Molecular and Cellular Biology, February 2000, p. 1299-1310, Vol. 20, No. 4
0270-7306/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology1 and Vollum Institute,3 Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, Oregon 97201, and Laboratory of Radiobiology, Harvard University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts 021152
Received 1 October 1999/Returned for modification 9 November 1999/Accepted 15 November 1999
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The newly identified p53 homolog p73 mimics the transcriptional function of p53. We have investigated the regulation of p73's transcriptional activity by p300/CREB binding protein (CBP). p73-p300 complexes were identified in HeLa cell extracts by cofractionation and coimmunoprecipitation assays. The p73-p300 interaction was confirmed in vitro by glutathione S-transferase-protein association assays and in vivo by coimmunoprecipitating the overexpressed p300 and p73 in human p53-free small-cell lung carcinoma H1299 or osteosarcoma Saos-2 cells. The N terminus but not the N-terminal truncation of p73 bound to the CH1 domain (amino acids [aa] 350 to 450) of p300/CBP. Accordingly, this p73 N-terminal deletion was unable to activate transcription or to induce apoptosis. Overexpression of either p300 or CBP stimulated transcription mediated by p73 but not its N-terminally deleted mutant in vivo. The N-terminal fragment from aa 19 to 597, but not the truncated fragment from aa 242 to 1700 of p300, reduced p73-mediated transcription markedly. p73-dependent transcription or apoptosis was partially impaired in either p300- or CBP-deficient human breast carcinoma MCF-7 or H1299 cells, suggesting that both coactivators mediate transcription by p73 in cells. These results demonstrate that the N terminus of p73 directly interacts with the N-terminal CH1 domain of p300/CBP to activate transcription.
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Transcriptional activation of class II genes by RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) involves protein-protein interactions between transcriptional activators and their coactivators (50). One extensively studied group of coactivators is the p300/CREB binding protein (CBP) family (72). p300 and CBP are distinct proteins encoded by two different genes and were initially identified independently (13, 18, 81). However, these two proteins not only share significant homology in their functional domains but also mediate transcription by binding to similar sets of transcriptional activators (72). Both can be negatively regulated by the 12S form of adenovirus E1A (2, 4, 56). Thus, these proteins are often referred to as p300/CBP. There are a variety of p300/CBP-interacting transcriptional activators, including CREB (44), c-Jun (46), ATF-2 (39), nuclear receptors (11, 34, 85), MyoD (87), SREBP-2 (64), and YY1 (47), suggesting that p300/CBP may play an integrating role in different cellular events mediated by these activators, such as cell proliferation, differentiation, and signaling (70, 72, 86). Interestingly, p300/CBP also binds to the p53 transcription activator and stimulates p53-dependent transcriptional activity in vivo (3, 26, 51), indicating that this group of coactivators also participate in the p53 response pathway.
The transactivation activity of the p53 tumor suppressor protein is
important for regulating cell growth and apoptosis in response to
various cellular stress signals (23, 42, 48, 49). This
activity is contributed by three main domains of this protein: the
N-terminal transactivation domain (amino acids [aa] 1 to 45)
(21, 67), the central sequence-specific DNA binding domain
(aa 113 to 290) (6, 12, 66, 80), and the C-terminal regulatory region (30). The N terminus contacts several
transcriptional regulators, including components of the RNAPII
transcriptional machinery, such as TAFII31 and
TAFII70 (54, 75), and the coactivators p300 and
CBP (3, 26, 51). Phosphorylation of this domain at Ser15
regulates the activity and stability of p53 in response to DNA damage
(71, 73). The central sequence-specific DNA binding domain
recognizes and binds to a specific consensus sequence with two copies
of the 10-mer 5'-RRRC(A/T)(T/A)GYYY-3' (19), which has been
identified in many p53 target genes (76). The products of
these genes, including p21waf1 (17,
20), MDM2 (82), Gadd45 (36), BAX-1
(59), IGF-BP3 (10), and 14-3-3
(29), act as downstream effectors of the p53-mediated growth
arrest or apoptosis. The C terminus regulates p53 transcriptional
activity (30). Posttranslational modification of this
region, such as DNA damage-responsive phosphorylation (35,
55) or acetylation (25, 53, 68), leads to activation of p53's DNA binding and transcriptional activities. Because of its
crucial importance in cell growth regulation, the transcriptional activity is conserved among p53 homologs.
Several p53-like proteins have been reported recently. One gene,
designated the p73 gene, has been isolated and found to encode two
spliced polypeptides, p73
and p73
. p73
(499 aa), possessing a
unique pentamer at its extreme C terminus, is 137 aa shorter than
p73
(636 aa) (33). The p73 protein resembles p53 in both sequence (approximately 60% identity with p53 in the central domain and 29% identity in the N terminus) and function (31, 33). Like p53, p73 transactivates p53 target genes in vivo and causes apoptosis and growth suppression (31, 33). Although p73 was expressed monoallelically in neuroblastoma, its tumor suppression function remains uncertain, because only the wild-type form has been
identified in all tumors or tumor cell lines tested (33). Another group of p53 homologs, p51/p63 (65, 69, 77, 83), was
also identified and found to share 55 to 65% homology with p53 in the
central domain. These p53 homologs can also suppress cell growth,
induce apoptosis, and transactivate p53-responsive genes (65,
83), although it is unclear whether they suppress tumor growth.
Finally, two additional p53-like activities have been identified,
p53-competing protein from mouse (9) and NBP (non-p53
response element [p53RE] binding protein) from human (90)
cell lines, although their identity remains to be clarified. Thus, the
transcriptional function is well conserved in the p53 family.
Identification of multiple p53 homologs suggests that these proteins
have distinct roles during embryogenesis and development or in response
to different cellular signals. In fact, two recent p63 knockout studies
demonstrated that p63, in contrast to p53 (16), is essential
for limb and epidermal morphogenesis (58, 84). Also, unlike
p53, p73 was not induced by some DNA damage signals (33),
suggesting a distinct pathway for this protein. Indeed, p73 has
recently been shown to be activated through c-Abl-mediated tyrosine
phosphorylation in response to DNA damage caused by cisplatin or
but not UV irradiation (1, 22, 89). Because of the lower
level of homology between p53 and p73 in the N and C termini (33), it would be interesting to learn whether these
transcriptional activators interact with the same set of coactivators,
such as p300/CBP, or with the same domains of these coactivators. It is clear that different domains of p300/CBP mediate transcription and thus
signaling by different transcriptional activators (72). Hence, identifying p73-interacting proteins or domains of the proteins
would provide clues for the potential signaling of p73. In attempt to
address this issue, we have investigated whether p300 and CBP regulate
p73-dependent function. We found that p300/CBP bound to p73 both in
vitro and in vivo and that it enhanced p73-dependent transcription.
Functional mapping revealed that unlike p53 (3, 26,
51; X. Zeng and H. Lu, unpublished data), p73 through its the
N terminus utilized the N-terminal CH1 domain (aa 390 to 450) of
p300/CBP for transcriptional activation and apoptosis. Consistent with
this observation, p73 functions were found to be impaired to different
degrees in p300- and CBP-deficient cells. Thus, this study provides
evidence that p73 interacts with the N-terminal domain of p300/CBP to
execute its transcriptional function.
| |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Plasmids and antibodies.
The pCDNA3-HA-p73
and
pCDNA3-HA-p73
plasmids were obtained from William G. Kaelin, Jr.
(Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Mass.). pCDNA3-Flag-p300 or CBP
plasmids were constructed. pCMV-p300-Ha was obtained from David
Livingston (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute). pGSTCBP1(aa 390-790) and
pGSTCBP3(aa1990-2441) were obtained from Robert G. Roeder (Rockefeller
University, New York, N.Y.). pGST-p300(aa 1571-2414) was a gift from
Yang Shi (Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.). pCDNA3-
N-p73
was constructed by PCR-directed mutagenesis using pCDNA3-HA-p73
as a
template. pCNA3-GFP, encoding green fluorescent protein (GFP), was a
gift from Moshe Oren (Weizmann Institute, Rehovot, Israel).
pCDNA3-Flag-p73
was constructed by putting a Flag epitope in front
of this insert. pEGFP-C1 was purchased from GIBCO-BRL. The monoclonal
anti-p73 antibodies ER15, recognizing both p73
and p73
, and ER13,
recognizing only p73
, were generously provided by William G. Kaelin,
Jr. (57). Polyclonal anti-CBP antibodies recognizing both
p300 and CBP were raised against the N-terminal region of CBP from aa
350 to 550. Monoclonal anti-p300 antibodies against the C-terminal
domain of p300 were purchased from Upstate Biotechnology. Polyclonal
anti-p53 antibodies were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. A
monoclonal anti-p73 antibody against the C terminus of this protein was
purchased from Oncogene.
Buffers. Lysis buffer consisted of 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 0.5% NP-40, 1 mM EDTA, 150 mM NaCl, and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. SNNTE buffer contained 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 5 mM EDTA, 1% NP-40, 500 mM NaCl, and 5% sucrose. Radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer consisted of 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), and 1% (wt/vol) sodium deoxycholate. Buffer C 100 (BC100) included 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.9), 0.1 mM EDTA, 10% glycerol, 100 mM KCl, 4 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), and 0.25 µg of pepstatin A/ml.
Cell culture. Human cervical carcinoma HeLa, human osteosarcoma Saos-2, and small-cell lung carcinoma H1299 cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium supplemented with 5 to 10% fetal bovine serum, 50 U of penicillin/ml, and 0.1 mg of streptomycin/ml at 37°C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere. p300- or CBP-deficient H1299 or human breast carcinoma MCF-7 cell lines were cultured in the same medium except that G418 (0.4 µg/ml) was added as a selection marker as previously described (88).
Construction and preparation of GST-p300 and GST-p73 fusion proteins. The glutathione S-transferase (GST)-p300 fusion protein expression plasmids were constructed as previously described (87). The GST-p73 fusion protein expression vectors were made by inserting the PCR-generated fragments of p73 into pGEX-KT (Pharmacia) at the EcoRI sites. The orientation and sequence of each p73 fragment were confirmed by sequencing and Western blotting (WB). These GST fusion proteins were expressed in and purified from bacteria. The GST-p73 (aa 411 to 636) fusion protein was also used as an antigen for generation of polyclonal anti-p73 antibodies as described above.
Preparation and fractionation of HeLa cell nuclear extracts. Nuclear extracts were prepared from HeLa cells as described elsewhere (14). Briefly, 30-ml aliquots of nuclear extracts containing 10 mg of protein/ml (~5 × 109 HeLa cells) were fractionated through a phosphocellulose (P11) column as described previously (54). Proteins were eluted by stepwise washes with 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, and 1.0 M KCl-containing buffer C.
Coimmunoprecipitation and WB analyses. Fifty-microliter aliquots of the 0.3 M protein fractions from the P11 column were incubated at 4°C for 4 h with 30 µl of protein A-agarose and 1 µg of antibodies specifically against p300 (monoclonal) and p73 (polyclonal). The beads were washed as described above. Bound proteins were subjected to SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) and analyzed by WB as described elsewhere (54), using the same antibodies, preimmune serum, or antibody 419 as a control, and detected by enhanced chemiluminescence (Amersham).
Purification of Flag-p300 and Flag-CBP. Flag-p300 and Flag-CBP were purified from a baculovirus expression system by immunoaffinity chromatography (27, 54) and used for protein association assays described below.
Transfection and coimmunoprecipitation.
H1299 cells (three
60-mm-diameter plates) were transfected with 3 µg of the parental
pCDNA3, p73
-HA, or p73
-HA expression plasmid by means of
LipofectAmine (GIBCO-BRL). Six hours after transfection, fresh
Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium was added to the plates to replace
the medium containing plasmids. Cells were harvested 48 h
posttransfection. Cell lysates were prepared as described previously
(55). Lysates (1 mg of proteins) were precleared with 35 µl of protein A-agarose (50% slurry) and then incubated for 3 h
at 4°C with fresh protein A-beads (35 µl) and 2 µg of monoclonal
antibody ER15, 421, or 419. The beads were loaded directly onto a
SDS-acrylamide gel after vigorously washes twice with lysis buffer,
twice with SNNTE, and once with RIPA buffer. The coimmunoprecipitated
proteins were detected by WB using ER15 or polyclonal anti-CBP
antibodies (detecting both p300 and CBP).
Metabolic labeling of cells. H1299 cells (50% confluent) were transfected with plasmids as indicated in the legend to Fig. 1, using LipofectAmine (Promega) as described above. At 32 h posttransfection, cells were metabolically labeled with [35S]Met (1 mCi/60-mm-diameter dish) for 8 h and then harvested for immunoprecipitation; 2 million cpm was used for each immunoprecipitation reaction, carried out as described above.
Cotransfection and CAT assay. Transfections were carried out as described above with H1299 and Saos-2 cells. Totals of 15 and 4 µg of plasmid DNA were used for 100- and 60-mm-diameter plates, respectively. At 48 h after transfection, the transfected cells were harvested for chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) assays as described previously (82).
Transient transfection and luciferase assay.
H1299 cells
(60% confluent in a 12-well plate) were transfected with a
pCMV-
-galactoside reporter plasmid (0.2 µg) and a luciferase
reporter plasmid (0.2 µg) driven by two copies of the p53RE motif
derived from the MDM2 promoter (82), together
with a combination of different plasmids (total plasmid DNA = 1 µg/well) as indicated in Fig. 5 and 7, using GenePORTER (Gene Therapy
Systems, Inc., San Diego, Calif.). At 48 h posttransfection, cells
were harvested for luciferase assays as described previously
(41). Luciferase activity was normalized by a factor of
-galactosidase activity tested in the same assay.
GST fusion protein association assay.
The fusion proteins
were expressed in Escherichia coli and purified on a
glutathione (GSH)-Sepharose 12B column. Protein-protein association
assays were conducted as reported previously (54), using
fusion protein-containing beads. The purified and in vitro-translated, 35S-labeled p53 protein or in vitro-translated,
35S-labeled p73
and p73
proteins generated by using
TNT kits (Promega) were incubated with the GSH-Sepharose 4B beads (50%
slurry) containing approximately 400 ng of GST-p300, GST-CBP, and GST,
respectively. One hour after incubation at room temperature, the
mixtures were washed once in BC100 containing 0.1% NP-40, twice in
SNNTE, and once in RIPA buffer. Bound proteins were analyzed on an
SDS-10% gel and detected by WB using the anti-p53 monoclonal antibody 421 to detect p53-GST-CBP interactions and autoradiography to detect
interactions of p53 or p73 with GST-CBP or GST-p300. Similar assays
were also conducted to map the p300 or CBP binding site on p73, using
GST-p73 fusion proteins as described elsewhere (91).
Apoptotic analysis. The analysis was carried out as previously described (91). H1299 or p300- or CBP-deficient cells (105/35-mm-diameter dish) were transfected with a plasmid encoding GFP (0.85 µg of DNA/dish) together with combinations of expression plasmids (total plasmid DNA = 2 µg/dish) as indicated in Fig. 6. Transfected cells in cultures were analyzed under a fluorescence microscope and identified by the presence of green fluorescence. Apoptotic cells were identified by their rounded and shrunken morphology in contrast to the spread-out appearance of nonapoptotic H1299 cells, counted on a blind basis, and presented as a percentage of the total population of fluorescent cells (see Fig. 6).
Caspase 3 assays.
H1299 or p300- or CBP-deficient H1299
cells (60% confluent) were transiently transfected with a plasmid
expressing p73
or a p73
mutant lacking the N-terminal aa 1 to 56 (
Np73
). Cells were harvested and lysed 34 h posttransfection
for caspase 3 assays according to a protocol provided by PharMingen.
The caspase 3 reaction mix contained 20 µM Ac-DEVD-7-amino-4-methyl
coumarin (AMC) substrate for caspase 3 (PharMingen), 150 µg of
lysates, and 500 µl of protease buffer (20 mM HEPES [pH 7.5], 10%
glycerol, 2 mM DTT freshly added); the reaction was conducted at 37°C
for 60 min. AMC released from Ac-DEVD-AMC substrates was measured with
a spectrofluorometer (Photon Technology International) with an
excitation wavelength of 380 nm and an emission wavelength range of 400 to 500 nm.
DNA fragmentation assays. Transfection of H1299 cells was conducted as described above. Floating or attached cells were harvested separately for DNA isolation 38 h posttransfection. Since few floating cells were found in the control, mutant p73-, or p300-alone-transfected dishes, DNA isolated from attached cells was used as a control. DNA fragments were detected by using a DNA ladder detection kit purchased from BioSource International, Inc., Camarillo, Calif.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Association of p73 with p300/CBP in vivo.
During purification
of NBP, a recently identified p53-like transcriptional activity from
HeLa cell nuclear extracts (90), we detected a significant
amount of p73
protein by WB with anti-p73 antibodies in the 0.3 M
wash fraction from a phosphocellulose column (Fig.
1A, lane 3 [90]). This
finding prompted an examination of whether p73 cofractionates with
other cellular proteins that may be important for its function. Given
that p53 interacts with p300/CBP (3, 26, 51), the same
membrane was then probed with polyclonal anti-CBP antibodies, which
detect both p300 and CBP (4, 56). p300 and CBP were enriched
in the same fraction (Fig. 1A, lane 3), implying that p73 may form a
complex with p300/CBP. To examine this possibility, proteins in the 0.3 M fraction of the P11 column were coimmunoprecipitated with monoclonal
anti-p300 or anti-p73
antibodies and detected by WB with antibodies
against p73 and p300. As shown in Fig. 1B, the p73 protein was
specifically coprecipitated by the monoclonal anti-p300 antibody or
vice versa (lanes 2 and 3). As a control, the monoclonal anti-simian
virus 40 (SV40) T-antigen antibody 419 or preimmune serum did not pull down any proteins detectable by either anti-p73
or anti-p300 antibodies (lanes 1 and 4). This result suggests that p73 can form a
complex with p300.
|
or HA-p73
and/or Flag-p300. The cells were harvested after metabolic labeling for
immunoprecipitation-autoradiograpic analyses as described in Materials
and Methods. A representative result is shown in Fig. 1C for HA-p73
and Flag-p300. Flag-p300 was coimmunoprecipitated with p73
by the
monoclonal anti-p73
antibody (Fig. 1C, lane 3), and the reverse was
also true with the monoclonal anti-Flag antibody (lane 6). This
occurred apparently when these proteins were coexpressed in the cells,
as this complex was not found when either protein alone was introduced
into the cells (compare lanes 1, 2, 4, and 5 with lanes 3 and 7). This
interaction was also specific for these two antibodies, as it was not
detected by a monoclonal antibody against SV40 large T antigen (lane
7). A fast-migrating band below the Flag-p300 protein (lanes 3, 4, and
6) could be a shortened large fragment of the exogenous Flag-p300
protein. These results were repeated using immunoprecipitation-WB after transient transfection with the same sets of plasmids; the p300-p73
complex was also detected by this method (data not shown). Moreover, the endogenous p300 or CBP was coimmunoprecipitated with exogenous HA-p73
or HA-p73
by monoclonal anti-p73 antibody ER15 when these transcriptional factors were overexpressed in H1299 cells (Fig. 1D,
lanes 2 and 3). Since the polyclonal anti-CBP antibody recognizes both
p300 and CBP, the doublet detected by this antibody may present both of
the p300 and CBP polypeptides (lanes 2 and 3). The interaction between
p300/CBP and p73 was specific, as it was not observed when anti-p53
antibodies were used (lane 4) or in the absence of p73 (lane 1). Taken
together, these results clearly demonstrate that p73 can associate with
p300 or CBP in cells.
p73 binds to the N-terminal domain of p300 or CBP.
Because p53
was previously reported to bind to the C-terminal domain (aa 1990 to
2441) of p300/CBP (26), we tested whether p73 targets the
same region, using GST protein association assays. Equal amounts (1 µg) of GST-p300 fusion proteins coupled to Sepharose 4B resin were
incubated with in vitro-translated, [35S]Met-labeled
p73
or p73
. Bound proteins were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and detected
by autoradiography. As shown in Fig. 2A,
both p73
and p73
bound specifically to the p300 N-terminal region
from aa 19 to 596 (19-596 domain) but not to the other regions of p300 (two top panels). When GST-CBP fusion proteins were incubated with
radioactively labeled p73, both
and
forms of p73 were also
observed to interact with the CBP N terminus, as shown by a
representative result in Fig. 2B for p73
. As CBP fragments encompassing aa 1 to 450 (lane 2) and 390 to 790 (lane 3) retained an
equivalent amount of p73, the p73 binding site in CBP (or p300) can be
ascribed to the region from aa 390 to 450. Indeed, a CBP fragment of aa
350 to 450 was able to bind to p73 (unpublished data). The
faster-migrating p73 band in lane 3 of Fig. 2B was due to its
comigration with the GST-CBP 390-790 fusion protein on an SDS-gel. As a
control, GST alone did not retain a significant amount of the p73
proteins (Fig. 2), nor did the C-terminal domains of CBP or p300 (Fig.
2). These results suggest that both p73
and p73
physically bind
to the first C/H domain (potential zinc finger domain) of p300 and CBP.
In contrast, p53 bound to both the N- and C-terminal domains of
p300/CBP (Fig. 2A, middle panel). Consistent with a previous report
(24), the binding of p53 to the N-terminal CH1 region of
p300/CBP appears to be not important for its transcription activity, as
a transcriptionally inactive 22/23 mutant of p53 also bound to this
domain (Zeng and Lu, unpublished data). The binding of p73 to the
domain is not due to an adherent property of this region, as it was not
the case for TAFII31 (Fig. 2A, bottom panel), consistent
with a recent report (62). Thus, p73 is associated with the
N-terminal CH1 domain of p300/CBP.
|
p300/CBP binds to the N-terminal domain of p73.
To map the
p300/CBP binding site in the p73 protein, we carried out a similar set
of GST pull-down assays using GST p73 fusion proteins. Bound p300 or
CBP was analyzed by SDS-PAGE, followed by WB with antibodies against
either p300 or CBP. Either p300 (Fig. 3A)
or CBP (Fig. 3B) was retained by the GST-p73 fusion protein containing
only the N-terminal domain (aa 1 to 70) but not by the C-terminal
region of p73
(aa 311 to 636) (compare lanes 3 with lanes 4 and 5).
p300 or CBP did not bind to the GST protein alone (lanes 2). Thus, p300
or CBP appears to recognize the N-terminal domain of p73, which shares
a 29% identity with the p53 N-terminal 1-58 domain.
|
p300/CBP stimulates p73-dependent transcription in vivo.
To
determine the functional relevance of the p300/CBP-p73 interaction, we
performed a set of transfection and CAT assays using a CAT reporter
plasmid containing two copies of p53RE derived from the MDM2
promoter (82). A p53-deficient human osteosarcoma Saos-2
cell line was cotransfected with 100 ng of p73
, p73
, or p53 and
increasing amounts of p300 or CBP. Since p73
and p73
displayed
similar transcription activities in this assay, a representative result
for only p73
in contrast with p53 is shown in Fig. 4A. The
p73-dependent CAT activity in the presence of 3 µg of the p300 or CBP
plasmid was ~10-fold greater than that in the absence of plasmid
(Fig. 4A, compare lane 2 with lanes 4 and
6). This stimulation was due to p300 or CBP, as it was not observed
when a parental vector was used (Fig. 4A); also, p73 was equivalently expressed regardless of whether p300 or CBP was coexpressed (Fig. 4B,
lanes 1 to 6). Moreover, transcriptional activity was specific for p73,
as it disappeared when p73 mutant R292H, which is equivalent to the
inactive p53 mutant R273H (31), was used in the assay (Fig.
4C). The transcriptional activity of p53 was enhanced, as expected, in
the presence of exogenous p300 or CBP (Fig. 4A and B), consistent with
previous studies (3, 26, 51). These results were also
reproducible using H1299 cells devoid of the p53 protein (Zeng and Lu,
unpublished data). We additionally observed that p73 or p53 requires a
full-length p300 or CBP protein for synergistic activation of
transcription, as p73 or p53 binding fragments of both proteins were
unable to enhance p73- or p53-mediated transcription in vivo (Fig.
5E and data not shown). Thus, these studies demonstrate that the coactivators p300 and CBP not only bind to
p73 but also enhance transcription mediated by this transcriptional activator.
|
|
The N-terminally deleted mutant of p73 is defective in binding to
the N terminus of p300 and stimulating transcription and apoptosis in
vivo.
The interaction of the N terminus of p73 with p300/CBP
suggests that the N terminus of p73 may serve as transactivation
domain, though this domain shares a low degree homology (29% identity) with that of p53 (33). To test this possibility, we first
examined the direct binding of the p73 N terminus to the N-terminal
domain of p300. For this purpose, we generated
Np73
and analyzed
its interaction with wild-type or mutant forms of p300 by in vitro coimmunoprecipitation and protein-protein association assays. Consistent with the results in Fig. 1 to 3 and our recent report (91), p73
was coimmunoprecipitated with Flag-p300 by
anti-Flag antibodies (Fig. 5A, lane 4). However,
Np73
was unable
to bind to p300 (compare lane 4 with lane 5), indicating that the
N-terminal 1-56 domain directly interacts with p300. The interaction
was specific, as no signals were immunoprecipitated by anti-Flag
antibodies either in the absence of Flag-p300 or using polyclonal
antibody 419 specifically against the SV40 T antigen (lane 3 or 6).
This interaction was mediated by the N-terminal domain of p300, as binding of
Np73
to the N-terminal region (aa 19 to 596) of p300 was dramatically reduced compared with that of the wild-type p73 (Fig.
5B, compare lane 6 with lane 13). These results demonstrate that the N
terminus of p73 directly binds to the N-terminal CH1-containing domain
of p300.
Np73
was inactive
in transcriptional activation of a luciferase reporter gene driven by
the p53RE motif derived from the p21 promoter (Fig. 5C; a luciferase
assay was used, as it is convenient for statistical analysis). This
defect was not due to lower expression of the p73 mutant, as both the
wild-type and mutant p73 proteins were expressed equivalently (Fig. 5C,
bottom panel). Moreover, p300 was unable to synergize transcriptional
activation by this p73 mutant (Fig. 5D, compare left four columns with
right three columns), likely due to loss of the interaction between
these two proteins (Fig. 5A to C). To further test whether fragments of
p300 can affect the transcriptional activity of p73
, mammalian
expression plasmids encoding wild-type p300, the N-terminal p73 binding
region (aa 19-596), a fragment lacking the p73 binding domain (deletion from aa 242 to 1700), and a fragment containing the
acetylase-containing region (aa 1700-1941) (5, 63) were used
for transient transfection-luciferase assays. Again, the result in Fig.
5E shows that p73-mediated transcription (p73 column) was significantly
stimulated by p300 (p300 column). By contrast, the p73 binding fragment
of p300 markedly inhibited p73-dependent transcription (19-597 column),
suggesting that this fragment might prevent p73 from binding to
p300/CBP (Fig. 2A and 5B), as this effect was not apparent when the
other p300 deletion lacking the p73 binding domain was introduced into
cells (Fig. 5E, D242-1700 column). A partial inhibitory effect on
p73-mediated transcription was observed in the presence of the
acetylase domain-containing fragment (1700-1941 column). These effects
were not due to different p73 or p300 fragment levels expressed in the
cells, as equivalent amounts of the proteins were revealed by
immunoprecipitation-WB analysis (data not shown).
Transcriptional activity of p73 is believed to be responsible at least
partially for apoptosis induced by this protein (31). Thus,
the transcriptionally inactive p73 deletion mutant may also be
defective in inducing apoptosis. To test this idea, the wild-type or
N-terminally deleted form of p73 was introduced into H1299 cells
together with a GFP expression vector. At 32 h posttransfection, apoptotic cells were identified by blind counting as rounded and shrunken under a fluorescence microscope (Fig.
6A).
The percentage of apoptotic cells
was calculated and presented in Fig. 6B. Approximately 4% of H1299
cells were undergoing apoptosis under normal conditions of cell
culture. p73 when overexpressed caused a significant increase of
apoptotic cells (26% apoptotic cells). p300 further enhanced p73-induced apoptosis (42% apoptotic cells) but had no effect on cells
transfected with a control vector. By contrast, the N-terminally deleted mutant of p73 was unable to induce apoptosis, regardless of
whether p300 was overexpressed. The apoptotic nature was ensured by a
DNA ladder assay (Fig. 6E). To further confirm the apoptotic induction
by p73 and p300, caspase 3 activity with the same set of experiments
was detected by monitoring its cleavage substrates as described in
Materials and Methods. A fluorescence graph of this activity is shown
in Fig. 6C, indicating that the greater the emission at a wavelength of
435 nm is, the higher the caspase 3 activity is. For example, p73
expression induced caspase 3 significantly (curve E) and p300 further
stimulated this activity (curve F), whereas either the N-terminally
deleted p73 or p300 alone was without effect on this activity (curves C
and D). The quantitation of three independent assays (Fig. 6D) again
displays the same result as that in Fig. 6B, demonstrating that the
N-terminal domain of p73 is not only crucial for its transcriptional
activity but also essential for promoting apoptosis, and p300 can
further enhance these functions.
|
p73-mediated transcription and apoptosis are impaired to different
degrees in p300- and CBP-deficient cells.
It has been recently
shown that p53 activation appears to require p300 but not CBP in
response to DNA damage (88). Our results indicate that both
p300 and CBP stimulate p73-mediated transcription (Fig. 4 and 5). To
determine which of the coactivators is essential for p73-mediated
transcription, cell lines expressing either active or inactive p300 or
CBP ribozymes were used as described elsewhere (37, 88). In
the active p300 or CBP ribozyme-expressing cells, p300 or CBP was
hardly detectable by WB using anti-p300 or anti-CBP antibodies (Fig.
7A and C, lane p300R or CBPR), whereas
these proteins were not affected in the inactive p300 or CBP
ribozyme-expressing cells (lane p300Ria or CBPRia) compared with that
in parental MCF-7 or H1299 cells (lane MCF-7 or H1299). p73
expression plasmids together with a luciferase reporter driven by the
p53RE motif derived from the MDM2 promoter were transiently
introduced into these cells as well as parental cells, and luciferase
activity was measured (Fig. 7B). Consistent with the results above,
luciferase activity was significantly elevated by p73 in the parental
or inactive p300 or inactive CBP ribozyme-expressing MCF-7 cells (compare column 1 with columns 2, 3, and 5). By contrast, p73-dependent luciferase activity decreased by ~76% in the p300-deficient cells (column 4) and by ~53% in the CBP-deficient cells (column 6). The
incomplete inhibition in either case was probably due to the existence
of endogenous CBP or p300 (Fig. 7A, bottom panel). The reduction of
p73-dependent transcription was not due to a difference in p73
expression, as p73 levels were equivalent in all cells transfected with
Flag-p73 expression plasmids (Fig. 7B, middle panel). This result was
also repeated with the p300- or CBP-deficient cell lines derived from
H1299 (Zeng and Lu, unpublished data). The result suggests that both
endogenous p300 and CBP proteins are utilized by p73 to execute
transcription in cells, and lack of either of the coactivators impairs
p73 transcriptional activity to a certain extent.
|
, wild-type p73
, or N-terminally deleted p73
. Consistent
with the result in Fig. 7A, p73-induced apoptosis was reduced markedly
(~60%) in the p300-deficient H1299 cells but to a lesser degree
(~37%) in the CBP-deficient H1299 cells (Fig. 7D). This difference
may be explained by the possibility that the number of residual CBP
molecules in CBPR cells is more than that of p300 in p300R cells (Fig.
7C); alternatively, p300 may be more critical than CBP in p73-induced
apoptosis. Again, the N-terminally deleted p73 was unable to induce
apoptosis in either cell line. These results suggest that p300 and
probably CBP plays a role in p73-induced apoptosis.
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
p300 and CBP have been shown to interact with a variety of transcriptional activators (72), including p53 (3, 26, 51), serving as a linker between these activators and the RNAPII transcriptional machinery. The study presented here further investigated whether this group of coactivators is also important for transcription mediated by the p53 homolog p73. This study demonstrates that p300 and CBP enhance p73-dependent transcription in vivo. Like p53, p73 interacted with p300 and CBP, as shown by in vitro protein-protein association assays (Fig. 2 and 3) or in vivo coimmunoprecipitation assays (Fig. 1). Unlike p53, which was originally found to bind to the C-terminal region of p300/CBP (3, 26, 51), the N-terminal domain of p73 bound to the N-terminal CH1-containing region of the coactivators (Fig. 2 and 5). Loss of this binding correlated with the defect in transcriptional activation by p73 (Fig. 5). Consistently, the N- but not the C-terminal fragments of p300, when overexpressed, inhibited p73-dependent transcription. By contrast, the C terminus of p300/CBP is crucial for transactivation by p53, as the transcriptionally inactive p53 mutant 22/23 (26, 52, 54) was still able to bind to the coactivator's N- but not C-terminal domain in vitro (data not shown; references 24 and 26). The difference between p73 and p53 in binding to distinct domains of p300/CBP was also observed in our recent study (91), in which MDM2, a cellular p53 inhibitor (60), selectively blocked the p73-p300 but not the p53-p300 interaction, as MDM2 itself bound to the p300 N terminus (aa 1 to 450) as well. However, binding of p53 to the N-terminal domain of p300/CBP was recently proposed to mediate MDM2-dependent p53 degradation (24), although the biological conditions under which p300 assists MDM2 to enhance p53 degradation are not known. Also, unlike p53, whose N-terminal domain (aa 1 to 45) was not absolutely essential for its apoptotic function (78), p73 appeared to require its N terminus for apoptosis (Fig. 6 and 7). This suggests that the transactivational activity of p73 may be closely related with its apoptosis function, although it remains possible that the N-terminal domain (aa 1 to 56) of p73 may induce apoptosis through a direct and transcription-independent pathway. Thus, these studies reveal that these two p53 family members share the same set of coactivators for their transactivational activities by targeting different domains of these partners.
It is interesting that p73 and p53 target different domains of p300/CBP (Fig. 2 and 5; references 24 and 26) for transactivation, despite the fact that the N termini of the two transcriptional activators are related (33). One interpretation for this difference could be that although p73 and p53 share an overall 29% identity in amino acid sequence in their N termini (33), the p73 N terminus is 16 residues longer than the p53 N terminus. This extra sequence in the middle of the p73 N terminus may cause some conformational variation that could, in turn, influence the manner by which p73 physically contacts p300 or CBP. This difference between p73 and p53 may serve to avoid a direct competition for the same set of coactivators between the activators of the same family within cells. Also, in line with the finding that p73 does not respond to some DNA-damaging reagents (33), this difference implies that p73 may be activated through a signaling pathway that requires the CH1 domain of p300/CBP, distinct from that for p53 activation.
One important question is whether p73 is also a substrate of the p300/CBP intrinsic acetylase, which acetylates histones (5, 63) and is vital for the biological function of these coactivators (32, 74). p53 was the first reported nonhistone protein and transcriptional activator shown to be acetylated by this family of coactivators (25). The acetylation of p53 by p300 or CBP stimulates its p53RE binding and transcriptional activities (25) in response to DNA damage (53, 68, 88). p73 requires a full-length p300 or CBP protein for synergistic activation of transcription (Fig. 5). This is reasonable because (i) the acetylase activity of p300/CBP, which maps to aa 1195-1810 (5, 63) of the coactivators, is required for transactivation in cells (25, 43, 79) and (ii) communication with the RNAPII transcriptional machinery important for p300/CBP functions is mediated through different regions of the coactivators (40, 61). Thus, it will be important to determine whether the p300/CBP-interacting p73 can be activated through acetylation as well.
It has not been resolved whether p300 and CBP contribute equivalently
to transcriptional activation and thus cellular signaling mediated by
different p300/CBP-interacting transcriptional activators in cells. One
report showed that p300 and CBP can selectively stimulate transcription
mediated by different human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 Tax mutants
(7). Recently, p300 and CBP null mice have been generated by
a gene knockout technique (86). The p300
/
or
CBP
/
mice were embryonic lethal with severe
proliferation defects, strongly demonstrating that these coactivators
are essential for cell viability and development. Intriguingly,
although retinoic acid receptor was reported to utilize both p300 and
CBP as comediators (11, 34), retinoic acid
receptor-dependent transcription was defective in the
p300
/
but not in CBP
/
cells
(86). This finding suggests that p300 and CBP may have some
independent partners, which is consistent with the observation that
p300 cannot compensate for the lack of CBP and vice versa (86). In agreement with this study is a recent report
showing that p300 and CBP play distinct roles in retinoic acid-induced F9 cell phenotypes (38). p300 appears to be important for
retinoic acid-induced differentiation, whereas CBP mediates retinoic
acid-induced apoptosis (38). More recently, p53 was shown to
be stabilized specifically by p300 but not CBP after ionizing
irradiation using p300- or CBP-deficient MCF-7 cell lines
(88). In contrast, using either the MCF-7 cell lines or
p300- or CBP-deficient H1299 cells, we found that p73-mediated
transcription was significantly impaired, though to different degrees,
in the absence of either p300 or CBP (Fig. 7A and B). However, the
inhibition of p73-mediated apoptosis was less dramatic in the
CBP-deficient cells than in the p300-deficient cells (Fig. 7C and D).
This difference suggests that p73-induced apoptosis may be regulated
through mechanisms aside from its transcription activity and that p300
may be more important than CBP in regulating p73-dependent apoptosis.
This question remains to be further investigated with the availability
of cultured p300
/
and CBP
/
cell lines
(86). Therefore, p300 and CBP may preferentially cooperate
with p73 or p53 in mediating specific cellular processes.
In searching for p73 regulators (15, 91), it was found that
p73 bound to p53's natural inhibitor MDM2 (60) and that this interaction reduced p73-mediated transcription in vivo. When overexpressed in cells, p73 was also able to induce the expression of
MDM2 (91), which is a p53 target gene
(82). Surprisingly, MDM2, though promoting p53 degradation
(28, 45), failed to do so for the p73 protein (15,
91). Instead, it disrupted the interaction of p73 but not p53
with p300/CBP (91). These results indicate that MDM2
regulates p73 function through a mechanism distinct from that for p53
regulation, although p73 and p53 shares this MDM2 negative regulatory
feedback loop. Recently, c-Abl was reported to up-regulate p73 but not
p53 by phosphorylating its tyrosine residue 90 in response to
irradiation or cisplatin treatment (1, 22, 89). This is also
different from p53, which is activated by ATM (ataxia telangiectasia
mutated) through serine 15 phosphorylation after
irradiation
(71, 73). Moreover, p73 does not appear to respond to
UV-induced DNA damage (22, 33). Thus, despite the functional
similarity between p73 and p53 in the downstream events (references
31, 33, and 91 and this study),
p73 and p53 are regulated through different mechanisms in response to
DNA damage signals. These differences may account for the distinct
roles of p73 and p53 in cell growth and homeostasis. Identification of
other upstream signals that regulate p73 functions is crucial for a
better understanding its biological role.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
X. Li and A. Miller contributed equally to this study.
We thank William G. Kaelin, Tsu-Pan Yao, David Livingston, Kristen Walker, Hongwe Chen, Ronald Evans, Wei Gu, Robert Roeder, James Lundblad, Jean-Rene Cardinaux, Brian Elenbass, and Yang Shi for generously providing some of the reagents used in this study. We thank Steve Mansoor and David Farrens for assistance with fluorophotometer analysis, and we thank members in the laboratories of Hua Lu and Matt Thayer for discussion.
R. Goodman, W. Yuan, and R. P. S. Kwok were supported by NIH grants. This work was supported partly by grants to H. Lu from the American Cancer Society (RPG-98-191-01-CBE), NIH (R01 CA 79721), Medical Research Foundation of Oregon, Oregon Cancer Center, and Oregon division of the American Cancer Society.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Oregon Health Sciences University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd., Portland, OR 97201. Phone: (503) 494-7414. Fax: (503) 494-8393. E-mail: LUH{at}OHSU.edu.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Agami, R.,
G. Blandino,
M. Oren, and Y. Shaul.
1999.
Interaction of c-Abl and p73 and their collaboration to induce apoptosis.
Nature
399:809-813[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 2. | Avantaggiati, M. L., M. Carbone, A. Graessmann, Y. Nakatani, B. Howard, and A. C. Levine. 1996. The SV40 large T antigen and adenovirus E1a oncoproteins interact with distinct isoforms of the transcriptional co-activator, p300. EMBO J. 15:2236-2248[Medline]. |
| 3. | Avantaggiati, M. L., V. Ogryzko, K. Gardner, A. Giordano, A. S. Levine, and K. Kelly. 1997. Recruitment of p300/CBP in p53-dependent signal pathways. Cell 89:1175-1184[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 4. | Arany, Z., D. Newsome, E. Oldread, D. M. Livingston, and R. Eckner. 1995. A family of transcriptional adaptor proteins targeted by the E1A oncoprotein. Nature 374:81-84[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 5. | Bannister, A. J., and T. Kouzarides. 1996. The CBP co-activator is a histone acetyltransferase. Nature 384:641-643[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 6. |
Bargonetti, J.,
J. J. Manfredi,
X. Chen,
D. R. Marshak, and C. Prives.
1993.
A proteolytic fragment from the central region of p53 has marked sequence-specific DNA-binding activity when generated from wild-type but not from oncogenic mutant p53 protein.
Genes Dev.
7:2565-2574 |
| 7. |
Bex, F.,
M. J. Yin,
A. Burny, and R. B. Gaynor.
1998.
Differential transcriptional activation by human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 Tax mutants is mediated by distinct interactions with CREB binding protein and p300.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:2392-2405 |
| 8. | Bhattacjarua, S. R., Eclmer, S. Grossman, E. Oldread, Z. Arany, A. D'Andrea, and D. M. Livingston. 1996. Cooperation of Stat2 and p300/CBP in signaling induced by interferon-alpha. Nature 383:344-347[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 9. |
Bian, J., and Y. Sun.
1997.
P53CP, a putative p53 competing protein that specifically binds to the consensus p53 DNA binding sites: a third member of the p53 family?
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:14753-14758 |
| 10. | Buckbinder, L., R. Talbott, S. Valesco-Miguel, I. Takenaka, B. Faha, B. R. Seizinger, and N. Kley. 1995. Induction of the growth inhibitor IGF-binding protein 3 by p53. Nature 377:646-649[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 11. | Chakravarti, D., V. J. LaMorte, M. C. Nelson, T. Nakajima, I. G. Schulman, H. Juguilon, M. Monteminy, and R. M. Evans. 1996. Role of CBP/p300 in nuclear receptor signaling. Nature 383:99-103[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 12. |
Cho, Y.,
S. Gorina,
P. D. Jeffrey, and N. P. Pavietich.
1994.
Crystal structure of a p53 tumor suppressor-DNA complex: understanding tumorigenic mutations.
Science
265:346-355 |
| 13. | Chrivia, J. C., R. P. Kwok, N. Lamb, M. Hagiwara, M. R. Montminy, and R. H. Goodman. 1993. Phosphorylated CREB binds specifically to the nuclear protein CBP. Nature 365:855-859[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 14. |
Dignam, J. D.,
R. M. Lebovitz, and R. G. Roeder.
1983.
Accurate transcription initiation by RNA polymerase II in a soluble extract from isolated mammalian nuclei.
Nucleic Acids Res.
11:1475-1489 |
| 15. | Dobbelstein, M., S. Wienzek, C. Konig, and J. Roth. 1999. Inactivation of the p53-homologue p73 by the mdm2-oncoprotein. Oncogene 18:2101-2106[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 16. | Donehower, L. A., M. Harvey, B. L. Slagle, M. J. McArthur, C. A. Montgomery, Jr., J. S. Butel, and A. Bradley. 1992. Mice deficient for p53 are developmentally normal but susceptible to spontaneous tumours. Nature 356:215-221[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 17. | Dulic, V., W. K. Kaufmann, S. J. Lees, T. D. Tisty, E. Lees, J. W. Harper, S. J. Elledge, and S. I. Reed. 1994. p53-dependent inhibition of cyclin-dependent kinase activities in human fibroblasts during radiation-induced G1 arrest. Cell 76:1013-1023[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 18. | Eckner, R., M. E. Ewen, D. Newsome, M. Gerdes, J. A. DeCaprio, J. B. Lawrence, and D. M. Livingston. 1994. Molecular cloning and functional analysis of the adenovirus E1A-associated 300-kD protein (p300) reveals a protein with properties of a transcriptional adaptor. Genes Dev. 7:869-884. |
| 19. | El-Deiry, W. S., S. E. Kern, J. A. Pietenpol, K. W. Kinzler, and B. Vogelstein. 1992. Definition of a consensus binding site for p53. Nat. Genet. 1:45-49[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 20. | El-Deiry, W. S., T. Tokino, V. E. Velculescu, D. B. Levy, R. Parsons, J. M. Trent, D. Lin, W. E. Mercer, K. W. Kinzler, and B. Vogelstein. 1993. WAF1, a potential mediator of p53 tumor suppression. Cell 75:817-825[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 21. |
Fields, S., and S. K. Jang.
1990.
Presence of a potent transcription activating sequence in the p53 protein.
Science
249:1046-1049 |
| 22. | Gong, J. G., A. Costanzo, H. Q. Yang, G. Melino, W. G. Kaelin, Jr., M. Levrero, and J. Y. Wang. 1999. The tyrosine kinase c-Abl regulates p73 in apoptotic response to cisplatin-induced DNA damage. Nature 399:806-809[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 23. | Gottlieb, T. M., and M. Oren. 1996. p53 in growth control and neoplasia. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gene Struct. Expr. 1287:77-102[Medline]. |
| 24. | Grossman, S. R., M. Perez, A. L. Kung, M. Joseph, C. Mansur, Z. Xiao, S. Kumar, P. M. Howley, and D. M. Livingston. 1998. p300/MDM2 complexes participate in MDM2-mediated p53 degradation. Mol. Cell 2:405-415[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 25. | Gu, W., and R. G. Roeder. 1997. Activation of p53 sequence-specific DNA binding by acetylation of the p53 C-terminal domain. Cell 90:595-606[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 26. | Gu, W., X. L. Shi, and R. G. Roeder. 1997. Synergistic activation of transcription by CBP and p53. Nature 387:819-823[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 27. | Harlow, E., and D. Lane. 1988. Antibodies: a laboratory manual, p. 519-522. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Plainview, N.Y. |
| 28. | Haupt, Y., R. Maya, A. Kazaza, and M. Oren. 1997. Mdm2 promotes the rapid degradation of p53. Nature 387:296-299[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 29. |
Hermeking, H.,
C. Lengauer,
K. Polyak,
T. He,
L. Zhang,
S. Thiagalingam,
K. W. Kinzler, and B. Vogelstein.
1997.
14-3-3 is a p53-regulated inhibitor of G2/M progression.
Mol. Cell
1:3-11[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 30. | Hupp, T. R., and D. P. Lane. 1994. Allosteric activation of latent p53 tetramers. Curr. Biol. 4:865-875[CrossRef][Medline] |