Previous Article | Next Article 
Molecular and Cellular Biology, October 2000, p. 7751-7763, Vol. 20, No. 20
0270-7306/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
RB-Dependent S-Phase Response to DNA
Damage
Karen E.
Knudsen,1
Dana
Booth,2,3
Soheil
Naderi,2,3
Zvjezdana
Sever-Chroneos,1
Anne F.
Fribourg,1
Irina C.
Hunton,2,3
James R.
Feramisco,3,4
Jean Y. J.
Wang,2,3 and
Erik S.
Knudsen1,*
Department of Cell Biology, University of
Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45267-0521,1 and
Department of Biology,2 Cancer
Center,3 and School of
Medicine,4 University of California, San Diego,
La Jolla, California 92093
Received 22 February 2000/Returned for modification 21 April
2000/Accepted 10 July 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
The retinoblastoma tumor suppressor protein (RB) is a potent
inhibitor of cell proliferation. RB is expressed throughout the cell
cycle, but its antiproliferative activity is neutralized by
phosphorylation during the G1/S transition. RB plays an
essential role in the G1 arrest induced by a variety of
growth inhibitory signals. In this report, RB is shown to also be
required for an intra-S-phase response to DNA damage. Treatment with
cisplatin, etoposide, or mitomycin C inhibited S-phase progression in
Rb+/+ but not in Rb
/
mouse embryo
fibroblasts. Dephosphorylation of RB in S-phase cells temporally
preceded the inhibition of DNA synthesis. This S-phase
dephosphorylation of RB and subsequent inhibition of DNA replication
was observed in p21Cip1-deficient cells. The induction of
the RB-dependent intra-S-phase arrest persisted for days and correlated
with a protection against DNA damage-induced cell death. These results
demonstrate that RB plays a protective role in response to genotoxic
stress by inhibiting cell cycle progression in G1 and in S phase.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The retinoblastoma tumor suppressor
protein (RB) is a negative regulator of cell proliferation (1, 31,
33, 39, 49). The antiproliferative activity of RB is mediated by
its ability to inhibit the transcription of genes that are required for
cell cycle progression, e.g., cyclin A (17, 33). This
transcriptional regulatory function of RB is achieved through several
distinct mechanisms, which are best illustrated by the inhibition of
E2F-regulated gene expression. RB binds to the C-terminal
transactivation domain of the E2F subunit in E2F-DP heterodimers and
therein neutralizes the transactivation function of E2F (10,
53). RB also assembles a repressor complex at promoters
containing E2F binding sites through simultaneous binding to both E2F
and histone deacetylase (3, 30). Because histone deacetylase
modifies chromatin to a closed state through deacetylation,
transcription is repressed (22). Additionally, it has
recently been reported that the RB-mediated repression of specific cell
cycle genes (e.g., the cyclin A gene) is dependent on association with
SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling activity (42, 43, 55). The
mechanism through which the SWI/SNF complex mediates RB-dependent
transcriptional repression is not clearly understood. However, loss of
SWI/SNF activity disrupts RB-mediated repression of specific cell cycle
targets and renders cells resistant to RB-mediated cell cycle arrest.
Lastly, RB may interact with specific components of the basal
transcription machinery (e.g., TFII250) to regulate their activities
(41). Through these collective mechanisms of transcriptional
regulation, RB exerts its antiproliferative action (56). In
general, RB activity is induced in response to environmental signals
which favor halting the cell cycle. For example, the antimitogenic
activity of transforming growth factor
requires RB activation
(15). Similarly, it has been shown that RB activity is
required for G1 arrest in response to DNA damage
(13).
The ability of RB to inhibit cellular proliferation is counterbalanced
by the action of cyclin-dependent kinases (Cdks). In response to
proliferative signals, Cdks are activated by their cyclin regulatory
subunits to phosphorylate RB and thereby inactivate its protein binding
function (1, 31, 39, 49). Specifically, when quiescent cells
are stimulated to enter the cell cycle, Cdk4/6-cyclin D complexes
become active in mid-G1 and initiate the phosphorylation of
RB (31, 39). Later in G1, RB becomes
hyperphosphorylated through the combined actions of Cdk4-cyclin D,
Cdk2-cyclin E, and Cdk2-cyclin A (5, 28, 31, 54). The
activities of Cdk2-cyclin E and Cdk2-cyclin A are both rate limiting
and required for entry into S phase (34, 35, 38).
Phosphorylation of RB is maintained throughout S and G2,
until RB is finally dephosphorylated by a phosphatase at the
M/G1 transition (25, 31). The E2F binding
function of RB can be inactivated by the phosphorylation of several Cdk
phosphorylation sites (6, 20). The binding of RB to c-Abl
tyrosine kinase is inactivated by the phosphorylation of two specific
serine sites (19), and binding to viral oncoproteins or
histone deacetylase is inactivated by two specific threonine sites
(12, 19, 20). These data show that phosphorylation of RB is
a highly regulated process and that specific phosphorylation events
result in distinct outcomes.
The importance of RB phosphorylation is underscored by the prevalence
of mutations in cancer that result in deregulation of RB
phosphorylation (1, 39). For example, amplification or overexpression of cyclin D and Cdk4/6, or loss of the Cdk4/6 inhibitor p16ink4a, occurs with high frequency in human
tumors (1, 39). Each of these types of mutations results in
increased RB phosphorylation and inactivation of RB function.
Accordingly, RB mutant proteins that lack the Cdk phosphorylation sites
which regulate E2F binding are potent inhibitors of the cell cycle
(6, 18, 27). These phosphorylation site-mutated RB proteins
(PSM-RB) cause a cell cycle arrest in G1, which can be
overridden by the increased expression of cyclin E (6, 18,
27). Interestingly, however, overproduction of cyclin E does not
rescue cell cycle inhibition imposed by PSM-RB, as these cells entered
but could not progress through S phase (6, 18). The S-phase
inhibitory action of RB cannot be mimicked by Cdk inhibitors such as
p16ink4a, p21Cip1, or
p27Kip1 (18). The observation that PSM-RB could
inhibit S-phase progression was consistent with the continued
phosphorylation of RB throughout S phase and suggested that RB might
become dephosphorylated under specific conditions, resulting in the
inhibition of DNA replication.
In this report we show that several DNA damage inducers, including
cisplatin, etoposide, and mitomycin C, can inhibit S-phase progression.
The S-phase inhibition induced by these DNA-damaging agents was
observed with RB-positive cells but not with RB-negative cells. The
inhibition of DNA replication was preceded by RB dephosphorylation, which also occurred in p21Cip1-deficient cells. This
RB-dependent S-phase block in damaged cells persisted for days and was
correlated with a protection against cell death. These observations
demonstrate that RB plays an essential role in the S-phase response to
genotoxic stress and suggest that regulation of RB phosphorylation can
occur in S phase to inhibit DNA synthesis.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Cell culture, synchronization, and drug treatment.
Mouse
embryo fibroblasts (MEFs) were derived from 10- to 12-day embryos
isolated from the mating of mice with Rb+/
or
p21+/
genotype. The genotype of all MEFs was determined
by PCR of head DNA, and the fibroblasts used in this study were between
passages 2 and 6. Cells were propagated in MEF medium (Dulbecco
modified Eagle medium supplemented with penicillin, streptomycin, and
glutamine in 10% fetal bovine serum [FBS] with 0.001%
-mercaptoethanol). To synchronize in quiescence, MEFs were cultured
in MEF medium containing only 0.1% FBS for 72 h. To synchronize
cells in S phase, cells were stimulated with 10% FBS for 16 h and
then blocked with either aphidicolin (Aph; 2 µg/ml) or hydroxyurea
(HU; 1 mM) (Sigma). Cells were cultured in the presence of either drug
for an additional 10 h to allow S-phase accumulation.
Clinical-grade cis-diamminedichloroplatinum II (CDDP;
Bristol-Oncology) and reagent-grade etoposide and mitomycin C (both
from Sigma) were applied at the given concentrations for the indicated
period of time. Release from S-phase synchrony was achieved by washing
the cells once with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) followed by two
washes with drug-free medium for 5 min. Bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU;
Amersham) was added to the medium upon release, and labeling was
carried out for the indicated time. The Rat-1 cells were cultured and
synchronized as previously described (18).
Immunofluorescence and microinjection.
MEFs were seeded at
0.75 × 105 to 1.0 × 105 cells per
well of a six-well plate onto glass coverslips. Aph-synchronized cells were injected using an Eppendorf automatic microinjection system mounted on a Zeiss S100 Axiovert microscope. Plasmids were diluted to a
concentration of 50 ng/µl in injection buffer as previously described
(18). The PSM-7LP plasmid has been previously described (18). All injections contained a nuclear green fluorescent
protein (GFP) expression plasmid (histone H2B fused to GFP) to allow
for the identification of productively injected cells. Cells were released from Aph arrest 16 h postinjection and labeled with BrdU for 4 h. BrdU incorporation was determined as previously described (18). In all experiments, the percentage of BrdU-positive
cells was determined as the percentage of Hoechst-stained nuclei or GFP-positive nuclei which were BrdU positive.
The ICR4 antibody was kindly provided by Michael Tilby (University of
Manchester) (45). For ICR4 staining, cells grown on glass
coverslips were fixed in 3.7% formaldehyde in PBS for 15 min at room
temperature. Fixed cells were then permeabilized using 0.3% Triton
X-100 in PBS for 15 min at room temperature. ICR4 was diluted at 1:10
in IF (immunofluorescence) buffer (PBS, 0.5% NP-40, 5 mg of bovine
serum albumin/ml) supplemented with MgCl2 and DNase I and
added to the permeabilized cells for 1 h 37°C. Cells were washed
with PBS and then subjected to secondary antibody diluted 1:100 in IF
buffer for 1 h at 37°C. Cells were washed again in PBS and
mounted using Gelvatol.
Immunoblotting, immunoprecipitation, and kinase assay.
For
the detection of RB, 2.0 × 106 cells were plated on
15-cm-diameter dishes and subjected to synchronization and drug
treatment as described. Cells were lysed in RIPA
(radioimmunoprecipitation assay) buffer, and RB was immunoprecipitated
with antibody 851 (44) and protein A-Sepharose. Resulting
immunocomplexes were recovered by centrifugation and washed four times
in RIPA buffer. Proteins were denatured by boiling in sodium dodecyl
sulfate (SDS) buffer supplemented with 3%
-mercaptoethanol,
resolved by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) on an SDS-6.5%
gel, and transferred to Immobilon-P. RB was detected by immunoblotting
with antibody 851.
For detection of cyclin E, cyclin A, p21, and Cdk2, cells were
subjected to synchronization and drug treatment as described.
Cells
were lysed in RIPA buffer, and equal amounts of protein
were resolved
by SDS-PAGE. Proteins were detected using standard
immunoblotting
procedures and the following antibodies: for cyclin
A, C-19 (Santa
Cruz); for cyclin E, M20 (Santa Cruz); for Cdk2,
M2 (Santa Cruz); and
for p21
Cip1, PC55
(Calbiochem).
Cdk2 immunoprecipitation and kinase assays were performed as previously
described (
17).
Flow cytometry staining and analysis.
Cells were fixed with
80% ethanol and processed for propidium iodide staining as described
previously (6, 12, 19, 20, 54). For bivariate analyses,
cells were fixed with ethanol and stained for BrdU incorporation and
propidium iodide staining. Flow cytometry was performed on a Coulter
Epic or Becton Dickinson flow cytometer. The percent BrdU labeling was
determined for S-phase cells by gating those cells with greater than 2N
but less than 4N DNA content and determining the percentage of these
cells which were BrdU positive. All statistical analysis of the flow
cytometry data was carried out blind.
Transfection and reporter assays.
For transfection, 1.5 × 105 MEFs were seeded on a 6-cm-diameter dish and
transfected 24 h later with 8 µg of total plasmid DNA (1 µg of
CMV-betagal, 5 µg of 3XE2FLUC, and 2 µg of CMV-NeoBam) by standard
calcium phosphate procedures, as previously described (21).
After transfection, cells were synchronized in Aph for 24 h, at
which time 0 or 32 µM CDDP was added. After 16 h, the cells were
harvested and processed for luciferase activity using the Promega
luciferase assay system according to the manufacturer's protocol.
-Galactosidase activity was also quantitated as an internal control
for transfection efficiency. Reported relative luciferase activity
reflects luciferase activity normalized to
-galactosidase activity.
Data shown represent the average of at least four independent experiments.
 |
RESULTS |
Cisplatin-induced RB dephosphorylation in S-phase cells.
We
have previously shown that PSM-RB, an RB mutant which cannot be
inactivated by phosphorylation, inhibits DNA synthesis when expressed
in S-phase Rat-1 cells (18). This observation suggested that
RB might be involved in the regulation of S-phase progression.
Physiological growth factors generally regulate S-phase entry but do
not control the progression through S phase. However, intra-S-phase
checkpoints can be triggered under stress and by DNA damage (24,
50, 51). To assess the role of RB in the S-phase DNA damage
response, we examined whether RB becomes activated or dephosphorylated
in S-phase cells after genotoxic stress. Rat-1 cells were synchronized
in early S phase with the DNA polymerase inhibitor Aph and subsequently
exposed either to the chemotherapeutic agent cisplatin (in the form of
CDDP; 50 µM, 3 h) or to ionizing radiation (IR; 10 Gy).
Following treatment, cells were released from the Aph arrest and
monitored for progression through S phase. Exposure to IR did not
interfere with DNA synthesis following Aph release (data not shown).
When released from Aph, Rat-1 cells progressed from S phase through
G2 and into the subsequent G1 in 6 h (Fig.
1a, left panels), and 80% of the cells
incorporated BrdU during this time period (Fig. 1b). In contrast, cells
treated with CDDP retained S-phase DNA content (Fig. 1a, right panels) and failed to incorporate BrdU (Fig. 1b). We then examined the status
of RB phosphorylation in CDDP-treated cells (Fig. 1c). Hypophosphorylated RB (pRB) was detected in quiescent Rat-1 cells (Fig.
1c, lane 1), and predominantly hyperphosphorylated RB (ppRB) was found
in asynchronously growing (lane 2) or Aph-arrested (lane 3) cells.
After 3 h of treatment with 50 µM CDDP, however, ppRB was no
longer detectable in the Aph-arrested, S-phase cells (lane 4). These
results established a correlation between the dephosphorylation of RB
and the inhibition of S-phase progression in cells damaged by CDDP.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
CDDP inhibits DNA synthesis and induces RB
dephosphorylation in S-phase cells. (a) Rat-1 cells were arrested in
Aph (2 µg/ml, 24 h) and then treated with CDDP (50 µM) or
vehicle for an additional 3 h. Cells were washed extensively to
remove Aph and CDDP and then collected at 2, 4, or 6 h after
washing. The DNA content of each population of cells was determined by
flow cytometry. Pretreatment with CDDP blocked S-phase progression in
Rat-1 cells. (b) Rat-1 cells were arrested in Aph (2 µg/ml, 24 h) and then treated with CDDP (50 µM) or vehicle for an additional
3 h. Cells were washed extensively to remove Aph and CDDP and then
labeled with BrdU for 3 h. The cells were then fixed and reacted
with anti-BrdU antibody. The percentage of cells that incorporated BrdU
was determined by counting at least 100 cells per experiment. Data
shown are means and standard deviations from three independent
experiments. Representative fields of BrdU-labeled cells are shown. (c)
The status of RB phosphorylation in Rat-1 cells that were serum starved
for 72 h (Qui; lane 1), asynchronously growing (Asy; lane 2), Aph
arrested (2 µg/ml, 24 h) (APH; lane 3), or Aph arrested and CDDP
treated (50 µM, 3 h) (CDDP + APH; lane 4) was examined by
immunoprecipitation of total cell lysate with anti-RB 851 followed by
immunoblotting with anti-RB 851.
|
|
RB is required for cisplatin-induced inhibition of DNA
synthesis.
To further assess the role of RB in CDDP-induced
S-phase inhibition, we compared the responses of RB-positive and
RB-deficient MEFs to CDDP. As a control, we first examined the
G1 checkpoint response in Rb+/+ and
Rb
/
MEFs, since a previous report has shown that
Rb
/
MEFs do not undergo G1 arrest following
exposure to CDDP (13). To examine the G1
response to CDDP, both Rb+/+ and Rb
/
MEFs
were made quiescent by serum starvation. Following serum stimulation,
35 to 45% of the MEFs incorporated BrdU, representing the
proliferative index of the MEF culture (data not shown). The proliferative indices of Rb+/+ and Rb
/
cultures were similar, and both types of MEFs showed serum dependence for G1 progression (Fig. 2A, left panel). When quiescent
MEFs were treated with CDDP (16 or 32 µM) and then stimulated with serum, the Rb+/+ MEFs arrested in G1 (Fig.
2a,
right panel). In contrast, the Rb
/
MEFs incorporated BrdU irrespective of CDDP
treatment (Fig. 2a, right panel). These results confirmed that RB is
required for CDDP to induce a cell cycle arrest in G1.

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Inhibition of DNA synthesis by CDDP requires RB. MEFs
were prepared by mating Rb-heterozygous mice and harvesting embryos at
day 10 to 12 of gestation. The genotype of each embryo was determined
by PCR of head DNA. Rb+/+ or Rb / MEFs from
the same litter were used between passages 2 and 6. (a)
Rb+/+ and Rb / MEFs were cultured in 0.1%
serum for 72 h. (Left) Quiescent cells were stimulated with 10%
FBS for 26 h (10%) or for only 30 min and then transferred into
0% FBS (0%) and labeled with BrdU. The stained cells were counted
(see Materials and Methods), and the percentage of BrdU-positive cells
in 10% FBS was set at 100. (Right) In parallel, quiescent cells were
treated with the indicated concentration of CDDP for 16 h and then
stimulated with 10% FBS and labeled with BrdU for 26 h. The BrdU-positive cells were
counted, and the value was normalized to the percentage of
BrdU-positive cells in untreated cells, which was set to 100%. (b)
(Left) Rb+/+ or Rb / MEFs were arrested in
early S phase by Aph as described in Materials and Methods. The
Aph-arrested cells were beyond the G1 restriction point, as
shown by a serum-independent DNA synthesis following release from the
Aph block. After the Aph was washed away, BrdU was added to cells with
the indicated concentration of FBS for 4 h. BrdU-positive cells
were counted, and the percentage of BrdU-positive cells in 10% FBS was
set as 100. (Right) Aph-arrested S-phase cells were treated with the
indicated concentrations of CDDP for 16 h. Cells were then washed
extensively to remove both Aph and CDDP and labeled with BrdU in 10%
FBS for 4 h. The BrdU-positive cells were counted, and the value
was normalized to that of CDDP-untreated culture, which was set to
100%. (c) MEFs of either Rb+/+ or Rb /
genotype were synchronized in S phase by sequential serum stimulation
from quiescence for 16 h followed by incubation in HU (1 mM) for
10 h. The S-phase cells were then subjected to either 0 or 32 µM
CDDP for 16 h and washed extensively in medium for release from
the HU block. BrdU was added to the medium, and cells were labeled for
4 h to monitor progression through S phase. Cells were fixed and
stained for the incorporation of BrdU. Data shown are relative
percentages of cells staining positive for BrdU incorporation from two
independent experiments. (d) Rb+/+ or Rb /
MEFs were synchronized in S phase using Aph, treated with 0 to 32 µM
CDDP for 16 h, and then washed for release for 4 h. Cells
were fixed and subjected to staining with the ICR4 antibody, which
detects platinated DNA. Representative pictures shown were captured
with identical exposure times.
|
|
To examine the intra-S-phase response to CDDP in this system, MEFs were
synchronized in early S phase by Aph treatment. Aph
synchronization was
performed in the presence of serum to allow
G
1 progression
beyond the restriction point. This was shown by
the incorporation of
BrdU upon Aph release in the presence or
absence of serum (Fig.
2b,
left panel). Furthermore, the Aph-synchronized
cells incorporated BrdU
within 1 h of release from Aph, consistent
with a block in early S
phase (not shown). The Aph-synchronized
S-phase cells were treated with
several concentrations of CDDP
and washed free of Aph and CDDP; then
the incorporation of BrdU
was examined. Exposure of the
Aph-synchronized Rb
+/+ MEFs to CDDP (16 or 32 µM) for
16 h led to an inhibition of DNA
synthesis (Fig.
2b, right panel).
Thus, CDDP inhibited S-phase
progression in Rb
+/+ MEFs,
similar to the response observed with Rat-1 cells (Fig.
1b).
Interestingly, Aph-synchronized Rb
/
MEFs were
unresponsive to CDDP, as these cells incorporated BrdU
upon Aph release
irrespective of prior treatment with CDDP (Fig.
2b, right panel). To
verify that the CDDP effect was not specific
for Aph-synchronized
cells, we used HU as an alternative means
to block cells in early S
phase. Treatment of HU-synchronized
Rb
+/+ cells with CDDP
led to an inhibition of BrdU incorporation following
HU release, while
HU-synchronized Rb
/
MEFs did not respond to CDDP and
continued to incorporate BrdU
following HU release (Fig.
2c).
CDDP is passively diffused into cells, where it forms adducts with DNA.
To verify that adducts were generated in both Rb
+/+ and
Rb
/
cells, we used a specific antibody (ICR4) which
reacts with the
platinum adducts (
45). In Aph-synchronized
MEFs not exposed
to CDDP, ICR4 immunoreactivity was not detectable
above the background
level (Fig.
2d, top panel). As expected, exposure
to CDDP led
to a dose-dependent increase in immunoreactivity toward
ICR4 (Fig.
2d, lower panels). Quantitation by digital imaging of ICR4
reactivity
showed a similar extent of platinum adduct formation between
the
Rb
+/+ and Rb
/
MEFs (not
shown).
In both Rb
+/+ and Rb
/
MEFs, CDDP caused an
inhibition of mitosis, assayed by nuclear condensation (data not
shown). Thus, the
G
2/M checkpoint is intact in
Rb
/
cells. In other experiments, we compared the
responses of Rb
+/+ and Rb
/
MEFs to a
transient 1-h exposure to CDDP (10 to 50 µM). At these
levels of
exposure, CDDP caused only a reduction in the rate of
DNA synthesis;
this was observed with both Rb
+/+ and Rb
/
MEFs. This reduction in the rate of DNA synthesis was consistent
with
comparable platinum adduct formation in these two cell types.
Taken
together, these results suggest that Rb
/
cells
experienced comparable damage by CDDP as the Rb
+/+ cells.
Moreover, RB is required for CDDP to inhibit DNA synthesis,
which
occurred under conditions of prolonged exposure and possibly
irreparable
damage.
Dephosphorylated RB is observed prior to the inhibition of DNA
replication in S-phase cells.
Since RB appeared to be required for
the S-phase response to CDDP, RB activity was monitored via examination
of its phosphorylation state. Serum-starved MEFs contained
predominantly pRB (Fig. 3a, lane 2).
After serum stimulation and Aph synchronization, ppRB was observed
(Fig. 3a, lane 3). Because a portion of the MEFs were not actively
cycling, pRB was also detected in these Aph-synchronized cultures.
Further incubation of Aph-synchronized cells did not alter the ratio of
ppRB to pRB (lane 4); however, addition of CDDP caused the
disappearance of ppRB (lane 5). We often observed the presence of a
shorter form of RB in Rb+/+ MEFs, and this delta-RB
corresponded to the C-terminally truncated RB previously described to
be generated by caspase cleavage (44).

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Dephosphorylation of RB in S phase precedes the
inhibition of DNA replication. (a) Lysates were prepared from either
asynchronously growing Rb / 3T3 cells (lane 1) or
Rb+/+ MEFs which were synchronized in either quiescence
(Qui; lane 2) or Aph (lane 3) and then treated with vehicle (lane 4) or
treated with 32 µM CDDP (lane 5) for 12 h. RB was recovered from
the lysates by immunoprecipitation, resolved by SDS-PAGE, and detected
by immunoblotting. (b) Lysates were prepared from either asynchronously
growing Rb / 3T3 cells (lane 1) or Rb+/+
MEFs that were synchronized in quiescence (lane 2) or S phase using Aph
(lane 3) and treated with 32 µM CDDP for 0 (lane 4), 4 (lane 5), 8 (lane 6), or 12 (lane 7) h. RB was recovered from the lysates by
immunoprecipitation, resolved by SDS-PAGE, and detected by
immunoblotting. (c) Cells cultured as described for panel b were
released from the Aph block, and BrdU incorporation was determined from
a 4-h labeling. Data shown are relative percentages of BrdU-positive
cells from two independent experiments.
|
|
As mentioned above, the inhibition of DNA synthesis was observed after
a prolonged exposure to CDDP. We therefore compared
the kinetics of RB
dephosphorylation and the inhibition of DNA
synthesis in
Aph-synchronized MEF cultures (Fig.
3b and c). With
32 µM CDDP,
little increase in pRB was observed after 4 h of incubation
(Fig.
3b, compare lanes 3 to 5). Correspondingly, DNA synthesis
was not
inhibited when cells were released from the Aph block
from a 4-h
incubation with CDDP (Fig.
3c). When cells were released
after 8 h
of exposure to CDDP, ppRB was no longer detected (Fig.
3b, lane 6) and
DNA synthesis was inhibited by approximately 50%
(Fig.
3c). After
12 h of exposure to CDDP, ppRB had been absent
for at least 4 h (Fig.
3b, compare lanes 4 to 7), and DNA synthesis
was inhibited in
the majority of the cells in the culture (Fig.
3c). Thus, the shift to
active RB preceded the inhibition of DNA
synthesis in CDDP-treated
S-phase
cells.
S-phase inhibition and dephosphorylated RB in
p21Cip1-deficient cells.
The Cdk inhibitor
p21Cip1 is upregulated by p53 in response to DNA damage
(8). Because p21Cip1 can inhibit RB
phosphorylation by Cdk (5), and because p21Cip1
can interact with PCNA to inhibit DNA synthesis (48), we
examined whether p21Cip1 might be responsible for the
CDDP-induced increase in pRB and inhibition of DNA synthesis. To do so,
MEFs were prepared from wild-type, Rb
/
, and
p21Cip1
/
embryos (4). Cells were then
synchronized by Aph and subsequently treated with increasing
concentrations of CDDP. As can be seen in Fig.
4a, wild-type MEFs arrest DNA synthesis
with increasing dose of CDDP (top panel), whereas Rb
/
MEFs exhibit no inhibition of BrdU incorporation, even at relatively high (40 µM) doses of CDDP (middle panel). By contrast,
p21Cip1
/
cells demonstrate an intermediate phenotype,
showing no inhibition at low or intermediate doses (0 to 16 µM) but
exhibiting S-phase retardation at higher doses (32 to 40 µM) (bottom
panel). p21Cip1
/
MEFs treated with 32 µM CDDP
contained predominantly the underphosphorylated form of RB only after
12 h of exposure (Fig. 4b), therefore exhibiting a delayed
activation of RB compared to wild-type MEFs (Fig. 3). The observation
that p21Cip1
/
MEFs exhibited a wild-type (albeit
delayed) response to CDDP in S phase is consistent with our previous
observation that the expression of p21Cip1 in S-phase cells
does not inhibit DNA synthesis, whereas the expression of PSM-RB blocks
the incorporation of BrdU under identical conditions (18).
Moreover, p21Cip1 was not induced in S-phase-synchronized
Rb+/+ MEFs following 16 h of treatment with 32 µM
CDDP (Fig. 4c, compare lanes 1 and 2). However, the presence of
p21Cip1 did affect Cdk2 activity. As shown in Fig. 4d,
Cdk2-associated kinase activity was attenuated in Aph-synchronized
Rb+/+ MEFs following a 16-h treatment with 32 µM CDDP
(compare lanes 2 and 3). By contrast, little change in Cdk2 activity
was consistently observed in p21Cip
/
MEFs following
identical treatment (compare lanes 5 and 6). Collectively, these
observations suggest that the inhibition of S-phase progression by CDDP
is partially dependent on p21Cip1 function, thus indicating
p21Cip1-independent mechanisms of RB dephosphorylation in
S-phase cells.

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
p21-defective cells exhibit a partial response to CDDP.
(a) Aph-blocked wild-type (top), Rb / (middle), and
p21Cip1 / (bottom) MEFs were subjected to increasing
doses (0 to 40 µM) of CDDP for 16 h. Cells were released from
Aph and labeled with BrdU for 4 h. The relative percent BrdU
incorporation shown is the average from one to three experiments. (b)
Lysates were prepared from either asynchronous Rb / 3T3
cells (lane 1) or p21Cip / MEFs that were synchronized
in quiescence (lane 2), blocked in Aph (lane 3), and treated with 32 µM CDDP for 0 (lane 4), 4 (lane 5), 8 (lane 6), 12 (lane 7), or 16 (lane 8) h. RB was recovered using immunoprecipitation, resolved by
SDS-PAGE, and detected by immunoblotting. (c) Lysates were prepared
from Rb+/+ MEFs that were synchronized with Aph (lane 1)
and treated with 32 µM CDDP for 16 h (lane 2). Equal amounts of
protein were resolved by SDS-PAGE, and p21Cip1 was detected
by immunoblotting. (d) Lysates were prepared from Rb+/+ and
p21Cip / MEFs that were synchronized in quiescence
(lanes 1 and 4), blocked in Aph (lanes 2 and 5), and treated with 32 µM CDDP for 16 h (lanes 3 and 6). Cdk2 complexes were recovered
by immunoprecipitation and analyzed in in vitro kinase assays using
histone H1 as a substrate. Kinase activity was detected by
autoradiography, and the immunoprecipitated Cdk2 was detected by
immunoblotting.
|
|
Cisplatin causes an RB-dependent arrest in mid-S phase.
To
demonstrate that CDDP affects S-phase progression in the absence of
Aph, we examined the effect of CDDP on S-phase progression in
asynchronously growing MEF cultures. Titration and time course experiments were performed to identify a CDDP concentration that would
induce RB dephosphorylation in asynchronous cells within one S-phase
cycle. We found that 64 µM CDDP caused the dephosphorylation of RB
between 4 and 6 h in asynchronously growing cells. Therefore, Rb+/+ MEFs were treated with 64 µM CDDP and pulse-labeled
with BrdU for 1 h prior to the collection of samples for RB
protein analysis (Fig. 5a)
and flow cytometric analysis (Fig. 5b).
After 6 h of CDDP treatment, ppRB was no longer detected (Fig. 5a,
lane 4). Pulse-labeling between h 5 to 6, however, showed no inhibition of DNA synthesis (Fig. 5b, panel 3). However, pulse-labeling with BrdU
between h 7 to 8 showed a strong inhibition of BrdU incorporation (Fig.
5b, panel 4), and only pRB was found in cells harvested at the 8-h time
point (Fig. 5a, lane 6). Dephosphorylated RB persisted through 12 h of CDDP treatment (Fig. 5a, lane 8), and DNA synthesis remained
inhibited (not shown). Most importantly, cells with S-phase DNA content
were present in these CDDP-treated cultures (as detected by propidium
iodide staining), but these S-phase cells no longer incorporated BrdU
(Fig. 5b, compare panels 2 and 4). Quantitation of the
fluorescence-activated-cell sorting (FACS) data showed that greater
than 75% of the cells with DNA content between 2N and 4N incorporated
BrdU in the absence of CDDP, but only 10% of such cells incorporated
BrdU following 7 to 8 h of CDDP treatment (Fig. 5c, panels 1 and
2; Fig. 5d). However, when Rb
/
MEFs were subjected to
the same CDDP treatment, DNA synthesis continued, as
Rb
/
MEFs treated with 64 µM CDDP continued to undergo
BrdU incorporation (Fig. 5c, compare panels 3 and 4). The relative
level of BrdU incorporation was decreased in the CDDP-treated culture,
consistent with a reduction in the rate of DNA synthesis due to the
formation of platinum adducts in the DNA. Quantitation of the FACS data showed that greater than 75% of the S-phase Rb
/
MEFs
incorporated BrdU, whether or not CDDP was present (Fig. 5d). Moreover,
the Rb
/
MEFs progressed from S into G2 and
accumulated in G2 phase (not shown). These results showed
that CDDP can inhibit S-phase progression without prior treatment of
cells with Aph or HU, and they reaffirmed that the inhibition of DNA
synthesis followed RB dephosphorylation by approximately 2 h. The
inhibition of DNA synthesis was not observed in asynchronously growing
Rb
/
MEFs treated with CDDP. In other experiments, we
found that asynchronously proliferating p21Cip1
/
MEFs
responded to CDDP by undergoing an S-phase arrest, similar to
p21Cip1+/+ MEFs (not shown).


View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
CDDP inhibits DNA synthesis in mid-S-phase cells. (a)
Asynchronously proliferating Rb+/+ MEFs were subjected to
vehicle (lanes 1, 3, 5, and 7) or 64 µM CDDP (lanes 2, 4, 6, and 8)
for the indicated time. Cells were harvested, lysates were prepared,
and RB was immunoprecipitated, resolved by SDS-PAGE, and detected by
immunoblotting. (b) Asynchronously growing Rb+/+ MEFs were
treated with CDDP for the indicated times (panel 1, no BrdU; panel 2, 0 h; panel 3, 6 h; panel 4, 8 h) with BrdU
pulse-labeling during the final hour of treatment. Cells were fixed and
processed for BrdU incorporation to detect DNA synthesis and stained
with propidium iodide (PI) to determine cell cycle phase by flow
cytometry. Shown are representative scatter plots with the log
fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) anti-BrdU staining versus propidium
iodide staining. (c) Asynchronously growing Rb+/+ (panels 1 and 2) or Rb / (panels 3 and 4) MEFs were treated with
vehicle (panels 1 and 3) or 64 µM CDDP (panels 2 and 4) for 8 h
with BrdU pulse-labeling during the final hour of treatment. Cells were
fixed and processed for BrdU incorporation to detect DNA synthesis and
stained with propidium iodide to determine cell cycle phase by flow
cytometry. Shown are representative scatter plots with the log FITC
anti-BrdU staining versus propidium iodide staining. (d) The percentage
of S-phase cells (greater than 2N but less than 4N DNA content)
exhibiting DNA synthesis (BrdU positive) was determined. Data shown are
from three independent experiments. (e) Asynchronously growing
wild-type and Rb / MEFs were treated with either IR (50 Gy), 5 µM etoposide, or 4 µg of mitomycin C (MMC) per ml. Following
treatment, cells were pulsed with BrdU for 1 h and subsequently
fixed and processed for bivariate flow cytometry. The percentage of
S-phase cells (with DNA content between 2N and 4N) that incorporated
BrdU was determined.
|
|
RB-dependent S-phase arrest by other DNA-damaging agents.
To
assess the effect of other genotoxic agents on S-phase progression,
Rb+/+ and Rb
/
MEFs were treated with IR,
etoposide, and mitomycin C. IR causes both single- and double-strand
breaks in DNA, etoposide inhibits topoisomerase II activity and results
in predominantly double-strand breaks in late S-phase, and mitomycin C
is an alkylkating agent which causes DNA cross-links and double-strand
breaks, similar to the effects of CDDP (32). Asynchronously
growing cells were either (i) treated with 50 Gy of IR and cultured for
an additional 8 h or (ii) exposed for 14 h to 5 µM
etoposide or 4 µg of mitomycin C per ml. Cells were then
pulse-labeled with BrdU for 1 h, fixed, and processed for
bivariate flow cytometry. For all treatments, the percentage of S-phase
cells (DNA content greater than 2N but less than 4N) incorporating BrdU
was determined. Eight hours following IR, both Rb+/+ and
Rb
/
MEFs incorporated BrdU similarly to unirradiated
controls. In both cell types, there was an accumulation of cells in
G2. By contrast, Rb+/+ MEFs showed a strong
S-phase inhibition following treatment with either etoposide or
mitomycin C (Fig. 5e). Again Rb
/
cells did not show a
significant reduction in the percentage of cells incorporating BrdU
following treatment with either etoposide or mitomycin C. As with CDDP
treatment, there was a reduction in the relative amount of BrdU
incorporated (not shown). However, the Rb
/
cells
accumulated with a 4N DNA content, indicating that they were capable of
progressing through S phase. These observations showed that the S-phase
arrest could be induced by CDDP, etoposide, and mitomycin C but not by
IR. Importantly, the induction of S-phase arrest by these specific
DNA-damaging agents was dependent on RB.
PSM-RB inhibits DNA synthesis in Rb
/
MEFs.
Since the data presented suggest that CDDP-, mitomycin C-, and
etoposide-induced inhibition of S phase is dependent on RB, we verified
that activation of RB is sufficient to inhibit S-phase progression in
the Rb-deficient cells. To do so, active RB (PSM-RB) was expressed in
Rb
/
MEFs. PSM-RB was chosen for these experiments, as
wild-type RB is inactivated by endogenous Cdk-cyclin complexes in
S-phase cells (18). Rb
/
MEFs were first
synchronized by Aph in S phase and then microinjected with both a
PSM-RB expression vector and a plasmid expressing a fusion protein of
histone H2B and GFP, which is localized to the nucleus. Sixteen hours
postinjection, cells were released from Aph and labeled with BrdU for
4 h. Productively injected cells were identified by the nuclear
GPF fluorescence, and the BrdU-positive cells were detected by
immunostaining with anti-BrdU antibodies (Fig.
6a). Quantitation of these fluorescence
images showed that the expression of H2B-GFP alone did not inhibit BrdU incorporation (Fig. 6b, vector). By contrast, coexpression with PSM-RB
completely inhibited DNA synthesis in the Aph-synchronized Rb
/
cells (Fig. 6b). Thus, active RB is sufficient to
inhibit S-phase progression.

View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Active RB is sufficient to block recovery from S-phase
block. (a) Rb / MEFs were synchronized in S phase by
sequential serum stimulation from quiescence for 16 h followed by
incubation in Aph for 10 h. These S-phase cells were then
microinjected with the indicated plasmids (50 ng/µl) and a plasmid
encoding nuclear GFP (50 ng/µl). After 16 h (to allow for
expression of the plasmid-encoded protein), the cells were washed
extensively in medium for release from Aph block. BrdU was added to the
medium, and cells were labeled for 4 h to monitor progression
through S phase. Cells were fixed and stained for the incorporation of
BrdU. Representative images are shown. (b) Data shown are percentages
of GFP-positive cells staining positive for BrdU incorporation from
three independent experiments with more than 40 injected cells per
experiment. Control reflects the percentage of uninjected cells
staining positively for BrdU incorporation from the same coverslips.
|
|
S-phase arrest coincides with inhibition of cyclin A but not
E2F.
Since the data presented demonstrate that CDDP initiates an
RB-dependent S-phase arrest, we probed the mechanism by which this
arrest is induced. The ability of RB to inhibit G1/S
progression has been attributed to its function as a transcriptional
repressor (33, 56). Initially, we investigated the effect of
CDDP treatment on E2F activity. For these experiments,
Rb+/+ and Rb
/
MEFs were transfected with
the 3×E2FLUC reporter and synchronized in S-phase with Aph.
Transfected cells were treated with either 0 or 32 µM CDDP for
16 h, at which time the cells were harvested for reporter assay.
As shown in Fig. 7a, E2F transcriptional
activity was inhibited approximately twofold in both
Rb
/
and Rb+/+ cells following CDDP
treatment. These data indicate that CDDP damage can down-regulate E2F
activity, but this inhibition occurs in Rb
/
MEFs.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
RB-dependent S-phase arrest correlates with inhibition
of cyclin A but not E2F. (a) Rb+/+ and Rb /
MEFs were cotransfected with the 3×E2FLUC and CMV-betagal reporter
constructs. Transfected cells were synchronized posttransfection with
Aph and treated with 0 or 32 µM CDDP. Cells were harvested after
16 h of treatment, and reporter assays were performed. Data shown
are averages of at least four independent experiments. (b)
Asynchronously growing Rb+/+ MEFs were treated with 0 or 64 µM CDDP for 8 h; TSA (200 ng/ml) or vehicle was also added for
the indicated times. BrdU was added to the cells for the last hour of
treatment, and the incorporation of BrdU was determined by staining
with anti-BrDU antibody followed by FACS analysis (Materials and
Methods). The percent of S-phase cells (with DNA content between 2N and
4N) that incorporated BrdU was determined and shown for each of the
experimental time points. (c) Rb+/+ and Rb /
MEFs were synchronized in Aph and treated with 0 or 32 µM CDDP for
16 h. Lysates were harvested, equal amounts of protein were
resolved by SDS-PAGE, and cyclin A, cyclin E, and Cdk2 were detected by
immunoblotting.
|
|
To examine whether histone deacetylase activity is required for CDDP to
inhibit S-phase progression, we added an inhibitor
of histone
deacetylase (trichostatin A [TSA]) to CDDP-treated
cells (
3,
30). Addition of TSA at concentrations that can
block the
transcription repression function of RB (
3,
30)
(data not
shown) did not affect the ability of CDDP-treated cells
to arrest in S
phase (Fig.
7b). This result suggests that histone
deacetylase activity
is dispensable for the S-phase arrest. However,
this result does not
rule out gene repression as the cause of
RB-mediated S-phase arrest,
since RB can inhibit transcription
in a histone deacetylase-independent
manner (
23,
29,
56).
Cyclin E, cyclin A, and Cdk2 are all important activators of DNA
replication which are regulated by RB and E2F. We therefore
examined
the levels of these proteins in Aph-synchronized Rb
/
and Rb
+/+ MEFs treated for 16 h with 0 or 32 µM CDDP
(Fig.
7c). The Cdk2
protein levels were not affected in either cell
type following
CDDP treatment (middle panel, compare lanes 1 and 2 and
lanes
3 and 4). The cyclin E protein level was significantly higher
in
Rb
/
MEFs than in Rb
+/+ MEFs
(
16), but CDDP treatment had no effect on cyclin E
expression
in either cell type (top panel, compare lanes 1 and 2 and
lanes
3 and 4). By contrast, cyclin A protein levels were specifically
attenuated in Rb
+/+ cells after CDDP treatment (lower
panel, compare lanes 3 and
4), whereas cyclin A protein levels were
unaffected by CDDP in
the absence of RB (compare lanes 1 and 2). Thus,
the RB-mediated
S-phase inhibition correlated with down-regulation of
cyclin A.
These results are also consistent with previous reports that
RB
inhibits cyclin A expression through a mechanism that does not
require the action of histone deacetylase (
56).
Rb
/
MEFs are hypersensitive to CDDP-induced
cytotoxicity.
Since it is known that checkpoint defects often
render tumor cells hypersensitive to antineoplastic agents, we assessed
the long-term consequence of RB-mediated arrest. To do so,
asynchronously proliferating Rb+/+ MEFs were treated with
16 or 32 µM CDDP for 16 h to induce RB dephosphorylation, after
which the cells were placed in fresh medium without CDDP. Samples were
collected 36 h to 144 h following CDDP addition for FACS
analysis and live-cell counting. In Rb+/+ MEFs, no
significant alteration in the cell cycle distribution was observed by
CDDP treatment or after CDDP withdrawal (Fig. 8a), except that the CDDP-treated
cultures were inhibited for DNA synthetic activity during the entire
144-h experimental time course (not shown). Thus, CDDP arrested
Rb+/+ cells in G1, S, and G2 phases
of the cell cycle, and the arrest appeared to be irreversible.
Consistent with an irreversible arrest in G1, S, and
G2, there was no increase in cell number from 36 to
144 h (Fig. 8b). The maintenance of live cells was not due to a
balance between cell proliferation and cell death, because these
Rb+/+ MEFs did not incorporate BrdU and did not contain
sub-G1 DNA during the experimental time course. By
contrast, Rb
/
MEFs did not survive following the
withdrawal of CDDP. A dramatic reduction in live cells (up to 90%) was
observed following transfer into fresh medium (Fig. 8b). The
Rb
/
MEFs underwent at least another round of DNA
replication following the withdrawal of CDDP to contain 8N DNA (not
shown). At the same time, a large percentage of Rb
/
MEFs showed sub-G1 DNA content, indicative of apoptosis
(not shown). Therefore, the RB-dependent arrest plays an important role
in protecting cells from CDDP-induced apoptosis. Without RB, CDDP did
not cause G1 or S-phase arrest. In addition, the Rb
/
MEFs bypassed the G2 checkpoint and
underwent a subsequent round of replication. The continued DNA
synthesis following CDDP-induced DNA damage in Rb
/
MEFs
is associated with an increased sensitivity to killing by CDDP.

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 8.
RB prevents cell death following DNA damage. (a)
Rb+/+ MEFs either asynchronously proliferating (Asy; panel
1) or treated with 32 µM CDDP for 16 h and then cultured for a
total 36 (panel 2) or 144 (panel 3) h after CDDP addition were
harvested, fixed, and stained with propidium iodide. Shown are
representative histograms of two independent experiments. (b)
Rb+/+ or Rb / MEFs were treated with 0, 16, or 32 µM CDDP. After 16 h of treatment, CDDP was washed from the
cells. The cells were then cultured for the indicated times after CDDP
addition, at which point they were fixed and stained with crystal
violet (left panel). The relative number of cells was determined by
counting random fields of crystal violet stained dishes (right panels).
The data are from duplicate plates and representative of three
independent experiments.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
DNA damage is known to activate regulatory mechanisms that stop a
proliferating cell in the G1 or G2 phase of the
cell cycle (9, 14, 50, 51). The induction of G1
or G2 arrest prevents replication or segregation of damaged
DNA and hence contributes to the maintenance of genome integrity. DNA
damage can also affect the progression through S phase. In previous
studies, DNA damage has been shown to cause a transient reduction in
the rate of DNA synthesis (24, 36, 46). In this study, we
have identified an additional intra-S-phase response that is activated
by a prolonged exposure to CDDP. We demonstrate that this S-phase
response requires RB activation, and dephosphorylation or activation
precedes S-phase inhibition. The RB-dependent intra-S-phase response to
CDDP appeared to be a long-term arrest in S-phase of the cell cycle. RB
also mediated the G1 arrest in CDDP-damaged cells
(13), but the G2 checkpoint response to CDDP did
not require RB. Similar RB-dependent S-phase inhibition was observed in
response to mitomycin C and etoposide exposure. The G1 and
S-phase arrest induced by RB had a protective effect against
CDDP-induced death, because Rb
/
cells could not undergo
either the G1 or the S-phase arrest and were hypersensitive
to the cytotoxic effect of CDDP.
It is known that cells respond in G1 to DNA damage by
p53-mediated induction of p21Cip1 (5). Increased
p21Cip1 serves to attenuate Cdk2 activity, thus preventing
RB phosphorylation and inhibiting progression into S phase. The data
presented herein demonstrate that the S-phase response to CDDP can be
only partially attributed to p21Cip1 function, since
p21Cip1
/
MEFs demonstrated a delayed response to CDDP
compared to their wild-type counterparts. Moreover, p21Cip1
was not induced in S-phase Rb+/+ MEFs after CDDP treatment.
However, the data presented indicate that p21Cip1 activity
is required for down-regulation of Cdk2 in response to CDDP. These
observations support a model wherein both p21Cip1-dependent
down-regulation of Cdk2 and p21Cip1-independent mechanisms
are important for RB-mediated arrest in response to CDDP.
It is possible that RB may be activated by a phosphatase in S phase
after DNA damage. Other studies have reported the activation of RB
phosphatase activities by stress. For example, in p53-deficient cells
(which cannot induce p21Cip1 expression), the
dephosphorylation of RB following DNA damage is mediated by the
activation of RB phosphatase (7). Exposure to UV has
recently been shown to invoke phosphatase activity, and this was
correlated with the dephosphorylation of the RB-related protein p107
(47). In addition, exposure of cells to conditions of
hypoxia also caused the dephosphorylation of RB in S-phase cells, and
this was attributed to phosphatase activity (26). Under
hypoxic conditions, the S-phase dephosphorylation of RB also correlated
with an inhibition of DNA synthesis (26). Although these
issues will be difficult to resolve until the mechanisms governing RB
phosphorylation in S phase are delineated, the contribution of RB
phosphatase activity and Cdk inhibition in the S-phase response to DNA
damage are of obvious relevance.
The mechanism by which RB inhibits DNA synthesis must also be
considered. Several possibilities can be envisioned, including (i)
direct inhibition of the DNA replication enzymes, (ii) disruption of
the prereplication complex (pre-RC) at origins that have not been
activated in mid-S phase, or (iii) destruction of a labile factor that
is required for origin firing. The direct inhibition of replication
enzymes by dephosphorylated RB is not likely, since DNA synthesis is
not inhibited until approximately 2 h after the dephosphorylation
of RB. RB is also not likely to inhibit the formation of pre-RC,
because this complex is assembled during early G1 prior to
the activation of Cdks and RB phosphorylation (2).
Furthermore, if RB were to directly disrupt the pre-RC, we would again
expect RB dephosphorylation and the inhibition of DNA synthesis to
occur simultaneously. At present, we favor the third hypothesis, in
which RB inhibits the expression of a labile factor that is required
for activation of the pre-RC. This mechanism is consistent with the 2-h
delay observed between RB dephosphorylation and the S-phase arrest. It
is also supported by our previous studies showing that the simian virus
40 T antigen, the adenovirus E1A protein, or the overproduction of E2F1
can reverse the S-phase inhibitory function of PSM-RB (18).
However, we find that TSA does not reverse the effect of CDDP on
S-phase progression. Thus, the RB-mediated S-phase arrest may be due to gene repression that is not dependent on histone deacetylase.
To address this issue, we investigated the effect of CDDP on known RB
targets in S phase. The data presented demonstrate that E2F activity is
inhibited equally in Rb+/+ and Rb
/
cells
after CDDP treatment, suggesting that the ability of RB to regulate E2F
reporter activity is distinct from the CDDP response. Similarly, cyclin
E levels were unchanged by CDDP treatment in both Rb+/+ and
Rb
/
cells. Since RB-mediated regulation of cyclin E is
dependent on histone deacetylase (55), these data are
consistent with the failure of TSA to prevent the RB-mediated DNA
damage response. By contrast, cyclin A was attenuated only in
Rb+/+ cells after DNA damage, suggesting that the ability
of RB to regulate cyclin A may contribute to the CDDP response
(21). Importantly, RB regulation of cyclin A is known to be
independent of histone deacetylase (55). We and others have
recently shown that the ability of RB to regulate cyclin A is dependent
on activity of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling protein, Brg-1
(42, 43, 55). In these studies, we showed that dominant
negative Brg-1 blocks cyclin A attenuation and cell cycle arrest after
CDDP treatment in immortalized rodent fibroblasts (43).
Furthermore, Zhang et al. showed that the RB/Brg-1-mediated
down-regulation of cyclin A correlated with S-phase arrest
(56). Together, these observations suggest that the ability
of RB to regulate cyclin A likely contributes to the S-phase DNA damage response.
The current concept of cell cycle checkpoint in response to DNA damage
is based on the yeast paradigm. In yeast, DNA damage induces a
transient inhibition of G1, S, and/or G2
(9, 14, 50, 51). Genetic evidence suggests that these
responses are to provide time for DNA repair, and proper repair
increases the chance for survival (37, 40, 52). This current
concept implies that the DNA damage-induced checkpoint is not
permanent, and cells will progress through the checkpoint once DNA is
repaired. The role of RB in mediating the G1 response to
DNA damage is well established (5, 13). However, whether RB
fulfills a classical checkpoint role in G1, by allowing
damaged cells to ultimately reenter the cell cycle, has not been
determined. Here we show that RB is required for an intra-S-phase cell
cycle arrest in response to CDDP-mediated damage. This cell cycle
arrest is maintained for a period of at least 5 days. Thus, the
RB-mediated long-term arrest in S phase does not appear to be a
reversible checkpoint response but may be the last resort for cells to
survive irreparable damage caused by CDDP.
The ability of RB to regulate both the G1/S transition and
the S-phase progression suggests that RB-deficient cells have an increased capacity to undergo DNA replication under conditions of
genotoxic stress. Such a defect could lead to genome instability and
tumor progression in tumors that exhibit RB loss through mutation (e.g., small cell lung cancer) or viral oncoprotein binding (e.g., cervical cancer). However, in terms of cancer treatment, such tumors
would be expected to respond favorably to CDDP. Although the RB gene
itself is mutated at a relatively low frequency in tumors, it is
inactivated in the majority of tumor types due to the increased
activity of Cdks and decreased activity of Cdk inhibitors (39). The data presented herein predict that RB-positive
tumors should be less sensitive to CDDP than tumor cells lacking the RB
protein. Moreover, these data demonstrate that the combined regulation
of S-phase entry and S-phase progression likely underlie the function
of RB as a tumor suppressor.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We are indebted to the Knudsen and Wang laboratories for
technical, administrative, and logistical support. We are grateful to
Yolanda Sanchez (University of Cincinnati) for critical reading of the
manuscript. Mice with targeted disruption of p21Cip1 were
from Tyler Jacks (MIT). We thank Steven Howell (University of
California, San Diego) and Lyon Gleich (University of Cincinnati) for
provision of CDDP. We are indebted to Mike Tilby (University of
Manchester) for supplying the ICR4 antibody and Geoff Wahl (Salk
Institute) for the H2B-GFP expression plasmid. We also thank George
Babcock and Jim Cornelius (Shriners Hospital for Children, Cincinnati,
Ohio) for expert flow cytometric analysis.
K.E.K. is supported by an NRSA award from the NIH (CA82034). S.N. is
supported by the Norwegian Cancer Society. E.S.K. is a Kimmel Scholar.
This work was supported by grants to J.Y.J.W. from the NCI/NIH
(CA58320) and to E.S.K. from NCI/NIH (CA82525) and the Ohio Cancer
Research Associates.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Cell Biology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0521. Phone: (513) 558-8885. Fax: (513) 558-4454. E-mail:
Erik.Knudsen{at}UC.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Bartek, J.,
J. Bartkova, and J. Lukas.
1997.
The retinoblastoma protein pathway in cell cycle control and cancer.
Exp. Cell Res.
237:1-6[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Bik, T.
1999.
MCM proteins in DNA replication.
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
68:649-686[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Brehm, A.,
E. A. Miska,
D. J. McCance,
J. L. Reid,
A. J. Bannister, and T. Kouzarides.
1998.
Retinoblastoma protein recruits histone deacetylase to repress transcription.
Nature
391:597-601[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Brugarolas, J.,
C. Chandrasekaran,
J. I. Gordon,
D. Beach,
T. Jacks, and G. J. Hannon.
1995.
Radiation-induced cell cycle arrest compromised by p21 deficiency.
Nature
377:552-557[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Brugarolas, J.,
K. Moberg,
S. D. Boyd,
Y. Taya,
T. Jacks, and J. A. Lees.
1999.
Inhibition of cyclin-dependent kinase 2 by p21 is necessary for retinoblastoma protein-mediated G1 arrest after gamma-irradiation.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
96:1002-1007[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Chew, Y. P.,
M. Ellis,
S. Wilkie, and S. Mittnacht.
1998.
pRB phosphorylation mutants reveal role of pRB in regulating S phase completion by a mechanism independent of E2F.
Oncogene
17:2177-2186[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Dou, Q. P.,
B. An, and P. L. Will.
1995.
Induction of a retinoblastoma phosphatase activity by anticancer drugs accompanies p53-independent G1 arrest and apoptosis.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92:9019-9023[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
el-Deiry, W. S.,
T. Tokino,
V. E. Velculescu,
D. B. Levy,
R. Parsons,
J. M. Trent,
D. Lin,
W. E. Mercer,
K. W. Kinzler, and B. Vogelstein.
1993.
WAF1, a potential mediator of p53 tumor suppression.
Cell
75:817-825[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Elledge, S. J.
1996.
Cell cycle checkpoints: preventing an identity crisis.
Science
274:1664-1672[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Flemington, E. K.,
S. H. Speck, and W. G. Kaelin, Jr.
1993.
E2F-1-mediated transactivation is inhibited by complex formation with the retinoblastoma susceptibility gene product.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
90:6914-6918[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Grunstein, M.
1997.
Histone acetylation in chromatin structure and transcription.
Nature
389:349-352[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Harbour, J. W.,
R. X. Luo,
A. Dei Santi,
A. A. Postigo, and D. C. Dean.
1999.
Cdk phosphorylation triggers sequential intramolecular interactions that progressively block Rb functions as cells move through G1.
Cell
98:859-869[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Harrington, E. A.,
J. L. Bruce,
E. Harlow, and N. Dyson.
1998.
pRB plays an essential role in cell cycle arrest induced by DNA damage.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
95:11945-11950[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Hartwell, L. H., and M. B. Kastan.
1994.
Cell cycle control and cancer.
Science
266:1821-1828[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Herrera, R. E.,
T. P. Makela, and R. A. Weinberg.
1996.
TGF beta-induced growth inhibition in primary fibroblasts requires the retinoblastoma protein.
Mol. Biol. Cell
7:1335-1342[Abstract].
|
| 16.
|
Herrera, R. E.,
V. P. Sah,
B. O. Williams,
T. P. Makela,
R. A. Weinberg, and T. Jacks.
1996.
Altered cell cycle kinetics, gene expression, and G1 restriction point regulation in Rb-deficient fibroblasts.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16:2402-2407[Abstract].
|
| 17.
|
Kaelin, W. G., Jr.
1999.
Functions of the retinoblastoma protein.
Bioessays
21:950-958[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Knudsen, E. S.,
C. Buckmaster,
T. T. Chen,
J. R. Feramisco, and J. Y. Wang.
1998.
Inhibition of DNA synthesis by RB: effects on G1/S transition and S-phase progression.
Genes Dev.
12:2278-2292[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Knudsen, E. S., and J. Y. Wang.
1996.
Differential regulation of retinoblastoma protein function by specific Cdk phosphorylation sites.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:8313-8320[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Knudsen, E. S., and J. Y. Wang.
1997.
Dual mechanisms for the inhibition of E2F binding to RB by cyclin-dependent kinase-mediated RB phosphorylation.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17:5771-5783[Abstract].
|
| 21.
|
Knudsen, K. E.,
A. F. Fribourg,
M. W. Strobeck,
J. M. Blanchard, and E. S. Knudsen.
1999.
Cyclin A is a functional target of retinoblastoma tumor suppressor protein-mediated cell cycle arrest.
J. Biol. Chem.
274:27632-27641[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Kouzarides, T.
1999.
Histone acetylases and deacetylases in cell proliferation.
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
9:40-48[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 23.
|
Lai, A.,
J. M. Lee,
W. M. Yang,
J. A. DeCaprio,
W. G. Kaelin, Jr.,
E. Seto, and P. E. Branton.
1999.
RBP1 recruits both histone deacetylase-dependent and -independent repression activities to retinoblastoma family proteins.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19:6632-6641[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
Larner, J. M.,
H. Lee, and J. L. Hamlin.
1997.
S phase damage sensing checkpoints in mammalian cells.
Cancer Surv.
29:25-45[Medline].
|
| 25.
|
Ludlow, J. W.,
C. L. Glendening,
D. M. Livingston, and J. A. DeCaprio.
1993.
Specific enzymatic dephosphorylation of the retinoblastoma protein.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13:367-372[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Ludlow, J. W.,
R. L. Howell, and H. C. Smith.
1993.
Hypoxic stress induces reversible hypophosphorylation of pRB and reduction in cyclin A abundance independent of cell cycle progression.
Oncogene
8:331-339[Medline].
|
| 27.
|
Lukas, J.,
T. Herzinger,
K. Hansen,
M. C. Moroni,
D. Resnitzky,
K. Helin,
S. I. Reed, and J. Bartek.
1997.
Cyclin E-induced S phase without activation of the pRb/E2F pathway.
Genes Dev.
11:1479-1492[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 28.
|
Lundberg, A. S., and R. A. Weinberg.
1998.
Functional inactivation of the retinoblastoma protein requires sequential modification by at least two distinct cyclin-cdk complexes.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:753-761[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 29.
|
Luo, R. X.,
A. A. Postigo, and D. C. Dean.
1998.
Rb interacts with histone deacetylase to repress transcription.
Cell
92:463-473[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 30.
|
Magnaghi-Jaulin, L.,
R. Groisman,
I. Naguibneva,
P. Robin,
S. Lorain,
J. P. Le Villain,
F. Troalen,
D. Trouche, and A. Harel-Bellan.
1998.
Retinoblastoma protein represses transcription by recruiting a histone deacetylase.
Nature
391:601-605[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 31.
|
Mittnacht, S.
1998.
Control of pRB phosphorylation.
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
8:21-27[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 32.
|
Mycek, M.,
R. Harvey, and P. Champe.
1997.
Anticancer drugs, p. 373-400.
In
R. Harvey, and P. Champe (ed.), Pharmacology, 2nd ed. Lippincott-Raven Publishers, Philadelphia, Pa.
|
| 33.
|
Nevins, J. R.,
G. Leone,
J. DeGregori, and L. Jakoi.
1997.
Role of the Rb/E2F pathway in cell growth control.
J. Cell Physiol.
173:233-236[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 34.
|
Ohtsubo, M.,
A. M. Theodoras,
J. Schumacher,
J. M. Roberts, and M. Pagano.
1995.
Human cyclin E, a nuclear protein essential for the G1-to-S phase transition.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15:2612-2624[Abstract].
|
| 35.
|
Pagano, M.,
R. Pepperkok,
F. Verde,
W. Ansorge, and G. Draetta.
1992.
Cyclin A is required at two points in the human cell cycle.
EMBO J.
11:961-971[Medline].
|
| 36.
|
Painter, R. B., and B. R. Young.
1980.
Radiosensitivity in ataxia-telangiectasia: a new explanation.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
77:7315-7317[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 37.
|
Paulovich, A. G., and L. H. Hartwell.
1995.
A checkpoint regulates the rate of progression through S phase in S. cerevisiae in response to DNA damage.
Cell
82:841-847[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 38.
|
Resnitzky, D.,
L. Hengst, and S. I. Reed.
1995.
Cyclin A-associated kinase activity is rate limiting for entrance into S phase and is negatively regulated in G1 by p27Kip1.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15:4347-4352[Abstract].
|
| 39.
|
Sherr, C. J.
1996.
Cancer cell cycles.
Science
274:1672-1677[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 40.
|
Siede, W.,
A. S. Friedberg, and E. C. Friedberg.
1993.
RAD9-dependent G1 arrest defines a second checkpoint for damaged DNA in the cell cycle of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
90:7985-7989[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 41.
|
Siegart, J., and P. Robbins.
1999.
Rb inhibits the intrinsic kinase activity of the TATA-binding protein-associated factor.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19:846-854[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 42.
|
Strobeck, M. W.,
A. F. Fribourg,
A. Puga, and E. S. Knudsen.
2000.
Restoration of retinoblastoma mediated signaling to Cdk2 results in cell cycle arrest.
Oncogene
19:1857-1867[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 43.
|
Strobeck, M. W.,
K. E. Knudsen,
A. F. Fribourg,
M. F. DeCristofaro,
B. E. Weissman,
A. N. Imbalzano, and E. S. Knudsen.
2000.
BRG-1 is required for RB-mediated cell cycle arrest.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
97:7748-7753[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 44.
|
Tan, X.,
S. J. Martin,
D. R. Green, and J. Y. J. Wang.
1997.
Degradation of retinoblastoma protein in tumor necrosis factor- and CD95-induced cell death.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:9613-9616[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 45.
|
Tilby, M. J.,
C. Johnson,
R. J. Knox,
J. Cordell, and C. J. Dean.
1991.
Sensitive detection of DNA modifications induced by cisplatin and carboplatin in vitro and in vivo using a monoclonal antibody.
Cancer Res.
51:123-129[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 46.
|
Vincent, R. A., Jr.,
A. J. Fink, and P. C. Huang.
1980.
Unscheduled DNA synthesis in cultured ataxia telangiectasia fibroblast-like cells.
Mutat. Res.
72:245-249[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 47.
|
Voorhoeve, P. M.,
R. J. Watson,
P. G. Farlie,
R. Bernards, and E. W. Lam.
1999.
Rapid dephosphorylation of p107 following UV irradiation.
Oncogene
18:679-688[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 48.
|
Waga, S.,
G. J. Hannon,
D. Beach, and B. Stillman.
1994.
The p21 inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinases controls DNA replication by interaction with PCNA.
Nature
369:574-578[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 49.
|
Wang, J. Y.,
E. S. Knudsen, and P. J. Welch.
1994.
The retinoblastoma tumor suppressor protein.
Adv. Cancer Res.
64:25-85[Medline].
|
| 50.
|
Weinert, T.
1998.
DNA damage and checkpoint pathways: molecular anatomy and interactions with repair.
Cell
94:555-558[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 51.
|
Weinert, T.
1998.
DNA damage checkpoints update: getting molecular.
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
8:185-193[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 52.
|
Weinert, T. A., and L. H. Hartwell.
1988.
The RAD9 gene controls the cell cycle response to DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Science
241:317-322[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 53.
|
Weintraub, S. J.,
K. N. Chow,
R. X. Luo,
S. H. Zhang,
S. He, and D. C. Dean.
1995.
Mechanism of active transcriptional repression by the retinoblastoma protein.
Nature
375:812-815[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 54.
|
Zarkowska, T., and S. Mittnacht.
1997.
Differential phosphorylation of the retinoblastoma protein by G1/S cyclin-dependent kinases.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:12738-12746[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 55.
|
Zhang, H. S.,
M. Gavin,
A. Dahiya,
A. A. Postigo,
D. Ma,
R. X. Luo,
J. W. Harbour, and D. C. Dean.
2000.
Exit from G1 and S phase of the cell cycle is regulated by repressor complexes containing HDAC-Rb-hSWI/SNF and Rb-hSWI/SNF.
Cell
101:79-89[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 56.
|
Zhang, H. S.,
A. A. Postigo, and D. C. Dean.
1999.
Active transcriptional repression by the Rb-E2F complex mediates G1 arrest triggered by p16INK4a, TGFbeta, and contact inhibition.
Cell
97:53-61[CrossRef][Medline].
|
Molecular and Cellular Biology, October 2000, p. 7751-7763, Vol. 20, No. 20
0270-7306/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Cuadrado, M., Gutierrez-Martinez, P., Swat, A., Nebreda, A. R., Fernandez-Capetillo, O.
(2009). p27Kip1 Stabilization Is Essential for the Maintenance of Cell Cycle Arrest in Response to DNA Damage. Cancer Res.
69: 8726-8732
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Trere, D., Brighenti, E., Donati, G., Ceccarelli, C., Santini, D., Taffurelli, M., Montanaro, L., Derenzini, M.
(2009). High prevalence of retinoblastoma protein loss in triple-negative breast cancers and its association with a good prognosis in patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. Ann Oncol
20: 1818-1823
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Liu, H., Knabb, J. R., Spike, B. T., Macleod, K. F.
(2009). Elevated Poly-(ADP-Ribose)-Polymerase Activity Sensitizes Retinoblastoma-Deficient Cells to DNA Damage-Induced Necrosis. Mol Cancer Res
7: 1099-1109
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Derenzini, M., Donati, G., Mazzini, G., Montanaro, L., Vici, M., Ceccarelli, C., Santini, D., Taffurelli, M., Trere, D.
(2008). Loss of Retinoblastoma Tumor Suppressor Protein Makes Human Breast Cancer Cells More Sensitive to Antimetabolite Exposure. Clin. Cancer Res.
14: 2199-2209
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ayala, Y. M., Misteli, T., Baralle, F. E.
(2008). TDP-43 regulates retinoblastoma protein phosphorylation through the repression of cyclin-dependent kinase 6 expression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
105: 3785-3789
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Magenta, A., Fasanaro, P., Romani, S., Di Stefano, V., Capogrossi, M. C., Martelli, F.
(2008). Protein Phosphatase 2A Subunit PR70 Interacts with pRb and Mediates Its Dephosphorylation. Mol. Cell. Biol.
28: 873-882
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Zagorski, W. A., Knudsen, E. S., Reed, M. F.
(2007). Retinoblastoma Deficiency Increases Chemosensitivity in Lung Cancer. Cancer Res.
67: 8264-8273
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Srinivasan, S. V., Mayhew, C. N., Schwemberger, S., Zagorski, W., Knudsen, E. S.
(2007). RB Loss Promotes Aberrant Ploidy by Deregulating Levels and Activity of DNA Replication Factors. J. Biol. Chem.
282: 23867-23877
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Sharma, A., Comstock, C. E.S., Knudsen, E. S., Cao, K. H., Hess-Wilson, J. K., Morey, L. M., Barrera, J., Knudsen, K. E.
(2007). Retinoblastoma Tumor Suppressor Status Is a Critical Determinant of Therapeutic Response in Prostate Cancer Cells. Cancer Res.
67: 6192-6203
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hess-Wilson, J. K., Daly, H. K., Zagorski, W. A., Montville, C. P., Knudsen, K. E.
(2006). Mitogenic Action of the Androgen Receptor Sensitizes Prostate Cancer Cells to Taxane-Based Cytotoxic Insult. Cancer Res.
66: 11998-12008
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Braden, W. A., Lenihan, J. M., Lan, Z., Luce, K. S., Zagorski, W., Bosco, E., Reed, M. F., Cook, J. G., Knudsen, E. S.
(2006). Distinct Action of the Retinoblastoma Pathway on the DNA Replication Machinery Defines Specific Roles for Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Complexes in Prereplication Complex Assembly and S-Phase Progression. Mol. Cell. Biol.
26: 7667-7681
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Reed, M. F., Zagorski, W. A., Howington, J. A., Zilfou, J. T., Knudsen, E. S.
(2006). Inhibition of retinoblastoma tumor suppressor activity by RNA interference in lung cancer lines.. Ann. Thorac. Surg.
82: 249-253
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Knudsen, E. S., Knudsen, K. E.
(2006). Retinoblastoma tumor suppressor: where cancer meets the cell cycle.. Exp. Biol. Med.
231: 1271-1281
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Jackson, J. G., Pereira-Smith, O. M.
(2006). Primary and Compensatory Roles for RB Family Members at Cell Cycle Gene Promoters That Are Deacetylated and Downregulated in Doxorubicin-Induced Senescence of Breast Cancer Cells.. Mol. Cell. Biol.
26: 2501-2510
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Cassie, S., Koturbash, I., Hudson, D., Baker, M., Ilnytskyy, Y., Rodriguez-Juarez, R., Weber, E., Kovalchuk, O.
(2006). Novel retinoblastoma binding protein RBBP9 modulates sex-specific radiation responses in vivo. Carcinogenesis
27: 465-474
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Crescenzi, E., Palumbo, G., Brady, H. J.M.
(2005). Roscovitine Modulates DNA Repair and Senescence: Implications for Combination Chemotherapy. Clin. Cancer Res.
11: 8158-8171
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Spentzos, D., Levine, D. A., Kolia, S., Otu, H., Boyd, J., Libermann, T. A., Cannistra, S. A.
(2005). Unique Gene Expression Profile Based on Pathologic Response in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. JCO
23: 7911-7918
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Mayhew, C. N., Bosco, E. E., Fox, S. R., Okaya, T., Tarapore, P., Schwemberger, S. J., Babcock, G. F., Lentsch, A. B., Fukasawa, K., Knudsen, E. S.
(2005). Liver-Specific pRB Loss Results in Ectopic Cell Cycle Entry and Aberrant Ploidy. Cancer Res.
65: 4568-4577
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Creton, S., Zhu, H., Gooderham, N. J.
(2005). A Mechanistic Basis for the Role of Cycle Arrest in the Genetic Toxicology of the Dietary Carcinogen 2-Amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine (PhIP). Toxicol Sci
84: 335-343
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Bosco, E. E., Knudsen, E. S.
(2005). Differential role of RB in response to UV and IR damage. Nucleic Acids Res
33: 1581-1592
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Naderi, S., Wang, J. Y.J., Chen, T.-T., Gutzkow, K. B., Blomhoff, H. K.
(2005). cAMP-mediated Inhibition of DNA Replication and S Phase Progression: Involvement of Rb, p21Cip1, and PCNA. Mol. Biol. Cell
16: 1527-1542
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Denlinger, C. E., Rundall, B. K., Keller, M. D., Jones, D. R.
(2004). Proteasome Inhibition Sensitizes Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer to Gemcitabine-Induced Apoptosis. Ann. Thorac. Surg.
78: 1207-1214
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Angus, S. P., Mayhew, C. N., Solomon, D. A., Braden, W. A., Markey, M. P., Okuno, Y., Cardoso, M. C., Gilbert, D. M., Knudsen, E. S.
(2004). RB Reversibly Inhibits DNA Replication via Two Temporally Distinct Mechanisms. Mol. Cell. Biol.
24: 5404-5420
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Roig, J. M., Molina, M. A., Cascante, A., Calbo, J., Carbo, N., Wirtz, U., Sreedharan, S., Fillat, C., Mazo, A.
(2004). Adenovirus-Mediated Retinoblastoma 94 Gene Transfer Induces Human Pancreatic Tumor Regression in a Mouse Xenograft Model. Clin. Cancer Res.
10: 1454-1462
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Bosco, E. E., Mayhew, C. N., Hennigan, R. F., Sage, J., Jacks, T., Knudsen, E. S.
(2004). RB signaling prevents replication-dependent DNA double-strand breaks following genotoxic insult. Nucleic Acids Res
32: 25-34
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Vasilevskaya, I. A., Rakitina, T. V., O'Dwyer, P. J.
(2004). Quantitative Effects on c-Jun N-Terminal Protein Kinase Signaling Determine Synergistic Interaction of Cisplatin and 17-Allylamino-17-Demethoxygeldanamycin in Colon Cancer Cell Lines. Mol. Pharmacol.
65: 235-243
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
de Bruin, A., Wu, L., Saavedra, H. I., Wilson, P., Yang, Y., Rosol, T. J., Weinstein, M., Robinson, M. L., Leone, G.
(2003). Rb function in extraembryonic lineages suppresses apoptosis in the CNS of Rb-deficient mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
100: 6546-6551
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Cicchillitti, L., Fasanaro, P., Biglioli, P., Capogrossi, M. C., Martelli, F.
(2003). Oxidative Stress Induces Protein Phosphatase 2A-dependent Dephosphorylation of the Pocket Proteins pRb, p107, and p130. J. Biol. Chem.
278: 19509-19517
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Markey, M. P., Angus, S. P., Strobeck, M. W., Williams, S. L., Gunawardena, R. W., Aronow, B. J., Knudsen, E. S.
(2002). Unbiased Analysis of RB-mediated Transcriptional Repression Identifies Novel Targets and Distinctions from E2F Action. Cancer Res.
62: 6587-6597
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Bowen, C., Birrer, M., Gelmann, E. P.
(2002). Retinoblastoma Protein-mediated Apoptosis After gamma -Irradiation. J. Biol. Chem.
277: 44969-44979
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Angus, S. P., Wheeler, L. J., Ranmal, S. A., Zhang, X., Markey, M. P., Mathews, C. K., Knudsen, E. S.
(2002). Retinoblastoma Tumor Suppressor Targets dNTP Metabolism to Regulate DNA Replication. J. Biol. Chem.
277: 44376-44384
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Dimitrova, D. S., Berezney, R.
(2002). The spatio-temporal organization of DNA replication sites is identical in primary, immortalized and transformed mammalian cells. J. Cell Sci.
115: 4037-4051
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Broceno, C., Wilkie, S., Mittnacht, S.
(2002). RB activation defect in tumor cell lines. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
99: 14200-14205
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Sampath, D., Shi, Z., Plunkett, W.
(2002). Inhibition of Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 2 by the Chk1-Cdc25A Pathway during the S-Phase Checkpoint Activated by Fludarabine: Dysregulation by 7-Hydroxystaurosporine. Mol. Pharmacol.
62: 680-688
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Wetherill, Y. B., Petre, C. E., Monk, K. R., Puga, A., Knudsen, K. E.
(2002). The Xenoestrogen Bisphenol A Induces Inappropriate Androgen Receptor Activation and Mitogenesis in Prostatic Adenocarcinoma Cells. Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
1: 515-524
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lan, Z., Sever-Chroneos, Z., Strobeck, M. W., Park, C.-H., Baskaran, R., Edelmann, W., Leone, G., Knudsen, E. S.
(2002). DNA Damage Invokes Mismatch Repair-dependent Cyclin D1 Attenuation and Retinoblastoma Signaling Pathways to Inhibit CDK2. J. Biol. Chem.
277: 8372-8381
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Strobeck, M. W., Reisman, D. N., Gunawardena, R. W., Betz, B. L., Angus, S. P., Knudsen, K. E., Kowalik, T. F., Weissman, B. E., Knudsen, E. S.
(2002). Compensation of BRG-1 Function by Brm. INSIGHT INTO THE ROLE OF THE CORE SWI{middle dot}SNF SUBUNITS IN RETINOBLASTOMA TUMOR SUPPRESSOR SIGNALING. J. Biol. Chem.
277: 4782-4789
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Shibata, Y., Nakamura, T.
(2002). Defective Flap Endonuclease 1 Activity in Mammalian Cells Is Associated with Impaired DNA Repair and Prolonged S Phase Delay. J. Biol. Chem.
277: 746-754
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Sever-Chroneos, Z., Angus, S. P., Fribourg, A. F., Wan, H., Todorov, I., Knudsen, K. E., Knudsen, E. S.
(2001). Retinoblastoma Tumor Suppressor Protein Signals through Inhibition of Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 2 Activity To Disrupt PCNA Function in S Phase. Mol. Cell. Biol.
21: 4032-4045
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Jiang, Z., Zacksenhaus, E.
(2002). Activation of retinoblastoma protein in mammary gland leads to ductal growth suppression, precocious differentiation, and adenocarcinoma. JCB
156: 185-198
[Abstract]
[Full Text]