Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Molecular and Cellular Biology, May 2001, p. 3351-3363, Vol. 21, No. 10
INSERM U469, 34094 Montpellier Cedex 5, France
Received 12 September 2000/Returned for modification 21 November
2000/Accepted 16 February 2001
Given the importance of intercellular adhesion for many regulatory
processes, we have investigated the control of protein kinase
C Several years ago, we have shown
that in a cell subpopulation of human pituitary and thyroid tumors,
protein kinase C Epithelial cell-cell contacts involve extremely well-organized
macromolecular structures. The transmembrane core of the adherence junction (localized at cell-cell contacts) is constituted by
E-cadherin, which binds Localization of inactive PKC is essentially cytoplasmic. When
stimulated, it interacts with membranes, including the plasma membrane,
through at least two different mechanisms: a direct interaction with
phospholipids (in particular phosphatidylserin) or an indirect
interaction via anchoring proteins such as RACK1 (receptor for
activated kinase C 1). It has been suggested that a progressive
decrease in the level of RACK1 is responsible for the decrease in PKC
accumulation at the plasma membrane observed in the process of
aging (6). RACK1 has also been suggested to be an
intracellular PKC shuttling protein for PKC We show here that cell-cell contact targeting is highly regulated
since, in the presence of the D294G point mutation, hPKC Materials.
PMA, histone IIIS, phalloidin, cytochalasin D,
goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin M (IgM; µ-chain specific)-agarose
beads, goat anti-rabbit IgG-tetramethyl rhodamine isocyanate (TRITC),
and phosphatidylserine were purchased from Sigma (Saint Quentin
Fallavier, France). Restriction enzymes were from Promega
(Charbonnières, France). Taq DNA polymerase, Ham F-10
and horse serum were from Eurobio (Les Ulis, France). ExGen 500 (linear
polyethyleneimine) and monoclonal anti-PKC Construction of plasmids encoding fusion proteins.
The GFP
fusion proteins used in transient-transfection experiments are
schematically represented in Fig. 1A. The hPKC
0270-7306/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/MCB.21.10.3351-3363.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
A Single Point Mutation in the V3 Region Affects Protein Kinase
C
Targeting and Accumulation at Cell-Cell Contacts
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
(PKC
) targeting to the cell-cell contacts. We have previously shown that, upon treatment of the pituitary cell line GH3B6
with thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) or phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA), human PKC
(hPKC
) is selectively
targeted to the cell-cell contacts (42). Here we show that
the D294G mutation of hPKC
, previously identified in a subpopulation
of human tumors, induces the loss of this selective targeting. The
D294G mutant is instead targeted to the entire plasma membrane,
including the cell-cell contacts, and the duration of the first rapid
and transient translocation induced by TRH (42) is longer
than that of the wild-type enzyme (93.3 versus 22.5 s), coinciding
with the duration of the [Ca2+]i increase. We
found that in the presence or absence of PMA, RACK1 is never localized
at the cell-cell contacts nor was it coimmunoprecipitated with hPKC
wild type or the D294G mutant. In contrast, PMA treatment or long-term
TRH stimulation resulted in the presence of F-actin and
-catenin at
the cell-cell contacts and their exclusion from the rest of the plasma
membrane. Upon disruption of the F-actin network with phalloidin or
cytochalasin D, wild-type hPKC
translocates but did not accumulate
at the plasma membrane and
-catenin did not accumulate at the
cell-cell contacts. In contrast, the disruption of the F-actin network
affected neither translocation nor accumulation of the D294G mutant.
These results show that the presence of PKC
at the cell-cell
contacts is a regulated process which depends upon the integrity of
both PKC
and the actin microfilament network.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
(PKC
) bore a point mutation at position 294, resulting in the substitution of an aspartic acid by a glycin (2,
31). The analysis of the biochemical properties of the D294G
mutant and of the phenotype of embryonic fibroblasts stably transfected
with it revealed a selective loss of recognition of substrates having
characteristics of anchoring proteins (32) and a dramatic
decrease in the dependence on serum growth factors for proliferation
(3). In Rat6 fibroblasts stably transfected with human
PKC
(hPKC
) or its mutant and treated with phorbol
12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) for 1 h, the D294G mutant localized
in the lysosome compartment (unpublished data), whereas wild-type
hPKC
(hPKC
-wt) localized at the plasma membrane but not
selectively at cell-cell contacts (3). Fibroblasts and
epithelial cells are very different in many features. We therefore changed our model to the GH3B6 epithelial pituitary cell line. In this
cell line, we found that PKC
is selectively targeted to the
cell-cell contacts upon thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) or PMA
stimulation (42). To our knowledge, there is only one other study reporting on the presence of PKC
at the cell-cell contacts during spontaneous or PMA-induced compaction of the embryo (28). Inhibition of PKC activity blocks compaction,
meaning that preventing PKC
localization at the cell-cell contacts
resulted in an inappropriate cellular response (28). In
view of the fact that an alteration in the cell-cell contacts is a
hallmark of cell transformation and since PKC
might be involved in
oncogenic transformation, localization of hPKC
at the cell-cell
contact in GH3B6 cells, with no translocation in single cells
(42), stimulated our interest. The goal of the present
study was therefore to understand the mechanisms underlying the
targeting of wild-type hPKC
to the cell-cell contact and to analyze
the incidence of the D294G point mutation on hPKC
localization.
-catenin, itself bound to
-catenin
(4, 40). The actin cytoskeleton is linked to the adherence
junction through its binding to
-catenin. Recently, Vasioukhin et
al. have reported on the essential role of actin polymerization in the
formation of adherence junction by demonstrating its role as a driving
force for epithelial cell-cell adhesion (44). PKC is not
an unknown actor in this dynamic process. It has indeed been shown to
upregulate intercellular adhesion of
-catenin-negative human colon
cancer cell variants via the induction of desmosomes (43).
Several of its substrates, such as vinculin, are localized at cell-cell contacts (5, 13-15, 29, 38, 45). Glycogen synthetase
kinase-3
, which phosphorylates
-catenin (16), is
itself a PKC substrate (11). Concerning PKC
, besides
being localized at cell-cell contacts during compaction
(28), PKC is also known to interact directly or indirectly
with the F-actin network. Two PKC isoforms,
and
; possess
actin-binding sites, and F-actin is able to directly stimulate PKC
catalytic activity (7, 30, 39).
II (34). Although it is generally accepted that an increase in intracellular calcium concentration ([Ca2+]i) is sufficient
to induce PKC
translocation, we have shown that this is not the case
in the GH3B6 cells since translocation occurs only in
contacting cells despite the similar increase in [Ca2+]i registered in all stimulated cells,
whether single or apposed (42). We thus hypothesized
the existence of additional levels of control that drive PKC
to its
targeting site and further allow its accumulation. Several
candidates could be involved, including RACK1 and F-actin.
accumulates
at the entire plasma membrane, including the cell-cell contacts. On the
basis of the lack of colocalization or coimmunoprecipitation of RACK1
with hPKC
, we think RACK1 is not involved in the cell-cell contact
targeting. In contrast, we present evidence for an involvement of
F-actin in wild-type hPKC
accumulation. Furthermore, we show that
polymerization of acting at the cell-cell contacts correlates with the
accumulation of
-catenin at this location upon PMA treatment or
long-term TRH stimulation, both partners being thus colocalized with
PKC
.
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
antibody were from
Euromedex (Souffelweyersheim, France). Fetal bovine serum was from
BioWhittaker (Walkersville, Md.). Monoclonal antibody against green
fluorescent protein (GFP), 1-O-n-octyl-
-D-glucopyranoside,
anti-mouse IgG-peroxidase, Fab fragments, and chemiluminescence
detection kit were from Roche Molecular Biochemicals (Indianapolis,
Ind.). pEGFP-N1 plasmid was from Clontech (Palo Alto, Calif.). The cDNA
clones coding for wild type (hPKC
-wt) or mutant D294G
(hPKC
-D294G) of PKC
were provided by V. Alvaro and B. I. Weinstein from Columbia Cancer Center, New York, N.Y. Protein G-agarose
and anti-
-catenin antibody were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.
(Santa Cruz, Calif.). [
-32P] ATP, sheep anti-mouse
immunoglobulin horseradish peroxidase-linked antibody, and membrane
Hybond C-Extra were from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech (Les Ulis, France).
Monoclonal anti-RACK1 antibody was purchased from Transduction
Laboratories (Lexington, Ky.). Phalloidin-TRITC was from Molecular
Probes (Eugene, Oreg.). Goat anti-rabbit IgG (H+L), horseradish
peroxidase conjugated, was from Pierce (Rockford, Ill.). TRH was from
Calbiochem (Meudon, France). Anti-mouse IgM-TRITC was from Nordic
Immunological Laboratories. Goat anti-mouse IgG-TRITC was from Jackson
ImmunoResearch (Marseille, France).
-wt or hPKC
-D294G
cDNA with an EcoRI site at their 5' terminus and a
KpnI site at their 3' terminus were produced by PCR using
wild-type or mutant D294G hPKC
cDNA subcloned into pBabe vectors
as templates.
-wt or hPKC
-D294G were gel
purified, digested with EcoRI and KpnI, and then
fused in frame to GFP by ligation into EcoRI- and
KpnI-digested pEGFP-N1 vector. The sequences of ligated PCR
fragments were checked by DNA sequencing, and no mutations were detected.
Cell culture, transfection, and observation of fusion protein localization in living cells. GH3B6 cells were cultured in Ham F10 medium supplemented with 2.5% (vol/vol) fetal bovine serum and 15% (vol/vol) horse serum, both of which were heat inactivated at 56°C for 1 h. Transient transfection of GH3B6 cells was performed with ExGen as described previously (42). The localization of fusion proteins in living cells was examined by conventional (PMA treatment) or confocal (TRH treatment) fluorescence microscopy. The confocal laser scanning microscope was equipped with an Ar/Kr laser (Odyssey XL with InterVision 1.4.1 software; Noran Instruments, Inc., Middleton, Wis.) as described by Guérineau et al. (12). At the time of observation, the culture medium was replaced by a buffer containing 140 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 2 mM CaCl2, 2 mM MgCl2, 10 mM HEPES, and 6 mM glucose (pH 7.4).
PKC
, RACK1, F-actin, and
-catenin detection by
immunocytochemistry.
GH3B6 cells were seeded on
20-by-20-mm2 coverslips in 2.5 ml of Ham F10 medium and
grown for 24 h before transfection or immunocytochemistry. Cells
were washed quickly three times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS;
140 mM NaCl, 27 mM KCl, 8 mM Na2HPO4, 1.5 mM
KH2PO4), fixed for 1 min with 3% formaldehyde
(vol/vol) in PEM buffer (80 mM PIPES, 5 mM EDTA, 2 mM
MgCl2; pH 6.5), and treated for 8 additional min with 3%
formaldehyde (vol/vol) in 100 mM sodium borate at pH 11. Cells were
incubated for 15 min in PBS containing 0.1% (wt/vol) sodium
borohydride, washed, permeabilized by incubation in PBS supplemented
with 0.2% Triton X-100, washed, incubated for 30 min with TBS (10 mM
Tris, 150 mM NaCl; pH 7.6) containing 1% bovine serum albumin, and
washed again. Cells were then incubated overnight at 4°C with
antibodies against PKC
, RACK1, or
-catenin (dilution, 1:100) and
washed. Cells were further incubated for 60 min with phalloidin-TRITC
for F-actin labeling or with the second antibody, i.e., goat anti-mouse
IgG-TRITC (diluted 1:40), goat anti-mouse IgM TRITC (diluted 1:40), or
goat anti-rabbit IgG TRITC (diluted 1:125) for PKC
, RACK1, or
-catenin immunostaining, respectively. After being washed, cells
were postfixed for 15 min with 3% formaldehyde in PBS and incubated in
the presence of 50 mM NH4Cl for 10 min. Coverslips were
mounted in 1,4-diazabicyclo-[2.2.2]octane at 100 mg/ml in PBS
containing 50% glycerol. Subcellular localization of fluorescence was
examined by conventional fluorescence microscopy.
Immunoprecipitation of hPKC
-wt-GFP and
hPKC
-D294G-GFP.
hPKC
-wt-GFP or hPKC
-D294G-GFP
constructs were transiently transfected into GH3B6 cells. At 48 h
after transfection, cells were washed in cold PBS and incubated in
radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 7.4; 150 mM NaCl;
1% Nonidet P-40; 0.25% sodium deoxycholate; 1 mM EGTA; 1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride [PMSF]; 1 µg of aprotinin, 10 µg of
leupeptin, and 1 µg of pepstatin per ml; 1 mM sodium orthovanadate)
at 4°C by gentle rocking. Cells were then scraped and collected into
microcentrifuge tubes. Lysates were precleared with 20 µl of protein
G beads, incubated for 10 min at 4°C by gentle rocking, and
centrifuged at 14,000 × g for 10 min at 4°C.
Supernatants were collected. Then, 2 mg of the cell proteins was mixed
with 2 µg of GFP antibody, and the reaction mixture was incubated at
4°C overnight. Immunocomplexes were captured by adding 20 µl of
protein G beads. This mixture was gently rocked at 4°C overnight.
After centrifugation and washing of the beads with 800 µl of 50 mM Tris (pH 7.4) supplemented with 1 µg of aprotinin, 1 µg of
leupeptin, and 1 µg of pepstatin per ml, immunocomplexes were
either resuspended in 50 µl of 50 mM Tris (pH 7.4) for further kinase
activity assay or in 50 µl of Laemmli buffer (19)
for Western blot analysis.
PKC
catalytic activity measurement.
Catalytic activity of
immunoprecipitated hPKC
-wt-GFP or hPKC
-D294G-GFP were measured
with histone IIIS as a substrate. The amount of each protein used for
catalytic activity assay was estimated before the assay by Western blot
analysis with a GFP antibody.
-32P]ATP (specific activity, 30 Ci/mmol) (Amersham), an 10 µg of phosphati-dylserine per ml
(3). The reaction was prepared in the absence or presence
of 1.2 mM calcium. Reaction was started by incubation at 30°C for 5 min and stopped at 0°C for 5 min. A half-volume of each reaction
mixture was dropped down on phosphocellulose paper P81 (Whatman)
squares which were subsequently washed twice for 10 min in 0.01 M
phosphoric acid, once in acetone for 30 s, once in petroleum ether
for 10 s and then air dried. The paper squares were transferred to
scintillation vials and counted.
Coimmunoprecipitation.
At 48 h after transfection,
cells transfected with hPKC
-wt-GFP or hPKC
-D294G-GFP were
incubated for 60 min with either fresh media or 100 nM PMA. Cells were
washed in cold PBS and lysed at 4°C in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5)
containing 150 mM NaCl; 1%
1-O-n-octyl-
-D-glucopyranoside; 1 mM EGTA; 1 mM PMSF; 1 µg of aprotinin, 10 µg of leupeptin, and 1 µg of pepstatin per ml; and 1 mM sodium orthovanadate. Lysed cells
were centrifuged at 14,000 × g for 10 min at 4°C.
Supernatants were collected, and immunoprecipitation with anti-GFP or
anti-RACK1 antibodies was performed. Briefly, the antibodies used were
cross-linked to either protein G-agarose for GFP antibody or anti-mouse
IgM-agarose beads for RACK1 antibody. The cross-linked antibodies (2 µg of anti-GFP or 2.5 µg of anti-RACK1) were incubated with 2 mg of cell lysates for 90 min on ice. The beads were washed thoroughly. Proteins were removed from beads by incubation for 5 min at 95°C in
20 µl of Laemmli buffer for Western blot analysis. These samples were
subjected to sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) on a 10% polyacrylamide gel, and transferred onto
nitrocellulose membranes. Membranes were cut at approximately the
migration front of the 50-kDa proteins and probed either with anti-GFP
antibody (1:500) in order to detect hPKC
-GFP at 103 kDa or with
anti-RACK1 antibody (1:1,000) in order to detect RACK1 at 36 kDa. After
being washed, the membranes were incubated for 1 h at room
temperature with anti-mouse IgG-peroxidase antibody (1:4,000) for GFP
staining or with anti-mouse immunoglobulin-peroxidase (1:2,000) for the detection of RACK1. Immunoreactive bands were visualized with the
chemiluminescence detection kit.
Cell fractionation and Western blot analysis. Untransfected or transiently transfected GH3B6 cells were separated into soluble and membrane fractions. Cells were washed with cold PBS followed by scraping into homogenization buffer (10 mM Tris; 2 mM EDTA; 1 mM PMSF; 1 µg of aprotinin, 10 µg of leupeptin, and 1 µg of pepstatin per ml; 1 mM sodium orthovanadate). Cells were then homogenized in a glass Dounce homogenizer and centrifuged for 30 min at 14,000 rpm. Supernatants were collected; they corresponded to the soluble fractions. Pellets were resuspended in homogenization buffer supplemented with 1% (vol/vol) Nonidet P-40 and incubated for 45 min on ice. This corresponds to the membrane fractions.
For immunoblotting, soluble and membrane fractions were subjected to SDS-PAGE and electrophoretically transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes. Nonspecific binding sites were blocked by incubation with TBS (50 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl; pH 7.4) containing 10% powdered milk for 1 h at room temperature. Membranes were then incubated with anti-PKC
(1:2,000), anti-GFP (1:1,000), anti-RACK1 (1:2,500), or
anti-
-catenin (1:400) antibody overnight at 4°C. After being washed with TBS containing 0.1% Tween, the membranes were incubated for 1 h at room temperature with anti-mouse IgG-peroxidase
antibody (1:4,000) for PKC
and GFP staining and with anti-mouse
immunoglobulin-peroxidase (1:2,000) or anti-rabbit IgG-peroxidase
(1:4,000) for the detection of RACK1 and
-catenin, respectively.
Immunoreactive bands were visualized with the chemiluminescence
detection kit.
Intracellular calcium concentration changes. The cytoplasmic free calcium concentration ([Ca2+]i) were measured with a real-time confocal laser scanning microscope (12). Cells were visualized with a 63-by-0.9 numerical aperture achroplan water immersion objective lens (Zeiss). The larger slit (100 µm) was used, giving bright images with a 3.1-µm axial resolution. Cells were loaded with the Ca2+-sensitive fluorescent probe Fluo-3 by exposure to 50 µM Fluo-3 acetoxymethyl ester (Fluo-3/AM; Molecular Probes) by incubation for 30 min at 37°C in a humidified incubator. Fluo-3 was excited through a 488-nm band-pass filter, and the emitted fluorescence was collected through a 515-nm barrier filter. [Ca2+]i changes were expressed as the F/Fmin ratio where Fmin was the minimum fluorescent intensity measured during the recording (30 images/s). Acquired data were then processed for analysis using Igor 3.14 (Wavemetrics, Inc., Lake Oswego, Oreg.) softwares. Three separate experiments were performed, and a minimum of 10 fields per experiment with both single and contacting cells were analyzed for [Ca2+]i changes.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The natural D294G mutation abolishes the specific targeting of
hPKC
to cell-cell contacts upon PMA stimulation.
In order to
determine whether PKC
localization is affected by the D294G
mutation, we transiently transfected GH3B6 cells with expression
plasmids for the two hPKC
-wt-GFP and hPKC
-D294G-GFP fusion
proteins (Fig. 1A). We then visualized
the subcellular distribution of each fusion protein in live GH3B6 cells
under basal conditions or after PMA stimulation. The pattern of GFP immunofluorescence recorded in living GH3B6 cells observed under a
confocal microscope reflects the spatiotemporal dynamics of translocation of hPKC
-wt-GFP and hPKC
-D294G-GFP. As shown in Fig. 1B, the location of both hPKC
-wt-GFP and hPKC
-D294G-GFP was cytoplasmic in unstimulated cells, whether isolated or apposed. Upon stimulation with 100 nM PMA for 60 min, hPKC
-wt-GFP
(and endogenous PKC
, results already published [42])
was selectively targeted to cell-cell contacts in apposed cells and was
not translocated in isolated cells, as previously shown
(42). In contrast, under the same conditions, the
hPKC
-D294G mutant translocated uniformly, cell-cell contacts
included, to the plasma membrane of stimulated cells, whether single or
apposed. Therefore, whereas the D294G mutation does not affect
cytoplasmic localization under basal conditions, the specific
localization at the interface of apposed cells is lost after PMA
activation.
|
(42), we
wanted to ensure that this was also the case for hPKC
-D294G. We thus
compared the kinase activities of hPKC
-D294G-GFP and hPKC
-wt-GFP. Both fusion proteins were immunoprecipitated from transiently transfected GH3B6 cells. Their catalytic activities were
measured in the presence of PMA and phosphatidylserine, with or without
Ca2+ using histone IIIS as substrate. As shown in Fig.
1C, the catalytic activities of both proteins were similar and were
increased upon Ca2+ addition. Figure 1C also shows that
similar amounts of both proteins were immunoprecipitated and used for
catalytic activity measurements.
Different mechanisms underly translocation of the wild-type and the
D294G mutant forms of hPKC
.
In our previous work, we observed
that stimulation of GH3B6 cells by TRH induces a biphasic accumulation
of hPKC
at the plasma membrane (42). We also provided
evidence that the mechanisms which underlie the early and transient
phases of translocation induced by TRH are different from those
involved in the longer, second phase that follows long-term
treatment with TRH or PMA. Here, we investigated whether the presence
of the D294G mutation affects hPKC
translocation after
short-term treatment with TRH as is the case after PMA stimulation. As
shown in Fig. 2A, TRH application induced
the rapid and transient translocation of the wild-type protein
exclusively at the interface between cells. Under the same conditions,
the D294G mutant also translocated (Fig. 2B), but its translocation was
also observed in single cells (Fig. 2B), the selective translocation to
cell-cell contacts being lost (data not shown), as is the case with PMA
treatment, and the time the D294G mutant remained at the plasma
membrane was longer (93.3 versus 22.5 s) (Fig. 2C). These results
suggest that the mechanisms involved in the accumulation of the D294G
mutant and the wild-type form of the enzyme at the plasma membrane are different.
|
does not translocate in isolated GH3B6 cells treated with TRH
in spite of the observed concomitant rise in
[Ca2+]i (42) and (ii) in apposed
cells, hPKC
returns to the cytoplasm very rapidly despite the still
elevated [Ca2+]i (Fig. 2C). The duration of
the first translocation phase is significantly longer in cells
expressing the mutant compared to cells expressing the wild-type
enzyme. We thus compared the duration of translocation of the mutant
and [Ca2+]i rise upon TRH stimulation. As
shown in Fig. 2C, the [Ca2+]i was elevated
for 118 ± 37 s, a duration that is not statistically different from the time hPKC
-D294G remained at the plasma membrane (93.3 ± 5.8 s). In contrast, this duration is statiscally
different from the time wild-type hPKC
remained at the cell-cell
contacts (22.5 ± 3.7 s). These results suggest the existence
of different mechanisms of interaction for the mutant and the wild-type
enzyme with the plasma membrane and cell-cell contacts, respectively, one being probably dependent upon the [Ca2+]i
and the other not.
RACK1 is not involved in hPKC
-wt or hPKC
-D294G
localization.
It has been proposed that localization of PKC
could be in part mediated by interactions with anchoring
proteins, including RACK1. In order to determine whether RACK1 is the
partner involved in the translocation and/or accumulation of
activated PKC
, we analyzed by Western blot, immunocytochemistry, and
coimmunoprecipitation whether or not RACK1 could colocalize and
interact with hPKC
-wt and hPKC
-D294G.
-wt as
attested by the decreased signal in the soluble fraction and the
concomittant increase in the membrane fraction, it had no
significant effect on the distribution of RACK1 in both fractions. The
prominent RACK1 immunoreactivity observed at the plasma membrane of
apposed cells at the exclusion of cell-cell contact (Fig. 3B)
remained unchanged upon PMA stimulation, whereas in the same cells,
hPKC
-wt-GFP specifically translocated to the interface of apposed
cells. Upon long-term TRH stimulation, RACK1 did not relocalize (data
not shown). This observation suggested that RACK1 may not be the
anchoring protein involved in hPKC
-wt translocation or accumulation
at the interface of apposed cells. In apposed cells transiently
tranfected with hPKC
-D294G-GFP treated or not with PMA (Fig. 3C),
the RACK1 localization was similar to that of apposed cells transfected
with the wild-type hPKC
, i.e., excluded from the cell-cell contact,
thus resulting in the partial colocalization of the D294G mutant and
RACK1 at the plasma membrane after PMA treatment. In isolated cells,
RACK1 and hPKC
-D294G-GFP were totally colocalized (data not shown).
|
and (ii) to investigate whether the colocalization of
hPKC
-D294G-GFP with RACK1 involved or not an interaction between
the two proteins. The results shown in Fig.
4 demonstrate that RACK1 was absent from
hPKC
-wt-GFP immunoprecipitates (Fig. 4A) and that hPKC
-wt-GFP
was absent from RACK1 immunoprecipitates (Fig. 4B), Whether GH3B6 cells
were treated or not with PMA. The same was true for extracts of cells
expressing the D294G mutant form of hPKC
(Fig. 4A and B). Thus, we
conclude that in GH3B6 cells, neither hPKC
nor hPKC
-D294G
interacts with RACK1 in vivo upon PMA stimulation. Similarly, we did
not detect the endogenous PKC
in RACK1 immunoprecipitates
(data not shown). The Western blot shown in Fig. 4C, performed
with the cell extracts used for immunoprecipitation, demonstrates that
the failure to detect RACK1 in GFP immunoprecipitates cannot be imputed
to a flaw in our detection technique. Furthermore, we used several
experimental procedures, including that of Tony Ng (Peter Parker's
laboratory), who succeeded in coimmunoprecipitating RACK1 and PKC
in
a different cell type, (unpublished result).
|
Wild-type hPKC
accumulation at cell-cell contacts depends on the
reorganization of F-actin.
Since there is evidence from the
literature that F-actin may interact with some PKCs and modulate their
catalytic activities (7, 30, 39) and since F-actin is
intimately linked with the molecular complexes present at cell-cell
contacts, we investigated whether endogenous F-actin participates in
the localization of hPKC
. To this end, F-actin was labeled with
phalloidin-TRITC in cells transfected with hPKC
-wt-GFP. In the
absence of PMA, F-actin was found to be uniformly distributed at the
plasma membrane, whereas hPKC
-wt-GFP was as expected found in the
cytoplasm (Fig. 5A). After 1 h of
PMA stimulation, F-actin and endogenous PKC
concomitantly
accumulated at the plasma membrane of apposed cells. A kinetic analysis
of the effect of PMA on F-actin reorganization showed that the effect
started at 10 min and lasted for at least up to 1 h of treatment
(data not shown).
|
upon PMA treatment indicated that
F-actin may participate in hPKC
translocation and/or accumulation at
cell-cell contacts. We thus treated transiently transfected cells with
phalloidin that blocks actin polymerization or cytochalasin D,
which induces the breakdown of actin filaments. The consequences of
such treatments on hPKC
translocation or accumulation were
analyzed by the technique of Western blot. In living GH3B6 cells
incubated for 1 h with phalloidin-TRITC in the medium, the actin
network was found to be disorganized (Fig. 5B). Phalloidin-TRITC
staining was performed on fixed 0.5 µM cytochalasin D-treated cells
(30 min) in order to verify that such a treatment on GH3B6 cells had
the expected consequences on F-actin network. Figure 5B shows that this
was indeed the case.
In the absence of PMA stimulation and with or without phalloidin
pretreatment, PKC
is mainly found in the soluble fraction (Fig. 5C).
In cells not preincubated with phalloidin, PMA stimulation (from 10 to
90 min) induced a decrease of the soluble fraction immunoreactivity
that correlated with an increase in that of the membrane fraction (Fig.
5C, left). This increase persisted for up to 90 min of PMA stimulation.
When cells were preincubated with phalloidin, the PKC
level also
increased in the membrane fraction from 10 to 20 min of PMA
stimulation, indicating that translocation had occurred. Surprisingly,
during the period from 40 to 90 min of PMA treatment, the PKC
level
decreased in the membrane fraction, whereas it increased in the soluble
fraction and finally returned to a basal level (Fig. 5B, right). The
same results were obtained with cells preincubated with cytochalasin D
before PMA stimulation (Fig. 5D). Thus, when the F-actin network is
disrupted with either phalloidin or cytochalasin D, long-lasting accumulation of PKC
at the plasma membrane cannot occur, whereas translocation can. Therefore, F-actin accumulation at cell-cell contacts upon PMA stimulation seems to be necessary for the biological activity of hPKC
at cell-cell contacts.
The D294G point mutation abolishes the F-actin dependence of
hPKC
accumulation.
The D294G point mutation abolishes the
selectivity of hPKC
targeting to cell-cell contacts. Considering the
colocalization of F-actin with wild-type hPKC
upon PMA stimulation
and the effect of the F-actin network reorganization on wild-type
hPKC
accumulation, we analyzed the link between the F-actin network
and translocation of accumulation of the hPKC
-D294G mutant.
-D294G-GFP indicated that the expression of the mutant did not
affect reorganization of the F-actin network at the cell-cell contacts
upon PMA treatment (Fig. 6A). Western
blot analysis indicated that phalloidin (Fig. 6B) or cytochalasin D
(data not shown) pretreatment did not affect translocation or
accumulation of the hPKC
-D294G-GFP fusion protein. Indeed, in cells
that were preincubated or not for 1 h with phalloidin and
stimulated with PMA from 10 to 60 min, we observed the same decrease of
the soluble fraction immunoreactivity that correlated to an increase in
the membrane fraction immunoreactivity. In both experimental
conditions, this increase persisted in the membrane fraction during the
entire time of the PMA treatment. Thus, the different subcellular
localizations of the wild-type hPKC
and mutant hPKC
-D294G at the
plasma membrane may involve not only different targeting mechanisms but
also different mechanisms of interaction with the membrane.
|
-Catenin accumulates at cell-cell contacts upon PMA
stimulation.
Cadherins are proteins specialized in cell-cell
adhesion and are associated with
-catenin that mediates a link
between cadherins and the actin-cytoskeleton via
-catenin. During
embryonic compaction, it has been demonstrated that
-catenin and
PKC
are both colocalized at the cell-cell contacts of apposed cells
(28). The same study provided evidence for a role of PKC
in the phosphorylation of
-catenin. This led us to investigate
whether
-catenin was colocalized with PKC
at the cell-cell
contacts under PMA stimulation. The endogenous
-catenin and PKC
localization was determined by Western blot and immunocytochemistry in
basal conditions and upon PMA treatment.
-catenin in the membrane fraction
concomitant with a decrease in the soluble fraction. Immunostaining of
-catenin in cells transiently transfected with hPKC
-wt-GFP showed (Fig. 7B) that, in basal conditions,
-catenin was detected both in the cytoplasm and at the plasma membrane. PMA
stimulation induced a redistribution of
-catenin staining:
-catenin levels increased at the interface of apposed cells, where
hPKC
-wt-GFP accumulation also occurred, at the expense of staining
of the remaining part of the plasma membrane and cytoplasm. We then
investigated whether the aberrant hPKC
-D294G-GFP localization was
associated with a different
-catenin subcellular distribution. Figure 7C shows that this is not the case: in cells transiently transfected with hPKC
-D294G-GFP,
-catenin still accumulated at
the cell-cell contacts.
|
at the cell-cell contacts. Is
-catenin localization also affected by the disruption of the microfilament network? The results of
-catenin immunostaining in cells treated with cytochalasin D and PMA (1 h of treatment) shows that this is the
case (Fig. 7D). Shorter PMA treatments (10 and 30 min) gave identical
results (data not shown). Reorganization of the F-actin network at the
cell-cell contacts upon PMA treatment is therefore necessary for
-catenin to accumulate at these cell-cell contacts.
Long-term TRH stimulation induces F-actin and
-catenin
accumulation at the cell-cell contacts.
In GH3B6 cells, TRH
induces a biphasic accumulation of hPKC
at the plasma membrane, the
second phase being abolished by deletion of the V1 region, as is the
PMA-induced translocation (42). However, in order to
assess whether F-actin reorganization and
-catenin relocalization at
the cell-cell contacts are induced upon long-term TRH treatment, as
they are after PMA treatment, GH3B6 cells were treated for 2 h
with 100 nM TRH. As shown in Fig. 8, this
2-h treatment had the same effects as the PMA treatment: it induced
F-actin reorganization at the cell-cell contacts and induced
-catenin accumulation. Therefore, long-term physiological stimulation has effects also encountered upon treatment with PMA, which
is considered a pharmacological, nonphysiological PKC activator.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The present study was initiated by the observation that hPKC
is
selectively targeted to cell-cell contacts in TRH- or PMA-treated GH3B6
cells. Since both PKC and cell adhesion are involved in complex
biological processes such as development and oncogenic transformation,
we considered them to be of potential importance for improving our
understanding of hPKC
targeting to cell-cell contacts. The results
presented here and, in particular, the fact that a natural mutation of
hPKC
abolishes the specific accumulation of the kinase at sites of
cell-cell contact, led us to consider hPKC
as an active player in
the control of pituitary intercellular communication via cell adhesion.
hPKC
targeting at cell-cell contacts: a regulated
mechanism.
Targeting of a protein is a complex phenomenon that
requires an understanding of its spatiotemporal dynamic. According to our previous study (42), hPKC
spatiotemporal dynamic is
constituted by two translocation phases upon TRH physiological
stimulation: a rapid and transient phase, followed by a slow and
long-lasting phase. Both phases involve different translocation
mechanisms since deletion of the V1 region of hPKC
abolishes the
second phase without affecting the first one. Upon PMA stimulation,
there is one long-lasting translocation phase which exhibits
similarities with the second phase of translocation upon TRH treatment
since what affects it also affects the second translocation phase upon TRH and vice versa (42). Based on the results presented
here, we now know also that the selectivity of the targeting site,
which is the same whatever the translocation phase and the stimulus, is
highly controlled. A single point mutation localized in the hinge
region of hPKC
, at position 294, is sufficient to affect it. One
possible explanation is that the D294G mutation, localized in the V3
region that is not directly involved in the interaction with
diacylglycerol, Ca2+, or phosphatidylserine, specifically
abolishes the interaction of PKC
with one or several cytoplasmic
chaperone proteins whose mission is to bring PKC
to the regions of
cell-cell contacts. Indeed, we have previously shown (32)
that the hPKC
-D294G mutant is no longer able to interact with
substrates with anchoring protein properties. Also supporting this
hypothesis is the fact that the hinge V3 region is involved with the C2
calcium binding region in the cytoplasmic sequestration of hPKC
,
probably via binding to a cytoplasmic anchoring protein
(42).
Which role for calcium in hPKC
targeting?
Spatiotemporal
localization of a protein can be devided into two events: translocation
from one subcellular compartment to another and accumulation at the
targeting site. It is generally accepted that translocation of
conventional PKCs, among which is the
isoform, requires calcium and
that calcium is sufficient to induce translocation (1, 8,
26). We have shown that, in GH3B6 cells, this is not the case
since hPKC
-wt does not translocate (first translocation phase) in
isolated cells despite the rise in [Ca2+]i as
in apposed cells (42) observed upon physiological
stimulation. In the present study, we provide evidence that the
accumulation of the kinase at cell-cell contacts that occurs during the
first phase of translocation may be also independent of the
[Ca2+]i. Indeed, wild-type hPKC
returns to
the cytoplasm despite a still-elevated calcium concentration in the
cell. Under the same conditions, the D294G mutant remains at the plasma
membrane and stays there as long as the
[Ca2+]i is high. The mutant behaves in GH3B6
cells the same way PKC
behaves in rat basophilic leukemia 2H3 cells
(26): translocation follows variations in intracellular
calcium concentrations. PKC
is a brain-specific PKC isoform. Rat
basophilic leukemia 2H3 cells may not have provided the adequate
binding partners for PKC
to be adequately targeted the way PKC
is
targeted in GH3B6 cells. As suggested above, the D294G mutant probably
may no longer recognize a cytoplasmic protein involved in targeting of
the wild-type enzyme and, when targeting of PKC becomes independent of
isoform-specific binding partners, it might only be dependent upon
variations in [Ca2+]i. Also, the fact that
when the [Ca2+]i decreases, the mutant
dissociates from the plasma membrane supports its direct interaction
with phospholipids. Indeed, previous studies have shown that the
interaction of PKC with phospholipidic vesicles is rapidly disrupted in
the presence of a calcium chelator (25). In contrast, the
fact that the wild-type enzyme returns to the cytoplasm despite
elevated calcium concentrations suggests a mode of interaction of
PKC
with the plasma membrane at the cell-cell contacts which
probably involves a direct interaction with anchoring proteins even
though we cannot rule out the fact that it may still require elevated
[Ca2+]i.
RACK1 is not an hPKC
anchoring protein in GH3B6 cells.
The
natural mutation of hPKC
located in the V3 hinge region abolishes
the specific accumulation of the kinase at sites of cell-cell contact
(42) by inducing hPKC
targeting to the entire plasma membrane, including cell-cell contacts. As stated above, one possible explanation for this fact is that the D294G mutation specifically abolishes the interaction of PKC
with one or
several cytoplasmic chaperones. To test this hypothesis, we
investigated the putative role of RACK1, which was the first PKC
anchoring protein to be isolated (24, 33) and was
subsequently shown to bind several PKC isoforms, including
II,
, and
(35, 36, 46). In unstimulated and
long-term TRH- or PMA-stimulated GH3B6 cells, however, we could
never detect RACK1 at the cell-cell contacts. In addition, we found
that RACK1 and hPKC
-wt, although colocalized in the cytoplasm,
never coimmunoprecipitated whether cells were treated or not with PMA.
Similar results were obtained with the D294G mutant, despite its
colocalization with RACK1 at plasma membrane sites other
than the cell-cell contacts, upon PMA treatment of cells. On the basis
of these results, we concluded that RACK1 does not mediate
translocation nor accumulation of either wild-type or D294G hPKC
under PMA stimulation.
F-actin network is involved in accumulation of PKC
at the
cell-cell contacts.
In the present study, we show that upon PMA
treatment or long-term TRH stimulation, there is a concentration of
F-actin at the cell-cell contacts of all apposed cells, whereas the
translocation of PKC
occurs only in a subpopulation of
these cells (42). Hence, translocation of PKC
is not
what causes the reorganization of the F-actin network. In GH3B6 cells,
PMA does not affect the [Ca2+]i (unpublished
results), although it induces the growth of actin filaments at the
cell-cell contacts. This indicates that, unlike the synaptic terminal
of retinal bipolar cells where PMA increases the growth of actin
filaments only in the presence of a Ca2+ influx
(17), the PMA-induced F-actin network reorganization may
involve activation of a calcium-independent PKC. Our present study
showing that the translocation of PKC
is maintained in cytochalasin
D- or phalloidin-treated GH3B6 cells argues against F-actin playing an
active role during translocation. This contrasts with another report
showing that nuclear translocation of PKC
in NIH 3T3 fibroblasts
depends on the integrity of the cytoskeleton (37), but it
is in line with the observed PMA-induced translocation of PKC
in
cytochalasin D-treated C6 glioma cells (9). Interestingly, we found that long-lasting accumulation of PKC
at the plasma membrane cannot occur but that the kinase returns to the cytoplasm in
phalloidin- or cytochalasin D-treated GH3B6 cells. This does indicate a
role of F-actin in the mechanism by which PKC
remains localized at
the cell-cell contacts, in the vicinity of its substrates. The
interaction between PKC
and F-actin at the cell-cell contacts could
be direct or indirect. Like PKC
(10), PKC
II, and
PKC
(7, 30), PKC
could directly interact with
F-actin at the cell-cell contacts. An example of indirect interaction
with F-actin is given by the cyclic-AMP-dependent protein kinase II
,
which is also linked to the actin cytoskeleton in both neurons
(22) and non-neuron cells (21). Rather than a
direct binding to F actin, in this case the kinase is linked to the
cytoskeleton by the kinase anchor protein AKAP75. Furthermore, F-actin
might be required to stimulate PKC
activity in order for PKC
to
phosphorylate its substrate at the cell-cell contacts since it has been
shown to directly stimulate PKC activity (39). Since when
the F-actin network is disrupted the intact PKC
returns to the
cytoplasm, the integrity of the F-actin network could be required for
PKC
to be downregulated.
mutant.
Which role for PKC
at the cell-cell contacts?
Several
examples in the literature argue in favor of a biological significance
of the interaction between PKC and F-actin, hence arguing in favor of a
biological significance of the interaction between PKC
and F-actin
at the GH3B6 cell-cell contacts. Among these examples, PKC
translocates to and stabilizes the actin network after
stimulation by interleukin-2 (10), and this association is
also required for glutamate release in PMA-treated neuronal cells
(41).
at the cell-cell contacts led us to search for
the presence of putative protein substrates of PKC
at this location,
and we thought of
-catenin as a potential candidate.
-Catenin is
known for its interaction with E-cadherins, which mediate intercellular
adhesion. In unstimulated GH3B6 cells, we found
-catenin both at the
plasma membrane and in the cytoplasm, whereas PMA treatment or
long-term TRH stimulation induced a concentration of
-catenin at the
cell-cell contacts, concomitantly with F-actin and hPKC
. In contrast
to PKC
, the concentration of
-catenin was observed in all apposed
cells, demonstrating that PKC
is not the causative agent of
-catenin accumulation at the cell-cell contacts. In cytochalasin
D-treated cells,
-catenin no longer concentrates at the cell-cell
contacts, whereas PKC
does; this result suggests that
-catenin is not the causative agent of PKC
targeting at the
cell-cell contacts. Up to now, we did not succeed in
coimmunoprecipitating
-catenin and PKC
nor in showing a
serine-threonine phosphorylation of
-catenin upon PMA stimulation
(data not shown). We thus do not know if there is a functional link
between
-catenin and PKC
that could account for the accumulation
of PKC
at the cell-cell contacts. Further work is thus needed to
investigate which protein(s) is able to interact with PKC
at the
cell-cell contact. Their identification will help us understand the
physiopathological consequences of the loss of PKC
targeting at the
cell-cell contacts by the D294G point mutation and thus the
physiological relevance of this mutant in tumorigenesis. Up to now,
there is no clear evidence that this mutant is important in cell
transformation. A large-scale analysis of the relationships between the
presence of the mutant and the tumor phenotypes should be done in order to clarify the potential interest of this mutation and, beyond this
mutation, analysis of the presence of other mutations in the
hPKC
gene should be undertaken. In addition, the hPKC
gene is
located in a particularly interesting region of chromosome 17, q23-q24. Chromosome 17q is frequently rearranged in breast cancers in
which we have detected the D294G point mutation (unpublished data), and gains with DNA amplification are most commonly observed in
the 17q23-q24 regions (27). This indicates that the
relationship between PKC
and tumorigenesis could be of at least two
types: (i) amplification of the wild-type gene, leading to
overexpression of the wild-type protein, and (ii) the possible presence
of genomic abnormalities, among which are point mutations.
Interestingly, alterated forms of PKC
have been observed in two cell
lines. A smaller-than-expected PKC
was found in a small lung
carcinoma cell line (57 kDa instead of 80 kDa), probably resulting from an aberrant posttranslational processing of the protein
(18), and a tumor-specific deletion within the gene
encoding PKC
was found in a primary melanoma cell line
(23).
In conclusion, by showing that a single point mutation known to
be without intrinsic effect on catalytic activity can abolish targeting selectivity, the present study highlights the complexity of
PKC
regulation and reinforces the necessity to consider PKC signaling as a network of interacting events rather than as a linear
chain of interactions.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank Danièle Gourdji for providing the GH3B6 cells, Catherine Legraverend and Corinne Prévostel for help in preparation of the manuscript, Tony Ng for providing experimental protocols for coimmunoprecipitation, and Xavier Bonnefont and Teddy Fauquier for help in confocal analyses.
A.V. was supported by the Association pour la Recherche contre le Cancer (ARC) and by the Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer. The confocal microscope was financed by grants from INSERM, Région Languedoc-Roussillon, ARC, and the Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale. This work was supported by grant 5695 from the ARC.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: INSERM U469, 141 rue de la Cardonille, 34094 Montpellier Cedex 5, France. Phone: (33) 467-142-918. Fax: (33) 467-542-432. E-mail: joubert{at}u469.montp.inserm.fr