Previous Article | Next Article 
Molecular and Cellular Biology, May 2001, p. 3289-3301, Vol. 21, No. 10
0270-7306/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/MCB.21.10.3289-3301.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Fission Yeast Rad17 Associates with Chromatin in
Response to Aberrant Genomic Structures
Mihoko
Kai,1
Hiroyuki
Tanaka,2 and
Teresa S.-F.
Wang1,*
Department of Pathology, Stanford University
School of Medicine, Stanford, California
94305-5324,1 and Department of
Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The University of Tokyo
Graduate School of Medicine, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan2
Received 13 October 2000/Returned for modification 5 December
2000/Accepted 26 February 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
Fission yeast checkpoint protein Rad17 is required for the DNA
integrity checkpoint responses. A fraction of Rad17 is chromatin bound
independent of the other checkpoint proteins throughout the cell cycle.
Here we show that in response to DNA damage induced by either methyl
methanesulfonate treatment or ionizing radiation, increased levels of
Rad17 bind to chromatin. Following S-phase stall induced by hydroxyurea
or a cdc22 mutation, the chromatin-bound Rad17
progressively dissociates from the chromatin. After S-phase arrest by
hydroxyurea in cds1
or rad3
cells or by
replication mutants, Rad17 remains chromatin bound. Rad17 is able to
complex in vivo with an Rfc small subunit, Rfc2, but not with Rfc1.
Furthermore, cells with rfc1
are checkpoint proficient,
suggesting that Rfc1 does not have a role in checkpoint function. A
checkpoint-defective mutant protein, Rad17(K118E), which has similar
nuclear localization to that of the wild type, is unable to bind ATP
and has reduced ability in chromatin binding. Mutant Rad17(K118E)
protein also has reduced ability to complex with Rfc2, suggesting that
Lys118 of Rad17 plays a role in Rad17-Rfc small-subunit
complex formation and chromatin association. However, in the
rad17.K118E mutant cells, Cds1 can be activated by
hydroxyurea. Together, these results suggest that Rad17 binds to
chromatin in response to an aberrant genomic structure generated from
DNA damage, replication mutant arrest, or hydroxyurea arrest in the
absence of Cds1. Rad17 is not required to bind chromatin when genomic
structures are protected by hydroxyurea-activated Cds1. The possible
checkpoint events induced by chromatin-bound Rad17 are discussed.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
For maintaining genome integrity
following replication perturbation or DNA damage, eukaryotic cells
employ checkpoint mechanisms to delay or arrest the cell cycle,
allowing cells to recover from the perturbation or to repair the damage
(10, 19, 20). In fission yeast, a group of gene products
named Rad1, Rad3, Rad9, Rad17, Rad26, Hus1, and Cut5 (Rad4) are
required for the checkpoint (1, 33, 39, 41, 42). Five of
the checkpoint gene products, Rad1, Rad3, Rad9, Rad17, and Hus1, are
evolutionarily conserved from yeast to humans (8, 33).
These checkpoint proteins are thought to function as sensors and
transducers in signaling both replication perturbation and DNA damage
by activating two downstream kinases, Cds1 and Chk1. These kinases
ultimately have an effect on the cell cycle machinery to delay or
arrest the cell cycle to prevent inappropriate mitotic entry in
maintaining genome integrity (5, 12, 13, 22, 29, 32, 39, 40,
60).
Recent studies have shown that the checkpoint proteins form complexes.
In fission yeast and human cells, Hus1 and Rad1 form a stable complex
in a Rad9-dependent manner (21, 55). Further studies have
shown that Hus1 exists in several forms. The main form, Hus1B,
participates in the complex with Rad1 and Rad9 (8). Rad3
has been shown to complex with Rad26 and phosphorylates Rad26 in
response to
radiation in G2 cells independent of other
checkpoint proteins (9), suggesting that this type of
damage can activate Rad3 kinase directly (27).
Rad17 and its budding yeast homologue RAD24 each
contain five domains with sequence homology to replication factor C
(Rfc) (17). Rfc is an evolutionarily conserved
five-subunit protein complex. During DNA replication, the Rfc complex
recognizes the primer-template junction of the initiation DNA structure
synthesized by polymerase
and loads the processivity clamp, PCNA,
onto DNA to allow polymerase
to synthesize the main bulk of the DNA
(56, 61). Genetic evidence has shown that several Rfc
subunits not only function as the PCNA clamp loader in replication, but
they are also required for the cell cycle checkpoint (24, 30, 31, 38, 43, 45, 46). Furthermore, budding yeast Rad24p and fission
yeast Rad17 have been shown to coimmunoprecipitate with Rfc5p and Rfc3,
respectively (30, 43, 44). Coprecipitation of budding
yeast Rad24p with all four of the small subunits of Rfc proteins
(Rfc2p, Rfc3p, Rfc4p, and Rfc5p) but not with Rfc1p has also been
reported (15). We and others have found that Rad17 exists
as a large protein complex independent of the other checkpoint Rad
proteins (8, 16). Although Rad17 does not associate with the Hus1-Rad1-Rad9 complex, Rad17 is required for the nuclear localization of Hus1 and Rad9 and interacts with Rad1 in two-hybrid reactions (8).
Studies of the budding yeast checkpoint proteins have suggested that
following DNA damage, aberrant DNA structure may be first processed by
checkpoint proteins Rad17p, Rad24p, and Mec3p (homologues of
Schizosaccharomyces pombe Rad1, Rad17, and Hus1,
respectively) into a structure that activates Mec1p (the S. pombe Rad3 homologue). Mec1p then activates Rad53p and Chk1p (the
S. pombe Cds1 and Chk1 counterparts) for cell cycle arrest
(14, 25, 49). The human homologue of fission yeast Rad1 is
thought to encode an exonuclease, and human Rad9 has been reported as
having 3'-to-5' exonuclease activity in vitro (3, 35).
Finding that fission yeast Rad3-Rad26 responds to damage independently
of other checkpoint proteins (9, 27) suggests that Rad17
and the Rad1-Rad9-Hus1B complex may have a role in processing the
aberrant DNA structure.
To begin to investigate this hypothesis, we focused on Rad17. We have
recently reported that a fraction of the cellular Rad17 protein is
chromatin bound throughout the cell cycle. Importantly, chromatin
binding of Rad17 is independent of other checkpoint proteins and the
Cds1 and Chk1 kinases (16). This finding (16) and the findings by others (15, 30, 31, 43) describing the
association of Rad17 with Rfc proteins raise the following questions.
(i) What are the chromatin binding statuses of Rad17 in response to DNA
damage and replication perturbation? (ii) Does a checkpoint-defective
mutant Rad17 protein bind to chromatin? (iii) Is a fraction of the Rfc
small subunits always in complex with Rad17 for checkpoint function?
(iv) Is Rfc1 not involved in the checkpoint process but only in
replication? Here we describe the chromatin association of wild-type
and a checkpoint-defective Rad17 protein in response to DNA damage and
various S-phase perturbations. Similar to reports by others (15,
31), we showed that Rad17 coprecipitates with Rfc2 but not with
Rfc1. We have further demonstrated that rfc1+ is
not involved in the checkpoint function and that residue
Lys118 of Rad17 is required for ATP binding of Rad17,
complex formation with Rfc2, and chromatin association. Together our
data suggest that Rad17, in a complex with the small subunits of Rfc,
associates with chromatin in response to an aberrant genomic structure.
This complex is not required to associate with the chromatin when the genomic structure is protected by the hydroxyurea-activated Cds1. We
discuss the possible events induced by the chromatin-bound Rad17-Rfc
small-subunit complex in functioning as a part of the checkpoint process.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Yeast strains, plasmids, media, genetics, and molecular
techniques.
All yeast strains were constructed by standard fission
yeast genetic techniques as described previously (18), and
resulting mutants were isolated by tetrad analysis. Where necessary,
strains were also confirmed for the presence of either the
hemagglutinin (HA) or myc epitope tags by Western blotting with the
respective monoclonal antibody. Fission yeast cells were grown in rich
media (YE5S) or Edinburgh minimal media with appropriate supplements as
described earlier (28). Molecular biological techniques
were performed according to prior methods (26). Myc-tagged
rad17 and rad17.K118E strains (17)
and pREP41-myc-rad17+ and
pREP41-rad17.K118E plasmids were generous gifts from A. M. Carr.
Chromatin fractionation assay.
Chromatin fractionation of
myc-tagged Rad17 or myc-tagged Rad17(K118E) was performed as described
previously (16) with the following modifications.
Logarithmically growing cells (5 × 108 cells) were
harvested in 1 mM sodium azide by centrifugation and were washed
sequentially with 25 ml of STOP buffer (0.9% NaCl, 1 mM
NaN3, 50 mM NaF, 10 mM EDTA), 25 ml of double-distilled
water, and 10 ml of 1.2 M sorbitol. Cells were resuspended in 1.125 ml of CB1 (50 mM sodium citrate, 40 mM EDTA, 1.2 M sorbitol) to which 125 µl of CB1 containing 10 mg of lysis enzymes (L2265; Sigma), 10 µg
of Zymolyase-20T (ICN), and 2.5 µl of
-mercaptoethanol were added.
Digestion of cells was monitored by removing 2 µl of cell sample and
adding an equal volume of 10% (wt/vol) sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS).
When cell lysis reached approximately 90% after zymolyase treatment,
the digestion was terminated by adding an equal volume of ice-cold 1.2 M sorbitol. Spheroplasts were harvested by centrifugation at
290 × g for 4 min and were washed twice with 1.2 ml of
1.2 M sorbitol. Finally, the spheroplasts were resuspended in 425 µl
of 1.2 M sorbitol, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at
80°C.
Samples were subsequently thawed on ice and lysed by the addition of 50 µl of 10× lysis buffer (500 mM potassium acetate, 20 mM
MgCl2, 200 mM HEPES [pH 7.9]). To the lysates, a Complete
Protease Inhibitor EDTA-Free Tablet (Roche Molecular Biochemical) and
20 µl of 25% Triton X-100 (TX-100) were added. Samples were
incubated on ice for 10 min, and 50 µl was removed and boiled in an
equal volume of 2× SDS sample loading buffer. This was analyzed as the
total protein fraction (designated Total). Extracts were subsequently
fractionated into soluble and pellet fractions by centrifugation at
12,000 × g for 15 min in a bench-top microcentrifuge.
Supernatant was removed and boiled in an equal volume of 2× SDS sample
buffer (designated Sup). An insoluble chromatin-enriched pellet
fraction was washed once with the lysis buffer without TX-100 and
digested with DNase I (100 U; Stratagene) in the presence of 5 mM
MgSO4 and protease inhibitors on ice for 30 min. The DNase
I-digested chromatin-enriched fraction was centrifuged for 5 min
at 14,000 × g. Supernatant was designated the
chromatin fraction (designated Chr), while the pellet was designated
the cellular scaffold and debris. The chromatin binding of
myc-Rad17 and myc-Rad17(K118E) was detected by an anti-myc monoclonal
antibody (9E10).
Preparation of cell extract.
Logarithmically growing cells
were washed in 20 ml of HB buffer (25 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 15 mM
MgCl2, 15 mM EGTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol [DTT], and
proteinase inhibitors as described above) with the addition of 300 mM
NaCl and 1% TX-100. Cells were disrupted with glass beads (425 to 600 µm; Sigma) in the above buffer and centrifuged at 14,000 × g for 15 min at 4°C. Supernatant was diluted to 150 mM
NaCl-0.5% TX-100 by HB buffer for immunoprecipitation. For preparation of cell extracts from cells expressing an epitope-tagged protein from the nmt1 promoter of pREP41, cells were first
grown in medium containing thiamine to repress overexpression. Cells were then harvested by centrifugation, washed with distilled water to
remove thiamine, reinoculated into thiamine lacking minimal medium with
appropriate nutritional selection, and grown for 18 h.
Immunofluorescence analysis.
For nuclear localization
analysis, anti-myc antibody (9E10) was used at 1:1,000 dilution and the
secondary antibody (goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin Alexa 488; Molecular
Probes) for immunofluorescence was used at 1:250 dilution. The
immunofluorescence protocol was as described previously
(36), with modification of in-cell-wall digestion with 0.2 mg of Zymolyase 20T (ICN) per ml in buffer for 8 to 10 min at room
temperature. DNA was stained with propidium iodide. For photography,
cells were dried on polylysine-coated coverslips and mounted in
50% glycerol and phosphate-buffered saline (PBS).
Construction of epitope-tagged rfc1+ and
rfc2+ strains.
Three-HA or 13 myc epitope
tags were independently constructed at the C terminus of
rfc1+, and the three-HA tag was constructed at
the C terminus of rfc2+ by a PCR method followed
by G418 selection exactly as described previously (2).
Construction of the rfc1
strain and analysis of
the phenotype of the rfc1
germinating spores.
A
heterozygous diploid (rfc1+/rfc
)
was constructed by one-step gene replacement by replacing the 1.7-kb
EcoRI-PstI fragment of
rfc1+ with a 1.8-kb ura4+
gene cassette as illustrated in Fig. 6A. The 3.8-kb
SpeI-HindIII fragment containing the
disrupted rfc1 gene was transformed into a diploid strain
(h+/h
leu1-32/leu1-32 ura4-D18/ura4-D18 ade6-M210/ade6-M216).
Stable transformants were selected and verified as heterozygous
diploids by Southern blot analysis. The heterozygous diploid cells were sporulated on MEA medium for 7 days. Spores derived from the
rfc1+/rfc1
heterozygous diploid
were washed with double-distilled water and then incubated at 30°C
for 18 h in 40 ml of water containing 0.1 ml of helicase (IBF)
followed by three further washes with water. The spores were cultured
in minimal medium containing adenine and leucine at 30°C to induce
preferential germination of ura4+ and
rfc1
spores. Germinating spores were collected every
2 h, fixed with 70% ethanol, stained with
4',6'-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI), and analyzed.
Purification of his-myc-tagged Rad17 and myc-tagged Rad17(K118E)
from fission yeast cells.
Rad17 was purified as a side fraction of
a large-scale fission yeast DNA polymerase
-primase purification
protocol, details of which will be published elsewhere (R. E. Davis and T. S. Wang, unpublished). Briefly, 225 g of fission
yeast cells containing his-myc-rad17+ at their
endogenous genomic loci (17) were disrupted with glass beads (425 to 600 µm; Sigma) in 2× lysis buffer which contains 300 mM HEPES (pH 7.9), 1 M KCl, 20% glycerol, 1 mM EDTA, 2 mM DTT, and
proteinase inhibitors (6 µM leupeptin, 2 µM pepstatin A, 2 mM
benzamidine, and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride). Crude cell
lysates were centrifuged at 8,000 × g for 15 min at 4°C. The supernatant was collected, recentrifuged at
90,000 × g for 90 min, diluted to 500 mM KCl, and then
applied to a fast-flow Q-Sepharose column pre-equilibrated in 1× lysis
buffer to remove nucleic acids. The flow-through fraction was collected
and diluted with dilution buffer (1 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT, 10% glycerol,
100 mM KPO4). Phosphocellulose resin equilibrated in the
same buffer was added to the flow-through fraction and rotated end to
end at 4°C. The phosphocellulose resin was washed three times with wash buffer (1 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT, 10% glycerol, protease inhibitors as
described above) plus 100 mM KPO4, pH 7.5. Proteins were
eluted with wash buffer plus 350 mM KPO4, pH 7.5. After
dialysis against a buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 50 mM NaCl, 1 mM
EDTA, 1 mM DTT, 10% glycerol, and protease inhibitors), the eluates
were loaded onto a high-resolution Q-Sepharose column. Proteins were eluted from the high-resolution Q-Sepharose column with a gradient of
50 to 1,000 mM NaCl. The myc-his-tagged Rad17 protein eluted from the
column was monitored by Western blot analysis and was eluted at
approximately 800 mM NaCl. Fractions containing the myc-his-Rad17
protein were pooled, dialyzed against MCAC buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl [pH
7.9], 500 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, protease inhibitors), and loaded
onto a Ni+-agarose column (1 ml) pre-equilibrated in the
MCAC buffer. The column was washed with five column volumes of MCAC
buffer, and myc-his-Rad17 protein was eluted by an MCAC buffer
containing 100 mM imidazole. The myc-his-tagged Rad17 protein was
monitored by Western blotting with an anti-myc monoclonal antibody
(9E10). Purified myc-Rad17 protein was dialyzed against the dialysis
buffer and was used for ATP binding studies. Mutant Rad17(K118E)
protein was purified from the rad17
strain harboring a
pREP41-rad17.K118E plasmid by using the same protocol.
ATP binding assay.
A 20-µl reaction mixture containing 0.2 µg of purified Rad17 protein or Rad17(K118E) protein in a solution
containing 25 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 3 mM MgCl2, 1 mM DTT,
50 µg of bovine serum albumin per ml, 0.2 µg of 96-mer
oligonucleotide or M13 DNA, and 10 µM [
-32P]ATP
(0.33 µCi/nmol) was incubated at room temperature for 20 min. The
reaction mixtures were irradiated with short-wave UV light in a
Stratalinker (Stratagene) for 20 min on ice, and the cross-linked
products were loaded onto SDS-8% polyacrylamide gels. The gels were
dried and exposed to PhosphorImager screens or X-ray films.
Immunoprecipitation and Western blotting.
One milligram of
total cell extract was diluted to 300 µl with HB buffer plus 150 mM
NaCl and 0.5% TX-100. The diluted cell extract was then incubated with
protein G agarose (Calbiochem) which had been prebound with anti-HA
monoclonal antibody (3F10 high affinity; Boehringer Mannheim).
Immunocomplexes were collected by centrifugation and washed four times
with 1 ml of HB buffer, boiled in SDS sample buffer, and fractionated
on SDS-8% polyacrylamide gels. Proteins were transferred to
polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Bio-Rad). The membranes were
blocked with Blotto (PBS, 1% fat-free milk powder, 0.05% Tween 20)
and incubated in Blotto plus anti-HA monoclonal antibody (12CA5)
(1:1,000 dilution) or anti-myc antibody (9E10) at a dilution of
1:1,000. The membranes were then washed in Blotto and incubated with
horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (1:2,000
dilution). Chemiluminescent detection of horseradish
peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies was carried out (NEM).
Cds1 kinase assay.
Cds1 kinase assays were performed as
previously described (22) with the following
modifications. Cell lysates were prepared from the myc-tagged Cds1
strain by glass bead disruption in HB buffer plus 150 mM NaCl as
described above. Cds1 protein was immunoprecipitated from 1 mg of
soluble protein in a 300-µl volume using protein G plus A agarose
(Calbiochem) which had been prebound with anti-myc monoclonal antibody
(9E10). Immunocomplexes were collected by centrifugation and washed
four times with 1 ml of HB buffer plus 150 mM NaCl and further washed
once with kinase buffer (10 mM HEPES [pH 7.5], 75 mM KCl, 5 mM
MgCl2, 0.5 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT). Twenty microliters (50%
slurry) of the immunocomplex-containing beads were incubated with 10 µl of 2× kinase buffer, 5 µCi of [
-32P]ATP, 1 µl of 2 mM ATP, and 5 µl of myelin basic protein (1 mg/ml stock) at
30°C for 15 min. One third of the sample was removed and analyzed by
Western blotting as a protein-loading control. Reactions were
terminated by being boiled in an equal volume of 2× SDS sample buffer,
and samples were fractionated on 15% SDS gels. Gels were dried and
exposed on PhosphorImager screens or X-ray films.
Flow cytometry analysis.
Cells were harvested, washed in
water, and fixed in 70% ethanol prior to staining with DAPI, as
described earlier. DNA contents were measured using a FACScan system
and CellFIT cell cycle analysis and LYSISII software (Becton Dickinson).
Cytology analysis.
Cells were fixed in 70% ethanol and
stained by DAPI as described previously (53).
 |
RESULTS |
DNA damage enhances Rad17 chromatin binding.
We have
previously shown that Rad17 binds to chromatin independent of other
checkpoint proteins throughout the cell cycle (16). To
investigate the significance of this finding, we first tested Rad17
chromatin binding in response to DNA damage. Since others have reported
that Rad17 exists in a complex with the small subunits of the Rfc
protein (15, 30, 31, 43), we also used Rfc2 as the
representative Rfc small subunit and tested the Rfc2 chromatin binding
status. We constructed strains containing HA epitope-tagged
rfc1+ or rfc2+ at their
respective chromosomal loci (see Materials and Methods). We first
analyzed the chromatin associations of Rad17 and Rfc2 in response to
DNA damage induced by methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) treatment from the
myc-tagged rad17+ strain (17) or
the HA-tagged rfc2+ strain. Spheroplasts
prepared from cells grown in MMS were made by limited enzymatic
digestion followed by lysis with nonionic detergent. Lysates were then
fractionated into soluble (Sup) and insoluble nuclear pellet fractions.
The insoluble nuclear pellet fraction was treated with DNase I to
release the chromatin-bound proteins as soluble chromatin-bound protein
fractions (Fig. 1A, Chr), leaving an
insoluble pellet of cellular debris and nuclear scaffold-bound
proteins. Histone H4 was used as a control for the chromatin-bound
protein, and tubulin was used as a control for the non-chromatin-bound
protein. We also tested whether MMS and hydroxyurea could affect the
chromatin binding of cellular proteins. As shown in the bottom panel of
Fig. 1A, tubulin was not chromatin bound and histone H4 was chromatin
bound under either hydroxyurea or MMS treatment, indicating that the
chromatin binding assay used in our study is a valid analysis. We also
tested the viability of cells in MMS. Following MMS treatment for
1.5 h, cells with untagged rad17+ and
strains with myc-tagged rad17+ and HA-tagged
rfc2+ were 100% viable. After 3 h of MMS
treatment, similar to the wild-type cells, 30 to 35% of the myc-tagged
rad17+ and HA-tagged
rfc2+ cells were viable, whereas less than 1%
of the rad17
cells were viable after 3 h of MMS
treatment.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Chromatin binding of Rad17 is enhanced following DNA
damage. (A) Schematic outline of the chromatin fractionation assay.
Details of the assay are described in Materials and Methods. Histone H4
and -tubulin were used as controls for chromatin-bound and
non-chromatin-bound proteins in either hydroxyurea- or MMS-treated or
-untreated cells with anti-acetyl-histone H4 (Lys 16) polyclonal
antibody (Upstate Biotechnology) or antitubulin monoclonal antibody,
respectively. HU, hydroxyurea. (B) Chromatin association of Rad17 and
Rfc2 following MMS treatment. Cells were grown in 0.05% MMS. At the
indicated times, cells were fractionated as outlined for panel A and as
described in Materials and Methods. Spheroplasts were prepared from
cells containing rad17+:myc
(left panel) or rfc2+:HA
(right panel). Twenty micrograms of total protein, an equivalent volume
of the supernatant (Sup), and five volume equivalents of
chromatin-bound proteins (Chr) were fractionated on an 8% SDS gel and
analyzed by Western blotting with anti-myc monoclonal antibody (9E10).
(C) Chromatin association of Rad17 after ionizing radiation. Cells
containing rad17:myc were irradiated with 250 Gy and
recovered by incubation at 25°C for 20 min and fractionated as
described for panel A. (D) Total cell extracts were prepared under
denaturing conditions from wild-type (untagged
rad17+) and myc-tagged
rad17+ cells and were probed with anti-myc
antibody. The arrows mark the two forms of Rad17:myc.
|
|
We then analyzed chromatin association of Rad17:myc and Rfc2:HA in
MMS-treated cells. After incubation in MMS for 1.5 and
3 h, a
progressive increase of chromatin-bound Rad17 protein was
observed
(Fig.
1B, left panel). However, there was no discernable
difference in
the chromatin-bound Rfc2 protein levels between
cells treated or not
treated with MMS (Fig.
1B, middle). To test
whether the enhancement of
chromatin association of Rad17 is specific
to the MMS-induced damage,
we analyzed the effect of ionizing
radiation on Rad17 chromatin
association. Cells with myc-tagged
rad17+ were
irradiated with 250 Gy. At this dosage, more than 70% of
the
rad17+ cells survived irradiation
(
17). Similar to the DNA damage
induced by MMS treatment,
ionizing radiation induced an increase
of Rad17 binding to chromatin
(Fig.
1C). These results indicate
that DNA damage induced by either MMS
or ionizing irradiation
enhances the Rad17-chromatin
association.
We often observed that the myc-tagged Rad17 protein appears as a
doublet with a major protein of higher molecular mass and
a minor
protein with lower molecular mass (Fig.
1D). Both Rad17
protein bands
are chromatin bound. Phosphatase treatment did not
reduce the two Rad17
proteins to a single species, indicating
that the slower mobility form
is not a phosphorylated Rad17 protein.
Since the extracts were prepared
under denaturing conditions,
the observed lower-molecular-mass species
was not likely to be
a degradation
product.
Rad17 responds to S-phase arrest induced by nucleotide pool
depletion and the replication mutant by binding to chromatin in
different ways.
We then investigated the chromatin association of
Rad17, Rfc1, and Rfc2 after 1.5 and 3 h of incubation of the cells
in 12 mM hydroxyurea (Fig. 2A and B).
Since asynchronous fission yeast cells are predominantly in
G2 phase, cells had a 2C DNA content before hydroxyurea
treatment (Fig. 2A, 0 h FACS profile). After 1.5 h, cells
began to progress into S phase. After 3 h in hydroxyurea, a
majority population of the cells was arrested in early S phase, with a
1C FACS profile. Interestingly, after 1.5 h in hydroxyurea a large
fraction of the chromatin-bound Rad17 dissociated from the chromatin,
and after 3 h nearly all of the chromatin-bound Rad17 prior to
incubation in hydroxyurea dissociated from the chromatin (Fig. 2A). The
dissociation of Rad17 from the chromatin was not due to cell death,
since 100% of the cells are viable after 3 h in hydroxyurea (data
not shown). These results indicate that Rad17 responds to
hydroxyurea-induced S-phase block by dissociating from the chromatin.



View larger version (68K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
The chromatin binding of Rad17 in response to S-phase
perturbation. (A) The mid-log-phase
rad17+:myc strain was
incubated in medium containing 12 mM hydroxyurea. At the indicated
times, cell samples were removed for FACS analysis and chromatin
fractionation assay by probing with anti-myc monoclonal antibody. (B)
Rfc1 and Rfc2 were chromatin bound in cells grown in hydroxyurea.
Mid-log-phase cells expressed Rfc1:HA in a
rad17+ background, or Rfc2:HA in a
rad17+ or rad17 background was
incubated in medium with 12 mM hydroxyurea for 3 h. Chromatin
fractionation assay was performed and analyzed by Western blotting and
was probed with anti-HA monoclonal antibody. (C) Mid-log-phase cells of
rad17+:myc in a
cdc22-M45 background grown at 25°C were shifted to 36°C
for 3 h. Cell samples grown at 25 and 36°C were removed for
chromatin fractionation assay. (D) Mid-log-phase cells that expressed
Rad17:myc from genomic loci in cdc20 and
pol ts13 backgrounds grown at 25°C were shifted to
36°C for 2 h. Chromatin fractionation was performed, analyzed by
Western blotting, and probed with anti-myc monoclonal antibody. (E)
Mid-log-phase cells that expressed Rad17:myc from genomic loci in
cds1 and rad3 backgrounds were incubated in
media containing 12 mM hydroxyurea. Chromatin fractionation assay was
performed and analyzed by Western blotting and was probed with anti-myc
monoclonal antibody.
|
|
We then analyzed the chromatin binding statuses of Rfc1 and Rfc2 in the
hydroxyurea-arrested cells. After 3 h of incubation
in
hydroxyurea, Rfc1 in the
rad17+ background and
Rfc2 in either the
rad17+ or
rad17
background remained chromatin bound (Fig.
2B). Since
the Rfc1-5 complex
is required for replication, it is not surprising
that in spite of
Rad17 dissociating from the chromatin or in cells
with
rad17
, there are chromatin-bound Rfc1 and Rfc2 proteins
for replication
purposes.
To ascertain that Rad17 dissociates from the chromatin in response to
nucleotide pool depletion caused by hydroxyurea, we
tested the
chromatin binding status of Rad17 in response to S-phase
stall induced
by
cdc22-M45 mutant arrest.
cdc22 encodes the
large
subunit of ribonucleotide reductase, which physiologically mimics
the effects of hydroxyurea. We constructed a strain with myc-tagged
rad17+ in a
cdc22-M45 background and
compared the chromatin binding
status of Rad17 after incubation for
3 h at 25 and 36°C. Similar
to that found in hydroxyurea block,
the Rad17 that previously
bound to chromatin at 25°C dissociated from
the chromatin after
3 h at 36°C (Fig.
2C). Together, these
results indicate that Rad17
dissociates from the chromatin in response
to S-phase stall induced
by nucleotide pool
depletion.
Finding that Rad17 dissociates from chromatin in response to S-phase
stall induced by hydroxyurea and
cdc22-M45 mutant arrest
led
us to investigate Rad17 chromatin binding status in response
to S-phase
arrest by replication mutants. We constructed strains
with the
myc-tagged
rad17+ at their genomic loci in
thermosensitive replication mutant backgrounds
and tested the chromatin
binding of Rad17 in each strain after
incubation for 2 h at the
permissive or nonpermissive temperature
(Fig.
2D). Rad17 was chromatin
bound in cells arrested at G
1/S
phase by
cdc20
(
pol
mutant), consistent with previous findings
(
16). Rad17 was also chromatin bound in cells arrested in
early
S phase by
pol
ts13. Rad17 also remained chromatin
bound in cells
arrested in late S phase by mutants of Pol

subunits,
cdc27 and
cdc1 (data not shown). Thus, Rad17
binds to chromatin in response
to S-phase arrest induced by nucleotide
pool depletion and by
replication mutants by binding to chromatin in
different
ways.
Rad17 remains chromatin bound in hydroxyurea-arrested
cds1
cells.
Cds1 is thought to have a role in
maintaining genomic integrity. Upon hydroxyurea block, Cds1 kinase is
highly activated and Chk1 becomes phosphorylated in hydroxyurea only
when Cds1 is absent (22). Phosphorylation of Chk1 has been
correlated to cell cycle arrest (59), while cell cycle
arrest by a replication mutant results in moderate activation of Cds1
(4, 47) and phosphorylation of Chk1 (4, 11).
Findings that Rad17 dissociates in hydroxyurea-arrested cells (Fig.
2A)
but remains chromatin bound in replication mutant-arrested
cells (Fig.
2D) have led us to analyze the chromatin binding status
of Rad17 in
hydroxyurea-treated
cds1
and
rad3
cells.
After 3
h in hydroxyurea, Rad17 remained on chromatin in
cds1
and
rad3
cells (Fig.
2E). In contrast,
in
cds1+ cells Rad17 dissociated from chromatin
in a manner similar to
that observed above for Fig.
2A. Rad17 remained
chromatin bound
in
rad3
cells, since Rad3 is required for
Cds1 activation by
hydroxyurea (
22). These results suggest
that in response to
S-phase arrest by hydroxyurea, Rad17 does not bind
to chromatin
when Cds1 is fully activated, whereas Rad17 remains
chromatin
bound when Chk1 is activated by hydroxyurea in the absence of
Cds1 or in the replication
mutants.
Checkpoint-defective mutant Rad17(K118E) protein localizes in the
nucleus but has reduced ability to bind chromatin.
To further
investigate the relevance of Rad17-chromatin association in the
checkpoint process, we analyzed a checkpoint-defective mutant
protein, Rad17(K118E). Mutant rad17.K118E has a
checkpoint-defective phenotype of severity approaching that of
rad17
(17). We first analyzed whether the
checkpoint defect of rad17.K118E is due to the mutant
Rad17(K118E) protein's inability to enter the nucleus. Both wild-type
myc-tagged Rad17 and mutant myc-tagged Rad17(K118E) ectopically
expressed from the pREP41 vector in rad17
cells were found localized in the nucleus by immunofluorescence microscopy analysis (Fig. 3A).

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
The checkpoint-defective Rad17(k118E) mutant protein
localizes in the nucleus but has reduced ability to bind chromatin. (A)
Logarithmically growing rad17 cells harboring
pREP41-myc-rad17+ or
pREP41-myc-rad17.K118E and wild-type untagged
rad17+ cells were harvested and processed for
immunofluorescence analysis as described in Materials and Methods. (B)
Chromatin fractionation assay was performed with logarithmically
growing rad17 cells harboring
pREP41-myc-rad17+ or
pREP41-myc-rad17.K118E as described in Materials and
Methods. (C) Cds1 kinase activities of the
rad17+ wild type and mutant
rad17.K118E in the presence of 12 mM hydroxyurea. The
indicated strains were grown at 25°C in either the absence or
presence of 12 mM hydroxyurea for 3 h. Cds1 was immunoprecipitated
from 1 mg of soluble protein and assayed for kinase activity as
described in Materials and Methods (upper panel, 32P). The
relative amounts of Cds1 used in the kinase assay were estimated by
Western blotting (lower panel, anti-myc).
|
|
We then compared the chromatin association status of wild-type Rad17
and mutant Rad17(K118E). Equal levels of wild-type myc-Rad17
protein
and myc-Rad17(K118E) mutant proteins in total spheroplast
lysates (Fig.
3B, Total panel) were used for comparison. A significant
fraction of
wild-type Rad17 protein expressed from the pREP41
vector was chromatin
bound (Fig.
3B, Chr, left panel). In contrast,
only a nominal amount of
mutant Rad17(K118E) protein was chromatin
bound (Fig.
3B, Chr). Most of
the Rad17(K118E) proteins remained
in the soluble cytoplasmic fraction
(Fig.
3B, Sup). Thus, there
is a striking difference in chromatin
binding ability between
the Rad17 protein from a checkpoint-proficient
strain and that
from a checkpoint-deficient mutant strain. Furthermore,
the decreased
ability of Rad17(K118E) chromatin binding is not due to a
failure
of nuclear
import.
Cds1 kinase is activated by hydroxyurea in the checkpoint-defective
rad17.K118E mutant.
Mutant rad17.K118E is
highly sensitive to
irradiation but exhibits a 50% cell viability
after 3 h in hydroxyurea, while rad17
cells under
the same condition have less than 1% cell survival (17).
The ability of cells to maintain viability in hydroxyurea has been
attributed to the checkpoint Rad-dependent activation of the Cds1
protein kinase to prevent accumulation of aberrant DNA structures and
to enable recovery from the stalled replication structure caused by
hydroxyurea arrest (22). We tested whether the Cds1 kinase
activity could be activated in the checkpoint-defective strain of the
rad17.K118E mutant. Cds1 kinase activity in wild-type cells
was highly induced after incubation in hydroxyurea, as expected. Cds1
kinase was also substantially activated in the rad17.K118E mutant, whereas Cds1 was not activated by hydroxyurea in
rad17
cells (Fig. 3C).
Lys118 of Rad17 is involved in ATP binding and complex
formation with Rfc2.
We further compared the biochemical
properties of wild-type Rad17 and mutant Rad17(K118E) proteins in
vitro. The Lys118 in Rad17 is located within the proposed
nucleotide binding site of the Walker type A domain (17).
Molecular modeling of the Rad17 protein has suggested that Rad17
protein binds ATP via this residue (54). We therefore
tested the abilities of wild-type Rad17 and mutant Rad17(K118E)
proteins to bind ATP in vitro. Wild-type myc-tagged Rad17 and mutant
myc-tagged Rad17(K118E) proteins were purified from fission yeast cells
(Fig. 4A). Neither the purified wild-type
Rad17 nor the mutant Rad17(K118E) proteins had detectable ATPase
activity (data not shown). However, with identical amounts of wild-type
Rad17 or mutant Rad17(K118E) protein (Fig. 4B, lower panel), only
wild-type Rad17 was able to bind ATP when ATP was added simultaneously
with either oligonucleotides of 96 bases (96 mer) or single-stranded
M13 DNA followed by cross-linking with UV irradiation (Fig. 4B,
32P-ATP panel). These results indicate that mutation of
Lys118 to Glu abolishes the ATP binding capacity of the
Rad17 protein. Thus, the Lys118 of Rad17 protein is
involved in nucleotide binding.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Purified Rad17 protein, but not the checkpoint-defective
Rad17(K118E) mutant protein, binds ATP in vitro. (A) Silver-stained
polyacrylamide gel of 0.2 µg of purified wild-type Rad17 and mutant
Rad17(K118E) proteins. (B) Wild-type Rad17, but not mutant
Rad17(K118E), binds ATP. [ -32P]ATP was incubated with
purified Rad17 (left panel) or purified mutant Rad17(K118E) protein
(right panel) in the presence or absence of 96-mer oligonucleotide or
M13 DNA and was processed as described in Materials and Methods. The
bottom panel shows the Western blot analysis of the purified Rad17 and
Rad17(K118E) proteins used for the ATP binding assay.
|
|
Budding yeast Rad24p coimmunoprecipitates with the four small subunits
of Rfc but not with the large subunit, Rfc1p (
15),
and the
interaction between Rad24p and Rfc5p is required for checkpoint
function (
30,
44). We therefore tested whether the
Rad17(K118E)
mutant protein could form a complex with the Rfc small
subunits
in vivo. We transformed either
pREP41-
myc-rad17+ or
pREP41-
myc-rad17(K118E) into a
rad17
strain
containing either
HA-tagged
rfc1+ or HA-tagged
rfc2+ at their respective chromosomal loci (see
Materials and Methods).
Strains of
rad17
that expressed
epitope-tagged Rad17:myc from
pREP41 and Rfc1:HA or Rfc2:HA from their
genomic loci had identical
growth rates and sensitivities to
hydroxyurea, UV, and MMS as
the wild-type strain (data not shown),
indicating that those strains
do not have any significant biological
perturbations. Using these
strains, we tested the coimmunoprecipitation
of HA-tagged Rfc1
and HA-tagged Rfc2 with either myc-tagged
Rad17(K118E) or myc-tagged
wild-type Rad17. Anti-myc antibody (9E10)
was unable to immunoprecipitate
the 2×-myc-tagged Rad17 under the
conditions used. However, the
2×-myc-tagged Rad17 is readily
detectable by the anti-myc monoclonal
antibody in Western blotting of
the crude cell extracts. We therefore
used an anti-HA antibody (3F10)
to immunoprecipitate HA-Rfc1 or
HA-Rfc2 followed by testing the
immunoprecipitates for myc-Rad17
or myc-Rad17(K118E) by probing with
anti-myc
antibody.
Lysates from
rad17
strains that expressed either Rfc1:HA
or Rfc2:HA had comparable levels of Rad17:myc protein (Fig.
5A,
cell lysates panel). In
immunoprecipitates of anti-HA antibody
(3F10), no
detectable myc-Rad17 coprecipitated with HA-Rfc1 from
cell lysates of
the
rad17
strain expressing Rfc1:HA and Rad17:myc
(Fig.
5A, first lane), while the Rfc1:HA protein was present in
the
immunoprecipitate (Fig.
5A, third lane). In contrast, from
lysates of
the
rad17
strain expressing Rfc2:HA and Rad17:myc,
coimmunoprecipitation of Rad17:myc protein and Rfc2:HA was readily
detected (Fig.
5A, second lane). These results confirm the findings
by
others (
15,
30,
31,
43) that fission yeast Rad17, similar
to budding yeast Rad24p, exists in complex with Rfc small subunits
in
vivo but not with Rfc1 protein.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Rad17 from a checkpoint-defective mutant,
rad17.K118E, has reduced ability to associate with Rfc2. (A)
Wild-type Rad17 can complex with Rfc2 but not with Rfc1. Crude cell
lysates were prepared from 5 × 108
rad17 cells expressing either the HA-tagged
rfc1+ or HA-tagged rfc2+
at their endogenous chromosomal loci and myc-Rad17 from
pREP41-myc-rad17+. Cell lysates (300 µl)
containing 1 mg of protein were used for immunoprecipitation (IP)
by anti-HA antibody. The immunoprecipitates were Western blotted with
either anti-HA (right panel) or anti-myc monoclonal antibody (left
panel). (B) Mutant Rad17(K118E) from a checkpoint-defective strain has
significantly reduced ability to associate with Rfc2. Lysates from
5 × 108 rad17 cells containing
HA-tagged rfc2+ at its endogenous chromosomal
locus and pREP41-myc-rad(K118E) were prepared and
immunoprecipitated with anti-HA monoclonal antibody, and the
immunoprecipitates were analyzed as for panel A. The cell lysate panels
show that all strains have adequate expression of the epitope-tagged
proteins. (C) Association of wild-type Rad17 and mutant Rad17(K118E)
proteins with Rfc2 following MMS treatment. Strains described for
panels A and B were grown in 0.05% MMS for 3 h. Cells (5 × 108) were removed for immunoprecipitation with anti-HA
monoclonal antibody and were probed with anti-myc monoclonal antibody.
(D) Association of wild-type Rad17 and mutant Rad17(K118E) proteins
with Rfc2:HA following hydroxyurea (HU) treatment. Cells (5 × 108) from strains described for panels A and B were grown
in media containing 12 mM hydroxyurea for 3 h. Cell lysates were
prepared and immunoprecipitated with anti-HA monoclonal antibody and
Western blotted with anti-myc monoclonal antibody.
|
|
We next tested whether the Rad17(K118E) mutant protein was able to
coimmunoprecipitate with HA-tagged Rfc2 (Fig.
5B). With
comparable
levels of Rfc2:HA being immunoprecipitated, the amount
of
Rad17(K118E):myc mutant protein coprecipitated with Rfc2 was
much
smaller than the amount of wild-type Rad17:myc protein (compare
Fig.
5B, left panel, with the second lane in panel A). Thus, the
Rad17(K118E) mutant protein from the checkpoint-defective strain
not
only has significantly reduced ability to associate with chromatin
(Fig.
3B) and an inability to bind ATP in vitro (Fig.
4B) but
also has
a substantially reduced ability to complex with Rfc2
protein (Fig.
5B).
These results indicate that Lys
118 of Rad17 plays an
important role in ATP binding, in complex formation
with Rfc2, and in
chromatin
association.
We then investigated whether Rad17-Rfc2 complex formation could be
different in the wild-type and a checkpoint-defective mutant
Rad17
strain following DNA damage and S-phase perturbation. We
compared the
ability of wild-type Rad17 and mutant Rad17(K118E)
proteins to complex
with Rfc2 after MMS treatment. After incubation
of the
rad17
strains that expressed Rfc2:HA from genomic loci
and Rad17:myc or
Rad17(K118E):myc from pREP41 in MMS for 1.5 h,
levels of total
Rad17:myc protein expressed and levels of the
Rad17:myc protein
coimmunoprecipitated with Rfc2:HA were comparable
in the MMS-treated
and untreated cell lysates (Fig.
5C, left panel).
Again, a
significantly reduced amount of mutant Rad17(K118E):myc
protein was
coimmunoprecipitated with Rfc2:HA (Fig.
5C, right
panel). After
1.5 h of incubation in MMS, the level of mutant
Rad17(K118E)
protein in complex with Rfc2 seemed slightly reduced
(Fig.
5C, right
panel, compare + MMS and

MMS lanes). Thus, DNA
damage by
MMS treatment does not significantly affect complex
formation
between wild-type Rad17 and Rfc2 but does reduce the
ability of the
checkpoint-defective mutant Rad17(K118E) protein
to complex with
Rfc2.
We next tested whether hydroxyurea could affect the abilities of
wild-type Rad17 and mutant Rad17(K118E) proteins to associate
with
Rfc2.
rad17
strains that expressed Rfc2:HA from genomic
loci and Rad17:myc or Rad17(K118E):myc from pREP41 were grown
in
hydroxyurea for 3 h. With comparable levels of Rad17:myc and
Rad17(K118E):myc expressed in lysates of each strain, wild-type
Rad17:myc coimmunoprecipitated with Rfc2:HA with or without
hydroxyurea
(Fig.
5D, left panel), whereas significantly reduced
amounts of
the Rad17(K118E):myc protein coimmunoprecipitated with
Rfc2:HA
protein (Fig.
5D, right panel). Thus, S-phase arrest by
hydroxyurea
does not affect the ability of Rad17 to complex with Rfc2
but
further reduces the ability of Rad17(K118E) to associate with
Rfc2.
These experiments suggest that Rad17 exists in a complex with the small
subunits of Rfc protein and differentially associates
with or
dissociates from the chromatin in response to DNA damage
or S-phase
stall induced by
hydroxyurea.
Cells with rfc1
are checkpoint proficient.
Cells with deletions or mutations of RFC2, RFC3, and
RFC5 from budding yeast or fission yeast have been shown to
display checkpoint-deficient phenotypes (31, 38, 43-46).
Our finding that Rad17 coimmunoprecipitates with Rfc2 but not with Rfc1
(Fig. 5A) and the findings by others (15, 31, 38, 43-46)
strongly suggest that the small subunits of Rfc, Rfc2-5, are involved
in checkpoint function as well as in replication. This raises the
question, are there two distinct types of Rfc complexes in cells, one
essential for DNA replication and having Rfc1 in complex with Rfc2-5
and another involved in the checkpoint process and having Rad17 in
complex with Rfc2-5? To answer this question, we analyzed the phenotype
of cells with a deletion of rfc1+. A
heterozygous
rfc1+/rfc1::ura4+
diploid was constructed as described in Materials and Methods. Tetrad
analysis of the diploid yielded two viable
ura4
spores, indicating that
rfc1+ is essential for cell viability (Fig.
6B).
Analysis of the phenotype of the
germinating spores derived from this heterozygous diploid in selective
media for germination of rfc1
spores showed that germinating spores with rfc1
displayed elongated cell
morphology (Fig. 6C). Analysis of the FACS profiles of the germinating
rfc1+ wild-type spores showed that the
rfc1+ germinating spores completed S phase after
16 h, displaying a 2C DNA profile. The rfc1
germinating spores displayed a >2C DNA profile after 14 h which
reflected the elongated cdc phenotype (Fig. 6D and E). This result
indicates that cells in the absence of rfc1+ are
proficient in cell cycle checkpoint response. Thus, Rfc1, in contrast
to Rfc2 and Rfc3, does not have a role in checkpoint function.

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Cells with deletion of rfc1 are checkpoint
proficient. (A) Restriction map and open reading frame (ORF) of
rfc1+. A 1.8-kb ura4+
gene cassette was used to replace 1.7 kb of the
EcoRI-PstI coding region as described in
Materials and Methods. (B) rfc1+ is an essential
gene. Spores derived from the heterozygous diploid
rfc1+/rfc1 were analyzed by tetrad
dissection after incubation on yeast extract agar plates at 30°C for
4 days. The 2:2 segregation of the germinating spores indicates that
rfc1+ is essential for cell viability. (C)
Germinating rfc1 spores have elongated cell morphology.
Shown are cells derived from a single germinating spore. (D) Cells with
rfc1 have intact checkpoint processes. DAPI staining of
germinating rfc1 spores having elongated cell morphology
and normal nuclear morphology is shown. (E) FACS profiles. Heterozygous
diploid rfc1+/rfc1 and control
ura4+/ura4D-18 diploid cells were
germinated at 30°C in minimal media lacking uracil. Germinating
spores were collected every 2 h, fixed with 70% ethanol, and
analyzed by FACS as described in Materials and Methods. The positions
of 1C and 2C DNA peaks are indicated.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
In this study we investigated the significance of Rad17 chromatin
binding. We showed the following results. (i) Following DNA damage,
increased levels of Rad17 protein bind to chromatin. (ii) In response
to S-phase perturbation induced by nucleotide pool depletion, Rad17
dissociates from the chromatin, whereas Rad17 remains chromatin bound
during replication mutant arrest. (iii) In contrast to Rad17 protein in
cds1+ cells, Rad17 remains chromatin bound in
hydroxyurea-treated cds1
cells. (iv) Rad17 protein from a
checkpoint-defective mutant, rad17.K118E, is unable to bind
ATP in vitro and has significantly reduced ability to associate with
chromatin and to complex with Rfc2 in vivo; however, Cds1 kinase can be
activated by hydroxyurea in these mutant cells. (v) Rad17 exists in a
complex with Rfc2 but not with Rfc1. The Rad17 protein associates with
Rfc2 even under DNA damage by MMS or S-phase stall by hydroxyurea,
while Rfc1 is not involved in checkpoint function. These results
suggest that a fraction of Rad17 in a complex with the small subunits of Rfc proteins binds to chromatin in response to the aberrant genomic
structures and may function as a part of the checkpoint process. We
discuss this hypothesis below and propose a model of how the Rad17-Rfc
small-subunit complex responds to different replication and damage
structures by differentially binding to chromatin (Fig.
7).

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
A proposed model illustrating how Rad17 binds to
chromatin in response to aberrant genomic structures induced by damage,
replication mutant arrest, and hydroxyurea block in the presence or
absence of an activated Cds1 kinase. P, phosphorylation.
|
|
Rad17 binds to chromatin in response to aberrant genomic
structures.
We showed in this study that Rad17 binds to chromatin
(i) following DNA damage (Fig. 1), (ii) following replication mutant arrest (Fig. 2D), and (iii) in hydroxyurea-arrested cds1
cells (Fig. 2E). DNA damage induced by MMS treatment or ionizing
radiation causes aberrant genomic structures and Chk1 phosphorylation
(59). S-phase arrest by replication mutants compromises
the replication complex or delays the progression of replication
forking, which could result in a mutagenic genomic structure, such as a
long stretch of single-strand template and double-strand breaks
(23, 50). These could induce a moderate activation of Cds1
and phosphoryation of Chk1 (4, 47). Hydroxyurea treatment
highly activates Cds1 kinase activity, which is thought to protect the
genome from deterioration (22). In cds1
cells, in the absence of Cds1 the aberrant replication complex or
structure might further deteriorate, which induces phosphorylation of
Chk1 (22). Since in hydroxyurea arrested cells
damage-induced phosphoryation of Chk1 is prevented,
hydroxyurea-activated Cds1 is thought to suppress a repair process and
Chk1 phosphorylation (6). Together, results of these Cds1
studies suggest that hydroxyurea-activated Cds1 is involved in a
process that prevents aberrant genomic structure formation and
induction of Chk1 phosphorylation. We showed here that DNA damage
enhances Rad17 chromatin association (Fig. 1), and Rad17 remains
chromatin bound following a replication mutant arrest and in
hydroxyurea-arrested cds1
cells (Fig. 2). Our results thus suggest that Rad17 binds to chromatin or remains on the chromatin in response to the aberrant genomic structures that may lead to phosphorylation of Chk1 to prevent cell cycle progression (Fig. 7).
How might Rad17 dissociate from the chromatin in hydroxyurea-treated
cds1+ cells? In hydroxyurea-treated
cds1+ cells, Cds1 kinase is highly activated.
Thus, the integrity of
the replication complex or replication fork is
being protected
from deterioration into aberrant genomic structures by
the activated
Cds1 (
22). If Cds1 is activated by
hydroxyurea, there would
be no aberrant genomic structure or
phosphorylation of Chk1. Thus,
Rad17 is not required to bind to
chromatin, resulting in dissociation
from chromatin (Fig.
2A and
7).
Consistent with these notions,
rad17
cells in which Cds1
cannot be activated by hydroxyurea (
22) are highly
sensitive to
hydroxyurea, with less than 1% cell survival after 3 h in hydroxyurea,
whereas mutant
rad17.K118E cells with an
activated Cds1 (Fig.
3C) have 50% cell survival. Moreover, in the
rad17.K118E mutant,
Chk1 is not phosphorylated in
MMS-induced DNA damage (data not
shown), and mutant
Rad17(K118E) protein has a substantially reduced
ability to
bind chromatin (Fig.
5B). Furthermore,
rad17
cells
with
an overexpression of Rad17(K118E) from pREP41 had 80% cell
survival in
hydroxyurea; however, the overexpression of Rad17(K118E)
was unable to
suppress the MMS sensitivity of
rad17
cells (data
not
shown). Together, these results suggest that a fraction of
Rad17 binds
to chromatin in response to the presence of aberrant
genomic
structures, either participating in maintaining the genomic
integrity
or in signalling downstream checkpoint and repair
processes.
These data led us to propose a model where Rad17 is not required to
associate with chromatin when the genomic structures are
being
protected by hydroxyurea-activated Cds1. Rad17 binds to
chromatin when
genomic structures are aberrant without protection
by a
hydroxyurea-activated Cds1, and the aberrant genomic structures
induce
phosphorylation of Chk1 (Fig.
7).
What event(s) might be induced by Rad17 chromatin binding?
It
has been suggested that double-strand-break formation is intrinsic
to S-phase progression (37). One possible event is that
Rad17 remains on the chromatin throughout the cell cycle, and following
recognition of an aberrant genomic structure by Rad3, additional Rad17
proteins are induced to bind chromatin to initiate damage processing.
Human Rad1 protein has been reported to encode a 3'-to-5' exonuclease
(35), and human Rad9 has been shown in vitro as being a
3'-to-5' exonuclease (3). Rad1 and Rad9 form a protein
complex with Hus1B (8), and molecular modeling has
predicted that this complex has structural similarity to the PCNA
sliding clamp (8, 48, 54). In two-hybrid reactions, Rad17
interacts with Rad1 and nuclear localization of Hus1B and Rad9 requires
Rad17 (8). Two studies of human checkpoint proteins have
also shown that in response to diverse DNA damage agents and
hydroxyurea, human Rad9 is converted into an extraction-resistant nuclear form (7). In vitro, human Rad17 interacts with
human Rad1, Rad9, and Hus1 in a checkpoint clamp-loading complex
similar to that of a replication clamp loader (54). It is
possible that chromatin binding of the Rad17-Rfc small-subunit complex
may function as a signal in loading Rad1-Rad9-Hus1 onto the aberrant
DNA structures for processing the lesion.
How could mutation of Rad17 at Lys118 to Glu cause a
checkpoint defect?
Of the six site-directed mutations introduced
into Rad17, the rad17.K118E mutant is the only mutant that
displays a checkpoint-deficient phenotype of severity approaching that
of rad17
(17). Lys118 is in a
domain that has sequence similarity to the Walker type A domain in a
proposed nucleotide phosphate binding P-loop (51, 58).
Rad17 protein purified from the checkpoint-defective
rad17.K118E mutant failed to bind ATP (Fig. 4B). This
indicates that the basic Lys118 residue is indeed a residue
critical for ATP binding and supports the structure-based prediction
that Lys118 in the P-loop directly contacts the phosphate
moiety of ATP (54).
The replication complex of Rfc1-5 is the eukaryotic homologue of the
prokaryotic replication clamp loader, the

-complex of
Escherichia coli Pol III (
34,
52). In
E. coli Pol III, the

-complex harnesses energy from ATP binding,
which induces a conformational
change of the

-complex, allowing it
to load the

clamp onto
DNA for processive DNA synthesis
(
52). The predicted molecular
model of Rad17 has also
suggested that ATP binding of Rad17 might
induce changes in orientation
between the N terminus and linker
domains of Rad17 and that mutation of
Lys
118 to Glu would result in an unfavorable electrostatic
interaction
with ATP (
54). Similar to the prokaryotic

-complex clamp loader,
ATP binding of Rad17 may induce a
conformational change which
may be required for the proper assembly of
the Rad17-Rfc small-subunit
complex. The inability of the mutant
Rad17(K118E) protein to bind
ATP may fail to induce a conformational
change of the mutant protein,
thus precluding proper assembly of the
Rad17-Rfc small-subunit
complex and chromatin association. Compared to
wild-type Rad17,
Rad17(K118E) has a substantially reduced ability to
complex with
Rfc2, whereas wild-type Rad17 is able to complex with Rfc2
following
replication perturbation or DNA damage (Fig.
5B, C, and D).
Moreover,
the reduced ability of Rad17(K118E) to bind chromatin is not
due
to its lack of nuclear import ability (Fig.
3A). Thus, a properly
assembled Rad17-Rfc2-5 complex associating with chromatin may
be a
prerequisite for a Rad17-mediated checkpoint process, and
mutation of
Lys
118 in
rad17.K118E would have a
checkpoint-deficient
phenotype.
There are two distinct types of Rfc complexes in cells.
Rfc is
a five-subunit protein complex that is an essential factor for DNA
replication (57). Genetic studies have shown that Rfc
small subunits, in addition to functioning in replication, are also
involved in the mitotic checkpoint (31, 38, 43, 46). In
support of this notion, we have demonstrated in this study that cells
with a deletion of rfc1 are checkpoint proficient (Fig. 6).
Thus, there are two distinct types of Rfc complexes in cells. Rfc1-5
complex functions in replication and constitutively binds to chromatin
as a replication-processive clamp loader. Rfc2-5-Rad17 complex
functions in the checkpoint process and binds to chromatin in response
to the presence of aberrant genomic structures.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank A. M. Carr for providing us with the myc-tagged
rad17 strain, mutant rad17(K118E) strain, and
plasmids pREP-myc-rad17 and
pREP-myc-rad17(K118E). We also thank Hiroto Okayama for
allowing Hiroyuki Tanaka to perform the rfc1 gene disruption
experiment in his laboratory. We especially thank members of our
laboratory for helpful discussion during the course of this work and
R. E. Davis for his help in large-scale Rad17 protein purification.
This study was supported by grant CA54415 from the National Cancer
Institute of the National Institutes of Health.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Dr.,
Stanford, CA 94305-5324. Phone: (650) 725-4907. Fax: (650) 725-6902. E-mail: twang{at}cmgm.stanford.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Al-Khodairy, F.,
E. Fotou,
K. S. Sheldrick,
D. J. Griffiths,
A. R. Lehmann, and A. M. Carr.
1994.
Identification and characterization of new elements involved in checkpoint and feedback controls in fission yeast.
Mol. Biol. Cell
5:147-160[Abstract].
|
| 2.
|
Bahler, J.,
J. Q. Wu,
M. S. Longtine,
N. G. Shah,
A. McKenzie,
A. B. Steever,
A. Wach,
P. Philippsen, and J. R. Pringle.
1998.
Heterologous modules for efficient and versatile PCR-based gene targeting in Schizosaccharomyces pombe.
Yeast
14:943-951[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Bessho, T., and A. Sancar.
2000.
Human DNA damage checkpoint protein hRAD9 is a 3' to 5' exonuclease.
J. Biol. Chem.
275:7451-7454[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Bhaumik, D., and T. S.-F. Wang.
1998.
Mutational effect of fission yeast Pol on cell cycle events.
Mol. Biol. Cell
9:2107-2123[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Boddy, M. N.,
B. Furnari,
O. Mondesert, and P. Russell.
1998.
Replication checkpoint enforced by kinase Cds1 and Chk1.
Science
280:909-912[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Brondello, J.-M.,
M. N. Broddy,
B. Furnari, and P. Russell.
1999.
Basis for the checkpoint signal specificity that regulates Chk1 and Cds1 protein kinases.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19:4262-4269[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Burtelow, M. A.,
S. H. Kaufmann, and L. M. Karnitz.
2000.
Retention of the hRad9 checkpoint complex in extraction-resistant nuclear complexes after DNA damage.
J. Biol. Chem.
275:26343-26348[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Caspari, T.,
M. Dahlen,
G. Kanter-Smoler,
H. D. Lindsay,
K. Hoffmann,
K. Papadimitriou,
P. Sunnerhagen, and A. M. Carr.
2000.
Characterization of Schizosaccharomyces pombe Hus1: a PCNA-related protein that associates with Rad1 and Rad9.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
74:1254-1262.
|
| 9.
|
Edwards, P. J.,
N. J. Bentley, and A. M. Carr.
1999.
A Rad3-Rad26 complex responds to DNA damage independently of other checkpoint proteins.
Nat. Cell Biol.
1:393-398[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Elledge, S. J.
1996.
Cell cycle checkpoints: preventing an identity crisis.
Science
274:1664-1672[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Francesconi, S.,
M. Grenon,
D. Bouvier, and G. Baldacci.
1997.
p56chk1 protein kinase is required for the DNA replication checkpoint at 37°C in fission yeast.
EMBO J.
16:1332-1341[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Furnari, B.,
A. Blasina,
M. N. Boddy,
C. H. McGowan, and P. Russell.
1999.
Cdc25 inhibited in vivo and in vitro by checkpoint kinases Cds1 and Chk1.
Mol. Biol. Cell
10:833-845[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Furnari, B.,
N. Rhind, and P. Russell.
1997.
Cdc25 mitotic inducer targeted by chk1 DNA damage checkpoint kinase.
Science
277:1495-1497[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Gardner, R.,
C. W. Putnam, and T. Weinert.
1999.
RAD53, DUN1 and PDS1 defines two parallel G2/M checkpoint pathways in budding yeast.
EMBO J.
18:3173-3185[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Green, C. M.,
H. Erdjument-Bromage,
P. Tempst, and N. F. Lowneds.
1999.
A novel Rad24 checkpoint protein complex closely related to replication factor C.
Curr. Biol.
10:39-42.
|
| 16.
|
Griffiths, D.,
M. Uchiyama,
P. Nurse, and T. S.-F. Wang.
2000.
A novel allele of the chromatin-bound fission yeast checkpoint protein Rad17 separates the DNA structure checkpoints.
J. Cell. Sci.
113:1075-1088[Abstract].
|
| 17.
|
Griffiths, D. J. F.,
N. C. Barbet,
S. McCready,
A. R. Lehmann, and A. M. Carr.
1995.
Fission yeast rad17: a homologue of budding yeast RAD24 that shares regions of sequence similarity with DNA polymerase accessory proteins.
EMBO J.
14:5812-5823[Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Gutz, H.,
H. Heslot,
U. Leupold, and N. Loprieno.
1974.
Schizosaccharomyces pombe, p. 395-446.
In
R. C. King (ed.), Handbook of genetics 1, vol. I. Plenum Press, New York, N.Y.
|
| 19.
|
Hartwell, L. H., and M. B. Kastan.
1994.
Cell cycle control and cancer.
Science
266:1821-1828[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Hartwell, L. H., and T. A. Weinert.
1989.
Checkpoints: controls that ensure the order of cell cycle events.
Science
246:629-634[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
Kostrub, C. F.,
K. Knudsen,
S. Subramani, and T. Enoch.
1998.
Hus1p, a conserved fission yeast checkpoint protein, interacts with Rad1p and is phosphorylated in response to DNA damage.
EMBO J.
17:2055-2066[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Lindsay, H. D.,
D. J. F. Griffiths,
R. Edwards,
J. M. Murray,
P. U. Christensen,
N. Walworth, and A. M. Carr.
1998.
S-phase specific activation of Cds1 kinase defines a subpathway of the checkpoint response in S. pombe.
Genes Dev.
12:382-395[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Liu, V. F.,
D. Bhaumik, and T. S.-F. Wang.
1999.
Mutator phenotype induced by aberrant replication.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19:1126-1135[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
Lydall, D., and T. Weinert.
1997.
G2/M checkpoint genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: further evidence for roles in DNA replication and/or repair.
Mol. Gen. Genet.
256:638-651[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 25.
|
Lydall, D., and T. A. Weinert.
1995.
Yeast checkpoint genes in DNA damage processing: implications for repair and arrest.
Science
270:1488-1491[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Maniatis, T.,
E. F. Fritsch, and J. Sambrook.
1982.
Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 27.
|
Michelson, R., and T. Weinert.
1999.
Sensor-less checkpoint activation?
Nat. Cell Biol.
1:177-178.
|
| 28.
|
Moreno, S.,
A. Klar, and P. Nurse.
1991.
Molecular genetic analysis of fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe.
Methods Enzymol.
194:795-823[Medline].
|
| 29.
|
Murakami, H., and H. Okayama.
1995.
A kinase from fission yeast responsible for blocking mitosis in S phase.
Nature
374:817-819[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 30.
|
Naiki, T.,
T. Shimomura,
T. Kondo,
K. Matsumoto, and K. Sugimoto.
2000.
Rfc5, in coorperation with Rad24, conrols DNA damage checkpoints throughout the cell cycle in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20:5888-5896[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 31.
|
Noskov, V. N.,
H. Araki, and A. Sugino.
1998.
The RFC2 gene, encoding the third-largest subunit of the replication factor C complex, is required for an S-phase checkpoint in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:4914-4923[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 32.
|
O'Connell, M. J.,
J. M. Raleigh,
H. M. Verkade, and P. Nurse.
1997.
Chk1 is a wee1 kinase in the G2 DNA damage checkpoint inhibiting cdc2 by Y15 phosphorylation.
EMBO J.
16:545-554[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 33.
|
O'Connell, M. J.,
N. C. Walworth, and A. M. Carr.
2000.
The G2-phase DNA damage checkpoint.
Trends Cell Biol.
10:296-303[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 34.
|
O'Donnell, M.,
R. Onrust,
F. B. Dean,
M. Chen, and J. Hurwitz.
1993.
Homology in accessory proteins of replicative polymerases E. coli to humans.
Nucleic Acids Res.
21:1-3[Free Full Text].
|
| 35.
|
Parker, A. E.,
I. V. D. Weyer,
M. C. Laus,
I. Oostveen,
J. Yon,
P. Verhasselt, and W. H. M. L. Luyten.
1998.
A human homolog of the Schizosaccharomyces pombe rad1+ checkpoint gene encodes an exonuclease.
J. Biol. Chem.
273:18332-18339[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 36.
|
Pasion, S. G., and S. L. Forsburg.
1999.
Nuclear localization of Schizosaccharomyces pombe Mcm2/Cdc19p requires MCM complex assembly.
Mol. Biol. Cell
10:4043-4057[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 37.
|
Petrini, J. H. J.
2000.
The Mre11 complex and ATM: collaborating to navigate S phase.
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
12:293-296[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 38.
|
Reynolds, N.,
P. A. Fantes, and S. A. MacNeill.
1999.
A key role of replication factor C in DNA replication checkpoint function in fission yeast.
Nucleic Acids Res.
27:462-469[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 39.
|
Rhind, N., and P. Russell.
2000.
Chk1 and Cds1: linchpins of the DNA damage and replication checkpoint pathways.
J. Cell Sci.
113:3889-3896[Abstract].
|
| 40.
|
Rhind, N., and P. Russell.
1998.
Mitotic DNA damage and replication checkpoints in yeast.
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
10:749-758[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 41.
|
Rhind, N., and P. Russell.
1998.
The Schizosaccharomyces pombe S-phase checkpoint differentiates between different types of DNA damage.
Genetics
149:1729-1737[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 42.
|
Saka, Y.,
P. Fantes, and M. Yanagida.
1994.
Coupling of DNA replication and mitosis by fission yeast rad4/cut5.
J. Cell Sci.
18(Suppl.):57-61.
|
| 43.
|
Shimada, M.,
D. Okuzaki,
S. Tanaka,
T. Tougan,
K. K. Tamai,
C. Shimoda, and H. Nojima.
1999.
Rfc3 of Schizosaccharomyces pombe, a small subunit of replication factor C complex, is required for both replication and damage checkpoints.
Mol. Biol. Cell
10:3991-4003[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 44.
|
Shimomura, T.,
S. Ando,
K. Matsumoto, and K. Sugimoto.
1998.
Functional and physical interaction between Rad24 and Rfc5 in the yeast checkpoint pathways.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:5485-5491[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 45.
|
Sugimoto, K.,
S. Ando,
T. Shimomura, and K. Matsumoto.
1997.
Rfc5, a replication factor C component, is required for regulation of Rad53 protein kinase in the yeast checkpoint pathway.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17:5905-5914[Abstract].
|
| 46.
|
Sugimoto, K.,
T. Shimomura,
K. Hashimoto,
H. Araki,
A. Sugino, and K. Matsumoto.
1996.
Rfc5, a small subunit of replication factor C complex, couples DNA replication and mitosis in budding yeast.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:7048-7052[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 47.
|
Tan, S., and T. S.-F. Wang.
2000.
Analysis of fission yeast primase defines the checkpoint responses to aberrant S phase initiation.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20:7853-7866[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 48.
|
Thelen, M. P.,
C. Venclovas, and K. Fidelis.
1999.
A sliding clamp model for the Rad1 family of cell cycle checkpoint proteins.
Cell
96:769-770[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 49.
|
Torre-Ruiz, M. A. D. L.,
C. M. Green, and N. F. Lowndes.
1998.
Rad9 and Rad24 define two additive, interacting branches of the DNA damage checkpoint pathway in budding yeast normally required for Rad53 modification and activation.
EMBO J.
17:2687-2698[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 50.
|
Tran, H. T.,
N. P. Degtyareva,
N. N. Koloteva,
A. Sugino,
H. Msumoto,
D. A. Gordenin, and M. A. Resnick.
1995.
Replication slippage between distant short repeats in Saccharomyces cerevisiae depends on the direction of replication and RAD50 and RAD52 genes.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15:5607-5617[Abstract].
|
| 51.
|
Traut, W.
1994.
The function and consensus motifs of nine types of peptide segments that form different types of nucleotide binding sites.
Eur. J. Biochem.
222:9-19[Medline].
|
| 52.
|
Turner, J.,
M. M. Hingorani,
Z. Kelman, and M. O'Donnell.
1999.
The internal working of a DNA polymerase clamp-loading machine.
EMBO J.
18:771-783[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 53.
|
Uchiyama, M.,
I. Galli,
D. J. F. Griffiths, and T. S.-F. Wang.
1997.
A novel mutant allele of Schizosaccharomyces pombe rad26 defective in monitoring S phase progression to prevent premature mitosis.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17:3103-3115[Abstract].
|
| 54.
|
Venclovas, C., and M. P. Thelen.
2000.
Structure-based predictions of Rad1, Rad9, Hus1 and Rad17 participation in sliding clamp and clamp-loading complexes.
Nucleic Acids Res.
28:2481-2493[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 55.
|
Volkmer, E., and L. M. Karnitz.
1999.
Human homologs of Schizosaccharomyces pombe Rad1, Hus1, and Rad9 form a DNA damage-responsive protein complex.
J. Biol. Chem.
274:567-570[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 56.
|
Waga, S., and B. Stillman.
1994.
Anatomy of a DNA replication fork revealed by reconstitution of SV40 DNA replication in vitro.
Nature
369:207-212[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 57.
|
Waga, S., and B. Stillman.
1998.
The DNA replication fork in eukaryotic cells.
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
67:721-751[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 58.
|
Walker, J. E.,
M. Saraste,
M. J. Runswick, and N. J. Gay.
1982.
Distantly related sequences in the - and -subunits of ATP synthase, myosin, kinase and other ATP-requiring enzymes and a common nucleotide binding fold.
EMBO J.
1:945-951[Medline].
|
| 59.
|
Walworth, N. C., and R. Bernards.
1996.
rad-dependent response of the chk1-encoded protein kinase at the DNA damage checkpoint.
Science
271:353-356[Abstract].
|
| 60.
|
Zeng, Y.,
K. C. Forbes,
Z. Wu,
S. Moreno,
H. Piwnica-Worms, and T. Enoch.
1998.
Replication checkpoint requires phosphorylation of the phosphatase Cdc25 by Cds1 or Chk1.
Nature
395:507-510[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 61.
|
Zhang, G.,
E. Gibbs,
Z. Kelman,
M. O'Donnell, and J. Hurwitz.
1999.
Studies on the interactions between human replication factor C and human proliferating cell nuclear antigen.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
96:1869-1874[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Molecular and Cellular Biology, May 2001, p. 3289-3301, Vol. 21, No. 10
0270-7306/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/MCB.21.10.3289-3301.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Porter-Goff, M. E., Rhind, N.
(2009). The Role of MRN in the S-Phase DNA Damage Checkpoint Is Independent of Its Ctp1-dependent Roles in Double-Strand Break Repair and Checkpoint Signaling. Mol. Biol. Cell
20: 2096-2107
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Dutta, C., Patel, P. K., Rosebrock, A., Oliva, A., Leatherwood, J., Rhind, N.
(2008). The DNA Replication Checkpoint Directly Regulates MBF-Dependent G1/S Transcription. Mol. Cell. Biol.
28: 5977-5985
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kim, J., Robertson, K., Mylonas, K. J. L., Gray, F. C., Charapitsa, I., MacNeill, S. A.
(2005). Contrasting effects of Elg1-RFC and Ctf18-RFC inactivation in the absence of fully functional RFC in fission yeast. Nucleic Acids Res
33: 4078-4089
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kai, M., Boddy, M. N., Russell, P., Wang, T. S.-F.
(2005). Replication checkpoint kinase Cds1 regulates Mus81 to preserve genome integrity during replication stress. Genes Dev.
19: 919-932
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Nakamura, T. M., Du, L.-L., Redon, C., Russell, P.
(2004). Histone H2A Phosphorylation Controls Crb2 Recruitment at DNA Breaks, Maintains Checkpoint Arrest, and Influences DNA Repair in Fission Yeast. Mol. Cell. Biol.
24: 6215-6230
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Shiomi, Y., Shinozaki, A., Sugimoto, K., Usukura, J., Obuse, C., Tsurimoto, T.
(2004). The reconstituted human Chl12-RFC complex functions as a second PCNA loader. GENES CELLS
9: 279-290
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Post, S. M., Tomkinson, A. E., Lee, E. Y.-H. P.
(2003). The human checkpoint Rad protein Rad17 is chromatin-associated throughout the cell cycle, localizes to DNA replication sites, and interacts with DNA polymerase {epsilon}. Nucleic Acids Res
31: 5568-5575
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Jones, R. E., Chapman, J. R., Puligilla, C., Murray, J. M., Car, A. M., Ford, C. C., Lindsay, H. D.
(2003). XRad17 Is Required for the Activation of XChk1 But Not XCds1 during Checkpoint Signaling in Xenopus. Mol. Biol. Cell
14: 3898-3910
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kai, M., Wang, T. S.-F.
(2003). Checkpoint activation regulates mutagenic translesion synthesis. Genes Dev.
17: 64-76
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Tanaka, H., Ryu, G.-H., Seo, Y.-S., Tanaka, K., Okayama, H., MacNeill, S. A., Yuasa, Y.
(2002). The fission yeast pfh1+ gene encodes an essential 5' to 3' DNA helicase required for the completion of S-phase. Nucleic Acids Res
30: 4728-4739
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Stokes, M. P., Van Hatten, R., Lindsay, H. D., Michael, W. M.
(2002). DNA replication is required for the checkpoint response to damaged DNA in Xenopus egg extracts. JCB
158: 863-872
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Nakamura, T. M., Moser, B. A., Russell, P.
(2002). Telomere Binding of Checkpoint Sensor and DNA Repair Proteins Contributes to Maintenance of Functional Fission Yeast Telomeres. Genetics
161: 1437-1452
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hong, E.-J. E., Roeder, G. S.
(2002). A role for Ddc1 in signaling meiotic double-strand breaks at the pachytene checkpoint. Genes Dev.
16: 363-376
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Abraham, R. T.
(2001). Cell cycle checkpoint signaling through the ATM and ATR kinases. Genes Dev.
15: 2177-2196
[Full Text]