Previous Article | Next Article 
Molecular and Cellular Biology, May 2001, p. 3534-3546, Vol. 21, No. 10
0270-7306/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/MCB.21.10.3534-3546.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Inhibition of Nuclear Import by Protein Kinase B
(Akt) Regulates the Subcellular Distribution and Activity of the
Forkhead Transcription Factor AFX
Amy M.
Brownawell,1,*
Geert J. P. L.
Kops,2
Ian G.
Macara,1 and
Boudewijn M. T.
Burgering2
Center for Cell Signaling, University of
Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908,1 and
Laboratory for Physiological Chemistry and Centre for
Biomedical Genetics, University Medical Center, 3584CG Utrecht, The
Netherlands2
Received 21 November 2000/Returned for modification 28 December
2000/Accepted 27 February 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
AFX belongs to a subfamily of Forkhead transcription factors that
are phosphorylated by protein kinase B (PKB), also known as Akt.
Phosphorylation inhibits the transcriptional activity of AFX and
changes the steady-state localization of the protein from the nucleus
to the cytoplasm. Our goal was threefold: to identify the cellular
compartment in which PKB phosphorylates AFX, to determine whether the
nuclear localization of AFX plays a role in regulating its
transcriptional activity, and to elucidate the mechanism by which
phosphorylation alters the localization of AFX. We show that
phosphorylation of AFX by PKB occurs in the nucleus. In addition,
nuclear export mediated by the export receptor, Crm1, is required for
the inhibition of AFX transcriptional activity. Both phosphorylated and
unphosphorylated AFX, however, bind Crm1 and can be exported from the
nucleus. These results suggest that export is unregulated and that
phosphorylation by PKB is not required for the nuclear export of AFX.
We show that AFX enters the nucleus by an active, Ran-dependent
mechanism. Amino acids 180 to 221 of AFX comprise a nonclassical
nuclear localization signal (NLS). S193, contained within this atypical
NLS, is a PKB-dependent phosphorylation site on AFX. Addition of a
negative charge at S193 by mutating the residue to glutamate reduces
nuclear accumulation. PKB-mediated phosphorylation of AFX, therefore,
attenuates the import of the transcription factor, which shifts the
localization of the protein from the nucleus to the cytoplasm and
results in the inhibition of AFX transcriptional activity.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Protein kinase B (PKB), also known
as Akt, promotes cell survival in many different cell types (24,
38, 40, 66). Following its initial cloning (17,
34), PKB was isolated as the transforming gene of v-Akt, hence
the name c-Akt and its classification as a proto-oncogene (6,
67). Activation of PKB requires the lipid phosphatidylinositol
3,4,5-triphosphate (PIP3) (15) and phosphorylation by an upstream kinase, PDK1 (2, 69, 72). PIP3 is produced by phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase in
response to signals from extracellular growth factors (for a review see reference 60). PKB has been shown to phosphorylate and
regulate the activity of transcription factors in response to survival factors. Genetic studies of Caenorhabditis elegans have
demonstrated that the PKB signal transduction pathway inhibits the
activity of the Forkhead transcription factor, daf-16, a
gene that regulates longevity (55). There are three human
orthologues of daf-16, AFX (13), FKHR
(27), and FKHRL1 (3), that were first
identified as chromosomal breakpoints in human tumors.
AFX is phosphorylated by PKB in response to insulin and serum at three
sites: T28, S193, and S258 (42). Phosphorylation of these
residues by PKB leads to both inhibition of the transcriptional activity of AFX and cytoplasmic retention and/or nuclear exclusion of
the protein. Withdrawal of serum or insulin results in AFX dephosphorylation, nuclear localization, and target gene activation. In
the absence of survival factors, Forkhead family members have been
shown to induce the transcription of proapoptotic genes, such as the
FasL gene (14) and the Bim gene
(22), thus triggering a cascade of events that lead to
apoptosis. In addition, overexpression of AFX blocks cell cycle
progression at G1 by a mechanism that is independent of
functional retinoblastoma protein but dependent on the cell cycle
inhibitor p27kip (49). Dysregulation of
Forkhead proteins may, therefore, comprise an important step in
oncogenic transformation by both inhibiting apoptosis and promoting
progression through the cell cycle.
Efficient regulated nuclear localization of transcription factors in
response to extracellular signals is essential for their function
(41). For example, in unstressed cells, p53 continuously shuttles into and out of the nucleus, and its subcellular distribution varies throughout the cell cycle. In response to certain stresses, however, p53 relocalizes to the nucleus to promote gene transcription. In some p53-related tumors, however, there is a defect in p53 localization (52, 65). In these cells, p53 is
constitutively cytoplasmic due to an increase in the export rate of the
protein. As a result, p53 cannot accumulate in the nucleus and carry
out its normal activities. This defect leads to unregulated cellular proliferation. Likewise, the transcriptional activity of Forkhead family members may be regulated not only by phosphorylation but also by
changes in their subcellular localization.
Many proteins are transported constitutively into and out of the
nucleus by members of the
-importin family of nuclear transport receptors (28, 48). These receptors recognize specific
localization signals within their cargoes, and their association with
these signal sequences is controlled by the small GTPase Ran. The
regulators of Ran are distributed asymmetrically within the cell: the
RanGTPase-activating protein (RanGAP) is cytoplasmic
(10), whereas the Ran exchange factor (RanGEF) is
nuclear (11). Therefore, most of the Ran present in the
nucleus is predicted to be GTP bound, while cytoplasmic Ran is
predicted to be GDP bound. The directionality of transport depends on
this RanGTP gradient. Unloading of cargo from an import receptor in the
nucleus is triggered by the binding of RanGTP to the receptor
(29, 31, 61). Conversely, an export receptor can only load
its cargo in the presence of RanGTP. Release of export cargo into the
cytoplasm occurs by the hydrolysis of RanGTP to RanGDP, stimulated by
RanGAP and other required cofactors (39).
In contrast to constitutive transport, regulated transport occurs
only in response to specific cellular signals, such as
phosphorylation (35). For example, mitogen-activated
protein kinase-activated protein kinase 2 is a nuclear protein in
unstimulated cells. In response to specific extracellular signals, it
is phosphorylated, binds p38 stress-activated protein kinase, and is
only then exported from the nucleus (7). Regulated
transport mechanisms play critical roles in augmenting or attenuating
signaling information by controlling the cellular localization of
proteins. Many proteins that have regulated transport mechanisms are
shuttling proteins that move continuously between the cytoplasm and
nucleus. Thus, their steady-state localization is determined by the
relative rate constants for import and export. Shuttling coordinates
nuclear and cytoplasmic events by providing a rapid and reversible
method to regulate a nuclear and/or cytoplasmic activity. Nuclear
transport often works in tandem with other mechanisms to regulate
the function of proteins. Some transcription factors require
phosphorylation in addition to changes in nuclear localization to
completely regulate their activity. This redundancy increases the
strength of cellular switches and provides additional ways to integrate
environmental cues with cellular signals. Finally, proteins that alter
their cellular localization in response to extracellular signals need a
mechanism for turning that signal off when it is no longer required. Protein degradation, dephosphorylation, and nuclear transport are all
mechanisms used to terminate activity. Although the regulated transport
mechanisms for several yeast proteins have been identified, including
those for Pho4 (36, 37) and Mig1 (20, 21),
few regulated transport mechanisms have been described for mammalian proteins.
Our goal, therefore, was to elucidate how PKB phosphorylation and the
resulting cellular relocalization of AFX alter its transcriptional activity. In this study, we show that PKB phosphorylation of AFX in the
nucleus followed by Crm1-dependent nuclear export is required to
inhibit the transcriptional activity of the Forkhead family member.
Although phosphorylation by PKB does not significantly alter AFX export
from the nucleus, it appears that nuclear import of phosphorylated AFX
is regulated. Amino acids 180 to 221 of AFX are necessary and
sufficient for nuclear import but comprise a nonclassical nuclear
localization signal (NLS). Addition of a negative charge at S193 by
mutating the residue to a glutamate inhibits nuclear import. Therefore,
phosphorylation of AFX by PKB likely reduces the nuclear import rate of
AFX. This results in a shift in the steady-state localization of AFX
from the nucleus to the cytoplasm, thereby inhibiting its
transcriptional activity.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Plasmids and recombinant proteins.
pMT2-HA-AFX,
pMT2-HA-SASA, pMT2-HA-A3, pSG5-gagPKB, p1205-luc, and pCMV-lacZ have
been described previously (42, 49). pMT2-HA-AFX
(
198-216) was constructed using PCR-based mutagenesis. To construct
the vectors encoding the fusions of green fluorescent protein (GFP) to
the C termini of various AFX sequences, pKGFP3 was used. To create
pKGFP3, GFP-GFP was PCR amplified and inserted as a
BglII-BglII fragment into pKGFP. For
pKGFP3-AFX(180-197), pKGFP3-AFX(198-221), and
pKGFP3-AFX(180-221), the indicated residues of AFX were PCR amplified
and ligated into pKGFP3 as XbaI-XbaI fragments.
Site-directed mutagenesis of residues within pKGFP3-AFX(180-221) to
produce pKGFP3-AFX(180-221)I-V, pKGFP3-AFX(180-221)S193A, and pKGFP3-AFX(180-221)S193E was carried out using the
Quikchange mutagenesis kit (Stratagene) according to the
manufacturer's recommendations. All mutations were verified
by sequencing. pQE60-Crm1 was a gift from Iain Mattaj (EMBL,
Heidelberg, Germany) (5). Crm-His6 was
purified using Talon beads (Clontech) as described previously (39). The addition of 14 mM
-mercaptoethanol was
required to retain the stability of the protein. pQE32-RanQ69L was a
gift from Dirk Görlich (University of Heidelberg).
His6-RanQ69L was prepared as described earlier
(31).
Cell culture.
Insulin receptor-overexpressing NIH 3T3 cells
(A14) were grown as described previously (15). All other
cells were passaged in Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium (supplemented
with 5% [vol/vol] fetal calf serum and penicillin-streptomycin).
Baby hamster kidney cells (BHK21), human embryonic kidney cells
(HEK293), and HeLa cells were cultured in a humidified, 37°C-5%
CO2 incubator. tsBN2 cells were grown at 33.5°C. Where
indicated, the tsBN2 cells were shifted to 39.5°C for 3 h after
the addition of 50 µM cycloheximide. The leptomycin B (LMB) used in
some cell-based assays was a gift from Barbara Wolff (Novartis).
Transfections.
Hemagglutinin (HA)-tagged AFX constructs were
transfected into A14, BHK21, HEK293, HeLa, and tsBN2 cells by the
calcium phosphate method. At 24 h posttransfection, the
transfection medium was replaced with fresh medium and the cells were
incubated at 37°C for an additional 24 h. Transfected HEK293
cells were harvested for immunoprecipitations at 48 h posttransfection.
Transfected A14 cells were serum starved overnight where indicated. For
immunofluorescence, A14 cells were either untreated, treated with 10 µM LY294002 (Calbiochem) for 10 min, or treated with 2 ng of LMB per
ml for 30 min prior to the addition of 1 µg of insulin per ml. The
cells were then incubated with insulin for an additional 30 min before
fixation. Transfected tsBN2, HeLa, and BHK21 cells were plated on
poly-L-lysine-coated coverslips. Transfected tsBN2 and HeLa
cells, where indicated, were serum starved for 1.5 h prior to fixation.
BHK21 cells were transfected with all pKGFP3 constructs using Effectene
transfection reagent (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's
instructions. These cells were processed 20 h after transfection.
After the indicated treatments, the transfected cells were fixed and
permeabilized with 4% paraformaldehyde-2% sucrose in
phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; 137 mM NaCl, 3 mM KCl, 10 mM
Na2HPO4, 2 mM KH2PO4
[pH 7.4]) and ice-cold methanol as described previously (54,
58, 73). Fixed cells were then prepared for analysis by
fluorescence microscopy.
Fluorescence microscopy.
After fixation and
permeabilization, cells expressing GFP fusions were incubated with
4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; 10 ng/ml) to stain the nuclei, and
then the coverslips were mounted on glass slides by using GelMount
(Biomeda). Images of the cells were captured using a 60×
water-immersion objective lens on a Nikon inverted microscope equipped
with a Hamamatsu charge-coupled device camera. All immunofluorescence
data were obtained and processed using Openlab (Improvision) and Adobe
Photoshop software. Images for each set of experiments were obtained
using the same camera settings. The relative nuclear and cytoplasmic
fluorescence levels of the GFP3 constructs were measured using
Openlab (Improvision). Nuclear fluorescence was calculated as a
percentage of the total cellular fluorescence
[N/(N+C)]. All fluorescence measurements were corrected for
background fluorescence levels. Each data point represents the mean
fluorescence obtained from 12 randomly chosen cells. Error is expressed
as the standard deviations of the means. All cells expressing HA-tagged
AFX constructs were blocked in 10% bovine serum albumin (BSA)-PBS at
room temperature incubated with monoclonal antibody 12CA5 (2 µg/ml)
and Texas red-conjugated donkey anti-mouse immunoglobulin G (1:1,500
dilution; Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories), both in 3% BSA;
stained with DAPI; and mounted and viewed as described above. Cells
expressing gag-PKB were detected using anti-gag and anti-PKB antisera
(15).
Immunodetection.
BHK21 cells expressing GFP3 constructs were
lysed with an equal volume of boiling Laemmli sample buffer. Equal
volumes of lysate (10 µl) were then analyzed by sodium dodecyl
sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and
immunoblotting for GFP3 with polyclonal anti-GFP (1:1,000 dilution;
Molecular Probes) and horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated
anti-rabbit secondary antibody (1:20,000 dilution; Jackson
Laboratories). Proteins were revealed by chemiluminescence (Kirkegaard
& Perry Laboratories). Subcellular fractionation of insulin-treated (1 µg/ml) A14 cells was carried out according to published protocols
(47, 76). Anti-phosphoT32 FKHR-L1, anti-c-cbl, and
anti-RNA pol II were gifts from Anne Brunet (Harvard University), Kris
Reedquist (University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands), and
Marc Timmers (University Medical Center), respectively.
Anti-phosphoS193 AFX and anti-phosphoS473 PKB were obtained from New
England Biolabs.
Luciferase assays.
A14 cells were cotransfected with the
1205-luc reporter, pMT2-HA-AFX, and pCMV-lacZ. Cells were also
transfected where indicated with pSG5-gagPKB. Cells were preincubated
with LMB where noted for 30 min prior to the addition of insulin. Cells
were then treated with insulin for 16 h in the absence or presence
of LMB. Transcriptional activity was measured 48 h after
transfection. Luciferase and
-galactosidase measurements were
performed as described (42).
Crm1 binding assays.
HEK293 cells were either mock
transfected or transfected with pMT2-HA-AFX or pMT2-HA-A3. Where
indicated, cells were treated with LY294002 (10 µM) for 2 h
prior to lysis. All cells were then washed twice with ice-cold PBS,
placed on ice, and lysed by the addition of 400 µl of lysis buffer
(25 mM HEPES [pH 7.4], 300 mM NaCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 20 mM
-glycerophosphate, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 0.1% Triton X-100, 1 mM okadaic acid, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride [PMSF], 10 µg
of leupeptin per ml, and 20 µg of aprotinin per ml). Lysates were
cleared by centrifugation (5 min at 14,000 × g,
4°C). The lysate was used for immunoprecipitation with 12CA5 at 4°C
for 1 h. Protein A-Sepharose beads were added to the samples for
1 h at 4°C. Immunoprecipitates were washed three times with buffer A (PBS, 1% NP-40, 20 mM
-glycerophosphate, 2 mM sodium orthovanadate, 1 mM okadaic acid) and once with buffer B (50 mM morpholine propanesulfonic acid [pH 7.5], 500 mM lithium chloride, 20 mM
-glycerophosphate, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 1 mM okadaic acid).
To release endogenous 14-3-3 protein bound to HA-AFX,
immunoprecipitates were washed three times with PBS containing 1 M
MgCl2 where indicated. Controls were washed three times
with PBS without added MgCl2.
The immunoprecipitates were resuspended in binding buffer (20 mM HEPES
[pH 7.3], 150 mM potassium acetate, 2 mM magnesium acetate, 0.1%
Tween 20, 28 mM
-mercaptoethanol, 0.05% ovalbumin, 1 mM sodium
orthovanadate, 20 mM
-glycerophosphate, 1 mM okadaic acid, and 1 mM
PMSF). Crm1-His6 was added to each assay to yield a final
concentration of 500 nM. His6-RanQ69L was added as
indicated to a final concentration of 3 µM. Samples were incubated
for 2 h at 4°C and then were washed three times with binding
buffer. Beads were resuspended in Laemmli sample buffer and the
proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with
HRP-conjugated 12CA5 (1:5,000 dilution), monoclonal
anti-His6 (1:2,000 dilution; BabCo), or polyclonal
anti-14-3-3
(1:100 dilution; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and
with HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse or anti-rabbit secondary antibody
(1:20,000 dilution; Jackson Laboratories). Proteins were revealed by
chemiluminescence (Kirkegaard & Perry Laboratories).
Heterokaryon fusion assays.
BHK21 cells were transfected
with pMT2-HA-A3. An acceptor cell line, GSN2, was a gift from Bryce
Paschal (University of Virginia) (12). This stably
transfected HeLa cell line expresses the nondiffusible nuclear protein
GFP-streptavidin-SV40NLS. BHK21 and GSN2 cells were coplated onto
poly-L-lysine-coated coverslips overnight. Cells were
treated with 50 µM cycloheximide for 30 min. The plasma membranes
were then fused for 2 min with 50% polyethylene glycol (molecular
weight, 8,000) prewarmed to 37°C. Cells were washed four times with
medium and were incubated at 37°C for an additional 1 h in the
presence of cycloheximide. Cells were then fixed and processed for
immunocytochemistry as described above.
 |
RESULTS |
PKB-dependent phosphorylation of AFX triggers relocalization of AFX
from the nucleus to the cytoplasm.
The subcellular distribution of
Forkhead family members is altered on addition of insulin or serum to
cells (9, 14, 71). This relocalization is dependent on the
phosphorylation of the Forkhead protein by PKB. As a basis for
subsequent experiments, we confirmed that the addition of insulin
results in a change in the steady-state distribution of HA-AFX in serum
starved cells from the nucleus to the cytoplasm within 30 min (Fig.
1A). Mutation of PKB phosphorylation
sites S193 and S258 to alanine (HA-SASA) inhibited this relocalization,
as did treatment with the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitor
LY294002 prior to the addition of insulin (Fig. 1A). Additionally, the
coexpression of constitutively active PKB (gagPKB) resulted in the
redistribution of HA-AFX but not HA-SASA to the cytoplasm (Fig. 1B). A
significant fraction of gagPKB, however, is localized to the nucleus
(Fig. 1B). This result is consistent with previous studies that have
shown gagPKB localization at the plasma membrane (40%), in the
cytoplasm (30%), and within the nucleus (30%) (1, 16).
These results confirm that phosphorylation of AFX by PKB results in a
rapid redistribution of AFX from the nucleus to the cytoplasm.

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
PKB-dependent phosphorylation of AFX triggers
relocalization of AFX from the nucleus to the cytoplasm. (A) A14 cells
were transfected with pMT2-HA-AFX or pMT2-HA-SASA. At 24 h
posttransfection, serum was withdrawn for 18 to 24 h. Insulin (1 µg/ml) was then added as indicated, and these cells were incubated
for 30 min. Cells treated with LY294002 (10 µM) to inhibit PIP3K were
preincubated for 10 min prior to the addition of insulin. Cells were
fixed, and then HA-AFX and HA-SASA were stained with 12CA5 and Texas
red-conjugated secondary antibody. (B) A14 cells were transfected with
pMT2-HA-AFX or pMT2-HA-SASA and with constitutively active PKB
(pSG5-gagPKB). At 48 h posttransfection, the cells were fixed and
HA-AFX and HA-SASA were stained as described for panel A. gagPKB was
stained with anti-gag antiserum and fluorescein
isothiocyanate-conjugated secondary antibody. Bars, 10 µm.
|
|
Nuclear export subsequent to phosphorylation by PKB in the nucleus
is required for the inhibition of AFX transcriptional activity.
We
wanted to test the hypothesis that PKB-dependent redistribution of AFX
to the cytoplasm is required to regulate the transcriptional activity
of the protein. The best-characterized nuclear export pathway uses a
leucine-rich nuclear export signal (NES), which is bound by the export
receptor Crm1 in the presence of RanGTP in the nucleus (25, 26,
43, 56, 68). The trimeric complex is then exported to the
cytoplasm and is disassembled. Crm1-dependent export can be inhibited
by LMB (74), which specifically inactivates Crm1 by
covalent modification of a key cysteine residue in the NES-binding
region of the protein (44). We tested, therefore, whether
LMB could inhibit the cytoplasmic relocalization of HA-AFX in response
to insulin (Fig. 2A)
and serum (data not shown). As shown
in Fig. 2A, LMB completely blocked the nuclear export of AFX. Thus,
nuclear export of AFX in response to insulin or serum proceeds via a
Crm1-dependent pathway.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Nuclear export subsequent to phosphorylation by PKB in
the nucleus is required for the inhibition of AFX transcriptional
activity. (A) A14 cells were transfected with pMT2-HA-AFX. At 24 h
posttransfection, serum was withdrawn for 18 to 24 h. The cells
were treated with LMB (2 ng/ml) for 30 min to inhibit Crm1-dependent
export. Then insulin (1 µg/ml) was added as indicated, and the cells
were incubated for an additional 30 min. Cells were fixed, and then
HA-AFX was stained as described previously. Bar, 10 µm. (B)
Serum-starved A14 cells were treated with insulin (1 µg/ml) and then
fractionated at the indicated times. Equal amounts of nuclear (N) and
cytoplasmic (C) lysates (50 µg) were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Western
blotting. An anti-PKB antibody was used to detect endogenous PKB
protein levels. An anti-PKB S473-P antibody was used to detect
activated PKB. c-cb1 and RNA pol II represent cytoplasmic and nuclear
protein markers, respectively. (C) A14 cells were transfected and
treated as described for panel A prior to cell lysis. Equal amounts of
cellular lysate (50 µg) were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Western
blotting. An anti-pT32-specific antibody was used to detect endogenous
FKHRL1 phosphorylated by PKB (14). Since A14 cells do not
express endogenous AFX, an anti-pS193-specific antibody was used to
detect HA-AFX phosphorylated by PKB. 12CA5 was used to visualize HA-AFX
expression. (D) A14 cells were cotransfected with the 1205-luc
reporter, pCMV-LacZ, pMT2-HA-AFX, and where indicated, pSG5-gagPKB.
Cells were preincubated with LMB where noted for 30 min prior to the
addition of insulin. Cells were then treated with insulin for 16 h in the absence or presence of LMB. Luciferase
activity was measured 48 h after transfection, and luciferase levels
were corrected for -galactosidase expression.
pMT2-HA-AFX-transfected control cells were serum starved, and the
inhibition of AFX activity was normalized to 0% (i.e., 100% relative
promoter activity). Data were obtained from five separate
experiments.
|
|
Activated PKB may enter the nucleus to phosphorylate its target
proteins (
4,
50); however, this view is controversial.
In
support of the idea that PKB translocates into the nucleus,
we have
observed by subcellular fractionation that A14 cells show
an increase
in endogenous activated PKB within the nucleus 10
min after the
addition of insulin (Fig.
2B; PKB S473-P). To examine
this issue within
the context of Forkhead transcription factors,
we used the inhibition
of AFX export by LMB to establish the cellular
compartment in which
this protein is phosphorylated by PKB. The
addition of insulin to
serum-starved cells expressing HA-AFX resulted
in phosphorylation of
S193 (Fig.
2C). Importantly, an equivalent
level of S193
phosphorylation was observed when cells were treated
with LMB prior to
the addition of insulin. This result suggests
that PKB can translocate
into the nucleus in order to phosphorylate
target proteins and that
PKB-dependent phosphorylation of AFX
occurs in the nucleus. This
conclusion is supported by our results
obtained for the
PKB-mediated phosphorylation of endogenous FKHRL1
in the presence
of LMB (Fig.
2C). FKHRL1 is another Forkhead family
member that also
has a steady-state nuclear localization in serum
starved cells
(
14). T28 is a reported PKB-dependent phosphorylation
site
on FKHRL1 (
14). This site was phosphorylated by PKB to
similar levels upon the addition of insulin in either the absence
or
the presence of LMB pretreatment (Fig.
2C). We conclude that
Forkhead
family members can be phosphorylated by PKB in the nucleus,
although we
are unable to rule out the possibility that some phosphorylation
of AFX
by PKB may occur in the
cytoplasm.
To test whether nuclear export is essential for the inhibitory effect
of PKB on Forkhead transcriptional activity, we performed
a
luciferase reporter gene assay. Forkhead transcription factors
can bind to and regulate the activity of the IGFBP-1 promoter
in vitro.
In cotransfection assays using a chloramphenicol acetyltransferase
reporter under the control of the IGFBP-1 promoter, it was shown
previously that Forkhead binding results in increased transcriptional
activity and that insulin represses this activity (
42).
HA-AFX
activity in serum-starved cells was normalized to 0% inhibition
of transcriptional activity (i.e., the relative promoter activity
was
100%). PKB phosphorylation of HA-AFX resulting from the addition
of
insulin or coexpression of gagPKB inhibited the reporter gene
activity
by ~50% (Fig.
2D). Pretreatment with LMB to inhibit HA-AFX
export,
however, attenuated the effect of insulin to approximately
20% and
abolished the effect of gagPKB on AFX activity. Since
LMB does not
affect the ability of PKB to phosphorylate AFX (Fig.
2C), the effect of
LMB cannot be explained by a lack of PKB phosphorylation.
Nor can it be
explained by a global effect on the cellular transcription
machinery,
since LMB has no effect on the transcriptional activity
of AFX mutants,
such as HA-SASA and HA-A3 (see below), that do
not relocalize to the
cytoplasm on insulin treatment or the cotransfection
of gagPKB (data
not shown). The reduced effect of LMB observed
in insulin-treated cells
most likely is due to the activation
of other identified signaling
pathways that regulate AFX activity
independent of cellular
localization (
42). The complete inhibition
observed in
gagPKB cotransfected cells suggests that PKB-dependent
regulation of
AFX activity requires the relocalization of the
protein to the
cytoplasm. We conclude, therefore, that both PKB
phosphorylation in the
nucleus and nuclear export mediated by
Crm1 are essential for the full
inhibition of AFX transcriptional
activity. These data strongly suggest
that a major component of
the transcriptional regulation of AFX occurs
at the level of nuclear
transport.
Regulation of localization of AFX by PKB does not occur at the
level of export.
There are several distinct mechanisms by which
PKB-dependent phosphorylation of AFX could trigger cytoplasmic
accumulation of the protein. First, PKB phosphorylation could
facilitate nuclear export by promoting the binding of Crm1 to AFX. In a
second model, AFX may be exported from the nucleus constitutively but
be reimported rapidly when it is unphosphorylated, so that its
steady-state distribution is predominantly nuclear. PKB phosphorylation
would then inhibit or decrease the rate of import, leading to a
redistribution to the cytoplasm. Third, both nuclear import and export
of AFX could be constitutive, and phosphorylation would permit
cytoplasmic retention by increasing the affinity of AFX for a
cytoplasmic anchor protein. Finally, phosphorylation by PKB could
release AFX from a nuclear anchor.
To distinguish between these possibilities, we performed Crm1 binding
assays. AFX cannot be expressed in appreciable amounts
as a recombinant
protein in
Escherichia coli. Therefore, HA-AFX
and HA-A3
(HA-AFX with the following mutations: T28A, S193A, and
S258A) were
immunoprecipitated from mammalian cell lysates and
incubated with
recombinant Crm1 in the absence or presence of
RanQ69L, a mutant of Ran
locked in its GTP bound conformation.
RanQ69L increases the affinity of
Crm1 for its export cargoes.
Interestingly, both PKB-phosphorylated
(HA-AFX) and -unphosphorylated
(HA-AFX plus LY294002 and HA-A3) AFX
bound to Crm1 in the presence
of RanQ69L (Fig.
3A). These data demonstrate that binding
of Crm1
to AFX is independent of phosphorylation by PKB.

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Both phosphorylated and unphosphorylated AFXs bind Crm1
and are exported from the nucleus. (A) HEK293 cells were transfected
with either pMT2-HA-AFX or pMT2-HA-A3 (T28A, S193A, S258A), incubated
in the presence of serum for 48 h, and where indicated, incubated
with LY294002 (10 µM) for 2 h prior to cell lysis. The HA-tagged
proteins were immunoprecipitated with 12CA5 and immobilized on protein
A-Sepharose. The beads were then incubated with recombinant Crm1 (500 nM) in the absence or presence of RanQ69L (3 µM), a Ran mutant locked
in the GTP bound conformation. Proteins that bound to AFX were analyzed
by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting. An anti-His6 antibody was
used to visualize Crm1, which possesses a carboxy-terminal
His6 tag. Directly conjugated HRP-12CA5 was used to
assess HA-AFX and HA-A3 immunoprecipitation. An anti-14-3-3 antibody was used to detect 14-3-3 binding. (B) HEK293 cells were
transfected with pMT2-HA-AFX and were treated as described for panel A. Prior to incubation with Crm1 and RanQ69L, immobilized HA-AFX was
washed with 1 M MgCl2 where indicated to remove bound
14-3-3 proteins. Proteins that bound AFX were analyzed as described for
panel A. (C) Heterotypic cell fusions were performed between BHK21
cells transiently transfected with pMT2-HA-A3 and a stably transfected
HeLa cell line expressing GFP-streptavidin-NLS (GSN2). Cell
cultures were trypsinized 24 h after transfection, mixed,
allowed to adhere to coverslips overnight, and then fused by using
polyethylene glycol. After incubation for 1 h with cycloheximide
(50 µM), cells were fixed and stained for HA-A3 with 12CA5 and a
Texas red-conjugated secondary antibody. Nuclei were visualized by
staining the DNA with DAPI. Bar, 10 µm.
|
|
To confirm that HA-AFX was phosphorylated in this experiment, we
examined its interaction with 14-3-3. The 14-3-3 proteins
are a family
of proteins reported to bind Forkhead transcription
factors in a
phosphorylation-dependent manner (
14). As shown
in Fig.
3A, endogenous 14-3-3 coimmunoprecipitated with HA-AFX
from cells grown
in the presence of serum, thereby confirming
that phosphorylation of
HA-AFX by PKB had occurred (Fig.
3A).
These data raised the possibility
that Crm1 binding to phosphorylated
AFX is indirect and is mediated by
14-3-3. It has been reported
previously that 14-3-3 contains a
leucine-rich NES-like motif
(
63). It is not clear,
however, that this sequence can function
as an NES, especially when
binding proteins are associated with
14-3-3. To test this hypothesis,
we stripped 14-3-3 proteins from
AFX using 1 M MgCl
2. This
treatment substantially decreased the
amount of 14-3-3 associated with
AFX but did not reduce the amount
of Crm1-RanQ69L that was bound (Fig.
3B). It should be noted that
although 14-3-3 proteins have been
reported to bind Crm1 in the
presence of mammalian cell lysates
(
63), we have been unable
to detect a direct interaction
between recombinant 14-3-3

, Crm1,
and RanQ69L (data not
shown).
The observation that Crm1 binding to AFX is independent of PKB
phosphorylation is supported by the results of heterokaryon
fusion
assays. HA-A3 has a steady-state nuclear localization but
nonetheless
may actively shuttle into and out of the nucleus.
Nucleocytoplasmic
shuttling can be observed by the use of cell
fusion assays in which the
donor and acceptor nuclei of the fused
cells can be distinguished.
Redistribution of a tagged protein
from one nucleus to another can only
occur if the protein exits
the donor nucleus and is reimported into the
acceptor nucleus.
To perform heterokaryon fusion assays, we used BHK21
cells expressing
HA-A3 as the donor and a reporter cell line, GSN2,
that expresses
GFP-streptavidin-NLS as the acceptor. The
GFP-streptavidin-NLS
fusion protein, which is constitutively nuclear
and does not shuttle,
acts as a marker for the acceptor nuclei. HA-A3
shuttling would
lead to its equilibration into the nucleus of a fused
GSN2 cell.
On the other hand, if HA-A3 does not shuttle, no HA-A3 would
be
detected in the nuclei of the GSN2 cells. Figure
3C shows an AFX
donor nucleus surrounded by three GSN2 acceptor nuclei that also
stained positive for HA-A3. Therefore, even though unphosphorylated
AFX
is predominantly nuclear in its steady-state distribution,
it is
constitutively shuttling into and out of the cytoplasm.
AFX
phosphorylation by PKB, however, results in a shift in the
steady-state
distribution of AFX to the cytoplasm. Taken together
these results
suggest that the regulation of AFX localization
in response to PKB
phosphorylation occurs not at the level of
nuclear export or nuclear
retention but instead at the level of
nuclear import or through
cytoplasmic retention of phosphorylated
AFX.
AFX import into the nucleus proceeds via an active, Ran-dependent
mechanism.
On account of the results described above, it was
important to identify the mechanism by which AFX is imported into the
nucleus. In principle, AFX could accumulate in the nucleus either by an active mechanism or by diffusion followed by nuclear retention. Most
active nuclear transport pathways studied to date require energy and an
intact Ran gradient across the nuclear envelope. To determine whether
the nuclear accumulation of AFX observed in serum-starved cells
proceeds via an active, Ran-dependent mechanism, we used tsBN2 cells.
These cells have a temperature-sensitive RanGEF (RCC1) allele
(70). When grown at the permissive temperature (33.5°C),
tsBN2 cells have an intact Ran gradient. However, incubation at the
nonpermissive temperature (39.5°C) causes collapse of the Ran
gradient and prevents Ran-dependent nuclear transport. As we have shown
previously, incubation for 3 h at 39.5°C in the presence of
cycloheximide (to prevent new RanGEF synthesis) completely inhibits the
import of other substrates known to utilize a classical import pathway,
such as the glucocorticoid receptor (62).
To test the Ran dependence of AFX import, we transfected tsBN2 cells
with a plasmid encoding HA-AFX. In the presence of cycloheximide,
cells
were grown at either 33.5°C or were shifted to 39.5°C for
3 h.
The cells were then serum starved. Immunofluorescence revealed
that at
the permissive temperature HA-AFX entered the nucleus
on serum
starvation (Fig.
4A, 33.5°C). In cells
incubated at 39.5°C,
however, HA-AFX did not accumulate in the
nucleus (Fig.
4A, 39.5°C).
We conclude, therefore, that import of AFX
into the nucleus proceeds
via an active, Ran-dependent mechanism.

View larger version (88K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
AFX import into the nucleus requires a Ran gradient and
basic residues downstream from S193. (A) tsBN2 cells were transfected
with pMT2-HA-AFX and were incubated at 33.5°C in the presence of
serum for 48 h. Cycloheximide (50 µM) was then added to the
medium to prevent new protein synthesis, and the cells were incubated
at either 33.5°C (right) or 39.5°C (left) for 3 h. Where
indicated, the serum was then withdrawn and the cells were returned to
33.5°C or 39.5°C for 1.5 h. Cells were fixed and HA-A3 was
stained as described previously. (B) HeLa cells were transfected with
pMT2-HA-AFX or pMT2-HA-AFX( 198-216) and were incubated in the
presence of serum for 48 h. Serum was then withdrawn for 1.5 h. Cells were fixed, and HA-AFX and HA-AFX( 198-216) were stained as
before. Nuclei were visualized by staining the DNA with DAPI. Bar, 10 µm.
|
|
Basic residues on both sides of S193 are necessary and sufficient
for nuclear import of AFX.
To determine whether PKB
phosphorylation regulates the nuclear import of AFX, we needed to
identify the NLS within the AFX sequence. Clusters of basic residues
are often predictive that a region of a protein may act as an NLS. AFX
contains two clusters of basic residues flanking the PKB
phosphorylation site S193. Therefore, deletion of these clusters would
test whether they are required for AFX nuclear import. Deletion of
residues 198 to 216 from HA-AFX that are C terminal to S193 results in
a protein that is unable to enter the nucleus under the same conditions of serum starvation that result in HA-AFX accumulation in the nucleus
(Fig. 4B). Thus, this region is necessary for nuclear import of AFX. To
test whether this region is sufficient to mediate import, we expressed
residues 198 to 221 as an amino-terminal fusion to GFP-GFP-GFP
[AFX(198-221)-GFP3] in mammalian cells. The triple GFP construct
(~80 kDa) was used to prevent passive diffusion through the nuclear
pore complex (NPC) which has a diffusion limit of ~60 kDa. (These
fusion proteins could not be expressed in E. coli, because
the NLS is cleaved stoichiometrically during the induction of
expression under all conditions tested). As shown in Fig.
5A, AFX(198-221)-GFP3 did not accumulate
in the nucleus. The basic region upstream of S193 was also not able to
act as an NLS in isolation [Fig. 5; AFX(180-197)-GFP3]. However, a
construct containing both basic regions accumulated efficiently in the
nucleus [AFX(180-221)-GFP3]. Expression of these constructs as
carboxy-terminal fusions to GFP-GFP-GFP resulted in the same
localization (data not shown). We conclude, therefore, that residues
180 to 221 of AFX constitute an NLS and that basic residues on both
sides of S193 are required for the nuclear import of AFX.

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Basic residues on both sides of S193 are sufficient for
nuclear import. Basic residues on either side of PKB
phosphorylation site S193 were expressed as N-terminal fusions to
GFP-GFP-GFP (GFP3). pKGFP3, pKGFP3-AFX(180-197),
pKGFP3-AFX(198-221), and pKGFP3-AFX(180-221) were transfected into
BHK21 cells. At 18 h posttransfection, the cells were fixed and
the DNA was stained with DAPI (A) or the cells were lysed and analyzed
by SDS-PAGE (10 µl of lysate/lane) and immunoblotting using an
anti-GFP antibody (B). (C) The relative nuclear and cytoplasmic
fluorescence levels of the constructs were obtained using Openlab
(Improvision). Nuclear fluorescence was calculated as a percentage of
the total cellular fluorescence corrected for the background
fluorescence. Each data point represents the mean fluorescence obtained
from 12 randomly chosen cells. Error is expressed as standard
deviations of the means. Bar, 10 µm.
|
|
Although the 180 to 221 region contains 12 lysine and arginine
residues, it does not comprise a classical monopartite or bipartite
NLS. In addition, binding of the classical import receptor importin

1, importin

3, or importin

to this region of the protein
could
not be detected (data not shown). Therefore, we produced a series
of mutations in AFX(180-221)-GFP3 to identify residues required
for
import (Fig.
6). Quantification of
relative nuclear and cytoplasmic
fluorescence levels demonstrated that
mutation of arginines 188
to 190 to alanine had the most deleterious
effect on import (Fig.
6, mutant II), followed by the mutation of
lysines 209 and 210
(Fig.
6, mutant V). This result reinforces the
requirement for
basic residues both upstream and downstream of S193 for
nuclear
import and confirms that the sequence is an atypical NLS.

View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Basic residues on both sides of S193 are required for
nuclear import, and the sequence is not a classical NLS motif. (A)
There are 12 lysine and arginine residues that surround S193. Five
constructs with mutations of basic residues within AFX(180-221)-GFP
were made (I through V). pKGFP3, pKGFP-AFX(180-221),
pKGFP3-AFX(180-221)-I, pKGFP3(180-221)-II, pKGFP3-AFX(180-221)-III,
pKGFP3-AFX(180-221)-IV, and pKGFP-AFX(180-221)-V were transfected
into BHK21 cells. At 18 h posttransfection, the cells were either
fixed (B) or lysed (C) and analyzed as described for Fig. 5 (D). Bar,
10 µm. wt, wild type.
|
|
Phosphorylation of S193 reduces the rate of nuclear import.
Phosphorylation of S193 adds a negative charge to a positively charged
region of AFX. This may affect the binding of AFX to its nuclear import
receptor and reduce its rate of import. To test this hypothesis, we
created two AFX(180-221)-GFP3 mutants: S193A, which cannot be
phosphorylated, and S193E, which may mimic phosphorylation at this
site. Nuclear import of S193A was comparable to that of wild-type
AFX(180-221)-GFP3 (Fig. 7A and C).
This demonstrates that mutation of
S193 results in a stable fusion protein that is able to enter the
nucleus. The S193E mutation, however, substantially reduced nuclear
accumulation (Fig. 7A and C). This result suggests that PKB
phosphorylation of S193 reduces the rate of nuclear import of AFX. It
is important to note that these GFP3 constructs do not contain an NES.
Therefore, over a 20-h transfection period, even with a greatly reduced
rate of import some nuclear accumulation would be expected, since the
construct cannot be reexported. Therefore, a phosphorylation-dependent
reduction in the import rate of AFX, combined with constitutive nuclear
export, would shift the steady-state distribution of the protein from
the nucleus to the cytoplasm. This mechanism is consistent with the
known redistribution of AFX to the cytoplasm on addition of insulin or
serum.

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
Phosphorylation of S193 reduces the rate of nuclear
import. Two AFX(180-221)-GFP3 mutants were created, S193A and S193E.
pKGFP3, pKGFP3-AFX(180-221), pKGFP3-AFX(180-221)S193A, and
pKGFP3-AFX(180-221)S193E were transfected into BHK21 cells. At 18 h posttransfection, the cells were either fixed (A) or lysed (B) and
analyzed as described for Fig. 5 (C). Bar, 10 µm. wt, wild type.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Nuclear transport of the Forkhead transcription factor, AFX, plays
a critical role in the regulation of its transcriptional activity.
Phosphorylation of AFX by PKB results in a rapid change in the
steady-state distribution of the protein from the nucleus to the
cytoplasm. However, the mechanism by which this relocalization occurs
has not been determined, although it has been proposed by others that
export may be regulated by PKB and that 14-3-3 may function as a
chaperone for export, as has also been suggested for the regulation of
cdc25 export (19). Based on the data presented in this
paper, we propose a different model, in which nuclear import, not
export, of AFX is the principal target of regulation by PKB (Fig.
8).

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 8.
Nuclear import, not export, of AFX is regulated by PKB.
(A) Unphosphorylated AFX appears nuclear at steady state but is
actually shuttling rapidly between the nucleus and the cytoplasm.
Therefore, the rate of import of unphosphorylated AFX exceeds its rate
of export. Nuclear export of both phosphorylated and unphosphorylated
AFX is likely mediated by the exportin, Crm1, since both HA-AFX and
HA-A3 bind Crm1 in the presence of RanGTP. Imp, importin. (B) The
addition of insulin to cells activates PKB and causes it to translocate
into the nucleus, where it phosphorylates Forkhead family members.
Phosphorylated AFX exits the nucleus by binding Crm1. Phosphorylation
of AFX at S193 attenuates nuclear import, perhaps by reducing the
affinity of AFX for its nuclear import receptor. Therefore,
phosphorylation by PKB decreases the import rate constant without
altering the export rate constant. Since the steady-state localization
of a protein is determined by its relative rates of import and export,
the localization of AFX would shift from the nucleus to the cytoplasm
as observed. This alteration in transport rates in conjunction with
proposed cytoplasmic retention by binding 14-3-3 proteins would result
in exclusion of AFX from the nucleus. Since AFX requires nuclear
localization to carry out transcription, this mechanism of regulated
transport would inhibit the activity of AFX in response to
phosphorylation by PKB.
|
|
Unphosphorylated AFX is predominantly nuclear at steady state. However,
heterokaryon fusion assays (Fig. 3C) demonstrated that the protein is,
in fact, continually shuttling between the nucleus and the cytoplasm.
The rate constant for unphosphorylated AFX import, therefore, must
exceed the rate constant for its export (Fig. 8A). Importantly, the
nuclear export of AFX appears to be unaltered by PKB phosphorylation.
Nuclear export of both phosphorylated and unphosphorylated AFXs is
likely mediated by the export receptor, Crm1. Both wild-type HA-AFX and
the triple mutant, HA-A3, which cannot be phosphorylated by PKB, bind
Crm1 in the presence of RanGTP (Fig. 3A). In support of the
identification of Crm1 as the export receptor, we show that AFX export
from the nucleus in response to insulin is blocked by the addition of
LMB (Fig. 2A), a potent and specific inhibitor of Crm1 function.
The addition of insulin to cells results in the activation of PKB and
its translocation into the nucleus, where it phosphorylates Forkhead
family members (Fig. 8B). Treatment of cells with LMB traps AFX and
FKHRL1 in the nucleus. However, both are phosphorylated in response to
insulin to the same extent and at the same residues as in cells not
treated with LMB (Fig. 2B). This result, therefore, strongly indicates
that PKB enters the nucleus when activated by insulin to phosphorylate
Forkhead transcription factors and other target proteins.
Phosphorylation alone, however, is not sufficient to inhibit the
transcriptional activity of AFX. We have shown, using transcriptional
activation assays, that blockade of AFX nuclear export by the addition
of LMB results in a loss of insulin-induced transcriptional
control (Fig. 2B). Therefore, both phosphorylation by
PKB and nuclear export mediated by Crm1 are essential for complete
inhibition of AFX transcriptional activity.
We have found that AFX enters the nucleus by an active, Ran-dependent
mechanism (Fig. 4A) and that import requires a basic region in AFX
encompassing PKB phosphorylation site S193 (Fig. 5). Importantly, the
addition of a negative charge at S193 substantially attenuates nuclear
import (Fig. 7), most likely by reducing the affinity of AFX for its
nuclear import receptor. We propose, therefore, that phosphorylation by
PKB at S193 reduces the rate of AFX import. Since the steady-state
localization of a protein is determined by its relative rate constants
for import and export, the localization of AFX would shift from the
nucleus to the cytoplasm (Fig. 8B). This alteration in the transport
rate constants in response to phosphorylation by PKB, in conjunction
with proposed cytoplasmic retention by binding 14-3-3 proteins
(14), would result in both the efficient nuclear exclusion
of AFX and the inhibition of its transcriptional activity. In
conclusion, we propose that this nuclear exclusion mechanism is
required to regulate the activity of AFX.
These data are consistent with the results of transcriptional
activation assays reported previously for FKHR (30). The
PKB phosphorylation site S256 in FKHR is analogous to S193 in AFX. Mutation of S256 to an alanine in the context of full-length FKHR abolished the ability of insulin and PKB to inhibit FKHR activity. In
contrast, mutation of S256 to an aspartate resulted in a substantial inhibition of its transcriptional activity. These effects were not
observed when the other two PKB sites were mutated independently. Although the localization of the S256D mutant was not assayed, our data
suggest that the inhibition of FKHR activity may be due, in part, to a
deficit in nuclear import.
"Classical" nuclear localization sequences are characterized by
short amino acid stretches that are enriched in basic amino acids. The
NLS of the large T antigen of simian virus 40 was identified by
deletion analysis that resulted in mislocalization of the protein to
the cytoplasm (45). It was later defined as a
seven-amino-acid sequence (PKKKRKV) sufficient to confer
nuclear localization when conjugated to a carrier protein
(46). Some proteins contain similar sequences that are
referred to as monopartite NLSs. Other proteins, such as nucleoplasmin,
contain bipartite NLSs that consist of two patches of basic residues
separated by a 10-amino-acid spacer (23). Generally,
proteins carrying classical or bipartite NLSs bind a cytoplasmic
receptor, importin
(28, 48). Importin
associates
with importin
, a protein that docks import complexes at the NPC and
translocates import cargo into the nucleus. There are, however, many
exceptions to this type of import, and there is a large family of
importins and exportins that can recognize distinct NLSs and mediate
transport of different subsets of cargo. For example, ribosomal
proteins (33) and histones (32) have been
shown to bind directly to several different importin
family members
and dock at the NPC independently of importin
. In addition, other
proteins, such as hnRNP K (51) and
-catenin
(75), can translocate through the NPC in the absence of
any soluble factors.
We have delineated residues 180 to 221 of AFX as a novel type of
nuclear import signal. This region contains a small portion of the DNA
binding domain. Therefore, like other Forkhead family members, the DNA
binding domain of AFX contributes to DNA binding and nuclear
localization (59). This region of AFX contains 12 lysine
and arginine residues. Although several groups of these basic residues
could act as monopartite or bipartite NLSs, the information provided by
mutational analysis suggests that AFX contains a nonclassical NLS.
Mutation of arginines 188 to 190 in the NLS of AFX has the greatest
inhibitory effect on nuclear import, followed by the mutation of
lysines 209 to 211. These groups of basic residues are separated by 18 amino acids, and both are contained within similar sequence repeats
(KAPRRR and KAPKKK). These repeats may be important for import receptor binding.
The identity of the nuclear import receptor of AFX remains to be
established. Since we do not observe binding of AFX to several classical import receptors, including importins
1,
3, and
, it
may bind to a novel member of the importin family (which comprises >20
members in mammalian cells). Alternatively, AFX may enter the nucleus
in other ways, for instance, by piggybacking on another protein that
contains a classical NLS. The role of PKB-mediated phosphorylation and
14-3-3 binding in altering AFX import can be more thoroughly studied
once the receptor is identified.
Binding of Forkhead family members to 14-3-3 proteins has been proposed
to play a role in the retention of phosphorylated Forkheads in
the cytoplasm (14). Phosphorylated FKHRL1
(14) and AFX (Fig. 3A) both bind 14-3-3 proteins.
However, we have never observed any specificity of AFX binding to a
particular 14-3-3 isoform. In fact, we have observed binding to
14-3-3
, 14-3-3
, and 14-3-3
(data not shown). Recently, it has
been proposed that 14-3-3 protein binding may impart no specific
information about subcellular targeting (53). Instead, a
14-3-3 protein may obscure the NLS or NES of the protein to which it
binds. In this way, 14-3-3 proteins would affect the subcellular
localization of their target proteins by interfering with the binding
of transport receptors. 14-3-3 binding to Forkhead family members may
sterically inhibit import receptor binding and, thereby, act to prevent import.
The proposal has also been made that 14-3-3 possesses an NES that is
recognized by Crm1 and participates directly in the export of binding
partners through a Crm1 interaction (63). In our hands,
however, 14-3-3 does not bind Crm1 directly, nor is its association
with AFX necessary for the interaction of AFX with Crm1. Therefore, in
this case at least, 14-3-3 isoforms appear to play no part in
regulating AFX nuclear export.
What is the AFX NES? Leucine-rich regions found in several Forkhead
family members conform to the consensus sequence for a Crm1-dependent
NES (9). This region in AFX corresponds to residues 300 to
308 (LELLDGLNL). Deletion of residues 298 to 308 results in
a protein that is unable to relocalize from the nucleus to the
cytoplasm on stimulation with insulin (unpublished data). This region,
therefore, likely represents the Crm1-dependent NES.
Distinct chromosomal translocations in pediatric alveolar
rhabdomyosarcoma and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) involve two
human Forkhead genes. Alveolar rhabdomyosarcomas are associated with
unique chromosomal translocations that arise from fusion of PAX3 or
PAX7 to the FKHR gene (27). The PAX3-FKHR fusion protein
is a more potent transcriptional activator than PAX3 alone (8) and transforms primary cells (64).
Several chromosomal translocations in ALL occur at the 11q23 locus, and
all convey a poor prognosis that is usually associated with a high rate
of treatment failure and relapse. These breakpoints affect the MLL gene
(also called HRX, ALL, or Htrx1) that is disrupted midway through the
coding region (18, 77). A well-documented translocation arises from the fusion of MLL to the AFX gene on chromosome X (13).
Importantly, the fusions of AFX and FKHR to their breakpoint partners
occur at identical amino acid positions within the Forkhead proteins.
The resulting fusion proteins contain the N-terminal DNA binding region
of the fusion partner and the C-terminal transactivation domain of the
Forkhead protein. The MLL-AFX fusion protein expresses residues 148 to
501 of AFX (57). This preserves the NLS of AFX identified
in this study (residues 180 to 221) but deletes the T28 phosphorylation
site. We have shown that deletion of residues N terminal to S193 causes
a loss of transcriptional regulation by insulin (42). In
addition, potential loss of S193 phosphorylation in the context of the
fusion protein would allow constitutive import into the nucleus.
Therefore, both the deregulation of Forkhead activity and a
constitutive nuclear localization likely contribute to the oncogenic
properties of these fusion proteins.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank all members of our laboratories for their continued
advice throughout the experimental and preparatory phases of the
manuscript. In particular, we thank Mark Lindsay, Michael Nemergut,
Kendra Plafker, Scott Plafker, Alicia Smith, Katie Welch, Nancy de
Ruiter, and Hans Bos. We also thank Iain Mattaj and Dirk Görlich
for their generosity in providing expression plasmids used in this
study (Crm1, RanQ69L), Barbara Wolff for her gift of LMB, Anne Brunet
for the anti-phospho T32 FKHRL1 antibody, Kris Reedquist for the c-cbl
antibody, Marc Timmers for the RNA pol II antibody, and Bryce Paschal
for the GSN2 cell line.
This work was supported by a grant awarded to I.G.M. from the National
Institutes of Health, DHHS (GM-50526). A.M.B. is supported by a
Postdoctoral National Service Award from the National Institutes of
Health, DHHS (GM-20017). G.K. and B.B. are supported by grants from NWO
and the Dutch Cancer Foundation (KWF).
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: University of
Virginia, Center for Cell Signaling, P.O. Box 800577, Charlottesville, VA 22908. Phone: (804) 982-0083. Fax: (804) 924-1236. E-mail: amb7c{at}Virginia.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Ahmed, N. N.,
T. F. Franke,
A. Bellacosa,
K. Datta,
M. E. Gonzalez-Portal,
T. Taguchi,
J. R. Testa, and P. N. Tsichlis.
1993.
The proteins encoded by c-akt and v-akt differ in post-translational modification, subcellular localization and oncogenic potential.
Oncogene
8:1957-1963[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Alessi, D. R.,
S. R. James,
C. P. Downes,
A. B. Holmes,
P. R. Gaffney,
C. B. Reese, and P. Cohen.
1997.
Characterization of a 3-phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase which phosphorylates and activates protein kinase B .
Curr. Biol.
7:261-269[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Anderson, M. J.,
C. S. Viars,
S. Czekay,
W. K. Cavenee, and K. C. Arden.
1998.
Cloning and characterization of three human forkhead genes that comprise an FKHR-like gene subfamily.
Genomics
47:187-199[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Andjelkovic, M.,
D. R. Alessi,
R. Meier,
A. Fernandez,
N. J. Lamb,
M. Frech,
P. Cron,
P. Cohen,
J. M. Lucocq, and B. A. Hemmings.
1997.
Role of translocation in the activation and function of protein kinase B.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:31515-31524[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Arts, G. J.,
M. Fornerod, and I. W. Mattaj.
1998.
Identification of a nuclear export receptor for tRNA.
Curr. Biol.
8:305-314[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Bellacosa, A.,
J. R. Testa,
S. P. Staal, and P. N. Tsichlis.
1991.
A retroviral oncogene, akt, encoding a serine-threonine kinase containing an SH2-like region.
Science
254:274-277[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Ben-Levy, R.,
S. Hooper,
R. Wilson,
H. F. Paterson, and C. J. Marshall.
1998.
Nuclear export of the stress-activated protein kinase p38 mediated by its substrate MAPKAP kinase-2.
Curr. Biol.
8:1049-1057[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Bennicelli, J. L.,
R. H. Edwards, and F. G. Barr.
1996.
Mechanism for transcriptional gain of function resulting from chromosomal translocation in alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:5455-5459[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Biggs, W. H.,
J. Meisenhelder,
T. Hunter,
W. K. Cavenee, and K. C. Arden.
1999.
Protein kinase B/Akt-mediated phosphorylation promotes nuclear exclusion of the winged helix transcription factor FKHR1.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
96:7421-7426[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Bischoff, F. R.,
H. Krebber,
T. Kempf,
I. Hermes, and H. Ponstingl.
1995.
Human RanGTPase-activating protein RanGAP1 is a homologue of yeast Rna1p involved in mRNA processing and transport.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92:1749-1753[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Bischoff, F. R., and H. Ponstingl.
1991.
Catalysis of guanine nucleotide exchange on Ran by the mitotic regulator RCC1.
Nature
354:80-82[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Black, B. E.,
L. Levesque,
J. M. Holaska,
T. C. Wood, and B. M. Paschal.
1999.
Identification of an NTF2-related factor that binds Ran-GTP and regulates nuclear protein export.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19:8616-8624[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Borkhardt, A.,
R. Repp,
O. A. Haas,
T. Leis,
J. Harbott,
J. Kreuder,
J. Hammermann,
T. Henn, and F. Lampert.
1997.
Cloning and characterization of AFX, the gene that fuses to MLL in acute leukemias with a t(X;11)(q13;q23).
Oncogene
14:195-202[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Brunet, A.,
A. Bonni,
M. J. Zigmond,
M. Z. Lin,
P. Juo,
L. S. Hu,
M. J. Anderson,
K. C. Arden,
J. Blenis, and M. E. Greenberg.
1999.
Akt promotes cell survival by phosphorylating and inhibiting a Forkhead transcription factor.
Cell
96:857-868[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Burgering, B. M., and P. J. Coffer.
1995.
Protein kinase B (c-Akt) in phosphatidylinositol-3-OH kinase signal transduction.
Nature
376:599-602[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Cheng, J. Q.,
D. A. Altomare,
M. A. Klein,
W. C. Lee,
G. D. Kruh,
N. A. Lissy, and J. R. Testa.
1997.
Transforming activity and mitosis-related expression of the AKT2 oncogene: evidence suggesting a link between cell cycle regulation and oncogenesis.
Oncogene
14:2793-2801[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Coffer, P. J., and J. R. Woodgett.
1991.
Molecular cloning and characterisation of a novel putative protein-serine kinase related to the cAMP-dependent and protein kinase C families.
Eur. J. Biochem.
201:475-481[Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Corral, J.,
A. Forster,
S. Thompson,
F. Lampert,
Y. Kaneko,
R. Slater,
W. G. Kroes,
C. E. van der Schoot,
W. D. Ludwig,
A. Karpas, et al.
1993.
Acute leukemias of different lineages have similar MLL gene fusions encoding related chimeric proteins resulting from chromosomal translocation.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
90:8538-8542[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Datta, S. R.,
A. Brunet, and M. E. Greenberg.
1999.
Cellular survival: a play in three Akts.
Genes Dev.
13:2905-2927[Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
DeVit, M. J., and M. Johnston.
1999.
The nuclear exportin Msn5 is required for nuclear export of the Mig1 glucose repressor of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Curr. Biol.
9:1231-1241[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Devit, M. J.,
J. A. Waddle, and M. Johnston.
1997.
Regulated nuclear translocation of the Mig1 glucose repressor.
Mol. Biol. Cell.
8:1603-1618[Abstract].
|
| 22.
|
Dijkers, P. F.,
R. H. Medemadagger,
J. J. Lammers,
L. Koenderman, and P. J. Coffer.
2000.
Expression of the pro-apoptotic bcl-2 family member bim is regulated by the forkhead transcription factor FKHR-L1.
Curr. Biol.
10:1201-1204[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 23.
|
Dingwall, C.,
S. V. Sharnick, and R. A. Laskey.
1982.
A polypeptide domain that specifies migration of nucleoplasmin into the nucleus.
Cell
30:449-458[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Dudek, H.,
S. R. Datta,
T. F. Franke,
M. J. Birnbaum,
R. Yao,
G. M. Cooper,
R. A. Segal,
D. R. Kaplan, and M. E. Greenberg.
1997.
Regulation of neuronal survival by the serine-threonine protein kinase Akt.
Science
275:661-665[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Fornerod, M.,
M. Ohno,
M. Yoshida, and I. W. Mattaj.
1997.
Crm1 is an export receptor for leucine-rich nuclear export signals.
Cell
90:1051-1060[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 26.
|
Fukuda, M.,
S. Asano,
T. Nakamura,
M. Adachi,
M. Yoshida,
M. Yanagida, and E. Nishida.
1997.
Crm1 is responsible for intracellular transport mediated by the nuclear export signal.
Nature
390:308-311[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 27.
|
Galili, N.,
R. J. Davis,
W. J. Fredericks,
S. Mukhopadhyay,
F. J. Rauscher,
B. S. Emanuel,
G. Rovera, and F. G. Barr.
1993.
Fusion of a fork head domain gene to PAX3 in the solid tumour alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma.
Nat. Genet.
5:230-235[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 28.
|
Görlich, D., and U. Kutay.
1999.
Transport between the cell nucleus and the cytoplasm.
Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol.
15:607-660[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 29.
|
Görlich, D.,
N. Pante,
U. Kutay,
U. Aebi, and F. R. Bischoff.
1996.
Identification of different roles for RanGDP and RanGTP in nuclear protein import.
EMBO J.
15:5584-5594[Medline].
|
| 30.
|
Guo, S.,
G. Rena,
S. Cichy,
X. He,
P. Cohen, and T. Unterman.
1999.
Phosphorylation of serine 256 by protein kinase B disrupts transactivation by FKHR and mediates effects of insulin on insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-1 promoter activity through a conserved insulin response sequence.
J. Biol. Chem.
274:17184-17192[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 31.
|
Izaurralde, E.,
U. Kutay,
C. Vonkobbe,
I. W. Mattaj, and D. Görlich.
1997.
The asymmetric distribution of the constituents of the Ran system is essential for transport into and out of the nucleus.
EMBO J.
16:6535-6547[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 32.
|
Jakel, S.,
W. Albig,
U. Kutay,
F. R. Bischoff,
K. Schwamborn,
D. Doenecke, and D. Görlich.
1999.
The importin beta/importin 7 heterodimer is a functional nuclear import receptor for histone H1.
EMBO J.
18:2411-2423[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 33.
|
Jakel, S., and D. Görlich.
1998.
Importin , transportin, RanBP5 and RanBP7 mediate nuclear import of ribosomal proteins in mammalian cells.
EMBO J.
17:4491-4502[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 34.
|
Jones, P. F.,
T. Jakubowicz,
F. J. Pitossi,
F. Maurer, and B. A. Hemmings.
1991.
Molecular cloning and identification of a serine/threonine protein kinase of the second-messenger subfamily.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
88:4171-4175[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 35.
|
Kaffman, A., and E. K. O'Shea.
1999.
Regulation of nuclear localization: a key to a door.
Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol.
15:291-339[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 36.
|
Kaffman, A.,
N. M. Rank,
E. M. O'Neill,
L. S. Huang, and E. K. O'Shea.
1998.
The receptor Msn5 exports the phosphorylated transcription factor Pho4 out of the nucleus.
Nature
396:482-486[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 37.
|
Kaffman, A.,
N. M. Rank, and E. K. O'Shea.
1998.
Phosphorylation regulates association of the transcription factor Pho4 with its import receptor Pse1/Kap121.
Genes Dev.
12:2673-2683[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 38.
|
Kauffmann-Zeh, A.,
P. Rodriguez-Viciana,
E. Ulrich,
C. Gilbert,
P. Coffer,
J. Downward, and G. Evan.
1997.
Suppression of c-Myc-induced apoptosis by Ras signalling through PI(3)K and PKB.
Nature
385:544-548[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 39.
|
Kehlenbach, R. H.,
A. Dickmans,
A. Kehlenbach,
T. Guan, and L. Gerace.
1999.
A role for RanBP1 in the release of Crm1 from the nuclear pore complex in a terminal step of nuclear export.
J. Cell Biol.
145:645-657[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 40.
|
Kennedy, S. G.,
A. J. Wagner,
S. D. Conzen,
J. Jordan,
A. Bellacosa,
P. N. Tsichlis, and N. Hay.
1997.
The PI 3-kinase/Akt signaling pathway delivers an anti-apoptotic signal.
Genes Dev.
11:701-713[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 41.
|
Komeili, A., and E. K. O'Shea.
2000.
Nuclear transport and transcription.
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
12:355-360[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 42.
|
Kops, G. J.,
N. D. de Ruiter,
A. M. De Vries-Smits,
D. R. Powell,
J. L. Bos, and B. M. Burgering.
1999.
Direct control of the Forkhead transcription factor AFX by protein kinase B.
Nature
398:630-634[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 43.
|
Kudo, N.,
S. Khochbin,
K. Nishi,
K. Kitano,
M. Yanagida,
M. Yoshida, and S. Horinouchi.
1997.
Molecular cloning and cell cycle-dependent expression of mammalian Crm1, a protein involved in nuclear export of proteins.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:29742-29751[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 44.
|
Kudo, N.,
N. Matsumori,
H. Taoka,
D. Fujiwara,
E. P. Schreiner,
B. Wolff,
M. Yoshida, and S. Horinouchi.
1999.
Leptomycin B inactivates Crm1/exportin 1 by covalent modification at a cysteine residue in the central conserved region.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
96:9112-9117[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 45.
|
Lanford, R. E., and J. S. Butel.
1984.
Construction and characterization of an SV40 mutant defective in nuclear transport of T antigen.
Cell
37:801-813[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 46.
|
Lanford, R. E.,
P. Kanda, and R. C. Kennedy.
1986.
Induction of nuclear transport with a synthetic peptide homologous to the SV40 T antigen transport signal.
Cell
46:575-582[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 47.
|
Lee, K. A.,
A. Bindereif, and M. R. Green.
1988.
A small-scale procedure for preparation of nuclear extracts that support efficient transcription and pre-mRNA splicing.
Gene Anal. Tech.
5:22-31[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 48.
|
Mattaj, I. W., and L. Englmeier.
1998.
Nucleocytoplasmic transport: the soluble phase.
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
67:265-306[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 49.
|
Medema, R. H.,
G. J. Kops,
J. L. Bos, and B. M. Burgering.
2000.
AFX-like Forkhead transcription factors mediate cell-cycle regulation by Ras and PKB through p27kip1.
Nature
404:782-787[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 50.
|
Meier, R.,
D. R. Alessi,
P. Cron,
M. Andjelkovic, and B. A. Hemmings.
1997.
Mitogenic activation, phosphorylation, and nuclear translocation of protein kinase B .
J. Biol. Chem.
272:30491-30497[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 51.
|
Michael, W. M.,
P. S. Eder, and G. Dreyfuss.
1997.
The K nuclear shuttling domain: a novel signal for nuclear import and nuclear export in the hRNP K protein.
EMBO J.
16:3587-3598[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 52.
|
Moll, U. M.,
M. LaQuaglia,
J. Benard, and G. Riou.
1995.
Wild-type p53 protein undergoes cytoplasmic sequestration in undifferentiated neuroblastomas but not in differentiated tumors.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92:4407-4411[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 53.
|
Muslin, A. J., and H. Xing.
2000.
14-3-3 proteins: regulation of subcellular localization by molecular interference.
Cell. Signal.
12:703-709[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 54.
|
Nemergut, M. E., and I. G. Macara.
2000.
Nuclear import of the Ran exchange factor, RCC1, is mediated by at least two distinct mechanisms.
J. Cell Biol.
149:835-850[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 55.
|
Ogg, S.,
S. Paradis,
S. Gottlieb,
G. I. Patterson,
L. Lee,
H. A. Tissenbaum, and G. Ruvkun.
1997.
The Forkhead transcription factor DAF-16 transduces insulin-like metabolic and longevity signals in C. elegans.
Nature
389:994-999[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 56.
|
Ossareh-Nazari, B.,
F. Bachelerie, and C. Dargemont.
1997.
Evidence for a role of Crm1 in signal-mediated nuclear protein export.
Science
278:141-144[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 57.
|
Parry, P.,
Y. Wei, and G. Evans.
1994.
Cloning and characterization of the t(X;11) breakpoint from a leukemic cell line identify a new member of the forkhead gene family.
Genes Chromosomes Cancer
11:79-84[Medline].
|
| 58.
|
Plafker, K., and I. G. Macara.
2000.
Facilitated nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of the Ran binding protein RanBP1.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20:3510-3521[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 59.
|
Qian, X., and R. H. Costa.
1995.
Analysis of hepatocyte nuclear factor-3 protein domains required for transcriptional activation and nuclear targeting.
Nucleic Acids Res.
23:1184-1191[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 60.
|
Rameh, L. E., and L. C. Cantley.
1999.
The role of phosphoinositide 3-kinase lipid products in cell function.
J. Biol. Chem.
274:8347-8350[Free Full Text].
|
| 61.
|
Rexach, M., and G. Blobel.
1995.
Protein import into nuclei: association and dissociation reactions involving transport substrate, transport factors, and nucleoporins.
Cell
83:683-692[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 62.
|
Richards, S. A.,
K. L. Carey, and I. G. Macara.
1997.
Requirement of guanosine triphosphate-bound Ran for signal-mediated nuclear protein export.
Science
276:1842-1844[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 63.
|
Rittinger, K.,
J. Budman,
J. Xu,
S. Volinia,
L. C. Cantley,
S. J. Smerdon,
S. J. Gamblin, and M. B. Yaffe.
1999.
Structural analysis of 14-3-3 phosphopeptide complexes identifies a dual role for the nuclear export signal of 14-3-3 in ligand binding.
Mol. Cell
4:153-166[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 64.
|
Scheidler, S.,
W. J. Fredericks,
F. J. Rauscher,
F. G. Barr, and P. K. Vogt.
1996.
The hybrid PAX3-FKHR fusion protein of alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma transforms fibroblasts in culture.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:9805-9809[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 65.
|
Schlamp, C. L.,
G. L. Poulsen,
T. M. Nork, and R. W. Nickells.
1997.
Nuclear exclusion of wild-type p53 in immortalized human retinoblastoma cells.
J. Natl. Cancer Inst.
89:1530-1536[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 66.
|
Songyang, Z.,
D. Baltimore,
L. C. Cantley,
D. R. Kaplan, and T. F. Franke.
1997.
Interleukin 3-dependent survival by the Akt protein kinase.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:11345-11350[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 67.
|
Staal, S. P.
1987.
Molecular cloning of the akt oncogene and its human homologues AKT1 and AKT2: amplification of AKT1 in a primary human gastric adenocarcinoma.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
84:5034-5037[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 68.
|
Stade, K.,
C. S. Ford,
C. Guthrie, and K. Weis.
1997.
Exportin 1 (Crm1p) is an essential nuclear export factor.
Cell
90:1041-1050[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 69.
|
Stokoe, D.,
L. R. Stephens,
T. Copeland,
P. R. Gaffney,
C. B. Reese,
G. F. Painter,
A. B. Holmes,
F. McCormick, and P. T. Hawkins.
1997.
Dual role of phosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-trisphosphate in the activation of protein kinase B.
Science
277:567-570[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 70.
|
Tachibana, T.,
N. Imamoto,
H. Seino,
T. Nishimoto, and Y. Yoneda.
1994.
Loss of RCC1 leads to suppression of nuclear protein import in living cells.
J. Biol. Chem.
269:24542-24545[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 71.
|
Takaishi, H.,
H. Konishi,
H. Matsuzaki,
Y. Ono,
Y. Shirai,
N. Saito,
T. Kitamura,
W. Ogawa,
M. Kasuga,
U. Kikkawa, and Y. Nishizuka.
1999.
Regulation of nuclear translocation of forkhead transcription factor AFX by protein kinase B.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
96:11836-11841[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 72.
|
Walker, K. S.,
M. Deak,
A. Paterson,
K. Hudson,
P. Cohen, and D. R. Alessi.
1998.
Activation of protein kinase B and isoforms by insulin in vivo and by 3-phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase-1 in vitro: comparison with protein kinase B .
Biochem. J.
331:299-308.
|
| 73.
|
Welch, K.,
J. Franke,
M. Kohler, and I. G. Macara.
1999.
RanBP3 contains an unusual nuclear localization signal that is imported preferentially by importin- 3.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19:8400-8411[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 74.
|
Wolff, B.,
J. J. Sanglier, and Y. Wang.
1997.
Leptomycin B is an inhibitor of nuclear export: inhibition of nucleo-cytoplasmic translocation of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) Rev protein and Rev-dependent mRNA.
Chem. Biol.
4:139-147[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 75.
|
Yokoya, F.,
N. Imamoto,
T. Tachibana, and Y. Yoneda.
1999.
-Catenin can be transported into the nucleus in a Ran-unassisted manner.
Mol. Biol. Cell
10:1119-1131[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 76.
|
Zerivitz, K., and G. Akusjarvi.
1989.
An improved nuclear extract preparation method.
Gene Anal. Tech.
6:101-109[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 77.
|
Ziemin-van der Poel, S.,
N. R. McCabe,
H. J. Gill,
R. Espinosa III,
Y. Patel,
A. Harden,
P. Rubinelli,
S. D. Smith,
M. M. LeBeau,
J. D. Rowley, et al.
1991.
Identification of a gene, MLL, that spans the breakpoint in 11q23 translocations associated with human leukemias.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
88:10735-10739[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Molecular and Cellular Biology, May 2001, p. 3534-3546, Vol. 21, No. 10
0270-7306/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/MCB.21.10.3534-3546.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Silhan, J., Vacha, P., Strnadova, P., Vecer, J., Herman, P., Sulc, M., Teisinger, J., Obsilova, V., Obsil, T.
(2009). 14-3-3 Protein Masks the DNA Binding Interface of Forkhead Transcription Factor FOXO4. J. Biol. Chem.
284: 19349-19360
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lau, C. J., Koty, Z., Nalbantoglu, J.
(2009). Differential Response of Glioma Cells to FOXO1-Directed Therapy. Cancer Res.
69: 5433-5440
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Miyamoto, S., Rubio, M., Sussman, M. A.
(2009). Nuclear and mitochondrial signalling Akts in cardiomyocytes. Cardiovasc Res
82: 272-285
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Mutka, S. C., Yang, W. Q., Dong, S. D., Ward, S. L., Craig, D. A., Timmermans, P. B.M.W.M., Murli, S.
(2009). Identification of Nuclear Export Inhibitors with Potent Anticancer Activity In vivo. Cancer Res.
69: 510-517
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lees, S. J., Childs, T. E., Booth, F. W.
(2008). Age-dependent FOXO regulation of p27Kip1 expression via a conserved binding motif in rat muscle precursor cells. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.
295: C1238-C1246
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Brenkman, A. B., de Keizer, P. L.J., van den Broek, N. J.F., van der Groep, P., van Diest, P. J., van der Horst, A., Smits, A. M.M., Burgering, B. M.T.
(2008). The Peptidyl-Isomerase Pin1 Regulates p27kip1 Expression through Inhibition of Forkhead Box O Tumor Suppressors. Cancer Res.
68: 7597-7605
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Jo, O. D., Martin, J., Bernath, A., Masri, J., Lichtenstein, A., Gera, J.
(2008). Heterogeneous Nuclear Ribonucleoprotein A1 Regulates Cyclin D1 and c-myc Internal Ribosome Entry Site Function through Akt Signaling. J. Biol. Chem.
283: 23274-23287
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Beysen, D., Moumne, L., Veitia, R., Peters, H., Leroy, B. P., De Paepe, A., De Baere, E.
(2008). Missense mutations in the forkhead domain of FOXL2 lead to subcellular mislocalization, protein aggregation and impaired transactivation. Hum Mol Genet
17: 2030-2038
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Emerling, B. M., Weinberg, F., Liu, J.-L., Mak, T. W., Chandel, N. S.
(2008). PTEN regulates p300-dependent hypoxia-inducible factor 1 transcriptional activity through Forkhead transcription factor 3a (FOXO3a). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
105: 2622-2627
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Papanicolaou, K. N., Izumiya, Y., Walsh, K.
(2008). Forkhead Transcription Factors and Cardiovascular Biology. Circ. Res.
102: 16-31
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Tsai, K.-L., Sun, Y.-J., Huang, C.-Y., Yang, J.-Y., Hung, M.-C., Hsiao, C.-D.
(2007). Crystal structure of the human FOXO3a-DBD/DNA complex suggests the effects of post-translational modification. Nucleic Acids Res
35: 6984-6994
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Jang, S.-W., Yang, S.-J., Srinivasan, S., Ye, K.
(2007). Akt Phosphorylates MstI and Prevents Its Proteolytic Activation, Blocking FOXO3 Phosphorylation and Nuclear Translocation. J. Biol. Chem.
282: 30836-30844
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Greer, E. L., Oskoui, P. R., Banko, M. R., Maniar, J. M., Gygi, M. P., Gygi, S. P., Brunet, A.
(2007). The Energy Sensor AMP-activated Protein Kinase Directly Regulates the Mammalian FOXO3 Transcription Factor. J. Biol. Chem.
282: 30107-30119
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Daitoku, H., Fukamizu, A.
(2007). FOXO Transcription Factors in the Regulatory Networks of Longevity. J Biochem
141: 769-774
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Bakker, W. J., van Dijk, T. B., Parren-van Amelsvoort, M., Kolbus, A., Yamamoto, K., Steinlein, P., Verhaak, R. G. W., Mak, T. W., Beug, H., Lowenberg, B., von Lindern, M.
(2007). Differential Regulation of Foxo3a Target Genes in Erythropoiesis. Mol. Cell. Biol.
27: 3839-3854
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Boura, E., Silhan, J., Herman, P., Vecer, J., Sulc, M., Teisinger, J., Obsilova, V., Obsil, T.
(2007). Both the N-terminal Loop and Wing W2 of the Forkhead Domain of Transcription Factor Foxo4 Are Important for DNA Binding. J. Biol. Chem.
282: 8265-8275
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Li, M., Chiu, J.-F., Mossman, B. T., Fukagawa, N. K.
(2006). Down-regulation of Manganese-Superoxide Dismutase through Phosphorylation of FOXO3a by Akt in Explanted Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells from Old Rats. J. Biol. Chem.
281: 40429-40439
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Vernes, S. C., Nicod, J., Elahi, F. M., Coventry, J. A., Kenny, N., Coupe, A.-M., Bird, L. E., Davies, K. E., Fisher, S. E.
(2006). Functional genetic analysis of mutations implicated in a human speech and language disorder. Hum Mol Genet
15: 3154-3167
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Garat, C. V., Fankell, D., Erickson, P. F., Reusch, J. E.-B., Bauer, N. N., McMurtry, I. F., Klemm, D. J.
(2006). Platelet-Derived Growth Factor BB Induces Nuclear Export and Proteasomal Degradation of CREB via Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase/Akt Signaling in Pulmonary Artery Smooth Muscle Cells.. Mol. Cell. Biol.
26: 4934-4948
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Edstrom, E., Altun, M., Hagglund, M., Ulfhake, B.
(2006). Atrogin-1/MAFbx and MuRF1 Are Downregulated in Aging-Related Loss of Skeletal Muscle.. Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
61: 663-674
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Salazar, M., Rojo, A. I., Velasco, D., de Sagarra, R. M., Cuadrado, A.
(2006). Glycogen Synthase Kinase-3beta Inhibits the Xenobiotic and Antioxidant Cell Response by Direct Phosphorylation and Nuclear Exclusion of the Transcription Factor Nrf2. J. Biol. Chem.
281: 14841-14851
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Mounier, C., Dumas, V., Posner, B. I.
(2006). Regulation of Hepatic Insulin-Like Growth Factor-Binding Protein-1 Gene Expression by Insulin: Central Role for Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Independent of Forkhead Box O Proteins. Endocrinology
147: 2383-2391
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Grinius, L, Kessler, C, Schroeder, J, Handwerger, S
(2006). Forkhead transcription factor FOXO1A is critical for induction of human decidualization.. J Endocrinol
189: 179-187
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Pache, J. C., Burton, D. W., Deftos, L. J., Hastings, R. H.
(2006). A Carboxyl Leucine-Rich Region of Parathyroid Hormone-Related Protein Is Critical for Nuclear Export. Endocrinology
147: 990-998
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Yan, J., Xu, L., Crawford, G., Wang, Z., Burgess, S. M.
(2006). The Forkhead Transcription Factor FoxI1 Remains Bound to Condensed Mitotic Chromosomes and Stably Remodels Chromatin Structure. Mol. Cell. Biol.
26: 155-168
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Matsuzaki, H., Ichino, A., Hayashi, T., Yamamoto, T., Kikkawa, U.
(2005). Regulation of Intracellular Localization and Transcriptional Activity of FOXO4 by Protein Kinase B through Phosphorylation at the Motif Sites Conserved among the FOXO Family. J Biochem
138: 485-491
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Thimmaiah, K. N., Easton, J. B., Germain, G. S., Morton, C. L., Kamath, S., Buolamwini, J. K., Houghton, P. J.
(2005). Identification of N10-Substituted Phenoxazines as Potent and Specific Inhibitors of Akt Signaling. J. Biol. Chem.
280: 31924-31935
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lynch, R. L., Konicek, B. W., McNulty, A. M., Hanna, K. R., Lewis, J. E., Neubauer, B. L., Graff, J. R.
(2005). The Progression of LNCaP Human Prostate Cancer Cells to Androgen Independence Involves Decreased FOXO3a Expression and Reduced p27KIP1 Promoter Transactivation. Mol Cancer Res
3: 163-169
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kunkel, M. T., Ni, Q., Tsien, R. Y., Zhang, J., Newton, A. C.
(2005). Spatio-temporal Dynamics of Protein Kinase B/Akt Signaling Revealed by a Genetically Encoded Fluorescent Reporter. J. Biol. Chem.
280: 5581-5587
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Liu, J. O.
(2005). The Yins of T Cell Activation. Sci Signal
2005: re1-re1
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Cao, X., Kambe, F., Moeller, L. C., Refetoff, S., Seo, H.
(2005). Thyroid Hormone Induces Rapid Activation of Akt/Protein Kinase B-Mammalian Target of Rapamycin-p70S6K Cascade through Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase in Human Fibroblasts. Mol. Endocrinol.
19: 102-112
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Zhang, J., Hu, S., Schofield, D. E., Sorensen, P. H. B., Triche, T. J.
(2004). Selective Usage of D-Type Cyclins by Ewing's Tumors and Rhabdomyosarcomas. Cancer Res.
64: 6026-6034
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Chen, T., Brownawell, A. M., Macara, I. G.
(2004). Nucleocytoplasmic Shuttling of JAZ, a New Cargo Protein for Exportin-5. Mol. Cell. Biol.
24: 6608-6619
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Zhang, D., Bar-Eli, M., Meloche, S., Brodt, P.
(2004). Dual Regulation of MMP-2 Expression by the Type 1 Insulin-like Growth Factor Receptor: THE PHOSPHATIDYLINOSITOL 3-KINASE/Akt AND Raf/ERK PATHWAYS TRANSMIT OPPOSING SIGNALS. J. Biol. Chem.
279: 19683-19690
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Shiraishi, I., Melendez, J., Ahn, Y., Skavdahl, M., Murphy, E., Welch, S., Schaefer, E., Walsh, K., Rosenzweig, A., Torella, D., Nurzynska, D., Kajstura, J., Leri, A., Anversa, P., Sussman, M. A.
(2004). Nuclear Targeting of Akt Enhances Kinase Activity and Survival of Cardiomyocytes. Circ. Res.
94: 884-891
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Khaleghpour, K., Li, Y., Banville, D., Yu, Z., Shen, S.-H.
(2004). Involvement of the PI 3-kinase signaling pathway in progression of colon adenocarcinoma. Carcinogenesis
25: 241-248
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Dansen, T. B., Kops, G. J. P. L., Denis, S., Jelluma, N., Wanders, R. J. A., Bos, J. L., Burgering, B. M. T., Wirtz, K. W. A.
(2004). Regulation of sterol carrier protein gene expression by the Forkhead transcription factor FOXO3a. J. Lipid Res.
45: 81-88
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Tsai, W.-C., Bhattacharyya, N., Han, L.-Y., Hanover, J. A., Rechler, M. M.
(2003). Insulin Inhibition of Transcription Stimulated by the Forkhead Protein Foxo1 Is Not Solely due to Nuclear Exclusion. Endocrinology
144: 5615-5622
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Matsuzaki, H., Daitoku, H., Hatta, M., Tanaka, K., Fukamizu, A.
(2003). Insulin-induced phosphorylation of FKHR (Foxo1) targets to proteasomal degradation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
100: 11285-11290
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Birkenkamp, K. U., Coffer, P. J.
(2003). FOXO Transcription Factors as Regulators of Immune Homeostasis: Molecules to Die for?. J. Immunol.
171: 1623-1629
[Full Text]
-
Rey, O., Yuan, J., Young, S. H., Rozengurt, E.
(2003). Protein Kinase C{nu}/Protein Kinase D3 Nuclear Localization, Catalytic Activation, and Intracellular Redistribution in Response to G Protein-coupled Receptor Agonists. J. Biol. Chem.
278: 23773-23785
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Burgering, B. M. T., Medema, R. H.
(2003). Decisions on life and death: FOXO Forkhead transcription factors are in command when PKB/Akt is off duty. J. Leukoc. Biol.
73: 689-701
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Tran, H., Brunet, A., Griffith, E. C., Greenberg, M. E.
(2003). The Many Forks in FOXO's Road. Sci Signal
2003: re5-re5
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Daitoku, H., Yamagata, K., Matsuzaki, H., Hatta, M., Fukamizu, A.
(2003). Regulation of PGC-1 Promoter Activity by Protein Kinase B and the Forkhead Transcription Factor FKHR. Diabetes
52: 642-649
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Maiyar, A. C., Leong, M. L.L., Firestone, G. L.
(2003). Importin-alpha Mediates the Regulated Nuclear Targeting of Serum- and Glucocorticoid-inducible Protein Kinase (Sgk) by Recognition of a Nuclear Localization Signal in the Kinase Central Domain. Mol. Biol. Cell
14: 1221-1239
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Leong, M. L. L., Maiyar, A. C., Kim, B., O'Keeffe, B. A., Firestone, G. L.
(2003). Expression of the Serum- and Glucocorticoid-inducible Protein Kinase, Sgk, Is a Cell Survival Response to Multiple Types of Environmental Stress Stimuli in Mammary Epithelial Cells. J. Biol. Chem.
278: 5871-5882
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kortylewski, M., Feld, F., Kruger, K.-D., Bahrenberg, G., Roth, R. A., Joost, H.-G., Heinrich, P. C., Behrmann, I., Barthel, A.
(2003). Akt Modulates STAT3-mediated Gene Expression through a FKHR (FOXO1a)-dependent Mechanism. J. Biol. Chem.
278: 5242-5249
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Valovka, T., Verdier, F., Cramer, R., Zhyvoloup, A., Fenton, T., Rebholz, H., Wang, M.-L., Gzhegotsky, M., Lutsyk, A., Matsuka, G., Filonenko, V., Wang, L., Proud, C. G., Parker, P. J., Gout, I. T.
(2003). Protein Kinase C Phosphorylates Ribosomal Protein S6 Kinase {beta}II and Regulates Its Subcellular Localization. Mol. Cell. Biol.
23: 852-863
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Petrulis, J. R., Kusnadi, A., Ramadoss, P., Hollingshead, B., Perdew, G. H.
(2003). The hsp90 Co-chaperone XAP2 Alters Importin beta Recognition of the Bipartite Nuclear Localization Signal of the Ah Receptor and Represses Transcriptional Activity. J. Biol. Chem.
278: 2677-2685
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Eilers, A. L., Sundwall, E., Lin, M., Sullivan, A. A., Ayer, D. E.
(2002). A Novel Heterodimerization Domain, CRM1, and 14-3-3 Control Subcellular Localization of the MondoA-Mlx Heterocomplex. Mol. Cell. Biol.
22: 8514-8526
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Rokudai, S., Fujita, N., Kitahara, O., Nakamura, Y., Tsuruo, T.
(2002). Involvement of FKHR-Dependent TRADD Expression in Chemotherapeutic Drug-Induced Apoptosis. Mol. Cell. Biol.
22: 8695-8708
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Schmidt, M., Fernandez de Mattos, S., van der Horst, A., Klompmaker, R., Kops, G. J. P. L, Lam, E. W.-F., Burgering, B. M. T., Medema, R. H.
(2002). Cell Cycle Inhibition by FoxO Forkhead Transcription Factors Involves Downregulation of Cyclin D. Mol. Cell. Biol.
22: 7842-7852
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Zhang, X., Gan, L., Pan, H., Guo, S., He, X., Olson, S. T., Mesecar, A., Adam, S., Unterman, T. G.
(2002). Phosphorylation of Serine 256 Suppresses Transactivation by FKHR (FOXO1) by Multiple Mechanisms. DIRECT AND INDIRECT EFFECTS ON NUCLEAR/CYTOPLASMIC SHUTTLING AND DNA BINDING. J. Biol. Chem.
277: 45276-45284
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
van den Heuvel, A. P. J., de Vries-Smits, A. M. M., van Weeren, P. C., Dijkers, P. F., de Bruyn, K. M. T., Riedl, J. A., Burgering, B. M. T.
(2002). Binding of protein kinase B to the plakin family member periplakin. J. Cell Sci.
115: 3957-3966
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Liu, W., Chin-Chance, C., Lee, E.-J., Lowe, W. L. Jr.
(2002). Activation of Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase Contributes to Insulin-Like Growth Factor I-Mediated Inhibition of Pancreatic {beta}-Cell Death. Endocrinology
143: 3802-3812
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Plafker, K., Macara, I. G.
(2002). Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer Biosensors That Detect Ran Conformational Changes and a Ran{middle dot}GDP-Importin-beta -RanBP1 Complex in Vitro and in Intact Cells. J. Biol. Chem.
277: 30121-30127
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Olashaw, N., Pledger, W. J.
(2002). Paradigms of Growth Control: Relation to Cdk Activation. Sci Signal
2002: re7-re7
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Stahl, M., Dijkers, P. F., Kops, G. J. P. L., Lens, S. M. A., Coffer, P. J., Burgering, B. M. T., Medema, R. H.
(2002). The Forkhead Transcription Factor FoxO Regulates Transcription of p27Kip1 and Bim in Response to IL-2. J. Immunol.
168: 5024-5031
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Brunet, A., Kanai, F., Stehn, J., Xu, J., Sarbassova, D., Frangioni, J. V., Dalal, S. N., DeCaprio, J. A., Greenberg, M. E., Yaffe, M. B.
(2002). 14-3-3 transits to the nucleus and participates in dynamic nucleocytoplasmic transport. JCB
156: 817-828
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Richards, J. S., Sharma, S. C., Falender, A. E., Lo, Y. H.
(2002). Expression of FKHR, FKHRL1, and AFX Genes in the Rodent Ovary: Evidence for Regulation by IGF-I, Estrogen, and the Gonadotropins. Mol. Endocrinol.
16: 580-599
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Yang, Z., Whelan, J., Babb, R., Bowen, B. R.
(2002). An mRNA Splice Variant of the AFX Gene with Altered Transcriptional Activity. J. Biol. Chem.
277: 8068-8075
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Richards, J. S., Russell, D. L., Ochsner, S., Hsieh, M., Doyle, K. H., Falender, A. E., Lo, Y. K., Sharma, S. C.
(2002). Novel Signaling Pathways That Control Ovarian Follicular Development, Ovulation, and Luteinization. Recent Prog Horm Res
57: 195-220
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
De Ruiter, N. D., Burgering, B. M. T., Bos, J. L.
(2001). Regulation of the Forkhead Transcription Factor AFX by Ral-Dependent Phosphorylation of Threonines 447 and 451. Mol. Cell. Biol.
21: 8225-8235
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Sussman, J., Stokoe, D., Ossina, N., Shtivelman, E.
(2001). Protein kinase B phosphorylates AHNAK and regulates its subcellular localization. JCB
154: 1019-1030
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Rey, O., Sinnett-Smith, J., Zhukova, E., Rozengurt, E.
(2001). Regulated Nucleocytoplasmic Transport of Protein Kinase D in Response to G Protein-coupled Receptor Activation. J. Biol. Chem.
276: 49228-49235
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Brownawell, A. M., Macara, I. G.
(2002). Exportin-5, a novel karyopherin, mediates nuclear export of double-stranded RNA binding proteins. JCB
156: 53-64
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Brunet, A., Kanai, F., Stehn, J., Xu, J., Sarbassova, D., Frangioni, J. V., Dalal, S. N., DeCaprio, J. A., Greenberg, M. E., Yaffe, M. B.
(2002). 14-3-3 transits to the nucleus and participates in dynamic nucleocytoplasmic transport. JCB
156: 817-828
[Abstract]
[Full Text]