Previous Article | Next Article 
Molecular and Cellular Biology, February 2000, p. 1426-1435, Vol. 20, No. 4
0270-7306/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Differential T-Cell Antigen Receptor Signaling
Mediated by the Src Family Kinases Lck and Fyn
Michael F.
Denny,
Barbara
Patai, and
David B.
Straus*
Departments of Medicine and Pathology,
University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
Received 25 June 1999/Returned for modification 9 August
1999/Accepted 16 November 1999
 |
ABSTRACT |
Src family tyrosine kinases play a key role in T-cell antigen
receptor (TCR) signaling. They are responsible for the initial tyrosine
phosphorylation of the receptor, leading to the recruitment of the
ZAP-70 tyrosine kinase, as well as the subsequent phosphorylation and
activation of ZAP-70. Molecular and genetic evidence indicates that
both the Fyn and Lck members of the Src family can participate in TCR
signal transduction; however, it is unclear to what extent they utilize
the same signal transduction pathways and activate the same downstream
events. We have addressed this issue by examining the ability of Fyn to
mediate TCR signal transduction in an Lck-deficient T-cell line
(JCaM1). Fyn was able to induce tyrosine phosphorylation of the TCR and
recruitment of the ZAP-70 kinase, but the pattern of TCR
phosphorylation was altered and activation of ZAP-70 was defective.
Despite this, the SLP-76 adapter protein was inducibly tyrosine
phosphorylated, and both the Ras-mitogen-activated protein kinase and
the phosphatidylinositol 4,5-biphosphate signaling pathways were
activated. TCR stimulation of JCaM1/Fyn cells induced the expression of
the CD69 activation marker and inhibited cell growth, but NFAT
activation and the production of interleukin-2 were markedly reduced.
These results indicate that Fyn mediates an alternative form of TCR
signaling which is independent of ZAP-70 activation and generates a
distinct cellular phenotype. Furthermore, these findings imply that the
outcome of TCR signal transduction may be determined by which Src
family kinase is used to initiate signaling.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Stimulation of the T-cell antigen
receptor (TCR) initiates a complex signaling cascade leading to clonal
expansion, cytokine production, and differentiation. Activation of
essential downstream signaling pathways, including the
phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2),
Ras-mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), and
phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase pathways, is dependent upon the activity
of protein tyrosine kinases (4, 42). Since the TCR lacks
intrinsic tyrosine kinase activity, the expression of non-receptor
tyrosine kinases is required for TCR signaling. In particular, members
of the Src family of tyrosine kinases are thought to provide critical
functions during the initial steps of TCR signaling.
Following receptor engagement, Src family kinases mediate the
phosphorylation of the TCR on tyrosine residues within
immunoreceptor-based tyrosine activation motifs (ITAMs) (6, 22,
53, 56). The ZAP-70 tyrosine kinase is then recruited to the TCR
by binding to tyrosine phosphorylated ITAMs (6, 21, 22, 57),
where it is activated by Src family kinases through tyrosine
phosphorylation within the ZAP-70 catalytic domain (5, 27,
56). Once activated, ZAP-70 then phosphorylates key adapter
proteins, such as LAT (62) and SLP-76 (58), which
ultimately promote the activation of downstream signaling pathways.
Loss of ZAP-70 (37, 60), LAT (13, 63), or SLP-76
(7, 39, 61) disrupts TCR signaling, impairs T-cell
development, and blocks T-cell activation. In this model of TCR
signaling, Src family kinases mediate both ITAM phosphorylation and
ZAP-70 activation (4, 42, 55).
T cells express primarily two members of the Src family of tyrosine
kinases, Lck and Fyn (9, 38), both of which have been
implicated in TCR signaling. Both kinases have been shown to interact
with the TCR (11, 14, 46, 51), and activated forms of the
kinases enhance interleukin-2 (IL-2) production (1, 8, 29).
However, studies of mice carrying null alleles of the Fyn and Lck genes
indicate that at least during development the kinases have only
partially overlapping functions. T-cell development is severely
impaired in Lck
/
mice (35), while
Fyn-deficient mice exhibit a much less drastic phenotype. Development
of Fyn
/
thymocytes appears normal, although they have a
diminished response to TCR stimulation, and mature T cells from
Fyn
/
mice fail to produce IL-2 upon TCR stimulation in
vitro (2, 49). The different phenotypes of Lck- and
Fyn-deficient mice either reflect the relatively low expression of Fyn
early in development (8, 38, 53) or indicate that these
kinases provide predominantly distinct functions. Crossing the Lck- and
Fyn-deficient mice exacerbates the developmental defects which are
apparent in the Lck
/
mice (16, 54),
suggesting that these Src family kinases possess some overlapping
functions. In addition, expression of an activated form of Fyn as a
transgene in Lck
/
mice can rescue certain aspects of
T-cell development (16). In sum, these studies indicate that
Fyn and Lck have only partially overlapping functions during T-cell
development. However, since these kinases may participate in a variety
of processes, it is not possible to attribute the observed
developmental phenotypes exclusively to alterations in TCR signaling.
Investigations designed specifically to address the ability of Lck and
Fyn to mediate TCR signal transduction have not revealed substantial
differences in their function. Studies using heterologous cell systems
indicate that both Lck and Fyn can mediate ITAM phosphorylation and
ZAP-70 activation when coexpressed with the TCR
subunit and ZAP-70
(5, 6, 56). Similarly, activated forms of either Lck or Fyn
are able to enhance TCR signaling and the production of IL-2 in T cells
stimulated in vitro (1, 8, 29), although Fyn appears to be
uniquely required for the activation of Pyk2 kinase following TCR
stimulation (41). These results imply that although Lck and
Fyn have distinct abilities to mediate T-cell development, they may
function equivalently to mediate TCR signaling when expressed at
similar levels, as is the case in mature T cells (38), or
when activated. To address the capacity of Fyn to support TCR signal
transduction, we have directly analyzed Fyn-mediated TCR signaling with
a T-cell line which expresses Fyn but lacks functional Lck. Our results
indicate that unlike Lck, which mediates TCR-signaling events necessary
for full T-cell activation, Fyn mediates an alternative form of TCR
signaling that results in a partial T-cell activation phenotype. TCR
signaling mediated by Fyn is characterized by a distinct pattern of
ITAM phosphorylation and the inability to activate ZAP-70 following its
recruitment to the TCR. These findings indicate that the outcome of TCR
signaling may be determined by differential usage of Src family
tyrosine kinases.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Cells and plasmids.
The Jurkat leukemic T-cell line and its
Lck-deficient derivative, JCaM1, were grown in RPMI 1640 medium
supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, glutamine, penicillin, and
streptomycin. Stable transfectants of a JCaM1 derivative expressing a
VP16-Tet repressor fusion protein (15) were obtained by
electroporation and selection by growth in the presence of G418 and
hygromycin. Fyn or Lck cDNA was subcloned into the pBP1 plasmid, in
which expression is regulated by a cytomegalovirus promoter containing a triplication of the Tet operator site (10). Clones which
expressed levels of TCR equivalent to that of the parental Jurkat cell
line, as determined by fluorescence flow cytometry, were maintained for
further analysis. Because mature T cells express nearly equivalent levels of Lck and Fyn kinases (38), we compared TCR
signaling in clones expressing equivalent levels of these kinases. The
levels of Fyn and Lck expression in the individual clones were
determined by immunoblotting lysates from a defined number of cells for
Lck and Fyn and then comparing the signal to known amounts of
glutathione S-transferase (GST) fusion protein standards of
Lck or Fyn (38). Using this approach, Lck expression in
JCaM1/Lck clones and the parental Jurkat E6 cell line was estimated to
be between 160,000 and 200,000 molecules per cell (data not shown).
Similarly, the various JCaM1/Fyn clones used in this study express
between 100,000 and 180,000 molecules of Fyn per cell, whereas vector
plasmid-transfected control cells, JCaM1/Lck cells, and parental Jurkat
cells each express approximately 5,000 molecules of Fyn per cell (not shown).
Immunoprecipitations and immunoblotting.
Cells were
stimulated at 37°C with TCR antibody C305 (59), harvested
by brief centrifugation, and lysed in a mixture of 1% NP-40, 10 mM
Tris (pH 7.8), 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF),
0.4 mM sodium orthovanadate, 10 mM NaF, and 1 µg of leupeptin per ml.
NP-40-soluble cell lysates were cleared by centrifugation at
14,000 × g for 10 min at 4°C. Lysates to be
separated into soluble and particulate fractions were cleared at
750 × g for 10 min at 4°C, and the resulting
supernatant was subjected to ultracentrifugation at 100,000 × g for 1 h. Proteins were immunoprecipitated from the
particulate fraction after solubilizing the pellet with NP-40 lysis
buffer containing 1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and then adjusting
the SDS concentration in both the soluble and particulate fractions to
0.1%. Lysates were further cleared by preincubation with fixed
Staphylococcus aureus cells. The anti-TCR
(6B10.2;
Zymed) and the anti-CD3 (Leu-4; Becton Dickinson) monoclonal antibodies
were covalently coupled to protein A-Sepharose with dimethyl
pimelimidate to eliminate interference of the immunoglobin during
subsequent immunoblotting. SLP-76 was immunoprecipitated with a
monoclonal antibody (Ab Solutions). ZAP-70, LAT, and PLC-
1 were
immunoprecipitated with rabbit antiserum (Upstate Biotechnology).
Immunoprecipitates were collected on protein A-Sepharose beads and
washed in lysis buffer containing 0.5 M NaCl. Immunoprecipitates or
lysates were analyzed by immunoblotting with monoclonal antibodies to
detect tyrosine phosphoproteins (4G10; Upstate Biotechnology), Lck
(provided by Anne Burkhardt and Joe Bolen), Fyn (Transduction
Laboratories), ZAP-70 (2F3.2), and PLC-
1 (mixed monoclonal
antibodies; Upstate Biotechnology). Phosphorylated extracellular
signal-regulated kinases were detected with a phospho-ERK1/2 antibody
(New England Biolabs). Primary antibodies were detected with a
horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody and enhanced chemiluminescence.
ZAP-70 in vitro kinase assay.
ZAP-70 kinase activity was
evaluated as described previously using ZAP-70 immunoprecipitates
incubated with [
-32P]ATP and a substrate peptide of
erythrocyte band III protein fused to GST (10). Samples were
separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) and
visualized by autoradiography. Regions corresponding to GST-band III
fusions were excised, and incorporation of 32P was
quantitated by measuring Cerenkov radiation levels.
Calcium measurement.
Determination of intracellular
Ca2+ ([Ca2+]i) concentration was
performed as described previously (10). Cells were loaded
with the fluorescent calcium binding dye indo-1 (Molecular Probes) at 1 µM, washed extensively, and placed in a spectrofluorometer equipped
with a water-jacketed cuvette holder at 37°C. Fluorescence intensity
values were corrected for cell autofluorescence, and intracellular
calcium concentration was determined using a Kd of calcium binding to indo-1 of 250 nM (17).
Ras activation assay.
Cells (25 × 106)
were lysed in Ras assay lysis buffer (25 mM HEPES [pH 7.5], 150 mM
NaCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA, 1% NP-40, 0.25% sodium
deoxycholate, and 10% glycerol) and cleared by centrifugation, and
activated Ras was collected by incubation for 30 min at 4°C with
glutathione-Sepharose beads precoated with 10 to 20 µg of Raf-1
Ras-binding domain (RBD) fused to GST (52). Following incubation, the beads were washed once with Ras assay lysis buffer, analyzed by SDS-PAGE, and immunoblotted with a pan-Ras monoclonal antibody (Transduction Laboratories).
Analysis of CD69 expression, IL-2 production, and growth
inhibition.
Cells were incubated at 37°C for 16 to 20 h
with either medium alone, TCR antibody (C305; 1:500 dilution of ascites
fluid, as either soluble antibody or antibody bound directly to the
tissue culture plate), phytohemagglutinin (PHA) (0.3 µg/ml), phorbol myristate acetate (PMA) (50 ng/ml), or ionomycin (1 µM). CD69 cell
surface expression was evaluated by fluorescence flow cytometry, following staining with a mouse anti-CD69 antibody (PharMingen) and a
fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated goat anti-mouse secondary antibody. IL-2 secreted into the culture supernatant was measured by
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using a monoclonal anti-human IL-2
antibody (BioSource) for capture, followed by detection with rabbit
anti-IL-2 antiserum (Genzyme), and an alkaline phosphatase-coupled goat
anti-rabbit antibody. Purified recombinant IL-2 (Genzyme) was used as a
standard. For growth inhibition, cells were grown in medium alone or
stimulated with PHA for 72 h. Viable cells were identified by the
exclusion of trypan blue, and cell number was determined with a hemocytometer.
NFAT activation assay.
Cells (10 × 106)
were transiently transfected with 25 µg of a 3× NFAT-luciferase
reporter plasmid, rested for 48 h, and then incubated for 5 h
at 37°C with medium alone, plate-bound C305 in combination with PMA,
or PMA plus ionomycin. Luciferase activity in unstimulated and
TCR-stimulated transfectants was expressed relative to that of the
appropriate PMA plus ionomycin stimulated sample to account for
differences in transfection efficiency between cell types.
 |
RESULTS |
Expression of Src kinases in the JCaM1 clones.
To compare TCR
signaling mediated by Lck and Fyn, we utilized the Jurkat-derived JCaM1
T-cell line, which is deficient in Lck activity (50) and has
only a low level of endogenous Fyn (Fig.
1A). Quantitative analysis established
that our JCaM1 and parental Jurkat cell lines express Fyn at
approximately 1/30 the level of Lck found in Jurkat (data not shown;
see Materials and Methods). Transfection of the JCaM1 cell line with a
Fyn cDNA allowed us to examine Fyn-mediated TCR-signaling events which are independent of Lck and compare them to TCR signaling in JCaM1 cell
lines expressing normal levels of Lck. Since mature T cells have
similar levels of Lck and Fyn (38), we selected clones which
expressed Fyn at levels which were essentially equivalent to the level
of Lck expressed in Jurkat cells. TCR expression was also similar in
all of the clones (data not shown). In the JCaM1 transfectants, the Lck
and Fyn kinases were expressed under the control of a
tetracycline-repressible TetR-VP16 fusion protein (15).
Addition of tetracycline to the culture medium reduced kinase levels in
a concentration-dependent manner, as shown in Fig. 1B for JCaM1/Lck
cells.

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Fyn and Lck expression in JCaM1 transfectants. (A)
NP-40-soluble lysates from an equal number of JCaM1/Lck, JCaM1/Fyn, or
plasmid vector-transfected cells were immunoblotted for the expression
of Lck or Fyn. (B) JCaM1/Lck cells were grown in medium containing
tetracycline (0 to 100 ng/ml) for at least 4 days, and NP-40-soluble
cell lysates from equivalent cell numbers were immunoblotted for Lck to
confirm tetracycline-regulated Lck expression. Tet, tetracycline.
|
|
Inducible tyrosine phosphorylation mediated by Lck or Fyn.
We
assessed the ability of Fyn to replace the function of Lck in JCaM1 by
blotting NP-40-soluble cell lysates with an antiphosphotyrosine antibody (Fig. 2, top). Transfection of
JCaM1 cells with Fyn restored both the basal level of tyrosine
phosphorylation and the induction of tyrosine phosphorylation following
TCR stimulation. However, the pattern of tyrosine phosphorylation
induced by TCR stimulation of JCaM1/Fyn cells was distinct from that in
JCaM1/Lck cells, particularly in the 50- to 75-kDa range (Fig. 2, top).
A 70-kDa band is absent in JCaM1/Fyn lysates, and a 65-kDa protein is
hyperphosphorylated relative to JCaM1/Lck. The distinct pattern of
tyrosine phosphorylation did not appear to be due simply to a
quantitative reduction in TCR signaling function in the JCaM1/Fyn cells
since reducing signaling in the JCaM1/Lck cells by lowering Lck levels
two- to threefold with the addition of tetracycline decreased the
levels, but did not alter the pattern, of tyrosine phosphorylation in
JCaM1/Lck cells.

View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Fyn expression in JCaM1 cells restores protein tyrosine
phosphorylation. (Top) NP-40-soluble lysates were prepared from
JCaM1/Lck cells grown in the absence or presence of tetracycline (Tet)
(3 ng/ml), JCaM1/Fyn cells, or plasmid vector-transfected cells that
were unstimulated or stimulated with a TCR antibody (C305) for 2 min at
37°C and immunoblotted with a phosphotyrosine antibody. The numbers
at the right indicate the positions of molecular mass markers in
kilodaltons. Arrowheads indicate differences in protein tyrosine
phosphorylation between JCaM1/Lck and JCaM1/Fyn cells. Results are
representative of more than 10 experiments. Similar results were
observed with three additional JCaM1/Fyn clones. (Middle) CD3 was
immunoprecipitated from lysates of cells which were unstimulated or
anti-TCR stimulated for 2 min at 37°C and immunoblotted for tyrosine
phosphoproteins. The positions of tyrosine-phosphorylated CD3 chains
and ZAP-70 are indicated. Anti-CD3- immunoblotting demonstrated that
equivalent amounts of CD3 were immunoprecipitated from all samples
(results not shown). Results are representative of at least three
experiments. Similar results were observed with two additional
JCaM1/Fyn clones. (Bottom) chain was immunoprecipitated from cell
lysates and immunoblotted with phosphotyrosine antibody. Nonreducing
conditions were used to accentuate the decrease in electrophoretic
mobility caused by extensive phosphorylation of - dimers.
Anti- -chain immunoblotting showed that equivalent amounts of were immunoprecipitated from each sample (results not shown). Results
are representative of at least three experiments. Similar results were
observed with two additional JCaM1/Fyn clones.
|
|
TCR tyrosine phosphorylation.
One of the key targets of the
Src family kinases which could be differentially phosphorylated
following TCR stimulation are the ITAM sequences in the cytoplasmic
domains of the TCR subunits. We analyzed the ability of Fyn to induce
phosphorylation of the CD3 and
subunits. Each CD3 subunit (
,
, and
) possesses a single ITAM, while an individual
chain
contains three ITAM sequences and is normally expressed as a
disulfide-linked dimer. Immunoprecipitates of CD3 or
were prepared
from unstimulated or TCR-stimulated cells and blotted with an
antiphosphotyrosine antibody. We observed that TCR stimulation of
JCaM1/Fyn induced substantially lower levels of CD3 phosphorylation
than JCaM1/Lck cells (Fig. 2, middle). In addition, TCR stimulation of
the JCaM1/Fyn cells resulted in a pattern of
-chain phosphorylation
which was distinct from the JCaM1/Lck cells (Fig. 2, bottom). In these
experiments,
-chain immunoprecipitates were analyzed under
nonreducing conditions which accentuated the reduction in
electrophoretic mobility caused by greater levels of ITAM
phosphorylation. TCR stimulation of JCaM1/Fyn cells generated primarily
a rapidly migrating form of phospho-
compared to the electrophoretic
mobility of the phosphorylated
species generated by TCR stimulation
of JCaM1/Lck cells (Fig. 2, bottom). These differences in
phosphorylation are similar to those accompanying stimulation of human
T-cell clones with agonist or altered peptide ligands (20).
The differences in CD3 and
-chain phosphorylation could not be
explained by a quantitative reduction in TCR signaling in JCaM1/Fyn
cells. Lowering Lck expression in JCaM1/Lck cells by including
tetracycline in the growth medium decreased the overall level of
tyrosine phosphorylation, including CD3 phosphorylation; however, even
these reduced levels of phosphorylation exceeded those of JCaM1/Fyn
cells (Fig. 2, middle). Similarly, overall
-chain phosphorylation
was reduced in JCaM1/Lck cells grown in tetracycline, but despite these
lower levels of phosphorylation, the electrophoretic mobility of
phospho-
under nonreducing conditions resembled that of JCaM1/Lck
cells grown in the absence of tetracycline (Fig. 2, bottom). These
results indicate that TCR phosphorylation mediated by Fyn is
qualitatively distinct from that of Lck.
Activation of ZAP-70.
We determined if the apparent
alterations in TCR phosphorylation which accompanied Fyn-mediated
signaling would alter the recruitment of ZAP-70 to the TCR or its
subsequent activation. To specifically test for the presence of
tyrosine phosphoproteins associated with the
chain,
immunoprecipitates of
chain from unstimulated or TCR-stimulated
JCaM1/Lck or JCaM1/Fyn cells were resolved by SDS-PAGE under reducing
conditions and immunoblotted for tyrosine phosphoproteins. Differences
in the electrophoretic mobility of phospho-
observed under
nonreducing conditions (Fig. 2, bottom) are not observed under reducing
conditions. While TCR stimulation of JCaM1/Fyn cells induced
-chain
phosphorylation, phosphorylated ZAP-70 was barely detectable in the
immunoprecipitates (Fig. 3, top). It was
possible that the reduced level of tyrosine-phosphorylated ZAP-70 in
the immunoprecipitates from the JCaM1/Fyn cells was due to lower levels
of
-chain phosphorylation. To address this possibility, we decreased
the level of Lck expression in JCaM1/Lck cells by including
tetracycline in the growth medium, thereby reducing the level of
TCR-stimulated
-chain phosphorylation in these cells. Our results
indicate that there were still substantially greater levels of
phospho-ZAP-70 in
immunoprecipitates from JCaM1 cells expressing
lower levels of Lck than in JCaM1/Fyn cells, despite equivalent levels
of
-chain tyrosine phosphorylation.

View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Fyn-mediated TCR signaling fails to induce ZAP-70
phosphorylation despite the recruitment of ZAP-70 to the TCR. (Top) chain was immunoprecipitated from cell lysates of JCaM1/Lck cells,
JCaM1/Lck cells grown in the presence of tetracycline (Tet) (3 ng/ml),
and JCaM1/Fyn cells which were either unstimulated or anti-TCR
stimulated for 2 min at 37°C. The immunoprecipitates were analyzed
under reducing conditions for tyrosine phosphoproteins. The positions
of tyrosine-phosphorylated chain and ZAP-70 are indicated. (Bottom)
The chain immunoprecipitates were analyzed for the presence of
associated ZAP-70 by immunoblotting. Anti- -chain immunoblotting
demonstrated that equivalent amounts of chain were
immunoprecipitated from each sample (results not shown). Results are
representative of at least three experiments. Similar results were
obtained using two additional JCaM1/Fyn clones.
|
|
The lower level of phospho-ZAP-70 associated with
in JCaM1/Fyn
cells could arise from a failure to recruit ZAP-70 to
following TCR
stimulation or from the inability of ZAP-70 to be recognized as a
substrate following its recruitment. By probing
-chain
immunoprecipitates with an anti-ZAP-70 antibody, we determined that the
ZAP-70 association with
was unimpaired in JCaM1/Fyn cells (Fig. 3,
bottom). Thus, the difference in the level of tyrosine-phosphorylated
ZAP-70 in
immunoprecipitates was not due to an inability of
Fyn-mediated
-chain phosphorylation to recruit ZAP-70 to the TCR.
To confirm that ZAP-70 activation was impaired in JCaM1/Fyn cells, we
directly assessed ZAP-70 phosphorylation and activity in ZAP-70
immunoprecipitates. A low level of phospho-ZAP-70 was detected in
immunoprecipitates from unstimulated JCaM1/Lck cells but not
unstimulated JCaM1/Fyn cells. Consistent with our previous observations, TCR stimulation of JCaM1/Fyn cells generated little phospho-ZAP-70, as determined by antiphosphotyrosine
immunoblotting of ZAP-70 immunoprecipitates (Fig.
4A). In addition, no phosphorylated ZAP-70 was detected in immunoprecipitates from the particulate fraction
of cell lysates of JCaM1/Fyn cells, eliminating the possibility that
the subcellular distribution of phosphorylated ZAP-70 is different in
JCaM1/Fyn cells (not shown). Analysis of ZAP-70 catalytic activity in
vitro verified that TCR stimulation of JCaM1/Fyn cells failed to
activate ZAP-70 (Fig. 4B). Thus, although TCR stimulation of JCaM1/Fyn
cells is able to induce the recruitment of ZAP-70 to the TCR,
subsequent activation of ZAP-70 by Fyn does not occur.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Activation of ZAP-70 is defective in JCaM1/Fyn cells.
(A) ZAP-70 phosphorylation is defective in JCaM1/Fyn cells.
Immunoprecipitates of ZAP-70 from JCaM1/Lck and JCaM1/Fyn cells which
were unstimulated or anti-TCR stimulated for 2 min at 37°C were
immunoblotted for phosphotyrosine (top) or ZAP-70 (bottom). Results are
representative of at least five experiments. Similar results were
obtained using two additional JCaM1/Fyn clones (not shown). (B) ZAP-70
kinase activation is defective in JCaM1/Fyn cells. In-vitro kinase
activity was analyzed using ZAP-70 immunoprecipitates from unstimulated
or TCR-stimulated JCaM1/Lck and JCaM1/Fyn cells, and an exogenous
substrate consisting of a band III peptide was fused to GST.
Incorporation of 32P into the GST-band III fusion protein
was measured by counting Cerenkov radiation levels. ZAP-70 kinase
activity is expressed relative to the activity from unstimulated
JCaM1/Lck cells (mean ± standard error [SE]; n = 3). (C) Inhibition of tyrosine-phosphatase activity does not restore
ZAP-70 phosphorylation in JCaM1/Fyn cells. JCaM1/Lck and JCaM1/Fyn
cells were stimulated individually at 37°C either with
bisperoxovanadium(phenanthroline) (20 µM) for 5 min or TCR antibody
for 2 min or in combination by pretreatment with
bisperoxovanadium(phenanthroline) for 3 min prior to inclusion of TCR
antibody for an additional 2 min. ZAP-70 immunoprecipitates from each
stimulation condition were analyzed for induction of tyrosine
phosphorylation. Results are representative of two experiments.
|
|
The inability of TCR stimulation of JCaM1/Fyn cells to induce
substantial levels of ZAP-70 phosphorylation may also be due to
enhanced sensitivity to phosphatases. To test this possibility, we
attempted to restore ZAP-70 phosphorylation by pretreating JCaM1/Fyn
cells with a phosphatase inhibitor prior to TCR stimulation (40). Pretreatment of either JCaM1/Lck or JCaM1/Fyn cells
with the phosphatase inhibitor bisperoxovanadium(phenanthroline)
(40) enhanced the levels of phospho-ZAP-70 generated by
subsequent TCR stimulation, but JCaM1/Fyn cells still only attained
levels of phosphorylated ZAP-70 equivalent to those of unstimulated
JCaM1/Lck cells (Fig. 4C). These results indicate that the low level of phospho-ZAP-70 observed in JCaM1/Fyn cells is most likely due to the
inability of Fyn to mediate ZAP-70 phosphorylation following its
recruitment to the TCR.
Adapter molecule phosphorylation.
Two key adapter molecules,
LAT and SLP-76, have been identified as substrates of ZAP-70 and are
essential for the activation of downstream signaling pathways (13,
58, 61, 62). Since the activation of ZAP-70 following TCR
stimulation is defective in JCaM1/Fyn cells, we expected that the
tyrosine phosphorylation of these adapters would be defective.
Antiphosphotyrosine blots of LAT immunoprecipitates showed that TCR
stimulation of JCaM1/Fyn cells failed to induce LAT tyrosine
phosphorylation (Fig. 5A), whereas
JCaM1/Lck cells induced LAT phosphorylation. TCR stimulation of plasmid
vector-transfected JCaM1 cells also failed to induce LAT
phosphorylation (data not shown). Additionally, phosphorylated LAT was
not observed in immunoprecipitates from the particulate fraction of
JCaM1/Fyn cell lysates, demonstrating that the failure to observe LAT
phosphorylation in JCaM1/Fyn cells is not due to alterations in the
intracellular distribution of LAT (data not shown). Consistent with
these findings, no tyrosine-phosphorylated LAT was detected in
immunoprecipitates of the Grb2 adapter protein from TCR-stimulated
JCaM1/Fyn cells, whereas tyrosine-phosphorylated LAT associated with
Grb2 in TCR-stimulated JCaM1/Lck cells (data not shown). Surprisingly,
in contrast to LAT, antiphosphotyrosine blots of SLP-76
immunoprecipitates showed that TCR simulation of JCaM1/Fyn cells was
able to induce SLP-76 tyrosine phosphorylation (Fig. 5B). The level of
SLP-76 phosphorylation was similar to that found in immunoprecipitates
from TCR-stimulated JCaM1/Lck cells. TCR stimulation of plasmid
vector-transfected JCaM1 cells induced a level of SLP-76
phosphorylation which was detectable upon extended exposure, probably
due to the expression of low levels of endogenous Fyn in these cells
(not shown). These results suggest that despite the failure to activate
ZAP-70 in JCaM1/Fyn cells following TCR stimulation, the SLP-76 adapter
molecule is still inducibly phosphorylated and may be able to mediate
the activation of downstream signaling pathways.

View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Fyn has differential effects on the phosphorylation of
the T-cell adapter proteins LAT and SLP-76. Immunoprecipitates of LAT
(A) and SLP-76 (B) from JCaM1/Lck and JCaM1/Fyn cells which were
unstimulated or anti-TCR stimulated for 2 min at 37°C were
immunoblotted with antiphosphotyrosine, anti-LAT, or anti-SLP-76.
Results are representative of three experiments in each case. Similar
results were obtained using three additional JCaM1/Fyn clones (results
not shown).
|
|
Intermediate signaling events in JCaM1/Fyn cells.
Since SLP-76
has been implicated in the activation of both the PIP2 and
Ras-MAPK pathways (58, 61), we examined these downstream
signaling events in JCaM1/Fyn cells. Engagement of the TCR induces the
phosphorylation and activation of phospholipase C-
1 (PLC-
1),
resulting in the production of IP3 and elevations in
[Ca2+]i. Activation of the PIP2
pathway in JCaM1/Fyn cells was examined by evaluating the
phosphorylation of PLC-
1 and monitoring elevations in
[Ca2+]i. Antiphosphotyrosine immunoblots of
PLC-
1 immunoprecipitates from unstimulated and TCR-stimulated cells
revealed that PLC-
1 phosphorylation was induced to the same level in
JCaM1/Fyn and JCaM1/Lck cells (Fig. 6A).
TCR stimulation of vector plasmid-transfected JCaM1 cells did not
induce detectable PLC-
1 phosphorylation (not shown). Analysis of the
elevation in [Ca2+]i using cells loaded with
the Ca2+-sensitive fluorescent dye indo-1 showed that TCR
stimulation of JCaM1/Fyn and JCaM1/Lck cells elicited similar
elevations in [Ca2+]i (Fig. 6B). Because
disturbances in activation of the PIP2 pathway may be more
apparent at submaximal levels of TCR stimulation, we also analyzed the
elevations in [Ca2+]i induced by lower
concentrations of anti-TCR antibody. Even submaximal levels of TCR
stimulation induced similar elevations in
[Ca2+]i in both JCaM1/Lck and JCaM1/Fyn cells
(Fig. 6C). These results indicate that TCR stimulation is able to
induce the activation of the PIP2 pathway despite the lack
of ZAP-70 activation.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Activation of the PIP2 pathway is intact in
TCR-stimulated JCaM1/Fyn cells. (A) PLC- 1 is tyrosine phosphorylated
following TCR stimulation of JCaM1/Fyn cells. Immunoprecipitates of
PLC- 1 from JCaM1/Lck and JCaM1/Fyn cells which were unstimulated or
TCR stimulated for 2 min at 37°C were immunoblotted with
antiphosphotyrosine or anti-PLC- 1. Results are representative of
three experiments. (B) JCaM1/Lck and JCaM1/Fyn cells exhibit similar
elevations in [Ca2+]i upon TCR stimulation.
JCaM1/Lck, JCaM1/Fyn, or vector-transfected cells were loaded with the
Ca2+-selective fluorescent indicator indo-1 and stimulated
at 37°C with a saturating concentration of TCR antibody (C305).
Results are representative of at least five experiments. (C) JCaM1/Lck
and JCaM1/Fyn cells display similar sensitivities to TCR stimulation.
Indo-1-loaded JCaM1/Lck or JCaM1/Fyn cells were stimulated with various
dilutions of TCR antibody (C305), and the resulting elevations in
[Ca2+]i were measured and expressed relative
to the maximum for each cell type (mean ± SE; n = 3). Statistical analysis was performed using a one-way analysis of
variance and Bonferroni's multiple comparison test. At each antibody
dilution, JCaM1/Lck and JCaM1/Fyn cells induced elevations in
[Ca2+]i which did not differ significantly
(P > 0.05).
|
|
To analyze the ability of Fyn to couple TCR stimulation to the Ras-MAPK
pathway, we first examined the activation of Ras in JCaM1/Fyn cells.
The specific interaction of activated Ras with the Ras binding domain
(RBD) from Raf I was used to assess the extent of Ras activation
(52). Lysates from JCaM1/Fyn or JCaM1/Lck cells were
incubated with an RBD-GST fusion protein, and the amount of activated
Ras associated with the fusion protein was determined by
immunoblotting. TCR stimulation of JCaM1/Fyn cells induced Ras
activation to a level similar to that observed in JCaM1/Lck cells (Fig.
7A). To confirm that this activation of
Ras led to the activation of ERKs, we blotted cell lysates with an
anti-phospho-ERK1/2 antibody (Fig. 7B). TCR stimulation was able to
induce ERK activation to a similar extent in JCaM1/Fyn and JCaM1/Lck
cells. However, kinetic analysis indicated that ERK activation may be
more transient in JCaM1/Fyn cells since it returns to basal levels
within 10 min following stimulation. These results show that TCR
stimulation of JCaM1/Fyn cells activates both the PIP2 and
Ras-MAPK pathways independently of ZAP-70 activation.

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
TCR stimulation of JCaM1/Fyn cells activates the
Ras-MAPK signaling pathway. (A) Ras activation is similar in JCaM1/Lck
and JCaM1/Fyn cells. Activated Ras was affinity purified from lysates
of unstimulated or TCR-stimulated JCaM1/Lck, JCaM1/Fyn, and
vector-transfected cells (2 min at 37°C) using an RBD-GST fusion
protein. Ras content was determined by immunoblotting. Results are
representative of three experiments. (B) The kinetics of ERK activation
in JCaM1/Fyn cells following TCR stimulation is distinct from that in
JCaM1/Lck cells. ERK phosphorylation was evaluated by immunoblotting
lysates with a phospho-ERK1/2 antibody. JCaM1/Lck or JCaM1/Fyn cells
were stimulated with a TCR antibody for 0 to 10 min at 37°C as
indicated. TCR stimulation of vector plasmid-transfected cells did not
induce ERK phosphorylation (results not shown). Results are
representative of three experiments.
|
|
Downstream signaling in JCaM1/Fyn cells.
Stimulation through
the TCR is able to elicit changes in gene expression and cell growth as
a result of downstream signaling events. To confirm that TCR
stimulation of JCaM1/Fyn cells was indeed capable of inducing
downstream signaling, we examined the expression of the CD69 activation
marker, growth arrest following stimulation, and production of the IL-2
cytokine. Stimulation with PHA induced the expression of CD69 in JCaM1
cells expressing either Lck or Fyn, although the levels attained were
greater in the JCaM1/Lck cells (Fig. 8A).
Stimulation with a TCR antibody also induced CD69 expression in both
JCaM1/Lck and JCaM1/Fyn cells, but neither PHA nor anti-TCR antibody
was able to induce CD69 expression in plasmid vector-transfected JCaM1
cells (data not shown). In addition, treatment with PHA blocked cell
growth to similar extents in both JCaM1/Lck and JCaM1/Fyn cells, while
PHA had no effect on the growth of vector-transfected JCaM1 cells (Fig.
8B). In contrast to these results, stimulation of JCaM1/Fyn cells with
either PHA or plate-bound TCR antibody, in combination with PMA,
induced 5- to 10-fold less IL-2 than similar treatment of JCaM1/Lck
cells (Fig. 8C). TCR-independent stimulation with PMA and the
Ca2+ ionophore ionomycin elicited similar levels of IL-2
from both cell types. To determine if the deficits in IL-2 production
in JCaM1/Fyn cells were due to impaired NFAT activity, we transfected cells with an NFAT-regulated luciferase reporter gene construct and
measured luciferase expression induced by TCR stimulation. While TCR
stimulation of JCaM1/Fyn cells was able to induce some NFAT activity,
it was substantially less than that of JCaM1/Lck cells (Fig. 8D). These
findings suggest that TCR signaling mediated by Fyn is able to activate
some downstream signaling pathways, but not others, resulting in a
partial activation phenotype.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 8.
TCR stimulation of JCaM1/Fyn cells elicits partial
activation of downstream signaling pathways. (A) TCR stimulation of
JCaM1/Fyn cells induces expression of the CD69 activation antigen.
JCaM1/Lck or JCaM1/Fyn cells were incubated overnight with medium alone
(unstim), PHA (0.3 µg/ml), or PMA (50 ng/ml). Following stimulation,
the cells were analyzed for expression of the CD69 activation antigen
by fluorescence flow cytometry. TCR antibody also induced CD69
expression in JCaM1/Lck and JCaM1/Fyn cells but not in vector
plasmid-transfected JCaM1 cells (results not shown). (B) TCR
stimulation of JCaM1/Fyn cells induces inhibition of cell growth. Cells
were plated in culture medium in the absence or presence of PHA (1 µg/ml) for 72 h at 37°C. The number of viable cells in each
sample was determined by counting cells which excluded trypan blue
(mean ± SE; n = 3). (C) IL-2 production is
impaired in JCaM1/Fyn cells following TCR stimulation. Cells were
incubated overnight at 37°C in medium with PMA (50 ng/ml) in
combination with PHA (0.3 µg/ml) or with immobilized TCR antibody
(1:1,000 dilution of C305 ascites fluid). IL-2 content in the culture
medium was determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. IL-2
production by JCaM1/Fyn cells is expressed relative to that of
JCaM1/Lck cells (mean ± SE; n = 3). (D) NFAT
activation is markedly reduced in JCaM1/Fyn cells. Activation of the
NFAT transcription factor was measured by transiently transfecting
JCaM1/Lck, JCaM1/Fyn, or vector control cells with a 3×
NFAT-luciferase reporter construct. Transfected cells were incubated at
37°C for 5 h with medium alone or with PMA in combination with
immobilized C305 or ionomycin. To control for differences in
transfection efficiency, luciferase activity induced by TCR stimulation
is expressed relative to that induced by treatment with PMA and
ionomycin (mean ± SE; n = 5).
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The Lck and Fyn tyrosine kinases have been implicated in the
initiation of TCR signal transduction, but it is unclear whether they
utilize the same signaling mechanism or activate the same downstream
signaling pathways. Analyses of Lck- and Fyn-deficient mice suggest
that these kinases provide unique and overlapping functions in
thymocytes (2, 16, 35, 49, 54), although these studies do
not address whether these differences reflect distinctions in the
initiation of the TCR signal or in other processes. The relatively low
level of Fyn expression early in thymocyte development (8, 38,
53) may also contribute to the distinct phenotypes exhibited by
Lck- and Fyn-deficient mice. Studies in heterologous cell systems
indicate that Lck and Fyn exhibit a very similar ability to execute the
initial steps in TCR signaling, including the phosphorylation of the
TCR
subunit and activation of ZAP-70 (5, 6, 56).
However, these systems may lack T-cell-specific regulatory proteins and
may not express the transfected TCR signaling proteins at the levels
and proportions observed in T cells. In this study, we have directly
examined the ability of Fyn to mediate TCR signaling in T cells,
independent of the contribution of Lck. Our results demonstrate that
Fyn is capable of mediating TCR signaling but uses a mechanism which is
distinct from that of Lck and only partially activates downstream
signaling events. Moreover, Fyn-mediated TCR signaling resembles the
initial biochemical signaling events that have been previously
described for TCR stimulation by altered peptide ligands (31,
48).
Stimulation of the TCR in cells which express Fyn, but lack Lck,
induced tyrosine phosphorylation, but phosphorylation of the TCR was
altered compared to cells expressing Lck. Fyn mediated only weak
phosphorylation of CD3, and the pattern of
chain phosphorylation was distinct from the pattern observed with Lck. The qualitative differences in TCR phosphorylation persisted even when the level of
Lck-mediated signaling was reduced to match that of Fyn. Despite the
altered TCR phosphorylation, Fyn was still capable of mediating recruitment of ZAP-70 to the TCR complex, although the phosphorylation and activation of ZAP-70 were defective. These results indicate that
while both Fyn and Lck can initiate TCR signaling, the mechanisms they
use are distinct.
The inability of cells expressing Fyn to induce the phosphorylation of
the LAT protein is consistent with the loss of ZAP-70 activation, since
LAT is a likely substrate of ZAP-70 (62). In contrast,
SLP-76, also a substrate of ZAP-70 (44, 58), was tyrosine
phosphorylated following TCR stimulation, suggesting that an
alternative means of TCR signaling is utilized by Fyn. Previous studies
indicate that TCR signaling mediated by Lck induces SLP-76
phosphorylation as a result of ZAP-70 activation and is largely
dependent upon LAT expression (13, 44, 58). Our results show
that Fyn induces SLP-76 phosphorylation through a distinct mechanism,
although further experiments are required to determine if Fyn and
ZAP-70 mediate the same pattern of SLP-76 phosphorylation (12,
58). Since both Fyn (28) and SLP-76 (36)
interact with the adapter protein SLAP-130/FYB, it is possible that
SLP-76 is recruited to Fyn by SLAP-130/FYB, either directly or
indirectly via the SKAP55 adapter protein (28, 32, 33). Assembly of this complex could allow SLP-76 to become phosphorylated by
Fyn independent of ZAP-70 activation. A recent study showed that
cotransfection of Fyn, SLAP-130/FYB, and SLP-76 was able to potentiate
downstream signaling (45). Once phosphorylated, SLP-76 may
participate in activation of both the PIP2 and the Ras-MAPK
pathways (61).
TCR stimulation of JCaM1/Fyn cells induced phosphorylation of PLC-
1
and elevations in [Ca2+]i, as well as
activation of Ras and ERK1/2. Consistent with the activation of these
intermediate signaling pathways, TCR stimulation induced the expression
of the CD69 activation antigen and caused inhibition of cell growth.
However, Fyn-mediated TCR signaling elicited only modest amounts of
IL-2 production, due at least in part to substantially reduced
activation of the NFAT transcription factor. This reduction in NFAT
activation may reflect the transient nature of ERK activation in
JCaM1/Fyn cells (Fig. 7). Consistent with this, we have observed that
the induction of AP-1 DNA binding activity in JCaM1/Fyn cells is
deficient compared to that of JCaM1/Lck cells (data not shown). These
results indicate that Fyn is able to mediate the activation of TCR
signaling pathways by a distinct mechanism which bypasses the normal
functioning of the ZAP-70 tyrosine kinase.
The differences in the initiation of TCR signaling mediated by Lck and
Fyn may be due to distinct substrate preferences of the catalytic
domains of the kinases or the result of distinct interactions of the
kinases with the TCR or other molecules. Inherent catalytic differences
between the kinases appear unlikely, given the similar ability of Fyn
and Lck to mediate
-chain phosphorylation and ZAP-70 activation when
expressed in Cos cells (6) or activation of a
CD16-CD7-ZAP-70 chimera following co-cross-linking with either a Fyn
or a Lck transmembrane chimera (26). Consistent with this, we do not observe substantial differences in the ability of Fyn and Lck
to phosphorylate the cytoplasmic domains of CD3
or
chain in
vitro (data not shown). However, these systems may lack key regulatory
elements which are present in the complete TCR complex or expressed
exclusively in T cells. As such, the distinct interaction of the
kinases with the intact TCR or other molecules may influence their
signaling properties. For example, Fyn has been demonstrated to
associate with ITAMs present in the cytoplasmic domains of the TCR
(14, 46). It is possible that this interaction specifies a
binding orientation of Fyn which determines the pattern of ITAM
phosphorylation and results in inefficient ZAP-70 phosphorylation by
Fyn. The high levels of expression which are attainable in heterologous
cell systems may permit ZAP-70 and Src family kinases to interact
independently of the expression of TCR subunits, which could mask
differences based upon distinct TCR binding. Distinct signaling
function of the Src family kinases could also reflect differences in
the SH2 and SH3 domains, since these regions could influence substrate
preferences and subcellular localization. Despite the high degree of
homology between the Lck and Fyn kinases, the precise nature of their
interactions with substrates may determine the specific signaling
pathways which are elicited by TCR stimulation.
The inability of JCaM1/Fyn cells to produce substantial amounts of IL-2
following TCR stimulation, although other downstream signaling events
are induced, resembles the phenotype of T cells stimulated under
conditions which lead to nonresponsiveness (anergy) (23,
47). In particular, our results are consistent with the hypothesis that Fyn may mediate TCR-signaling events leading to anergy
following stimulation with altered peptide ligand (APL) or under
conditions in which the strength of TCR signal is decreased (20,
30). The biochemical events which accompany TCR stimulation with
APL closely parallel our findings with Fyn-mediated TCR signaling. In
both cases, the phosphorylation of CD3 is reduced and the pattern of
-chain phosphorylation is altered. In mouse or human T cells, APL
preferentially induces a less completely phosphorylated form of
than agonist peptides (20, 25, 31, 48). The pattern of
agonist- and APL-mediated
phosphorylation in human cells closely
resembles that observed in JCaM1/Lck and JCaM1/Fyn cells, respectively
(20). In addition, stimulation of JCaM1/Fyn cells, like
stimulation of T-cell clones with APL, leads to the recruitment of
ZAP-70 to the TCR but does not lead to ZAP-70 activation. The similarity between signaling events which accompany partial activation by APL and the TCR signaling events in JCaM1/Fyn cells suggests a model
whereby TCR signaling mediated by Fyn in the absence of Lck leads to
partial activation and the induction of anergy.
Our results imply that T cells may regulate TCR signaling by altering
the expression, activity, or localization of Lck and Fyn. Changes in
the relative expression of Lck and Fyn have been described during
T-cell development (38), following TCR stimulation (34,
43), and in T cells from lpr mice (24).
Under these conditions, TCR-signaling events may be mediated
selectively by either Lck or Fyn. In addition, sequestering Lck away
from the TCR by virtue of its association with CD4 or other molecules
could limit Lck-mediated TCR signaling (18, 19, 30). In
fact, stimulation of the TCR in the absence of CD4 corecruitment can lead to the induction of T-cell nonresponsiveness (30).
Furthermore, exclusive activation of Lck or Fyn catalytic function
could also lead to differential TCR signaling (3). Further
studies are required to determine whether differential TCR signaling
results from the utilization of these mechanisms.
In summary, we present biochemical and cellular evidence that Fyn is
able to mediate TCR signaling transduction but that it utilizes a
mechanism which is distinct from that utilized by Lck. This alternative
signaling mechanism leads to only a partial induction of downstream
signaling events, resulting in deficient production of IL-2. These
findings suggest that the outcome of TCR stimulation is likely to be
dependent upon whether Lck or Fyn plays a predominate role in mediating
signaling events.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank Anne Burkhardt, Joe Bolen, Nicolai van Oers, and Arthur
Weiss for reagents; James Lodolce, Averil Ma, and Gijs van Seventer for
technical advice; and Jim Miller and Andrew Chan for their critical review.
D.B.S. is supported by a research award from the American Cancer
Society, and M.F.D. is an Arthritis Foundation Postdoctoral Fellow.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: University of
Chicago, Department of Medicine/MC6084, 5841 S. Maryland Ave., Chicago, IL 60637. Phone: (773) 702-4708. Fax: (773) 702-2281. E-mail: dstraus{at}midway.uchicago.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Abraham, N.,
M. C. Miceli,
J. R. Parnes, and A. Veillette.
1991.
Enhancement of T-cell responsiveness by the lymphocyte-specific tyrosine protein kinase p56lck.
Nature
350:62-66[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Appleby, M. W.,
J. A. Gross,
M. P. Cooke,
S. D. Levin,
X. Qian, and R. M. Perlmutter.
1992.
Defective T cell receptor signaling in mice lacking the thymic isoform of p59fyn.
Cell
70:751-763[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Boussiotis, V. A.,
D. L. Barber,
B. J. Lee,
J. G. Gribben,
G. J. Freeman, and L. M. Nadler.
1996.
Differential association of protein tyrosine kinases with the T cell receptor is linked to the induction of anergy and its prevention by B7 family-mediated costimulation.
J. Exp. Med.
184:365-376[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Cantrell, D.
1996.
T cell antigen receptor signal transduction pathways.
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
14:259-274[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Chan, A. C.,
M. Dalton,
R. Johnson,
G. H. Kong,
T. Wang,
R. Thoma, and T. Kurosaki.
1995.
Activation of ZAP-70 kinase activity by phosphorylation of tyrosine 493 is required for lymphocyte antigen receptor function.
EMBO J.
14:2499-2508[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Chan, A. C.,
M. Iwashima,
C. W. Turck, and A. Weiss.
1992.
ZAP-70: a 70-kd protein-tyrosine kinase that associates with the TCR chain.
Cell
71:649-662[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Clements, J. L.,
B. Yang,
S. E. Ross-Barta,
S. L. Eliason,
R. F. Hrstka,
R. A. Williamson, and G. A. Koretzky.
1998.
Requirement for the leukocyte-specific adapter protein SLP-76 for normal T cell development.
Science
281:416-419[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Cooke, M. P.,
K. M. Abraham,
K. A. Forbush, and R. M. Perlmutter.
1991.
Regulation of thymocyte signal transduction by a non-receptor protein tyrosine kinase, p59fyn(T).
Cell
65:281-292[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Cooke, M. P., and R. M. Perlmutter.
1989.
Expression of a novel form of the fyn proto-oncogene in hematopoietic cells.
New Biol.
1:66-74[Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Denny, M. F.,
H. C. Kaufman,
A. C. Chan, and D. B. Straus.
1999.
The Lck SH3 domain is required for activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway but not the initiation of T-cell antigen receptor signaling.
J. Biol. Chem.
274:5146-5152[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Duplay, P.,
M. Thome,
F. Herve, and O. Acuto.
1994.
p56lck interacts via its src homology 2 domain with the ZAP-70 kinase.
J. Exp. Med.
179:1163-1172[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Fang, N.,
D. G. Motto,
S. E. Ross, and G. A. Koretzky.
1996.
Tyrosines 113, 118, and 145 of SLP-76 are required for optimal augmentation of NFAT promoter activity.
J. Immunol.
157:3769-3773[Abstract].
|
| 13.
|
Finco, T. S.,
T. Kadlecek,
W. Zhang,
L. E. Samelson, and A. Weiss.
1998.
LAT is required for TCR-mediated activation of PLC 1 and the Ras pathway.
Immunity
9:617-626[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Gauen, L. K.,
A.-N. Kong,
L. E. Samelson, and A. S. Shaw.
1992.
p59fyn tyrosine kinase associates with multiple T-cell receptor subunits through its unique amino-terminal domain.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
12:5438-5446[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Gossen, M., and H. Bujard.
1992.
Tight control of gene expression in mammalian cells by tetracycline-responsive promoters.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
89:5547-5551[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Groves, T.,
P. Smiley,
M. Cooke,
K. Forbush,
R. Perlmutter, and C. Guidos.
1996.
Fyn can partially substitute for Lck in T lymphocyte development.
Immunity
5:417-428[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Grynkiewicz, G.,
M. Poenie, and R. Y. Tsien.
1985.
A new generation of Ca++ indicators with greatly improved fluorescent properties.
J. Biol. Chem.
260:3440-3448[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Hampl, J.,
Y.-H. Chien, and M. M. Davis.
1997.
CD4 augments the response of a T cell to agonist but not to antagonist ligands.
Immunity
7:379-385[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Haughn, L.,
S. Gratton,
L. Caron,
R. Sekaly,
A. Veillette, and M. Julius.
1992.
Association of tyrosine kinase p56lck with CD4 inhibits the induction of growth through the  T-cell receptor.
Nature
358:328-331[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Hemmer, B.,
I. Stefanova,
M. Vergelli,
R. N. Germain, and R. Martin.
1998.
Relationships among TCR ligand potency, thresholds for effector function elicitation, and the quality of early signaling events in human T cells.
J. Immunol.
160:5807-5814[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
Irving, B. A.,
A. C. Chan, and A. Weiss.
1993.
Functional characterization of a signal transducing motif present in the T cell antigen receptor chain.
J. Exp. Med.
177:1093-1103[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Iwashima, M.,
B. A. Irving,
N. van Oers,
A. Chan, and A. Weiss.
1994.
Sequential interactions of the TCR with two distinct cytoplasmic tyrosine kinases.
Science
263:1136-1139[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Jenkins, M. K.,
D. M. Pardoll,
J. Mizuguchi,
T. M. Chused, and R. H. Schwartz.
1987.
Molecular events in the induction of a nonresponsive state in interleukin 2-producing helper T-lymphocyte clones.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
84:5409-5413[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
Katagiri, T.,
K. Urakawa,
Y. Yamanashi,
K. Semba,
T. Takahashi,
K. Toyoshima,
T. Yamamoto, and K. Kano.
1989.
Overexpression of src family gene for tyrosine-kinase p59fyn in CD4 CD8 T cells of mice with a lymphoproliferative disorder.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
86:10064-10068[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Kersh, E. N.,
A. S. Shaw, and P. M. Allen.
1998.
Fidelity of T cell activation through multistep T cell receptor phosphorylation.
Science
281:572-575[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Kolanus, W.,
C. Romeo, and B. Seed.
1993.
T cell activation by clustered tyrosine kinases.
Cell
74:171-183[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 27.
|
Kong, G.,
M. Dalton,
J. B. Wardenburg,
D. Straus,
T. Kurosaki, and A. C. Chan.
1996.
Distinct tyrosine phosphorylation sites within ZAP-70 mediate activation and negative regulation of antigen receptor function.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16:5026-5035[Abstract].
|
| 28.
|
Liu, J.,
H. Kang,
M. Raab,
A. J. da Silva,
S.-K. Kraeft, and C. E. Rudd.
1998.
FYB (FYN binding protein) serves as a binding partner for lymphoid protein and FYN kinase substrate SKAP55 and a SKAP55-related protein in T cells.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
95:8779-8784[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 29.
|
Luo, K., and B. M. Sefton.
1992.
Activated lck tyrosine protein kinase stimulates antigen-independent interleukin-2 production in T cells.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
12:4724-4732[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
Madrenas, J.,
L. A. Chau,
J. Smith,
J. A. Bluestone, and R. N. Germain.
1997.
The efficiency of CD4 recruitment to ligand-engaged TCR controls the agonist/partial agonist properties of peptide-MHC molecule ligands.
J. Exp. Med.
185:219-229[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 31.
|
Madrenas, J.,
R. L. Wange,
J. L. Wang,
N. Isakov,
L. Samelson, and R. N. Germain.
1995.
phosphorylation without ZAP-70 activation induced by TCR antagonists or partial agonists.
Science
267:515-518[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 32.
|
Marie-Cardine, A.,
E. Bruyns,
C. Eckerskorn,
H. Kirchgessner,
S. C. Meuer, and B. Schraven.
1997.
Molecular cloning of SKAP55, a novel protein that associates with the protein tyrosine kinase p59fyn in human T-lymphocytes.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:16077-16080[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 33.
|
Marie-Cardine, A.,
L. R. Hendricks-Taylor,
N. J. Boerth,
H. Zhao,
B. Schraven, and G. A. Koretzky.
1998.
Molecular interaction between the Fyn-associated protein SKAP55 and the SLP-76-associated phosphoprotein SLAP130.
J. Biol. Chem.
273:25789-25795[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 34.
|
Marth, J. D.,
D. B. Lewis,
C. B. Wilson,
M. E. Gearn,
E. G. Krebs, and R. M. Perlmutter.
1987.
Regulation of pp56lck during T-cell activation: functional implications for the src-like protein tyrosine kinases.
EMBO J.
6:2727-2734[Medline].
|
| 35.
|
Molina, T. J.,
K. Kishihara,
D. P. Siderovski,
W. van Ewijk,
A. Narendran,
E. Timms,
A. Wakeham,
C. J. Paige,
K. U. Hartmann,
A. Veillette,
D. Davidson, and T. W. Mak.
1992.
Profound block in thymocyte development in mice lacking p56lck.
Nature
357:161-164[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 36.
|
Musci, M. A.,
L. R. Hendricks-Taylor,
D. G. Motto,
M. Paskind,
J. Kamens,
C. W. Turck, and G. A. Koretzky.
1997.
Molecular cloning of SLAP-130, an SLP-76-associated substrate of the T cell antigen receptor-stimulated protein tyrosine kinases.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:11674-11677[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 37.
|
Negishi, I.,
N. Motoyama,
K. I. Nakayama,
K. Nakayama,
S. Senju,
S. Hatakeyama,
Q. Zhang,
A. C. Chan, and D. Y. Loh.
1995.
Essential role for ZAP-70 in both positive and negative selection of thymocytes.
Nature
376:435-438[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 38.
|
Olszowy, M. W.,
P. L. Leuchtmann,
A. Veillette, and A. S. Shaw.
1995.
Comparison of p56lck and p59fyn protein expression in thymocyte subsets, peripheral T cells, NK cells, and lymphoid cell lines.
J. Immunol.
155:4236-4240[Abstract].
|
| 39.
|
Pivniouk, V.,
E. Tsitsikov,
P. Swinton,
G. Rathburn, and F. W. Alt.
1998.
Impaired viability and profound block in thymocyte development in mice lacking the adaptor protein SLP-76.
Cell
94:229-238[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 40.
|
Posner, B.,
R. Faure,
J. Burgess,
P. Bevan,
D. Lachance,
G. Zhang-Sun,
G. Fantus,
J. Ng,
D. Hall,
B. Lum, and A. Shaver.
1994.
Peroxovanadium compounds. A new class of potent phosphotyrosine phosphatase inhibitors which are insulin mimetics.
J. Biol. Chem.
269:4596-4604[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 41.
|
Qian, D.,
S. Lev,
N. van Oers,
I. Dikic,
J. Schlessinger, and A. Weiss.
1997.
Tyrosine phosphorylation of Pyk2 is selectively regulated by Fyn during TCR signaling.
J. Exp. Med.
185:1253-1259[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 42.
|
Qian, D., and A. Weiss.
1997.
T cell antigen receptor signal transduction.
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
9:205-212[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 43.
|
Quill, H.,
M. Riley,
E. Cho,
J. Casnellie,
J. Reed, and T. Torigoe.
1992.
Anergic Th1 cells express altered levels of the protein tyrosine kinases p56Lck and p59Fyn.
J. Immunol.
149:2887-2893[Abstract].
|
| 44.
|
Raab, M.,
A. J. da Silva,
P. R. Findell, and C. E. Rudd.
1997.
Regulation of Vav-SLP-76 binding by ZAP-70 and its relevance to TCR /CD3 induction.
Immunity
6:155-164[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 45.
|
Raab, M.,
H. Kang,
A. da Silva,
X. Zhu, and C. E. Rudd.
1999.
FYN-T-FYB-SLP-76 interactions define a T-cell receptor /CD3-mediated tyrosine phosphorylation pathway that up-regulates interleukin 2 transcription in T-cells.
J. Biol. Chem.
274:21170-21179[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 46.
|
Samelson, L. E.,
A. F. Phillips,
E. T. Luong, and R. D. Klausner.
1990.
Association of the fyn protein-tyrosine kinase with the T-cell antigen receptor.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
87:4358-4362[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 47.
|
Sloan-Lancaster, J.,
B. D. Evavold, and P. M. Allen.
1993.
Induction of T-cell anergy by altered T-cell-receptor ligand on live antigen-presenting cells.
Nature
363:156-159[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 48.
|
Sloan-Lancaster, J.,
A. S. Shaw,
J. B. Rothbard, and P. M. Allen.
1994.
Partial T cell signaling: altered phospho- and lack of Zap70 recruitment in APL-induced T cell anergy.
Cell
79:913-922[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 49.
|
Stein, P. L.,
H.-M. Lee,
S. Rich, and P. Soriano.
1992.
pp59fyn mutant mice display differential signaling in thymocytes and peripheral T cells.
Cell
70:741-750[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 50.
|
Straus, D., and A. Weiss.
1992.
Genetic evidence for the involvement of the lck tyrosine kinase in signal transduction through the T cell antigen receptor.
Cell
70:585-593[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 51.
|
Straus, D. B.,
A. C. Chan,
B. Patai, and A. Weiss.
1996.
SH2 domain function is essential for the role of the Lck tyrosine kinase in T cell receptor signal transduction.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:9976-9981[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 52.
|
Taylor, S. J., and D. Shalloway.
1996.
Cell cycle-dependent activation of Ras.
Curr. Biol.
6:1621-1627[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 53.
|
van Oers, N.,
N. Killeen, and A. Weiss.
1996.
Lck regulates the tyrosine phosphorylation of the T cell receptor subunits and ZAP-70 in murine thymocytes.
J. Exp. Med.
183:1053-1062[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 54.
|
van Oers, N.,
B. Lowin-Kropf,
D. Finlay,
K. Connolly, and A. Weiss.
1996.
 T cell development is abolished in mice lacking both Lck and Fyn protein tyrosine kinases.
Immunity
5:429-436[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 55.
|
Wange, R., and L. Samelson.
1996.
Complex complexes: signaling at the TCR.
Immunity
5:197-205[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 56.
|
Wange, R. L.,
R. Guitian,
N. Isakov,
J. D. Watts,
R. Aebersold, and L. E. Samelson.
1995.
Activating and inhibitory mutations in adjacent tyrosines in the kinase domain of ZAP-70.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:18730-18733[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 57.
|
Wange, R. L.,
S. N. Malek,
S. Desiderio, and L. E. Samelson.
1993.
Tandem SH2 domains of ZAP-70 bind to T cell antigen receptor and CD3 from activated Jurkat T cells.
J. Biol. Chem.
268:19797-19801[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 58.
|
Wardenburg, J.,
C. Fu,
J. Jackman, |