Previous Article | Next Article 
Molecular and Cellular Biology, October 2000, p. 7401-7409, Vol. 20, No. 19
0270-7306/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Transcriptional Repression by Drosophila
Methyl-CpG-Binding Proteins
Karim
Roder,1
Ming-Shiu
Hung,1
Tai-Lin
Lee,1
Tzu-Yang
Lin,2
Hengyi
Xiao,3
Ken-Ichi
Isobe,3
Jyh-Lyh
Juang,2 and
C.-K.
James
Shen1,*
Institute of Molecular Biology, Academia
Sinica, Nankang,1 and Division of
Genomic Medicine, National Health Research
Institute,2 Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China,
and Department of Basic Gerontology, National Institute for
Longevity Sciences, Ogu, Aichi 474-8522, Japan3
Received 6 January 2000/Returned for modification 22 February
2000/Accepted 6 July 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
C methylation at genomic CpG dinucleotides has been implicated in
the regulation of a number of genetic activities during vertebrate cell
differentiation and embryo development. The methylated CpG could
induce chromatin condensation through the recruitment of
histone deacetylase (HDAC)-containing complexes by methyl-CpG-binding proteins. These proteins consist of the methylated-DNA binding domain
(MBD). Unexpectedly, however, several studies have identified MBD-containing proteins encoded by genes of Drosophila
melanogaster, an invertebrate species supposed to be void of
detectable m5CpG. We now report the genomic structure of a
Drosophila gene, dMBD2/3, that codes for two
MBD-containing, alternatively spliced, and developmentally regulated
isoforms of proteins, dMBD2/3 and dMBD2/3
. Interestingly, in vitro
binding experiments showed that as was the case for vertebrate MBD
proteins, dMBD2/3
could preferentially recognize
m5CpG-containing DNA through its MBD. Furthermore,
dMBD2/3
as well as one of its orthologs in mouse, MBD2b, could
function in human cells as a transcriptional corepressor or
repressor. The activities of HDACs appeared to be
dispensable for transcriptional repression by dMBD2/3
. Finally,
dMBD2/3
also could repress transcription effectively in transfected
Drosophila cells. The surprisingly similar structures and
characteristics of the MBD proteins as well as DNA cytosine (C-5)
methyltransferase-related proteins in Drosophila and
vertebrates suggest interesting scenarios for their roles in eukaryotic
cellular functions.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
In vertebrates, including the
mammals, the chromosomal DNAs are modified by C methylation at a
limited number of CpG dinucleotides, resulting in m5CpG,
methylated at position 5 of the C residues. This methylation at CpG has
been implicated in the regulation of a number of genetic activities
during mammalian cell differentiation and embryo development. These activities include tissue-specific gene transcription, X chromosome inactivation, genomic imprinting, cellular defense against
viral agents, and tumorigenesis (references 1, 2, 11, 13,
15, and 34 and references therein).
The level of m5CpG in the vertebrate cells is presumably
balanced by the combined actions of DNA cytosine (C-5)
methyltransferases (CpG MTases) (2, 26) and DNA
demethylases (3).
It is generally accepted that regulation of the different cellular
activities by DNA methylation is modulated mainly through the
m5CpG residues. Indeed, m5CpG could be
recognized by a specific class of proteins that consist of the
methylated-DNA binding domain (MBD) (21). These "MBD proteins," in particular MeCP2 and MBD2/3, could preferentially bind
to m5CpG-containing DNA, recruit histone deacetylase
(HDAC)-containing complexes, and thus cause chromatin condensation in
the vicinity of m5CpG (12, 22, 23, 33). This is
very likely one major, but not the only, scheme involved in the
functioning of vertebrate DNA methylation.
Unlike the vertebrates, several invertebrate species, including
Drosophila melanogaster (27, 31), do not have
apparent DNA methylation in their genomes. Nor has CpG MTase
been reported to occur in these invertebrate animals. It was thus
surprising to find mammalian CpG MTase-related proteins as
well as MBD proteins expressed in Drosophila. A
Drosophila protein, DmMTR1, is characteristically similar to
the vertebrate maintenance CpG MTase, dnmt1, in several aspects (9). In particular, DmMTR1 molecules are located
outside the nuclei during interphase of the syncytial
Drosophila embryos, as is dnmt1 in the mouse blastocyst
(19). However, DmMTR1 molecules appear to be rapidly
transported into and then out of the nuclei again, as the embryos
undergo the mitotic waves (9). Immunofluorescence data
further indicate that DmMTR1 molecules "paint" the whole set of
condensed Drosophila chromosomes throughout the mitotic phase, suggesting that it may play an essential role in the cell cycle-regulated condensation of the Drosophila chromosomes.
In addition to DmMTR1, another Drosophila polypeptide,
DmMT2, exhibiting high sequence homology to mammalian dnmt2, a
relatively short homolog of dnmt1 but without detectable methylation
activities (25), has been identified through a database
search (9, 30). Expression of DmMT2 in Drosophila
is developmentally regulated (9).
Interestingly, several recent reports have also noted the
identification of an MBD protein encoded by the Drosophila
genome (9, 30, 33). Like the mammalian MBD (12, 22, 23, 33), the Drosophila MBD protein, which was termed the
"Drosophila MBD-like sequence" (33) or
dMBD2/3 (30), interacts with HDAC in vitro and in vivo
(30). However, it did not appear to recognize m5CpG (30). Here we report the complete genomic
structure of the Drosophila dMBD2/3 gene, which encodes two
alternatively spliced and developmentally regulated MBD proteins. We
also provide the first evidence that the Drosophila MBD
protein(s) could recognize m5CpG-containing DNA, albeit
with a lower affinity than the mammalian MBD proteins. Remarkably, the
protein(s) could also function as a corepressor via an HDAC-independent pathway.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Recombinant clones.
The three P1 clones containing the
dMBD2/3 gene were identified by the hybridization of
filter-containing Drosophila P1 genomic clones (Genome
Systems Inc.) with an expression sequence tag (EST) clone, LD03777. The
nucleotide sequences of the P1 clones, LD03777, and another EST clone,
LD46808, were determined by automated sequencing of both strands.
All recombinant procedures were done by the methods of Sambrook et al.
(29). The cDNAs of dMBD2/3
and mouse MBD2b were cloned in
frame into pGEX-4T-2 and pGEX-4T-1 (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech),
respectively. To generate the plasmid pGEX-dMBD2/3
(36-226),
encoding the glutathione transferase (GST) fusion protein of dMBD2/3
without the MBD, the cDNA of dMBD2/3
was cut with HaeII and blunt ended, and the 3' fragment was cloned into
pGEX-4T-1.
The maps of the recombinant plasmids used in transfection are depicted
in Fig.
4A. pSG424-dMBD2/3

contains the sequence for
amino acids
(aa) 1 to 226 of dMBD2/3

cloned in frame in the expression
vector
pSG424 (
28). pSG424-MBD2b contains the sequence for aa
1 to
226 of the mouse MBD2b protein (
8). pSG424-p45 was a gift
from N. Gavva at the University of California at Davis. pCI-Gal4
harbors the sequence for the Gal4 DNA binding domain downstream
of the
cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoter in pCI (Promega Biotech).
pCI-dMBD2/3

contains the sequence for aa 1 to 226 of dMBD2/3
cloned in frame
with Gal4 of pCI-Gal4. Similarly, pCI-Gal4-MBD2b
contains the sequence
for aa 1 to 262 of the mouse MBD2b protein.
To obtain
pCI-Gal4-dMBD2/3

(36-226) without the MBD, the respective
cDNA was
released from pGEX-dMBD2/3

(36-226) by
EcoRI/
XhoI digestion
and cloned into
EcoRI/
SalI-cut pCI-Gal4. pG5-TK-CAT was a gift
from M. Ptashne. It contains five Gal4-binding sites in front
of the
thymidine kinase (TK) basic promoter. pG0-TK-CAT is the
derivative
without Gal4-binding sites. pG0-

-Luc contains the
proximal human

1 globin promoter (

87 to +41) upstream of the
luciferase gene of
pGL3-basic (Promega Biotech). To create pG5-

-Luc,
five Gal4-binding
sites were cloned upstream of the

1 globin
promoter in pG0-

-Luc.
p21 (
35) contains the proximal promoter
region (

60 to +13)
of the murine p21
waf1 gene upstream of the
luciferase gene in pGL3-basic. p21-GCmut
is a derivative containing a
mutated GC box. pPacSp1 was a generous
gift from Guntram Suske
(Institute of Molecular Biology and Tumor
Research, Philipps
University, Marburg, Germany). pAc5.1/V5-His/lacZ
was obtained from
Invitrogen.
Northern blot analysis.
Total Drosophila RNAs
were isolated from different stages using the TRIZOL reagent (Life
Technologies). Poly(A) RNAs were then isolated with a kit from Qiagen.
One microgram of the RNAs was loaded in each lane, blotted onto
nitrocellulose filter paper, and hybridized with
32P-labeled LD03777 probe.
1 tubulin RNA patterns were
used as the internal control for the Northern blot analysis.
EMSA.
The sequence of the
-TATA oligonucleotide used in
the electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) is
5'-GATCTCACTGTGTCGACCTTGGGCATAAAAGGCAGAGCACTGGAGCTGCTGCTTAA-3' (complement,
3'-CTAGAGTGACACAGCTGGAACCCGTATTTTCCGTCTCGTGACCTC GACGACGAATT-5').
To obtain methylated DNA, the oligonucleotide or pBluescript II
KS (pBSKS; Stratagene) was fully methylated with SssI
methylase according to the instructions of the manufacturer (New
England Biolabs). The oligonucleotides were labeled with 32P at their 5' ends and gel purified prior to EMSA.
The GST fusion proteins were all generated from recombinant
pGEX-4T plasmids (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) transformed into
Escherichia coli BL21 cells. The proteins were purified with
glutathione-Sephadex beads (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The expression
plasmid pGST-ankyrin was a gift from Xin Chen. For EMSA, different
amounts of the fusion proteins were preincubated with 100 ng of pBSKS
and 8 µg of bovine serum albumin at room temperature for 5 min in 20 mM HEPES (pH 7.9)-3 mM MgCl2-1 mM EDTA-10 mM
-mercaptoethanol-0.1% Triton X-100-10% glycerol in a total
volume of 20 µl. The labeled oligonucleotides (40,000 cpm,
approximately 1 ng) were then added, and the samples were further
incubated for 20 min at room temperature. To separate the protein-DNA
complexes, the reaction mixtures were loaded onto a running
nondenaturing 4% polyacrylamide gel, which had been prerun in 0.5×
Tris-borate-EDTA buffer for 30 min at 4°C and 200 V. Electrophoresis
was further carried out at 4°C and 200 V for 2 1/2 h. Gels were dried
and exposed on X-ray film at
80°C. For competition experiments, a
100-fold molar excess of the competitor DNAs was included in the
binding reactions.
Transient DNA transfection.
The human kidney epithelial cell
line 293T was grown in Dulbecco modified Eagle medium-10% fetal calf
serum and transfected at 20% confluence in 2-cm "Cell Wells." The
DNA samples for transfection were introduced as a calcium phosphate
coprecipitate consisting of 1 µg of a reporter plasmid (pG0-TK-CAT,
pG5-TK-CAT, pG0-
-Luc, pG5-
-Luc, p21, or p21-GCmut), 0.3 µg of
pCMV-
-gal (18), 10 µg of salmon sperm DNA as the
carrier, and different amounts of an expression plasmid
[pSG424-dMBD2/3
, pSG424-MBD2b, pCI-Gal4, pCI-Gal4-dMBD2/3
,
pCI-Gal4-dMBD2/3
(36-226), pCI-Gal4-MBD2b, or pSG424-p45]. pSG424
and/or pCI-Gal4 was used as the control plasmid(s), and either was also
added as required to keep the total amount of DNA used in each
transfection the same. Sixteen hours after transfection, the medium was
changed and cells were incubated for another 48 h. The
chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT), luciferase, and
-galactosidase assays were performed as described previously.
For transfection of the
Drosophila SL2 cell line, the cells
were maintained at 23.5°C in a modified M3 medium (Invitrogen)
supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and penicillin and
streptomycin
(both from Gibco BRL). At 18 h before the
transfection, 2 × 10
6 cells were plated out onto
individual 10-cm petri dishes. On
the following day, the cells were
harvested and resuspended in
medium without the serum and antibiotics.
Then 7.5 × 10
5 cells/well were seeded onto a 24-well
plate, and DNA transfection
was carried out using Lipofectin. Each
liposome-DNA mixture contained
1 µg of the reporter plasmid
pG5-

-Luc or pG0-

-Luc, different
amounts of an MBD expression
plasmid or its corresponding vector,
0.2 µg of pPac-Sp1, and 0.3 µg
of pAc5.1/V5-His/lacZ. The transfected
cells were kept in
antibiotic-free and serum-free medium at 23.5°C
for 6 h before
replacement with normal serum. The luciferase and

-galactosidase
activities were assayed after another 72 h of
incubation.
For trichostatin A (TSA) treatment, 1 µg of the reporter plasmid(s)
and 50 ng of the expression plasmid(s) were used in each
cotransfection. Twenty hours after transfection, the transfected
293T
cells were treated with TSA at various concentrations (see
Fig.
5) for
24 h. Luciferase or CAT activities were then assayed
and
normalized to the extract protein concentrations. In keeping
with
previous studies (
16), we observed a general increase of
the
promoter activities after the TSA treatment, e.g., six- to
eightfold
for the CMV promoter and five- to ninefold for the Rous
sarcoma virus
promoter (data not
shown).
 |
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
Genomic organization of dMBD2/3, a
Drosophila gene encoding two MBD-containing
polypeptides.
Multiple EST clones were identified by Blast
search using the mammalian MBD2b sequence (8) as the bait.
One of the clones (LD03777) originating from a Drosophila
embryonic cDNA library was first sequenced. Its insert is 865 bp long,
including the poly(A) tail. LD03777 bears an open reading frame
corresponding to 226 aa, which has been referred to previously as the
"Drosophila MBD-like sequence" (33) or
dMBD2/3
(30). The protein contains an MBD-like
sequence in the N-terminal domain and a coiled-coil motif near the C
terminus. It is apparently the ortholog of the vertebrate MBD2/MBD3
family (8, 30, 33).
dMBD2/3
is the product of alternative splicing.
First, blot hybridization of a P1
Drosophila genomic filter
with LD03777
identified three P1 clones, 1540, 1769, and 1809 (Fig.
1A). The
in situ data located clones 1540 and 1769 to 85D20-85D24 and 85D18-85D27,
respectively, but no in situ
information was available for clone
1809. Comparison of the nucleotide
sequences of LD03777 and the
P1 clones revealed the existence of an
891-bp intron (bp 236 to
1126 [Fig.
1B]) downstream of the MBD of
dMBD2/3

. Second, we
found another EST clone, LD46808,
1,198 bp long, which contains
an extra exon of 339 bp derived from the
891-bp intron (bp 479
to 817 [Fig.
1A and B]). These data indicate
that the primary
transcript of the
dMBD2/3 gene
shown in Fig.
1B is alternatively
spliced to generate two mRNAs coding
for dMBD2/3

and a longer
protein, dMBD2/3 (Fig.
1A).



View larger version (96K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Structure and expression of the Drosophila
dMBD2/3 gene. (A) Genomic and cDNA organization of
dMBD2/3. The chromosomal location (85D) of the
gene and the three P1 clones spanning the region are indicated. Shown
below the P1 clones are the cDNAs for dMBD2/3 and
dMBD2/3 , which were derived from the cDNA clones LD46808
and LD03777, respectively. The base numbering of the two cDNAs
corresponds to that of the genomic sequence of
dMBD2/3 shown in panel B. (B) Genomic sequence of
dMBD2/3. The sequence of the
dMBD2/3 gene was deduced from the three P1 clones.
The putative site of transcriptional initiation, as inferred from the
sequences of the two cDNA clones, is designated +1. The two introns and
the regions upstream and downstream of the gene are shown with
lowercase letters. The corresponding amino acids are also shown, with
those homologous to the conserved amino acids among the vertebrate MBDs
indicated by bold letters. The putative TATA box in the upstream
promoter region and the poly(A) signal, AATAAA, are
underlined. (C) Expression of dMBD2/3 and
dMBD2/3 mRNA. Drosophila poly(A)
RNAs isolated from different stages of development were analyzed by
Northern blot hybridization with the cDNA clone LD03777 as the probe.
The two transcripts (1,270 and 890 nt long) are indicated.
|
|
Developmental regulation of the alternative splicing of
dMBD2/3.
The two dMBD2/3 mRNAs are
differentially expressed during Drosophila development, as
shown by Northern blot analysis using LD03777 as the hybridization
probe (Fig. 1C). In overnight embryos and in adult flies, two mRNAs of
lengths similar to those of dMBD2/3
(890 nucleotides
[nt]) and dMBD2/3 (1,270 nt), respectively, were present
(Fig. 1C, lanes 2 and 6). On the other hand, only the long transcript
was expressed in embryos younger than 2 h (Fig. 1C, lane 1), and
the short mRNA was the predominant species at the other stages of
development (Fig. 1C, lanes 3 through 5). The Northern blotting data
suggest that the alternative splicing scheme generating
dMBD2/3 and dMBD2/3
mRNAs is developmentally regulated and that the two proteins play different roles during development. dMBD2/3 is likely an essential gene
for the early development of Drosophila, since a line with
P-element insertion in the putative promoter region of
dMBD2/3 is lethal to homozygous embryos (M.-S. Hung,
unpublished data).
dMBD2/3
could preferentially recognize
m5CpG-containing DNA.
Whether the
Drosophila MBD protein binds to m5CpG is an
interesting question. All vertebrate MBD proteins identified thus far could recognize and preferentially bind to DNA containing
m5CpG (reference 4 and reference
therein). Close sequence examination indicates that the MBD in
dMBD2/3 is similar to those in vertebrates but with many
amino acid differences, including relatively long deletions (Fig. 1B)
(30, 33). Recombinant GST fusions of different MBD proteins
(Fig. 2A) were thus compared for their
abilities to bind methylated or unmethylated DNA (Fig. 2B). As expected from the previous studies (8), little binding of mouse MBD2b to unmethylated probe could be detected (Fig. 2B, lanes 1 through 3).
On the other hand, it bound to the methylated DNA probe with relatively
high affinity (Fig. 2B, compare lanes 4 through 6 to lanes 1 through
3).

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Preferential binding of Drosophila and
mammalian MBD proteins to m5CpG-containing DNA. (A)
Coomassie blue staining patterns of recombinant GST fusion
polypeptides. One microgram each of GST fusions with the intact
dMBD2/3 (lane 2), dMBD2/3 (36-226) (lane 3),
a mouse ankyrin polypeptide (lane 4), and mouse MBD2b (lane 6) was
electrophoresed on a denaturing sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide
gel and stained with Coomassie blue. Also run on the gel were molecular
mass markers (lane 1) and bovine serum albumin (lane 5). (B) EMSA of
recombinant GST fusions. The abilities of the Drosophila
dMBD2/3 and mouse MBD2b proteins to recognize
m5CpG were compared by EMSA. A 56-bp DNA probe ( -TATA)
containing the human globin TATA box with a single CpG was
electrophoresed after incubation with competitor DNA and increasing
amounts of proteins (2, 20, and 200 ng). Another probe,
-TATAm, which contains the same sequence as -TATA but
with the CpG site methylated at position 5 of the C residues, was
analyzed in the same way. The oligonucleotides -TATA and
-TATAm were used as the probes in an EMSA after binding
with increasing amounts (2, 20, and 200 ng) of recombinant GST fusions
of MBD2b or dMBD2/3 . The arrow points to the complex
formed between the -TATAm oligonucleotide and both MBD2b
and dMBD2/3 . The GST protein did not form a complex either
with -TATA or with -TATAm (data not shown).
|
|
Interestingly,
Drosophila dMBD2/3

also formed a
specific complex with the methylated probe but not with unmethylated
DNA
(Fig.
2B, lanes 7 through 12). This complex comigrates with the
fast band of the mouse MBD2b-DNA complexes (Fig.
2B, compare lanes
6 and 12). Quantitation of the respective complexes by PhosphorImager
analysis (Fig.
2B) and experiments using lower concentrations
of the
recombinant proteins (data not shown) indicated that the
affinity of
binding of dMBD2/3

to the methylated DNA probe was
approximately 20-fold lower than that of the mouse MBD2b. This
reduced
affinity of binding of dMBD2/3

to methylated DNA is likely
due to the relatively divergent sequence and consequently the
structure
of the MBD in dMBD2/3

. The preferential binding of
dMBD2/3

to DNA containing m
5CpG was also noted
by others (A. Wolffe, personal
communication).
MBD is required for dMBD2/3
binding to methylated
DNA.
The specificity of the dMBD2/3
-DNA complex was
further confirmed by experiments shown in Fig.
3. First, as exemplified for a
GST-ankyrin fusion polypeptide (Fig. 3A, lanes 1 and 2), proteins without MBD do not bind to the probe, methylated or unmethylated. Similarly, GST alone could not form a complex with the same set of DNA
oligonucleotides (data not shown). Second, the complex was effectively
competed away upon the addition of a 100-fold molar excess of
methylated probe or methylated pBluescript DNA (Fig. 3A, compare lane 3 to lanes 4 and 6) but not upon addition of the same amount of
unmethylated competitors (Fig. 3A, lanes 5 and 7). Finally, removal of
aa 1 to 35 from dMBD2/3
, which comprise a major portion of
the MBD-like sequence, abolished its ability to bind methylated DNA, as
demonstrated by EMSA (Fig. 3B, compare lanes 2 and 3) and by
Southwestern analysis (data not shown). It should be noted here that
Tweedie et al. (30) have found no methyl-CpG-binding
activity for either dMBD2/3 or dMBD2/3
in their
EMSA. However, in those cases, a different DNA oligonucleotide was
used. It is likely that the recognition of m5CpG by these
two Drosophila MBD proteins is dependent on the DNA sequence
context.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
(A) Oligonucleotide competition EMSA of
dMBD2/3 . -TATA and -TATAm
oligonucleotides were allowed to form complexes with 200 ng of the GST
fusion of dMBD2/3 , 20 ng of the GST fusion of MBD2b, or
200 ng of the GST fusion of a mouse ankyrin polypeptide. The binding
reactions were carried out without ( ) or with the inclusion of 100 ng
of competitor DNA oligonucleotide -TATA, -TATAm,
plasmid pBSKS, or pBSKS methylated at all of the CpG sites
(pBSKSm). The reaction products were then analyzed by EMSA.
(B) Requirement of the MBD of dMBD2/3 for complex
formation. The oligonucleotides were allowed to form a complex with 200 ng of the GST fusion of intact dMBD2/3 or with 200 ng of
the GST fusion of a truncated dMBD2/3 .
|
|
dMBD2/3
and mouse MBD2b could function as
transcription corepressors or repressors in human 293T cells.
The
mammalian MBD2a protein repressed promoter activity in a cotransfection
assay (23). To examine whether the Drosophila MBD
protein(s) could also act as a transcriptional corepressor, we first
carried out side-by-side comparison of the effects of MBD2b, which is
an isoform of mouse MBD2a, and of Drosophila
dMBD2/3
on the expression in human 293T cells of a
cotransfected TK promoter with five Gal4-binding sites (Fig.
4B). The Gal4 fusions of
either protein significantly repressed the TK promoter in a
dosage-dependent manner (Fig. 4B, see data for pSG424-MBD2b and
pSG424-dMBD2/3
) when being recruited to the promoter via
the upstream Gal4-binding sites in pG5-TK-CAT. In contrast, expression
of only the Gal4 (Fig. 4B, see data for pSG424) had no obvious effect
and that of a fusion polypeptide between Gal4 and the activation domain of p45, a subunit of the erythroid enriched factor NF-E2, stimulated the TK promoter activity (Fig. 4B, see data for pSG424-p45).




View larger version (125K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Transcription repression by Drosophila and
mammalian MBD proteins in human cells. (A) Maps of reporter and
expression plasmids used in the cotransfection assays. For more details
of the plasmids, see Materials and Methods. (B) Relative CAT activities
from pG5-TK-CAT in human 293T cells cotransfected with increasing
amounts of different recombinant expression plasmids. The CAT
activities were standardized with the -galactosidase activity from
cotransfected pCMV- -gal. Activity with 3.5 µg of cotransfected
pSG424 is defined as 1. The bars represent standard deviations of two
sets of transfection carried out in duplicate. (C) Relative luciferase
activities from pG5- -Luc or pG0- -Luc in human 293T cells
cotransfected with increasing amounts of different recombinant
expression plasmids. The activation from pG5- -Luc or pG0- -Luc was
measured and standardized with the -galactosidase activity from
cotransfected pCMV- -gal. The luciferase activity from pG5- -Luc
without cotransfected expression plasmid is defined as 1 (lane 1). Note
that in contrast with activity shown in panel B, the expression of the
Gal fusions in this set of experiments was directed by a CMV promoter
in the pCI vector.
|
|
The strong repression effects by the MBD proteins were also observed in
a separate set of experiments. In this case, a minimal
promoter of the
human

globin gene with five Gal4-binding sites
(Fig.
4A, see map)
was used as the reporter. The expression of
either
Gal4-dMBD2/3

(Fig.
4C, lanes 2 through 4) or Gal4-MBD2b
(Fig.
4C, lanes 6 through 8) significantly repressed, by more
than
90%, the luciferase activity of pG5-

-Luc. Interestingly,
removal of
the MBD from dMBD2/3

did not affect its function as
a
transcription corepressor (Fig.
4C, compare lanes 4 and 5).
When a
reporter plasmid without the Gal4-binding sites, pG0-

-Luc,
was used,
the two MBD proteins could still repress the promoter
activity but to a
much smaller extent (approximately 50%) (Fig.
4C, compare lanes 10 through 16 and 2 through 8). This is consistent
with our finding that,
like for MeCP2 (
20) but unlike for MBD1
(
24), the
repression effect of dMBD2/3

is dependent on its
distance
from the promoter (K. Roder, unpublished
data).
The data in Fig.
4 indicate that in human cells, both
Drosophila dMBD2/3

and mouse MBD2b could
function as transcriptional
corepressors of at least two different
basic promoters. Furthermore,
as exemplified for dMBD2/3

,
the m
5CpG recognition and transcriptional repression by
these MBD proteins
are exerted through two separate
domains.
TSA treatment could not inhibit the repressor or corepressor
function of dMBD2/3
.
Whether the corepressor and
repressor functions of dMBD2/3
or MBD2b are mediated
through HDAC(s) has been tested with the use of TSA. In general, TSA
treatment could increase the activities of many endogenous and
transfected promoters (10, 32). We have observed the same
phenomenon. As shown in Fig. 5A, the
activity of p21, the promoter of the murine
p21waf1 gene, was greatly increased in a TSA
concentration-dependent manner. This is consistent with the finding by
Xiao et al. (35). Furthermore, a mutant promoter, p21-GCmut,
with a mutation in the proximal GC box of p21, exhibited a much smaller
magnitude of TSA inducibility (Fig. 5A). Similar to
p21waf1, the activities of the TK promoter in
plasmid pG0-TK-CAT or pG5-TK-CAT (Fig. 5B) and the
globin promoter
in pG0-
-Luc or pG5-
-Luc (Fig. 5C) were all increased after TSA
treatment, 2- to 4-fold and 15- to 16-fold, respectively. However, it
is obvious from Fig. 5B and C that TSA treatment could not relieve the
repression by dMBD2/3
, whether or not the reporter
plasmids contained the Gal4-binding sites.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Effects of TSA treatment on the repression
function of dMBD2/3 . (A) Activity increases of the
p21waf1 and p21-GCmut promoters after treatment
with the indicated concentrations of TSA. Increases relative to the
promoter activity in the absence of TSA treatment are indicated above
the bars. (B) Activity increases of the TK promoter by TSA treatment.
The blank bars represent the TK promoter activities in the presence of
exogenously expressed Gal4 protein, and the black bars represent
activities with the Gal4 fusion of dMBD2/3 . (C) Activity
increases of the human globin promoter caused by TSA treatment.
|
|
These results together indicated that dMBD2/3

and
MBD2b could function in vivo as transcription corepressors without the
involvement of HDAC. However, dMBD2/3

could associate with
HDAC
in vitro and in vivo (
30). Thus, like mammalian MBD2a
(
23),
Drosophila MBD proteins such as
dMBD2/3

are also capable of functioning
as transcription
corepressors through either HDAC-independent
or HDAC-dependent
repression pathways in a promoter context-specific
manner. This
utilization of two alternative pathways to repress
transcription has
been implicated for at least one other
Drosophila corepressor, Groucho (
5).
dMBD2/3
also could effectively repress transcription
in Drosophila cells.
To test whether
dMBD2/3
could function as a corepressor and/or repressor
in a Drosophila cellular environment, we carried out DNA
transfection in an SL2 cell culture. As in those experiments performed
for Fig. 4B and C, pG5-
-Luc or pG0-
-Luc was cotransfected with
pSG424 or pSG424-dMBD2/3
. In addition, pPacSp1 was also cotransfected since high-level activities of both the
globin promoter in pG5-
-Luc or pG0-
-Luc and the simian virus 40 promoter in pSG424 require the binding of Sp1 factor, which
Drosophila cells lack (6).
Indeed, as shown in Fig.
6,
dMBD2/3

could effectively repress the

globin promoter
in pG5-

-Luc. Furthermore, as was true
for 293T cells,
dMBD2/3

also repressed transcription in the absence
of the five Gal4-binding sites, although the magnitude of
repression
was smaller (Fig.
6). Experiments using
pCI-Gal4-dMBD2/3

instead
of pSG424-dMBD2/3

gave similar results (data not shown).

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Transcriptional repression by
dMBD2/3 in Drosophila SL2 cells. The relative
luciferase activities from pG5- -Luc or pG0- -Luc in SL2 cells
cotransfected with pSG424 or pSG424-dMBD2/3 were
calculated. Activity with 1 µg of cotransfected pSG424 is defined as
1. The globin promoter and simian virus 40 promoter in pG0- -Luc
and pG5- -Luc and in pSG424, respectively, were driven by Sp1 factor
expressed by cotransfected pPacSp1. Indeed, the luciferase activities
were at least 10 times lower without cotransfection with pPacSp1 (data
not shown).
|
|
Conservation of Drosophila proteins related to factors
involved in the vertebrate DNA methylation program.
As already
mentioned, the end product of the DNA methylation reaction,
m5CpG, has been recognized as the key determinant
responsible for the functioning of CpG MTases and DNA
demethylases in vertebrate cells (reference 13 and
reference therein). Among the possible mechanisms, m5CpG
serves as the binding site for MBD proteins, many of which appear to
reside within chromatin remodeling complexes that contain HDACs
(12, 22, 23, 30). The identification of
Drosophila proteins (DmMTR1 [9] and DmMT2
[9, 30]) related to two of the vertebrate CpG
MTase family members and of the Drosophila MBD
proteins (9, 30, 33) has thus raised interesting questions regarding the mechanisms of functioning of these proteins in
vertebrates as well as in Drosophila (9,
30). Two scenarios could be envisioned to explain the
evolutionary conservation of the vertebrate CpG MTase-related
proteins in Drosophila. First, DNA methylation-demethylation processes actually occur in Drosophila but only transiently
at specific stages of the development or cell cycle, thereby escaping previous methods of detection (27, 31). Alternatively, these proteins and their mammalian counterparts carry out currently unknown
functions not requiring the enzymatic reactions. Our data on
dMBD2/3
have interesting implications for the above models.
Previously, it was shown that ectopically expressed mammalian MBD
proteins, in particular MBD1, could effectively repress
transfected
promoters in
Drosophila cells, if the promoter DNA
was
methylated at CpGs prior to the transfection (
7,
24).
Furthermore, Lyko et al. (
17) have reported that ectopic
expression
of mammalian CpG MTases caused genomic DNA
methylation and embryonic
lethality in
Drosophila. The
lethality is most likely due to the
silencing of essential genes during
Drosophila development, which
in turn, as suggested by the
authors, could be caused either by
steric inhibition of transcription
factor binding or through changes
in the chromatin structure near the
m
5CpG residues. The capability of dMBD2/3

to recognize and preferentially
bind
m
5CpG-containing DNA (Fig.
2 and
3) lends support to
the first scenario
outlined
above.
In this study, we have also demonstrated for the first time that
Drosophila MBD proteins could function as transcription
corepressors
or repressors for unmethylated promoters in mammalian as
well
as
Drosophila cells (Fig.
4 and
6). This is remarkably
similar
to the behavior of the human MBD1 proteins in transfected
mammalian
and
Drosophila cell cultures (
7).
Furthermore, TSA inhibition
experiments suggested that repression by
dMBD2/3

was mostly HDAC
independent (Fig.
5), as
previously observed for repression of
certain promoters by the
mammalian MBD proteins (
23,
36).
In this regard, it should
be noted that certain HDACs, such as
the Sir2 HDAC, could not be
inhibited by TSA (
9a). Since dMBD2/3
could
associate with several types of HDACs (
30), it may also
repress transcription through HDAC-dependent pathways. In any
case, our
data also provide strong support for the second scenario,
i.e., that
Drosophila CpG MTase- and MBD protein-related
factors,
as well as their mammalian homologs, carry out functions,
e.g.,
repression of transcription, not requiring the presence of
m
5CpG
residues.
In summary, we have shown that
Drosophila MBD proteins such
as dMBD2/3

could recognize m
5CpG through the
MBD motif. dMBD2/3

also acts as a potent repressor
in both
Drosophila and mammalian cells. These data together with
the
previous reports indicate that a nearly full complement of
factors
related to those involved in the vertebrate DNA methylation
program are
expressed in
Drosophila. Interestingly, as already
mentioned
above, the functional conservation of the MBD proteins
is further
supported by the finding that a
Drosophila strain carrying
a
P-element insertion in the
dMBD2/3 promoter is
lethal to homozygous
embryos (Hung, unpublished). Molecular genetic
analysis of these
proteins in
Drosophila will provide
interesting and essential
insights into the mechanistic aspects of the
functions of CpG
MTases, MBD proteins, and their related
factors in eukaryotic
cells.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
The first four authors contributed equally to this work.
We are grateful to Shigeo Hayashi at the Genetic Strain Research
Center, National Institute of Genetics, Japan, for providing the P1
genomic clones and to Alan Wolffe for communicating unpublished results. We also thank Duen-wei Hsu, Xin Chen, Mark Ptashne, Narender Gavva, Bon-chu Chung, and Guntram Suske for some of the vectors and
clones used in the study.
K. Roder is the recipient of a DFG postdoctoral fellowship (Ro
2121/1-1). This research was supported by the Academia Sinica, the
National Science Council, and the Foundation of Biomedical Sciences,
Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Institute of
Molecular Biology, Academia Sinica, Nankang, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China. Phone: 011-886-2-27821436. Fax: 011-886-2-2788-4177. E-mail:
ckshen{at}ccvax.sinica.edu.tw or
cjshen{at}ucdavis.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Baylin, S. B.
1997.
Tying it all together: epigenetics, genetics, cell cycle, and cancer.
Science
277:1948-1949[Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
|
Bestor, T. H., and G. L. Verdine.
1994.
DNA methyltransferases.
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
6:380-389[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Bhattacharya, S. K.,
S. Ramchandani,
N. Cervoni, and M. Szyf.
1999.
A mammalian protein with specific demethylase activity for mCpG DNA.
Nature
397:579-583[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Bird, A., and A. P. Wolffe.
1999.
Methylation-induced repression belts, braces, and chromatin.
Cell
99:451-454[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Chen, G.,
J. Fernandez,
S. Mische, and A. J. Courey.
1999.
A functional interaction between the histone deacetylase Rpd3 and the corepressor Groucho in Drosophila development.
Genes Dev.
13:2218-2230[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Courey, A. J., and R. Tjian.
1988.
Analysis of Sp1 in vivo reveals multiple transcriptional domains, including a novel glutamine-rich activation motif.
Cell
55:887-898[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Fujita, N.,
S.-I. Takebayashi,
K. Okumura,
S. Kudo,
T. Chiba,
H. Saya, and M. Nakao.
1999.
Methylation-mediated transcriptional silencing in euchromatin by methyl-CpG binding protein MBD1 isoforms.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19:6415-6426[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Hendrich, B., and A. Bird.
1998.
Identification and characterization of a family of mammalian methyl-CpG binding proteins.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:6538-6547[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Hung, M. S.,
N. Karthikeyan,
B. Huang,
H.-C. Koo,
J. Kiger, and C.-K. J. Shen.
1999.
Drosophila proteins related to vertebrate DNA (5-cytosine) methyltransferases.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
96:11940-11945[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9a.
|
Imai, S.-I.,
C. M. Armstrong,
M. Kaeberlein, and L. Guarente.
2000.
Transcriptional silencing and longevity protein Sir2 is an NAD-dependent histone deacetylase.
Nature
403:795-800[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Jin, S., and K. W. Scotto.
1998.
Transcriptional regulation of the MDR1 gene by histone acetyltransferase and deacetylase is mediated by NF-Y.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:4377-4384[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Jones, P. A., and M. L. Gonzalgo.
1997.
Altered DNA methylation and genome instability a new pathway to cancer?
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:2103-2105[Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Jones, P. L.,
G. J. C. Veenstra,
P. A. Wade,
D. Vermaak,
S. U. Kass,
N. Landsberger,
J. Strouboulis, and A. P. Wolffe.
1998.
Methylated DNA and MeCP2 recruit histone deacetylase to repress transcription.
Nat. Genet.
19:187-191[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Jost, J. P., and H. P. Saluz (ed.).
1993.
DNA methylation: molecular and biological significance.
Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, Switzerland.
|
| 14.
|
Kudo, S.
1998.
Methyl-CpG-binding protein MeCP2 represses SP1-activated transcription of the human leukosialin gene when the promoter is methylated.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:5492-5499[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Laird, P. W., and R. Jaenisch.
1996.
The role of DNA methylation in cancer genetic and epigenetics.
Annu. Rev. Genet.
30:441-464[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Luo, R. X.,
A. A. Postigo, and D. C. Dean.
1998.
Rb interacts with histone deacetylase to repress transcription.
Cell
92:463-473[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Lyko, F.,
B. H. Ramsahoye,
H. Kashevsky,
M. Tudor,
M.-A. Mastrangelo,
T. L. Orr-Weaver, and R. Jaenisch.
1999.
Mammalian (cytosine-5) methyltransferases cause genomic DNA methylation and lethality in Drosophila.
Nat. Genet.
23:363-366[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 18.
|
MacGregor, G. R., and C. T. Caskey.
1989.
Construction of plasmids that express E. coli beta-galactosidase in mammalian cells.
Nucleic Acids Res.
17:2365[Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Mertineit, C.,
J. A. Yoder,
T. Taketo,
D. W. Laird,
J. M. Trasler, and T. H. Bestor.
1998.
Sex-specific exons control DNA methyltransferase in mammalian germ cells.
Development
125:889-897[Abstract].
|
| 20.
|
Nan, X.,
F. J. Campoy, and A. Bird.
1987.
MeCp2 is a transcriptional repressor with abundant binding sites in genomic chromatin.
Cell
88:471-481.
|
| 21.
|
Nan, X.,
R. R. Meehan, and A. Bird.
1993.
Dissection of the methyl-CpG binding domain from the chromosomal protein MeCP2.
Nucleic Acids Res.
21:4886-4892[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Nan, X.,
H.-H. Ng,
C. A. Johnson,
C. D. Laherty,
B. M. Turner,
R. N. Eisenman, and A. Bird.
1998.
Transcriptional repression by the methyl-CpG-binding protein MeCP2 involves a histone deacetylase complex.
Nature
393:386-389[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 23.
|
Ng, H.-H.,
Y. Zhang,
B. Hendrich,
C. A. Johnson,
B. M. Turner,
H. Erdjument-Bromage,
P. Tempst,
D. Reinberg, and A. Bird.
1999.
MBD2 is a transcriptional repressor belonging to the MeCP1 histone deacetylase complex.
Nat. Genet.
23:58-61[Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Ng, H.-H.,
P. Jeppesen, and A. Bird.
2000.
Active repression of methylated genes by the chromosomal protein MBD1.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20:1394-1406[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Okano, M.,
S. Xie, and E. Li.
1998.
Dnmt2 is not required for de novo and maintenance methylation of viral DNA in embryonic stem cells.
Nucleic Acids Res.
26:2536-2540[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Okano, M.,
D. W. Bell,
D. A. Haber, and E. Li.
1999.
DNA methyltransferases Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b are essential for de novo methylation and mammalian development.
Cell
99:247-257[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 27.
|
Patel, C. V., and K. P. Gopinathan.
1987.
Determination of trace amounts of 5-methylcytosine in DNA by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography.
Anal. Biochem.
164:164-169[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 28.
|
Sadowski, I., and M. Ptashne.
1989.
A vector for expressing GAL4(1-147) fusions in mammalian cells.
Nucleic Acids Res.
17:7539[Free Full Text].
|
| 29.
|
Sambrook, J.,
E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis.
1989.
Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 30.
|
Tweedie, S.,
H.-H. Ng,
A. L. Barlow,
B. M. Turner,
B. Hendrich, and A. Bird.
1999.
Vestiges of a DNA methylation system in Drosophila melanogaster?
Nat. Genet.
23:389-390[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 31.
|
Urieli-Shoval, S.,
Y. Gruenbaum,
J. Sedat, and A. Razin.
1982.
The absence of detectable methylated bases in Drosophila melanogaster DNA.
FEBS Lett.
146:148-152[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 32.
|
Van Lint, C.,
S. Emiliani, and E. Verdin.
1996.
The expression of a small fraction of cellular genes is changed in response to histone hyperacetylation.
Gene Expr.
5:245-253[Medline].
|
| 33.
|
Wade, P. A.,
A. Gegonne,
P. L. Jones,
E. Ballestar,
F. Aubry, and A. P. Wolffe.
1999.
Mi-2 complex couples DNA methylation to chromatin remodelling and histone deacetylation.
Nat. Genet.
23:62-66[Medline].
|
| 34.
|
Walsh, C. P., and T. H. Bestor.
1999.
Cytosine methylation and mammalian development.
Genes Dev.
13:26-34[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 35.
|
Xiao, H.,
T. Hasegawa, and K.-I. Isobe.
1999.
Both Sp1 and Sp3 are responsible for p21waf1 promoter activity induced by histone deacetylase inhibitor in NIH3T3 cells.
J. Cell. Biochem.
73:291-302[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 36.
|
Yu, F.,
J. Thiesen, and W. H. Stratling.
2000.
Histone-deacetylase-independent transcriptional repression by methyl-CpG-binding protein 2.
Nucleic Acids Res.
28:2201-2206[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Molecular and Cellular Biology, October 2000, p. 7401-7409, Vol. 20, No. 19
0270-7306/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Tzeng, T.-Y., Lee, C.-H., Chan, L.-W., Shen, C.-K. J.
(2007). Epigenetic regulation of the Drosophila chromosome 4 by the histone H3K9 methyltransferase dSETDB1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
104: 12691-12696
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Marhold, J., Kramer, K., Kremmer, E., Lyko, F.
(2004). The Drosophila MBD2/3 protein mediates interactions between the MI-2 chromatin complex and CpT/A-methylated DNA. Development
131: 6033-6039
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hung, M.-S., Shen, C.-K. J.
(2003). Eukaryotic Methyl-CpG-Binding Domain Proteins and Chromatin Modification. Eukaryot Cell
2: 841-846
[Full Text]
-
Wang, I-F., Reddy, N. M., Shen, C.-K. J.
(2002). Higher order arrangement of the eukaryotic nuclear bodies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
99: 13583-13588
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kudo, S, Nomura, Y, Segawa, M, Fujita, N, Nakao, M, Hammer, S, Schanen, C, Terai, I, Tamura, M
(2002). Functional characterisation of MeCP2 mutations found in male patients with X linked mental retardation. J. Med. Genet.
39: 132-136
[Full Text]