Previous Article | Next Article 
Molecular and Cellular Biology, December 2000, p. 8923-8932, Vol. 20, No. 23
0270-7306/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Constitutive Instability of Muscle Regulatory Factor Myf5 Is
Distinct from Its Mitosis-Specific Disappearance, Which Requires a
D-Box-Like Motif Overlapping the Basic Domain
Catherine
Lindon,*
Olivier
Albagli,
Peggy
Domeyne,
Didier
Montarras, and
Christian
Pinset
Groupe de Développement Cellulaire,
Institut Pasteur, 75724 Paris Cedex 15, France
Received 1 May 2000/Returned for modification 19 June 2000/Accepted 12 September 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
Transcription factors Myf5 and MyoD play critical roles in
controlling myoblast identity and differentiation. In the myogenic cell
line C2, we have found that Myf5 expression, unlike that of MyoD, is
restricted to cycling cells and regulated by proteolysis at mitosis. In
the present study, we have examined Myf5 proteolysis through stable
transfection of myogenically convertible U20S cells with Myf5
derivatives under the control of a tetracycline-sensitive promoter. A
motif within the basic helix-loop-helix domain of Myf5 (R93 to Q101)
resembles the "destruction box" characteristic of substrates of
mitotic proteolysis and thought to be recognized by the
anaphase-promoting complex or cyclosome (APC). Mutation of this motif
in Myf5 stabilizes the protein at mitosis but does not affect its
constitutive turnover. Conversely, mutation of a serine residue (S158)
stabilizes Myf5 in nonsynchronized cultures but not at mitosis. Thus,
at least two proteolytic pathways control Myf5 levels in cycling cells.
The mitotic proteolysis of Myf5 is unlike that which has been described
for other destruction box-dependent substrates: down-regulation of Myf5
at mitosis appears to precede that of known targets of the APC and is
not affected by a dominant-negative version of the ubiquitin carrier
protein UbcH10, implicated in the APC-mediated pathway. Finally, we
find that induction of Myf5 perturbs the passage of cells through
mitosis, suggesting that regulation of Myf5 levels at mitosis may
influence cell cycle progression of Myf5-expressing muscle precursor cells.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The myogenic regulatory factors
(MRFs) are muscle-specific basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) proteins which
play essential roles in determination and differentiation of skeletal
muscle cells both in vivo and in model myogenic cell lines (reviewed in
reference 41). Ectopic expression of any one of
these factors is sufficient to induce myogenic differentiation in
various nonmuscle cells (4, 9) via mechanisms leading to
cell cycle withdrawal and transactivation of muscle-specific promoters
(8, 38). In vivo, expression of either Myf5 or MyoD is
required for skeletal muscle lineage determination (34) and
both are expressed in proliferating myoblasts in culture
(27).
The muscle-specific transactivation functions of MyoD are repressed in
proliferating myoblasts by numerous negative influences (reviewed in
reference 3). Direct effects of the cell cycle include repression of MyoD function by cyclin D1 (36) in
G1 phase, mediated by the direct interaction of MyoD with
cyclin-dependent kinase 4 (cdk4) (43). In addition, it has
recently been shown that MyoD expression is cell cycle regulated in
proliferating C2 muscle cells such that its levels fall during
G1 and recover following passage into S phase
(24). The regulation of Myf5 factor activity is distinct
from that of MyoD, since it does not interact with cdk4 (43)
and shows a different periodicity in its expression through the cell
cycle (24). Moreover, we have previously shown that Myf5 is
regulated during the cell cycle by proteolysis, undergoing accelerated
degradation at mitosis by a pathway which may involve the 26S
proteasome (27). MyoD has been shown to undergo rapid,
constitutive degradation by the ubiquitin-26S proteasome pathway
(1) but does not appear to be additionally destabilized by
passage into mitosis (27).
Proteolysis mediated by the 26S proteasome is an important mechanism
for generating rapid irreversible transitions in diverse cellular
processes such as cell cycle progression, signal transduction, and
differentiation (reviewed in reference 16).
Substrates are marked for degradation by the 26S proteasome by the
conjugation of multiple ubiquitin molecules in a pathway requiring
three distinct enzyme activities that include the activity of a
ubiquitin carrier protein (Ubc, E2) and that of the ubiquitin ligase
(E3), which mediates target recognition. Studies of proteolysis in cell
cycle progression have so far implicated two major E3 activities in selection of cell cycle-specific substrates. Skp1-Cullin-F-box complex is active throughout the cell cycle, and targeting of substrates is generally dependent on their regulated phosphorylation (30). The anaphase-promoting complex or cyclosome (APC) was identified as a cell cycle-regulated E3 which is specifically activated
at mitosis for destruction of mitotic cyclins and other mitotic
regulators (23). Destruction of mitotic substrates depends on a loosely conserved motif known as the destruction box (D-box) (13, 22), which is thought to be recognized by the APC,
although direct binding of the APC to its substrates has never been
demonstrated (reviewed in reference 42).
We were interested in the possibility that the periodic destruction of
Myf5 in the cell cycle might constitute a mechanism for regulating its
myogenic functions in proliferating cells. In order to pursue this
issue, we undertook to identify sequences involved in controlling the
stability of Myf5. Here we describe point mutations which identify two
distinct pathways regulating the turnover of Myf5. One is involved in
constitutive Myf5 degradation and appears homologous to that described
for MyoD (37). The other is mitosis specific and disrupted
by mutation of a D-box-like motif immediately adjacent to the
DNA-binding domain. However, despite the dependence of the
mitosis-specific proteolytic pathway on an apparent D-box motif,
further experiments indicate that it is not dependent on previously
characterized APC activity. Further suggesting the existence of novel
D-box-dependent pathways of proteolysis, we show that the onset of Myf5
destruction at mitosis can occur before that of known substrates of
D-box-dependent proteolysis and that its precise timing appears to vary
from cell to cell.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Plasmid constructs.
Full-length cDNAs corresponding to mouse
Myf5 (gift of S. Tajbahksh) was cloned into the
tetracycline-regulatable vector pUHD10-3 (gift of H. Bujard) for
transfection into UTA6 cells (see below).
Site-directed mutagenesis of Myf5 was carried out on the Myf5 cDNA
cloned into T7plink (pT7
Myf5) by a whole-plasmid PCR based on the
ExSite method described by Stratagene Cloning Systems (La Jolla,
Calif.). Oligonucleotide primers bearing the required sequence alterations were phosphorylated at their 5' ends using polynucleotide kinase. One microgram of each primer was used to amplify 300 ng of the
plasmid template in the presence of 200 µM each deoxynucleoside triphosphate and 5% dimethyl sulfoxide by 15 cycles of PCR with Advantage cDNA polymerase (CLONTECH Laboratories Inc., Palo Alto, Calif.). Products were then treated with DpnI and with
cloned Pfu DNA polymerase (Stratagene Cloning Systems)
before ligation with T4 DNA ligase. Mutagenized sequences were
subcloned into pUHD10-3-Myf5 as MscI-SphI
fragments and confirmed by sequencing.
pJHEAUC+2 (which bears the gene encoding UbcH10) and pJHEAUC-CS2
(UbcH10-C114S) were the gift of J. Ruderman.
Cell culture and transfection.
The U20S-derived UTA6 clone
has been previously described (10) and was cultured in a
50:50 (vol/vol) mixture of MCDB 202 medium and DME medium (both from
CryoBiosystème, Angoulême, France) containing 10%
(vol/vol) fetal calf serum (FCS; Jacques Boy, Reims, France), 500 µg
of G418 (GIBCO-BRL) per ml, and 1 µg of tetracycline (Calbiochem, La
Jolla, Calif.) per ml. Transfection of UTA6 cells with purified
plasmids was carried out by a standard protocol for coprecipitation
with calcium phosphate. pUHD10-3Myf5-derived constructs were
cotransfected with a plasmid bearing the gene for hygromycin resistance
(pCMVhygro, a gift of Frédéric Auradé). Transfected
UTA6 cells were cultured for 10 to 12 days in the presence of 170 U of
hygromycin B (Calbiochem) per ml, and selected clones were picked and
subcultured for analysis of Myf5 induction by immunofluorescence
analysis after 3 days with and without tetracycline.
UTA6-Myf5/ clones were maintained as the parental UTA6 cells, with the
addition of 170 U of hygromycin B per ml.
For most of the experiments described (see Fig. 1, 2, 3A, and 4), UTA6
and derived clones were plated at 2 × 103 to 3 × 103 cells/cm2 in medium containing 10% FCS
and 100 ng of tetracycline per ml. This reduced dose of tetracycline
was sufficient to repress activity of the tetracycline-sensitive
transactivator tTA and allowed more rapid induction of target genes
than was observed in cells grown in 1 µg of tetracycline per ml.
After 48 h with 100 ng of tetracycline per ml, cells were rinsed
twice in tetracycline-free medium and the culture medium was replaced
with medium containing 10% FCS only. For the experiments described in
the legends of Fig. 1C and 5, cells were plated directly in the
presence or absence of the doses of tetracycline indicated.
Transient transfection of UTA6-Myf5/ cells (see Fig. 3B) was carried
out using Fugene 6 transfection reagent (Boehringer Mannheim) as
recommended by the manufacturer. Expression of Myf5 was induced 1 h before transfection.
Synchronization of UTA6-Myf5/ cells (see Fig. 3A and 4) was achieved by
a double thymidine block. Thymidine (2 mM; Sigma Chemical Co., St.
Louis, Mo.) was added to cultures a few hours after cells were plated
(in the presence of 100 ng of tetracycline per ml) for 24 h. This
was followed by 14 h of incubation in thymidine-free culture
medium (still in the presence of 100 ng of tetracycline per ml) and
another 24-h incubation with 2 mM thymidine. Dishes were rinsed twice
to remove thymidine and tetracycline at time zero.
Flow cytometric analysis.
Cells for analysis by flow
cytometry were harvested by trypsinization, (except for the mitotic
cells collected by "shake-off" shown in Fig. 5). Cells were washed
once in ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and fixed for at least
24 h in 70% ethanol at 4°C. Cells were resuspended in PBS
containing 50 µg of RNase A (Boehringer Mannheim) per ml and 10 µM
propidium iodide (Sigma Chemical Co.), incubated for 1 h, and
analyzed for propidium iodide fluorescence and/or cell number using a
FACStar Plus cytometer (Becton Dickinson, Mountain View, Calif.).
Immunoblot analyses.
Extracts were prepared and analyzed as
described previously (27). Myf5 polyclonal antiserum raised
against the C-terminal peptide of Myf5 has been described previously
(27) and was used at a dilution of 1:1,000. Cyclin A
monoclonal antibody (clone CY-A1; Sigma Chemical Co.) was used at a
1:200 dilution. Cyclin B1 monoclonal antibody (clone V152; Neomarkers,
Union City, Calif.) was used at 1:100. Sp1 polyclonal antibody (PEP2;
Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, Calif.) was used at 1:500.
Immunocytochemical analyses.
Cells were fixed with
paraformaldehyde, permeabilized, and incubated with antibodies
essentially as described previously (27). For Troponin T
staining (see Fig. 1C), cells were incubated with mouse monoclonal
antibody (clone JLT-12; Sigma Chemical Co.) at a 1:200 dilution
followed by Alexa488-coupled goat anti-mouse antibody (Molecular Probes
Inc., Eugene, Oreg.) at a 1:200 dilution. For Myf5-cyclin double
labeling (see Fig. 4), cells were incubated with Myf5 antibody at a
1:1,000 dilution followed by Alexa488-coupled goat anti-rabbit antibody
(Molecular Probes Inc.) at a 1:200 dilution. Following Myf5 staining,
cells were refixed in 4% (wt/vol) paraformaldehyde for 5 min, washed
in PBS, and then fixed in an ice-cold 1:1 (vol/vol) mixture of methanol
and acetone. Cells then underwent sequential incubation with cyclin A
or cyclin B1 antibody (1:200), biotin-coupled goat anti-mouse antibody
(Sigma Chemical Co.), and Alexa594-coupled streptavidin (Molecular
Probes, Inc.). Cells were rinsed briefly in PBS containing
4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; Sigma Chemical Co.) and then
mounted in Mowiol (Calbiochem) under glass coverslips, viewed, and
photographed with a Zeiss Axiophot fluorescence microscope.
 |
RESULTS |
Our previous results demonstrated that Myf5 undergoes a
mitosis-specific proteolytic degradation associated with
phosphorylation of the protein (27). Preliminary study of
the degradation of Myf5 in vitro using Xenopus ovocyte
extracts (C. Lindon, unpublished data) indicated that
removal of the bHLH domain protected Myf5 against mitotic degradation.
Removal of the C-terminal domain, while abolishing the
phosphorylation-associated mobility shift of Myf5 in mitotic extracts,
had no such effect. Therefore, we investigated sequences within the
bHLH domain which might regulate the mitotic stability of Myf5. Among
these, we noticed a sequence adjacent to the basic domain of Myf5 which
resembles the D-box motif (Fig. 1A).
Since the D-box is required for substrate targeting in APC-mediated
proteolysis (7, 11, 20, 22, 29, 35), we investigated whether
this motif might play a role in regulating Myf5 stability.


View larger version (79K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Stabilization of Myf5 at mitosis. (A)
Schematic representation of Myf5 showing location of the D-box-like
motif. The RXXL motif is present in all members of the MRF family
(boxed) and resembles more closely the functional D-box in geminin than
those in the mitotic cyclins. *, proline-directed serine/threonine
residues that are possible phosphorylation sites at mitosis. (B)
UTA6-derived cell lines were induced for expression of different
versions of Myf5 by withdrawal of tetracycline from the culture medium
for 16 h in the presence of nocodazole (to enrich the population
of cells in mitosis). Parallel cultures were treated for 2 h with
the proteasome inhibitor ALLN prior to preparation of extracts.
Immunoblots of protein extracts prepared from the mitotic cells
harvested by mitotic shake-off (M) and extracts prepared from the
adherent, interphase (I) cells are compared for expression of Myf5.
Levels of mitotic cyclins, and levels of transcription factor Sp1 as a
loading control, are shown for a representative set of extracts (top).
We note that steady-state levels of Myf5 proteins varied between
clones, and we selected clones between which levels could most easily
be compared. (C) UTA6-derived cell lines were induced for expression of
different versions of Myf5 for 5 days. Cells were fixed and stained for
expression of a skeletal muscle-specific marker, Troponin T, as
described in Materials and Methods. All antibodies are described in
Materials and Methods. tet, tetracycline.
|
|
Forced expression of Myf5 at readily detectable levels is frequently
incompatible with proliferation (4; our unpublished observations). Therefore, we selected a system permitting conditional expression of stably transfected cDNA: the U20S osteosarcoma-derived clone UTA6 (10), which expresses the tetracycline-regulated transactivator tTA (14) and which we have previously found
to express target genes in a highly inducible and dose-dependent fashion (2). U20S cells have previously been shown to
undergo myogenic conversion in response to MyoD (15), and we
find that the U20S-derived UTA6 cells undergo myogenic conversion when
Myf5 expression is induced for more than 48 h (Fig. 1C and
unpublished data). We transfected wild-type Myf5 (Myf5/wt) and other
versions of Myf5 bearing point mutations in the bHLH region into UTA6
cells in the presence of tetracycline. After the cells were subjected to growth in selection medium, we identified clones in which the products of the transfected cDNAs were strongly expressed when tetracycline was withdrawn from the culture medium but which could not
be detected by immunocytochemical or immunoblot analysis of cells grown
in the presence of 1 µg of tetracycline per ml.
A D-box-like motif in the bHLH domain of Myf5 regulates Myf5
stability in mitotic cells.
We examined the stability of different
versions of Myf5 in mitotic cells. Expression of Myf5 proteins was
induced in UTA6-Myf5 clones in the presence of nocodazole. Nocodazole
prevents formation of the mitotic spindle, causing cells to arrest in a
metaphase-like state. Under these conditions, cyclin B1 is stable and
cyclin A is degraded (Fig. 1B, top). Extracts were prepared both from the population of cells arrested in mitosis (M) and from the remaining nonmitotic cells (I). Parallel cultures were treated for 2 h with N-acetyl-Leu-Leu-norleucinal (ALLN), an inhibitor of protein
degradation by the proteasome, before preparation of extracts.
Immunoblot analysis of these extracts reveals that ectopically
expressed Myf5/wt is absent from nocodazole-blocked U20S cells.
Following treatment of cells with ALLN, Myf5 was detectable in mitotic
extracts as a more slowly migrating form (Fig. 1B). This pattern is
similar to that observed for endogenous Myf5 in C2-derived myoblasts, with which cells we demonstrated that the change in mobility of Myf5
from ALLN-treated mitotic cells is phosphorylation dependent (27).
Figure 1B shows that substitution of residues within the 9-amino-acid
D-box-like motif has a significant effect on the mitotic stability of
Myf5. Replacement of the minimum D-box consensus sequence RXXL by AXXA
created a version of Myf5 (Myf5/R93A,L96A) readily detectable (in
phosphorylated form) in extracts from mitotic cells without ALLN
pretreatment (Fig. 1B). This result suggests that the R93-Q101 motif is
a functional D-box. This putative D-box motif is highly conserved
between the different members of the MRF family (Fig. 1A), yet it does
not function as a D-box for MyoD, which is stable at mitosis
(27), and is also unlikely to do so for the other members of
the family, whose expression is associated with a differentiated state.
The only position at which Myf5 differs from all other members of the
family is at the final position of the putative 9-residue motif. We
tested the possibility that this residue, Q101, contributes to the
mitotic instability of Myf5 by substituting a glutamate (E) at this
position, as is found in the other MRFs. We found that this version of
Myf5 is also more stable than the wild-type protein in mitotic cells (Fig. 1B, Q101E), consistent with the ascription of Q101 to a putative
D-box motif. Since the putative D-box lies within a region of the Myf5
protein implicated in DNA binding, we examined whether mutations in
this region might affect Myf5 stability indirectly, through
modification of its DNA-binding-associated functions. Figure 1C
illustrates the myogenic conversion of U20S cells in response to
expression of each of the mutant versions tested for their stability at
mitosis (shown in Fig. 1B). Indeed, we have found that Myf5/R93A,L96A
does show reduced activity in myogenic conversion assays (Fig. 1C),
consistent with a reduced affinity for E-box sequences (unpublished
data). However, Myf5/Q101E, which is also stabilized in mitotic cells,
showed no loss in capacity to induce myogenic conversion (Fig. 1C).
Thus, the mitotic stability of the different versions of Myf5 does not
correlate with their myogenic activities. Moreover, we find that
abrogation all myogenic activity does not increase the mitotic
stability of Myf5 (Fig. 1B and C,
76-88).
Finally, we examined the appearance in mitotic extracts of a version of
Myf5 analogous to MyoD/S200A, since it has been shown that S200 of MyoD
is a site for phosphorylation by cdk's (25) and required
for rapid turnover of the protein (25, 37). We find that the
corresponding residue (S158) in Myf5, which does indeed regulate
constitutive turnover (see below), is neither required for
phosphorylation of Myf5 at mitosis nor involved in its mitotic
destruction (Fig. 1B, S158A).
These data identify a D-box-like motif in Myf5 whose integrity is
essential to the mitotic destruction of Myf5.
Myf5 stability is regulated by distinct pathways in mitotic and
interphase cells.
We investigated whether the constitutive
turnover of Myf5 was altered by mutation of the putative D-box motif.
We assessed the turnover of different versions of Myf5, by addition of
cycloheximide (CHX) to nonsynchronized cultures 24 h after
induction of the proteins and immunoblot analysis of extracts prepared
over a 2-h time course following CHX treatment (Fig.
2). Under these conditions, wild-type
Myf5 is virtually undetectable within 1 h of CHX treatment (Fig.
2). The half-life of Myf5/R93A,L96A is similar to that of the wild-type
protein. By contrast, Myf5/S158A appears considerably more stable, as
has been described for the corresponding version of MyoD (25,
37). These results show that Myf5 is destabilized during
interphase by phosphorylation on S158 but that the pathway of
degradation disrupted by mutation in the R93-Q101 region is specific to
mitotic cells. Thus, the proteolysis of Myf5 is regulated by distinct
pathways in interphase and mitosis.

View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Stabilization of Myf5 in nonsynchronized cells. Cells
were induced for 24 h and then CHX was added to cultures to block
further protein synthesis. Protein extracts were prepared at the times
indicated (in minutes following addition of CHX) and examined for Myf5
levels by immunoblot analysis.
|
|
In addition, we note that Myf5/R93A,L96A in mitotic cells is further
stabilized by the presence of ALLN and that Myf5/S158A is similarly
stabilized in interphase cells (Fig. 1B). This finding indicates that
these point mutations do not identify all of the determinants of Myf5
stability and that additional pathways target Myf5 for proteolysis.
The timing and mechanism of Myf5 destruction at mitosis appear
distinct from those of known substrates of mitotic proteolysis.
The nocodazole block assay for mitotic instability does not indicate
when degradation begins, and we had observed that the reduction in Myf5
levels in nocodazole-blocked cells was even more marked than the
reduction in cyclin A levels (Fig. 1B), suggesting that the timings of
their destructions might be different. In order to examine more
precisely the onset of Myf5 instability at mitosis, we synchronized
Myf5/wt and Myf5/R93A,L96A cells for progress through the cell cycle by
release from a double thymidine block. Since Myf5 induces significant
G1 arrest in U2OS cells (data not shown), Myf5 expression
was induced at the time of release from the G1/S block to
ensure that most, if not all, cells in the culture pass through mitosis.
We prepared cell extracts at various times after release of cultures
from the early S-phase block and Myf5 induction and examined expression
of Myf5 and mitotic cyclins by immunoblot analyses (Fig.
3A). Myf5 levels were
found to fall before those of the endogenous mitotic cyclins.
Destruction of cyclins A and B1 correlates with the exit of cells from
mitosis 12 to 14 h following release from the double thymidine
block. The fall in Myf5/wt levels 10 to 12 h after release from
the block suggests that mitotic degradation of Myf5 begins before that
of the mitotic cyclins and at a time which may correspond to the entry
of cells into mitosis. However, we cannot exclude the possibility that
generalized protein synthesis inhibition at mitosis (32),
coupled to its short constitutive half-life, contributes to the early
disappearance of Myf5 at mitosis. The level of Myf5/R93A,L96A protein
is more stable than that of the wild-type protein, although (as also
indicated by the nocodazole block assay [Fig. 1B]) there is still a
decrease in the level of the protein between S phase and
G2/M. Levels of Myf5 proteins recover rapidly after
mitosis, unlike those of mitotic cyclins, whose degradation continues
in G1 (6). Therefore, the timing of Myf5
degradation, although dependent on a D-box-like motif, appears distinct
from that of known substrates of the APC, of which cyclin A is the only
example shown to be degraded before the end of metaphase.

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Myf5 proteolysis at mitosis is distinct from that of
mitotic cyclins. (A) UTA6-Myf5/ cells were synchronized at the start of
S phase by a double thymidine block protocol (Materials and Methods).
Cells were simultaneously released from the second thymidine block and
induced for expression of Myf5 or Myf5/R93A,L96A. Samples were
prepared for flow cytometric analysis of DNA content (top) and
immunoblot analyses (bottom) at the times indicated. (B)
UTA6-Myf5/wt and UTA6-Myf5/R93A,L96A cells were transfected with
expression vectors for wild-type UbcH10 (lanes wt) or a
dominant-negative version, UbcH10-DN (lanes DN). Total cell
extracts were prepared after 48 h and examined by immunoblot
analysis for levels of Myf5 proteins and mitotic cyclins. Transfection
efficiencies were assessed by cotransfection with a
-galactosidase-expressing plasmid and were the same for each
transfection (approximately 20%), as assessed by in situ staining for
-galactosidase activity in parallel cultures. (C) The transfected cell populations described in
the Fig. 3B legend and identified by in situ staining for
-galactosidase activity were examined for the number of mitotic
versus interphase figures. At least 250 transfected cells in 10 different fields were scored for each transfection. Black histograms,
UTA6-Myf5/wt cells. Gray histograms, UTA6-Myf5/R93A,L96A cells.
|
|
We investigated more directly whether the APC might be implicated
in Myf5 proteolysis. We transiently transfected UTA6-Myf5 clones with wild-type and dominant-negative versions of the ubiquitin carrier protein UbcH10, originally identified as the human homologue of
cyclin-selective E2 from clam ovocytes (39). The
dominant-negative E2 (UbcH10-DN) blocks destruction of all APC
substrates which have been tested (5) and arrests cells at
the metaphase-anaphase transition (39). Total cell extracts
prepared from UbcH10-DN-transfected cells contained somewhat elevated
levels of cyclins A and B1 (Fig. 3B, top), as described by Townsley et
al. (39), and we verified that these elevated levels
correspond to an efficient metaphase block of transfected cells (Fig.
3C). In contrast, we found that Myf5 is not stabilized by the presence
of UbcH10-DN (Fig. 3B, bottom). Moreover, we found a slight
decrease in the level of Myf5/wt (but not in that of Myf5/R93A,L96A) in
extracts from UbcH10-DN-transfected cells. This result is consistent
with an increased rate of Myf5/wt degradation in
metaphase-blocked cells. Thus, while Myf5 mitotic degradation depends upon the integrity of a D-box-like motif, the
pathway of its proteolysis appears distinct with respect to both timing
and mechanism from that of known APC targets.
Mitotic destruction of Myf5 is not synchronized.
We carried
out a cell-by-cell analysis of Myf5 levels in order to further
understand the timing of its destruction at mitosis. Populations of
cells were prepared for immunocytochemical analysis 12 h after
release from the double thymidine block (when the maximum number of
cells have a 4N DNA content [Fig. 3A]) and stained simultaneously for
Myf5 and cyclin A (Fig. 4A and
B) or for Myf5 and
cyclin B1 (Fig. 4C).

View larger version (85K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Cell-by-cell analyses of Myf5 levels at
mitosis. UTA6-Myf5/ cells were prepared as described for Fig. 3A and,
12 h after release from double thymidine block, were fixed and
prepared for immunofluorescence analyses of Myf5 and cyclin A (A and B)
or Myf5 and cyclin B1 (C). Bar, 25 µm. (A) UTA6-Myf5/wt cells
costained for Myf5, cyclin A, and DAPI. Two fields are shown. Most
cells show strong nuclear staining for cyclin A, confirming that the
majority of cells are in late S phase, G2, or prophase. The
redistribution of cyclin A throughout the cell is observed following
nuclear-envelope breakdown at the end of prophase, and its levels
decrease gradually during subsequent prometaphase and metaphase
(31). Cells with decondensed chromatin and which show no
cyclin A staining are presumed to be in early G1 (having
completed mitosis), and indeed, these cells systematically occur in
pairs (top, small arrows). As expected, there is a clear correlation
between the intensities of Myf5 and cyclin A stainings in cells outside
of mitosis. That is, Myf5 staining is strongest in cells showing strong
nuclear cyclin A staining (but before the onset of nuclear
condensation). Cyclin A-negative cells in late mitosis or
G1 (bottom and top, respectively; small arrows) typically
show faint or no staining for Myf5. By contrast, in prophase and
prometaphase cells (large arrows), there is no clear correlation
between Myf5 and cyclin A stainings. (B) UTA6-Myf5/R93A,L96A cells
costained for Myf5, cyclin A, and DAPI. Small arrows, G1
cells; large arrows, prometaphase cells. (C) UTA6-Myf5/wt cells
costained for Myf5, cyclin B1, and DAPI. Cyclin B1 translocates to the
nucleus from the cytoplasm during prophase (31). Cells
clearly in late prophase or prometaphase (showing nuclear cyclin B1, or
in which nuclear-envelope breakdown has occurred) are indicated
with arrows.
|
|
We found a clear correlation between the intensities of Myf5/wt and
cyclin A stainings in cells which were in S, G2, or
G1 phase (Fig. 4A). However, when we examined the different
phases of mitosis, we found Myf5 staining to be highly variable.
Approximately half of cells in prophase or prometaphase showed a
complete absence of Myf5 staining. This heterogeneous pattern of Myf5
staining before metaphase does not result solely from a gradual loss of Myf5, since prophase cells (Fig. 4A, bottom) may stain more weakly than
prometaphase cells (Fig. 4A, top). Cells showing strong staining for
Myf5 could indeed be found at both prophase and prometaphase (Fig. 4A,
top), and a fraction of metaphase cells were also positive for Myf5.
This observation suggests that the onset of Myf5 destruction at mitosis
is not a strictly synchronized event. As expected, Myf5/R93A,L96A was
found to give a more homogeneous staining pattern: the protein was
detected at similar levels in G2, prophase, and metaphase
cells that stained for Myf5 (Fig. 4B), although cells showing no Myf5
staining could also be found in all phases. A statistical analysis of
the distribution of Myf5-positive cells through mitosis in the
populations illustrated is shown in Table 1.
We also compared the pattern of Myf5 staining at mitosis to that of
cyclin B1 (Fig. 4C). The cellular distribution of cyclin B1 is distinct
from that of cyclin A, since it translocates from the cytoplasm to the
nucleus following the onset of mitosis (31). Examination of
Myf5 staining in cells showing nuclear cyclin B1 staining confirmed
that prometaphase cells are more likely to be Myf5 negative than
prophase cells (Fig. 4A, top) but, again, indicated that Myf5 staining
is highly variable in early prophase (and does not correlate with the
nuclear translocation of cyclin B1 [Fig. 4C, bottom]).
Myf5/R93A,L96A-negative cells were present at all stages of mitosis,
but in general, mitotic cells in this population showed stronger
staining with the Myf5 antibody than those in the population expressing
wild-type protein (data not shown).
These results do not allow us to distinguish between the possibilities
that (i) Myf5 destruction occurs throughout prophase and
prometaphase at a rate that varies from cell to cell and (ii) Myf5
destruction at mitosis is rapid but initiated at different moments
throughout mitosis. However, from the images presented in Fig. 4, it is
clear that
in cells where Myf5 undergoes mitotic degradation
the
onset of this proteolysis can occur in prophase or earlier.
In conclusion, we find that the destruction of Myf5 accompanies entry
into mitosis but is heterogeneous, suggesting that additional signals,
and not only progression through the cell cycle, regulate Myf5
destruction at mitosis.
Myf5 perturbs the passage of cells through mitosis.
We noticed
that induction of UTA6-Myf5 clones raised the apparent mitotic index of
cultures, even at levels of Myf5 expression where there was no
measurable effect on the overall rate of proliferation (10 ng of
tetracycline per ml [data not shown]). Since many UTA6 cells detach
from the substratum, or remain loosely attached, at mitosis, this
population of cells can be harvested from the culture medium. We found
that induction of Myf5/wt even at low levels of expression (equivalent
to that of the endogenous protein in C2 myoblast cells [data not
shown]) led to a threefold increase in the number of mitotic (4N)
cells collected from the culture medium but that no such effect
occurred in the parental UTA6 cell line (Fig.
5A). We have confirmed that this
increased mitotic population represents viable cells, which reattach to
the substratum and proliferate when replated (Fig. 5B). Thus, Myf5
perturbs the passage of cells through mitosis, even at low levels of
expression. This effect is even more marked at higher levels of Myf5/wt
expression (0 ng of tetracycline per ml) (Fig. 5B) but difficult to
quantify due to the simultaneous G1 arrest induced by
Myf5/wt at this level of expression (data not shown).

View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Flow cytometric analyses of Myf5-expressing
cells. (A) Parental UTA6 cells or UTA6-Myf5/wt cells were cultured for
3 days at 1,000 or 10 ng of tetracycline (tet) per ml. The total cell
population did not vary at these different doses of tetracycline. The
culture medium was recovered after gentle shaking of the dish. Detached
cells were harvested by centrifugation and prepared for flow
cytometric analysis of DNA content. Samples were analyzed with a fixed
time parameter to enable comparison of cell numbers in each sample.
FL2-A (intensity of propidium iodide fluorescence) indicates relative
DNA contents of cells, with a 4N cell population identified by an FL2-A
of 400. Since the population of cells harvested resembles
mitotic cells by phase-contrast microscopy, we suggest that the 2N
fraction seen by flow cytometric analysis consists of cells which
complete mitosis during the time of preparation of samples. (B)
Detached cell populations harvested from UTA6-Myf5/ cells cultured at
the doses of tetracycline indicated for 3 days were replated by
transfer of the culture medium to fresh dishes. These cells were
cultured for a further 24 h without change of medium and then
fixed with 70% ethanol and stained with Giemsa (GIBCO-BRL). (C)
Detached cell populations (SO cells) were prepared from UTA6-Myf/wt and
UTA6/R93A,L96A cells grown for 3 days with 0 ng of tetracycline per ml.
The adherent population of cells from each dish was recovered by
trypsinization and prepared for flow cytometric analysis to allow
quantification of the total cell population. Histograms from adherent
and SO cells prepared with 0 ng of tetracycline per ml are shown (N.B.,
the adherent samples are diluted 50× compared to the SO samples). (D)
Cells from the UTA6-Myf5/R93A,L96A SO population analyzed for panel C,
fixed and stained with DAPI. Representative fields show cells in
metaphase (left) and anaphase/telophase (top right) and undergoing
cytokinesis (lower right).
|
|
We compared the effects of Myf5/wt and Myf5/R93A,L96A on the yield of
4N cells collected. We found that Myf5/R93A,L96A had a stronger effect
(Fig. 5C and Table 2). This effect is
presumably direct (that is, does not rely on transactivation properties
of Myf5), since Myf5/R93A,L96A shows a gain of function with respect to
accumulation of 4N cells (Fig. 5C) but partial loss of function with
respect to DNA binding and transactivation properties (unpublished data). Moreover, we have observed this effect in cells expressing Myf5/
76-88, which shows no DNA-binding activity at all (data not
shown).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 2.
Relative cell numbers in shake-off and adherent
populations of clones A2 and R5 analyzed by flow cytometry
|
|
We examined the population of 4N cells stained with DAPI, in order to
assess whether the expression of Myf5, or its stable derivative, might
interfere with the degradation of substrates controlling mitosis
progression; competition for intracellular ubiquitin and other
components of APC-mediated proteolysis has been shown to limit entry
into anaphase in the presence of excess APC substrate (17,
40). However, we found 4N cells in all phases of mitosis
(representative fields of UTA6-Myf5/R93A,L96A cells are shown [Fig.
5D]), including many cells in anaphase and telophase. These
observations suggest that the presence of Myf5 in cells does not
perturb mitosis by titrating components required for APC-mediated
proteolysis but does interfere with some other aspect of progression in mitosis.
We have been unable to detect any sufficiently significant differences
in the overall timings of mitosis between synchronized cultures of
UTA6, UTA6-Myf5/wt, and UTA6-Myf5/R93A,L96A cells (Fig. 3A and data not
shown) or in their rates of proliferation to explain the apparent
threefold increase in mitotic cell number.
Thus, ectopic expression of Myf5 in U20S cells perturbs these cells in
mitosis by a mechanism that remains to be defined. We do not know at
present if the increased population of mitotic cells harvested from
induced cultures corresponds to those which do not down-regulate Myf5
before or during prophase (Fig. 4). However, these observations suggest
that the disappearance of Myf5 early in mitosis, a regulated event
itself, controls some aspect of passage through mitosis.
 |
DISCUSSION |
In this paper we show that at least two distinct mechanisms
regulate the turnover of the MRF Myf5 in cycling cells. One of these
mechanisms operates specifically at mitosis, giving rise to the
destruction of Myf5 which we have observed in myoblasts blocked at
mitosis (27). Those previous results, showing that Myf5 is
detected in phosphorylated form in extracts from mitotic cells treated
with a proteasome inhibitor (27), suggested that Myf5 may be
targeted for destruction by a phosphorylation state specific to
mitosis. Here we show that, in addition to any requirement for
phosphorylation of the protein, destruction of Myf5 at mitosis is
sensitive to mutation of a motif in its "hinge" region (between the
basic and bHLH domains) which resembles the D-box implicated in mitotic
destruction of substrates of the APC (7, 11, 20, 22, 29,
35). The putative D-box motif (minimal consensus RXXLXXXXX) in
Myf5 is identical in four of nine residues with the D-box of the
S-phase inhibitor geminin (29). Substitution of the
consensus residues impairs M-phase destruction of Myf5 in U2OS cells.
Significantly, a version of this motif mutated by substitution of a
single residue (Q101) to resemble more closely the homologous motif
present in MyoD also has a stabilizing effect on Myf5 at mitosis.
This finding suggests that sequence differences within the
hinge region of the MRFs might determine their stability at mitosis.
Since the hinge region is thought to be important for DNA-binding and
transactivation properties of the MRFs (26), this increased
stability may accompany modified interactions of Myf5 with DNA and/or
protein targets, although we have not found a direct correlation
between DNA-binding affinity and stability at mitosis of different
versions of Myf5.
Although D-box-mediated proteolysis is thought to be the hallmark of
APC activity, we find that the degradation of Myf5 in mitotic cells
involves a mechanism distinct from that which regulates known
substrates of the APC. Not only does the onset of Myf5 destruction precede that of known substrates, but Myf5 is also not stabilized in
the presence of a dominant-negative version of an E2 activity (UbcH10)
involved in APC-mediated destruction of several mitotic substrates,
including cyclins A and B1 and geminin (5). Thus, the
D-box-like motif we have described may participate in recognition of
phosphorylated Myf5 by a different ubiquitin ligase activity. On the
other hand, there is some evidence that the APC may be active in a
broader context than is usually described: the D-box-dependent degradation of budding yeast Cdc25p has been shown to be cell cycle
independent (21), and APC activity in postmitotic neurons has recently been reported (12). In conclusion, it appears
that D-box motifs can be recognized at times outside of the
metaphase-G1 window by proteolytic pathways which may or
may not involve APC activity. It remains to be shown whether Myf5
destruction at mitosis requires some form of the APC; this question
awaits detailed biochemical analysis of Myf5 degradation. The turnover
of the MyoD protein is regulated by the ubiquitin-26S proteasome
pathway (1) and is sensitive to phosphorylation on serine
residue S200 (25, 37). Although there is reduced sequence
conservation between MyoD and Myf5 in this region of the proteins, we
altered a serine residue in Myf5 (S158) which appeared to lie in a
homologous position when the downstream conserved region of the
proteins was taken as a reference. We find that although this mutation
does strongly diminish the turnover of Myf5 in nonsynchronized
cultures, it does not allow accumulation of the protein in mitotic
cells. Thus, at least two pathways exist by which Myf5 is degraded. A
high level of turnover is superimposed by a distinct, D-box-dependent mechanism at G2/M.
Are there functional implications to the instability of Myf5? The idea
that degradation of Myf5 is a highly regulated event is consistent with
the idea that Myf5 destruction may be a mechanism for regulation of its
functions in determination and differentiation. Indeed, a specific
defect in differentiation of a clonal cell line isolated from C2 has
been correlated with the increased rate of MRF turnover in these
myoblasts (18). Several transcription factors have been
reported to be phosphorylated at mitosis (reference 28 and references therein); this is shown to
correlate with a loss of the DNA-binding activities of these factors in
vitro (see, for example, reference 33) or their
exclusion from condensed chromatin in mitotic cells (28) and
may be a mechanism to enable the reprogramming of target promoters as
cells enter G1 (discussed in references
19 and 28). Since Myf5 is
expressed predominantly in proliferating cells where its presumed
target genes are silent, perhaps the absence of Myf5 during M phase is
critical to prevent reprogramming of muscle-specific E-box-dependent
promoters in cells which have not yet received a signal to
differentiate. Transcriptional targets of Myf5 prior to the onset of
differentiation have not been identified, and its functions in
proliferating myoblasts
if any
are unknown. Here we show that Myf5
perturbs cells in mitosis, leading to the accumulation of detached
mitotic cells. This effect of Myf5 does not appear to result from any
measurable accelerated entry into, delayed exit from, or decreased
viability during mitosis. We are investigating the possibility that
Myf5 might influence the attachment of mitotic cells. Together with our
recent observation that Myf5 plays a positive role in the proliferation
of primary myoblast cultures (D. Montarras, C. Lindon, P. Domeyne, and
C. Pinset, unpublished data), these results indicate that novel
functions of Myf5 in the cell cycle might control the balance between
proliferation and differentiation in determined myoblasts.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank Christoph Englert for UTA6 cells; Shahragim Tajbakhsh
for Myf5 cDNA; Hermann Bujard, Frédéric Auradé, and
Joan Ruderman for plasmids; Olivier Coux, Gustavo Gutierrez, Thierry Lorca, and Eric Karsenti for insightful comments during the course of
this work; and Olivier Coux and Gustavo Gutierrez for critical reading
of the manuscript.
This work was supported by the Association Française contre les
Myopathies (AFM) and by grants to C.L. from the AFM and the Fondation
pour la Recherche Medicale (FRM).
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Present address: Wellcome/CRC
Institute, Tennis Court Rd., Cambridge CB2 1QR, United Kingdom. Phone: 44 1223 334093. Fax: 44 1223 334089. E-mail:
acl34{at}cam.ac.uk.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Abu Hatoum, O.,
S. Gross-Mesilaty,
K. Breitschopf,
A. Hoffman,
H. Gonen,
A. Ciechanover, and E. Bengal.
1998.
Degradation of myogenic transcription factor MyoD by the ubiquitin pathway in vivo and in vitro: regulation by specific DNA binding.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:5670-5677[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
|
Albagli, O.,
D. Lantoine,
S. Quief,
F. Quignon,
J. Kerckaert,
D. Montarras,
C. Pinset, and C. Lindon.
1999.
Overexpressed BCL6 (LAZ3) oncoprotein triggers apoptosis, delays S phase progression and associates with replication foci.
Oncogene
18:5063-5075[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Arnold, H.-H., and B. Winter.
1998.
Muscle differentiation: more complexity to the network of myogenic regulators.
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
8:539-544[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Auradé, F.,
C. Pinset,
P. Chafey,
F. Gros, and D. Montarras.
1994.
Myf5, MyoD, myogenin and MRF4 myogenic derivatives of the embryonic mesenchymal cell line C3H10T1/2 exhibit the same adult muscle phenotype.
Differentiation
55:185-192[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Bastians, H.,
L. M. Topper,
G. Gorbsky, and J. V. Ruderman.
1999.
Cell cycle-regulated proteolysis of mitotic target proteins.
Mol. Biol. Cell
10:3927-3941[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Brandeis, M., and T. Hunt.
1996.
The proteolysis of mitotic cyclins in mammalian cells persists from the end of mitosis until the onset of S phase.
EMBO J.
15:5280-5289[Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Cohen-Fix, O.,
J.-M. Peters,
M. Kirschner, and D. Koshland.
1996.
Anaphase initiation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is controlled by the APC-dependent degradation of the anaphase inhibitor Pds1p.
Genes Dev.
10:3081-3093[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Crescenzi, M.,
T. Fleming,
A. Lassar, and H. Weintraub.
1990.
MyoD induces growth arrest independent of differentiation in normal and transformed cells.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
87:8442-8446[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Davis, R. L.,
H. Weintraub, and A. B. Lassar.
1987.
Expression of a single transfected cDNA converts fibroblast to myoblasts.
Cell
51:987-1000[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Englert, C.,
X. Hou,
S. Maheswaran,
P. Bennett,
C. Ngwu,
G. G. Re,
A. J. Garvin,
M. R. Rosner, and D. A. Haber.
1995.
WT1 suppresses synthesis of the epidermal factor receptor and induces apoptosis.
EMBO J.
14:4662-4675[Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Funabiki, H.,
H. Yamano,
K. Nagao,
H. Tanaka,
H. Yasuda,
T. Hunt, and M. Yanagida.
1997.
Fission yeast Cut2 required for anaphase has two destruction boxes.
EMBO J.
16:5977-5987[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Gieffers, C.,
B. H. Peters,
E. R. Kramer,
C. G. Dotti, and J.-M. Peters.
1999.
Expression of the CDH1-associated form of the anaphase-promoting complex in postmitotic neurons.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
96:11317-11322[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Glotzer, M.,
A. M. Murray, and M. W. Kirschner.
1991.
Cyclin is degraded by the ubiquitin pathway.
Nature
349:132-138[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Gossen, M., and H. Bujard.
1992.
Tight control of gene expression in mammalian cells by tetracycline-responsive promoters.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
89:5547-5551[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Gu, W.,
J. Schneider,
G. Condorelli,
S. Kaushal,
V. Mahdavi, and B. Nadal-Ginard.
1993.
Interaction of myogenic factors and the retinoblastoma protein mediates muscle cell commitment and differentiation.
Cell
72:309-324[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Hershko, A., and A. Ciechanover.
1998.
The ubiquitin system.
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
67:425-479[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Holloway, S. L.,
M. Glotzer,
R. W. King, and A. W. Murray.
1993.
Anaphase is initiated by proteolysis rather than by the inactivation of maturation-promoting factor.
Cell
73:1393-1402[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Horwitz, M.
1996.
Hypermethylated myoblasts specifically deficient in MyoD autoactivation as a consequence of instability of MyoD.
Exp. Cell Res.
226:170-182[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 19.
|
John, S., and J. L. Workman.
1998.
Bookmarking genes for activation in condensed mitotic chromosomes.
Bioessays
20:275-279[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Juang, Y.-L.,
J. Huang,
J.-M. Peters,
M. E. McLaughlin,
C.-Y. Tai, and D. Pellman.
1997.
APC-mediated proteolysis of Ase1 and the morphogenesis of the mitotic spindle.
Science
275:1311-1314[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
Kaplon, T., and M. Jacquet.
1995.
The cellular content of Cdc25p, the Ras exchange factor in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, is regulated by destabilization through a cyclin destruction box.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:20742-20747[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
King, R. W.,
M. Glotzer, and M. W. Kirschner.
1996.
Mutagenic analysis of the destruction signal of mitotic cyclins and structural characterization of ubiquitinated intermediates.
Mol. Biol. Cell
7:1343-1357[Abstract].
|
| 23.
|
King, R. W.,
J.-M. Peters,
S. Tugendreich,
M. Rolfe,
P. Hieter, and M. W. Kirschner.
1995.
A 20S complex containing CDC27 and CDC16 catalyzes the mitosis-specific conjugation of ubiquitin to cyclin B.
Cell
81:279-288[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Kitzmann, M.,
G. Carnac,
M. Vandromme,
M. Primig,
N. J. C. Lamb, and A. Fernandez.
1998.
The muscle regulatory factors MyoD and Myf-5 undergo distinct cell cycle-specific expression in muscle cells.
J. Cell Biol.
142:1447-1459[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Kitzmann, M.,
M. Vandromme,
V. Schaeffer,
G. Carnac,
J. C. Labbé,
N. Lamb, and A. Fernandez.
1999.
Cdk1 and Cdk2 mediate phosphorylation of MyoD S200 in growing C2 myoblasts: role in modulating half-life and myogenic activity.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19:3167-3176[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Kophengnavong, T.,
J. E. Michnowicz, and T. K. Blackwell.
2000.
Establishment of distinct MyoD, E2A, and twist DNA binding specificities by different basic region-DNA conformations.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20:261-272[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 27.
|
Lindon, C.,
D. Montarras, and C. Pinset.
1998.
Cell cycle-regulated expression of the muscle determination factor Myf5 in proliferating myoblasts.
J. Cell Biol.
140:111-118[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 28.
|
Martinez-Balbas, M. A.,
A. Dey,
S. K. Rabindran,
K. Ozato, and C. Wu.
1995.
Displacement of sequence-specific transcription factors from mitotic chromatin.
Cell
83:29-38[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 29.
|
McGarry, T. J., and M. W. Kirschner.
1998.
Geminin, an inhibitor of DNA replication, is degraded during mitosis.
Cell
93:1043-1053[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 30.
|
Patton, E. E.,
A. R. Willems, and M. Tyers.
1998.
Combinatorial control in ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis: don't Skp the F-box hypothesis.
Trends Genet.
14:236-243[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 31.
|
Pines, J., and T. Hunter.
1991.
Human cyclins A and B1 are differentially located in the cell and undergo cell cycle-dependent nuclear transport.
J. Cell Biol.
115:1-17[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 32.
|
Prescott, D. M., and M. A. Bender.
1962.
Synthesis of RNA and protein during mitosis in mammalian tissue culture cells.
Exp. Cell Res.
26:260-268[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 33.
|
Roberts, S. B.,
N. Segil, and N. Heintz.
1991.
Differential phosphorylation of the transcription factor Oct1 during the cell cycle.
Science
253:1022-1026[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 34.
|
Rudnicki, M. A.,
P. Schnegelsberg,
R. Stead,
T. Braun,
H. Arnold, and R. Jaenisch.
1993.
MyoD or Myf5 is required for the formation of skeletal muscle.
Cell
75:1351-1359[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 35.
|
Shirayama, M.,
W. Zachariae,
R. Ciosk, and K. Nasmyth.
1998.
The Polo-like kinase Cdc5p and the WD-repeat protein Cdc20p/fizzy are regulators and substrates of the anaphase promoting complex in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
EMBO J.
17:1336-1349[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 36.
|
Skapek, S. X.,
J. Rhee,
P. S. Kim,
B. G. Novitch, and A. B. Lassar.
1996.
Cyclin-mediated inhibition of muscle gene expression via a mechanism that is independent of pRB hyperphosphorylation.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16:7043-7053[Abstract].
|
| 37.
|
Song, A.,
Q. Wang,
M. G. Goebl, and M. A. Harrington.
1998.
Phosphorylation of nuclear MyoD is required for its rapid degradation.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:4994-4999[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 38.
|
Sorrentino, V.,
R. Pepperkok,
R. Davis,
W. Ansorge, and L. Philipson.
1990.
Cell proliferation inhibited by MyoD1 independently of myogenic differentiation.
Nature
345:813-815[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 39.
|
Townsley, F. M.,
A. Aristarkhov,
S. Beck,
A. Hershko, and J. V. Ruderman.
1997.
Dominant-negative cyclin-selective ubiquitin carrier protein E2-C/UbcH10 blocks cells in metaphase.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:2362-2367[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 40.
|
Yamano, H.,
C. Tsurumi,
J. Gannon, and T. Hunt.
1998.
The role of the destruction box and its neighboring lysine residues in cyclin B for anaphase ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis in fission yeast: defining the D-box receptor.
EMBO J.
17:5670-5678[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 41.
|
Yun, K., and B. Wold.
1996.
Skeletal muscle determination and differentiation: story of a core regulatory network and its context.
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
8:877-889[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 42.
|
Zachariae, W.,
M. Schwab,
K. Nasmyth, and W. Seufert.
1998.
Control of cyclin ubiquitination by CDK-regulated binding of Hct1 to the anaphase promoting complex.
Science
282:1721-1724[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 43.
|
Zhang, J.-M.,
Q. Wei,
X. Zhao, and B. M. Paterson.
1999.
Coupling of the cell cycle and myogenesis through the cyclin D1-dependent interaction of MyoD with cdk4.
EMBO J.
18:926-933[CrossRef][Medline].
|
Molecular and Cellular Biology, December 2000, p. 8923-8932, Vol. 20, No. 23
0270-7306/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Lagha, M., Kormish, J. D., Rocancourt, D., Manceau, M., Epstein, J. A., Zaret, K. S., Relaix, F., Buckingham, M. E.
(2008). Pax3 regulation of FGF signaling affects the progression of embryonic progenitor cells into the myogenic program. Genes Dev.
22: 1828-1837
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Li, W., Wu, G., Wan, Y.
(2007). The dual effects of Cdh1/APC in myogenesis. FASEB J.
21: 3606-3617
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Relaix, F., Montarras, D., Zaffran, S., Gayraud-Morel, B., Rocancourt, D., Tajbakhsh, S., Mansouri, A., Cumano, A., Buckingham, M.
(2006). Pax3 and Pax7 have distinct and overlapping functions in adult muscle progenitor cells. J. Cell Biol.
172: 91-102
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Tintignac, L. A. J., Sirri, V., Leibovitch, M. P., Lecluse, Y., Castedo, M., Metivier, D., Kroemer, G., Leibovitch, S. A.
(2004). Mutant MyoD Lacking Cdc2 Phosphorylation Sites Delays M-Phase Entry. Mol. Cell. Biol.
24: 1809-1821
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lindon, C., Pines, J.
(2004). Ordered proteolysis in anaphase inactivates Plk1 to contribute to proper mitotic exit in human cells. J. Cell Biol.
164: 233-241
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Roy, K., de la Serna, I. L., Imbalzano, A. N.
(2002). The Myogenic Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Family of Transcription Factors Shows Similar Requirements for SWI/SNF Chromatin Remodeling Enzymes during Muscle Differentiation in Culture. J. Biol. Chem.
277: 33818-33824
[Abstract]
[Full Text]