Previous Article | Next Article 
Molecular and Cellular Biology, January 2000, p. 648-655, Vol. 20, No. 2
0270-7306/0/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Engineering Mouse Chromosomes with
Cre-loxP: Range, Efficiency, and Somatic
Applications
Binhai
Zheng,1
Marijke
Sage,1
Elizabeth A.
Sheppeard,1
Vesna
Jurecic,1 and
Allan
Bradley1,2,*
Department of Molecular and Human
Genetics1 and Howard Hughes Medical
Institute,2 Baylor College of Medicine,
Houston, Texas 77030
Received 1 June 1999/Returned for modification 3 August
1999/Accepted 5 October 1999
 |
ABSTRACT |
Chromosomal rearrangements are important resources for genetic
studies. Recently, a Cre-loxP-based method to introduce
defined chromosomal rearrangements (deletions, duplications, and
inversions) into the mouse genome (chromosome engineering) has been
established. To explore the limits of this technology systematically,
we have evaluated this strategy on mouse chromosome 11. Although the
efficiency of Cre-loxP-mediated recombination decreases
with increasing genetic distance when the two endpoints are on the same
chromosome, the efficiency is not limiting even when the genetic
distance is maximized. Rearrangements encompassing up to three quarters
of chromosome 11 have been constructed in mouse embryonic stem (ES)
cells. While larger deletions may lead to ES cell lethality, smaller
deletions can be produced very efficiently both in ES cells and in vivo in a tissue- or cell-type-specific manner. We conclude that any chromosomal rearrangement can be made in ES cells with the
Cre-loxP strategy provided that it does not affect cell
viability. In vivo chromosome engineering can be potentially used to
achieve somatic losses of heterozygosity in creating mouse models of
human cancers.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Specific chromosomal rearrangements
can be engineered in mice to model human chromosomal disorders, such as
those associated with deletions or duplications of chromosomal segments
(for example, Smith-Magenis syndrome, Downs syndrome, and
Charcot-Marie-Tooth type 1A) (5, 7, 10). Chromosomal
rearrangements also facilitate genetic studies (2, 14).
Inversion chromosomes can be used to establish balanced lethal systems
to facilitate stock maintenance. Deletions can be used for mapping and
in genetic screens for recessive mutations.
In Drosophila melanogaster there is a wealth of chromosomal
rearrangements that are widely used as genetic tools. In particular, chromosomal deletions (deficiencies) which collectively cover approximately 60 to 70% of the genome have been indispensable in
mapping recessive mutations and in region-specific mutagenesis screens.
The use of deletions in mice, however, has been much more limited
because of the paucity of chromosomal deletions which, until recently,
were restricted to a few regions of the mouse genome flanking visible
genetic markers (14). The application of the
Cre-loxP recombination system over large distances in mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells has made it possible to engineer specific chromosomal rearrangements in the mouse (13, 17). This
chromosome engineering strategy involves three manipulation steps in ES
cells (see Fig. 1): (i) one loxP site is targeted to one
endpoint along with the 5' half of an Hprt selectable marker
gene (5' hprt); (ii) another loxP site is
targeted to a second endpoint with the 3' half of the Hprt
gene (3' hprt); and (iii) transient expression of Cre
recombinase catalyzes loxP site-specific recombination, leading to the desired rearrangement. Reconstitution of a full-length Hprt gene provides selection for ES cells with the
recombination products in culture in HAT
(hypoxanthine-aminopterin-thymidine) medium. By using this technology,
deletions, duplications, inversions, or translocations can be generated
depending upon the relative position and orientation of the two
loxP sites and selection cassettes (13, 17).
The Cre-loxP chromosome engineering strategy provides a
unique and unprecedented opportunity to manipulate the mouse genome. However, several critical questions remain to be answered in order to
explore fully the potential of this technology. First, is there any
limit as to the kind and size of rearrangements that can be made with
this technology? While there are likely to be biological limits in
mice, ES cells harboring large chromosomal deletions offer an
opportunity to perform haploid genetic screens in vitro. For such
applications, the larger the deletion, the more powerful the screen.
Second, what is the efficiency of Cre-mediated recombination for
substrates of different genetic distances? This will be pertinent to
the scope and applicability of this technology. Third, can this
strategy be used to engineer chromosomes somatically, that is, in a
tissue- or cell-type-specific manner without the strong positive
selection schemes that are used in cell culture? Tissue-specific deletions also enable recessive genetics to be employed somatically, for instance, to induce loss of heterozygosity (LOH) to model genetic
changes in human cancers or to conduct screens for novel tumor
suppressor genes in combination with mutagenesis strategies. Somatically induced deletions may avoid the developmental problems associated with larger germline deletions and consequently a larger chromosomal region can be studied in a single animal.
To address these questions, we applied the Cre-loxP
chromosome engineering strategy to various parts of mouse chromosome 11 (Chr 11) in ES cells and in vivo. With an improved selection cassette, we obtained an 11% deletion efficiency for a two-centimorgan (2-cM; equivalent to 4 Mb) deletion substrate in murine ES cells.
Rearrangements of up to three-quarters of Chr 11 have been made,
demonstrating that there appears to be no recombination-based
restriction as to what type of rearrangements can be made provided that
ES cells tolerate the genetic change. We found that the efficiency of
Cre-mediated recombination between two loxP sites on the
same chromosome (cis) decreases with increasing genetic
distance. We found that large chromosomal deletions may be deleterious
to ES cells and that deletions which were lethal to developing embryos
could be engineered somatically at high efficiencies, breaking ground
for somatic chromosome engineering.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Construction of targeting vectors.
The Hsd17b1
targeted cell line has been described elsewhere (13). The
targeting vectors for Wnt3 (modified from a previous version
[8]) and p53 have also been described
elsewhere (24). All microsatellite markers were targeted
with insertion vectors. The targeting vectors for D11Mit199
and D11Mit69 were modified from previous versions
(8), replacing the mutant 3' hprt cassette with
the wild-type sequence.
The D11Mit142 and D11Mit71 loci were targeted
with insertion vectors generated from a targeting-ready genomic library
that contains the puromycin resistance gene, a loxP site, 3'
hprt cassette, and an agouti coat color transgene in the
vector backbone (23). Clones isolated from this library were
restriction mapped, and a gap was created in the region of homology
which was used as the probe to detect targeting by Southern analysis.
The targeting vectors for D11Mit142 have been described
(23). A clone with a 10.9-kb genomic insert at
D11Mit71 was isolated from the 3' hprt library
and mapped with several restriction enzymes. The insert consists of two
flanking (2.3 and 3.9 kb) and three internal (0.8, 3.3, and 0.6 kb)
NcoI fragments. The internal fragments were deleted from the
clone to create a gap in the region of homology, resulting in targeting
vector pTVD11Mit71F. The insert was then flipped by using
rare cutter AscI sites that flank the insert, resulting in
targeting vector pTVD11Mit71R which was used to deliver the
loxP site to the D11Mit71 locus with the reverse
orientation. The 3.3-kb internal NcoI fragment was used as
the probe in mini-Southern analysis to detect gap repair-dependent
targeting events (20, 23). This probe hybridizes to a 6-kb
and a (weak) 2.8-kb wild-type EcoRI fragment and, in
targeted clones, an additional 18.6-kb targeted fragment resulting from
the insertion of the vector sequence into the targeted locus.
Generation and analysis of chromosomal rearrangements.
ES
cell cultures, gene targeting, and germ line transmission were
performed as described previously (12). AB2.2 ES cells were
used in most experiments except in a few cases where a hybrid ES cell
line (between 129S7 and C57BL/6-Tyrc-Brd),
ER3.4, was used (E. Regel and A. Bradley, unpublished data). Electroporation of the Cre expression plasmid pOG231 (11),
selection of Cre recombination products with HAT medium, and drug
(neomycin and puromycin) resistance tests were performed as described
earlier (8, 13) with some modifications. ES cells (80%
confluent) were passaged 1 day before electroporation and fed with
medium 2 h before electroporation. The cells were then trypsinized
and resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and cell counting was performed with a Coulter Counter. The cells were again suspended in
PBS to make the final cell density of 1.1 × 107
cells/ml. In a typical transient Cre expression experiment, 25 µg of
pOG231 (prepared by CsCl centrifugation, unlinearized) was electroporated into 107 ES cells in 0.9 ml of PBS. The
electroporation was conducted with a Bio-Rad GenePulser and a Gene
Pulser cuvette with a 0.4-cm electrode gap at 230 V and 500 µF. Cells
(in PBS) were then mixed with M15 medium and plated on two to three
plates at different densities. For the cis 2-cM substrates,
electroporated cells were subject to serial dilution before plating to
enable counting of the HAT-resistant colonies. HAT selection was
initiated about 48 h after electroporation, maintained for 8 days
and released in hypoxanthine thymidine (HT) for 2 days before the
colonies were counted and picked. In all experiments a 104
dilution was also plated for each cell line under no selection to count
and calculate the number of colonies that survived electroporation. Assessed by this procedure, usually about one-third of the cells undergoing electroporation survived and formed colonies on feeder plates in M15 medium. To control between different experiments, a 2-cM
double-targeted cell line was included in each experiment as a control
for the Cre recombination efficiency, and this efficiency (~11%) has
been consistent throughout all of the experiments.
FISH.
Metaphase chromosome spreads from ES cells were
prepared as described previously (15). Fluorescence in situ
hybridization (FISH) was performed with phage or BAC probes according
to a standard protocol (3). The mPer1 phage
clone, BAC 330H2, was labeled with digoxigenin and detected by
anti-digoxigenin-rhodamine antibody. BAC 293C22 and BAC 330P14 were
labeled with biotin and detected with fluorescein
isothiocyanate-avidin. BAC 232M23 was labeled with a mixture of
digoxigenin and biotin. The chromosomes were stained with DAPI
(4',6'-diamidino-2-phenylindole). The images were taken as monotonic
pictures, and the composites were made with artificial coloration for clarity.
PCR and sequence analysis.
Primer Pa, 5'-AGG ATG
TGA TAC GTG GAA GA (Hprt intron, forward), and primer
Pb, 5'-GCC GTT ATT AGT GGA GAG GC (polymerase II promoter
in the neomycin resistance gene, reverse), were used to specifically
amplify by PCR a fragment containing exon 3 sequence in the 5'
hprt cassette. Primer Pa and primer
Pc, 5'-CCA GTT TCA CTA ATG ACA CA (Hprt exon 9, reverse), were used to specifically amplify exon 3 sequence in the 3'
hprt cassette. Primer Pd, 5'-GCA TTG TTT TGC CAG
TGT C (Hprt exon 6, reverse), was used to sequence exon 3 in
the PCR products.
The primers used to detect the cardiac specific 2-cM deletion were P1,
5'-CCT CAT GGA CTA ATT ATG GAC (
Hprt exon 2, forward),
and
P2, the same as P
c (
Hprt exon 9, reverse). The
primer pair
used to detect the

MyHC-Cre (Cre coding sequence under
the control
of

-myosin heavy chain promoter) transgene has been
described
elsewhere (
1).
 |
RESULTS |
High-efficiency Cre-loxP based chromosomal engineering
with an improved vector in mouse ES cells.
Sequence analysis
identified a frameshift mutation in the coding portion of the 3'
hprt selection cassette (Fig.
2)
previously successfully used for chromosome engineering
(13), leading to a translation stop codon nine codons
downstream of the mutation (Fig. 2A). This mutation should render a
reconstituted Hprt minigene nonfunctional, yet HAT-resistant
colonies were obtained with this cassette. These may have resulted from
a repair event during or following Cre recombination (see below). Since
the events we have scored to date required selection, the efficiency of
Cre-mediated loxP site-specific recombination on
multimegabase substrates may be greater than that scored by the number
of selected HAT-resistant clones. Because the recombination efficiency
is pertinent in applications of the Cre-loxP-based
chromosome engineering strategy, we reassessed this efficiency for a
2-cM interval between Hsd17b1 (E2DH)
and D11Mit199 on Chr 11 (8) by using cassettes
without the frameshift mutation. The D11Mit199 locus was
retargeted with the corrected 3' hprt cassette in an ES cell
line that had been targeted at the Hsd17b1 locus with the 5'
hprt cassette (13) so that the loxP
sites were in the same orientation (8). The double-targeted cell lines were electroporated with a Cre expression plasmid (pOG231) (11) or a control plasmid (TyBS) (22), and the
recombination efficiency was assessed (defined here as the number of
HAT-resistant colonies per cell surviving electroporation). No
HAT-resistant colony was obtained with the control plasmid. With the
Cre expression plasmid, approximately half of the double-targeted
clones yielded recombination efficiencies of approximately 11%, while
the rest had efficiencies of approximately 0.047% (Table
1). Cre recombination products from the
former group are puromycin sensitive (indicating that these cell lines
have a deletion), while those from the latter group are puromycin
resistant (indicating that these cell lines have a deletion and a
duplication). Therefore, the two different efficiencies reflect the
configuration of the targeted loxP sites on the Chr 11 homologues in the parental cell lines, which is resolved into a
deletion in cis and which is resolved into a deletion and a
duplication in trans (8, 13). The cis
events occurred several hundred times more efficiently than the
trans events. To rule out any effect of HAT selection on
Cre-mediated recombination, we transfected three cis
double-targeted cell lines with the Cre expression plasmid and randomly
picked colonies grown under no drug selection. We then determined the
percentage of the colonies that were recombined by both drug resistance
test and Southern analysis on individual clones. Of 279 colonies picked
for all three double-targeted cell lines, 24 had undergone the 2-cM
Cre-mediated deletion, yielding a Cre recombination efficiency of
~9%, which is not significantly different from that assessed by HAT
selection. As a control, the 2-cM substrate with the mutant 3'
hprt cassette gave Cre recombination efficiencies of 0.007%
for cis and 0.0001% for trans (8).
Thus, the Cre recombination efficiency is improved by approximately 3 orders of magnitude after correction of the frameshifted 3'
hprt selection cassette.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
The Cre-loxP based chromosome engineering
strategy. 5' hprt was previously named hprt 3';
3' hprt was previously name hprt 5'. A neomycin
(Neo) or a puromycin (Puro) resistance gene is
linked to the first or the second loxP site, respectively,
for positive selection during gene targeting. In this case, Cre
recombination between two loxP sites targeted in the same
orientation in cis (on the same chromosome) leads to a
deletion that is neomycin and puromycin sensitive due to the loss of
the Neo- and Puro-carrying reciprocal product, a
ring chromosome in G1 (shown) or a duplication sister
chromatid in G2 (not shown). If the two loxP
sites are on the two different chromosome homologues (in
trans), a deletion and a duplication will be produced. The
rearrangements can then be transmitted through the mouse germline if
viable.
|
|

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
A frameshift mutation in the original 3' hprt
cassette used in chromosome engineering. (A) Partial exon 3 sequence of
the wild-type (WT) and mutant 3' hprt cassette with
conceptual translation. The thymidine residue in the wild-type sequence
that is deleted in the mutant is in boldface and underlined. The
altered amino acid residues affected by the mutation is in italicized
boldface. *, Stop codon. (B) A proposed mechanism by which
HAT-resistant colonies were obtained by a combination of
Cre-loxP site-specific recombination and homologous
recombination, as shown for Cre recombination between two
loxP sites in trans in the same orientation that
leads to a deletion and a duplication. 1-2, 3-6, and 3-9 refer to
Hprt exons. Pa, Pb, Pc,
and Pd, primers for PCR and sequence analysis of exon 3 of
the Hprt gene. The portion of the coding sequence affected
by the mutation in exons 3-9 is shaded. The polyadenylation signal and
neomycin and puromycin resistance genes are not shown for simplicity.
|
|
Coupled Cre-loxP recombination and gene
conversion.
The Hprt cassette reconstructed by
Cre-loxP recombination from the mutant 3' hprt
selection cassette should be nonfunctional. However, HAT-resistant
colonies were readily obtained (8, 13). This raised the
question as to the nature of the event that leads to the HAT-resistant
colonies in these experiments. The frequency of spontaneous reversion
is too low to explain the observed frequency of HAT-resistant clones
from the mutant cassette. The frameshift mutation is located in a 2-kb
overlap between the 5' and the 3' hprt cassettes, and
therefore the mutation in the 3' cassette may be corrected by
homologous recombination with sequences in the 5' cassette. We
hypothesized that Cre brings the two loxP sites together to
promote site-specific recombination and that during or immediately
after this process the endogenous homologous recombination machinery
repairs the mutation (Fig. 2B). This notion would predict that all
recombination products would have the wild-type exon 3 sequence rather
than a correcting single nucleotide insertion resulting from a
spontaneous reversion. Sequence analysis demonstrated that all
HAT-resistant colonies had acquired a wild-type sequence in the
reconstituted full-length Hprt minigene (n = 10) (see Fig. 2B and Materials and Methods).
trans recombination events also generate an
Hprt+ deletion chromosome and the reciprocal
product, a duplication chromosome,
which retains the recombined
overlapping region between the 5'
and 3' cassettes (Fig.
2B). Sequence
analysis of PCR products
from exon 3 in the reciprocal product revealed
that this exon
3 remained wild type in all cases analyzed (
n = 17), indicating
that the repair results from a gene conversion
event (see Fig.
2B and Materials and
Methods).
Long-range chromosomal rearrangements can be made in ES cells.
Our chromosome engineering strategy has primarily focused on deletions,
duplications, and inversions of a few centimorgans (8, 13).
The ability to manipulate a larger region of the chromosome is
desirable in many instances. For example, large inversions, when marked
with a recessive lethal mutation, can be used as balancer chromosomes
(2). ES cells with a large deletion may be useful in screens
for recessive mutations in vitro. Since the apparent Cre recombination
efficiency was dramatically increased with the corrected 3'
hprt cassette, we tested whether long-range (defined here as
tens of megabases) deletions can be made in ES cells.
A deletion of 22 cM between
Hsd17b1 and
D11Mit69
on Chr 11 was used for this test. Previous attempts to generate this
deletion
in ES cells with the mutant 3'
hprt cassette had
failed (
8).
The
D11Mit69 locus was targeted with
the 3'
hprt cassette oriented
for a deletion in an ES cell
line that had been targeted at
Hsd17b1 (
8).
Fifteen double-
loxP-targeted cell lines were transiently
transfected with a Cre expression plasmid, and HAT-resistant colonies
were counted after 12 days. Drug resistance tests indicated that
four
parental cell lines were double targeted in
cis and eleven
were double targeted in
trans. The recombination events were
confirmed
to be Cre dependent because a mock transfection with a
control
plasmid (TyBS) yielded no HAT-resistant colonies for one
cis and
one
trans double-targeted parental cell
line. Unlike previous
cis-trans tests, however, Cre
recombination for both
cis and
trans configurations occurred at a similar efficiency of approximately
3 × 10
5 (Table
1 and see below). We further successfully
generated a
number of long-range rearrangements on Chr 11 (Fig.
3; Table
1).
The most dramatic example is
illustrated in Fig.
4D, where Cre
recombination between two
loxP sites targeted in
trans to
Hsd17b1 and
D11Mit71 that are
60 cM away from each other on Chr 11 leads
to a minideletion chromosome
and a large duplication chromosome.
Therefore, long-range chromosomal
rearrangements, including deletions
and deletion-duplications, can be
generated with the improved
selection cassette.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Genetic intervals of rearrangements made on mouse Chr 11 in this study. 2 cM, Hsd17b1-D11Mit199, deletion,
deletion-duplication; 22 cM, Hsd17b1-D11Mit69, deletion,
deletion-duplication; 24 cM, Wnt3-p53, inversion,
deletion-duplication; 30 cM, Hsd17b1-D11Mit142, inversion,
deletion-duplication; 60 cM, Hsd17b1-D11Mit71, inversion,
deletion-duplication. The total genetic distance from centromere (Cen)
to telomere (Tel) is about 80 cM.
|
|

View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
FISH analysis of long-range Cre recombination products
on Chr 11. (A) Del(11)5Brd-Dp(11)5Brd, a 22-cM deletion chromosome and
a 22-cM duplication chromosome produced by a trans event
between Hsd17b1 and D11Mit69. (B)
Del(11)5Brd-WT-WT, a 22-cM deletion chromosome produced by a
cis event between Hsd17b1 and
D11Mit69, while the remaining wild-type chromosome is
duplicated to survive. (C) The same as in panel B except that the
duplicated wild-type chromosomes are in a Robertsonian (or
iso-chromosome) configuration. (D) Del(11)7Brd-Dp(11)7Brd, a 60-cM
deletion chromosome and a 60-cM duplication chromosome produced by a
trans event between Hsd17b1 and
D11Mit71. Colors: yellow, BAC 232M23 (D11Mit320);
red, BAC 330H2 (D11Mit263); green, BAC 330P14
(D11Mit11). Two or more probes were differentially labeled
and artificially colored.
|
|
Large chromosomal deletions may cause ES cell lethality.
The
Cre-mediated deletion efficiency for the cis configuration
differs by more than 3 orders of magnitude between a 2-cM
(Hsd17b1-D11Mit199) and a 22-cM
(Hsd17b1-D11Mit69) substrate (Table 1). The reduced Cre
recombination efficiency for a larger substrate may simply reflect a
lower efficiency of Cre-loxP juxtaposition with greater physical separation. However, it is also possible that ES cells with
larger deletions may be selected against if the deletion has
deleterious effects on cell viability or growth. In this scenario, only
cells that have undergone a compensatory genetic change would survive.
To test this, the deletion cell lines were analyzed by FISH with probes
both internal and external to the deletion interval. Intriguingly, of
five recombination products derived from three independent
cis double-targeted parental cell lines, all were trisomy
11, with two wild-type and one deletion chromosome. The two wild-type
chromosomes were found to exist as two separate chromosomes (as in Fig.
4B, three of five analyzed) or as a Robertsonian fusion in other cases
(as in Fig. 4C, two of five analyzed, both of which derived from
independent double-targeted parental cell lines). In contrast, the
majority (three of four) of the trans recombination products
analyzed contain the expected single deletion and duplication
chromosomes. The remaining trans product contained a
duplication chromosome and two deletion chromosomes in the Robertsonian configuration. All double-targeted parental cell lines analyzed, irrespective of the cis or trans configuration,
contain two wild-type chromosomes (data not shown). These results
indicate that the deletion in cis, which leads to a single
copy of the 22-cM region of Chr 11, is haploinsufficient in ES cells.
Consequently, rare variants are selected in which the remaining
wild-type chromosome is duplicated. Thus, the hemizygous 22-cM deletion
causes ES cell lethality or a severe growth disadvantage.
Cre-loxP recombination efficiency decreases over
increasing genetic distances.
The Cre recombination efficiency is
an important consideration in designing Cre-loxP-based
chromosome engineering experiments. To provide a framework for future
experiments, we determined this efficiency for cis events at
different genetic distances. Since a 22-cM deletion had been observed
to cause cell death or a growth disadvantage, we assessed the
efficiency of inversions as the indicator of Cre recombination
efficiency for the larger intervals. Four rearrangements were included
in this analysis: (i) a 2-cM deletion between Hsd17b1 and
D11Mit199, Del(11)4Brd; (ii) a 24-cM inversion between
p53 and Wnt3, In(11)8Brd; (iii) a 30-cM inversion between Hsd17b1 and D11Mit142, In(11)6Brd; and
(iv) a 60-cM inversion between Hsd17b1 and
D11Mit71, In(11)7Brd (Fig. 3). When the two loxP
sites are in opposite orientations, approximately half of the
independent double-targeted cell lines give HAT-resistant colonies
(interpreted as loxP sites in cis), and the other
half do not give any colonies (interpreted loxP sites in
trans), presumably due to the formation of dicentric and
acentric chromosomes. FISH analysis confirmed that the relevant
inversions had occurred in representative clones from all three large
genetic intervals (data not shown). As shown in Fig.
5, between 2 and 60 cM, the logarithm of
the Cre recombination efficiency is inversely proportional to the
genetic distance between the loxP sites.

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Efficiency of Cre recombination over genetic distance.
The percentage of Cre recombination efficiency (y axis, in
log10 scale) is plotted against the genetic distance
(x axis, in linear scale). The first datum point represents
a deletion. The other three points with larger genetic distances
represent inversions. Error bars indicate the standard deviations. The
numbers of independent experiments were as indicated in Table 1.
|
|
Tissue-specific chromosome engineering.
Several deletions of a
few centimorgans around the Hsd17b1 locus on Chr 11 are
heterozygous lethal (8). Although this underscores the
developmental importance of this chromosomal region, lethal deletions
cannot be used for genetic screens. However, if the deletion can be
made somatically, for instance, in a tissue- or cell-type-specific
manner, the problem of heterozygous lethality can be partially
circumvented. To test this possibility, we generated a 2-cM
Hsd17b1-D11Mit199 double-targeted mouse line (deletion substrate) and crossed it to a cardiac-specific Cre (i.e.,
MyHC-Cre) (1). The
MyHC-Cre line had previously been used to make
cardiac-specific deletions of several kilobases with an efficiency of
up to 90% (1). Tissue DNA was isolated from two progeny
that inherited both the
MyHC-Cre transgene and the 2-cM substrate.
PCR analysis with primers specific to the reconstituted Hprt
minigene was performed to determine whether the Cre-mediated
recombination had occurred (Fig. 6A).
This analysis demonstrated that the Cre recombination occurred in
heart, but not in skeletal muscle, liver, lung, or spleen (Fig. 6A). To
provide a more quantitative measure of Cre recombination, Southern
analysis was performed on two animals by using restriction digestions
and a probe at Hsd17b1 that would distinguish the wild-type
allele, the (double) targeted allele and the Cre-recombined allele
(Fig. 6B). Deletion occurred exclusively in the heart but not in the
other organs tested (Fig. 6B). Based on the ratio of intensity of the
recombined fragment and the predeletion allele for both animals tested,
the deletion efficiency in the heart is about 10%.

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Cardiac-specific 2-cM deletion between
Hsd17b1 and D11Mit199. (A) PCR analysis of the
deletion products. P1 and P2, primers used to specifically amplify the
full-length Hprt. PCR reactions on MyHC-Cre serve as a
control. N, negative control; P, positive control; H, heart; M,
skeletal muscle; Li, liver; Lu, lung; S, spleen. (B) Southern analysis
of the deletion products. C, control cell line that contains a deletion
and a wild-type chromosome. The cardiac-specific deletion band is
indicated by an asterisk. N, NheI; S,
SfiI; solid triangle, loxP site.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The organism that the Cre-loxP system is derived from,
bacteriophage P1, evolved the system to resolve its ~100-kb genome into monomeric circular forms (18). The Cre-loxP
site-specific recombination system has been extensively used for
conditional genetic technology, namely, the temporal and spatial
control of gene expression in mice (16). In these
applications, the genetic material involved (as determined by the
distance between the two loxP sites) is usually a few
kilobases. We have previously shown that this system can be adapted for
substrates of several megabases by incorporating a positive selection
scheme (8, 13). In the present study, we redefined the Cre
recombination efficiency for a 4-Mb substrate, after we corrected a
mutation in the selection cassette. Surprisingly, the efficiency for
this substrate is approximately 11% by transient Cre expression. This
efficiency approaches that obtained with substrates of several
kilobases and indicates that at between several kilobases and several
megabases the Cre-loxP recombination occurs at comparable
efficiencies. This might reflect aspects of chromatin domain
organization such that sequences that are 1-kb to 1-Mb apart may have
similar separations in three-dimensional space. In this aspect, the
fact that the 2-cM cardiac-specific deletion can be detected by
Southern analysis is of particular significance. In many cancers,
interstitial deletions are the dominant mode for loss of the remaining
allele of a tumor suppressor gene (6). Therefore, in vivo
chromosomal deletions can be used to mimic somatic LOH in human cancers
and in searches for novel tumor suppressor genes in combination with
point mutagenesis.
The 22-cM deletion between Hsd17b1 and D11Mit69
on Chr 11 appears to cause ES cell lethality or a severe growth
disadvantage because deletion products for this interval exclusively
carry an additional wild-type Chr 11. This may be due to a dosage
effect of one or multiple genes in this interval such that a single
copy of these genes cannot support the normal growth of ES cells
(haploinsufficiency). The Cre-loxP-mediated deletion of this
22-cM region therefore selects for cells that have duplicated the
wild-type Chr 11. This result underscores the tight control of the
euploid ES cell genome. A region of haploinsufficiency has also been
proposed to reside on Chr 9 in studies on a radiation-induced deletion
complex (19). The observation of haploinsufficiency in ES
cells is in direct contrast with many cancer cells that often carry
large chromosomal deletions and chromosomal losses. Such a unique
feature of ES cells may be further studied by isolating suppressors of
this lethality caused by the deletions. On the other hand, these data indicate that duplications are tolerated better than deletions in ES
cells. This is consistent with the notion that monosomies rarely, if
ever, exist, whereas trisomy 8, 11, and 15 and several other
chromosomes have been observed in ES cells (9). The
relatively frequent occurrence of trisomy 11 is further suggested by
our observation that one of four 22-cM deletion-duplication products analyzed by FISH contain one duplication and two deletion chromosomes where the deletion chromosome is presumably not required to be duplicated for cell survival or growth. The lethality caused by large
deletions in ES cells precludes a straightforward approach of using the
deletion as a partial haploid reagent in mutagenesis screens.
It is possible that the partial-trisomy ES cells selected by the 22-cM
cis deletion are derived from an underlying trisomy 11 population in the ES cells transfected with Cre. Although these cells
are not detected by analysis of double-targeted clones, extrapolation
of the inversion recombination efficiencies suggests that either these
cells are present at 10
2 frequencies in the transfected
clones or that this nondisjunction event is induced by the
Cre-loxP recombination event itself.
Large-deletion-associated ES cell lethality can obscure the Cre
recombination efficiency. We therefore determined the Cre efficiency by
using large inversion substrates. This analysis indicates that Cre
recombination efficiency decreases over increasing genetic distances.
However, in all cases, the recombination products (HAT-resistant
colonies) are readily obtained in sufficient numbers in a single
experiment except when inviable products are generated (dicentric and
acentric chromosomes). For multimegabase substrates, the logarithm of
the Cre recombination efficiency is approximately inversely
proportional to the genetic distance (Fig. 5). This can be used as a
guide for future experiments with Cre-loxP-based chromosome
engineering. However, other factors, such as chromosomal locations and
differences in experimental manipulations, may affect the Cre
recombination efficiency. For deletions, the Cre recombination drops
more precipitously as the genetic distance increases for two reasons.
First, the physical barrier Cre has to overcome to bring the two
loxP sites together is greater as the distance between the
two loxP sites increases, as in inversions. Second, larger deletions may cause ES cell lethality or a growth disadvantage and are
consequently selected against after Cre recombination. In the
trans configuration where a deletion and a duplication chromosomes are the products, Cre recombination efficiency is moderately reduced with an increasing genetic distance (Table 1). This
suggests that chromosome homologues may pair in a mitotic cell cycle,
assisting Cre recombination by bringing the two loxP substrates on different chromosomes to the same subcellular location. Under such circumstances, the closer the two loxP sites are
genetically, the closer they are physically when the two chromosomes
pair, and therefore, the higher the Cre recombination efficiency.
Alternatively, if trans recombination occurs mainly in
G2 and recombined sister chromatids tend to segregate away
from each other, as reported in Drosophila (4),
the HAT-resistant deletion products will frequently contain a wild-type
chromosome instead of the duplication chromosome. In this scenario,
trans deletion-duplication events involving a larger
distance will appear to occur at a lower frequency due to the
production of haploinsufficient deletions.
The Cre recombination efficiency for large deletion-duplications is
probably comparable to that for translocations between nonhomologues.
In some of our experiments, we analyzed some random integration clones
when targeting the second loxP site. Upon Cre expression,
approximately half of these clones give HAT-resistant colonies and the
other half do not give viable HAT-resistant colonies. The former group
presumably yields translocations, while the latter group yields
dicentric and acentric products. The efficiency of generating these
translocations is about 10
5. It has been reported using a
similar strategy that Cre recombination efficiency for a translocation
between chromosomes 12 and 15 occurs at about 10
7
(17). The higher efficiency in our experiments may be due to the Cre plasmid, the tissue culture conditions, and/or the
electroporation procedures used. It remains possible that the 2-kb
homology between our 5' hprt and 3' hprt
cassettes assists the Cre-loxP recombination by recruiting
the homologous recombination machinery to help secure the
loxP site recombination synapse.
The mutant 3' hprt cassette used in previous chromosome
engineering experiments provides a unique opportunity for studying a
potential interaction between homologous and site-specific
recombination. Sequence analysis of Cre recombination products
indicates that the mutation is repaired by homologous recombination
with the wild-type template in the 5' hprt cassette. This
homologous recombination cannot occur in the absence of site-specific
recombination since the homology is only 2 kb, but the substrates are
on different chromosomes or far away (multimegabases) from each other
on the same chromosome. Therefore, it must have occurred during or
immediately after the Cre-loxP recombination. It is possible
that the Holliday junction structure created by Cre (21) can
be resolved by homologous recombination machinery. This scenario would
suggest that the two recombination events are not mutually exclusive
and can be coupled under specific circumstances. The other possibility
is that Cre-loxP recombination facilitates gene conversion
merely by bringing the two substrates together. Immediately after
site-specific recombination, homologous recombination occurs. Since
HAT-resistant colonies for a 2-cM substrate are obtained with an
efficiency of approximately 3 orders of magnitude higher with the
wild-type 3' selection cassette than with the mutant version,
homologous recombination responsible for repairing the mutation occurs
ca. 0.1% of the time after Cre recombination.
Taken together, the Cre-loxP chromosome engineering strategy
provides a powerful tool for genetic studies and for genome
manipulation. We explored the possibility and determined the efficiency
of generating various chromosomal rearrangements on mouse Chr 11. We
conclude that any desired rearrangement can be made with the
Cre-loxP system provided that the rearrangement does not
have any deleterious effect on the ES cells. Cre-loxP
recombination is very efficient for substrates of a few centimorgans
both in tissue culture and in vivo. This efficiency decreases over
increasing genetic distances between the two loxP sites. The
work presented here provides a framework for future applications of
chromosome engineering.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank Sandra Rivera, Sukeshi Vaishnav, and Yin-Chai Cheah for
technical assistance; Hong Su for an Hsd17b1 targeted cell line; Wei Wen Cai for the BAC clones used in FISH analysis; Michael Schneider for the
MyHC-Cre mouse line; Pentao Liu for helpful discussions; Patrick Biggs, Xiaozhong Wang, and Meredith Wentland for
helpful comments on the manuscript; and Sylvia Perez for secretarial assistance.
This work is partially supported by grants from the National Institutes
of Health, the National Cancer Institute, and DAMD17-98-1-8280. A.B. is
an investigator with the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Molecular and Human Genetics/HHMI, Baylor College of Medicine, One
Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030. Phone: (713) 798-6671. Fax: (713)
798-8142. E-mail: abradley{at}bcm.tmc.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Agah, R.,
P. A. Frenkel,
B. A. French,
L. H. Michael,
P. A. Overbeek, and M. D. Schneider.
1997.
Gene recombination in postmitotic cells. Targeted expression of Cre recombinase provokes cardiac-restricted, site-specific rearrangement in adult ventricular muscle in vivo.
J. Clin. Investig.
100:169-179[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Ashburner, M.
1989.
Drosophila: a laboratory handbook, vol. 1.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 3.
|
Baldini, A., and E. A. Lindsay.
1994.
Mapping human YAC clones by fluorescence in situ hybridization using Alu-PCR from single yeast colonies, p. 75-84.
In
K. H. A. Choo (ed.), In situ hybridization protocols, vol. 33. Humana Press, Totowa, N.J.
|
| 4.
|
Beumer, K. J.,
S. Pimpinelli, and K. G. Golic.
1998.
Induced chromosomal exchange directs the segregation of recombinant chromatids in mitosis of Drosophila.
Genetics
150:173-188[Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Chen, K. S.,
P. Manian,
T. Koeuth,
L. Potocki,
Q. Zhao,
A. C. Chinault,
C. C. Lee, and J. R. Lupski.
1997.
Homologous recombination of a flanking repeat gene cluster is a mechanism for a common contiguous gene deletion syndrome.
Nat. Genet.
17:154-163[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Croce, C. M.
1991.
Genetic approaches to the study of the molecular basis of human cancer.
Cancer Res.
51:5015s-5018s[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Korenberg, J. R.,
X. N. Chen,
R. Schipper,
Z. Sun,
R. Gonsky,
S. Gerwehr,
N. Carpenter,
C. Daumer,
P. Dignan,
C. Disteche, et al.
1994.
Down syndrome phenotypes: the consequences of chromosomal imbalance.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
91:4997-5001[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Liu, P.,
H. Zhang,
A. McLellan,
H. Vogel, and A. Bradley.
1998.
Embryonic lethality and tumorigenesis caused by segmental aneuploidy on mouse Chromosome 11.
Genetics
150:1155-1168[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Liu, X.,
H. Wu,
J. Loring,
S. Hormuzdi,
C. M. Disteche,
P. Bornstein, and R. Jaenisch.
1997.
Trisomy eight in ES cells is a common potential problem in gene targeting and interferes with germ line transmission.
Dev. Dyn.
209:85-91[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Lupski, J. R.
1998.
Genomic disorders: structural features of the genome can lead to DNA rearrangements and human disease traits.
Trends Genet.
14:417-422[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 11.
|
O'Gorman, S.,
N. A. Dagenais,
M. Qian, and Y. Marchuk.
1997.
Protamine-Cre recombinase transgenes efficiently recombine target sequences in the male germ line of mice, but not in embryonic stem cells.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:14602-14607[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Ramirez-Solis, R.,
A. C. Davis, and A. Bradley.
1993.
Gene targeting in embryonic stem cells.
Methods Enzymol.
225:855-878[Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Ramirez-Solis, R.,
P. Liu, and A. Bradley.
1995.
Chromosome engineering in mice.
Nature
378:720-724[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Rinchik, E. M., and L. B. Russell.
1990.
Germ-line deletion mutations in the mouse: tools for intensive functional and physical mapping of regions of the mammalian genome, p. 121-158.
In
K. E. Davies, and S. M. Tilghman (ed.), Genome analysis, vol. 1. Genetic and physical mapping. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 15.
|
Robertson, E. J.
1987.
Embryo-derived stem cell lines, p. 71-112.
In
E. J. Robertson (ed.), Teratocarcinomas and embryonic stem cells: a practical approach. IRL, Oxford, England.
|
| 16.
|
Sauer, B.
1998.
Inducible gene targeting in mice using the Cre/lox system.
Methods
14:381-392[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Smith, A. J.,
M. A. De Sousa,
B. Kwabi-Addo,
A. Heppell-Parton,
H. Impey, and P. Rabbitts.
1995.
A site-directed chromosomal translocation induced in embryonic stem cells by Cre-loxP recombination.
Nat. Genet.
9:376-385[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Sternberg, N. L.
1992.
Cloning high molecular weight DNA fragments by the bacteriophage P1 system.
Trends Genet.
8:11-16[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Thomas, J. W.,
C. LaMantia, and T. Magnuson.
1998.
X-ray-induced mutations in mouse embryonic stem cells.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
95:1114-1119[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Valancius, V., and O. Smithies.
1991.
Double-strand gap repair in a mammalian gene targeting reaction.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
11:4389-4397[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
Voziyanov, Y.,
S. Pathania, and M. Jayaram.
1999.
A general model for site-specific recombination by the integrase family recombinases.
Nucleic Acids Res.
27:930-941[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Yokoyama, T.,
D. W. Silversides,
K. G. Waymire,
B. S. Kwon,
T. Takeuchi, and P. A. Overbeek.
1990.
Conserved cysteine to serine mutation in tyrosinase is responsible for the classical albino mutation in laboratory mice.
Nucleic Acids Res.
18:7293-7298[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Zheng, B.,
A. A. Mills, and A. Bradley.
1999.
A system for rapid generation of coat color-tagged knockouts and defined chromosomal rearrangements in mice.
Nucleic Acids Res.
27:2354-60[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
Zheng, B.,
M. Sage,
W. W. Cai,
D. M. Thompson,
B. C. Tavsanli,
Y. C. Cheah, and A. Bradley.
1999.
Engineering a mouse balancer chromosome.
Nat. Genet.
22:375-378[CrossRef][Medline].
|
Molecular and Cellular Biology, January 2000, p. 648-655, Vol. 20, No. 2
0270-7306/0/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Lu, Y., Lin, C., Wang, X.
(2009). PiggyBac transgenic strategies in the developing chicken spinal cord. Nucleic Acids Res
0: gkp686v1-gkp686
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hu, L., Zhu, Y. T., Qi, C., Zhu, Y.-J.
(2009). Identification of Smyd4 as a Potential Tumor Suppressor Gene Involved in Breast Cancer Development. Cancer Res.
69: 4067-4072
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Duchon, A., Besson, V., Pereira, P. L., Magnol, L., Herault, Y.
(2008). Inducing Segmental Aneuploid Mosaicism in the Mouse Through Targeted Asymmetric Sister Chromatid Event of Recombination. Genetics
180: 51-59
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lange, U. C., Adams, D. J., Lee, C., Barton, S., Schneider, R., Bradley, A., Surani, M. A.
(2008). Normal Germ Line Establishment in Mice Carrying a Deletion of the Ifitm/Fragilis Gene Family Cluster. Mol. Cell. Biol.
28: 4688-4696
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Adams, D. J., van der Weyden, L.
(2008). Contemporary approaches for modifying the mouse genome. Physiol. Genomics
34: 225-238
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Khor, B., Bredemeyer, A. L., Huang, C.-Y., Turnbull, I. R., Evans, R., Maggi, L. B. Jr., White, J. M., Walker, L. M., Carnes, K., Hess, R. A., Sleckman, B. P.
(2006). Proteasome Activator PA200 Is Required for Normal Spermatogenesis. Mol. Cell. Biol.
26: 2999-3007
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Wobus, A. M., Boheler, K. R.
(2005). Embryonic Stem Cells: Prospects for Developmental Biology and Cell Therapy. Physiol. Rev.
85: 635-678
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Egli, D., Hafen, E., Schaffner, W.
(2004). An Efficient Method to Generate Chromosomal Rearrangements by Targeted DNA Double-Strand Breaks in Drosophila melanogaster. Genome Res
14: 1382-1393
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Chan, F., Bradley, A., Wensel, T. G., Wilson, J. H.
(2004). Knock-in human rhodopsin-GFP fusions as mouse models for human disease and targets for gene therapy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
101: 9109-9114
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Semenova, E., Wang, X., Jablonski, M. M., Levorse, J., Tilghman, S. M.
(2003). An engineered 800 kilobase deletion of Uchl3 and Lmo7 on mouse chromosome 14 causes defects in viability, postnatal growth and degeneration of muscle and retina. Hum Mol Genet
12: 1301-1312
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
van der Weyden, L., Adams, D. J., Bradley, A.
(2002). Tools for targeted manipulation of the mouse genome. Physiol. Genomics
11: 133-164
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Campo, N., Daveran-Mingot, M.-L., Leenhouts, K., Ritzenthaler, P., Le Bourgeois, P.
(2002). Cre-loxP Recombination System for Large Genome Rearrangements in Lactococcus lactis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
68: 2359-2367
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Fischer, S. E. J., Wienholds, E., Plasterk, R. H. A.
(2001). Regulated transposition of a fish transposon in the mouse germ line. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
10.1073/pnas.121569298v1
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
LePage, D. F., Church, D. M., Millie, E., Hassold, T. J., Conlon, R. A.
(2000). Rapid generation of nested chromosomal deletions on mouse chromosome 2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
97: 10471-10476
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Puech, A., Saint-Jore, B., Merscher, S., Russell, R. G., Cherif, D., Sirotkin, H., Xu, H., Factor, S., Kucherlapati, R., Skoultchi, A. I.
(2000). Normal cardiovascular development in mice deficient for 16 genes in 550 kb of the velocardiofacial/ DiGeorge syndrome region. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
97: 10090-10095
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Schimenti, J. C., Libby, B. J., Bergstrom, R. A., Wilson, L. A., Naf, D., Tarantino, L. M., Alavizadeh, A., Lengeling, A., Bucan, M.
(2000). Interdigitated Deletion Complexes on Mouse Chromosome 5 Induced by Irradiation of Embryonic Stem Cells. Genome Res
10: 1043-1050
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Fischer, S. E. J., Wienholds, E., Plasterk, R. H. A.
(2001). Regulated transposition of a fish transposon in the mouse germ line. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
98: 6759-6764
[Abstract]
[Full Text]