INTRODUCTION

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

Addition of a poly(A) tail to the 3' end of a eukaryotic mRNA is an essential step in the regulation of gene expression. Polyadenylation enhances initiation of translation (45), mRNA stability (5), and transport of mRNA from the nucleus to the cytoplasm (25). The importance of this modification is reflected in the fact that all eukaryotic mRNAs, except for the replication-dependent histone mRNAs of metazoans, are polyadenylated. In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, polyadenylation occurs in the nucleus in a two-step reaction (for recent reviews, see references 39, 50, and 53). Site-specific endonucleolytic cleavage of the primary transcript by the yeast cleavage factors CF I and II is followed by addition of a poly(A) tail to the upstream fragment by a complex of poly(A) polymerase (Pap1), CF I, and polyadenylation factor I (PF I). Pap1, a monomeric polypeptide of 64 kDa, is the key enzyme which catalyzes the addition of poly(A) tail to the mRNA (32, 33). The purified enzyme has no specificity for genuine yeast mRNA 3' ends, but specificity for the correct 3' end is conferred by association with other mRNA processing factors (43). Furthermore, interaction with these factors also determines the length of the poly(A) tail (2, 30, 40, 55).

Among the cloned genes encoding 3'-end processing factors in yeast and mammals, PAP1 shows the greatest sequence homology to its mammalian counterpart. There is a 47% identity between the yeast and mammalian proteins throughout the 450 amino acids in the amino-terminal region, which is thought to comprise the catalytic domain of these enzymes (37). The C-terminal regions vary significantly; in particular, the yeast Pap1 lacks the serine/threonine (Ser/Thr)-rich regulatory domain found in the mammalian enzyme (10). In contrast to its mammalian homologue, the yeast Pap1 is not required for the initial mRNA 3'-end cleavage (7, 41).

Posttranslational modification by phosphorylation and ubiquitination plays a major role in regulation of various aspects of cellular physiology, including progression through the mitotic cell cycle (13), transcriptional activation, signal transduction, and receptor-mediated endocytosis (22). For several reasons, we were interested in whether the yeast Pap1 was subject to such regulatory modifications. First, very little is known about the posttranslational modifications of RNA-binding proteins and the effects on nuclear processes. Second, mammalian poly(A) polymerase (PAP) is modified by phosphorylation on the cyclin-dependent kinase (cdk) consensus sites located in the Ser/Thr-rich region. Hyperphosphorylation occurs specifically during mitosis (M), resulting in inactivation of PAP (9). Numerous proteins, including components of the transcriptional and translational machinery, are phosphorylated as a result of mitotic cdk p34^cdc2 activity in mammalian cells, leading to a general repression of nuclear RNA transcription and reduced protein synthesis in mitosis (20). Phosphorylation-mediated gene repression may be needed to facilitate mitotic events, such as chromosome condensation and segregation and dissociation of the nuclear lamina that is seen in mammalian cells. Down-regulation of the mammalian PAP by phosphorylation during mitosis is perhaps a mechanism to prevent inappropriate polyadenylation and probably affects synthesis of all polyadenylated transcripts (9, 10). Phosphorylation of the yeast enzyme has not been investigated. Furthermore, we have previously identified a protein, Ufd1 (named Ufd for ubiquitin fusion degradation), which interacts specifically with Pap1 in a two-hybrid screen (12). Ufd1 was also independently identified by Johnson et al. (27) and was shown to have a role in the ubiquitination process. However, ubiquitination of PAP or mRNA processing factors has not been reported.

In this study, we show that yeast Pap1 undergoes posttranslational modifications at the S-G₂ transition of the cell cycle. The modifications involve both phosphorylation and ubiquitination but do not alter the stability of the bulk of cellular Pap1. Analysis of strains harboring mutations in the gene encoding Cdc28, a homologue of the mammalian cdc2 kinase that modifies the mammalian PAP at mitosis (9), suggests that Cdc28 activity is not directly required for Pap1 phosphorylation but may be involved in the correct timing of the modification. This is consistent with the lack of cdc2-cyclin B consensus phosphorylation sites in Pap1. However, the phosphorylated species does appear to be an inactive form of Pap1. Our studies indicate that the cell cycle regulation of yeast Pap1 is different from that reported for the mammalian enzyme.

	MATERIALS AND METHODS

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

Yeast strains and cell culture. All cultures were grown to early log phase, with an optical density at 600 nm of 1, in yeast extract peptone medium (YPD) or synthetic medium (SM) supplemented with 2% glucose, at 30°C except where indicated. S. cerevisiae strains used in this study were gifts from D. Finley (Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.), M. Hochstrasser (University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill.), S. Reed (The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, Calif.), M. Tyers (Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada), and A. Amon (The Whitehead Institute, Boston, Mass.) and are as follows: W3031-A (MATa ade2-1 his3-11,15 leu2-3,112 trp1-1 ura3-1 can1-100), Fc12-18 (MATa bar1 trp1 leu2 ura3 his2 ade1), cdc28-4 cells (MATa ura3 leu2 ade1 trp1 arg4 his2 cdc28-4), cdc28-13 cells (MATa ura3 leu2 ade2 trp1 arg4 his2 cdc28-13), cdc28-1N cells (MATa ura3 leu2 ade2 trp1 arg4 his2 cdc28-1N), cdc9-1 cells (MAT ura3 leu1 ade2 trp1 can1 cdc9-1), cdc13-1 cells (MAT ura3 his7 trp1 can1 cdc13-1), cdc4-1 cells (MATa ade2-1 his3-11,15 leu2-3,112 trp1-1 ura3-1 cdc4-1), and cdc34-2 cells (MATa ade2-1 his3-11,15 leu2-3,112 trp1-1 ura3-1 cdc34-2). The HA-Smt3 construct was a gift from David Leggett (Harvard Medical School). The 2µm-based plasmids expressing the hemagglutinin (HA) and Myc epitope-tagged forms of ubiquitin used in this study were described previously (24). For ubiquitin overexpression from the CUP1 promoter of these plasmids, cells were induced by addition of 100 µM CuSO₄ for 5 h at 30°C.

Immunoprecipitation and Western blot analysis. Yeast cells were harvested, washed with cold water, and resuspended in cell lysis buffer (30 mM HEPES [pH 7.5], 100 mM potassium acetate, 2 mM magnesium acetate, 0.5 M sorbitol, 1 mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100, 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate [SDS]) supplemented with protease inhibitors (1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 µg of leupeptin A per ml, 1 µg of pepstatin, 10 µg of tolysulfonyl phenylalanyl chloromethyl ketone [TPCK] per ml, 10 µg of N-p-tosyl-L-lysine chloromethyl ketone [TLCK] per ml, 50 mM N-ethylmaleimide) and phosphatase inhibitors (50 mM -glycerophosphate, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate). Samples were lysed with glass beads by vortex mixing (three times for 1 min each time with 1-min cooling intervals on ice). Cell lysates were centrifuged at 15,000 × g for 20 min at 4°C. The protein concentration of the supernatant was measured by the Bradford assay.

Cell synchronization and release. Chemical arrest was performed by treatment for 3 h with -factor mating pheromone (2 µg/ml) for G₁ phase, hydroxyurea (10 mg/ml) for S phase, or nocodazole (15 µg/ml) in M phase at 30°C, unless noted. To release, cells were washed twice and resuspended in fresh media. Arrest was confirmed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis and microscopic examination of bud formation. Samples were collected and pelleted at various time intervals. Typically, a 150-ml culture with an optical density at 600 nm of 1 was used for protein lysate, 2 ml was used for total RNA preparation, and 1 ml was used for FACS analysis and determination of the budding index.

Flow cytometry. Flow cytometric DNA quantitation was determined by the following procedure (14). Cells were fixed in 70% ethanol for 18 h at 4°C. Samples were then washed with and resuspended in 1 ml of 50 mM sodium citrate (pH 7.5) and then treated with 25 µl of 10-mg/ml RNase A at 37°C for 1 h followed by addition of 50 µl of 20-mg/ml proteinase K and incubation at 37°C for another hour. The DNA was stained by addition of 1 ml of 50 mM sodium citrate containing 5 µg of propidium iodide per ml. Samples were incubated in the dark overnight at 4°C and analyzed on a FACScan (Becton Dickinson). For each histogram, 25,000 cells were analyzed with the ModiFIT cell cycle analysis software to calculate the percentages of cells in G₁, S, and G₂/M phases.

Pulse-chase analysis. The pulse-chase analysis regimen was adapted from the regimen of Amon et al. (1) with minor modifications. Yeast cells were grown in YPD to log phase at 30°C. A 50-ml culture was then washed in synthetic medium without methionine (SM-Met) and grown in 5 ml of SM-Met medium supplemented with 0.1 mM methionine for 5 min. Cells were then labeled with 500 µCi of Trans³⁵S-label (ICN) (85% [³⁵S]methionine, 15% [³⁵S]cysteine) for 30 min at 30°C. Cells were then centrifuged and resuspended at time zero in YPD medium containing 2 mM methionine, 2 mM cysteine, and when noted, 1 mg of cycloheximide per ml. Aliquots of cells were removed at different times during the chase, washed twice with cold water, and stored at 80°C before protein extraction. Protein extracts were prepared as described above by the glass bead disruption method. Incorporation of ³⁵S was determined by counting tricholoroacetic acid-precipitable material. Aliquots of extract containing equivalent disintegrations per minute were precleared with 20 µl of protein A-Sepharose beads for 15 min. Supernatant was incubated with anti-Pap1 antibody for 2 h at 4°C, after which 20 µl of protein A-Sepharose beads was added for an additional 2 h. The beads were washed twice with 1 ml of the wash buffer and twice with 1 ml of wash buffer containing 2 M urea. Beads were resuspended in sample buffer containing dithiothreitol, boiled, and resolved on a 10% polyacrylamide-SDS gel. The gel was then stained with Coomassie blue, dried, and subjected to autoradiography or quantified with a PhosphorImager system (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, Calif.). The half-life of Pap1 was calculated from the formula t_1/2 = 1n 2/degradation rate by using Fig. P software (BioSoft, Cambridge, United Kingdom) (11).

In vitro polyadenylation assays. For processing extracts, cdc9-1 and cdc13-1 cells were grown to logarithmic phase in YPD medium at the permissive temperature of 24°C and then shifted to the restrictive temperature of 37°C for 2 h. Cell cycle arrest was confirmed by microscopic examination and FACS analysis. Cell extract for polyadenylation assays was prepared as described previously (30). Extract was prepared in the presence of phosphatase inhibitors (50 mM -glycerophosphate and 1 mM sodium orthovanadate). For separation of Pap1 forms, 1 ml of cell extract (10 mg/ml) was loaded onto a 1-ml Q fast anion-exchange column (Pharmacia), equilibrated with buffer B, containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.9), 80 mM potassium chloride, and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. The column was washed with 7 volumes of buffer B. The bound proteins were then eluted with steps of 150 or 500 mM potassium chloride. Fractions (3 ml each) were immunoprecipitated with Pap1 antibody. The Pap1 immunoprecipitates were divided into two parts and analyzed by immunoblotting and for Pap1 activity. The polyadenylation assay was performed by incubating the Pap1 immunoprecipitates with 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 2% polyethylene glycol 8000, 20 mM creatine phosphate, 1 mM MnCl₂, 2 mM ATP, and an -³²P-labeled RNA substrate in a final volume of 20 µl for 20 min at 30°C. Phosphatase treatment was performed in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0 for 5 min at 30°C. The RNA substrate contains the 161 nucleotides of the wild-type GAL7 sequence upstream of the poly(A) site (7). Resulting products were analyzed on a 6% polyacrylamide-8.3 M urea gel and visualized by autoradiography.

	RESULTS

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

Pap1 is modified during the cell cycle. As a first step towards investigating potential regulation of the yeast Pap1, we analyzed the amount and type of Pap1 found in the cells as they progressed through the cell cycle. Wild-type cells were blocked by -factor pheromone at G₁. After release, cell samples were removed at various time intervals to determine the position in the cell cycle by measuring DNA content by FACS and by examining bud formation microscopically. -factor treatment resulted in a G₁ arrest, as evidenced by the uniform population of cells with 1 N content of DNA and the accumulation of unbudded cells (Fig. 1A). The percentage of cells at different stages of the cell cycle was calculated to better estimate the timing of Pap1 modification. After release from -factor arrest, cells continued in a synchronized fashion to replicate their DNA and progress through M phase.

View larger version (44K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 1.   Analysis of Pap1 modification during the S. cerevisiae cell cycle. Fc12-18 wild-type cells were synchronized with -factor mating pheromone at G1 (0 min [0']) followed by a release into YPD medium. (A) Synchrony was assessed by measuring the DNA content of cells by FACS analysis, and the percentages of cells at different stages of the cell cycle were determined using the cellfit cell cycle program, as shown below the relevant times. At the indicated times (in minutes), the occurrence (percentage) of buds in synchronized culture was determined by microscopic examination. (B) Pap1 was immunoprecipitated from cell extract at various time intervals with anti-Pap1 antibody and resolved by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and immunoblot analysis was performed with anti-Pap1 antibody. The positions of molecular mass markers (in kilodaltons) are indicated to the left of the gel.

View larger version (64K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 2.   Analysis of Pap1 modification detected in cells blocked with hydroxyurea. Cells containing the HA-Ub construct were grown in selective medium at 25°C (without copper induction) and then blocked at S phase with hydroxyurea. Cells were released into fresh medium lacking hydroxyurea. Extracts from cells taken from a log-phase yeast culture (lane 1), from cells treated with hydroxyurea (H) (lane 2), and from cells removed at various time points (in minutes) after release from the hydroxyurea block (lanes 3 to 6) were immunoprecipitated with anti-Pap1 antibody, separated by SDS-PAGE, and then probed with anti-Pap1 antibody (-Pap1) (lanes 1 to 6). The positions of molecular mass markers (in kilodaltons) are indicated to the left of the gel.

Pap1 is phosphorylated. The 90-kDa form of Pap1 is not found in recombinant Pap1 (rPap1) made in Escherichia coli or cells from a log-phase yeast culture (Fig. 3A, lanes 1 and 4). However, overexpression of ubiquitin in an asynchronized cell culture of the same yeast strain resulted in accumulation of Pap1 isoforms which comigrated with those observed in the late S/G₂ phase of cells synchronized by -factor arrest (Fig. 3A, lanes 2 and 3). In these samples, additional species between 64 and 90 kDa in size and greater than 90 kDa are also visible. To verify that the 90-kDa species was indeed a form of Pap1, we tested whether it could also be immunoprecipitated with a monoclonal antibody directed against an epitope in the N terminus of Pap1 (Fig. 3B). Both Pap-specific antibodies, but not an unrelated antibody against -galactosidase, immunoprecipitate the 90-kDa form, as well as the 64-kDa Pap1. Furthermore, the 90-kDa species is also detected when blots are probed with either the N terminus or C terminus anti-Pap1 specific antibody (data not shown). These results confirm that the 90-kDa species contains a form of Pap1 which has probably been posttranslationally modified.

View larger version (37K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 3.   Pap1 phosphorylation. (A) Pap1 was immunoprecipitated from extract prepared from synchronized Fc12-18 cells which have entered late S/G2 after release from -factor arrest (lane 2), from unsynchronized W303 cells overexpressing HA-ubiquitin (lane 3), or from unsynchronized W303 cells without ubiquitin overexpression (lane 4). rPap is recombinant Pap1 made in E. coli (lane 1). (B) Extracts from W303 cells overexpressing ubiquitin were immunoprecipitated with anti--galactosidase ( -gal) (lane 1) or with the C-terminal (lane 2) or N-terminal (lane 3) Pap1 antibodies, and the immunoblot was probed with the C-terminal Pap1 antibody. IP Ab, immunoprecipitation antibody. (C) The 90-kDa Pap1 species is sensitive to phosphatases. Immunoprecipitates were incubated without phosphatase () (lane 1) or with 200 U of lambda phosphatase () (lane 2), 2 U of alkaline phosphatase (AP) (lane 4), or heat-inactivated lambda phosphatase () (lane 3) on alkaline phosphatase (AP) (lane 5). (D) Phosphorylation of Pap1 at S/G2 of the cell cycle. Phosphatase treatment of the Pap1 immunoprecipitate from the 90-min time point shown in Fig. 1B. Lane 1, no phosphatase; lane 2, lambda phosphatase; lane 3, protein phosphatase 1 (PP1). Unless indicated otherwise, the immunoprecipitations and immunoblotting were performed with the C-terminus-specific Pap antibody. The positions of molecular mass markers (in kilodaltons) are indicated to the left of the gels.

Phosphorylation is associated with Pap1 inactivation. To characterize the effects of Pap1 modifications, we took advantage of two mutations, cdc9-1 and cdc13-1, that cause cell cycle arrest specifically in the S/G₂ phase when cells are grown at the nonpermissive temperature. The cdc9-1 mutant encodes a temperature-sensitive DNA ligase which results in unligated Okazaki fragments at the restrictive temperature (28). The cdc13-1 mutant has defective metabolism of the telomere-associated DNA. These mutants arrest in the late S phase or in the early G₂ phase as a consequence of DNA damage detected by the RAD9 checkpoint (52). In these strains, low levels of the 90-kDa Pap1 are present even at the permissive temperature (Fig. 4A, lanes 1 and 3). The 90-kDa Pap1 species increases relative to the 64-kDa form in the cdc9 and cdc13 cells at the restrictive temperature, consistent with these strains arresting at the time in the cell cycle coinciding with the Pap1 modification (Fig. 4A, lanes 2 and 4).

View larger version (83K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 4.   Chromatographic separation of phosphorylated Pap1 and recovery of poly(A) addition activity by phosphatase treatment. (A) Immunoprecipitated Pap1 from extracts made from cdc9-1 and cdc13-1 cells grown at 24°C (lanes 1 and 3) or 37°C (lanes 2 and 4). (B) Pap1 species obtained from cdc9-1 and cdc13-1 extracts after Q fast column fractionation. Immunoprecipitated Pap1 from either total cell lysate (L) at 37°C (lanes 1 and 6) or an equal proportion of different Q fast fractions (flowthrough [FT] or elutions with 150 and 500 mM KCl) as indicated over lanes 2 to 5 and 7 to 10 were separated by SDS-PAGE and then probed with anti-Pap1 antibody. Phosphatase treatment of the 500 mM fraction was performed for 5 min (lanes 5 and 10). For panels A and B, the position of the 83-kDa molecular mass marker is indicated to the left of the gels. (C) Pap1 activity of the Q fast fractions analyzed by addition of poly(A) tail onto radioactive substrate RNA. Polyadenylation assays were performed using 50 ng of the yeast rPap1 (lane 2) or immunoprecipitated Pap1 from total extract (L) (lanes 3 and 10), different Q fast fractions (lanes 4 to 6 and 11 to 13), and phosphatase-treated 150 mM fractions (lane 9) and 500 mM fractions (lanes 7 and 14). Untreated substrate RNA is shown in lane 1. The positions of the poly(A)+ and substrate RNA on the gel are indicated to the left of the gel, and the positions of size markers (in bases) are shown to the right.

View larger version (50K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 5.   Effects of cdc28 mutations on phosphorylation of Pap1. Wild-type (Wt) and cdc28-4, cdc28-13, cdc28-1N, cdc4-1, and cdc34-2 mutant cells were grown at 24°C and then shifted to 37°C for 2.5 h. (A) Cell cycle arrest was confirmed by FACS analysis and budding index. (B) Pap1 from the wild type (lanes 1 and 2) and cdc28 (lanes 3 to 8), cdc4-1 (lanes 9 and 10), and cdc34-2 (lanes 11 and 12) mutants was analyzed by immunoprecipitation followed by immunoblotting. The positions of molecular mass markers (in kilodaltons) are indicated to the left of the gel.

Pap1 is ubiquitinated. We also asked if Pap1 is modified by ubiquitination in addition to phosphorylation. To show the presence of ubiquitinated Pap1, we employed a commonly used HA-tagged ubiquitin construct, which is under control of a copper-inducible promoter (24). In the absence of copper, this construct has been reported to produce ubiquitin at a level approximately 2-fold higher than the endogenous level, while in the presence of copper, the level increases 100-fold (15, 24). When cells containing this construct are grown in the presence of copper, the 90-kDa Pap1 accumulates (Fig. 3A, lane 3; Fig. 6A, lane 2; Fig. 6B, lane 1). Neither the 64-kDa form nor the 90-kDa form of Pap1 is found in immunoprecipitations performed with anti--galactosidase antibody (Fig. 6A, lane 1). If the Pap1 immunoprecipitate is instead probed with anti-HA antibody, a ladder of high-molecular-weight proteins is detected in samples from cells expressing the HA-Ub fusion (Fig. 6A, lane 4; Fig. 6B, lane 3). Ubiquitination of proteins typically produces a pattern of higher-molecular-weight species such as those observed in the Pap1 immunoprecipitate (15, 38). The fact that these are not detected in an immunoprecipitation performed with antibodies against -galactosidase (Fig. 6A, lane 3) suggests that they are specific to Pap1 and represent modification of Pap1 by ubiquitination. None of these appear to comigrate with the bands detected with the Pap1 antibody and thus are not likely to be abundant species, as one might expect for a modification which usually targets proteins for degradation. Because multiple HA-ubiquitination adducts are probably present in each band, it is easier to detect these species with the HA antibody. Overexpression of a ubiquitin-like protein, Smt3 (46) as an HA-Smt3 fusion does not result in any HA-reactive species detectable in Pap1 immunoprecipitates (Fig. 6B, lane 4), suggesting that Pap1 is not a target for this type of modification.

View larger version (36K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 6.   Pap1 is ubiquitinated in vivo. (A) Extracts from W303 cells overexpressing an HA-Ub fusion were used for immunoprecipitation (IP) with anti--galactosidase ( -gal) (lanes 1 and 3) or with the C-terminal Pap1 antibody (lanes 2 and 4), and the immunoblot was probed with the C-terminal Pap1 (lanes 1 and 2) or anti-HA antibodies (lanes 3 and 4). (B) Immunoprecipitated Pap1 from W303 cells overexpressing HA-tagged ubiquitin (lanes 1 and 3) or HA-tagged Smt3 (lanes 2 and 4) was probed with anti-Pap1 (lanes 1 and 2) or anti-HA (lanes 3 and 4) antibodies. The positions of molecular mass markers (in kilodaltons) are indicated to the left of the gels.

Pap1 is ubiquitinated at late S/G₂ in the cell cycle. Our data show that phosphorylated Pap1 accumulates at late S/G2, and we wanted to see if the ubiquitination of Pap1 occurred at the same time. For this experiment, we used extracts prepared for the cell cycle time course shown in Fig. 2, in which W303 cells carrying the copper-inducible HA-Ub construct are released from a hydroxyurea-induced arrest in S phase. As discussed above, overexpression of ubiquitin causes the accumulation of phosphorylated Pap1 in unsynchronized cells and apparently perturbs the cell cycle regulation of this modification. To avoid this complication, copper was not used to induce high levels of the ubiquitin fusion. However, even in the absence of copper, there is sufficient expression of HA-Ub to allow detection of Pap1-ubiquitin conjugates with the HA antibody. When Pap1 immunoprecipitates were probed with the HA antibody, a ladder of ubiquitinated species was detected 45 min after release (Fig. 7, lane 4), concurrent with the appearance of the 90-kDa phosphorylated species (Fig. 2, lane 4). When ubiquitin is not overexpressed, it appears that less material is found in higher-molecular-weight conjugates such as seen in Fig. 6, and there is accumulation of a species which reproducibly migrates slightly slower than the 90-kDa phosphorylated form (Fig. 7, compare lanes 4 and 7).

View larger version (90K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 7.   Pap1 is ubiquitinated at S/G2. Pap1 immunoprecipitates prepared from cells after release from the hydroxyurea block as described in the legend to Fig. 2 were analyzed for ubiquitin-containing species by probing with HA antibody (-HA) (lanes 1 to 6). For comparison, lane 4 of Figure 2 is shown again as lane 7.

The stability of the 64-kDa Pap1 does not change during the cell cycle. The above results demonstrate that a fraction of Pap1 becomes ubiquitinated at the S/G₂ phase of the cell cycle. However, the steady-state levels of the 64-kDa Pap1 do not change after the S/G₂ modification has occurred (Fig. 1B and 2). Since ubiquitination commonly targets a protein for degradation, we determined the stability of the 64-kDa protein by pulse-chase analysis with [³⁵S]methionine/cysteine in the presence of cycloheximide. Radiolabeled extracts from asynchronous W303 cells prepared at the beginning of or 2 h into the chase period were immunoprecipitated with antibody to the C terminus of Pap1. Pap1 was first detected by immunoblotting (Fig. 8A, lanes 1 and 2), and the blot was then subjected to autoradiography (Fig. 8A, lanes 3 and 4). The amounts of Pap1 at the beginning and end of the chase period detected by blotting were identical, indicating that synthesis of the new protein had been blocked by cycloheximide. More important was the finding that the levels of Pap1 detected by radioactivity had also not changed. Thus, there was no turnover of Pap1 during this time.

View larger version (24K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 8.   The 64-kDa Pap1 is a stable protein. (A) Wild-type W303 cells were pulse-labeled with [35S]methionine/cysteine for 30 min and then chased with excess unlabeled methionine and cysteine in the presence of cysteine in the presence of cycloheximide for 120 min (120'). Radiolabeled Pap1 was immunoprecipitated, separated by SDS-PAGE, and then transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane. The 64-kDa Pap1 was detected by immunoblot analysis (lanes 1 and 2) and then subjected to autoradiography (Autorad) to show 35S-labeled Pap1 (lanes 3 and 4). (B) An experiment similar to that shown in panel A was conducted with synchronized cells. Wild-type cells were blocked at S with hydroxyurea (HU) for 120 min. Cell cycle arrest was monitored visually and determined to be complete when greater than 90% of cell showed large buds. Pulse-chase analysis was performed as described above for panel A but in the absence of cycloheximide. Samples were withdrawn at the indicated time points (in minutes), and Pap1 immunoprecipitates were detected by autoradiography. (C) 35S-labeled Pap1 from the experiment of panel B was quantified by PhosphorImager analysis. The graph shows the half-life of Pap1 calculated from the values found.

	DISCUSSION

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

Our results demonstrate that the yeast Pap1 is phosphorylated and ubiquitinated in a cell cycle-dependent manner. By examination of synchronized cells, we have found that Pap1 phosphorylation begins at S and persists through G₂ but disappears before nuclear division. Consistent with this result, a small amount of modified Pap1 is found in cells arrested in S by hydroxyurea. Furthermore, the phosphorylation does not appear to require the activity of the Cdc28 kinase. These findings are in contrast to those for the mammalian PAP, which is phosphorylated by the Cdc28 homologue in the M phase of the cell cycle (9). The difference in the timing of modification implies an intriguing difference in cell cycle regulation of mRNA polyadenylation in the yeast and mammalian systems.

In the budding yeast S. cerevisiae, unlike mammalian cells, there is a lack of clear definition between S, G₂, and M, and a partial overlap between the S and M phases (17). Events that would be restricted to late G₂ or M phase in other organisms, including mitotic spindle assembly and activation of cyclin B-Cdc28 complexes, begin during the S phase (13). In addition, nuclear envelope disassembly, a distinctive hallmark of mammalian M phase, does not occur in budding yeast, and there is less dramatic chromosome condensation. These features of budding yeast are perhaps necessary to allow formation of a daughter bud, growth of the bud, and migration of the nucleus to the bud neck before mitosis.

These distinctions correlate with a difference in regulating the poly(A) polymerase. In mammals, down-regulation of PAP phosphorylation during mitosis is thought to be part of the general repression of mRNA synthesis seen at this time. Our data show that this modification in yeast occurs at S/G₂ and not mitosis. This is the period of DNA replication, spindle pole formation, and active growth of the budding daughter cell, and a time when the expression of many genes involved in these events must be correctly choreographed. In mammals, the Cdc2-cyclin B complex phosphorylates PAP. While we do not yet know the kinase responsible for Pap1 phosphorylation, the continued appearance of the 90-kDa Pap1 in strains defective for Cdc28 suggests that it is not the yeast cdc2-cyclin B homologue. The three cdc28 mutations that we have examined have been studied extensively. The cdc28-4 and cdc28-13 mutants, which arrest in G₁, are both thermolabile for kinase activity in vitro (44, 48). The cdc28-1N mutant is not a temperature-sensitive kinase in vitro (48), and the effect leading to a G₂/M arrest is thought to involve its interaction with B-type cyclins or Cks1 (29, 48). However, compared to the protein from the wild-type strain, the protein from the cdc28-1N mutant is highly unstable at the restrictive temperature (4). Our data show that the cell cycle regulation of the Pap1 phosphorylation is perturbed in these mutant strains, indicating that Cdc28 probably modulates the activity of enzymes involved in producing or removing the phosphorylated Pap1.

Like the mammalian PAP, we have found that Pap1 phosphorylation is also associated with enzyme inactivation. It does not appear to affect the cellular localization of the enzyme during the cell cycle (data not shown). However, in contrast to the mammalian situation, only a portion of Pap1 is phosphorylated. Furthermore, the overall amount of poly(A) does not change during the cell cycle (data not shown). These observations suggest that a possible function for Pap1 modification may be to regulate the polyadenylation of a subset of yeast mRNAs whose products are needed primarily during, but not after, S phase. One class of such mRNAs might be those encoding histones (21, 35). The amount of histone mRNAs in a cell increases by as much as 20-fold during the period of DNA replication, and part of this regulation occurs at a posttranscriptional level. In higher eukaryotes, this posttranscriptional component involves both 3'-end processing and mRNA stability, but the nature of this aspect of the regulation has not been determined for yeast. In contrast to higher eukaryotes, which use a specialized cleavage machinery for histone mRNA 3'-end processing, the yeast histone pre-mRNAs undergo both cleavage and polyadenylation (21). Another interesting example is telomerase RNA, an untranslated stable nuclear RNA involved in replicating the ends of the chromosomes. This RNA is induced in S phase, and a small fraction of the S. cerevisiae telomerase RNA is polyadenylated in a Pap1-dependent manner in vivo (6). Finally, a recent genomewide analysis of the yeast mitotic cell has found that the levels of at least 74 different mRNA transcripts peaked in S phase (8). Negative regulation of polyadenylation by Pap1 modification may contribute to the decline in the levels of these transcripts as cells move out of S phase. Such a regulation could occur throughout the nucleus or be more pronounced by limitation to a subnuclear space, if, for example, the Pap1-modifying enzymes were recruited or activated only in the vicinity of certain transcriptional units.

It was surprising to find that a small amount of Pap1 was ubiquitinated. The ubiquitin system is generally associated with rapid protein degradation, yet Pap1 is a stable protein with an estimated half-life of 14 h. Ubiquitination can have regulatory functions that do not involve proteolysis. For example, the first protein identified as a ubiquitin target, histone H2A, is a stably ubiquitinated protein in vivo (19). Ubiquitin conjugation has also been implicated in protein-protein interaction (3) and in the endocytosis of membrane proteins (23). A ubiquitinated form of actin, arthrin, is a stable myofibril component involved in thin filament assembly or function of the myofibrillar protein of Drosophila flight muscle (3).

Other stable proteins also become ubiquitinated. One example is the large subunit of the yeast RNA polymerase II, Rbp1 (26). Ubiquitination of Rbp1 is mediated by the ubiquitin-protein ligase, Rsp5. However, Pap1 is not a substrate for this class of ligases (J. Huibregtse, N. Mizrahi, and C. Moore, unpublished data). Another intriguing example is the nucleotide excision repair protein Rad23 (51). This normally stable protein becomes short-lived under certain conditions (47). Rad23 degradation is thought to be mediated by an N-terminal Ub-like domain and the UFD pathway (49). This pathway is involved in the degradation of artificial fusion proteins, which have an in-frame ubiquitin moeity at their N terminus. Other physiological substrates for this pathway have not been identified (49). Interestingly, Pap1 interacts specifically with Ufd1 (12) and has two regions with approximately the same amount of homology to ubiquitin as the Rad23 Ub-like domain, suggesting that its ubiquitination may require the UFD pathway. Ubiquitination and subsequent degradation of a stable protein such as Pap1 may be important to eliminate defective protein, to tightly control its cellular level, or to remove protein not associated with polyadenylation specificity factors. In support of these possibilities, it has been shown that overexpression of PAP in chicken cells is detrimental to cell growth (54).

While phosphorylation is often a prerequisite for recognition by the ubiquitination machinery (22), the relationship between the phosphorylated and ubiquitinated forms of Pap1 is not clear. The ubiquitinated species appear to be larger than the 90-kDa phosphorylated form. In addition, overexpression of ubiquitin causes accumulation of the 90-kDa Pap1 in unsynchronized cells, but this may be an indirect effect. However, we have also observed that phosphatase treatment does not affect the ubiquitinated forms (data not shown), suggesting that these modifications may occur independently. The resolution of this issue will require mapping the sites of phosphorylation and ubiquitination and identifying the proteins involved in Pap1 modifications.

We do not yet understand the full significance of Pap1 modifications reported here but they may be critical for progression through the cell cycle in yeast. The ramifications of these multiple modifications on Pap1 activity and its interaction with the RNA substrate and other RNA processing factors during the cell cycle will be important areas of future investigation.