Molecular and Cellular Biology, July 2001, p. 4129-4139, Vol. 21, No. 13
0270-7306/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/MCB.21.13.4129-4139.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Department of Cell Biology and Physiology1 and Howard Hughes Medical Institute,2 Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110-1093
Received 7 February 2001/Returned for modification 19 March 2001/Accepted 23 March 2001
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Chk1 is an evolutionarily conserved protein kinase that regulates cell cycle progression in response to checkpoint activation. In this study, we demonstrated that agents that block DNA replication or cause certain forms of DNA damage induce the phosphorylation of human Chk1. The phosphorylated form of Chk1 possessed higher intrinsic protein kinase activity and eluted more quickly on gel filtration columns. Serines 317 and 345 were identified as sites of phosphorylation in vivo, and ATR (the ATM- and Rad3-related protein kinase) phosphorylated both of these sites in vitro. Furthermore, phosphorylation of Chk1 on serines 317 and 345 in vivo was ATR dependent. Mutants of Chk1 containing alanine in place of serines 317 and 345 were poorly activated in response to replication blocks or genotoxic stress in vivo, were poorly phosphorylated by ATR in vitro, and were not found in faster-eluting fractions by gel filtration. These findings demonstrate that the activation of Chk1 in response to replication blocks and certain forms of genotoxic stress involves phosphorylation of serines 317 and 345. In addition, this study implicates ATR as a direct upstream activator of Chk1 in human cells.
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Checkpoints are signaling pathways that monitor the integrity and replication status of the genetic material before cells commit to either replicate (in S phase) or segregate (in mitosis) their DNA (27). Upon activation, checkpoints interface with cyclin-Cdk complexes to block cell cycle progression or alternatively to induce cell death. The DNA replication checkpoint monitors S-phase completion and prevents mitosis in its absence. The DNA damage checkpoint monitors the integrity of the genome and arrests the cell cycle either in G1 before DNA replication (termed the G1 DNA damage checkpoint), in S phase (the S-phase DNA damage checkpoint), or in G2 before mitosis (the G2 DNA damage checkpoint). Eukaryotic cells activate an evolutionarily conserved set of checkpoint proteins that rapidly induce cell cycle arrest to prevent replication or segregation of damaged DNA before repair is completed.
A key component of the DNA damage checkpoint is ATM (ataxia telangiectasia-mutated), a 370-kDa protein kinase (58). The ATM gene is mutated in the human genetic disorder ataxia telangiectasia (58). Cell lines derived from patients lacking ATM are radiosensitive and exhibit defects in checkpoint responses to ionizing radiation (IR), including p53-dependent G1 cell cycle arrest and p53-independent S and G2 cell cycle arrests (31). The kinase activity of ATM is activated in response to double-stranded DNA breaks, and ATM targets several effectors of checkpoint control, including Cds1 (also known as Chk2), Brca1, p95 (nbs1), p53, and Mdm2 (2, 5, 8-10, 15, 23, 33, 34, 41, 42, 47, 69, 74). Checkpoint responses to UV light and base-damaging agents are normal in cells lacking ATM. Taken together, these findings point to a seminal role for ATM in the IR-induced DNA damage checkpoint.
ATR (the ATM- and Rad3-related protein kinase) also contributes to checkpoint control in eukaryotes (13, 32). Unlike ATM, deletion of ATR in mice results in an embryonic lethal phenotype indicating that ATR is an essential gene (6, 17). Another feature that distinguishes these two kinases is their sensitivity to different types of checkpoint signals. As mentioned above, cells lacking ATM are hypersensitive to IR, but not to UV or hydroxyurea (HU), whereas cells overexpressing a kinase-inactive form of ATR are sensitive to UV and HU, as well as to IR. This suggests that ATR plays a more prominent role than ATM during the cellular response to unreplicated DNA (induced by agents such as HU) and to certain DNA-damaging agents, including UV light (14, 68). However, overexpression of ATR complements the radioresistant DNA synthesis defect of cells lacking ATM, demonstrating that these two kinases have overlapping functions in vivo. In support of this, ATM and ATR have been shown to have similar kinase specificities (35, 52). Both prefer phosphorylating serine or threonine residues that are followed by glutamine (SQ/TQ motifs), and as such, ATM and ATR have overlapping substrate specificity in vivo. Examples of substrates shared by ATM and ATR include p53 and Brca1 (40, 62, 63).
Another potential subsrate of ATR is the human Chk1 protein kinase. Chk1 was first identified in fission yeast as an essential component of the DNA damage checkpoint (1, 66). An additional role for Chk1 in the DNA replication checkpoint was revealed when fission yeast cells lacking both Chk1 and a second checkpoint kinase, Cds1, were found to advance into mitosis with unreplicated DNA (4, 43, 72). Homologs of Chk1 have also been found in humans, Drosophila melanogaster, Caenorhabditis elegans, budding yeast, and Xenopus (20, 21, 38, 50, 55, 60). In humans, fission yeast, and Xenopus, Chk1 has been proposed to regulate the G2 checkpoint by phosphorylating the Cdc25 protein phosphatase on a residue or residues that facilitate the binding of 14-3-3 proteins (38, 54, 56, 72, 73).
Like ATR, Chk1 has been shown to be an essential gene in mice (6, 17, 44, 61). These findings unveil essential functions for both ATR and Chk1 in the absence of environmentally imposed genotoxic stress. Embryos and conditional ES cell lines lacking Chk1 also exhibit defective checkpoint responses to replication blocks and DNA-damaging agents, establishing a checkpoint function for mammalian Chk1 in mice (44, 61). Evidence that Chk1 contributes to G2 checkpoint control in human cells comes from studies showing that agents such as UCN-01 and SB-218078, which are potent inhibitors of Chk1, abrogate G2 checkpoint function in human cells (7, 25, 29).
Chk1 is a component of signaling pathways that respond to structures characteristic of DNA damage and/or incomplete DNA replication. In fission yeast, Chk1 responds to DNA damage induced by either IR or UV, and Chk1 also functions in the DNA replication checkpoint (4, 22, 43, 66, 67, 72). Xenopus Chk1 responds to DNA replication blocks and UV damage, but not to DNA with double-strand breaks, which is characteristic of gamma-irradiated DNA (26, 37). The regulation of Chk1 is perhaps best characterized in Xenopus, where it has been demonstrated that Chk1 is phosphorylated and activated by ATR and that the ATR-Chk1 pathway responds to unreplicated DNA and UV-damaged DNA (26). In the case of human Chk1, there is controversy concerning not only what types of DNA structures it responds to, but also whether its kinase activity is elevated in response to genotoxic stress. Some studies have reported that the electrophoretic mobility of human Chk1 is retarded after exposure to IR (7, 44, 56), HU (7, 44), and UV (44, 46). Other studies failed to observe changes in the electrophoretic mobility of Chk1 when cells were treated with these agents (30). In addition, two studies have reported slight increases in Chk1 kinase activity in response to UV and BNP1350, a topoisomerase I inhibitor (46, 71), while other studies have reported that the kinase activity of human Chk1 is not altered in response to genotoxic stress (30, 76). Finally, human Chk1 has been shown to be phosphorylated on serine 345 when cells are treated with UV, IR, or HU in an ATR-dependent manner (44). However, it is not known if additional sites become phosphorylated during genotoxic stress, if phosphorylation contributes to Chk1 activity, or if human Chk1 is a direct target of ATR.
In this study, we investigated the regulation of human Chk1 in response to different types of genotoxic stress. We report that human Chk1 is phosphorylated on serines 317 and 345 in response to checkpoint activation. The kinase activity of human Chk1 is activated upon phosphorylation of serines 317 and 345, and the phosphorylated, activated form of Chk1 elutes more quickly on gel filtration columns. Finally, we report that ATR directly phosphorylates human Chk1 on serines 317 and 345 in vitro and that the phosphorylation of these residues is ATR dependent in vivo.
| |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cell lines
293 and HeLa cells were grown in
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM; Gibco) supplemented with
10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 U (each) of penicillin and
streptomycin per ml, and 1 mM glutamine (culture medium). AT22IJE T
cells expressing ATM (AT+) or not expressing ATM
(AT
) (77) were cultured in a mixture of
DMEM, 10% FBS, 100 U of penicillin and streptomycin per ml, 1 mM
glutamine, and 100 µg of hygromycin per ml. U2OS cells were grown in
modified McCoy's 5A medium (Gibco) supplemented with 10% FBS, 100 U
of penicillin and streptomycin per ml, and 1 mM glutamine.
Antibodies. Chk1 was detected with a rabbit polyclonal antibody raised against bacterially-produced glutathione S-transferase (GST)-Chk1 or with commercial monoclonal (SC8408) or polyclonal (SC7898) antibodies purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Chk1 fusion proteins were precipitated with either anti-c-Myc (9E10)-agarose conjugate (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) or anti-Flag M2 antibody-agarose affinity gel (Sigma Chemical Co.) and detected by Western blotting with c-myc polyclonal antibody (A-14; Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Bound primary antibodies were detected with either horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated goat anti-mouse antibody (ICN/CAPPEL) or HRP-rat anti-rabbit antibody (Zymed), and proteins were visualized by chemiluminescence with the ECL enhanced chemiluminescence reagent (Amersham). Antibodies specific for Chk1 phosphorylated on serine 317 were generated by immunization of rabbits with the phosphopeptide C-VKYSSpSQPEPRT coupled to keyhole limpet hemocyanin.
Generation of recombinant adenoviruses. Wild-type and mutant forms of Chk1 were cloned as Flag-tagged fusions into the adenovirus shuttle vector pAdTrack-CMV (cytomegalovirus) (28). Chk1 (wild type and mutants) cDNAs were amplified with forward primer 3 containing the Flag tag and a KpnI site (5'-ATAGGTACCATGGACTATAAGGACGACGATGATAAGGCAGTGC CCTTTGAGGAAG-3') and reverse primer 4 containing a stop codon and an XbaI site (5'-ATATCTAGATCATGTGGCAGGAAGCC). PCR products were digested with KpnI and XbaI and cloned into pAdTrack-CMV. The pAdTrack-CMV-based plasmids encoding wild-type and mutant Chk1 proteins were cotransformed with pAdEasy-1 into Escherichia coli BJ5183 to achieve homologous recombination. Recombinant adenoviruses were generated and propagated with the pAdEasy system as described previously (28).
Generation of recombinant baculovirus encoding His-Chk1 and affinity purification of Chk1 antibody. Chk1 was amplified by PCR with pAdTrack-CMV-Flag-Chk1(wild type) as template with forward primer 5'-GGGAATTCGGTGGAGTCATGGCAGTGC CC and reverse primer 5'-GGGGTACCCTGTGGCAGGAAGCC. The PCR product was digested with EcoRI and KpnI and ligated into pFASTBACHTa (Gibco BRL). Recombinant baculovirus encoding His6-Chk1 was generated with the BAC-TO-BAC Baculovirus Expression System (Gibco BRL) and protocols suggested by the manufacturer. His6-Chk1 protein was purified from infected Sf9 insect cells on Ni-nitrilotriacetic acid agarose (Qiagen), and purified His6-Chk1 was eluted in a mixture of 50 mM Tris-Cl (pH 8.0), 150 mM NaCl, 200 mM imidazole, and 1 mM dithiothreitol (DTT). Four milligrams of His6-Chk1 was coupled to 2 g of CNBr-activated Sepharose 4B (Sigma Chemical Co.) according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Antibodies generated against GST-Chk1 were applied to the column, and Chk1-specific antibodies were eluted with 0.1 M glycine (pH 2.8) and immediately neutralized with 1 M Tris (pH 8.0).
Coupling of antibody to immobilized protein A for immunoprecipitations. ImmunoPure immobilized protein A agarose (Pierce) and affinity-purified Chk1 antibodies were incubated for 1 h at 4°C in 1 ml of mammalian cell lysis buffer 1 (MCLB1: 50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.0], 2 mM DTT, 5 mM EDTA, 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 100 mM NaCl, 1 µM microcystin, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride [PMSF], 10 µg of aprotinin per ml, 20 µM leupeptin) at a ratio of 14 µg of affinity-purified antibody to 30 µl of packed beads. The antibody-bead mixture was washed once with 1 ml of MCLB1, twice with 1 ml of LiCl buffer (0.5 M LiCl, 50 mM Tris [pH 8.0]), and twice with 1 ml of MCLB1.
Treatment of cells with DNA-damaging agents and
caffeine
HeLa cell cultures were incubated in
culture medium containing 50 µM cisplatin, 3 µM etoposide, or 3 µM 1-
-D-arabinofuranosylcytosine (ara-C) for
1 h. The medium was removed, and cells were washed once and then
incubated for 6 h in culture medium. For UV irradiation, the
culture medium was removed, cells were washed twice with
phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and cells were irradiated in uncovered
tissue culture dishes with 254-nm UV light at a dose of 10 J/m2 with a Stratalinker (Stratagene). Fresh culture medium
was added back, and cells were incubated for an additional 6 h. In
some experiments, HeLa cells were incubated in 10 mM caffeine for
2.5 h prior to HU treatment.
Plasmids Chk1 was amplified by PCR with pAdTrack-CMV-Flag-Chk1(+) as the template with forward primer 1 (5'-AGGGAATCCCATGGCAGTGCCCTTTGTGG-3') and reverse primer 2 (5'-GCTCTAGAGCTCATGTGGCAGGAAGCC-3'). The PCR product was digested with EcoRI and XbaI and ligated into pcDNA3-myc to generate pcDNA3-myc-Chk1. Alanine was substituted for aspartic acid at position 130 to generate kinase-inactive Chk1 (Chk1D130A). Phosphorylation-site mutants were made with the Quick Change mutagenesis kit (Strategene) by using pcDNA3-myc-Chk1 as a template. In each case, serine was changed to alanine. pcDNA3-myc-Chk1 was used as a template with forward primer 5'-GTGAAGTACTCCAGTGCTCAGCCAGAACCCCGC-3' and reverse primer 5'-GCGGGGTTCTGGCTGAGCACTGGAGTACTTCAC-3' to generate pcDNA3-myc-Chk1(S317A). pcDNA3-myc-Chk1 was used as a template with forward primer 5'-CAAGGGATCAGCTTTGCTCAGCCCACATGTCC-3' and reverse primer 5'-GGACATGTGGGCTGAGCAAAGCTGATCCCTTG-3' to generate pcDNA3-myc-Chk1(S345A). pcDNA3-myc-Chk1 was used as a template with forward primer 5'-CATATGCTTTTGAATGCTCAGTTACTTGGCACCCC-3' and reverse primer 5'-GGGGTGCCAAGTAACTGAGCATTCAAAAGCATATG-3' to generate pcDNA3-myc-Chk1(S357A). pcDNA3-myc-Chk1 was used as a template with forward primer 5'-GGCACCCCAGGATCCGCACAGAACCCCTGGCAG-3' and reverse primer 5'-CTGCCAGGGGTTCTGTGCGGATCCTGGGGTGCC-3' to generate pcDNA3-myc-Chk1(S366A). pcDNA3-myc-Chk1 was used as a template with forward primer 5'-GCTGATTGATATTGTGAGCGCACAGAAGGTTTGGCTTCCTGCC-3' and reverse primer 5'-GGCAGGAAGCCAAACCTTCTGTGCGCTCACAATATCAATCAGC-3' to generate pcDNA3-myc-Chk1(S468A). pcDNA3-myc-Chk1(S317A) was used as a template with primers described above to generate pcDNA3-myc-Chk1(S317A, S345A). pcDNA3-myc-Chk1(S357A) was used as a template with the primers described above to generate pcDNA3-myc-Chk1(S357A, S366A). Chk1 (wild type and D130A) proteins were also amplified by PCR with forward primer 5 (ATACCCGGGAATGGCAG TGCCCTTTGTGG) and reverse primer 6 (ATAGAATTCTCATGTGGCAGGAAGCC). The PCR products were digested with SmaI and EcoRI and ligated into pGEX2TN. pGEX2TN-Chk1 was used as a template to generate pGEX2TN-Chk1(S317A), pGEX2TN-Chk1(S345A), pGEX2TN-Chk1(S357A), pGEX2TN-Chk1(S366A), and pGEX2TN-Chk1(S468A) by using the methodologies and primers described above.
Purification of soluble GST-Chk1 (wild type and mutants) for
kinase assays.
JM109 cells were transformed with plasmids encoding
GST-Chk1 (wild type and mutants). Cultures were grown at 37°C to an
optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.6, and
isopropyl-1-thio-
-D-galactopyranoside (IPTG) was added
to a final concentration of 0.5 mM. After growing for an additional
3 h at 30°C, cells were pelleted by centrifugation. Cell pellets
were washed with PBS buffer and resuspended in STE (100 mM NaCl, 10 mM
Tris HCl [pH 8.0], 1 mM EDTA) supplemented with 2 mM PMSF, 10 µg of
aprotinin per ml, 20 µM leupeptin, and 1.0 mg of lysozyme per
ml. After rocking at 4°C for 20 min, Sarkosyl was added to a final
concentration of 1.5%, and lysis was accomplished by sonication.
Lysates were clarified by centrifugation, and Triton X-100 was added to
a final concentration of 2%. Proteins were precipitated with
glutathione-agarose (Sigma Chemical Co.) and washed twice in
STE, twice in LiCl buffer (0.5 M LiCl, 50 mM Tris HCl [pH 8.0]), and
twice in 50 mM Tris HCl (pH 7.4). GST-fusion proteins were eluted with
20 mM glutathione in 50 mM Tris HCl (pH 7.4).
Purification of GST-Cdc25C200-256 GST-Cdc25C200-256 was produced in bacteria and purified as described previously (53). The protein was eluted from GSH agarose in buffer consisting of 50 mM Tris (pH 7.4), 20 mM glutathione, 2 mM PMSF, 10 µg of aprotinin per ml, and 20 µM leupeptin followed by dialysis in 1 liter of dialyis buffer (25 mM Tris [pH 8.0], 5 mM DTT) overnight at 4°C.
Chk1 kinase assays
To monitor the activity
of endogenous Chk1, 3 × 106 HeLa cells were untreated
or treated with 3 mM HU for 17 h. Cells were lysed in MCLB2 (50 mM
Tris-HCl [pH 8.0], 2 mM DTT, 5 mM EDTA, 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 100 mM
NaCl, 1 µM microcystin, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 2 mM PMSF,10 µg
of aprotinin per ml, 20 µM [5 µg/ml] leupeptin, 10 mM
-glycerophosphate, 1 mM sodium fluoride). Clarified lysates,
representing 2 mg of total cellular protein, were incubated with 14 µg of affinity-purified Chk1 antibody coupled to protein A agarose
overnight at 4°C. Precipitates were washed twice with MCLB2 and twice
with incomplete kinase buffer (50 mM Tris Cl [pH 7.4], 1 mM DTT, 10 mM MgCl2). Fifty-microliter kinase reactions were carried
out in the presence of incomplete kinase buffer containing 10 µM ATP,
10 µCi of [
-32P]ATP, and 5 µg of soluble
GST-Cdc25C200-256. Reaction mixtures were incubated at
30°C for 25 min and resolved by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide
gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), and proteins were transferred to
nitrocellulose membrane. Radiolabeled proteins were visualized by
autoradiography. The same membranes were then subjected to Western blot
analysis with anti-Chk1 monoclonal antibody. For ectopically produced
Chk1, clarified lysates, representing 2 mg of total cellular protein,
or column fractions were incubated with 30 µl of anti-Flag-agarose
(Sigma Chemical Co.) for 2 h at 4°C. Precipitates were washed
twice with MCLB2, twice with LiCl buffer, and once with incomplete
kinase buffer. Kinase assays were performed as described above.
Phosphatase treatment.
HeLa cells were lysed in MCLB2 (50 mM
Tris-Cl [pH 8.0], 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgCl2,
0.5% Nonidet P-40, 2 mM DTT) containing 2 mM PMSF,10 µg of aprotinin
per ml, and 5 µg of leupeptin per ml. Clarified lysates containing
150 µg of total cellular protein were incubated with 5 U of calf
intestinal phosphatase (NEB) in the absence or presence of 10 mM
-glycerophosphate and 10 mM NaF at 37°C for 1 h.
ATR kinase assays.
293 cells (2.8 × 106) were transfected with 30 µg of plasmid
encoding kinase-active or -inactive Flag-ATR by using the calcium phosphate transfection system according to the manufacturer's instructions (Life Technologies). Forty-eight hours after transfection, cells were lysed in MCLB3 (50 mM Tris-Cl [pH 8.0], 150 mM NaCl, 0.5%
Nonidet P-40, 2 mM DTT, 5 mM EDTA, 10% glycerol) containing 1 µM
microcystin, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 2 mM PMSF, 10 µg of aprotinin
per ml, 5 µg of leupeptin per ml, 10 mM
-glycerophosphate, and 1 mM sodium fluoride. Lysates representing 4 mg of total cell protein
were incubated with anti-Flag agarose for 2 h at 4°C. Precipitates were washed twice with MCLB3, once with LiCl buffer, and
once with incomplete kinase buffer (20 mM HEPES [pH 7.4], 10 mM
MgCl2, 10 mM MnCl2, 50 mM
NaCl, 1 mM DTT). Kinase assays (50 µl) were performed in incomplete
kinase buffer supplemented with 5 µM ATP, 20 µM
-glycerophosphate, 10 µCi of [
-32P]ATP,
and 1 µg of GST-Chk1 (wild type and mutants) that had been purified
from bacteria.
Adenovirus infections and gel filtration. HeLa cells were either mock infected or infected for 60 min with recombinant adenoviruses encoding Flag-tagged versions of Chk1 (wild type and mutants) at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 10 in 1 ml of serum-free DMEM. After 1 h, 5 ml of culture medium was added. After 15 h of infection, cells were either untreated or were incubated with 10 mM HU for 4 h. Cells were lysed in MCLB1. Lysates were passed through a 27-gauge needle 10 times and then clarified by centrifugation at 20,000 × g for 10 min followed by 50,000 rpm for 30 min. Clarified lysates containing 2 to 5 mg of total cellular protein were loaded onto a Superdex 200 10/30 column (Pharmacia) and eluted with 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, and 1 mM EDTA. Columns were run at 0.35 ml/min, and 0.5 ml was collected per fraction. For mock-infected cells, 150 µl from fractions 23 to 30 was resolved by SDS-PAGE. Chk1 was visualized by Western blotting with anti-Chk1 polyclonal antibody (SC7898). For adenovirus-infected cells, fractions were first incubated with 30 µl of packed anti-Flag-agarose. Precipitates were resolved by SDS-PAGE, and Flag-Chk1 (wild type and mutants) proteins were visualized by Western blotting with Chk1 polyclonal antibody (SC7898). When kinase assays were performed, precipitates were first incubated in complete kinase buffer containing GST-Cdc25C200-256. Kinase reactions were resolved by SDS-PAGE, and proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose. Radiolabeled proteins were visualized by autoradiography, and then the membrane was subjected to Western blotting with Chk1 polyclonal antibody (SC7898).
In vivo 32P labeling and two-dimensional peptide mapping analysis. 293 cells (2 × 106) were either mock transfected or transfected with plasmids encoding myc-tagged wild-type and mutant forms of Chk1 by using the Superfect transfection reagent (Qiagen). After 16 h of incubation, cells were incubated in phosphate-free DMEM containing 2 mCi of 32P-labeled inorganic phosphate per ml and 10 mM HU for 4 h. When labeling exogenous Chk1, 1 µM UCN-01 was also included during the labeling period. Cells were lysed in MCLB1. Endogenous Chk1 was immunoprecipitated from mock-transfected cell lysates with affinity-purified polyclonal antibody that had been precoupled to protein A beads. Ectopically expressed Chk1 was immunoprecipitated with anti-myc monoclonal antibody-agarose (Santa Cruz). Immunoprecipitates were subjected to SDS-PAGE on an 8% polyacrylamide gel, and proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose. Radiolabeled Chk1 was digested in a solution containing 0.2 mg of trypsin (Worthington) per ml in 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate for 17 h. Tryptic phosphopeptides were separated in the first dimension by thin-layer chromatography at pH 1.9 and in the second dimension by ascending chromatography in a buffer consisting of n-butanol-pyridine-acetic acid-water in a ratio of 75/50/15/60 (65). Alternatively, tryptic phosphopeptides were incubated with 1.2 U of Asp-N endopeptidase (Roche) per ml in 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate for 17 h and then incubated with Ziptip C18 resin (Millipore) to purify the phosphopeptides prior to two-dimensional phosphopeptide mapping. In some cases, an unlabeled phosphopeptide of the sequence LVQGISFpSQPTCP was resolved by two-dimensional mapping.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Checkpoints induce the phosphorylation and activation of Chk1.
To examine how the Chk1 protein kinase is regulated during checkpoint
responses, HeLa and U2OS cells were treated with HU to activate the DNA
replication checkpoint (Fig. 1A). U2OS
cells contain a functional p53 protein, whereas HeLa cells lack
functional p53 due to the expression of the papillomavirus E6 protein,
which targets p53 for destruction (59). The
electrophoretic mobility of Chk1 was observed to be retarded on SDS
gels after HU treatment of both cell types, suggesting that p53 status
does not impinge upon this pathway (Fig. 1A, lanes 2 and 6).
Phosphatase treatment confirmed that the slower electrophoretic form of
Chk1 was due to HU-induced phosphorylation of Chk1 (lanes 3 and 4).
Interestingly, the reduced electrophoretic mobility of Chk1 was also
observed when HeLa cells were treated with UV light and a variety of
chemotherapeutic agents that induce DNA damage or interfere with DNA
replication, including cisplatin, ara-C, and etoposide (Fig. 1B).
|
Gel filtration analysis of human Chk1.
Gel filtration analysis
was performed to monitor the elution profile of Chk1 before and after
HU treatment (Fig. 2). In the absence of
HU treatment, Chk1 eluted in fractions 29 and 30, consistent with it
being a monomer in cells. However, after HU treatment, Chk1 was also
detected in fractions that eluted earlier (Fig. 2 [and see Fig. 7]).
Interestingly, the phosphorylated form of Chk1 that migrates with a
slower electrophoretic mobility on SDS gels was preferentially found in
the fractions that elute earlier. These findings suggest that the
phosphorylated form of Chk1 either multimerizes, binds to cellular
proteins, or undergoes conformational changes causing it to elute with
protein standards of 100 to 158 kDa. To determine whether ectopically
expressed Chk1 behaved like endogenous Chk1, we produced a recombinant
adenovirus expressing Flag-tagged Chk1. Lysates prepared from infected
HeLa cells were resolved by gel filtration, and selected fractions were
incubated with Flag-agarose to specifically precipitate Flag-tagged
Chk1. Precipitates were analyzed for the presence of Chk1 by Western blotting. As seen in Fig. 2, in the absence of HU treatment, Flag-Chk1 eluted in the same fractions as endogenous Chk1 (fractions 29 and 30).
After HU treatment, Flag-Chk1 was observed to also elute in fractions
27 and 28, as did endogenous Chk1.
|
Checkpoint-induced phosphorylation of Chk1 is ATM independent but
caffeine sensitive.
To determine whether the HU-induced
phosphorylation of Chk1 required functional ATM, immortalized
fibroblasts derived from a patient lacking ATM (AT cells), stably
transfected with either the ATM expression vector
(AT+) or an empty vector
(AT
), were treated with HU. The electrophoretic
mobility of Chk1 was then monitored by immunoblotting (Fig.
3A). The slower electrophoretic form of
Chk1 was detected in both AT+ (lane 2) and
AT
(lane 5) cells, although reduced levels of
Chk1 protein were observed in both cell lines after HU treatment. We
also monitored the electrophoretic mobility of Chk1 after treatment of
AT+ and AT
cells with
ionizing radiation. As seen in Fig. 3A (lanes 3 and 6), the
electrophoretic mobility of a fraction of Chk1 was found be retarded in
both AT+ and AT
cells,
although to a lesser extent than that observed with HU.
|
Chk1 is phosphorylated on serines 317 and 345 in vivo.
Two-dimensional phosphopeptide mapping of Chk1 was performed to
identify residues that were phosphorylated in response to HU treatment.
HU-treated HeLa cells were incubated with
32P-labeled inorganic phosphate, and endogenous
Chk1 was isolated by immunoprecipitation. In addition, HeLa cells were
transfected with plasmids encoding myc-tagged Chk1. Transfected cells
were incubated with 32P-labeled inorganic
phosphate in the presence of both HU and 1 µM UCN-01. UCN-01 inhibits
the activity of Chk1 kinase, but not the activity of the kinases that
lie upstream of Chk1 (7, 25, 29). We observed enhanced
phosphorylation of ectopically expressed Chk1, but not that of
endogenous Chk1 when UCN-01 was included during the labeling period.
Although the mechanistic basis for this is not known, UCN-01 is
expected to inhibit the kinase activity of ectopically produced Chk1,
thus allowing cells to overproduce Chk1 in a kinase-inactive form.
32P-labeled endogenous Chk1 and myc-tagged Chk1
were digested with trypsin, and peptides were separated in two
dimensions. As seen in Fig. 4, two
predominant phosphospeptides (denoted 1 and 2) were evident in the case
of endogenous (Fig. 4B) and ectopically expressed (Fig. 4C) Chk1. Given
the caffeine sensitivity of Chk1 phosphorylation, we examined the Chk1
protein sequence for the presence of SQ and TQ residues. Serine and
threonine residues followed by glutamine are preferred sites of
phosphorylation for the ATM and ATR kinases (35, 52). As
seen in Fig. 4A, there are five SQ residues located within the C
terminus of Chk1 (serines 317, 345, 357, 366, and 468). A mutant form
of Chk1 containing alanine in place of serine at position 317 was
expressed as a myc-tagged fusion protein in HeLa cells. Two-dimensional
tryptic phosphopeptide mapping demonstrated that mutation of serine 317 resulted in the disappearance of phosphopeptide 1 (Fig. 4D). This indicates that serine 317 is phosphorylated in HU-treated cells.
|
|
HU-induced activation of Chk1 requires phosphorylation of serines
317 and 345.
To address the functional significance of
phosphorylation of serines 317 and 345, recombinant adenoviruses
expressing single- and double-phosphorylation-site mutants of Chk1 were
generated. HeLa cells were infected with wild-type and mutant viruses
in the presence of HU. Lysates were prepared and fractionated by gel
filtration. Selected fractions were analyzed for Chk1 protein and for
Chk1 kinase activity. As seen in Fig. 6
and as shown earlier (Fig. 2), the phosphorylated, activated form of
Chk1 eluted in fractions consistent with a molecular size of ~100 to
158 kDa (fractions 26 to 28). The bulk of the hypo- or
unphosphorylated, inactive Chk1 migrated in fractions 29 to 30, as
expected for monomeric protein. Mutation of either S317 or S345 to
alanine reduced the amount of Chk1 in the fractions eluting earlier
(fractions 26 to 28). In addition, the kinase activity associated with
Chk1(S317A) and Chk1(S345A) in fractions 26 to 28 was markedly reduced
compared with that of wild-type Chk1. Finally, the mutant of Chk1
containing alanine in place of serines 317 and 345 eluted primarily in
fractions 29 and 30 and was poorly activated by HU treatment. Taken
together, these findings suggest that phosphorylation of both S317 and
S345 contributes to the activation of Chk1 and its faster elution on gel filtration columns.
|
|
Phosphorylation of Chk1 by ATR.
We next asked whether Chk1 is
a direct substrate of ATR in vitro. Kinase-active and
-inactive forms of ATR were tested for their ability to phosphorylate
Chk1 in vitro. A kinase-inactive mutant of Chk1(D130A) fused to GST was
used as a substrate in these assays. As seen in Fig.
8A, Chk1 was phosphorylated by
kinase-active (lane 2) but not kinase-inactive (lane 3) ATR.
Radiolabeled Chk1 was isolated and digested with trypsin followed by
Asp-N endopeptidase. Peptides were separated in two dimensions, and
phosphopeptides were visualized by autoradiography. As seen in Fig. 8B,
two predominant phosphopeptides were detected under these conditions.
Mutation of serine 317 caused loss of phosphopeptide 1 (Fig. 8D),
whereas mutation of serine 345 caused loss of phosphopeptide 2 (Fig.
8E). To further confirm that phosphopeptide 2 represented the peptide containing phosphorylated serine 345, we synthesized the phosphopeptide expected after digestion of Chk1 with both trypsin and Asp-N
endopeptidase (LVQGISFpSQPTCP) and monitored its position after
two-dimensional phosphopeptide mapping. As seen in Fig. 8B and C, the
synthetic phosphopeptide comigrated with phosphopeptide 2, confirming
that phosphopeptide 2 contains S345. These results demonstrate that Chk1 is phosphorylated on serines 317 and 345 by ATR in vitro and
indicate that Chk1 may also be a direct target of ATR in vivo.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In this study, regulation of the human Chk1 protein kinase was examined after exposure of cells to agents that induce various forms of DNA damage or interfere with DNA replication. There has been controversy concerning not only what DNA structures human Chk1 responds to, but also whether the kinase activity of Chk1 is elevated in response to genotoxic stress. It has been reported that human Chk1 is inducibly phosphorylated on serine 345 in response to HU and UV and, to a lesser extent, IR (44). In addition, dominant-negative forms of ATR interfere with the phosphorylation of Chk1 on serine 345 in vivo (44). However, it has not been determined if human Chk1 becomes phosphorylated on additional sites in response to genotoxic stress in vivo, if phosphorylation regulates the kinase activity of human Chk1, or if human Chk1 is a direct target of ATR.
In this study, serines 317 and 345 were identified as sites of phosphorylation in vivo and as sites of ATR phosphorylation in vitro. Furthermore, expression of a kinase-inactive form of ATR interfered with the UV-induced phosphorylation of Chk1 on serine 317 in vivo. It has previously been reported that kinase-inactive ATR also interferes with the UV-induced phosphorylation of Chk1 on serine 345 in vivo. These findings in conjunction with the role of ATR in regulating cellular responses to UV and HU argue that human Chk1 may be directly phosphorylated on serines 317 and 345 by ATR in vivo. Xenopus Chk1 contains four SQ/TQ consensus sites within its C terminus, and all four can be phosphorylated by ATR in vitro (26). Expression of a mutant form of Chk1 lacking all four phosphorylation sites abrogated checkpoint responses of Xenopus extracts to replication blocks and UV-damaged DNA (26). These findings highlight the conserved nature of the ATR-Chk1 checkpoint pathway in eukaryotic organisms.
Human Chk1 has five ATM or ATR consensus phosphorylation sites (SQ/TQ) within its C terminus. These include serines 317, 345, 357, 366, and 468, each of which is followed by glutamine. Serines 317 and 345 are the only two found conserved in Chk1 from other species, including fission yeast, C. elegans, Xenopus, and Drosophila. In addition, residues inclusive of and surrounding serines 317 and 345 in human Chk1 comprise optimal ATM or ATR consensus phosphorylation sites (35). Interestingly deletion of the C terminus of human and Xenopus Chk1 potently activates its intrinsic kinase activity, suggesting that the C terminus functions as a negative regulator (12, 51). Phosphorylation of Chk1 by ATR may serve to relieve this C-terminal inhibitory function to activate Chk1 during the cellular response to genotoxic stress. In addition to activating the protein kinase activity of Chk1, phosphorylation also caused Chk1 to elute faster on gel filtration columns. Additional studies will be required to determine if the faster elution profile of the phosphorylated form of human Chk1 is a result of Chk1 binding to cellular proteins, multimerizing, or undergoing conformational changes. In checkpoint-activated extracts, Xenopus Chk1 has been shown to bind to claspin, a 215-kDa protein, and the interaction between Xenopus Chk1 and claspin is required for checkpoint-induced activation of Chk1 (37).
Although Chk1 is highly conserved throughout evolution, the signals that Chk1 responds to have diverged in eukaryotic organisms. In fission yeast, Chk1 responds to DNA damage induced by either IR or methyl methanesulfonate as well as UV (66, 67). In Xenopus, Chk1 is activated by DNA replication blocks and UV-damaged DNA, but not by double-stranded DNA breaks of the type induced by IR. In this study, we report that human Chk1 is activated by HU, UV, etoposide, cisplatin and ara-C, but poorly by IR. HU blocks DNA replication by inhibiting ribonuceotide reductase, but may subsequently induce DNA damage. ara-C is a nucleoside analog that incorporates into DNA and interferes with DNA polymerases, which in turn interferes with DNA chain elongation during both DNA replication and DNA repair (48, 64). UV and cisplatin perturb the helical structure of the DNA duplex and as such inhibit DNA replication (19). Etoposide is a DNA topoisomerase II inhibitor that causes double-stranded DNA breaks (11). IR also induces double-stranded DNA breaks, but does not signal efficiently to human Chk1. One function of DNA topoisomerase II is to disentangle intertwined daughter chromatids after DNA replication and prior to mitosis. Thus, inhibition of topoisomerase II by etoposide also leads to activation of the chromatid catenation checkpoint (18), and this may explain in part why etoposide but not IR leads to Chk1 activation. Thus, human Chk1 is activated when DNA replication is directly blocked (i.e., by agents such as HU) or disabled (ara-C, UV, cisplatin), but is poorly activated by double-stranded DNA breaks induced by IR. In addition, Chk1 may be activated when cells recognize mismatches that result from attempted replication across modified or damaged bases. An essential role for Chk1 in genome surveillance during DNA replication may explain why disruption of Chk1 results in early embryonic lethality in mice (44, 61).
Data reported in this study and elsewhere indicate that ATR lies directly upstream of Chk1 in pathways that respond to unreplicated DNA and certain forms of DNA damage. There are likely to be several downstream cellular targets of Chk1 in these pathways as well. In humans, fission yeast, and Xenopus, Chk1 has been shown to phosphorylate Cdc25 on a residue or residues that facilitate the binding of 14-3-3 proteins (38, 54, 56, 72, 73). The functional significance of 14-3-3-Cdc25 interactions has been demonstrated in several organisms by expression of mutants of Cdc25 that cannot bind to 14-3-3 proteins. Perturbations in the DNA replication checkpoint and/or the G2-DNA damage checkpoint have been observed in cells expressing the non-14-3-3 binding mutants of Cdc25 (39, 54, 72, 73). Loss of 14-3-3 binding leads to the nuclear accumulation of Cdc25 in fission yeast, Xenopus, and human tissue culture cells (16, 24, 25, 36, 45, 70, 73). Thus, one function of Chk1 may be to keep Cdc25C out of the nucleus as part of the cellular response to checkpoint activation. The Cdc25A protein phosphatase has also been proposed to be a target of human Chk1. A recent study reported that the G1 cell cycle arrest induced by UV-damaged DNA requires ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis of Cdc25A, and this in turn requires Chk1 (46). Chk1 has also been shown to directly phosphorylate Cdc25A in vitro, although the functional significance was not examined (56). Further studies will be required to identify additional substrates of human Chk1.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We are grateful to J. Schwarz and C. Ryan for assistance with production of recombinant adenoviruses and J. Gales for production and purification of antibodies. We thank K. Cimprich and R. Abraham for providing ATR reagents and M. Linder for helpful discussions. We thank J. Hurov, C. Lovly, and M.-S. Chen for comments on the manuscript.
This work was supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health. H.P.-W. is an Investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Cell Biology and Physiology and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, Box 8228, 660 South Euclid Ave., St. Louis, MO 63110. Phone: (314) 362-6812. Fax: (314) 362-3709. E-mail: hpiwnica{at}cellbio.wustl.edu.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Al-Khodairy, F., E. Fotou, K. S. Sheldrick, D. J. F. Griffiths, A. R. Lehmann, and A. M. Carr. 1994. Identification and characterization of new elements involved in checkpoint and feedback controls in fission yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell 5:147-160[Abstract]. |
| 2. |
Banin, S.,
L. Moyal,
S. Shieh,
Y. Taya,
C. W. Anderson,
L. Chessa,
N. I. Smorodinsky,
C. Prives,
Y. Reiss,
Y. Shiloh, and Y. Ziv.
1998.
Enhanced phosphorylation of p53 by ATM in response to DNA damage.
Science
281:1674-1677 |
| 3. | Blasina, A., B. D. Price, G. A. Turenne, and C. H. McGowan. 1999. Caffeine inhibits the checkpoint kinase ATM. Curr. Biol. 9:1135-1138[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 4. |
Boddy, M. N.,
B. Furnari,
O. Mondesert, and P. Russell.
1998.
Replication checkpoint enforced by kinases Cds1 and Chk1.
Science
280:909-912 |
| 5. |
Brown, A.,
C.-H. Lee,
J. K. Schwarz,
N. Mitiku,
D. Griffith,
H. Piwnica-Worms, and J. H. Chung.
1999.
A human Cds1-related kinase that functions downstream of ATM in the cellular response to DNA damage.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
96:3745-3750 |
| 6. |
Brown, E. J., and D. Baltimore.
2000.
ATR disruption leads to chromosomal fragmentation and early embryonic lethality.
Genes Dev.
14:397-402 |
| 7. |
Busby, E. C.,
D. F. Leistritz,
R. T. Abraham,
L. M. Karnitz, and J. N. Sarkaria.
2000.
The radiosensitizing agent 7-hydroxystaurosporine (UCN-01) inhibits the DNA damage checkpoint kinase hChk1.
Cancer Res.
60:2108-2212 |
| 8. |
Canman, C. E.,
D. S. Lim,
K. A. Cimprich,
Y. Taya,
K. Tamai,
K. Sakaguchi,
E. Appella,
M. B. Kastan, and J. D. Siliciano.
1998.
Activation of the ATM kinase by ionizing radiation and phosphorylation of p53.
Science
281:1677-1689 |
| 9. | Chaturvedi, P., W. K. Eng, Y. Zhu, M. R. Mattern, R. Mishra, M. R. Hurle, X. Zhang, R. S. Annan, Q. Lu, L. F. Faucette, G. F. Scott, X. Li, S. A. Carr, R. K. Johnson, J. D. Winkler, and B.-B. S. Zhou. 1999. Mammalian Chk2 is a downstream effector of the ATM-dependent DNA damage checkpoint pathway. Oncogene 18:4047-4054[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 10. |
Chehab, N. H.,
A. Malikzay,
E. S. Stavridi, and T. D. Halazonetis.
1999.
Phosphorylation of Ser-20 mediates stabilization of human p53 in response to DNA damage.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
96:13777-13782 |
| 11. | Chen, A. Y., and L. F. Liu. 1994. DNA topoisomerases: essential enzymes and lethal targets. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 34:191-218[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 12. | Chen, P., C. Luo, Y. Deng, K. Ryan, J. Register, S. Margosiak, A. Tempczyk-Russell, B. Nguyen, P. Myers, K. Lundgren, C. C. Kan, and P. M. O'Connor. 2000. The 1.7 A crystal structure of human cell cycle checkpoint kinase Chk1: implications for Chk1 regulation. Cell 100:681-692[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 13. |
Cimprich, K. A.,
T. B. Shin,
C. T. Keith, and S. L. Schreiber.
1996.
cDNA cloning and gene mapping of a candidate human cell cycle checkpoint protein.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:2850-2855 |
| 14. | Cliby, W. A., C. J. Roberts, K. A. Cimprich, C. M. Stringer, J. R. Lamb, S. L. Schreiber, and S. H. Friend. 1998. Overexpression of a kinase-inactive ATR protein causes sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents and defects in cell cycle checkpoints. EMBO J. 17:159-169[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 15. |
Cortez, D.,
Y. Wang,
J. Qin, and S. J. Elledge.
1999.
Requirement of ATM-dependent phosphorylation of brca1 in the DNA damage response to double-strand breaks.
Science
286:1162-1166 |
| 16. |
Dalal, S. N.,
C. M. Schweitzer,
J. Gan, and J. A. DeCaprio.
1999.
Cytoplasmic localization of human cdc25C during interphase requires an intact 14-3-3 binding site.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19:4465-4479 |
| 17. | de Klein, A., M. Muijtjens, R. van Os, Y. Verhoeven, B. Smit, A. M. Carr, A. R. Lehmann, and J. H. Hoeijmakers. 2000. Targeted disruption of the cell-cycle checkpoint gene ATR leads to early embryonic lethality in mice. Curr. Biol. 10:479-482[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 18. | Downes, C. S., D. J. Clarke, A. M. Mullinger, J. F. Gimenez-Abian, A. M. Creighton, and R. T. Johnson. 1994. A topoisomerase II-dependent G2 cycle checkpoint in mammalian cells. Nature 372:467-470[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 19. | Eastman, A. 1987. The formation, isolation and characterization of DNA adducts by the anti-cancer platinum complexes. Pharmacol. Ther. 34:155-166[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 20. | Flaggs, G., A. W. Plug, K. M. Dunks, K. E. Mundt, J. C. Ford, M. R. E. Quiggle, E. M. Taylor, C. H. Westphal, T. Ashley, M. F. Hoekstra, and A. M. Carr. 1997. ATM-dependent interactions of a mammalian Chk1 homolog with meiotic chromosomes. Curr. Biol. 7:977-986[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 21. | Fogarty, P., S. D. Campbell, R. Abu-Shumays, B. S. Phalle, K. R. Yu, G. L. Uy, M. L. Goldberg, and W. Sullivan. 1997. The Drosophila grapes gene is related to checkpoint gene chk1/rad27 and is required for late syncytial division fidelity. Curr. Biol. 7:418-426[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 22. | Francesconi, S., M. Grenon, D. Bouvier, and G. Baldacci. 1997. p56chk1 protein kinase is required for the DNA replication checkpoint at 37oC in fission yeast. EMBO J. 16:1332-1341[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 23. |
Gatei, M.,
S. P. Scott,
I. Filippovitch,
N. Soronika,
M. F. Lavin,
B. Weber, and K. K. Khanna.
2000.
Role for ATM in DNA damage-induced phosphorylation of BRCA1.
Cancer Res.
60:3299-3304 |
| 24. | Graves, P. R., C. M. Lovly, G. L. Uy, and H. Piwnica-Worms. 2001. Localization of human Cdc25C is regulated both by nuclear export and 14-3-3 binding. Oncogene 20:1839-1851[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 25. |
Graves, P. R.,
L. Yu,
J. K. Schwarz,
J. Gales,
E. A. Sausville,
P. M. O'Connor, and H. Piwnica-Worms.
2000.
The Chk1 protein kinase and the Cdc25C regulatory pathways are targets of the anticancer agent UCN-01.
J. Biol. Chem.
275:5600-5605 |
| 26. |
Guo, Z.,
A. Kumagai,
S. X. Wang, and W. G. Dunphy.
2000.
Requirement for atr in phosphorylation of chk1 and cell cycle regulation in response to DNA replication blocks and UV-damaged DNA in Xenopus egg extracts.
Genes Dev.
14:2745-2756 |
| 27. |
Hartwell, L. H., and T. A. Weinert.
1989.
Checkpoints: controls that ensure the order of cell cycle events.
Science
246:629-634 |
| 28. |
He, T. C.,
S. Zhou,
L. T. da Costa,
J. Yu,
K. W. Kinzler, and B. Vogelstein.
1998.
A simplified system for generating recombinant adenoviruses.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
95:2509-2514 |
| 29. |
Jackson, J. R.,
A. Gilmartin,
C. Imburgia,
J. D. Winkler,
L. A. Marshall, and A. Roshak.
2000.
An indolocarbazole inhibitor of human checkpoint kinase (Chk1) abrogates cell cycle arrest caused by DNA damage.
Cancer Res.
60:566-572 |
| 30. | Kaneko, Y. S., N. Watanabe, H. Morisaki, H. Akita, A. Fujimoto, K. Tominaga, M. Terasawa, A. Tachibana, K. Ikeda, M. Nakanishi, and Y. Kaneko. 1999. Cell-cycle-dependent and ATM-independent expression of human Chk1 kinase. Oncogene 18:3673-3681[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 31. | Kastan, M. B., and D.-S. Lim. 2000. The many substrates and functions of ATM. Nat. Rev. 1:179-186. |
| 32. |
Keegan, K. S.,
D. A. Holtzman,
A. W. Plug,
E. R. Christenson,
E. E. Brainerd,
G. Flaggs,
N. J. Bentley,
E. M. Taylor,
M. S. Meyn,
S. B. Moss,
A. M. Carr,
T. Ashley, and M. F. Hoekstra.
1996.
The Atr and Atm protein kinases associate with different sites along meiotically pairing chromosomes.
Genes Dev.
10:2423-2437 |
| 33. | Khanna, K. K., K. E. Keating, S. Kozlov, S. Scott, M. Gatei, K. Hobson, Y. Taya, B. Gabrielli, D. Chan, and S. P. Lees-Miller. 1999. ATM associates with and phosphorylates p53: mapping the region of interaction. Nat. Genet. 20:398-400. |
| 34. |
Khosravi, R.,
R. Maya,
T. Gottlieb,
M. Oren,
Y. Shiloh, and D. Shkedy.
2000.
Rapid ATM-dependent phosphorylation of MDM2 precedes p53 accumulation in response to DNA damage.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
96:14973-14977 |
| 35. |
Kim, S. T.,
D. S. Lim,
C. E. Canman, and M. B. Kastan.
1999.
Substrate specificities and identification of putative substrates of ATM kinase family members.
J. Biol. Chem.
274:37538-37543 |
| 36. |
Kumagai, A., and W. G. Dunphy.
1999.
Binding of 14-3-3 proteins and nuclear export control the intracellular localization of the mitotic inducer Cdc25.
Genes Dev.
13:1067-1072 |
| 37. | Kumagai, A., and W. G. Dunphy. 2000. Claspin, a novel protein required for the activation of Chk1 during a DNA replication checkpoint response in Xenopus egg extracts. Mol. Cell 6:839-849[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 38. |
Kumagai, A.,
Z. Guo,
K. H. Emami,
S. X. Wang, and W. G. Dunphy.
1998.
The Xenopus Chk1 protein kinase mediates a caffeine-sensitive pathway of checkpoint control in cell-free extracts.
J. Cell Biol.
142:1559-1569 |
| 39. |
Kumagai, A.,
P. S. Yakowec, and W. G. Dunphy.
1998.
14-3-3 proteins act as negative regulators of the mitotic inducer Cdc25 in Xenopus egg extracts.
Mol. Biol. Cell
9:345-354 |
| 40. | Lakin, N. D., B. C. Hann, and S. P. Jackson. 1999. The ataxia-telangiectasia related protein ATR mediates DNA-dependent phosphorylation of p53. Oncogene 18:3989-3995[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 41. | Li, S., N. S. Ting, L. Zheng, P. L. Chen, Y. Ziv, Y. Shiloh, E. Y. Lee, and W. H. Lee. 2000. Functional link of BRCA1 and ataxia telangiectasia gene product in DNA damage response. Nature 406:210-215[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 42. | Lim, D. S., S. T. Kim, B. Xu, R. S. Maser, J. Lin, J. H. Petrini, and M. B. Kastan. 2000. ATM phosphorylates p95/nbs1 in an S-phase checkpoint pathway. Nature 404:613-617[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 43. |
Lindsay, H. D.,
D. J. Griffiths,
R. J. Edwards,
P. U. Christensen,
J. M. Murray,
F. Osman,
N. Walworth, and A. M. Carr.
1998.
S-phase-specific activation of Cds1 kinase defines a subpathway of the checkpoint response in Schizosaccharomyces pombe.
Genes Dev.
12:382-395 |
| 44. |
Liu, Q.,
S. Guntuku,
X. S. Cui,
S. Matsuoka,
D. Cortez,
K. Tamai,
G. Luo,
S. Carattini-Rivera,
F. DeMayo,
A. Bradley,
L. A. Donehower, and S. J. Elledge.
2000.
Chk1 is an essential kinase that is regulated by Atr and required for the G(2)/M DNA damage checkpoint.
Genes Dev.
14:1448-1459 |
| 45. | Lopez-Girona, A., B. Furnari, O. Mondesert, and P. Russell. 1999. Nuclear localization of Cdc25 is regulated by DNA damage and a 14-3-3 protein. Nature 397:172-175[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 46. |
Mailand, N.,
J. Falck,
C. Lukas,
R. G. Syljuasen,
M. Welcker,
J. Bartek, and J. Lukas.
2000.
Rapid destruction of human Cdc25A in response to DNA damage.
Science
288:1425-1429 |
| 47. |
Matsuoka, S.,
G. Rotman,
A. Ogawa,
Y. Shiloh,
K. Tamai, and S. J. Elledge.
2000.
Ataxia telangiectasia-mutated phosphorylates Chk2 in vivo and in vitro.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
97:10389-10394 |
| 48. | Mikita, T., and G. P. Beardsley. 1988. Functional consequences of the arabinosylcytosine structural lesion in DNA. Biochemistry 27:4698-4705[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 49. |
Moser, B. A.,
J.-M. Brondello,
B. Baber-Furnari, and P. Russell.
2000.
Mechanism of caffeine-induced checkpoint override in fission yeast.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20:4288-4294 |
| 50. | Nakajo, N., T. Oe, K. Uto, and N. Sagata. 1999. Involvement of Chk1 kinase in prophase I arrest of Xenopus oocytes. Dev. Biol. 207:432-444[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 51. | Oe, T., N. Nakajo, Y. Katsuragi, K. Okazaki, and N. Sagata. 2001. Cytoplasmic occurrence of the Chk1/Cdc25 pathway and regulation of Chk1 in Xenopus oocytes. Dev. Biol. 229:250-261[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 52. |
O'Neill, T.,
A. J. Dwyer,
Y. Ziv,
D. W. Chan,
S. P. Lees-Miller,
R. H. Abraham,
J. H. Lai,
D. Hill,
Y. Shiloh,
L. C. Cantley, and G. A. Rathbun.
2000.
Utilization of orientated peptide libraries to identify substrate motifs selected by ATM.
J. Biol. Chem.
275:22719-22727 |