Previous Article | Next Article 
Molecular and Cellular Biology, February 2000, p. 1382-1393, Vol. 20, No. 4
0270-7306/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
The SCFHOS/
-TRCP-ROC1 E3 Ubiquitin
Ligase Utilizes Two Distinct Domains within CUL1 for Substrate
Targeting and Ubiquitin Ligation
Kenneth
Wu,
Serge Y.
Fuchs,
Angus
Chen,
Peilin
Tan,
Carlos
Gomez,
Ze'ev
Ronai, and
Zhen-Qiang
Pan*
Derald H. Ruttenberg Cancer Center, The Mount
Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York 10029-6574
Received 6 August 1999/Returned for modification 15 September
1999/Accepted 15 November 1999
 |
ABSTRACT |
We describe a purified ubiquitination system capable of rapidly
catalyzing the covalent linkage of polyubiquitin chains onto a
model substrate, phosphorylated I
B
. The initial ubiquitin transfer and subsequent polymerization steps of this reaction require
the coordinated action of Cdc34 and the
SCFHOS/
-TRCP-ROC1 E3 ligase complex, comprised of four
subunits (Skp1, cullin 1 [CUL1], HOS/
-TRCP, and ROC1). Deletion
analysis reveals that the N terminus of CUL1 is both necessary and
sufficient for binding Skp1 but is devoid of ROC1-binding activity and,
hence, is inactive in catalyzing ubiquitin ligation. Consistent with
this, introduction of the N-terminal CUL1 polypeptide into cells blocks
the tumor necrosis factor alpha-induced and SCF-mediated degradation of I
B by forming catalytically inactive complexes lacking ROC1. In
contrast, the C terminus of CUL1 alone interacts with ROC1 through a
region containing the cullin consensus domain, to form a complex fully
active in supporting ubiquitin polymerization. These results suggest
the mode of action of SCF-ROC1, where CUL1 serves as a dual-function
molecule that recruits an F-box protein for substrate targeting through
Skp1 at its N terminus, while the C terminus of CUL1 binds ROC1 to
assemble a core ubiquitin ligase.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Regulation of protein stability by
ubiquitin (Ub)-dependent proteolysis plays major roles in the control
of multiple aspects of cell function, such as transcriptional control,
cell cycle progression, and signal transduction (17).
Ubiquitination involves three distinct enzymatic events that ultimately
lead to the covalent linkage of Ub polymers to the lysine
-amino
groups of substrate proteins. Ub is initially charged in an
ATP-dependent fashion by the Ub-activating enzyme, E1, to form a
high-energy thiol-ester bond between the carboxyl group of its
C-terminal glycine residue and E1. The thiol-ester-linked Ub is then
transferred to an E2, which cooperates with an E3 ligase to catalyze
the formation of an isopeptide bond between Ub and the substrate
(16).
One well-characterized Ub-proteasome pathway is the degradation of
I
B
required for the activation of the transcription factor NF-
B (26). I
B
, which sequesters NF-
B in the cell
cytoplasm (3), is phosphorylated by the IKK kinase complex
that is activated in response to proinflammatory cytokines (4, 9,
28, 36, 48, 53). Such phosphorylation triggers the rapid
ubiquitination and subsequent degradation of I
B
, resulting in the
release of NF-
B (5, 7, 37). Recent studies have
demonstrated that the
-TRCP/HOS F-box protein family plays a direct
role in targeting I
B
for ubiquitination and degradation
(12, 15, 21, 22, 30, 42, 47, 50) by binding to this
inhibitor at its N-terminally located
DS(PO3)G
XS(PO3) motif (1, 47,
49). More recently, the ubiquitination of I
B
has been
reconstituted in vitro with purified components including
SCFHOS/
-TRCP-ROC1 as the E3 ligase complex
(44).
SCFHOS/
-TRCP-ROC1 contains Skp1, cullin 1 (CUL1),
HOS/
-TRCP, and the newly identified ROC1 (also called Rbx1 or Hrt1).
ROC1 is a novel RING-H2 finger protein that was initially isolated as a
CUL4A-interacting protein by a yeast two-hybrid screen (30).
It has also been biochemically purified as a common component of both
the human (44) and yeast (38) SCF complexes, as
well as the native human von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) tumor suppressor
complex (19). In addition, the ROC1 homologue, ROC2 (also
called SAG), was isolated as a redox-agent-induced gene product that
protects cells from apoptosis (10). ROC1 plays an essential
role in the Cdc34/SCF-mediated ubiquitination-degradation pathway.
Yeast ROC1 encodes an essential gene whose reduced expression led to
the accumulation of Sic1 and Clns (19, 30, 38, 40), both of
which are previously identified substrates of the Cdc34-SCF
ubiquitination apparatus (11, 35, 39). Yeast ROC1 is a
component of the SCF complexes that mediates the in vitro
ubiquitination of Sic1 by Cdc4 (19, 38) and Clns by Grr1
(40).
The in vitro reconstitution experiments (44) reveal that the
human ROC1 protein is recruited by CUL1 to form the
SCFHOS/
-TRCP-ROC1 complex (with Skp1 and
HOS/
-TRCP). Like its yeast counterpart, human Skp1 links CUL1 to the
F-box protein HOS/
-TRCP. In addition, Skp1 enhances the ability of
HOS/
-TRCP to interact with phosphorylated I
B
. The purified
recombinant SCFHOS/
-TRCP-ROC1 complex specifically binds
IKK
-phosphorylated I
B
and catalyzes its ubiquitination in the
presence of Ub, E1, and Cdc34 as the E2-conjugating enzyme. Each of the
four subunits within SCFHOS/
-TRCP-ROC1 is required for
the substrate ubiquitination reaction. These studies suggest that
SCFHOS/
-TRCP-ROC1 acts as an E3 holoenzyme that is both
necessary and sufficient to initiate and catalyze ubiquitination. A
recent study has identified Sgt1p as a novel protein that interacts
with Skp1 and which is required for assembling the yeast kinetochore
complex (20). However, the biochemical role of Sgt1p in the
SCF-ROC1-mediated ubiquitination reaction remains to be determined.
In addition to its role in the SCF pathway, ROC1 may mediate other
ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis events in the cell. It has been shown
by cotransfection experiments that ROC1 binds five cullin family
members (CUL1, CUL2, CUL3, CUL4A, and CUL4B), whereas ROC2
preferentially interacts with CUL5 (30). Consistent with this, ROC1 is found to be a component of the pVHL complex
(19), whose additional subunits include pVHL, CUL2, and
elongins C and B (24, 33, 43). Furthermore, ROC1 shares
extensive homology with APC11 (19, 30, 38), a subunit of the
anaphase-promoting complex (35), which interacts with the
cullin-related protein APC2 (30). These findings suggest
that ROC/APC11, through its combinatorial interaction with cullin/APC2,
forms a dimeric core component common to a large family of multisubunit
Ub ligases.
Using a sensitive 32P-Ub-incorporation assay, we have
previously observed that the purified ROC1-CUL1 complex contains a
ligase activity capable of catalyzing Ub polymerization in a
substrate-independent manner (44). In addition, missense
mutations in ROC1 significantly reduce Ub ligase activity without
affecting its interaction with CUL1 (30). Consistent with
these observations, a recently published study by Seol et al.
(38) has shown that the Cdc53-Hrt1 subcomplex is capable of
activating the autoubiquitination of Cdc34. These studies indicate that
the ROC1-CUL1 complex constitutes a Ub ligase. Furthermore, yeast ROC1
has been shown to directly interact with Cdc34 (38, 40).
Taken together, these findings raise the intriguing possibility that
the ROC/APC11-cullin/APC2 subassembly within the E3 complex carries
out a common Ub ligase function that facilitates the transfer of
activated Ub from a cognate E2 to targeted substrates.
In this report, we show a rapid synthesis of polyubiquitin chains
covalently linked to I
B
through a coordinated action between SCFHOS/
-TRCP-ROC1 and Cdc34. We further elucidate the
mechanism of action of SCFHOS/
-TRCP-ROC1 in which it
utilizes two distinct domains within CUL1 for substrate targeting and
for Ub ligation.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Plasmids.
N-terminally Flag-tagged CUL1 fragments were
constructed by PCR by using the pcDNA-CUL1 plasmid (29) as
the template. The following primers were used (boldfaced sequences
indicate Flag tag): Flag-CUL1 (started at the initiation codon),
5'GCCACCATGGATTACAAGGATGACGACGATAAGATGTCGTCAACCCGGAGCC; Flag-CUL1 (amino acids 324 to 776),
5'GCCACCATGGAT TACAAGGATGACGACGATAAGAATC T TG TATC TAGAATCCAGGAT;
Flag-CUL1 (terminated at amino acid 776), 5'GGACTAGTTAAGCCAAGTAACTGTAGGTG; Flag-CUL1 (1 to 452),
5'GACAACCATCACTTGATTGAG; Flag-CUL1 (1 to 544),
5'GGACCCGGAGCTCAGCACTTG; and Flag-CUL1 (1 to 645),
5'CTTTAATAAAATCTGTAAAACTTGCGCC. PCRs were performed with the
Expand High Fidelity PCR System from Boehringer Mannheim per manufacturer's protocol, and the 3' deoxyadenosine overhangs were added by using Taq DNA polymerase from Stratagene for a
final 10-min extension step. The Flag-tagged CUL1 constructs were
inserted into cytomegalovirus (CMV)-promoter-based expression vectors
using either the Invitrogen Eukaryotic TA Cloning Kit (Flag-CUL1
fragments) or the Eukaryotic TOPO TA Cloning Kit (full-length
Flag-CUL1) per manufacturer's instructions. All Flag-CUL1 truncations
were verified by dideoxy sequencing.
The plasmids expressing HA-ROC1 and Skp1 have been described previously
(29, 30).
Enzymes.
Human E1, mouse Cdc34 (mCdc34),
SCFHOS-ROC1, and IKK
S177E,S181E were
prepared as described previously (44). E2-25K was isolated
from cytosolic extracts of HeLa cells by using a Ub-affinity column as
previously described (16). E1 and other E2s present in the E2-25K preparation were removed by Q-Sepharose chromatography and
glycerol gradient sedimentation. Ubc4 and Ubc5 were kindly provided by
G. Fang (Harvard Medical School) and T. Ohta and Y. Xiong (University
of North Carolina at Chapel Hill).
Transfection, metabolic labeling, and extract preparation.
Plates (150 by 25 mm) of 293T cells were grown on 20 ml of Dulbecco
modified Eagle medium per plate (Gibco BRL), 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (Sigma), and 1% antibiotic-antimycotic agent (Gibco
BRL). DNA(s) was transfected up to a concentration of 30 µg per plate
by using the standard calcium phosphate precipitation method. For
metabolic labeling, 45-h-posttransfected cells were washed with 10 ml
of phosphate-buffered saline and were starved for 30 min with 6 ml of
Dulbecco modified Eagle medium lacking L-methionine/L-cysteine per plate (Gibco BRL),
10% heat-inactivated and dialyzed fetal bovine serum (Gibco BRL), and
1% antibiotic-antimycotic agent. The media was then changed to include
100 µCi of Easy Tag Express-[35S] Protein labeling Mix
(NEN) per ml. Labeling was allowed to occur for approximately 2 h.
To harvest the transfected cells, the plates were washed with 10 ml of
phosphate-buffered saline, and cells were pelleted
at 180 ×
g for 5 min with a Beckman CS-6KR centrifuge at 4°C.
Cell
pellets were resuspended in 0.4 ml of buffer A (10 mM Tris-HCl
[pH
7.4], 10 mM NaCl, 0.5% NP-40, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride,
2 µg of antipain per ml, and 2 µg of leupeptin per ml) per plate,
and
the resulting suspension was sonicated (seven repetitive 20-s
treatments). Buffer B (20 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.4], 1 M NaCl, 0.2%
NP-40, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 2 µg of antipain per
ml,
and 2 µg of leupeptin per ml) (0.6 ml per plate) was then
added. The
mixture was agitated for 60 min at 4°C followed by
centrifugation (at
100,000 ×
g at 4°C for 60 min). Supernatants
were
saved.
In vitro ubiquitination of I
B
.
The in vitro
ubiquitination of I
B
was carried out as previously described
(44), with modifications. Glutathione
S-transferase (GST)-I
B
(1 to 54) (3.3 pmol) was
phosphorylated by purified IKK
S177E,S181E (0.1 pmol) in
a reaction mixture (30 µl) that contained 50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.4],
0.6 mM dithiothreitol, 5 mM MgCl2, 2 mM NaF, 10 nM Okadaic
Acid, and 50 µM [
-32P]ATP. After incubation at
37°C for 20 min, SCFHOS-ROC1 (1 pmol) and ATP (to a final
concentration of 4 mM) were added to the reaction mixture, and the
second incubation was carried out at 0°C for 15 min. Ub (300 pmol),
E1 (2 pmol), and mCdc34 (60 pmol or specified otherwise) were then
added to the mixture, and the final incubation was at 37°C for times
as indicated. The reaction was terminated by the addition of sodium
dodecyl sulfate (SDS) loading buffer (15 µl), and the mixture was
boiled for 3 min. Aliquots of the reaction products (20 µl) were
separated by SDS-8.5% and 6% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE).
Immunoprecipitation.
Extracts, in the amounts indicated,
were mixed with 10 µg of
HA (12CA5),
Flag (M2) antibody, or
Skp1 antibody (4 µl). Protein A-agarose beads (10 µl; Upstate
Biotechnology) were added. The mixture was agitated for 1 h at
4°C. In experiments shown in Fig. 3B and 5B, protein extracts were
mixed with M2-cross-linked antibody beads (15 µl; Sigma), and the
mixture was agitated for 2 h at 4°C. Beads were washed three
times with 0.5 ml of buffer C (buffer A and B mixed in equal volumes)
then were washed two times with 0.5 ml of buffer D (25 mM Tris-HCl [pH
7.5], 1 mM EDTA, 0.01% NP-40, 10% glycerol, and 50 mM NaCl). Bound
protein was released by boiling the beads for 3 min in the presence of
40 µl of SDS loading buffer. Twenty microliters of each eluate was
used for SDS-PAGE followed by autoradiography.
I
B
degradation.
HeLa cells were transfected with 2 µg of CMV vectors expressing Flag-I
B
, CUL1, or CUL1 (1 to 452)
and were treated with human tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF
) (0.5 ng/ml) 24 h later. Cells were harvested 20 min after the addition
of TNF
, and the level of Flag-I
B
in whole-cell extracts (100 µg) was analyzed by immunoblot analysis with the M2 monoclonal antibody.
Ub ligation assay.
For the reactions shown in Fig. 4A, the
reaction mixture (30 µl) contained 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 5 mM
MgCl2, 2 mM NaF, 10 nM Okadaic Acid, 2 mM ATP, 0.6 mM
dithiothreitol, 5 µg of 32P-Ub, E1 (2 pmol), mCdc34 (10 pmol), and SCFHOS-ROC1 (0.1 pmol). For experiments shown in
Fig. 4B and 6, the immunoprecipitated recombinant ROC1-CUL1 complexes,
prepared as described above, were added to a Ub ligation mixture
containing the same components as above except for the omission of
SCFHOS-ROC1. The mixture was incubated at 37°C for 60 min
unless otherwise specified. The reaction mixture was then treated with
20 µl of 4× concentrated Laemmli loading buffer and was boiled for 3 min prior to SDS-12.5% and/or 7.5% PAGE analysis.
 |
RESULTS |
Rapid ubiquitination of I
B
catalyzed by the
Cdc34- SCFHOS/
-TRCP-ROC1 ligase system in
vitro.
We have previously reconstituted the ubiquitination of
I
B
in vitro with six purified components that include
GST-I
B
(1 to 54) as the substrate,
IKK
S177E,S181E, Ub, E1, Cdc34, and
SCFHOS/
-TRCP- ROC1 (44). In this
reaction, GST-I
B
(1 to 54) was phosphorylated with
32P by IKK
S177E,S181E and was subsequently
bound to SCFHOS/
-TRCP-ROC1. Following the addition of
Ub, E1, and Cdc34, covalent linkage of Ub to the substrate generated
multiple high-molecular-weight substrate-Ub conjugates (Fig.
1A, lane 1) in a substrate-dependent manner (lane 2). The identity of these 32P-labeled,
high-molecular-weight reaction products as GST-I
B
(1 to 54)-Ub
conjugates was confirmed by anti-GST Western blot analysis (reference
44 and data not shown). To assess the kinetics of
this reaction, we examined the efficiency of GST-I
B
(1 to 54)
ubiquitination as a function of time. As shown in Fig. 1B, multiple
high-molecular-weight substrate-Ub conjugates were readily formed after
3 min (lane 3), and the levels of polyubiquitinated substrates
(containing six or more ubiquitin moieties) further increased over time
(Fig. 1B, lanes 4 to 6 on the 6% gel, and Fig. 1C, middle and right
panels). In contrast, time-dependent accumulation of mono-, di-, or
triubiquitinated substrates was not observed (Fig. 1B, lanes 3 to 6),
suggesting an efficient Ub chain polymerization by this reconstitution
system. GST-I
B
(1 to 54) conjugated with four or five ubiquitin
molecules comigrated with the autophosphorylated
IKK
S177E,S181E species, precluding an assessment of
their production. The reaction required Ub, E1, Cdc34, and
SCFHOS/
-TRCP-ROC1 as their removal abolished
ubiquitination (Fig. 1B, lane 1).

View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
The SCFHOS/ -TRCP-ROC1/Cdc34 ligase system
rapidly catalyzes the initial Ub transfer and subsequent polymerization
onto phosphorylated I B . (A) Substrate-dependent ubiquitination of
I B . The ubiquitination of GST-I B (1 to 54) was carried out
as described in Materials and Methods in the presence (lane 1) or
absence (lane 2) of GST-I B (1 to 54). The reaction was incubated
at 37°C for 60 min. (B) Kinetics of the GST-I B (1 to 54)
ubiquitination reaction. Ubiquitination reactions were carried out with
wild-type Ub (lanes 2 to 6) or UbK48R (lanes 7 to 11). The
reaction mixture was incubated for the times indicated, and aliquots of
the reaction products were separated by both SDS/8.5% and 6% PAGE.
The autoradiogram is shown, and the Ub polymerization status of the
ubiquitinated GST-I B (1 to 54) is indicated. (C) Quantitation of
the ubiquitinated GST-I B (1 to 54) products. Shown is the
phosphorimager quantitation of the levels of each of the ubiquitinated
species.
|
|
To analyze the initial catalysis leading to the formation of the first
isopeptide bond between GST-I

B

(1 to 54) and Ub,
we replaced Ub
with Ub
K48R to inhibit Ub polymerization. A
monoubiquitinated substrate was
formed within 3 min of incubation at a
level approximately sevenfold
greater than that observed with wild-type
Ub (Fig.
1B, compare
lanes 3 and 8, also see Fig.
1C, left panel). This
substrate-Ub
conjugate peaked after 9 min (Fig.
1B, lanes 8 to 11, and
Fig.
1C, left panel). Both di- and triubiquitinated GST-I

B

(1 to
54) appeared with slower kinetics compared to the monoubiquitinated
product (Fig.
1B, lanes 8 to 11, and Fig.
1C, left panel). Significant
levels of polyubiquitinated products (containing six or more ubiquitin
moieties), formed through lysine residues other than K48, were
only
detected after 60 min of incubation (Fig.
1B, lanes 8 to
11 on the 6%
gel). However, contrary to the distinct ladder of
polyubiquitinated
products synthesized with Ub (Fig.
1B, lanes
3 to 6 on the 6% gel),
the high-molecular-weight products formed
with Ub
K48R were
indiscrete and heterogeneous (Fig.
1B, lanes 8 to 11 on
the 6%
gel).
These results demonstrate that (i) the initial isopeptide bond formed
between GST-I

B

(1 to 54) and a thiol-ester-charged
Ub is rapidly
catalyzed upon mixing the substrate-E3 complex with
Ub, E1, and Cdc34;
(ii) once the first Ub is covalently attached,
Ub chain polymerization
proceeds promptly; and (iii) K48 is the
preferred acceptor residue for
Ub polymerization catalyzed by
the
Cdc34-SCF
HOS/
-TRCP-ROC1 ligase system. The rapid
reaction kinetics observed are
in accord with in vivo observations that
the proinflammatory cytokine-induced
degradation of I

B

is an
extremely rapid event (
31).
Both Cdc34 and Ubc4 and -5 support ubiquitination of I
B
in
vitro.
We compared Cdc34 and Ubc4 and -5 for their ability to
support SCFHOS/
-TRCP-ROC1-catalyzed ubiquitination of
I
B
by using the purified reconstitution system. Consistent with
observations in Fig. 1, Cdc34 efficiently catalyzed the covalent
linkage of polyubiquitin chains to the substrate in a
concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 2,
lanes 2, 3, and 13). Addition of Ubc4 (lanes 5 and 6) or Ubc5 (lanes 8 and 9) in place of Cdc34 also supported the ubiquitination of GST-I
B
(1 to 54). However, several differences were observed. First, incubation with Ubc4 or -5 resulted in more substrates converted
into Ub conjugates than did incubation with Cdc34 (compare lanes 5 and
8 with lane 2), suggesting that Ubc4 and -5 promoted more-efficient
substrate utilization. This is in keeping with previously published
observations (30). Second, Ubc4 and -5 produced a greater
abundance of both the mono- and diubiquitinated GST-I
B
(1 to 54)
species than did Cdc34 (compare lanes 5, 6, 8, and 9 with lanes 2 and
3). This is consistent with the recent report that Cdc34 supported
polyubiquitination of an I
B
peptide (residues 20 to 43) in the
presence of the [
-TRCP]-containing SCF complex, whereas Ubc5
predominantly stimulated mono- and diubiquitination (46).
These results suggest that Ubc4 or -5 generates mono- and
diubiquitinated I
B
more efficiently than Cdc34. However, Cdc34
and Ubc4 or -5 appear to be equally efficient in producing polyubiquitinated species. Third, both Ubc4 and Ubc5, but not Cdc34, appeared to catalyze low levels of monoubiquitination
of the substrate in the absence of
SCFHOS/
-TRCP-ROC1 (compare lanes 7 and 10 with
lane 4). This is consistent with the previous finding that yeast Ubc4
alone catalyzed the formation of low-molecular-mass ubiquitinated
conjugates of I
B
(8). These results suggest that both
Ubc4 and Ubc5 may bind nonspecifically to the phosphorylated
GST-I
B
(1 to 54) and catalyze its monoubiquitination in an
E3-independent manner. Fourth, while the high-molecular-weight Ub
conjugates (containing six or more Ub moieties) (Fig. 1) formed with
Cdc34 migrated as a protein ladder (lanes 2 and 3), those produced by
Ubc4 (lanes 5 and 6) or Ubc5 (lanes 8 and 9) appeared as heterogeneous
species. Fifth, a significant portion of autophosphorylated
IKK
S177E,S181E was converted into high-molecular-weight
species by Ubc4 and -5, but not by Cdc34 (compare lanes 5, 6, 8, and 9 with lanes 2 and 3). Thus, Ubc4 and -5 may also catalyze the
ubiquitination of autophosphorylated IKK
S177E,S181E by
unknown mechanisms. Lastly, mixing of Cdc34 with Ubc4 (lane 11) or Ubc5
(lane 12) produced conjugate patterns identical to those observed with
Ubc4 or -5 alone, suggesting that Ubc4 and -5 acted in a dominant
fashion under the conditions used.

View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Comparison of Cdc34 and Ubc4 and -5 in their ability to
support the ubiquitination of I B . The reaction mixture contained
20 (lanes 2, 5, and 8) or 60 (lanes 3, 6, and 9) pmol of E2 as
indicated, as well as other components as described in Materials and
Methods. In reactions shown in lanes 11 and 12, 20 pmol of Cdc34 was
mixed with 20 pmol of either Ubc4 or Ubc5. No ubiquitination agents
(Ub, E1, E2, or SCFHOS/ -TRCP-ROC1) were added to the
reaction shown in lane 1. SCFHOS/ -TRCP-ROC1 was omitted
in lanes 4, 7, and 10, while E2 was omitted in lane 13. The reaction
was incubated for 60 min, and the products were separated by SDS-8.5%
PAGE. The autoradiogram is shown.
|
|
Both Cdc34 and Ubc4 and -5 have been reported to function as an E2 for
the ubiquitination of I

B

(
8,
13,
30,
42,
44,
46,
50).
By expressing dominant negative mutants of
E2s, Gonan et al.
(
13) showed that both Ubc5 and Cdc34 were
involved in
signal-induced ubiquitination and degradation of I

B

.
While the
above results are in accord with previous studies, they
did demonstrate
that Cdc34 and Ubc4 and -5 produce distinct conjugate
patterns. Cdc34
appeared to predominantly promote synthesis of
polyubiquitin chains,
but not mono- and diubiquitinated substrate
species. However, Ubc4 and
-5 seemed to be more efficient than
Cdc34 in engaging the
ubiquitination of I

B

, albeit resulting
in the accumulation of
mono- and diubiquitin conjugates. It is
presently not understood
whether a mechanism exists in cells to
coordinate these two different
classes of E2s to catalyze the
efficient and extensive
polyubiquitination of I

B

.
The N terminus of CUL1 binds Skp1, but not ROC1, and is inactive in
supporting Ub ligation.
The above results establish that
SCFHOS/
-TRCP-ROC1 coordinates with Cdc34 to catalyze
polyubiquitination reactions. The fact that the Ub ligase activity
resides within the ROC1-CUL1 subcomplex of the E3 holoenzyme (30,
38, 44) implies that the core ligase module must interact with
Cdc34 to catalyze efficient Ub transfer and chain polymerization. To
determine structural domains required for the assembly of the ROC1-CUL1
core Ub ligase, we employed deletion analysis to define regions within
CUL1 required for interacting with Skp1 and ROC1, as well as for the
activation of the Ub ligase activity.
Treatment of extracts of 293T cells containing
35S-labeled
Flag-CUL1, HA-ROC1, and Skp1 with either anti-Flag (Fig.
3A, lane
1) or anti-HA (lane 7) antibodies resulted in coprecipitation
of all
three proteins. This result is consistent with previous
findings
indicating that CUL1/Cdc53 is capable of simultaneously
binding both
Skp1 and ROC1 (
19,
30,
38,
40,
44). However,
anti-Flag
immunoprecipitation of extracts containing overexpressed
HA-ROC1, Skp1,
and a Flag-tagged CUL1 N-terminal fragment (spanning
amino acids 1 to
452) yielded Skp1, but not HA-ROC1 (lane 2).
This finding was confirmed
by a reciprocal immunoprecipitation
experiment with anti-HA antibodies,
which failed to detect Flag-CUL1
(1 to 452) or Skp1 (lane 8). Thus,
ROC1 interacts with neither
Skp1 nor the N terminus of CUL1.


View larger version (3629K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
The N terminus of CUL1 binds Skp1, but not ROC1. (A)
Immunoprecipitation analysis of the CUL1 N-terminal polypeptide for its
interaction with Skp1 and ROC1. 293T cells were transfected with
various combinations of full-length Flag-CUL1, Flag-CUL1 (1 to 452),
HA-ROC1, and Skp1. 35S-labeled extracts (approximately 0.2 mg of protein) were immunoprecipitated by using Flag (lanes 1 to 6),
HA (lanes 7 to 12), or Skp1 (lanes 13 to 14) antibodies, and
immunoprecipitates were separated by SDS-12.5% PAGE followed by
autoradiography. (B) Immunoprecipitation and immunoblot analyses of the
CUL1 N-terminal protein for its interaction with endogenous SCF-ROC1
components. Approximately 1 mg of extract protein was
immunoprecipitated by M2 antibody cross-linked beads, and the resulting
precipitates were examined by immunoblot analysis for the presence of
Flag-tagged CUL1 derivatives, Skp1, HA-tagged ROC1, endogenous ROC1,
and -TRCP.
|
|
Several additional points were revealed by this immunoprecipitation
experiment. First, the full-length CUL1 protein interacted
with HA-ROC1
in the absence of overexpressed recombinant Skp1
(lanes 3 and 9).
Second, CUL1 bound Skp1 regardless of the presence
of ROC1 (lane 4).
Third, Flag-CUL1 (1 to 452) formed a complex
with endogenous Skp1 (lane
5), consistent with the previous finding
that the N terminus of Cdc53
is required for Skp1 binding (
32).
Detection of the
interaction between CUL1 (1 to 452) or CUL1 and
endogenous Skp1 (Fig.
3B) is due to the presence of high levels
of Skp1 in 293T cells
(
54). Lastly, immunoprecipitation with
anti-Skp1 antibodies
confirmed a direct interaction between Skp1
and CUL1 (lane 14) or CUL1
(1 to 452) (lane
13).
Further immunoprecipitation and immunoblot analyses were carried out to
better assess the ability of the recombinant CUL1
or CUL1 (1 to 452) to
interact with the endogenous SCF-ROC1 components.
As shown in Fig.
3B,
both CUL1 and CUL1 (1 to 452) interacted
with Skp1 independent of
transfection of the Skp1-expressing plasmid.
In addition, they were
both associated with the endogenous

-TRCP,
which appeared as a
doublet of proteins at 58 to 60 kDa (
47).
In cells
transiently expressing Flag-CUL1 and HA-ROC1,

-TRCP
was complexed
with Flag-CUL1 in levels significantly higher than
those derived from
other transfected cells (compare lane 3 with
the rest). The reason for
this discrepancy is not clear. Contrary
to their comparable capacity to
interact with both Skp1 and

-TRCP,
the full-length CUL1, but not
CUL1 (1 to 452), was able to bind
both recombinant and endogenous
ROC1.
Taken together, these results demonstrate that CUL1 interacts with Skp1
and ROC1 through distinct domains and that the N terminus
of CUL1 is
both necessary and sufficient for binding Skp1. Therefore,
CUL1
recruits the F-box substrate-targeting protein through Skp1
at its N
terminus.
We next examined the ability of the full-length and N-terminal CUL1s to
support substrate-independent Ub ligation by using
a
32P-Ub-incorporation assay as previously established
(
44). Incubation
of purified E1, Cdc34, and
SCF
HOS/
-TRCP-ROC1 with [
32P]-Ub resulted
in the formation of a protein ladder of
32P-labeled Ub
polymers in an E1-Cdc34-dependent manner (Fig.
4A,
lanes
1 to 4), consistent with previously reported observations
(
44). As shown, the synthesized Ub polymers, ranging in size
from dimers to octamers, migrated identically to those produced
by
E2-25K/E1 (compare lanes 4 and 5). E2-25K is known to be capable
of
polymerizing unanchored Ub chains (
6). Of note, the addition
of SCF
HOS/
-TRCP-ROC1 did not further enhance the ability
of E2-25K to catalyze
Ub polymerization (data not shown), suggesting
that these two
enzymes do not cooperate. These results thus confirm
that the
human SCF
HOS/
-TRCP-ROC1-Cdc34 ligase system
catalyzes Ub self-polymerization. Significant
cellular levels of
unanchored polyubiquitin chains have been previously
identified
(
14,
41,
45). The mechanism and biological significance
of
this self-ligation reaction is presently unclear. However,
this
reaction obviates the requirement for a specific substrate,
thus
providing a sensitive assay to measure the Ub ligase activity
by Cdc34
and ROC1-CUL1.



View larger version (396023K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
The N terminus of CUL1 is devoid of Ub ligase-activating
activity and inhibits TNF -induced degradation of I B . (A)
Substrate-independent Ub self-polymerization catalyzed by Cdc34 and
SCFHOS/ -TRCP-ROC1. The Ub ligation assay was carried out
with indicated components as described in Materials and Methods.
Aliquots of the reaction products were separated by SDS-7.5% and
12.5% PAGE. The autoradiogram of the 7.5% gel is shown at the top,
while a region of the autoradiogram of the 12.5% gel is shown at the
bottom. The numbers on the right indicate the polymerization status of
the ligation products. (B) The N terminus of CUL1 is devoid of Ub
ligase-activating activity. Three levels of 35S-labeled
extracts containing HA-ROC1 and Flag-CUL1 (lanes 3, 4, and 5) or
Flag-CUL1 (1 to 452) (lanes 7, 8, and 9), corresponding to 0.07, 0.21, and 0.7 mg of total proteins, respectively, were immunoprecipitated by
Flag antibodies. In each titration set, the molar amounts of
full-length CUL1 and the truncated protein in the immunoprecipitates
were approximately equal, based on quantitation of the
35S-labeled polypeptides by phosphorimager analysis. The
immunoprecipitates were assayed for Ub ligase activity as described in
Materials and Methods. Aliquots of the reaction products were separated
by SDS-7.5% and 12.5% PAGE. The numbers in the middle indicate the
polymerization status of the ligation products. The autoradiogram of
the 7.5% gel is shown at the top, while a region of the autoradiogram
of the 12.5% gel is shown at the bottom. The autoradiogram from the
7.5% gel was exposed for three times as long as that from the 12.5%
gel. (C) Overexpression of CUL1 (1 to 452) inhibits the degradation of
I B . TNF -induced degradation of Flag-I B in HeLa cells was
carried out as described in Materials and Methods. One hundred
micrograms of extract proteins was separated by SDS-10% PAGE and was
subjected to immunoblot analysis by using M2 antibody.
|
|
It has been reported that in yeast, ROC1 complexed with either SCF or
Cdc53 (CUL1 homologue) alone, can catalyze extensive
autoubiquitination
of Cdc34 (
2,
38,
40). However, only
low levels of
autoubiquitination of Cdc34 by the human
SCF
HOS/
-TRCP-ROC1 complex were detected by immunoblot
analysis (data not shown).
Nevertheless, we cannot rule out that the
high-molecular-weight
Ub ligation products (with molecular weight
greater than that
of Ub9) contained autoubiquitinated
Cdc34.
The addition of a reaction mixture containing
32P-Ub, E1,
and Cdc34 to the
35S-labeled HA-ROC1/Flag-CUL1 complex,
immobilized to anti-Flag-protein
A beads, resulted in the synthesis of
32P-labeled Ub polymers (Fig.
4B, lanes 1 to 5). The
synthesis of
Ub polymers by ROC1-CUL1 required the presence of Cdc34
(lane
6). Substitution of the HA-ROC1/Flag-CUL1 complex with the
Flag-CUL1
(1 to 452) immunoprecipitates abolished Ub polymerization
reaction
(Fig.
4B, lanes 7 to 9). These results demonstrate that the N
terminus of CUL1, incapable of binding ROC1, is also catalytically
inactive in supporting Ub
ligation.
We have previously established that the SCF components HOS/

-TRCP and
CUL1 are required for the degradation of I

B in HeLa
cells induced by
TNF

(
12). The results shown in the present
study indicate
that CUL1 and CUL1 (1 to 452) interacted with endogenous
SCF-ROC1
components to form SCF
-TRCP-ROC1 or
SCF
-TRCP complexes lacking ROC1, respectively (Fig.
3B).
Based on our
previous finding that the SCF
HOS/
-TRCP
complex lacking ROC1 binds I

B

but does not support I

B

ubiquitination
(
44), we reasoned that expression of CUL1 (1 to 452) in cells
would block the degradation of I

B. To test this
possibility,
we examined the levels of I

B

by immunoblot analysis
in TNF

-induced
cells that were transfected with CMV-based vectors
expressing
Flag-I

B

and either the full-length or the N-terminal
fragment
(amino acids 1 to 452) of CUL1. The results indicate that
TNF
induced degradation of I

B

in the presence of vector alone
(Fig.
4C, upper panel, lanes 2 and 3) or recombinant CUL1 (lanes 4 and
5). This result suggests that the assembled
SCF
-TRCP-ROC1 complex containing the recombinant
full-length CUL1 detected
in Fig.
3B is functional in promoting the
I

B

degradation. In
contrast, introduction of CUL1 (1 to 452) into
cells significantly
reduced Flag-I

B

degradation (lanes 6 and 7).
Under these conditions,
the levels of PCNA remained unchanged (Fig.
4C,
lower panel),
excluding the possibility of any nonspecific effects that
might
influence the levels of I

B

detected. Furthermore,
overexpression
of CUL1 (1 to 452) inhibited the degradation of
endogenous I

B
as well (data not shown). These results establish
that CUL1 (1
to 452) exerts a dominant negative effect by forming SCF
complexes
lacking ROC1 that bind phosphorylated I

B but which are
unable
to catalyze its
ubiquitination.
These data collectively demonstrate that the N terminus of CUL1
provides an anchorage site for Skp1, which recruits a given
F-box
protein, capable of targeting its cognate substrates. This
region
alone, however, is devoid of ROC1-binding activity and,
hence, is
inactive in supporting Ub ligation and degradation of
a physiological
substrate.
ROC1 forms a complex with the C terminus of CUL1, that includes the
cullin/APC2 consensus region, to catalyze Ub polymerization.
To
determine the role of the C terminus of CUL1 in ubiquitination, we
expressed a Flag-tagged CUL1 fragment spanning amino acids 324 to 776 in 293T cells. Immunoprecipitation with anti-Flag antibodies detected
this C-terminal species, which migrated as a doublet at apparent
molecular weights of ~50 and 60 kDa (Fig. 5A, lane 7). Further experiments are
required to determine whether this heterogeneity derives from protein
modification or degradation. When Flag-CUL1 (324 to 776) and HA-ROC1
were coexpressed, the two formed a complex, as demonstrated by
reciprocal immunoprecipitations with either anti-HA (lane 5) or
anti-Flag (lane 10) antibodies. Phosphorimager analysis indicated that
Flag-CUL1 (324 to 776) bound to ROC1 with an efficiency equal to that
observed with the full-length CUL1 (lanes 4 and 9). Like the
full-length protein, Flag-CUL1 (324 to 776) interacted with ROC1 in
both recombinant and endogenous forms (Fig. 5B, lanes 2 and 3).
Furthermore, this C-terminal polypeptide did not bind Skp1. In
contrast, Flag-CUL1 (1 to 452) interacted with Skp1, but not ROC1 (Fig.
5B, lane 4), which is consistent with observations shown in Fig. 3B. As
expected, anti-Flag immunoprecipitates derived from untransfected cells did not contain SCF-ROC1 components (Fig. 5B, lane 1).



View larger version (362431K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
The C terminus of CUL1 interacts with ROC1 in a region
that includes the cullin/APC2 consensus motif. (A) Immunoprecipitation
analysis of Flag-CUL1 (324 to 776). 293T cells were transfected with
HA-ROC1, Flag-CUL1, or Flag-CUL1 (324 to 776), alone or in combination.
35S-labeled extracts (approximately 0.2 mg of protein) were
immunoprecipitated with HA (lanes 1 to 5) or Flag antibodies
(lanes 6 to 10). Immunoprecipitates were separated by SDS-12.5% PAGE
followed by autoradiography. (B) Immunoprecipitation and immunoblot
analyses of Flag-CUL1 (324 to 776). Approximately 1 mg of extract
protein was immunoprecipitated by M2 antibody cross-linked beads, and
the resulting precipitates were examined by immunoblot analysis for the
presence of Flag-tagged CUL1 derivatives, Skp1, HA-ROC1 and endogenous
ROC1. (C) The ROC1 binding domain coincides with the cullin/APC2
homology region. 293T cells were transfected with CMV-based vectors
expressing HA-ROC1, Flag-CUL1, Flag-CUL1 (1 to 452), Flag-CUL1 (1 to
544), or Flag-CUL1 (1 to 645), alone or in combination.
35S-labeled extracts (approximately 0.6 mg of protein) were
immunoprecipitated with Flag antibodies, and the immunoprecipitates
were separated by SDS-12.5% PAGE. The portion of the gel containing
both Skp1 and HA-ROC1 was exposed for four times as long as that
containing CUL1.
|
|
Previously described sequence analysis identified a cullin/Cdc53/APC2
region of homology at the C terminus spanning approximately
200 amino
acids (the cullin box) (
51,
52). In CUL1, the cullin
box is
located between amino acids 450 and 650. The apparent overlap
between
the cullin box and the ROC1-binding domain (Fig.
5A) prompted
us to
examine the intriguing possibility that this conserved cullin
box is
the region responsible for ROC1 binding. For this purpose,
we expressed
two additional Flag-tagged truncated CUL1 polypeptides
spanning amino
acids 1 to 544 and 1 to 645, respectively, in 293T
cells.
Immunoprecipitation experiments with anti-Flag antibodies
indicate that
both truncated proteins interacted specifically
with endogenous Skp1,
though each truncated CUL1 protein was bound
to Skp1 with lower
efficiency than that of the wild type (Fig.
5C, lanes 1 to 5). However,
while full-length CUL1 and Flag-CUL1
(1 to 645) were found complexed
with both Skp1 and HA-ROC1 (Fig.
5C, lanes 1 and 4, respectively),
neither Flag-CUL1 (1 to 452)
nor Flag-CUL1 (1 to 544) interacted with
ROC1 (lanes 2 and 3,
respectively). Of note, Flag-CUL1 (1 to 645) bound
to HA-ROC1
with an efficiency 3.3-fold lower than that of the conjugate
containing
the full-length CUL1 (compare lanes 1 and 4; determined by
phosphorimager
analysis), suggesting that the C-terminal 130 amino
acids of CUL1
may play a role in stabilizing the ROC1 binding.
Furthermore,
a truncated CUL1 protein (amino acids 452 to 776) was
found to
be able to bind ROC1 (data not shown), suggesting that a
sequence
stretch spanning amino acids 324 to 452 (upstream of the
cullin
box) is also dispensable for ROC1 binding. Taken together, these
results suggest that the ROC1-binding domain coincides with the
conserved cullin box (see Fig.
7).
The rate of synthesis of Ub ligation products was examined and compared
in the presence of immunopurified HA-ROC1/Flag-CUL1
(Fig.
6A, left panel, lanes 1 to 5) or
HA-ROC1/Flag-CUL1 (324
to 776) (left panel, lanes 6 to 10) complex.
With HA-ROC1/Flag-CUL1,
multiple high-molecular-weight species were
formed after 3 min
of incubation and increased over time (left panel,
lanes 2 to
5). An approximately 50%-higher rate of Ub ligation was
observed
with HA-ROC1/Flag-CUL1 (324 to 776) in comparison to
HA-ROC1/Flag-CUL1
(left panel, lanes 7 to 10; see right panel for
quantitation).
Further experiments indicated that the presence of both
ROC1 and
CUL1 or CUL (324 to 776) is required for the assembly of the
active
Ub ligase complex (Fig.
6B). Low levels of Ub ligase activity
observed with extracts from cells transfected with HA-ROC1 alone
(Fig.
6B, lane 3) are due to the presence of a small amount of
endogenous
CUL1 in the immunoprecipitates (data not shown). Furthermore,
CUL1 (1 to 544), which was incapable of binding ROC1, was also
inactive in
supporting Ub ligation (Fig.
6C), suggesting that
the integrity of the
cullin box is required for both ROC1 binding
and Ub ligase activation.
The low expression of CUL (1 to 645)
and CUL1 (452 to 776) in
transfected 293T cells (approximately
10-fold lower than the expression
of the full-length CUL1) failed
to yield levels of protein sufficient
for measuring Ub ligase
activity.

View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
The C terminus of CUL1 fully supports Ub ligation. (A)
Flag-CUL1 (324 to 776) complexes with ROC1 to catalyze Ub ligation. The
HA immunoprecipitates of 35S-labeled extracts
(approximately 0.3 mg of total protein) containing HA-ROC1 and
Flag-CUL1 (lanes 1 to 5) or Flag-CUL1 (324 to 776) (lanes 6 to 10) were
assayed for Ub ligase activity (as shown on the left). The reaction was
terminated at the time points indicated. The autoradiogram is shown.
Equal molar mounts of Flag-CUL1 and Flag-CUL1 (324 to 776) were present
in the immunoprecipitates, as determined by phosphorimager analysis of
the 35S-labeled polypeptides. Quantitation of Ub ligation
products (molecular masses greater than 70 kDa) is shown on the right.
(B) Both CUL1 (324 to 776) and HA-ROC1 are required for Ub ligation.
HA-ROC1, Flag-CUL1, and Flag-CUL1 (324 to 776), alone or in
combination, were transfected into 293T cells. 35S-labeled
extracts (approximately 0.3 mg of total protein) were
immunoprecipitated with HA antibodies and were assayed for ligase
activity. (C) CUL1 (1 to 544) is inactive in supporting Ub ligation.
35S-labeled extracts containing HA-ROC1/Flag-CUL1 (lane 1)
or HA-ROC1/Flag-CUL1 (1 to 544) (lanes 2 and 3) were immunoprecipitated
with Flag antibodies and were assayed for ligase activity. The
immunoprecipitates used in lane 2 contained an equal molar amount of
Flag-CUL1 (1 to 544) (derived from approximately 0.2 mg of total
extract protein) compared to the Flag-CUL1 used in lane 1. A 0.6-mg
sample of extract protein containing Flag-CUL1 (1 to 544) was used in
lane 3.
|
|
We conclude from these results that ROC1 binds the C terminus of CUL1
(amino acids 324 to 776) and that this complex is sufficient
to
catalyze Ub ligation. The interaction of these two proteins
is most
likely mediated by direct contact between ROC1 and the
cullin box
within CUL1. However, further experiments are required
to determine
whether the cullin box alone is sufficient to activate
Ub ligase
activity.
 |
DISCUSSION |
The kinetic analysis in the present study reveals that the
SCFHOS/
-TRCP-ROC1-Cdc34 ligase system rapidly catalyzes
the initial Ub transfer and subsequent polymerization onto a model
substrate, phosphorylated I
B
. While both Cdc34 and Ubc4 and -5 support I
B
ubiquitination, they produce distinct conjugate
patterns. Cdc34 appeared to predominantly promote the synthesis of
polyubiquitin chains, but not mono- and diubiquitinated substrate
species. However, Ubc4 and -5 seemed to be more efficient in engaging
the ubiquitination of I
B
when compared to Cdc34, albeit resulting
in the accumulation of mono- and diubiquitin conjugates.
Our previous reconstitution experiments have revealed that Skp1 is
indispensable for tethering HOS/
-TRCP to CUL1 (44). The
results of deletion analysis indicate that the N terminus of CUL1
(amino acids 1 to 452) is both necessary and sufficient for binding
Skp1, and hence HOS/
-TRCP. Consistent with this, introduction of the
N-terminal CUL1 polypeptide into cells blocks the TNF
-induced and
SCF-mediated degradation of I
B by disrupting the endogenous SCF-ROC1
complexes. These observations confirm and extend the previous finding
that deletion of Cdc53 (residues 9 to 280) completely disrupts
Skp1-F-box protein binding in budding yeast cells (32). Our
mapping analysis has localized the C terminus of CUL1 (amino acids 342 to 776) as the region responsible for interaction with ROC1, resulting
in the assembly of a complex fully active in supporting ubiquitin
polymerization. This interaction is most likely mediated by a direct
contact between ROC1 and the cullin/APC2 consensus motif. Taken
together, these results suggest the mode of action of SCF-ROC1 in
ubiquitination (see Fig. 8A). In this model, CUL1 serves as a
dual-function molecule: the N terminus binds Skp1, which then recruits
the F-box protein for targeting a phosphorylated substrate, and the
C-terminal region, including the cullin box, binds ROC1, leading to the
assembly of a Ub ligase, which interacts with Cdc34 to catalyze
Ub transfer and polymerization.
Mutagenesis studies have shown that the conserved RING-H2 residues
within ROC1 are critical for ubiquitination (19, 30, 40),
implicating a role of the RING finger structure in contacting Cdc34.
More-recent studies have uncovered a large number of
RING-finger-containing proteins, including c-Cbl (18) and
BRCA1 (25), that possess Ub ligase activity. As shown in
Fig. 6C, ROC1 and CUL1 are both important for ubiquitin ligase
activity. The identification of the core ligase formed between ROC1 and
the C terminus of CUL1 should enable further detailed structural
analysis, leading to the elucidation of the enzymatic action of
the ubiquitin ligation reaction.
Previous studies have established that the human ROC1 binds five
members of the cullin family (CUL1, CUL2, CUL3, CUL4A, and CUL4B),
while ROC2 preferentially interacts with CUL5 (30). In
addition, the ROC homologue APC11 binds APC2 (30). The
localization of the ROC1-binding domain to the cullin box of CUL1
suggests a structural conservation in the assembly of a core
ROC/APC11-cullin/APC2 complex through this conserved region.
Furthermore, our data strongly suggests the interaction between ROC1
and the cullin box of CUL1 is required for the activation of the Ub
ligase activity (Fig. 7), implying that
other ROC-CUL complexes may contain Ub ligase activity as well. Indeed,
both ROC1-CUL2 (unpublished data) and APC11-APC2 (30),
assembled in transfected cells, are capable of catalyzing Ub ligation
reactions in vitro.

View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
Structural domains within the human CUL1 protein. A
schematic representation of the truncated human CUL1 polypeptides
analyzed is shown on the left. Structural and functional features of
CUL1 are also shown. A summary of Skp1 and ROC1 binding as well as the
Ub ligase activity of full-length and truncated CUL1 polypeptides is
shown on the right. Note that CUL1 (1 to 645), marked by an asterisk,
binds to ROC1 threefold less efficiently than the full-length protein
(see Fig. 5C).
|
|
We, therefore, propose a unified framework depicting the action of the
ROC/APC11-dependent super-family of E3 ligases (Fig. 8B). Members of this E3 class each
contain a common dimeric core Ub ligase element formed by combinatorial
interactions between the ROC/APC11 and CUL/APC2 family proteins (Fig.
8, left). This core ligase module is recruited, via an adapter protein,
to form a complex with a substrate-targeting molecule (Fig. 8B,
middle). The resulting multisubunit E3 holoenzyme binds the substrate
and catalyzes its ubiquitination in the presence of an E2 (Fig. 8B, right). The Skp1-F-box based SCF model is one such pathway that recruits the ROC1-CUL1 core Ub ligase to catalyze the ubiquitination of
phosphorylated substrate proteins, such as I
B
. There is
accumulating evidence that this mechanism may also apply to the pVHL
complex. pVHL, which targets HIF
-subunits for oxygen-dependent
degradation (27), forms a complex that structurally
resembles the SCF-ROC1 complex (19, 43) and also contains Ub
ligase activity (23). More recently, the N terminus of CUL2
has been shown to bind the elongin BC dimer, which interacts with pVHL
(34). The underlying similarity between CUL2 and CUL1 (this
study) suggests a general dual functional role for cullin molecules in
substrate targeting and Ub ligation. Using the N terminus of these
cullin molecules as bait may identify Skp1-like molecules that link
respective substrate-targeting molecules, leading to the identification
of novel ubiquitination and degradation pathways. Lastly, APC,
comprised of 8 to 12 subunits (35), exhibits a greater
degree of structural complexity than SCF-ROC1. Understanding the
assembly of this E3 ligase requires a more detailed biochemical
characterization of the APC subunits.

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 8.
(A) Proposed structural organization of SCF-ROC1 and
interactions between components of the E3 complex and the substrate as
well as Cdc34. (B) A proposed molecular framework for the
ROC-APC11-dependent Ub ligases. Note that the VCB-CUL2-ROC1 complex
refers to the pVHL tumor suppressor complex containing pVHL, elongins C
and B, CUL2, and ROC1. See the text for a description of the model
presented.
|
|
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank T. Ohta, Y. Xiong, and G. Fang for providing purified
Ubc5 and Ubc4 proteins; J. W. Harper for providing
-TRCP
antibodies; J. Hurwitz for helpful discussion; and S. Santagata for
critical reading of the manuscript.
Z.-Q.P. was supported by the Life and Health Insurance Medical Research
Fund, the New York Community Trust, and the Irma T. Hirschl Award. This
study was supported by Public Health Service grants CA78419 to Z.R. and
GM55059 to Z.-Q.P.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Derald H. Ruttenberg Cancer Center, The Mount Sinai School, of Medicine, One
Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY 10029-6574. Phone: (212) 659-5500. Fax: (212) 849-2446. E-mail:
ZQ_Pan{at}SMTPlink.mssm.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Aberle, H.,
A. Bauer,
J. Stappert,
A. Kispert, and R. Kemler.
1997.
-Catenin is a target for the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway.
EMBO J.
16:3797-3804[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Banerjee, A.,
L. Gregori,
Y. Xu, and V. Chau.
1993.
The bacterially expressed yeast cdc34 gene product can undergo autoubiquitination to form a multiubiquitin chain-linked protein.
J. Biol. Chem.
268:5668-5675[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Beg, A. A.,
S. M. Ruben,
R. I. Scheinman,
S. Haskill,
C. A. Rosen, and A. S. Baldwin, Jr.
1992.
I B interacts with the nuclear localization sequences of the subunits of NF- B: a mechanism for cytoplasmic retention.
Genes Dev.
6:1899-1913[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Beg, A. A.,
T. S. Finco,
P. V. Nantermet, and A. S. J. Baldwin.
1993.
Tumor necrosis factor and interleukin-1 lead to phosphorylation and loss of I B: a mechanism for NF- B activation.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13:3301-3310[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Brown, K.,
S. Gerstberger,
L. Carlson,
G. Fransozo, and U. Siebenlist.
1995.
Control of I B proteolysis by site-specific, signal-induced phosphorylation.
Science
267:1485-1488[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Chen, Z., and C. M. Pickart.
1990.
A 25-kilodalton ubiquitin carrier protein (E2) catalyzes multi-ubiquitin chain via K48 of ubiquitin.
J. Biol. Chem.
265:21835-21842[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Chen, Z.,
J. Hagler,
V. J. Palombella,
F. Melandri,
D. Scherer,
D. Ballard, and T. Maniatis.
1995.
Signal-induced site-specific phosphorylation targets I B to the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway.
Genes Dev.
9:1586-1597[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Chen, Z. J.,
L. Parent, and T. Maniatis.
1996.
Site-specific phosphorylation of IkappaBalpha by a novel ubiquitination-dependent protein kinase activity.
Cell
84:853-862[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 9.
|
DiDonato, J. A.,
M. Hayakawa,
D. M. Rothwarf,
E. Zandi, and M. Karin.
1997.
A cytokine-responsive I B kinase that activates the transcription factor NF- B.
Nature
388:548-554[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Duan, H.,
Y. Wang,
M. Aviram,
M. Swaroop,
J. A. Loo,
J. Bian,
Y. Tian,
T. Mueller,
C. L. Bisgaier, and Y. Sun.
1999.
SAG, a novel zinc RING finger protein that protects cells from apoptosis induced by redox agents.
Mol. Cell Biol.
19:3145-3155[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Feldman, R. M. R.,
C. C. Correll,
K. B. Kaplan, and R. J. Deshaies.
1997.
A complex of Cdc4p, Skp1p, and Cdc53p/Cullin catalyzes ubiquitination of the phosphorylated CDK inhibitor Sic1p.
Cell
91:221-230[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Fuchs, S. Y.,
A. Chen,
Y. Xiong,
Z.-Q. Pan, and Z. Ronai.
1999.
HOS, a human homologue of Slimb, forms an SCF complex with Skp1 and Cullin 1 and targets the phosphorylation-dependent degradation of I B and -catenin.
Oncogene
18:2039-2046[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Gonen, H.,
B. Bercovich,
A. Orian,
A. Carrano,
C. Takizawa,
K. Yamanaka,
M. Pagano,
K. Iwai, and A. Ciechanover.
1999.
Identification of the ubiquitin carrier proteins, E2s, involved in signal-induced conjugation and subsequent degradation of IkappaBalpha.
J. Biol. Chem.
274:14823-14830[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Halderman, M. T.,
D. Finley, and C. M. Pickart.
1995.
Dynamics of ubiquitin conjugation during erythroid differentiation in vitro.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:9507-9516[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Hatakeyama, S.,
M. Kitagawa,
K. Nakayama,
M. Shirane,
M. Matsumoto,
K. Hattori,
H. Higashi,
H. Nakano,
K. Okumura,
K. Onoe,
R. A. Good, and K. Nakayama.
1999.
Ubiquitin-dependent degradation of IkappaBalpha is mediated by a ubiquitin ligase Skp1/Cul 1/F-box protein FWD1.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
96:3859-3863[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Hershko, A.,
H. Heller,
S. Elias, and A. Ciechanover.
1983.
Components of ubiquitin-protein ligase system. Resolution, affinity purification, and role in protein breakdown.
J. Biol. Chem.
258:8206-8214[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 17.
|
Hershko, A., and A. Ciechanover.
1998.
The ubiquitin system.
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
67:425-479[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Joazeiro, C. A.,
S. S. Wing,
H. Huang,
J. D. Leverson,
T. Hunter, and Y. C. Liu.
1999.
The Tyrosine kinase negative regulator c-Cbl as a RING-Type, E2-Dependent ubiquitin-protein ligase.
Science
286:309-312[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Kamura, T.,
D. M. Koepp,
M. N. Conrad,
D. Skowyra,
R. J. Moreland,
O. Iliopoulos,
W. S. Lane,
W. G. Kaelin, Jr.,
S. J. Elledge,
R. C. Conaway,
J. W. Harper, and J. W. Conaway.
1999.
Rbx1, a component of the VHL tumor suppressor complex and SCF ubiquitin ligase.
Science
284:657-661[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Kitagawa, K.,
D. Skowyra,
S. J. Elledge,
J. W. Harper, and P. Hieter.
1999.
SGT1 encodes an essential component of the yeast kinetochore assembly pathway and a novel subunit of the SCF ubiquitin ligase complex.
Mol. Cell
4:21-33[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Laney, J. D., and M. Hochstrasser.
1999.
Substrate targeting in the ubiquitin system.
Cell
97:427-430[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Latres, E,
D. S. Chiaur, and M. Pagano.
1999.
The human F box protein beta-Trcp associates with the Cul1/Skp1 complex and regulates the stability of -catenin.
Oncogene
18:849-854[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 23.
|
Lisztwan, J.,
G. Imbert,
C. Wirbelauer,
M. Gstaiger, and W. Krek.
1999.
The von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor protein is a component of an E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase activity.
Genes Dev.
13:1822-1833[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
Lonergan, K. M.,
O. Iliopoulos,
M. Ohh,
T. Kamura,
R. C. Conaway,
J. W. Conaway, and W. G. Kaelin, Jr.
1998.
Regulation of hypoxia-inducible mRNAs by the von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor protein requires binding to complexes containing elongins B/C and Cul2.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:732-741[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Lorick, K. L.,
J. P. Jensen,
S. Fang,
A. M. Ong,
S. Hatakeyama, and A. M. Weissman.
1999.
RING fingers mediate ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme (E2)-dependent ubiquitination.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
96:11364-11369[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Maniatis, T.
1999.
A ubiquitin ligase complex essential for the NF-kappaB, Wnt/Wingless, and Hedgehog signaling pathways.
Genes Dev.
13:505-510[Free Full Text].
|
| 27.
|
Maxwell, P. H.,
M. S. Wiesener,
G. W. Chang,
S. C. Clifford,
E. C. Vaux,
M. E. Cockman,
C. C. Wykoff,
C. W. Pugh,
E. R. Maher, and P. J. Ratcliffe.
1999.
The tumour suppressor protein VHL targets hypoxia-inducible factors for oxygen-dependent proteolysis.
Nature
399:271-275[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 28.
|
Mercurio, F.,
H. Zhu,
B. W. Murray,
A. Shevchenko,
B. L. Bennett,
J. Li,
D. B. Young,
M. Barbosa, and M. Mann.
1997.
IKK-1 and IKK-2: cytokine-activated I B kinases essential for NF- B activation.
Science
278:860-866[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 29.
|
Michel, J., and Y. Xiong.
1998.
Human CUL-1, but not other cullin family members, selectively interacts with SKP1 to form a complex with SKP2 and cyclin A.
Cell Growth Differ.
9:439-445.
|
| 30.
|
Ohta, T.,
J. J. Michel,
A. J. Schottelius, and Y. Xiong.
1999.
ROC1, a homolog of APC11, represents a family of cullin partners with an associated ubiquitin ligase activity.
Mol. Cell
3:535-541[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 31.
|
Palombella, V. J.,
O. J. Rando,
A. L. Goldberg, and T. Maniatis.
1994.
The ubiquitin proteasome pathway is required for processing the NF-kappa B1 precursor protein and the activation of NF-kappa B.
Cell
78:773-785[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 32.
|
Patton, E. E.,
A. Willems,
D. Sa,
L. Kuras,
D. Thomas,
K. L. Craig, and M. Tyers.
1998.
Cdc53 is a scaffold protein for multiple Cdc34/Skp1/F-box protein complexes that regulate cell division and methionine biosynthesis in yeast.
Genes Dev.
12:692-705[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 33.
|
Pause, A.,
S. Lee,
R. A. Worrell,
D. Y. Chen,
W. H. Burgess,
W. M. Linehan, and R. D. Klausner.
1997.
The von Hippel-Lindau tumor-suppressor gene product forms a stable complex with human CUL-2, a member of the Cdc53 family of proteins.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:2156-2161[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 34.
|
Pause, A.,
B. Peterson,
G. Schaffar,
R. Stearman, and R. D. Klausner.
1999.
Studying interactions of four proteins in the yeast two-hybrid system: structural resemblance of the pVHL/elongin BC/hCUL-2 complex with the ubiquitin ligase complex SKP1/cullin/F-box protein.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
96:9533-9538[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 35.
|
Peters, J.-M.,
R. W. King, and R. Deshaies.
1998.
Cell cycle control by ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis, p. 345-387.
In
J.-M. Peters, J. R. Harris, and D. Finley (ed.), Ubiquitin and the biology of the cell. Plenum Press, New York, N.Y.
|
| 36.
|
Regnier, C. H.,
H. Y. Song,
X. Gao,
D. V. Goeddel,
Z. Cao, and M. Rothe.
1997.
Identification and characterization of an I B kinase.
Cell
90:373-383[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 37.
|
Scherer, D. C.,
J. A. Brockman,
Z. Chen,
T. Maniatis, and D. W. Ballard.
1995.
Signal-induced degradation of I B requires site-specific ubiquitination.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92:11259-11263[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 38.
|
Seol, J. H.,
R. M. Feldman,
W. Zachariae,
A. Shevchenko,
C. C. Correll,
S. Lyapina,
Y. Chi,
M. Galova,
J. Claypool,
S. Sandmeyer,
K. Nasmyth, and R. J. Deshaies.
1999.
Cdc53/cullin and the essential hrt1 RING-H2 subunit of SCF define a ubiquitin ligase module hat activates the E2 enzyme cdc34.
Genes Dev.
13:1614-1626[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 39.
|
Skowyra, D.,
K. Craig,
M. Tyers,
S. J. Elledge, and J. W. Harper.
1997.
F-box proteins are receptors that recruit phosphorylated substrates to the SCF ubiquitin-ligase complex.
Cell
91:209-219[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 40.
|
Skowyra, D.,
D. M. Koepp,
T. Kamura,
M. N. Conrad,
R. C. Conaway,
J. W. Conaway,
S. J. Elledge, and J. W. Harper.
1999.
Reconstitution of G1 cyclin ubiquitination with complexes containing SCFGrr1 and rbx1.
Science
284:662-665[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 41.
|
Spence, J.,
S. Sadis,
A. L. Haas, and D. Finley.
1995.
A ubiquitin mutant with specific defects in DNA repair and multiubiquitination.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15:1265-1273[Abstract].
|
| 42.
|
Spencer, E.,
J. Jiang, and Z. J. Chen.
1999.
Signal-induced ubiquitination of I B by the F-box protein Slimb/ -TrCP.
Genes Dev.
13:284-294[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 43.
|
Stebbins, C. E.,
W. G. Kaelin, Jr., and N. P. Pavletich.
1999.
Structure of the VHL-ElonginC-ElonginB complex: implications for VHL tumor suppressor function.
Science
284:455-461[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 44.
|
Tan, P.,
S. Y. Fuchs,
A. Chen,
K. Wu,
C. Gomez,
Z. Ronai, and Z. Q. Pan.
1999.
Recruitment of a ROC1-CUL1 ubiquitin ligase by Skp1 and HOS to catalyze the ubiquitination of I B .
Mol. Cell
3:527-533[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 45.
|
Van Nocker, S., and R. D. Vierstra.
1993.
Multiubiquitin chains linked through lysine 48 are abundant in vivo and are competent intermediates in the ubiquitin proteolytic pathway.
J. Biol. Chem.
268:24766-24773[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 46.
|
Vuillard, L.,
J. Nicholson, and R. T. Hay.
1999.
A complex containing betaTrCP recruits Cdc34 to catalyze ubiquitination of IkappaBalpha.
FEBS Lett.
455:311-314[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 47.
|
Winston, J. T.,
P. Strack,
P. Beer-Romero,
C. Y. Chu,
S. J. Elledge, and J. W. Harper.
1999.
The SCF -TRCP-ubiquitin ligase complex associates specifically with phosphorylated destruction motifs in I B and -catenin and stimulates I B ubiquitination in vitro.
Genes Dev.
13:270-283[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 48.
|
Woronicz, J. D.,
X. Gao,
Z. Cao,
M. Rothe, and D. V. Goeddel.
1997.
I B kinase- : NF- B activation and complex formation with I B kinase- and NIK.
Science
278:866-869[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 49.
|
Yaron, A.,
H. Gonen,
I. Alkalay,
A. Hatzubai,
S. Jung,
S. Beyth,
F. Mercurio,
A. M. Manning,
A. Ciechanover, and Y. Ben-Neriah.
1997.
Inhibition of NF- B cellular function via specific targeting of the I B-ubiquitin ligase.
EMBO J.
16:6486-6494[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 50.
|
Yaron, A.,
A. Hatzubal,
M. Davis,
I. Lavon,
S. Amit,
A. M. Manning,
J. S. Andersen,
M. Mann,
F. Mercurio, and Y. Ben-Neriah.
1998.
Identification of the receptor component of the I B -ubiquitin ligase.
Nature
396:590-594[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 51.
|
Yu, H.,
J.-M. Peters,
R. W. King,
A. M. Page,
P. Hieter, and M. W. Kirschner.
1998.
Identification of a cullin homology region in a subunit of the anaphase-promoting complex.
Science
279:1219-1222[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 52.
|
Zachariae, W.,
A. Shevchenko,
P. D. Andrews,
R. Ciosk,
M. Galova,
M. J. R. Stark,
M. Mann, and K. Nasmyth.
1998.
Mass spectrometric analysis of the anaphase-promoting complex from yeast: identification of a subunit related to cullins.
Science
279:1216-1219[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 53.
|
Zandi, E.,
D. M. Rothwarf,
M. Delhase,
M. Hayakawa, and M. Karin.
1997.
The I B kinase complex (IKK) contains two kinase subunits, IKK and IKK , necessary for I B phosphorylation and NF- B activation.
Cell
91:243-252[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 54.
|
Zhang, H.,
R. Kobayashi,
K. Galaktionov, and D. Beach.
1995.
p19/Skp1 and p45/Skp2 are essential elements of the Cyclin A-Cdk2 S phase kinase.
Cell
82:915-925[CrossRef][Medline].
|
Molecular and Cellular Biology, February 2000, p. 1382-1393, Vol. 20, No. 4
0270-7306/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Isobe, T., Hattori, T., Kitagawa, K., Uchida, C., Kotake, Y., Kosugi, I., Oda, T., Kitagawa, M.
(2009). Adenovirus E1A Inhibits SCFFbw7 Ubiquitin Ligase. J. Biol. Chem.
284: 27766-27779
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Tan, M., Davis, S. W., Saunders, T. L., Zhu, Y., Sun, Y.
(2009). RBX1/ROC1 disruption results in early embryonic lethality due to proliferation failure, partially rescued by simultaneous loss of p27. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
106: 6203-6208
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Yamoah, K., Oashi, T., Sarikas, A., Gazdoiu, S., Osman, R., Pan, Z.-Q.
(2008). Autoinhibitory regulation of SCF-mediated ubiquitination by human cullin 1's C-terminal tail. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
105: 12230-12235
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Limon-Mortes, M. C., Mora-Santos, M., Espina, A., Pintor-Toro, J. A., Lopez-Roman, A., Tortolero, M., Romero, F.
(2008). UV-induced degradation of securin is mediated by SKP1-CUL1-{beta}TrCP E3 ubiquitin ligase. J. Cell Sci.
121: 1825-1831
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Manfiolli, A. O., Maragno, A. L. G.C., Baqui, M. M.A., Yokoo, S., Teixeira, F. R., Oliveira, E. B., Gomes, M. D.
(2008). FBXO25-associated Nuclear Domains: A Novel Subnuclear Structure. Mol. Biol. Cell
19: 1848-1861
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
He, H., Gu, Q., Zheng, M., Normolle, D., Sun, Y.
(2008). SAG/ROC2/RBX2 E3 ligase promotes UVB-induced skin hyperplasia, but not skin tumors, by simultaneously targeting c-Jun/AP-1 and p27. Carcinogenesis
29: 858-865
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Gazdoiu, S., Yamoah, K., Wu, K., Pan, Z.-Q.
(2007). Human Cdc34 Employs Distinct Sites To Coordinate Attachment of Ubiquitin to a Substrate and Assembly of Polyubiquitin Chains. Mol. Cell. Biol.
27: 7041-7052
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Wen, X., Duus, K. M., Friedrich, T. D., de Noronha, C. M. C.
(2007). The HIV1 Protein Vpr Acts to Promote G2 Cell Cycle Arrest by Engaging a DDB1 and Cullin4A-containing Ubiquitin Ligase Complex Using VprBP/DCAF1 as an Adaptor. J. Biol. Chem.
282: 27046-27057
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Meyer, L., Deau, B., Forejtnikova, H., Dumenil, D., Margottin-Goguet, F., Lacombe, C., Mayeux, P., Verdier, F.
(2007). {beta}-Trcp mediates ubiquitination and degradation of the erythropoietin receptor and controls cell proliferation. Blood
109: 5215-5222
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Gil-Bernabe, A. M., Romero, F., Limon-Mortes, M. C., Tortolero, M.
(2006). Protein Phosphatase 2A Stabilizes Human Securin, Whose Phosphorylated Forms Are Degraded via the SCF Ubiquitin Ligase.. Mol. Cell. Biol.
26: 4017-4027
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Gurtan, A. M., Stuckert, P., D'Andrea, A. D.
(2006). The WD40 Repeats of FANCL Are Required for Fanconi Anemia Core Complex Assembly. J. Biol. Chem.
281: 10896-10905
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Gazdoiu, S., Yamoah, K., Wu, K., Escalante, C. R., Tappin, I., Bermudez, V., Aggarwal, A. K., Hurwitz, J., Pan, Z.-Q.
(2005). Proximity-induced activation of human Cdc34 through heterologous dimerization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
102: 15053-15058
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ulane, C. M., Kentsis, A., Cruz, C. D., Parisien, J.-P., Schneider, K. L., Horvath, C. M.
(2005). Composition and Assembly of STAT-Targeting Ubiquitin Ligase Complexes: Paramyxovirus V Protein Carboxyl Terminus Is an Oligomerization Domain. J. Virol.
79: 10180-10189
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Miller, F., Kentsis, A., Osman, R., Pan, Z.-Q.
(2005). Inactivation of VHL by Tumorigenic Mutations That Disrupt Dynamic Coupling of the pVHL{middle dot}Hypoxia-inducible Transcription Factor-1{alpha} Complex. J. Biol. Chem.
280: 7985-7996
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Crane, R., Kloepfer, A., Ruderman, J. V.
(2004). Requirements for the destruction of human Aurora-A. J. Cell Sci.
117: 5975-5983
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Yan, Q., Kamura, T., Cai, Y., Jin, J., Ivan, M., Mushegian, A., Conaway, R. C., Conaway, J. W.
(2004). Identification of Elongin C and Skp1 Sequences That Determine Cullin Selection. J. Biol. Chem.
279: 43019-43026
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kuo, W.-L., Duke, C. J., Abe, M. K., Kaplan, E. L., Gomes, S., Rosner, M. R.
(2004). ERK7 Expression and Kinase Activity Is Regulated by the Ubiquitin-Proteosome Pathway. J. Biol. Chem.
279: 23073-23081
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Li, Y., Gazdoiu, S., Pan, Z.-Q., Fuchs, S. Y.
(2004). Stability of Homologue of Slimb F-box Protein Is Regulated by Availability of Its Substrate. J. Biol. Chem.
279: 11074-11080
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ke, P.-Y., Chang, Z.-F.
(2004). Mitotic Degradation of Human Thymidine Kinase 1 Is Dependent on the Anaphase-Promoting Complex/Cyclosome-Cdh1-Mediated Pathway. Mol. Cell. Biol.
24: 514-526
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Foster, J. S., Fernando, R. I., Ishida, N., Nakayama, K. I., Wimalasena, J.
(2003). Estrogens Down-regulate p27Kip1 in Breast Cancer Cells through Skp2 and through Nuclear Export Mediated by the ERK Pathway. J. Biol. Chem.
278: 41355-41366
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Wu, K., Yamoah, K., Dolios, G., Gan-Erdene, T., Tan, P., Chen, A., Lee, C.-g., Wei, N., Wilkinson, K. D., Wang, R., Pan, Z.-Q.
(2003). DEN1 Is a Dual Function Protease Capable of Processing the C Terminus of Nedd8 and Deconjugating Hyper-neddylated CUL1. J. Biol. Chem.
278: 28882-28891
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Dias, D. C., Dolios, G., Wang, R., Pan, Z.-Q.
(2002). CUL7: A DOC domain-containing cullin selectively binds Skp1{middle dot}Fbx29 to form an SCF-like complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
99: 16601-16606
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Tian, G., Sobotka-Briner, C. D., Zysk, J., Liu, X., Birr, C., Sylvester, M. A., Edwards, P. D., Scott, C. D., Greenberg, B. D.
(2002). Linear Non-competitive Inhibition of Solubilized Human gamma -Secretase by Pepstatin A Methylester, L685458, Sulfonamides, and Benzodiazepines. J. Biol. Chem.
277: 31499-31505
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Li, B., Ruiz, J. C., Chun, K. T.
(2002). CUL-4A Is Critical for Early Embryonic Development. Mol. Cell. Biol.
22: 4997-5005
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Chen, A., Kleiman, F. E., Manley, J. L., Ouchi, T., Pan, Z.-Q.
(2002). Autoubiquitination of the BRCA1{middle dot}BARD1 RING Ubiquitin Ligase. J. Biol. Chem.
277: 22085-22092
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Shen, W.-H., Parmentier, Y., Hellmann, H., Lechner, E., Dong, A., Masson, J., Granier, F., Lepiniec, L., Estelle, M., Genschik, P.
(2002). Null Mutation of AtCUL1 Causes Arrest in Early Embryogenesis in Arabidopsis. Mol. Biol. Cell
13: 1916-1928
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Wu, K., Chen, A., Tan, P., Pan, Z.-Q.
(2002). The Nedd8-conjugated ROC1-CUL1 Core Ubiquitin Ligase Utilizes Nedd8 Charged Surface Residues for Efficient Polyubiquitin Chain Assembly Catalyzed by Cdc34. J. Biol. Chem.
277: 516-527
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Chen, X., Zhang, Y., Douglas, L., Zhou, P.
(2001). UV-damaged DNA-binding Proteins Are Targets of CUL-4A-mediated Ubiquitination and Degradation. J. Biol. Chem.
276: 48175-48182
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Santagata, S., Gomez, C. A., Sobacchi, C., Bozzi, F., Abinun, M., Pasic, S., Cortes, P., Vezzoni, P., Villa, A.
(2000). N-terminal RAG1 frameshift mutations in Omenn's syndrome: Internal methionine usage leads to partial V(D)J recombination activity and reveals a fundamental role in vivo for the N-terminal domains. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
97: 14572-14577
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Wu, K., Chen, A., Pan, Z.-Q.
(2000). Conjugation of Nedd8 to CUL1 Enhances the Ability of the ROC1-CUL1 Complex to Promote Ubiquitin Polymerization. J. Biol. Chem.
275: 32317-32324
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lai, Z., Ferry, K. V., Diamond, M. A., Wee, K. E., Kim, Y. B., Ma, J., Yang, T., Benfield, P. A., Copeland, R. A., Auger, K. R.
(2001). Human mdm2 Mediates Multiple Mono-ubiquitination of p53 by a Mechanism Requiring Enzyme Isomerization. J. Biol. Chem.
276: 31357-31367
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Chen, A., Wu, K., Fuchs, S. Y., Tan, P., Gomez, C., Pan, Z.-Q.
(2000). The Conserved RING-H2 Finger of ROC1 Is Required for Ubiquitin Ligation. J. Biol. Chem.
275: 15432-15439
[Abstract]
[Full Text]