Previous Article | Next Article 
Molecular and Cellular Biology, October 2000, p. 7613-7623, Vol. 20, No. 20
0270-7306/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Nonperiodic Activity of the Human
Anaphase-Promoting Complex-Cdh1 Ubiquitin Ligase Results in
Continuous DNA Synthesis Uncoupled from Mitosis
Claus Storgaard
Sørensen,1
Claudia
Lukas,1
Edgar R.
Kramer,2
Jan-Michael
Peters,2
Jiri
Bartek,1 and
Jiri
Lukas1,*
Danish Cancer Society, Institute of Cancer
Biology, DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark,1
and Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, A-1030
Vienna, Austria2
Received 5 April 2000/Returned for modification 8 May 2000/Accepted 21 July 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
Ubiquitin-proteasome-mediated destruction of rate-limiting proteins
is required for timely progression through the main cell cycle
transitions. The anaphase-promoting complex (APC), periodically activated by the Cdh1 subunit, represents one of the major cellular ubiquitin ligases which, in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and
Drosophila spp., triggers exit from mitosis and during
G1 prevents unscheduled DNA replication. In this study we
investigated the importance of periodic oscillation of the APC-Cdh1
activity for the cell cycle progression in human cells. We show that
conditional interference with the APC-Cdh1 dissociation at the
G1/S transition resulted in an inability to accumulate a
surprisingly broad range of critical mitotic regulators including
cyclin B1, cyclin A, Plk1, Pds1, mitosin (CENP-F), Aim1, and Cdc20.
Unexpectedly, although constitutively assembled APC-Cdh1 also delayed
G1/S transition and lowered the rate of DNA synthesis
during S phase, some of the activities essential for DNA replication
became markedly amplified, mainly due to a progressive increase of
E2F-dependent cyclin E transcription and a rapid turnover of the
p27Kip1 cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor. Consequently,
failure to inactivate APC-Cdh1 beyond the G1/S transition
not only inhibited productive cell division but also supported slow but
uninterrupted DNA replication, precluding S-phase exit and causing
massive overreplication of the genome. Our data suggest that timely
oscillation of the APC-Cdh1 ubiquitin ligase activity represents an
essential step in coordinating DNA replication with cell division and
that failure of mechanisms regulating association of APC with the Cdh1
activating subunit can undermine genomic stability in mammalian cells.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
To support error-free development
and ensure tissue homeostasis of multicellular organisms, eukaryotic
cells evolved multiple layers of tightly controlled molecular pathways
that coordinate the progression through distinct phases of the cell
cycle. These mechanisms ultimately converge on regulating the activity
of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs), which by phosphorylating their
critical substrates catalyze progression through the main cell cycle
transitions (40, 44, 50). Besides the active role of CDKs,
timely and rapid inactivation of those CDKs that fulfilled their
functions appears to be equally important in promoting cell cycle
progression (21). The ubiquitin-proteasome-mediated
destruction of the cyclin subunits represents a key mechanism
supporting the timing of CDK inhibition (14, 22). Covalent
attachment of polyubiquitin chains priming the mitotic cyclins for
degradation by the proteasome is catalyzed by the anaphase-promoting
complex (APC) ubiquitin ligase, a large multiprotein particle composed
of at least 10 subunits (41, 48, 69). As such, APC possesses
little ubiquitin ligase activity unless it is activated by a direct
interaction with either of the two additional subunits, Cdc20 (fizzy in
Drosophila melanogaster) or Cdh1 (fizzy-related) (10,
24, 57, 60, 66). APC activity during the cell cycle is highly
periodic. At the metaphase-anaphase transition, APC associates with
Cdc20, an event which strictly requires previous phosphorylation of the
APC core by mitotic kinases (25, 59). In budding yeast, the
activated APC-Cdc20 complex initiates sister chromatid separation by
triggering destruction of the securin Pds1 (7, 8) and
facilitates exit from mitosis by initiating degradation of the mitotic
cyclin Clb5 (58). APC-Cdh1 assembles later in anaphase.
In sharp contrast to Cdc20, Cdh1 activates both interphase and mitotic
APC, and its binding to the APC core is negatively regulated by
phosphorylation of the Cdh1 subunit itself (19, 24, 25, 32,
70). By targeting mitotic cyclins such as Clb2 for degradation,
APC-Cdh1 contributes to abrupt silencing of mitotic CDK activity, a
regulatory step essential for reestablishment of preinitiation
complexes on origins of DNA replication (43). During the
exit from mitosis, Cdc20 is degraded (52, 68), whereas Cdh1
remains bound to APC throughout G1 (10, 19, 24,
70). The resulting postmitotic activity of APC-Cdh1, at least in
Saccharomyces cerevisiae, appears to be critically important
for establishment and maintenance of the G1 phase (17,
29, 57, 66). Consistently, also during Drosophila development, the Cdh1 homologue fizzy-related is expressed only in
those cell cycles that contain a G1 phase (60).
The physiological significance of persistent APC activity during
G1 could at least partly reflect prevention of precocious
accumulation of the mitotic cyclins. In addition, APC-Cdh1 may also
control accumulation of other S-phase-promoting factors such as Dbf4
(5, 11, 47, 67), as well as inhibitors of initiation of DNA
replication, exemplified by geminin (38). Collectively, all
of the above listed evidence points to an important role of APC-Cdh1 in
both mitotic exit and regulation of DNA replication. Apart from the crucial importance of APC-dependent proteolysis for cell cycle progression, several reports have suggested a role for APC-Cdh1 activity in quiescent cells (2, 13).
Recently, we have witnessed tremendous progress in understanding the
molecular anatomy of the APC in yeast and vertebrate experimental
systems. The need to elucidate APC function and identify its natural
substrates in human somatic cells has recently become apparent from
studies demonstrating a potential link between APC-dependent proteolysis and cancer. Thus, kinetochore-associated APC regulators Mad2, Mad3, and Bub1 were found down-regulated or mutated in subsets of
tumors and directly implicated in contributing to genomic instability (3, 16, 30). Molecular cloning of human securin
(73) unexpectedly revealed the identity of Pds1 with the
PTTG oncogene overexpressed in several types of human cancer
(9, 55). Our own results showed that APC-Cdh1 assembly is
controlled by the pRb-E2F tumor suppressor pathway which is frequently
deregulated during multistep tumorigenesis (32). Here we
have generated novel experimental tools allowing positive or negative
modulation of the APC ubiquitin ligase activity by conditional
manipulation of APC-Cdh1 assembly or ablation of Cdh1 function by
neutralizing antibodies, respectively. We present data supporting an
essential role of periodic oscillation of the APC-associated ubiquitin
ligase activity for proliferation and genome integrity of human cells.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Plasmids and gene transfer.
Human Cdh1 cDNA was tagged on
the amino terminus with myc epitope and subcloned into the
pBI tetracycline-responsive plasmid (Clontech). Expression plasmids
coding for puromycin resistance, i.e., pBabePuro, for a constitutively
active mutant of the retinoblastoma protein, i.e., pRb
cdk, and for
cyclin B1-luciferase were reported previously (32, 36). The
cycE-Luc reporter plasmid (pCE
3565/+263) (1) was a gift
from P. Jansen-Dürr. Plasmids 6xE2F-Luc containing six
E2F-responsive elements in front of the TATA box and Myc-Luc containing
four Myc-responsive E boxes cloned into the pG12-promoter vector and
pCMV-LacZ reporter plasmids were previously described (56).
Cell culture.
U-2-OS-TA, a U-2-OS human osteosarcoma cell
line with stably integrated tetracycline-regulated transcriptional
activator and a neomycin resistance gene (37), was
transfected with the pBI plasmid containing myc-Cdh1 along
with the pBabePuro plasmid in a 10:1 ratio. Puromycin-resistant clones
were isolated and cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium with
10% fetal calf serum (FCS), G418 (400 µg/ml), puromycin (1 µg/ml),
and tetracycline (2 µg/ml). Induction of myc-Cdh1
expression by removal of tetracycline was performed according to
procedures previously published (37). Synchronization of
cells in S phase was achieved by addition of aphidicolin (5 µg/ml)
into culture medium for 18 h. Metaphase-arrested cells were
obtained by incubating the cells in the presence of nocodazole (40 ng/ml) for 12 h.
Immunochemical techniques.
Antibodies used in this study
included rabbit polyclonal antibodies to human Cdc20 (SC 8358; Santa
Cruz), p27 (PC52; Calbiochem), mitosin (14C10; GeneTex), and CENP-F
(NB500-101; Novus Biologicals). Rabbit sera to human Cdh1 and Cdc27
were previously described (13, 24). Rabbit sera against
cyclin A and human Pds1 were obtained from M. Pagano and H. Zou,
respectively. Mouse monoclonal antibodies included CC03 to cyclin B1
(Calbiochem); PL-5 to human Plk1 (15); 9E10 to
myc epitope (gift from G. Evan); CTR-453 to pericentriolar
proteins (donated by M. Bornens); KH-95 to E2F-1 (Santa Cruz), DCS-141
to Mcm7 (C. S. Sørensen, C. Lukas, E. R. Kramer, C. Gieffers, J.-M. Peters, J. Bartek, and J. Lukas, unpublished data);
HE-12 and HE-172 to cylin E (34), and A78720 to Aim1 (Transduction Laboratories). Monoclonal antibody to Skp2 was provided by W. Krek. Immunoprecipitation, immunoblotting, and in situ
immunocytochemical techniques including detection of bromodeoxyuridine
(BrdU) incorporated into newly synthesized DNA were described earlier
(33, 35). Cyclin E-associated kinase activity using histone
H1 as a substrate was assessed essentially as previously described
(56).
Microinjection.
Affinity-purified rabbit antibody to Cdh1
(Sat105 [13]) or purified nonimmune rabbit
immunoglobulin G (IgG) (Sigma) was microinjected (2 mg/ml) into R-12
cells (34) grown on glass CELLocate coverslips (Eppendorf)
and synchronized in G0 by incubation for 48 h in
serum-free medium. Alternatively, expression plasmids for
myc-Cdh1, cyclin E, and pRb
cdk (25-µg/ml needle
concentration) were coinjected in combinations specified in the figure
legends. The cells were subsequently stimulated by the addition of
medium containing 10% FCS supplemented with BrdU (100 µg/ml). All
microinjections were performed with a Zeiss-AIS system exactly as
previously described (33, 34).
Reporter assays.
U-2-OS Cdh1 cells were electroporated with
1 µg of the reporter plasmids containing Myc, cyclin E, and E2F
promoter fragments regulating the expression of the luciferase gene,
together with 0.5 µg of the internal control pCMV-LacZ. The cells
were harvested after 48 h of culture with or without tetracycline
as indicated in the figure legends. The resulting luciferase and
-galactosidase activities were measured with a Lumat LB 9501 luminometer (Berthold) and an UltroSpec 2000 spectrophotometer
(Pharmacia Biotech), respectively.
RT-PCR.
U-2-OS Cdh1 cells were induced to express
myc-Cdh1 by removal of tetracycline from the culture medium
for the time specified in figure legends. Total RNA was isolated using
a Triazol reagent kit (Gibco-BRL) according to manufacturer's
instructions. Conditions for reverse transcription (RT) and PCR
amplification including the primer sequences for cyclin E and the
porphobilinogen deaminase (PBGD) housekeeping gene have been
described in detail (56).
Flow cytometry.
Cells were trypsinized and fixed in 70%
ice-cold methanol for 20 min, washed in phosphate-buffered saline, and
incubated for 30 min at 37°C in propidium iodide (PI) buffer (10 mM
Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 5 mM MgCl2, 50 µg of PI per ml, and
10 µg of RNase A per ml). The stained cells were acquired by the
FACSCalibur flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson), and the DNA content was
analyzed using CellQuest software.
In vitro ubiquitination assay.
Cyclin B fragments (amino
acids 13 through 110) from sea urchins were iodinated as previously
described (24). [35S]methionine- and
[35S]cysteine-labeled Xenopus Pds1, Plx, and
geminin and human Aim1, cyclin A, and Cdc20 proteins were prepared by
coupled transcription-translation reactions in rabbit reticulocyte
lysate (Promega). To obtain highly pure Cdh1-activated APC, the
inactive APC core was purified from interphase Xenopus egg
extracts. Under such conditions, APC is not phosphorylated and thus not
bound to Cdc20. Since Xenopus eggs do not contain any
endogenous Cdh1, such APC was highly and specifically activated by
baculovirus-expressed human Cdh1. Conversely, specific APC-Cdc20
ubiquitin ligase was generated by using APC purified from mitotic
Xenopus oocytes, which contain high cyclin B-Cdc2 activity
essential to modify the APC core to a status activatable by
baculovirus-expressed human Cdc20. The in vitro ubiquitination reaction
was performed essentially as previously described (25). Samples were analyzed by sodium dodecyl sulfate-5 to 15%
polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and phosphorimaging.
 |
RESULTS |
Generation of human cell lines allowing conditional manipulation of
APC-Cdh1 assembly during the cell cycle.
Human U-2-OS cells
engineered to express myc-tagged Cdh1 in a
tetracycline-dependent manner rapidly accumulated the
myc-Cdh1 protein upon removal of tetracycline from culture
medium (Fig. 1A). Densitometric
measurements revealed that the degree of myc-Cdh1 overexpression varied among different clones, ranging from a five- to
eightfold increase compared to the endogenous protein (fivefold in
clone A6, shown as an example in Fig. 1A). All phenotypic and biochemical consequences of the myc-Cdh1 induction were
identical and essentially reproduced in both higher- and
lower-expressing clones, and unless stated otherwise, the data shown
below were obtained from experiments performed with clone A6.

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Conditionally elevated myc-Cdh1 associates
with endogenous APC irrespective of cell cycle position. (A) U-2-OS
Cdh1-inducible cells (clone A6) were grown in the absence of
tetracycline and at the indicated time points, the abundance of
endogenous and myc-tagged Cdh1 was determined by Western
blotting using a rabbit polyclonal antibody raised against the
full-length Cdh1 protein. Western blotting of stable Mcm7 protein is
provided as a loading control. (B) Exponentially grown U-2-OS Cdh1
cells were induced to express ectopic Cdh1 as indicated by removal of
tetracycline for 24 h. The cell extracts were immunoprecipitated
(IP) either with an unrelated control antibody (IgG) or with antiserum
against the structural APC component Cdc27 ( Cdc27). The relative
amount of Cdh1 bound to the immunopurified APC was determined by
Western blotting essentially as described for panel A. (C) Parental
U-2-OS and U-2-OS Cdh1 cell lines were synchronized in S phase by
aphidicolin or mock treated with the solvent (dimethyl sulfoxide) as
indicated. In U-2-OS Cdh1 cells, the myc-Cdh1 transgene was
induced by removal of tetracycline for an additional 24 h (in the
constant presence of aphidicolin). The ability of Cdh1 to interact with
APC was then determined exactly as described for panel B. (D) U-2-OS
Cdh1 cells were induced by the removal of tetracycline, and at the
indicated time points, the cell extracts were analyzed by Western
blotting for the abundance of the Cdc20 protein. In parallel, the cells
induced to express myc-Cdh1 for 24 h were incubated
either with solvent (dimethyl sulfoxide) or with a proteasome inhibitor
LLnL for 12 h before immunoblotting with anti-Cdc20 antibody.
|
|
Immunoprecipitation analyses verified that the
myc-Cdh1
protein induced in exponentially growing U-2-OS cells was functional,
as it readily associated with the cellular APC, immunopurified
through
its Cdc27 subunit (Fig.
1B). Moreover, induction of
myc-Cdh1
resulted in formation of stable APC complexes also in cells
synchronized
in S phase by aphidicolin (Fig.
1C), which means under
conditions
when APC and Cdh1 normally do not associate due to
CDK-dependent
phosphorylation of the Cdh1 subunit (
10,
24,
32). We concluded
that the degree of elevation in Cdh1 protein
conditionally achieved
in our cell lines saturates the cellular
capacity to modify Cdh1
during S phase and results in stable,
nonoscillating APC-Cdh1
association throughout the cell cycle. These
results suggest that
Cdh1 protein levels relative to other APC subunits
and to its
upstream regulators such as cyclin A (
32) must be
tightly controlled
and must not exceed a certain threshold to avoid
untimely APC
activation.
The next question was whether the ectopic Cdh1 also affects recruitment
of Cdc20, another activating subunit, into APC complexes.
Interestingly, Western blotting analysis revealed that following
myc-Cdh1 induction, Cdc20 protein rapidly disappeared and
remained
virtually undetectable as long as the cells grew without
tetracycline
(Fig.
1D). Reduction of the Cdc20 protein was caused by
acceleration
of its turnover since inhibition of the proteasome
restored the
Cdc20 protein levels to the values observed in
exponentially growing
cells (Fig.
1D). The rapid disappearance of the
Cdc20 protein
following
myc-Cdh1 induction indicated that
mammalian Cdc20 is
degraded in an APC-Cdh1-dependent manner in vivo.
Collectively,
these data demonstrated that the APC activity in our
inducible
cell lines was largely (if not completely) generated by
APC-Cdh1
complexes.
Nonperiodic APC-Cdh1 association prevents G2 and M
events and causes endoreplication.
Next we asked how the U-2-OS
cells would respond to transient or prolonged loss of periodicity of
APC-dependent proteolysis. Following removal of tetracycline from the
culture medium, the cells rapidly ceased to multiply (Sørensen et al.,
unpublished data). Detailed flow cytometry analysis revealed that
induction of myc-Cdh1 dramatically deregulated cell cycle
progression at multiple transition points. First we noticed that such
cells transiently but reproducibly accumulated in G1 (Fig.
2A). Detailed measurements of
G1 length in cells released from metaphase arrest confirmed that induction of myc-Cdh1 approximately doubled the time
required for progression through G1 and delayed entry into
S phase for 6 to 8 h (Fig. 2B). However, cells continuously
expressing myc-Cdh1 proved unable to sustain a stable
G1 arrest and, between 36 and 48 h after induction,
forced progressive accumulation of cells with a 4 N DNA content (Fig.
2A). Multiparameter flow cytometry combining measurements of DNA
distribution with BrdU incorporation also revealed that the rate of
nucleotide incorporation in myc-Cdh1-expressing cells was
2.1-fold slower compared to that in the S-phase cells from the same
clone not expressing the myc-Cdh1 transgene. Consistently, when released from aphidicolin-mediated early S-phase arrest, myc-Cdh1-expressing cells traversed the S phase more slowly
compared to the control cells (Sørensen et al., unpublished data).
Nevertheless, this slow but uninterrupted DNA synthesis led to a
progressive increase in cellular ploidy culminating between days 4 and
5, when the majority of the cells expressing myc-Cdh1
acquired DNA content higher than 4 N (Fig. 2A). The cells at this stage
contained enlarged nuclei (Fig. 2C) consistent with the increased DNA
content detected by flow cytometry. Immunostaining with antibodies
specific for pericentriolar proteins revealed that such cells failed to separate centrosomes and create bipolar microtubule-generating centers
(Fig. 2C), an event which otherwise marks the transition between
G2 phase and initial stages of mitosis (39).
Together with complete lack of any morphological signs of mitosis
(Sørensen et al., unpublished data), these data suggest that
deregulated activation of APC-Cdh1 ubiquitin ligase in U-2-OS cells
precluded productive cell division and promoted slow but continuous DNA replication, uncoupled from mitosis.

View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Induction of myc-Cdh1 prevents cell division
and promotes endoreplication. (A) U-2-OS Cdh1 cells were stimulated to
express myc-Cdh1 by removal of tetracycline ( Tet). At the
indicated time points after myc-Cdh1 induction, the cells
were fixed, stained with propidium iodide, and analyzed for DNA content
by single-parameter fluorescence-activated cell sorting. Arrows
indicate the position of G1 and G2/M cells as
well as the degree of endoreplication (over 4 N DNA content); the
asterisk indicates the initial transient accumulation of cells in
G1 phase. (B) U-2-OS Cdh1 cells were synchronized in
metaphase by incubating in the presence of nocodazole. Rounded mitotic
cells were collected and replated into a drug-free medium. At the same
time, expression of myc-Cdh1 was induced by removing
tetracycline from the medium ( Tet). At indicated time points, the
cells were fixed, and their cell cycle distribution was determined by
flow cytometry. (C) U-2-OS Cdh1 cells were seeded on glass coverslips
and either cultured in the constant presence of tetracycline (+Tet) or
induced to express myc-Cdh1 for 4 days ( Tet day 4). The
cells were immunostained with an antibody against pericentriolar
proteins (left panels). DNA was counterstained with Hoechst 33258 (right panels). The representative images at both time points show
identical fields for centrosome and DNA staining, respectively
(arrowheads, separated centrosomes; arrows, unseparated centrosomes).
(D) U-2-OS Cdh1 cells were either grown in the constant presence of
tetracycline (+Tet) or induced to express myc-Cdh1 by
removal of tetracycline for 48 h ( Tet). When indicated, the
expression of ectopic Cdh1 was silenced by readdition of tetracycline
into the culture media, and the cells were incubated for an additional
48 h ( Tet/+Tet). The DNA content was analyzed by FACS.
|
|
Ultimately, prolonged induction of ectopic Cdh1 appeared to be lethal,
as evidenced by progressive cell detachment detectable
after 5 days of
myc-Cdh1 induction (Sørensen et al., unpublished
data).
However, shorter exposure of cells to active APC-Cdh1 was
partially
reversible, albeit with serious consequences for genomic
integrity.
Readdition of tetracycline and silencing of the
myc-Cdh1
expression after 12 to 48 h of its induction restored cell
division
in a significant proportion of cells (Fig.
2D) (Sørensen et
al.,
unpublished data). Superimposing of fluorescence-activated cell
sorting histograms revealed that, although such cells resumed
cell
cycle progression, they appeared to either decrease or increase
the
ploidy compared to cells never exposed to an excess of ectopic
Cdh1
(Fig.
2D). Collectively, these results indicate the critical
importance
of periodic oscillation of the APC-Cdh1 ubiquitin ligase
activity for
coordinating S phase with cell division and consequently
for protecting
the stability of the genome in mammalian
cells.
APC-Cdh1 induces destruction of mitotic regulators.
Western
blotting analysis revealed that a number of known or putative APC
substrates regulating entry into, progression through, and exit from
mitosis, such as cyclin B1, cyclin A, securin Pds1, the polo-like
kinase Plk1, the kinetochore-associated proteins mitosin-CENP-F, the
Aurora-like midbody-associated protein Aim1 (Fig.
3A), and Cdc20 (Fig. 1D), were
quantitatively degraded following myc-Cdh1 induction. The
degradation was proteasome dependent (Fig. 3A, right panels; Fig. 1D)
and relatively fast; for instance, cyclin B1 protein began to decline
at around 3 h and reached a nadir at 6 h after
myc-Cdh1 induction (Fig. 3B) (Sørensen et al., unpublished
data). Thus, it appears that in mammalian cells, APC-Cdh1 can induce
rapid degradation of many known or putative APC substrates directly
involved in regulating cell division. In several independent experiments, we have noticed that myc-Cdh1-induced
destruction of cyclin A appeared to be less quantitative and delayed
compared to that of cyclin B1 (Fig. 3A) (Sørensen et al., unpublished
data). This phenomenon was especially pronounced when
myc-Cdh1 was expressed in cells arrested in S phase by
aphidicolin (Fig. 3B), suggesting that S-phase cells may contain a
subpopulation of cyclin A specifically protected from APC-mediated
proteolysis.

View larger version (84K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
APC-Cdh1 ubiquitinates and targets for destruction
multiple regulators of cell division. (A) U-2-OS Cdh1 cells were
induced to express myc-Cdh1 by the removal of tetracycline
( Tet), and the abundance of the indicated proteins (all APC
substrates) was analyzed by immunoblotting with specific antibodies
(Mcm7 protein serves as a loading control). When indicated, proteasome
function was inhibited by addition of LLnL into the culture medium
between 24 and 36 h after removal of tetracycline. (B) U-2-OS Cdh1
cells were presynchronized in S phase by aphidicolin before induction
of myc-Cdh1 with or without concomitant inhibition of the
proteasome by LLnL. At the indicated time points, the cell lysates were
prepared and analyzed by Western blotting with the indicated
antibodies. (C) Xenopus APC was activated with
baculovirus-expressed human Cdh1 and Cdc20, respectively. Radioactively
labeled substrates (marked by asterisks) were added to the
ubiquitination reaction and analyzed at 0, 5, 10, 20, and 30 min. In
the control reaction Cdh1-activated APC was used without addition of E2
enzymes.
|
|
To directly address the issue of the apparently broad substrate
recognition by the human APC-Cdh1 ubiquitin ligase, we reconstituted
the APC-dependent ubiquitination reaction in vitro. Consistent
with the
data obtained with the inducible clones, cyclin B, Pds1,
Aim1, and Plx
(
Xenopus homolog of human Plk1 kinase) were efficiently
ubiquitinated by APC activated by Cdh1 (Fig.
3C). Also other APC
substrates such as geminin, cyclin A, and Cdc20 were efficiently
modified by Cdh1-activated APC in an in vitro ubiquitination assay
(Sørensen et al., unpublished data). Direct comparison of APC
ubiquitin ligase activities catalyzed by Cdh1- and Cdc20-activating
subunits, respectively, revealed that, while APC-Cdh1 efficiently
ubiquitinated all substrates tested, APC-Cdc20 was less efficient
in
modification of Plx and Aim1 (Fig.
3C). We concluded that once
assembled, APC-Cdh1 is capable of ubiquitinating and priming for
rapid
destruction a broad range of key regulators of multiple
steps of
mammalian cell
division.
Failure to inactivate APC-Cdh1 at the G1/S transition
promotes E2F-dependent up-regulation of cyclin E-Cdk2.
Contrary to
the destruction of mitotic regulators, induction of myc-Cdh1
promoted progressive up-regulation of cyclin E-Cdk2 (Fig.
4A), which in mammalian cells represents
the major CDK activity responsible for initiation of DNA replication
(18, 28, 45, 46). This was achieved by at least two distinct
mechanisms. First, starting from 24 h after myc-Cdh1
induction, we observed a rapid decline of the p27 protein, a potent
inhibitor of Cdk2 kinase activity (51, 65), accompanied by
accumulation of Skp2, the F-box protein recruiting p27 to the SCF
ubiquitin ligase (Fig. 4A) (4, 62). We did notice the
transient drop of the Skp2 protein shortly after replating the cells
into tetracycline-free medium; nevertheless, the progressive increase
of the Skp2 levels after 24 h was reproducibly observed in several
independent experiments and distinct U-2-OS-Cdh1 clones (Sørensen et
al., unpublished data). This was not due to stabilization of the Skp2
protein, whose turnover was actually somewhat accelerated (Sørensen et al., unpublished data), potentially explaining its initial transient decline (Fig. 4A). The gradual accumulation of Skp2 was likely a
consequence of stimulation of its transcription, which was detected in
myc-Cdh1-expressing cells (Fig. 4B). Second,
myc-Cdh1 induction lead to a marked increase of the cyclin E
protein itself (Fig. 4A). Pulse-chase assays did not show any
significant changes in cyclin E protein stability (Sørensen et al.,
unpublished data). However, RT-PCR analysis (Fig. 4B) and Northern blot
analysis (Sørensen et al., unpublished data) revealed that the
transcription of cyclin E mRNA increased approximately fivefold in
cells expressing myc-Cdh1. Consistently, reporter assays
performed with a cyclin E promoter fragment showed marked
superactivation in cells induced to express myc-Cdh1 (Fig.
4C). This could not be explained solely by the
myc-Cdh1-induced changes in the cell cycle position since similar results were obtained when the expression of ectopic Cdh1 was
induced in cells arrested by aphidicolin in early S phase (Fig. 4D).
Cyclin E expression is controlled by a concerted action of the two
major G1 transcriptional activities, namely, those associated with E2F and Myc (reference 56 and
references therein). Several pieces of evidence suggested that the
accelerated transcription of cyclin E reflected the increased activity
of endogenous E2F. First, the Cdh1-induced activation of the cyclin E
promoter could be fully repressed by coexpression with pRb
cdk
(Sørensen et al., unpublished data), a phosphorylation-deficient
retinoblastoma protein which was previously demonstrated to be a potent
repressor of all known E2F isoforms (34). Second, parallel
luciferase measurements revealed that induction of ectopic Cdh1 led to
a severalfold increase of the activity associated with endogenous E2F
but not with Myc transcription factors (Fig. 4C). Finally, induction of
myc-Cdh1 led to an increased accumulation of at least one
member of the E2F transcription factor family, namely, E2F-1 (Fig. 4A).
Also in this case, active APC-Cdh1 did not significantly affect E2F-1
protein stability (Sørensen et al., unpublished data) but rather
promoted increased transcription of the E2F-1 gene (Fig. 4B). Taken
together, these data strongly suggested that nonperiodic activation of
APC-Cdh1 created conditions permissive for gradual accumulation and
elevated activity of the E2F transcription factors and consequently for
increased synthesis of at least some cell cycle regulators capable of
initiating and maintaining DNA synthesis, which, in the concomitant
absence of cell division, likely generated the major force promoting
progressive endoreplication.

View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Constitutive APC-Cdh1 assembly stimulates E2F-dependent
superactivation of cyclin E-Cdk2. (A) U-2-OS Cdh1 cells were induced
exactly as described in the legend for Fig. 3A. The kinase activity
associated with cyclin E was measured using histone H1 as a substrate
(upper panel). The abundance of the p27, Skp2, cyclin E, and E2F-1
proteins was determined in whole cell extracts (WCE) by Western
blotting using specific antibodies as indicated. cyclin E,
anti-cyclin E. (B) Total mRNA was isolated from U-2-OS-Cdh1 cells
induced to express myc-Cdh1 for the indicated time, and the
transcription of endogenous cyclin E, Skp2, E2F-1, and control
housekeeping PBGD genes was determined by RT-PCR. (C) U-2-OS
Cdh1 cells were transiently transfected with the indicated reporter
plasmids and were either kept uninduced (+Tet) or stimulated to express
myc-Cdh1 for 24 h ( Tet). The activity associated with
each reporter construct was measured by standard luciferase reporter
assays and normalized for transfection efficiency by subtracting the
values associated with cotransfected -Gal reporter (RLU, relative
light units). (D) U-2-OS Cdh1 cells were presynchronized in early S
phase by incubation with aphidicolin. Luciferase activity associated
with the indicated reporter constructs was measured essentially as
described for panel C, except that the cells remained arrested with
aphidicolin throughout the whole assay period.
|
|
Functional status of APC-Cdh1 ubiquitin ligase modulates the
ability of cyclin E-Cdk2 to initiate DNA replication.
The data
obtained with our inducible cell lines showed that, on one hand,
persistent APC-Cdh1 interaction delayed both the passage through
G1/S transition and the progression through S phase. On the
other hand, induction of myc-Cdh1 gradually increased the
activity associated with the S-phase-promoting cyclin E-Cdk2 holoenzyme
and caused progressive overreplication of the genome. Although
counterintuitive at first glance, this complex consequence of
nonperiodic APC-Cdh1 activity on DNA synthesis could be reconciled if
Cdk2, by itself capable of supporting limited DNA replication, requires
an APC-sensitive auxiliary factor to set a correct timing of initiation
and subsequent rate of DNA synthesis. To test such predictions, we
employed an inverse approach to our previous experiments, and rather
than overexpressing ectopic Cdh1, we ablated the function of the
endogenous protein by means of a specific anti-Cdh1 neutralizing antibody. We performed these experiments in immortalized rat
fibroblasts (R-12 cell line) which could be synchronized by mitogen
depletion and thus provide an accurate system to monitor events at the
G1/S transition (33, 37). First we tested the
capability of Sat105, a highly specific anti-Cdh1 antibody
(13; Sørensen et al., unpublished data) to
interfere with Cdh1 function. Indeed, when added in the in vitro
ubiquitination reaction, Sat105 progressively inhibited Cdh1-dependent
polyubiquitination of cyclin B in a dose-dependent manner (Fig.
5A). This effect was specific for
APC-Cdh1 because APC-Cdc20 complexes were not inhibited even by high
doses of these antibodies (Fig. 5A). Moreover, Sat105 inhibited
endogenous APC-Cdh1 activity also in vivo. When microinjected into
G1 fibroblasts, which naturally contain highly active
APC-Cdh1, Sat105 significantly stabilized a cyclin B1-luciferase
reporter protein (Fig. 5B), which serves as a sensitive marker for
APC-dependent proteolysis (32).

View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Inactivation of APC-Cdh1 cooperates with cyclin E-Cdk2
to initiate DNA replication. (A) APC-dependent ubiquitination reaction
of radiolabeled cyclin B (marked by asterisk) specifically catalyzed by
Cdh1 and Cdc20, respectively, was reconstituted in vitro essentially as
described in the legend to Fig. 3B. Purified anti-Cdh1 antibody
(Sat105) was added into the reaction in increasing amounts as
indicated. Control, no antibody added. (B) Serum-starved R-12 cells
were microinjected with the control (IgG) or anti-Cdh1 (Sat105)
antibodies, respectively (2-mg/ml needle concentration), together with
the expression plasmid for cyclin B1-luciferase reporter (5 µg/ml).
Subsequently, the cells were stimulated with 10% FCS for 8 h to
reenter G1 phase and assayed for accumulation of the
reporter by immunostaining with antiluciferase antibody. Arrows point
to the productively injected cells in representative fields; both
images were taken under identical exposure times. Bar, 10 µm. (C)
Serum-starved R12 cells were microinjected with indicated antibodies as
in panel B together with expression plasmids for pRb cdk and cyclin E
(Cyc. E) (both 25 µg/ml). The cells were stimulated with FCS
supplemented with BrdU (100 µg/ml) for 20 h, fixed, and assayed
for S-phase entry by immunodetection of BrdU. (D) Serum-starved R-12
cells were microinjected with cyclin E and myc-Cdh1
expression plasmids (25 µg/ml) as indicated, stimulated with FCS
containing BrdU (100 µg/ml) for 24 h, and evaluated as in panel
C.
|
|
Having validated the ability of Sat105 to functionally neutralize Cdh1,
we next tested whether inactivation of APC-Cdh1 could
affect the length
of G
1. Indeed, microinjection of Sat105 into
synchronized
rat fibroblasts consistently resulted in a moderate
(15 to 20%)
increase in cells incorporating BrdU when compared
to control-injected
cells (Sørensen et al., unpublished data).
To specifically address
whether the functional status of APC-Cdh1
influences the
S-phase-promoting potential of cyclin E-Cdk2, we
generated a model
system based on two recent findings obtained
in our laboratories.
First, rat fibroblasts deprived of de novo
expression of E2F target
genes by means of a constitutively active
allele of the retinoblastoma
protein (pRb

cdk) undergo G
1 arrest,
which could be
rescued by coexpression of cyclin E from a heterologous
promoter
(
6,
23,
34). Second, pRb

cdk greatly stimulates
assembly
of APC-Cdh1 holoenzyme even in the presence of active
cyclin E-Cdk2
(
32). Hence, expression of pRb

cdk together with
cyclin E
generates a defined system in which S phase is generated
largely by the
cyclin E-Cdk2 kinase activity in the concomitant
presence of functional
APC. Importantly, under such conditions,
coinjection of Sat105
significantly accelerated S-phase entry
compared to control cells
injected with nonspecific antibody (Fig.
5C). More detailed analysis at
multiple time points revealed that
under these experimental conditions,
the Sat105-microinjected
cells accumulated in S phase approximately
6 h earlier compared
to control cells (Sørensen et al.,
unpublished data). Conversely,
both the mitogen-induced S phase and
accelerating effect of ectopic
cyclin E on G
1/S transition
were significantly reduced upon comicroinjection
with expression
plasmid for
myc-Cdh1 (Fig.
5D). Taken together,
these data
indicate that cancellation of the APC ubiquitin ligase
activity at the
G
1/S transition and throughout S phase allows
accumulation
of at least one unstable protein, which augments
cyclin E-Cdk2-mediated
initiation of DNA
replication.
 |
DISCUSSION |
Periodic assembly of APC with Cdh1 represents an essential step in
coordinating multiple cell cycle transitions in human cells.
Our
data demonstrate that periodic regulation of APC-Cdh1-mediated
proteolysis appears crucial for productive cell division of mammalian
cells. Failure to inactivate APC-Cdh1 ubiquitin ligase in a timely
manner led to unscheduled destruction of key G2/M regulators such as mitotic cyclins, Plk1, and Pds1 and consequently precluded cell cycle progression beyond the G2 phase. Our
finding that Cdc20 represents a bona fide in vivo substrate for
APC-Cdh1 ubiquitin ligase is fully consistent with the recent report,
published while this manuscript was being prepared, that ubiquitination of Cdc20 in an in vitro-reconstituted reaction is specifically catalyzed by APC-Cdh1 (49). The observation that human
APC-Cdh1 catalyzes ubiquitination and promotes destruction of the above G2/M regulators with similar rapid kinetics was unexpected,
given the evidence from lower eukaryotes arguing for more restricted substrate specificity conferred by Cdc20 or Cdh1, respectively (57, 66). For instance, yeast Cdh1, even when overexpressed, induced complete destruction of Clb2 yet only partial elimination of
Pds1. Our results suggest that the situation is different and that the
APC-Cdh1 ubiquitin ligase may regulate abundance of a broad range of
proteins containing appropriate recognition signals such as the
destruction box or the newly identified KEN box (49). This
notion is further supported by recent data from budding yeast cells in
which Pds1 proteolysis in G1 has been shown to depend on
Cdh1, not Cdc20 (54). In contrast, APC-Cdc20 appears to have a more restricted substrate specificity, at least in vitro where it can
ubiquitinate Aim1 and Plk1 less well than APC-Cdh1. Cdc20 and Cdh1 may
therefore differ mostly in their mode of regulation and the resulting
temporal difference in their ability to activate the APC, whereas their
substrate specificities may be more similar than previously proposed.
In addition, we identified mitosin-CENP-F and Aim1 as two novel KEN
box-containing proteins specifically degraded in an APC-Cdh1-dependent
manner. It is intriguing that mitosin-CENP-F localizes to kinetochores
(53, 72), suggesting that kinetochore-associated proteins
may not only help to sequester and inhibit APC upon activation of the
spindle checkpoint (69) but could actually be themselves
targeted for APC-mediated proteolysis. This observation further
underscores the need for a tight control of APC-Cdh1 activity, to
ensure timely and spatially correct segregation of sister chromatids in
anaphase. The Aurora and Ipl1-like midbody-associated protein Aim1
has been recently found to play an essential role in cytokinesis in
mammalian cells (64). Our finding that Aim1 protein is also
degraded in an APC-Cdh1-dependent manner helps explain the periodic
accumulation of this protein during the cell cycle (64) and
suggests that Cdh1, through regulation of Aim1 protein turnover,
supports timely exit from mitosis.
Besides the negative effect on cell division, conceptually consistent
with findings made in yeast,
Drosophila, and
Xenopus laevis (
69), our results revealed a novel aspect of
APC-mediated
proteolysis, namely, that dissociation of Cdh1 from the
APC core
at the G
1/S transition appears to play a central
role in protecting
cells from genomic instability by helping to
restrict chromosomal
duplication to only one round per cell division
cycle. We could
demonstrate that untimely activation of APC-Cdh1 during
S phase
interfered with the natural oscillation of some factors that
were
rate limiting for G
1/S transition, such as cyclin E or
E2F-1,
and as such likely contributed to uninterrupted DNA synthesis
and severe rereplication of the genome. Moreover, de novo refiring
of
at least some origins without intervening mitosis could be
further
augmented by APC-Cdh1-mediated destruction of the newly
emerging class
of APC substrates such as geminin, which at least
in
Xenopus
embryos functions as a potent inhibitor of initiation
of DNA
replication (
38). This, together with high cyclin E-Cdk2
activity could overpower a potential lack of other APC targets,
which
may normally accumulate at the G
1/S transition and
cooperate
with cyclin E-Cdk2 to efficiently initiate DNA replication in
a timely manner. Although the identity of such protein(s) remains
elusive, our in vivo APC-Cdh1 neutralization data strongly argue
for
its existence (Fig.
5C and D). One plausible candidate is
Dbf4, which
together with its catalytic subunit Cdc7 was demonstrated
as an
essential factor for S-phase entry in various organisms
(
5,
11,
47,
67), and yeast Dbf4 was recently shown to
be a bona fide
substrate for APC-mediated proteolysis (
11,
47).
Finally,
several other observations opened up the possibility
that the
persistent replication-promoting activity in cells expressing
ectopic
Cdh1 could be facilitated also by a potential cross talk
between APC
and SCF ubiquitin ligases. High and nonperiodic APC-Cdh1
activity
apparently supported progressive accumulation of Skp2
F-box protein, a
crucial SCF component, and thus created conditions
permissive for a
rapid turnover of p27 CDK inhibitor that would
otherwise restrain
S-phase-promoting CDK activities. How APC-Cdh1
induces accumulation of
Skp2 remains to be established. The reported
requirement of Skp2 for S
phase (
71), the sharp increase of
Skp2 accumulation at the
G
1/S transition (
31), and increased
transcription of the Skp2 gene in
myc-Cdh1-expressing cells
(this
study) indicate that Skp2 expression could be regulated, at least
in part, by
E2F.
One plausible explanation for the gradually increasing E2F-mediated
transcription could be the degradation of cyclin A observed
in
myc-Cdh1-expressing cells. In such a scenario, APC-Cdh1
would
not directly induce E2F-dependent transcription but rather would
prevent its physiological silencing, which normally occurs at
the end
of S phase following the completion of genome duplication.
It has been
previously demonstrated that cyclin A-Cdk2 phosphorylates
the
E2F-heterodimerizing partner DP-1 and thereby cancels the
ability of
E2F-DP-1 complexes to bind DNA (
26). It has also
been shown
that failure to displace E2F from DNA results in the
inability to exit
S phase (
27), the phenotype very similar to
what we describe
here as a consequence of the deregulated APC-Cdh1
activity. Hence, one
plausible way to gradually amplify cellular
E2F activity in our system
would be based on autostimulation of
E2F-1 synthesis, promoted by
reduced levels of cyclin A upon
myc-Cdh1
induction.
The involvement of cyclin A as a mediator of some crucial phenotypic
consequences of nonperiodic APC-Cdh1 assembly raised
an important issue
of complexity in terms of the functional interplay
between APC-Cdh1 and
E2F-cyclin A. We have previously demonstrated
that, during S phase,
E2F-regulated genes including cyclin A prevent
Cdh1 from interacting
with the APC core and thus ensure that the
APC ubiquitin ligase would
not be switched on prematurely (
32).
The data presented in
this study show that approximately fivefold
elevation of Cdh1 protein
was sufficient to revert this dependency
and induce destruction of a
major pool of cellular cyclin A. However,
our observation that S-phase
cells retained detectable amounts
of cyclin A at the time when
induction of
myc-Cdh1 nearly completely
eliminated other APC
substrates suggests the existence of a fraction
of cyclin A
specifically protected against APC-dependent proteolysis.
Indeed,
factors capable of interfering with vertebrate cyclin
A but not cyclin
B destruction have been recently reported in
the literature
(
12). Availability of such an APC-insensitive
pool of cyclin
A would be consistent with the reported role of
cyclin A-Cdk2 in
phosphorylating Cdh1 and thus securing that cells
beyond the
G
1/S transition would not prematurely reactivate
destruction
of other APC targets (
32). In fact, our
observation that despite
steadily increasing cyclin E-Cdk2 activity in
myc-Cdh1-expressing
cells, Cdh1 remained bound to functional
APC further supports
cyclin A but not cyclin E as a direct Cdh1 kinase
in mammalian
cells. The interspecies differences between mammals and
the genus
Drosophila, in which cyclin E-Cdk2 has been
proposed as a physiological
fizzy-related kinase, could be explained by
at least several distinctions
in cyclin-CDK biochemistry including the
dominant catalytic partners
of cyclin A and its subcellular
localization (
61). Finally,
very recent advances in the
proteolysis field indicate that degradation
of mammalian cyclin A might
be unexpectedly complex; during this
study, Nakayama and colleagues
reported that cyclin A but not
cyclin B can be efficiently
ubiquitinated by SCF
Skp2 ubiquitin ligase (
42).
Based on our finding that elevation
of
myc-Cdh1 stimulates
transcription of the Skp2 F-box protein
and given that Skp2 and cyclin
A proteins physically interact
(
71), it is plausible that in
our system, as well as during
unperturbed cell cycle progression
(
42), the steady-state levels
of cyclin A result from a
delicate balance between its E2F-regulated
transcription and its
protein turnover controlled by both APC
and SCF ubiquitin
ligases.
Taken together, the cellular mechanisms involved in regulating the
periodicity of APC-Cdh1 assembly in mammalian cells appear
to play a
crucial role in coupling DNA replication with productive
cell division.
In fact, Cdh1 appears to join the small number
of cell cycle genes such
as the
myc, p53, cyclin E, and p21 genes,
the deregulation
of which appears capable of inducing genomic
instability. It is
tempting to speculate that at least some mechanisms
involved in control
of APC-Cdh1 assembly could be deregulated
during multistep
tumorigenesis, for instance in those human tumors
that aberrantly
accumulate mitotic B-type cyclins during G
1
(
20).
Our finding that mitosin-CENP-F is targeted by
APC-Cdh1 for destruction
opens up a possibility to search for
potential defects affecting
stability of kinetochore-associated
proteins and raise the question
whether these could explain at least
some aspects of aneuploidy
detected in the majority of human tumors.
Finally, our observation
that APC-Cdh1 directly determines the level of
the human
Pds1 (
PTTG) and
Aim1
proto-oncogenes raises the possibility that aberrations
in
posttranscriptional regulation including proteolysis might
account for
their elevated expression in human malignancies (
9,
55,
63).
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We are grateful to C. Giefers, H. Zou, M. Pagano, M. Bornens, W. Krek, and G. Evan for donating diverse antibodies and to H. Zou, T. McGarry, K. Helin, P. Jansen-Dürr, J. Cleveland, and Y. Terada
for cDNAs and reporter constructs.
This work was supported by grants from the Danish Cancer Society, the
Human Frontier Science Program (RG-299/97), the Danish Medical Research
Council (9600821), and the Austrian Industrial Research Promoting Fund
(FFF 3/12801).
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Institute of
Cancer Biology, Danish Cancer Society, Strandboulevarden 49, DK-2100
Copenhagen Ø, Denmark. Phone: 45 35 25 73 10. Fax: 45 35 25 77 21. E-mail: lukas{at}biobase.dk.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Botz, J.,
K. Zerfass-Thome,
D. Spitkovsky,
H. Delius,
B. Vogt,
M. Eilers,
A. Hatzigeorgiou, and P. Jansen-Dürr.
1996.
Cell cycle regulation of the murine cyclin E gene depends on an E2F binding site in the promoter.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16:3401-3409[Abstract].
|
| 2.
|
Brandeis, M., and T. Hunt.
1996.
The proteolysis of mitotic cyclins in mammalian cells persists from the end of mitosis until the onset of S phase.
EMBO J.
15:5280-5289[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Cahill, D. P.,
C. Lengauer,
J. Yu,
G. J. Riggins,
J. K. Willson,
S. D. Markowitz,
K. W. Kinzler, and B. Vogelstein.
1998.
Mutations of mitotic checkpoint genes in human cancers.
Nature
392:300-303[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Carrano, A. C.,
E. Eytan,
A. Hershko, and M. Pagano.
1999.
SKP2 is required for ubiquitin-mediated degradation of the CDK inhibitor p27.
Nat. Cell Biol.
1:193-199[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Cheng, L.,
T. Collyer, and C. F. Hardy.
1999.
Cell cycle regulation of DNA replication initiator factor Dbf4p.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19:4270-4278[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Chew, Y. P.,
M. Ellis,
S. Wilkie, and S. Mittnacht.
1998.
pRB phosphorylation mutants reveal role of pRB in regulating S phase completion by a mechanism independent of E2F.
Oncogene
17:2177-2186[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Ciosk, R.,
W. Zachariae,
C. Michaelis,
A. Shevchenko,
M. Mann, and K. Nasmyth.
1998.
An ESP1/PDS1 complex regulates loss of sister chromatid cohesion at the metaphase to anaphase transition in yeast.
Cell
93:1067-1076[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Cohen-Fix, O.,
J. M. Peters,
M. W. Kirschner, and D. Koshland.
1996.
Anaphase initiation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is controlled by the APC-dependent degradation of the anaphase inhibitor Pds1p.
Genes Dev.
10:3081-3093[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Dominguez, A.,
F. Ramos-Morales,
F. Romero,
R. M. Rios,
F. Dreyfus,
M. Tortolero, and J. A. Pintor-Toro.
1998.
hpttg, a human homologue of rat pttg, is overexpressed in hematopoietic neoplasms: evidence for a transcriptional activation function of hPTTG.
Oncogene
17:2187-2193[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Fang, G.,
H. Yu, and M. W. Kirschner.
1998.
Direct binding of CDC20 protein family members activates the anaphase-promoting complex in mitosis and G1.
Mol. Cell
2:163-171[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Ferreira, M. F.,
C. Santocanale,
L. S. Drury, and J. F. Diffley.
2000.
Dbf4p, an essential S phase-promoting factor, is targeted for degradation by the anaphase-promoting complex.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20:242-248[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Funakoshi, M.,
S. Geley,
T. Hunt,
T. Nishimoto, and H. Kobayashi.
1999.
Identification of XDRP1: a Xenopus protein related to yeast Dsk2p binds to the N-terminus of cyclin A and inhibits its degradation.
EMBO J.
18:5009-5018[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Gieffers, C.,
B. H. Peters,
E. R. Kramer,
C. G. Dotti, and J. M. Peters.
1999.
Expression of the CDH1-associated form of the anaphase-promoting complex in postmitotic neurons.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
96:11317-11322[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Glotzer, M.,
A. W. Murray, and M. W. Kirschner.
1991.
Cyclin is degraded by the ubiquitin pathway.
Nature
349:132-138[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Golsteyn, R. M.,
S. J. Schultz,
J. Bartek,
A. Ziemiecki,
T. Ried, and E. A. Nigg.
1994.
Cell cycle analysis and chromosomal localization of human Plk1, a putative homologue of the mitotic kinases Drosophila polo and Saccharomyces cerevisiae Cdc5.
J. Cell Sci.
107:1509-1517[Abstract].
|
| 16.
|
Imai, Y.,
Y. Shiratori,
N. Kato,
T. Inoue, and M. Omata.
1999.
Mutational inactivation of mitotic checkpoint genes, hsMAD2 and hBUB1, is rare in sporadic digestive tract cancers.
Jpn. J. Cancer Res.
90:837-840[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Irniger, S., and K. Nasmyth.
1997.
The anaphase-promoting complex is required in G1 arrested yeast cells to inhibit B-type cyclin accumulation and to prevent uncontrolled entry into S-phase.
J. Cell Sci.
110:1523-1531[Abstract].
|
| 18.
|
Jackson, P. K.,
S. Chevalier,
M. Philippe, and M. W. Kirschner.
1995.
Early events in DNA replication require cyclin E and are blocked by p21CIP1.
J. Cell Biol.
130:755-769[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Jaspersen, S. L.,
J. F. Charles, and D. O. Morgan.
1999.
Inhibitory phosphorylation of the APC regulator Hct1 is controlled by the kinase Cdc28 and the phosphatase Cdc14.
Curr. Biol.
9:227-236[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Keyomarsi, K., and A. B. Pardee.
1993.
Redundant cyclin overexpression and gene amplification in breast cancer cells.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
90:1112-1116[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
King, R. W.,
R. J. Deshaies,
J. M. Peters, and M. W. Kirschner.
1996.
How proteolysis drives the cell cycle.
Science
274:1652-1659[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
King, R. W.,
J. M. Peters,
S. Tugendreich,
M. Rolfe,
P. Hieter, and M. W. Kirschner.
1995.
A 20S complex containing CDC27 and CDC16 catalyzes the mitosis-specific conjugation of ubiquitin to cyclin B.
Cell
81:279-288[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 23.
|
Knudsen, E. S.,
C. Buckmaster,
T. T. Chen,
J. R. Feramisco, and J. Y. Wang.
1998.
Inhibition of DNA synthesis by RB: effects on G1/S transition and S-phase progression.
Genes Dev.
12:2278-2292[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
Kramer, E. R.,
C. Gieffers,
G. Holzl,
M. Hengstschlager, and J. M. Peters.
1998.
Activation of the human anaphase-promoting complex by proteins of the CDC20/Fizzy family.
Curr. Biol.
8:1207-1210[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 25.
|
Kramer, E. R.,
N. Scheuringer,
A. V. Podtelejnikov,
M. Mann, and J.-M. Peters.
2000.
Mitotic regulation of the APC activator proteins CDC20 and CDH1.
Mol. Biol. Cell
11:1555-1569[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Krek, W.,
M. E. Ewen,
S. Shirodkar,
Z. Arany,
W. G. Kaelin, Jr., and D. M. Livingston.
1994.
Negative regulation of the growth-promoting transcription factor E2F-1 by a stably bound cyclin A-dependent protein kinase.
Cell
78:161-172[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 27.
|
Krek, W.,
G. Xu, and D. M. Livingston.
1995.
Cyclin A-kinase regulation of E2F-1 DNA binding function underlies suppression of an S phase checkpoint.
Cell
83:1149-1158[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 28.
|
Krude, T.,
M. Jackman,
J. Pines, and R. A. Laskey.
1997.
Cyclin/Cdk-dependent initiation of DNA replication in a human cell-free system.
Cell
88:109-119[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 29.
|
Kumada, K.,
S. Su,
M. Yanagida, and T. Toda.
1995.
Fission yeast TPR-family protein nuc2 is required for G1-arrest upon nitrogen starvation and is an inhibitor of septum formation.
J. Cell Sci.
108:895-905[Abstract].
|
| 30.
|
Lee, H.,
A. H. Trainer,
L. S. Friedman,
F. C. Thistlethwaite,
M. J. Evans,
B. A. Ponder, and A. R. Venkitaraman.
1999.
Mitotic checkpoint inactivation fosters transformation in cells lacking the breast cancer susceptibility gene, Brca2.
Mol. Cell
4:1-10[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 31.
|
Lisztwan, J.,
A. Marti,
H. Sutterluty,
M. Gstaiger,
C. Wirbelauer, and W. Krek.
1998.
Association of human CUL-1 and ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme CDC34 with the F-box protein p45(SKP2): evidence for evolutionary conservation in the subunit composition of the CDC34-SCF pathway.
EMBO J.
17:368-383[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 32.
|
Lukas, C.,
C. S. Sørensen,
E. Kramer,
E. Santoni-Rugiu,
C. Lindeneg,
J. M. Peters,
J. Bartek, and J. Lukas.
1999.
Accumulation of cyclin B1 requires E2F and cyclin-A-dependent rearrangement of the anaphase-promoting complex.
Nature
401:815-818[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 33.
|
Lukas, J.,
J. Bartkova,
M. Rohde,
M. Strauss, and J. Bartek.
1995.
Cyclin D1 is dispensable for G1 control in retinoblastoma gene-deficient cells independently of cdk4 activity.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15:2600-2611[Abstract].
|
| 34.
|
Lukas, J.,
T. Herzinger,
K. Hansen,
M. C. Moroni,
D. Resnitzky,
K. Helin,
S. I. Reed, and J. Bartek.
1997.
Cyclin E-induced S phase without activation of the pRb/E2F pathway.
Genes Dev.
11:1479-1492[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 35.
|
Lukas, J.,
D. Parry,
L. Aagaard,
D. J. Mann,
J. Bartkova,
M. Strauss,
G. Peters, and J. Bartek.
1995.
Retinoblastoma-protein-dependent cell-cycle inhibition by the tumour suppressor p16.
Nature
375:503-506[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 36.
|
Lukas, J.,
B. O. Petersen,
K. Holm,
J. Bartek, and K. Helin.
1996.
Deregulated expression of E2F family members induces S-phase entry and overcomes p16INK4A-mediated growth suppression.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16:1047-1057[Abstract].
|
| 37.
|
Lukas, J.,
C. S. Sørensen,
C. Lukas,
E. Santoni-Rugiu, and J. Bartek.
1999.
p16INK4a, but not constitutively active pRb, can impose a sustained G1 arrest: molecular mechanisms and implications for oncogenesis.
Oncogene
18:3930-3935[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 38.
|
McGarry, T. J., and M. W. Kirschner.
1998.
Geminin, an inhibitor of DNA replication, is degraded during mitosis.
Cell
93:1043-1053[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 39.
|
Meraldi, P.,
J. Lukas,
A. M. Fry,
J. Bartek, and E. A. Nigg.
1999.
Centrosome duplication in mammalian somatic cells requires E2F and Cdk2-cyclin A.
Nat. Cell Biol.
1:88-93[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 40.
|
Morgan, D. O.
1995.
Principles of CDK regulation.
Nature
374:131-134[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 41.
|
Morgan, D. O.
1999.
Regulation of the APC and the exit from mitosis.
Nat. Cell Biol.
1:E47-E53[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 42.
|
Nakayama, K.,
H. Nagahama,
Y. A. Minamishima,
M. Matsumoto,
I. Nakamichi,
K. Kitagawa,
M. Shirane,
R. Tsunematsu,
T. Tsukiyama,
N. Ishida,
M. Kitagawa, and S. Hatakeyama.
2000.
Targeted disruption of Skp2 results in accumulation of cyclin E and p27(Kip1), polyploidy and centrosome overduplication.
EMBO J.
19:2069-2081[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 43.
|
Noton, E., and J. F. Diffley.
2000.
CDK inactivation is the only essential function of the APC/C and the mitotic exit network proteins for origin resetting during mitosis.
Mol. Cell
5:85-95[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 44.
|
Nurse, P.
1990.
Universal control mechanism regulating onset of M-phase.
Nature
344:503-508[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 45.
|
Ohtsubo, M., and J. M. Roberts.
1993.
Cyclin-dependent regulation of G1 in mammalian fibroblasts.
Science
259:1908-1912[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 46.
|
Ohtsubo, M.,
A. M. Theodoras,
J. Schumacher,
J. M. Roberts, and M. Pagano.
1995.
Human cyclin E, a nuclear protein essential for the G1-to-S phase transition.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15:2612-2624[Abstract].
|
| 47.
|
Oshiro, G.,
J. C. Owens,
Y. Shellman,
R. A. Sclafani, and J. J. Li.
1999.
Cell cycle control of Cdc7p kinase activity through regulation of Dbf4p stability.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19:4888-4896[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 48.
|
Peters, J. M.
1998.
SCF and APC: the Yin and Yang of cell cycle regulated proteolysis.
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
10:759-768[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 49.
|
Pfleger, C. M., and M. W. Kirschner.
2000.
The KEN box: an APC recognition signal distinct from the D box targeted by Cdh1.
Genes Dev.
14:655-665[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 50.
|
Pines, J.
1995.
Cyclins, CDKs and cancer.
Semin. Cancer Biol.
6:63-72[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 51.
|
Polyak, K.,
M. H. Lee,
H. Erdjument-Bromage,
A. Koff,
J. M. Roberts,
P. Tempst, and J. Massague.
1994.
Cloning of p27Kip1, a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor and a potential mediator of extracellular antimitogenic signals.
Cell
78:59-66[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 52.
|
Prinz, S.,
E. S. Hwang,
R. Visintin, and A. Amon.
1998.
The regulation of Cdc20 proteolysis reveals a role for APC components Cdc23 and Cdc27 during S phase and early mitosis.
Curr. Biol.
8:750-760[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 53.
|
Rattner, J. B.,
A. Rao,
M. J. Fritzler,
D. W. Valencia, and T. J. Yen.
1993.
CENP-F is a ca. 400 kDa kinetochore protein that exhibits a cell-cycle dependent localization.
Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton
26:214-226[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 54.
|
Rudner, A. D.,
K. G. Hardwick, and A. W. Murray.
2000.
Cdc28 activates exit from mitosis in budding yeast.
J. Cell Biol.
149:1361-1376[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 55.
|
Saez, C.,
M. A. Japon,
F. Ramos-Morales,
F. Romero,
D. I. Segura,
M. Tortolero, and J. A. Pintor-Toro.
1999.
hpttg is over-expressed in pituitary adenomas and other primary epithelial neoplasias.
Oncogene
18:5473-5476[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 56.
|
Santoni-Rugiu, E.,
J. Falck,
N. Mailand,
J. Bartek, and J. Lukas.
2000.
Involvement of Myc activity in a G1/S-promoting mechanism parallel to the pRb/E2F pathway.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20:3497-3509[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 57.
|
Schwab, M.,
A. S. Lutum, and W. Seufert.
1997.
Yeast Hct1 is a regulator of Clb2 cyclin proteolysis.
Cell
90:683-693[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 58.
|
Shirayama, M.,
A. Toth,
M. Galova, and K. Nasmyth.
1999.
APC(Cdc20) promotes exit from mitosis by destroying the anaphase inhibitor Pds1 and cyclin Clb5.
Nature
402:203-207[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 59.
|
Shteinberg, M.,
Y. Protopopov,
T. Listovsky,
M. Brandeis, and A. Hershko.
1999.
Phosphorylation of the cyclosome is required for its stimulation by Fizzy/cdc20.
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
260:193-198[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 60.
|
Sigrist, S. J., and C. F. Lehner.
1997.
Drosophila fizzy-related down-regulates mitotic cyclins and is required for cell proliferation arrest and entry into endocycles.
Cell
90:671-681[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 61.
|
Sprenger, F.,
N. Yakubovich, and P. H. O'Farrell.
1997.
S-phase function of Drosophila cyclin A and its downregulation in G1 phase.
Curr. Biol.
7:488-499[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 62.
|
Sutterluty, H.,
E. Chatelain,
A. Marti,
C. Wirbelauer,
M. Senften,
U. Muller, and W. Krek.
1999.
p45SKP2 promotes p27Kip1 degradation and induces S phase in quiescent cells.
Nat. Cell Biol.
1:207-214[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 63.
|
Tatsuka, M.,
H. Katayama,
T. Ota,
T. Tanaka,
S. Odashima,
F. Suzuki, and Y. Terada.
1998.
Multinuclearity and increased ploidy caused by overexpression of the aurora- and Ipl1-like midbody-associated protein mitotic kinase in human cancer cells.
Cancer Res.
58:4811-4816[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 64.
|
Terada, Y.,
M. Tatsuka,
F. Suzuki,
Y. Yasuda,
S. Fujita, and M. Otsu.
1998.
AIM-1: a mammalian midbody-associated protein required for cytokinesis.
EMBO J.
17:667-676[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 65.
|
Toyoshima, H., and T. Hunter.
1994.
p27, a novel inhibitor of G1 cyclin-Cdk protein kinase activity, is related to p21.
Cell
78:67-74[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 66.
|
Visintin, R.,
S. Prinz, and A. Amon.
1997.
CDC20 and CDH1: a family of substrate-specific activators of APC-dependent proteolysis.
Science
278:460-463[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 67.
|
Weinreich, M., and B. Stillman.
1999.
Cdc7p-Dbf4p kinase binds to chromatin during S phase and is regulated by both the APC and the RAD53 checkpoint pathway.
EMBO J.
18:5334-5346[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 68.
|
Weinstein, J.
1997.
Cell cycle-regulated expression, phosphorylation, and degradation of p55Cdc: a mammalian homolog of CDC20/Fizzy/slp1.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:28501-28511[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 69.
|
Zachariae, W., and K. Nasmyth.
1999.
Whose end is destruction: cell division and the anaphase-promoting complex.
Genes Dev.
13:2039-2058[Free Full Text].
|
| 70.
|
Zachariae, W.,
M. Schwab,
K. Nasmyth, and W. Seufert.
1998.
Control of cyclin ubiquitination by CDK-regulated binding of Hct1 to the anaphase promoting complex.
Science
282:1721-1724[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 71.
|
Zhang, H.,
R. Kobayashi,
K. Galaktionov, and D. Beach.
1995.
p19Skp1 and p45Skp2 are essential elements of the cyclin A-CDK2 S phase kinase.
Cell
82:915-925[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 72.
|
Zhu, X.,
M. A. Mancini,
K. H. Chang,
C. Y. Liu,
C. F. Chen,
B. Shan,
D. Jones,
T. L. Yang-Feng, and W. H. Lee.
1995.
Characterization of a novel 350-kilodalton nuclear phosphoprotein that is specifically involved in mitotic-phase progression.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15:5017-5029[Abstract].
|
| 73.
|
Zou, H.,
T. J. McGarry,
T. Bernal, and M. W. Kirschner.
1999.
Identification of a vertebrate sister-chromatid separation inhibitor involved in transformation and tumorigenesis.
Science
285:418-422[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Molecular and Cellular Biology, October 2000, p. 7613-7623, Vol. 20, No. 20
0270-7306/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Harmey, D., Smith, A., Simanski, S., Moussa, C. Z., Ayad, N. G.
(2009). The Anaphase Promoting Complex Induces Substrate Degradation during Neuronal Differentiation. J. Biol. Chem.
284: 4317-4323
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Faustrup, H., Bekker-Jensen, S., Bartek, J., Lukas, J., Mailand, N.
(2009). USP7 counteracts SCF{beta}TrCP- but not APCCdh1-mediated proteolysis of Claspin. JCB
184: 13-19
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lammens, T., Boudolf, V., Kheibarshekan, L., Panagiotis Zalmas, L., Gaamouche, T., Maes, S., Vanstraelen, M., Kondorosi, E., La Thangue, N. B., Govaerts, W., Inze, D., De Veylder, L.
(2008). Atypical E2F activity restrains APC/CCCS52A2 function obligatory for endocycle onset. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
105: 14721-14726
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Narbonne-Reveau, K., Senger, S., Pal, M., Herr, A., Richardson, H. E., Asano, M., Deak, P., Lilly, M. A.
(2008). APC/CFzr/Cdh1 promotes cell cycle progression during the Drosophila endocycle. Development
135: 1451-1461
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Sugimoto, N., Kitabayashi, I., Osano, S., Tatsumi, Y., Yugawa, T., Narisawa-Saito, M., Matsukage, A., Kiyono, T., Fujita, M.
(2008). Identification of Novel Human Cdt1-binding Proteins by a Proteomics Approach: Proteolytic Regulation by APC/CCdh1. Mol. Biol. Cell
19: 1007-1021
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Verschuren, E. W., Ban, K. H., Masek, M. A., Lehman, N. L., Jackson, P. K.
(2007). Loss of Emi1-Dependent Anaphase-Promoting Complex/Cyclosome Inhibition Deregulates E2F Target Expression and Elicits DNA Damage-Induced Senescence. Mol. Cell. Biol.
27: 7955-7965
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Keck, J. M., Summers, M. K., Tedesco, D., Ekholm-Reed, S., Chuang, L.-C., Jackson, P. K., Reed, S. I.
(2007). Cyclin E overexpression impairs progression through mitosis by inhibiting APCCdh1. JCB
178: 371-385
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Yabuta, N., Okada, N., Ito, A., Hosomi, T., Nishihara, S., Sasayama, Y., Fujimori, A., Okuzaki, D., Zhao, H., Ikawa, M., Okabe, M., Nojima, H.
(2007). Lats2 Is an Essential Mitotic Regulator Required for the Coordination of Cell Division. J. Biol. Chem.
282: 19259-19271
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lehman, N. L., Tibshirani, R., Hsu, J. Y., Natkunam, Y., Harris, B. T., West, R. B., Masek, M. A., Montgomery, K., van de Rijn, M., Jackson, P. K.
(2007). Oncogenic Regulators and Substrates of the Anaphase Promoting Complex/Cyclosome Are Frequently Overexpressed in Malignant Tumors. Am. J. Pathol.
170: 1793-1805
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Machida, Y. J., Dutta, A.
(2007). The APC/C inhibitor, Emi1, is essential for prevention of rereplication. Genes Dev.
21: 184-194
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Havens, C. G., Ho, A., Yoshioka, N., Dowdy, S. F.
(2006). Regulation of Late G1/S Phase Transition and APCCdh1 by Reactive Oxygen Species. Mol. Cell. Biol.
26: 4701-4711
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Stewart, S., Fang, G.
(2005). Destruction Box-Dependent Degradation of Aurora B Is Mediated by the Anaphase-Promoting Complex/Cyclosome and Cdh1. Cancer Res.
65: 8730-8735
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kondorosi, E., Redondo-Nieto, M., Kondorosi, A.
(2005). Ubiquitin-Mediated Proteolysis. To Be in the Right Place at the Right Moment during Nodule Development. Plant Physiol.
137: 1197-1204
[Full Text]
-
Pan, J., Chen, R.-H.
(2004). Spindle checkpoint regulates Cdc20p stability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev.
18: 1439-1451
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Vinardell, J. M., Fedorova, E., Cebolla, A., Kevei, Z., Horvath, G., Kelemen, Z., Tarayre, S., Roudier, F., Mergaert, P., Kondorosi, A., Kondorosi, E.
(2003). Endoreduplication Mediated by the Anaphase-Promoting Complex Activator CCS52A Is Required for Symbiotic Cell Differentiation in Medicago truncatula Nodules. Plant Cell
15: 2093-2105
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Laronne, A., Rotkopf, S., Hellman, A., Gruenbaum, Y., Porter, A. C.G., Brandeis, M.
(2003). Synchronization of Interphase Events Depends neither on Mitosis nor on cdk1. Mol. Biol. Cell
14: 3730-3740
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Chabes, A. L., Pfleger, C. M., Kirschner, M. W., Thelander, L.
(2003). Mouse ribonucleotide reductase R2 protein: A new target for anaphase-promoting complex-Cdh1-mediated proteolysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
100: 3925-3929
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Zhou, Y., Ching, Y.-P., Chun, A. C. S., Jin, D.-Y.
(2003). Nuclear Localization of the Cell Cycle Regulator CDH1 and Its Regulation by Phosphorylation. J. Biol. Chem.
278: 12530-12536
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Harper, J. W., Burton, J. L., Solomon, M. J.
(2002). The anaphase-promoting complex: it's not just for mitosis any more. Genes Dev.
16: 2179-2206
[Full Text]
-
Hussein, D., Taylor, S. S.
(2002). Farnesylation of Cenp-F is required for G2/M progression and degradation after mitosis. J. Cell Sci.
115: 3403-3414
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Pfleger, C. M., Lee, E., Kirschner, M. W.
(2001). Substrate recognition by the Cdc20 and Cdh1 components of the anaphase-promoting complex. Genes Dev.
15: 2396-2407
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Pfleger, C. M., Salic, A., Lee, E., Kirschner, M. W.
(2001). Inhibition of Cdh1-APC by the MAD2-related protein MAD2L2: a novel mechanism for regulating Cdh1. Genes Dev.
15: 1759-1764
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Huang, J. N., Park, I., Ellingson, E., Littlepage, L. E., Pellman, D.
(2001). Activity of the APCCdh1 form of the anaphase-promoting complex persists until S phase and prevents the premature expression of Cdc20p. JCB
154: 85-94
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Sørensen, C. S., Lukas, C., Kramer, E. R., Peters, J.-M., Bartek, J., Lukas, J.
(2001). A Conserved Cyclin-Binding Domain Determines Functional Interplay between Anaphase-Promoting Complex-Cdh1 and Cyclin A-Cdk2 during Cell Cycle Progression. Mol. Cell. Biol.
21: 3692-3703
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Zeitlin, S. G., Shelby, R. D., Sullivan, K. F.
(2001). CENP-A is phosphorylated by Aurora B kinase and plays an unexpected role in completion of cytokinesis. JCB
155: 1147-1158
[Abstract]
[Full Text]