Institute of Environment and Life Science,
Hallym University, Chuncheon 200-702, Korea
Received 19 September 2000/Returned for modification 20 November
2000/Accepted 15 April 2001
Recent genetic studies suggest that ephrins may function in a
kinase-independent Eph receptor pathway. Here we report that expression
of EphA8 in either NIH 3T3 or HEK293 cells enhanced cell adhesion to
fibronectin via
5
1- or
3
integrins. Interestingly, a kinase-inactive EphA8 mutant also markedly
promoted cell attachment to fibronectin in these cell lines. Using a
panel of EphA8 point mutants, we have demonstrated that EphA8 kinase
activity does not correlate with its ability to promote cell attachment
to fibronectin. Analysis using EphA8 extracellular and intracellular
domain mutants has revealed that enhanced cell adhesion is dependent on
ephrin A binding to the extracellular domain and the juxtamembrane
segment of the cytoplasmic domain of the receptor. EphA8-promoted
adhesion was efficiently inhibited by wortmannin, a
phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI 3-kinase) inhibitor. Additionally, we
found that EphA8 had associated PI 3-kinase activity and that the
p110
isoform of PI 3-kinase is associated with EphA8. In vitro
binding experiments revealed that the EphA8 juxtamembrane segment was
sufficient for the formation of a stable complex with p110
. Similar
results were obtained in assay using cells stripped of endogenous
ephrin A ligands by treatment with preclustered ephrin A5-Fc proteins. In addition, a membrane-targeted lipid kinase-inactive p110
mutant was demonstrated to stably associate with EphA8 and suppress
EphA8-promoted cell adhesion to fibronectin. Taken together, these
results suggest the presence of a novel mechanism by which the EphA8
receptor localizes p110
PI 3-kinase to the plasma membrane in a
tyrosine kinase-independent fashion, thereby allowing access to lipid
substrates to enable the signals required for integrin-mediated cell adhesion.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The Eph receptor tyrosine kinases
(RTKs), together with their ephrin ligands, regulate diverse
developmental patterning processes including axon guidance, cell
migration, and cell segregation (13). However, in contrast
to other families of receptor tyrosine kinases, the Eph RTKs do not
appear to regulate cell proliferation and survival. It was recently
reported that activation of the Eph RTKs by their cognate ligands leads
to changes in cell adhesion to various extracellular matrix proteins.
For example, EphB1 promoted cell attachment to fibronectin or
fibrinogen, whereas neither a kinase-inactive EphB1 mutant nor EphB1
point mutants defective for binding to either Nck or
low-molecular-weight protein tyrosine phosphatase (LMW-PTP) showed this
effect (21, 35). EphB2 was also shown to indirectly
control integrin activity by inducing tyrosine phosphorylation of
R-Ras, possibly through a novel signaling intermediate, Src homology 2 (SH2) domain-containing Eph receptor binding protein 1 (SHEP1)
(9, 43). More recently, EphA2 kinase was reported to
regulate integrin function by causing focal adhesion kinase
dephosphorylation (26). These results are consistent with
the concept that the kinase activity of the Eph RTKs plays a pivotal
role in regulation of cell adhesion through integrins. In contrast,
some studies indicate that the Eph RTKs might function in a kinase
activity-independent mechanism. Evidence supporting this possibility
comes from genetic studies using the nematode Caenorhabditis
elegans. For example, mutations in the Eph receptor VAB-1 kinase
domain caused a less penetrant embryonic arrest phenotype than a null
mutation in the same gene, suggesting that VAB-1 may function partly in
a kinase-independent signaling pathway (15). Moreover,
C. elegans ephrin vab-2 mutations enhanced
vab-1 kinase mutations, resembling vab-1 null
mutations in the resulting phenotype (6). Two different
mechanisms of kinase activity-independent signaling by Eph RTKs are
possible. First, the ephrin ligands could transmit signals via the Eph
receptor cytoplasmic region in a way that does not involve the tyrosine
kinase activity. Interestingly, the native EphB6/Mep protein lacks
tyrosine kinase activity due to many amino acid substitutions in
conserved kinase domain sequence motifs which are important for
catalysis; this may reflect an intrinsic signaling function of the
kinase-inactive receptor (17). Second, the Eph receptors
could function in reverse signaling via ephrin ligands. Vertebrate
ephrins either are membrane anchored by glycosylphosphatidylinositol
(GPI) anchors (ephrin A subgroup) or are transmembrane proteins (ephrin
B subgroup). (12). The observation that ephrin B protein
become phosphorylated on cytoplasmic tyrosine residues in response to
Eph receptor binding provides evidence for the reverse signaling
hypothesis (4, 20). More recently, consistent with a
guidance role for the EphB2 extracellular domain (19), it
was shown that retinal ganglion cell axon pathfinding within the retina
was partially mediated by EphB receptors acting in a kinase-independent
manner (3). It was also demonstrated that upon receptor
binding, the ephrin A5 ligand could induce a signaling event through
the Fyn protein tyrosine kinase, concomitant with alterations in the
adhesive properties of the ligand-expressing cells (8).
However, there have been no indications to date that the known
intracellular signals transmitted by mammalian Eph receptors elicit
biological responses without the tyrosine kinase activity.
We have previously reported that the EphA8 receptor can regulate
cellular cytoskeletal modification through a kinase-dependent signaling
mechanism (7). For example, EphA8 defective in binding to
Fyn kinase fails to attenuate cell attachment responses to uncoated
glass surfaces. However, unlike the case for EphB receptors, we found
no strong correlation between tyrosine phosphorylation of EphA8 and
alterations in cell attachment to a specific extracellular matrix
protein such as fibronectin. On the basis of this observation, we asked
whether the EphA8-mediated cell attachment to fibronectin could be
regulated in a kinase activity-independent manner. In this study, we
used cell lines that express endogenous ephrin A ligand to evaluate
whether expression of diverse EphA8 kinase mutants resulted in
different responses to fibronectin. In these systems, we observed that
expression of the EphA8 receptor significantly promoted cell attachment
to fibronectin without altering cellular integrin levels. Surprisingly,
no significant differences in the ability to promote cell attachment to
fibronectin were observed between wild-type EphA8 and
kinase-inactive mutants. Moreover, our results identify p110
phosphotidylinositol (PI) 3-kinase as a key bridging molecule between
EphA8 and integrins. Our results provide the first example of
kinase-independent communication between the mammalian EphA receptors
and integrins.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Cell culture and transfection.
NIH 3T3 cells were maintained
in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM; Sigma) supplemented with
5% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum (Life Technologies. Inc) as
described previously (30). HEK293 cells were routinely
cultured in alpha-MEM (Sigma) containing 10% heat-inactivated fetal
bovine serum (BioWhittaker). Tetracycline-free serum (Clontech) was
used in experiments involving doxycycline-induced EphA8 expression to
prevent leakage expression. The calcium phosphate precipitation method
was used as described previously (16) to transfect cells
with various expression plasmids. Stable G418-resistant clones were
selected by supplementing the culture medium with G418 (400 µg/ml).
The clones were periodically cultured in the same selection medium to
maintain stable expression. Transient transfections were carried out
using LipofectAMINE (Life Technologies) according to the
manufacturer's instructions. Doxycycline-inducible EphA8 expression
cell lines were constructed by cotransfection with the pTRE-EphA8 and
pTet-On (Clontech) constructs, followed by selection with G418.
Positive clones were directly selected by Western analysis on the basis
of their ability to express EphA8 in the presence of doxycycline (2 µg/ml; Sigma). At least three independent clones of each of the
wild-type and kinase-inactive EphA8 receptors were obtained.
PI-specific phospholipase C (PI-PLC) was treated to eliminate
GPI-linked ephrin A subgroup ligands from NIH 3T3 or HEK293 cells as
described previously (30). For treatment of preclustered
ephrin A5-Fc proteins, purified ephrin A5-Fc (30) was
aggregated using anti-human Fc (Jackson Immunoresearch) for 1 h at
4°C, and stimulations were for 20 min at 37°C.
Construction of expression vectors.
The murine EphA8 cDNA
(pSP38), EphA8-TrkB chimeric cDNA, and EphA8 cDNA tagged with the
nine-amino-acid hemagglutinin (HA) epitope (YPYDVPDYA) at its COOH
terminus have been described elsewhere (7, 30). The
EphA8-
III deletion mutant was generated as follows. First, a 689-bp
EcoRI/NcoI fragment (nucleotides [nt] 2 to 690 of the insert in pSP38) was ligated to a 224-bp
NcoI/XhoI-digested PCR product amplified using
primers matching nt 899 to 918 and 1101 to 1120 of the insert in pSP38.
The resulting EcoRI/XhoI fragment was subcloned
into the corresponding region of full-length EphA8 cDNA. To construct
the EphA8-
V-VII deletion mutant, a 1,095-bp PstI fragment
(nt 814 to 1908 of the insert in pSP38) was subcloned into pGEM5z
(Promega) and then subjected to two separate PCRs. A 248-bp PCR product
was amplified using the 5' T7 universal primer and a 3' primer matching
nt 1037 to 1054 of the pSP38 insert, and a 301-bp PCR product was
amplified using a 5' primer matching nt 1679 to 1696 of the pSP38
insert and the 3' SP6 universal primer. The two partially complementary
PCR fragments thus generated were annealed and used as the template in
another PCR with the 5' T7 and 3' SP6 universal primers. The resulting
385-bp product was digested with PstI and subcloned into the
corresponding region of full-length EphA8 cDNA. The EphA8 juxtamembrane
region (JM) deletion mutant (EphA8-
JM) was also generated by PCR as
follows: a 324-bp PCR product was amplified using primers matching nt
1524 to 1543 and 1822 to 1840 of the insert in pSP38, and a 255-bp PCR
product was generated using primers nt 2008 to 2022 and 2230 to 2249 of
the insert in pSP38. The partially complementary fragments generated by
these PCRs were annealed and reamplified with the primers used for the
5' end of the first PCR product and the 3' end of the second PCR
product. The resulting 481-bp product was digested with StuI
and XbaI and subcloned into the corresponding region of
full-length EphA8 cDNA. To construct the EphA8 sterile alpha motif
(SAM) deletion mutant (EphA8-
SAM), a 1,010-bp
XbaI/EcoRI fragment (nt 2235 to 3244 of the pSP38
insert) was subcloned into pGEM11z (Promega) and used as the template
in two separate PCRs: a 634-bp PCR product was amplified using the 5'
SP6 universal primer and a 3' primer matching nt 2839 to 2853 of the
pSP38 insert, and a 239-bp PCR product was amplified using a 5' primer
matching nt 3049 to 3068 of the insert in pSP38 and the 3' T7 universal primer. The resulting PCR fragments were annealed and used as the
template in another PCR with the 5' SP6 and 3' T7 universal primers.
The resulting 865-bp fragment was digested with NcoI and
ApaI and subcloned into the corresponding region of the
XbaI/EcoRI EphA8 fragment in pGEM11z. Regions
amplified by PCR were sequenced to exclude the possibility of errors
introduced by the polymerase.
Site-directed mutagenesis was performed using the Altered Sites II in
vitro mutagenesis system (Promega) as described elsewhere (7). Briefly, to introduce a point mutation at the Tyr-792 codon, a 20-bp oligonucleotide (nt 2442 to 2461 of the insert in pSP38)
incorporating TTC (Phe) instead of TAC (Tyr-792) was used together with
amp repair and tet knockout oligonucleotides, according to the manufacturer's instructions. Point mutations at the
Lys-666 codon were also generated using 20-bp oligonucleotides (nt 2068 to 2087 of the insert in pSP38) incorporating either ATG (Met) or AGG
(Arg) instead of AAG (Lys-666). The resulting inserts containing
Phe-792, Met-666, or Arg-666 codon were digested with NheI
and EcoRI, and the 1,964-bp restriction fragments were isolated and subcloned into the corresponding region of full-length EphA8 cDNA.
The doxycycline-regulated EphA8 expression construct was generated by
digesting the carboxy-terminal HA-tagged murine EphA8 cDNA with
EcoRI and then subcloning the resulting fragment into the
tetracycline-inducible vector pTRE (Clontech).
To generate a full-length murine p110
cDNA, a partial fragment (nt
1668 to 4690 of the murine p110
cDNA sequence (GenBank accession no.
AJ24928)) was first isolated from an expressed sequence tag clone
(GenBank accession no. AW761865; Research Genetics). The rest of the
p110
cDNA was generated using reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) and
mouse embryonic brain mRNA as a template. The first RT-PCR product was
generated using Omniscript reverse transcriptase (Qiagen), a 5' primer
matching nt 1384 to 1408, and a 3' primer matching nt 1805 to 1829. The
resulting PCR fragment was digested with EcoRV, and this
353-bp fragment was then subcloned into pBluescript SK. The second
RT-PCR product was generated using a 5' primer (nt 300 to 319 of the
p110
cDNA plus an EcoRI site at its 5' end) and a 3'
primer matching nt 1444 to 1468 of the p110
cDNA. The resulting PCR
fragment was digested with EcoRI and EcoRV, and the resulting 1,126-bp
fragment was subcloned into pBluescript SK. These DNA fragments were
then ligated together with the insert derived from the expressed
sequence tag clone to generate the full-length p110
cDNA in the
vector pcDNA3. The construct was DNA sequenced in both directions to
exclude the possibility of errors.
To introduce the eight-amino-acid FLAG epitope (DYKDDDDK) at
the carboxy terminus of the murine p110
protein, two
oligonucleotides were synthesized. The first consisted of a 57-bp
oligonucleotide with 3' 20bp of the p110
coding sequence, the FLAG
tag sequence, a TGA stop codon, and an XhoI site at the 5'
end. The second consisted of a 20-bp oligonucleotide corresponding to
nt 2607 to 2626 of the p110
cDNA. PCR using these primers was
performed with HotStar Taq polymerase (Qiagen), which
amplified a 1,039-bp DNA fragment. The resulting PCR product was
digested with HindIII and XhoI and subcloned
into the corresponding region of the full-length p110
in pcDNA3. DNA
sequencing across the cloning site was performed to exclude the
possibly of errors in sequence.
A point mutation at the Lys-833 codon of murine p110
was generated
using a 25-bp oligonucleotide (nt 2803 to 2827 of AJ24928) to
incorporate AGA (Arg) instead of AAA (Lys).
To generate the Myr-p110
construct, we first designed a pcDNA-Myr
vector, a modified pcDNA3 expression vector encoding the amino-terminal
15 amino acids of chicken c-Src, which includes the c-Src
amino-terminal myristoylation signal. The pcDNA-Myr vector was
generated with two complementary oligomers. The 57-bp forward primer
consisted of an EcoRI site at the 5' end, 45 nt encoding the
amino-terminal 15 amino acids of chicken c-Src, and an XhoI
site at the 3' end. The two oligonucleotides were phosphorylated at
their 5' ends using T4 polynucleotide kinase (Epicentre Technologies) and were then self-annealed prior to being inserted into pcDNA3.
RT-PCR analysis.
For RT-PCR analysis, total RNA was isolated
from transfected HEK293 cells using an RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen) and
then used to synthesize first-strand cDNA using oligo (dT) primers and
Omniscript reverse transcriptase (Qiagen). The resulting cDNA was then
used in PCR to amplify murine p110
, EphA8, and human p110
DNA
fragments. A 546-bp DNA fragment of EphA8 was amplified using a 5'
primer matching nt 2569 to 2588 of the insert in pSP38 and a 3' primer matching the HA epitope sequence appended at the carboxy terminus of
EphA8. A 330-bp DNA fragment of murine p110
was amplified using a 5'
primer matching nt 3322 to 3341 of the murine p110
cDNA and a 3'
primer matching the FLAG epitope sequence appended at the carboxy
terminus of p110
. A 229-bp DNA fragment of the human p110
was
amplified using a 5' primer matching nt 3401 to 3420 and a 3' primer
matching nt 3609 to 3628 of the human p110
cDNA sequence (GenBank
accession no. X83368). PCR was performed using HotStar Taq
DNA polymerase and 18 cycles of amplification with a 1-min denaturation
step at 94°C, a 1-min annealing step at 56°C, and a 1.5-min
extension step at 72°C.
Immunoprecipitation, Western blotting, cell surface
biotinylation, and pulse-chase experiments.
Immunoprecipitation
and Western blotting were performed as previously described
(7). For cell surface biotinylation, confluent cells were
detached by trypsin treatment, washed once with complete medium (DMEM
or alpha-MEM containing 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum) and
counted prior to cell surface biotinylation. The cells were placed on
ice, washed five times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and
biotinylated by incubation with
sulfo-N-hydroxysuccinimide-biotin (0.5 mg/ml; Pierce) for
30 min. The reaction was stopped by washing three times with PBS.
Labeled cells were lysed with PLC lysis buffer as described above.
Extracted cell proteins were immunoprecipitated with the relevant
antibodies, and the immunocomplexes were bound to protein A-Sepharose
(integrin
5 polyclonal antibody) or rabbit anti-mouse
immunoglobulin G (IgG)-Sepharose (integrin
5
1 monoclonal antibody) beads. Bound
material was eluted by boiling the beads in 5% sodium dodecyl sulfate
(SDS) and resolved by electrophoresis on SDS-7.5 polyacrylamide gels
(7.5% SDS-PAGE) under nonreducing conditions. Biotinylated integrins
were detected by incubating blots with streptavidin-horseradish
peroxidase (HRP) (Pierce). For pulse-chase experiments, cells were
transiently transfected with FLAG-tagged p110
and then treated with
doxycycline to induce the wild-type EphA8 protein. Cells were washed
once with PBS and starved for 2 h in methionine- and cysteine-free
medium containing 10% dialyzed fetal calf serum. The cells were then
pulse-labeled for 15 min with 200 µCi of
[35S]methionine and [35S]cysteine (NEN),
per ml, washed once to remove unincorporated radioactivity, and chased
for 30 min in unlabeled normal medium with or without preclustered
EphA5-Fc. At the indicated times, cells were detergent extracted and
subjected to immunoprecipitation with anti-FLAG antibody.
Binding assay, GST-mixing experiment, far-Western analysis, and
PI 3-kinase assay.
Binding assays using EphA5-Fc proteins and
glutathione S-transferase (GST)-mixing experiments were
performed as described previously (7, 30). Far-Western
blot assays were performed as described previously (11).
GST-JM fusion protein was radiolabeled using [
-32P]ATP
and anti-HA immunoprecipitates containing wild-type EphA8 as described
previously (7). The labeled GST-JM proteins were purified
using a PD-10 column (Amersham-Pharmacia) and then used to probe
membranes containing proteins transferred from 7.5% SDS-polyacrylamide gels. After incubation at room temperature for 3 h, the membranes were washed five times with Tris-buffered saline (10 mM Tris-HCl [pH
7.5], 0.9% NaCl) before exposure to film. PI 3-kinase activity was
measured as previously described (14), with some
modifications. Briefly, proteins were immunoprecipitated by incubating
cell extracts with an anti-HA antibody or a p85 subunit-specific PI
3-kinase antibody and protein A-Sepharose as described above. The
Sepharose beads were washed three times with HNTG buffer
(7), once with 1% Nonidet P-40 in PBS, once with 100 mM
Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) containing 500 mM LiCl, and once with 50 mM Tris-HCl
buffer (pH 7.2) containing 150 mM NaCl. After removal of the last wash,
the beads were resuspended in kinase buffer (20 mM HEPES [pH 7.2], 50 mM NaCl, 1 mM EGTA) containing 4 µg of PI (Sigma), 10 µM ATP, 5 mM
MnCl2, and 10 µCi of [
-32P]ATP and
incubated for 20 min at 30°C. The reaction was stopped by the
addition of 100 µl of 1 N HCl and 200 µl of a 1:1 mixture of
chloroform and methanol. The lipids were extracted and resolved on
potassium oxalate-pretreated thin-layer chromatography (TLC) plates (EM
Sciences) with 35 ml of 2 N acetic acid and 65 ml of 1-propanol as the
mobile phase. Dried plates were exposed to either Fuji-Imaging plates
for quantitation or Kodak X-ray film for autoradiography. Analysis of
ephrin A5-stimulated accumulation of 3'-phosphorylated inositol
phospholipids was performed as described elsewhere (18, 32). Briefly, HEK293 cells transiently transfected with p110
were treated with doxycyline for 12 h to induce the expression of
the EphA8 receptors. These cells were serum starved in
phosphate-deficient DMEM for 2 h prior to labeling with
32Pi (2 mCi/ml for 2 h in a 60-mm-diameter
dish) and then treated with preclustered ephrin A5-Fc for the indicated
times. Lipid extraction, deacylation, and analysis of the deacylated
lipids by anion-exchange high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC)
were performed as previously described (32).
Cell attachment assays.
Attachment assays were performed on
22-mm2 coverslips coated with different matrix proteins.
Coverslips were placed in 35-mm-diameter dishes, coated by overnight
incubation at 4°C, and postcoated for 1 h with 1% bovine serum
albumin in PBS. Fibronectin (Promega) and laminin (Upstate
Biotechnology, Inc.) were used at 100 and 125 µg/ml, respectively, in
PBS. in cell attachment assays using PI 3-kinase inhibitors, wortmannin
(stored in dimethyl sulfoxide [DMSO] in the dark at
20°C) was
added directly to the culture medium for 30 min. Cells were collected
by brief trypsinization, washed twice with complete medium, and then
replated in triplicate onto coverslips (5 × 105
cells/coverslip). After 15 (NIH 3T3) or 30 (HEK293) min at 37°C, unattached cells were removed by washing twice with complete medium, and adherent cells were incubated until 2 h after replating. Adherent cells on coverslips were counted directly by a hemocytometer. Alternatively, cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, stained with
0.5% crystal violet in 20% methanol, and quantified by measurement of
the optical density at 570 nm. Control coverslips were incubated for
2 h without washing and used to measure total cell numbers. The
ratio of attached cells to total cell numbers was calculated for each
of three coverslips. Data are expressed as mean ± standard error
(SE) and are representative of three independent experiments. In
experiments using integrin blocking antibodies, cells were preincubated
with the relevant antibodies (5 µg/ml) for 5 min at room temperature
before replating.
Antibodies.
Polyclonal rabbit antibody specific for the
EphA8 JM was described previously (7). Monoclonal
antiphosphotyrosine antibody (4G10) and polyclonal anti-p85 subunit PI
3-kinase antibody were purchased from Upstate Biotechnology. Polyclonal
rabbit anti-p110
, -p110
, and -p110
antibodies were from Santa
Cruz Biotechnology. Polyclonal rabbit anti-HA antibody was obtained
from Zymed. Monoclonal mouse anti-FLAG antibody was from Sigma.
Monoclonal anti-human integrin
5
1 (JBS5)
and murine
5
1 (BMA5) and polyclonal
anti-murine integrin
5 antibodies were from Chemicon.
Monoclonal anti-murine integrin
3 antibody was from
Transduction Laboratories. The HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies were
from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, and streptavidin-HRP was from Pierce.
 |
RESULTS |
Both wild-type and kinase-inactive EphA8 proteins promote cell
attachment to fibronectin.
To determine whether EphA8 signaling
can promote cell adhesion through integrins, wild-type and
kinase-inactive EphA8 receptors and a chimeric EphA8-TrkB receptor
consisting of the extracellular domain of the EphA8 receptor plus the
transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains of TrkB were stably expressed in
NIH 3T3 fibroblasts. Lysates prepared from representative cell lines
were analyzed by immunoprecipitation with either anti-TrkB or
anti-EphA8 antibodies and then assayed by immunoblotting using a
mixture of anti-EphA8 and anti-TrkB antibodies as a probe (Fig.
1A, top). High levels of chimeric
EphA8-TrkB receptor, wild-type EphA8, and kinase-inactive EphA8 were
detected in the correspondingly transfected fibroblasts. When the same
blot was stripped and reprobed with antiphosphotyrosine antibody (Fig.
1A, bottom), it was evident that both EphA8-TrkB and EphA8 proteins
were highly tyrosine phosphorylated due to the endogenous expression of
EphA subgroup ligands as described previously (Fig. 1A, bottom, lanes 3 to 5) (30). In contrast, the EphA8 mutant containing Met
in place of Lys-666, the putative ATP binding residue, was not tyrosine
phosphorylated (Fig. 1A, bottom, lane 6). The kinase-inactive EphA8
mutant appeared to be weakly tyrosine phosphorylated because it was
very weakly detected after long exposure (data not shown). This
phosphorylation is possibly due to cross-phosphorylation induced by
heterodimerization of EphA8 with other EphA family members present in
low levels in these cells, as assessed by a binding assay using ephrin
A5-Fc (see Fig. 4B). Cell attachment assays were performed by detaching the cells from culture dishes and replating them onto coverslips coated
with fibronectin or laminin. As shown in Fig. 1B, adhesion of two
independent NIH 3T3 clones onto a fibronectin matrix was significantly
enhanced by expression of the wild-type EphA8 receptor, whereas the
EphA8-TrkB chimeric receptor did not promote cell attachment to
fibronectin. Unexpectedly, expression of a kinase-inactive EphA8
receptor also markedly promoted cell adhesion to fibronectin, producing
an effect similar to that exerted by the wild-type EphA8 receptor. No
consistent differences in adhesion to laminin-coated surfaces were
observed in response to EphA8. In our cell adhesion assays where cells
were seeded onto coverslips, most attached to the surface as
well-separated cells that did not aggregate. These results strongly
suggest that the intracytoplasmic region of the EphA8 receptor plays a
critical role in promoting cell attachment to fibronectin and that the
kinase activity of the receptor is not necessary for this action.

View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
(A) Stable expression and in vivo tyrosine
phosphorylation of EphA8, EphA8-TrkB, and the EphA8 mutant containing
Met in place of Lys-666. NIH 3T3 cells were stably transfected with
pMEXneo-derived expression plasmids containing, the indicated
cDNAs, and individual G418-resistant clones were isolated. Cells were
lysed in PLC lysis buffer, and proteins from each cell lysate were
immmuprecipitated with either anti-TrkB or anti-EphA8 antibody.
Immunoprecipitates were separated by 7.5% SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted
with a mixture of anti-TrkB and anti-EphA8 antibodies (top); the same
blot was stripped and reprobed with antiphosphotyrosine antibody
(bottom). (B) Cell attachment responses to two different extracellular
matrix proteins. Control NIH 3T3 fibroblasts (either parental or vector
transfected) or stably transfected cells expressing the indicated
proteins were plated on coverslips coated with fibronectin or laminin.
Cells were allowed to adhere for 15 min. then nonadherent cells were
removed by washing, and incubation was continued for 105 min. The
percentage of cells attached after 15 min is shown. Data from three
separate experiments are presented as means ± SE.
|
|
EphA8-stimulated cell attachment is mediated through
5
1 and
3 integrins in NIH
3T3 fibroblasts.
We next investigated whether the observed
promotion of cell attachment by EphA8 was mediated by integrins by
testing the effects of monoclonal anti-
5
1
and anti-
3 integrin blocking antibodies on
EphA8-stimulated cell attachment to fibronectin. Neither
anti-
5
1 nor anti-
3
integrin antibodies had any significant effect on the attachment of a
parental NIH 3T3 fibroblasts to fibronectin, which stayed at a
consistent level of 45 to 55% (Fig. 2A).
This level of adhesion seems to be the basal level, and it is possible that it is not integrin mediated, since it could not be reduced by the
use of the integrin blocking antibodies, including those specific for
4 and
v integrins (data not shown). In
contrast, EphA8-stimulated cell adhesion in NIH 3T3 fibroblasts
expressing the wild-type or kinase-inactive EphA8 receptor was
partially inhibited by anti-
5
1 integrin
blocking antibodies. The simultaneous addition of
anti-
5
1 and anti-
3
integrin blocking antibodies markedly inhibited adhesion of these
transfected fibroblasts onto a fibronectin matrix. The
3
integrin subunit is known to heterodimerize with the
v
or
IIb integrin subunit (1). Since
IIb
3 integrin is expressed only in
platelets, it is likely that
v
3 integrin is involved in EphA8 modulation of cell adhesion in NIH 3T3
fibroblasts. This possibility could not be confirmed in the present
study, as no specific blocking antibody against murine
v
3 integrin was available. Nonetheless,
our data strongly suggest that EphA8 action modulates cell adhesion
through
5
1 and possibly
v
3 integrin proteins in NIH 3T3
fibroblasts.

View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
(A) Effects of anti- 5 1 and
anti- 3 integrin blocking antibodies (Ab) on NIH 3T3 cell
adhesion to fibronectin. NIH 3T3 fibroblasts stably expressing
wild-type or kinase-inactive EphA8 were detached and incubated for 5 min with either anti- 5 1 or
anti- 3 integrin blocking antibody (5 µg/ml). The cells
were then replated on fibronectin-coated coverslips and allowed to
adhere for 15 min. Data from three independent experiments are
presented as means ± SE. (B) Induction of wild-type EphA8 protein
expression in NIH 3T3 fibroblasts. Cells were incubated with 2 µg of
doxycycline (Dox) per ml for the indicated periods of time and then
lysed, and proteins from the lysates were immunoprecipitated with
anti-EphA8 antibody. Immunoprecipitates were separated by 7.5%
SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with anti-EphA8 antibody (top); the same
blot was stripped of antibodies and reprobed with antiphosphotyrosine
antibody (bottom). (C) Effects of anti- 5 1
and anti- 3 integrin blocking antibodies on NIH 3T3 cell
attachment stimulated by the induced expression of EphA8. Cells were
treated with doxycycline for the indicated periods of time, and cell
attachment assays were performed after incubation with either
anti- 5 1 or anti- 3 blocking
antibodies as described above. (D) Analysis of
5 1 and 3 integrins
expressed in NIH 3T3 cells, concomitant with the induced expression of
EphA8. EphA8 expression was induced for the indicated times, then the
cells were harvested and cell surface proteins were biotinylated;
integrins were immunoprecipitated with anti- 5 polyclonal
antibody, and biotinylated integrins were detected using
streptavidin-HRP (top). Cells were lysed in PLC lysis buffer, and
protein concentrations were equalized (bottom). Cell lysates were
fractionated by SDS-PAGE and then analyzed by immunobloting using
anti- 3 antibody as a probe.
|
|
Long-term forced overexpression of EphA8 in NIH 3T3 fibroblasts may
result in complex modifications of cell adhesion molecules. We
therefore adopted a doxycycline-inducible expression system for the
EphA8 receptor in NIH 3T3 fibroblasts. In this system, no EphA8 was
detected in the absence of doxycycline, the level of EphA8 expression
correlated with the time of incubation with doxycycline (Fig. 2B, top),
and a marked increase in tyrosine phosphorylation of EphA8 was observed
in response to doxycycline treatment (Fig. 2B, bottom), demonstrating
that expression of EphA8 is tightly regulated by doxycycline. To
investigate whether integrin activity was regulated by
doxycycline-induced expression of EphA8, we carried out cell attachment
assays after treatment with doxycycline for various periods of time. In
the absence of doxycycline, transfected and parental cells adhered to
fibronectin to similar extents, whereas the transfected cells treated
with doxycycline for 6 h showed a significant increase in adhesion to fibronectin (Fig. 2C). The increase in cell attachment was maximal
after 12 h of induction. Similar to the effects observed in NIH
3T3 fibroblasts stably expressing the EphA8 receptor,
anti-
5
1 and anti-
3
integrin blocking antibodies partially inhibited doxycycline-induced cell adhesion to fibronectin. In addition, the simultaneous addition of
anti-
5
1 and anti-
3
integrin blocking antibodies markedly inhibited adhesion of these NIH
3T3 fibroblasts onto a fibronectin matrix.
To test whether EphA8 expression affected integrin expression, we
analyzed cell surface
5
1 integrin levels
by immunoprecipitation of biotin-labeled cells with an
anti-
5 polyclonal antibody (Fig. 2D, top). This result
revealed that overall cell surface
5
1 integrin was not significantly altered by the induced expression of
wild-type EphA8 receptor. Likewise, as demonstrated by Western blot
analysis of total cell lysates with the anti-
3 integrin antibody as a probe, total levels of
3 integrin
expression were not changed by the doxycycline-induced expression of
EphA8 (Fig. 2D, bottom). Taken together, our results indicate that
EphA8 expression modulates cell adhesion through
5
1 and
3 integrin proteins in NIH 3T3 fibroblasts without altering the integrin expression level.
EphA8-stimulated cell attachment is mediated mainly
through
5
1 integrin in HEK293
epithelial cells.
To investigate whether regulation of integrin
activity by the EphA8 receptor is dependent on cell type, we also
expressed wild-type or kinase-inactive EphA8 receptors in HEK293
epithelial cells, once again using a powerful doxycycline-inducible
expression system. In response to doxycycline, the time-dependent EphA8
induction (Fig. 3A, top) and tyrosine
phosphorylation (Fig. 3A, middle) profiles in HEK293 cells were very
similar to the patterns observed for the EphA8 receptor inducibly
expressed in NIH 3T3 fibroblasts. Likewise, the kinase-inactive EphA8
mutant was also induced by doxycycline (Fig. 3C, top), and as we
expected, no tyrosine phosphorylation of the mutant EphA8 protein was
detectable (Fig. 3C, bottom). The adhesive properties of these cells in
response to doxycycline were tested in cell attachment assays.
Induction of the EphA8 proteins in these cells dramatically promoted
cell attachment to a fibronectin matrix within 12 h, regardless of
the EphA8 kinase activity (Fig. 3B and D). To test whether the cells
adhered to fibronectin through
5
1
integrin receptors, we examined the effects of
anti-
5
1 blocking antibodies on cell
adhesion to fibronectin at each induction time point (Fig. 3B and D).
It was evident that anti-
5
1 blocking
antibodies alone greatly inhibited cell adhesion to fibronectin. In
contrast, no inhibition of cell adhesion onto fibronectin could be
detected by adding anti-
v
3 blocking
antibodies (data not shown). These results indicate that in HEK293
cells,
5
1 integrin is a major fibronectin
receptor which interacts with EphA8 in a kinase activity-independent
fashion. In addition, as observed in NIH 3T3 fibroblasts, the
expression of EphA8 did not alter the surface expression of
5
1 integrin in HEK293 epithelial cells
(Fig. 3A, bottom). Taken together, our data indicate that EphA8
modulation of cell adhesion through alteration of integrin activity is
a global mechanism and not restricted to a small subset of cell types.

View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
(A) Induction of wild-type EphA8 protein expression in
HEK293 epithelial cells. Cells were incubated with 2 µg of
doxycycline (Dox) per ml for the indicated times. Proteins from cell
lysates were immmunoprecipitated with anti-EphA8 antibody, then
separated by 7.5% SDS-PAGE, and immunoblotted with the same antibody
(top); the same blot was stripped and then reprobed with
antiphosphotyrosine antibody (middle); Bottom, analysis of
5 1 integrin expressed in HEK293 cells,
concomitant with the induced expression of EphA8. EphA8 expression was
induced for the indicated times, then the cells were harvested, and
cell surface proteins were biotinylated. Labeled integrins were
immunoprecipitated with anti- 5 1
monoclonal antibody and then detected with streptavidin-HRP. (B) Effect
of anti- 5 1 integrin blocking antibodies
(Ab) on the cell attachment stimulated by the induced expression of
EphA8 in HEK293 cells. The cells were treated with doxycycline for the
indicated times, and then cell attachment assays were performed after
incubation with anti- 5 1 blocking
antibodies as described in the legend to Fig. 2A. Note that HEK293
cells were allowed to adhere for 30 min before being washed to remove
nonadherent cells, and then incubation was continued for 90 min. The
percentage of cells attached after 30 min is shown. Data from three
independent experiments are presented as means ± SE. (C)
Induction of kinase-inactive EphA8 protein expression in HEK293
epithelial cells. As a positive control, HEK293 cells inducibly
expressing the wild-type EphA8 protein were treated with doxycycline
for 12 h. Proteins from cell lysates were immmunoprecipitated with
anti-EphA8 antibody, then separated by 7.5% SDS-PAGE, and
immunoblotted with anti-EphA8 antibody (top); the same blot was
stripped and then reprobed with antiphosphotyrosine antibody (bottom).
(D) Effects of anti- 5 1 integrin blocking
antibodies on cell attachment stimulated by the induced expression of
kinase-inactive EphA8 receptor in HEK293 cells. Cell attachment assays
were performed as described for panel B.
|
|
Ligand binding of EphA8 is critical for the increased cell
attachment to fibronectin.
To investigate whether regulation of
integrin activity by EphA8 is a ligand-dependent process, we
constructed two different deletion mutants lacking structural motifs of
the EphA8 ectodomain. According to the recently published genomic
organization of the murine EphA8 gene, the globular domain and a
stretch of cysteine-rich sequences are encoded, possibly as a
functional unit, by exon III, whereas two fibronectin type III (FNIII)
domains are encoded by exons V to VII (22). It is well
known that the N-terminal globular domain of Eph receptors is critical
for ligand binding (23). It has also been suggested that
FNIII domains play a role in receptor dimerization (24).
Thus, exon boundaries were used to generate EphA8 deletion mutants
lacking these two important structural domains. The deletion mutants
were named EphA8
III and EphA8
V-VII, according to their deleted
exons. These deletion mutants were stably expressed in NIH 3T3
fibroblasts, and two independent clones of each deletion mutant were
studied in order to eliminate the possibility of clonal selection for
the results.
Expression of the corresponding proteins with the expected molecular
masses was demonstrated by Western blot analysis (Fig. 4A, top), but the EphA8
III protein
was not detectably tyrosine phosphorylated, possibly
due to inefficient ligand binding (Fig. 4A, bottom, lanes 4 and 5). The
EphA8
V-VII protein became highly tyrosine phosphorylated without
further stimulation with exogenous ligands (Fig. 4A, bottom, lanes 6 and 7). To test whether ephrin A subgroup ligands could interact with
these deletion mutants, ephrin A5-Fc chimeric protein was purified and
used as a probe in binding assays. EphA5-Fc was added in excess to
cells expressing wild-type or deletion mutant EphA8 proteins, and the
cells were incubated with radioiodinated goat anti-human IgG. As
shown in Fig. 4B, the ephrin A5-Fc chimeric proteins did not bind
efficiently to EphA8
III-expressing cells but did bind in a specific
manner to cells expressing EphA8
V-VII. However, we reproducibly
observed that binding of ephrin A5 to the EphA8 protein lacking two
FNIII domains was reduced relative to wild-type EphA8 receptor binding, suggesting that FNIII domains are partially required for ligand binding. Alternatively, it is also possible that the ligand
binding-inhibitory effect of deleting the FNIII domains was due to the
decreased distance between the N-terminal ligand binding domain and the membrane, resulting in a reduction in its accessibility by ephrin A. We
next performed a cell attachment assay to test whether expression of
EphA8 deletion mutants could promote cell adhesion to fibronectin. As
shown in Fig. 4C, cells expressing either wild-type EphA8 or EphA8
V-VII bound efficiently to fibronectin. However, in multiple experiments, we consistently observed that cells expressing the EphA8
III protein adhered to fibronectin slightly more than the parental NIH 3T3 fibroblasts did. Thus, our data strongly indicate that
the specific interaction between the ephrin A ligand and the EphA8
receptor is crucial for modulation of integrin activity.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
(A) Expression and tyrosine phosphorylation of the
exogenous EphA8 III and EphA8 V-VII deletion mutants in NIH 3T3
fibroblasts. NIH 3T3 cells were transfected with pMEXneo-derived
expression plasmids containing recombinant cDNAs encoding the indicated
deletion proteins and selected in G418-containing medium. Two
independent cell lines per constructs were analyzed by
immunoprecipitation with anti-EphA8 antibody. Western blot analysis was
performed with anti-EphA8 antibody (top); the same blot was stripped
and then reprobed with antiphosphotyrosine antibody (bottom). C,
control. (B) The domain encoded by exon III of EphA8 is critical for
efficient binding of the ephrin A5 ligand. NIH 3T3 cells stably
expressing wild-type EphA8 or the indicated deletion mutants were
treated with 40 nM chimeric ephrin A5-Fc proteins followed by
radioiodinated goat anti-human lgG, washed, and solubilized for
determination of specific binding. Nonspecific binding was assessed as
binding in the absence of chimeric Fc proteins. Specific binding, shown
on the y axis, was calculated by subtracting nonspecific binding from
total counts bound. (C) Deletion of exon III abrogates the
EphA8-stimulated cell attachment to fibronectin. Cell attachment assays
were performed as described in previous figure legends.
|
|
Tyrosine phosphorylations in EphA8 do not correlate with
EphA8-stimulated cell attachment to fibronectin
To
test whether the EphA8-stimulated integrin activity was independent of
tyrosine phosphorylation of EphA8, the codons for Tyr-615 and Tyr-792
were replaced with phenylalanine codons in the EphA8 cDNA to construct
EphA8Y615F and EphA8Y792F point mutants. We
have previously demonstrated that Tyr-615 constitutes a major
autophosphorylation site and mediates preferential binding to the Fyn
SH2 domain (7). Tyr-792 is located in the activation loop
of the EphA8 tyrosine kinase domain, and corresponding tyrosine residues are found in all known members of the Eph receptor family. HEK293 cells were transiently transfected with pcDNA3 constructs containing wild-type or mutated EphA8 cDNAs. In contrast to the wild-type protein, the EphA8 mutant proteins immunoprecipitated from
lysates of EphA8Y615F- or
EphA8Y792F-transfected cells contained markedly reduced
levels of phosphotyrosine (Fig. 5A,
bottom left) compared with the overall expression levels of these
proteins (Fig. 5A, top left). Nonetheless, the attachment responses of
HEK293 cells expressing EphA8Y615F or
EphA8Y792F were stimulated to a degree similar to that
observed in cells expressing the wild-type EphA8 protein (Fig. 5B).

View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
(A) Transient expression and tyrosine phosphorylation of
EphA8 point mutants and kinase-inactive proteins. HEK293 cells were
transiently transfected with pcDNA3-derived expression plasmids
containing the recombinant cDNAs encoding the indicated EphA8 mutant
proteins and were lysed for immunoprecipitation with anti-EphA8
antibody at 24 h posttransfection. Western blot analysis was
performed with anti-EphA8 antibody to verify the level of EphA8
expression (top); the same blot was stripped and then reprobed with
antiphosphotyrosine antibody to evaluate the level of
autophosphorylation of the transfected EphA8 mutant proteins (bottom).
(B) Mutations of two major tyrosine phosphorylation sites and the ATP
binding site lysine of the EphA8 receptor do not affect
EphA8-stimulated cell attachment to fibronectin. Cell attachment assays
were performed as described in previous figure legends. (C) Top,
schematic representation of the EphA8 cytoplasmic domain deletion
mutants. Middle, HEK293 cells were transiently transfected with the
indicated constructs, and cells were lysed for immunoprecipitation with
anti-HA polyclonal antibody at 24 h posttransfection. Western blot
analysis was performed with same antibody to verify the expression
level of the deletion mutant. Note that the anti-EphA8 antibody does
not recognize the EphA8 mutant lacking the JM encoded by exon X. Bottom, the same blot was stripped and then reprobed with
antiphosphotyrosine antibody. (D) Cell attachment assays performed as
described in previous figure legends.
|
|
In the case of the kinase-inactive mutant EphA8K666M,
replacement of a lysine residue with methionine may structurally alter
the EphA8 protein, leading to constitutive stimulation of integrin activity. In other studies of EphB1 and EphB2, the corresponding lysine
residue was replaced with arginine, and these kinase-inactive EphB
mutants failed to confer EphB1-induced cell attachment responses (9, 21, 35, 43). This difference led us to investigate whether another kinase-inactive mutant, EphA8K666R, could
stimulate integrin activity. Despite the fact that similarly high
levels of expression of each kinase-inactive mutant protein were
observed (Fig. 5A, right), the EphA8K666R mutant promoted
cell attachment to fibronectin similarly to wild-type EphA8 or the
EphA8K666M mutant (Fig. 5B). Taken together, these results
demonstrate that phosphorylation on tyrosine residues of EphA8 does not
play a critical role in the EphA8-stimulated cell attachment to fibronectin.
The JM encoded by exon X is crucial for interaction with
integrin
To investigate the structural determinant of EphA8 that
controls integrin activity, we used exon-intron boundaries of the murine EphA8 gene to design deletion mutants. The exon X- and XVI-encoded portions of the murine EphA8 receptor correspond to a
highly conserved JM and a sterile alpha motif (SAM), respectively (22). The EphA8 cytoplasmic domain deletion mutants were
transiently expressed as HA epitope-tagged proteins in HEK293 cells.
The HA epitope-tagged deletion mutants were expressed at the expected molecular masses and at similar levels, indicating the stability of
these constructs (Fig. 5C, middle). Although the JM deletion mutant
contained reduced levels of phosphotyrosine (Fig. 5C, bottom, lane 3)
due to the lack of a major autophosphorylation site, Tyr-615, it had
retained efficient tyrosine kinase activity, as demonstrated by its
action on an exogenous substrate (enolase) in an in vitro kinase assay
(data not shown). We then monitored the effects of each deletion mutant
on the adhesive properties of the cells. HEK293 cells expressing
wild-type EphA8 or the SAM deletion mutant showed increased adhesion to
fibronectin relative to cells transiently transfected with empty vector
(Fig. 5D). In contrast, cells expressing the JM deletion mutant showed
only a slight increase in adhesion to fibronectin, much less than the
increase observed in cells expressing the SAM deletion mutant or
wild-type EphA8. This result indicates that the EphA8 JM encoded by
exon X is required for interaction with integrin.
The p85 subunit-associated PI 3-kinase does not contribute to
EphA8-stimulated integrin activation.
In a preliminary approach to
identifying the signaling mechanism by which EphA8 regulates integrin
function, we assessed the effects of the PI 3-kinase inhibitor
wortmannin on HEK293 cells that had been induced to express wild-type
or kinase-inactive EphA8 receptors. Treatment of HEK293 cells with up
to 100 nM wortmannin had no effect on the basal adhesion to fibronectin
(Fig. 6A). Regardless of the kinase
activity, doxycycline-induced expression of EphA8 proteins in HEK293
cells stimulated cell attachment to fibronectin in the absence of
wortmannin. However, EphA8-stimulated cell attachment was partially
inhibited by 10 nM wortmannin and almost completely abolished by
wortmannin concentrations of 50 to 100 nM (Fig. 6A). We also observed
that the PI 3-kinase inhibitor LY294002 had a similar inhibitory effect
on EphA8-stimulated cell attachment (data not shown). These results
imply that PI 3-kinase may couple the EphA8 receptor to integrin
activation. To further explore the possibility of an association
between the EphA8 receptor and PI 3-kinase activity, we performed in
vitro kinase assays using HEK293 cells induced to express EphA8
proteins. After induction of EphA8 proteins with doxycycline, extracts
were immunoprecipitated with anti-HA antibody to capture the activated
EphA8 proteins, and the immunoprecipitates were then assayed for the
ability to phosphorylate PI in vitro. An increase in PI 3-kinase
activity, as indicated by the appearance of PI(3)P, was observed upon
expression of the wild-type or kinase-inactive EphA8 protein (Fig. 6B,
first and second panels). Interestingly, an in vitro PI 3-kinase assay using antiPhosphotyrosine immunoprecipitates has revealed that PI
3-kinase activity was significantly increased by the induction of
expression of the wild-type EphA8 but not when kinase-inactive EphA8
was induced (Fig. 6B, third panel). More importantly, wild-type or SAM
deletion EphA8 proteins stimulated PI 3-kinase activity to a greater
extent than did the JM deletion EphA8 mutant in HEK293 transfectants
(Fig. 6C and D). However, we observed that transient expression of the
PI 3-kinase p85 subunit lacking the p110 binding site (
p85) did
not inhibit EphA8-promoted cell adhesion to fibronectin (data not
shown). Consistent with this observation, the EphA8-expressing cells
did not show any significant alteration in PI 3-kinase activity in
anti-p85 subunit immunoprecipitates, whereas p85-associated PI 3-kinase
activity in the same cells was elevated in response to serum
stimulation (Fig. 6E). We also generated stable HEK293 cell lines
expressing 10-fold-excess amounts of
p85. The anti-p85 subunit
immunoprecipitates from these cells showed no changes in PI 3-kinase
activity in response to serum stimulation (Fig. 7A, left, lanes 1 and 2). In contrast,
transient expression of the wild-type or kinase-inactive EphA8 proteins
in the same cells reproducibly induced a marked increase in PI 3-kinase
activity (Fig. 7A, left, lanes 4 and 5) and also promoted cell
attachment to a fibronectin matrix (Fig. 7A, right). In addition,
immunoprecipitates obtained with antiserum against the p110
or
p110
PI 3-kinase catalytic subunit showed similar levels of PI
3-kinase activity, regardless of the auto-kinase activity of the
expressed EphA8 protein (Fig. 7B, first and second panels). These
results strongly indicate that the EphA8 receptor can regulate integrin
activity independently of the p85 regulatory subunit by interacting
with PI 3-kinase.

View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
(A) Inhibition of EphA8-stimulated cell attachment by
wortmannin. Expression of wild-type or kinase-inactive EphA8 proteins
in HEK293 cells was induced with doxycycline (Dox) for 24 h, and
cells were incubated with wortmannin at concentrations ranging from 10 to 100 nM for 30 min prior to cell attachment assays. Cells that had
not been treated with doxycycline were included as controls. Wortmannin
was dissolved in DMSO. Note that cells were treated with DMSO for 30 min prior to the cell attachment assay in the absence of wortmannin (0 nM on the x axis). Treatment of cells with DMSO (5 to 10 µl) had no effect on the basal level of adhesion or EphA8-stimulated
cell adhesion. (B) The EphA8 proteins were induced with doxycycline for
the indicated times and then immunoprecipitated with either anti-HA
antibody (top, left and middle) or antiphosphotyrosine antibody (top,
right). Immunoprecipitates were incubated with 4 µg of PI and 10 µCi of [ -32P]ATP for 10 min, and the reaction was
analyzed by TLC followed by autoradiography. Western blot analysis of
anti-HA immunoprecipitates was performed with the same antibody to
verify the expression levels of wild-type and kinase-inactive EphA8
proteins at the indicated induction times (bottom). (C and D) The EphA8
JM is necessary for association with PI 3-kinase activity. HEK293 cells
were transiently transfected with the indicated constructs, and cells
were lysed for immunoprecipitation of the EphA8 deletion mutants with
anti-HA polyclonal antibody at 24 h posttransfection. Western blot
analysis was performed with same antibody to verify the expression
level of the deletion mutant (C, bottom) PI 3-kinase activity was
determined by TLC and autoradiography (C, top) and also by measuring
formation of radiolabeled PIP from PI, using a phosphorimaging system
(D). Shown are mean values (±SE) of three independent experiments. (E)
p85-dependent heterodimeric PI 3-kinase is not stimulated to response
to EphA8 expression. The kinase-inactive EphA8 protein was induced with
doxycycline for the indicated times, and then p85-p110 heterodimeric PI
3-kinase was immunoprecipitated with anti-p85 polyclonal antibody. As a
control, the same cells were starved of serum for 24 h and then
stimulated with (+) or without ( ) serum for 15 min in the absence of
doxycycline. Immunoprecipitates were analyzed by in vitro PI 3-kinase
assay, and lipids were extracted and analyzed by TLC and
autoradiography as described above.
|
|

View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
Evidence that p110 PI 3-kinase is tightly associated
with the EphA8 receptor. (A) Left, HEK293 cells were transfected with
the p85 cDNA, and individual G418-resistant clones were isolated. A
representative cell line was treated with (+) or without ( ) serum for
15 min, cells were lysed in PLC lysis buffer, and p110-p85 heterodimers
from the cell lysates were immmuprecipitated with anti-p85 polyclonal
antibody (lanes 1 and 2). The stable p85 transfectants were
transiently transfected with the indicated constructs and lysed for
immunoprecipitation of the EphA8 proteins with anti-HA polyclonal
antibody at 24 h posttransfection (lanes 3 to 5). PI-3 kinase activity
was measured as described in previous figure legends. Right, cell
attachment assays performed as in previous figure legends. (B) EphA8
protein expression in HEK293 cells was induced with doxycycline
treatment for the indicated times, and then PI 3-kinases were
immunoprecipitated (IP) with the indicated anti-p110 isotype
antibodies. PI 3-kinase activity was measured as described in previous
figure legends. (C) Expression of wild-type or kinase-inactive EphA8
proteins in HEK293 cells was induced with doxycycline for the indicated
times. Top, proteins from cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with
anti-p110 antibody and then analyzed by immunoblot using anti-EphA8
antibody as a probe (top); the same blot was stripped and reprobed with
anti-p110 antibody (bottom).
|
|
The tight association between p110
PI 3-kinase and the EphA8
receptor.
To identify the EphA8-specific PI 3-kinase isotype, we
performed immunoprecipitations using a p110
-specific antibody (Fig. 7B, third panel). Anti-p110
immunoprecipitates contained low levels
of PI-3 kinase activity in the absence of EphA8 protein (lanes 1 and
3). Expression of the wild-type or kinase-inactive EphA8 proteins
resulted in a substantial increase in p110
PI 3-kinase activity
(lanes 2 and 4). Moreover, stringently washed anti-p110
immunoprecipitates contained high levels of wild-type or
kinase-inactive EphA8 protein (Fig. 7C, top, lanes 2 and 4). Interestingly, we reproducibly observed that the p110
protein level
was substantially increased in EphA8-expressing cells (Fig. 7C,
bottom), suggesting that the p110
PI 3-kinase may be stabilized by
the EphA8 receptor. In addition, these results suggest that the
increase in PI 3-kinase activity from either EphA8 or p110
immunoprecipitates was due to the presence of more p110
protein that
had been stabilized by the activated EphA8 receptor. Taken together,
our results demonstrate that p110
PI 3-kinase mediates EphA8-dependent regulation of integrins.
To further investigate whether deletion of the JM region of EphA8
weakens EphA8 regulation of integrin activity, we transiently expressed
JM or SAM deletion EphA8 proteins in HEK293 cells and treated the cells
with doxycycline for 12 h to induce wild-type or kinase-inactive
EphA8 protein. The effects of each deletion mutant on EphA8-stimulated
cell adhesion, p110
PI 3-kinase activity, and EphA8 association with
p110
were then examined (Fig. 8). Regardless of the level of EphA8 kinase activity, fibronectin adhesion
activity was much lower for cells expressing the JM deletion EphA8
mutant than for cells transfected with the SAM deletion mutant (Fig.
8A). In addition, the JM deletion mutant resulted in a substantial
inhibition of EphA8-stimulated p110
PI 3-kinase activity, whereas
the SAM deletion mutant did not (Fig. 8B). We have consistently
observed that the JM deletion EphA8 mutant partially inhibits the
association of wild-type or kinase-inactive EphA8 protein with p110
(Fig. 8C, top, lanes 1 and 3). However, it appears that association of
the JM deletion EphA8 mutant with p110
was not completely defective
(Fig. 8C, middle). More importantly, in cells expressing both
full-length EphA8 and the JM deletion mutant protein, the p110
protein level was significantly reduced, suggesting that the JM
deletion mutant heterodimerizes with the full-length EphA8 to weaken
the ability of EphA8 to associate with cytoplasmic p110
. To further
determine whether the EphA8 JM is sufficient for interaction with
p110
, we performed in vitro binding assays using a bacterially
expressed GST-JM fusion protein comprising the entire JM of EphA8. In
these experiments, we transiently expressed FLAG-tagged murine p110
protein and treated the cells with doxycycline for 24 h to induce
wild-type EphA8 protein (Fig. 8D, lanes 2 and 4). Approximately equal
amounts of purified GST-JM or GST alone were bound to
glutathione-Sepharose beads and then mixed with equivalent amounts of
lysate prepared from HEK293 cells expressing p110
with or without
EphA8 induction. Proteins from the cell lysates that bound to each GST
fusion protein were then analyzed by immunoblot using anti-FLAG
antibody as a probe (Fig. 8D). Data obtained from these experiments
clearly show that the of EphA8 JM forms a stable complex with the
p110
protein that is highly enriched in doxycycline-treated cells
(Fig. 8D, lane 4). To further assess whether GST-JM protein directly
associate with p110
, FLAG-tagged p110
protein was transiently
expressed in HEK293 cells expressing wild-type EphA8 in response to
treatment with doxycycline. Lysates prepared from the cells treated
with or without doxycycline were immunoprecipitated with anti-FLAG antibody and then subjected to far-Western blot analysis using 32P-labeled GST-JM protein as a probe. In these
experiments, the purified GST-JM fusion protein containing Tyr-615
(Fig. 5C) was phosphorylated in vitro by incubation with
immunoprecipitates containing wild-type EphA8 and then purified using a
gel filtration column. As shown in Fig. 8E, 32P-labeled
GST-JM protein bound to p110
protein that was highly enriched in
doxycycline-treated cells, indicating that the EphA8 receptor JM is
able to directly associate with p110
(Fig. 8E, lane 2). Taken
together, these findings provide evidence that the EphA8 JM plays a
critical role in forming a stable complex with p110
PI-3 kinase.

View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 8.
The JM deletion EphA8 mutant suppresses EphA8-promoted
p110 PI 3-kinase activity and integrin activation by inhibiting the
association of EphA8 with p110 . HEK293 cells expressing EphA8 in
response to doxycycline (Dox) were transiently transfected with the
indicated constructs; 12 h after transfection, EphA8 protein
expression was induced for 12 h. (A) Cell attachment assays
performed as described in previous figure legends. (B) Proteins from
cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-p110 antibody, and
then PI-3 kinase activity was measured as described in previous figure
legends. (C) Proteins from cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with
anti-p110 antibody and then analyzed by immunoblotting with
anti-EphA8 antibody as a probe (top); the same blot was stripped and
reprobed with anti-HA and anti-p110 antibodies (middle and bottom,
respectively). (D) The EphA8 JM is sufficient for association with
p110 . A FLAG-tagged murine p110 construct was transiently
transfected into parental cells (lane 5) or HEK293 cells expressing
EphA8 in response to doxycycline treatment (lanes 1 to 4). As a
control, the FLAG-tagged p110 protein transiently expressed in
parental HEK293 cells was directly immunoprecipitated with anti-FLAG
antibody (lane 5). The induction of EphA8 began 12 h after transfection
and continued for 24 h (lanes 2 and 4). Proteins from each cell
lysate were mixed with approximately equal amounts of purified GST or
with GST-JM fusion protein bound to glutathione-Sepharose beads (lanes
1 to 4). The washed beads were separated by 7.5% SDS-PAGE and Western
blotted using anti-FLAG antibody as a probe. (E) The EphA8 JM is
sufficient for direct association with p110 . HEK293 cells expressing
both exogenous p110 and wild-type EphA8 were prepared as described
for panel D. FLAG-tagged p110 was directly immunoprecipitated with
anti-FLAG antibody, and then the washed beads were directly separated
by 7.5% SDS-PAGE and transferred to membranes. The blots were probed
with 32P-labeled GST-JM protein to detect p110 . The
labeling of GST-JM protein was performed in an in vitro kinase assay
with [ -32P]ATP and anti-HA immunoprecipitates
containing wild-type EphA8 as previously described. Note that the
GST-JM fusion protein contained Tyr-615, which is a major
phosphorylation site.
|
|
Association of p110
with EphA8 is rapidly induced by oligomeric
ephrin A5-Fc added to cells stripped of ephrin A ligands.
To
further exclude the possibility that EphA8 promotes integrin activity
by activating ligand signaling pathways, NIH 3T3 cells were treated
with PI-PLC, which eliminates GPI-linked ephrin A subgroup ligands from
the cell surface as previously reported (30). We then
compared the ability of the ephrin A-stripped cells to adhere to
surfaces coated with fibronectin with or without preclustered ephrin
A5-Fc soluble ligand stimulation (see Fig. 11A). As we expected, a
prominent increase in cell attachment was induced in cells stimulated
by preclustered ephrin A5-Fc. Furthermore, the ability of wild-type or
kinase-inactive EphA8 receptor to associate with the p110
protein
was markedly enhanced by stimulation with preclustered ephrin A5-Fc
(Fig. 9A, top, lanes 2 and 4). The
p110
PI 3-kinase activity was also significantly increased in the
cells stimulated by preclustered ephrin A5-Fc (Fig. 9A. bottom, lanes 2 and 4). We also transiently expressed wild-type or lipid
kinase-inactive p110
in HEK293 cells expressing induced wild-type
EphA8. These cells were also treated with PI-PLC and preclustered
ephrin A5-Fc. Interestingly, we reproducibly observed that transient
expression of a murine p110
mutant lacking lipid kinase activity,
K833R, did not significantly alter cell attachment promoted by EphA8
activation (See Fig. 11B). Consistent with these results, association
of the lipid kinase-inactive p110
protein with EphA8 was not
detected in cells stimulated with preclustered ephrin A5-Fc
(Fig. 9B, lane 5). These results suggest that the lipid kinase-active
form of p110
may be important for stable association with EphA8 at
the plasma membrane. In contrast, exogenous wild-type p110
expression markedly strengthened cell attachment promoted by EphA8
activation until 4 h after EphA8 induction (see Fig. 11B). In
addition, the rapid and stable association of the FLAG-tagged wild-type
p110
PI-3 kinase with EphA8 occurred upon stimulation with
preclustered ephrin A5-Fc (Fig. 9B, lane 3). We also investigated
whether EphA8 increases the level of 3' phosphoinositides in vivo upon
stimulation with preclustered ephrin A5-Fc (Fig. 10A). For these experiments, we
transiently expressed wild-type p110
in HEK293 cells expressing
induced wild-type or kinase-inactive EphA8. These cells were treated
with PI-PLC during the period of serum starvation for 2 h, then labeled
with 32Pi, and exposed to preclustered ephrin
A5-Fc for the indicated times. The 32P-labeled
phospholipids were then analyzed as described previously (18,
32). As expected, the ephrin A5-Fc treatment markedly increased
the amount of PI(3, 4, 5)P3 in HEK293 cells expressing either wild-type or kinase-inactive EphA8. The EphA5-stimulated accumulation of PI(3, 4)P2 in these cell lines was similar
to that of PI(3, 4, 5)P3, but the levels of PI(3)P PI(4)P
and PI(4, 5)P2 did not significantly increase with ephrin
A5 treatment (data not shown). From results obtained from multiple
experiments, it became evident that endogenously expressed p110
protein levels were significantly elevated upon stimulation with
preclustered ephrin A5-Fc (Fig. 9A, middle). In addition, the
exogenously expressed wild-type p110
protein level was consistently
increased by EphA8 activation (Fig. 9B, bottom, lane 3). These results
suggest that ephrin A ligands enhance the stability of p110
bound to
EphA8 rather than increasing p110
mRNA because the p110
cDNA used for exogenous expression did not contain its own basal promoter and
transcriptionally regulated sequences. To further investigate whether
p110
mRNA levels can be upregulated by activated EphA8 expression in
HEK293 cells, we used a semiquantitative RT-PCR approach to measure
p110
mRNA levels. Primer sets that discriminate between exogenous
murine p110
and endogenous human p110
were used (Fig. 9C). In all
PCR experiments, the quality and amount of cDNA were initially assessed
by PCR with primers specific for
-actin (data not shown). Similar
levels of human p110
mRNA were detected regardless of activated
EphA8 induction (Fig. 9C, bottom). In addition, a similar level of
murine p110
mRNA was observed in cells transfected with wild-type
murine p110
or the lipid kinase-inactive p110
mutant (Fig. 9C,
top). As expected, in the absence of doxycycline treatment, the murine
EphA8 mRNA level was barely detectable. In contrast, it was abundant in
the same cells treated with doxycycline. To further analyze the rate of degradation of the exogenously expressed p110
protein, we
transiently expressed wild-type EphA8 in HEK293 cells expressing
induced wild-type EphA8. These cells were serum starved and treated
with PI-PLC simultaneously and then pulsed labeled with
[35S]cysteine and [35S]methionine for 15 min without preclustered ephrin A5-Fc treatment. The amount of p110
was then measured in the 30 min following the chase with or without
preclustered ephrin A5-Fc treatment. As shown in Fig. 10B, the rate of
degradation of p110
was much higher in untreated cells (lane 3). The
half-life of p110
in untreated cells was estimated to be less than
10 min (data not shown). In contrast, degradation of p110
in the
ligand-treated cells was almost undetectable for at least 30 min (lane
2). These results strongly suggest that the level of p110
in cells
is increased by the activated EphA8 receptor through protein
stabilization. It should be noted that in these experiments, the Eph
receptor was not efficiently labeled, probably because of the absence
of doxycycline treatment during the period of serum starvation and pulse-chase. Taken together, these results strongly indicate that induced EphA8 expression does not affect p110
mRNA levels; rather, it probably stabilizes the p110
protein that is associated with EphA8 at the plasma membrane. We also estimated the fraction of EphA8
associated with the exogenously expressed p110
protein in HEK293
cells that had been transiently transfected with p110
and then
treated with doxycycline for 12 h. These cells were also treated
with PI-PLC and preclustered ephrin A5-Fc. The relative amount of EphA8
was calculated by comparing the amount of EphA8 recovered using
anti-FLAG antibody to the total cellular EphA8 in the same lysate.
These amounts were estimated using immunoblot analysis and anti-EphA8
antibody as a probe (Fig. 10C). To achieve maximum recovery of p110
,
three consecutive immunoprecipitations of the same lysate were combined
and analyzed. The results indicate that about 10% of total cellular
EphA8 was recovered by anti-FLAG antibody through association with
p110
(Fig.