Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Molecular and Cellular Biology, March 2000, p. 1825-1835, Vol. 20, No. 5
Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center,
Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown,
Massachusetts 02129,1 and Division of
Molecular Oncology, Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's
Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
021152
Received 1 June 1999/Returned for modification 21 July
1999/Accepted 17 November 1999
Notch receptors participate in a highly conserved signaling pathway
that regulates morphogenesis in multicellular animals. Maturation of
Notch receptors requires the proteolytic cleavage of a single precursor
polypeptide to produce a heterodimer composed of a ligand-binding
extracellular domain (NEC) and a single-pass transmembrane
signaling domain (NTM). Notch signaling has been correlated
with additional ligand-induced proteolytic cleavages, as well as with
nuclear translocation of the intracellular portion of NTM
(NICD). In the current work, we show that the
NEC and NTM subunits of Drosophila
Notch and human Notch1 (hN1) interact noncovalently.
NEC-NTM interaction was disrupted by 0.1%
sodium dodecyl sulfate or divalent cation chelators such as EDTA, and
stabilized by millimolar Ca2+. Deletion of the
Ca2+-binding Lin12-Notch (LN) repeats from the
NEC subunit resulted in spontaneous shedding of
NEC into conditioned medium, implying that the LN repeats
are important in maintaining the interaction of NEC and
NTM. The functional consequences of EDTA-induced
NEC dissociation were studied by using hN1-expressing NIH
3T3 cells. Treatment of these cells for 10 to 15 min with 0.5 to 10 mM
EDTA resulted in the rapid shedding of NEC, the transient
appearance of a polypeptide of the expected size of NICD,
increased intranuclear anti-Notch1 staining, and the transient activation of an Notch-sensitive reporter gene. EDTA treatment of HeLa
cells expressing endogenous Notch1 also stimulated reporter gene
activity to a degree equivalent to that resulting from exposure of the
cells to the ligand Delta1. These findings indicate that receptor
activation can occur as a consequence of NEC dissociation,
which relieves inhibition of the intrinsically active NTM subunit.
Notch receptors are central
components of a highly conserved signal transduction pathway that
regulates cell fate decisions in multicellular animals (for recent
reviews, see references 2 and
17). Numerous genetic and molecular analyses have
demonstrated that Notch signaling controls the implementation of
differentiative, proliferative, and apoptotic programs of gene
expression, which is consistent with it having a broad role in the
processes of organ development and morphogenesis (12, 16,
23; S. Kurata, M. Go, S. Artavanis-Tsakonas, and W. Gehring,
submitted for publication). Acquired or inherited abnormalities in
genes involved in Notch signaling have also been detected in certain
human leukemias (13) and Alagille (29, 33) and
CADASIL (24) syndromes, indicating that perturbations of
Notch signaling underlie several forms of human disease.
Notch receptors are initially synthesized as approximately 300- to
350-kDa single-pass transmembrane proteins, which then undergo
proteolytic processing in the trans-Golgi network by a furin-like
convertase at a site ~70 amino acids external to the transmembrane
domain (3, 7, 31). This results in the formation of a mature
heterodimeric receptor, consisting of N-terminal extracellular (NEC) and C-terminal transmembrane (NTM)
subunits, which is subsequently transported to the cell surface (7). The NEC subunits of various Notch receptors
consist largely of up to 36 tandemly repeated epidermal growth factor
(EGF) modules followed by three iterated Lin12-Notch (LN) modules,
a protein motif that is only found in Notch receptors.
NTM subunits have a small extracellular domain containing
two conserved cysteine residues and intracellular domains that include
six to seven ankyrin-CDC10-like repeats that are usually flanked by
functional nuclear localization signal sequences and C-terminal PEST
sequences. Although NEC and NTM can be
coimmunoprecipitated (7), the nature of the interaction between these two subunits has not been defined.
Genetic and molecular analyses have identified several Notch ligands
and at least one transcription factor, Suppressor of Hairless [Su(H),
which is referred to in vertebrates as CBF1 or RBP-J Studies conducted in invertebrates, frogs, and mammals have shown that
forms of Notch resembling NTM produce gain-of-function
phenotypes when expressed independently of NEC (10,
15, 35, 38), implying that the NEC subunit acts to
restrain receptor activation in the absence of ligand. NEC
deletions that remove all EGF repeats result in a dysfunctional receptor (21). In contrast, deletions that remove the LN
modules and certain LN point mutations have been reported to produce
gain-of-function phenotypes (18, 30, 44), suggesting that
this domain is a negative regulator of Notch signaling.
Biochemical characterization of prototypical EGF and LN modules of
human Notch1 (hN1), has shown that the structural integrity of these
modules is dependent on the presence of millimolar Ca2+
(5, 37). Based on the regulatory role of the domains
containing these modules, the importance of Ca2+ for
heterodimeric stability was investigated. We now demonstrate that the
NEC and NTM subunits of both
Drosophila Notch and hN1 are noncovalently associated. This
association is stabilized by millimolar Ca2+ and disrupted
by EDTA, indicating the involvement of Ca2+-binding domains
in maintenance of the interaction. Deletion of Ca2+-binding
NEC EGF repeats does not disrupt subunit association,
whereas deletion of Ca2+-binding LN modules abolishes
stable association of NEC and NTM. Brief
exposure of NIH 3T3 cells expressing human Notch1 to EDTA leads to the
rapid shedding of NEC, which is followed by the appearance
of a short-lived polypeptide of the expected size of NICD,
increased anti-Notch1 intranuclear staining, and increased
CBF1-dependent transcription from a reporter gene. EDTA also stimulates
CBF1-dependent reporter gene activity in HeLa cells expressing
endogenous Notch1 to a degree approximating that produced by
co-cultivation with cells expressing the ligand Delta1. These findings
suggest a model for receptor regulation whereby the activity of
NTM is restrained, prior to activation, by a
Ca2+-dependent interaction with NEC.
cDNA expression constructs.
The various forms of
Drosophila Notch and hN1 used in this study are summarized
in Fig. 1. To permit detection of hN1
NEC, a single copy of an oligonucleotide linker encoding
the hemagglutinin (HA) epitope was ligated in the sense orientation
into a SalI site at coding sequence position 2602 in the
full-length hN1 cDNA. The resultant cDNA encodes a form of hN1 (N1HA)
with an HA tag inserted between EGF repeats 22 and 23. Other cDNAs were
created using the PCR to introduce silent restriction sites that
permitted in-frame deletion and/or insertion of coding sequences of
interest. The N1HA cDNA was further modified by introduction of a
deletion removing nucleotides 4294 to 4683 (codons 1431 to 1560) to
create
0270-7306/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Calcium Depletion Dissociates and Activates
Heterodimeric Notch Receptors
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
], that acts
downstream of Notch (9, 21, 42). Ligands fall into groups
homologous to the Drosophila ligands Delta or Serrate, which
are themselves single-pass transmembrane proteins that exhibit partial
functional redundancy and interact with EGF repeats 11 and 12 of
Drosophila Notch (19, 38). Recent studies have
provided the rationale for a seemingly simple and direct activation
mechanism whereby the binding of ligand triggers one or more
proteolytic cleavages that free the Notch intracellular domain
(NICD) from its membrane tether (21, 26, 32).
This is thought to permit translocation of NICD to the
nucleus, where it associates with CBF1 bound to specific promoter
sequences, thereby activating transcription of target genes (11,
21, 26, 28, 44, 45, 47, 48). However, with the exception of a
select set of transformed and terminally differentiated cells,
extensive immunocytochemical analyses have failed to detect Notch in
the nuclei of developing animals (1, 49). In addition,
although some studies have shown a positive correlation between the
level of nuclear Notch and downstream signaling (41, 44),
other studies conducted in flies (15), mice (3,
35), and cultured cells (4) have failed to detect such
a relationship. These disparate results suggest that the relationship
between nuclear translocation of NICD and signaling events,
such as the activation of CBF1, is likely to be complex.
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
LIN12-HA, which encodes a form of hN1 lacking the three LN
repeats.
EGF-HA was created by insertion of the HA-encoding
oligonucleotide linker into an engineered SalI site at
position 4282 (21 codons 5' of LN module 1), followed by ligation to a
PCR product spanning hN1 bp
15 to +72 encoding the human Notch1
leader peptide. NTM was created by ligation of the same
leader peptide-encoding oligonucleotide to nucleotides 4992 to 7665 of
the Notch1 open reading frame (codons 1665 to 2555). Expression
constructs for Drosophila Notch and Delta (14)
and the intracellular domain of human Notch2 (8) have been
described previously. An expression construct for the intracellular
domain of murine Notch3 (N3IC), cloned into the vector pCMV, was
provided by U. Lendahl (6).

View larger version (25K):
[in a new window]
FIG. 1.
Predicted structure of engineered Notch polypeptides.
cDNAs encoding Drosophila Notch and various forms of human
Notch1 were assembled and expressed in Drosophila S2 and
mammalian cell lines, respectively, as described in Materials and
Methods. dN, full-length Drosophila Notch; NEC,
Notch extracellular subunit; NTM, Notch transmembrane
subunit; L, leader peptide; HA, hemagglutinin tag; C, conserved
cysteine residues; P, PEST sequence; N1HA, HA epitope-tagged human
Notch 1;
EGF, a form of hN1 lacking all 36 EGF repeats;
LN-HA, a
form of hN1 with the three LN module repeats deleted; NTM,
a form of hN1 with an amino terminus 69 amino acids external to the
transmembrane domain.
Expression of Notch proteins in cultured cells. Schneider S2 cells and Drosophila Kc cells were grown in Sang's M3 medium (JRH Biosciences) with 10% fetal calf serum. Expression of Drosophila Notch and Delta was induced with CuSO4 in stable lines of S2 cells: N-S2 and Dl-S2, respectively (14). Mammalian cell lines were maintained at 37°C in 5% CO2. In transient-expression studies, cDNAs inserted into pcDNA3 (Invitrogen) were transfected into NIH 3T3 or 293A cells using Lipofectamine Plus reagent (Gibco-BRL). In stable expression studies, cDNAs inserted into pBABE were packaged into retroviruses, which were used to infect NIH 3T3 cells as described previously (3, 32). Infected cells were selected by the addition of 2 µg of puromycin per ml to culture media. 293A cells and NIH 3T3 cells were maintained in Dulbecco modified Eagle medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (D10). Jurkat cells were grown in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum.
Preparation of cell lysates and immunoprecipitates. Mammalian cells were washed two times with ice-cold Hanks buffered saline (HBS) and collected by centrifugation at 1,000 rpm for 5 min. Cell pellets were lysed in 50 mM Tris (pH 7.5) containing 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 µg of aprotinin per ml, 10 µg of leupeptin per ml, and 1% NP-40 for 15 min on ice. Lysates were cleared by centrifugation at 14,000 × g for 15 min at 4°C.
hN1 polypeptides were immunoprecipitated from whole-cell lysates by incubation for 1 h at 4°C with 3 to 5 µl of polyclonal rabbit serum, termed TC (20), raised against a portion of intracellular hN1 (IC) or by incubation with anti-HA (clone HA.11; BABCO). This was followed by incubation with 10 µl of protein A-Sepharose beads (Pharmacia) for 1 h. Immunoprecipitates were prepared from conditioned cell culture media by prebinding anti-HA to protein A beads for 2 h. Beads were then mixed with conditioned medium for 6 h to overnight with rocking at 4°C.Gel electrophoresis and Western blotting.
Proteins were
solubilized in 50 mM Tris (pH 6.8) containing 3% sodium dodecyl
sulfate (SDS) and 10% glycerol with or without 3%
-mercaptoethanol
and electrophoresed on discontinuous SDS-polyacrylamide gels
(27). Western blots were prepared according to the method of
Towbin et al. (48). Drosophila Notch
NEC and NTM were detected by staining of blots
with monoclonal antibodies F461.3B and C17.9C6, respectively
(39). Epitope-tagged human Notch1 NEC and
NTM were detected by staining with mouse anti-HA or with a
rabbit anti-IC, respectively. Notch2 polypeptides were detected with rat monoclonal antibody bHN6 (7), which was raised against the intracellular domain of Notch2. Staining was developed by using a
chemiluminescent detection method (ECL kit; Amersham).
NEC-NTM heterodimer dissociation studies. Notch expression in N-S2 cells was induced by the addition of 0.7 mM CuSO4 to the medium for 16 to 24 h. To study the release of the NEC subunit, N-S2 cells, or Kc cells were washed one to two times in TBS (20 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.4] with 150 mM NaCl and 0 to 5 mM CaCl2) and resuspended in TBS containing either 2 to 5 mM CaCl2, 0.5 to 5 mM EDTA, or 5 mM EGTA. The cell suspension was rocked slowly at room temperature for 2 to 60 min, and the supernatant collected after two centrifugations at 2,000 and 16,000 rpm, respectively, and analyzed directly by Western blotting.
In EDTA dissociation experiments, N1HA cells were washed twice with HBS and then incubated at various temperatures in HBS containing 2.5 mM CaCl2 or 0.5 to 10 mM EDTA for 1 to 30 min. Conditioned HBS was then removed, taking care not to disturb weakly adherent cells, and spun at 14,000 × g for 15 min. Free NEC was detected in the cleared HBS by immunoprecipitation with anti-HA followed by Western blot analysis. The cells were gently washed once with HBS and then changed back to D10. Whole-cell extracts were subsequently prepared at various time points as described above. In experiments studying the dissociation of immunoprecipitated NTM and NEC, immune complexes prepared on protein A beads (see above) were washed three times with ice-cold 50 mM Tris (pH 7.5), 100 mM NaCl, and 1% NP-40. NEC-NTM complexes were then resuspended in the same solution with either no additional ions, 2.5 mM CaCl2, or 10 mM EDTA at 25°C for 30 to 60 min with gentle rocking. After the beads were pelleted, the supernatant was removed and analyzed for release of hN1 subunits by reprecipitation with the appropriate antibody. The remaining beads were washed once with incubation buffer and analyzed by Western blotting.Aggregation of Notch and Delta cells. Expression of N and Dl in N-S2 and Dl-S2 cells, respectively, was induced overnight by addition of 0.7 mM CuSO4. After one washing with TBS containing 2 mM CaCl2, N-S2 cells were resuspended in TBS containing 5 mM CaCl2 or 2 mM EDTA and incubated for 30 min at room temperature. The EDTA-treated cells were reconstituted with CaCl2 (5 mM) to saturate the Ca2+-binding sites in the extracellular domain of Notch. After 5 min of further incubation, N-S2 cells were mixed with washed Dl-S2 cells, and aggregation was monitored turbidometrically as previously described (36).
Transcriptional activation assays.
NIH 3T3 cells growing in
six-well dishes were cotransfected in triplicate with either 1 µg of
the HES-AB-luciferase or 1 µg of the HES-
AB-luciferase plasmids
containing hairy/enhancer of split 1 (HES1) promoter elements
(21) and 20 ng of a Renilla luciferase control
plasmid (pRL-TK; Promega) by using Lipofectamine Plus reagent
(Gibco-BRL). At 24 h after transfection, the cells were briefly
treated with HBS containing various concentrations of EDTA or 2.5 mM
CaCl2 as described above and then allowed to recover in D10
for up to 8 h. Firefly and Renilla luciferase
activities were determined in whole cell extracts using the Dual
Luciferase Assay Kit (Promega) and a Turner Designs TD20 dual
luminometer. Luciferase activity assays were also conducted with HeLa
cells using a procedure modified from that described by Jarriault et al. (22). Cells were grown in 24-well plates in D10. On day 1, cells were cotransfected with 0.06 µg of CMV-
Gal control
plasmid (Invitrogen) and 0.6 µg of the HES-AB-luciferase plasmid or
the HES-
AB-luciferase plasmid (mHES) using Lipofectamine Plus
reagent. On day 2, approximately 24 h after transfection, 4 × 105 control quail QT6 cells or Delta-expressing QT6Dl
cells (22) were added and cocultured with the transfected
HeLa cells. On day 3, individual wells were treated with regular media,
phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) or 0.5 mM EDTA in PBS for 15 min at
37°C. Cells were then incubated an additional 6 h in D10 medium
prior to analysis of luciferase activities by using the Luciferase
Reporter Gene Assay kit (Boehringer Mannheim). Luciferase activities
were normalized to levels of
-Gal measured by the
-Gal Elisa kit
(Boehringer Mannheim).
Immunostaining. NIH 3T3 cells growing on eight-well chamber slides (Permanox; Tissue-Tek) were treated with HBS supplemented with CaCl2 or EDTA as described above. After various periods of recovery in D10, the cells were fixed in 3% paraformaldehyde and stained with rabbit anti-IC and goat anti-rabbit-fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) (Sigma) as described previously (3).
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Noncovalent association of NEC and
NTM.
To determine the nature of the interaction
between NEC and NTM, a form of hN1 bearing an
extracellular HA epitope tag was stably expressed in NIH 3T3 cells
(subsequently termed N1HA cells), which do not express endogenous
murine Notch1 polypeptides at detectable levels (3). In
control experiments with membrane impermeable biotinylation reagents,
it was found that NTM and NEC were labeled,
whereas full-length unprocessed hN1 (NFL) was not (not
shown), indicating that hN1 processing is necessary for surface
expression, just as has been previously shown for hN2 (7).
The NEC and NTM subunits coimmunoprecipitated
in extracts prepared in 1% NP-40 but did not coprecipitate in 0.1%
SDS (Fig. 2A), indicating that their
association is maintained by noncovalent interactions sensitive to
ionic detergents. In addition, the amount of NTM detected
was essentially identical when equivalent volumes of a whole-cell
extract prepared with NP-40 were subjected to SDS-electrophoresis under
reducing and nonreducing conditions (Fig. 2B). It was consistently noted that the mobility of both NFL and NEC
were retarded by treatment with
-mercaptoethanol, presumably because
reduced extracellular domain EGF and LN modules assume a more extended
conformation. Levels of NTM were also roughly equivalent
when aliquots of a whole-cell extract prepared from Jurkat cells with
NP-40 were analyzed by SDS-electrophoresis under reducing and
nonreducing conditions (Fig. 2C), indicating that endogenous
NTM is also free of covalently associated polypeptides.
Whole-cell extracts from Schneider 2 (S2) cells stably expressing
Drosophila Notch (N) prepared in sample buffer containing
2% SDS and no reducing agent again showed that the NEC and
NTM subunits were dissociated by nonreducing
SDS-electrophoresis (Fig. 2D). These data indicate that noncovalent
association is an evolutionarily conserved property of Notch receptor
heterodimers.
|
Metal ion dependency of NEC-NTM
association.
The Ca2+ requirement of multiple EGF
(37) and LN (5) modules for maintenance of
structural integrity suggested that the noncovalent interaction of
NEC and NTM might be
Ca2+-sensitive. To investigate this possibility, we studied
the dissociation of NEC from immunocomplexes prepared with
antibody directed against NTM. Time-dependent release of
NEC was accelerated by 10 mM EDTA and prevented by 2.5 mM
CaCl2 at 25°C (Fig. 3A),
indicating that NEC-NTM heterodimers are
stabilized by millimolar Ca2+. We had noted previously that
NEC and NTM coprecipitated at 4°C in the
presence of 1 mM EDTA (not shown), suggesting that dissociation rates
were strongly influenced by temperature. This was confirmed by
incubation of NEC-NTM immunocomplexes in 1 mM
EDTA at various temperatures (Fig. 3B), which showed that the
dissociation of NEC was retarded at 4°C compared to 25 or
37°C (Fig. 3B).
|
Metal ion chelator-induced shedding of NEC from
cells.
The role of divalent metal ions in stabilization of
NEC-NTM heterodimers in cells was first
assessed in N-S2 cells (Fig. 4A). Incubation of these cells in TBS resulted in some release of
NEC, which was prevented by addition of 5 mM
CaCl2 and enhanced by 5 mM EDTA, suggesting that
NEC-NTM-interaction in cells is also stabilized
by Ca2+. NEC release was also enhanced by 5 mM
EGTA (not shown), a chelator that is relatively specific for
Ca2+ (42). Additional studies demonstrated that
dissociation of endogenous NEC from Drosophila
Kc cells was detected as early as 2 min after addition of 0.5 mM EDTA
and appeared to be complete by 30 min (Fig. 4B). The EDTA-mediated
release of NEC was not affected by addition of a cocktail
of protease inhibitors, suggesting that its occurrence is not dependent
on proteolysis (Fig. 4B).
|
Requirement of LN repeats for NEC-NTM
association.
The role of specific Ca2+-binding domains
in stabilization of NEC-NTM heterodimers was
studied by expressing forms of N1HA bearing deletions in NIH 3T3 cells.
To investigate the role of the LN domain, NIH 3T3 cells were transduced
with a cDNA, termed
LN-HA, encoding an epitope-tagged form of
NEC deleted of all three LN modules. Whole-cell extracts of
cells expressing
LN-HA were found to contain
LNFL and
NTM but no detectable
LNEC (Fig.
5A). These cells also contained a second
polypeptide of slightly smaller size than NTM that
cross-reacted with anti-IC. The size of this novel polypeptide approximates the size of an intracellular cleavage product implicated in signaling downstream of activated Notch (11, 26, 32, 45, 47,
48). We also noted that the levels of hN1 polypeptides were
substantially lower in
LN-HA-expressing cells than in
NIHA-expressing cells. NTM in N1HA cell extracts was
detectable in Western blot exposures of as little as 5 s, whereas
exposure times of several minutes were required to detect the processed
LN polypeptides. This is consistent with the observation that other
forms of constitutively active hN1 are consistently expressed at low
levels, relative to forms of hN1 without intrinsic signaling activity,
in retrovirus-transduced NIH 3T3 cells (J. C. A., unpublished
data).
|
LNEC,
anti-HA immunoprecipitates were prepared from conditioned media and
analyzed by Western blotting. This revealed the presence of
substantial amounts of an immunoreactive polypeptide of the expected
size of
LNEC (~210 kDa, Fig. 5A) in conditioned medium
obtained from
LN-HA expressing cells. Of note, spontaneous shedding
of NEC was not observed from N1HA cells, despite the
presence of higher amounts of processed NTM in these cells
relative to
LN-HA cells. These findings indicate that the LN modules
are essential for the formation of a stable NEC-NTM heterodimer in cultured cells.
To determine whether the expression of
LN-HA polypeptides produced
increases in Notch signaling, control pBABE cells, N1HA cells, and
LN-HA cells were transfected with a CBF1-sensitive reporter gene.
Despite relatively low levels of processed
LN-HA polypeptides,
LN-HA cells demonstrated a small but significant increase in
reporter gene activity relative to pBABE and N1HA cells (Fig. 5B).
These results are compatible with data showing that expression of
LN-deleted forms of Notch in vivo results in phenotypes consistent with
gain-of-function (30).
To address the role of the Ca2+-binding EGF repeats in
stabilizing the interaction of NEC and NTM, a
form of hN1 containing an extracellular epitope tag and all three LN
repeats but lacking all 36 EGF repeats, termed
EGF-HA (Fig. 1), was
transiently expressed in 293A cells. Immunoprecipitates prepared with
anti-HA contained large amounts of coprecipitating NTM,
indicating that association of NTM and NEC does
not require the EGF repeats (Fig. 5C). Further, NTM was
released from immune complexes by EDTA, indicating that the interaction
of
EGFEC and NTM is dependent on divalent
metal ions. Together with data obtained through studies of
LN-HA,
these findings demonstrate that the Ca2+-dependent
interaction of NEC and NTM is dependent on
Ca2+-binding LN modules.
Activation of hN1 processing and nuclear translocation by
EDTA.
The release of NEC from cells treated with EDTA
presumably creates a cellular pool of free NTM in a near
synchronous fashion (Fig. 4E). Prior work has shown that
amino-terminally deleted forms of Notch resembling NTM,
commonly termed
E, produce gain-of-function phenotypes in several developmental systems (10, 15, 38), suggesting that free NTM might behave like an activated form of Notch. This
possibility is also supported by observations showing that a form of
E retaining 61 of the predicted 69 extracellular amino acids of
human Notch1 NTM induces T-cell leukemia in mice
(35) and activates CBF1 in cultured cells (4).
E.
Transfected cells also expressed approximately equivalent amounts of
NTM or
E polypeptides (Fig. 6A, inset), indicating that
these two polypeptides are of similar potency. These data suggested
that EDTA-mediated release of NEC from NTM
should activate Notch signaling, possibly by triggering the processing of NTM to NICD. To investigate the latter
possibility, hN1HA cells were treated for 15 min with buffer containing
either 10 mM EDTA or 2.5 mM CaCl2 and allowed to recover
for various lengths of time in complete medium. Analysis of HBS
supernatants showed that release of NEC was observed only
in EDTA-treated cells (Fig. 6B). In this and other experiments,
shedding of NEC from N1HA cells was incomplete, since
substantial amounts of residual NEC were observed in
whole-cell extracts prepared from EDTA-treated cells at 0 min. Despite
this limitation, extracts prepared from EDTA-treated cells, but not
Ca2+-treated control cells, showed the appearance of a
short-lived polypeptide of the expected size of NICD that
peaked 1 h after EDTA treatment and disappeared by 2 to 4 h
after exposure (Fig. 6B). Additional studies showed that exposure to
0.5 mM EDTA for 15 min was sufficient to induce the appearance of this
novel polypeptide by 1 h after treatment (Fig. 6C). The appearance
of putative NICD correlated temporally with the results of
immunostaining with a Notch1 antibody raised against the intracellular
domain (Fig. 6D). Treatment for 15 min with 0.5 mM EDTA led to a
transient increase in intranuclear staining after 1 to 2 h that
was no longer detectable by 4 h after treatment. Taken together,
these data suggest that dissociation of NEC induced further
processing and nuclear translocation of the NTM subunit.
|
Activation of signaling by NEC shedding.
To
correlate EDTA-induced NEC shedding and NTM
processing with functional activation, a series of experiments were
performed with reporter plasmids. In an initial time course experiment,
exposure to 10 mM EDTA, but not 2.5 mM Ca2+, led to a
time-dependent increase in the activity of a CBF1-sensitive reporter
gene that was apparent by 4 h and which peaked by 6 h after
exposure (Fig. 7A).
Reporter gene activity slowly
declined at time points beyond 6 h (Fig. 7A and data not shown),
which is to be expected given the 3- to 5-h half-lives of luciferase mRNA and protein. The effect appeared to be mediated through activation of CBF1, since EDTA treatment did not activate a mutated promoter element that fails to bind CBF1 (Fig. 7B). To further correlate dissociation of NEC and activation of the reporter, a
dose-response experiment was carried out. Exposure to 0.5 to 10 mM EDTA
for 15 min at 37°C produced roughly equivalent degrees of reporter
gene activation, an effect that was completely abolished by the
addition of a molar excess of Ca2+ (Fig. 7C).
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our data indicate that the NEC subunit of Notch receptors acts to restrain NTM subunit signaling and illustrate two distinct mechanisms through which the effect of NEC can be overcome: (i) divalent metal ion chelator-mediated release of NEC and (ii) internal deletions in NEC that remove Ca2+-binding LN modules.
Disruption of NEC-NTM interaction by EDTA and
stabilization by Ca2+ demonstrates a conserved requirement
for metal ions in the maintenance of Notch heterodimers. Stabilization
by Ca2+ could result from metal ion coordination by amino
acid residues in NEC, NTM, or both, the latter
possibly stemming from shared metal ion coordination as part of a metal
ion bridge. With respect to metal binding by NEC, prior
work has shown that the folding and structural integrity of individual
EGF and LN modules depends on the presence of millimolar Ca2+ (5, 37). Here we show by deletional
analysis that the LN repeat region plays an essential role in
stabilization of NEC-NTM heterodimers, whereas
the EGF repeats appear not to influence this association. Together,
these findings suggest that the release of NEC by chelators
may stem from conformational changes in LN modules. Such a critical
role for the LN repeats in the restraint of NTM activity is
further supported by developmental studies in invertebrates which have
shown that disruption of LN modules by deletions or point mutations
results in dominant gain-of-function phenotypes (18, 30,
44). It will be of interest to see if activating LN point
mutations also disrupt NEC-NTM interaction. The
effects attributable to the LN domain could be explained by direct
binding of these modules to the extracellular portion of
NTM, which might serve to protect NTM from
activating proteolytic cleavage(s). The appearance of a novel form of
intracellular Notch of the expected size of NICD in hN1
LN-expressing cells is compatible with this possibility. These
observations predict that mutations or modifications in NTM
that disrupt NEC-binding and/or metal-binding residues
should also be activating. Of note, several point mutations in the
extracellular portion of NTM have also proven to cause
gain-of-function phenotypes (18, 30).
Other lines of evidence support a model in which proteolytic processing of NTM to NICD and its subsequent translocation to the nucleus are critical steps in the activation of downstream genes such as HES1 by Notch (21, 26, 28, 44). Here, after EDTA treatment we have directly observed that transcriptional activation of a CBF1-sensitive reporter gene is preceded by the appearance of an NICD-like cleavage product and increased levels of intranuclear Notch1. To date, nuclear Notch has been very difficult to detect by biochemical or in situ methods in normal cells, possibly because it is present in very low amounts and/or has a very short half-life. The transient appearance of NICD and intranuclear Notch after a brief period of exposure to EDTA would tend to support the latter possibility. The ability to detect NICD and intranuclear Notch after EDTA treatment of NIH 3T3 cells overexpressing hN1 likely stems from the near synchronous release of NEC from NTM. This pool of free NTM presumably serves as a substrate for secondary events, such as proteolytic processing, that permit nuclear translocation.
Certain aspects of our data, however, raise a number of issues that are pertinent to both the specific mechanism of activation by EDTA and, more generally, to the normal mechanism of Notch signaling. Given the apparently large increase in nuclear Notch that is induced by EDTA, it is perhaps surprising that the increases in reporter gene activation are modest (3.5- to 5-fold) compared to those observed with sustained overexpression of NICD from strong promoters (21). Factors that may act to limit the magnitude of the response to EDTA treatment include the transient nature of the stimulus and the resistance of a significant fraction of the cellular NEC to EDTA-induced dissociation. We have observed that a substantial portion of the EDTA-resistant NEC in NIH 3T3 cells is located on the cell surface (J.C.A., unpublished data), suggesting that EDTA sensitivity may be regulated by currently unknown factors that modify NEC-NTM complex stability. Although the magnitude of the signal induced by EDTA is smaller than the "supraphysiologic" signals observed in transiently overexpressing cells, it is comparable to that produced by cocultivation with ligand-expressing cells and therefore within a range that is expected to produce biologically relevant effects.
The apparent delay between the peak appearance of NICD and
intranuclear staining (~1 h after EDTA) and maximal reporter gene activation (~4 to 6 h after EDTA) was also unanticipated and
raises questions about the timing of events that activate downstream target genes. While the temporal relationship between the nuclear translocation of NICD and the activation of target genes
has yet to be addressed, a number of other studies have suggested that
the level of nuclear Notch and signaling are not strictly correlated.
Membrane-tethered forms of Drosophila
E resembling
NTM that localized largely to extranuclear membranes caused
gain-of-function developmental abnormalities in several tissues that
were equivalent to, or more severe, than those produced by a form of
NICD that localized entirely to the nucleus (2, 15,
38). Similarly, a form of human
E that localized largely to
extranuclear membranes is as effective as nuclear NICD in
activating CBF1 in cultured cells (4) and inducing T-cell leukemia in mice (35). The imperfect relationship between
the level of nuclear Notch and phenotype observed in these experiments suggest that additional events besides nuclear translocation may be
necessary for signaling. It is possible that a need for other events
may underlie the discordance between the timing of peak intranuclear
Notch levels and gene activation observed in cells treated with EDTA.
Another observation requiring further investigation is the basis for
the relatively small increase in CBF1-dependent reporter gene
activation that is observed in cells stably expressing
LN-HA. Multiple factors may be acting to limit the degree of sustained CBF1
activation in
LN-HA cells. We have observed consistently that the
levels of constitutively active Notch1 polypeptides in NIH 3T3 cells
fall over a period 3 to 7 days post-retroviral transduction to levels
much lower than those observed in transiently expressing cells, in
which reporter assays are typically performed (J.C.A., unpublished
data). The explanation for this decrease in expression is not clear,
but it has also been observed within single clones, suggesting that
mechanisms other than negative selection may be responsible. In
addition, Notch1 activation may upregulate the expression of several
negative regulators, such as Deltex (34; W. Pear et
al., in press) or Notch3 (6, 32). Together, these factors
may act to limit the activation of CBF1 in cells stably overexpressing
constitutively active forms of Notch1 to levels similar to those
produced by ligand stimulation.
The observation that EDTA-mediated dissociation of NEC is sufficient to trigger NTM signaling raises the possibility that ligand-induced activation might proceed through an analogous mechanism. The simplest mechanism would be for ligand-binding to induced conformational changes that promote dissociation of NEC. However, the Notch-Delta-dependent aggregation of S2 cells would appear to exclude this possibility as a general mechanism for physiologic activation of Notch signaling. A second possibility is that ligand binding might trigger endocytosis of Notch-ligand complexes, an event clearly documented in Drosophila (14, 25). The importance of endocytosis has been corroborated by genetic analyses demonstrating that dynamin, a protein that participates in endocytosis, is necessary for Notch signaling in vivo (43). Endocytosis could contribute by exposing the ligand-receptor complex to the low pH within endosomes, which might physically destabilize the NEC-NTM interaction by titrating Ca2+-binding acidic residues in the LIN12 domain (5). Alternatively, endocytosis could deliver receptor-ligand complexes to activating protease(s), the subcellular localization of which is currently unknown. A third possibility, which is also compatible with the second, is that ligand binding might facilitate additional extracellular cleavages in NTM or NEC that remove domains required for heterodimer stabilization. We have recently observed that cocultivation of N1HA cells with cells expressing Jagged1 or Jagged2 ligands leads to the appearance of NEC in conditioned media (J.C.A., unpublished data), suggesting that one or more of these mechanisms may be relevant to normal receptor activation. Overexpression of Notch may titrate out factors, such as endocytic trafficking molecules or proteases, that participate in required events prior or subsequent to ligand binding, thus providing an explanation for how ligand might both promote the aggregation of S2 cells and the dissociation of NEC from NIH 3T3 cells. Future investigation of the fate of NTM, NEC, and ligand postinteraction will be needed to sort out these possibilities and uncertainties.
Of more general importance, the presence of 0.5 mM EDTA in trypsin solutions and the expression of one or more Notch receptors by most cultured cell lines implies that routine splitting of adherent cells likely produces transient activation of Notch signaling. In support of this possibility, we have recently noted that standard treatment of certain cell lines with trypsin-EDTA solutions induces the appearance of immunoreactive polypeptides of the expected size of NICD (J.C.A., unpublished data). Given the pleiotropic effects of activated Notch on many cellular processes, the timing of trypsinization may contribute to variability in some cultured cell assays.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This work was supported by NIH grants CA66849 and CA82308 (J.C.A.), CA62450 (J.S.), NS26084 (S.A.T.), NS10735-01 (L.M.G.), HL61001 (S.C.B.), and the Massachusetts General Hospital (S.A.T.). S.C.B. is a Pew Scholar in the Biomedical Sciences.
We thank A. Israel for providing the HES-AB and HES-
AB luciferase
reporters and U. Lendahl for providing the N3IC expression plasmid.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Division of Molecular Oncology, Department of Pathology, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St., Boston, MA 02115. Phone: (617) 732-7483. Fax: (617) 732-7449. E-mail: jaster{at}rics.bwh.harvard.edu.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Ahmad, I., P. Zagouras, and S. Artavanis-Tsakonis. 1995. Involvement of Notch-1 in mammalian retinal neurogenesis: association of Notch-1 activity with both immature and terminally differentiated cells. Mech. Dev. 53:73-85[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 2. |
Artavanis-Tsakonas, S.,
M. D. Rand, and R. J. Lake.
1999.
Notch signaling: cell fate control and signal integration in development.
Science
284:770-776 |
| 3. |
Aster, J.,
W. Pear,
R. Hasserjian,
H. Erba,
F. Davi,
B. Luo,
M. Scott,
D. Baltimore, and J. Sklar.
1994.
Functional analysis of the TAN-1 gene, a human homolog of Drosophila notch.
Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol.
59:125-136 |
| 4. |
Aster, J. C.,
E. S. Robertson,
R. P. Hasserjian,
J. R. Turner,
E. Kieff, and J. Sklar.
1997.
Oncogenic forms of NOTCH1 lacking either the primary binding site for RBP-Jkappa or nuclear localization sequences retain the ability to associate with RBP-Jkappa and activate transcription.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:11336-11343 |
| 5. | Aster, J. C., W. B. Simms, Z. Zavala-Ruiz, V. Patriub, C. L. North, and S. C. Blacklow. 1999. The folding and structural integrity of the first LIN-12 module of human Notch1 are calcium-dependent. Biochemistry 38:4736-4742[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 6. | Beatus, P., J. Lundkvist, C. berg, and U. Lendahl. 1999. The Notch 3 intracellular domain represses Notch 1-mediated activation through Hairy/Enhancer of split (HES) promoters. Development 126:3925-3935[Abstract]. |
| 7. | Blaumueller, C. M., H. Qi, P. Zagouras, and S. Artavanis-Tsakonas. 1997. Intracellular cleavage of Notch leads to a heterodimeric receptor on the plasma membrane. Cell 90:281-291[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 8. | Capobianco, A. J., P. Zagouras, C. M. Blaumueller, S. Artavanis-Tsakonas, and J. M. Bishop. 1997. Neoplastic transformation by truncated alleles of human NOTCH1/TAN1 and NOTCH2. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:6265-6273[Abstract]. |
| 9. | Christensen, S., V. Kodoyianni, M. Bosenberg, L. Friedman, and J. Kimble. 1996. lag-1, a gene required for lin-12 and glp-1 signaling in Caenorhabditis elegans, is homologous to human CBF1 and Drosophila Su(H). Development 122:1373-1383[Abstract]. |
| 10. | Coffman, C. R., P. Skoglund, W. A. Harris, and C. R. Kinter. 1993. Expression of an extracellular deletion of Xotch diverts cell fates in Xenopus embryos. Cell 73:659-671[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 11. | De Strooper, B., W. Annaert, P. Cupers, P. Saftig, K. Craessaerts, J. S. Mumm, E. H. Schroeter, V. Schrijvers, M. S. Wolfe, W. J. Ray, A. Goate, and R. Kopan. 1999. A presenilin-1-dependent gamma-secretase-like protease mediates release of Notch intracellular domain. Nature 398:518-522[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 12. | Deftos, M. L., Y. W. He, E. W. Ojala, and M. J. Bevan. 1998. Correlating notch signaling with thymocyte maturation. Immunity 9:777-786[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 13. | Ellisen, L. W., J. Bird, D. C. West, A. L. Soreng, T. C. Reynolds, S. D. Smith, and J. Sklar. 1991. TAN-1, the human homolog of the Drosophila Notch gene, is broken by chromosomal translocations in T lymphoblastic neoplasms. Cell 66:649-661[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 14. | Fehon, R. G., P. J. Kooh, I. Rebay, C. L. Regan, T. Xu, M. A. T. Muskavitch, and S. Atravanis-Tsakonas. 1990. Molecular interactions between the protein products of the neurogenic loci Notch and Delta, two EGF-homologous genes in Drosophila. Cell 61:523-534[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 15. | Fortini, M. E., I. Rebay, L. A. Caron, and S. Artavanis-Tsakonas. 1993. An activated Notch receptor blocks cell-fate commitment in the developing Drosophila eye. Nature 365:555-557[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 16. | Go, M. J., D. S. Eastman, and S. Artavanis-Tsakonas. 1998. Cell proliferation control by Notch signaling in Drosophila development. Development 125:2031-2040[Abstract]. |
| 17. |
Greenwald, I.
1998.
LIN-12/Notch signaling: lessons from worms and flies.
Genes Dev.
12:1751-1762 |
| 18. | Greenwald, I., and G. Seydoux. 1990. Analysis of gain-of-function mutations of the lin-12 gene of Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 346:197-199[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 19. | Gu, Y., N. A. Hukriede, and R. G. Fleming. 1995. Serrate expression can functionally replace Delta activity during neuroblast segregation in the Drosophila embryo. Development 121:855-865[Abstract]. |
| 20. |
Hasserjian, R. H.,
J. C. Aster,
F. Davi,
D. Weinberg, and J. Sklar.
1996.
Modulated expression of NOTCH1 during thymic development.
Blood
88:970-976 |
| 21. | Jarriault, S., C. Brou, F. Logeat, E. H. Schroeter, R. Kopan, and A. Israel. 1995. Signaling downstream of activated mNotch. Nature 377:355-358[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 22. |
Jarriault, S.,
O. Le Bail,
E. Hirsinger,
O. Pourquie,
F. Logeat,
C. F. Strong,
C. Brou,
N. G. Seidah, and A. Israel.
1998.
Delta-1 activation of notch-1 signaling results in HES-1 transactivation.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:7423-7431 |
| 23. |
Jehn, B. M.,
W. Bielke,
W. S. Pear, and B. A. Osborne.
1999.
Protective effects of notch-1 on TCR-induced apoptosis.
J. Immunol.
162:635-638 |
| 24. | Joutel, A., C. Corpechot, A. Ducros, K. Vahedi, H. Chabriat, P. Mouton, S. Alamowitch, V. Domenga, M. Cecillion, E. Marechal, J. Maciazek, C. Vayssiere, C. Cruaud, E. A. Cabanis, M. M. Ruchoux, J. Weissenbach, J. F. Bach, M. G. Bousser, and E. Tournier-Lasserve. 1996. Notch3 mutations in CADASIL, a hereditary adult-onset condition causing stroke and dementia. Nature 383:707-710[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 25. |
Klueg, K. M.,
T. R. Parody, and M. A. Muskavitch.
1998.
Complex proteolytic processing acts on Delta, a transmembrane ligand for Notch, during Drosophila development.
Mol. Biol. Cell.
9:1709-1723 |
| 26. |
Kopan, R.,
E. H. Schroeter,
H. Weintraub, and J. S. Nye.
1996.
Signal transduction by activated mNotch: importance of proteolytic processing and its regulation by the extracellular domain.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:1683-1688 |
| 27. | Laemmli, U. K. 1970. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227:680-685[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 28. | Lecourtois, M., and F. Schweisguth. 1998. Indirect evidence for Delta-dependent intracellular processing of Notch in Drosophila embryos. Curr. Biol. 8:771-774[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 29. | Li, L., I. D. Krantz, Y. Deng, A. Genin, A. B. Banta, C. C. Collins, M. Qi, B. J. Trask, W. L. Kuo, J. Cochran, T. Costa, M. E. Pierpont, E. B. Rand, D. A. Piccoli, L. Hood, and N. B. Spinner. 1997. Alagille syndrome is caused by mutations in human Jagged1, which encodes a ligand for Notch1. Nat. Genet. 16:243-251[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 30. |
Lieber, T.,
S. Kidd,
E. Alcamo,
V. Corbin, and M. W. Young.
1993.
Antineurogenic phenotypes induced by truncated Notch proteins indicate a role in signal transduction and may point to a novel function for Notch in nuclei.
Genes Dev.
7:1949-1965 |
| 31. |
Logeat, F.,
C. Bessia,
C. Brou,
O. LeBail,
S. Jarriault,
N. G. Seidah, and A. Israel.
1998.
The Notch1 receptor is cleaved constitutively by a furin-like convertase.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
95:8108-8112 |
| 32. | Luo, B., J. C. Aster, R. P. Hasserjian, F. Kuo, and J. Sklar. 1997. Isolation and functional analysis of a cDNA for human Jagged2, a gene encoding a ligand for the Notch1 receptor. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:6057-6067[Abstract]. |
| 33. | Oda, T., A. G. Elkahloun, B. L. Pike, K. Okajima, I. D. Krantz, A. Genin, D. A. Piccoli, P. S. Meltzer, N. B. Spinner, F. S. Collins, and S. C. Chandrasekharappa. 1997. Mutations in the human Jagged1 gene are responsible for Alagille syndrome. Nat. Genet. 16:235-242[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 34. |
Ordentlich, P.,
A. Lin,
C. P. Shen,
C. Blaumueller,
K. Matsuno,
S. Artavanis-Tsakonas, and T. Kadesch.
1998.
Notch inhibition of E47 supports the existence of a novel signaling pathway.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:2230-2239 |
| 35. |
Pear, W. S.,
J. C. Aster,
M. L. Scott,
R. P. Hasserjian,
B. Soffer,
J. Sklar, and D. Baltimore.
1996.
Exclusive development of T cell neoplasms in mice transplanted with bone marrow expressing activated Notch alleles.
J. Exp. Med.
183:2283-2291 |
| 36. |
Qi, H.,
M. D. Rand,
X. Wu,
N. Sestan,
W. Wang,
P. Rakic,
T. Xu, and S. Artavanis-Tsakonas.
1999.
Processing of the notch ligand delta by the metalloprotease Kuzbanian.
Science
283:91-94 |
| 37. | Rand, M. D., A. Lindblom, J. Carlson, B. O. Villoutreix, and J. Stenflo. 1997. Calcium binding to tandem repeats of EGF-like modules. Expression and characterization of the EGF-like modules of human Notch-1 implicated in receptor-ligand interactions. Protein Sci. 6:1-13. |
| 38. | Rebay, I., R. G. Fehon, and S. Artavanis-Tsakonas. 1993. Specific truncations of Drosophila Notch define dominant activated and dominant negative forms of the receptor. Cell 74:319-329[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 39. | Rebay, I., R. J. Fleming, R. G. Fehon, L. Cherbas, P. Cherbas, and S. Artavanis-Tsakonas. 1991. Specific EGF repeats of Notch mediate interactions with Delta and Serrate: implications for Notch as a multifunctional receptor. Cell 67:687-699[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 40. | Schmid, R. W., and C. N. Reilly. 1957. New complexon for the titration of calcium in the presence of magnesium. Anal. Chem. 29:264-268[CrossRef]. |
| 41. | Schroeter, E. H., J. A. Kisslinger, and R. Kopan. 1998. Notch-1 signalling requires ligand-induced proteolytic release of intracellular domain. Nature 393:382-386[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 42. | Schweisguth, F., and J. Posakony. 1992. Suppressor of Hairless, the Drosophila homolog of the mouse recombination signal-binding protein gene, controls sensory organ fates. Cell 69:1199-1212[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 43. | Seugnet, L., P. Simpson, and M. Haenlin. 1997. Requirement for dynamin during Notch signaling in Drosophila neurogenesis. Dev. Biol. 192:585-598[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 44. | Struhl, G., and A. Adachi. 1998. Nuclear access and action of notch in vivo. Cell 93:649-660[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 45. | Struhl, G., and I. Greenwald. 1999. Presenilin is required for activity and nuclear access of Notch in Drosophila. Nature 398:522-525[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 46. |
Towbin, H.,
T. Staehelin, and J. Gordon.
1979.
Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from polyacrylamide gels to nitrocellulose sheets: procedure and some applications.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
76:4350-4354 |
| 47. | Wolfe, M. S., W. Xia, B. L. Ostaszewski, T. S. Diehl, W. T. Kimberly, and D. J. Selkoe. 1999. Two transmembrane aspartates in presenilin-1 required for presenilin endoproteolysis and gamma-secretase activity. Nature 398:513-517[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 48. | Ye, Y., N. Lukinova, and M. E. Fortini. 1999. Neurogenic phenotypes and altered Notch processing in Drosophila Presenilin mutants. Nature 398:525-529[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 49. |
Zagouras, P.,
S. Stifani,
C. M. Blaumueller,
M. L. Carcangiu, and S. Artavanis Tsakonas.
1995.
Alterations in Notch signaling in neoplastic lesions of the human cervix.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92:6414-6418 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»