Previous Article | Next Article 
Molecular and Cellular Biology, April 2000, p. 2809-2817, Vol. 20, No. 8
0270-7306/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Dpb11 Controls the Association between DNA
Polymerases
and
and the Autonomously Replicating Sequence
Region of Budding Yeast
Hiroshi
Masumoto,1,2
Akio
Sugino,2 and
Hiroyuki
Araki1,3,4,*
Division of Microbial Genetics, National
Institute of Genetics,1 The Graduate
University for Advanced Studies,3 and
PRESTO, Japan Science and Technology
Corporation,4 Shizuoka, and Research
Institute for Microbial Diseases, Osaka University,
Osaka,2 Japan
Received 15 November 1999/Returned for modification 13 January
2000/Accepted 28 January 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
Dpb11 is required for chromosomal DNA replication and the S-phase
checkpoint in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Here, we report detection of a physical complex containing Dpb11 and DNA polymerase
(Dpb11-Pol
complex). During the S phase of the cell cycle, Dpb11
associated preferentially with DNA fragments containing autonomously
replicating sequences (ARSs), at the same time as Pol
associated
with these fragments. Association of Dpb11 and Pol
with these
fragments was mutually dependent, suggesting that the Dpb11-Pol
complex associates with the ARS. Moreover, Dpb11 was required for the
association of Pol
-primase with the fragments. Thus, it seems likely
that association of the Dpb11-Pol
complex with the ARS fragments is
required for the association of the Pol
-primase complex. Hydroxyurea
inhibits late-origin firing in S. cerevisiae, and the
checkpoint genes, RAD53 and MEC1, are involved
in this inhibition. In the presence of hydroxyurea at temperatures
permissive for cell growth, Pol
in dpb11-1 cells associated with early- and late-origin fragments. In wild-type cells,
however, it associated only with early-origin fragments. This indicates
that Dpb11 may also be involved in the regulation of late-origin
firing. Overall, these results suggest that Dpb11 controls the
association between DNA polymerases
and
and the ARS.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Eukaryotic chromosomal DNA
replicates exactly once per cell cycle, in the S phase. In
Saccharomyces cerevisiae, chromosomal DNA replication is
initiated at a restricted region known as the autonomously replicating
sequence (ARS) (reviewed in references 10 and
43). An origin recognition complex (ORC), comprising six subunits, is bound to each ARS throughout the cell cycle (6, 14). At the end of mitosis, six Mcm family proteins (Mcm2 to -7)
are also loaded with the ORC onto the ARS as components of the
prereplicative complex (pre-RC) (14). The Mcm proteins have a conserved amino acid sequence and form large complexes (11, 29,
48). Loading of these proteins requires both the ORC and Cdc6
(1, 15, 46).
At the onset of S phase, Cdk and Cdc7 protein kinases facilitate
loading of the single-stranded DNA binding protein, RPA, onto the ARS
(47). Then, the three DNA polymerases (Pol
, -
, and
-
), essential for chromosomal DNA replication (reviewed in reference
45), are recruited to the ARS region to initiate DNA synthesis (1, 2, 47). Association of Pol
and Pol
with the ARS region is dependent on Cdc45 (2), which associates with the ARS in the G1 and S phases of the cell cycle (1, 2) and interacts with the Mcm proteins (12, 21, 22, 24, 32, 52).
All the replication proteins described above are well conserved from
yeasts through humans. The Cdc45 protein of Xenopus laevis is also required for association of Pol
with chromatin DNA
(31), as observed in yeast. Moreover, Cdc45 and Pol
form
a complex in Xenopus egg extracts (31). In in
vitro simian virus 40 (SV40) DNA replication, T antigen unwinds the
replication origin and RPA binds the unwound single-stranded DNA. DNA
primase, tightly associated with Pol
, then synthesizes an RNA
primer. This RNA primer is used by Pol
to synthesize a short DNA
strand, followed by elongation of the DNA strand by Pol
and/or
Pol
, using the short DNA fragment as a primer (43).
Although the cellular counterpart of the SV40 T antigen has not been
identified, it is believed that similar reactions take place during
chromosomal DNA replication.
DNA replication in eukaryotic cells initiates from multiple replication
origins that fire throughout the S phase of the cell cycle; some
origins fire early, others fire late (17, 25). In S. cerevisiae, hydroxyurea (HU), which inhibits ribonucleotide reductase and consequently inhibits DNA synthesis, blocks the firing of
late origins. In rad53 and mec1 mutants
(defective in cell cycle checkpoints), however, late-origin firing is
not blocked by HU (40). Methyl methane sulfonate similarly
inhibits late-origin firing, and this inhibition is not observed in
rad53 or orc2 mutants (42). From these
observations, it is proposed that the regulation of late-origin firing
is important for the S-phase checkpoint (13, 40, 42).
The DPB11 gene was isolated as a multicopy suppressor of
mutations in the POL2 and DPB2 genes, which
encode the catalytic and second-largest subunits of Pol
,
respectively (5). The amino acid sequence of Dpb11 is
similar to the sequence of the Cut5 (also known as Rad4) protein of
Schizosaccharomyces pombe. This protein is required for the
onset of the S-phase and cell cycle checkpoint in S. pombe
(30, 37-39, 49). Both Dpb11 and Cut5 have four copies of
the BRCA1 C-terminus (BRCT) domain, which is thought to be an
interaction domain between proteins (7, 9, 51).
In thermosensitive dpb11-1 mutants, S-phase progression is
delayed when the temperature is shifted up, followed by cell division with unequal chromosome segregation. In the presence of HU,
dpb11-1 cells also have an elongated spindle, indicating
that mitosis has started without the completion of DNA replication.
Furthermore, there is a strong genetic interaction between Dpb11 and
Pol
; high-copy DPB11 suppresses the growth defects of
pol2-11 and dpb2-1, and no combination of
dpb11-1 with one of pol2-11, pol2-18,
and dpb2-1 is obtained. This suggests that Dpb11 interacts
with Pol
and is required for DNA replication and the S-phase
checkpoint (5).
To gain a broader understanding of the function of Dpb11, we tried to
identify the factors that interact with Dpb11 by isolating synthetic
lethal mutations with dpb11-1 (sld). So far, we
have isolated five SLD genes. SLD1 is identical
to the DPB3 gene that encodes the third-largest subunit of
Pol
(4), and SLD4 is identical to
CDC45 (22). The SLD2 gene encodes a
52-kDa protein that forms a complex with Dpb11 that is essential for
DNA replication. From this analysis, we suggested that a Dpb11-Sld2
complex is required for one of the steps close to the initiation of DNA
replication (27). The SLD2 gene was independently
isolated as the DRC1 (DNA replication and checkpoint 1)
gene, and the drc1-8 mutant was found to be defective in the
S-phase checkpoint (50).
To further elucidate the function of Dpb11, we analyzed the association
between Dpb11, DNA polymerases, and chromatin DNA, using a chromatin
immunoprecipitation (CHIP) assay (44). In the S phase of the
cell cycle, Dpb11 and Pol
simultaneously associated with DNA
fragments containing an ARS, and their association was mutually
dependent. We also detected a complex of Dpb11 and Pol2 that was most
abundant during the S phase. Moreover, Dpb11 was required for blockage
of late-origin firing by HU. Therefore, we suggest that Dpb11 is
required for DNA polymerases to associate with the ARS and for blockage
of late-origin firing.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Plasmids.
Hemagglutinin (HA) or c-myc
epitope-tagged gene fusions were constructed by PCR amplification of
the coding regions of interest and insertion of the resulting PCR
products into plasmid pUC18. NotI-3HA or
NotI-9myc cassettes were inserted into the
resulting plasmids, creating a C-terminal fusion with each coding
sequence. An N-terminally deleted fragment of each gene fusion was
subcloned into an integrating vector of the YIp family. The resulting
plasmids, YIplac128-POL2-3HA/C and YIplac211-DPB11-9myc/C, were
digested with PstI before yeast transformation. For
Mcm4-3HA, p404-CDC54-HA/C (1) was digested with
NruI prior to yeast transformation.
Yeast strains.
W303-1Ab (
bar1) was constructed
from W303-1A (MATa ura3-1 trp1-1 leu2-3,112
his3-11,15 ade2-1 can1-100) by replacing the endogenous
BAR1 gene with a URA3 insertion mutant allele and subsequently popping out the URA3 gene. W303-1Ab
(bar1) was the parent strain for most of the strains used in
this study. W303-1Ab was transformed with YIplac211dpb11-1
(5), and the Ura+ transformants were grown at
25°C on plates containing 5-fluoroorotic acid. A
temperature-sensitive colony (YHM1) was isolated from the plates.
Strains harboring POL2-3HA, DPB11-9my, or
MCM4-3HA were constructed by a homologous recombination that
disrupted the wild-type allele and simultaneously created a C-terminal
epitope-tagged version of the gene in W303-1Ab and YHM1. The resulting
strains were YHM01 (POL2-3HA), YHM08 (MCM4-3HA),
YHM011 (DPB11-9myc), YHM11 (dpb11-1 POL2-3HA),
and YHM18 (dpb11-1 MCM4-3HA). YHM21 (rad53-1
POL2-3HA), YHM311 (mcm5-1 DPB11-9myc), and YHM511
(cdc17-1 DPB11-9myc) were constructed from YHY301a
(MATa rad53-1; W303 background), K5581
(MATa mcm5-1; W303 background), and K6877
(MATa cdc17-1; W303 background) by disruption of
BAR1 and integration of POL2-3HA or
DPB11-9myc. YHM01101 (POL2-3HA DPB11-9myc) was
constructed by further integration of Pol2-3HA into YHM011. YHM013
(MATa PRI1-9myc
bar1) and YHM113
(MATa dpb11-1 PRI1-9myc
bar1) were segregants
from a cross of YHM11 and K7213 (MAT
PRI1-9myc; W303
background). YHM014 (MATa
bar1 RFA1-18myc)
was a segregant from a cross of K7131 (MAT
RFA1-18myc;
W303 background) and W303-1Ab. YHM114 was constructed by replacing the
endogenous DPB11 gene of YHM014 with the dpb11-1 mutant allele as YHM1 was constructed. Similarly, YHM611
(MATa rfa2-2 DPB11-9myc) was constructed by
replacing the endogenous RFA2 gene of YHM011 with the
rfa2-2 allele on pHC36 obtained from P. Plevani (University
of Milan, Milan, Italy). YHA500 (MATa dpb2-1 POL2-3HA
DPB11-9myc) and YHA503 (MATa dpb2-1
DPB11-9myc) were segregants from a cross of YHA422 (MAT
dpb2-1
bar1; W303 background) and YHM01101. K5581, K6877,
K7131, and K7213 were obtained from T. Tanaka (Research Institute of
Molecular Pathology, Vienna, Austria) and YHY301a from K. Shirahige
(Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Nara, Japan). YHA410 and
YHA411 used for two-dimensional (2D) gel analysis were described
previously (27).
Synchronization of cells.
For
-factor arrest and release
experiments at 16°C, cells were suspended in fresh YPD medium
(26) containing 30 ng of
-factor per ml and incubated for
3 h at 25°C. The
-factor was removed by centrifugation, and
the cells were resuspended at 1.3 × 107 cells/ml in
YPD containing 0.1 mg of actinase E (Kakenseiyaku) per ml and incubated
further at 16°C. For
-factor arrest-and-release experiments at 25 and 36°C, the cells were suspended in fresh YEPR medium (2%
raffinose instead of glucose in YPD) and incubated for 2 h at
25°C. The
-factor was added to a final concentration of 30 ng/ml
and incubated for 3 h at 25°C. Additionally, 0.2 M HU was added
and incubated for 1 h at 25°C. The
-factor was removed by
centrifugation, and the cells were resuspended at 1.3 × 107 cells/ml in YEPR containing 0.1 mg of actinase E per ml
and 0.2 M HU and incubated at 25°C or 36°C.
Immunoprecipitation.
Approximately 109 cells
with a density of 107 cells/ml were spheroplasted according
to Donovan et al. (15) with modifications. Cells were
incubated at room temperature for 10 min in 12.5 ml of
prespheroplasting buffer (100 mM PIPES
[piperazine-N,N'-bis(2-ethanesulfonic acid)]
[pH 9.4] and 10 mM dithiothreitol), followed by incubation at 30°C
for 15 min with agitation in 5 ml of YPD supplemented with 0.6 M
sorbitol, 25 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], and 100 µl of Zymolase20T (50 mg/ml) (Seikagakukogyo). The spheroplasts were incubated in 5 ml of
YPD-0.7 M sorbitol-25 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) at 30°C for 20 min,
followed by washing the spheroplasts twice with 2 ml of cross-linking
buffer (0.4 M sorbitol, 150 mM Na acetate, 2 mM Mg2+
acetate, 20 mM HEPES-KOH [pH 7.5]). The spheroplasts were suspended in 2 ml of cross-linking buffer containing the cross-linking agent dithiobis(succinimidylpropionate) (DSP; Pierce) to a final
concentration of 2 mM (20, 36). After 30-min incubation at
room temperature, the reaction was stopped by incubation for 5 min with
50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5). The spheroplasts were pelleted in a microfuge,
washed with 1 ml of cross-linking buffer, and resuspended in lysis
buffer (20 mM HEPES-KOH [pH 7.5] 140 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1% Triton
X-100, 1× Complete Proteinase Inhibitor Cocktail (Roche), and 1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride). The lysates were clarified by
centrifugation, and stored at
80°C. Extracts (1 mg) were incubated
with anti-HA monoclonal antibody (MAb) 12CA5 at 4°C for 3 h,
followed by incubation for 1 h with protein G-Sepharose beads
(Pharmacia). The beads were washed three times in lysis buffer
supplemented with 360 mM NaCl. In the
immunoprecipitation-immunoblotting experiments, 15 µg of protein from
each extract was loaded per lane. Extracts and immunoprecipitates were
separated in a sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-7.5% polyacrylamide gel
and analyzed by Western blotting.
CHIP assay.
The CHIP assay used in this study is based on
the methods described by Tanaka et al. (46) with some
modifications. The soluble fraction of the whole-cell extract was
discarded, and the insoluble pellet was resuspended in 500 µl of
lysis buffer. This chromatin-containing suspension was sonicated to
yield an average DNA size of 500 bp (range, 100 to 1,000 bp), clarified
by centrifugation, and subjected to immunoprecipitation with anti-HA
MAbs (12CA5) or anti-myc (9E11) MAbs conjugated to protein
G-Sepharose beads (Pharmacia). PCR was carried out in 50-µl volumes
containing 1/60 to 1/15 of the anti-myc or anti-HA antibody
immunoprecipitates, respectively, or 1/6,000 of the cross-linked DNA
samples derived from the whole-cell extract. Taq polymerase
(AmpliTaq Gold; Perkin-Elmer) and the corresponding buffer system were
used. PCR primer sequences and cycle conditions are available upon
request. Three pairs of primers were used together in each PCR. The
final concentration of each primer was set up to amplify each fragment
evenly from total genomic DNA. The PCR products were separated in a
2.5% agarose gel and stained with 0.2 µg of ethidium bromide per ml.
The gels were photographed using a Polaroid MP-4 Land Camera, and the
negatives were scanned directly into Photoshop 3.0 (Adobe).
Other methods.
Fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACS) and
2D gel analyses were performed as described previously (27).
 |
RESULTS |
Dpb11 physically interacts with Pol
.
Previously, we have
shown a strong genetic interaction between Dpb11 and Pol
(5). Using a two-hybrid assay (data not shown), we have also
observed an interaction between Dpb11 and Dpb2, the second-largest
subunit of Pol
(3). These results suggest that Dpb11 and
Pol
form a complex. We have subsequently tried to detect a physical
interaction between Dpb11 and the catalytic subunit of Pol
, Pol2
(33).
Cells harboring DPB11-9myc and POL2-3HA on their
chromosomes were grown, and the cell wall was digested. The resultant
spheroplasts were treated with the cross-linking agent, DSP, and Pol2
was precipitated from the cell lysates with an anti-HA antibody. The
precipitated sample was subjected to SDS-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis, and Dpb11 and Pol2 were detected on the membranes
using anti-myc and anti-HA antibodies, respectively. As
shown in Fig. 1A, Dpb11 coimmunoprecipitated with Pol2, although in the absence of the cross-linking agent, no coimmunoprecipitation was detected. To know the
specificity of coimmunoprecipitation in the presence of the
cross-linking agent, we examined whether Mcm2 and tubulin coprecipitate
with Pol2 using anti-Mcm2 and antitubulin antibodies. Then, we found
that neither Mcm2 nor tubulin coimmunoprecipitates with Pol2 (Fig. 1B).
These results suggest that the specificity of coimmunoprecipitation
remains in the presence of the cross-linking agent, and therefore the
Dpb11-Pol2 complex is not an artifact of cross-linking. It is also
suggested that Pol2 weakly or transiently interacts with Dpb11 because
the Dpb11-Pol2 complex was only detected in the presence of the
cross-linking agent.

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Dpb11 and Pol2 form a complex. (A) Cells of W303-1Ab,
YHM011 (DPB11-9myc), and YHM01101 (POL2-3HA
DPB11-9myc) were spheroplasted and treated with DSP (+) or left
untreated ( ). Lysates were prepared from log-phase cells (log) and
cells arrested by -factor ( ), HU, and nocodazole (Noc) with the
indicated genotypes: an epitope-tagged gene (+) and a wild-type allele
( ). HA-tagged Pol2 was immunoprecipitated with anti-HA mouse MAb
12CA5. Extracts or immunoprecipitates were separated in a SDS-7.5%
polyacrylamide gel and myc-tagged Dpb11 and HA-tagged Pol2
were detected by immunoblotting, using anti-myc rabbit
polyclonal antibodies or anti-HA mouse MAb 16B12, respectively. (B)
Extracts and immunoprecipitates from YHM011 (lanes 1 and 3) and
YHM01101 (lanes 2 and 4) were separated in a SDS-7.5% polyacrylamide
gel as described in panel A. In addition to Pol2 and Dpb11, Mcm2 and
tubulin were detected by immunoblotting with anti-Mcm2 (yN-19; Santa
Cruz Biotechnology) and anti-tubulin (YOL1/34) antibodies. (C)
YHM01101, YHM31101 (mcm5-1), and YHA500 (dpb2-1
POL2-3HA DPB11-9myc) cells were grown at 25°C and then cultured
at 36°C for 1 h. The cell lysates were subjected to
immunoprecipitation using an anti-HA antibody.
|
|
We also examined the formation of a complex between Dpb11 and Pol

during the cell cycle. Cells were arrested with

-factor
(G1 phase),
HU (S phase), or nocodazole (M phase) and treated
with DSP, and Pol2
was immunoprecipitated. Coimmunoprecipitation
of Dpb11 and Pol2 was
observed in all the cells examined, and
Dpb11 was most abundant in the
precipitates from cells arrested
by HU (Fig.
1A). Furthermore, Pol2 and
Dpb11 coimmunoprecipitation
was also observed in
mcm5-1
mutant defective in the initiation
of DNA replication at the
restrictive temperature (Fig.
1C). These
results suggested that
formation of a complex between Dpb11 and
Pol2 does not depend on DNA
synthesis. Dpb11 did not associate
with the ARS fragments of the
mcm5-1 mutants (see below), and
the Dpb11-Pol2 complex
remained intact after DNase I treatment
(data not shown), suggesting
that the Dpb11-Pol2 complex is not
bridged by DNA
fragments.
We further examined the Dpb11-Pol2 complex formation in
dpb2-1 cells from which Pol2 and Dpb2 are rarely copurified
(
3).
The amount of Pol2 was reduced in the
dpb2-1
cells, probably because
of the unstable Pol

complex, and
coimmunoprecipitation of Pol2
and Dpb11 was not observed (Fig.
1C).
Coimmunoprecipitation of
these proteins could not be observed even when
the amount of Pol2
was increased by using five times the number of
dpb2-1 cells (data
not shown). This result indicates that
the amount of the Dpb11-Pol
complex is severely reduced in
dpb2-1 cells, and complex formation
between Dpb11 and Pol

requires
Dpb2.
Neutral-neutral 2D gel analysis of replication intermediates formed
in synchronized dpb11-1 cells.
In a previous analysis
of DNA replication intermediates in asynchronous dpb11-1
cells by neutral-neutral 2D gel electrophoresis (8), we
showed that DNA replication initiated from ARS306 is rapidly abolished
after temperature upshift (27). As a replication fork
initiating from an origin other than ARS306 has been observed in
dpb11-1 cells (27), we analyzed the replication
intermediates in synchronized dpb11-1 cells.
Wild-type and
dpb11-1 cells were arrested in late
G
1 phase with

-factor and released in fresh medium at a
temperature nonpermissive
for cell growth. Cells were taken at 10-min
intervals from the
cultures, and the replication intermediates from an
active origin,
ARS1, were analyzed by 2D gel electrophoresis
(
8). Bubble arc
signals, indicative of replication
initiation in the ARS1 region,
were observed in the wild-type cells
from 30 to 50 min and 100
to 120 min after release from

-factor,
suggesting the presence
of two replication cycles. However, neither
bubble arcs nor Y
arcs that are generated from replication forks
initiating from
outside the ARS1 and passing through the ARS1 region
were observed
in the
dpb11-1 cells (Fig.
2). This indicates that DNA synthesis
initiating from ARS1 and other origins is reduced at temperature
nonpermissive for cell growth, suggesting that Dpb11 is required
for
the initiation and/or the early step of elongation of DNA
replication
at ARS.

View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Neutral-neutral 2D gel analysis of the chromosomal ARS1
locus in synchronized cells. YHA410 (WT) and YHA411
(dpb11-1) cells were arrested in G1 phase by
-factor and released to YPD medium at 37°C. The same number of
cells at each time point (in minutes) was subjected to 2D gel
electrophoresis and probed for the 5-kb NcoI fragment
containing ARS1.
|
|
Dpb11 and Pol
associate simultaneously with ARS fragments in S
phase.
To investigate the function of Dpb11 during the cell cycle,
we used a CHIP assay (44). Cells harboring Pol2-3HA or
Dpb11-9myc were arrested by
-factor and released at 16°C to slow
movement of the replication fork (1). Cells were withdrawn
from the cultures every 15 min and fixed with formaldehyde. The
chromatin fraction was obtained from these cells, sonicated, and
subjected to immunoprecipitation with anti-HA or anti-myc
antibodies. The whole cell extracts and the immunoprecipitates were
subjected to SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, followed by
Western blotting with anti-HA or anti-myc antibody. The
protein levels of Pol2-3HA and Dpb11-9myc in the whole-cell extracts
and the immunoprecipitates did not fluctuate during the cell cycle. DNA was extracted from the immunoprecipitates and analyzed by PCR to
determine the relative abundance of specific sequences bound to the
immunoprecipitated HA- or myc-tagged proteins. We used three
sets of PCR primers to amplify two ARS fragments (ARS1 and ARS305)
fired early in S phase (18), and one non-ARS fragment in the
CYC1 gene.
The CHIP assay showed that Pol2 associates with the ARS fragments
containing ARS1 or ARS305 60 to 75 min after release from

-factor
and then reassociates with non-ARS fragments as previously
reported
(Fig.
3A) (
1). Dpb11 also
preferentially associated
with the ARS fragments 60 to 75 min after
release and dissociated
from the fragments thereafter. Thus, Dpb11 and
Pol2 associate
with ARS fragments at the same timing during the cell
cycle. An
association between Dpb11 and non-ARS fragments was not
detected
in this experiment (Fig.
3A). To examine whether Dpb11
associates
with non-ARS fragments, we also used the primers specific to
five
unique sequences between the ARS305 and ARS306 that are the same
as those described by Aparicio et al. (
1). As shown in Fig.
3B, association signals of Pol2 with non-ARS fragments 8 kb distant
from either ARS (305 plus 8 kb and 306 plus 8 kb) (Fig.
3B) were
detected weakly at 60 min and strongly at 75 and 90 min. Pol2
association was also detected with the more distal fragment (17
kb)
(Fig.
3B) at 75 min and 90 min. On the contrary, significant
signals of
Dpb11 association were detected only with ARS305 and
ARS306 fragments.
These results suggest that the Dpb11 association
is limited to ARS
fragments.

View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Dpb11 associates with the ARS fragments in S phase. (A
and B) YHM01 (POL2-3HA, WT) and YHM011
(DPB11-9myc, WT) cells were arrested in G1 phase
and released in YPD medium at 16°C. Cells were withdrawn from the
culture every 15 min and fixed with formaldehyde. The chromatin
fraction was sonicated and used for immunoprecipitation of HA- and
myc-tagged proteins. PCR was performed either on
immunoprecipitates derived from the same number of cells at each time
point (in minutes) or on the 0-min chromatin fraction from the
whole-cell extract (WCE). Note that faint signals of non-ARS fragments
on the 90-min immunoprecipitates from YHM011 in panel B were not
reproducibly obtained. (C) The DNA content was measured by FACS
analysis of the samples collected in panel A. The percentage of budded
cells is also shown.
|
|
Association of Dpb11 with the ARS fragments depends on Mcm, RPA,
and Dpb2 but not Pol
.
The pre-RC is assembled at ARSs from late
M to G1 phase. This complex is then activated by Cdk and
Cdc7 protein kinases, and DNA polymerases are recruited to the
activated origins at the initiation of DNA replication (1).
To determine if the association of Dpb11 with ARS fragments depends on
Mcm5 (one of the pre-RC components), we performed a CHIP assay using
mcm5-1 cells. We detected almost no selective signals in
wild-type cells at 36°C by the CHIP assay, probably because Dpb11
moves rapidly away from the ARS fragments. To slow replication fork
movement at 36°C, we inhibited ribonucleotide reductase and
subsequently inhibited DNA synthesis, using HU. Under these conditions,
Dpb11 was shown to be associated with ARS fragments in the wild-type
cells (Fig. 4A), similar to the results
obtained in the absence of HU at 16°C (Fig. 3A). However, no
significant amplification of DNA fragments was detected in the
mcm5-1 cells at the restrictive temperature (Fig. 4B). Thus,
Mcm5 is required for Dpb11 association with the ARS fragments. Since
mcm5-1 cells have a temperature-sensitive allele that causes
a defect in pre-RC formation at the restrictive temperatures
(46), it is likely that pre-RC formation is a prerequisite for Dpb11 association with the ARS fragments.

View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Association of the Dpb11 protein with the ARS fragments
depends on the function of Mcm5, Rfa2, and Dpb2 but not on Cdc17
(Pol ). YHM011 (DPB11-9myc) (A), YHM311 (DPB11-9myc
mcm5-1) (B), YHM611 (DPB11-9myc rfa2-2) (C), YHA503
(DPB11-9myc dpb2-1) (D), YHM511 (DPB11-9myc
cdc17-1) (E), and YHM501 (POL2-3HA cdc17-1) (F) cells
were treated with -factor for 3 h, 0.2 M HU was added, and the
culture was incubated for another hour. The -factor was removed, and
the cells were suspended in YEPR medium containing 0.2 M HU at 36°C.
PCR was performed as described in the legend to Fig. 3. In the presence
of HU, the G1 cells of all strains retained 1C DNA contents
throughout the progression of budding (data not shown). Note that the
signals appeared after release from factor in panels B and D were
not observed reproducibly.
|
|
After the pre-RC is assembled on the ARS region, the single-stranded
DNA binding protein, RPA, also associates with this region.
RPA is
required for association of the Pol

-primase complex with
the ARS
region (
47). To determine whether Dpb11 association
depends
on RPA, we performed a CHIP assay using
rfa2-2 cells.
These
cells have a temperature-sensitive allele in the second-largest
subunit
of RPA (
41) and do not associate Pri1, a subunit of
DNA
primase (
19) with their ARS regions at the restrictive
temperature
(
47). As shown in Fig.
4C, no significant
amplification of DNA
fragments was observed in these cells, suggesting
that Dpb11 association
is also dependent on the presence of functional
RPA.
As Dpb11 physically interacts with Pol

(Fig.
1), we investigated the
dependency of the association between Dpb11 and the
ARS fragments on
DNA polymerase. The
cdc17-1 mutation in the catalytic
subunit of Pol

(
10) causes temperature-sensitive
initiation
and association defects between Pri1 and ARS regions
(
47). Using
2D agarose gel analysis, we found that
dpb2-1 mutants rapidly
lose their bubble arc signals after a
temperature shift to the
restrictive temperature (data not shown),
suggesting that this
mutation causes an initiation defect. Complex
formation between
Dpb11 and Pol2 was also defective in
dpb2-1 cells (Fig.
1B). Therefore,
cdc17-1 and
dpb2-1 mutants were used for further
analysis.
As shown in Fig.
4D, no significant signals for Dpb11 association with
the ARS fragments were observed in
dpb2-1 cells. In
contrast, a significant signal was observed for the association
between
Dpb11, Pol2, and the ARS fragments in
cdc17-1 cells (Fig.
4E
and F). Thus, Dpb11 association with the ARS fragments depends
on
Pol

but not on Pol

. As no Pol

initiation defective mutants
have been reported, we could not determine whether Dpb11 association
depends on Pol

.
Dpb11-1 mutant cells are defective in association
between DNA polymerase and ARS fragment.
As Mcm proteins associate
with the ARS fragments at the end of mitosis (14), we
predicted that Mcm proteins remain associated with the ARS fragments in
cells lacking Dpb11 function. To test this prediction,
dpb11-1 cells harboring Mcm4-3HA were arrested in G1 phase
by
-factor and released at 36°C without HU. As expected, Mcm4
remained associated with the ARS fragments throughout progress of
budding in dpb11-1 cells, whereas it dissociated from the
ARS fragments when DNA replication started (later than 60 min after release) in wild-type cells (Fig. 5A and
E). Thus, Mcm association with ARSs does not require the presence of
functional Dpb11, but dissociation of Mcm from these sequences does.
This is probably because the Mcm proteins dissociate from the ARS
fragments after DNA synthesis begins (1, 46), and DNA
synthesis does not begin in dpb11-1 cells.

View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Association of Pol2 and Pri1 with ARS fragments requires
Dpb11. (A to D). Association of Mcm4, Rfa1, Pol2, and Pri1 with ARS1-
and ARS305-containing fragments in wild-type and dpb11-1
cells. YHM08 (MCM4-3HA) (A), YHM18 (MCM4-3HA
dpb11-1) (A), YHM014 (RFA1-18myc) (B), YHM114
(RFA1-18myc dpb11-1) (B), YHM01 (POL2-3HA) (C),
YHM11 (POL2-3HA dpb11-1) (C), YHM013 (PRI1-9myc)
(D), and YHM113 (PRI1-9myc dpb11-1) (D) cells were arrested
by -factor and released to YEPR medium in the presence of HU at
36°C, as described in the legend to Fig. 4. PCR was performed as
described in Fig. 3. (E) The DNA content of the cells were measured by
FACS analysis after the cells had been cultured at 36°C without HU.
In the presence of HU, the DNA content of cells remained exclusively 1C
throughout the progression of budding.
|
|
After Mcm association, RPA associates with the ARS region
(
47). As our results indicate that Dpb11 association
requires
functional RPA (Fig.
4C), we used the CHIP assay to examine
RPA
association in
dpb11-1 cells that harbor Rfa1-18myc. As
shown
in Fig.
5B, signals indicative of Rfa1 association with the ARS
fragments were detected even in
dpb11-1 cells. This result
suggests
that RPA association with the ARS fragments occurs
independently
of the Dpb11
association.
Furthermore, we investigated the association of Pol2 and Pri1 with the
ARS fragments in
dpb11-1 cells to determine whether
Dpb11
plays a role in the association between DNA polymerases
and ARS
regions.
Dpb11-1 cells harboring Pol2-3HA or Pri1-9myc
arrested by

-factor were released at 36°C in the presence of
HU.
No significant association signals were detected in the
dpb11-1 cells, whereas ARS association signals for both
proteins were
observed in wild-type cells (Fig.
5C and D). These
results suggest
that Dpb11 is required for association of Pol

and
Pol

-primase
with ARS fragments. Since Dpb11 association with the ARS
fragments
depended on Pol

but not Pol

, it seems likely that
association
of the Dpb11-Pol

complex with ARS fragments is required
for Pol
association with the ARS fragments. We were not able to
detect
association of Pol

with the ARS fragments by CHIP assay, even
in wild-type cells (data not shown). Thus, we could not determine
when
and how Pol

associates with the ARS fragments during the
initiation
of DNA
replication.
DNA polymerases associate with late origins in the presence of HU
in dpb11-1 cells.
Because dpb11-1 cells
show elongated spindles in the presence of HU (5), they are
thought to be defective not only in DNA replication but also in the
S-phase checkpoint. Since late-origin firing is inhibited in the
presence of HU in wild-type cells but not in mec1 and
rad53 cells, it has been proposed that the checkpoint proteins, Mec1 and Rad53, control late-firing origins (40). In the presence of HU, RPA and Cdc45 have been shown to associate with
late-origin regions in rad53 cells but not in wild-type
cells (2, 47). Furthermore, Rad53 protein kinase is
activated by HU at a lower level in dpb11-1 cells than
wild-type cells (50). Therefore, we investigated whether
Dpb11 is involved in the control of late-firing origins.
First, we examined the association of Pol2 and Dpb11 with late-origin
regions in the presence of HU. Cells harboring the tagged
one of these
two genes arrested by

-factor were released into
YEPR
(
26) containing HU at 25°C, and cells were collected 75
min later. We used two sets of PCR primers to amplify early- and
late-origin fragments and one set for a nonorigin fragment in
the
CYC1 gene. We monitored ARS305 as an early origin and ARS501
as a late origin (
18). As shown in Fig.
6A, Dpb11 and Pol2 associated
with the
ARS305 fragment but not with the ARS501 fragment, similar
to the action
of RPA (
47) in wild-type cells. Thus, association
of Dpb11
and Pol2 with late-firing-origin fragments is inhibited
by HU in
wild-type cells.

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Pol2 associates with a late-firing origin-containing
fragment as well as with a early-firing origin-containing fragment in
dpb11-1 mutants. (A) YHM011 (DPB11-9myc) and
YHM01 (POL2-3HA) cells arrested by -factor were released
to YPD medium without HU and cultured at 16°C ( HU) or to YEPR
medium supplemented with HU and cultured at 25°C (+HU) (time = 0 min). The DNA from cells taken at 75 min was subjected to PCR
amplification as outlined in the legend to Fig. 3. (B) YHM01
(POL2-3HA), YHM11 (POL2-3HA dpb11-1), and YHM21
(POL2-3HA rad53-1) cells were arrested by -factor,
released in YEPR medium supplemented with 0.2 M HU, and cultured at
25°C. PCR was performed as described in the legend to Fig. 3.
|
|
Association of Pol2 with the ARS305 and ARS501 fragments in

-factor-synchronized
dpb11-1 cells was examined at
25°C, a temperature
permissive for cell growth and for firing ARS305
and ARS501 (data
not shown). Pol2 associated with the ARS305 fragment
but not with
the ARS501 fragment in the presence of HU in wild-type
cells (Fig.
6B). Pol2 also associated with the ARS305 fragment in
dpb11-1 cells. Thus, the Dpb11-1 protein is functional at
25°C for the
ARS association, which is consistent with the firing of
ARS305
at 25°C. Moreover, Pol2 associated with the ARS501 fragment in
dpb11-1 cells as well as in
rad53-1 cells (Fig.
6B). These results
suggest that Dpb11 is involved in the control of
late-firing origins,
which may be important for the S-phase
checkpoint.
 |
DISCUSSION |
Dpb11 functions for association of DNA polymerases with ARS
regions.
In a previous study, we suggested that Dpb11 is required
for one of the steps close to the initiation of DNA replication
(27). In the present study, three lines of evidence suggest
that DNA synthesis cannot initiate without functional Dpb11. First,
significant signals were not observed in synchronized
dpb11-1 cells by 2D gel analysis (Fig. 2). Second, Dpb11
associated with the ARS fragments after the assembly of the pre-RC
(Fig. 4B), and Dpb11 was required for association of the Pol
-primase
complex (Fig. 4E). The Pol
-primase complex is essential for
initiation of DNA synthesis because it is the only enzyme known to
synthesize the primer RNA (19). Third, the Mcm proteins did
not dissociate from the ARS fragments without functional Dpb11 (Fig.
5A). It has been suggested that Mcm proteins dissociate from the
pre-RCs on ARSs when DNA synthesis begins (1, 46).
Therefore, it is likely that Dpb11 is involved in the initiation of DNA synthesis.
The CHIP assay showed that Dpb11 associates preferentially with the ARS
fragments in S phase (Fig.
3A). In this assay, proteins
were
cross-linked to DNA in vivo, and the chromatin DNA was purified
and
sonicated. The sheared chromatin was immunoprecipitated with
specific
antibodies, and the DNA from the immunoprecipitate was
then amplified
with specific primers. As sonication sheared the
DNA into approximately
500-bp fragments, we could not limit the
association sequence of Dpb11
to less than a 500-bp sequence.
This means that we cannot determine
whether Dpb11 associates with
the ARS sequence, as the ARS sequence
only spans about 100 bp.
Therefore, we conclude that Dpb11 association
with ARS region
(ARS sequence plus the sequence surrounding the ARS) is
essential
for initiation of DNA synthesis because Dpb11 association is
required
for Pol
association.
We have shown in this study that Dpb11 and Pol

form a complex (Fig.
1). Consistent with formation of this complex, we also
found that their
association with ARS fragments is mutually dependent
(Fig.
4D and
5C).
These observations, combined with the results
that show the kinetics of
Dpb11 and Pol2 association with the
ARS fragments is similar (Fig.
3A),
suggest that the Dpb11-Pol
complex associates with ARS regions
during initiation of DNA replication.
After initiation, the
Dpb11-Pol

complex seems to disassemble
because after this stage
Dpb11 does not appear to be associated
with a non-ARS fragment, and
Pol2 moves to a non-ARS fragment
(Fig.
3A and B). Therefore, it seems
likely that Dpb11 plays a
role in the association of Pol

with the
ARS
region.
We do not know exactly what role Dpb11 plays in the association of
Pol

and Pol

with the ARS. It has been shown that Cdc45,
which
interacts with Mcm proteins (
12,
21,
22,
24,
32,
52), is
required for the loading of Pol

and Pol

(
2).
CDC45 was isolated as
SLD4 in our previous
sld screening, suggesting
that Cdc45 interacts with Dpb11,
directly or indirectly (
27).
The CHIP assay has been used to
show that Cdc45 associates with
early-firing ARS regions in the
G
1 and S phases of the cell cycle,
associates with
late-firing ARS regions in S phase, and also dissociates
like Mcm
proteins in S phase (
1,
2). Dpb11 associates with
both
early- and late-firing ARS regions in S phase (Fig.
3 and
6A). These
results together suggest that Dpb11 interacts with
Mcm proteins through
Cdc45, which may be important for Pol

loading
onto the
ARS.
S-phase progression of
dpb11-1 cells after HU arrest was
delayed (
27) and short DNA fragments were accumulated in
dpb11-10 cells at high temperature (
35),
suggesting that Dpb11 may also
play a role in the elongation step of
DNA replication. In the
present study, we did not observe any
association of Dpb11 with
non-ARS fragments by the CHIP assay. However,
we cannot neglect
the possibility that Dpb11-antibody interactions are
interfered
with at the replication fork by other replication proteins
or
the replicating DNA, and therefore Dpb11-DNA association is less
easily detected by the CHIP assay. It is also possible that Dpb11
is
required for reassociation of Pol

with chromatin DNA during
the
elongation step or after HU
arrest.
Complex formation between Dpb11 and Pol
.
In the present
study, the Dpb11-Pol
complex was detected with the cross-linking
agent, DSP (Fig. 1A). As DSP cross-links proteins that face each other,
all subunits of Pol
could be cross-linked. Thus, we could not
determine which subunit of Pol
binds to Dpb11. However, detection of
an interaction between Dpb11 and Dpb2 in the two-hybrid assay and the
absence of a Dpb11-Pol
complex in dpb2-1 cells (Fig. 1C)
suggest that the most probable candidate is Dpb2, the second-largest
subunit of Pol
. As the pol2-11 and dpb2-1
mutations both weaken the interaction between Pol2 and Dpb2 (3,
16), an increase in the copy number of DPB11 may also
improve the formation of Dpb11 and mutant Pol
complexes and suppress
the growth defects of pol2-11 and dpb2-1.
Recently, Kesti et al. (
28) reported that the Pol2
C-terminal region is essential for DNA replication and cell growth,
while
the N-terminal polymerase domains of this protein are dispensable
for cell growth. As Pol2-11 lacks 32 C-terminal amino acid residues
(
34) and the Pol2 C-terminal region is required for complex
formation between Pol2 and Dpb2 (
33), the Pol2 C-terminal
region
could be essential for Dpb11-Pol

complex formation.
DPB3, a gene
that encodes the third-largest subunit of
Pol

, is not essential
for cell growth (
4). However, cells
bearing the
sld1-1 mutation
of
DPB3 and the
dpb11-1 mutation are lethal (
27). This lethality
may be caused by a decrease in the number of Pol2-Dpb2 complexes
in a
cell, since less than 50% of the Pol

activity of wild-type
cells
has been recovered from
dpb3 cells (
4).
Nevertheless,
we cannot eliminate the possibility that other proteins
connect
Dpb11 to Pol

. If this does occur, Dpb11 and Pol

may be
present
in the same
complex.
Since Dpb11 has four BRCT domains that are important for
protein-protein interactions (
5,
7,
9,
51), Dpb11 might
be a
scaffold protein for assembly of DNA replication proteins
including
Pol

and Pol

at the initiation of DNA replication.
From this point
of view, the Dpb11-Pol

complex might be a core
complex in the
assembly of replication proteins because the association
between Pol

and the ARS region depends on Dpb11. Studies of the
in vitro SV40
replication system suggest that Pol

is the first
to associate with
the replication origin because the Pol

-primase
complex initiates DNA
synthesis (
23). We therefore propose that
the complex
consisting of the Dpb11-Pol

core, Pol

and other
replication
proteins, associates with ARS
region.
Since a small amount of the Dpb11-Pol

complex was observed in
G
1 and M phases (Fig.
1A), this complex may also function
for
DNA repair, and other factors may be required for association
of
the Dpb11-Pol

complex with the ARS region. We have previously
shown
that Dpb11 and Sld2 form a complex essential for DNA replication,
and
dpb11-1 cells are defective in the formation of this complex
(
27). Thus, Sld2 may play an important role in association
of
Dpb11-Pol

complex with the ARS region and disassembly of the
complex after DNA synthesis
starts.
Dpb11 controls the association of DNA polymerases with ARS
regions.
In the presence of HU, late-origin firing is inhibited in
wild-type cells. However, in rad53 or mec1 cells
defective in checkpoint, DNA synthesis initiates from both early- and
late-firing origins in the presence of HU (40). In the
presence of HU, Mcm proteins associate with early- and
late-firing-origin regions; however, RPA and Cdc45 only associate with
early-origin regions. In rad53 cells, RPA and Cdc45
associate with early and late origins in the presence of HU (2,
47).
In the present study, we have shown that in the presence of HU, Dpb11
and Pol2 behave as RPA and Cdc45 behave in wild-type
cells (Fig.
6A),
and Pol2 associates with both early- and late-firing
origins in
dpb11-1 cells (Fig.
6B). As Dpb11 is partly required
for
activation of Rad53 protein kinase (
50), Dpb11 may monitor
the initiation of DNA replication and then communicate with Rad53.
Both
the ARS305 and ARS501 fragments were simultaneously amplified
from
dpb11-1 cells after Pol2 immunoprecipitation. In
rad53 cells,
Pol2 associated with the ARS501 fragment at a
later stage than
these cells did with the ARS305 fragment (Fig.
6B).
Analysis with
2D gels of
dpb11-1 cells cultured in the
absence of HU showed
that initiation of DNA replication from the early
origin, ARS1,
occurred at almost the same time as initiation from
ARS501 (data
not shown). Similar observations have been reported for
the
orc2-1 mutation. This mutation is located in the
second-largest subunit
of the ORC and makes the ORC defective in the
initiation of DNA
replication. The
orc2-1 mutation affects
the timing of origin
firing, and
orc2-1 mutants are
defective in inhibition of late-origin
firing when cells are exposed to
methyl methane sulfonate (
42).
Therefore, it seems likely
that Dpb11 is involved in the control
of activation of early origins
and in blocking late-origin firing,
which may be important for the
S-phase
checkpoint.
Overall, the results reported in this paper strongly suggest that there
is a distinct regulatory step for association of DNA
polymerases with
replication origins. This step might be controlled
by the cell cycle as
well as the S-phase checkpoint, and Dpb11
is an integral part of this
novel regulatory mechanism. Cut5,
a probable counterpart of Dpb11 in
fission yeast, also has BRCT
domains and functions in both DNA
replication and checkpoints
(
30,
37-39,
49). This suggests
that a similar protein may be
involved in the association of DNA
polymerases with replication
origins and the monitoring of this step in
other eukaryotic
cells.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank T. Tanaka, K. Nasmyth, O. M. Aparicio, S. Bell, P. Plevani, and K. Shirahige for information about PCR primers, strains, and plasmids; T. Yasuda, H. Ohmori, and N. Shimamoto for information about cross-linkers; C. Wittenberg for information about Pol2 before
publication; L. Johnston, Y. Kamimura, and J. Tomizawa for critical
reading of the manuscript.
This study is partially supported by grants-in-aid from the Ministry of
Education, Science, Sports, and Culture, Japan, to A.S. and H.A.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Division of
Microbial Genetics, National Institute of Genetics, 1111 Yata, Mishima, Shizuoka 411-8540, Japan. Phone: (81) 559 81 6754. Fax: (81) 559 81 6762. E-mail: hiaraki{at}lab.nig.ac.jp.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Aparicio, O. M.,
D. M. Weinstein, and S. P. Bell.
1997.
Components and dynamics of DNA replication complexes in S. cerevisiae: redistribution of MCM proteins and Cdc45p during S phase.
Cell
91:59-69[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Aparicio, O. M.,
A. M. Stout, and S. P. Bell.
1999.
Differential assembly of Cdc45p and DNA polymerases at early and late origins of DNA replication.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
96:9130-9135[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Araki, H.,
R. K. Hamatake,
L. H. Johnston, and A. Sugino.
1991.
DPB2, the gene encoding DNA polymerase II subunit B, is required for chromosome replication in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
88:4601-4605[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Araki, H.,
R. K. Hamatake,
A. Morrison,
A. L. Johnson,
L. H. Johnston, and A. Sugino.
1991.
Cloning DPB3, the gene encoding the third subunit of DNA polymerase II of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Nucleic Acids Res.
19:4867-4872[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Araki, H.,
S.-H. Leem,
A. Phongdara, and A. Sugino.
1995.
Dpb11, which interacts with DNA polymerase II( ) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, has a dual role in S-phase progression and at a cell cycle checkpoint.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92:11791-11795[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Bell, S. P., and B. Stillman.
1992.
ATP-dependent recognition of eukaryotic origin of DNA replication by a multiprotein complex.
Nature
357:128-134[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Bork, P.,
K. Hoffman,
P. Bucher,
A. F. Neuwald,
S. F. Altschul, and E. V. Koonin.
1997.
A superfamily of conserved domains in DNA damage-responsive cell cycle checkpoint proteins.
FASEB J.
11:68-76[Abstract].
|
| 8.
|
Brewer, B. J., and W. L. Fangman.
1987.
The localization of replication origins on ARS plasmids in S. cerevisiae.
Cell
51:463-471[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Callebaut, I., and J.-P. Mornon.
1997.
From BRCA1 to RAP1: a widespread BRCT module closely associated with DNA repair.
FEBS Lett.
400:25-30[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Campbell, J. L., and C. S. Newlon.
1991.
Chromosomal DNA replication, p. 41-146.
In
J. R. Broach, J. R. Pringle, and E. W. Jones (ed.), The molecular and cellular biology of the yeast Saccharomyces: genome dynamics, protein synthesis, and energetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 11.
|
Chong, J. P.,
P. Thommes, and J. J. Blow.
1996.
The role of MCM/P1 proteins in the licensing of DNA replication.
Trends Biochem. Sci.
21:102-106[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Dalton, S., and B. Hopwood.
1997.
Characterization of Cdc47p-minichromosome maintenance complex in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: identification of Cdc45p as a subunit.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17:5867-5875[Abstract].
|
| 13.
|
Desany, B. A.,
A. A. Alcasabas,
J. B. Bachant, and S. J. Elledge.
1998.
Recovery from DNA replicational stress is the essential function of the S-phase checkpoint pathway.
Genes Dev.
12:2956-2970[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Diffley, J. F. X.,
J. H. Cocker,
S. J. Dowell,
J. Harwood, and A. Rowley.
1995.
Stepwise assembly of initiation complexes at budding yeast replication origins during the cell cycle.
J. Cell Sci. Suppl.
19:67-72[Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Donovan, S.,
J. Harwood,
L. S. Drury, and J. F. X. Diffley.
1997.
Cdc6p-dependent loading of Mcm proteins onto pre-replicative chromatin in budding yeast.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:5611-5616[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Dua, R.,
D. L. Levy, and J. L. Campbell.
1998.
Role of the putative Zinc finger domain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA polymerase in DNA replication and the S/M checkpoint pathway.
J. Biol. Chem.
273:30046-30055[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 17.
|
Fangman, W. L., and B. J. Brewer.
1992.
A question of time-replication origins of eukaryotic chromosomes.
Cell
71:363-366[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Ferguson, B. M.,
B. J. Brewer,
A. E. Reynolds, and W. L. Fangman.
1991.
A yeast origin of replication is activated late in S phase.
Cell
65:507-515[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Foiani, M.,
G. Lucchini, and P. Plevani.
1997.
The DNA polymerase -primase complex couples DNA replication, cell-cycle progression and DNA-damage response.
Trends Biochem. Sci.
22:424-427[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Gunzburg, J. D.,
R. Riehl, and R. A. Weinberg.
1989.
Identification of a protein associated with p21ras by chemical crosslinking.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
86:4007-4011[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
Hardy, C. F. J.
1997.
Identification of Cdc45p, an essential factor required for DNA replication.
Gene
187:239-246[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Hennesy, K. M.,
A. Lee,
E. Chen, and D. Botstein.
1991.
A group of interacting yeast DNA replication genes.
Genes Dev.
5:958-969[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Heredeen, D., and T. J. Kelly.
1996.
SV40 DNA replication, p. 29-65.
In
J. J. Blow (ed.), Eukaryotic DNA replication. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom.
|
| 24.
|
Hopwood, B., and S. Dalton.
1996.
Cdc45p assembles into a complex with Cdc46/Mcm5p, is required for minichromosome maintenance, and is essential for chromosomal DNA replication.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:12309-12314[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Huberman, J. A., and A. D. Riggs.
1968.
On the mechanism of DNA replication in mammalian chromosomes.
J. Mol. Biol.
32:327-341[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 26.
|
Kaiser, C.,
S. Michaelis, and A. Mitchell.
1994.
Methods in yeast genetics.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 27.
|
Kamimura, Y.,
H. Masumoto,
A. Sugino, and H. Araki.
1998.
Sld2, which interacts with Dpb11 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, is required for chromosomal DNA replication.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:6102-6109[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 28.
|
Kesti, T.,
K. Flick,
S. Keränen,
J. E. Syväoja, and C. Wittenberg.
1999.
DNA polymerase catalytic domains are dispensable for DNA replication, repair and cell viability.
Mol. Cell
3:679-685[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 29.
|
Lei, M.,
Y. Kawasaki, and B. K. Tye.
1996.
Physical interactions among Mcm proteins and effects of Mcm dosage on DNA replication in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16:5081-5090[Abstract].
|
| 30.
|
McFarlane, R. J.,
A. M. Carr, and C. Price.
1997.
Characterization of the Schizosaccharomyces pombe rad4/cut5 mutant phenotypes: dissection of DNA replication and G2 checkpoint control function.
Mol. Gen. Genet.
255:332-340[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 31.
|
Mimura, S., and H. Takisawa.
1998.
Xenopus Cdc45-dependent loading of DNA polymerase onto chromatin under the control of S-phase cdk.
EMBO J.
17:5699-5707[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 32.
|
Moir, D.,
S. E. Stewart,
B. C. Osmond, and D. Botstein.
1982.
Cold-sensitive cell-division-cycle mutants of yeast: properties and pseudoreversion studies.
Genetics
100:547-563[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 33.
|
Morrison, A.,
H. Araki,
A. B. Clark,
R. K. Hamatake, and A. Sugino.
1991.
A third essential DNA polymerase in S. cerevisiae.
Cell
62:1143-1151.
|
| 34.
|
Navas, T. A.,
Z. Zhou, and S. J. Elledge.
1995.
DNA polymerase links the DNA replication machinery to the S phase checkpoint.
Cell
80:29-39[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 35.
|
Reid, R. D. J.,
P. Fiorani,
M. Sugawara, and M.-A. Bjornsti.
1999.
CDC45 and DPB11 are required for processive DNA replication and resistance to DNA topoisomerase I-mediated DNA damage.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
96:11440-11445[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 36.
|
Roth, R. A., and S. B. Pierce.
1987.
In vivo cross-linking of protein disulfide isomerase to immunoglobulins.
Biochemistry
26:4179-4182[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 37.
|
Saka, Y., and M. Yanagida.
1993.
Fission yeast cut5+, required for S phase onset and M phase restraint, is identical to the radiation-damage repair gene rad4+.
Cell
74:383-393[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 38.
|
Saka, Y.,
F. Esashi,
T. Matsusaka,
S. Mochida, and M. Yanagida.
1997.
Damage and replication checkpoint control in fission yeast is ensured by interactions of Crb2, a protein with BRCT motif, with Cut5 and Chk1.
Genes Dev.
11:3387-3400[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 39.
|
Saka, Y.,
P. Fantes,
T. Sutani,
C. McInerny,
J. Creanor, and M. Yanagida.
1994.
Fission yeast cut5 links nuclear chromatin and M phase regulator in the replication checkpoint control.
EMBO J.
13:5319-5329[Medline].
|
| 40.
|
Santocanale, C., and J. F. X. Diffley.
1998.
A Mec1- and Rad53-dependent checkpoint controls late-firing origins of DNA replication.
Nature
395:615-618[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 41.
|
Santocanale, C.,
H. Neecke,
M. P. Longhese,
G. Lucchini, and P. Plevani.
1995.
Mutations in the gene encoding the 34 kDa subunit of yeast replication protein A cause defective S phase progression.
J. Mol. Biol.
254:595-607[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 42.
|
Shirahige, K.,
Y. Hori,
K. Shiraishi,
M. Yamashita,
K. Takahashi,
C. Obuse,
T. Tsurimoto, and H. Yoshikawa.
1998.
Regulation of DNA-replication origins during cell-cycle progression.
Nature
395:618-621[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 43.
|
Stillman, B.
1994.
Initiation of chromosomal DNA replication in eukaryotes: lessons from lambda.
J. Biol. Chem.
269:7047-7050[Free Full Text].
|
| 44.
|
Strahl-Bolsinger, S.,
A. Hecht,
K. Luo, and M. Grunstein.
1997.
SIR2 and SIR4 interactions differ in core and extended telomeric heterochromatin in yeast.
Genes Dev.
11:83-93[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 45.
|
Sugino, A.
1995.
Yeast DNA polymerases and their role at the replication fork.
Trends Biochem. Sci.
20:319-323[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 46.
|
Tanaka, T.,
D. Knapp, and K. Nasmyth.
1997.
Loading of an Mcm protein onto DNA replication origins is regulated by Cdc6p and CDKs.
Cell
90:649-660[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 47.
|
Tanaka, T., and K. Nasmyth.
1998.
Association of RPA with chromosomal replication origins requires an Mcm protein, and is regulated by Rad53, and cyclin- and Dbf4-dependent kinases.
EMBO J.
17:5182-5191[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 48.
|
Tye, B.-K.
1994.
The MCM2-3-5 proteins: are they replication licensing factors?
Trends Cell Biol.
4:160-166.
|
| 49.
|
Verkade, H. M., and M. J. O'Connell.
1998.
Cut5 is a component of the UV-responsive DNA damage checkpoint in fission yeast.
Mol. Gen. Genet.
260:426-433[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 50.
|
Wang, H., and S. J. Elledge.
1999.
DRC1, DNA replication and checkpoint protein 1, functions with DPB11 to control DNA replication and the S-phase checkpoint in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
96:3824-3829[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 51.
|
Zhang, X.,
S. Morera,
P. A. Bates,
P. C. Whitehead,
A. I. Coffer,
K. Hainbucher,
R. A. Nash,
M. J. E. Sternberg,
T. Lindahl, and P. S. Freemont.
1998.
Structure of an XRCC1 BRCT domain: a new protein-protein interaction module.
EMBO J.
21:6404-6411[CrossRef].
|
| 52.
|
Zou, L.,
J. Mitchell, and B. Stillman.
1997.
CDC45, a novel yeast gene that functions with the origin recognition complex and proteins in initiation of DNA replication.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17:553-563[Abstract].
|
Molecular and Cellular Biology, April 2000, p. 2809-2817, Vol. 20, No. 8
0270-7306/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Navadgi-Patil, V. M., Burgers, P. M.
(2008). Yeast DNA Replication Protein Dpb11 Activates the Mec1/ATR Checkpoint Kinase. J. Biol. Chem.
283: 35853-35859
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Chilkova, O., Stenlund, P., Isoz, I., Stith, C. M., Grabowski, P., Lundstrom, E.-B., Burgers, P. M., Johansson, E.
(2007). The eukaryotic leading and lagging strand DNA polymerases are loaded onto primer-ends via separate mechanisms but have comparable processivity in the presence of PCNA. Nucleic Acids Res
35: 6588-6597
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Shultz, R. W., Tatineni, V. M., Hanley-Bowdoin, L., Thompson, W. F.
(2007). Genome-Wide Analysis of the Core DNA Replication Machinery in the Higher Plants Arabidopsis and Rice. Plant Physiol.
144: 1697-1714
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Jeon, Y., Lee, K. Y., Ko, M. J., Lee, Y. S., Kang, S., Hwang, D. S.
(2007). Human TopBP1 Participates in Cyclin E/CDK2 Activation and Preinitiation Complex Assembly during G1/S Transition. J. Biol. Chem.
282: 14882-14890
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Honey, S., Futcher, B.
(2007). Roles of the CDK Phosphorylation Sites of Yeast Cdc6 in Chromatin Binding and Rereplication. Mol. Biol. Cell
18: 1324-1336
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Bloom, J., Cross, F. R.
(2007). Novel Role for Cdc14 Sequestration: Cdc14 Dephosphorylates Factors That Promote DNA Replication. Mol. Cell. Biol.
27: 842-853
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Nedelcheva-Veleva, M. N., Krastev, D. B., Stoynov, S. S.
(2006). Coordination of DNA synthesis and replicative unwinding by the S-phase checkpoint pathways. Nucleic Acids Res
34: 4138-4146
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Taricani, L., Wang, T. S.F.
(2006). Rad4TopBP1, a Scaffold Protein, Plays Separate Roles in DNA Damage and Replication Checkpoints and DNA Replication. Mol. Biol. Cell
17: 3456-3468
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Seki, T., Akita, M., Kamimura, Y., Muramatsu, S., Araki, H., Sugino, A.
(2006). GINS Is a DNA Polymerase {epsilon} Accessory Factor during Chromosomal DNA Replication in Budding Yeast. J. Biol. Chem.
281: 21422-21432
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ogiwara, H., Ui, A., Onoda, F., Tada, S., Enomoto, T., Seki, M.
(2006). Dpb11, the budding yeast homolog of TopBP1, functions with the checkpoint clamp in recombination repair. Nucleic Acids Res
34: 3389-3398
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Das-Bradoo, S., Ricke, R. M., Bielinsky, A.-K.
(2006). Interaction between PCNA and Diubiquitinated Mcm10 Is Essential for Cell Growth in Budding Yeast.. Mol. Cell. Biol.
26: 4806-4817
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Matsuno, K., Kumano, M., Kubota, Y., Hashimoto, Y., Takisawa, H.
(2006). The N-Terminal Noncatalytic Region of Xenopus RecQ4 Is Required for Chromatin Binding of DNA Polymerase {alpha} in the Initiation of DNA Replication.. Mol. Cell. Biol.
26: 4843-4852
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kim, J.-E., McAvoy, S. A., Smith, D. I., Chen, J.
(2005). Human TopBP1 Ensures Genome Integrity during Normal S Phase. Mol. Cell. Biol.
25: 10907-10915
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Calzada, A., Hodgson, B., Kanemaki, M., Bueno, A., Labib, K.
(2005). Molecular anatomy and regulation of a stable replisome at a paused eukaryotic DNA replication fork. Genes Dev.
19: 1905-1919
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hiraga, S.-I., Hagihara-Hayashi, A., Ohya, T., Sugino, A.
(2005). DNA polymerases {alpha}, {delta}, and {varepsilon} localize and function together at replication forks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. GENES CELLS
10: 297-309
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Spiga, M.-G., D'Urso, G.
(2004). Identification and cloning of two putative subunits of DNA polymerase epsilon in fission yeast. Nucleic Acids Res
32: 4945-4953
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Yamada, Y., Nakagawa, T., Masukata, H.
(2004). A Novel Intermediate in Initiation Complex Assembly for Fission Yeast DNA Replication. Mol. Biol. Cell
15: 3740-3750
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kesti, T., McDonald, W. H., Yates, J. R. III, Wittenberg, C.
(2004). Cell Cycle-dependent Phosphorylation of the DNA Polymerase Epsilon Subunit, Dpb2, by the Cdc28 Cyclin-dependent Protein Kinase. J. Biol. Chem.
279: 14245-14255
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Fukui, T., Yamauchi, K., Muroya, T., Akiyama, M., Maki, H., Sugino, A., Waga, S.
(2004). Distinct roles of DNA polymerases delta and epsilon at the replication fork in Xenopus egg extracts. GENES CELLS
9: 179-191
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Harris, S., Kemplen, C., Caspari, T., Chan, C., Lindsay, H. D., Poitelea, M., Carr, A. M., Price, C.
(2003). Delineating the position of rad4+/cut5+ within the DNA-structure checkpoint pathways in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. J. Cell Sci.
116: 3519-3529
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Feng, W., Rodriguez-Menocal, L., Tolun, G., D'Urso, G.
(2003). Schizosacchromyces pombe Dpb2 Binds to Origin DNA Early in S Phase and Is Required for Chromosomal DNA Replication. Mol. Biol. Cell
14: 3427-3436
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Huang, D., Koshland, D.
(2003). Chromosome integrity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: the interplay of DNA replication initiation factors, elongation factors, and origins. Genes Dev.
17: 1741-1754
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kubota, Y., Takase, Y., Komori, Y., Hashimoto, Y., Arata, T., Kamimura, Y., Araki, H., Takisawa, H.
(2003). A novel ring-like complex of Xenopus proteins essential for the initiation of DNA replication. Genes Dev.
17: 1141-1152
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Takayama, Y., Kamimura, Y., Okawa, M., Muramatsu, S., Sugino, A., Araki, H.
(2003). GINS, a novel multiprotein complex required for chromosomal DNA replication in budding yeast. Genes Dev.
17: 1153-1165
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Edwards, S., Li, C. M., Levy, D. L., Brown, J., Snow, P. M., Campbell, J. L.
(2003). Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA Polymerase {varepsilon} and Polymerase {sigma} Interact Physically and Functionally, Suggesting a Role for Polymerase {varepsilon} in Sister Chromatid Cohesion. Mol. Cell. Biol.
23: 2733-2748
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Van Hatten, R. A., Tutter, A. V., Holway, A. H., Khederian, A. M., Walter, J. C., Michael, W. M.
(2002). The Xenopus Xmus101 protein is required for the recruitment of Cdc45 to origins of DNA replication. JCB
159: 541-547
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Chou, D. M., Petersen, P., Walter, J. C., Walter, G.
(2002). Protein Phosphatase 2A Regulates Binding of Cdc45 to the Prereplication Complex. J. Biol. Chem.
277: 40520-40527
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Shimizu, K., Hashimoto, K., Kirchner, J. M., Nakai, W., Nishikawa, H., Resnick, M. A., Sugino, A.
(2002). Fidelity of DNA Polymerase epsilon Holoenzyme from Budding Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem.
277: 37422-37429
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ott, R. D., Rehfuess, C., Podust, V. N., Clark, J. E., Fanning, E.
(2002). Role of the p68 Subunit of Human DNA Polymerase {alpha}-Primase in Simian Virus 40 DNA Replication. Mol. Cell. Biol.
22: 5669-5678
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ohya, T., Kawasaki, Y., Hiraga, S.-I., Kanbara, S., Nakajo, K., Nakashima, N., Suzuki, A., Sugino, A.
(2002). The DNA Polymerase Domain of polepsilon Is Required for Rapid, Efficient, and Highly Accurate Chromosomal DNA Replication, Telomere Length Maintenance, and Normal Cell Senescence in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem.
277: 28099-28108
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Shimizu, K., Kawasaki, Y., Hiraga, S.-I., Tawaramoto, M., Nakashima, N., Sugino, A.
(2002). The fifth essential DNA polymerase phi in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is localized to the nucleolus and plays an important role in synthesis of rRNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
99: 9133-9138
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Choe, W., Budd, M., Imamura, O., Hoopes, L., Campbell, J. L.
(2002). Dynamic Localization of an Okazaki Fragment Processing Protein Suggests a Novel Role in Telomere Replication. Mol. Cell. Biol.
22: 4202-4217
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Tadokoro, R., Fujita, M., Miura, H., Shirahige, K., Yoshikawa, H., Tsurimoto, T., Obuse, C.
(2002). Scheduled Conversion of Replication Complex Architecture at Replication Origins of Saccharomyces cerevisiae during the Cell Cycle. J. Biol. Chem.
277: 15881-15889
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Nakajima, R., Masukata, H.
(2002). SpSld3 Is Required for Loading and Maintenance of SpCdc45 on Chromatin in DNA Replication in Fission Yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell
13: 1462-1472
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Wang, H., Elledge, S. J.
(2002). Genetic and Physical Interactions Between DPB11 and DDC1 in the Yeast DNA Damage Response Pathway. Genetics
160: 1295-1304
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Dua, R., Levy, D. L., Li, C. M., Snow, P. M., Campbell, J. L.
(2002). In Vivo Reconstitution of Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA Polymerase epsilon in Insect Cells. PURIFICATION AND CHARACTERIZATION. J. Biol. Chem.
277: 7889-7896
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Feng, W., D'Urso, G.
(2001). Schizosaccharomyces pombe Cells Lacking the Amino-Terminal Catalytic Domains of DNA Polymerase Epsilon Are Viable but Require the DNA Damage Checkpoint Control. Mol. Cell. Biol.
21: 4495-4504
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Waga, S., Masuda, T., Takisawa, H., Sugino, A.
(2001). DNA polymerase varepsilon is required for coordinated and efficient chromosomal DNA replication in Xenopus egg extracts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
10.1073/pnas.081088798v1
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Bielinsky, A., Gerbi, S.
(2001). Where it all starts: eukaryotic origins of DNA replication. J. Cell Sci.
114: 643-651
[Abstract]
-
Ohya, T., Maki, S., Kawasaki, Y., Sugino, A.
(2000). Structure and function of the fourth subunit (Dpb4p) of DNA polymerase {varepsilon} in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res
28: 3846-3852
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
ESASHI, F., MOCHIDA, S., MATSUSAKA, T., OBARA, T., OGAWA, A., TAMAI, K., YANAGIDA, M.
(2000). Establishment of and Recovery from Damage Checkpoint Requires Sequential Interactions of Crb2 with Protein Kinases Rad3, Chk1, and Cdc2. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol
65: 443-450
[Abstract]
-
Makiniemi, M., Hillukkala, T., Tuusa, J., Reini, K., Vaara, M., Huang, D., Pospiech, H., Majuri, I., Westerling, T., Makela, T. P., Syvaoja, J. E.
(2001). BRCT Domain-containing Protein TopBP1 Functions in DNA Replication and Damage Response. J. Biol. Chem.
276: 30399-30406
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Waga, S., Masuda, T., Takisawa, H., Sugino, A.
(2001). DNA polymerase varepsilon is required for coordinated and efficient chromosomal DNA replication in Xenopus egg extracts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
98: 4978-4983
[Abstract]
[Full Text]