Previous Article | Next Article 
Molecular and Cellular Biology, October 2000, p. 7764-7772, Vol. 20, No. 20
0270-7306/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Inactivation of 14-3-3
Influences Telomere
Behavior and Ionizing Radiation-Induced Chromosomal
Instability
Sonu
Dhar,1
Jeremy A.
Squire,2
M. Prakash
Hande,1
Raymund J.
Wellinger,3 and
Tej K.
Pandita1,*
Center for Radiological Research, College of Physicians and
Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York
10032,1 and Department of Medical
Biophysics, University of Toronto, Ontario,2 and
Département de Microbiologie et Infectiologie,
Faculté de Médecine, Université de Sherbrooke,
Sherbrooke, Quebec J1H 5N4,3 Canada
Received 13 April 2000/Returned for modification 30 May
2000/Accepted 31 July 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
Telomeres are complexes of repetitive DNA sequences and proteins
constituting the ends of linear eukaryotic chromosomes. While these
structures are thought to be associated with the nuclear matrix, they
appear to be released from this matrix at the time when the cells exit
from G2 and enter M phase. Checkpoints maintain the order
and fidelity of the eukaryotic cell cycle, and defects in checkpoints
contribute to genetic instability and cancer. The 14-3-3
gene has
been reported to be a checkpoint control gene, since it promotes
G2 arrest following DNA damage. Here we demonstrate that
inactivation of this gene influences genome integrity and cell
survival. Analyses of chromosomes at metaphase showed frequent losses
of telomeric repeat sequences, enhanced frequencies of chromosome
end-to-end associations, and terminal nonreciprocal translocations in
14-3-3
/
cells. These phenotypes correlated with a
reduction in the amount of G-strand overhangs at the telomeres and an
altered nuclear matrix association of telomeres in these cells. Since
the p53-mediated G1 checkpoint is operative in these cells,
the chromosomal aberrations observed occurred preferentially in
G2 after irradiation with gamma rays, corroborating the
role of the 14-3-3
protein in G2/M progression. The
results also indicate that even in untreated cycling cells, occasional
chromosomal breaks or telomere-telomere fusions trigger a
G2 checkpoint arrest followed by repair of these aberrant
chromosome structures before entering M phase. Since 14-3-3
/
cells are defective in maintaining
G2 arrest, they enter M phase without repair of the
aberrant chromosome structures and undergo cell death during mitosis.
Thus, our studies provide evidence for the correlation among a
dysfunctional G2/M checkpoint control, genomic instability,
and loss of telomeres in mammalian cells.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
A significant evolutionary
conservation is apparent for 14-3-3 proteins in many eukaryotes,
ranging from plants to mammals. The 14-3-3 proteins appear to modulate
the activity of a large variety of functional proteins and enzymes,
many of which are involved in control of cell cycle, cell death, and
mitogenesis (1, 45). The 14-3-3 proteins are thought to
function as adaptor proteins that allow interaction between signaling
proteins that do not associate directly with each other (1).
The 14-3-3
gene was originally identified as an epithelium-specific
marker, HME1, which was downregulated in a few breast cancer cell lines but not in cancer cell lines derived from other tissue types
(31). Recent data indicate that the expression of 14-3-3
is lost in 94% of breast tumors (7). At the functional
level, the 14-3-3
protein has been implicated in the G2
checkpoint (13, 30). For instance, its association with
different kinases in the cytosol and on the nuclear membrane may
contribute to kinase activation during intracellular signaling
(44), and the protein appears to sequester the mitotic
initiation complex, cdc2-cyclin B1, in the cytoplasm after DNA damage
(3). The latter prevents cdc2-cyclin B1 from entering the
nucleus, where the protein complex could normally initiate mitosis.
Thus, 14-3-3
has been implicated in maintaining a post-DNA-damage
G2 arrest, thereby allowing for DNA repair (3,
13). Such cell-cycle checkpoints are considered to be the
guardians of genome integrity, with their abrogation contributing to
reduce genomic stability.
Genome stability is also maintained by the telomeres, as these
chromosome terminal structures protect the chromosomes from fusions or
degradation, as originally reported by Muller (23) and
McClintock (19, 20). Human telomeres contain long stretches of a tandemly arranged hexameric sequence, TTAGGG, bound by
specific proteins (32). Shortening or loss of telomeric
repeats is correlated with chromosome end-to-end associations that
could lead to genomic instability and gene amplification (4, 16,
25, 27, 28). Increased chromosome end-to-end associations, or
telomeric associations, seen at metaphase, have been reported in cells
derived from tumor tissues, senescent cells, the Thiberge Weissenbach
syndrome, and ataxia telangiectasia individuals and following viral
infections (6, 28, 29). They have been linked to genomic
instability and carcinogenicity (4, 28, 29). More recently
it was found that telomeric end-to-end fusions were enhanced in cells
expressing dominant negative alleles of the human telomeric protein
TRF2 (40), and these fusion events also correlated with a
loss of telomeric G-strand overhangs.
We were interested to determine whether a normal G2
checkpoint is necessary for chromosome stability in mammalian cells.
For this purpose, we studied the link between the 14-3-3
gene and chromosome behavior, as it relates to a gene involved in the
G2 checkpoint after DNA damage. We used isogenic human
colorectal cancer cells in which both 14-3-3
alleles were
inactivated and were generated by a somatic-cell knockout approach
(3). We found that, indeed, the frequencies of chromosomal
aberrations such as telomere-telomere fusions, unbalanced
translocations, and chromosomal breaks are higher in
14-3-3
/
cells than in the parental
14-3-3
+/+ cells. These chromosomal aberrations appear
mostly to involve losses of telomeric repeats, as a significant number
of telomeres fail to hybridize in situ to telomere-specific probes, and
signals for telomeric G-strand overhangs are diminished in these cells. Thus, these results are consistent with the idea that abrogating the
maintenance of a G2 checkpoint in the
14-3-3
/
cells leads to an accumulation of unrepaired
chromosomal aberrations, such as losses and subsequent fusion of
telomeres, which may be part of the reason for the mitotic catastrophes
observed in these cells.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Cells.
Human colorectal cells (HCT116) in which 14-3-3
alleles are inactivated were obtained from Bert Vogelstein, The Johns
Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md. The parental cell line is designated 14-3-3
+/+, and the derivatives are
designated 14-3-3
+/
and 14-3-3
/
.
The cells were maintained according to the procedure described recently
(3). Three 14-3-3
/
derivative clones were
analyzed for subsequent experiments. GM02052 was maintained according
to the procedure described recently (37).
Clonogenic assays.
Cells in plateau phase growth were plated
as single cells into 60-mm dishes in 5.0 ml of medium, incubated for
6 h, and subsequently exposed to ionizing radiation. The number of
cells per dish was chosen to ensure that about 50 colonies would
survive a particular radiation dose treatment. Cells were exposed to
ionizing radiation in the dose range of 0 to 8 Gy at room temperature
using a 137Cs
ray at a dose rate of 1.1 Gy/min. Cells
were incubated for 12 or more days and were fixed in methanol-acetic
acid (3:1) prior to staining with crystal violet. Only colonies
containing >50 cells were counted. The mean plating efficiencies for
14-3-3
+/+, 14-3-3
+/
, and
14-3-3
/
were 55, 54, and 39%, respectively.
Chromosome studies.
Metaphase chromosomes were prepared by a
procedure described earlier (28). Giemsa-stained chromosomes
from metaphases were analyzed for chromosome end-to-end associations.
Detection of telomeres and terminal restriction fragment
analysis.
Detection of telomeres on metaphases was done by
fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) using a telomere-specific
probe (28). For terminal restriction fragment (TRF)
analysis, DNA was isolated from exponentially growing cells by a
procedure described earlier (28). This DNA was digested with
the restriction enzymes RsaI and HinfI, which do
not cut TTAGGG sequences, was processed for fractionation,
and was hybridized with a 32P-labeled (TTAGGG)5
probe. Detection and measurement of TRF lengths were performed as
described earlier using ImageQuant version 1.2, build 039 (Molecular
Dynamics) (37, 38). The nondenaturing in-gel hybridization
to determine relative amounts of telomeric single-stranded DNA (G
tails) was performed as described previously (21).
Telomerase assay.
Telomerase activity was determined using
the telomerase PCR enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit
(Boehringer Mannheim) as described before (35). Telomerase
activity was determined in triplicate, and a negative and a positive
control were run with each experiment. As a negative control, an
aliquot of each extract was heat inactivated for 10 min at 95°C.
Chromosome-specific changes assessed by SKY.
Spectral
karyotyping (SKY) analysis was carried out on chromosomal spreads on
freshly dropped slides that were less than 2 months in age. The assay
was carried out using the SKY paints according to the manufacturer's
instructions (ASI, Carlsbad, Calif.) (36). Briefly, slides
were formalin fixed and denatured in 70% formamide-2× SSC (1× SSC
is 0.15 M NaCl plus 0.015 M sodium citrate) at 75°C for 2 min. The
SKY paints were denatured, preannealed, and hybridized to the denatured
slides for 48 h at 37°C. Posthybridization washes and detections
were carried out according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Spectral images were acquired and analyzed with an SD 200 spectral
bioimaging system (ASI, Ltd., Migdal Haemek, Israel) attached to a
Zeiss microscope (Axioplan 2; Carl Zeiss Canada). The generation of a
spectral image is achieved by acquiring ~100 frames of the same image
that differ from each other only in the optical path difference. The
images were stored in a computer for further analysis using the SKYVIEW
(version 1.2) (ASI) software. For every chromosomal region, the
identity was determined by measuring the spectral emission at that
point. Regions where sites for rearrangement or translocation between
different chromosomes occurred were visualized by a change in the
display color at the point of transition. Pseudocolor classifications
were made to aid in the delineation of specific structural aberrations
where the display color of different chromosomes might appear quite similar.
Determination of telomere-nuclear matrix association.
Cells
in exponential phase were used to prepare the nuclear matrix halos,
which were isolated by removing histones and other loosely bound
proteins. Nuclear halos are morphologically defined as nuclear
structures that remain after the selective removal of perinuclear
components with ionic detergent. The halos are thought to represent
relaxed loops of DNA with periodical attachment to the nuclear matrix,
which is a residual framework of nucleoskeletal proteins. The procedure
used for the isolation of lithium diiodosalicylate (LIS)-generated halo
structures is a modification of the LIS technique described recently
(37). Cells were trypsinized, washed twice with cold
phosphate-buffered saline and twice with 25 ml of cold cell wash buffer
(CWB; 50 mM KCl, 0.5 mM EDTA, 0.05 mM spermidine, 0.05 mM spermine,
0.25 mM phenylmethylsolfonyl fluoride [PMSF], 0.5% thiodiglycol, 5 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.4]), pelleted at 1,000 × g for 5 min, and then suspended in 12 ml of CWB containing 0.1% digitonin
(Boehringer Mannheim). The cells were passed through a 20-gauge needle,
and lysis was monitored by phase-contrast microscopy. The 2-ml
suspension was loaded on 3 ml of 10% glycerol cushion in CWB and was
spun for 10 min at 800 × g. The nuclei were washed with CWB containing 0.1% digitonin, suspended in CWB and with 0.1%
digitonin and 0.5 mM CuSO4 but without EDTA, and incubated for 20 min at 37°C. About 19 volumes of LIS solution (10 mM LIS, 100 mM lithium acetate, 0.1% digitonin, 0.05 mM spermine, 0.125 mM
spermidine, 0.25 mM PMSF, 20 mM HEPES-KOH [pH 7.4]) was added, and
the mixture was incubated for 10 min at room temperature. Halos were
collected by centrifugation for 10 min at 2,800 rpm in a benchtop
centrifuge and were washed three times with matrix wash buffer (MWB; 20 mM KCl, 70 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 10 mM Tris HCl [pH 7.4])
with 0.1% digitonin. The resulting halo structures contained naked
chromosomal DNA and the nuclear matrix. The nuclear halos were then
washed with a restriction enzyme buffer, 6 × 106
halos were cleaved in a volume of 0.5 ml containing 1,000 U of the
restriction enzyme StyI for 3 h at 37°C, and the
nuclear matrices were pelleted by centrifugation. To purify released
DNA fragments that were attached to the nuclear matrix, both fractions
were treated with proteinase K in a solution containing 10 mM EDTA, 0.5% sodium dodecyl sulfate, and 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4) and were incubated overnight at 37°C. DNA was purified as described previously (28, 37). Agarose gel electrophoresis was performed for the fractionation of DNA (28, 37). For Southern blot analysis, equal volumes from about 106 halos were fractionated on
0.8% agarose gels. Prior to DNA loading, RNase was added to a final
concentration of 10 µg/ml. Fractionation of DNA, transfer to a
Hybond-N membrane, or slot blotting of DNA, hybridization with a
32P-labeled (TTAGGG)5 probe, and detection were
done as described previously (28, 37). Quantitation and
comparison of the telomeric DNA among total (T), released (S), and (P)
telomeric DNA fragments attached to the nuclear matrix were achieved by phosphorimaging.
Assay for G1 and G2 checkpoints by
examining chromosomal aberrations.
G1-type chromosomal
aberrations were assessed as described previously (26).
Briefly, cells in plateau phase were irradiated with 3 Gy of gamma
rays, allowed to incubate for 24 h, and subcultured, and
metaphases were collected. Chromosome spreads were prepared by the
procedure described earlier (24). All categories of
G1-type asymmetrical chromosome aberrations were scored:
dicentrics, centric rings, interstitial deletions/acentric rings, and
terminal deletions.
The efficiency of G2 checkpoint control was evaluated by
comparing mitotic indices and chromatid-type aberrations at metaphase between the cell types after irradiation. Chromosomal aberrations were
assessed by counting chromatid breaks and gaps per metaphase as
described previously (22). Cells in exponential phase were irradiated with 1 Gy of gamma ray, and metaphases were collected at 45 and 90 min following irradiation and were examined for chromatid breaks
and gaps. Fifty metaphases were scored for each postirradiation time point.
 |
RESULTS |
Inactivation of 14-3-3
influences cell growth and survival after
irradiation with gamma rays.
14-3-3
+/+ and
derivatives 14-3-3
+/
and 14-3-3
/
are human colorectal cancer cells that were derived from cell line
HCT116 as described recently (3). The parental cells, which
express wild-type p53 and 14-3-3
, have intact DNA damage checkpoints
(41). Since the 14-3-3
protein is involved in
G2 checkpoint control, we determined whether inactivation
of the 14-3-3
gene in HCT116 cells influences cell growth by
standard growth curve assays. The population doubling time of the
14-3-3
/
cells was longer by ~6 h than that of
14-3-3
+/
and 14-3-3
+/+ cells (data not
shown). Cells with both alleles of 14-3-3
inactivated also showed
lower cell viability, as monitored by the trypan blue exclusion test,
with about 11% nonviable cells (data not shown). This is consistent
with the reduced plating efficiency of these cells (~39% for
14-3-3
/
cells, compared to ~59% for
14-3-3
+/+ cells).
Since 14-3-3

/
cells grow more slowly, we examined
whether inactivation of 14-3-3

influences cell survival after
irradiation
with gamma rays, using colony-forming experiments. Cells
with
both copies of 14-3-3

inactivated exhibited an approximately
twofold enhancement in ionizing radiation sensitivity for reproductive
cell death when compared to 14-3-3
+/+ cells (Fig.
1). No difference in ionizing radiation
sensitivity
for reproductive cell death was found in
14-3-3
+/
cells and 14-3-3
+/+ cells
(Fig.
1), suggesting that cells heterozygous for the 14-3-3
gene
have a phenotype similar to that of the parental cells.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Comparison of gamma-ray survival. Dose-response curves
are shown for 14-3-3 / , 14-3-3 +/ ,
and 14-3-3 +/+ cells treated with ionizing radiation
while growing exponentially and asynchronously. The ataxia
telangiectasia (A-T) cell line GM02052 was used as a positive control
to indicate radiosensitivity in an exponentially growing asynchronous
population.
|
|
Inactivation of 14-3-3
leads to chromosome end-to-end
associations and frequent losses of telomeric repeats.
Cells in
which both alleles of 14-3-3
are inactivated grow slowly and exhibit
decreased cell survival after gamma ray treatment. It is thus possible
that damaged DNA is not repaired appropriately in these cells. To
determine whether inactivation of the 14-3-3
gene influences
chromosome behavior, we compared 14-3-3
+/+,
14-3-3
+/
, and 14-3-3
/
cells for
frequencies of chromosome end-to-end associations by analyzing colcemid
accumulated cells at metaphase. In human cells, the formation of
dicentric chromosomes and other abnormalities created as a consequence
of end-to-end fusions have been correlated with losses of telomere
function and have been reported for senescent primary cells and in
tumor cells (4, 6). In these cases, the chromosomal
aberrations correlated with critically shortened telomeres
(6). To determine the influence of inactivation of the
14-3-3
gene on the frequency of chromosome end-to-end associations, 200 metaphases were examined. 14-3-3
/
cells had 1.9 chromosome end-to-end associations per metaphase, whereas their
parental 14-3-3
+/+ cells had 0.12 chromosome end-to-end
associations per metaphase (Fig. 2 and
Table 1). The differences in the
frequency of chromosome end-to-end associations between
14-3-3
/
and 14-3-3
+/+ cells are
statistically significant. Since chromosome end-to-end associations may
lead to anaphase bridge formation, cells without colcemid treatment
were analyzed for anaphase bridges. Three hundred cells at anaphase
were examined for bridges. 14-3-3
/
cells displayed
an at least eightfold higher frequency of anaphase bridges than
14-3-3
+/+ cells (Table 1).

View larger version (79K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Telomere FISH analysis of metaphase chromosomal spreads.
14-3-3 +/+ (a) and 14-3-3 / (b) cells
are shown. Note the absence of telomeric signals in
14-3-3 / cells, as indicated by the arrows. (c)
Telomeric signals are present at some telomere fusion sites in
14-3-3 / cells (indicated by arrows).
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 1.
Comparison of frequency of chromosome end-to-end
associations at metaphase and bridges at anaphase among three isogenic
cell typesa
|
|
These data suggest that due to occasional losses of telomere function,
chromosome end associations are formed, and these associations
are not
resolved in 14-3-3

/
cells. To further examine how
inactivation of 14-3-3

is linked
with the loss of telomere function,
we examined the sizes of TRFs
(see Materials and Methods). By Southern
blotting, we found no
significant differences in TRF sizes when
comparing DNA derived
from 14-3-3

/
cells with that
from 14-3-3
+/
and 14-3-3
+/+ cells (Fig.
3). However, this analysis yields an
appraisal only
of the population of TRFs generated and does not monitor
the ends
of individual chromosomes. We therefore performed FISH for
telomeric
repeats on metaphase spreads by using a telomere-specific
Cy3-labeled
(CCCTAA)
3 peptide nucleic acid probe. Fifty
metaphase chromosome
spreads (184 telomeres per metaphase) from
14-3-3
+/+ and 14-3-3

/
cells were
included and analyzed (Fig.
2). A significantly higher
proportion of
chromatid ends in 14-3-3

/
cells (about 11% of
telomeres per metaphase) have fewer telomere-specific
fluorescent
signals than the 14-3-3
+/+ cells. These observations
suggest that the chromosome end-to-end
fusions observed in
14-3-3

/
cells correlated with losses of telomeric
repeats. However, telomere
signals were seen in about 18% of the
fusion sites, indicating
that total loss of telomeres is not required
for telomere fusions
(Fig.
2).

View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Detection of single-strand extension of the G-rich
strand and sizes of terminal restriction fragments on DNA derived from
14-3-3 / , 14-3-3 +/ , and
14-3-3 +/+ cells. Lane 1, DNA from
14-3-3 +/ cells; lane 2, DNA from
14-3-3 +/+ cells; lane 3, DNA from
14-3-3 / cells; lane 4, denatured plasmid DNA (ssDNA)
containing telomeric repeats (positive control); lane 5, ds plasmid DNA
as a negative control (only lights up once the DNA is denatured, as
seen only in Fig. 3b). (a) A nondenaturing hybridization to genomic DNA
digested with restriction enzymes HinfI and RsaI.
This method allows visualization of G-strand overhangs on telomeres.
Signals were quantified by PhosphorImage analysis and were corrected
for DNA loading using the rehybridized gel shown in Fig. 3b. Note the
difference in the signal intensity in nondenatured gel between
14-3-3 / and 14-3-3 +/+ cells. (b)
Denatured gel was used to compare the TRFs among
14-3-3 / , 14-3-3 +/ , and
14-3-3 +/+ cells. Note that no difference in mean TRF is
found between the three cell types. M, molecular weight markers.
|
|
Normally, mammalian telomeres end in a single-stranded G-tail overhang
of about 100 to 200 bases (
17,
21). Recently it
was shown
that these G tails can invade the double-stranded portion
of telomeric
repeats, forming a D loop (
11). This telomeric
DNA end
structure may be conserved among higher eukaryotes and
is required for
the association of terminus-specific proteins
forming the cap (
10,
12). Clearly, if telomeres were fused
by end-to-end associations
or if telomeric repeats were not present,
such as on broken chromosome
ends, these G tails would disappear.
Such a situation has already been
observed to occur as a consequence
of overexpressing dominant negative
alleles of TRF2 (
40). Thus,
to assess whether the
inactivation of 14-3-3

also correlates
with reduced signals for G
tails, we examined the signals for
G tails on TRFs of
14-3-3

/
, 14-3-3
+/
, and
14-3-3
+/+ cells by a nondenaturing in-gel hybridization
(
17,
21). The
advantage of this method is that terminal
fragments of any size
can be analyzed by using an end-labeled
d(CCCTAA)
3 probe (Fig.
3). In DNA derived from
14-3-3

/
cells, the signal for G tails was
significantly and reproducibly
reduced, by about 35%, compared to DNA
from 14-3-3
+/+ cells.
A difference in the G tails of telomeres might also be due to
alterations in telomerase activity. We examined telomerase activity
in
extracts of 14-3-3
+/+ and 14-3-3

/
cells by a telomeric repeat amplification protocol-ELISA, which
detects
the in vitro synthesis of telomeric repeats by telomerase
(
35). Using this method, no significant differences in
telomerase
activity between 14-3-3

/
and
14-3-3
+/+ cells were found, indicating that the overall
activity of telomerase
is not affected by the lack of the 14-3-3

protein (data not shown).
Further, when localization of hTERT was
determined by immunostaining
using anti-hTERT, no difference was
observed between 14-3-3

/
and
14-3-3
+/+ cells (data not
shown).
Enhanced chromosome end fusions in cells with inactivated 14-3-3
correlate with frequent terminal nonreciprocal translocations and ring
formations.
The results described above indicate that inactivation
of the 14-3-3
gene enhances the frequency of observable chromosome end-to-end associations. We next determined whether such chromosome end
associations correlate with any other karyotypic changes (Table 1). For
each cell type, 200 Giemsa-stained metaphases were examined for
spontaneous chromosome breakage. Chromosomal breaks were detected at
2.4-fold-higher levels in the 14-3-3
/
cells than in
the parental 14-3-3
+/+ cells (Table
2). Furthermore, in order to assess
whether 14-3-3
/
cells show specific chromosome
fragility, karyotypic changes were determined by SKY. This analysis
uses colored fluorescent chromosome-specific paints that provide a
complete analysis of possible interchromosomal changes. We found that
14-3-3
/
cells had about threefold higher levels of
terminal nonreciprocal translocations (Fig.
4). We
also found ring chromosomes in 4% of 14-3-3
/
cells
but not in 14-3-3
+/+ cells (Fig. 4). The presence of
ring structures in 14-3-3
/
cells suggests that
telomere functions can be simultaneously lost at both ends of the same
chromosome, allowing for fusion of the arms of the chromosome.


View larger version (98K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
DAPI (4',6'-diamidino-2-phenylindole) banding and SKY
analyses of metaphases in 14-3-3 +/+ (a) and
14-3-3 / (b) cells. The following descriptions of
parts A, B, and C apply to both panels a and b. (A) RGB picture; (B)
inverted DAPI staining; (C) SKY and DAPI banding of cells in panels A
and B. (a) Karyotype in panel C: [der(2)t(2;8), der(10)dup(10)t(1:10),
der(11)t(1;11), t(11;13)/der(11)dup(13), der(16)t(2;8),
der(18)t(17;18),21pstk+]. (b) Karyotype in panel C: [t(2;9)(p10;q10),
t(3;7)(p10;q110), t(5;19)(p10;p10), der(15;22)(q10;q10),
der(16)t(8;160(q13;p13.3), der(18)t(17;18)(q21;p11.3)]. A SKY
hybridization and detection kit (SD-200 Bio system; Applied Spectral
Imaging Inc.) was used to visualize all human chromosomes in 23 to 24 colors. Chromosomes were analyzed by a combination of Fourier
spectroscopy, charge-coupled device imaging, and computerization to
excite and measure the emission spectra simultaneously for all dyes in
the spectral range and from all points in the metaphase spreads. Images
were analyzed by using SKYVIEW software. Note that
14-3-3 / cells have rings and a higher frequency of
terminal translocations, as indicated by arrows. In panel b, the large
arrow indicates a ring and small arrows indicate translocations and
fragments.
|
|
The higher frequency of chromosome end fusions could be due to
altered chromatin structure in cells with inactivated 14-3-3
.
To determine whether inactivation of the 14-3-3
gene influences the
telomere nuclear matrix associations, exponentially growing cells were
processed by the LIS procedure, and the resulting nuclear matrix halos
were cleaved with StyI (see Materials and Methods for
details). The nuclear matrix halos are the insoluble nonchromatin scaffolding of the interphase nuclei. The nuclear remnant and associated DNA were separated by centrifugation and were suspended in
MWB buffer. For genomic blotting analysis, equal volumes representing DNA from identical numbers of halos were fractionated side by side on
1.5% agarose gels. 14-3-3
+/+ cells have 56% of the
telomeric DNA associated with the nuclear matrix (attached) (P)
fraction and 44% in the soluble (free) (S) fraction (Fig.
5). In contrast,
14-3-3
/
cells have 71% of the telomeric DNA
associated with the nuclear matrix and 29% in the soluble fraction. In
both instances, summation of the P and S values is equal to total
telomeric DNA (T), suggesting that no telomeric DNA was lost during the
extraction procedure. These results suggest that inactivation of
14-3-3
influences the association of telomeres with the nuclear
matrix.

View larger version (100K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Autoradiograph of telomeric DNA in
14-3-3 +/+ (lanes 1 to 3) cells and
14-3-3 / (lanes 4 to 6) cells. Halo preparation was
digested with StyI and centrifuged to separate free (S)
(lanes 2 and 5) and pelleted (P) (lanes 3 and 6) telomeric fractions.
Note that the summation of P and S values is equal to total (lanes 1 and 3). P and S lanes of 14-3-3 / and P and S lanes
of 14-3-3 +/+ cells represent telomeric DNA from a
similar number of halos. Note the difference in the ratio of P versus S
fractions of telomere DNA between 14-3-3 / and
14-3-3 +/+ cells. The results are representative of three
separate experiments. Lanes 1 and 4, total telomeric DNA; lanes 2 and
5, soluble fraction; lanes 3 and 6, nuclear matrix fraction.
|
|
Observable chromosome aberrations in 14-3-3
/
cells correlate with a deficiency of a G2-type but not a
G1-type checkpoint.
In 14-3-3
/
cells, there is an increased frequency of chromosome end fusions,
nonreciprocal translocations, ring chromosome formations, and losses of
G tails (see above), indicating frequent loss of telomere functions in
these cells. However, it remained unclear whether a defective
G2 checkpoint contributes to these losses or whether other
changes in these cells could induce general chromosome instability. One
way to address this question is to compare cell cycle stage-specific
aberrations among 14-3-3
+/+ and
14-3-3
/
cells. Another way to address the same
question is to compare the mitotic index of 14-3-3
/
cells and 14-3-3
+/+ cells after treatment with ionizing
radiation. Therefore, we first set out to determine the frequencies of
chromosome aberrations induced in G1 or in G2
in 14-3-3
/
and 14-3-3
+/+ cells. To
determine G1-type chromosome damage, plateau phase cells
were treated with 3 Gy of gamma rays and replated 12 h after irradiation, and aberrations were scored at metaphase as described previously (26). We found no differences in residual
G1-induced chromosomal aberrations seen at metaphase
between 14-3-3
/
and 14-3-3
+/+ cells
(Fig. 6A). These results confirm that
cells with an inactivated 14-3-3
gene have a normal G1
checkpoint, evidenced by similar chromosomal repair resulting in
similar aberration frequencies. This suggests that the loss of telomere
function with subsequent enhanced chromosome aberrations does not occur
during the G1-to-S-phase transition in cells with an
inactivated 14-3-3
gene.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
G1- and G2-type chromosomal
aberrations. (A) Cells in plateau phase were irradiated with 3 Gy,
incubated for 24 h postirradiation, and then subcultured, and
metaphases were collected. G1-type aberrations were
examined at metaphase. All categories of asymmetric chromosome
aberrations were scored: dicentrics, centric rings, interstitial
deletions/acentric rings, and terminal deletions. The frequency of
chromosomal aberrations was low and was identical among
14-3-3 +/ and 14-3-3 +/+ cells, and the
frequency of other types of aberrations was also identical between the
14-3-3 / and 14-3-3 +/+ cells,
indicating the normal G1 cell-cycle checkpoint. (B) Cells
in exponential phase were irradiated with 1 Gy. Metaphases were
harvested following irradiation and were examined for chromatid breaks
and gaps. Two cell types showed significant differences in the
chromosomal aberrations, suggesting that 14-3-3 / has
a defective cell-cycle checkpoint.
|
|
Since 14-3-3

has been shown to be involved in a G
2
checkpoint after DNA damage, we evaluated the influence of inactivation
of the 14-3-3

gene on ionizing radiation-induced G
2-type
chromosome
aberrations. Cells in exponential phase were irradiated with
1
Gy, and metaphases were examined for chromatid-type breaks and
gaps.
Cells with both alleles of 14-3-3

inactivated exhibited
a
1.5-fold-increased frequency of G
2-type chromatid
aberrations
at 45 min postirradiation compared to
14-3-3
+/+ cells, and this difference was increased to
2.8-fold at 90 min
(Fig.
6B). In 14-3-3
+/+ cells, the
frequency of G
2-type aberrations decreased with longer
incubations after irradiation (compare the frequencies for 45
and 90 min postirradiation for these cells [Fig.
6B]), indicating
a
functional repair system in these cells. However, for
14-3-3

/
cells, no such decrease was found,
reinforcing the idea that
G
2-type chromosomal aberrations
are not repaired efficiently before
onset of mitosis in these
cells.
Further, when we examined the mitotic index of
14-3-3

/
and 14-3-3
+/+ cells after 90 min of posttreatment with 2 Gy of gamma rays,
we found that cells with
an inactivated 14-3-3

gene had only
about a 17% decrease in mitotic
index, whereas cells with the
14-3-3

gene had about a 61% decrease
in mitotic index (Fig.
7).
These results
suggest that a defective G
2 checkpoint contributes
to
mitotic catastrophe.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
Comparison of the mitotic index among
14-3-3 / , 14-3-3 +/ , and
14-3-3 +/+ cells after treatment with 2 Gy of gamma rays.
Cells were examined for the frequency of mitotic cells at different
time points postirradiation. Note that the frequency of the mitotic
index decreased dramatically in 14-3-3 +/+ and
14-3-3 +/ cells, whereas the decrease was less in
14-3-3 / cells. Also note the differences in the
mitotic index 2 h posttreatment between 14-3-3 +/+
cells and 14-3-3 / cells; such differences are
statistically significant (P > 0.05).
|
|
These results suggest that although the 14-3-3

/
cells have a functional G
1 cell-cycle checkpoint, genetic
damage accumulates
in G
2 following irradiation, which is
consistent with a failure
to arrest and repair in G
2 in
response to DNA damage. The frequency
of observable spontaneous as well
as ionizing radiation-induced
chromatid breaks was dramatically higher
in 14-3-3

/
cells, suggesting that losses of telomere
function occurred by
breakage near telomeres, rather than by a
telomerase-based
mechanism.
 |
DISCUSSION |
The present studies reveal that in cells with both alleles of the
14-3-3
gene inactivated, frequent chromosome breakage with complete
loss of the telomeric repeats in some chromosomes, as well as
chromosome end fusions, ring chromosomes, and reciprocal as well as
unbalanced translocations, can be observed. It is important to note
that these chromosomal aberrations occurred in cells with normal p53
function that were incubated in normal growth conditions without
genotoxic challenges (Fig. 2, 3, and 4 and Table 1). The fact that the
p53-mediated G1 checkpoint was operative in these cells is
underscored by our findings that
irradiation induced comparable
frequencies of observable chromosome aberrations when
14-3-3
/
, 14-3-3
+/
, or
14-3-3
+/+ cells were irradiated while in G1
(Fig. 6A). However, there was a clear and significant difference in
such aberrations if log-phase cells were irradiated, and mitoses
occurring shortly thereafter were monitored; at 90 min after
irradiation, there was a 2.8-fold difference in the frequencies of
aberrations/metaphase between 14-3-3
/
and
14-3-3
+/+ cells. Furthermore, when the
G2-induced aberrations were monitored for the parental
cells over time after irradiation, there was a decline in the frequency
of aberrations, indicating successful repair of at least some of the
induced damage. For 14-3-3
/
cells, on the other
hand, the frequencies of aberrations increased in the same time span,
indicating very inefficient repair (Fig. 6B). Consistent with these
data, survival studies demonstrated that 14-3-3
/
cells were more sensitive to
irradiation (Fig. 1).
These data, taken together, reinforce the idea that in human cells,
chromosomal damage that might occur during S or G2 phase is
recognized by a G2/M checkpoint mechanism. In cells lacking the 14-3-3
protein, initial G2 cell-cycle arrest after
DNA damage is operative, but the cell-cycle arrest cannot be sustained,
and the cells will enter mitosis prematurely (3). Our study
now reveals that as a consequence of this inability to appropriately repair, such cells enter mitosis with frequent chromosomal aberrations. Thus, abrogation of a sustained G2 cell-cycle arrest after
chromosomal damage will lead to genetic instability, a common and
recognized prelude to cellular transformation (5). It is
noteworthy that the 14-3-3
/
cells studied here
appear not to adapt to the chromosomal damage, but rather to die in a
process called "mitotic catastrophe" (3).
A similar situation has been described for yeast cells: when a single
unrepairable double-strand (ds) DNA break is created, cells initially
arrest the cell cycle in G2 but will eventually adapt and
pass into mitosis with the damaged chromosome (34). However,
if there is more than one unrepairable ds DNA break or increased DNA
damage due to mutations in repair proteins, yeast cells will not adapt
and will remain indefinitely in a poorly characterized G2
state (14). Thus, it is possible that there is too much
chromosomal damage in the 14-3-3
/
cells, which
simply does not allow adaptation to occur. Alternatively, some of the
components of the mammalian G2 checkpoints, in particular the 14-3-3 genes, may be involved in regulating adaptation (3, 15,
39). Consistent with the latter, there is increasing evidence to
suggest that in yeast and humans, initial arrest and maintenance of the
G2 checkpoint are distinct mechanisms (3, 9).
About 18% of the chromosome end-to-end associations that we observed
in 14-3-3
/
cells did contain telomeric sequences at
the fusion points (Fig. 2). Furthermore, we documented alterations in
telomere-nuclear matrix associations and a significant loss of G tails
at the telomeres in these cells (Fig. 3 and 5). These results suggest
that at least part of the accumulating damage in
14-3-3
/
cells is specific to telomeric regions.
The 14-3-3 proteins constitute a highly conserved isoform of hetero-
and homodimeric molecules that are associated with signaling proteins.
14-3-3
does not seem to be influencing telomerase activity, as we
did not find a significant difference in telomerase activity when
extracts derived from 14-3-3
/
cells were compared to
those of parental cells (data not shown), suggesting that the effects
observed (loss of telomeres) are not due merely to a telomerase defect.
We speculate that the 14-3-3
protein may, directly or indirectly,
play a role in coordinating the specific chromatin remodeling events
leading up to mitosis. Thus, even in cells without genotoxic
challenges, the dynamic telomere-nuclear matrix associations may not be
regulated appropriately in G2, leading to chromosome breaks
with complete loss of telomeric sequences or nonfunctional telomeres
that will induce telomere fusions.
For yeast, there is also evidence for dynamic changes in telomeric
chromatin in late S/G2. First, telomeric regions are very late replicating, and dynamic changes of the terminal DNA structures have been documented to occur at the end of S phase (8, 18, 42,
43). Second, these changes in the terminal DNA structures roughly
coincide in time with an altered accessibility of telomeric chromatin
to set up a telomeric heterochromatin-like domain (2).
Telomere associations have been observed at G1,
G2, and metaphase in different cell types (27,
28). Several reports suggest that chromosome end-fusions occur in
cells with very short telomeres (4, 33). However, shortening
of telomeres is not an absolute requirement for telomere end fusions,
as 14-3-3
/
and 14-3-3
+/+ cells have
telomeres of similar size, and telomeric repeat signals were detected
at some of the fusion sites (Fig. 2). Similar findings have been
documented for cells with inactivated ATM function, with another gene
involved in G2/M progression, and for cells expressing a
dominant negative mutant form of TRF2 (37, 38, 40).
Our results are thus consistent with a model that predicts that
telomere function in mammalian cells is exquisitely sensitive to
perturbations of cell-cycle regulation and chromatin remodeling during
G2. We speculate that it may be the functioning p53
checkpoint in the 14-3-3
/
cells that causes these
cells to die rather than adapt to the genetic instabilities reported
here. Since inactivation of the 14-3-3
gene leads to
radiosensitivity, genomic instability, and loss of telomeres, further
experiments are needed to reveal the players in 14-3-3
damage response.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
This investigation was supported by NS34746 (T.K.P.). R.J.W. is a
chercheur boursier sénior of the Fonds de la Recherche en
Santé du Québec (FRSQ) and acknowledges support by the
Canadian NCI (grant #010049).
Thanks are due to Bert Vogelstein for providing reagents and Raj
Pandita for her advice and help.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Center for
Radiological Research, College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia
University, VC11-213, 630 West 168th St., New York, NY 10032. Phone:
(212) 305-3911. Fax: (212) 305-3229. E-mail:
tkp1{at}columbia.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Aitkin, A.
1996.
14-3-3 proteins on the MAP.
Trends Cell Biol.
6:341-347[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Aparicio, O. M., and D. E. Gottschling.
1994.
Overcoming telomeric silencing: a trans-activator competes to establish gene expression in a cell cycle-dependent way.
Genes Dev.
18:1133-1146.
|
| 3.
|
Chan, T. A.,
H. Hermakin,
C. Lengauer,
K. W. Kinzler, and B. Vogelstein.
1999.
14-3-3 is required to prevent mitotic catastrophe after DNA damage.
Nature
401:616-620[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Counter, C. M.,
A. A. Avilion,
C. E. LeFeuvre,
N. G. Stewart,
C. W. Greider,
C. B. Harley, and S. Bacchetti.
1992.
Telomere shortening associated with chromosome instability is arrested in immortal cells which express telomerase activity.
EMBO J.
11:1921-1929[Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Dasika, G. K.,
S. C. Lin,
S. Zhao,
P. Sung,
A. Tomkinson, and E. Y. Lee.
1999.
DNA damage-induced cell cycle checkpoints and DNA strand break repair in development and tumorigenesis.
Oncogene
18:7883-7899[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 6.
|
de Lange, T.
1995.
Telomere dynamics and genome instability in human cancer, p. 265-297.
In
E. H. Blackburn, and C. W. Greider (ed.), Telomeres. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 7.
|
Ferguson, A. T.,
E. Evron,
C. Umbricht,
T. K. Pandita,
H. Hermeking,
J. Marks,
A. Futreal,
M. R. Stampfer, and S. Sukumar.
2000.
High frequency of hypermethylation at the 14-3-3 locus leads to gene silencing in breast cancer.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
97:6049-6054[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Ferguson, B. M.,
B. J. Brewer,
A. E. Reynolds, and W. L. Fangman.
1991.
A yeast origin of replication is activated late in S phase.
Cell
65:507-515[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Gardner, R.,
C. W. Putnam, and T. Weinert.
1999.
RAD53, DUN1 and PDS1 define two parallel G2/M checkpoint pathways in budding yeast.
EMBO J.
18:3173-3185[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Greider, C. W.
1999.
Telomeres do D-loop-T-loop.
Cell
97:419-422[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Griffith, J. D.,
L. Comeau,
S. Rosenfield,
R. M. Stansel,
A. Bianchi,
H. Moss, and T. de Lange.
1999.
Mammalian telomeres end in a large duplex loop.
Cell
97:503-514[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Henderson, E. R., and E. H. Blackburn.
1989.
An overhanging 3' terminus is a conserved feature of telomeres.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
9:345-348[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Hermeking, H.,
C. Lengauer,
K. Polyak,
T.-C. He,
L. Zhang,
S. Thiagalingam,
K. W. Kinzler, and B. Vogelstein.
1997.
14-3-3 is a p53-regulated inhibitor of G2/M progression.
Mol. Cell
1:3-11[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Lee, S. E.,
J. K. Moore,
A. Holmes,
K. Umezu,
R. D. Kolodner, and J. E. Haber.
1998.
Saccharomyces Ku70, mre11/rad50 and RPA proteins regulate adaptation to G2/M arrest after DNA damage.
Cell
94:399-409[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Lopez-Girona, A.,
B. Furnari,
O. Mondesert, and P. Russell.
1999.
Nuclear localization of Cdc25 is regulated by DNA damage and a 14-3-3 protein.
Nature
397:172-175[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Ma, C.,
S. Martin,
B. Trask, and J. L. Hamlin.
1993.
Sister chromatid fusion initiates amplification of the dihydrofolate reductase gene in Chinese hamster cells.
Genes Dev.
7:605-620[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 17.
|
Makarov, V.,
Y. Hirose, and J. P. Langmore.
1997.
Long G tails at both ends of human chromosomes suggest a C strand degradation mechanism for telomere shortening.
Cell
88:657-666[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 18.
|
McCarroll, R. M., and W. L. Fangman.
1988.
Time of replication of yeast centromeres and telomeres.
Cell
54:505-513[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 19.
|
McClintock, B.
1941.
The stability of broken ends of chromosomes in Zea mays.
Genetics
26:234-282[Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
McClintock, B.
1942.
The fusion of broken ends of chromosomes following nuclear fusion.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
28:458-463[Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
McElligott, R., and R. J. Wellinger.
1997.
The terminal DNA structure of mammalian chromosomes.
EMBO J.
16:3705-3714[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Morgan, S. E.,
C. Lovly,
T. K. Pandita,
Y. Shiloh, and M. B. Kastan.
1997.
Fragments of ATM which have dominant-negative or complementing activity.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17:2020-2029[Abstract].
|
| 23.
|
Muller, H. J.
1938.
The remaking of chromosomes.
Collecting Net
13:181-195.
|
| 24.
|
Pandita, T. K.
1983.
Effect of temperature variation on sister chromatid exchange frequency in cultured human lymphocytes.
Hum. Genet.
63:189-190[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 25.
|
Pandita, T. K., and D. DeRubeis.
1995.
Spontaneous amplification of interstitial telomeric bands in Chinese hamster ovary cells.
Cytogenet. Cell Genet.
68:95-101[Medline].
|
| 26.
|
Pandita, T. K., and C. R. Geard.
1996.
Chromosome aberrations in human fibroblasts induced by monoenergetic neutrons. I. Relative biological effectiveness.
Radiat. Res.
145:730-739[Medline].
|
| 27.
|
Pandita, T. K.,
E. J. Hall,
T. K. Hei,
M. A. Piatyszek,
W. E. Wright,
C. Q. Piao,
R. K. Pandita,
J. C. Willey,
C. R. Geard,
M. B. Kastan, and J. W. Shay.
1996.
Chromosome end-to-end associations and telomerase activity during cancer progression in human cells after treatment with alpha-particles simulating radon progeny.
Oncogene
13:1423-1430[Medline].
|
| 28.
|
Pandita, T. K.,
S. Pathak, and C. R. Geard.
1995.
Chromosome end associations, telomeres and telomerase activity in ataxia telangiectasia cells.
Cytogenet. Cell Genet.
71:86-93[Medline].
|
| 29.
|
Pathak, S.,
Z. Wang,
M. K. Dhaliwal, and P. C. Sacks.
1988.
Telomeric association; another characteristic of cancer chromosomes.
Cytogenet. Cell Genet.
47:227-229[Medline].
|
| 30.
|
Piwnica-Worms, H.
1999.
Cell cycle. Fools rush in.
Nature
401:535-536[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 31.
|
Prasad, G. L.,
E. M. Valverius,
E. McDuffie, and H. L. Cooper.
1992.
Complementary DNA cloning of a novel epithelial cell marker protein, HMEI, that may be down-regulated in neoplastic mammary cells.
Cell Growth Differ.
3:507-513[Abstract].
|
| 32.
|
Price, C. M.
1999.
Telomeres and telomerase: broad effects on cell growth.
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
9:218-224[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 33.
|
Saltman, D.,
R. Morgan,
M. L. Cleary, and T. de Lange.
1993.
Telomeric structure in cells with chromosome end associations.
Chromosoma
102:121-128[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 34.
|
Sandell, L. L., and V. A. Zakian.
1993.
Loss of a yeast telomere: arrest, recovery, and chromosome loss.
Cell
75:729-739[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 35.
|
Sawant, S. G.,
V. Gregoire,
S. Dhar,
C. B. Umbricht,
S. Cvilic,
S. Sukumar, and T. K. Pandita.
1999.
Telomerase activity as a measure for monitoring radiocurability of tumor cells.
FASEB J.
13:1047-1054[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 36.
|
Schrock, E.,
S. du Manoir,
T. Veldman,
B. Schoell,
J. Wienberg,
M. A. Ferguson-Smith,
Y. Ning,
D. H. Ledbetter,
I. Bar-Am,
D. Soenksen,
Y. Garini, and T. Ried.
1996.
Multicolor spectral karyotyping of human chromosomes.
Science
273:494-497[Abstract].
|
| 37.
|
Smilenov, L. B.,
S. Dhar, and T. K. Pandita.
1999.
Altered telomere nuclear matrix interactions and nucleosomal periodicity in cells derived from individuals with ataxia telangiectasia before and after ionizing radiation treatment.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19:6963-6971[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 38.
|
Smilenov, L. B.,
S. E. Morgan,
W. Mellado,
S. G. Sawant,
M. B. Kastan, and T. K. Pandita.
1997.
Influence of ATM function on telomere metabolism.
Oncogene
15:2659-2665[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 39.
|
Toczyski, D. P.,
D. J. Galgoczy, and L. H. Hartwell.
1997.
CDC5 and CKII control adaptation to the yeast DNA damage checkpoint.
Cell
90:1097-10106[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 40.
|
van Steensel, B.,
A. Smogorzewska, and T. de Lange.
1998.
TRF2 protects human telomeres from end-to-end fusions.
Cell
92:401-413[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 41.
|
Waldman, T.,
K. W. Kinzler, and B. Vogelstain.
1995.
p21 is necessary for the p53 mediated G1 arrest in human cancer cells.
Cancer Res.
55:5187-5190[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 42.
|
Wellinger, R. J.,
A. J. Wolf, and V. A. Zakian.
1993.
Origin activation and formation of single-strand TG1-3 tails occur sequentially in late S phase on a yeast linear plasmid.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13:4057-4065[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 43.
|
Wellinger, R. J.,
A. J. Wolf, and V. A. Zakian.
1993.
Saccharomyces telomeres acquire single-strand TG1-3 tails late in S phase.
Cell
72:51-60[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 44.
|
Xing, H.,
K. Kornfield, and A. J. Muslin.
1997.
The protein kinase KSR interacts with 14-3-3 protein and Raf.
Curr. Biol.
7:294-300[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 45.
|
Zha, J.,
H. Harada,
E. Yang,
J. Jockel, and S. J. Korsmeyer.
1996.
Serine phosphorylation of death agonist BAD in response to survival factor results in binding to 14-3-3 not BCL-X.
Cell
87:619-628[CrossRef][Medline].
|
Molecular and Cellular Biology, October 2000, p. 7764-7772, Vol. 20, No. 20
0270-7306/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Blickwedehl, J., Agarwal, M., Seong, C., Pandita, R. K., Melendy, T., Sung, P., Pandita, T. K., Bangia, N.
(2008). Role for proteasome activator PA200 and postglutamyl proteasome activity in genomic stability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
105: 16165-16170
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Agarwal, M., Pandita, S., Hunt, C. R., Gupta, A., Yue, X., Khan, S., Pandita, R. K., Pratt, D., Shay, J. W., Taylor, J.-S. A., Pandita, T. K.
(2008). Inhibition of Telomerase Activity Enhances Hyperthermia-Mediated Radiosensitization. Cancer Res.
68: 3370-3378
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hunt, C. R., Pandita, R. K., Laszlo, A., Higashikubo, R., Agarwal, M., Kitamura, T., Gupta, A., Rief, N., Horikoshi, N., Baskaran, R., Lee, J.-H., Lobrich, M., Paull, T. T., Roti Roti, J. L., Pandita, T. K.
(2007). Hyperthermia Activates a Subset of Ataxia-Telangiectasia Mutated Effectors Independent of DNA Strand Breaks and Heat Shock Protein 70 Status. Cancer Res.
67: 3010-3017
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Rubin, E., Wu, X., Zhu, T., Cheung, J. C.Y., Chen, H., Lorincz, A., Pandita, R. K., Sharma, G. G., Ha, H. C., Gasson, J., Hanakahi, L. A., Pandita, T. K., Sukumar, S.
(2007). A Role for the HOXB7 Homeodomain Protein in DNA Repair. Cancer Res.
67: 1527-1535
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ziv, S., Brenner, O., Amariglio, N., Smorodinsky, N. I., Galron, R., Carrion, D. V., Zhang, W., Sharma, G. G., Pandita, R. K., Agarwal, M., Elkon, R., Katzin, N., Bar-Am, I., Pandita, T. K., Kucherlapati, R., Rechavi, G., Shiloh, Y., Barzilai, A.
(2005). Impaired genomic stability and increased oxidative stress exacerbate different features of Ataxia-telangiectasia. Hum Mol Genet
14: 2929-2943
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Gupta, A., Sharma, G. G., Young, C. S. H., Agarwal, M., Smith, E. R., Paull, T. T., Lucchesi, J. C., Khanna, K. K., Ludwig, T., Pandita, T. K.
(2005). Involvement of Human MOF in ATM Function. Mol. Cell. Biol.
25: 5292-5305
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Akahira, J.-i., Sugihashi, Y., Suzuki, T., Ito, K., Niikura, H., Moriya, T., Nitta, M., Okamura, H., Inoue, S., Sasano, H., Okamura, K., Yaegashi, N.
(2004). Decreased Expression of 14-3-3{sigma} Is Associated with Advanced Disease in Human Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Its Correlation with Aberrant DNA Methylation. Clin. Cancer Res.
10: 2687-2693
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hunt, C. R., Dix, D. J., Sharma, G. G., Pandita, R. K., Gupta, A., Funk, M., Pandita, T. K.
(2004). Genomic Instability and Enhanced Radiosensitivity in Hsp70.1- and Hsp70.3-Deficient Mice. Mol. Cell. Biol.
24: 899-911
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lottersberger, F., Rubert, F., Baldo, V., Lucchini, G., Longhese, M. P.
(2003). Functions of Saccharomyces cerevisiae 14-3-3 Proteins in Response to DNA Damage and to DNA Replication Stress. Genetics
165: 1717-1732
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Sharma, G. G., Hwang, K.-k., Pandita, R. K., Gupta, A., Dhar, S., Parenteau, J., Agarwal, M., Worman, H. J., Wellinger, R. J., Pandita, T. K.
(2003). Human Heterochromatin Protein 1 Isoforms HP1Hs{alpha} and HP1Hs{beta} Interfere with hTERT-Telomere Interactions and Correlate with Changes in Cell Growth and Response to Ionizing Radiation. Mol. Cell. Biol.
23: 8363-8376
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Yang, H.-Y., Wen, Y.-Y., Chen, C.-H., Lozano, G., Lee, M.-H.
(2003). 14-3-3{sigma} Positively Regulates p53 and Suppresses Tumor Growth. Mol. Cell. Biol.
23: 7096-7107
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Cong, Y.-S., Wright, W. E., Shay, J. W.
(2002). Human Telomerase and Its Regulation. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
66: 407-425
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Konishi, H., Nakagawa, T., Harano, T., Mizuno, K., Saito, H., Masuda, A., Matsuda, H., Osada, H., Takahashi, T.
(2002). Identification of Frequent G2 Checkpoint Impairment and a Homozygous Deletion of 14-3-3{epsilon} at 17p13.3 in Small Cell Lung Cancers. Cancer Res.
62: 271-276
[Abstract]
[Full Text]