Previous Article | Next Article 
Molecular and Cellular Biology, July 2001, p. 4256-4264, Vol. 21, No. 13
0270-7306/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/MCB.21.13.4256-4264.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Functional Organization of Single and Paired V(D)J
Cleavage Complexes
Mark A.
Landree,1
Sam B.
Kale,2 and
David
B.
Roth1,2,3,*
Interdepartmental Program in Cell and
Molecular Biology,1 Department of
Immunology,2 and Howard Hughes
Medical Institute,3 Baylor College of Medicine,
Houston, Texas 77030
Received 17 January 2001/Returned for modification 22 February
2001/Accepted 4 April 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
RAG-1 and RAG-2 initiate V(D)J recombination by binding to specific
recognition sequences (RSS) and then cleave the DNA in two
steps: nicking and hairpin formation. Recent work has established that
a dimer of RAG-1 and either one or two monomers of RAG-2 bind to a
single RSS, but the enzymatic contributions of the RAG molecules within
this nucleoprotein complex and its functional organization have not
been elucidated. Using heterodimeric protein preparations containing
both wild-type and catalytically deficient RAG-1 molecules, we found
that one active monomer is sufficient for both nicking and hairpin
formation at a single RSS, demonstrating that a single active site can
carry out both cleavage steps. Furthermore, the mutant heterodimers
efficiently cleaved both RSS in a synaptic complex. These results
strongly suggest that two RAG-1 dimers are responsible for RSS cleavage
in a synaptic complex, with one monomer of each dimer catalyzing both
nicking and hairpin formation at each RSS.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
V(D)J recombination assembles
separate antigen receptor gene segments into an exon encoding the
antigen binding domain of immunoglobulin and T-cell receptor proteins.
The V(D)J recombinase consists of two proteins, RAG-1 and RAG-2, which
bind to recognition sequences (RSS) located adjacent to the V, D, and J
coding segments. Recombination is initiated by the RAG proteins, which
introduce a nick precisely between the RSS and the coding segment,
creating a free 3' OH which is then used as a nucleophile to attack the opposite strand, resulting in a blunt, 5'-phosphorylated signal end and
a hairpin coding end (17, 22).
Although nicking can occur at a single RSS, efficient hairpin formation
normally requires a pair of different RSS, one with a 12- and one with
a 23-nucleotide spacer (known, respectively, as the 12-RSS and the
23-RSS), with the two being assembled into a synaptic complex
(9, 30). This restriction, known as the 12/23 rule,
prevents immunologically irrelevant recombination events from
scrambling the immune receptor loci. The 12/23 rule can, however, be
bypassed under certain conditions, such as when Mn2+ is substituted for the physiological
divalent cation, Mg2+ (30).
In order to understand the mechanism of cleavage and the molecular
basis of the 12/23 rule, it is necessary to delineate the organization
of the nucleoprotein complexes that carry out cleavage at a single RSS
and at a 12/23 RSS pair. Recent work has shown that a single molecule
of DNA containing an RSS is bound by a RAG-1 dimer, with one or two
monomers of RAG-2, and that this nucleoprotein complex is competent for
cleavage (3, 21, 29). This single RSS complex is quite
stable; it is resistant to incubation with a 250-fold excess of
specific competitor at 37°C for at least 1 h (8).
Furthermore, purified RAG-1 dimers are stable in solution, even in the
absence of DNA, remaining associated after overnight incubation at
4°C (21). Additional evidence for the stability of RAG-1
dimers is provided by the observation that heterodimer formation
requires coexpression of two different RAG-1 molecules: mixing of
individually purified RAG-1 homodimers did not result in detectable
heterodimer formation (29).
Although the stoichiometry of RAG-1 molecules bound to a single RSS has
been established, our understanding of the anatomy of a functional
RAG-RSS complex remains incomplete. A question of particular
mechanistic importance is whether the two cleavage steps, nicking and
hairpin formation, utilize one or both active sites present in the
RAG-1 dimer bound at a single RSS. Precedents exist for both
possibilities. The Tn7 transposase utilizes two distinct
active sites, in two different transposase proteins, to catalyze
cleavage of the top and bottom strands (24). In contrast,
the transposases of bacteriophage Mu, Tn10, and
Tn5 each use a single active site to carry out cleavage and
strand transfer (4, 11, 18, 19, 32).
To address these questions, we have taken advantage of catalytically
deficient RAG-1 mutants. We recently identified three catalytic amino
acids (D600, D708, and E962) in RAG-1 that are thought to be involved
in coordinating a divalent metal ion that is essential for cleavage
(14). There is evidence that two of these amino acids,
D708 and D600, directly contact the metal ion (7, 12, 14).
Importantly, mutant proteins bearing a single-amino-acid substitution
at any of these three positions exhibit essentially wild-type RSS
binding and 12/23 synaptic complex formation but are completely unable
to carry out either nicking or hairpin formation (7, 12,
14). Because metal ions are required for DNA binding (2,
23), it is likely that these catalytically deficient mutants can
bind metal ions but fail to position them properly for catalysis.
Moreover, pairwise combinations of these mutant proteins do not restore
enzymatic activity when assayed either in vivo or in vitro,
demonstrating that these three catalytic amino acids are not
contributed by different monomers of RAG-1 (unpublished observations).
We have used purified mutant heterodimers of RAG-1 that contain one
wild-type monomer and one catalytically deficient monomer to determine
that a single RAG-1 monomer performs both nicking and hairpin formation
at a single RSS. Furthermore, analysis of cleavage of paired 12/23
complexes suggests that the synaptic complex contains two RAG-1 dimers.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Protein purification.
Baculovirus transfer vectors encoding
the mutant RAG proteins or their wild-type counterparts were made by
subcloning into the pFastBac transfer vector (GIBCO/BRL). Sf9 cells
were coinfected with one recombinant baculovirus encoding a RAG-1
molecule with an N-terminal maltose binding protein (MBP) fusion
and three copies of a C-terminal Myc tag
(MBP-RAG-1[384-1008]-Myc3, ~130 kDa, referred to as mR1) and a
second recombinant baculovirus encoding a RAG-1 molecule lacking the
N-terminal MBP fusion but containing a C-terminal polyhistidine and
three copies of the Myc tag (RAG-1[384-1008]-His9-Myc3, ~85 kDa,
referred to as R1h) (2, 13, 17). Typically, 500-ml volumes
of Sf9 cells at a density of 2 × 106
cells/ml were infected with high-titer virus stocks. Cells were harvested ~60 h postinfection and lysed in 30 ml of lysis buffer (20 mM Tris-Cl, pH 7.9, at 4°C; 0.5 M NaCl; 20% glycerol; 2 mM
-mercaptoethanol) plus 10 mM imidazole by dounce homogenization (20 strokes, tight pestle). The resulting lysate was centrifuged at
100,000 × g for 30 min at 4°C. The supernatant was
loaded onto a 0.5-ml metal chelating Sepharose column (Pharmacia)
charged with NiSO4. The column was washed with 10 ml of lysis buffer containing 60 mM imidazole and eluted with 5 ml of
lysis buffer containing 250 mM imidazole. The eluate was diluted with 8 ml of amylose A (25 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.2; 0.5 M NaCl; 10%
glycerol; 1 mM dithiothreitol [DTT]) and loaded onto a 0.5-ml
amylose resin column. The column was washed with 10 ml of amylose A,
and the protein was eluted with amylose A plus 10 mM maltose. Fractions containing the RAG proteins were dialyzed against 1,000 volumes of
storage buffer (25 mM K-HEPES, pH 7.5; 150 mM potassium glutamate; 20%
glycerol; 2 mM DTT) for 3 h at 4°C. The protein was aliquotted, flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at
80°C. Glutathione S-transferase (GST)-tagged RAG-2(1-383) was purified
as described previously (25, 26).
Electrophoretic mobility shift assays.
Purified RAG-1 and
RAG-2 proteins (100 ng of each, as measured by Coomassie
blue-stained gels) were incubated with 25 fmol of the annealed
oligonucleotide substrate DAR39/40 (17) in 10 µl of
reaction buffer (37.8 mM HEPES-KOH, pH 7.5; 51 mM potassium glutamate;
10% glycerol; 3 mM DTT; 2.5 pmol of the nonspecific competitor
oligonucleotide FM117 [17]; 1 mM
MgCl2; 60 µg of bovine serum albumin
[BSA] per ml; 0.006% NP-40; 20% dimethyl sulfoxide).
The incubations were at 30°C for 30 min, and they were cross-linked
by the addition of glutaraldehyde (to 0.1%), with an additional
incubation for 10 min at 37°C, as described previously (2,
8). DNA binding was analyzed by nondenaturing electrophoresis
through a 4% polyacrylamide gel run in 1× Tris-borate-EDTA (TBE) (80 mA · h at 4°C). Dried gels were visualized
by autoradiography and/or with a phosphorimager.
Oligonucleotide cleavage assays.
Oligonucleotide cleavage
assays were performed as described previously (13). RAG-1
and RAG-2 (100 ng of each; approximately 400 fmol of RAG-1 dimer) were
incubated with 250 fmol of annealed DAR39/40 (17) (DAR39
was 5' 32P end labeled) in a 10-µl
reaction mixture (40 mM HEPES-KOH, pH 7.5; 60 mM potassium glutamate;
5; 60 mM potassium glutamate; 10% glycerol; 3 mM DTT; 1 mM
MnCl2; 60 µg of BSA per ml; 0.006% NP-40) at
37°C for 45 min unless otherwise stated. The reactions were stopped
by adding an equal volume of a solution containing 94% formamide, 20 mM EDTA, and 0.05% bromophenol blue. The reaction products were
separated by electrophoresis through a 10% acrylamide gel containing
30% formamide, 0.67× TBE, 7 M urea, and 12.5 mM HEPES-KOH, pH 7.5, for 2 h at 75 W. Wet gels were visualized by autoradiography or
with a phosphorimager.
Plasmid cleavage assays.
RAG-1 and RAG-2 were incubated with
20 ng of pJH290 for 3 h at 30°C (50 mM HEPES-KOH, pH 8.0; 11 mM
KCl; 4 mM NaCl; 15 mM KGlu; 5 mM MgCl2; 4%
glycerol; 1 mM DTT; 100 ng of BSA per µl; 20 ng of HMG-1 per
µl). The cleavage reactions were terminated by the addition of 100 µl of stop buffer (100 mM Tris-Cl, pH 8.0; 0.2% sodium dodecyl
sulfate; 0.35 mg of proteinase K per ml; 10 mM EDTA) and
incubated at 55°C for 1 h. The deproteinized cleavage products were phenol-chloroform extracted, ethyl alcohol precipitated, resuspended in 20 µl of Tris-EDTA, and digested with
PvuII (0.1 U) for 30 min at 37°C. Half of the digested
reaction products were then separated by electrophoresis through a
4.5% acrylamide gel, transferred to a solid support, and hybridized
with a randomly primed 693-bp PvuII fragment from pJH290
that is complementary to all cleavage products.
 |
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
Expression and purification of heterodimeric RAG-1 protein.
To
purify heterodimers containing one wild-type monomer and one
catalytically deficient monomer (D708N, D600N, or E962Q), we coinfected
insect cells with recombinant baculoviruses encoding two different
versions of RAG-1, one with an N-terminal MBP fusion (referred to as
mR1) and one with a C-terminal polyhistidine tag (referred to as R1h).
Three different dimers can be formed within a cell infected by both
viruses, as diagrammed in Fig. 1A: an mR1-mR1 homodimer, an mR1-R1h heterodimer, and an R1h-R1h
homodimer. Assuming random association, these three species should be
formed in a 1:2:1 ratio. Heterodimers (mR1-R1h) were purified by
sequential affinity chromatography using an Ni2+
chelating resin (which binds the polyhistidine tag) followed by an
amylose A resin (which binds the MBP tag). This sequential chromatography scheme purifies heterodimers away from contaminating homodimers (purified heterodimer preparations contain less than 5%
homodimer [see below]).

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Heterodimeric RAG-1 protein preparations containing
equal amounts of the two RAG-1 monomers. (A) Three possible
combinations (i, ii, and iii, respectively) of RAG-1 dimers resulting
from random assortment during coinfection. Form ii is the only dimer
retained after sequential affinity chromatography. (B) Representative
Western blot analysis of heterodimeric RAG-1 protein preparations using
the anti-c-Myc antibody (clone 9E10). The quantitation of band
intensity was carried out by fluorimager analysis. The average molar
ratios (fluorimager units for mR1 divided by fluorimager units for R1h
for both amounts loaded [1x and 2x]) were calculated from three
independent protein preparations of each heterodimer.
|
|
We prepared two types of mutant heterodimers, MBP-tagged
wild-type-histidine-tagged mutant [mR1-R1h(708)] and
MBP-tagged mutant-histidine-tagged
wild-type [mR1(708)-R1h].
As expected, both preparations yielded
similar results. To determine
the molar ratio of mR1 to R1h in
each preparation, we performed Western
blot analysis using an
anti-c-Myc antibody which recognizes a
C-terminal Myc epitope
tag present on both proteins (Fig.
1B). Each
determination was
made at two different protein concentrations to
ensure that the
values fell within the linear range of the assay. The
resulting
data show that the different heterodimer preparations
contained
equal amounts of RAG-1 protein. The control wild-type
heterodimer
(mR1-R1h) showed an average mR1/R1h molar ratio of 0.9, as
determined
by fluorimager analysis of three different protein
preparations
(representative data are shown in Fig.
1B, lanes 5 and 6).
The
two mutant heterodimers [mR1-R1h(708) (Fig.
1B, lanes 7 and
8)
and mR1(708)-R1h (Fig.
1B, lanes 9 and 10)] yielded average
molar
ratios of 0.9 and 1.2, respectively, demonstrating that the
purified
heterodimers contained equal proportions of wild-type and
mutant
monomers.
The 1:1 molar ratio of the recovered proteins suggests that the
purified heterodimer preparations were not significantly contaminated
by homodimers. To verify this and to directly detect the heterodimers,
we assayed the ability of purified heterodimers to bind to an
RSS-containing oligonucleotide using a standard electrophoretic
mobility shift assay (
8). Mobility shift assays were
performed
in the presence of independently purified GST-tagged RAG-2,
as
both RAG proteins are required for stable RSS binding (
2,
8,
29). R1h-R1h homodimers produce a shifted species with
substantially
faster mobility than the mR1-mR1homodimers (Fig.
2A, compare lanes
1 and 5; Fig.
2B, lanes
2 and 6). As expected, the purified wild-type
and mutant
heterodimers, mR1-R1h, mR1-R1h(708), and mR1(708)-R1h,
migrated
to an intermediate position (Fig.
2A, lanes 2 to 4),
providing direct
evidence that the purified species are indeed
heterodimers. (The
heterodimers were more clearly separated from
the mR1-mR1homodimers
after extended periods of electrophoresis,
as shown in Fig.
2B
[compare lanes 3 through 5 with lane 6].)
Note that both mutant
heterodimers bound to the RSS at essentially
wild-type levels,
verifying that the D708N mutation does not significantly
affect DNA
binding, as shown previously for D708N homodimers (
14).

View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Electrophoretic mobility shift analysis of homodimers
and heterodimers. Electrophoretic mobility shift analysis of a
12-RSS-containing oligonucleotide substrate was performed with either
homodimeric or heterodimeric RAG-1 and GST-tagged RAG-2. All reaction
mixtures contain GST-tagged RAG-2, but only RAG-1 is listed above the
lanes for simplicity. Dialysis buffer used for RAG-1 purification was
used for no RAG-1 control. The heterodimers shift the probe to an
intermediate size relative to the large and small homodimers. In panel
B, samples were run for a longer time.
|
|
This assay can also be used to detect the presence of contaminating R1h
homodimers in the purified heterodimer preparations,
taking advantage
of the substantial difference in the mobilities
of the R1h-R1h and the
mR1-R1h species. Unfortunately, the difference
between the mobilities
of the mR1-R1h and mR1-mR1 complexes is
not as great, which makes it
difficult to detect small amounts
of contaminating mR1-mR1 homodimers,
if present. Nevertheless,
all experiments were done with both
mR1(708)-R1h and mR1-R1h(708)
heterodimer preparations, which
yielded the same results (see
below); contamination of the mR1(708)-R1h
heterodimer by small
amounts of catalytically inactive
mR1(708)-mR1(708) mutant homodimers
should not affect the results. No
R1h-R1h homodimers were detected
in the mR1-R1h, mR1-R1h(708), or
mR1(708)-R1h heterodimer preparations
(Fig.
2), even with long
autoradiographic exposures (data not
shown). Based on electrophoretic
mobility shift analysis of a
protein titration (data not shown), we
conclude that the purified
heterodimer preparations contained <5%
homodimer, in agreement
with the results of Western blot analysis shown
in Fig.
1. These
results also show that the RAG-1 heterodimers
are stable and did
not reassort (to generate a homodimer from two
heterodimers) during
the 40-min incubation at 37°C prior to gel
electrophoresis. Similar
results were obtained with mR1(600)-R1h and
mR1(962)-R1h (data
not shown). While these data do not rule out the
possibility that
DNA-protein complexes could rearrange without complete
dissociation,
they are consistent with the results of previous studies
in which
the reassortment of heterodimers was not detected
(
29).
One functional RAG-1 active site is sufficient for both nicking and
hairpin formation in Mn2+.
The catalytically competent
RAG-12-RSS complex (also called the 12-SC) contains a dimer of RAG-1,
one 12-RSS, and either one or two RAG-2 molecules (3, 21,
29). How many functional active sites within the RAG-1 dimer
bound to a single RSS are necessary for nicking and hairpin formation?
The simplest possibility is either that (i) one RAG-1 monomer nicks and
the other monomer is responsible for hairpin formation or that (ii) a
single monomer's active site performs both catalytic steps. These two
models can be tested using the purified mutant heterodimers which
contain one wild-type RAG-1 monomer and one mutant RAG-1 monomer that is incapable of either nicking or hairpin formation. Model 1 predicts that a standard substrate would be nicked, without hairpin formation (since nicking must precede hairpin formation); use of a prenicked substrate would allow hairpin formation. According to model 2, both
nicking and hairpin formation should be observed with the use of
standard substrates.
To address this question, standard single-RSS cleavage reactions were
performed using a 12-RSS, either wild-type or mutant
heterodimeric
RAG-1, and wild-type GST-tagged RAG-2. The results
of a typical
experiment are shown in Fig.
3A. In the
presence
of Mn
2+, which allows efficient cleavage
of a single RSS, both wild-type
and mutant heterodimers carried out
both nicking and hairpin formation
(Fig.
3A, lanes 1 to 3). (The 50%
reduction in both nicking and
hairpin formation by the mutant
heterodimers is discussed below.)
As expected, no cleavage was observed
using RAG-2 only (Fig.
3A,
lane 4). Two other mutant heterodimers
[mR1(600)-R1h and mR1(962)-R1h]
were also able to carry out
nicking and hairpin formation under
these conditions (data not shown),
in agreement with the predictions
of model 2.

View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
One functional RAG-1 monomer is capable of
nicking and hairpin formation at a single RSS. Abbreviations: U, uncut
substrate; HP, hairpin product; N, nicked intermediate. (A)
Standard cleavage reactions using a radiolabeled 12-RSS-containing
oligonucleotide substrate and Mn2+ were performed.
(B) Cleavage was allowed to proceed for the times noted. (C) RAG-1 and
RAG-2 proteins were diluted with dialysis buffer prior to
incubation, and cleavage was allowed to proceed for 45 min. (D)
Schematic of substrate and cleavage products. *, radiolabel.
|
|
The results described above indicate that a single RAG-1 molecule is
capable of carrying out both cleavage steps. It is important,
however,
to rule out two alternative scenarios in which more than
one active
RAG-1 monomer might contact the RSS. First, the cleavage
events
detected in our experiments might occur in higher-order
complexes or
aggregates containing more than one heterodimer of
RAG-1. Gel
filtration analysis of the mutant heterodimer [mR1(708)-R1h]
provides
strong evidence against this possibility, because the
fractions with
the highest cleavage activity migrated with an
apparent molecular mass
that corresponds to dimers of RAG-1 (data
not shown), in agreement with
the results of previous gel filtration
analysis of wild-type RAG-1
dimers (
3,
21). Second, we considered
the possibility that
cleavage by the mutant heterodimers might
occur by a bind-and-release
mechanism (nicking, release of the
nicked substrate, rebinding, and
hairpin formation), although
this mechanism is not utilized by
wild-type RAG proteins (
8,
15). To address this
possibility, we examined the kinetics of
nicking and hairpin formation
by the mutant heterodimers. The
time course experiment results shown in
Fig.
3B demonstrate that
nicking and hairpin formation by the wild-type
and both mutant
heterodimers follow similar kinetics. Nicking, along
with a low
level of hairpin formation, is readily apparent at the first
time
point (5 min) (Fig.
3B, lanes 1 to 3). Hairpin formation
continued
to increase up to the last time point (40 min) (Fig.
3B,
lanes
13 to 15). The parallel kinetic profiles of wild-type and mutant
heterodimers argue against the possibility that hairpin formation
by
the mutant heterodimers occurs by a bind-and-release model
(additional
evidence is presented
below).
Another prediction of model 2 is that the overall level of cleavage by
the mutant heterodimers should be decreased twofold,
since both the
wild-type and mutant monomers in each heterodimer
should have an equal
probability of binding an RSS. The results
shown in Fig.
3A and B are
in agreement with this prediction,
since at all time points of
examination the nicks and hairpins
generated by the mutant heterodimers
were approximately twofold
less abundant (by phosphorimager analysis)
than the products generated
by wild-type heterodimers. To confirm this
measurement, we performed
a protein titration, testing a series of
twofold dilutions (Fig.
3C). This analysis again demonstrated that the
reactions performed
by both undiluted mutant heterodimers (Fig.
3C,
lanes 5 and 9)
most closely mimic the activity observed with the 1:2
diluted
wild-type heterodimer (Fig.
3C, lane 2). Together, these data
suggest that one functional RAG-1 active site is sufficient for
both
nicking and hairpin formation at a single RSS in
Mn
2+. Furthermore, these results are inconsistent
with the bind-and-release
model, which predicts that cleavage by the
heterodimers should
yield a level of hairpin formation no more than
25% of the wild-type
level and that this yield should be even lower if
release and
rebinding are not 100% efficient. (According to this
model, only
50% of the initial RAG-RSS complexes should be competent
for nicking.
Hairpin formation requires release of the RAG dimers; only
50%
of the rebound dimers would be in the proper position to catalyze
hairpin formation, resulting in a theoretical maximum efficiency
of
25%.)
As a final test of the bind-and-release model, we performed competition
experiments. This model predicts that hairpin formation
by the mutant
heterodimers occurs only after release and rebinding
of the RAG
proteins. Therefore, addition of excess unlabeled competitor
RSS at the
onset of catalysis should specifically block the appearance
of
radiolabeled hairpin products. RAG-RSS complexes were allowed
to form
during a 60-min preincubation in the presence of a radiolabeled
12-RSS
and Ca
2+ (which supports DNA binding but not
catalysis). After the preincubation,
Mn
2+ was
added either with or without a 100-fold molar excess of unlabeled
12-RSS competitor and cleavage was allowed to occur for either
5 or 45 min (Fig.
4A, lanes 1 through 12 or 13 through 23, respectively).
The levels of nick and hairpin products were
not significantly
affected by the presence of competitor RSS in the
second (Mn
2+) incubation (Fig.
4A, lanes 1 through 4 and 13 through 16). In
contrast, when added to the first
incubation (with Ca
2+), the same amount of
competitor effectively abolished both nicking
activity and hairpin
formation (Fig.
4A, lanes 8 through 12 and
21 through 23). These data
are inconsistent with the bind-and-release
model, which predicts that
competitor DNA should not affect nicking
but should abolish hairpin
formation. Based on these results and
the data described above, we
conclude that the mutant RAG heterodimers
remain stably associated with
the RSS substrate during catalysis.
Therefore, the ability of the
mutant heterodimers to both nick
and form a hairpin at a single
RSS strongly suggests that one
functional active site within the
context of a RAG-1 dimer performs
both catalytic steps.

View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Mutant heterodimer cleavage activity is competitor
resistant. Abbreviations: U, uncut substrate; HP, hairpin product; N,
nicked intermediate; PN, prenicked substrate. (A) This assay was
staged, using two incubations. In the first incubation, RAGs and
substrate were incubated in Ca2+ to allow complex formation
in either the presence or the absence of specific cold competitor. In
the second incubation, Mn2+ was added to allow catalysis in
either the presence or the absence of specific cold competitor. (B)
Cleavage in the presence of Mg2+ or Mn2+ was
tested on an uncut substrate or a prenicked substrate.
|
|
One RAG-1 active site is also sufficient for both cleavage steps at
a single RSS in the presence of Mg2+.
The
experiments described above were performed in the presence of
Mn2+, which is known to relax the specificity of many
nucleases (31), including the RAG proteins
(17). Furthermore, Mn2+ nonspecifically
rescues catalytic activities of several mutant RAG proteins (but not
the DDE mutants) by unknown mechanisms (14). Therefore, it
was important to examine single-RSS cleavage in the presence of
Mg2+ (hairpin formation was inefficient but detectable
under these conditions). As we observed in experiments with
Mn2+, both mutant heterodimer preparations were capable of
nicking and hairpin formation in the presence of Mg2+,
yielding levels of these products that were approximately twofold lower
than those observed with wild-type heterodimers (Fig. 4B, lanes 1 to
3). The mutant heterodimers were also capable of catalyzing hairpin
formation using a prenicked substrate, again approximately 50% less
efficiently than the wild type both in the presence of Mg2+
(Fig. 4B, lanes 5 through 7) and in the presence of Mn2+
(Fig. 4B, lanes 9 through 11). Thus, a single functional RAG-1 active
site in the RAG-RSS complex was sufficient for nicking and hairpin
formation in the presence of both Mn2+ and
Mg2+. The ratios of nick formation to hairpin formation for
wild-type and mutant heterodimers were closely matched at early time
points. In some experiments, after prolonged incubation the mutant
heterodimers showed somewhat less hairpin formation than wild-type
heterodimers. The mechanistic basis for this behavior is unclear. It is
important to note, however, that cleavage at a single RSS is not
necessarily a physiologic reaction (analysis of cleavage at a 12/23 RSS
pair is presented below).
Our data demonstrate that the V(D)J recombinase can utilize a single
RAG-1 active site to perform both catalytic steps of
cleavage at a
single RSS. Recent experiments, published while
this report was in
preparation (
27), also support this conclusion.
The 50%
reduction in cleavage efficiency observed with the mutant
heterodimers
further indicates that the active monomer must be
bound in a specific
orientation. Given that the Hin homology domain
of RAG-1 (amino acids
389 to 446) is responsible for binding to
the nonamer (
5,
26,
28), it is possible that one RAG-1
monomer binds to the nonamer
and positions the second monomer
at the cleavage site

the junction
between the heptamer and the
coding flank. In fact, recent experiments
indicate that cleavage
at a single RSS is mediated by the RAG-1 monomer
that is not bound
to the nonamer (
27).
The Tn
10 transposase uses a single active site to perform
all four reactions necessary for transposition: nicking, hairpin
formation, hairpin opening, and strand transfer (
4,
11).
We have shown that a single RAG-1 active site can be used for
both
nicking and hairpin formation. Since the RAG proteins are
capable of
transposition (
1,
10), it will be interesting
to determine
whether the same RAG-1 monomer catalyzes all three
steps: nicking,
hairpin formation, and
transposition.
Cleavage of a 12/23 synaptic complex requires two RAG-1
dimers.
Under physiological conditions, hairpin formation is
substantially stimulated by the formation of a synaptic complex in
which the RAG proteins are bound to both a 12- and a 23-RSS (6,
9, 30). The stoichiometry of this complex with respect to RAG-1 has not been established. Two models have been proposed for the formation of these complexes (3, 27, 29). A RAG complex containing a RAG-1 dimer associated with a single RSS could simply capture a second RSS, leading to a synaptic complex containing only one
dimer of RAG-1. Alternatively, the synaptic complex could form by
collision of two RAG-RSS complexes, leading to a complex containing two
RAG-1 dimers. Examples of both dimeric (19) and tetrameric
(18, 32) configurations are provided by bacterial transposases. In both cases, only one active monomer at each end of the
transposable element is necessary for all catalytic activities (4, 11, 18, 19, 32).
To probe the organization of the synaptic complex, we assessed the
ability of the mutant heterodimers to perform coupled cleavage
of a
plasmid substrate, pJH290, which contains a 12/23 RSS pair
(
16). Using this substrate, cleavage at a single RSS can
be
readily distinguished from coupled cleavage at a 12/23 RSS pair.
Thus, if the synaptic complex contains a single RAG-1 heterodimer,
cleavage should occur only at a single RSS, because only one active
site is present in the complex. If, however, the synaptic complex
contains two heterodimers, cleavage can occur at both RSS, producing
a
doubly cleaved
fragment.
We performed an analysis of the kinetics of plasmid cleavage using
wild-type and mutant heterodimers (Fig.
5A). The mutant
heterodimers produced
appreciable levels of the doubly cut species
(Fig.
5A, lanes 2 and 3 and lanes 6 and 7, as well as lanes 10
and 11 and lanes 14 and 15),
indicating the presence of two functional
RAG-1 active sites and
suggesting that the synaptic complex contained
two RAG-1 dimers.
Nevertheless, we considered two alternative
scenarios in which a
synaptic complex containing a single RAG-1
dimer could generate doubly
cleaved products. First, one active
site might nick and form a
hairpin(s) efficiently at both RSS
(although this would presumably
require major structural rearrangements
within the synaptic complex),
which would result in wild-type
cleavage at both RSS if no particular
orientation was required
or a 50% reduction if the active monomer had
to bind either the
12- or the 23-RSS. Second, the doubly cleaved
products could be
derived from sequential single RSS cleavage events.
Our kinetics
analysis argues strongly against the latter possibility,
because
singly cleaved intermediates should precede the appearance of
doubly cleaved products. Double cleavage by both mutant heterodimers
was observed at the earliest time point (30 min) (Fig.
5A, lanes
2 and
3); no singly cleaved species were detected until the 60-min
time point
(Fig.
5A, lanes 6 and 7). Note that the earlier time
point is shorter
than the incubation time used for the mobility
shift experiments (40 min), in which no detectable rearrangement
of protein subunits within
the RAG-1 dimer was observed. Therefore,
it is unlikely that doubly
cleaved species arise from successive
single-RSS cleavage events, since
they appear before the singly
cleaved species accumulates. Additional
support for this interpretation
is provided by competition experiments,
which showed that cleavage
of plasmid substrates is resistant to a
100-fold molar excess
of specific RSS competitor DNA (data not shown).

View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Two dimers of RAG-1 exist in a synaptic complex.
Abbreviations: U, uncut substrate; SC, cleavage at one RSS; DC,
cleavage at both RSS; CE, coding end. (A) Cleavage was allowed
to proceed for the times noted; (B) RAG-1 and RAG-2 proteins were
diluted with dialysis buffer prior to incubation and cleavage was
allowed to proceed for 30 min.
|
|
The two-dimer model is further supported by quantitative analysis of
the ratio of single- to double-cleavage events. This
model predicts
that the mutant heterodimer should generate singly
and doubly cleaved
products in a ratio of 2:1, because single-cleavage
events can occur
whenever either RSS has a catalytically competent
monomer in the proper
configuration (two out of four possible
combinations), whereas
double cleavage requires both monomers
to be in the correct position
(one out of four possible combinations).
In agreement with these
expectations, Fig.
5A demonstrates an
increased ratio of singly cut to
doubly cut species derived from
the mutant heterodimers (relative to
wild-type) and a level of
doubly cleaved products that was decreased
compared to that observed
with the wild-type heterodimer (Fig.
5A,
compare lanes 13 through
15). To confirm these results, we performed a
protein titration
(Fig.
5B) which showed that the level of doubly
cleaved products
produced by the undiluted mutant heterodimers (Fig.
5B, lanes
4 and 5) was equal to that generated by a 1:4 dilution of the
wild-type heterodimer (Fig.
5B, lane 3), as predicted by the two-dimer
model. These results are inconsistent with the single-dimer model
in
which only one functional monomer is required for cleavage
at both RSS,
because this model predicts either no decrease (if
the functional
monomer can be bound to either RSS) or a twofold
decrease (if the
functional monomer must bind in a particular
orientation) in doubly cut
products. Our data clearly show a fourfold
reduction, consistent with
the two-dimer model. Furthermore, the
ratio of single-cut to double-cut
products generated by the mutant
heterodimers was higher than it was in
the case of wild-type homodimers
at all dilutions tested, in agreement
with the two-dimer model.
Together, these data strongly suggest that
the synaptic complex
contains two dimers of RAG-1 and that one monomer
of RAG-1 at
each RSS is sufficient for
cleavage.
Several well-characterized transposases perform cleavage in
trans: the active monomer responsible for cleaving at one
end
of the transposon is donated by a transposase monomer bound to
the
other end (
4,
11,
18,
19,
32). Hairpin formation
by the
RAG proteins (in Mg
2+) is strongly stimulated by
the presence of a 12/23 RSS pair (
6,
9,
30). Catalysis of
this step in
trans would provide a simple
way to ensure that
double-strand break formation requires synaptic
complex assembly, and
would help to enforce coupled cleavage.
Our data show that under
conditions that bypass the requirement
for a 12/23 RSS pair (in
Mn
2+), hairpin formation can be carried out in
cis, by the same RAG-1
monomer that is responsible for
nicking. We obtained similar results
in Mg
2+,
under conditions that support inefficient hairpin formation
at a single
RSS. The substantial stimulation of hairpin formation
observed in the
presence of a 12/23 RSS pair in Mg
2+ may reflect
a conformational change induced by the addition of
the second dimer of
RAG-1 in the synaptic complex. Future experiments
are required to
determine the organization of the RAG monomers
in the synaptic complex
and to determine whether the individual
cleavage steps are catalyzed in
cis or in
trans.
Another unanswered question is the role of RAG-2 in catalysis. Although
it is not clear whether RAG-2 contributes amino acids
to the active
site, we have recently identified a RAG-2 mutant
that specifically
inhibits hairpin formation (
20). The use of
this mutant in
experiments similar to those described here should
facilitate
determination of the organization of RAG-2 monomers
in the synaptic
complex, providing a more comprehensive understanding
of the
architecture of the DNA-protein complex that carries out
V(D)J
recombination.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
Monica Calicchio and Wei-han Kan provided technical
assistance, and we thank Suzanne Robertson and Denise Guzman for
secretarial support. We are grateful to Vicky Brandt for editorial help
and to Tania Baker and Ilana Goldhaber-Gordon for helpful discussions. Mary Purugganan, Heather Schultz, Leslie Huye, Sundeep Shah, and Matt
Neiditch provided critical suggestions on the manuscript.
This work was supported by a grant from the National Institutes of
Health (AI-36420). M.A.L. was supported by a National Institutes of
Health Predoctoral Fellowship (T32-AI07495). D.B.R. is an Assistant Investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Immunology, Immunology M929, Baylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor
Plaza, Houston, TX 77030. Phone: (713) 798-8145. Fax: (512) 857-0178. E-mail: davidbr{at}bcm.tmc.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Agrawal, A.,
Q. M. Eastman, and D. G. Schatz.
1998.
Transposition mediated by RAG1 and RAG2 and its implications for the evolution of the immune system.
Nature
394:744-751[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Akamatsu, Y., and M. A. Oettinger.
1998.
Distinct roles of RAG1 and RAG2 in binding the V(D)J recombination signal sequences.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:4670-4678[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Bailin, T.,
X. Mo, and M. J. Sadofsky.
1999.
A RAG1 and RAG2 tetramer complex is active in cleavage in V(D)J recombination.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19:4664-4671[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Bolland, S., and N. Kleckner.
1996.
The three chemical steps of Tn10/IS10 transposition involve repeated utilization of a single active site.
Cell
84:223-233[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Difilippantonio, M. J.,
C. J. McMahan,
Q. M. Eastman,
E. Spanopoulou, and D. G. Schatz.
1996.
RAG1 mediates signal sequence recognition and recruitment of RAG2 in V(D)J recombination.
Cell
87:253-262[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Eastman, Q. M.,
T. M. J. Leu, and D. G. Schatz.
1996.
Initiation of V(D)J recombination in vitro obeying the 12/23 rule.
Nature
380:85-88[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Fugmann, S. D.,
I. J. Villey,
L. M. Ptaszek, and D. G. Schatz.
2000.
Identification of two catalytic residues in RAG1 that define a single active site within the RAG1/RAG2 protein complex.
Mol. Cell
5:97-107[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Hiom, K., and M. Gellert.
1997.
A stable RAG1-RAG2-DNA complex that is active in V(D)J cleavage.
Cell
88:65-72[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Hiom, K., and M. Gellert.
1998.
Assembly of a 12/23 paired signal complex: a critical control point in V(D)J recombination.
Mol. Cell
1:1011-1019[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Hiom, K.,
M. Melek, and M. Gellert.
1998.
DNA transposition by the RAG1 and RAG2 proteins: a possible source of oncogenic translocations.
Cell
94:463-470[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Kennedy, A. K.,
D. B. Haniford, and K. Mizuuchi.
2000.
Single active site catalysis of the successive phosphoryl transfer steps by DNA transposases: insights from phosphorothioate stereoselectivity.
Cell
101:295-305[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Kim, D. R.,
Y. Dai,
C. L. Mundy,
W. Yang, and M. A. Oettinger.
1999.
Mutations of acidic residues in RAG1 define the active site of the V(D)J recombinase.
Genes Dev.
13:3070-3080[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Kim, D. R., and M. A. Oettinger.
1998.
Functional analysis of coordinated cleavage in V(D)J recombination.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:4679-4688[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Landree, M. A.,
J. A. Wibbenmeyer, and D. B. Roth.
1999.
Mutational analysis of RAG-1 and RAG-2 identifies three active site amino acids in RAG-1 critical for both cleavage steps of V(D)J recombination.
Genes Dev.
13:3059-3069[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Li, W.,
P. Swanson, and S. Desiderio.
1997.
RAG-1 and RAG-2-dependent assembly of functional complexes with V(D)J recombination substrates in solution.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17:6932-6939[Abstract].
|
| 16.
|
Lieber, M. R.,
J. E. Hesse,
S. Lewis,
G. C. Bosma,
N. Rosenberg,
K. Mizuuchi,
M. J. Bosma, and M. Gellert.
1988.
The defect in murine severe combined immune deficiency: joining of signal sequences but not coding segments in V(D)J recombination.
Cell
55:7-16[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 17.
|
McBlane, J. F.,
D. C. van Gent,
D. A. Ramsden,
C. Romeo,
C. A. Cuomo,
M. Gellert, and M. A. Oettinger.
1995.
Cleavage at a V(D)J recombination signal requires only RAG1 and RAG2 proteins and occurs in two steps.
Cell
83:387-395[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Namgoong, S.-Y., and R. M. Harshey.
1998.
The same two monomers within a MuA tetramer provide the DDE domains for the strand cleavage and strand transfer steps of transposition.
EMBO J.
17:3775-3785[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Naumann, T. A., and W. S. Reznikoff.
2000.
Trans catalysis in Tn5 transposition.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
97:8944-8949[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Qiu, J.,
S. B. Kale,
H. Y. Schultz, and D. B. Roth.
2001.
Separation-of-function mutants reveal critical roles for RAG2 in both the cleavage and joining steps of V(D)J recombination.
Mol. Cell
7:77-87[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Rodgers, K. K.,
I. J. Villey,
L. Ptaszek,
E. Corbett,
D. G. Schatz, and J. E. Coleman.
1999.
A dimer of the lymphoid protein RAG1 recognizes the recombination signal sequence and the complex stably incorporates the high mobility group protein HMG2.
Nucleic Acids Res.
27:2938-2946[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Roth, D. B.,
C. Zhu, and M. Gellert.
1993.
Characterization of broken DNA molecules associated with V(D)J recombination.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
90:10788-10792[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Santagata, S.,
V. Aidinis, and E. Spanopoulou.
1998.
The effect of Me2+ cofactors at the initial stages of V(D)J recombination.
J. Biol. Chem.
273:16325-16331[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
Sarnovsky, R. J.,
E. W. May, and N. L. Craig.
1996.
The Tn7 transposase is a heteromeric complex in which DNA breakage and joining activities are distributed between different gene products.
EMBO J.
15:6348-6361[Medline].
|
| 25.
|
Sawchuk, D. J.,
F. Weis-Garcia,
S. Malik,
E. Besmer,
M. Bustin,
M. C. Nussenzweig, and P. Cortes.
1997.
V(D)J recombination: modulation of RAG1 and RAG2 cleavage activity on 12/23 substrates by whole cell extract and DNA-bending proteins.
J. Exp. Med.
185:2025-2031[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Spanopoulou, E.,
F. Zaitseva,
F.-H. Wang,
S. Santagata,
D. Baltimore, and G. Panayotou.
1996.
The homeodomain region of Rag-1 reveals the parallel mechanisms of bacterial and V(D)J recombination.
Cell
87:263-276[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 27.
|
Swanson, P. C.
2001.
The DDE motif in RAG-1 is contributed in trans to a single active site that catalyzes the nicking and transesterification steps of V(D)J recombination.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
21:449-458[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 28.
|
Swanson, P. C., and S. Desiderio.
1998.
V(D)J recombination signal recognition: distinct, overlapping DNA-protein contacts in complexes containing RAG1 with and without RAG2.
Immunity
9:115-125[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 29.
|
Swanson, P. C., and S. Desiderio.
1999.
RAG-2 promotes heptamer occupancy by RAG-1 in the assembly of a V(D)J initiation complex.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19:3674-3683[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
van Gent, D. C.,
D. A. Ramsden, and M. Gellert.
1996.
The RAG1 and RAG2 proteins establish the 12/23 rule in V(D)J recombination.
Cell
85:107-113[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 31.
|
Vermote, C. L. M., and S. E. Halford.
1992.
EcoRV restriction endonuclease: communication between catalytic metal ions and DNA recognition.
Biochemistry
31:6082-6089[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 32.
|
Williams, T. L.,
E. L. Jackson,
A. Carritte, and T. A. Baker.
1999.
Organization and dynamics of the Mu transpososome: recombination by communication between two active sites.
Genes Dev.
13:2725-2737[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Molecular and Cellular Biology, July 2001, p. 4256-4264, Vol. 21, No. 13
0270-7306/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/MCB.21.13.4256-4264.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Nishihara, T., Nagawa, F., Imai, T., Sakano, H.
(2008). RAG-Heptamer Interaction in the Synaptic Complex Is a Crucial Biochemical Checkpoint for the 12/23 Recombination Rule. J. Biol. Chem.
283: 4877-4885
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Godderz, L. J., Rahman, N. S., Risinger, G. M., Arbuckle, J. L., Rodgers, K. K.
(2003). Self-association and conformational properties of RAG1: implications for formation of the V(D)J recombinase. Nucleic Acids Res
31: 2014-2023
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Yurchenko, V., Xue, Z., Sadofsky, M.
(2003). The RAG1 N-terminal domain is an E3 ubiquitin ligase. Genes Dev.
17: 581-585
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ciubotaru, M., Ptaszek, L. M., Baker, G. A., Baker, S. N., Bright, F. V., Schatz, D. G.
(2003). RAG1-DNA Binding in V(D)J Recombination. SPECIFICITY AND DNA-INDUCED CONFORMATIONAL CHANGES REVEALED BY FLUORESCENCE AND CD SPECTROSCOPY. J. Biol. Chem.
278: 5584-5596
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Swanson, P. C.
(2002). A RAG-1/RAG-2 Tetramer Supports 12/23-Regulated Synapsis, Cleavage, and Transposition of V(D)J Recombination Signals. Mol. Cell. Biol.
22: 7790-7801
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Huye, L. E., Purugganan, M. M., Jiang, M.-M., Roth, D. B.
(2002). Mutational Analysis of All Conserved Basic Amino Acids in RAG-1 Reveals Catalytic, Step Arrest, and Joining-Deficient Mutants in the V(D)J Recombinase. Mol. Cell. Biol.
22: 3460-3473
[Abstract]
[Full Text]