Previous Article | Next Article 
Molecular and Cellular Biology, November 2000, p. 8319-8328, Vol. 20, No. 22
0270-7306/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Developmentally Regulated Rpd3p Homolog Specific to
the Transcriptionally Active Macronucleus of Vegetative
Tetrahymena thermophila
Emily A.
Wiley,1,2,
Reiko
Ohba,2
Meng-Chao
Yao,1 and
C. David
Allis2,*
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center,
Seattle, Washington 98109,1 and
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics,
University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
22908-07332
Received 29 March 2000/Returned for modification 16 May
2000/Accepted 31 July 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
A clear relationship exists between histone acetylation and
transcriptional output, the balance of which is conferred by opposing histone acetyltransferases (HATs) and histone deacetylases (HDACs). To
explore the role of HDAC activity in determining the transcriptional competency of chromatin, we have exploited the biological features of
Tetrahymena as a model. Each vegetative cell contains two
nuclei: a somatic, transcriptionally active macronucleus containing
hyperacetylated chromatin and a transcriptionally silent, germ line
micronucleus containing hypoacetylated histones. Using a PCR-based
strategy, a deacetylase gene (named THD1) encoding a
homolog of the yeast HDAC Rpd3p was cloned. Thd1p deacetylates all four
core histones in vitro. It resides exclusively in the macronucleus
during vegetative growth and is asymmetrically distributed to
developing new macronuclei early in their differentiation during the
sexual pathway. Together, these data are most consistent with a
potential role for Thd1p in transcriptional regulation and suggest that
histone deacetylation may be important for the differentiation of
micronuclei into macronuclei during development.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
In eukaryotes, DNA is assembled with
histones to form nucleosomes, the fundamental repeating subunit of
chromatin (27). Further compaction of DNA into dynamic
higher-order structures is necessary for organization of complex
genomes within nuclei, and can influence DNA-templated processes such
as transcription and replication (21, 56). Nucleosomal
histones possess a globular core domain and projecting amino-terminal
"tails" known to contain a diverse array of posttranslational
modifications including acetylation, phosphorylation, and
methylation (15, 55). A rapidly expanding body of evidence
suggests that these covalent histone modifications, acting singly
or in combination, play important roles in many DNA processes, although
their exact function remains to be determined (46).
A strong correlation exists between histone acetylation and the
transcriptional output of resident genes packaged in a chromatin template (10, 21, 47). Transcriptionally inert chromatin is
most often hypoacetylated, relative to transcriptionally active or
competent regions, which are hyperacetylated. Regulation of the
steady-state levels of histone acetylation is a dynamic process under
the control of two competing enzymatic activities: histone acetyltransferases (HATs), which catalyze the transfer of acetyl moieties from acetyl coenzyme A to the conserved lysines in the histone
tails, and histone deacetylases (HDACs), which catalyze the removal of
acetyl moieties from these residues. Recently, the discovery that many
HATs and HDACs had previously been identified as transcriptional
regulators provided a clear mechanistic link between chromatin and gene
expression (9, 10, 47).
In addition to the transcription process, histone acetylation is
associated with the assembly of histones onto DNA. Newly synthesized
histones H3 and H4 are both deposited into replicating chromatin in
acetylated forms (39). On nascent histone H4, a diacetylation pattern involving lysine 5 and lysine 12 (K5 and K12) is
conserved among a wide group of eukaryotes (1, 13, 44, 45)
that probably includes yeast (25, 36). Once assembled into
chromatin, newly synthesized histones are deacetylated, an event
thought to be important for chromatin maturation (4, 43).
Thus far, an HDAC responsible for the removal of deposition acteyl
groups in vivo is not known, and the relationship, if any, between
deposition- and transcription-related acetylation and deacetylation is unclear.
HDACs have been identified from a number of organisms and fall into one
of three general families based on sequence homology to yeast
Rpd3p, Hda1p, or the maize nucleolar phosphoprotein Hd2p (31). Rpd3p and Hda1p are catalytic subunits of
distinct yeast HDAC complexes (40). Rpd3p and its homologs
are capable of deacetylating lysines used in deposition-related
acetylation (26, 41), but their activities are also involved
in targeted gene repression, as are some Hda1p-type activities
(37, 54).
To begin to explore the role of HDACs in deposition- versus
transcription-related acetylation, we took advantage of the biological features of the ciliated protozoan Tetrahymena thermophila.
During vegetative growth, each cell has a transcriptionally active
macronucleus that contains highly acetylated chromatin and a
micronucleus that is transcriptionally inert and contains unacetylated
chromatin except during periods of active replication and
chromatin assembly (1, 12, 51). It has been suggested that
differences in chromatin structure and function between these two
nuclei may be related to their global acetylation state, as
determined by the histone-modifying activities present in each
(12).
In this report, we describe the identification and cloning of the first
ciliate HDAC gene, a gene (called THD1) encoding a Rpd3p-type HDAC. Although Thd1p is able to deacetylate newly
synthesized histone H4 in vitro, it localizes specifically to the
macronucleus, indicating that it is not the activity responsible for
maintaining unacetylated chromatin in micronuclei by removing
deposition-related acetylation. The macronuclear localization of Thd1p
during vegetative growth and its selective recruitment to developing
new macronuclei during the sexual pathway at a time when these nuclei
become transcriptionally active raise the intriguing possibility that
Thd1p plays an important role in the establishment of transcriptionally
competent chromatin during nuclear differentiation.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Strains and plasmids.
Genetically marked strains of T. thermophila, CU427 (Mpr/Mpr[6-mp-s]VI) and CU428
(Chx/Chx-[cy-s]VII), provided by Peter Bruns (Cornell University,
Ithaca, N.Y.) were used in all experiments. The DNA sequences reported
were derived from strain CU428. For green fluorescent protein (GFP)
localization, constructs were made in the GFP vector pVGF-1 (M.-C. Yao
and C.-H. Yao, unpublished data), consisting of the micronuclear rDNA
vector pD5H8 (19) containing the GFP coding sequence
controlled by flanking sequences of the Tetrahymena rpL29
gene, and unique cloning sites at the 3' end. For construction of
GFP-THD1, the entire THD1 open reading frame
(ORF), with flanking restriction sites, was obtained by PCR
oligonucleotides THD1-F (5'-AAACCTCGAGATGAAGGGATTAGATTTGTATCC-3') and THD1-B (5'-GATGGGCCCTCACTCGATATCCATTTTTTTATC-3').
The resulting PCR product was restriction digested with
ApaI and XhoI and ligated to
XhoI-ApaI-digested pVGF-1 with T4 DNA ligase (New
England BioLabs). The resulting plasmid was named pVGF-T.
Gene cloning and sequencing of THD1.
Degenerate
oligonucleotide primers were designed against highly conserved amino
acid sequences within the HDAC family (see Fig. 1A). Their sequences
are as follows: Rpd3-5', 5'-CAYCCYATGAARCCYCAYAGA-3'; and Rpd3-3',
5'-RTAWCCWCCWCCWCC-3' (degenerate bases in oligonucleotide primers: R,
A or G; Y, C or T; and W, A or T). Total cDNA from vegetatively growing
cells, produced by the method of Barnard et al. (7), was
used to amplify a product, which was cloned and sequenced. An internal,
gene-specific sequence was used to design a third primer, Rpd3-B
(5'-CTGTCGTTTTATAATGTGG-3'), that was used in conjunction
with an oligo(dT) primer to amplify a cDNA copy of the 3' end of the
gene. The 5' end of the gene was obtained using rapid amplification of
cDNA ends (cRACE), as previously described (34). For this
DNA, the 3' cDNA was synthesized by PCR using a sequence-specific
oligonucleotide primer, RACE-P (5'-GCTATATAAACGATTGTGTT-3'). The product was circularized by end ligation with RNA ligase (New England BioLabs) and amplified by PCR using the oligonucleotide primers
RACE-1 (5'-GTTGATATTGCACTTAACTGG-3') and RACE-2
(5'-GGTTTGCATCATGCTAAGC-3'). All PCR products were cloned
and sequenced as described previously (11).
Northern blot analyses.
Total RNA from 5 × 106 cells was isolated by Trizol extraction as specified by
the manufacturer (GIBCO-BRL). RNA (30 µg) was electrophoresed on a
2.2 M formaldehyde-1% agarose gel, blotted onto Magnagraph nylon
membranes (MSI, Inc.), and hybridized with the indicated probes at
42°C in hybridization buffer containing 50% formamide.
Generation, characterization, and affinity purification of
polyclonal antibodies against Thd1p.
A peptide corresponding to
the amino terminus of Thd1p (see Fig. 1B) was synthesized with an
additional amino-terminal cysteine for coupling to the carrier protein,
keyhole limpet hemocyanin, as described by Lerner et al.
(28). The coupling reaction was allowed to proceed at room
temperature for several hours; the progress of the reaction was
monitored by reverse-phase high-pressure liquid chromatography.
Approximately 500 µg of conjugate was used in total for four separate
injections into one rabbit. Preimmune serum was obtained from the same
rabbit before immunization. In immunoblotting experiments, crude serum
was used at a 1:1,000 dilution. Antibodies against Thd1p were purified
by affinity chromatography using immunizing peptide coupled to
SulphoLink (Pierce) as specified by the manufacturer.
Immunoblot analysis.
Total nuclei were collected as
described previously (20) or further fractionated and
isolated over a sucrose gradient by the method described by Allis and
Dennison (3). The purity of different nuclei populations was
assessed by fluorescence-activated cell sorter analysis of
Dounce-homogenized nuclei suspended in nucleus buffer (0.25 M sucrose,
1 mM MgCl2 [pH 7.5]) and stained with 50 µg of
propidium iodide per ml. Cytoplasmic fractions were prepared as
previously described (38). The resulting nuclear or
cytoplasmic fractions were resuspended in sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)
gel loading buffer, boiled, and subjected by protein separation by
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) on an 8% polyacrylamide gel, which was then transferred to nitrocellulose and probed with a
1:50 dilution of affinity-purified antibody solution (~20 µg of
anti-Thd1p antibodies), or a 1:1,000 dilution of crude antiserum or
preimmune serum as indicated. Immunoreactivity was detected by using
alkaline phosphatase-conjugated secondary antibodies or by using
horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G
(Amersham; 1:5,000 dilution) for enhanced chemiluminescence detection
as indicated.
Immunoprecipitation, sucrose density fractionation, and
deacetylase assays.
The substrate for all deacetylase assays was
Tetrahymena histones that were acetylated in vivo in the
presence of [3H]acetate. Following extraction, all four
core histones possessed multiple [3H]acetyllysine
residues (determined by acid-urea PAGE [53] and fluorography [data not shown]). Core histones were isolated from the
nuclei as previously described (53). Tetrahymena
histones were labeled in vivo by adding sodium
[3H]acetate (12.5 µCi/ml, 15.2 Ci/mmol) to a culture of
growing cells at 3 × 105 cells/ml as previously
described (50) or by adding [3H]lysine (2 µCi/ml, 50Ci/mmol) to a 5-h conjugating cell population as previously
described (1).
For immunoprecipitations, total nuclei from 108 cells
were isolated and extracted by DNase I digestion as described
previously (35). For each immunoprecipitation, 1/10 of
the resulting supernatant (107 cell equivalent) was
incubated overnight at 4°C with 10 µg of affinity-purified Thd1p
antibodies (preincubated for 2 h at room temperature with or
without the immunizing peptide). For a control, 10 µl of the
corresponding preimmune serum was used. A 20-µl volume of a protein
A-Sepharose slurry (Pierce) was added and allowed to incubate for
1 h at 4°C. Immune complexes were pelleted by centrifugation and
washed three times with 1 ml of Tris-buffered saline (TBS) (pH 7.5)
containing 1% NP-40. Beads were resuspended in 200 µl of deacetylase
buffer (15 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.0], 15 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA), and a
deacetylase assay was performed as described previously
(49), except that for the substrate, 2 × 104 dpm of Tetrahymena 3H-acetylated
histones was used per assay. For nuclear fractionation experiments,
total macronuclei and micronuclei were collected, extracted by DNase I
digestion, and fractionated over a sucrose density gradient, all as
described by Ohba et al. (35). A 20-µl volume of each
fraction tested was added to 180 µl of deacetylase buffer containing
the 2 × 104 dpm of acetylated histone substrate and
assayed as described previously (49). For visualization of
[3H]acetyllysine on individual histones, histones
separated through SDS-PAGE or acid-urea PAGE gels were stained with
Coomassie brilliant blue R 250 and fluorographed.
Nucleotide sequence accession number.
The THD1
sequence has been submitted to GenBank and assigned accession no.
AF276431.
 |
RESULTS |
Cloning of a RPD3 homolog from Tetrahymena.
Most
organisms express multiple HDACs in both the Rpd3p and Hda1p families,
but little is known about the individual deacetylase enzyme(s) of
Tetrahymena. HDAC activity can be detected in both the
macronuclei and micronuclei of vegetatively growing cells (50; E. Wiley, unpublished data). Initial efforts to
elucidate the complexity of deacetylase activities in these cells
revealed two peaks of activity in total (combined macronuclear and
micronuclear) nuclear extracts (see Fig. 3A).
To identify HDACs that are expressed during vegetative growth, PCR was
performed on cDNA isolated from growing cells by using degenerate
oligonucleotide primers corresponding to evolutionarily conserved HDAC
sequences. One set of primers corresponding to the sequences most
highly conserved within the Hda1p family failed to amplify detectable
amounts of cDNA. Another primer set, corresponding to sequences
highly conserved within the Rpd3p family, amplified a single cDNA
fragment (Fig. 1A). The entire cDNA,
as well as upstream and downstream sequences, was cloned using
additional PCR-based techniques (see Materials and Methods for
details).


View larger version (105K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Identification and cloning of a ciliate RPD3 homolog.
(A) Cloned THD1 cDNA and translated amino acid sequence
beginning at the first AUG. Horizontal arrows indicate highly conserved
HDAC sequences used to design degenerate oligonucleotide primers used
in initial PCRs. Vertical arrowheads mark the positions of introns. (B)
Protein sequence alignment of Thd1p, Rpd3p, and Hda1. All three
proteins were aligned using ClustalW version 1.8 and printed using
BoxShade version 3.21. Identical residues are shaded in black, and
conserved residues are shaded in gray. The carboxyl-terminal peptide
sequence used to generate Thd1p antiserum is underlined.
|
|
The genomic copy was identified and cloned by similar techniques and
was named THD1 (for "Tetrahymena histone
deacetylase 1"). Comparison of the genomic and cDNA
sequences indicated that THD1 contained three introns (Fig.
1A). Southern blot analysis of genomic DNA using THD1
cDNA as a probe indicated that THD1 is present in single
copy in the genome (data not shown). The predicted translation of the
largest ORF of the THD1 cDNA, beginning at the first AUG
codon, is shown in Fig. 1A. This ORF is believed to be correct for the
following reasons: (i) the DNA immediately upstream of this AUG is
highly AT rich, a characteristic of most untranslated regions of
Tetrahymena genes; (ii) the size of the predicted translated
protein is similar to the size of homologs from other organisms (for
example, see Fig. 1B); and (iii) the predicted molecular weight of the
encoded protein is in agreement with that observed by immunoblotting of
Tetrahymena proteins resolved by SDS-PAGE (Fig.
2). The THD1 gene encodes a
429-amino-acid polypeptide with 49% identity (66% similarity) to
yeast Rpd3p and 24% identity (48% similarity) to yeast Hda1p. From
this comparison, represented in Fig. 1B, Thd1p was considered to be a
member of the Rpd3p family of HDACs.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Thd1p antiserum identifies a single ~52-kDa
polypeptide in immunoblot analysis. Total nuclear proteins (macro- and
micronuclear) were resolved by SDS-PAGE and transferred to
nitrocellulose, and the membrane was cut into parallel strips for
immunodetection with either antiserum raised against the COOH-terminal
Thd1p peptide (lane 2) or preimmune serum (lane 1) and with alkaline
phosphatase-conjugated secondary antibodies. A separate lane was loaded
with the cytoplasmic fraction from the same cells and probed with the
anti-Thd1p antiserum ( -Thd1p) (lane 3).
|
|
Thd1p antiserum identifies a 52-kDa polypeptide present in one
deacetylase activity peak from total nuclear extracts.
Like other
known HDACs the extreme COOH terminus of Thd1p is divergent from that
of other deacetylases, making it feasible to generate antiserum
specific for Thd1p. Polyclonal antiserum was raised against a
COOH-terminal synthetic peptide (amino acids 414 to 429 [Fig. 1B])
and purified by affinity chromatography. In immunoblot analyses, both
the crude and purified antiserum bound to a single polypeptide band
present in total nuclear extracts of vegetative cells. This
polypeptide, which migrated as a ~52-kDa molecule in SDS-PAGE, was
not detected by preimmune serum (Fig. 2, compare lanes 1 and 2). A
smaller amount of the same polypeptide was detected in a cytoplasmic
extract from the same cell equivalent (lane 3). Thus, as with Rpd3p
homologs in human and mouse cells, Thd1p is concentrated in nuclei.
This interpretation was later confirmed by in vivo localization of
GFP-tagged Thd1p (see Fig. 6).
The overall complexity of Tetrahymena HDAC activity was
elucidated by assaying sucrose density gradient fractions of total nuclear (micro- and macronuclear) extracts for HDAC activity using in
vivo-acetylated histones as substrate. Two clear peaks of deacetylase activity were evident (Fig. 3A). By
comparison with size standards fractionated on a parallel gradient, the
largest peak of activity (peak A) eluted with a size corresponding to
~150 to 160 kDa. The smaller peak (peak B) eluted with a mass of
~100 to 110 kDa. Both activity peaks were sensitive to the
noncompetitive HDAC inhibitor trichostatin A (TSA), which is a potent
and specific inhibitor of many mammalian and yeast histone deacetylases
in vitro (42, 57, 58). The presence of 50 nm TSA in the
assay mixture reduced the activities of peaks A and B by 72 and 80%, respectively. Taken together, these data provide evidence for multiple
deacetylases in vegetative Tetrahymena nuclei.

View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Thd1p is in one of at least two HDAC complexes. (A)
Fractions from a sucrose gradient sedimentation of combined macro- and
micronuclear extracts (numbered in brackets) were assayed for HDAC
activity using in vivo-labeled histones as the substrate and measuring
the counts released. The fractionation profile of standard proteins
with known molecular masses, run on a parallel gradient, is shown in
parentheses. (B) Immunoblot analysis of the above fractions. Individual
fractions (brackets) (25 µl) were resolved by SDS-PAGE and analyzed
by immunoblotting with affinity-purified Thd1p antibodies.
|
|
To test whether Thd1p was a component of either or both deacetylase
complexes, the same density gradient fractions were subjected to
immunoblot analysis with anti-Thd1p antibodies. As shown in Fig. 3B,
Thd1p was detected only in the fractions comprising activity peak A,
indicating that the majority of Thd1p molecules exist in a complex of
~160 kDa. Moreover, the deacetylase activity in each fraction
correlated closely with the relative amount of Thd1p detected,
suggesting that Thd1p is responsible for the activity of peak A. These
results also indicate that there is at least one other, as yet unknown,
HDAC that is responsible for the deacetylase activity peak B.
Thd1p deacetylates each of the four core histones.
To confirm
that Thd1p possessed HDAC activity, Thd1p was immunoprecipitated from
nuclear extracts by using affinity-purified Thd1p antibodies (Fig.
4A, lane 1). Immunoprecipitation of Thd1p was significantly reduced by preincubating antibodies with a 10-fold molar excess of the Thd1p COOH-terminal peptide (p414-429) used to
generate antiserum (lane 2, +P). The resulting immunoprecipitates were
then incubated with in vivo-acetylated histone substrate, and the
amount of released [3H]acetate was quantified. The
anti-Thd1p immunoprecipitate released ~14-fold more
[3H]acetate than did preimmune serum (Fig. 4A, lane 3;
Fig. 4B, compare the second and third bars). This activity was
inhibited by the presence of 50 nM TSA in the assay reactions mixtures
(Fig. 4B, right-hand bar), demonstrating that release of
[3H]acetate is due to deacetylase activity. Furthermore,
preincubation of anti-Thd1p antibodies with the Thd1p COOH-terminal
peptide prevented both the immunoprecipitation Thd1p (Fig. 4A, lane 2) and the release of [3H]acetate from histones (Fig. 4B,
fourth bar). Together, these results indicated that the deacetylase
activity immunoprecipitated with anti-Thd1p antibodies (Fig. 4B, third
bar) was specific to Thd1p.

View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Thd1p deacetylates each of the four core histones. (A)
Anti-Thd1p immunoprecipitates Thd1p. Immunoprecipitation was carried
out on extract from total nuclei with affinity-purified Thd1p
antibodies ( -Thd1p) (lane 1), or the Thd1p antibodies preincubated
with Thd1p peptide (+p) (amino acids 414 to 429) (lane 2), or with
preimmune serum (pre-im) (lane 3). An equal fraction of each
immunoprecipitate was analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with
Thd1p antibodies. "IgG" marks the position of signal due to the
secondary antibody reaction with immunoglobulin G. (B) An equal
fraction of each immunoprecipitate was used for detection of HDAC
activity as described in the legend to Fig. 3A. Bars represent the
counts (in disintegrations per minute) released and extracted following
incubation. The immunoprecipitates tested were preimmune serum
(pre-im), anti-Thd1p antibodies ( -Thd1p), the same but with
immunoprecipitate incubated with TSA prior to and during the reaction
(+TSA), anti-Thd1p antibodies incubated with Thd1p COOH-peptide prior
to immunoprecipitation ( -Thd1p +pep), and histones incubated alone
without immunoprecipitate (hist). (C) Following incubation with
immunoprecipitated Thd1p, with or without TSA in the reaction mixture,
reaction products were resolved by SDS-PAGE and subjected to
fluorography; Coom., Coomassie blue-stained gel; fluor., fluorographed
gel. (D) Following incubation with immunoprecipitated Thd1p, with or
without TSA, reaction products were analyzed as in panel C, except that
acid-urea PAGE was used to resolve the histones. Numbers indicate the
positions of acetylated isoforms.
|
|
To test whether Thd1p had selective specificity for any of the core
histones, substrates from the reactions with immunoprecipitated Thd1p
(Fig. 4B, third and fifth bars) were resolved by SDS-PAGE. [3H]acetate remaining on the resolved histones was
detected by fluorography. As shown in Fig. 4C, incubation with
anti-Thd1p immunoprecipitate clearly removed
[3H]acetate from H2B and H4 compared with control
incubations in the presence of TSA. The protein band representing both
H3 and H2A also lost acetyl modifications; however, the comigration of Tetrahymena H3 and H2A in SDS-PAGE led us to resolve these
histones by acid-urea PAGE followed by fluorography. This analysis
demonstrated that both histones H3 and H2A lost acetyl modifications
compared with the controls containing TSA (Fig. 4D). Thus, Thd1p is
capable of deacetylating all four core histones in vitro with no
obvious preference for any single histone under these assay conditions.
Thd1p is specific to transcriptionally active macronuclei.
Like Rpd3p homologs in other organisms, Thd1p appeared to be
concentrated in the nucleus (Fig. 2). We next assessed
whether there was specificity in nuclear localization (i.e.,
selective partitioning to either micro- or macronuclei). In immunoblot
analyses of total protein from micro- and macronuclei, which were
separated by unit-gravity sedimentation, anti-Thd1p antibodies
bound strongly to a single polypeptide present in extracts from
macronuclei but failed to bind any polypeptide from micronuclei (Fig.
5). Therefore, Thd1p appeared to be
present only in transcriptionally active macronuclei.

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Thd1p is present in macronuclei but not in micronuclei
of vegetative cells. Highly purified populations of macro- and
micronuclei were isolated by unit-gravity sedimentation. Equivalent
amounts of nuclear extract (2 × 106 macronuclei and
2 × 107 micronuclei) were resolved by SDS-PAGE and
transferred to nitrocellulose. Each lane was split in two and
separately probed with affinity-purified Thd1p antibodies, or with
pre-immune serum. m, micronuclei (small filled circle); M, macronuclei
(large open circle). The positions of size standards are indicated on
the left.
|
|
However, the macronucleus-specific localization pattern observed
in immunoblot analyses would also be obtained if Thd1p were selectively degraded in micronuclei during nuclear isolation. We
therefore determined whether the same localization pattern was observed
in vivo, using GFP-tagged Thd1p. For these experiments, GFP was fused
to the entire THD1 ORF and the integrity of the GFP-THD1
fusion junction was confirmed by sequence analysis (data not shown).
This fusion construct was contained within an rDNA-based vector. Upon
transformation with this vector, the rDNA and flanking constructs
are processed, amplified, and maintained as rDNA minichromosomes (19).
Immunoblot analysis of transformants with anti-Thd1p antibodies (Fig.
6A) confirmed that the entire Thd1
protein was synthesized in transformants, since the Thd1p
antiserum, raised against the COOH terminus, detected a
polypeptide of the approximate predicted molecular weight of the
full-length fusion protein. Moreover, this analysis confirmed the
expression of the GFP-Thd1p fusion protein at high levels during
logarithmic vegetative growth. As expected, a similar polypeptide was
not detected in cells expressing GFP alone. Also as expected, a
reduction of GFP-Thd1p expression in transformants nearing the
stationary phase was observed due to reduced rpL29 promoter function in
stationary-phase cells.

View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
GFP-tagged Thd1p is concentrated in macronuclei and is
undetectable in micronuclei in vivo. (A) Immunoblot of transformant
populations expressing GFP-THD1 (L, mid-log phase; S,
near-stationary phase) or GFP alone (mid-log phase) probed with Thd1p
antibodies. The arrow indicates the position of GFP-Thd1p. The band
detected at the bottom of the gel is probably a degradation product of
GFP-Thd1p. (B) Fluorescence micrographs of transformants expressing
GFP-THD1 or GFP alone. Arrows point to micronuclei. The presence of two
micronuclei in these cells is discussed in the text (see Discussion).
The cytoplasmic punctate DAPI staining is due to the presence of DAPI
in the vacuoles of living cells.
|
|
In transformants expressing GFP-Thd1p, fluorescence was brightest
in the macronucleus and undetectable in the micronuclei. In
contrast, control transformants expressing GFP alone showed the
brightest fluorescence in the cytoplasm (Fig. 6B). These results lend
further support to the conclusion that Thd1p is present only in
macronuclei, not in micronuclei, during vegetative growth. This
localization pattern suggests that Thd1p functions specifically within
the context of a transcriptionally competent nucleus.
Thd1p expression is developmentally regulated.
In
Tetrahymena, the micronucleus, acting as the germ line
nucleus, undergoes a developmental pathway that ultimately produces both new macronuclei and new micronuclei during the sexual
process termed conjugation (reference 32 and
references therein). Throughout conjugation, micronuclei undergo
replication and chromatin assembly at defined intervals during
mitotic and meiotic (micronuclear) divisions, and endoreplications
during other intervals are required by the developing new macronucleus
(2, 17). To further examine whether Thd1p is linked to
deposition- versus transcription-related acetylation, Northern blot
analyses of total RNA, taken at hourly intervals through conjugation,
were performed.
Our analyses clearly revealed that expression of Thd1p mRNA does not
correlate only with the development of the new macronucleus, which
occurs between 7 and 14 h of conjugation (Fig.
7A) (see below). Thd1p mRNA levels
fluctuated throughout the time course examined, with peaks observed at
4 to 5, 7, and 12 to 14 h. Quantitation of THD1 mRNA
(Fig. 7B, bottom) revealed a ca. five-fold increase from 4- to 5-h
conjugants, a ca. twofold increase in 7-h conjugants, and a ca. sixfold
increase in 12- to 14-h conjugants relative to the preceding time point
shown. Interestingly, these intervals have each previously been shown
to correspond closely to periods of active DNA replication and
chromatin assembly (2, 17), as supported by the presence of
coincident peaks in histone H4 transcript levels detected in the same
RNA samples (Fig. 7B). These data demonstrate that Thd1p expression is
regulated throughout development and raise the intriguing possibility
that it may play an additional role in deacetylating newly synthesized
histones during DNA replication. In support, Thd1p levels are elevated ca. twofold in replicating micronuclei from 5-h conjugating cells compared to the surrounding time points (Fig.
8).

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
Thd1p expression and nuclear localization are
developmentally regulated. (A) Schematic representation of the timing
of nuclear development and transcriptional activity through sexual
conjugation (see reference 52 and the text for
details). Micronuclei are denoted by small filled circles; developing
new macronuclei (anlagen) are denoted by gray-shaded circles; and
macronuclei and parental or old macronuclei (marked by a cross) are
denoted by large open circles. (B) Northern hybridization analysis of
total RNA from different time points throughout conjugation. Actual
times postmixing are indicated by the numbers at the top. Samples were
resolved by formaldehyde-agarose gel electrophoresis, transferred to a
nylon membrane, and hybridized with cDNA probes of the
THD1, histone H4-I, and rDNA genes. Asterisks indicate the
intervals of DNA synthesis previously described (2, 17). The
two bands detected with the H4-I probe are transcripts from both H4-I
and H4-II genes, as previously noted (6). S, starved
(premixed) cells. Note that THD1 transcript levels in S
cells are reproducibly higher than in 2-h conjugants, but the
difference varies (~1.5- to ~4-fold) from preparation to
preparation. Also, macronuclear Thd1 protein levels are slightly higher
but variable. Quantitation of the THD1 signal corrected for
the amount of sample loaded (rDNA) was determined by PhosphorImager
analysis for each sample; values (in arbitrary units) are represented
by the bar graph.
|
|

View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 8.
Immunodetection of Thd1p in synchronous populations of
developing nuclei. Nuclei isolated by unit-gravity sedimentation were
subjected to SDS-PAGE, transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane,
and immunoblotted with Thd1p antibodies and anti-histone H3
antiserum as indicated. As a control, the same immunoblot was probed
with antiserum against p55, a macronucleus- and anlagen-specific
GCN5-type HAT, to rule out cross-contamination of micronuclear samples
with macronuclei (data not shown). Fluorescence-activated cell sorter
analyses (see Materials and Methods) also revealed that all
micronuclear and anlagen samples were >95% pure (not shown). Numbers
in parentheses indicate the relative amounts of anti-Thd1p signal
corrected for anti-histone H3 signal.
|
|
Thd1p is targeted to developing new macronuclei.
During
conjugation, one transcriptionally inert product of a single
postzygotic mitotic division of the micronucleus ultimately differentiates into a transcriptionally active new macronucleus while
the other, genetically equivalent, daughter remains transcriptionally inert and condensed. At this time, the former "old" macronucleus is
no longer needed, and it is degraded by an apoptosis-like mechanism (Fig. 7A) (see reference 16 for details and
additional references). The discovery that Thd1p is confined to the
macronucleus during vegetative growth (Fig. 5 and 6) prompted us to
determine the point in the development of new macronuclei (between 7 and 14 h [Fig. 7A]) when Thd1p levels dramatically increase.
Synchronous populations of developing nuclei recovered at different
time points were collected and analyzed for the presence of Thd1p by
immunoblotting with Thd1p antibodies following SDS-PAGE (Fig. 8).
Unlike vegetative cells, a small and somewhat variable amount of Thd1p
was detected in micronuclei at each time point of conjugation examined.
At 5 h postmixing, when ~80% of the micronuclei were undergoing
division (determined by cytological staining with 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole [DAPI] [see Materials and
Methods]), a modest peak in micronuclear Thd1p staining was observed
(detected relative to staining by general H3 antiserum used as an
internal control for the amount of chromatin loaded [see bar graph]).
Whether this modest peak reflects a role in removal of
deposition-related acetylation sites from nascent micronuclear histones
remains unknown and is an intriguing possibility.
After fertilization, two postzygotic divisions lead to the
establishment of anteriorly positioned micronuclei that immediately swell and begin to differentiate into new macronuclei, becoming transcriptionally competent. In these nuclei (referred to as
anlagen and shaded gray at 7.5 and 9 h [Fig. 8]), the amount of
Thd1p is ca. twofold higher than in the micronuclei, which arose from the same nuclear divisions (5-h micronuclei). At the subsequent time points analyzed (9 and 14 h), the levels of Thd1p
remained asymmetrically distributed between developing micro- and
macronuclei. Taken together, these analyses provide evidence for
developmental regulation of Thd1p in the nuclear populations. The
increase in the level of Thd1 in developing new macronuclei, compared
to micronuclei, early in their differentiation (7.5 h) suggests that it
may play a role in the establishment of transcriptionally active
chromatin in these nuclei.
 |
DISCUSSION |
In this study we describe the cloning and characterization of the
first HDAC from a ciliated protozoan. The enzyme from T. thermophila, called Thd1p, is a member of the Rpd3p family. As is
the case for other Rpd3p homologs, Thd1p can deacetylate all four core
histones (18, 22, 26). Its localization to the macronucleus, but not the micronucleus during vegetative
growth, suggests that this activity is not responsible for maintaining micronuclear chromatin in an unacetylated, condensed state. This result
is consistent with earlier findings that the extremely low levels of
histone acetylation observed in micronuclei are probably due in
part to the absence of nuclear HAT-mediated histone acetylation
(50). Our data are most consistent with a role of Thd1p
functioning within the context of a transcriptionally active nucleus
(see below). This interpretation agrees well with the results of
studies demonstrating that Rpd3p-type enzymes are components of
transcription regulatory complexes, whose activity is necessary for
targeted gene repression (5, 23).
Similar to mammalian cells overexpressing the Rpd3p homolog HDAC1,
which exhibit a reduced growth rate due to a severe delay during the
G2 and M phases of the cell cycle (8),
Tetrahymena cells producing high levels of GFP-Thd1p grew
slowly and were quite large (data not shown). Moreover, many of these
cells contained two micronuclei instead of one during vegetative growth
(Fig. 6B), a phenotype that occurs when a macronucleus is delayed in entering or progressing through the M phase (in wild-type cells, macronuclear division immediately follows micronuclear division). In
addition, GFP fluorescence in these transformants was detected for
only ~30 to 80 cell generations and was accompanied by a marked decrease in GFP-Thd1p production (data not shown). None of these observations were made for transformants expressing GFP alone, raising
the interesting possibility that overproduction of Thd1p is deleterious
to vegetative cells, causing several phenotypic aberrations by
mechanisms that are not understood.
It is likely that only one Rpd3p-type enzyme exists in
Tetrahymena, since PCR with degenerate oligonucleotides
encoding amino acid sequences highly conserved within the Rpd3p family
of HDACs detected the expression of only THD1. Supporting
this idea, a THD1 cDNA probe failed to hybridize with
other Tetrahymena genomic DNA fragments under low-stringency
Southern hybridization conditions that allowed the hybridization of
THD1 to yeast RPD3 (Wiley, unpublished). In
addition, unlike RPD3 in yeast, THD1 appears to
be an essential gene (Wiley, unpublished), indicating that it probably
has no redundant functions with other Tetrahymena HDACs.
Thd1p is clearly not the only Tetrahymena HDAC, however.
Fractionation experiments indicated that at least one other deacetylase activity exists in vegetative cells. This activity might be from an
Hda1-type enzyme, although PCR with oligonucleotides corresponding to
highly conserved Hda1 peptide sequences failed to identify such a
cDNA (data not shown). Our results indicate that Thd1p expression
is regulated in a dynamic fashion throughout the sequential events of
sexual conjugation and nuclear differentiation. In contrast to
the situation in vegetative cells, Thd1p may play a role in histone metabolism in micronuclei during early periods of the sexual pathway. Low levels of Thd1p are detected in micronuclei early
in conjugation (Fig. 8), a time when micronuclei are transcriptionally active for a brief period during meiotic prophase (33, 48). From this, Thd1p activity may be important for aspects of meiosis, a
possibility consistent with results of recent studies in yeast documenting a need for HDAC activity during meiosis (24).
The amino-terminal "tail" of newly synthesized histone H4 is
diacetylated on lysines 5 and 12 (Ac K5/K12) in a wide range of
organisms (analogous to positions 4 and 11 on Tetrahymena H4 [1, 13, 44, 45]). These "deposition-related"
acetyl groups are then removed by an unknown deacetylase activity
coincident with maturation of the nascent histones into chromatin (see
the introduction). The ability of Rpd3p homologs to deacetylate Ac K5/K12 on H4 has been previously described (30, 41),
although, as yet, none have been linked to replicating chromatin. In
this study, THD1 transcript levels fluctuated in a
developmentally regulated manner, where peaks coincided with intervals
of DNA replication, and a modest increase in micronuclear Thd1p
was detected in 4- to 5-h conjugants where micronuclei are
rapidly dividing. In addition, newly synthesized, diacetylated (Ac
K4/K11) H4 histones isolated from this time point are partially
deacetylated by Thd1p in vitro to produce many monoacetylated molecules
(data not shown), and previous experiments showed that newly
synthesized H4 is deacetylated stepwise, through a clear monoacetylated
intermediate in vivo (1). Together, these observations
raise the possibility that Thd1p activity may play a role in the
deacetylation of newly synthesized histones, although clear evidence is
lacking. The suggestion that Thd1p plays a role in deacetylating
nascent H4 in germ line nuclei, however, seems at odds with our
failure to detect Thd1p in vegetative micronuclei. Although this
apparent discrepancy remains unresolved, we note that acetylated
H4 is not detected in situ in vegetative micronuclei during S phase
(see the insert to Fig. 3b of reference 29), even
though it is easily detected by the same assay in micronuclei from 5-h
mating cells. Future investigations utilizing cells reduced in Thd1p
expression will more directly address possible relationships between
Thd1p activity and histone deposition in both vegetative and
conjugating cells.
Levels of Thd1p increase in developing new macronuclei, but this
increase is not observed in new micronuclei at 7.5 h of
conjugation (Fig. 8), the time when the two types of nuclei first
become morphologically and functionally distinct (32). Thus,
an asymmetric distribution of Thd1p is established early in micro- and
macronuclear differentiation. Previous investigations demonstrated that
developing new macronuclei initiate transcription detectable by
[3H]uridine autoradiography and that bulk levels of
acetylated histone increase dramatically in anlagen shortly after this
time (12, 29, 52). One intriguing possibility is that Thd1p
is involved in creating transcription-related acetylation patterns in
new macronuclei, thus establishing transcriptionally competent
chromatin in developing new macronuclei. Regulation of steady-state
histone acetylation levels appears to be extremely complex, with a wide range of levels maintained by different acetate turnover rates. Histones that are rapidly acetylated and deacetylated are
preferentially associated with transcriptionally active or competent
chromatin (14, 50). We suspect that the role of Thd1p may be
closely tied to the rapid deacetylation of this class of histone as
part of the transcription process.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We gratefully acknowledge James Smothers and Craig Mizzen for
their helpful discussions and technical advice on the cloning and
biochemical characterization of Thd1p, and we thank Douglas Chalker for
his critical reading of the manuscript. We give special thanks to David
Goldfarb for the time and accommodations he devoted to this research.
This research was supported by grants from the National Institutes of
Health to C.D.A. (GM40922), to M.C.Y. (GM26210), and to E.A.W.
(GM18785-04).
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Virginia, Box
800733, Charlottesville, VA 22908-0733. Phone: (804) 243-6048. Fax:
(804) 924-5069. E-mail: allis{at}virginia.edu.
Present address: Department of Biology, Clapp Laboratory, Mount
Holyoke College, South Hadley, MA 01075. Phone: (206) 667-4435.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Allis, C. D.,
L. G. Chicoine,
R. Richman, and I. G. Schulman.
1985.
Deposition-related histone acetylation in micronuclei of conjugating Tetrahymena.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
82:8048-8052[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
|
Allis, C. D.,
M. Colavito-Shepanski, and M. A. Gorovsky.
1987.
Scheduled and unscheduled DNA synthesis during development in conjugating Tetrahymena.
Dev. Biol.
124:469-480[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Allis, C. D., and D. K. Dennison.
1982.
Identification and purification of young macronuclear anlagen from conjugating cells of Tetrahymena thermophila.
Dev. Biol.
93:519-533[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Annunziato, A. T., and R. L. Seale.
1983.
Histone deacetylation is required for the maturation of newly replicated chromatin.
J. Biol. Chem.
258:12675-12684[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Ayer, D.
1999.
Histone deacetylases: transcriptional repression with SINers and NuRDs.
Trends Cell Biol.
9:193-198[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Bannon, G. A.,
F. J. Calzone,
J. K. Bowen,
C. D. Allis, and M. A. Gorovsky.
1983.
Multiple, independently regulated, polyadenylated messages for histone H3 and H4 in Tetrahymena.
Nucleic Acids Res.
25:3903-3917.
|
| 7.
|
Barnard, R.,
J. N. Southard, and F. Talamantes.
1994.
Two-step PCR amplification of multiple specific products from cDNA using one specific primer and oligo dT.
BioTechniques
16:251-252[Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Bartl, S.,
J. Taplick,
G. Lagger,
H. Khier,
K. Kuchler, and C. Seiser.
1997.
Identification of mouse histone deacetylase 1 as a growth factor-inducible gene.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17:5033-5043[Abstract].
|
| 9.
|
Belotserkovskaya, R.,
D. E. Sterner,
M. Deng,
M. H. Sayre,
P. M. Lieberman, and S. L. Berger.
2000.
Inhibition of TATA-binding protein function by SAGA subunits Spt3 and Spt8 at Gcn4-activated promoters.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20:634-647[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Brown, C. E.,
I. Lechner,
I. Howe, and J. L. Workman.
2000.
The many HATs of transcription coactivators.
Trends Biochem. Sci.
25:15-19[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Brownell, J. E.,
J. Zhou,
T. Ranalli,
R. Kobayashi,
D. G. Edmondson,
S. Y. Roth, and C. D. Allis.
1996.
Tetrahymena histone acetyltransferase A: a homolog to yeast Gcn5p linking histone acetylation to gene activation.
Cell
84:843-851[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Chicoine, L. G., and C. D. Allis.
1986.
Regulation of histone acetylation during macronuclear differentiation in Tetrahymena: evidence for control at the level of acetylation and deacetylation.
Dev. Biol.
116:477-485[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Chicoine, L. G.,
I. G. Schulman,
R. Richman,
R. G. Cook, and C. D. Allis.
1986.
Nonrandom utilization of acetylation sites in histones isolated from Tetrahymena.
J. Biol. Chem.
261:1071-1076[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Covault, J., and R. Chalkley.
1980.
The identification of distinct populations of acetylated histone.
J. Biol. Chem.
255:9110-9116[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Davie, J. R.
1996.
Histone modifications, chromatin structure, and the nuclear matrix.
J. Cell. Biochem.
62:149-157[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Davis, M. C.,
J. G. Ward,
G. Herrick, and C. D. Allis.
1992.
Programmed nuclear death: apoptotic degradation of specific nuclei in conjugating Tetrahymena.
Dev. Biol.
154:419-432[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Doerder, F. P., and L. E. DeBault.
1975.
Cytofluorimetric analysis of nuclear DNA during meiosis, fertilization and macronuclear development in the ciliate Tetrahymena pyriformis, syngen 1.
J. Cell Sci.
17:471-493[Abstract].
|
| 18.
|
Emiliani, S.,
W. Fischle,
C. Van Lint,
Y. Al-Abed, and E. Verdin.
1997.
Characterization of a human RPD3 ortholog, HDAC3.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
95:2795-2800[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Godiska, R., and M.-C. Yao.
1990.
A programmed site-specific DNA rearrangement in Tetrahymena thermophila requires flanking polyurine tracts.
Cell
61:1237-1246[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Gorovsky, M. A.,
M.-C. Yao,
J. B. Keevert, and G. L. Pleger.
1975.
Isolation of micro- and macronuclei of Tetrahymena pyriformis.
Methods Cell Biol.
9:311-327[Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Grunstein, M.
1997.
Histone acetylation in chromatin structure and transcription.
Nature (London)
389:349-352[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Hassig, C.,
J. Tong,
T. Fleischer,
T. Owa,
P. Grable,
D. Ayer, and S. Schreiber.
1998.
A role for histone deacetylase activity in HDAC1-mediated transcriptional repression.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
95:3519-3524[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Hassig, C. A., and S. L. Schreiber.
1997.
Nuclear histone acetylases and deacetylases and transcriptional regulation: HATs off to HDACs.
Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol.
1:300-308[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Kim, Y. B.,
A. Honda,
M. Yoshida, and S. Horinouchi.
1998.
phd1+, a histone deacetylase gene of Schizosaccharomyces pombe, is required for the meiotic cell cycle and resistance to trichostatin A.
FEBS Lett.
436:193-196[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 25.
|
Kleff, S.,
E. D. Andrulis,
C. W. Anderson, and R. Sternglanz.
1995.
Identification of a gene encoding a yeast histone H4 acetyltransferase.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:24674-24677[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Kolle, D.,
G. Brosch,
T. Lechner,
A. Pipal,
W. Helliger,
J. Taplick, and P. Loidl.
1999.
Different types of maize histone deacetylases are distinguished by a highly complex substrate and site specificity.
Biochemistry
38:6769-6773[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 27.
|
Kornberg, R. D., and Y. Lorch.
1999.
Twenty-five years of the nucleosome, fundamental particle of the eukaryotic chromosome.
Cell
98:285-294[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 28.
|
Lerner, R. A.,
N. Green,
H. Alexander,
F. T. Liu,
J. G. Sutcliffe, and T. M. Shinnick.
1981.
Chemically synthesized peptides predicted from the nucleotide sequence of the hepatitis B virus genome elicit antibodies reactive with the native envelope protein of Dane particles.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
78:3403-3407[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 29.
|
Lin, R.,
J. W. Leone,
R. G. Cook, and C. D. Allis.
1989.
Antibodies specific to acetylated histones document the existence of deposition- and transcription-related histone acetylation in Tetrahymena.
J. Cell Biol.
108:1577-1588[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
Loidl, P.
1994.
Histone acetylation: facts and questions.
Chromosoma
103:441-449[Medline].
|
| 31.
|
Lusser, A., B. G.,
A. Loidl,
H. Haas, and P. Loidl.
1997.
Identification of maize histone deacetylase HD2 as an acidic nucleolar phosphoprotein.
Science
277:88-91[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 32.
|
Martindale, D. W.,
C. D. Allis, and P. J. Bruns.
1982.
Conjugation in Tetrahymena thermophila. A temporal analysis of cytological stages.
Exp. Cell Res.
140:227-236[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 33.
|
Martindale, D. W.,
C. D. Allis, and P. J. Bruns.
1985.
RNA and protein synthesis during meiotic prophase in Tetrahymena thermophila.
J. Protozool.
32:644-649[Medline].
|
| 34.
|
Maruyama, I. N.,
T. L. Rakow, and H. I. Maruyama.
1995.
cRACE: a simple method for identification of the 5' end of mRNAs.
Nucleic Acids Res.
23:3796-3797[Free Full Text].
|
| 35.
|
Ohba, R.,
D. J. Steger,
J. E. Brownell,
C. A. Mizzen,
R. G. Cook,
J. Cote,
J. L. Workman, and C. D. Allis.
1999.
A novel H2A/H4 nucleosomal histone acetyltransferase in Tetrahymena thermophila.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19:2061-2068[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 36.
|
Parthun, M. R.,
J. Widom, and D. E. Gottschling.
1996.
The major cytoplasmic histone acetyltransferase in yeast: links to chromatin replication and histone metabolism.
Cell
87:85-94[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 37.
|
Pazin, M. J., and J. T. Kadonaga.
1997.
What's up and down with histone deacetylation and transcription?
Cell
89:325-328[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 38.
|
Richman, T.,
L. G. Chicoine,
M. P. Collini,
R. G. Cook, and C. D. Allis.
1988.
Micronuclei and the cytoplasm of growing Tetrahymena contain a histone acetylase activity which is highly specific for free histone H4.
J. Cell Biol.
106:1017-1026[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 39.
|
Roth, S. Y., and C. D. Allis.
1996.
Histone acetylation and chromatin assembly: a single escort, multiple dances?
Cell
87:5-8[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 40.
|
Rundlett, S. E.,
A. A. Carmen,
R. Kobayashi,
S. Bavykin,
B. M. Turner, and M. Grunstein.
1996.
HDA1 and RPD3 are members of distinct yeast histone deacetylase complexes that regulate silencing and transcription.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:14503-14508[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 41.
|
Rundlett, S. E.,
A. A. Carmen,
N. Suka,
B. M. Turner, and M. Grunstein.
1998.
Transcriptional repression by UME6 involves deacetylation of lysine 5 of histone H4 by RPD3.
Nature
392:831-835[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 42.
|
Sanchez Del Pino, M.,
G. Lopez-Rodas,
R. Sendra, and V. Tordera.
1994.
Properties of the yeast nuclear histone deacetylase.
Biochem. J.
303:723-729.
|
| 43.
|
Shimamura, A., and A. Worcel.
1989.
The assembly of regularly spaced nucleosomes in the Xenopus oocyte S-150 extract is accompanied by deacetylation of histone H4.
J. Biol. Chem.
264:14524-14530[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 44.
|
Sobel, R. E.,
R. G. Cook, and C. D. Allis.
1994.
Non-random acetylation of histone H4 by a cytoplasmic histone acetyltransferase as determined by novel methodology.
J. Biol. Chem.
269:18576-18582[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 45.
|
Sobel, R. E.,
R. G. Cook,
C. A. Perry,
A. T. Annunziato, and C. D. Allis.
1995.
Conservation of deposition-related acetylation sites in newly synthesized histones H3 and H4.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92:1237-1241[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 46.
|
Strahl, B. D., and C. D. Allis.
2000.
The language of covalent histone modifications.
Nature
403:41-45[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 47.
|
Struhl, K.
1998.
Histone acetylation and transcriptional regulatory mechanisms.
Genes Dev.
12:599-606[Free Full Text].
|
| 48.
|
Sugai, T., and K. Hiwatashi.
1974.
Cytologic and autoradiographic studies of the micronucleus at meiotic prophase in Tetrahymena pyriformis.
J. Protozool.
21:542-548[Medline].
|
| 49.
|
Taunton, J.,
C. A. Hassig, and S. L. Schreiber.
1996.
A mammalian histone deacetylase related to the yeast transcriptional regulator Rpd3p.
Science
272:408-411[Abstract].
|
| 50.
|
Vavra, K. J.,
C. D. Allis, and M. A. Gorovsky.
1982.
Regulation of histone acetylation in Tetrahymena macro- and micronuclei.
J. Biol. Chem.
257:2591-2598[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 51.
|
Vavra, K. J.,
D. S. Pederson, and M. A. Gorovsky.
1981.
Nuclease sensitivity of chromatin containing active genes: kinetic analyses utilizing continuous elution of digestion products from an ultrafiltration cell.
Nucleic Acids Res.
9:5825-5843[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 52.
|
Wenkert, D., and C. D. Allis.
1984.
Timing of the appearance of macronuclear-specific histone variant hv1 and gene expression in developing new macronuclei of Tetrahymena thermophila.
J. Cell Biol.
98:2107-2117[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 53.
|
Wiley, E. A.,
C. A. Mizzen, and C. D. Allis.
2000.
Isolation and characterization of in vivo modified histones and an activity gel assay for identification of histone acetyltransferases.
Methods Cell Biol.
62:379-394[Medline].
|
| 54.
|
Wolffe, A. P.
1997.
Transcriptional control. Sinful repression.
Nature
387:16-17[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 55.
|
Wolffe, A. P., and J. J. Hayes.
1999.
Chromatin disruption and modification.
Nucleic Acids Res.
27:711-720[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 56.
|
Workman, J. L., and R. E. Kingston.
1998.
Alteration of nucleosome structure as a mechanism of transcriptional regulation.
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
67:545-579[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 57.
|
Yoshida, M.,
S. Horinouchi, and T. Beppu.
1995.
Trichostatin A and trapoxin: novel chemical probes for the role of histone acetylation in chromatin structure and function.
Bioessays
17:423-430[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 58.
|
Yoshida, M.,
M. Kijima,
M. Akita, and T. Beppu.
1990.
Potent and specific inhibition of mammalian histone deacetylase both in vivo and in vitro by trichostatin A.
J. Biol. Chem.
265:17174-17179[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Molecular and Cellular Biology, November 2000, p. 8319-8328, Vol. 20, No. 22
0270-7306/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Smith, J. J., Torigoe, S. E., Maxson, J., Fish, L. C., Wiley, E. A.
(2008). A Class II Histone Deacetylase Acts on Newly Synthesized Histones in Tetrahymena. Eukaryot Cell
7: 471-482
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Parker, K., Maxson, J., Mooney, A., Wiley, E. A.
(2007). Class I Histone Deacetylase Thd1p Promotes Global Chromatin Condensation in Tetrahymena thermophila. Eukaryot Cell
6: 1913-1924
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Stemm-Wolf, A. J., Morgan, G., Giddings, T. H. Jr., White, E. A., Marchione, R., McDonald, H. B., Winey, M.
(2005). Basal Body Duplication and Maintenance Require One Member of the Tetrahymena thermophila Centrin Gene Family. Mol. Biol. Cell
16: 3606-3619
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Wiley, E. A., Myers, T., Parker, K., Braun, T., Yao, M.-C.
(2005). Class I Histone Deacetylase Thd1p Affects Nuclear Integrity in Tetrahymena thermophila. Eukaryot Cell
4: 981-990
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Duharcourt, S., Yao, M.-C.
(2002). Role of Histone Deacetylation in Developmentally Programmed DNA Rearrangements in Tetrahymena thermophila. Eukaryot Cell
1: 293-303
[Abstract]
[Full Text]