed three times in PBS-0.05% Tween 20 before development.
Synchronization of HeLa cells.
HeLa cells were synchronized
by double thymidine block in combination with nocodazole as described
previously (1, 17, 26), with slight modification. Briefly,
cells were incubated in 2 mM thymidine for 17 h, rinsed, and
incubated in DMEM for 9 h. The 2 mM thymidine was added again for
15 h, and cells were rinsed and grown in DMEM for an appropriate
length of time for each cell cycle stage. The efficiency of
synchronization at S phase by double thymidine block was assessed by
fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis (data not shown). The
percentage of cells subsequently entering M phase synchronously at
13 h after the release from thymidine was more than 80%,
indicating proper synchronization (data not shown). In combination with
a transient nocodazole treatment, HeLa cells were synchronized at
G1, S, G2, and M phases.
Immunofluorescent staining.
Cells were grown on glass
coverslips in 24-well plates until 50 to 70% confluent. Mitotic
chromosome spreads were prepared essentially as described elsewhere
(22). The coverslips were washed in PBS twice and then fixed
with 4% paraformaldehyde at 4°C or acetone at
20°C. Cells and
spreads were subjected to immunofluorescent staining as described
previously (22). For DNA detection,
2,6-diamidinophenylindole (DAPI) was used. The coverslips were then
rinsed in distilled H2O and mounted onto slides with
antifade (0.055 mM p-phenylenediamine dihydrochloride in PBS
with glycerol added to 90%) (13) or Prolong (Molecular
Probes, Eugene, Oreg.). Image analysis was performed using a Zeiss
Axioplan 2 microscope with a Photometrics Sensys charge-coupled device
camera. J/C Cittert-type iterative digital deconvolution was performed
using the Zeiss KS 300 program. Confocal image analysis was performed
using a Bio-Rad MRC 1024UV laser scanning confocal microscope equipped
with a krypton-argon mixed-gas laser with excitation at 488 nm and
568-nm wavelength beam and an argon ion water-cooled UV laser with
excitation wavelength of 363 nm. Transmitted images were collected
using the transmitted light device and collected in three separate
colors. The confocal device is attached to a Nikon DiaPhot inverted
microscope. Magnification was achieved using a 60× PlanApo NA 1.4 objective. Images were collected by averaging 12 images using the
Kalman filter.
In situ cell extraction.
Cell extractions were performed
essentially according to Fey et al. (6). HeLa cells were
grown on coverslips coated with polylysine. The cells were washed with
PBS and cytoskeleton (CSK) buffer [10 mM
piperazine-N,N'-bis(2-ethanesulfonic acid)
(PIPES; pH 7.0), 100 mM NaCl, 300 mM sucrose, 3 mM MgCl2].
Cells were extracted using CSK buffer with 0.5% Triton X-100 for 5 min
at 4°C to remove soluble cytoplasmic proteins. Cells were next
treated with an extraction buffer (42.5 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.3], 8.5 mM
NaCl, 2.6 mM MgCl2, 1% Tween 20, 0.5% deoxycholic acid)
for 5 min at 4°C to remove cytoskeletal proteins. The cells were then
treated with CSK buffer (containing 2 mM CaCl2 and 2 mM
MgCl2), 0.5% Triton X-100, and DNase I (100 µg/ml;
Worthington, Freehold, N.J.) for 30 min at 37°C. The cells were
subsequently washed with 0.25 M ammonium sulfate in CSK buffer. In some
cases, cells were treated with 2 M NaCl before or after DNase I
treatment. The proteins resistant to these extractions are defined to
be associated with the nuclear matrix (4, 6). At each step,
subsets of coverslips were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min
at 4°C and stained with antibody as described above.
Immunofluorescence images of the cells from each extraction step were
collected with the same exposure time.
 |
RESULTS |
Identification of CNAP1, a 155-kDa protein associated with
hCAP-C-hCAP-E.
The endogenous protein complex containing
hCAP-C-hCAP-E from HeLa nuclear extracts was isolated using an
anti-hCAP-E antibody affinity column. Under stringent
immunoprecipitation conditions including a 1 M salt wash with detergent
(see Materials and Methods), several polypeptide species were
copurified with the hCAP-C-hCAP-E complex (Fig.
1A). The trypsin-digested peptides
derived from a protein species of 155 kDa were subjected to
microsequencing analysis (Fig. 1B). A BLAST search identified matching
sequences in a human cDNA encoding a protein of unknown function
designated KIAA0159 (GenBank accession number D63880) (20).
The cDNA encodes an open reading frame of 1,401 amino acids with a
calculated molecular mass of 157,122 Da and a pI of 6.11. This protein
specifically interacts with the condensation-related SMC complex
hCAP-C-hCAP-E and thus was designated CNAP1. This cDNA product is
homologous to XCAP-D2, a subunit of the Xenopus condensin
complex (14), as well as to pEg7, the same protein
identified independently based on its function in chromosome
condensation in Xenopus egg extracts (3).

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Identification of a 155-kDa polypeptide as CNAP1. (A)
Silver staining of the immunoprecipitated proteins from HeLa nuclear
extracts using anti-hCAP-E antibody. The arrows indicate hCAP-C and
hCAP-E. The open arrowhead indicates a 155-kDa protein (p155)
corresponding to CNAP1. Positions of size markers (M) in panels A, C,
and D are indicated in kilodaltons. IgH, immunoglobulin heavy chain (B)
Peptide sequence analysis of p155. Numbers represent the amino acid
residues in the CNAP1 protein. Black bars below the schematic diagram
of CNAP1 protein indicate the positions of identified peptide
sequences. The open boxes labeled CNAP1N and CNAP1C represent
recombinant proteins corresponding to the N- and C-terminal regions of
CNAP1 used to generate antibodies. (C) Western blot analysis of
recombinant CNAP1 fusion proteins with antibodies specific for N- and
C-terminal domains of CNAP1. Antibodies specific for CNAP1N and CNAP1C
were used to test cross-reactivity of the two antibodies with
GST-CNAP1N (lanes 1 and 3) and GST-CNAP1C (lanes 2 and 4). Lanes 2 and
3 demonstrate the lack of cross-reactivity between the two antibodies.
Specific signals corresponding to the GST fusion proteins are indicated
with arrowheads. (D) Detection of the endogenous CNAP1 by Western blot
analysis of crude HeLa nuclear extracts using anti-CNAP1C antibody (Ab)
(lanes 1 and 2). Lane 1 was further probed with anti-hCAP-E antibody to
confirm the size of CNAP1 relative to that of hCAP-E.
|
|
Polyclonal antibodies were raised against bacterially expressed N- and
C-terminal regions of CNAP1 and were affinity purified
(Fig.
1B). The
specificities of the antibodies were tested against
the corresponding
recombinant glutathione
S-transferase (GST)
fusion proteins
and endogenous CNAP1 in crude HeLa nuclear extracts
(Fig.
1C and D). No
cross-reactivity was observed between the
two antibodies, consistent
with the lack of amino acid sequence
homology between the two antigen
fragments (Fig.
1C). Furthermore,
both antibodies (anti-CNAP1C [Fig.
1D] and anti-CNAP1N [data not
shown]) specifically recognized a
single polypeptide of 155 kDa
in crude HeLa nuclear extracts. These
results demonstrate that
CNAP1 cDNA indeed encodes a 155-kDa protein
and that the two antibodies
against CNAP1 are highly specific in human
cells.
CNAP1 forms a complex with hCAP-C-hCAP-E and localizes to
mitotically condensed chromosomes.
Having confirmed the
specificity of the antibodies against CNAP1, we next tested the
specificity of the interaction between CNAP1 and hCAP-C-hCAP-E by
reciprocal immunoprecipitation. Antibody against CNAP1 specifically
immunoprecipitated hCAP-C-hCAP-E from mitotic HeLa extracts in a
stoichiometric manner (Fig. 2A). The interaction between hCAP-C and hCAP-E was highly stable and resistant to 2 M guanidine treatment (Fig. 2A, lane 4), whereas hCAP-C-hCAP-E dissociated from CNAP1 with this treatment (Fig. 2A, lanes 1 and 3),
indicating that hCAP-C-hCAP-E is the core complex and CNAP1 associates
with it. The ratio between hCAP-C-hCAP-E and CNAP1 was the same in
reciprocal immunoprecipitation using either anti-CNAP1 or anti-hCAP-E
antibody. This suggests that almost 100% of the molecules of
hCAP-C-hCAP-E and CNAP1 are involved in complex formation in the cell
(Fig. 2A, compare lanes 1 and 3 with lanes 2 and 4). The 2 M guanidine
eluate from the anti-CNAP1 immunoprecipitation (Fig. 2A, lane 1) was
subjected to Western blot analysis using anti-hCAP-E antibody, further
confirming the identity of the coprecipitated protein (Fig. 2B). In
addition to CNAP1, two other polypeptide species, P120 and P100, were
immunoprecipitated by both antibodies against CNAP1 and hCAP-E (Fig.
2A, lanes 1 and 2). Their molecular weights suggest that P120 and P100
may correspond respectively to XCAP-G and XCAP-H found in the
Xenopus condensin complex (10, 14). Taken
together, these findings indicate that the protein complex containing
hCAP-C-hCAP-E and CNAP1 is the human condensin complex.

View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Coimmunoprecipitation of the hCAP-C-hCAP-E complex with
anti-CNAP1C antibody using mitotic HeLa extracts. (A) Silver staining
of reciprocal coimmunoprecipitation. A pattern of immunoprecipitated
(IP) proteins by anti-CNAP1C (lanes 1 and 3) is compared to that by
anti-hCAP-E (lanes 2 and 4). Eluate, proteins that were eluted from
beads with 2 M guanidine (see Materials and Methods); beads, proteins
that remained on the beads after the elution; IgH, immunoglobulin heavy
chain. Three polypeptides indicated by an asterisk are unique to
anti-hCAP-E immunoprecipitation. Sizes of markers are indicated in
kilodaltons. (B) Western blot analysis of the proteins
immunoprecipitated with anti-CNAP1C antibody probed with anti-hCAP-E.
(C) CNAP1 localization on mitotic chromosomes. Immunofluorescent
staining of a HeLa mitotic chromosome spread using DAPI (panel 1) to
visualize DNA and anti-CNAP1C antibody (Ab) to detect CNAP1 protein
(panel 2). The bright spots in the center correspond to centrosomes.
|
|
Previously, we have shown that hCAP-C-hCAP-E localizes to mitotic
chromosomes, consistent with the results observed with its
Xenopus homolog (
11,
22). Based on the specific
interaction
between hCAP-C-hCAP-E and CNAP1 in the mitotic extracts as
described
above, colocalization of the two were tested in HeLa cells.
Immunofluorescent
staining of metaphase spreads with anti-CNAP1
antibody revealed
that CNAP1 specifically localizes to mitotic
chromosomes (Fig.
2C). CNAP1 appears to distribute along the entire
chromosome arm
in a manner identical to hCAP-E (
22).
Centrosomes are also stained
with this particular antibody (Fig.
2C,
panel 2, center). However,
unlike the consistent staining of mitotic
chromosomes, centrosome
staining was not reproducible by antibodies
from different rabbits
(data not shown). Therefore, the significance of
centrosome staining
is not clear. Taken together, the results show that
hCAP-C-hCAP-E
and CNAP1 not only form a complex in mitotic cells but
also colocalize
on mitotic chromosomes, confirming the notion that they
are components
of the human condensin
complex.
Cell cycle-specific subcellular localization of the human condensin
complex.
It has been demonstrated that hCAP-C-hCAP-E is expressed
throughout the cell cycle, suggesting that its mitosis-specific
function is regulated posttranslationally (22).
Understanding how human condensin function is suppressed in interphase
will help us decipher the mechanism of the cell cycle-specific
regulation of chromosome condensation. It is possible, for example,
that hCAP-C-hCAP-E and CNAP1 may not be in the same complex during
interphase. Therefore, complex formation and subcellular distribution
patterns of hCAP-C-hCAP-E and CNAP1 were followed during the cell
cycle using synchronized HeLa cells.
The subcellular distribution pattern of CNAP1 is similar to the pattern
of hCAP-C-hCAP-E throughout the cell cycle (Fig.
3).
The specificity of antibodies against
hCAP-C and hCAP-E was demonstrated
by Western blot analysis against
crude HeLa extracts at various
cell cycle stages in our previous study
(
22). As determined
previously by reciprocal
immunoprecipitation, almost 100% of hCAP-C
and hCAP-E molecules are
engaged in heterodimeric complex formation
(
22). Therefore,
detection of either hCAP-C or hCAP-E can be
interpreted as detection of
the hCAP-C-hCAP-E complex. This was
confirmed by costaining with
antibodies against hCAP-C and hCAP-E
(data not shown). The specificity
of anti-CNAP1 antibody was further
confirmed with immunodepletion of
antibody with the CNAP1 antigen,
which abolished the observed CNAP1
staining (data not shown).
During M phase, hCAP-C-hCAP-E and CNAP1
both localize to condensed
chromosomes, consistent with the result in
Fig.
2C (Fig.
3, panels
4). A subpopulation of CNAP1 was also observed
in the mitotic
cytoplasm (Fig.
3B, panel 4). This was not detected with
chromosome
spreads, which lose cytoplasmic proteins during preparation
(Fig.
2C). Furthermore, hCAP-E and hCAP-C were also detected in the
cytoplasm in mitotic cells with longer exposure, indicating that
a
subpopulation of the complex is present in the mitotic cytoplasm.
After
cell division, both hCAP-C-hCAP-E and CNAP1 accumulate in
the
cytoplasm during G
1 phase (Fig.
3, panels 1). Dissociation
of hCAP-C-hCAP-E and CNAP1 from chromosomes was observed as early
as
late telophase (data not shown). The dissociated hCAP-C-hCAP-E
and
CNAP1 are diffusely present in the newly assembled nucleus
during the
telophase/G
1 phase transition and appear to eventually
relocalize to the cytoplasm during G
1 phase (compare panels
1
in Fig.
3 with panel 1 in Fig.
6A, representing the early
G
1-phase
cells, which have not fully flattened out). At
this point, it
is not clear whether the nuclear population of
hCAP-C-hCAP-E and
CNAP1 is actively exported to the cytoplasm at the
M/G
1 transition
or the nuclear population becomes degraded
and newly synthesized
proteins accumulate in the cytoplasm. The
majority of hCAP-C-hCAP-E
and CNAP1 remains in the cytoplasm during S
and G
2 phases until
prophase (Fig.
3, panels 2 and 3).

View larger version (110K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Analysis of the subcellular localization of the
hCAP-C-hCAP-E complex and CNAP1 in HeLa cells at different cell cycle
stages, as indicated at the top. The proteins are detected by
immunofluorescent staining with antibody specific for hCAP-E,
representing hCAP-C-hCAP-E (A) and CNAP1 (B). The top panels show
immunofluorescent staining, and the bottom panels represent DAPI
staining.
|
|
Next we tested whether hCAP-C-hCAP-E and CNAP1 are still in the same
complex in the cytoplasm during interphase. The amount
of hCAP-E and
CNAP1 is consistent throughout the cell cycle, as
confirmed by Western
blot analysis (
22) (data not shown). Anti-CNAP1
antibody immunoprecipitated hCAP-C-hCAP-E equally well from both
S-phase cytoplasmic and mitotic extracts in a stoichiometric manner,
suggesting that CNAP1 is in a complex with hCAP-C-hCAP-E throughout
the cell cycle (Fig.
2A and
4B).
Anti-hCAP-E antibody reciprocally
coprecipitated CNAP1 both from
mitotic extracts and, although
less efficiently, from S-phase
cytoplasmic extracts (Fig.
4A,
compare lanes 1 and 2). The reason for
the difference of the accessibility
of the anti-hCAP-E antibody in the
S-phase cytoplasm is not clear.
Furthermore, crude cytoplasmic extracts
were size fractionated
using sucrose gradient ultracentrifugation to
compare the protein
peaks. The results showed that the peak of
hCAP-C-hCAP-E coincides
with the peak of CNAP1, indicating that the
majority of both hCAP-C-hCAP-E
and CNAP1 are in the same complex (data
not shown). Taken together,
these results indicate that hCAP-C-hCAP-E
and CNAP1 are in a complex
throughout the cell cycle and that
subcellular distribution of
the human condensin complex is regulated in
a cell cycle-dependent
manner.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Coimmunoprecipitation of human condensin complex from
S-phase cytoplasmic and mitotic HeLa extracts. (A)
Coimmunoprecipitation of the complex with anti-hCAP-E middle domain
antibody from S-phase cytoplasmic (lane 1) and mitotic (lane 2)
extracts. hCAP-C, hCAP-E, CNAP1, P120, and P100 are indicated. IgH,
immunoglobulin heavy chain. (B) Coimmunoprecipitation of the complex
with anti-CNAP1 antibody using S-phase cytoplasmic and mitotic
extracts. Extracts used are indicated at the top. CNAP1 remained on
beads after guanidine elution (lanes 3 and 4). In both panels, sizes
are indicated in kilodaltons.
|
|
Involvement of the human condensin complex in the early stage of
mitotic chromosome condensation together with phosphor-H3.
Interestingly, a subpopulation of hCAP-C-hCAP-E and CNAP1 was detected
in the nucleus in G2 phase as distinct foci (Fig. 3, panels
3). The presence of nuclear foci of the condensin complex in interphase
cells raises the possibility that a subpopulation of the condensin
complex remains on chromosomes after mitosis and participates in the
nucleation of chromosome condensation for the next cycle of mitosis.
Therefore, we tested whether the foci observed in the interphase nuclei
are localized on chromosomes or in the nucleoplasm. Stepwise in situ
extraction of HeLa cells revealed that these condensin foci are
associated with interphase chromosomes (Fig.
5A). This procedure includes the
extraction of soluble proteins by detergent and the removal of
chromosomal DNA by DNase I digestion. Cells were seeded on coverslips
and synchronized at G2 phase prior to the extraction. The
foci in the nucleus were detected by anti-hCAP-C antibody. Most of the cytoplasmic staining by anti-hCAP-C antibody was removed as soluble proteins were extracted, whereas the foci in the nucleus remained (Fig.
5A, panels 2 and 3). Cells were then treated with DNase I, which
removed chromosomal DNA, as confirmed by the disappearance of DAPI
staining (Fig. 5A, panel 4). The nuclear foci of hCAP-C were removed by
this treatment, indicating that the nuclear foci of condensin are on
chromosomes. Similar results were obtained using anti-hCAP-E and
anti-CNAP1 antibodies, confirming the specificity of the signal (data
not shown). These nuclear foci are not at the centromeric regions, as
determined by costaining with CREST antibody, which detects the
centromeric proteins CENP-A, -B, and -C (5) (Fig. 5B).
Partial extraction revealed that the nuclear condensin foci are also
present at G1 and S phases (Fig.
6), although the intensity of the
G1 foci appears to decrease slightly in the second
extraction, suggesting that the complex may bind to chromosomes somewhat differently during G1 phase (Fig. 6A, Extracted).
Thus, while the majority of the complex relocalizes to the cytoplasm after mitosis, a subpopulation of human condensin remains on
chromosomes at distinct sites until the onset of the next mitosis.

View larger version (101K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Nuclear foci of the human condensin complex. (A)
Immunofluorescent staining of the hCAP-C-hCAP-E complex in
G2-synchronized HeLa cells with in situ extraction and DNA
digestion. The top panels show immunofluorescent staining of the
hCAP-C-hCAP-E complex using anti-hCAP-C antibody; the bottom panel
indicates DNA visualized by DAPI staining. The extraction steps are
indicated at the top (see Materials and Methods). (B) Immunofluorescent
costaining of the CSK-extracted cell with anti-hCAP-C and CREST
antibodies. Panel 1, anti-hCAP-C; panel 2, CREST antibody; panel 3, merged image (red [anti-hCAP-C] and green [CREST]); panel 4, DAPI.
|
|

View larger version (69K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Immunofluorescent staining of the hCAP-C-hCAP-E complex
in G1 (A)- and S (B)-phase-synchronized HeLa cells with in
situ extraction and DNA digestion. The top panels show
immunofluorescent staining with anti-hCAP-C antibody; the bottom panels
indicate DNA visualized by DAPI staining. Each extraction step is
indicated at the top.
|
|
The above results support the hypothesis that these foci on chromosomes
may be critical in the initiation of mitotic chromosome
condensation,
which occurs during G
2 phase prior to breakdown
of the
nuclear membrane. To address this issue, we tested colocalization
of
hCAP-C-hCAP-E with phosphor-H3 during the G
2/M transition.
Phosphorylation of H3 occurs in a mitosis-specific manner and
is
required for condensation and segregation of chromosomes, although
the
precise role of the phosphorylated H3 tail is not clear
(
24).
Phosphorylation is initiated from pericentromeric
regions during
late G
2 phase and spreads throughout
chromosomes as condensation
proceeds, suggesting its direct role in
condensation (
8).
The foci of phosphor-H3 were observed only in late G
2/early
prophase HeLa cells (Fig.
7). Using our
fixation protocol, clear
visualization of the foci required the CSK
treatment, which removes
soluble cytoplasmic and cytoskeletal proteins
(see Materials and
Methods). However, similar foci were also observed
in the cells
fixed with 1% formaldehyde followed by Triton X-100
treatment
as published previously (
8) (data not shown).
Furthermore,
the observed phosphor-H3 foci after CSK treatment are
confirmed
to be at the centromeric regions by costaining with
CREST antibody,
which is consistent with published results
(
8) (Fig.
7D). These
data suggest that the observed foci are
physiologically relevant.
The hCAP-C-hCAP-E and CNAP1 foci are
originally not at the centromere
or pericentromeric regions during
interphase (Fig.
5B). However,
we found that some of the foci are
larger and colocalize with
phosphor-H3 at late G
2/early
prophase, when local condensation
is initiated but the mitotic
chromosomes have not been completely
formed (Fig.
7A and B). These foci
appear to coincide with clusters
of brighter DAPI staining that
represent condensed DNA regions
(Fig.
7B, panels 5 and 6).
Interestingly, we also observed the
condensin complex in the nucleolus
localizing most prominently
during G
2 phase (Fig.
7A and
C). Nucleolar localization was confirmed
by costaining with antibody
against B23, a nucleolus-specific
protein (Santa Cruz Biotechnology,
Santa Cruz, Calif.) (data not
shown). In earlier interphase, the
condensin foci do not colocalize
with phosphor-H3, since no detectable
staining was observed with
anti-phosphor-H3 antibody, consistent with
the notion that the
H3 phosphorylation occurs in late G
2
(Fig.
7C). These results
indicate that human condensin, originally
forming distinct foci
on chromatin (not at the centromeres) during
interphase, assembles
into larger foci with phosphor-H3 at locally
condensed chromosome
regions around centromeres during the
G
2/M transition. During
metaphase, once mitotic chromosome
condensation is complete, both
human condensin and phosphor-H3 coat the
entire chromosome.

View larger version (87K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
Colocalization analysis of the condensin complex with
phosphor-H3. HeLa cells were treated with CSK buffer and costained with
anti-hCAP-E, anti-phosphor-H3, and DAPI as indicated at the top.
Colocalization of anti-hCAP-E (green) and anti-phosphor-H3 staining
(red) is shown as a merged image (colocalization is shown in yellow).
(A) Late-G2-phase cell. Nucleolus staining with hCAP-E is
indicated by an arrows. (B) Early-prophase cell. The arrowheads in
panels 1, 2, and 3 identify a site of locally condensed DNA, which is
enlarged to show DAPI (panel 5) and the merged image of hCAP-E (green)
and phosphor-H3 (red) (panel 6). (C) Comparison of early prophase (same
as in panel B) and interphase cells. Staining is indicated at the top,
and the nucleolus staining of anti-hCAP-E is indicated with an arrow.
(D) Colocalization of phosphor-H3 and centromeric regions. The
CSK-extracted cell was stained with anti-phosphor-H3 (panel 1) and
CREST (panel 2); the merged image is shown in panel 3 (red
[phosphor-H3] and green [CREST]). These images were captured with
confocal microscopy.
|
|
To substantiate the immunocolocalization results above, we next tested
whether phosphor-H3 physically interacts with the condensin
complex in
mitotic cells. Coimmunoprecipitation was performed
using mitotic HeLa
extracts with anti-CNAP1 antibody. Although
the majority of histones
remain insoluble, small amounts of histones
were extracted with 0.4 M
salt extraction, and the immunoprecipitation
was carried out at the
same salt concentration. The immunoprecipitated
materials were
subjected to Western blot analysis using anti-phosphor-H3
antibody to
detect the presence of phosphor-H3 (Fig.
8A). A specific
signal corresponding to
phosphor-H3 was detected in the 1 M salt
eluate (Fig.
8A, lanes 1 and
3). As controls, protein A beads
alone were incubated with the
extracts, and anti-CNAP1 antibody
on beads without extracts were also
compared in the Western blot
analysis (Fig.
8A, lanes 2 and 4, respectively). Furthermore,
the presence or absence of ethidium bromide
(EtBr) did not affect
the coprecipitation, suggesting that the
interaction is mediated
by protein-protein interaction and not by DNA
(Fig.
8A, lanes
6 and 7). The identity of the phosphor-H3 signal was
further confirmed
by antibody specific for general histone H3 (data not
shown).
Phosphor-H3 was also coimmunoprecipitated with antibody
specific
for hCAP-E, which we have shown copurifies the condensin
complex
(Fig.
2A, lane 2; Fig.
8A, lane 8). In contrast, anti-hCAP-C
antibody,
which immunoprecipitates the hCAP-C-hCAP-E heterodimeric
complex
but fails to coprecipitate other condensin components, most
likely
due to competition for the binding site with other condensin
components,
did not copurify phosphor-H3 (data not shown). This result
suggests
that the presence of some non-SMC component(s) of the
condensin
complex is required for the interaction with phosphor-H3.
Finally,
anti-phosphor-H3 antibody reciprocally immunoprecipitated
condensin
(Fig.
8B). These results demonstrate that human condensin and
phosphor-H3 not only colocalize with each other but interact with
each
other in the cell. However, this interaction is apparently
weaker than
the interaction between the condensin components hCAP-C-hCAP-E
and
CNAP1, which is resistant to 1 M salt, suggesting that phosphor-H3
is
not part of the condensin complex and the interaction may also
be
indirect. Similar coimmunoprecipitation was carried out using
interphase extracts, which coprecipitated acetylated histone H3
but no
detectable phosphor-H3 (data not shown). Therefore, condensin
binding
to histone H3 is not phosphorylation specific. This result
is
consistent with our observation that the earlier interphase
cells
lacking H3 phosphorylation still contain condensin speckles
associated
with chromatin (Fig.
6 and
7C). Taken together, these
results suggest
that the condensin association with chromosomes
may be at least partly
mediated by protein-protein interaction
with core histones. Since the
interaction of condensin with histone
H3 is not necessarily limited to
the phosphorylated form, the
formation of the large condensation
intermediate foci containing
phosphor-H3 and condensin most likely
requires an additional factor(s)
and/or specific DNA sequence(s) or
structure(s) as well as condensin
component modification (e.g.,
phosphorylation). Nonetheless, these
results strongly suggest that the
nuclear population of human
condensin in interphase cells plays an
important role in the reinitiation
of mitotic chromosome condensation
together with phosphorylation
of histone H3 by forming the condensation
intermediate structure.

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 8.
Coimmunoprecipitation of phosphor-H3 with the condensin
complex. (A) Mitotic HeLa extracts were used for coimmunoprecipitation
using anti-CNAP1 antibody (lanes 1, 3, 6, and 7). The
immunoprecipitated materials eluted from antibody beads with 1 M salt
were probed with anti-phosphor-H3 antibody in a Western blot analysis.
Controls include protein A beads alone incubated with extract (lane 2)
and protein A beads bound by antibody without extract (lane 4). In lane
7, EtBr was added to remove residual DNA contaminants from the extract
prior to immunoprecipitation, which was compared to the sample without
EtBr (lane 6) and the input extracts (lane 5). Lane 8 shows
coimmunoprecipitation with anti-hCAP-E antibody probed with
anti-phosphor-H3 antibody. (B) Reciprocal immunoprecipitation with
anti-phosphor-H3 antibody probed with anti-hCAP-E antibody. The
full-length hCAP-E is indicated. Input extract in lane 1 also shows the
smaller degradation product of hCAP-E indicated by an asterisk, which
was not coprecipitated with anti-phosphor-H3 (lane 3). Protein A beads
alone did not coprecipitate hCAP-E from the extract (lane 2). In both
panels, sizes are indicated in kilodaltons.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Regulation of chromosome condensation and decondensation during
the cell cycle is essential for the normal life cycle of the cell. The
condensin complex containing a heterodimeric SMC complex, XCAP-C-XCAP-E, has been demonstrated to be physically required for
mitotic chromosome condensation in an in vitro Xenopus
oocyte system. In this report, we describe the identification of a
protein termed CNAP1 that is tightly associated with a human SMC
protein complex, hCAP-C-hCAP-E, in the cell. The hCAP-C-hCAP-E
heterodimer is the human ortholog of Xenopus XCAP-C-XCAP-E,
and CNAP1 is homologous to Xenopus condensin component
XCAP-D2. Thus, our results establish the presence of an equivalent
condensin complex in mammalian cells. Regulation of condensin during
the somatic cell cycle has not been investigated previously. Our
immunolocalization and biochemical analyses comparing three of the
condensin components, hCAP-C, hCAP-E, and CNAP1, demonstrate the cell
cycle-specific behavior of the human condensin complex in somatic
cells. The complex is present throughout the cell cycle but is
sequestered in the cytoplasm during the interphase. Importantly, a
subpopulation of the complex remains tightly associated with certain
sites on chromosomes as foci throughout interphase. These foci become
larger and colocalize with clusters of phosphor-H3 on condensed regions
of chromosomes at the G2/M transition. These results
suggest that the residual chromosome-associated condensin in the
interphase nucleus participates in the reinitiation of mitotic
chromosome condensation, perhaps by receiving a cell cycle-specific
signal, and eventually recruits cytoplasmic condensin onto the
neighboring chromosomes.
Human condensin complex containing CNAP1.
The
Xenopus condensin complex was shown to contain five
subunits, including the SMC family proteins XCAP-C and XCAP-E and the three non-SMC subunits XCAP-D2, XCAP-G, and XCAP-H
(10). This complex is directly involved in mitotic
chromosome condensation in Xenopus embryos. In our previous
study, we discovered hCAP-C-hCAP-E, a human ortholog of the
XCAP-C-XCAP-E complex, which associates with condensed chromosomes in
mitotic human cells (22). In the present study, CNAP1 is
identified as a protein that specifically forms a complex with
hCAP-C-hCAP-E in human cells. CNAP1 is homologous to the
Xenopus condensin component XCAP-D2 (14). Two
other polypeptides (P120 and P100) that are copurified could
correspond to XCAP-G and XCAP-H. Our results indicate the
presence of a condensin complex in human somatic cells similar to the
one in Xenopus embryos. Recently, the homologous condensin
complex was identified in Schizosaccharomyces pombe and
S. cerevisiae (7, 23). From these findings taken together, condensin appears to be conserved from yeast to humans despite the differences in the degree of chromosome condensation in
these species.
In a
Xenopus embryonic system, the function of the
condensin complex appears to be regulated by mitosis-specific
phosphorylation
of several components of the complex (
14).
Xenopus condensin
appears to be unphosphorylated during
interphase. In somatic cells
that undergo G
1 and
G
2 phases, the regulation of mitosis-specific
function of
condensin may be different or more complex. Indeed,
human condensin
components are phosphorylated throughout the cell
cycle at multiple
sites, which most likely contributes to the
fine-tuning of complex
function (A. R. Ball, Jr., and K. Yokomori,
unpublished data). Our
studies identify the cell cycle-specific
localization of the complex in
the cytoplasm upon entering G
1 phase. These results raise
the possibility that the retention
of the human condensin complex in
the cytoplasm may be an important
means to block the complex from
acting on chromosomes prematurely
during interphase. The study on the
condensin complex in
S. cerevisiae indicated that the
condensin complex stays associated with chromosomes
throughout the cell
cycle (
7). This is in contrast to the cell
cycle-dependent
relocalization of the complex in human cells (this
report) and in
S. pombe (
23). Condensin function and regulation
may differ in a budding yeast and higher eukaryotes despite the
conservation of the complex components, presumably due to the
differences in the complexity of the genome structure. The chicken
hCAP-E homolog, ScII, was originally reported to loosely associate
with
the nucleus during interphase based on mass enucleation results
(
21). However, the immunolocalization analysis of ScII in
the
interphase cells was not provided in the study, and the reason
for
the apparent discrepancy between the results for chicken cells
and for
human cells is not clear. How the complex dissociates
from chromosomes
at the end of mitosis is not known. It will be
important to investigate
how relocalization of the complex is
regulated. Despite the structural
similarity within the conserved
N- and C-terminal portions, the second
SMC complex, hSMC1-hSMC3,
which is involved in sister chromatid
cohesion and metaphase progression,
distributes differently in the cell
(
22) (H. C. Gregson et al.,
submitted for publication).
This suggests that the interactions
of other factors unique to each SMC
complex are critical for specific
subcellular
localization.
Formation of large condensation intermediate foci containing
condensin and phosphor-H3.
Whether there are specific sites on
chromosomes for initiation of condensation and how condensation spreads
over the entire chromosome are issues that remain unanswered.
Phosphorylation of the histone H3 tail is a cell cycle-specific event
initiated during the G2/M transition and is maintained
until the end of mitosis, closely correlating with mitotic chromosome
condensation. Histone H3 phosphorylation was recently shown to be
required for proper condensation and segregation of chromosomes
(24). Phosphorylation appears to spread from pericentromeric
regions to the whole chromosome, which may reflect the spread of
condensation (8). It was proposed that phosphor-H3 may be
involved in the initiation of condensation by destabilizing local
chromatin structure to allow easier access of condensation factors, or
by directly recruiting factors required for condensation through its
phosphorylated tail (24). However, the molecular event
involving the phosphorylated tail is still not well understood.
Our study provides the first evidence that condensin and phosphor-H3
may be involved together in the chromosome condensation
process. Our
results demonstrate that the condensin complex and
phosphor-H3
colocalize to the large foci coinciding with the locally
condensed
chromosomes during late G
2/early prophase. Interestingly,
the hCAP-C-hCAP-E foci are on chromosomes prior to the initiation
of
H3 phosphorylation that occurs at late G
2 and do not
initially
localize to the centromeric regions. In addition, similar to
the
observation in
S. cerevisiae (
7), human
condensin localizes
to the nucleolus in a G
2-phase-specific
manner, in which phosphorylation
of H3 is initially absent. Therefore,
our results suggest that
the human condensin has its own preferential
binding sites on
interphase chromosomes independent of phosphor-H3.
Furthermore,
our data provide evidence that condensin directly or
indirectly
interacts with histone H3 (regardless to its phosphorylation
state)
through protein-protein interaction, which may contribute to the
association of condensin to chromosomes. It is not unreasonable
to
speculate that mitotic chromosome condensation is a multistep
process
requiring additional factors at each step. Therefore,
the large
condensation foci containing phosphor-H3 and condensin
may be a
higher-order architecture representing an intermediate
step of
condensation. Formation of such large foci most likely
requires
additional factors, since the interaction of condensin
with histone H3
is not phosphorylation specific. Nonetheless,
our results demonstrate
that the human condensin complex remains
associated with specific sites
on chromosomes during interphase
and participates in reinitiation of
mitotic chromosome condensation
together with phosphor-H3. Further
investigation of the in vivo
binding sites of the human condensin
complex on interphase chromosomes
as well as the requirement for the
large foci formation with phosphor-H3
will be important to understand
the role of human condensin in
initiation of condensation in human
cells.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
The first two authors contributed equally to this work.
We acknowledge W. R. Brinkley and C. D. Allis for kindly
providing antibody for CREST antiserum and general histone H3,
respectively. We thank M. Waterman, S. Sandmeyer, and A. R. Ball,
Jr., for critical reading of the manuscript.
This work was supported in part by GM59150 from NIH to K.Y. K.Y.
was a Leukemia Society of America Special Fellow.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: 240D Med Sci I,
Department of Biological Chemistry, College of Medicine, University of
California, Irvine, CA 92697-1700. Phone: (949) 824-8215. Fax: (949)
824-2688. E-mail: kyokomor{at}uci.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Bootsma, D.,
L. Budke, and O. Vos.
1964.
Studies on synchronous division of tissue culture cells initiated by excess thymidine.
Exp. Cell Res.
33:301-309[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Brenner, S.,
D. Pepper,
M. W. Berns,
E. Tan, and B. R. Brinkley.
1981.
Kinetochore structure, duplication, and distribution in mammalian cells: analysis by human autoantibodies from scleroderma patients.
J. Cell Biol.
91:95-102[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Cubizolles, F.,
V. Legagneux,
R. Le Guellec,
I. Chartrain,
R. Uzbekov,
C. Ford, and K. Le Guellec.
1998.
pEg7, a new Xenopus protein required for mitotic chromosome condensation in egg extracts.
J. Cell Biol.
143:1437-1446[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
de Belle, I.,
S. Cai, and T. Kohwi-Shigematsu.
1998.
The genomic sequences bound to special AT-rich sequence-binding protein 1 (SATB1) in vivo in Jurkat T cells are tightly associated with the nuclear matrix at the bases of the chromatin loops.
J. Cell Biol.
141:335-348[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Earnshaw, W. C., and N. Rothfield.
1985.
Identification of a family of human centromere proteins using autoimmune sera from patients with scleroderma.
Chromosoma
91:313-321[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Fey, E. G.,
K. M. Wan, and S. Penman.
1984.
Epithelial cytoskeletal framework and nuclear matrix-intermediate filament scaffold: three-dimensional organization and protein composition.
J. Cell Biol.
98:1973-1984[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Freeman, L.,
L. Aragon-Alcaide, and A. Strunnikov.
2000.
The condensin complex governs chromosome condensation and mitotic transmission of rDNA.
J. Cell Biol.
149:811-824[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Hendzel, M. J.,
Y. Wei,
M. A. Mancini,
A. Van Hooser,
T. Ranalli,
B. R. Brinkley,
D. P. Bazett-Jones, and C. D. Allis.
1997.
Mitosis-specific phosphorylation of histone H3 initiates primarily within pericentromeric heterochromatin during G2 and spreads in an ordered fashion coincident with mitotic chromosome condensation.
Chromosoma
106:348-360[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Hirano, T.
1999.
SMC-mediated chromosome mechanics: a conserved scheme from bacteria to vertebrates?
Genes Dev.
13:11-19[Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Hirano, T.,
R. Kobayashi, and M. Hirano.
1997.
Condensins, chromosome condensation protein complexes containing XCAP-C, XCAP-E, and a Xenopus homolog of the Drosophila Barren protein.
Cell
89:511-521[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Hirano, T., and T. J. Mitchison.
1994.
A heterodimeric coiled-coil protein required for mitotic chromosome condensation in vitro.
Cell
79:449-458[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Jessberger, R.,
C. Frei, and S. M. Gasser.
1998.
Chromosome dynamics: the SMC protein family.
Curr. Opin. Genes Dev.
8:254-259[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Johnson, G. D., and G. M. Nogueira Araujo.
1981.
A simple method of reducing the fading of immunofluorescence during microscopy.
J. Immunol. Methods
43:349-350[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Kimura, K.,
M. Hirano,
R. Kobayashi, and T. Hirano.
1998.
Phosphorylation and activation of 13S condensin by Cdc2 in vitro.
Science
282:487-490[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Kimura, K., and T. Hirano.
1997.
ATP-dependent positive supercoiling of DNA by 13S condensin: a biochemical implication for chromosome condensation.
Cell
90:625-634[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Kimura, K.,
V. V. Rybenkov,
N. J. Crisona,
T. Hirano, and N. R. Cozzarelli.
1999.
13S condensin actively reconfigures DNA by introducing global positive writhe: implication for chromosome condensation.
Cell
98:239-248[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Knehr, M.,
M. Poppe,
M. Enulescu,
W. Eickelbaum,
M. Stoehr,
D. Schroeter, and N. Paweletz.
1995.
A critical appraisal of synchronization methods applied to achieve maximal enrichment of HeLa cells in specific cell cycle phases.
Exp. Cell Res.
217:546-553[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Koshland, D., and A. Strunnikov.
1996.
Mitotic chromosome condensation.
Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol.
12:305-333[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Moroi, Y.,
C. Peebles,
M. J. Fritzler,
J. Steigerwald, and E. M. Tan.
1980.
Autoantibody to centromere (kinetochore) in scleroderma sera.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
77:1627-1631[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Nagase, T.,
N. Seki,
A. Tanaka,
K. Ishikawa, and N. Nomura.
1995.
Prediction of the coding sequences of 40 new genes (KIAA0121-KIAA0160) deduced by analysis of cDNA clones from human cell line KG-1.
DNA Res.
2:167-174[Abstract].
|
| 21.
|
Saitoh, N.,
I. G. Goldberg,
E. R. Wood, and W. C. Earnshaw.
1994.
ScII: an abundant chromosome scaffold protein is a member of a family of putative ATPases with an unusual predicted tertiary structure.
J. Cell Biol.
127:303-318[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Schmiesing, J. A.,
A. R. Ball,
H. C. Gregson,
J. Alderton,
S. Zhou, and K. Yokomori.
1998.
Identification of two distinct human SMC protein complexes involved in mitotic chromosome dynamics.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
95:12906-12911[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Sutani, T.,
T. Yuasa,
T. Tomonaga,
N. Dohmae,
K. Takio, and M. Yanagida.
1999.
Fission yeast condensin complex: essential roles of non-SMC subunits for condensation and Cdc2 phosphorylation of Cut3/SMC4.
Genes Dev.
13:2271-2283[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
Wei, Y.,
L. Yu,
J. Bowen,
M. A. Gorovsky, and C. D. Allis.
1999.
Phosphorylation of histone H3 is required for proper chromosome condensation and segregation.
Cell
97:99-109[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 25.
|
Yokomori, K.,
M. P. Zeidler,
J.-L. Chen,
C. P. Verrijzer,
M. Mlodzik, and R. Tjian.
1994.
Drosophila TFIIA directs cooperative DNA binding with TBP and mediates transcriptional activation.
Genes Dev.
8:2313-2323[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Zieve, G. W.,
D. Turnbull,
M. Mullins, and J. R. McIntosh.
1980.
Production of large numbers of mitotic mammalian cells by use of the reversible microtubule inhibitor nocodazole.
Exp. Cell Res.
126:397-405[CrossRef][Medline].
|
Molecular and Cellular Biology, September 2000, p. 6996-7006, Vol. 20, No. 18
0270-7306/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Kong, X., Ball, A. R. Jr., Sonoda, E., Feng, J., Takeda, S., Fukagawa, T., Yen, T. J., Yokomori, K.
(2009). Cohesin Associates with Spindle Poles in a Mitosis-specific Manner and Functions in Spindle Assembly in Vertebrate Cells. Mol. Biol. Cell
20: 1289-1301
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Swain, J. E., Ding, J., Wu, J., Smith, G. D.
(2008). Regulation of spindle and chromatin dynamics during early and late stages of oocyte maturation by aurora kinases. Mol Hum Reprod
14: 291-299
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Takemoto, A., Murayama, A., Katano, M., Urano, T., Furukawa, K., Yokoyama, S., Yanagisawa, J., Hanaoka, F., Kimura, K.
(2007). Analysis of the role of Aurora B on the chromosomal targeting of condensin I. Nucleic Acids Res
35: 2403-2412
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Swain, J. E., Ding, J., Brautigan, D. L., Villa-Moruzzi, E., Smith, G. D.
(2007). Proper Chromatin Condensation and Maintenance of Histone H3 Phosphorylation During Mouse Oocyte Meiosis Requires Protein Phosphatase Activity. Biol. Reprod.
76: 628-638
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lam, W. W., Peterson, E. A., Yeung, M., Lavoie, B. D.
(2006). Condensin is required for chromosome arm cohesion during mitosis.. Genes Dev.
20: 2973-2984
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Blank, M., Lerenthal, Y., Mittelman, L., Shiloh, Y.
(2006). Condensin I recruitment and uneven chromatin condensation precede mitotic cell death in response to DNA damage. JCB
174: 195-206
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Jelinkova, L., Kubelka, M.
(2006). Neither Aurora B Activity nor Histone H3 Phosphorylation Is Essential for Chromosome Condensation During Meiotic Maturation of Porcine Oocytes. Biol. Reprod.
74: 905-912
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Staudt, N., Fellert, S., Chung, H.-R., Jackle, H., Vorbruggen, G.
(2006). Mutations of the Drosophila Zinc Finger-encoding Gene vielfaltig Impair Mitotic Cell Divisions and Cause Improper Chromosome Segregation. Mol. Biol. Cell
17: 2356-2365
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lam, W. S., Yang, X., Makaroff, C. A.
(2005). Characterization of Arabidopsis thaliana SMC1 and SMC3: evidence that AtSMC3 may function beyond chromosome cohesion. J. Cell Sci.
118: 3037-3048
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Savvidou, E., Cobbe, N., Steffensen, S., Cotterill, S., Heck, M. M. S.
(2005). Drosophila CAP-D2 is required for condensin complex stability and resolution of sister chromatids. J. Cell Sci.
118: 2529-2543
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Haumaitre, C., Barbacci, E., Jenny, M., Ott, M. O., Gradwohl, G., Cereghini, S.
(2005). Lack of TCF2/vHNF1 in mice leads to pancreas agenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
102: 1490-1495
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Watrin, E., Legagneux, V.
(2005). Contribution of hCAP-D2, a Non-SMC Subunit of Condensin I, to Chromosome and Chromosomal Protein Dynamics during Mitosis. Mol. Cell. Biol.
25: 740-750
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hirota, T., Gerlich, D., Koch, B., Ellenberg, J., Peters, J.-M.
(2004). Distinct functions of condensin I and II in mitotic chromosome assembly. J. Cell Sci.
117: 6435-6445
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ono, T., Fang, Y., Spector, D. L., Hirano, T.
(2004). Spatial and Temporal Regulation of Condensins I and II in Mitotic Chromosome Assembly in Human Cells. Mol. Biol. Cell
15: 3296-3308
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Geiman, T. M., Sankpal, U. T., Robertson, A. K., Chen, Y., Mazumdar, M., Heale, J. T., Schmiesing, J. A., Kim, W., Yokomori, K., Zhao, Y., Robertson, K. D.
(2004). Isolation and characterization of a novel DNA methyltransferase complex linking DNMT3B with components of the mitotic chromosome condensation machinery. Nucleic Acids Res
32: 2716-2729
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Bort, R., Martinez-Barbera, J. P., Beddington, R. S. P., Zaret, K. S.
(2004). Hex homeobox gene-dependent tissue positioning is required for organogenesis of the ventral pancreas. Development
131: 797-806
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Takemoto, A., Kimura, K., Yokoyama, S., Hanaoka, F.
(2004). Cell Cycle-dependent Phosphorylation, Nuclear Localization, and Activation of Human Condensin. J. Biol. Chem.
279: 4551-4559
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Galy, V., Mattaj, I. W., Askjaer, P.
(2003). Caenorhabditis elegans Nucleoporins Nup93 and Nup205 Determine the Limit of Nuclear Pore Complex Size Exclusion In Vivo. Mol. Biol. Cell
14: 5104-5115
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Cimini, D., Mattiuzzo, M., Torosantucci, L., Degrassi, F.
(2003). Histone Hyperacetylation in Mitosis Prevents Sister Chromatid Separation and Produces Chromosome Segregation Defects. Mol. Biol. Cell
14: 3821-3833
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Uzbekov, R., Timirbulatova, E., Watrin, E., Cubizolles, F., Ogereau, D., Gulak, P., Legagneux, V., Polyakov, V. Ju., Le Guellec, K., Kireev, I.
(2003). Nucleolar association of pEg7 and XCAP-E, two members of Xenopus laevis condensin complex in interphase cells. J. Cell Sci.
116: 1667-1678
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Przewloka, M. R., Pardington, P. E., Yannone, S. M., Chen, D. J., Cary, R. B.
(2003). In Vitro and In Vivo Interactions of DNA Ligase IV with a Subunit of the Condensin Complex. Mol. Biol. Cell
14: 685-697
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Losada, A., Hirano, M., Hirano, T.
(2002). Cohesin release is required for sister chromatid resolution, but not for condensin-mediated compaction, at the onset of mitosis. Genes Dev.
16: 3004-3016
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kim, J.-S., Krasieva, T. B., LaMorte, V., Taylor, A. M. R., Yokomori, K.
(2002). Specific Recruitment of Human Cohesin to Laser-induced DNA Damage. J. Biol. Chem.
277: 45149-45153
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ball, A. R. Jr., Schmiesing, J. A., Zhou, C., Gregson, H. C., Okada, Y., Doi, T., Yokomori, K.
(2002). Identification of a Chromosome-Targeting Domain in the Human Condensin Subunit CNAP1/hCAP-D2/Eg7. Mol. Cell. Biol.
22: 5769-5781
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Bomar, J., Moreira, P., Balise, J. J., Collas, P.
(2002). Differential regulation of maternal and paternal chromosome condensation in mitotic zygotes. J. Cell Sci.
115: 2931-2940
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Stear, J. H., Roth, M. B.
(2002). Characterization of HCP-6, a C. elegans protein required to prevent chromosome twisting and merotelic attachment. Genes Dev.
16: 1498-1508
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hagstrom, K. A., Holmes, V. F., Cozzarelli, N. R., Meyer, B. J.
(2002). C. elegans condensin promotes mitotic chromosome architecture, centromere organization, and sister chromatid segregation during mitosis and meiosis. Genes Dev.
16: 729-742
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Petersen, J., Paris, J., Willer, M., Philippe, M., Hagan, I. M.
(2002). The S. pombe aurora-related kinase Ark1 associates with mitotic structures in a stage dependent manner and is required for chromosome segregation. J. Cell Sci.
114: 4371-4384
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hirano, T.
(2002). The ABCs of SMC proteins: two-armed ATPases for chromosome condensation, cohesion, and repair. Genes Dev.
16: 399-414
[Full Text]
-
Gregson, H. C., Schmiesing, J. A., Kim, J.-S., Kobayashi, T., Zhou, S., Yokomori, K.
(2001). A Potential Role for Human Cohesin in Mitotic Spindle Aster Assembly. J. Biol. Chem.
276: 47575-47582
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Cabello, O. A., Eliseeva, E., He, W., Youssoufian, H., Plon, S. E., Brinkley, B. R., Belmont, J. W.
(2001). Cell Cycle-dependent Expression and Nucleolar Localization of hCAP-H. Mol. Biol. Cell
12: 3527-3537
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Giet, R., Glover, D. M.
(2001). Drosophila Aurora B Kinase Is Required for Histone H3 Phosphorylation and Condensin Recruitment during Chromosome Condensation and to Organize the Central Spindle during Cytokinesis. JCB
152: 669-682
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kimura, K., Cuvier, O., Hirano, T.
(2001). Chromosome Condensation by a Human Condensin Complex in Xenopus Egg Extracts. J. Biol. Chem.
276: 5417-5420
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kruhlak, M. J., Hendzel, M. J., Fischle, W., Bertos, N. R., Hameed, S., Yang, X.-J., Verdin, E., Bazett-Jones, D. P.
(2001). Regulation of Global Acetylation in Mitosis through Loss of Histone Acetyltransferases and Deacetylases from Chromatin. J. Biol. Chem.
276: 38307-38319
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Zeitlin, S. G., Shelby, R. D., Sullivan, K. F.
(2001). CENP-A is phosphorylated by Aurora B kinase and plays an unexpected role in completion of cytokinesis. JCB
155: 1147-1158
[Abstract]
[Full Text]