Previous Article | Next Article 
Molecular and Cellular Biology, April 2000, p. 2505-2516, Vol. 20, No. 7
0270-7306/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Defects in tRNA Processing and Nuclear Export Induce
GCN4 Translation Independently of Phosphorylation of the
Subunit of Eukaryotic Translation Initiation Factor 2
Hongfang
Qiu,1
Cuihua
Hu,1
James
Anderson,1
Glenn R.
Björk,2
Srimonti
Sarkar,3
Anita K.
Hopper,3 and
Alan G.
Hinnebusch1,*
Laboratory of Eukaryotic Gene Regulation,
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda,
Maryland 208921; Department of
Microbiology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden2;
and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology,
Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey,
Pennsylvania 170333
Received 13 October 1999/Returned for modification 24 November
1999/Accepted 30 December 1999
 |
ABSTRACT |
Induction of GCN4 translation in amino acid-starved
cells involves the inhibition of initiator tRNAMet
binding to eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 (eIF2) in
response to eIF2 phosphorylation by protein kinase GCN2. It was shown
previously that GCN4 translation could be induced
independently of GCN2 by overexpressing a mutant
tRNAAACVal (tRNAVal*) or the RNA
component of RNase MRP encoded by NME1. Here we show that
overexpression of the tRNA pseudouridine 55 synthase encoded by
PUS4 also leads to translational derepression of
GCN4 (Gcd
phenotype) independently of eIF2
phosphorylation. Surprisingly, the Gcd
phenotype of
high-copy-number PUS4 (hcPUS4) did not require
PUS4 enzymatic activity, and several lines of evidence indicate that PUS4 overexpression did not diminish functional initiator
tRNAMet levels. The presence of hcPUS4 or
hcNME1 led to the accumulation of certain tRNA
precursors, and their Gcd
phenotypes were reversed by
overexpressing the RNA component of RNase P (RPR1),
responsible for 5'-end processing of all tRNAs. Consistently,
overexpression of a mutant pre-tRNATyr that cannot
be processed by RNase P had a Gcd
phenotype.
Interestingly, the Gcd
phenotype of hcPUS4
also was reversed by overexpressing LOS1, required for
efficient nuclear export of tRNA, and los1
cells have a Gcd
phenotype. Overproduced PUS4 appears to impede
5'-end processing or export of certain tRNAs in the nucleus in a
manner remedied by increased expression of RNase P or LOS1,
respectively. The mutant tRNAVal* showed nuclear
accumulation in otherwise wild-type cells, suggesting a defect in
export to the cytoplasm. We propose that yeast contains a nuclear
surveillance system that perceives defects in processing or export of
tRNA and evokes a reduction in translation initiation at the step
of initiator tRNAMet binding to the ribosome.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Starvation of yeast cells for amino
acids or purines leads to increased expression of GCN4, a
transcriptional activator of amino acid biosynthetic enzymes (general
amino acid control). GCN4 expression is stimulated at the
translational level by a mechanism involving four short upstream open
reading frames (uORFs) in its mRNA leader. During growth on amino
acid-replete medium, scanning ribosomes translate the first uORF
(uORF1) and reinitiate downstream at uORF2, uORF3, or uORF4 but cannot
reinitiate again at the GCN4 start codon. In amino
acid-starved cells, eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 (eIF2) is phosphorylated on its
subunit by protein kinase
GCN2, and the phosphorylated eIF2 inhibits the guanine nucleotide
exchange factor for eIF2, known as eIF2B. Consequently, formation of
the ternary complex containing eIF2, GTP, and initiator
methionyl-tRNA (Met-tRNAiMet) is reduced,
impairing delivery of tRNAiMet to the ribosome. In
GCN4 mRNA, the ensuing delay in rebinding of ternary complex
to 40S ribosomes which have translated uORF1 allows them to scan past
uORF2 to uORF4 and reinitiate downstream at the GCN4 start
codon instead (25, 26). Thus, GCN4 translation is
induced under conditions of diminished ternary-complex formation.
It is thought that GCN2 is activated in amino acid-starved cells by
uncharged tRNAs (34, 42, 43, 54) which
accumulate under these conditions and bind to a regulatory
domain in GCN2 homologous to histidyl-tRNA synthetases (55,
57, 58). Because starvation for any of several amino acids
elicits activation of GCN2 and attendant derepression of
GCN4 (34, 57), it is probable that most uncharged
tRNAs can bind to GCN2 and activate its kinase function. Two
positive regulators of GCN2, encoded by GCN1 and GCN20 (41, 53), show sequence similarity to
translation elongation factor eEF3 and have ribosome binding activities
(40). It has been proposed that the GCN1-GCN20 complex
functions at the ribosome in promoting activation of GCN2 by uncharged
tRNAs which have entered the decoding site (40).
There are several instances where GCN4 translation is
stimulated in a manner dependent on the uORFs but independent of GCN2 and eIF2 phosphorylation. Mutations in subunits of eIF2 or eIF2B appear
to reduce the functions of these two factors and mimic the effects of
eIF2 phosphorylation in restricting ternary-complex formation.
These mutations constitutively derepress GCN4 translation and the amino acid biosynthetic enzymes subject to general amino acid control (Gcd
phenotype). The same phenotype is
observed for deletions that reduce the number of IMT genes
encoding tRNAiMet (14) and thereby
decrease the steady-state level of this component of the ternary
complex. Mutations in GCD10 (18, 22) and
GCD14 (10, 13), whose products are required
for methylation of adenosine-58 in tRNAiMet
(1), also have GCN2-independent Gcd
phenotypes. Lack of m1A58 specifically impairs 5'-end
processing and stability of tRNAiMet. In these
instances, the Gcd
phenotype can be explained by a
reduction in the ternary-complex level independently of eIF2
phosphorylation by GCN2.
Previously, we observed GCN2-independent derepression of
GCN4 translation in cells overexpressing tRNAs under
conditions where it was presumed that the excess tRNA was not
aminoacylated efficiently. This occurred most notably with a mutant
form of tRNAAACVal harboring an A-to-G substitution
in the 3'-terminal nucleotide (tRNAVal*), which is
expected to impair aminoacylation by valyl-tRNA synthetase. Overexpression of tRNAVal* did not lead to eIF2
phosphorylation in strains containing GCN2; however, it exacerbated the
growth defect of a GCN2c mutant (expressing a
constitutively active kinase) in which eIF2 is hyperphosphorylated and
thus impaired in general translation initiation. The latter findings
suggested that excess tRNAVal* leads to reduced eIF2
function by a mechanism independent of eIF2 phosphorylation
(54). To explain these findings, we proposed that yeast
cells have a second sensor of uncharged tRNA besides GCN2
that also constrains eIF2 activity. Moreover, because
tRNAVal* overexpression did not activate GCN2, it
seemed possible that this defective tRNA was physically
sequestered from GCN2 (54).
GCN2-independent derepression of GCN4 translation also was
elicited by overexpression of NME1 (51), encoding
the RNA component of RNase MRP (48). RNase MRP is involved
in processing rRNA, and it was suggested that defects in ribosome
biogenesis caused by NME1 overexpression could impair
GCN4 translational control. Partial derepression of
GCN4 translation additionally occurred during growth on rich
medium in mutant strains with constitutively high levels of protein
kinase A (PKA) function (RAS2Val19 and
bcy1
mutants) (16). It is unknown how elevated
PKA function impairs translational control of GCN4.
In this report we show that overexpression of the tRNA
pseudouridine 55 synthase encoded by PUS4
(7) stimulates GCN4 translation independently of
GCN2 and its phosphorylation site on eIF2. We present several lines of
evidence that PUS4 overexpression does not reduce the amount of
functional tRNAiMet as the means of limiting
ternary-complex formation or its utilization in translation initiation.
Instead, it appears that excess PUS4 impedes the 5'-end processing
and export of certain tRNAs in the nucleus. The same mechanism
seems to apply to overexpressed NME1; moreover, overproduction of a
mutant pre-tRNA that cannot be processed by RNase P elicits a
GCN2-independent Gcd
phenotype. These and
other findings strongly suggest that yeast contains a surveillance
system that perceives defects in tRNA processing or transport in
the nucleus and reduces the efficiency of translation initiation in the
cytoplasm in response.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Identification of PUS4 as a high-copy-number
suppressor of gcn2-1.
Plasmid pAH14 was isolated previously
as a high-copy-number suppressor of a gcn2-1 mutant
(27). Sequencing the ends of the DNA insert and comparison
with the complete yeast genome sequence showed that the insert is ~5
kb and contains three genes from chromosome XIV: RFC3
(36), MID1 (30), and PUS4
(7). Subclones pHQ536 carrying MID1 and
PUS4, pHQ537 carrying PUS4, and pHQ538 carrying
RFC3 and MID1 were constructed from pAH14 (see
below) and introduced into gcn2-1 mutant H113, and the
resulting transformants were tested for growth on medium containing
3-aminotriazole (3-AT). Only plasmids pHQ536 and pHQ537 conferred 3-AT
resistance, indicating that PUS4 is a high-copy-number
suppressor of gcn2-1. To confirm this conclusion, 5' and 3'
deletions (pHQ546 and pHQ545, respectively) and an internal frameshift
mutation (pHQ575) in PUS4 were constructed (see below). None
of these plasmids conferred 3-AT resistance in strain H113, and neither
did the single-copy-number PUS4 plasmid pHQ543 that we constructed.
Yeast strains and plasmid construction.
All yeast strains
except HQY316 used in this study were described previously and are
listed in Table 1. HQY316 was constructed from H1895 by replacing LOS1 with the
los1
::hisG::URA3::hisG allele using a ~4.8-kb EcoRI-BglII fragment
from plasmid pHQ871. The resulting los1
strain was
identified by PCR and further confirmed by complementation of its
Gcd
phenotype by LOS1 plasmid pHQ860. The
plasmids used in this work were constructed as follows. Plasmid pHQ536
containing MID1 (30) and PUS4 was
constructed by inserting an ~4-kb SalI fragment from pAH14
into YEplac181 (20) at the SalI site. An
~2.0-kb BglII-Asp718 fragment containing
PUS4 (7) from pHQ536 was inserted into YEplac181
between the BamHI and Asp718 sites to produce
plasmid pHQ537. An ~3.8-kb NheI-XbaI fragment
containing RFC3 (36) and MID1 from
pAH14 was inserted into YEplac181 at the XbaI site to produce pHQ538. To construct the C-terminal deletion of
PUS4, an ~1.5-kb XbaI fragment from pHQ537 was
subcloned into YEplac181 at the XbaI site to produce pHQ545,
encoding PUS4 amino acids 1 to 342. The N-terminal deletion of
PUS4 was constructed by removing the BamHI
fragment from pHQ537 to produce plasmid pHQ546, in which the 5'
noncoding region and first 74 codons of PUS4 were deleted. A
frameshift mutation in PUS4 was constructed by digesting
pAH14 with BamHI, filling in the ends, and religating to
produce pHQ575. Single-copy-number plasmid pHQ543 bearing
PUS4 was constructed by inserting an ~1.8-kb
BglII-NaeI fragment from pHQ536 into YCplac111 (20). High-copy-number PUS4 plasmid pHQ547 was
constructed by inserting the BglII-SphI fragment
containing PUS4 from pAH14 into YEp24 between the
BamHI and SphI sites. The single-copy-number GCN2 plasmid pHQ548 was created by inserting the
XbaI-SalI fragment from p722 (56) into
YCplac111. To add the hemagglutinin (HA) epitope to PUS4,
NruI and MluI sites were first introduced into pHQ537 immediately 5' to the PUS4 stop codon by
site-directed mutagenesis, using the Quik-Change site-directed
mutagenesis kit (Stratagene), producing plasmid pHQ732. An ~100-bp
PCR fragment encoding three copies of HA with Ecl136II and
MluI ends was then inserted between the
NruI-MluI sites of pHQ732 to produce plasmid pHQ753 encoding PUS4-HA. An ~2-kb SalI fragment encoding
PUS4-HA from pHQ753 was inserted into YCplac111 and pHQ583 to produce single-copy-number and high-copy-number plasmids pHQ771 and pHQ839, respectively. pHQ583 is a derivative of YEplac181 in which the polycloning sites SacI to BamHI were deleted by
filling in the EcoRI and XbaI sites and
religating. pHQ853 and pHQ857, encoding pus4-1-HA and
pus4-2-HA, respectively, were derived from pHQ839 by
site-directed mutagenesis using the Quik-Change site-directed mutagenesis kit.
Plasmid pHQ731, used for in vitro synthesis of tRNAAsp
mut#2 (8), was constructed by inserting a 52-bp
double-stranded oligonucleotide encoding the T7 promoter and
tRNAAsp mut#2 into pUC18 at the SmaI site.
To construct hcNME1 and hcNME1/RPR1 plasmids, an
EcoRI linker was first added to the filled-in
BamHI site of pDK45, an NME1-bearing plasmid
obtained from Lasse Lindahl, to produce pHQ859. The ~0.7-kb
EcoRI fragment containing NME1 from pHQ859 was
then inserted into YEplac181 and pHQ682 at their respective
EcoRI sites to produce high-copy-number plasmids pHQ862 and
pHQ863 containing NME1 and NME1/RPR1,
respectively. pHQ682 was constructed by inserting the ~1.3-kb
EcoRI-HindIII fragment containing
RPR1 from pDK42, an RPR1-bearing plasmid obtained
from Lasse Lindahl, into YEplac181 between the EcoRI and
HindIII sites. An EcoRI linker was also added
to the filled-in HindIII site of pDK42, so that an
~1.3-kb EcoRI fragment bearing RPR1 could be isolated from the resulting plasmid (pHQ858) and inserted into pHQ839
at the EcoRI site, producing high-copy-number plasmid pHQ864 bearing PUS4-HA and RPR1.
LOS1-bearing plasmids YEpLOS1 and YCpLOS1 were described
previously (29). To construct the los1
plasmid, a BamHI linker was first added at the
PvuII site of YCpLOS1 to produce plasmid pHQ868 and a
BamHI fragment containing
hisG::URA3::hisG was inserted at the
BamHI site to produce plasmid pHQ871. hcLOS1
plasmid pHQ860 was constructed by inserting a 5.3-kb SphI
fragment from YCpLOS1 into the SphI site of YEplac181.
Plasmids pHQ982 and pHQ985 encoding wild-type and mutant
pre-tRNAGUATyr, respectively, were constructed
by inserting PCR-synthesized genomic DNA fragments with
EcoRI and BamHI sites at the 5' and 3' ends,
respectively, between the corresponding sites in high-copy-number plasmid YEplac181. The genomic DNA fragments containing 170 and 18 bp
of 5' and 3' noncoding DNA, respectively, were synthesized using the
following oligonucleotide primers:
5'-CCGGAATTCCTGTATTAGTCGATATACCACC-3' (forward primer),
5'-CGCGGATCCGCAAGATTTAAAAAAATATCTCCCGGGGGCGA-3' (reverse
primer for the wild-type 3' trailer), and
5'-CGCGGATCCGCAAGATTTAAAAAAATACGACTCCCGGGGGCGA-3' (reverse
primer for the mutant 3' trailer).
Assay of HIS4-lacZ and GCN4-lacZ
fusions.
Assays were conducted using cell extracts prepared from
cultures grown in SD medium containing only the required supplements as
described previously (37). For repression conditions,
saturated cultures were diluted 1:50 into fresh medium and harvested in mid-logarithmic phase after 6 h of growth. For derepression
conditions, cultures were grown for 2 h under repression
conditions and then for 6 h after adding 3-AT to 10 mM,
5-methyltryptophan (5-MT) to 2 mM, or sulfometuron methyl (SM) to 0.5 µg/ml.
Assay of yeast tRNA pseudouridine 55 synthase.
Synthesis of pseudouridine is accompanied by
the release of a proton from carbon 5 in the pyrimidine ring of the
uridine base (12); therefore, release of tritium from
[5-3H]uridine-labeled tRNA can be used as a measure
of pseudouridine 55 synthase activity (46).
PUS4, the S. cerevisiae enzyme, can catalyze the formation
of pseudouridine 55 in a model substrate corresponding to
the acceptor stem and T
C stem-loop of tRNAAsp (mut#2
minihelix) (8). Accordingly, we assayed PUS4 activity in
cell extracts by measuring the release of tritium (46) from mut#2 minihelix RNA synthesized in vitro in the presence of
[5-3H]UTP. tRNAAsp mut#2 RNA labeled with
[5-3H]uridine was synthesized in vitro as previously
described (46). Briefly, 10 µg of MvaI-digested
pHQ731 was mixed with 100 µCi of [5-3H]UTP (14.5 Ci/mmol; Amersham), dried under vacuum, and resuspended in 100 µl of
a reaction mixture containing 40 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.9), 6 mM
MgCl2, 2 mM spermidine, 10 mM NaCl, 10 mM dithiothreitol, 10 mM GMP, 1 mM each GTP, CTP, and ATP, 250 µM UTP, and 100 U of
RNasin (Promega). The reaction was initiated by adding 100 U of T7 RNA
polymerase (Promega), and the mixture was incubated at 37°C for
2 h. Afterwards, the mixture was extracted once with phenol-chloroform (1:1) and the [3H]RNA was ethanol
precipitated and resuspended in water pretreated with diethylpyrocarbonate.
The tritium release assay for pseudouridine synthase was
conducted as described previously (46). Briefly, the
reaction mixture contained 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 10 mM
MgCl2, 10 mM dithiothreitol, 0.2 mg of bovine serum albumin
per ml, 80 U of RNasin (Promega), and 3H-labeled
tRNAAsp mut#2 (2.5 × 106 cpm). The
reaction was started by adding S100 yeast whole-cell extract to a total
volume of 100 µl, and the mixture was incubated at 30°C for 30 min.
The reaction was terminated by adding 0.3 ml of a suspension of Norit A
(12% in 0.1 N HCl). After 2 min at room temperature, the mixture was
centrifuged and the radioactivity in the supernatant was determined.
The activity of pseudouridine 55 synthase in the whole-cell
extract was expressed as cpm of 3H released per microgram
of protein. S100 yeast whole-cell extracts were prepared as described
previously (4).
Analysis of tRNA modification and aminoacylation in
vivo.
The primer extension assay used for mapping
pseudouridine residues was conducted as described
previously (5-7). In this assay, RNA is treated with
1-cyclohexyl-3-(2-morpholinoethyl)-carbodiimide metho-p-toluenesulfonate (CMCT), a chemical that reacts with
both pseudouridine and uridine residues. The presence of
CMCT-coupled nucleosides in tRNA impedes reverse transcription
primed by an oligonucleotide annealed 3' to the CMCT-coupled base.
Because CMCT-pseudouridine is more resistant than
CMCT-uridine to alkali treatment, the locations of
pseudouridine residues in a tRNA molecule can be
deduced from the presence of alkali-insensitive blocks to reverse
transcription (5, 6). Chromatography of aminoacylated tRNAiMet and elongator tRNAMet
(tRNAeMet) on RPC-5 resin was carried out as
described previously (1). For Northern analysis of in
vivo-aminoacylated tRNAs, total RNA was prepared under acidic
conditions and resolved by electrophoresis on acid-urea gels as
described previously (52). The following oligonucleotides
were used to probe the Northern blots:
5'-TGGTAGCGCCGCTCGGTTTCGAATCC-3' (tRNAiMet),
5'-TGCTCCAGGGGAGGTTCGAACTCTCGACC-3'
(tRNAeMet),
5'-CACTCACGATGGGGGTCGAA-3'
(tRNAUCUArg),
5'-TGCTCGAGGTGGGGA/TTTGAACCCACGACGG-3'
(tRNAUAUIle),
5'-GATTGCAGCACCTGAGTTTCGCGTTATGG-3' (5S rRNA), and
5'-GGTGGGAGACTTTCAACCCAAAGC-3' (NME1).
Fluorescence in situ hybridization.
The fluorescence in situ
hybridization procedure was conducted as described previously
(47), except that transformants carrying plasmids were grown
at 30°C to log phase. The oligonucleotides used were probe 04 (47), to detect tRNAUAUIle, and
5'-CGCCCAGGATCGAACTG GGGACGTTCTGCGTGTTAAGCAGATGCCATAACCGACTAGACC-3', to
detect tRNAAACVal.
 |
RESULTS |
Overexpression of PUS4, encoding tRNA
pseudouridine 55 synthase, derepresses GCN4
translation in the absence of eIF2 kinase GCN2.
In an effort to
identify a novel regulator of GCN2, we analyzed a previously described
high-copy-number plasmid, pAH14, which suppresses the 3-AT-sensitive
(3-ATs) phenotype of a gcn2-1 mutant
(27). 3-AT is a competitive inhibitor of the histidine
biosynthetic enzyme encoded by HIS3, and GCN4-mediated derepression of HIS3 transcription is required for growth in
the presence of this inhibitor. Accordingly, gcn2 mutants
are 3-ATs because they fail to derepress GCN4
translation in response to histidine starvation. Suppression of the
3-ATs phenotype of gcn2-1 by pAH14 suggested
that HIS3 derepression had been restored independently of
GCN2. Sequencing the ends of the genomic DNA insert in pAH14 revealed
that it contains three genes from chromosome XIV: RFC3
(36), MID1 (30), and PUS4, of which the last encodes tRNA pseudouridine 55 synthase (7). By analyzing subclones of pAH14, we determined
that high-copy-number PUS4 was sufficient for suppression of
gcn2-1 and that deletions removing the 5' or 3' end of the
PUS4 ORF or introduction of a frameshift mutation in
PUS4 abolished suppression (see Materials and Methods).
Moreover, PUS4 on a low-copy-number plasmid failed to
suppress the gcn2-1 allele (data not shown). Thus, we
concluded that PUS4 is a high-copy-number suppressor of
gcn2-1.
We found that high-copy-number PUS4
(hcPUS4) suppressed the 3-ATs phenotypes
of a gcn2
mutant and a strain containing an Ala
substitution in the GCN2 phosphorylation site in eIF2
, Ser-51 (the
SUI2-S51A allele) (Fig. 1).
Thus, it appeared that hcPUS4 derepresses HIS3 expression independently of eIF2
phosphorylation by GCN2, an event
required in wild-type cells for increased translation of GCN4 mRNA. Analysis of a HIS4-lacZ fusion showed
that expression of HIS4, another target of GCN4, was
derepressed ca. threefold in gcn2
transformants bearing
hcPUS4 (Table 2). Similar
degrees of HIS4-lacZ derepression were observed in
gcn2
cells bearing hcPUS4 in the
presence or absence of inhibitors of histidine (3-AT), tryptophan
(5-MT), or isoleucine-valine (SM) biosynthesis. These findings suggested that GCN4 expression was
constitutively derepressed by hcPUS4 independently of both
amino acid starvation and eIF2 phosphorylation by GCN2. Supporting this
conclusion, expression of a GCN4-lacZ fusion was
derepressed five- to sixfold in gcn2
cells bearing
hcPUS4 in the presence or absence of 3-AT (Table 3). In contrast, expression of a
GCN4-lacZ fusion lacking all four uORFs required for
translational control was unaffected by hcPUS4 (Table
3). These last results indicate that hcPUS4 stimulates GCN4 expression at the translational level. In
agreement with this conclusion, the presence of
hcPUS4 had no effect on steady-state GCN4 mRNA
levels (data not shown).

View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
High-copy-number plasmid encoding PUS4 derepresses
histidine biosynthetic genes in the absence of GCN2 and Ser-51 of
eIF2 . Isogenic strains H1816 (gcn2 SUI2), H1897
(GCN2 sui2-S51A), and H1817 (gcn2 sui2-S51A)
were transformed with the indicated plasmids, replica-plated to SD
medium or to SD medium containing 30 mM 3-AT, and incubated for 3 days
at 30°C. pHQ547 is a high-copy-number (h.c.) plasmid containing
PUS4; pC102-2 is a low-copy-number (l.c.) plasmid containing
GCN2, and p919 is a low-copy-number (l.c.) plasmid
containing SUI2.
|
|
A high-copy-number plasmid encoding the mutant
tRNAAACVal described above
(hctRNAVal*) (54) led to slightly higher
levels of GCN4-lacZ expression in a gcn2
strain than did hcPUS4; however, the presence of both plasmids in the same transformants did not increase GCN4
expression in an additive fashion (Table
4). This nonadditivity suggests that
overexpression of PUS4 or tRNAVal* leads to
derepression of GCN4 expression by a common mechanism.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 4.
Nonadditive effects of high-copy-number plasmids carrying
tRNAVal* and PUS4 on derepression of
GCN4-lacZ expression in a gcn2 strain
|
|
hcPUS4 leads to elevated pseudouridine 55 synthase activity in vivo.
To show that cells bearing
hcPUS4 contain increased amounts of PUS4 protein, we assayed
pseudouridine 55 synthase activity in cell extracts (see
Materials and Methods). As shown in Table 5, extracts of transformants containing
hcPUS4 or a functional HA-tagged form of hcPUS4
contained 15 to 16 times as much pseudouridine 55 synthase
activity than did the corresponding extract from the vector
transformant. This increase in enzyme activity was similar in magnitude
to the increase in PUS4 protein levels measured in extracts from
transformants bearing the HA-tagged PUS4 allele (PUS4-HA) on high-copy-number versus single-copy-number
plasmids, as judged by immunoblot analysis with anti-HA antibodies
(Table 5). Based on these results, we conclude that hcPUS4
leads to a large increase in the level of PUS4 enzyme activity in vivo.
Increased pseudouridine 55 synthase activity is not
required for suppression of gcn2 mutations by
hcPUS4.
The observations that overexpressing the
mutant tRNAVal* derepressed GCN4
translation independently of GCN2 (54), that
hctRNAVal* and hcPUS4 had nonadditive
effects on GCN4 expression, and that PUS4 is a tRNA
modification enzyme led us to consider that overexpression of PUS4
might lead to aberrant pseudouridine formation in tRNAs and impede aminoacylation by their cognate aminoacyl-tRNA
synthetases. If this occurred with tRNAiMet, the
only known tRNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae that
normally lacks this modification (49), it would lower
ternary-complex levels and thereby derepress GCN4
translation in gcn2
cells.
Several observations preclude the possibility of aberrant
pseudouridine formation in tRNAiMet or
in any other tRNAs in hcPUS4 transformants. First, we
found no evidence for increased pseudouridine levels in
total tRNA prepared from gcn2
transformants carrying
hcPUS4 versus vector alone. When total tRNA isolated
from these transformants was digested to nucleosides and resolved by
high-pressure liquid chromatography (19), there was no
significant difference in the amount of pseudouridine relative to other nucleosides, conventional or modified, between the two tRNA samples (data not shown). For example, the ratios of
pseudouridine to t6A
(N6-threonylcarbamoyladenosine) in the vector
and hcPUS4 transformants were 6.65 and 6.82, respectively; the corresponding ratios of pseudouridine to m22G
(N2,N2-dimethylguanosine;
a modification at guanosine-26) were 2.61 and 2.68.
To determine whether overexpression of PUS4 leads
specifically to formation of pseudouridine-55 in
tRNAiMet, total tRNA was
isolated from gcn2
transformants containing hcPUS4 or vector alone and subjected to a primer
extension assay for mapping pseudouridine residues
(see Materials and Methods). By applying this technique with primers
that anneal 3' to position 55 in tRNAiMet or
tRNAeMet, we observed the expected block to
reverse transcription at pseudouridine 55 in
tRNAeMet from transformants containing
hcPUS4 or vector alone. In contrast, we observed no block at
this location in tRNAiMet that was enhanced by the
presence of hcPUS4 (Fig. 2A).
Similar results were obtained using total tRNAs prepared from
cultures starved for histidine by 3-AT treatment (data not shown).
Thus, hcPUS4 does not lead to detectable amounts of
pseudouridine 55 in tRNAiMet or
diminish this modification in tRNAeMet.

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
High-copy-number PUS4 does not alter
base modification of tRNAiMet. (A) Samples of
total tRNA (10 µg) prepared from gcn2 strain H1894
carrying empty vector (YEplac181) or hcPUS4 plasmid (pHQ537)
were treated (+) or not treated ( ) with CMCT, and 1 µg was reverse
transcribed using end-labeled primers complementary to
tRNAiMet or tRNAeMet
(nucleotides 60 to 76). Reverse transcription products were resolved in
an 8% sequencing gel. The strong stops in reverse transcription of
CMCT-treated tRNA correspond to pseudouridine-55
( 55), as indicated by the arrow. On the left of the gel is a
sequence ladder of initiator tRNAMet. The strong
stops at position 52 for tRNAiMet observed
independently of CMCT presumably arise from strong secondary structure.
(B) The same tRNA samples as in panel A were aminoacylated with
[3H]methionine or [35S]methionine, and ca.
500,000 cpm was resolved on an RPC-5 column. Radioactivity in each
fraction (2 ml) was measured by liquid scintillation and plotted
against the fraction number. The elution positions of the
methionine-accepting tRNAs are indicated at the appropriate
positions.
|
|
In accordance with the above findings, we obtained strong
evidence that pseudouridine 55 synthase activity is
not required for the suppressor activity of hcPUS4.
Using site-directed mutagenesis, we altered PUS4 residues 283 to 286 from TYIR to AAAA (producing pus4-1-HA) or altered residues
74 to 77 from LDPL to AAAA (pus4-2-HA) and introduced the
mutant alleles into a gcn2
strain on high-copy-number plasmids. The residues altered by these mutations are conserved in
pseudouridine 55 synthases among bacteria and yeast
(32). As shown in Table 5, neither high-copy-number mutant
allele led to pseudouridine 55 synthase activity in
extracts above the background level produced by chromosomal
PUS4. Immunoblot analysis showed that expression of
pus4-1-HA was only slightly reduced, whereas pus4-2-HA expression was greatly decreased, compared to
wild-type PUS4-HA (Table 5). Surprisingly,
hcpus4-1-HA was indistinguishable from hcPUS4-HA
in suppressing the 3-ATs phenotype of the
gcn2
mutant (Table 5), suggesting that hcPUS4 suppressor activity does not require elevated
pseudouridine 55 synthase activity. The fact that
hcpus4-2-HA was inactive as a dosage suppressor can
be explained by the fact that it was not highly expressed (Table 5).
Evidence that hcPUS4 elicits derepression of
GCN4 partly by interfering with 5'-end processing of
tRNA by RNase P.
Although the pseudouridine 55 synthase activity of PUS4 is not required for its suppressor
activity, it was possible that increased binding of overexpressed PUS4
to one or more tRNAs would restrict the access of other enzymes
involved in modification or processing of these tRNAs. As indicated
above, we were particularly interested in possible differences in the
structure or function of tRNAiMet that could reduce
ternary-complex formation. To investigate this last possibility, we
first aminoacylated total tRNA from transformants containing
hcPUS4 or vector alone with
[35S]methionine or [3H]methionine,
respectively, and resolved the labeled tRNAs by RPC-5 column
chromatography (31). tRNAs that differ by only a single
methyl group can be resolved by RPC-5 chromatography (15).
The results in Fig. 2B show that the elution positions of
[35S]methionine-charged tRNAiMet and
tRNAeMet were identical between gcn2
transformants bearing hcPUS4 and vector alone. These
results suggest that mature methionine-accepting tRNAs are
modified identically in cells overexpressing PUS4 and wild-type cells; however, it is possible that certain modifications would not alter the behavior of methionyl-tRNAs on RPC-5 chromatography.
In a second approach, we investigated whether hcPUS4 led to
reductions in the efficiency of tRNAiMet
aminoacylation in vivo which might arise from a defect in one or more
steps in the production of tRNAiMet. The degree of
aminoacylation of a tRNA in vivo can be measured by isolating total
tRNA at pH 4.5 to preserve the aminoacyl-tRNA linkage and
resolving the aminoacylated and deacylated forms by gel electrophoresis
followed by Northern blot hybridization (52). When this
technique was carried out with tRNA isolated from transformants bearing hcPUS4 versus vector alone, we observed no
significant differences in the charged-to-uncharged ratios for
tRNAiMet, tRNAeMet,
tRNAUCUArg, tRNAUAUIle, and
tRNACAALeu (Fig. 3
and data not shown). These results suggest that
tRNAiMet, as well as four other tRNAs analyzed
by this technique, are aminoacylated with similar efficiencies in cells
overexpressing PUS4 and in wild-type cells.

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Evidence that hcPUS4 does not reduce in vivo
aminoacylation of various tRNAs. Total RNAs prepared under acidic
conditions (52) from strain H1894 (gcn2 )
carrying empty vector (YEplac181) or high-copy-number plasmids carrying
PUS4 (pHQ537) or PUS4-HA (pHQ839) were resolved
by electrophoresis on an acid-urea polyacrylamide gel and subjected to
Northern blot analysis. The same blot was probed with radiolabeled
oligonucleotides that specifically hybridized to the indicated
tRNAs by stripping one probe from the blot before using the next.
An aliquot of tRNAiMet was deacylated in 2 M
Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) and loaded in lane 1. The intensities of the
hybridization signals corresponding to charged and uncharged tRNAs
were quantified by phosphorimaging analysis, and the ratios of charged
to uncharged tRNA signals are listed below each lane.
|
|
We also measured the total steady-state levels of
tRNAiMet, tRNAUAUIle, and
tRNACCATrp by Northern analysis and observed no
large differences for the mature forms of these tRNAs in
gcn2
strains bearing hcPUS4-HA versus vector
alone (Fig. 4, lanes 1 and 2, and data
not shown). Interestingly, the hcPUS4-HA transformants
showed significant accumulation of the various precursors of
tRNAiMet containing both 5' and 3' extensions that
are transcribed from different IMT genes (Fig. 4, lanes 1 and 2), leading to a precursor/mature tRNAiMet
ratio ca. twofold greater than that of the vector transformant (Table
6). After normalizing for the amounts of
5S RNA in the samples, we calculated that the hcPUS4-HA
transformants contained 93% of the wild-type level of mature
tRNAiMet. Thus, it appears that the
hcPUS4-HA transformants process tRNAiMet
precursors more slowly than does the wild type but this defect does not
substantially reduce the steady-state level of mature tRNAiMet. The hcPUS4-HA transformants
also showed slight accumulation of the larger
tRNAUAUIle precursor (Fig. 4), which corresponds to
the primary transcript containing 5' and 3' extensions plus the intron
(44); again, little or no reduction in the level of mature
tRNAUAUIle was evident (Table 6). The presence of
hcPUS4 had no detectable effect on the levels of precursor
or mature tRNACCATrp precursor (data not shown).
These findings suggest that PUS4 overexpression decreases
the rate at which 5' and 3' extensions are removed from a subset of
tRNAs.

View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Overexpressing PUS4 or NME1 leads
to accumulation of untrimmed tRNA precursors. Total RNA (9 µg)
prepared from gcn2 strains carrying empty vector
YEplac181 or high-copy-number plasmids pHQ839 (h.c.PUS4-HA),
pHQ864 (h.c.PUS4-HA/RPR1), (Vector) pHQ862
(h.c.NME1), and pHQ863 (h.c.NME1/RPR1)
were subjected to Northern blot analysis and probed with a radiolabeled
oligonucleotide complementary to tRNAiMet. The same
blots were stripped and reprobed with radiolabeled oligonucleotides
specific for tRNAUAUIle or 5S rRNA (see Materials
and Methods). The positions of pre-tRNAiMet,
mature tRNAiMet,
pre-tRNAUAUIle, mature
tRNAUAUIle, and 5S rRNA are indicated on the left.
The primary transcript (upper band) and the 5'- and 3'-end-processed
intron-containing pre-tRNAUAUIle (lower band)
are indicated on the right by the letters a and b, respectively.
|
|
Although we observed only a small reduction in the steady-state level
of mature tRNAiMet in hcPUS4-HA
transformants (Table 6), it was important to determine whether this
defect was responsible for the suppressor phenotype of
hcPUS4. We showed previously that a high-copy-number plasmid bearing IMT4, encoding tRNAiMet,
overcame the Gcd
phenotype of gcd10 mutations
that reduce steady-state levels of mature tRNAiMet
(1). In contrast, we saw little or no effect of
hcIMT4 on the phenotype of hcPUS4 (Fig.
5A) even though it produced ca. fourfold-higher levels of mature tRNAiMet (Fig.
5B). We conclude that the Gcd
phenotype of
hcPUS4 does not arise from a reduction in the steady-state level of mature tRNAiMet.

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Overexpression of initiator tRNAMet does
not suppress the Gcd phenotype of hcPUS4. (A)
Transformants of strain H1894 (gcn2 ) bearing
high-copy-number plasmids YEplac181 and YEp24 (Vectors), pHQ839 and
YEp24 (h.c.PUS4-HA/vector), or pHQ839 and pC50
(h.c.PUS4-HA/h.c.IMT4) were replica-plated to SD
medium containing 30 mM 3-AT and incubated for 3 days at 30°C. (B)
Total RNA (6 µg) isolated from strains carrying the indicated
high-copy-number plasmids were subjected to Northern blot analysis and
probed with an oligonucleotide specific for initiator
tRNAMet.
|
|
The observation that hcPUS4 leads to accumulation of
untrimmed tRNAiMet precursors suggested that an
overabundance of these molecules in the nucleus might be a signal for
activating GCN4 translation by a GCN2-independent pathway.
Because removal of the 5' leader by RNase P appears to be
required for subsequent removal of the 3' trailer (44), we
asked whether overexpression of the RNA component of RNase P,
encoded by RPR1, would suppress the Gcd
phenotype of hcPUS4 in gcn2
cells. As shown in
Fig. 6A, the presence of RPR1
in the same high-copy-number plasmid bearing PUS4-HA
overcame the 3-ATr phenotype and partially suppressed the
derepression of GCN4 expression, conferred by
hcPUS4-HA. Immunoblot analysis indicated that
hcRPR1 did not significantly affect PUS4-HA expression in
these cells (Fig. 6B). Thus, overexpression of RPR1
overrides the suppressor function of hcPUS4 and does not
simply reduce the extent of PUS4 overproduction. Northern blot analysis
showed that the presence of RPR1 with PUS4-HA in
the same high-copy-number plasmid decreased the precursor/mature ratios
for tRNAiMet and tRNAUAUIle
from 1.05 to 0.77 and 0.19 to 0.14, respectively (Fig. 4 and Table 6).
These results are in agreement with the idea that hcPUS4 elicits derepression of GCN4, at least in part, by
interfering with 5'-end processing of certain tRNAs by RNase P.

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Overexpression of RPR1 reduces the
Gcd phenotype of hcPUS4. (A) Transformants of
strain H1895 (gcn2 ) bearing high-copy-number plasmids
YEplac181 (Vector), pHQ839 (h.c.PUS4-HA), pHQ864
(h.c.PUS4-HA/RPR1), or pHQ682 (h.c.RPR1) were
replica-plated to SC medium containing 30 mM 3-AT and incubated for 3 days at 30°C (left panel). Extracts from the same transformants grown
under repressing (nonstarvation) conditions were assayed for
-galactosidase activity, and the results shown in the right panel
are the means and standard deviations from three individual
transformants. (B) Expression of PUS4-HA in transformants
carrying high-copy-number plasmids pHQ839 (h.c.PUS4-HA) or
pHQ864 (h.c.PUS4-HA/RPR1) measured by Western blot analysis.
PUS4-HA was detected by anti-HA antibody and visualized by enhanced
chemiluminescence. The intensities of bands were calculated with a
scanner (Silverscanner III) and NIH image software (version 1.61). The
relative levels were calculated by averaging the band intensities from
two independent extract preparations for each transformant (lanes 1 to
4, pHQ839 transformant; lanes 5 to 8, pHQ864 transformant).
|
|
Other evidence that accumulation of unprocessed
pre-tRNAs stimulates GCN4 translation by a
GCN2-independent pathway relates to the previous observation that
high-copy-number NME1 also triggers this response
(51). NME1 encodes the RNA component of
ribonuclease MRP, involved in pre-rRNA processing (48).
Because RNases MRP and P are ribonucleoprotein complexes which share
numerous protein subunits (11, 39), we considered that
NME1 overexpression might titrate protein
subunits away from RPR1 RNA. The ensuing reduction
in RNase P levels would impair the processing of one or more
pre-tRNAs, and the unprocessed precursors would trigger GCN2-independent derepression of GCN4 translation. According
to this hypothesis, simultaneous overexpression of
RPR1 and NME1 should reverse the titration
of subunits from RNase P and reduce the concentration of tRNA
precursors, thereby restoring the repression of GCN4
translation. As shown in Fig. 7A, the
presence of hcNME1 suppressed the 3-ATs
phenotype of a gcn2
mutant (Gcd
phenotype)
and the presence of RPR1 on the same high-copy-number plasmid eliminated the suppressor activity of hcNME1. The
antagonistic effect of hcRPR1 on hcNME1
suppressor activity did not involve a reduction in NME1
expression (Fig. 7B).

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
Overexpression of RPR1 reduces the
Gcd phenotype of hcNME1. (A) Transformants of
strain H1895 (gcn2 ) bearing high-copy-number
plasmids YEplac181 (Vector), pHQ862 (h.c.NME1), pHQ863
(h.c.NME1/RPR1), or pHQ682 (h.c.RPR1) were
replica-plated to SC medium containing 30 mM 3-AT and incubated for 3 days at 30°C (left panel). Extracts from the same transformants grown
under repressing (nonstarvation) conditions were assayed for
-galactosidase activity, and the results shown in the right panel
are the means and standard deviations of activities from three
individual transformants. (B) Expression of NME1 in
transformants carrying high-copy-number plasmids YEplac181
(Vector), pHQ862 (h.c.NME1), pHQ863
(h.c.NME1/RPR1), and pHQ682 (h.c.RPR1) was
measured by Northern blot analysis using radiolabeled oligonucleotide
specific to NME1. (C) Transformants of strain H1895
(gcn2 ) bearing high-copy-number plasmids YEplac181
(Vector), pHQ982 (h.c. wild-type
pre-tRNATyrGUA) and pHQ985 (h.c. mutant
pre-tRNATyrGUA) were replica-plated to
SC medium containing 30 mM 3-AT and incubated for 3 days at 30°C.
|
|
Northern analysis revealed that the hcNME1 transformants had
increased amounts of precursors and decreased levels of mature tRNAiMet compared to the vector transformants (Fig.
4, lanes 4 and 5), with a twofold increase in the
precursor/mature ratio (0.92 versus 0.47 [Table 6]) for this
tRNA. A twofold increase in the amount of unprocessed primary
transcript for tRNAUAUIle also was observed in the
hcNME1 transformants with respect to the vector
transformants (Fig. 4 and Table 6). The presence of hcRPR1 together with hcNME1 decreased the
precursor/mature ratio from 0.92 to 0.57 for
tRNAiMet and from 0.16 to 0.10 for
pre-tRNAUAUIle in the
hcNME1 transformant (Table 6). These data are
consistent with the idea that hcNME1 leads to derepression
of GCN4 by interfering with 5'-end processing of tRNAs
by RNase P. Because introduction of hcIMT4 did not reverse
the Gcd
phenotype of hcNME1 (data not shown),
it most probably results from accumulation of unprocessed
pre-tRNAs rather than depletion of mature
tRNAiMet.
To provide more direct evidence that untrimmed pre-tRNA elicits
derepression of GCN4 translation, we examined the
consequences of overexpressing a mutant form of
pre-tRNAGUATyr that cannot be processed by
yeast RNase P in vitro. Three base changes were introduced into
wild-type pre-tRNAGUATyr to extend the length
of uninterrupted helix in the aminoacyl stem (35). In
accordance with our hypothesis, the gene encoding the stem extension
mutant of pre-tRNAGUATyr on a high-copy-number
plasmid conferred a Gcd
phenotype in the
gcn2
strain whereas the corresponding plasmid encoding
wild-type pre-tRNAGUATyr did not (Fig. 7C). The
results of Northern analysis confirmed that the stem extension mutation
impaired processing of the pre-tRNAGUATyr in vivo (data
not shown).
Evidence that PUS4 overexpression elicits derepression
of GCN4 partly by interfering with nuclear export of
tRNAs.
It is thought that tRNA export in mammalian cells
requires exportin-t (Xpo-t), which binds tRNA directly with high
affinity (33). It also requires the GTP-bound form of Ran
(RanGTP), which forms a complex with Xpo-t and tRNA (2,
33) involving extensive interactions with the backbone of the
T
C and acceptor arms of the tRNA (3). LOS1 is a yeast
homolog of Xpo-t (2, 33), and the nuclear accumulation of
tRNA observed in a los1
mutant (47) plus
the ability of LOS1 to interact with Ran-GTP in a tRNA-dependent
fashion (23) have implicated LOS1 in tRNA export from
the yeast nucleus. If LOS1 resembles Xpo-t in binding to the T
C and
acceptor arms of tRNA, overexpressed PUS4 might compete with LOS1
for tRNA binding and interfere with tRNA export. This possibility is consistent with the findings that PUS4 can form stable
complexes with tRNA in vitro (45), that a minimal
substrate for enzymatic formation of pseudouridine 55 by
PUS4 is a T
C stem-loop structure (8), and that
pseudouridine 55 synthase in Escherichia coli
requires the T
C stem-loop to catalyze pseudouridine
formation (21). The accumulation of mature tRNA in the
nucleus resulting from inhibition of LOS1 function by PUS4 might be a
signal for derepression of GCN4 translation. According to
this hypothesis, overexpression of LOS1 should reduce the
derepression of GCN4 elicited by hcPUS4.
In agreement with this prediction, LOS1 on a
high-copy-number plasmid partially overcame the ability of
hcPUS4-HA to confer 3-ATr and derepression of
GCN4-lacZ translation in gcn2
cells without reducing the expression of PUS4-HA (Fig. 8A and
B). In contrast, hcLOS1 had
little effect on these same phenotypes when conferred by
hctRNAVal* (Fig. 8A) or hcNME1 (Fig. 8C).
This result is consistent with the idea that hcPUS4 elicits
derepression of GCN4 in part by interfering with LOS1
function and producing the accumulation of mature tRNA in the
nucleus. The hctRNAVal* and hcNME1
suppressors, by contrast, would derepress GCN4 by producing
defective or unprocessed tRNAs, respectively, without directly
interfering with tRNA export. As expected, Northern analysis showed
that hcLOS1 did not reduce the accumulation of tRNA
precursors in cells bearing hcPUS4 (data not shown).

View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 8.
Overexpression of LOS1 reduces the
Gcd phenotype of hcPUS4. (A) Transformants of
strain H1895 (gcn2 ) bearing high-copy-number plasmids
YEplac181/YEp24 (Vectors), pHQ839/YEp24
(h.c.PUS4-HA/Vector), pHQ839/YEpLOS1
(h.c.PUS4-HA/h.c.LOS1), p856/YEp24
(h.c.tRNAVal*/Vector), and p856/YEpLOS1
(h.c.tRNAVal*/h.c.LOS1) were replica-plated
to SC medium containing 30 mM 3-AT and incubated for 3 days at 30°C
(left panel). Extracts from the same transformants grown under
repressing (nonstarvation) conditions were assayed for
-galactosidase activity, and the results shown in the right panel
are the means and standard deviations from three individual
transformants. (B) Expression of PUS4-HA in transformants
carrying high-copy-number plasmids pHQ839/Vector (Vector + h.c.PUS4-HA) or pHQ839/YEpLOS1 (h.c.LOS1 + h.c.PUS4-HA) measured by Western blot analysis. PUS4-HA was
detected with an anti-HA antibody and visualized by enhanced
chemiluminescence. Intensities of bands were calculated with a scanner
(Silverscanner III) and NIH image software (version 1.61). The relative
levels were calculated by averaging the band intensities from two
independent extract preparations for each transformant (lanes 1 to 4, pHQ839/Vector transformant; lanes 5 to 8, pHQ839/YEpLOS1 transformant).
(C) Transformants of strain H1895 (gcn2 ) bearing
high-copy-number plasmids YEplac181/YEp24 (Vectors), pHQ862/YEp24
(h.c.NME1/Vector), pHQ862/YEpLOS1
(h.c.NME1/h.c.LOS1), or YEplac181/YEpLOS1
(Vector/h.c.LOS1) were replica-plated to SC medium
containing 30 mM 3-AT and incubated for 3 days at 30°C. (D) Deletion
of LOS1 has a Gcd phenotype. Transformants of
strain HQY316 (gcn2 los1 ) bearing plasmids YEplac181
(vector), pHQ860 (h.c.LOS1), and pHQ839
(h.c.PUS4-HA) were replica-plated to SD medium containing
the required supplements and 30 mM 3-AT and incubated for 3 days at
30°C.
|
|
If nuclear accumulation of mature tRNA elicits GCN2-independent
derepression of GCN4, inactivation of LOS1 should
increase GCN4 expression in a gcn2
mutant. In
agreement with this prediction, deletion of LOS1 partially
suppressed the 3-ATs phenotype of the gcn2
strain (Fig. 8D). We also found that introduction of hcPUS4
into the los1
gcn2
double mutant led to even greater 3-ATr (Fig. 8D). This last observation can be explained by
proposing that inhibiting LOS1 function in tRNA export is
only one component of the derepression signal generated by
hcPUS4. As indicated above, the fact that
hcRPR1 partially reversed the Gcd
phenotype of
hcPUS4 also points to a defect in tRNA 5'-end processing elicited by PUS4 overexpression.
In an effort to provide independent evidence that hcPUS4
derepresses GCN4 translation partly by interfering with
LOS1-mediated tRNA export, we carried out fluorescence in situ
hybridization to visualize the cellular distributions of
various tRNAs in cells overexpressing PUS4. For
tRNAUAUIle, we consistently observed nuclear
accumulation in most cells bearing hcPUS4 versus
vector alone (Fig. 9A and B). In
addition, the presence of hcLOS1 reduced the extent and
frequency of tRNAUAUIle nuclear accumulation
compared to the situation with hcPUS4 alone (Fig. 9B and C).
These results support the idea that PUS4 overexpression impedes
nuclear export of tRNAUAUIle in a
manner that can be overcome by increased expression of LOS1. Similar results were observed for tRNAAACVal,
although the extent of nuclear accumulation conferred by
hcPUS4 was less pronounced. No significant nuclear
accumulation was detected for tRNAiMet,
tRNAAAUIle, tRNAGUATyr, and
tRNACAALeu. Thus, it appears that PUS4
overexpression interferes with nuclear export of a subset of tRNAs.
(The fact that hcPUS4 did not produce detectable nuclear
accumulation of tRNAiMet despite accumulation of
its untrimmed precursors in this strain [Fig. 4] may be explained by
the fact that tRNAiMet exhibits a more intense
nuclear signal than the other tRNAs we examined in wild-type cells,
presumably indicating a relatively large nuclear pool of mature
tRNAiMet under normal conditions.)

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 9.
hcPUS4-HA leads to nuclear accumulation of
tRNAUAUIle detected by fluorescence in situ
hybridization. Cells of transformants of strain H1895
(gcn2 ) bearing high-copy-number plasmids YEplac181/YEp24
(vectors) (A and a), pHQ839/YEp24 (h.c.PUS4-HA/vector) (B
and b), or pHQ839/YEpLOS1 (h.c.PUS4-HA/h.c.LOS1)
(C and c) were subjected to fluorescence in situ hybridization using a
probe specific for tRNAUAUIle (panels A, B, and C)
or stained with 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) to visualize
nuclei (panels a, b, and c).
|
|
Interestingly, we observed significant nuclear accumulation of
tRNAVal* in strains overexpressing this mutant tRNA
versus the corresponding wild-type tRNAAACVal
species (Fig. 10B and C). We previously
proposed that the mutation in the 3'-terminal nucleotide of
tRNAVal* would impede aminoacylation in vivo because
the same substitution reduced charging in vitro of a yeast
tRNAAACVal model substrate (minihelix)
(17) and of E. coli
tRNAAACVal (50). To test this
prediction, we used Northern analysis under acidic conditions to
analyze the relative amounts of deacylated tRNAAACVal in cells overexpressing
tRNAVal* and in those overexpressing wild-type
tRNAAACVal. The results in Fig. 10D showed that
essentially all of the overexpressed wild-type
tRNAAACVal was acylated in vivo, since the vast
majority of this sample (lane 6) comigrated with the acylated form of
native tRNAAACVal rather than with the
faster-migrating deacylated tRNA (lanes 2 and 1, respectively).
Unexpectedly, it appeared that the mutant tRNAVal*
molecules in the deacylated sample (lane 3) migrated more slowly and
were more heterogeneous than the deacylated wild-type
tRNAAACVal (lane 1), suggesting a defect in
processing the mutant tRNA. The overexpressed mutant
tRNAVal* in the acylated sample (lane 4) was only
slightly more heterogeneous than the acylated wild-type
tRNAAACVal (lane 6). This last observation, plus
the fact that the aberrant species in deacylated
tRNAVal* roughly comigrated with acylated
wild-type tRNAAACVal, led us to propose that the
tRNAVal* molecules are aberrantly processed and
aminoacylated inefficiently in vivo.


View larger version (2534K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 10.
Evidence that mutant tRNAVal* is
defective for aminoacylation and processing and is retained in the
nucleus. (A to C) Cells of transformants of strain H1937
(gcn2 ) bearing empty vector YEp24 (A and a), p1362
(tRNAVal*) (B and b), or p1308 (wild-type
tRNAVal) (C and c) were subjected to fluorescence in
situ hybridization using a probe specific for
tRNAAACVal (A, B, and C) or stained with DAPI to
visualize nuclei (a, b, and c). (D) Total RNAs prepared under acidic
conditions from the strains analyzed in panels A to C were resolved by
electrophoresis on an acid-urea polyacrylamide gel and subjected to
Northern blot analysis using a probe specific for
tRNAAACVal. In lanes 1, 3, and 5, the RNA samples
were deacylated in 2 M Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) prior to electrophoresis.
|
|
Recent findings indicate that tRNAs are aminoacylated in the
nucleus and that this reaction stimulates their export to the cytoplasm
both in mammalian cells (38) and in yeast (47a). This might explain our finding that mutant tRNAVal*
accumulated in the nucleus (Fig. 10B). However, it is possible that the
mutation in tRNAVal* also weakens its interaction with
LOS1 (3), either directly or because of incomplete
processing of the acceptor stem (Fig. 10D). In any case, the nuclear
retention of tRNAVal* provides strong support for the
idea that defects in the maturation of tRNA in the nucleus or in
its export to the cytoplasm can trigger derepression of GCN4
translation. Moreover, it can explain why hctRNAVal* failed to stimulate eIF2
phosphorylation
by GCN2, which are both presumably restricted to the cytoplasm
(54).
 |
DISCUSSION |
Evidence that unprocessed tRNAs in the nucleus elicit
derepression of GCN4 translation independently of eIF2
phosphorylation.
GCN4 translation can be stimulated
independently of GCN2 in mutants with lesions in subunits of eIF2 or
eIF2B, in the genes encoding tRNAiMet, or in the
GCD10- or GCD14-encoded proteins required for
methylation of adenosine-58 in tRNAiMet. It is
thought that all of these mutations mimic the effects of GCN2-mediated
eIF2
phosphorylation by lowering the concentration of ternary
complexes in the cytoplasm. It was suggested that a defect in ribosome
biogenesis was responsible for derepressing GCN4 translation
in gcn2 cells overexpressing NME1
(51). Our finding that the Gcd
phenotype of
hcNME1 was suppressed by overexpressing RPR1
points to a reduction in RNase P levels and diminished tRNA 5'-end
processing as the cause of derepression. We propose that overexpression
of NME1 reduces RNase P levels by titrating from RPR1 one or
more protein subunits shared between RNases MRP and P. Consistent with this hypothesis, we detected an ca. twofold increase in the
precursor/mature ratio for tRNAiMet in the
hcNME1 strain versus the wild type, and this phenotype was partially reversed by hcRPR1. The small
reduction in mature initiator tRNAMet abundance
caused by hcNME1 cannot account for its Gcd
phenotype, because it was not suppressed by hcIMT4. Instead, we propose that an increase in the levels of unprocessed tRNAs in
the nucleus activates a regulatory mechanism that down-regulates ternary complex binding to 40S ribosomes by an amount sufficient to
derepress GCN4 translation. We cannot exclude the
possibility that a defect in ribosome biogenesis also contributes to
the derepression of GCN4 conferred by hcNME1.
A more direct demonstration that unprocessed tRNAs trigger
GCN2-independent derepression of GCN4 was provided by our
finding that an overexpressed mutant
pre-tRNAGUATyr that cannot be processed by
RNase P also elicits a Gcd
phenotype in
gcn2
cells. Because unprocessed pre-tRNAs are not exported (9, 38, 47), this result provides strong evidence that the accumulated pre-tRNAs are recognized in the nucleus
and send a signal to the cytoplasm, which leads to increased
translation of GCN4 mRNA. This signalling mechanism may
additionally account for the Gcd
phenotype of
hctRNAVal*, because this mutant tRNA appeared to be
processed aberrantly and was retained in the nucleus.
Evidence that overexpression of PUS4 elicits
GCN2-independent derepression of GCN4 by impeding nuclear
export and 5'-end processing of tRNAs.
The derepression of
GCN4 translation in cells overexpressing
PUS4 also seems to be triggered partly by the
accumulation of pre-tRNAs in the nucleus. The Gcd
phenotype of hcPUS4 was partially reversed by
hcRPR1, suggesting that overexpressed PUS4 interferes with
5'-end processing by RNase P. Consistent with this model, we observed a
ca. twofold increase in the precursor/mature ratio for
tRNAiMet in the hcPUS4 transformant,
which was reversed by cooverexpressing RPR1. The postulated
interference with RNase P exerted by overexpressed PUS4 could involve
direct competition between these two enzymes for binding to a subset of
tRNA precursors. This idea is ostensibly at odds with the fact that
5'-end processing of pre-tRNAiMet was impaired
by hcPUS4 even though this tRNA is not a substrate for
PUS4. When overexpressed 15-fold, however, PUS4 may bind tightly to
pre-tRNAiMet and block access of RNase P even
though it fails to synthesize pseudouridine-55.
Alternatively, PUS4 and RNase P may interact with a common tRNA
chaperone that facilitates the activities of both enzymes, and
overexpression of PUS4 could reduce the availability of this
hypothetical chaperone for 5'-end processing of
pre-tRNAiMet by RNase P.
Unlike the situation with hcNME1, the Gcd
phenotype of hcPUS4 was partially suppressed by
hcLOS1 in addition to hcRPR1. Because LOS1
appears to be the yeast homologue of mammalian exportin-t, the
suppression by hcLOS1 could indicate that overexpression of PUS4 impedes tRNA export and that increased nuclear accumulation of
one or more fully processed tRNAs contributes to the derepression of GCN4 translation. Consistent with this interpretation, a
los1
mutant had a Gcd
phenotype, albeit
weaker than that of hcPUS4, and we observed nuclear
accumulation of tRNAUAUIle in strains bearing
hcPUS4 that was reversed by cooverexpressing LOS1. At the
same time, we did not observe convincing nuclear accumulation of
several other tRNAs examined in strains harboring hcPUS4. Thus, overexpressed PUS4 seems to inhibit
LOS1-dependent nuclear export of only a subset of tRNAs. This
inhibition might involve competition between LOS1 and PUS4 for binding
to the affected tRNAs. Presumably, the selective nuclear retention
of tRNAs is sufficient to trigger derepression of GCN4
only when combined with the accumulation of certain pre-tRNAs
which results from inhibition of RNase P by overexpressed PUS4.
Considering that removal of introns from pre-tRNAs is defective
in los1 mutants (28), it is conceivable that the
Gcd
phenotype of los1
cells results from
accumulation of unspliced pre-tRNAs in the nucleus rather than
from nuclear retention of fully processed tRNAs. Similarly, it
could be argued that the tRNAUAUIle species
retained in the nucleus of hcPUS4 transformants (Fig. 9) are
incompletely processed molecules rather than fully matured tRNAs. However, the latter possibility seems inconsistent with the
fact that hcPUS4 produces only a small increase in the
relative abundance of pre-tRNAUAUIle, which is
a minor fraction of the combined pool of precursor and mature forms of
this tRNA (Fig. 4). Thus, the increase in pre-tRNAUAUIle abundance seems insufficient to
account for its considerable nuclear retention in hcPUS4
transformants. Assuming that LOS1 is the tRNA exportin of yeast, it
may be simpler to propose that hcLOS1 overcomes the nuclear
retention of mature tRNAUAUIle in cells
overexpressing PUS4 rather than suggesting that it corrects a
processing defect. Accordingly, we consider it likely that an overabundance of mature tRNA in the nucleus, as well as
accumulation of unprocessed pre-tRNAs, can trigger derepression
of GCN4 by the GCN2-independent pathway.
It is thought that GCN2 is stimulated in the cytoplasm of amino
acid-starved cells by uncharged tRNAs that interact with
translating ribosomes. In view of recent findings that tRNAs
are aminoacylated in the nucleus (38), we considered the
possibility that uncharged tRNA in the nucleus could be a signal
for GCN2-independent derepression of GCN4. Consistent with
this model, we obtained evidence that tRNAVal* is
retained in the nucleus and is aminoacylated inefficiently, possibly
because of a processing defect. Either impeding 5'-end processing by
overexpressing NME1 or PUS4, or overproducing a mutant tRNA that cannot be processed by RNase P, should also
produce an excess of pre-tRNAs in the nucleus that cannot be
charged. Increased binding of overexpressed PUS4 to mature tRNAs in
the nucleus might block their interaction with aminoacyl-tRNA
synthetases or, by impeding export, generate increased nuclear pools of
tRNA which outstrip the enzymatic capacity of synthetases in the
nucleus. (The fact that hcPUS4 did not perceptibly increase
the proportion of total cellular tRNA that was uncharged could be
explained by stipulating that only a small fraction of the mature
tRNA is located in the nucleus.) Finally, this model could account
for the GCN2-independent derepression of GCN4 that
accompanies overproduction of wild-type tRNAs under conditions of
reduced aminoacylation (54). The idea that GCN4
translation can be induced by uncharged tRNA in the nucleus is
attractive; however, it seems equally possible that an excess of
unprocessed or untransported tRNA in the nucleus, regardless of its
aminoacylation status, is the primary signal for this derepression mechanism.
Under adverse environmental conditions where processing, modification
or transport of tRNA is impaired, it could be advantageous to
decrease the rate of protein synthesis. The inhibition of
ternary-complex formation by phosphorylation of eIF2 is a widely
employed mechanism to down-regulate translation under conditions of
starvation or stress (24). Our results indicate that
ternary-complex formation or utilization is reduced by a
mechanism other than eIF2
phosphorylation in response to
malfunctions in tRNA biogenesis. This may provide a useful
strategy for coupling the rate of translation initiation in the
cytoplasm with nuclear events involved in producing functional tRNA
molecules that can participate in protein synthesis.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank Lasse Lindahl for the NME1 and
RPR1 plasmids and David Engelke for advice and gifts of
plasmids. We thank Bobbie Felix for help in preparation of the
manuscript and members of the Hinnebusch and Dever laboratories for discussion.
G.R.B. was supported by grants from the National Science Research
Council (BU-2930) and the Swedish Cancer Society (project 680), and
A.K.H. was supported by NIH grant GM27930.