Molecular and Cellular Biology, October 2000, p. 7419-7426, Vol. 20, No. 20
Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research,
Cambridge, Massachusetts 021421;
Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of
Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 021392; and
California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California
911253
Received 5 May 2000/Accepted 19 June 2000
Achieving long-term retroviral expression in primary cells has been
problematic. De novo DNA methylation of infecting proviruses has been
proposed as a major cause of this transcriptional repression. Here we
report the development of a mouse stem cell virus (MSCV) long terminal
repeat-based retroviral vector that is expressed in both embryonic stem
(ES) cells and hematopoietic stem (HS) cells. Infected HS cells and
their differentiated descendants maintained long-term and stable
retroviral expression after serial adoptive transfers. In addition,
retrovirally infected ES cells showed detectable expression level of
the green fluorescent protein (GFP). Moreover, GFP expression of
integrated proviruses was maintained after in vitro differentiation of
infected ES cells. Long-term passage of infected ES cells resulted in
methylation-mediated silencing, while short-term expression was
methylation independent. Tissues of transgenic animals, which we
derived from ES cells carrying the MSCV-based provirus, did not express
GFP. However, treatment with the demethylating agent 5-azadeoxycytidine
reactivated the silent provirus, demonstrating that DNA methylation is
involved in the maintenance of retroviral repression. Our results
indicate that retroviral expression in ES cells is repressed by
methylation-dependent as well as methylation-independent mechanisms.
Retroviral vectors are appealing
vehicles for gene transfer. However, long-term expression mediated by
integrated proviruses in primary cells has been difficult to achieve.
Retroviral regulatory elements are repressed in numerous cell types,
including embryonic stem (ES) cells and hematopoietic stem (HS) cells
(1, 3). For example, vectors that are functional in mature
hematopoietic cells are often not expressed in blood cells of animals
transplanted with the infected stem cells (18, 19, 31). In
particular, the lack of significant provirus transcription in ES cells
and their differentiated descendants has hampered the use of retroviral vectors in transgenic experiments (5, 12, 32).
Interestingly, this block in provirus expression is maintained upon
differentiation of infected cells despite the fact that primary
infection of cells after differentiation results in efficient
expression (6, 7, 26).
Transcriptional repression is thought to be mediated by both
cis-acting de novo methylation of the integrated proviruses
and cell-type-specific trans-acting transcriptional
repressors (5, 9, 23). The effect of trans-acting
factors on retroviral expression through binding of specific sequences
within the promotors of retroviruses has been examined in many studies
(29, 30, 35). In fact, the mouse stem cell virus (MSCV) long
terminal repeat (LTR) was generated by the modification of the
sequences within the LTR to increase the affinity for positive factors
and decrease the affinity for negative regulators (20).
In contrast, the role of methylation in silencing has been less clear.
DNA methylation is thought to be a general mechanism used by cells to
silence foreign DNA and may be involved in the cell defense against
transposable elements (39). DNA methylation has also been
associated with the repression of gene expression and the silencing of
viral control elements (2, 14, 38). Exogenously introduced
retroviruses silenced in vitro and in vivo can be reactivated by
treatments that result in genomewide demethylation. In addition,
transcriptionally silent endogenous retroviral elements are reactivated
upon loss of genomic methylation in Dnmt1 knockout mice
(38). Therefore, DNA methylation is thought to causally repress expression of retroviral promoters in a variety of cell types.
ES cells provide a good model to study the role of DNA methylation in
retroviral silencing. First, it was demonstrated that ES cells have
high de novo methylation activity, which leads to effective methylation
of integrated retroviral vectors, while little or no de novo
methylation activity was detected in differentiated cells
(21). In addition, ES cells were genetically modified to
alter the endogenous level of DNA methylation by the targeted disruption of the maintenance methyltransferase gene Dnmt1.
ES cells homozygous for this mutation proliferate normally with their genomic DNA highly demethylated, while differentiated cells and mice
die due to the loss of genomic methylation (21, 22). Therefore, these modified ES cells are useful to study the effect of
DNA methylation on retroviral gene expression. In addition, ES cells
can be induced to differentiate in vitro or in vivo, allowing the study
of DNA methylation and its effect on long-term expression.
Both Moloney virus-based and MSCV-based retroviral vectors have been
used for gene transduction in a variety of cells. The MSCV vector is
different from the typical Moloney virus vector in that the mutations
in the LTR have allowed expression in a larger host range (8,
20). To this end, we modified MSCV to express the green
fluorescent protein (GFP) as a sensitive reporter for gene expression
(37). Using this vector, we demonstrated efficient
expression in both ES and HS cells. We also demonstrated that silencing
of retroviruses involves two mechanisms: (i) trans-acting factors that affect the initial expression of Moloney virus-based vectors but not MSCV-based vectors and (ii) long-term DNA
methylation-dependent silencing that directly restricts expression of
MSCV in ES cells and during embryogenesis. Silencing of the MSCV vector
in wild-type ES cells and in in vivo differentiated ES cells was
reversed by 5-azadeoxycytidine (5-azadC) treatments that demethylated
the retroviral sequences, demonstrating that DNA methylation directly controls the maintenance of retroviral repression.
Tissue culture.
ES cells were cultured as described
previously (21). To generate ES cell clones for injection
into blastocysts, the ES cells were maintained on irradiated mouse
embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) with 500 U of leukemia inhibitory factor
(LIF) per ml (22). For other experiments, the ES cells were
cultured without MEFs in 1,000 U of LIF per ml. 293 cells were
maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium supplemented with 10%
fetal bovine serum (FBS), penicillin, streptomycin, and glutamine.
Abelson virus-transformed B cells were maintained in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% defined FBS (HyClone), penicillin, streptomycin,
glutamine, and 50 µM Plasmids.
The retroviral vectors MfgGFP, pMXGFP, and
MSCViresGFP have been described elsewhere (27, 33, 37). The
MSCViresGFP vector was modified by introducing either the Cre
recombinase or the human Bcl-2 gene upstream of the internal ribosome
entry site (IRES)-GFP cassette as described elsewhere (11,
37). The replication-incompetent helper plasmid pCL-eco was used
(24).
Retroviral infections.
To generate retroviral supernatants,
293 cells were transiently transfected by calcium phosphate-mediated
coprecipitation with 5 µg of the replication-incompetent helper
vector pCL-eco and 10 µg of the reporter retroviral vector as stated
elsewhere (28). The cells were fed at 24 h
postinfection, and the retroviral supernatant was used at 48 h.
The cells continued to produce high-titer retroviruses for another 2 days, and that supernatant was used if needed for additional
experiments. The supernatant was collected, brought to 4 µg of
Polybrene per ml-10 mM HEPES, and filtered (0.45-µm-pore-size
filter) for use.
0270-7306/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Retroviral Expression in Embryonic Stem Cells
and Hematopoietic Stem Cells
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
-mercaptoethanol. ES cells with retroviral
integrants were in vitro differentiated as follows: the cells were
passaged without LIF in the absence of MEFs on bacterial plastic petri
dishes for 4 days, trypsinized, and cultivated with or without retinoic
acid for 2 weeks (25).
FACS (fluorescence-activated cell sorting) analysis and sorting. Adherent cell lines were trypsinized, washed, and resuspended in complete medium to achieve a single-cell suspension at the time points indicated. Nonadherent cells were used directly for analysis. Organs were disrupted manually and passed through a 70-µm mesh to generate a single-cell suspension. The cells were analyzed for viability using scatter properties and the exclusion of propidium iodide. The level of GFP expression was monitored by fluorescence without compensation to detect cells with low levels of GFP expression. The ES cells were sorted into ES cell medium and plated immediately onto either gelatinized plates or MEFs for blastocyst injections. The survival of ES cells after sorting was approximately 50%, as measured by the number of colonies generated divided by the expected number of colonies.
5-AzadC treatments. ES cells were treated with 0.15 µM 5-azadC (Sigma) at days 1 and 3 postplating. The cells were fed, allowed to recover, and then assayed 4 to 8 days later. The red blood cells in whole blood were lysed (5), and the remaining cells were stained with fluorescently labeled anti-H2-b, anti-H2-d, anti-B220, anti-TCRa (Pharmingen) at 1:200 as indicated. At day 0, splenocytes were treated with either anti-CD3 or anti-CD40 (Pharmingen); 0.15 µM 5-azadC was added at day 1, and the anti-CD3-treated cells were assayed at day 4. 5-AzadC was added again to the B-cell cultures with fresh anti-CD40 at day 4, and the cells were assayed at day 6.
Staurosporine-mediated cell death. ES cells were infected with the stated retrovirus and treated with staurosporine at day 4 postinfection for 24 h with the indicated concentration of drug. The percentage of viable, GFP-positive cells was determined by flow cytometry (6). Data are presented as a percentage of GFP-positive cells before treatment. Results from one representative experiment of three performed are shown.
LacZ staining. ES cells were infected with the stated retrovirus and sorted for GFP expression at day 3 postinfection. The ES cells were plated and cultured for an additional 5 days and stained for LacZ expression as described elsewhere (41).
Adoptive transfers. Recipient mice (10) received a total of 1,200 rads of whole-body radiation in two doses (800 and 400 rads) 3 h apart and were then injected with 2 × 106 to 5 × 106 infected bone marrow cells. Irradiated mice were maintained on trimethaprim-sulfamethoxazole in sterile cages for 4 to 6 weeks to prevent opportunistic infections (34). Serial passages were performed by harvesting bone marrow from mice 6 to 8 weeks postreconstitution and transferring 2 × 106 to 5 × 106 cells into irradiated recipients. Mice were analyzed 8 to 12 weeks posttransfer to allow reconstitution of the T-cell compartment. These experiments were repeated multiple times with similar results.
Southern blot analysis. The genomic DNA was isolated as described elsewhere (19). Ten micrograms of DNA was digested with the stated restriction enzyme overnight. The products were resolved on an agarose gel, transferred to a nylon membrane, and detected using a probe that spans the entire GFP coding sequence.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
High-efficiency retroviral expression in ES cells.
Retroviral
vectors based on the MSCV LTR were constructed with a multiple cloning
site followed by an IRES driving expression of the gene for GFP as
schematically diagrammed in Fig. 1A (MiG) (37). We generated high-titer retroviruses by transient
transfection and infected ES cells with an adapted spin infection
protocol. Using this protocol, we reproducibly achieved high-efficiency (>50%) infection of ES cells as measured by flow cytometry;
uninfected control cells were negative for GFP expression (Fig. 1B).
The intracellular concentration of GFP is directly proportional to the
fluorescence intensity measured by flow cytometry.
|
|
Short-term transcriptional silencing in ES cells is methylation
independent.
It long has been hypothesized that retroviruses are
transcriptionally silenced in embryonic cells by DNA methylation
(12, 14, 21). Therefore, it was possible that DNA
methylation of the MSCV LTR was responsible for the decreased level of
expression in ES cells compared to other cell types (Fig. 1B). In
addition, we sought to test whether DNA methylation of the Moloney
virus-based vectors in the wild-type ES cells was the mechanism by
which the Moloney virus-based LTRs were silenced (9, 13). To
this end, we infected ES cells deficient for the maintenance DNA
methyltransferase gene, Dnmt1, the loss of which results in
genomewide hypomethylation (21, 22).
Dnmt1
/
ES cells are demethylated, and
proviral sequences remain unmethylated. The Moloney virus-based
retroviruses such as pMX remained silent even when introduced into
Dnmt1
/
ES cells, whereas MSCV expressed
similar levels of GFP in both Dnmt1+/+ and
Dnmt1
/
ES cells (Fig.
3A). Therefore, the initial block in
transcription directed by Moloney virus LTRs in ES cells is independent
of DNA methylation and is presumably due to the binding of
trans-acting factors. In addition, the mean fluorescence
intensities of GFP were comparable between the
Dnmt1+/+ and Dnmt1
/
ES cells, indicating that the basal level of expression of the MSCV LTR
is independent of DNA methylation.
|
DNA methylation constrains long-term retroviral
expression.
MiG-infected GFP-expressing ES cells were continually
passaged to test the effect of DNA methylation on long-term expression. Though GFP expression was high in both
Dnmt1
/
and
Dnmt1+/+ ES cells at 5 days postinfection, a
substantial fraction of the infected wild-type ES were GFP negative at
26 days postinfection. This was apparent by both a loss in the
percentage of GFP-positive cells as well as a decrease in the mean
fluorescence intensity of the bulk population of wild-type ES cells and
was observed in both bulk cultures and individual cloned lines
containing single integrants (Fig. 3B and data not shown). The fraction
of GFP-positive cells continues to decrease with additional passages,
as shown in Fig. 3C. These results suggest that long-term expression
was suppressed by DNA methylation. To directly test whether retroviral repression was due to de novo methylation of the newly integrated retroviruses, we treated the long-term cultures with 5-azadC, a drug
that leads to hypomethylation of genomic DNA (16). If DNA
methylation was preventing expression of the MSCV LTR, treatment with
the drug should activate retroviral expression. Indeed, we found that
5-azadC treatment of ES cells that had lost expression of GFP through
long-term passage reactivated the provirus (Fig. 3C). In contrast,
Dnmt1
/
ES cells infected with the retrovirus
did not lose expression of GFP; thus, treatment with 5-azadC did not
significantly affect retroviral expression (Fig. 3C). We also analyzed
clonal lines containing single proviral integrants in which GFP
expression was progressively silenced and found that treatment with
5-azadC resulted in the reactivation of gene expression in all cases
(data not shown). This demonstrates that DNA methylation controls
long-term but not short-term expression of retroviruses in ES cells.
Expression is maintained after in vitro differentiation. Previously, in vitro differentiation of ES cells had been demonstrated to silence expression of retroviral sequences (12, 20). Thus, we tested whether GFP expression from the MiG retrovirus in ES cells was affected by in vitro differentiation. We cultured MiG-infected wild-type ES cells in the absence of embryonic feeder cells and LIF in suspension to generate embryoid bodies. Disaggregated embryoid bodies were replated either with or without retinoic acid. We found no change in GFP expression in MiG-infected bulk cultures or individual subclones containing one to several integrants upon in vitro differentiation with either method, as shown for one clonal line containing multiple integrants in Fig. 3D. GFP expression was unchanged in all in vitro-differentiated ES cell lines, regardless of whether the subclones contained only a single or multiple integrants. This indicates that the MSCV-based MiG retrovirus is not silenced by in vitro differentiation.
Generation of mice from GFP-expressing MiG-infected ES cells.
We next determined whether expression of the MSCV-based MiG vector was
affected by in vivo differentiation of the infected ES cells. Cells
from the chimeric animals were derived by injection of MiG-infected
wild-type ES cells (derived from 129-Sv/Jae mice) into BALB/c
blastocysts. MiG-infected Dnmt1
/
ES cells
cannot be used for injection into blastocysts, because Dnmt1
/
ES cells die upon differention and
therefore do not contribute significantly to adult mice
(22). MiG-infected wild-type ES cells were sorted for GFP
expression by flow cytometry prior to injection, and two GFP-expressing
clones, R2 and R11, were isolated (Fig.
4B). Southern blot analysis demonstrated
that R2 contained two integrants that comigrate on an agarose gel, and
R11 contained three proviral integrants (Fig. 4A). High-contribution
chimeras (>80% by coat color) were generated from the R2 and R11 ES
cells, which transmitted the proviruses to their offspring (data not shown).
|
In vitro reactivation of retroviral expression.
One possible
explanation for transcriptional repression during in vivo
differentiation was de novo methylation of the integrated retroviral
LTR during embryonic development. To test this hypothesis, we cultured
splenocytes from a mouse containing the R2 proviruses and from a
littermate control, by treating the cells with either anti-CD3 or
anti-CD40 to activate and induce proliferation of the T cells or B
cells, respectively (4). We then assayed for GFP expression
by flow cytometry and found that proliferation of the splenocytes did
not activate expression of the retrovirus (data not shown). Next, we
added 5-azadC to the splenocyte cultures to induce demethylation of the
retroviruses. Indeed, treatment with 5-azadC activated expression in
approximately 2% of the T cells (anti-CD3) (Fig.
5B) and 2% of the B cells (anti-CD40)
(data not shown). In addition, when in vivo-differentiated cells, which had been isolated from the kidney of a transgenic mouse and transformed with simian virus 40 large T antigen (15), were treated with 5-azadC, activation of the silent provirus was observed in a similar fraction of the cells (data not shown). The extent of reactivation of
expression of the provirus in in vivo-differentiated cells by 5-azadC
was lower than in ES cells, where the reactivation of the provirus with
5-azadC was almost complete.
|
Retroviral expression in HS cells after serial adoptive
transfers.
Bone marrow contains the HS cells that can stably
repopulate the hematopoietic system after transfer to lethally
irradiated mice. To determine whether HS cells can be effectively
transduced and express the MiG retrovirus, we used infected bone marrow
cells to reconstitute lethally irradiated mice (Fig.
6). We found that between 30 and 80% of
the splenocytes from these primary recipients expressed the retrovirus,
as measured by FACS analysis for GFP expression and shown for one
representative experiment (Fig. 6A). The MiG virus was expressed in the
B-cell, T-cell, and granulocyte compartments, as measured by a pan-B
cell (B220), pan-T-cell (Thy-1), and pan-granulocyte (Gr-1) marker
electronically gated on GFP-positive cells (Fig. 6B and data not
shown). Because a large fraction of the splenocytes in the primary
recipients are derived from relatively differentiated,
lineage-committed progenitors, serial adoptive transfers are required
to test for retroviral expression in the true HS cells (17).
Therefore, we used bone marrow from these primary recipients to
serially reconstitute lethally irradiated mice. This protocol requires
substantial expansion from the stem cells and tests for long-term
expression of the retrovirus. We observed no change in the percentage
GFP-positive HS cells, and the level of GFP expression from the
adoptive transfers into multiple recipients was stable over three
additional passages (4° recipient). In addition, the infected cells
gave rise to both B- and T-cell lineages at the expected ratios
(Fig. 6B), demonstrating not only that the MiG retrovirus transduced
the long-term repopulating HS cells but also that the MiG-mediated GFP
expression was stable during in vivo hematopoietic differentiation.
However, our results do not exclude the possibility that in addition to
the transcriptionally active proviruses present within these cells,
there are also copies of the virus that were transcriptionally
silenced.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We have investigated the role of DNA methylation in
retroviral silencing. Retrovirus-based studies of stem cells have been hampered by the lack of expression. We have overcome the
transcriptional repression in ES cells by using an MSCV-based vector in
combination with a sensitive GFP reporter gene (MiG vector). The
analysis of expression of the MiG vector and other Moloney virus-based vectors in Dnmt1
/
and
Dnmt1+/+ ES cells has allowed us to determine
whether DNA methylation directly controls retroviral gene expression in
these cells. We found that both methylation-dependent and
methylation-independent mechanisms exist to control retroviral gene expression.
Historically, retroviral expression of Moloney virus-based vectors in ES cells has been negligible. In contrast, the MSCV LTR not only transduces GFP expression in ES cells but also expresses other exogenous gene products such as the Cre recombinase and the antiapoptotic factor Bcl-2 at detectable level in ES cells. Therefore, the MSCV LTR can be used to express various transgenes in ES cells and their differentiated descendant cells.
It had been proposed that DNA methylation has evolved as a cellular mechanism to silence retroviral elements, preventing the spread of transposable elements through the genome (39). Indeed, de novo methylation of integrated proviral sequences has been observed in wild-type ES cells, which was correlated with the transcriptional silencing of the retrovirus (14). Our findings are the first demonstration that inhibition of the Dnmt1 methyltransferase gene prevents silencing of the retroviruses in ES cells. This result provides direct evidence that DNA methylation is causally involved in long-term retroviral repression. Consistent with this conclusion is the demonstration that the transcriptionally silenced proviruses present in long-term Dnmt1+/+ ES cell cultures can be reversed by treatments with 5-azadC.
In contrast, methylation-independent mechanisms determine initial
retroviral expression in ES cells. Wild-type or
Dnmt1
/
ES cells infected with Moloney
virus-based vectors were transcriptionally silent, and therefore this
silencing was independent of the DNA methylation status of the cells.
Moreover, the basal level of expression from the MSCV-based vector was
unaffected by the methylation status of the cells. This formally
demonstrates that DNA methylation-independent mechanisms control
initial retroviral gene expression in ES cells. Because the basal level
of expression of the MSCV LTR in ES cells is lower than in
differentiated cell types and not affected by the methylation status of
the ES cells, trans-acting factors must regulate the initial
level of expression.
Previous studies found that retroviruses, including the MSCV LTR, are silenced by the in vitro differentiation process (20). In contrast, we found for the first time that expression of this MSCV-based retrovirus in ES cells was maintained after in vitro differentiation with and without retinoic acid. We were also able to show long-term, stable GFP expression from the MiG vector in HS cells and their differentiated derivatives. MiG-mediated GFP expression from HS cells was stable through serial adoptive transfers, and the HS cells gave rise to GFP-expressing B- and T-cell lineages. Therefore, this MSCV-based retroviral transduction system should allow for a molecular analysis of stem cell biology and differentiation programs by forced expression of exogenous gene products.
It has been postulated that methylation-dependent mechanisms repress retroviral gene expression upon in vivo differentiation (13, 20). To test this, we injected GFP-expressing undifferentiated ES cells into recipient blastocysts and generated chimeric mice. Differentiated tissues derived from these in vivo-differentiated ES cells, such as PBMCs, lacked significant GFP expression. Treatment of ES cell-derived differentiated cells with 5-azadC in vitro or in vivo led to partial reactivation of expression of the silenced retroviruses in lymphoid and nonlymphoid tissues. We conclude from these results that the maintenance of retroviral silencing in vivo involves DNA methylation. However, only a small fraction of the 5-azadC-treated cells reactivated GFP expression, unlike the long-term ES cell cultures, in which every cell reactivated GFP expression. This suggests that methylation-independent mechanisms exist to suppress retroviral expression. Alternatively, 5-azadC treatment of differentiated cells, in contrast to ES cells, may not lead to a level of genomic demethylation sufficient for complete retroviral reactivation. The transgenic animals carrying the silenced MiG proviruses will be a valuable indicator for in vivo activation of GFP expression under different conditions.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
The first two authors, S. R. Cherry and D. Biniszkiewicz, contributed equally to this work.
We thank members of the Baltimore and Jaenisch labs for advice and discussions. We are grateful to Brian Bates for discussions and comments on the manuscript, George Daly for discussions, Jessie Dausman for blastocyst injections, Ruth Curry for mouse work, and Glen Paradis for FACS sorting.
D. Biniszkiewicz was supported by the Deutsche Akademische Austauschdienst. D. Baltimore and R. Jaenisch (NIH/NCI 5-R35-CA44339) are supported by NIH grants. This work was supported in part by the ERC program of the National Science Foundation under award EEC-9843342.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, 9 Cambridge Center, Cambridge, MA 02142. Phone: (617) 258-5186. Fax: (617) 258-6505. E-mail: jaenisch{at}wi.mit.edu.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Asche, W.,
G. Colletta,
G. Warnecke,
P. Nobis,
S. Pennie,
R. M. King, and W. Ostertag.
1984.
Lack of retrovirus gene expression in somatic cell hybrids of Friend cells and teratocarcinoma cells with a teratocarcinoma phenotype.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
4:923-930 |
| 2. | Cedar, H. 1988. DNA methylation and gene activity. Cell 53:3-4[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 3. |
Challita, P. M., and D. B. Kohn.
1994.
Lack of expression from a retroviral vector after transduction of murine hematopoietic stem cells is associated with methylation in vivo.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
91:2567-2571 |
| 4. | Coligan, J. E., et al. (ed.). Current protocols in immunology. J. Wiley & Sons, New York, N.Y. |
| 5. | Gautsch, J. W. 1980. Embryonal carcinoma stem cells lack a function required for virus replication. Nature 285:110-112[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 6. | Gautsch, J. W., and M. C. Wilson. 1983. Delayed de novo methylation in teratocarcinoma suggests additional tissue-specific mechanisms for controlling gene expression. Nature 301:32-37[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 7. |
Greiser-Wilke, I.,
W. Ostertag,
P. Goldfarb,
A. Lang,
M. Furusawa, and J. F. Conscience.
1981.
Inducibility of spleen focus-forming virus by BrdUrd is controlled by the differentiated state of the cell.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
78:2995-2999 |
| 8. |
Grez, M.,
E. Akgun,
F. Hilberg, and W. Ostertag.
1990.
Embryonic stem cell virus, a recombinant murine retrovirus with expression in embryonic stem cells.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
87:9202-9206 |
| 9. |
Hoeben, R. C.,
A. A. Migchielsen,
R. C. van der Jagt,
H. van Ormondt, and A. J. van der Eb.
1991.
Inactivation of the Moloney murine leukemia virus long terminal repeat in murine fibroblast cell lines is associated with methylation and dependent on its chromosomal position.
J. Virol.
65:904-912 |
| 10. | Huang, D. C., S. Cory, and A. Strasser. 1997. Bcl-2, Bcl-XL and adenovirus protein E1B19kD are functionally equivalent in their ability to inhibit cell death. Oncogene 14:405-414[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 11. | Jacob, J., and D. Baltimore. 1999. Modelling T-cell memory by genetic marking of memory T cells in vivo. Nature 399:593-597[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 12. |
Jaenisch, R.,
H. Fan, and B. Croker.
1975.
Infection of preimplantation mouse embryos and of newborn mice with leukemia virus: tissue distribution of viral DNA and RNA and leukemogenesis in the adult animal.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
72:4008-4012 |
| 13. |
Jaenisch, R.,
A. Schnieke, and K. Harbers.
1985.
Treatment of mice with 5-azacytidine efficiently activates silent retroviral genomes in different tissues.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
82:1451-1455 |
| 14. | Jahner, D., and R. Jaenisch. 1985. Retrovirus-induced de novo methylation of flanking host sequences correlates with gene inactivity. Nature 315:594-597[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 15. |
Jat, P. S.,
C. L. Cepko,
R. C. Mulligan, and P. A. Sharp.
1986.
Recombinant retroviruses encoding simian virus 40 large T antigen and polyomavirus large and middle T antigens.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
6:1204-1217 |
| 16. | Jones, P. A. 1985. Altering gene expression with 5-azacytidine. Cell 40:485-486[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 17. | Jones, R. J., J. E. Wagner, P. Celano, M. S. Zicha, and S. J. Sharkis. 1990. Separation of pluripotent haematopoietic stem cells from spleen colony-forming cells. Nature 347:188-189[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 18. | Kohn, D. B. 1995. The current status of gene therapy using hematopoietic stem cells. Curr. Opin. Pediatr. 7:56-63[Medline]. |
| 19. | Krall, W., and D. B. Kohn. 1996. Expression levels by retroviral vectors based upon the N2 and the MFG backbones. Gene Ther. 3:365[Medline]. |
| 20. |
Laker, C.,
J. Meyer,
A. Schopen,
J. Friel,
C. Heberlein,
W. Ostertag, and C. Stocking.
1998.
Host cis-mediated extinction of a retrovirus permissive for expression in embryonal stem cells during differentiation.
J. Virol.
72:339-348 |
| 21. | Lei, H., S. P. Oh, M. Okano, R. Juttermann, K. A. Goss, R. Jaenisch, and E. Li. 1996. De novo DNA cytosine methyltransferase activities in mouse embryonic stem cells. Development 122:3195-3205[Abstract]. |
| 22. | Li, E., T. H. Bestor, and R. Jaenisch. 1992. Targeted mutation of the DNA methyltransferase gene results in embryonic lethality. Cell 69:915-926[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 23. |
Loh, T. P.,
L. L. Sievert, and R. W. Scott.
1990.
Evidence for a stem cell-specific repressor of Moloney murine leukemia virus expression in embryonal carcinoma cells.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
10:4045-4057 |
| 24. |
Naviaux, R. K.,
E. Costanzi,
M. Haas, and I. M. Verma.
1996.
The pCL vector system: rapid production of helper-free, high-titer, recombinant retroviruses.
J. Virol.
70:5701-5705 |
| 25. |
Nichols, J.,
E. P. Evans, and A. G. Smith.
1990.
Establishment of germ-line-competent embryonic stem (ES) cells using differentiation inhibiting activity.
Development
110:1341-1348 |
| 26. | Niwa, O., Y. Yokota, H. Ishida, and T. Sugahara. 1983. Independent mechanisms involved in suppression of the Moloney leukemia virus genome during differentiation of murine teratocarcinoma cells. Cell 32:1105-1113[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 27. | Onishi, M., S. Kinoshita, Y. Morikawa, A. Shibuya, J. Phillips, L. L. Lanier, D. M. Gorman, G. P. Nolan, A. Miyajima, and T. Kitamura. 1996. Applications of retrovirus-mediated expression cloning. Exp. Hematol. 24:324-329[Medline]. |
| 28. |
Pear, W. S.,
G. P. Nolan,
M. L. Scott, and D. Baltimore.
1993.
Production of high-titer helper-free retroviruses by transient transfection.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
90:8392-8396 |
| 29. |
Petersen, R.,
G. Kempler, and E. Barklis.
1991.
A stem cell-specific silencer in the primer-binding site of a retrovirus.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
11:1214-1221 |
| 30. |
Prince, V. E., and P. W. Rigby.
1991.
Derivatives of Moloney murine sarcoma virus capable of being transcribed in embryonal carcinoma stem cells have gained a functional Sp1 binding site.
J. Virol.
65:1803-1811 |
| 31. |
Robbins, P. B.,
D. C. Skelton,
X. J. Yu,
S. Halene,
E. H. Leonard, and D. B. Kohn.
1998.
Consistent, persistent expression from modified retroviral vectors in murine hematopoietic stem cells.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
95:10182-10187 |
| 32. | Robertson, E., A. Bradley, M. Kuehn, and M. Evans. 1986. Germ-line transmission of genes introduced into cultured pluripotential cells by retroviral vector. Nature 323:445-448[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 33. |
Silver, D. P.,
E. Spanopoulou,
R. C. Mulligan, and D. Baltimore.
1993.
Dispensable sequence motifs in the RAG-1 and RAG-2 genes for plasmid V(D)J recombination.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
90:6100-6104 |
| 34. | Soriano, P. 1999. Generalized lacZ expression with the ROSA26 Cre reporter strain. Nat. Genet. 21:70-71[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 35. |
Tsukiyama, T.,
H. Ueda,
S. Hirose, and O. Niwa.
1992.
Embryonal long terminal repeat-binding protein is a murine homolog of FTZ-F1, a member of the steroid receptor superfamily.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
12:1286-1291 |
| 36. | Van Parijs, L., Y. Refaeli, A. K. Abbas, and D. Baltimore. 1999. Autoimmunity as a consequence of retrovirus-mediated expression of C-FLIP in lymphocytes. Immunity 11:763-770[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 37. | Van Parijs, L., Y. Refaeli, J. D. Lord, B. H. Nelson, A. K. Abbas, and D. Baltimore. 1999. Uncoupling IL-2 signals that regulate T cell proliferation, survival, and Fas-mediated activation-induced cell death. Immunity 11:281-288[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 38. | Walsh, C. P., J. R. Chaillet, and T. H. Bestor. 1998. Transcription of IAP endogenous retroviruses is constrained by cytosine methylation. Nat. Genet. 20:116-117[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 39. | Yoder, J. A., C. P. Walsh, and T. H. Bestor. 1997. Cytosine methylation and the ecology of intragenomic parasites. Trends Genet. 13:335-340[CrossRef][Medline]. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»