Previous Article | Next Article 
Molecular and Cellular Biology, January 2000, p. 516-522, Vol. 20, No. 2
0270-7306/0/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
The Transmembrane Mutation G380R in Fibroblast
Growth Factor Receptor 3 Uncouples Ligand-Mediated Receptor Activation
from Down-Regulation
E.
Monsonego-Ornan,1
R.
Adar,1
T.
Feferman,2
O.
Segev,1 and
A.
Yayon1,*
Department of Molecular Cell Biology, The
Weizmann Institute of Science,1 and
ProChon Biotech Ltd., Kiryat Weizmann,2
Rehovot 76100, Israel
Received 14 July 1999/Returned for modification 22 September
1999/Accepted 11 October 1999
 |
ABSTRACT |
A point mutation, Gly380Arg, in the transmembrane domain of
fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) leads to achondroplasia, the most common form of genetic dwarfism in humans. This substitution was suggested to enhance mutant receptor dimerization, leading to
constitutive, ligand-independent activation. We found that dimerization
and activation of the G380R mutant receptor are predominantly ligand
dependent. However, using both transient and stable transfections, we
found significant overexpression only of the mutant receptor protein.
Metabolic pulse-chase experiments, cell surface labeling, and kinetics
of uptake of radiolabeled ligand demonstrated a selective delay in the
down-regulation of the mutant receptor. Moreover, this receptor was now
resistant to ligand-mediated internalization, even at saturating ligand
concentrations. Finally, transgenic mice expressing the human G380R
mutant receptor under the mouse receptor transcriptional control
demonstrated a markedly expanded area of FGFR3 immunoreactivity within
their epiphyseal growth plates, compatible with an in vivo defect in
receptor down-regulation. We propose that the achondroplasia mutation
G380R uncouples ligand-mediated receptor activation from
down-regulation at a site where the levels and kinetics of FGFR3
signals are crucial for chondrocyte maturation and bone formation.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Fibroblast growth factor (FGF)
receptors (FGFR) constitute a family of four genes that encode multiple
receptor isoforms, all of which have intrinsic tyrosine kinase activity
(8, 12). Upon binding of a ligand, receptor dimerization is
induced, leading to auto- and transphosphorylation followed by receptor
internalization and down-regulation. These lead to the controlled
activation of specific signal transduction pathways and the expression
of FGF target genes, critically required during embryogenesis, tissue repair, and angiogenesis (1).
Multiple mutations in FGFR 1, 2, and 3 (FGFR1, FGFR2, and FGFR3,
respectively) give rise to a variety of inherited skeletal malformations (40). Mutations in FGFR3 are responsible for
disorders predominantly of the long bones, including achondroplasia,
the most common form of human genetic dwarfism (27, 29).
Over 97% of cases of achondroplasia result from either a G-to-A
transition or a G-to-C transversion, changing the codon for Gly380
(GGG) to Arg (AGG or CGG) in the transmembrane domain of FGFR3. An
Asn540Lys mutation in the proximal tyrosine kinase domain of FGFR3 is
found in the milder disorder of hypochondroplasia (2), while
substitution to a cysteine of residue 248, 249, 370, or 371 in the
extracellular domain or a Lys650Glu mutation in the kinase activation
loop gives rise to the most severe and neonatal lethal thanatophoric
dysplasia (TD) types, I and II, respectively (28, 33). All
of these skeletal malformations represent autosomal dominant disorders characterized by disproportionately short limbs and relative
macrocephaly (23).
The cellular basis underlying the clinical features of achondroplasia
is a defect in chondrocyte function during endochondral bone formation,
the primary mechanism by which long bones elongate (22).
This formation involves a linear process of chondrocyte proliferation
and maturation in a very strictly time- and space-controlled manner
(10). The cartilage progenitor cells which arise at the top
of the epiphyseal growth plate proceed to form columns of proliferating
chondrocytes that later differentiate to produce the calcified matrix.
This matrix is subsequently remodeled by invading osteoblasts to form
the typical bone structure underlying the cartilaginous growth plate
(3). A disturbance in any of the stages in this tightly
coordinated process is quickly reflected by an alteration in the normal
pattern of the growth plate, resulting in inappropriate bone growth and
short stature. The remarkably similar phenotype shared by
achondroplasia-affected individuals, irrespective of their genetic
background, suggests a unique mechanism responsible for this inhibition
of endochondral bone formation.
FGFR3 is highly expressed during embryonic development in the
precartilaginous condensing mesenchyme and in bony and cartilaginous structures of the developing vertebrae (20). Later in
development, during endochondral ossification, it is concentrated in
the perichondrium, the resting cartilage, and the maturation and upper
hypertrophic zones of the growth plate, where it may play a key role in
terminal chondrocyte differentiation. Mice deficient in FGFR3 show
remarkable skeletal overgrowth with wider growth plates, suggesting
that FGFR3 exerts a negative effect on bone growth (5, 7).
Moreover, transgenic mice overexpressing FGF2 driven by the collagen
type II promoter show shortening of their long bones and macrocephaly (4).
Little is known about the molecular mechanisms underlying the various
chondrodysplasia syndromes. The current dogma is that constitutive,
ligand-independent activation of mutant receptors and their downstream
signaling is the mechanism shared by all of these disorders (15,
18, 38). This notion is supported by the finding that many of
these disorders result from substitutions to unpaired cysteine residues
in the extracellular domain of FGFR, leading to covalently
disulfide-linked receptor dimers, as in TD type I, or from direct
activating mutations in the kinase domain of these receptors, as in
hypochondroplasia and TD type II; both types of mutations can lead to
ligand-independent constitutive phosphorylation (25, 28,
36). We found a specific defect in ligand-mediated receptor
down-modulation of G380R which may lead to inappropriate levels and
kinetics of receptor activation at a site where both are crucial for
chondrocyte maturation and bone formation.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Cell lines.
Nontransformed rat chondrocytes derived from
fetal calvaria (RCJ 3.1C5.18), a generous gift from J. Aubin, and human
embryonal kidney cells expressing large T antigen (293T) were cultured
in Dulbecco modified Eagle medium (DMEM) containing 10% fetal calf serum.
Expression of human wt and G380R mutant FGFR3.
Wild-type
(wt) or mutant receptor cDNA in expression vector pcDNA3 (Invitrogen)
was transfected into RCJ or 293T cells by the calcium phosphate method.
For stable expression, clones were selected in G418 (GibcoBRL,
Gaithersberg, Md.) (0.5 mg/ml) and screened for FGFR3 expression by
sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE)
and Western blotting. Retroviruses were produced in 293T cells
cotransfected with vector pLXSN containing either wt or mutant FGFR3
and a Psi helper phage. Virus-containing medium, collected every 8 h, was filtered and kept at
80°C until further use. Infections were
performed by incubating RCJ cells with virus-enriched medium and 8 µg
of Polybrene per ml for 6 h followed by selection in G418 (0.5 mg/ml). Positive pools were screened for FGFR3 expression by SDS-PAGE
and Western blotting.
Immunoprecipitation.
Cells were lysed in lysis buffer (50 mM
Tris-HCl [pH 8.0], 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM
ZnCl2, 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 1 mg of aprotonin per ml, 1 mg
of leupeptin per ml, 2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) and clarified
by centrifugation at 12,000 × g for 15 min. The
lysates were immunoprecipitated for 16 h at 4°C with anti-FGFR3
C terminus antibody (Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, Calif.) and analyzed by
SDS-6% PAGE and Western blotting. Protein bands were visualized with
horseradish peroxidase and an ECL kit (Amersham) according to the
manufacturer's instructions.
Covalent cross-linking.
Cells were washed twice with binding
buffer (DMEM, 25 mM HEPES, 1% bovine serum albumin) and incubated at
4°C without or with FGF9 (50 ng/ml). After 2 h, chemical
cross-linking was performed with 1 mM bis-(sulfosuccinimidyl)-suberate
for 30 min at room temperature. Cells were washed twice with binding
buffer and lysed, and the lysates were precipitated with protein
A-immobilized FGFR3 antibodies. The immunoprecipitates were transferred
to a nitrocellulose membrane and blotted with anti-FGFR3 antibodies
(generated in rabbits with a purified recombinant kinase domain of
mouse FGFR3).
Analysis of pMAPK.
Cells were grown in six-well plates.
After starvation for 16 h with serum-free DMEM, the cells were
incubated for 9 min either without or with 50 ng of FGF9 per ml and
lysed. Equal amounts of each lysate were separated by SDS-7.5% PAGE,
and the presence of phosphorylated MAPK (pMAPK) was determined by
Western immunoblotting with antibodies against phosphorylated
mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK).
Fos-luciferase assay.
RCJ cells were cultured in 60-mm
plates at 37°C and transfected in duplicate with 0.5 µg of
-galactosidase cDNA with or without 2 µg of a c-fos
promoter-luciferase cDNA. After 24 h, the cells were serum
starved for 16 h, treated for 9 min with FGF9, lysed, and assayed
for luciferase activity. Luciferase activity was measured by use of a
Turner luminometer with luciferase reaction buffer (100 mM Tris
acetate, 10 mM magnesium acetate, 1 mM EDTA, 0.07 mM luciferin, 2 mM
ATP). To account for transfection efficiencies, luciferase values from
each transfection were normalized for the corresponding
-galactosidase activities.
Metabolic pulse-chase labeling experiments.
RCJ cells were
cultured in methionine-depleted medium for 3 h, after which
35S-methionine (150 µCi/ml) was added for 30 min. Cells
were washed extensively with DMEM and incubated at 37°C for various
times. Cells were extracted, and lysates were precipitated with
immobilized anti-FGFR3 antibodies. Proteins were separated by SDS-6%
PAGE and visualized by autoradiography.
Cell surface biotinylation.
RCJ cells were washed twice in
ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline and incubated at 4°C with 0.5 mg
of water-soluble biotin-X-NHS (Pierce) per ml in borate buffer (10 mM
boric acid [pH 8], 150 mM NaCl). After 45 min, the coupling of biotin
was blocked by an extensive wash with 15 mM glycine in
phosphate-buffered saline. Cells were incubated at 37°C for various
times. To evaluate cell surface receptors, the cells were extracted and
their lysates were precipitated with immobilized streptavidin (Pierce).
The precipitated proteins were separated by SDS-6% PAGE, transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane, and probed with anti-FGFR3 antibodies.
Radiolabeled ligand internalization assay.
FGF2 was labeled
with 125I-Na (1 mCi) by the chloramine-T method
(16) and separated from free iodine on a heparin-Sepharose column. Cells cultured in 12-well plates were washed with binding buffer (DMEM, 100 mM HEPES [pH 7.5], 1% bovine serum albumin) and
incubated in the presence of radiolabeled 125I-FGF2 (5 ng/ml) without or with a 200-fold excess of cold ligand for 2 h at
4°C. To allow for ligand internalization, cells were transferred to
37°C for various times, at the end of which the cells were placed on
ice and washed twice with low-affinity buffer (25 mM HEPES [pH 7.5],
1.6 M NaCl). The cellular distribution of the radiolabeled ligand was
determined by use of a low-pH extraction buffer (25 mM HEPES [pH 4],
1.6 M NaCl) to remove cell surface receptor-associated ligand; the
remaining radioactivity, solubilized in 100 mM NaOH, represented the
internalized ligand. The extent of nonspecific binding was determined
in the presence of a 100-fold excess of unlabeled FGF2 and was
subtracted from all data points.
Immunohistochemistry.
Isolated bones were fixed in 4%
paraformaldehyde (pH 7.4) containing cetylpyridinium chloride (0.5%),
decalcified in EDTA, dehydrated with an ethanol gradient, and embedded
in paraffin. Sections (5 µm) were cut, stained with anti-FGFR3
antibodies (Santa Cruz), and visualized with fluorescein-conjugated
anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G (Vectra Laboratory). Slides were
counterstained with methyl green (Vector) and mounted with Lemonvitrex
(Carlo Erba). Negative controls were obtained by substituting normal rabbit serum for the specific antibodies.
 |
RESULTS |
Expression of wt and G380R mutant FGFR3 in chondrocytes.
Since
the cells most affected in achondroplasia are chondrocytes, we chose to
study FGFR3 functions in the nontransformed RCJ 3.1C5.18 cell line
derived from multipotential mesenchymal rat stem cells and expressing
chondrocyte-specific differentiation markers (9, 17). Human
wt FGFR3- or G380R mutant FGFR3-encoding plasmids were introduced into
RCJ cells by stable transfection with full-length human FGFR3 (hFGFR3)
cDNA driven by a cytomegalovirus promoter. Six independent clones
expressing the transduced genes, as evident by SDS-PAGE and immunoblot
analysis, were selected. All clones transduced with the G380R mutant
receptor were found to express higher receptor protein levels than
those expressing the wt receptor (Fig.
1A). Two stable clones which expressed
comparable levels of the two receptors (Fig. 1B) were chosen for
further studies.

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Expression of wild-type and G380R mutant hFGFR3 in RCJ
and 293T cells. (A and B) Lysates of RCJ cells expressing the wt
receptor or the G380R mutant receptor were precipitated and probed with
anti-FGFR3 antibodies. Three different clones expressing wt or mutant
(Ach) FGFR3 (A) or stable clones expressing equal amounts of wt or
mutant FGFR3 and RCJ pools infected with wt FGFR3- or mutant
FGFR3-encoding retroviruses (B) are shown. (C) 293T cells transfected
with the indicated concentrations of either receptor cDNA were lysed,
precipitated, and analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting with
anti-FGFR3 antibodies.
|
|
Differential overexpression of G380R mutant FGFR3.
Repeated
transfections with different cell lines have always yielded, on
average, more clones expressing the mutant receptor than the wt
receptor as well as higher protein levels for the G380R mutant gene
than for the wt gene under identical conditions. This finding suggested
a posttranscriptional mechanism as the potential cause for the
selective accumulation of the mutant receptor. To rule out the
possibility that the apparent selective overexpression of the mutant
receptor was due to clonal variation, the receptors were subcloned into
a retroviral expression vector, and parental RCJ cells were infected
with the retrovirus encoding either wt or mutant FGFR3. Pools of
infected cells expressing either receptor were obtained and analyzed
(Fig. 1B). FGFR3 migrates on SDS-PAGE as two discrete bands; the upper
band is the mature, membrane-associated glycoprotein (130 kDa), while
the lower band is the immature, nonprocessed form (97 kDa)
(13). A comparison of immunoprecipitates from wt FGFR3- and
G380R mutant FGFR3-expressing cells revealed a clear difference in the
ratio of the 97-kDa form to the 130-kDa form. While in wt
receptor-expressing cells the protein was present mainly as the 97-kDa
form, in cells expressing the mutant receptor, more of the protein
accumulated as the 130-kDa, mature form (Fig. 1B). The phenomenon of
higher total expression levels for the mutant receptor was not unique
to chondrocytes, as it was similarly observed when equal amounts of wt
receptor- and mutant receptor-encoding cDNAs were transiently
transfected into 293T human embryonal kidney cells (Fig. 1C). At such
high expression levels, even the mutant receptor accumulated more as
the 97-kDa form, most likely due to saturation of the posttranslational
and trafficking machinery. Nevertheless, the expression of wt FGFR3
could be observed only at DNA concentrations of at least 0.1 µg/ml,
while that of the mutant receptor could be easily detected at half that amount.
Ligand-mediated dimerization and activation of G380R mutant
FGFR3.
Since receptor overexpression may by itself lead to
spontaneous dimerization of receptor tyrosine kinases, we investigated the ability of wt and mutant FGFR3 expressed in RCJ cells to form ligand-dependent and -independent dimers. Chemical cross-linking followed by Western immunoblot analysis failed to detect dimers of
either wt or mutant FGFR3 expressed at moderate levels (Fig. 2A) in the absence of FGF9, a preferred
ligand for FGFR3 (10). At very high expression levels, both
receptors underwent spontaneous, ligand-independent dimerization and
autophosphorylation (data not shown), which were more pronounced for
the G380R mutant receptor due to its abnormal accumulation at the
plasma membrane. Significant levels of receptor dimers were, however,
formed only upon ligand binding to both wt and mutant receptors.
Activation of downstream signaling pathways, such as MAPK (Fig. 2B) or
that of the immediate-early gene c-fos, were also strictly
ligand dependent for both receptor types (Fig. 2C). A more detailed
analysis, including the activation of FRS2, JNK, phospholipase C-
(PLC-
), and Stat1 and using several different cell lines, revealed
identical results (P. David, R. Ben-Levi, and A. Yayon, unpublished
data). These results suggest that at least at moderate expression
levels, the G380R mutant receptor, like its wt counterpart, does not
form spontaneous ligand-independent dimers.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Receptor dimerization, MAPK activation, and
c-fos induction by wt and G380R mutant FGFR3. (A) Stable
clones of RCJ cells expressing either the wt receptor or the G380R
mutant (Ach) receptor were incubated for 2 h at 4°C in the
absence ( ) or presence (+) of 50 ng of FGF9 per ml. After chemical
cross-linking, cells were lysed, immunoprecipitated with anti-FGFR3 C
terminus antibodies, and probed on an immunoblot with a polyclonal
antibody to the kinase domain of FGFR3. (B) Cells incubated with (+) or
without ( ) FGF9 for 9 min at 37°C were lysed, and their lysates
were separated by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with an anti-pMAPK
antibody. (C) Cells transfected with the c-fos luciferase
vector were incubated with or without FGF9, lysed, and analyzed for
luciferase activity. The data shown represent the means ± standard deviations of duplicate transfections normalized for
-galactosidase activity. A.U, arbitrary units.
|
|
G380R mutant FGFR3 is specifically defective in internalization and
accumulates at the cell surface.
In order to obtain more insight
into the mechanisms responsible for the apparent difference in
processing of wt FGFR3 and mutant FGFR3, de novo receptor synthesis and
translocation to and from the plasma membrane were followed by a short
pulse of metabolic labeling of RCJ cells expressing either of the two
receptors (Fig. 3A). The immature form
(97 kDa) of both receptors could be detected within 30 min after
labeling with 35S-methionine. It took another 30 min for
processing and for the 130-kDa form to appear. There did not seem to be
a significant difference in posttranslational processing and
trafficking to the membrane between the two receptors (Fig. 3A).
However, a clear difference in the rates of internalization and
degradation between the two receptors could be observed. While the wt
receptor remained intact for up to 2 h before it was internalized
and degraded, the mutant receptor was not internalized during this time
period and could be traced even after a 4-h chase (Fig. 3A).

View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Metabolic labeling and surface biotinylation of wt and
G380R mutant FGFR3 expressed in RCJ cells. (A) Stable clones of RCJ
cells expressing wt or G380R mutant (Ach) receptors were pulse-labeled
with 35S-methionine for 30 min. At the indicated times,
cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-FGFR3 antibodies and
resolved by SDS-6% PAGE and autoradiography. (B and C) Stable clones
(B) or infected pools (C) of RCJ cells were cell surface biotinylated
for 45 min. At the indicated times, cell lysates were precipitated with
immobilized avidin, analyzed by SDS-6% PAGE, blotted onto a
nitrocellulose membrane, and probed with anti-FGFR3 antibodies. Results
represent three independent experiments repeated with different RCJ
clones.
|
|
In another independent technique used to monitor the fate of the plasma
membrane resident receptor, total cell surface proteins
were labeled
for 45 min with membrane-impermeable, water-soluble
biotin-X-NHS.
Stable RCJ clones (Fig.
3B) and infected RCJ pools
(Fig.
3C) expressing
either the wt or the mutant receptor were
biotinylated, and their cell
lysates were precipitated with immobilized
avidin, separated by
SDS-PAGE, and immunoblotted with antibodies
to FGFR3 (Fig.
3B and C).
As expected, only the mature, 130-kDa,
membrane-associated protein band
of both receptors could be detected
by that method. Similar to the
results obtained by metabolic labeling
(Fig.
3A), the biotin-labeled wt
receptor disappeared from the
cell surface within 2 h after
labeling, while the G380R mutant
receptor remained stable on the cell
surface for more than 3 h
(Fig.
3B and C). Some variation in the
time scale for internalization
but not in the selective delay in mutant
receptor down-regulation
was observed between different experiments,
most likely due to
the variation in receptor expression levels. Taken
together, these
results suggest that the selective accumulation of the
mutant
receptor may be a direct consequence of its slower rate of
internalization
and/or
degradation.
Ligand-mediated receptor internalization is selectively abrogated
in G380R mutant FGFR3.
Cell surface receptors, including receptor
tyrosine kinases, are internalized upon ligand binding (30),
leading to receptor down-regulation and signal transduction
attenuation. We therefore examined the internalization and degradation
rates of biotin-labeled receptors in response to a ligand (Fig.
4A). A major difference in the rates of
internalization of wt FGFR3 and mutant FGFR3 was revealed. The addition
of a ligand had a dramatic effect, as expected, on the wt receptor
half-life, as in less than 30 min, most of the labeled receptor was
internalized and targeted for degradation. Strikingly, the rate of
internalization of the mutant receptor was not affected by the addition
of a ligand in several different clones (data not shown), even at
saturating ligand concentrations (Fig. 4A). Using a kinase-deficient
version of the wt or mutant receptor, we found no effect of the ligand
on the half-life of either receptor (data not shown); this result
suggests that FGFR internalization may be strictly regulated by
interactions with the intracellular domain, which in turn may depend on
its kinase activity.

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Ligand-mediated receptor internalization. (A) RCJ cells
expressing wt or mutant (Ach) receptors were cell surface biotinylated
for 45 min and incubated with (+) or without ( ) FGF9 (50 ng/ml) for
the indicated times. The cell lysates were precipitated with
immobilized avidin, analyzed by SDS-6% PAGE, and probed with
anti-FGFR3 antibodies. (B) Cells were incubated for 2 h at 4°C
with 125I-FGF2 and then transferred to 37°C for the
indicated times. At the end of each incubation, low-affinity heparan
sulfate-bound ligand was removed with a high-salt buffer, high-affinity
receptor-bound ligand was dissociated under low-pH conditions, and the
retained intracellular radioactivity was determined by solubilizing the
cells in 100 mM NaOH. The results shown are the averages ± standard deviations of triplicate measurements, calculated as the ratio
between the internalized ligand and the receptor-bound ligand.
Nonspecific binding was subtracted from all data points.
|
|
In a more quantitative approach, the effect of FGF ligands on receptor
internalization was examined by monitoring the level
of the accumulated
radiolabeled ligand with time. We found marked
differences in the
kinetics of radiolabeled FGF2 accumulation
between the cells (Fig.
4B).
Cells expressing the mutant receptor
bound significantly higher levels
of the ligand than wt receptor-expressing
cells, reflecting the higher
levels of expression of the mutant
receptor but, nevertheless,
internalized the labeled ligand at
a very slow rate. Cells expressing
wt FGFR3, despite having a
smaller number of binding sites for FGF2,
internalized most of
this ligand in less than 30 min, while the
internalization of
the radiolabeled ligand by G380R mutant
FGFR3-expressing cells
was far from being completed even after 120 min
(Fig.
4B).
To investigate the effect of receptor stabilization on receptor
activation, RCJ cells expressing wt or G380R mutant FGFR3
were treated
with cycloheximide, which blocks the production of
newly synthesized
receptors. Monitoring of FGFR3 levels at different
times revealed
prolonged expression of the mutant receptor compared
to the wt receptor
(Fig.
5), in agreement with previous
results
(Fig.
3). This finding was, however, accompanied by a sustained
capacity of the mutant receptor to undergo ligand-dependent
phosphorylation,
suggesting that as long as the receptor is on the cell
surface,
it is capable of ligand binding and transphosphorylation. The
mutant receptor, therefore, not only accumulates at the surface
but
also is capable of signaling over a longer period of time
than its
normal counterpart.

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Expression and phosphorylation of wt and G380R mutant
FGFR3. RCJ cells expressing either wt or mutant (Ach) receptors were
treated for the indicated times with 10 µg of cyclohexamide (Chx) per
ml at 37°C. Then, the cells were incubated for 10 min with 50 ng of
FGF9 per ml and lysed. Each lysate (1 mg of protein) was
immunoprecipitated with an antiphosphotyrosine antibody. Samples were
separated by SDS-6% PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose, and blotted
with antibodies to FGFR3.
|
|
Expanded expression of FGFR3 in growth plates of transgenic mice
carrying the human mutant receptor.
To address the relevance of
such a specific delay in receptor internalization to the localization
of FGFR3 in the growth plate, we analyzed epiphyseal growth plates of
transgenic mice which were engineered to express G380R mutant hFGFR3
under mouse FGFR3 transcriptional control and which show a phenotype
remarkably similar to that of afflicted humans (28a).
Immunostaining with anti-FGFR3 antibodies revealed that while the
localization of this receptor in the growth plates of normal mice was
restricted to cells in the upper hypertrophic zone (Fig.
6, left), transgenic littermates
expressed the receptor in a significantly wider area of the growth
plates comprising several layers of cells, including the lower
hypertrophic zone (Fig. 6, right). No such difference was observed at
the RNA level, as detected by in situ hybridization (data not shown).
This result suggests that the mutant receptor may not be down-regulated
in vivo at the time and differentiation stage at which the normal
receptor is down-regulated.

View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Immunohistochemical analysis of epiphyseal growth plates
from normal and transgenic G380R mutant hFGFR3-expressing mice.
Immunostaining for FGFR3 was performed on sections of proximal tibia
growth plates from 8-day-old normal and transgenic littermates with
anti-FGFR3 and fluorescein-conjugated antibodies. Cells expressing
FGFR3 are indicated by white brackets. The different zones of the
growth plate (PZ, proliferating zone; MZ, maturation zone; MZ,
hypertrophic zone) are noted.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Substitution of a glycine with an arginine in the transmembrane
domain of FGFR3, as in achondroplasia, results primarily in the
stabilization and accumulation of the mutant receptor at the cell
surface. Transgenic mice expressing G380R mutant hFGFR3 driven by the
mouse FGFR3-specific promoter and enhancer demonstrate a significantly
extended area of FGFR3 expression similar to that observed in sections
from human TD type I cases (6) and compatible with the
detected prolonged expression of the mutant receptor in genetically
engineered chondrocytes. The direct consequence of this specific defect
in internalization is uncontrolled, prolonged, ligand-dependent
activation of this receptor, which may contribute to receptor
overactivation (15, 18, 25, 36, 38) and the observed
inhibition of chondrocyte terminal differentiation typical of
achondroplasia. This suggestion is well in line with the current
concept that multiple mutations in FGFR responsible for human skeletal
dysplasias are all gain-of-function mutations. Whether the observed
selective overexpression of the FGFR3 protein in TD type I
(6) and possibly of other mutants of FGFR3 results from a
similar defect in receptor down-regulation has yet to be determined.
Ligand-induced dimerization is a key event in the transmembrane
signaling of receptor tyrosine kinases. A Val-Glu point mutation in the
transmembrane domain of the Neu/ErbB-2 tyrosine kinase leads to
constitutive receptor phosphorylation due to ligand-independent dimerization and activation (39). The G380R mutation in
FGFR3, being in a position analogous to that of the neu
mutation, was implied to function in a similar manner to constitutively
activate this receptor (38). Constitutive activation of the
mutant receptor was supported by experiments with chimeric proteins of
FGFR3 having the kinase domain of either FGFR1 (18) or the
neu oncogene (37), having the extracellular
domain of the platelet-derived growth factor receptor (24),
or having a full-length homologous mutant of FGFR2 (15). Our
results, like those of Raffioni et al. (24) and Thompson and
coworkers (34), suggest that at moderate expression levels,
the G380R mutant receptor, like its normal counterpart, requires a
ligand for dimerization and activation. We have also found an equal
capacity of the mutant receptor to dimerize with either a wild-type or
a mutant receptor counterpart upon ligand binding, as evidenced by
coexpression and immunoprecipitation experiments (data not shown). This
finding may argue against mutant homodimerization via hydrogen bonding
as the sole mechanism driving constitutive receptor activation in human
achondroplasia. The discrepancy between the reported, albeit partial,
ligand-independent activation and our above-mentioned results may be
due to the use of different cellular systems, which may express
variable levels of these receptors or their endogenous ligands
(1) acting in an autocrine manner to stimulate the
overexpressed receptor. Indeed, from our experience, it is not uncommon
to detect significant basal phosphorylation levels of the wild-type
receptor as well. One cannot rule out, however, the possibility that
both constitutive activation and selective overexpression of the mutant
receptor may act in concert to locally enhance FGFR3 signals.
Tyrosine kinase receptors undergo ligand-mediated internalization
following their dimerization and activation (31). Although specific data concerning FGFR3 internalization are not available, the
mechanisms responsible for the internalization of other tyrosine kinase
receptors are relevant to FGFR3, as evidenced by the increased rate of
internalization of this receptor in response to a ligand and the lack
of this effect in a kinase-deficient receptor. Our studies of
internalization rates by several independent methods, such as
pulse-chase metabolic labeling, surface biotinylation, and quantitative
measurements of receptor-mediated internalization of a radiolabeled
ligand, clearly establish a primary defect in the down-regulation of
the G380R mutant receptor. The pattern of expression of the mutant
receptor is distinct from that of the wt receptor in both total
receptor levels and the ratio between the immature, unglycosylated form
and the mature, membrane form of the receptor. The selective
accumulation of the mutant receptor in the mature form is of particular
importance, as it is this form which is capable of binding and
responding to extracellular ligands by dimerization and downstream
signal transduction. Such an accumulation of a fully functional
receptor may also support the prolonged and persistent signals induced
by a locally expressed ligand. It is expected that in the heterozygous
achondroplasia state, a block in the internalization of the mutant
receptor may eventually lead, through the process of ligand-mediated
receptor heterodimerization (35, 39), to the excess
accumulation and activation of wt FGFR as well. Such a transdominant
positive effect of the mutant receptor can further contribute to the
overall excessive and prolonged activation of FGFR-specific pathways.
The molecular basis for the selective accumulation of the mutant
receptor is not clear. It could be related to differential, posttranslational processing of the receptor. Introducing a positively charged residue within the interior of the hydrophobic membrane may
also present an ionic barrier for membrane endocytosis or cause a
change in receptor protein conformation crucial for the interaction of
the receptor with intracellular components responsible for
internalization. Alternatively, the lack of down-regulation may be due
to a specific block in the transmittance of an internalization signal
by the mutant receptor. FGFR1, with a mutation in Y766 autophosphorylation and in the PLC-
binding site, is defective in
internalization and degradation (32) and leads to a
hypomorphic gain-of-function allele resulting in vertebral
abnormalities in mice targeted for this mutation (26). The
disrupted down-regulation signal in achondroplasia may be different
from that of MAPK, JNK, and Stat1 as well as from PLC-
-mediated
signals, which seem to be properly activated by the mutant receptor.
The fact that this phenomenon is also observed for 293T human embryonal
kidney cells, L8 myoblasts, and CHO epithelial cells suggests that the
internalization defect of the mutant receptor is an intrinsic
characteristic of the mutant protein and is not cell or tissue
specific, as could be implied from the selective defect in bone formation.
Signals from FGFR3 seem to exert a selective negative effect on bone
growth, as evidenced from the skeletal overgrowth of FGFR3-null mice
(5, 7) and the severe skeletal growth retardation of mice
overexpressing FGF2 (4). Moreover, FGFR3 mutations selectively inhibit endochondral ossification and long-bone formation without detectable abnormalities in other tissues, where FGFR3 is
highly expressed (20, 41). The cellular context in which FGFR function seems to be of great importance, and their
tissue-specific expression as well as the expression of their ligands
is highly coordinated throughout development. Several FGF ligands were
found to be expressed by growth plate chondrocytes (11, 14, 20, 21), and receptor activation in the growth plate can be readily explained by either autocrine or paracrine mechanisms. Ligand-mediated receptor overactivation is therefore an attractive mechanism to support
an exclusive effect of mutated FGFR3 on long-bone formation due to the
specific combination of ligands, receptors, and coreceptors, such as
heparan sulfate proteoglycans, in this tissue and at different stages
along the pathway of differentiation of epiphyseal chondrocytes.
The process of longitudinal bone growth involves coordination and
precise balance among chondrocyte proliferation, differentiation, cartilage matrix production, and mineralization within the developing growth plate. These cellular activities are under the influence of a
variety of hormonal and local factors, such as FGF ligands (19), whose relative concentrations, sites, and sequence of appearance vary critically during development. It is this tightly coordinated process which may make the growth plate a most sensitive organ to a variety of insults, such as in achondroplasia.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We are grateful to Yuri Sheinin for assistance with the
immunolocalization studies, Peer David for most helpful discussions, Magda David for excellent technical assistance, and Moshe Oren for the
Fos-luciferase construct.
This work was supported in part by the Israel Academy of Sciences and
Humanities and by Prochon Biotech Ltd.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Molecular Cell Biology, The Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot
76100, Israel. Phone: 972-8-9342696. Fax: 972-8-9344125. E-mail:
Liyayon{at}wiccmail.weizmann.ac.il.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Basilico, C., and D. Moscatelli.
1992.
The FGF family of growth factors and oncogenes.
Adv. Cancer Res.
59:115-165[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Bellus, G. A.,
I. McIntosh,
J. Szabo,
A. Aylsworth,
I. Kaitila, and C. A. Francomano.
1996.
Hypochondroplasia: molecular analysis of the fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 gene.
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.
785:182-187[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Cancedda, R.,
F. Descalzi Cancedda, and P. Castagnola.
1995.
Chondrocyte differentiation.
Int. Rev. Cytol.
159:265-358[Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Coffin, J. D.,
R. Z. Florkiewicz,
J. Neumann,
T. Mort-Hopkins,
G. W. Dorn II,
P. Lightfoot,
R. German,
P. N. Howles,
A. Kier,
B. A. O'Toole, et al.
1995.
Abnormal bone growth and selective translational regulation in basic fibroblast growth factor (FGF-2) transgenic mice.
Mol. Biol. Cell
6:1861-1873[Abstract].
|
| 5.
|
Colvin, J. S.,
B. A. Bohne,
G. W. Harding,
D. G. McEwen, and D. M. Ornitz.
1996.
Skeletal overgrowth and deafness in mice lacking fibroblast growth factor receptor 3.
Nat. Genet.
12:390-397[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Delezoide, A. L.,
C. Lasselin-Benoist,
L. Legeai-Mallet,
P. Brice,
V. Senee,
A. Yayon,
A. Munnich,
M. Vekemans, and J. Bonaventure.
1997.
Abnormal FGFR 3 expression in cartilage of thanatophoric dysplasia fetuses.
Hum. Mol. Genet.
6:1899-1906[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Deng, C.,
B. A. Wynshaw,
F. Zhou,
A. Kuo, and P. Leder.
1996.
Fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 is a negative regulator of bone growth.
Cell
84:911-921[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Givol, D., and A. Yayon.
1992.
Complexity of FGF receptors: genetic basis for structural diversity and functional specificity.
FASEB J.
6:3362-3369[Abstract].
|
| 9.
|
Grigoriadis, A. E.,
J. N. Heersche, and J. E. Aubin.
1988.
Differentiation of muscle, fat, cartilage, and bone from progenitor cells present in a bone-derived clonal cell population: effect of dexamethasone.
J. Cell Biol.
106:2139-2151[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Horton, W. A.,
M. A. Machado,
J. Ellard,
D. Campbell,
E. A. Putnam,
A. L. Aulthouse,
X. Sun, and L. J. Sandell.
1993.
An experimental model of human chondrocyte differentiation.
Prog. Clin. Biol. Res.
3838:533-540.
|
| 11.
|
Jingushi, S.,
S. P. Scully,
M. E. Joyce,
Y. Sugioka, and M. E. Bolander.
1995.
Transforming growth factor-beta 1 and fibroblast growth factors in rat growth plate.
J. Orthop. Res.
13:761-768[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Johnson, D. E., and L. T. Williams.
1993.
Structural and functional diversity in the FGF receptor multigene family.
Adv. Cancer Res.
60:1-41[Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Keegan, K.,
S. Meyer, and M. J. Hayman.
1991.
Structural and biosynthetic characterization of the fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR-3) protein.
Oncogene
6:2229-2236[Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Leach, R. J.,
C. Sokol, and J. P. McMurtry.
1997.
Immunolocalization of basic fibroblast growth factor in porcine epiphyseal growth plate.
Domest. Anim. Endocrinol.
14:129-132[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Li, Y.,
K. Mangasarian,
A. Mansukhani, and C. Basilico.
1997.
Activation of FGF receptors by mutations in the transmembrane domain.
Oncogene
14:1397-1406[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 16.
|
McConahey, P. J., and F. J. Dixon.
1980.
Radioiodination of proteins by the use of the chloramine-T method.
Methods Enzymol.
70:210-213[Medline].
|
| 17.
|
McDougall, S.,
Y. H. Fu,
G. N. Lowe,
A. Williams,
R. Polendo,
P. D. Benya,
A. Iida-Klein,
M. A. Fang, and T. J. Hahn.
1996.
Surface adhesion-mediated regulation of chondrocyte-specific gene expression in the nontransformed RCJ 3.1C5.18 rat chondrocyte cell line.
J. Bone Miner. Res.
11:1130-1138[Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Naski, M. C.,
Q. Wang,
J. Xu, and D. M. Ornitz.
1996.
Graded activation of fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 by mutations causing achondroplasia and thanatophoric dysplasia.
Nat. Genet.
13:233-237[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Nilsson, A.,
C. Ohlsson,
O. G. Isaksson,
A. Lindahl, and J. Isgaard.
1994.
Hormonal regulation of longitudinal bone growth.
Eur. J. Clin. Nutr.
48(Suppl. 1):S150-158.
|
| 20.
|
Peters, K.,
D. Ornitz,
S. Werner, and L. Williams.
1993.
Unique expression pattern of the FGF receptor 3 gene during mouse organogenesis.
Dev. Biol.
155:423-430[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Peters, K. G.,
S. Werner,
G. Chen, and L. T. Williams.
1992.
Two FGF receptor genes are differentially expressed in epithelial and mesenchymal tissues during limb formation and organogenesis in the mouse.
Development
114:233-243[Abstract].
|
| 22.
|
Ponseti, I. V.
1970.
Skeletal growth in achondroplasia.
J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. Vol.
52:701-716[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Ponseti, I. V.
1988.
Bone formation in achondroplasia.
Basic Life Sci.
48:109-122[Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Raffioni, S.,
Y. Z. Zhu,
R. A. Bradshaw, and L. M. Thompson.
1998.
Effect of transmembrane and kinase domain mutations on fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 chimera signaling in PC12 cells. A model for the control of receptor tyrosine kinase activation.
J. Biol. Chem.
273:35250-35259[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Robertson, S. C.,
A. N. Meyer,
K. C. Hart,
B. D. Galvin,
M. K. Webster, and D. J. Donoghue.
1998.
Activating mutations in the extracellular domain of the fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 function by disruption of the disulfide bond in the third immunoglobulin-like domain.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
95:4567-4572[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Rossant, J.,
B. Ciruna, and J. Partanen.
1997.
FGF signaling in mouse gastrulation and anteroposterior patterning.
Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol.
62:127-133[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 27.
|
Rousseau, F.,
J. Bonaventure,
M. L. Legeai,
A. Pelet,
J. M. Rozet,
P. Maroteaux,
M. M. Le, and A. Munnich.
1994.
Mutations in the gene encoding fibroblast growth factor receptor-3 in achondroplasia.
Nature
371:252-254[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 28.
|
Rousseau, F.,
V. el Ghouzzi,
A. L. Delezoide,
L. Legeai-Mallet,
M. Le Merrer,
A. Munnich, and J. Bonaventure.
1996.
Missense FGFR3 mutations create cysteine residues in thanatophoric dwarfism type I (TD1).
Hum. Mol. Genet.
5:509-512[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 28a.
| Segev, O., I. Chumakov, Z. Nevo, D. Givol, L. Madar-Shapiro, Y. Sheinin, M. Weinreb, and A. Yayon. Restrained
chondrocyte proliferation and maturation with abnormal growth plate
vascularization and ossification in human FGFR-3G380R transgenic mice.
Hum. Mol. Genet., in press.
|
| 29.
|
Shiang, R.,
L. M. Thompson,
Y. Z. Zhu,
D. M. Church,
T. J. Fielder,
M. Bocian,
S. T. Winokur, and J. J. Wasmuth.
1994.
Mutations in the transmembrane domain of FGFR3 cause the most common genetic form of dwarfism, achondroplasia.
Cell
78:335-342[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 30.
|
Sorkin, A.,
K. Helin,
C. M. Waters,
G. Carpenter, and L. Beguinot.
1992.
Multiple autophosphorylation sites of the epidermal growth factor receptor are essential for receptor kinase activity and internalization. Contrasting significance of tyrosine 992 in the native and truncated receptors.
J. Biol. Chem.
267:8672-8678[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 31.
|
Sorkin, A.,
C. Waters,
K. A. Overholser, and G. Carpenter.
1991.
Multiple autophosphorylation site mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor. Analysis of kinase activity and endocytosis.
J. Biol. Chem.
266:8355-8362[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 32.
|
Sorokin, A.,
M. Mohammadi,
J. Huang, and J. Schlessinger.
1994.
Internalization of fibroblast growth factor receptor is inhibited by a point mutation at tyrosine 766.
J. Biol. Chem.
269:17056-17061[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 33.
|
Tavormina, P. L.,
R. Shiang,
L. M. Thompson,
Y. Z. Zhu,
D. J. Wilkin,
R. S. Lachman,
W. R. Wilcox,
D. L. Rimoin,
D. H. Cohn, and J. J. Wasmuth.
1995.
Thanatophoric dysplasia (types I and II) caused by distinct mutations in fibroblast growth factor receptor 3.
Nat. Genet.
9:321-328[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 34.
|
Thompson, L. M.,
S. Raffioni,
J. J. Wasmuth, and R. A. Bradshaw.
1997.
Chimeras of the native form or achondroplasia mutant (G375C) of human fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 induce ligand-dependent differentiation of PC12 cells.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17:4169-4177[Abstract].
|
| 35.
|
Ullrich, A., and J. Schlessinger.
1990.
Signal transduction by receptors with tyrosine kinase activity.
Cell
61:203-212[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 36.
|
Webster, M. K.,
P. Y. D'Avis,
S. C. Robertson, and D. J. Donoghue.
1996.
Profound ligand-independent kinase activation of fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 by the activation loop mutation responsible for a lethal skeletal dysplasia, thanatophoric dysplasia type II.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16:4081-4087[Abstract].
|
| 37.
|
Webster, M. K., and D. J. Donoghue.
1996.
Constitutive activation of fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 by the transmembrane domain point mutation found in achondroplasia.
EMBO J.
15:520-527[Medline].
|
| 38.
|
Webster, M. K., and D. J. Donoghue.
1997.
FGFR activation in skeletal disorders: too much of a good thing.
Trends Genet.
13:178-182[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 39.
|
Weiner, D. B.,
J. Liu,
J. A. Cohen,
W. V. Williams, and M. I. Greene.
1989.
A point mutation in the neu oncogene mimics ligand induction of receptor aggregation.
Nature
339:230-231[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 40.
|
Wilkie, A. O.,
K. G. Morriss,
E. Y. Jones, and J. K. Heath.
1995.
Functions of fibroblast growth factors and their receptors.
Curr. Biol.
5:500-507[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 41.
|
Wuechner, C.,
A. C. Nordqvist,
A. Winterpacht,
B. Zabel, and M. Schalling.
1996.
Developmental expression of splicing variants of fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) in mouse.
Int. J. Dev. Biol.
40:1185-1188[Medline].
|
Molecular and Cellular Biology, January 2000, p. 516-522, Vol. 20, No. 2
0270-7306/0/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Arnaud-Dabernat, S., Kritzik, M., Kayali, A. G., Zhang, Y.-Q., Liu, G., Ungles, C., Sarvetnick, N.
(2007). FGFR3 Is a Negative Regulator of the Expansion of Pancreatic Epithelial Cells. Diabetes
56: 96-106
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ben-Zvi, T., Yayon, A., Gertler, A., Monsonego-Ornan, E.
(2006). Suppressors of cytokine signaling (SOCS) 1 and SOCS3 interact with and modulate fibroblast growth factor receptor signaling. J. Cell Sci.
119: 380-387
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lievens, P. M.-J., Mutinelli, C., Baynes, D., Liboi, E.
(2004). The Kinase Activity of Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 3 with Activation Loop Mutations Affects Receptor Trafficking and Signaling. J. Biol. Chem.
279: 43254-43260
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Cho, J. Y., Guo, C., Torello, M., Lunstrum, G. P., Iwata, T., Deng, C., Horton, W. A.
(2004). Defective lysosomal targeting of activated fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 in achondroplasia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
101: 609-614
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Rauchenberger, R., Borges, E., Thomassen-Wolf, E., Rom, E., Adar, R., Yaniv, Y., Malka, M., Chumakov, I., Kotzer, S., Resnitzky, D., Knappik, A., Reiffert, S., Prassler, J., Jury, K., Waldherr, D., Bauer, S., Kretzschmar, T., Yayon, A., Rothe, C.
(2003). Human Combinatorial Fab Library Yielding Specific and Functional Antibodies against the Human Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 3. J. Biol. Chem.
278: 38194-38205
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ornitz, D. M., Marie, P. J.
(2002). FGF signaling pathways in endochondral and intramembranous bone development and human genetic disease. Genes Dev.
16: 1446-1465
[Full Text]
-
Rozenblatt-Rosen, O., Mosonego-Ornan, E., Sadot, E., Madar-Shapiro, L., Sheinin, Y., Ginsberg, D., Yayon, A.
(2002). Induction of chondrocyte growth arrest by FGF: transcriptional and cytoskeletal alterations. J. Cell Sci.
115: 553-562
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Blanchard, F., Wang, Y., Kinzie, E., Duplomb, L., Godard, A., Baumann, H.
(2001). Oncostatin M Regulates the Synthesis and Turnover of gp130, Leukemia Inhibitory Factor Receptor alpha , and Oncostatin M Receptor beta by Distinct Mechanisms. J. Biol. Chem.
276: 47038-47045
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Wang, Q., Green, R. P., Zhao, G., Ornitz, D. M.
(2001). Differential regulation of endochondral bone growth and joint development by FGFR1 and FGFR3 tyrosine kinase domains. Development
128: 3867-3876
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Iwata, T., Li, C.-L., Deng, C.-X., Francomano, C. A.
(2001). Highly activated Fgfr3 with the K644M mutation causes prolonged survival in severe dwarf mice. Hum Mol Genet
10: 1255-1264
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Chesi, M., Brents, L. A., Ely, S. A., Bais, C., Robbiani, D. F., Mesri, E. A., Kuehl, W. M., Bergsagel, P. L.
(2001). Activated fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 is an oncogene that contributes to tumor progression in multiple myeloma. Blood
97: 729-736
[Abstract]
[Full Text]