Previous Article | Next Article 
Molecular and Cellular Biology, March 2000, p. 2186-2197, Vol. 20, No. 6
0270-7306/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Apoptotic and Growth-Promoting Activity of E2F
Modulated by MDM2
Öonagh
Loughran and
Nicholas B.
La
Thangue*
Division of Biochemistry and Molecular
Biology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, United Kingdom
Received 26 July 1999/Returned for modification 15 September
1999/Accepted 24 November 1999
 |
ABSTRACT |
E2F integrates and coordinates cell cycle progression with the
transcription apparatus through its cyclical interactions with important regulators of cellular proliferation, such as pRb, cyclins, and cdk's. Physiological E2F is a heterodimeric transcription factor
composed of an E2F and a DP family member, and while E2F proteins can
stimulate proliferation, certain members of the family are known to be
endowed with growth-inhibitory and tumor suppressor-like activity. We
have investigated the product of the human mdm2 oncogene, hDM2, and report on its ability to regulate E2F-dependent apoptosis in
a fashion that is independent of p53. hDM2 can prevent
p53
/
cells from entering E2F-dependent apoptosis, an
outcome that is dependent upon the presence of the DP subunit. Cells
rescued from apoptosis possess lower levels of E2F subunits, although the rescued cells show an increase in DNA synthesis and possess enhanced viability that reflects cooperation between E2F-DP and hMD2.
Furthermore, the regulation of E2F activity correlates with an
hDM2-dependent effect on the intracellular distribution of DP-1, since
hDM2 causes the nuclear accumulation of DP-1. The control of E2F by
hDM2 therefore has certain parallels with the targeted degradation by
MDM2 of p53. However, the domains in hDM2 required for the regulation
of E2F activity can be distinguished from those necessary for p53
degradation, suggesting that control of E2F and p53 by hDM2 may be
mechanistically distinct. These experiments define a new level of
interplay between E2F and hDM2 whereby hDM2 has a profound impact on
the physiological consequences of E2F activation. They suggest that the
oncogenic properties of hDM2 may in part be mediated by an
antiapoptotic activity that converts E2F from a negative to a positive
regulator of cell cycle progression and thereby retains E2F at a level
that contributes to a continual state of growth stimulation.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Murine double minute 2 (mdm2), which was first described as one of the genes
amplified on the double minute chromosomes present in the spontaneously
transformed BALB/c 3T3 murine cell line 3T3 DM (6), is an
evolutionarily conserved gene whose protein product, MDM2, is endowed
with growth-promoting activity. The overexpression of MDM2 can
immortalize rodent primary fibroblasts and transform a variety of cell
lines (14), and the human homologue of mdm2, hdm2, is frequently overexpressed in tumors (44).
MDM2 can antagonize transcriptional activation by p53 (39)
and p53-dependent growth arrest (8), which is mediated
through the ability of the N-terminal region of MDM2 to bind to the
N-terminal trans activation domain of p53 (7, 32,
39). Furthermore, mice deficient for mdm2 are not
viable unless they lack the p53 gene (23, 33), suggesting that the regulation of p53 is an important physiological function of
MDM2. In addition to its ability to antagonize p53-dependent transcription, MDM2 can promote the degradation of p53, apparently through a ubiquitin-dependent proteasome pathway (18, 28), and recent studies have shown that MDM2 undergoes nucleocytoplasmic export and continuously shuttles between the nucleus and cytoplasm, and
a nuclear export signal (NES) in MDM2 may be involved in a similar
export mechanism similar to that of the human immunodeficiency virus
rev protein (10, 46). Some evidence has suggested that the
inhibition of MDM2 export interferes with the ability of MDM2 to
destabilize p53 (46).
Also, MDM2 has been shown to functionally interact with a number of
other proteins, including the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor protein
pRb (52), E2F (38), the ribosomal protein L5
(37), and the human TATA box binding protein
(32), and the C-terminal RING finger in MDM2 may interact
with RNA (13). Overall, it appears that although the
regulation of p53 is an important target in mediating the oncogenic
effects of MDM2, it is likely that additional proteins can be subject
to control by MDM2.
The E2F family of transcription factors plays an important role in
orchestrating early cell cycle progression (12, 30). Hypophosphorylated pRb, which is active in negative growth control, binds to E2F and thereafter becomes progressively phosphorylated during
the cell cycle through the sequential activity of cdk's, with the
subsequent release of E2F allowing the transcriptional activation of
target genes required for the early cell cycle. In mammalian cells E2F
is composed of one of six E2F family members bound to a DP family
member (12, 29), in which the transcriptional activity of
E2F is mediated through a C-terminal activation domain that is under
the control of pRb or its relatives p107 and p130, proteins that
physically interact with E2F in a heterodimer and in a temporally
specific fashion (12). Many target genes that are subject to
control by E2F have been identified. In general, these genes encode
proteins that are required for cell cycle progression and, for example,
include enzymes for DNA synthesis, such as dihyduofolate reductase, or
regulatory proteins, such as cyclins A and E (50).
It has been shown that MDM2 can bind to pRb through a domain located in
the C-terminal region of pRb which overlaps with a domain required for
the interaction of pRb with E2F and for growth suppression
(52). Furthermore, a direct interaction with both the E2F
and DP subunits of the E2F heterodimer may be important in augmenting
the response of E2F-regulated genes (38), and in
p53
/
tumor cells, MDM2 can override pRb- or
p107-induced growth arrest (11). In
p53
/
Rb
/
cells MDM2 can
mediate anchorage-independent growth, an effect that requires a domain
in MDM2 suggested to be involved in E2F regulation (11).
Therefore, considerable evidence supports a functional connection
between MDM2 and E2F.
An overwhelming body of evidence has established a role for E2F in
promoting proliferation, although certain E2F family members may also
function as negative regulators of cell growth (12). For
example, overexpression of E2F-1 promotes cell cycle progression and is
sufficient to drive quiescent cells into S phase (22), and
both E2F-1 and DP-1 can cooperate with an activated ras
oncogene to transform cells (22). However,
E2F-1
/
knockout mice suffer a significant
increase in the incidence of tumors, arguing that E2F-1 is also endowed
with growth-inhibitory and tumor suppressor activities (15, 52,
53). Indeed, this apparent dichotomous function of E2F-1 may be
partially attributable to its apoptotic function, as the overexpression
of E2F-1 can not only cause quiescent cells to enter S phase but also
promote apoptosis (25, 45, 48, 51).
We have explored the regulation of apoptosis by E2F in different types
of p53
/
cells and specifically addressed the influence
of hDM2 on apoptosis. We find that hDM2 can prevent cells from entering
E2F-dependent apoptosis and further that this outcome is critically
dependent on the DP component of the E2F heterodimer. Cells that have
been rescued from apoptosis by hDM2 contain lower levels of E2F, which we show is dependent on the presence of the DP subunit and on the
ability of MDM2 to promote E2F degradation. Moreover, the regulation of
E2F correlates with an hDM2-dependent influence on the nuclear
accumulation of DP-1, suggesting that an altered intracellular
distribution is important in mediating the physiological effects of
hDM2. Most importantly, in rescued cells hDM2 and E2F-DP cooperate in
promoting DNA synthesis and cell viability. These data define a new
level of interplay between the pathways of control mediated by hDM2 and
E2F that occurs independently of p53. Furthermore, they support a model
whereby in tumor cells hDM2 can antagonize the apoptotic properties of
E2F and thereby maintain E2F in a permanent state of growth stimulation.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Cell culture and transfection.
SAOS2 cells and early-passage
p53
/
mouse embryo fibroblasts (MEFs) (35)
were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium (DMEM)
supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum. For transient transfections, immunostaining, and terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase-mediated dUTP-biotin nick end labeling (TUNEL) and bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) assays, about 3 × 105 SAOS2 cells or 2 × 105 p53
/
MEFs were seeded onto glass
coverslips in 30-mm-diameter dishes and transfected 12 h later
using the calcium phosphate procedure described previously
(54), in which the total amount of transfected DNA was made
equivalent with empty vector. The cells were transfected for 6 h,
washed, and grown under low-serum conditions (0.2% fetal calf serum)
for a further 18 h prior to being fixed for immunostaining, BrdU
staining, or TUNEL assay. Transfection efficiency usually was between
18 and 24%.
Expression vectors.
The plasmids pCMVHA-HA-E2F-5 and
pHA-E2F-5
TAD were described previously (1). The plasmid
pCMVE2F-4, which encodes human E2F-4, was described previously
(4). The plasmid pRcCMVHA-E2F-1wt, encoding human E2F-1, was
a kind gift from W. Krek (26). Plasmids pG4-DP-1 and the
DP-1 derivatives pG4DP3
, pG4DP3
E, pG4DP3
DEF, and pCMV
gal
have been previously described (3, 9, 31). Plasmid pC53-SN3,
expressing wild-type p53 (2), and the hDM2 expression
vectors (7, 8) have been previously described.
Apoptosis TUNEL assay and immunostaining.
Cells on
coverslips were transfected as indicated in the figures and, at the
appropriate time, fixed for 30 min in 4% paraformaldehyde in
phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) at room temperature. The cells were
permeabilized at 4°C for 2 min in 0.1% Triton X-100-0.1% sodium
citrate and treated for an additional 10 min with 10% fetal calf serum
in PBS. TUNEL staining (Boehringer Mannheim) for apoptotic cells was
carried out according to the manufacturer's instructions. For
immunostaining, the coverslips were incubated with the primary antibody
for 30 min at room temperature and washed in PBS containing 1% bovine
serum albumin. Rabbit polyclonal antibodies were used at a 1:200
dilution, and mouse monoclonal antibodies were used at a 1:1,000
dilution unless otherwise stated. Secondary antibodies, either
anti-mouse fluorescein isothiocyanate- or tetramethyl rhodamine isothiocyanate-conjugated or anti-rabbit fluorescein isothiocyanate- or
tetramethyl rhodamine isothiocyanate-conjugated antibodies (Southern
Biotechnology Associates Inc.), were incubated for '30 min at room
temperature and washed in PBS containing 1% bovine serum albumin with
1 µg of DAPI (4',6'-diamidino-2-phenylindole)/ml to visualize nuclei.
Transfected cells were identified by immunostaining them with an
appropriate antibody, and the level of apoptosis is expressed relative
to the number of cells transfected (antihemagglutinin [HA] was used
to detect E2F-1, E2F-4, and E2F-5; anti-DP-1 was used to detect DP-1;
and Ab-1 [Calbiochem] was used to detect hDM2); the data shown were
derived from at least three independent experiments.
BrdU staining.
Following transfection and overnight
incubation in 0.2% serum, cells were incubated with BrdU (Boehringer
Mannheim) for between 5 and 10 min. The cells were fixed in 70%
ethanol-2 mM glycine (pH 2.0) for 20 min at
20°C, and BrdU
incorporation was detected according to the manufacturer's
instructions. Transfected cells were identified by immunostaining them
with an appropriate antibody, and the level of BrdU incorporation was
expressed relative to the total number of cells transfected.
Immunoblotting.
For immunoblotting, about 5 × 105 SAOS2 cells or 3.5 × 105
p53
/
MEFs were seeded in 60-mm-diameter dishes and
transfected with plasmid as described above. The cells were harvested,
snap frozen, and subsequently lysed in sodium dodecyl sulfate sample
buffer before separation on a 10% polyacrylamide gel. Protein loading was standardized by
-galactosidase activity (derived from
transfected pCMV
gal) and carried out as described previously
(9). The results shown are representative of three
independent experiments.
Colony assay.
For the colony assay, about 5 × 105 SAOS2 cells in 60-mm-diameter dishes were transfected
with 12 µg of each plasmid. Equal amounts of neoresistant plasmid DNA
were added to each transfection. The cells were transfected for 6 h, split, and grown in 10% DMEM with 0.5 mg of G418 (Sigma)/ml added
on the third day to select for resistant colonies. Alternatively,
following transfection, the cells were incubated for 18 h in low
serum prior to being split and subjected to selection. The data shown
were derived from three independent experiments.
Antibodies.
Rabbit polyclonal antibodies to DP-1 and DP-3
have been described previously (9). Other primary antibodies
used were the anti-E2F-1 mouse monoclonal antibody KH95 (Santa Cruz),
anti-p53 mouse monoclonal antibody DO1 (Santa Cruz), the anti-MDM2
mouse monoclonal antibody Ab-1, and the anti-HA mouse polyclonal
antibody (BabCo).
 |
RESULTS |
Apoptotic properties of E2F family proteins.
It is known that
E2F-1 can induce apoptosis (45, 48, 51), but the properties
of the other family members, such as E2F-4 and -5, have not been
elucidated. To explore their apoptotic activities, we compared the
properties of exogenous E2F-1 to those of E2F-4 and -5 in SAOS2
osteosarcoma cells into which E2F expression vectors were transfected
under low-serum growth conditions (31). SAOS2 cells, which
are p53
/
Rb
/
, undergo
apoptosis upon the introduction of exogenous E2F-1 (45). By
TUNEL assay, and consistent with previous reports, E2F-1 could promote
apoptosis, whereas under the same conditions, E2F-4 and E2F-5 had
negligible activity (Fig. 1a, compare bar
2 to 3 and 6).

View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Properties of E2F responsible for apoptosis. (a) SAOS2
cells were transfected as indicated with 6 µg of E2F-1 (bar 2), 6 µg of E2F-4 (bar 3), or 6 µg of E2F-5 (bar 6) alone or with (+) 6 µg of DP3- (bars 4 and 7) or 6 µg of DP3- E (bars 5 and 8).
After 6 h, the cells were washed and further grown overnight in
0.2% fetal calf serum in DMEM. Apoptosis was assayed ~18 h after
transfection, and apoptotic cells were quantitated as described in the
text. The total amount of transfected DNA was made up with pcDNA3. The
percentage of apoptosis is expressed relative to the total number of
transfected cells, and the data shown represent the average values (+ standard deviations) from three independent experiments. (b) The
intracellular distribution of the indicated E2F proteins was determined
under apoptotic conditions after SAOS2 cells were transfected with 6 µg of E2F-1 (i), 6 µg of E2F-4 (ii), 6 µg of both E2F-4 and
DP-3 (iii), 6 µg of both E2F-4 and DP-3 E (iv), 6 µg of
E2F-5 (v), or 6 µg of both E2F-5 and DP-3 (vi) and treated as
described. Anti-HA was used to detect E2F-1 (i), -4 (ii, iii, and iv),
and -5 (v and vi). (c) SAOS2 cells were transfected with 6 µg of
E2F-5 (bars 2 and 3) or 6 µg of E2F-5 TAD (bars 4 and 5) together
with 6 µg of DP-3 (bars 2 and 4) or 6 µg of DP-3 DEF (bars
3 and 5) and treated as described for panel (a). (d) The intracellular
distribution of the indicated proteins was determined under apoptotic
conditions after SAOS2 cells were transfected with 6 µg of E2F-5
together with 6 µg of DP-3 (i) or DP-3 DEF (ii). The
intracellular distribution of E2F-5 is shown.
|
|
In considering the properties of E2F-4 and -5 that might influence
apoptosis, we evaluated the importance of nuclear accumulation (1,
9, 36). Since E2F-1 possesses an intrinsic nuclear localization
signal (NLS) whereas E2F-4 and E2F-5 do not (1), we reasoned
that the observed differences in apoptotic activity may reflect their
distinct intracellular locations. We tested this idea by coexpressing
E2F-4 and E2F-5 with a member of the DP family, the physiological
heterodimeric partners of E2F proteins (3, 16), that
contains an alternatively spliced NLS, referred to as DP-3
(1,
9, 42). When expressed alone, DP-3
failed to induce apoptosis
(data not shown). However, in the presence of DP-3
, both E2F-4 and
E2F-5 induced apoptosis (Fig. 1a, bars 4 and 7), a result suggesting
that nuclear translocation and accumulation are necessary for
E2F-dependent apoptosis; under these conditions, expressing DP-3
alone failed to induce apoptosis (data not shown). We confirmed this
view by studying the effect of coexpressing either DP-1 (which lacks an
intrinsic NLS [9]) or a mutant DP-3
protein,
referred to as DP-3
E, which lacks a 16-residue sequence, known as
the E region, that forms part of the bipartite NLS (9).
Coexpression of either DP-1 or DP-3
E with E2F-4 or -5 failed to
stimulate apoptosis (Fig. 1a, bars 5 and 8, and data not shown),
arguing that nuclear E2F-4 and -5 heterodimers possess apoptotic activity.
The intracellular distribution (1, 9) for each of the E2F
and DP components was verified in cells grown under low-serum conditions. In contrast to E2F-1, both E2F-4 and -5 were predominantly cytosolic (Fig. 1b, compare i with ii and v) but underwent nuclear accumulation when coexpressed with DP-3
and failed to do so with DP-3
E (Fig. 1b, compare ii with iii and iv and v with vi).
The results suggest that a nuclear E2F heterodimer can induce
apoptosis. To examine other functionally relevant domains, we studied
two mutant derivatives. The first possessed a deletion in the DEF
region of DP-3
, which is a protein sequence conserved in all known
DP proteins that is necessary for DNA binding but fails to affect
dimerization with E2F family members (3). In the context of
DP-3
, the mutation in DP-3
DEF leaves the NLS intact, as
DP-3
DEF can undergo nuclear accumulation and recruit E2F-5 into
nuclei (Fig. 1d, compare i with ii). For the second derivative, a
mutant E2F-5 protein lacking the transcriptional activation domain,
E2F-5
TAD, was studied. When coexpressed with wild-type E2F-5,
DP-3
DEF failed to induce apoptosis (Fig. 1c, compare bars 2 and
3), suggesting that nuclear accumulation and dimerization are not
sufficient and that DNA binding subunits are necessary for the
induction of apoptosis. In contrast, E2F-5
TAD together with
wild-type DP-3
retained apoptotic activity (Fig. 1c, compare bars 2 and 4), albeit at a lower level than that possessed by wild-type E2F-5
(Fig. 1c, compare bars 2 and 4).
These results extend previous studies of E2F-dependent apoptosis
(21, 43). Specifically, they document the fact that
apoptosis can be induced by E2F-4 and E2F-5 heterodimers and that
nuclear localization and DNA binding of the E2F-DP heterodimer is
necessary for apoptotic activity. In contrast, the transcriptional
activation domain of E2F-5 is not necessary but rather augments apoptosis.
hDM2 overcomes E2F-mediated apoptosis in SAOS2
p53
/
cells.
The fact that MDM2
activity is integrated with the pRb-E2F pathway of growth control
(38, 52) prompted us to examine the possibility that hDM2
could alter the apoptotic activity of E2F; experiments were performed
with p53
/
cells to rule out any influence of
p53. For these studies, we capitalized on the information described
above and in the first instance explored the influence of hDM2 on
E2F-dependent apoptosis in SAOS2 cells. Therefore, hDM2 was expressed
in cells undergoing apoptosis as a result of E2F-1 expression, and the
level of apoptotic cells was compared to that of transfected cells
expressing both components of the physiological heterodimer, namely
E2F-1 and DP-1. We found that the apoptotic activity of E2F-1, when
expressed alone, was not affected by hDM2, as the number of apoptosing
cells remained at a level very similar to that caused by E2F-1 alone (Fig. 2a, compare bars 3 and 4), a result
consistent with earlier studies, which established that hDM2 fails to
overcome E2F-1-dependent apoptosis (21). Remarkably,
however, although the level of apoptosis was only marginally greater
when DP-1 and E2F-1 were coexpressed (Fig. 2a, compare bars 3 and 5),
there was a highly significant decline in apoptosis upon the expression
of hDM2 (Fig. 2a, compare bars 5 and 6), similar results being obtained
with DP-3
(data not shown). Thus, hDM2 can down-regulate
E2F-dependent apoptosis, but it does so in a fashion that reflects the
presence of the DP subunit.

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
hDM2 overcomes E2F-dependent apoptosis in a DP
subunit-dependent fashion in SAOS2 cells. (a) SAOS2 cells were
transfected as indicated with 6 µg of E2F-1 (bars 3 to 6), 6 µg of
DP-1 (bars 5 and 6), or 6 µg of hDM2 (bars 2, 4, and 6). After 6 h, the cells were washed and grown overnight in 0.2% fetal calf serum
in DMEM. Apoptosis was assayed ~18 h after transfection, and
apoptotic cells were quantitated as described in the text. The
percentage of apoptosis is expressed relative to the total number of
transfected cells, and the data shown represent the average values (+ standard deviations) from three independent experiments. +, present;
, absent. (b) SAOS2 cells were transfected as indicated with 6 µg
of E2F-4 (bars 3, 4, and 5) or E2F-5 (bars 6, 7, and 8) together with 6 µg of DP-3 (bars 4, 5, 7, and 8) and 6 µg of hDM2 (bars 2, 5, and 8) and treated as described for panel a. (c) The intracellular
distribution of the indicated proteins was determined under apoptotic
conditions after SAOS2 cells were transfected with the appropriate
expression vectors encoding the indicated proteins as described in for
panel a. Anti-HA was used to detect E2F-1, anti-DP-1 was used to detect
DP-1, and anti-MDM2 was used to detect hDM2 (data not shown). The
transfected expression vectors are indicated, and the immunostained
protein is shown by white lettering. Note that iii and v, and iv and
vi, show the same field stained with either anti-HA (iii and iv) or
anti-DP-1 (v and vi) and that the images shown result from the same
time of exposure.
|
|
To assess the generality of these observations, we extended our studies
to the other E2F and DP family members. Under conditions where E2F-4 or
E2F-5 cause apoptosis, namely, when coexpressed with the
isoform of
DP-3 (Fig. 1a), the presence of hDM2 effectively reduced the level of
apoptosis (Fig. 2b, compare bar 4 with 5 and 7 with 8). Since the
apoptotic activity of E2F-4 and E2F-5 is dependent upon the presence of
a DP protein (Fig. 1c), these results support the idea that the
presence of a DP partner plays an important role in facilitating the
antiapoptotic effects of hDM2.
As the intracellular location of the E2F heterodimer is a critical
determinant in causing apoptosis (Fig. 1), we next assessed whether the
antiapoptotic activity of hDM2 correlated with any alteration in the
distribution or abundance of E2F. Coexpressing hDM2 with E2F-1 had no
apparent effect on the distribution of E2F-1 (Fig. 2c, compare i and
ii). Consistent with previous results (9), coexpressing DP-1
with E2F-1 caused DP-1 to undergo nuclear accumulation which, without
E2F-1, was mostly cytosolic (Fig. 2c, compare v and vii). However, in
cells expressing both E2F-1 and DP-1, the coexpression of hDM2 caused a
marked reduction in the level of immunostaining arising from either
DP-1 or E2F-1 (Fig. 2c, compare iii and v with iv and vi). These
results suggest that hDM2 can influence the levels of E2F subunits and
that it does so in a fashion that is dependent upon the presence of the DP subunit.
hDM2 down-regulates the levels of E2F and DP proteins.
Since
the immunostaining results (Fig. 2) suggested that hDM2 can
down-regulate the levels of the E2F and DP subunits, we tested this
idea by directly measuring E2F and DP levels under conditions of
E2F-dependent apoptosis. Firstly, we studied the effects of hDM2 on
E2F-1, either alone or together with DP-1. Although the presence of
hDM2 failed to affect the level of E2F-1 (Fig.
3a, compare lanes 4 and 5), a clear
reduction in E2F-1 was apparent in cells that coexpressed DP-1 (Fig.
3a, compare lanes 6 and 7), thus suggesting that a DP partner is
necessary to allow hDM2 to modulate the levels of E2F-1. In contrast to
E2F-1, the level of DP-1 was reduced either in the presence or absence
of E2F-1 upon coexpressing hDM2 (Fig. 3b, compare lane 6 with 7 and lane 8 with 9), consistent with the idea that the DP subunit is the
component in the E2F heterodimer that is targeted by hDM2.

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
hDM2 regulates the levels of E2F and DP subunits. (a and
b) SAOS2 cells were transfected as indicated with expression vectors
encoding E2F-1 (12 µg; lanes 4, 5, 6, and 7) or DP-1 (12 µg; lanes
6, 7, 8, and 9) together with hDM2 (12 µg) as indicated. After 6 h, the cells were washed and further grown for ~18 h in 0.2% fetal
calf serum in DMEM. The cells were harvested and assayed for
immunoblotting with anti-E2F-1 (a) or anti-HA for DP-1 (b) as described
in the text. The band apparent in panel b, lane 4, results from a
nonspecific reaction of the anti-HA antibody. (c) SAOS2 cells were
transfected as indicated with expression vectors encoding E2F-5 (12 µg; lanes 3, 4, 5, and 6) and DP-3 (12 µg; lanes 5 and 6)
together with hDM2 (12 µg; lanes 2, 4, and 6) treated as described
above and were immunoblotted with anti-HA for E2F-5. (d) SAOS2 cells
were transfected as indicated with expression vectors encoding p53 (12 µg; lanes 2 and 3) or hDM2 (12 µg; lane 3) treated as described
above and were immunoblotted with anti-p53. For each of the experiments
shown, the amount of extract loaded was determined by reference to the
level of galactosidase activity derived from pCMV gal (see
Materials and Methods). +, present; , absent.
|
|
Having established that hDM2 can regulate the levels of the E2F-DP-1
heterodimer, we examined the effect of hDM2 on E2F-5. Specifically, we
coexpressed E2F-5 with DP3
to create conditions that favor apoptosis
and where a functional influence on apoptosis by hDM2 was apparent
(Fig. 2b). In a fashion similar to the effect of hDM2 on the
E2F-1-DP-1 heterodimer, expressing hDM2 with E2F-5 caused a marked
reduction in the levels of E2F-5 (Fig. 3c, compare lanes 5 and 6).
hDM2 can regulate the stability of p53 (18, 28). As a
positive control, therefore, we monitored the effect of hDM2 on exogenous p53 in SAOS2 cells. As expected, there was a clear and significant reduction in the level of p53 in the presence of hDM2 (Fig.
3d, compare lanes 2 and 3).
Overall, a comparison of the effect of hDM2 on E2F-dependent apoptosis
with the levels of E2F and DP proteins indicated that a correlation
exists between the abilities of hDM2 to overcome apoptosis and to
compromise the level of the E2F subunits. The results lend themselves
to the suggestion that hDM2 may exert its antiapoptotic effect by
stimulating a reduction in the level of the E2F heterodimer.
hDM2 modulates E2F activity in p53
/
MEFs.
As
SAOS2 cells are human tumor cells which have sustained mutations in
genes other than p53, such as Rb, it was
important to establish that similar effects were observed in
nontumorigenic p53
/
cells. To this end, we
assessed the effect of hDM2 in early-passage MEFs in which the p53 gene
had been knocked out through homologous recombination (35).
The introduction of E2F-1 into p53
/
MEFs stimulated
apoptosis in a fashion similar to that observed in SAOS2 cells (Fig.
4a, compare bar 1 with 3), and the
subsequent introduction of DP-1 together with E2F-1 marginally affected
the level of apoptosis (Fig. 4a, compare bar 3 with 5). In contrast to
the lack of effect of hDM2 on E2F-1-dependent apoptosis (Fig. 4a,
compare bar 3 with 4), hDM2 caused a marked reduction in the apoptotic
activity induced by E2F-1 and DP-1 (Fig. 4a, compare bar 5 with 6), an
outcome that reflects the observations made in SAOS2 cells. As a
control for hDM2 activity, the apoptosis induced in
p53
/
MEFs upon the expression of wild-type p53 was
significantly reduced upon the coexpression of hDM2 (Fig. 4a, compare
bars 9 and 10).

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
hDM2 overcomes E2F-dependent apoptosis in
p53 / MEFs. (a) p53 / MEFs were
transfected with expression vectors encoding hDM2 (6 µg; bars 3, 4, 6, 8, and 10), E2F-1 (6 µg; bars 3, 4, 5, and 6), DP-1 (6 µg; bars
7 and 8), or p53 (6 µg; bars 9 and 10) as indicated. After 6 h,
the cells were washed and grown overnight in 0.2% fetal calf serum in
DMEM. Apoptosis was assayed ~18 h after transfection, and the
apoptotic cells were counted. The percentage of apoptosis is expressed
relative to the total number of cells counted, and the data shown (+ standard deviations) were derived from two separate experiments. (b)
p53 / MEFs were transfected as indicated with expression
vectors encoding hDM2 (12 µg; lanes 1, 3, and 5), E2F-1 (12 µg;
lanes 2, 3, 4, and 5), or DP-1 (12 µg; lanes 4 and 5). The cells were
treated as described in the legend to Fig. 3a and immunoblotted with
anti-HA for E2F-1 and DP-1; E2F-1 and DP-1 are indicated. +, present;
, absent.
|
|
We measured the levels of E2F-1 and DP-1 in p53
/
MEFs
in the presence and absence of hDM2. While E2F-1 levels were not
affected by hDM2 (Fig. 4b, lanes 2 and 3), there was a clear and
striking down-regulation of E2F-1 when hDM2 was coexpressed with E2F-1 and DP-1 (Fig. 4b, compare lanes 4 and 5). Overall, this analysis of
the properties of E2F-dependent apoptosis in p53
/
MEFs
indicates that apoptosis is regulated by hDM2 in a fashion similar to
that observed in SAOS2 cells, namely, that for hDM2 to be able to
rescue cells from undergoing E2F-dependent apoptosis, both subunits of
the E2F heterodimer must be present.
hDM2 cooperates with E2F in DNA synthesis and colony-forming
activity.
We reasoned that in overcoming E2F-dependent apoptosis,
it was likely that hDM2 promoted cell cycle progression and enhanced cell viability. Therefore, we monitored the level of DNA synthesis through BrdU incorporation in cells grown under low-serum conditions. When expressed alone, either E2F-1 or DP-1 stimulated BrdU
incorporation (Fig. 5c, compare bars 2 and 6), and coexpressing E2F-1 with DP-1 resulted in a level of BrdU
incorporation similar to that with E2F-1 or DP-1 alone (Fig. 5c,
compare bars 2, 4, and 6). However, although hDM2 had a small effect on
BrdU incorporation in the presence of E2F-1, a marked induction was
apparent when hDM2 was coexpressed with E2F-1 and DP-1 (Fig. 5c, bar
5), suggesting that in the presence of both subunits, hDM2 can
stimulate a greater level of DNA synthesis than in the presence of
either subunit alone.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
hDM2 regulation of E2F promotes DNA synthesis and
confers a survival advantage. (a) SAOS2 cells were transfected as
indicated with expression vectors encoding E2F-1 (6 µg; bars 2, 3, 4, and 5) or DP-1 (6 µg; bars 4, 5, and 6) together with hDM2 (6 µg;
bars 1, 3, and 5). After 6 h, the cells were washed and grown for
~18 h in 0.2% fetal calf serum in DMEM. BrdU incorporation was
assayed at ~18 h as described in the text, and immunostaining was
performed in parallel to determine transfection efficiency (data not
shown). The BrdU incorporation was determined relative to the
transfection efficiency, and the data shown represent the average
values (+ standard deviations) from three independent experiments where
the BrdU incorporation is expressed relative to the control treatment
of pcDNA3-transfected cells. (b) SAOS2 cells were transfected as
indicated with expression vectors encoding E2F-1 (12 µg; bars 2 and
3), DP-1 (12 µg; bars 3 and 4), and hDM2 (12 µg; bars 1, 2, 3, and
4). After 6 h, the cells were washed and grown in either 0.2%
( ) or 10% ( ) fetal calf serum for ~18 h, after which the cells
were placed under G418 selection under normal culture conditions; each
bar represents the average data from a single experiment involving
duplicate treatments. The average number of colonies over three
distinct experiments obtained after transfection with pcDNA3 was 588. The colonies were stained with crystal violet, and colony-forming
activity is presented as the increase in colony numbers in the presence
of hDM2 relative to the numbers in the absence of hDM2 in cells treated
with the indicated expression vectors. +, present; , absent.
|
|
As a further measure of the proliferative capacity of cells expressing
E2F, DP, and hDM2, we performed a colony assay. A dramatic increase in
colony formation was apparent in cells coexpressing E2F-1, DP-1, and
hDM2 but not in cells expressing E2F-1 or DP-1 with or without hDM2
(usually between 50 and 100% [Fig. 5d]), an effect that was apparent
in cells cultured in low or high serum levels. Thus, these results
imply that the reduced level of E2F-dependent apoptosis caused by hDM2
correlates with increased DNA synthesis and enhanced cell viability,
suggesting that rescued cells are endowed with a significant growth
advantage. Moreover, as the enhanced colony-forming activity was only
apparent when hDM2 was coexpressed with the E2F-DP heterodimer, the
results imply that hDM2 and E2F-DP functionally cooperate in
stimulating colony formation.
Domains in hDM2 required for the regulation of E2F activity.
We continued to analyze the mechanism through which hDM2 modulates the
activity of the E2F heterodimer by examining the regions in hDM2 that
are necessary for the observed effects on E2F-dependent apoptosis,
colony formation, and altered protein level. We employed a number of
mutant proteins derived from hDM2 (Fig.
6a) that have previously been examined
for their regulatory effects on p53 activity (7). Thus,
mutant hDM2
222-437 lacks most of the C-terminal half
but retains the p53 binding domain, NLS, NES, and RING finger and has
been reported to bind to p53, but it fails to affect the level of p53
protein (8, 28). hDM21-440 has a truncation in
the C-terminal region and has wild-type activity for p53 regulation
(8), and hDM2
59-89 possesses a deletion in
the p53 interaction domain and fails to regulate p53 activity
(7).

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Domains in hDM2 required to regulate E2F. (a)
Diagrammatic summary of wild-type hDM2 (indicating the relevant
domains) and the hDM2 mutant derivatives. (b) SAOS2 cells were
transfected under low-serum conditions as indicated with expression
vectors encoding E2F-1 (6 µg) and DP-1 (6 µg) together with the
hDM2 derivative hDM21-440, hDM2 222-437, or
hDM2 59-89 (6 µg; bars 2, 3, and 4). Apoptotic cells
were assayed as described in the legend to Fig. 2. The values shown
indicate the percent change in apoptotic activity relative to the
control treatment (cells transfected with pcDNA3) and represent the
average values (+ standard deviations) from three independent
experiments. The control-treated cells usually showed less than 5%
apoptosis. (c) SAOS2 cells were transfected as indicated with
expression vectors encoding E2F-1 (12 µg) and DP-1 (12 µg) together
with the indicated hDM2 derivatives (12 µg; bars 2, 3, and 4) and
treated as described (grown in 0.2% fetal calf serum) in the legend to
Fig. 5b. The percent change in colony numbers was calculated as the
colony activity in the presence of hDM2 relative to that in the absence
of hDM2, and the data represent the average values (+ standard
deviations) derived from three independent experiments. (d and e) SAOS2
cells were transfected as indicated with expression vectors encoding
E2F-1 (12 µg; lanes 1 to 4) and DP-1 (12 µg; lanes 3 and 4)
together with wild-type hDM2 (d) or hDM2 222-437 (e) (12 µg; lanes 2 and 4). The cells were harvested and assayed by
immunoblotting with anti-E2F-1 or anti-HA for DP-1 as indicated. (f)
SAOS2 cells were transfected as indicated with expression vectors
encoding p53 (12 µg; lanes 1 and 2) together with
hDM2 222-437 (12 µg; lane 2). The cells were harvested
and assayed by immunoblotting with anti-p53 or anti-MDM2 as indicated.
The amount of extract loaded was determined by reference to the level
of galactosidase activity derived from pCMV gal. +, present; ,
absent.
|
|
In a fashion similar to that of wild-type hDM2, both
hDM21-440 and hDM2
222-437 could
overcome apoptosis, whereas hDM2
59-89 rescued some
cells from undergoing apoptosis but nevertheless was less efficient
than the other mutants (Fig. 6b, compare bars 2, 3, and 4). In the
colony assay, mutants hDM21-440 and
hDM2
222-437 augmented colony formation as efficiently
as wild-type hDM2, whereas hDM2
59-89, while causing a
significant induction of colony formation, possessed reduced activity
(Fig. 6c, compare bars 1, 2, and 3).
Next, we investigated the effects of the hDM2 mutants on the levels of
E2F-1 and DP-1 under apoptotic conditions, where coexpression of
wild-type hDM2 caused a marked reduction in the levels of both subunits
(Fig. 6d). Data derived from one of the mutants, namely, hDM2
222-437, are presented. In comparison to wild-type
hDM2, hDM2
222-437 affected the levels of E2F-1 and
DP-1 to similar extents. Specifically, the increased level of E2F-1
apparent upon coexpression of DP-1 was significantly compromised by
hDM2
222-437 (Fig. 6e, compare lanes 1, 3, and 4). In a
fashion similar to that of wild-type hDM2, the effect of
hDM2
222-437 was dependent upon the presence of DP-1,
since little reduction in the E2F-1 level was apparent without a
coexpressed DP subunit (Fig. 6e, compare lanes 1 and 2 with 3 and 4).
The same effect was seen when the level of DP-1 was analyzed, as
hDM2
222-437 caused a significant reduction in the DP-1
level (Fig. 6e, compare lane 3 to 4). As a control, we
investigated the effect of hDM2
222-437 on exogenous p53
in SAOS2 cells. As expected from previous studies (28),
hDM2
222-437 did not affect the level of p53 (Fig. 6f,
compare lanes 1 and 2) despite high expression levels of the hDM2
mutant (Fig. 6f, lane 2). A similar analysis was performed with
hDM2
59-89, where an effect upon the level of E2F-1 or
DP-1 was not apparent (data not shown). (For a summary of the results
from the analysis of hDM21-440 and
hDM2
59-89, see Fig. 8c.)
hDM2 modulates the intracellular location of DP-1.
The
interaction between DP-1 and hDM2 (38) and the role of MDM2
in nucleocytoplasmic shuttling (46), combined with the data
presented here, led us to consider the possibility that hDM2 can
influence the intracellular location of DP-1. In the first instance, we
performed the experiments with apoptotic cells coexpressing wild-type
hDM2 and DP-1. As expected (9, 46), hDM2 was present predominantly in nuclei (Fig.
7a),
whereas DP-1 was located mostly in the cytosol (Fig. 2 and 7a). In
contrast, expressing hDM2 with DP-1 caused DP-1 to undergo a dramatic
alteration in intracellular distribution: thus, although hDM2 possessed
a nuclear location, a significant nuclear presence was observed for
DP-1 (Fig. 7, compare b to d), suggesting that hDM2 can modulate the
intracellular distribution of DP-1.

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
Influence of hDM2 on the intracellular
distribution of DP-1. The intracellular distribution of the indicated
proteins was determined under apoptotic conditions after SAOS2 cells
were transfected with expression vectors encoding hDM2 (6 µg) (a),
DP-1 (6 µg) (b), or both hDM2 and DP-1 (6 µg each) (c, d, e, f, g,
and h). The cells were treated as described in the text with anti-DP-1
(b, d, f, g, and h) and anti-MDM2 (a, c, e, g, and i). Panels a and b
show different cells, whereas panels c and d, e and f, g and h, and i
and j show the same cells stained with anti-MDM2 and anti DP-1,
respectively; note that the images result from different exposure
times. The hDM2 mutant derivatives are indicated. Similar results were
obtained with U20S cells (data not shown).
|
|
We then studied the effect of the hDM2 mutant derivatives on DP-1
location. For this analysis, each mutant was coexpressed with wild-type
DP-1, and thereafter, the influence on the intracellular location was
determined in cells double stained with anti-MDM2 and anti-DP-1. Each
of the hDM2 derivatives had an intracellular distribution similar to
that of wild-type hDM2, possessing a mostly nuclear location (Fig. 7e,
g, and i). In a fashion similar to that of wild-type hDM2, both
hDM2
1-440 and hDM2
222-437 caused DP-1
to undergo nuclear accumulation (Fig. 7f and h). In contrast,
hDM2
59-89 failed to affect the location of DP-1, as
DP-1 remained cytosolic despite the nuclear presence of
hDM2
59-89 (Fig. 7, compare i and j).
This analysis suggests that the ability of hDM2 to influence the
nuclear accumulation of DP-1 may be functionally important for hDM2 in
regulating the activity of the E2F heterodimer because a correlation
exists between the ability of hDM2 to regulate E2F activity, namely,
apoptosis and cell cycle progression, and the hDM2-stimulated nuclear
accumulation of DP-1.
 |
DISCUSSION |
hDM2 overcomes E2F-dependent apoptosis.
A significant
conclusion from the study reported here relates to the ability of hDM2
to overcome E2F-dependent apoptosis and the important role played by
the DP subunit of the E2F heterodimer in facilitating the antiapoptotic
effect of hDM2. This effect is exerted independently of the established
role of hDM2 in regulating the p53 response (44), as most
importantly, the ability of hDM2 to control E2F-dependent apoptosis was
apparent in p53
/
cells. Furthermore, the
data suggest that once cells have been rescued from apoptosis by hDM2,
hDM2 and the E2F-DP heterodimer cooperate to enhance cell viability and
cell cycle progression; thus, the data establish the fact that an
antiapoptotic and growth-promoting activity of hDM2 may be channelled
through a single cellular target. In a physiological setting, the
results imply that hDM2 can alter the cellular consequences of
deregulating the E2F pathway from the induction of apoptosis to that of
growth stimulation, a process that may be critically important during tumorigenesis.
Of relevance to these results is the considerable body of evidence in
support of the idea that the oncogenic properties of MDM2 proteins may
be influenced by mechanisms other than the regulation of p53 activity.
For example, the targeted expression of MDM2 to breast epithelial cells
uncouples S-phase progression and causes multiple rounds of chromosomal
replication, a process that is independent of p53 (34).
Furthermore, mdm2 transcripts that lack the region encoding
the p53 binding domain yet possess oncogenic activity have been
isolated from human tumor cells (49), again suggesting that
MDM2 can exert oncogenic activity independently of p53. It is possible,
based on the information presented here, that the regulation of E2F
activity by hDM2 plays a significant role in both of these situations.
Although physiological E2F DNA binding activity is a heterodimer
composed of a DP and an E2F subunit (12), little information is available on the regulatory roles played by the DP subunit. At a
generic level, the formation of the E2F-DP heterodimer augments DNA
binding activity, transcriptional activity, and the interaction with
pocket proteins, although the domains recognized by pocket proteins and
the trans activation domain reside in the E2F subunit (29). The role described here for the DP subunit in allowing regulation of E2F-DP activity by hDM2 documents an example of a
distinct role for the DP component. In this respect, it is noteworthy that earlier studies have addressed the regulation of E2F-1-dependent apoptosis by hDM2 and concluded that hDM2 has little influence on
apoptotic activity (21), data that are consistent with the studies presented here (Fig. 2a). However, in a physiological context
where E2F DNA binding activity normally exists as an E2F-DP heterodimer
(12), the analysis documented in this study of the role
played by the DP component is likely to be highly relevant.
In considering a possible explanation for the requirement for both
components of the E2F-DP heterodimer in facilitating the rescue from
apoptosis by hDM2, it is feasible that the phenomenon relates to
different properties in the regulation of target genes by E2F-1
compared to E2F-1-DP-1. While E2F-1 can bind to the E2F consensus DNA
binding site, the binding activity is stimulated upon formation of the
E2F-1-DP-1 heterodimer (12). In contrast, the efficiencies
of apoptosis induction by E2F-1 alone and by E2F-1-DP-1 appear to be
similar (Fig. 2a). A potential model to explain these data therefore
suggests that E2F-1 alone and E2F-1-DP-1 induce apoptosis through
similar mechanisms. Following on, it is possible that the E2F-1
homodimer and the E2F-1-DP-1 heterodimer target a set of genes which
is principally required to regulate apoptosis and that the presence of
the DP subunit allows regulation by hDM2 and enhanced cell viability.
Previous studies that have addressed a role of MDM2 in E2F-dependent
apoptosis were performed with p53
/
cells, where it was
concluded that the inhibition of apoptosis caused by MDM2 was mediated
through the ability of hDM2 to down-regulate p53 activity
(25). More recently, it has been suggested that E2F-1 is
up-regulated in a fashion similar to that of p53 in response to DNA
damage and furthermore that MDM2 plays a role in this process (5). However, while these results are compatible with the
data presented here, it is important to note that in contrast to these studies, our analysis was performed with p53
/
cells
that lack wild-type p53 activity (both tumor cells and early-passage
p53
/
MEFs) and therefore our results point towards a
mechanism that operates independently of p53 in enabling hDM2 to
monitor the status of E2F activity.
Does hDM2 regulate an S-phase checkpoint?
A variety of studies
have ascribed both oncogenic and apoptotic activity to E2F
(12). In this respect, given the important role that E2F
plays in the control of proliferation, it makes considerable sense that
cellular mechanisms should exist that monitor E2F and, in circumstances
of aberrant control, stimulate apoptosis. Indeed, it is likely that
E2F-dependent apoptosis represents a physiologically relevant process,
as E2F-1
/
mice have defects in apoptosis
during normal thymocyte ontogeny (15). Furthermore, the
apoptosis seen in Rb
/
mice shows a clear
tissue dependence on p53, as apoptosis is dependent upon p53 in the eye
lens but is p53 independent in the peripheral nervous system (35,
40).
The properties of the E2F-DP transcription factor and its role in
regulating early cell cycle progression, particularly entry into S
phase, are consistent with a model in which inappropriately high levels
of E2F-DP activity activate a pathway that induces apoptosis. There is
a considerable body of evidence that supports the existence and
functional importance of a pathway that monitors E2F-DP levels for the
normal exit from S phase, and the suppression of such an S-phase
checkpoint through the down-regulation of E2F-DP levels may be the
basis of normal cell cycle progression (27).
The data presented here indicate that hDM2 can influence apoptotic
activity but that it does so in a fashion that is dependent upon the DP
component and, further, correlates with a reduction in the levels of
the E2F and DP subunits. It is possible that high levels of E2F-1
activate a checkpoint pathway which eventually leads to apoptosis (Fig.
8a and b). As the levels of the E2F-DP subunits are down-regulated during progress through S phase (26, 27), one potential scenario to explain our results envisages that
hDM2 either activates a process normally used by cells to regulate
E2F-DP protein levels or mimics such an activity and that this process
is necessary for cells to suppress the S-phase checkpoint and continue
cell cycle progression.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 8.
Model for regulation of E2F by hDM2. (a and b) It is
envisaged that inappropriately high levels of E2F-DP activity cause the
activation of a checkpoint pathway of control which thereafter leads to
apoptosis (a). Since hDM2 can influence apoptosis by causing a
reduction in E2F and DP subunit levels (b), it is suggested that this
process may allow hDM2 to modulate checkpoint activity, limit
apoptosis, and thereby facilitate cell cycle progression. The data
suggest that the DP subunit is instrumental in enabling hDM2 to
regulate E2F-dependent apoptosis. (c) Summary of the effects of hDM2
and mutant derivatives on E2F-DP regulation. (1), data not shown.
|
|
hDM2 influences E2F-DP levels and augments E2F-dependent
growth.
The ability of hDM2 to regulate the levels of E2F and DP
correlated with the rescue of cells from apoptosis and induction of DNA
synthesis. While it is necessary to clarify the mechanism involved in
the down-regulation of E2F and DP subunits, it is noteworthy that the
regulation of p53 by hDM2 involves a stimulation of ubiquitin-dependent
degradation mediated by the E3 ligase-like activity in hDM2 (18,
28), and further, that the regulation of E2F and DP protein
levels involves ubiquitin-dependent degradation (17, 19). It
is consistent with this idea that the N-terminal region of hDM2, which
is required for p53 regulation (39, 41), plays an important
role in the regulation of E2F-DP activity, as the hDM2 derivative
hDM2
59-89 has reduced capacity to control E2F-DP
activity. It is possible that the p53 binding domain of hDM2 plays a
wider role in mediating the effects of hDM2. However, despite these
parallels between the regulation of p53 and that of E2F-DP, it is
likely that each process is mechanistically distinct. This was most
clearly suggested from studying hDM2
222-437, which
cannot influence p53 levels (28) but possesses properties very similar to those of wild-type hDM2 in the control of the E2F-DP heterodimer.
Further evidence to support this viewpoint came from studies of the
effect of hDM2 on the intracellular location of DP-1 which found that
hDM2 can augment the nuclear accumulation of DP-1, a process that most
likely results from a physical interaction between DP-1 and hDM2
(38). In contrast, the regulation of p53 by hDM2 has been
suggested to involve nuclear export, as disruption of a candidate NES
in hDM2 impairs the regulation of p53 activity by hDM2 (46).
Therefore, although hDM2 can modulate the levels of both p53 and
DP-E2F, and the processes involved may show certain similarities, they
are nevertheless likely to be distinct.
We observed a good correlation between the domains in hDM2 required to
overcome apoptosis and those responsible for enhanced cell viability in
rescued cells (Fig. 8c). Given the role of E2F in stimulating apoptosis
and promoting cell cycle progression (12), there is a clear
possibility that hDM2 modulates E2F both to oppose apoptosis and to
enhance cell viability, particularly because of the convergence between
the hDM2 domains required for apoptosis rescue and enhanced cell
viability and previous reports documenting the increased activity of
E2F with hDM2 (38, 52).
In conclusion, the results reported here establish a new role for hDM2
which relates to the control of the E2F heterodimer. Specifically, hDM2
can alter the properties of E2F from a negative to a positive regulator
of cell cycle progression. This effect occurs in
p53
/
cells and therefore is exerted in a
fashion that is independent of documented hDM2-p53 interaction. In
tumor cells, where hdm2 undergoes increased expression, the
physiological impact of this process is likely to be considerable.
Thus, by targeting p53, hDM2 inactivates p53-stimulated apoptosis,
while through its ability to regulate the apoptotic activity of E2F, it
retains E2F in a growth-stimulating state. Given the importance of E2F
in cell cycle control, the regulation of E2F reported here likely makes a highly significant and important contribution to the process of tumorigenesis.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank Marie Caldwell for help in preparing the manuscript,
Karen Vousden and Arnie Levine for reagents, and David Lane for the
p53
/
MEFs. We thank the Medical Research Council for
supporting this research.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Division of
Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Davidson Building, University of
Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, United Kingdom. Phone: 0044 141 330 5514. Fax: 0044 141 330 5859. E-mail:
n.lathangue{at}bio.gla.ac.uk.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Allen, E. K.,
S. de la Luna,
R. M. Kerkhoven,
R. Bernards, and N. B. La Thangue.
1997.
Distinct mechanisms of nuclear accumulation regulate the functional consequence of E2F transcription factors.
J. Cell Sci.
110:2819-2831[Abstract].
|
| 2.
|
Baker, S. J.,
S. Markowitz,
E. R. Fearson,
J. K. U. Willson, and B. Vogelstein.
1990.
Suppression of human colorectal-carcinoma cell-growth by wild type p53.
Science
249:912-915[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Bandara, L. R.,
R. Girling, and N. B. La Thangue.
1997.
Apoptosis induced in mammalian cells by small peptides that functionally antagonize the Rb-regulated E2F transcription factor.
Nat. Biotechnol.
15:896-901[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Beijersbergen, R. L.,
R. M. Kerkoven,
L. Zhu,
L. Carlee,
P. M. Voorhoeve, and R. Bernards.
1994.
E2F4, a new member of the E2F gene family, has oncogenic activity and associates with p107 in vivo.
Genes Dev.
8:2680-2690[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Blattner, C.,
A. Sparks, and D. Lane.
1999.
Transcription factor E2F-1 is upregulated in response to DNA damage in a manner analogous to that of p53.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19:3704-3713[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Cahilly-Snyder, L.,
T. Yang-Feng,
U. Francke, and D. L. George.
1987.
Molecular analysis and chromosomal mapping of amplified genes isolated from a transformed mouse 3T3-cell line.
Somat. Cell Mol. Genet.
13:235-244[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Chen, J.,
V. Marechal, and A. J. Levine.
1993.
Mapping of the p53 and mdm-2 interaction domains.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13:4107-4114[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Chen, J.,
X. Wu,
J. Lin, and A. J. Levine.
1996.
mdm2 inhibits the G1 arrest and apoptosis functions of the p53 tumor suppressor protein.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16:2445-2452[Abstract].
|
| 9.
|
de la Luna, S.,
M. J. Burden,
C.-W. Lee, and N. B. La Thangue.
1996.
Nuclear accumulation of the E2F heterodimer regulated by subunit composition and alternative splicing of a nuclear localization signal.
J. Cell. Sci.
109:2443-2452[Abstract].
|
| 10.
|
Dobbelstein, M.,
J. Roth,
W. T. Kimberly,
A. J. Levine, and T. Shenk.
1997.
Nuclear export of the E1B 55-kDa and E4 34-kDa adenoviral oncoproteins mediated by a rev-like signal sequence.
EMBO J.
16:4276-4284[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Dubs-Poterszman, C.,
B. Tocque, and B. Wasylyk.
1995.
MDM2 transformation in the absence of p53 and abrogation of the p107 cell-cycle arrest.
Oncogene
11:2445-2449[Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Dyson, N.
1998.
The regulation of E2F by pRB-family proteins.
Genes Dev.
12:2245-2262[Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Elenbaas, B.,
M. Dobbelstein,
J. Roth,
T. Shenk, and A. J. Levine.
1996.
The MDM2 oncoprotein binds specifically to RNA through its RING finger domain.
Mol. Med.
2:439-451[Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Fakharzadeh, S. S.,
S. P. Trusko, and D. L. George.
1991.
Tumorigenic potential associated with enhanced expression of a gene that is amplified in a mouse tumor cell line.
EMBO J.
10:1565-1569[Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Field, S. J.,
F.-Y. Tsai,
F. Kuo,
A. M. Zubiaga,
W. G. Kaelin, Jr.,
D. M. Livingston,
S. H. Orkin, and M. E. Greenberg.
1996.
E2F-1 functions in mice to promote apoptosis and suppress proliferation.
Cell
85:549-561[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Girling, R.,
J. F. Partridge,
N. Burden,
N. F. Totty,
J. J. Hsuan, and N. B. La Thangue.
1993.
A new component of the transcription factor DRTF/E2F.
Nature
362:83-87[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Hateboer, G.,
R. M. Kerkhoven,
A. Shvarts,
R. Bernards, and R. L. Beijersbergen.
1996.
Degradation of E2F by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway: regulation by retinoblastoma family proteins and adenovirus transforming proteins.
Genes Dev.
10:2960-2970[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Haupt, Y.,
R. Maya,
A. Kazaz, and M. Oren.
1997.
Mdm2 promotes the rapid degradation of p53.
Nature
387:296-299[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Hoffman, F.,
F. Martelli,
D. M. Livingston, and Z. Wang.
1996.
The retinoblastoma gene product protects E2F-1 from degradation by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway.
Genes Dev.
10:2949-2959[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Honda, R.,
H. Tanaka, and H. Yasuda.
1997.
Oncoprotein MDM2 is a ubiquitin ligase E3 for tumor suppressor p53.
FEBS Lett.
420:25-27[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Hsieh, J.-K.,
S. Fredersdorf,
T. Kouzarides,
K. Martin, and X. Lu.
1997.
E2F-1-induced apoptosis requires DNA binding but not transactivation and is inhibited by the retinoblastoma protein through direct interaction.
Genes Dev.
11:1840-1852[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Johnson, D. G.,
J. K. Schwarz,
W. D. Cress, and J. R. Nevins.
1993.
Expression of E2F-1 induces quiescent cells to enter S phase.
Nature
365:349-352[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 23.
|
Jones, S. N.,
A. E. Roe,
L. A. Donehower, and A. Bradley.
1995.
Rescue of embryonic lethality in Mdm2-deficient mice by absence of p53.
Nature
378:206-208[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Kowalik, T. F.,
J. DeGregori,
J. K. Schwartz, and J. R. Nevins.
1995.
E2F1 overexpression in quiescent fibroblasts leads to induction of cellular DNA synthesis and apoptosis.
J. Virol.
69:2491-2500[Abstract].
|
| 25.
|
Kowalik, T. F.,
J. DeGregori,
G. Leone,
L. Jakoi, and J. R. Nevins.
1998.
E2F-1-specific induction of apoptosis and p53 accumulation, which is blocked by Mdm2.
Cell Growth Differ.
9:113-118[Abstract].
|
| 26.
|
Krek, W.,
M. E. Ewen,
S. Shirodkar,
Z. Arany,
W. G. Kaelin, and D. M. Livingston.
1994.
Negative regulation of the growth-promoting transcription factor E2F-1 by a stably bound cyclin A-dependent protein kinase.
Cell
78:161-172[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 27.
|
Krek, W.,
G. Xu, and D. M. Livingston.
1995.
Cyclin A-kinase regulation of E2F-1 DNA binding function underlies suppression of an S phase checkpoint.
Cell
83:1149-1158[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 28.
|
Kubbutat, M. H. G.,
S. N. Jones, and K. H. Vousden.
1997.
Regulation of p53 stability by Mdm2.
Nature
387:299-303[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 29.
|
Lam, E., and N. B. La Thangue.
1994.
DP and E2F proteins: co-ordinating transcription with cell cycle progression.
Curr. Opin. Cell. Biol.
6:859-866[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 30.
|
La Thangue, N. B.
1994.
DRTF1/E2F: an expanding family of heterodimeric transcription factors implicated in cell-cycle control.
Trends Biochem. Sci.
19:108-114[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 31.
|
Lee, C.-W.,
T. S. Sørensen,
N. Shikama, and N. B. La Thangue.
1998.
Functional interplay between p53 and E2F through co-activator p300.
Oncogene
16:2695-2710[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 32.
|
Leng, P.,
D. R. Brown,
S. Debs, and S. P. Deb.
1995.
The human oncoprotein MDM2 binds to the human TATA-binding protein in vivo and in vitro.
Int. J. Oncol.
6:251-259.
|
| 33.
|
Luna, R. M.,
D. S. Wagner, and G. Lozano.
1995.
Rescue of early embryonic lethality in mdm2-deficient mice by deletion of p53.
Nature
378:203-206[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 34.
|
Lundgren, K.,
R. Moutes de Oca Luna,
Y. B. McNeil,
E. P. Emerick,
B. Spencer,
C. R. Barfield,
G. Lozano,
M. P. Rosenberg, and C. A. Finlay.
1997.
Targeted expression of MDM2 uncouples S phase from mitosis and inhibits mammary gland development independent of p53.
Genes Dev.
11:714-725[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 35.
|
Macleod, K. F.,
Y. Hu, and T. Jacks.
1996.
Loss of Rb activates both p53-dependent and independent cell death pathways in the developing mouse nervous system.
EMBO J.
15:6178-6188[Medline].
|
| 36.
|
Magae, J.,
C. L. Wu,
S. Illenye,
E. Harlow, and N. H. Heintz.
1996.
Nuclear localization of DP and E2F transcription factors by heterodimeric partners and retinoblastoma protein family members.
J. Cell Sci.
109:1717-1726[Abstract].
|
| 37.
|
Marechal, V.,
B. Elenbaas,
J. Piette,
J. C. Nicolas, and A. J. Levine.
1994.
The ribosomal L5 protein is associated with mdm-2 and mdm-2-p53 complexes.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14:7414-7420[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 38.
|
Martin, K.,
D. Trouche,
C. Hagemeier,
T. S. Sørensen,
N. B. La Thangue, and T. Kouzarides.
1995.
Stimulation of E2F1/DP1 transcriptional activity by MDM2 oncoprotein.
Nature
375:691-694[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 39.
|
Momand, J.,
G. P. Zambetti,
D. C. Olson,
D. L. George, and A. J. Levine.
1992.
The mdm-2 oncogene product forms a complex with p53 and inhibits p53-mediated transactivation.
Cell
69:1237-1245[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 40.
|
Morgenbesser, S. D.,
B. O. Williams,
T. Williams, and R. A. DePinho.
1994.
p53 dependent apoptosis produced by Rb-deficiency in the developing lens.
Nature
371:72-74[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 41.
|
Oliner, J. D.,
J. Pietenpol,
S. Thiagalingam,
J. Gyuris,
K. W. Kinzler, and B. Vogelstein.
1993.
Oncoprotein MDM2 conceals the activation domain of tumour suppressor p53.
Nature
362:857-860[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 42.
|
Ormondroyd, E.,
S. de la Luna, and N. B. La Thangue. |