Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Molecular and Cellular Biology, April 2000, p. 2941-2948, Vol. 20, No. 8
Department of Microbiology and Immunology,
University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
94143-0414
Received 19 October 1999/Returned for modification 17 November
1999/Accepted 19 January 2000
Telomeric DNA is maintained within a length range characteristic of
an organism or cell type. Significant deviations outside this range are
associated with altered telomere function. The yeast telomere-binding
protein Rap1p negatively regulates telomere length. Telomere elongation
is responsive to both the number of Rap1p molecules bound to a telomere
and the Rap1p-centered DNA-protein complex at the extreme telomeric
end. Previously, we showed that a specific trinucleotide substitution
in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae telomerase gene
(TLC1) RNA template abolished the enzymatic activity of
telomerase, causing the same cell senescence and telomere
shortening phenotypes as a complete tlc1 deletion. Here we
analyze effects of six single- and double-base changes within these
same three positions. All six mutant telomerases had in vitro enzymatic
activity levels similar to the wild-type levels. The base changes
predicted from the mutations all disrupted Rap1p binding in vitro to
the corresponding duplex DNAs. However, they caused two classes of effects on telomere homeostasis: (i) rapid, RAD52-independent telomere
lengthening and poor length regulation, whose severity correlated with
the decrease in in vitro Rap1p binding affinity (this is consistent
with loss of negative regulation of telomerase action at these
telomeres; and (ii) telomere shortening that, depending on the template
mutation, either established a new short telomere set
length with normal cell growth or was progressive and led to
cellular senescence. Hence, disrupting Rap1p binding at the
telomeric terminus is not sufficient to deregulate telomere elongation.
This provides further evidence that both positive and negative
cis-acting regulators of telomerase act at telomeres.
Telomeres, the heterochromatic
structures present at the ends of linear chromosomes, serve many
functions: they differentiate chromosome ends from broken DNA ends,
protecting them from nucleases and recombinases, they help position
chromosomes within the nucleus, and they serve as a reservoir of
replenishable DNA added de novo to counteract the incomplete
replication of chromosome ends by DNA polymerases (reviewed in
references 3 and 44). Disruptions in telomere sequence, length, or structure can alter the properties of
telomeres, resulting in loss of telomere length regulation, mislocalization of chromosomes within the nucleus, telomere-telomere fusions, and chromosome instability (2, 9, 14, 21, 22, 40).
The length of the telomeric DNA tract, while somewhat variable, is
maintained within a range that is characteristic of a given species,
cell type, or growth condition (reviewed in reference 13). Telomeric DNA is subject both to lengthening
activities, such as recombination and the addition of new DNA by
telomerase, and shortening activities, such as incomplete replication
and nucleolytic degradation (13). In the yeast
Saccharomyces cerevisiae, telomeres typically contain about
300 ± 100 bp of (TG1-3/C1-3A) DNA.
However, clonal isolates of S. cerevisiae initially exhibit telomeres within a much tighter size range (35). The full
range of telomere lengths is attained only after extended growth in culture and is then maintained for the telomere population. These findings suggested that the lengthening and shortening activities that
act on telomeres do so gradually and are closely balanced with each
other (35), creating a situation of telomere length homeostasis.
The importance of maintaining telomeres within a given size range
becomes evident when cells are grown in the absence of telomerase; telomeres shorten with each round of DNA replication, losing from 4 to
5 bp/generation in yeast to about 50 bp/generation in mammalian cells
(4, 37). While no obvious detrimental effects are caused by
the initial telomere shortening, eventually the shortening telomeres
cease to function to stabilize chromosome ends (15, 27).
However, such critically short telomeres still contain substantial
tracts of telomeric repeat DNA (15). Furthermore, in both
yeast and human cells lacking a functional telomerase, telomeres become
critically short earlier (and at a longer length) than in cells
containing telomerase (34, 45). These observations suggested
that telomerase itself protects short telomeres. Thus, whether a
telomere is critically short depends not only on its number of
telomeric DNA repeats but also on the status of other components of the
telomere, including telomerase.
The proteins that have been implicated in telomere length homeostasis
include telomere-associated proteins and proteins involved in DNA
replication, recombination, and repair (1, 5, 6, 12).
However, little is known about the roles of most of these proteins in regulating telomere length. Mounting evidence
suggests that replication of the G-rich strand of telomeres by
telomerase is coordinately regulated with replication of the C-rich
strand by conventional DNA polymerases (1, 10). In the
ciliate Euplotes, inhibition of telomeric C-strand synthesis
with aphidicolin results in increased telomerase-mediated G-rich strand
synthesis (10). We have previously shown that telomerase is
a dimeric (or oligomeric) enzyme complex that remains stably bound to
telomeric DNA following polymerization (33). This
observation raises the possibility that as the dimeric replicative DNA
polymerase complex proceeds toward the end of the chromosome, it may
directly contact the dimeric telomerase complex. Such contact may play
a role in the observed coordinate regulation of C- and G-strand
syntheses (10).
Here we focus on the effects of synthesizing telomere sequences that
disrupt binding to the protein Rap1p. This abundant protein binds
tightly to duplex telomeric DNA (9) and is the best
characterized of the proteins involved in telomere structure and
maintenance. In addition to its role at the telomeres, Rap1p binds to
promoter elements of many genes to activate transcription and binds to the silent mating type loci, where it acts to repress transcription (36). Certain mutations in Rap1p lead to lengthening of
telomeres (21-24, 29, 36). However, elucidating the role of
Rap1p at the telomere has been difficult, since mutations that
compromise the telomere-specific function of Rap1p may also affect the
other essential cellular functions of Rap1p. In contrast, mutations in
the template sequence of the RNA subunit of telomerase can be used to
synthesize telomeric repeats with altered binding to Rap1p, thereby
reducing or altering the binding of Rap1p to the newly synthesized
repeats without interfering with its other roles in the cell. In the
budding yeast Kluyveromyces lactis, such mutations cause
various degrees of telomere lengthening (21, 22, 31).
In this study, we analyzed a cluster of novel mutations made in the
template domain of the S. cerevisiae TLC1 gene. We focused on RNA residues that, when incorporated into telomeric DNA, alter the
core consensus Rap1p binding site. We show, for the first time in
S. cerevisiae, that mutating the telomeric Rap1p binding site can lead to stochastic telomere lengthening, which affects a
steadily increasing subpopulation of telomeres until all have been
elongated. Telomere lengthening is rapid and RAD52 independent, and it
does not correlate with increased core activity of telomerase in vitro,
strongly suggesting that rapid elongation results from derepression of
the action of telomerase at the telomere. However, for other specific
template mutations, disrupting the Rap1p binding site is not sufficient
for telomere lengthening, and instead telomeres shorten. These findings
provide further evidence that telomere elongation involves both
derepression (loss of Rap1p-mediated repression) and activation by one
or more cis-acting positive regulators of telomere addition
(6, 32, 41), whose functions can be disrupted by mutations
in telomeric DNA.
TLC1 mutant allele construction.
The 212-bp
mutant template fragments, generated by two-step overlap PCR
(16), were subcloned into pRS313TLC1 at
NcoI/HpaI sites. PCR-amplified DNAs were
sequenced and shown to contain only the intended mutations.
Strain construction.
YJP116 was generated by disrupting one
allele of TLC1 with TRP1 and one allele of
RAD52 with LEU2 from the diploid strain YJL537
(gift from Joachim Li). Following transformation with pRS316 containing
the wild-type TLC1 gene, including 614 bp of upstream and
222 bp of downstream flanking sequence, the strain was sporulated and
Trp+, Leu+, and Ura+ spores were
isolated. The resulting strain, strain YJP153, was transformed with
pRS313 plasmids containing either TLC1 or the various mutant
alleles of TLC1, and loss of the wild-type allele (pRS316-TLC1) was selected on 5-fluoro-orotic acid (5-FOA) medium.
Telomere cloning and sequencing.
Genomic DNA prepared from
tlc1-476gCA cells was directly ligated to pBST SK Rap1p binding assays.
Competition gel shift assays were
carried out as described previously (34).
Southern blotting.
Haploid strains containing the various
TLC1 alleles on a pRS313 plasmid were either picked directly
from 5-FOA plates lacking histidine and grown overnight in liquid
medium lacking histidine (25 generations growth) or restreaked on 5-FOA
plates lacking histidine before being grown in liquid medium lacking
histidine (35, 45, 55, and 65 generations of growth). Genomic DNA was
isolated, digested with XhoI, separated on a 1.2% agarose
gel, transferred to Hybond-N+, and hybridized to a
32P-labeled oligonucleotide
(5'-TGTGGTGTGTGGGTGTGGTGT-3') as described previously
(34).
Extract preparation and fractionation.
Each of the various
strains were grown in 8 liters of liquid medium lacking histidine to an
optical density at 600 nm of 0.3. Histidine was then added to a final
concentration of 20 mg/liter, and cells were grown further to an
optical density at 600 nm of 1.2. Cells were collected by
centrifugation, and whole cell extracts were prepared and fractionated
on DEAE-agarose as described previously (34).
In vitro telomerase reactions.
The amount of telomerase
present in the active DEAE fraction from each of the various strains
was assayed by dot blotting, using a 32P-labeled
TLC1 gene probe. Telomerase reactions contained equal amounts of telomerase (up to 50% [vol/vol] DEAE fraction), 50 mM
Tris-HCl (pH 8), 1 mM spermidine, 1 mM dithiothreitol 50 µM dGTP, 50 µM dATP, 50 µM dCTP, 7.5 µM [ In previous studies, we generated and characterized a mutant
telomerase RNA (tlc1 allele) bearing a three-nucleotide
substitution (tlc1-476gug [lowercase indicates
mutated residues]) in the TLC1 template domain (Fig.
1A) (33, 34). This mutant
enzyme is completely inactive in vitro. Like yeast strains with
tlc1, est2, or est3 gene deletions
(18), cells containing only the tlc1-476gug allele show progressive loss of telomeric DNA and cellular senescence (34). Such cells can be rescued by maintenance of
telomeres by an alternative, RAD52-dependent
telomerase-independent pathway (26). To begin to
dissect the effects of the three base changes in the template in the
tlc1-476gug allele, we analyzed six S. cerevisiae strains that bear substitutions in the same three
nucleotides, 476 to 474, either individually or in pairs. The mutated
template bases are shown in Fig. 1A.
0270-7306/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Telomerase RNA Template Mutations Reveal Sequence-Specific
Requirements for the Activation and Repression of Telomerase Action
at Telomeres
and
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
plasmid
DNA that had been digested with EcoRV and XmaI
and then further digested with XbaI before being religated and transformed into Escherichia coli Electro-MAX cells.
Clones containing telomeric DNA were identified by hybridization to a 32P-labeled telomeric oligonucleotide, and the insert DNA
was sequenced. Telomeric DNA was sequenced by the dideoxy-chain
termination sequencing method.
-32P]dTTP (400 Ci/mmol), and 1 µM primer. The DNA primers used are shown in the
legend to Fig. 1, and the reactions were carried out as described
previously (33).
![]()
RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

View larger version (41K):
[in a new window]
FIG. 1.
Telomerase activity assays using the template mutant
enzymes. (A) Sequence of the wild-type (WT) template domain (residues
484 to 468 from the 5' end) of the TLC1 RNA. (B) Telomerase
was partially purified from wild-type cells or the various single- and
double-mutant strains and assayed for telomerase activity using a
telomeric oligonucleotide in the presence of [32P]dTTP
and unlabeled dGTP, dATP, and dCTP (lanes marked ddG
). In lanes
marked ddG+, dGTP was replaced with ddGTP. Extension products were
purified and separated on a denaturing gel before being exposed to
X-ray film. Primers differed only at the 3' end and matched the
sequence of the RNA template from positions 475 through 483 (GTGTGGTGTGTGCA, GTGTGGTGTGTGCG,
GTGTGGTGTGTGGA, or GTGTGGTGTGTGGG).
We first measured the core enzymatic activity, at saturating primer concentrations (33), of each of the six mutant telomerases in vitro. Telomerase was partially purified from mutant cell extracts and assayed in vitro, using methods and criteria that we developed previously for various wild-type and mutant S. cerevisiae telomerases (7, 33, 34). The enzymatic properties of the six mutant tlc1 telomerases were essentially indistinguishable from wild-type properties (Fig. 1B). While the tlc1-476CuA telomerase showed slightly more activity than the other single-mutant enzymes (when normalized per telomerase RNA present in the active fractions assayed), this increase in activity was within the typical range of variation seen among different wild-type extracts. Since no one- or two-base changes caused a significant loss of activity, we conclude that the ablation of core telomerase activity by the tlc1-476gug triple-base substitution is caused by the concerted effect of all three base changes rather than by any single-base substitution.
All six tlc1 template mutations were recessive, with the
TLC1/tlc1 heterozygotes showing normal telomere length and
cell growth (data not shown). This is similar to the results described
previously for heterozygotes of five other template mutants of S. cerevisiae telomerase, including the tlc1-476gug mutant
(34). Whereas the tlc1-476gug triple-base mutant
in the absence of RAD52 gene function showed rapid cellular
senescence (within 25 cell divisions [Fig. 2]), each of the single-mutant strains
grew normally in both rad52 disrupted (Fig. 2) and
RAD52 genetic backgrounds (data not shown). However, each of
the three double mutated tlc1 alleles caused a specific and
distinguishable effect on cell growth. While tlc1-476Cug allowed for near wild-type growth, both the tlc1-476gCg and
tlc1-476guA mutations led to cellular senescence, but
reproducibly more slowly than the tlc1-476gug triple
mutation (Fig. 2). Together, these data suggest that of the three
nucleotides at positions 476 to 474 (Fig. 1A), the wild-type C
nucleotide at position 476 plays an especially important role in
telomere maintenance, since all three strains that exhibited senescence
(tlc1-476gug, -gCg, and -guA)
contained a mutation in this position, and the only double-mutant strain that did not senesce (tlc1-476Cug) contained the
wild-type C residue in this position.
|
All of the 476-474 single- and double-base substitutions disrupt
Rap1p binding.
The three nucleotides mutated in telomeric DNA
synthesized by tlc1-476gug telomerase lie entirely within
the highly conserved core of the consensus binding site for Rap1p, the
major telomere-binding protein in S. cerevisiae (Fig.
3A). We therefore assessed the relative
affinities of Rap1p for duplex DNA oligonucleotides bearing each of the
six 476-474 single or double mutations by gel shift competition assays
(Fig. 3B). In this analysis, the affinity of Rap1p for each of the
mutated oligonucleotides, relative to the wild-type telomeric sequence,
was determined by quantitating the amount of radiolabeled wild-type
oligonucleotide bound by Rap1p in the presence of increasing amounts of
various unlabeled competitor oligonucleotides. (Rap1p binding affinity
was decreased over 300-fold compared to the wild-type level by the
476gtg triple-nucleotide substitution [see also reference
34] and all three double mutations.) The
single-nucleotide substitution of 476gCA also decreased Rap1p binding
over 300-fold, further emphasizing the importance of position 476 in
the telomerase RNA, which templates a DNA nucleotide that lies at the
center of the Rap1p core binding site. The remaining two single-base
mutations also reduced Rap1p binding affinity compared to the wild-type
level, though to lesser extents (14-fold for 476CtA and 4-fold for
476CCg).
|
Each of the 476-474 single- and double-base substitutions has a
distinctive effect on telomere length.
It was shown previously
that in the yeast K. lactis, three telomeric sequence
mutations that disrupt Rap1p binding resulted in immediate telomere
lengthening and loss of length regulation (31). In these
three mutants, the severity of the lengthening phenotype
correlated with the degree of loss of Rap1 binding affinity in
vitro (21). However, it was not shown whether such
lengthening resulted from increased telomeric recombination, increased
telomerase activity, or both. We therefore assessed telomere
lengths in the six strains described here. We deleted the
RAD52 gene, thereby preventing any recombination-mediated
telomere maintenance. Three distinct types of telomere changes
were observed: telomere lengthening and loss of length
regulation, stable maintenance of telomeres at a shortened mean length,
and progressive telomere shortening (Fig.
4).
|
|
Telomere elongation by mutant tlc1-476gCA telomerase was rapid and stochastic. Two aspects of the telomere lengthening seen in tlc1-476gCA single-mutant cells were particularly noteworthy. First, the extent of telomere elongation/deregulation appeared complete within the first 35 generations of growth in the presence of the mutant enzyme. To obtain a minimal estimate of the rate of telomeric DNA elongation in this strain, genomic DNA was isolated from colonies picked directly from the 5-FOA counterselection plate. After only ~25 generations of growth in the absence of the wild-type enzyme (the first point at which DNA could be analyzed), the subpopulation of elongated telomeres had reached a new average length of approximately 3 kbp longer than wild type (Fig. 4B). Thus, a conservative minimal estimate of the elongation rate is 120 bp/cell division (Fig. 4B, compare strains CCA and gCA). Given that telomeres in wild-type cells increase and decrease in length only very gradually, by no more than 3 to 5 bp/cell division (35, 37), this rate represents minimally a 25-fold increase over the normal rate of net telomeric DNA addition in vivo. Second, while the majority of the telomeric molecules were elongated in the gCA mutant, a subpopulation was not elongated, and instead these telomeres were gradually shortened as the cells continued to divide (Fig. 4A and B). This population of short telomeres eventually disappeared, possibly because they were converted to longer telomeres and/or because they led to cessation of cell division, and hence cells containing these telomeres became greatly underrepresented in the cell culture.
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Mutations in the template domain of the telomerase RNA subunit have been invaluable tools for elucidating the enzymatic properties of telomerase. Such mutations are also proving useful in elucidating telomere structure-function relationships. We showed previously that substitution of a specific three-base sequence located within the telomerase RNA template completely destroys telomerase activity and function (33, 34). In the present study, we created a series of one- and two-nucleotide substitutions in this three-base sequence. None significantly altered core in vitro telomerase activity, but each had a different effect on telomere maintenance and long-term cell viability (Table 1). Thus, we can begin to dissect away effects caused by lack of telomerase activity from effects caused by changes in the telomeric sequence synthesized. Notably, 476gCA telomerase, which caused significant telomere lengthening in vivo, and 476CCg telomerase, which maintained shortened but stable telomeres, both had wild-type-like activity in vitro. In addition, the telomerase of the tlc1-476Cug double mutant, which grew well, was somewhat less active in vitro than the telomerase of the tlc1-476guA mutant, yet the latter cells senesced. Hence, the telomere lengthening and shortening and cellular senescence phenotypes caused by these mutations likely result from altered regulation of the action of telomerase at telomeres or the altered telomeric DNA sequences, rather than significantly altered intrinsic core enzymatic activity.
The base changes expected to be copied from each of the six mutated telomerase RNA templates into telomeric DNA all reduced, to various degrees, in vitro binding by the DNA sequence-specific binding protein Rap1p. Hence, when transferred to the telomere, we predict that these base changes could correspondingly disrupt, at the distal ends of the telomeres, the telomeric DNA-protein complex centered on Rap1p. In the two mutants that showed telomere elongation, as with three previously reported telomerase RNA template mutants of K. lactis (21, 31), the predicted reduction in binding by Rap1p at the terminal telomeric repeats correlated with the degree of loss of length regulation. However, loss of Rap1 binding affinity clearly is not sufficient to cause elongation in all cases, since telomeres in the other four S. cerevisiae mutants described here were shorter than wild type.
Telomere shortening could also potentially be indicative of increased negative regulation by Rap1p at telomeres. For example, other effects of the base changes in the telomeric repeats on Rap1p binding could include a change in the bending of the Rap1p-bound mutant repeat, changing the overall properties of the higher-order telomeric DNA-protein complex. However, for the shortening effects to be entirely Rap1p mediated, all such base changes would have had to have caused a gain of function in Rap1p length regulation. While possible, this does not seem likely, given that all four of the shortening mutations described in this study, as well as two different template mutations that were analyzed previously that disrupt the Rap1p binding site and cause shortening (34), would have had a similar gain-of-function effect. It therefore seems likely that impairment of at least one other function besides Rap1 binding affinity contributes to the telomere shortening observed in these mutants.
This work provides further evidence that telomere addition is subject to at least two levels of control: repression by Rap1p and activation by another factor(s). Such other possible factors include Est1p and/or Cdc13p, both of which bind single-stranded telomeric DNA in vitro with DNA sequence specificity and are required for telomere addition in vivo. Additionally, a specific DNA sequence or structure at the telomeric 3' end, which may be altered by the four shortening mutations, could be required for telomere elongation by telomerase. We have shown previously that telomerase, in addition to the base pairing between the RNA template domain and telomeric DNA, shows sequence-specific interactions with DNA in vitro (33, 34). Thus, the interaction of the telomeric DNA with telomerase enzyme, comprised minimally of Est2p and the TCL1 RNA (18), could also potentially be altered in vivo by the changes in the telomeric sequence caused by the tlc1 template mutations. Finally, it has been proposed that the Rap1p-centered higher-order DNA-protein complex of the telomere helps to maintain telomere length homeostasis by limiting the elongation of long telomeres and stimulating the elongation of short telomeres (21-25, 29, 31). If so, loss of Rap1p binding would certainly exacerbate the phenotypes seen here.
We propose that the rapid and stochastic telomere elongation catalyzed in vivo by 476gCA telomerase results from altered regulation of telomerase activity at the telomere. The behavior of 476gCA telomeres also strongly suggests that on any given telomere molecule in the population, telomere overelongation/deregulation initiates stochastically. We therefore propose that in tlc1-476gCA cells, as the initial population of telomeres becomes shortened under the direction of the tlc1-476gCA allele, at each cell division a subset of these telomeres loses regulation. Once overelongation/deregulation initiates on any one telomere, it rapidly progresses to the fully elongated/deregulated state and apparently does not regain length control. Thus, the whole population of telomeres eventually switches over to the deregulated state. A similar phenomenon of conversion of the telomere population to a deregulated state was seen previously with K. lactis cells mutated both in the telomerase RNA template and in the C terminus of Rap1p. However, in that case no telomere shortening was observed prior to the loss of length regulation (21).
It has been proposed that normally, two mutually reinforcing telomeric components contribute to length control: a proper regulatory end structure that is disrupted upon incorporation of mutant residues into the terminal telomeric repeat(s); and a higher-order structure, destabilized by telomere shortening, that normally acts to limit telomerase access to telomeres (21, 22, 29, 31, 38). In addition, the specific importance of the terminal few repeats has been demonstrated by mutating them in K. lactis (21, 22, 38). Such telomerase RNA template mutations cause deregulated telomere lengthening, either immediately following expression of the mutant enzyme, like that we report here for the S. cerevisiae tlc1-476gCA and tlc1-476CuA mutants, or only after hundreds of generations of growth (31). Loss of the telomeric cap structure also apparently allows telomere degradation and telomere-telomere fusions (30, 40, 45). While the two immediate-telomere-lengthening mutations described in K. lactis decreased Rap1p binding affinity in vitro, the two delayed-lengthening mutations that have been described in K. lactis did not, suggesting that at least two types of regulatory mechanisms are involved in telomere homeostasis (21, 31). It was proposed that mutations causing immediate telomere lengthening do so by altering the cap structure at the extreme terminus of the telomere, leading to either an increased rate of telomere addition by telomerase, as we have demonstrated in the present work with S. cerevisiae telomerase, or increased telomeric recombination (22, 38). On the other hand, mutations that require hundreds of generations to manifest a telomere lengthening phenotype may do so by causing a more global alteration in telomere structure. This requires a more extensive replacement of wild-type repeat tracts by mutant telomeric repeats throughout the length of the telomere, and the phenotypic delay has been proposed to occur because these mutant repeats only gradually infiltrate throughout the body of the telomeres (31).
Both tlc1-476gCA RAD52 and tlc1-476gCA rad52 cells, which contain long telomeres with extremely low affinity for Rap1p, showed an apparently normal FACS profile (C. D. Smith, unpublished observation). Furthermore, these cells had only slightly abnormal cytology, with minimally increased numbers of the large, unbudded, multinucleated cells typically associated with a failure to properly segregate chromosomes (38; J. C. Prescott, E. H. Blackburn, and C. D. Smith, unpublished observation). The long tracts of mutant telomeric repeats were added directly onto a preexisting tract of wild-type repeats, suggesting that an internal tract of wild-type telomeric repeats may be sufficient to maintain at least some telomere functions, although not telomere length regulation. Alternatively, the presence of an internal tract of wild-type telomeric DNA may facilitate Rap1p binding to the mutant repeats, thus maintaining a functional elongated telomere.
Several different telomere phenotypes are caused by various mutations affecting Rap1p and/or its telomeric DNA binding sites, which include lengthening, shortening, and mislocalization in the nucleus, suggests that Rap1p has multiple roles in telomere maintenance. Mutations in the C-terminal domain of Rap1p, which normally mediates interactions with Sir and Rif proteins, causes telomere lengthening and, in some situations, cellular phenotypes indicative of loss of capping (21-23). Human telomeres contain two distinct telomere-binding proteins, TRF1 and TRF2 (39, 40). It is possible that the roles carried out by Rap1p in yeasts are divided between TRF1 and TRF2 in mammals. As with yeast telomerase RNA template mutations that cause telomere elongation concomitant with disruption of Rap1 binding (21, 31; this work), disrupting the DNA binding domain of TRF1 causes telomere lengthening (39), suggesting that telomere addition in human cells is also responsive to TRF1 occupancy of the telomere. Mutations that disrupt the binding of TRF2 to telomeres cause telomere-telomere fusions and apoptosis, suggesting that TRF2 protects the telomeric terminus (19, 40). This function of TRF2 may be analogous to the role of Rap1p in the formation of a telomeric cap structure. Thus, the data suggest that Rap1p serves both a TRF1-homologous role in regulating telomere length homeostasis and a TRF2-homologous role in protecting the end of the chromosome from being recognized as damaged DNA.
Telomeres generally contain single-stranded 3' overhangs during at least part of the cell cycle (28, 43). Telomere addition requires that this 3' terminus, which is itself synthesized by telomerase, be made accessible to telomerase. It is possible that the wild-type telomeric repeats present when the mutant template telomerase first replaces wild-type telomerase cannot base pair with the mutant template in a manner that allows productive synthesis by telomerase. The necessity for such template position-specific base pairing has been demonstrated for Tetrahymena telomerase (42). In Oxytricha nova, the 3' overhang is bound both in vivo and in vitro by a heterodimeric protein complex in which nearly every nucleotide is stacked with an aromatic amino acid (11, 17). Two S. cerevisiae proteins, Est1p and Cdc13p, bind single-stranded telomeric TG1-3 repeat DNA in vitro (32, 41) and could possibly be counterparts of the Oxytricha heterodimer. While neither Est1p nor Cdc13p is required for core enzymatic activity of telomerase in vitro, both are required for telomerase action in vivo, suggesting that they may modulate the interaction between telomerase and the telomeric 3' end (7, 18, 25). Hence, the mutations described here that disrupt Rap1p binding, yet do not cause telomere lengthening, may exert their effects by disrupting sequence-specific binding by Estp1p, Cdc13p, and/or some other positive regulator of telomerase action. The DNA sequence requirements for Est1p and Cdc13p binding are not sufficiently understood to predict what effects the mutations analyzed here would have on their binding.
It was noted previously that a short conserved core sequence within the otherwise highly variable telomeric repeat units of yeasts coincides with the Rap1 binding core (8). Here we have reported widely varying effects on telomeres caused by small mutations within this core sequence in S. cerevisiae TLC1 RNA. We propose that the striking evolutionary conservation of this core sequence in the telomeric DNA of yeasts is imposed because this sequence has to serve as a binding site not only for Rap1p but also for Est1p, Cdc13p, and possibly other factors including the telomerase RNP itself.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This work was supported by grant GM26259 from the National Institutes of Health to E.H.B. J.C.P. was supported by a Special Fellow award from the Leukemia Society of America.
We thank the members of the Blackburn laboratory for helpful ideas and
discussions and specifically Shivani Nautiyal and Chris D. Smith for
critical reading of the manuscript. Plasmid pBR
HS LEU2, used to
disrupt RAD52, was a gift from Dennis Livingston.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Phone: (415) 476-4912. Fax: (415) 476-8201. E-mail: telomer{at}itsa.ucsf.edu.
Present address: Sunesis Pharmaceuticals, Redwood City, Calif.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Adams, A. K., and C. Holm. 1996. Specific DNA replication mutations affect telomere length in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:4614-4620[Abstract]. |
| 2. | Ancelin, K., C. Brun, and E. Gilson. 1998. Role of the telomeric DNA-binding protein TRF2 in the stability of human chromosome ends. Bioessays 20:879-883[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 3. | Blackburn, E. H. 1991. Structure and function of telomeres. Nature 350:569-573[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 4. | Blasco, M. A., H. W. Lee, M. P. Hande, E. Samper, P. M. Lansdorp, R. A. DePinho, and C. W. Greider. 1997. Telomere shortening and tumor formation by mouse cells lacking telomerase RNA. Cell 91:25-34[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 5. |
Boulton, S. J., and S. P. Jackson.
1996.
Identification of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ku80 homologue: roles double strand break rejoining and in telomeric maintenance.
Nucleic Acids Res.
24:4639-4648 |
| 6. |
Bourns, B. D.,
M. K. Alexander,
A. M. Smith, and V. A. Zakian.
1998.
Sir proteins, Rif proteins, and Cdc13p bind Saccharomyces telomeres in vivo.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:5600-5608 |
| 7. |
Cohn, M., and E. H. Blackburn.
1995.
Telomerase in yeast.
Science
269:396-400 |
| 8. | Cohn, M., M. J. McEachern, and E. H. Blackburn. 1998. Telomeric sequence diversity within the genus Saccharomyces. Curr. Genet. 33:83-91[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 9. | Conrad, M. N., J. H. Wright, A. J. Wolf, and V. A. Zakian. 1990. RAP1 protein interacts with yeast telomeres in vivo: overproduction alters telomere structure and decreases chromosome stability. Cell 63:739-750[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 10. |
Fan, X., and C. M. Price.
1997.
Coordinate regulation of G and C strand length during new telomere synthesis.
Mol. Biol. Cell
8:2145-2155 |
| 11. | Gottschling, D. E., and V. A. Zakian. 1986. Telomere proteins: specific recognition and protection of the natural termini of Oxytricha macronuclear DNA. Cell 47:195-205[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 12. |
Gravel, S.,
M. Larrivee,
P. Labrecque, and R. J. Wellinger.
1998.
Yeast Ku as a regulator of chromosomal DNA end structure.
Science
280:741-744 |
| 13. | Greider, C. W. 1996. Telomere length regulation. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 65:337-365[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 14. | Greider, C. W. 1998. Telomeres and senescence: the history, the experiment, the future. Curr. Biol. 8:R178-R181[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 15. |
Hande, M. P.,
E. Samper,
P. Lansdorp, and M. A. Blasco.
1999.
Telomere length dynamics and chromosomal instability in cells derived from telomerase null mice.
J. Cell Biol.
144:589-601 |
| 16. | Ho, S. N., H. D. Hunt, R. M. Horton, J. K. Pullen, and L. R. Pease. 1989. Site-directed mutagenesis by overlap extension using the polymerase chain reaction. Gene 77:51-59[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 17. | Horvath, M. P., V. L. Schweiker, J. M. Bevilacqua, J. A. Ruggles, and S. C. Schultz. 1998. Crystal structure of the Oxytricha nova telomere end binking protein complexed with single strand DNA. Cell 95:963-974[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 18. | Hughes, T. R., D. K. Morris, A. Salinger, N. Walcott, C. I. Nugent, and V. Lundblad. 1997. The role of the EST genes in yeast telomere replication. Ciba Found. Symp. 211:41-47[Medline]. |
| 19. |
Karlseder, J.,
D. Broccoli,
Y. Dai,
S. Hardy, and T. de Lange.
1999.
p53- and ATM-dependent apoptosis induced by telomeres lacking TRF2.
Science
283:1321-1325 |
| 20. | König, P., and D. Rhodes. 1997. Recognition of telomeric DNA. Trends Biochem. Sci. 22:43-47[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 21. | Krauskopf, A., and E. H. Blackburn. 1996. Control of telomere growth by interactions of RAP1 with the most distal telomeric repeats. Nature 383:354-357[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 22. |
Krauskopf, A., and E. H. Blackburn.
1998.
Rap1 protein regulates telomere turnover in yeast.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
95:12486-12491 |
| 23. |
Kyrion, G.,
K. A. Boakye, and A. J. Lustig.
1992.
C-terminal truncation of RAP1 results in the deregulation of telomere size, stability, and function in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
12:5159-5173 |
| 24. |
Li, B., and A. J. Lustig.
1996.
A novel mechanism for telomere size control in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Genes Dev.
10:1310-1326 |
| 25. |
Lingner, J.,
T. R. Cech,
T. R. Hughes, and V. Lundblad.
1997.
Three Ever Shorter Telomere (EST) genes are dispensable for in vitro yeast telomerase activity.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:11190-11195 |
| 26. |
Lundblad, V., and E. H. Blackburn.
1993.
An alternative pathway for yeast telomere maintenance rescues est1 senescence.
Cell
73:347-360[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 27. | Lundblad, V., and J. W. Szostak. 1989. A mutant with a defect in telomere elongation leads to senescence in yeast. Cell 57:633-643[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 28. | Makarov, V. L., Y. Hirose, and J. P. Langmore. 1997. Long G tails at both ends of human chromosomes suggest a C strand degradation mechanism for telomere shortening. Cell 88:657-666[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 29. |
Marcand, S.,
E. Gilson, and D. Shore.
1997.
A protein-counting mechanism for telomere length regulation in yeast.
Science
275:986-990 |
| 30. |
McEachern, M. J., and E. H. Blackburn.
1996.
Cap-prevented recombination between terminal telomeric repeat arrays (telomere CPR) maintains telomeres in Kluyveromyces lactis lacking telomerase.
Genes Dev.
10:1822-1834 |
| 31. | McEachern, M. J., and E. H. Blackburn. 1995. Runaway telomere elongation caused by telomerase RNA gene mutations. Nature 376:403-409[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 32. |
Nugent, C. I.,
T. R. Hughes,
N. F. Lue, and V. Lundblad.
1996.
Cdc13p: a single-strand telomeric DNA-binding protein with a dual role in yeast telomere maintenance.
Science
274:249-252 |
| 33. |
Prescott, J., and E. H. Blackburn.
1997.
Functionally interacting telomerase RNAs in the yeast telomerase complex.
Genes Dev.
11:2790-2800 |
| 34. |
Prescott, J., and E. H. Blackburn.
1997.
Telomerase RNA mutations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae alter telomerase action and reveal nonprocessivity in vivo and in vitro.
Genes Dev.
11:528-540 |
| 35. |
Shampay, J., and E. H. Blackburn.
1988.
Generation of telomere-length heterogeneity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
85:534-538 |
| 36. | Shore, D. 1994. RAP1: a protean regulator in yeast. Trends Genet 10:408-412[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 37. |
Singer, M. S., and D. E. Gottschling.
1994.
TLC1: template RNA component of Saccharomyces cerevisiae telomerase.
Science
266:404-409 |
| 38. |
Smith, C. D., and E. H. Blackburn.
1999.
Uncapping and deregulation of telomeres lead to detrimental cellular consequences in yeast.
J. Cell Biol.
145:203-214 |
| 39. | van Steensel, B., and T. de Lange. 1997. Control of telomere length by the human telomeric protein TRF1. Nature 385:740-743[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 40. | van Steensel, B., A. Smogorzewska, and T. de Lange. 1998. TRF2 protects human telomeres from end-to-end fusions. Cell 92:401-413[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 41. |
Virta-Pearlman, V.,
D. K. Morris, and V. Lundblad.
1996.
Est1 has the properties of a single-stranded telomere end-binding protein.
Genes Dev.
10:3094-3104 |
| 42. | Wang, H., D. Gilley, and E. H. Blackburn. 1998. A novel specificity for the primer-template pairing requirement in Tetrahymena telomerase. EMBO J. 17:1152-1160[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 43. | Wellinger, R. J., A. J. Wolf, and V. A. Zakian. 1993. Saccharomyces telomeres acquire single-strand TG1-3 tails late in S phase. Cell 72:51-60[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 44. |
Zakian, V. A.
1995.
Telomeres: beginning to understand the end.
Science
270:1601-1607 |
| 45. |
Zhu, J.,
H. Wang,
J. M. Bishop, and E. H. Blackburn.
1999.
Telomerase extends the lifespan of virus-transformed human cells without net telomere lengthening.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
96:3723-3728 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»