Previous Article | Next Article 
Molecular and Cellular Biology, August 2001, p. 4875-4888, Vol. 21, No. 15
0270-7306/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/MCB.21.15.4875-4888.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Multifunctional Centromere Binding Factor 1 Is
Essential for Chromosome Segregation in the Human Pathogenic Yeast
Candida glabrata
Tanja
Stoyan,1,*
Gernot
Gloeckner,2
Stephan
Diekmann,3 and
John
Carbon1
Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental
Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, California
93106,1 and Departments of Genome
Analysis2 and Molecular
Biology,3 Institute for Molecular
Biotechnology, 07745 Jena, Germany
Received 22 February 2001/Returned for modification 26 March
2001/Accepted 9 May 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
The CBF1 (centromere binding factor 1) gene of
Candida glabrata was cloned by functional
complementation of the methionine biosynthesis defect of a
Saccharomyces cerevisiae cbf1 deletion mutant. The
C. glabrata-coded protein, CgCbf1, contains a
basic-helix-loop-helix leucine zipper domain and has features similar
to those of other budding yeast Cbf1 proteins. CgCbf1p binds in vitro
to the centromere DNA element I (CDEI) sequence GTCACATG with high
affinity (0.9 × 109 M
1). Bandshift
experiments revealed a pattern of protein-DNA complexes on
CgCEN DNA different from that known for S.
cerevisiae. We examined the effect of altering the CDEI binding
site on CEN plasmid segregation, using a newly developed
colony-sectoring assay. Internal deletion of the CDEI binding site led
only to a fivefold increase in rates of plasmid loss, indicating that
direct binding of Cbf1p to the centromere DNA is not required for full
function. Additional deletion of sequences to the left of CDEI,
however, led to a 70-fold increase in plasmid loss rates. Deletion of
the CBF1 gene proved to be lethal in C. glabrata.
C. glabrata cells containing the CBF1 gene under
the influence of a shutdown promoter (tetO-ScHOP) arrested their
growth after 5 h of cultivation in the presence of the reactive drug doxycycline. DAPI (4',6'-diamidino-2-phenylindole) staining of the
arrested cells revealed a significant increase in the number of
large-budded cells with single nuclei, 2C DNA content, and short
spindles, indicating a defect in the G2/M transition of the
cell cycle. Thus, we conclude that Cbf1p is required for chromosome segregation in C. glabrata.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Candida species are major
fungal pathogens which can cause both mucosal and systemic
infections in humans (for a review, see reference 18).
Although Candida albicans is the best known of the
pathogenic Candida group, the frequency with which other
Candida species are isolated from clinical infections has
been steadily increasing during the past few years. A very recent study
identified Candida glabrata as the second most
commonly isolated Candida species in bloodstream isolates
(47). C. glabrata is a common pathogen in
immunocompromised persons or those with diabetes mellitus. Depending on
the site of infection, C. glabrata is often the second or
third most common cause of candidiasis after C. albicans,
and C. glabrata infections have been linked to the deaths of
compromised, at-risk hospitalized patients (18). The
treatment of C. glabrata infections is difficult since the
strains are often resistant to antifungal drugs (59).
In contrast to other Candida species, C. glabrata, although
asexual, is haploid, which facilitates molecular genetic
analysis. C. glabrata is closely related to
Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and both strains share high
sequence homologies in their genes (30, 37, 62). Recently,
a centromere (CEN) was isolated from C. glabrata,
and it has been used in the construction of plasmid vectors (31,
32). Centromeres are specific regions of eukaryotic chromosomes
that are necessary for chromosome segregation in meiosis and mitosis
(for reviews, see references 10 and 21). They provide attachment sites for the spindle microtubules that
transport the chromatids during anaphase. A plasmid vector that
contains CEN along with an ARS sequence is
segregated to daughter cells with high mitotic fidelity and is
maintained at low copy numbers. In contrast to the large regional
centromeres of humans that span several kilobases on the DNA, the
C. glabrata centromere represents a "point centromere"
and is only 153 bp in length. It has high homology to the centromeres
of S. cerevisiae and those of other budding yeasts
(Kluyveromyces lactis, Kluyveromyces marxianus, Saccharomyces
uvarum) (12, 23, 24, 26). Two conserved consensus
sequences (centromere DNA elements [CDE]), CDEI (8 bp) and CDEIII (26 bp), are separated by a 79-bp nonconserved A+T-rich spacer
sequence, CDEII. The species specificities of the CENs of
C. glabrata and S. cerevisiae are determined by
both CDEII and CDEIII (32). In recent years, several
proteins that bind to these elements in S. cerevisiae have
been discovered (for a review, see reference 36). A
complex that binds to the CDEIII region is the CBF3 complex, which
consists of the proteins p110Cbf3a/Ndc10p/Cbf2p,
p64Cbf3b/Cep3p, p58Cbf3c/Ctf13p, and
p23Cbf3d/Skp1p (35, 36). Other centromere
binding proteins are Cse4p, Mif2p (40, 56), and a
recently isolated protein complex consisting of Okp1p, Ctf19p, and
Mcm21p (25, 46, 48). Loss of these proteins generally
results in a lethal phenotype and abnormal mitotic behavior.
Centromere binding factor 1 (Cbf1; also called Cp1 and Cpf1) in
S. cerevisiae has been well studied (5, 9, 39).
It is an abundant basic-helix-loop-helix leucine zipper protein which
binds as a homodimer to the degenerate octanucleotide
RTCACRTG (the CDEI region of the centromere, where R is purine)
(4, 8, 27). Deletion of the CDEI binding site leads to 10- to 30-fold increases in rates of plasmid loss (16, 43).
CBF1 gene disruption leads to a 20-fold increase in
chromosome missegregation and a 35% increase in generation time
(9, 39). Cbf1 null mutants are methionine auxotrophs, and Cbf1p binding motifs have been found in the promoters of some of the MET genes. Cbf1p interacts directly with
other kinetochore proteins, and CBF3 subunits can promote the binding of Cbf1p to the DNA (22). A functional comparison of the
centromere binding proteins with transcription factors binding at the
MET16 promoter reveals strong analogy between the centromere
and the MET16 promoter (22). Cbf1p also binds
to the promoters of several other genes (GAL2, TRP1, CYT1),
but its potential to activate transcription of these genes is low or
undetectable (8, 29, 45). A CBF1 gene from
K. lactis has also been cloned (41). In
contrast to what occurs in S. cerevisiae, CBF1
deletion is lethal in K. lactis, but it is not clear what
exactly causes the lethality. Cbf1 proteins from S. cerevisiae and K. lactis are functionally
interchangeable despite low overall homology.
Recently, we have cloned a CBF3d homolog from C. glabrata and showed that it can functionally substitute for its
S. cerevisiae counterpart (57). In this study
we present the cloning and functional characterization of the
CBF1 gene of C. glabrata (CgCBF1). We have developed a color-based colony-sectoring assay for C. glabrata, which enabled us to study the effect of CDEI loss on
plasmid stability. Furthermore, we have investigated the effects of
CgCbf1p depletion on cell morphology and growth. Our data reveal that,
in spite of their high sequence homology, the S. cerevisiae
and C. glabrata centromeres are structurally and
functionally quite different.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Yeast and bacterial strains and media.
The yeast strains
used in this study and their genotypes are listed in Table
1. Rich medium (yeast-peptone-dextrose
[YPD]), synthetic minimal dextrose (SD) medium (0.7% yeast
nitrogen base, 2% glucose, 2% agar), and 5-fluoro-orotic acid (5-FOA)
medium were prepared as described previously (28).
Escherichia coli strain XL-1Blue was used for propagation of
plasmids, and E. coli strain BL21(DE3) (Novagen, Madison,
Wis.) was used for expression of recombinant proteins. Bacterial media
were prepared as described previously (51).
Plasmids and generation of yeast strains.
pRSCg1 was
constructed by ligating a 2.2-kb SpeI/HindIII
fragment from pYep#9.1 (see Fig. 1) into pRS425 (11).
p112-Cp1 was created by ligating the blunt-ended
SpeI/PstI fragment into the SmaI site
of p112-8XM (31). Transformation of yeast with plasmids or
with DNA fragments was performed by the lithium acetate method
(2).
Plasmids for plasmid loss assays.
The vectors used in the
sectoring assay were derivatives of pBM2.9 (20). The
PstI fragment of pBM2.9 containing the CoxII-ARS fragment was deleted, and the vector was religated, leaving a unique
PstI site (pBM
P). The blunt-ended AatII
fragment of pCgACH-3 (31) containing CgHIS3,
CgARS, and CgCEN (pBM-HAC-WT) was ligated into
the SmaI site of pBM
P (pBM
P-HAC). An attempt to
exchange the BglII fragment of pBM
P-HAC with PCR
fragments carrying deleted centromeres revealed two more unexpected
BglII sites in the plasmid. Therefore, we created a second
plasmid in which both BglII sites were deleted, and the
SpeI/PstI fragment of pBM
P-HAC was cloned into
this vector (pBM
P
B-HAC). Since this plasmid did not complement the red phenotype of CgHTUA, wild-type CEN was
replaced with deleted centromeres in pBM
P
B-HAC and the
SpeI/PstI fragments of the resulting plasmids
were cloned back into pBM
P. Deleted centromeres were generated by
PCR using the primer pairs Cg
292 and CgCEN1R and Cg
308 and
CgCEN1R (Table 2). For site-specific
mutagenesis and internal deletion of the CDEI binding site, the
wild-type centromere was released as a BglII fragment
from pCgACH3 and ligated into the BamHI site of pUC19,
creating pUCCgCEN1. This plasmid was subjected to
site-specific mutagenesis using a U.S.E. kit (Amersham-Pharmacia, Little Chalfont, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom) with the primers Cg
IDelete, Cg
IRandom, and
Cg
IExchange (Table 2) according to the supplier's instructions,
giving pUCCgCEN
1D, pUCCgCEN
1R, and pUCCgCEN
1E,
respectively. The mutagenesis was confirmed by sequencing. To
create pBM-
200 and pBM
ID-
200, PBM
P
ID and pBM
PAHC were
digested with SpeI and NheI, the ends were filled in with T4 polymerase, and the vectors were religated.
CgCBF1 gene disruption.
Two DNA fragments (A and B)
containing 5' nontranslated sequences and 5' coding sequences (fragment
A) and 3' coding sequences and 3' nontranslated sequences (fragment B)
of CBF1 were amplified by PCR using the primer pairs Cg1/1A
and -B and Cg1/2A and -B (see Table 2). The two fragments and an
XhoI fragment of pCgACT-14 containing CgTRP1
(31) were ligated into the KpnI and
XbaI sites of pUC19. The KpnI/XbaI
fragment was released from the resulting plasmid and used to transform
strain Cg2001HTU/p112-Cp1. Transformants were selected for their
ability to grow in the absence of tryptophan. Successful gene
replacement was verified by Southern blot analysis. The resulting
strain was named CgTS1.
ADE2 disruption
To delete the
ADE2 gene in strain Cg2001HTU, an
EcoRI/BamHI fragment was released from
pAD1A1 (20) and cotransformed with p112-8XM, bearing the
S. cerevisiae URA3 (ScURA3) gene. One
colony out of 7,400 screened colonies showed a red color. Loss of
p112-8XM was selected for by growth on medium containing 5-FOA, and the new strain was named CgHTUA.
Epitope tagging of CgCBF1.
To generate an epitope-tagged
version of CgCBF1, three DNA fragments were generated by
PCR. Fragment A (primers Cg1/7 and Cg1/8) represented the C-terminal
part of the CBF1 coding region, including the last codon
before the stop codon. Fragment B (primers HA-F and HA-R) encoded three
copies of the 9-amino-acid (aa) hemagglutinin (HA) epitope followed by
two TAG stop codons (the template for the PCR was pBFG5, kindly
provided by R. Ballester). Fragment C (primers Cg1/9 and Cg1/10)
encoded the 3' nontranslated region of CgCBF1. All three
fragments were cut by the corresponding enzymes (Table 2) and
ligated simultaneously to pRSCg1 cut with MscI and
HindIII. The resulting plasmid was digested with
BglII, blunt ended, and ligated with a blunt-ended
XhoI fragment coding for CgHIS3 released from
pCgACH-3 (31). The SpeI/HindIII
fragment was then released from the resulting plasmid (pRSCg1-HA) and
transformed into CgTS1. The transformants were screened for their
ability to grow on 5-FOA medium and for their inability to grow in the absence of tryptophan, indicating both the functionality of the transcript and integration into the original gene locus. The resulting strain was grown on plates containing 5-FOA to select for loss of the
plasmid p112-Cp1, and the selected strain was named CgTS3. The
generation of correctly translated protein was confirmed by Western
blot analysis (not shown) with a purified monoclonal antibody (MAb),
HA.11 16B12 (Berkley Antibody Co.).
Generation of strains for chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP)
experiments.
CgTRP1 released from pCgACT-14 as an
XhoI fragment (31) was blunt ended by filling
in protruding ends using T4 DNA polymerase and ligated into pUCCgCEN1
and pUCCgCEN
1D which had been cut with NheI and blunt
ended. Fragments including centromeres plus CgTRP1 (1.5 kb)
were released from the plasmids by digestion with EcoRI and
SphI and used to transform strain CgTS3. Correct insertion into the centromere locus was confirmed by Southern blot analysis of
AseI- and AflIII-digested genomic DNA, using
CgCEN
270 DNA as a probe. To confirm the mutation, the centromeres
were amplified from the genomic DNA by PCR and sequenced.
Generation of strains containing CgCBF1 under a controllable
promoter.
Region A (nucleotides 749 to 315) and region B
(nucleotides 6 to 492) of CgCBF1 were amplified by PCR using
the primers Cg1/13 and Cg1/14 and the primers Cg1/11 and 1/12,
respectively. Region A was cloned into the SpeI site, and
region B was cloned into the EcoRI and KpnI sites
of plasmids p97CGH, p98CGH, and p99CGH (42),
generating p97CBF1, p98CBF1, and p99CBF1, respectively. The plasmids
were linearized with BssHII and used to transform strain
ACG22. Homologous recombination was verified by Southern blot analysis
of MscI-digested genomic DNA, using radiolabeled region B as
a probe (not shown). Three strains, 97CBF1, 98CBF1, and 99CBF1, were
obtained, and each contained the CBF1 gene under the
influence of a different promoter (42).
DNA sequence analysis.
DNA sequencing of pYep#9.1 (see Fig.
1) was carried out on a shotgun library of the plasmid in an M13
vector. pYep#9.1 DNA (5 µg) was sonicated and size fractionated. The
fraction containing DNA fragments between 1 and 1.5 kb in length was
ligated into the M13mp18 vector after filling in the protruding ends by
T4 polymerase treatment (15). The M13 templates were
prepared by the Triton method (38). All templates were
sequenced by dye terminator chemistry (Perkin-Elmer), and data were
collected using ABI 377 automated sequencers and finally assembled with
the computer program Gap 4 (55). Most gaps were closed by
performing long runs using dye primer chemistry. Inserts of clones
spanning the remaining gaps were amplified using standard forward and
reverse primers. PCR bands were purified with a gel extraction kit
(Genomed) and sequenced using the reverse universal primer. All other
sequence analysis was done by cycle sequencing, and the labeled PCR
fragments were analyzed on an ABI 377 automated sequencer.
Expression of recombinant CgCbf1p and ScCbf1p in E.
coli.
A DNA fragment encoding the entire CgCBF1
open reading frame (ORF) was amplified by PCR with the primer pair
Cg1/1Ec and Cg1/3Ec and was cloned into the BamHI site of
the expression vector pET28a(+) (Novagen). DNA sequencing revealed a
point mutation in codon 355 of the PCR product. The
MscI/HindIII fragment of the recombinant plasmid was therefore replaced by the corresponding fragment of pRS-Cg1, resulting in plasmid pETCg1. This plasmid was transformed into
E. coli strain BL21(DE3). The histidine-tagged CgCbf1 fusion protein obtained from the E. coli cytosol was purified by
affinity chromatography on chelating Sepharose according to a protocol of Novagen. Recombinant ScCbf1p was expressed and purified similarly, using a pETScCbf1 expression plasmid kindly provided by D. Thomas. The
protein concentration of the IMAC eluate was determined by a
Bradford assay (Bio-Rad, Hercules, Calif.).
Protein extracts.
C. glabrata protein extracts
for sodium dodecyl sulfate-gel electrophoresis were made and analysis
of proteins on Western blots was done as previously described
(28). For analysis of proteins by DNA mobility shift
assays, Cg2001HTU cells were grown in 0.5 liter of YPD for 17 h at
30°C. Freshly harvested cell paste (7 g) was washed with water, and
the washed pellet was packed into a 10-ml syringe and extruded into a
beaker of liquid nitrogen. Cells were mechanically disrupted in liquid
nitrogen (53) using a blender at high speed for 10 min.
All subsequent steps were performed at 4°C as previously described
(35), with the following modifications: the freeze-dried
powder was resuspended in 6 ml of buffer A (50 mM
KPO4 [pH 7.0], 100 mM
-glycerophosphate, 10 mM NaF, 10 mM EDTA, 10 mM EGTA, 0.5 M dithiothreitol, 1 mM
Pefabloc, 2.5 µg of leupeptin, 2.5 µg of pepstatin A per ml,
and 2 µg of aprotinin per ml) and stirred gently for 40 min. KCl was
added after 10 min to a final concentration of 1 M. After
centrifugation (14,000 × g for 30 min), the
supernatant (whole-cell extract) was flash frozen in small aliquots and
stored at
70°C.
DNA mobility shift assays.
Electrophoretic mobility shift
assays were performed as previously described (4, 35) with
either poly(dI-dC) (see below) or 6 µg of salmon sperm DNA (Sigma) as
the nonspecific competitor. The reaction volume was 20 to 30 µl, and
the 4% nondenaturing polyacrylamide gels were electrophoresed at 10 to
15 V/cm at room temperature (RT) either in 0.5× Tris-borate-EDTA (TBE)
or in a solution containing 50 or 100 mM glycine and 2 mM
EDTA. Specific competitor DNA was prepared by synthesizing
complementary single-stranded oligonucleotides carrying the CDEI motif
(CgCDEI.F and CgCDEI.R [Table 2]). Oligonucleotides were
phosphorylated, annealed, and oligomerized as described previously
(60). Concatamerized fragments were radiolabeled by
filling in the ends with [
-32P]dATP and
[
-32P]dCTP using the Klenow fragment (New
England Biolabs).
Determination of a CgCbf1p equilibrium binding constant.
To
determine the true equilibrium constant for CgCbf1p binding to
CgCEN DNA, we applied a previously described electrophoretic mobility shift method that corrects for nonspecific binding of protein
to DNA (3, 4, 7). To determine the apparent binding constant (Kapp), increasing amounts of
the 252-bp radiolabeled CgCEN fragment (0.02 to 10 fmol;
~0.003 to 1.7 ng) were incubated with a constant amount of
affinity-purified CgCbf1p (1 µl of a 1:50 dilution; estimated to be 1 to 2 ng by Coomassie blue staining and Bradford analysis) and
poly(dI-dC) nonspecific DNA (50 ng). Reaction mixtures (20 µl) were
incubated for 15 min on ice in binding buffer containing 15 mM KCl
(4), run on 4% polyacrylamide gels in 0.5× TBE, and
electrophoresed at 10 V/cm at RT. Gels were preelectrophoresed at 8 V/cm at RT. The concentrations of retarded protein-DNA complexes,
[CDs], and of the unbound probe for
specific DNA, [Ds], were
determined with a molecular phosphorimager (Bio-Rad Laboratories). At
equilibrium, the relationship between free and bound specific probe
DNAs is given by the following equations:
|
(1)
|
|
(2)
|
where
C0 is the number of
CgCbf1p DNA binding sites present. The binding data were plotted
according to equation
1 (see Fig.
3A) and equation
2 (see Fig.
3B).
Kapp is given by the slope of
the line
in Fig.
3B, and
C0 is given by the
x intercept. The equilibrium constant for binding
of
nonspecific DNA (
Kn) was determined from a
parallel set of
reaction mixtures in which constant amounts of protein
(~1 to
2 ng) and the radiolabeled Cg
CEN fragment (2.5 fmol; ~0.4 ng)
were incubated together with increasing amounts of
nonspecific
poly(dI-dC) DNA (480- to 133,000-fold mass excess
over the mass
of specific DNA). Nonspecific- and specific-DNA
equilibrium binding
constants (
Kn and
Ks) were determined using the following
equations:
|
(3)
|
|
(4)
|
To calculate 1/
Kapp from
equation
3, the value for
C0
determined from Fig.
3B was used. Values for
Kn and
Ks
were determined
graphically from equation
4 by plotting
1/
Kapp versus the concentration
of
nonspecific DNA, [
Dn0]
(see Fig.
3C).
Kn/
Ks is
given by the slope of the line and 1/
Ks equals the
y intercept. Thus,
Kn equals the slope of the line
divided by
the
y intercept. The lines in Fig.
3B and C were fit
by
least-squares linear
regression.
In vivo cross-linking and ChIP.
ChIP experiments were
carried out as described previously (1, 6). C. glabrata strains were exponentially grown to an optical density
(OD) of 1 (~4 × 107 cells/ml) and fixed
with 1% formaldehyde for 15 min at RT. Formaldehyde-induced cross-linking was quenched for 5 min at RT by the addition of glycine
to a final concentration of 120 mM. The cells were washed and lysed
with glass beads, and the chromatin was sheared by sonication to an
average length of 0.8 kb. Purified MAb HA.11 16B12 (Berkeley Antibody Co.) was added to the sheared chromatin at a final
concentration of 5 µg/ml, and immunocomplexes were captured with
protein A-Sepharose beads for 2 h at 4°C. For DNA analysis, 1 µl of total or 2 µl of immunoprecipitated chromatin was subjected
to PCRs (22 cycles) with primers for CgCEN (Cg
N270 and
CgCEN2), CgHIS3 (CgHis1 and CgHis2), and CgACT
(actin gene) (CgACT1 and CgACT4). The PCR products were electrophoresed
on 2% agarose gels, stained with ethidium bromide, and digitally
photographed with the AlphaImager 2000 system (Alpha Innotech, San
Leandro, Calif.).
Determination of growth rates.
Approximately 1.5 × 105 cells/ml were inoculated into YPD and
cultured at 37°C with or without doxycycline (at a final
concentration of 10 µg/ml). At the time points indicated in the
figures, aliquots were taken and sonicated briefly (~5 s) to
break down aggregates. Growth was monitored by determining the OD at
660 nm and counting the cells in a Neubauer chamber. The number of
viable cells was determined by spreading the diluted cultures on YPD
plates and counting the number of colonies that had appeared after
cultivating the cells for 24 h at 37°C.
Minichromosome stability assays. (i) Sectoring
assay
Strain CgHTUA was transformed with pBM-HAC
plasmids containing either wild-type or mutated copies of
CgCEN, and transformants were grown overnight in
selective medium lacking histidine. Dilutions of overnight cultures
were plated on SD medium containing limited amounts of adenine (24 µg/ml) plus three supplements (histidine, uracil, and tryptophan; 40 µg each/ml). After growth for 48 h at 30°C, plates were kept
at 4°C for 24 h to allow color development. Images were taken at
a ×7 magnification under an Olympus stereo microscope and captured
with a digital camera.
(ii) Replica-plating assay.
Dilutions of selectively grown
overnight cultures of transformants were plated on YPD. After growth
for 18 h at 30°C, the colonies were replica plated onto either
YPD or selective medium (SD medium with supplements but without
histidine). Colonies were counted after 18 to 24 h at 30°C.
Cytological analysis.
For analyzing nuclear
morphology, aliquots of ACG22 and 98CBF1 cells were grown
for 6 and 9 h, respectively, at 37°C in the presence of
doxycycline (10 µg/ml) and were stained with
4',6'-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; Roche) as described previously
(28). Immunofluorescence was carried out as has been
described previously (28) with rat-antitubulin MAb
(YOL1/34; Harlan-Sera-Lab, Leicestershire, England) and
fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated goat anti-rat antibody (Sigma).
Cells were examined using an Olympus BX 60 microscope and a 100×
objective. Digital images were captured using an Optronics DEI 750 digital color camera and a Micron Mittenia computer. For
fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACS) analysis, the strains were
incubated in YPD including 10 µg of doxycycline per ml at 37°C for
the time indicated in Fig. 8. Approximately 2 × 107 cells were fixed in 1 ml of 70% ethanol
overnight at 4°C. The fixed cells were washed with 1 ml of
phosphate-buffered saline and, after treatment with 1 ml of RNase A (1 mg/ml) for 3 h at 37°C, were sonicated for 3 s. Cells were
then digested with 0.2 ml of pepsin (5 mg/ml in 55 mM HCl) for 45 min
at 37°C and stained overnight at 4°C in 0.5 ml of 10× propidium
iodide solution (5 mg of propidium iodide plus 1.42 g of
MgCl2 · 6H2O dissolved in 100 ml of 180 mM Tris [pH 7.5]-190 mM NaCl buffer). Approximately 2 × 106 cells were diluted in 2 ml of
phosphate-buffered saline in cryotubes and shipped overnight for FACS
analysis (Cytometry Research, LLC, San Diego, Calif.).
Nucleotide sequence accession number.
The sequences are
available in the GenBank database under the accession number
AF233343.
 |
RESULTS |
The CgCBF1 gene functionally complements methionine
auxotrophy of an S. cerevisiae cbf1 deletion
mutant.
In S. cerevisiae, CBF1 gene deletion
results in plasmid instability, slow growth, and methionine auxotrophy
(39). Therefore, we decided to attempt cloning
CBF1 from C. glabrata by functional complementation of the methionine biosynthesis defect of an S. cerevisiae cbf1 null mutant. A C. glabrata genomic
library (52) was transformed into the S. cerevisiae
cbf1 null mutant strain CC718-1A (34). The cells were
first grown under conditions that selected for ScURA3 on the
library vector pYep24 and were then replica plated onto minimal medium
lacking methionine. After several days at 30°C, one clone of about
2,000 transformants tested was found to be growing without methionine.
The plasmid DNA was isolated by shuttling to E. coli and
subsequently was retransformed into CC718-1A. The plasmid could correct
the methionine auxotrophy of CC718-1A (Fig.
1A). To avoid time-consuming subcloning
of the 13-kb insert, the entire plasmid was sequenced by an automated sequencing approach (see Materials and Methods for details). Sequencing revealed that the insert contained five major ORFs whose translation products could be successfully aligned to proteins from the database (Fig. 1B). One of them was identified as CgCBF1, and a
vector containing this ORF was proved able to complement the
CBF1 gene disruption in CC718-1A (Fig. 1A).

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
(A) CgCBF1 gene expression complements
the methionine biosynthetic defect of an S. cerevisiae
cbf1 null mutant strain. Growth of CC718-1A,
CC718-1A/pYep#9.1, and CC718-1A/pRSCg1 on SD medium lacking
methionine (met) is shown. The plates were incubated for 4 days
at 30°C. (B) Genomic map of the cloned DNA insert in plasmid
pYep#9.1. Major ORFs were detected and analyzed using BLAST and the
Wisconsin Sequence Analysis software package (GCG9). The
positions of the ORFs are indicated by arrows. Flanking thick
lines represent vector sequences. Restriction sites are shown only if
relevant. H, HindIII; S, SpeI.
|
|
Cbf1 proteins from budding yeasts share common features.
The
sequence of CgCBF1 predicts a protein of 441 aa with a
calculated molecular mass of 51.4 kDa. CgCbf1p shares general
features of Cbf1ps from other budding yeasts, including S. cerevisiae and K. lactis (39, 41). It is a
basic helix-loop-helix leucine zipper protein with an acidic
isoelectric point of 4.6 and has a negative net charge of
55.9.
Interestingly, the negative net charge of CgCbf1p is much higher than
that of ScCbf1p and K. lactis Cbf1p (KlCbf1p) (
19.5 and
34, respectively). The N terminus contains patches of acidic amino
acids that are characteristic for transcription factors. Amino acid
sequence alignment of CgCbf1p with the sequences of other budding yeast
Cbf1ps revealed high homologies in the C-terminal regions but low
overall homology (Fig. 2). The homologies
(identities) of the C termini are 66% (46%) between CgCbf1p (aa 263 to 386) and ScCbf1p (aa 205 to 329) and 65% (46%) between CgCbf1p and
KlCbf1p (aa 231 to 355). The overall homology (identity) between
CgCbf1p and both of the other budding yeast Cbf1ps is 34% (25%).
Interestingly, both the homology (identity) of the C termini and the
overall homology (identity) between ScCbf1p and KlCbf1p are higher,
namely, 82% (68%) and 44% (35%).

View larger version (69K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Cbf1 proteins of budding yeasts are homologous in their
C-terminal regions but show low overall homology. Shown is a CLUSTAL V
protein sequence alignment of CgCbf1, KlCbf1, and ScCbf1. Conserved
amino acids are highlighted. The basic helix-loop-helix leucine zipper
domain is boxed.
|
|
A soluble recombinant histidine-tagged version of CgCbf1p
(rCgCbf1p) expressed in
E. coli cells was shown to alter the
migration
of a
C. glabrata centromere (Cg
CEN) DNA
fragment in gel mobility
shift assays (Fig.
3). A prominent slowly migrating complex
and
a minor, slightly faster-migrating complex were observed. Both
complexes could be specifically competed by an annealed and
concatemerized
oligomer containing the CDEI binding site (data not
shown). Binding
of Cbf1p to the centromere is not species specific
since Cg
CEN could be shifted by ScCbf1p and
CEN3
from
S. cerevisiae was shifted
by CgCbf1p (data not shown).
To determine the equilibrium constant
for rCgCbf1p binding to
Cg
CEN, we chose a method that has been
used to determine the
equilibrium binding constant of ScCbf1p
(
4). A constant
amount of rCbf1p is titrated with increasing
amounts of
Cg
CEN, and the binding reactions are analyzed by a
shift
assay (Fig.
3). A typical titration curve is shown in Fig.
3A, and the
Scatchard plot of the data is shown in Fig.
3B. The
apparent binding
constant calculated from these data is 2.6 ×
10
10 M
1. The
concentration of active rCgCbf1 in the reaction mixture
could also be
determined from the data and was calculated to be
1.6 × 10
10 M
1, or 16.5 µg/ml.
Given a protein concentration of 100 µg/ml as
determined by a protein
assay, the rCgCbf1p preparation contains
16.5% active protein. The
equilibrium binding constant for nonspecific
binding of Cbf1p to
poly(dI-dC) was determined from a parallel
set of experiments where
constant amounts of rCgCbf1 and Cg
CEN were titrated with
increasing amounts of poly(dI-dC) (Fig.
3C).
The binding constant for
nonspecific binding (
Kapp) was
determined
to be 5.3 × 10
5
M
1. The true equilibrium binding constant
(
Ks) for rCgCbf1 binding
to
Cg
CEN was calculated from these data to be 0.9 × 10
9 M
1. The true
equilibrium constant determined for ScCbf1p binding
to
CEN3
of
S. cerevisiae is 3 × 10
8
M
1 (
4,
61). Thus, CgCbf1 binds
with a threefold higher affinity
to Cg
CEN than ScCbf1p does
to Sc
CEN3.

View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Determination of an equilibrium binding constant for
CgCbf1p binding to a C. glabrata centromere DNA
fragment. (A) Saturation binding curve as determined from experiments
using increasing amounts of radiolabeled CgCEN DNA and a
constant amount of affinity-purified CgCbf1p in the presence of
nonspecific poly(dI-dC) DNA. The concentration of CgCbf1p that bound to
CgCEN, [CDs], is
plotted versus that of free CgCEN,
[Ds]. (B) Scatchard plot of
the data in panel A (see Materials and Methods for details). The slope
of the line equals Kapp, and the
x intercept equals C0, the
number of binding sites in the reaction. (C) Determination of the
equilibrium constant for nonspecific binding
(Kn) to correct
Kapp for the contribution made by binding of
CgCbf1p to nonspecific DNA. Constant amounts of radiolabeled
CgCEN and affinity-purified CgCbf1p were incubated with
increasing amounts of poly(dI-dC) DNA. The inverse of
Kapp (determined from equation 3, see
Materials and Methods) is plotted versus the concentration of
nonspecific DNA,
[Dn0]. Both
Kn and
Ks can be determined. The
y intercept equals
1/Ks, and the slope of the line
is equal to
Kn/Ks.
Thus, Kn is equal to the slope divided
by the y intercept.
|
|
Bandshift experiments reveal multiple CgCEN-bound proteins.
We
next examined C. glabrata crude extracts and CEN
DNA in mobility shift assays. Fragment mobility shift assays have been used in the past to identify centromere binding proteins in S. cerevisiae (4, 35, 44, 61). In contrast to the
migration patterns obtained in bandshift experiments with purified
rCgCbf1 (Fig. 3), the use of crude extracts led to the specific
formation of four different protein-DNA complexes with CgCEN
in which the first 270 bp were deleted (CgCEN
270) (Fig.
4A). The three largest complexes but not
complex I could be specifically competed with a CDEI oligomer and thus
contain CgCbf1p (Fig. 4A). When the CgCEN DNA was incubated
with increasing amounts of crude extract, we first observed the
formation of complex I, followed by the formation of complexes III and
IV and then complex II (Fig. 4B). Direct comparison of the migration
patterns of complexes obtained with purified rCgCbf1 and crude extracts
led to the conclusion that complexes II and III correspond to the major
and minor complexes observed with rCgCbf1, taking into consideration
that the molecular weight of histidine-tagged rCgCbf1 is ~10%
greater than that of the wild-type protein (Fig. 4B). Surprisingly, the
migration pattern of a bandshift with a CEN DNA fragment
lacking sequences to the left of CDEI (CgCEN
292 DNA) did
not show complexes IV and I, whereas as expected the migration behavior
of the rCgCbf1-DNA complex was unaltered (Fig. 4B). Complex I formation
was also abolished when the sequences to the right of CDEIII were less than 27 bp (not shown).

View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Gel mobility shift assays with C.
glabrata crude extracts and a labeled CgCEN DNA
fragment. Shown are autoradiograms of protein-DNA complexes that were
formed after incubation of CgCEN DNA with C.
glabrata crude extracts and the results of fractionation on
nondenaturing gels as described previously (35). (A)
Specific competition of complex formation with a CDEI oligomer.
Radioactively labeled CEN DNA (5 pmol) was incubated
with 2 µl of C. glabrata crude extract in the presence
or absence of increasing amounts of an unlabeled, concatemerized CDEI
binding site. The numbers on the right indicate the four different
complexes that were observed with wild-type CEN DNA. (B)
Concentration dependence of protein-DNA complex formation. The same
amount of radiolabeled CEN DNA used to obtain the
results in panel A was incubated with increasing amounts of crude
extract. (C) Centromere mutants that were tested in bandshift
experiments and in vivo plasmid loss assays (Fig. 5). WT, wild type.
(D) Protein-DNA complex formation on mutated centromere DNAs.
Centromere DNA fragments were generated by PCR and radiolabeled as
described in Materials and Methods. Centromere DNAs (5 pmol) were
incubated with either 2 µl of crude extract or with a 1:20 dilution
of purified rCbf1p. (E) Protein-DNA complex formation of
CgCbf1p-depleted cells. A crude extract made from C.
glabrata 98CBF1 cells (Fig. 8) grown for 7 h in the
presence of 10 g of doxycycline per ml was incubated with
CEN DNA.
|
|
A series of mutant centromeres was generated (Fig.
4C), and the in
vitro binding of Cbf1p to these centromeres was tested
in bandshift
experiments (Fig.
4D). In addition to mutants in
which the
CEN DNA was truncated from the 5' end, we created three
mutants in which the CDEI site is deleted internally. In the
CEN mutant

ID, the CDEI binding site is partially
deleted; in

IR,
the CDEI binding site is replaced by a
BamHI site; and in

IE,
the CDEI site is exchanged for a
motif found in position 280 which
closely resembles a CDEI binding site
(Fig.
4C). With
CEN DNA
fragments in which the first 308 bp,
including the CDEI binding
site, were deleted (

308), no complexes
could be detected (Fig.
4D). Centromere DNA fragments containing an
internally deleted
CDEI binding site led to formation of complex I only
(Fig.
4D).
Taken together, these results indicate that complex I forms
independently
of the presence of CDEI and that complex IV contains both
CgCbf1p
and a protein(s) bound in complex I. The exact constitution of
complex I will require purification of the bound protein(s) by
DNA
affinity column
chromatography.
Influence of the CDEI binding site on mitotic fidelity of
CEN plasmid segregation.
In order to determine the
effect of mutations of the CDEI binding site upon CEN
function, we tested the effects of deletion of the CDEI binding site in
a colony-sectoring assay for C. glabrata, which enabled us
to score for the loss frequencies of CEN-bearing plasmids
(Fig. 5). To establish this assay, an
ade2 null mutant strain was created by deleting
ADE2 from strain CgHTU2001. The new strain, CgHTUA, has a
red color due to the accumulation of intermediates of purine
biosynthesis (Fig. 5N) (50). The various C. glabrata centromeres to be tested for CEN function were
then cloned into an ARS plasmid (pBM
P) which carried
CgADE2 and CgHIS3 as selectable markers (see
Materials and Methods for details). Strain CgHTUA transformed with
pBM-WT gave white colonies, since the ade2 deletion was
fully complemented by the wild-type copy of the CgADE2 gene
on the plasmid. To monitor the loss of plasmids, transformed colonies
were scored for the appearance of red colony color (Fig. 5B to D and F
to M). "Half-sectored" colonies have lost or misseggregated the
plasmid during the first cell division. Plasmid loss rate is thus equal
to the number of half-red colonies (or greater than the number of
half-sectored colonies) divided by the total number of colonies
after the number of colonies that were entirely red was subtracted.
Although this assay does not distinguish between nonsegregation
(2:0), plasmid loss (1:0), and other aberrant transmission
events like the sophisticated systems developed for S. cerevisiae (33, 54), it is much more sensitive and
accurate than the replica-plating assays previously used
(31). The plasmid loss rate per generation for a plasmid containing wild-type CEN (450 bp, depicted in Fig. 5A) was
determined to be 1.6 × 10
2 (1.7%), which
is comparable to plasmid stabilities determined for
CEN-based plasmids in S. cerevisiae (Table
3). Deletion of sequences to the left of
CDEI (
292) resulted in a twofold increase in plasmid loss per
generation compared to the plasmid loss of the wild type. Further
deletion of the CDEI domain, however, led to such a dramatic increase
in plasmid loss per generation that it could not be monitored by the
sectoring assay (
308). A replica-plating assay (Table
4) showed that the plasmid loss frequency
of pBM-
308 is increased 70-fold relative to that of the wild type. A
similar result, namely, a drop in plasmid stability from 61 to 17%
after deletion of CDEI, had been reported previously (31).
Plasmids completely lacking the centromere have a 107-fold-increased
relative rate of plasmid loss. Surprisingly, the mutants with
internally deleted CDEI binding sites showed only a four- to fivefold
increase in rates of minichromosome loss (Table 3). When 200 bp of the CDEI-flanking region was deleted in addition to the CDEI deletion (
ID-
200), the loss rate was increased by 15-fold, which is 3-fold higher than that of a CEN construct lacking only CDEI
(
ID) (Table 3). We thus concluded that direct Cbf1p binding to CDEI
is not essential for full centromere function, as long as centromere sequences of sufficient length are present to the left of CDEI. However, in the absence of those sequences (i.e., with vector sequences
substituting), CDEI is crucial for centromere function and its deletion
leads to a dramatic loss of CEN function.

View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Color-based colony-sectoring assay for
CEN plasmid missegregation in C.
glabrata. A visual assay was established to accurately measure
the rates of plasmid loss per generation (see Materials and Methods).
Strain CgHTUA was transformed with derivatives of the vector pBM P
containing the various centromeres depicted in Fig. 4C (for details,
see Materials and Methods). (A) CgHTUA/pBM-WT; (B) CgHTUA/pBM- 292;
(C) CgHTUA/pBM- ID- 200; (D) CgHTUA/pBM- 308; (E)
CgHTUA/pBM- CEN; (F to N) colonies in various stages of sectoring;
(F) CgHTUA-pBM-WT; (N) CgHTUA.
|
|
CgCBF1 deletion is lethal in C.
glabrata.
Since C. glabrata is a haploid
organism without a known sexual cycle, it does not have a second allele
that might cover a lethal gene disruption. Therefore, before
inactivating genomic CBF1, a plasmid containing a copy of
CgCBF1 along with ScURA3 as a selection marker
(p112-Cp1) was introduced into the C. glabrata strain
Cg2001HTU. Plasmid stability was maintained by the presence of
CgARS and CgCEN sequences on the plasmid
(31). The new strain, CgHTU/p112-Cp1, was transformed with
a DNA fragment containing CgTRP1 flanked on each side by 400 bp of 5' and 3' coding and noncoding sequences of CgCBF1
(Fig. 6A). Transformants were selected on
medium lacking tryptophan, and stable transformants were replica plated
onto medium containing 5-FOA to select for loss of p112-Cp1. Out of the
25 colonies that were replica plated, 7 were not able to grow on 5-FOA
medium. Southern analysis of genomic DNAs from the transformants
revealed that, in those colonies that could not grow on 5-FOA medium,
CgCBF1 had been successfully deleted. In contrast, colonies
that were able to grow on 5-FOA medium still contained the wild-type
gene (Fig. 6B), indicating that CgCBF1 is necessary for the
viability of the strain. In two-thirds of the transformants, the
CgCBF1 gene had not been replaced but the CgTRP1
gene was integrated nevertheless. Nonhomologous-recombination events
have been reported to occur with high frequency in C. glabrata and might be the cause for high numbers of random
integrants (14). We found similarly high numbers of
nonhomologous recombination events in all gene replacements we have
attempted with C. glabrata. Furthermore, the Southern
analysis and genetic data suggest that CBF1 is a single-copy
gene in C. glabrata.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
CBF1 gene deletion is lethal in C.
glabrata. (A) Gene replacement of CgCBF1. The
2.2-kb SpeI/HindIII fragment containing
the CgCBF1 gene (Fig. 1) was subcloned and is shown as
part of pRS-Cg1. For the gene knockout, the CBF1 ORF was
replaced by the CgTRP1 gene in a homologous
recombination event. Hatched bars (Regions A and B) represent ~400 bp
of homologous sequences on each side of the CgTRP1 gene
generated by PCR. Flanking thick lines represent vector sequences.
Restriction sites are shown only if relevant. H,
HindIII; S, SpeI. (B) Southern blot of
genomic DNAs from C. glabrata transformants. Genomic
DNAs were extracted from strain CgHTU2001 (lane 1), strain
CgHTU2001/random (a transformant that was able to grow after being
replated on 5-FOA medium) (lane 2), and the cbf1
deletion strain CgTS1/p112-Cp1 (lane 3) and digested with
EcoRI. CgCBF1 was probed with a
radioactively labeled PCR fragment generated with primers Cg1/3 and
Cg1/4 (Table 2). The labeled band in lane 3 (CgTS1/p112-Cp1)
corresponds to the CgCBF1 copy on plasmid p112-Cp1.
|
|
CgCbf1p is present at the centromere in vivo.
One way to
explain that internal deletion of the CDEI binding site results in only
a mild loss of CEN function would be that Cbf1p is still at
the centromere and can carry out its function without binding to CDEI.
In order to test this hypothesis, we investigated the in vivo
interaction of CgCbf1p with the CEN DNA in the presence or
absence of CDEI, employing a ChIP assay (1). A new strain,
CgTS3, that expressed an HA-tagged version of CgCbf1 (CgCbf1-HA) was
created (Fig. 7A). CgCEN in
this strain was then replaced with CEN in which the CDEI
site was deleted and which carried the CgTRP1 gene inserted
100 bp upstream of CDEI in the centromere to allow for selection
(CgTS7). As mentioned above, the loss rate of plasmids carrying this
centromere mutation was increased 15-fold over that of the wild type.
As a control, CgCEN was also replaced with a wild-type
CEN bearing a CgTRP1 insertion at the same
position (CgTS5). Both strains grew normally in rich medium (YPD).
After the growth of both strains to an OD of 1, the cells were treated
with formaldehyde to cross-link cellular structures and then lysed and
sonicated to shear the chromatin. Subsequently, HA-specific antiserum
was used to immunoprecipitate chromatin containing tagged Cbf1p. After
reversing the cross-links, coimmunoprecipitation of CEN DNA
was probed by PCR using the primers Cg
270 and CgCEN2. The
CEN DNA was found to be present in the CgCbf1-HA
immunoprecipitate but not in the mock-treated control of chromatin from
strain CgTS5 (Fig. 7B). To test for the specificity of the
CEN DNA coprecipitation, two additional PCRs were carried out with primers against the C. glabrata actin gene
(CgACT) and CgHIS3. Neither of these sequences
was found in the CgCbf1-HA immunoprecipitate. In chromatin from strain
CgTS7 carrying a centromere with a deleted CDEI site, HA-Cbf1p was not
detected (Fig. 7B). These results demonstrate that CgCbf1p specifically
associates with the centromere in vivo as long as an intact CDEI
binding site is present. However, because of the relative insensitivity of ChIP analysis, the failure to detect CEN chromatin-bound
CgCbf1p in the absence of a CDEI binding site does not conclusively
demonstrate that CgCbf1p is absent in the
ID mutant CEN
chromatin.

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
CgCbf1p binds in vivo at the centromere. (A) An
HA-tagged version of CgCBF1 was created by employing a
PCR-based strategy (see Materials and Methods for details). (B)
Coimmunoprecipitation (ChIP) of CEN DNA and CgCbf1-HA.
Formaldehyde-cross-linked chromatin (15 min of fixation) prepared from
CgCbf1p-HA epitope-tagged strains CgTS5 (wild type) and CgTS7 ( I)
was immunoprecipitated with anti-HA antibody or mock treated (no
antibody [AB]). Experimental reaction mixtures were prepared in
duplicate. Total input material (1 µl of chromatin solution) and
coimmunoprecipitated DNA (2 µl of chromatin solution) were analyzed
by PCR using primers specific to CgCEN (180 bp) and two
noncentromeric loci, CgACT1 (308 bp) and
CgHIS3 (224 bp) (see Table 2 for primers). Aliquots of
the PCRs were loaded on 2% agarose gels and analyzed. , anti.
|
|
CgCbf1p-depleted cells show defects in chromosome segregation.
We observed that after overnight incubation on 5-FOA plates, the
cbf1 null mutant cells had formed a thin layer, indicating that they were able to perform a few cell divisions before they were
depleted of CgCbf1p and ceased to grow. DAPI staining of these cells
revealed a significant percentage of large-budded cells with a single
mass of DNA bridging the neck (data not shown). This cell morphology is
highly suggestive of a defect in chromosome segregation. Since the
toxicity of 5-FOA also led to morphologic changes in wild-type cells,
we decided to bring the gene under the influence of a controllable
promoter to study the effects of Cbf1p depletion in a more controlled
way. We employed a system described by Nakayama et al. (42) to create a
doxycycline-controllable cassette including the tetracycline operator
chimeric promoter (tetO-ScHOP1), which was cloned in front of the
CgCBF1 ORF by homologous recombination (Fig.
8A). Strain 98CBF1 showed normal growth
compared to that of the wild type (ACG22), indicating that the
introduced tetO-ScHOP promoter is sufficiently active to drive expression of CgCBF1 (Fig. 8B). In contrast to wild-type
cells, however, 98CBF1 cells arrested growth after cultivation for
5 h in the presence of 10 µg of doxycycline per ml (Fig. 8B). A gel mobility shift assay with crude extract derived from arrested cells
and CEN DNA showed the elimination of complexes II, III, and
IV, indicating that CgCbf1p is no longer present in the cells (Fig.
4E). A cell count of DAPI-stained cells that had been incubated for
6 h in the presence of doxycycline showed a substantial fraction (33%; n = 348) of large-budded cells in which the DNA
had stayed in the mother cell (Table 5;
Fig. 8C). After 9 h, a large number of 98CBF1 cells (27%;
n = 843) had become enlarged with diffuse or
undetectable nuclei (Table 5). A closer examination of the large-budded
cells by immunostaining with an antitubulin antibody showed that they
had abnormally short spindles (Fig. 8D). The relative DNA contents of
the cells was determined by flow cytometry (FACS analysis) (Fig. 8E).
Logarithmically growing 98CBF1 cells showed an accumulation of cells
with 2C DNA content after 6 h of growth in the presence of
doxycycline. The wild-type cells were predominantly (>95%) in
G1 phase throughout the experiment. Flow
cytometry was also used to compare the sizes of mutant and wild-type
cells by measuring their forward scatter, which is a measure of cell
size (Fig. 8F). The mean sizes of the mutant cells were significantly
increased over that of wild-type cells after 6 h of growth in the
presence of doxycycline. Taken together, this phenotype indicates a
defect in chromosome transmission at the G2/M
transition in the cell cycle. A similar G2 delay
is seen in kinetochore structural mutants at their nonpermissive
temperatures in S. cerevisiae, for example, in strains with
mutations at ndc10-1 (19),
cep3-1 or -2 (58),
ctf13-30 (17), skp1-4
(13), okp1-5 (46),
ctf19
1 (25), and mcm21
(48). It is thus likely that Cbf1p carries out its
essential function in some aspect of the chromosome segregation process
in C. glabrata, although the results do not conclusively
demonstrate a centromere defect.

View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 8.
Phenotype of a CBF1 gene shutdown
mutant. (A) Generation of strain 98CBF1 by replacing the
CgCBF1 promoter with the controllable promoter
tetO::ScHOP1 (43). (B) Effect of
doxycycline on the growth of cells. ACG22 (wild-type) ( and ) and
98CBF1 (mutant) ( and ) cells were cultured without ( and )
or with ( and ) 10 µg of doxycycline per ml. The number
of viable cells was determined by spreading diluted aliquots of the
cultures at the indicated time points on YPD and counting the number of
colonies that had appeared after incubating the plates for 24 h at
37°C. (C) DAPI-stained mutant and wild-type cells grown for 6 h
with 10 µg of doxycycline (dox) per ml. (D) Immunofluorescence of an
arrested mutant cell (after 6 h with doxycycline). Spindle
microtubules were detected with an antitubulin antibody followed by
fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated goat anti-rat antibody. (E and F)
Flow cytometry profiles of mutant and wild-type cells. (E) Mutant cells
show a partial arrest in G2. The cells were grown in the
presence of doxycycline for the indicated time points and processed for
the analysis of their DNA contents by staining with propidium iodide
(see Materials and Methods for details). The x axis is a
measure of the fluorescence caused by the propidium iodide, whereas the
y axis represents the relative numbers of cells. As a
control, wild-type cells (7 h) were treated with 30 µg of nocodazole
per ml for 3 h prior to processing. (F) The mutant cells are
larger than the wild-type cells. A forward scatter analysis of the flow
cytometry data reveals the relative size distributions of mutant and
wild-type cells after 6 h of growth in the presence of
doxycycline. The y axis represents the relative number
of cells.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
CgCbf1 can functionally complement a cbf1 deletion
in S. cerevisiae.
We have cloned the
CBF1 gene from C. glabrata by functional
complementation of the methionine defect of an S. cerevisiae
cbf1 null mutant. The overall homology between C. glabrata and S. cerevisiae Cbf1p is only 34%, and it
is thus remarkable that CgCbf1p can substitute for its S. cerevisiae counterpart. It has been shown previously that the
first 209 aa of the protein are not required for transcription of the
MET genes in S. cerevisiae (39). The C-terminal region containing the basic helix-loop-helix leucine zipper
domains are highly conserved between the two yeasts and seem to be
sufficient to carry out the function(s) of Cbf1p at the MET
promoters of S. cerevisiae. A similar result has been reported for KlCbf1p, which may also complement the methionine deficiency of the S. cerevisiae cbf1 null mutant. While
KlCbf1p and ScCbf1p are functionally interchangeable, i.e., ScCbf1p can complement the lethality of the Klcbf1 gene disruption
(41), attempts to grow the Cgcbf1 null mutant
on 5-FOA medium after introducing a plasmid bearing a copy of the
ScCBF1 gene under its own promoter were unsuccessful (data
not shown). Although other promoters of S. cerevisiae have
been shown to be functional in C. glabrata (e.g., the
ScURA3 gene [31]), it is possible that a
promoter defect inhibits the functional expression of ScCbf1p in
C. glabrata. The overall growth of the Sccbf1
null mutant carrying the CgCBF1 gene is very slow and
indicates that CgCbf1p cannot fully substitute for all the functions of ScCbf1p.
Structure-function analysis of the CDEI region in the C.
glabrata centromere.
CgCbf1p binds to CDEI-like sequences,
as has been found for Cbf1ps from other budding yeasts, but CgCbf1p has
a threefold-higher binding affinity for CgCEN than the
average binding affinity of ScCbf1p to the 16 centromeres of S. cerevisiae (61). In CEN DNA fragment
mobility shift assays with crude extracts we observed a specific DNA
binding activity that required sequences to the left of CDEI to be able
to bind to the DNA (complex I). In the absence of CDEI, this binding
activity could still be detected at the centromere. Bandshifts with
crude extracts from CgCbf1p-depleted cells showed the elimination of
complexes II, III, and IV but not complex I, suggesting that complex I
does not contain intact or fragmented CgCbf1p. In vivo, deletion of
flanking DNA alone or of CDEI alone resulted in relatively minor
effects on CEN function, whereas deletion of both the
flanking region and CDEI completely inactivated the centromere. This
result strongly suggests that in addition to binding to CDEI, CgCbf1p
or another protein or proteins bind to the DNA region to the left of
CDEI. The ChIP experiments and gel shift assays using CgCbf1p-depleted
extracts suggest that the protein that binds to the CDEI-flanking
region is a new unidentified protein or protein complex. The combined results indicate that centromere function requires either binding of
CgCbf1p to the CDEI binding site or the presence of this new protein or
protein complex. The exact nature of this protein will need to be
determined via DNA affinity column chromatography. Nothing similar has
been reported to exist in S. cerevisiae; thus, in this
respect the C. glabrata centromere is different than
CEN in S. cerevisiae, although the CEN
DNA sequences are quite homologous between the two yeasts.
As yet, no evidence for a CDEIII binding activity in
C. glabrata extracts was found, although definitive experiments are
still
to be carried out. It is possible that the uncharacterized band
(complex I) seen in fragment mobility shift assays is due to binding
of
a CBF3-like subunit protein, since deletion of CDEIII sequences
also
prevents the formation of this
complex.
Function of CgCbf1p at the C. glabrata
centromere.
Deletion of the CgCBF1 gene is lethal in
C. glabrata, and repression of CgCbf1p synthesis results in
severe defects in chromosome segregation. The effects of CgCbf1p
depletion on C. glabrata cells, namely, the accumulation of
large-budded cells in which the DNA remains with the mother cells, cell
enlargement, a 2C DNA content, and short spindles, are indicative of
defects in the G2/M transition in the cell cycle.
Taken together with the results of the sectoring assays, which show a
70-fold drop in plasmid stability upon deletion of CDEI and flanking
sequences, this finding strongly suggests that CgCbf1p is important for
centromere function in C. glabrata.
While CDEI is essentially required for
CEN function when
flanking sequences are missing, deletion of CDEI, leaving sequences
upstream of CDEI intact, does not have a dramatic effect on plasmid
stability and is not lethal when it is introduced into the genome.
Furthermore, we did not find any evidence by ChIP analysis for
the
presence of CgCbf1p at the centromere in vivo when the CDEI
binding
site was deleted. These results raise the question of
whether direct
binding of CgCbf1p to CDEI is necessary for proper
chromosome
segregation. It is possible that a modified form of
CgCbf1p is part of
a protein complex that binds to the
CEN region
at a site
different from that of CDEI, perhaps in the flanking
region to the left
of CDEI, and supplies an essential centromere
or kinetochore function.
In a similar way, a mammalian basic helix-loop-helix
transcription
factor, the leukemia oncoprotein SCL, has been reported
to
carry out its function in hematopoietic development without
direct
binding to the DNA (
49). Whereas direct DNA binding of
SCL
was dispensable for some of its functions, it was essentially
required
for others. One assumes that, in the absence of direct
binding to the
DNA, CgCbf1p would be held in place by protein-protein
interactions.
These might be too weak to remain stable during
the relatively harsh
washing conditions of the ChIP assays. Thus,
it is difficult to draw a
definite conclusion from the results
from the ChIP
experiments.
In addition to its role in
CEN function, CgCbf1p may also
act as a transcription factor for a protein involved in the chromosome
segregation process. The regulated protein may be a kinetochore
protein
or another protein(s) involved in processes of mitosis.
An auxotrophic
growth defect caused by the lack of CgCbf1p at
other promoters (e.g.,
MET) is most likely not the reason for
the lethality of the
CBF1 gene deletion in
C. glabrata since the
cbf1 null strain does not grow on rich media. To gain
further
insight into the exact mechanism of CgCbf1p function at the
C. glabrata centromere, identification and characterization
of other
kinetochore proteins will be necessary. These remain the aims
of future
studies.
Cbf1p as a target for chemotherapy against C.
glabrata infections.
Classic antifungal drugs are known
for their toxic side effects. A number of new antifungal drugs which
are currently under investigation in clinical trials have been
developed in recent years. More research is needed to find suitable
antifungal drug targets that would lead to the discovery of drugs that
are less harmful to the human body. The budding yeast centromere
proteins are suitable selective targets for antifungal drug screens
since centromeres of this class are structurally different than the large "regional" centromeres found on human chromosomes. Thus, drugs directed toward the inactivation of budding yeast centromere proteins should be quite selective and relatively nontoxic to animal
cells. Since the lack of active CgCbf1p in C. glabrata is
fatal and causes severe chromosome segregation defects, this protein
may be an excellent selective target for chemotherapy against candidiasis.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
This work was supported by the Thueringen and German Ministries
of Science (TMWFK and BMBF) and by NIH grant CA-11034 to J. Carbon
from the National Cancer Institute.
We thank D. Sanglard for providing the C. glabrata
library; R. Ballester, P. Joyce, K. Kitada, N. Nakayama, and D. Thomas for providing strains and plasmids; J. Hegemann for the polyclonal antibody to ScCbf1; B. Matsumoto for help with microscopy and colony
photography; and D. McLaren for artwork. We also thank P. Hemmerich, G. Wieland, and the members of the Clarke and Carbon labs for helpful
discussions; R. Eck, K. Sanyal, and M. Baum for help with experiments;
and S. Ohndorf for technical assistance with the cloning of
CBF1.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of
California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106. Phone: (805) 893-3867. Fax: (805)
893-4724. E-mail: stoyan{at}lifesci.ucsb.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Aparicio, O. M.,
D. M. Weinstein, and S. P. Bell.
1997.
Components and dynamics of DNA replication complexes in S. cerevisiae: redistribution of MCM proteins and Cdc45 during S-phase.
Cell
91:59-69[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Aususbel, F. M.,
R. Brent,
R. E. Kingston,
D. D. Moore,
J. G. Seidmann,
J. A. Smith, and K. Struhl (ed.).
1995.
Current protocols in molecular biology.
Wiley, New York, N.Y.
|
| 3.
|
Baker, R. E.,
O. Gabrielsen, and B. D. Hall.
1986.
Effects of tRNATyr point mutations on the binding of yeast RNA polymerase III transcription factor C.
J. Biol. Chem.
261:5275-5282[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Baker, R. E.,
M. Fitzgerald-Hayes, and T. C. O'Brien.
1989.
Purification of the yeast centromere binding protein CP1 and a mutational analysis of its binding site.
J. Biol. Chem.
264:10843-10850[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Baker, R. E., and D. C. Masison.
1990.
Isolation of the gene encoding the Saccharomyces cerevisiae centromere-binding protein CP1.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
10:2458-2467[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Baum, M., and L. Clarke.
2000.
Fission yeast homologs of human CENP-B have redundant functions affecting cell growth and chromosome segregation.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20:2852-2864[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Boulanger, P.,
S. K. Yoshinaga, and A. J. Berk.
1987.
DNA-binding properties and characterization of human transcription factor TFIIIC2.
J. Biol. Chem.
262:15098-15105[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Bram, R. J., and R. D. Kornberg.
1987.
Isolation of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae centromere DNA-binding protein, its human homolog, and its possible role as a transcription factor.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
7:403-409[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Cai, M., and R. Davis.
1990.
Yeast centromere binding protein Cbf1, of the helix-loop-helix protein family, is required for chromosome stability and methionine prototrophy.
Cell
61:437-446[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Choo, K. H. A. (ed.).
1997.
The centromere.
Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom.
|
| 11.
|
Christianson, T. W.,
R. S. Sikorski,
M. Dante,
J. H. Shero, and P. Hieter.
1992.
Multifunctional yeast high-copy-number shuttle vectors.
Gene
110:119-122[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Clarke, L., and J. Carbon.
1980.
Isolation of a yeast centromere and construction of functional small circular chromosomes.
Nature
287:504-509[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Connelly, C., and P. Hieter.
1996.
Budding yeast SKP1 encodes an evolutionarily conserved kinetochore protein required for cell cycle progression.
Cell
86:275-285[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Cormack, B., and S. Falkow.
1999.
Efficient homologous and illegitimate recombination in the opportunistic yeast pathogen Candida glabrata.
Genetics
151:979-987[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Craxton, M.
1993.
Cosmid sequencing.
Methods Mol. Biol.
23:149-67[Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Cumberledge, S., and J. Carbon.
1987.
Mutational analysis of meiotic and mitotic centromere function in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Genetics
117:203-212[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 17.
|
Doheny, K. F.,
P. K. Sorger,
A. A. Hyman,
S. Tugendreich,
F. Spencer, and P. Hieter.
1993.
Identification of essential components of the S. cerevisiae kinetochore.
Cell
73:761-774[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Fidel, P.,
J. A. Vazquez, and J. D. Sobel.
1999.
Candida glabrata: review of epidemiology, pathogenesis, and clinical disease with comparison to C. albicans.
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
12:80-96[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Goh, P.-Y., and J. V. Kilmartin.
1993.
NDC10: a gene involved in chromosome segregation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
J. Cell Biol.
121:503-512[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Hanic-Joyce, P. J., and P. B. M. Joyce.
1998.
A high-copy-number ADE2-bearing plasmid for transformation of Candida glabrata.
Gene
211:395-400[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Hegemann, J. H., and U. Fleig.
1993.
The budding yeast centromere.
Bioessays
15:451-460[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Hemmerich, P.,
T. Stoyan,
G. Wieland,
M. Koch,
J. Lechner, and S. Diekmann.
2000.
Interaction of yeast kinetochore proteins with centromere-protein/transcription factor Cbf1.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
97:12583-12588[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Heus, J. J.,
B. J. M. Zonneveld,
H. Y. Steensma, and J. A. Van den Berg.
1990.
Centromeric DNA of Kluyveromyces lactis.
Curr. Genet.
18:517-522[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Huberman, J.,
R. Pridmore,
D. Jager,
B. Zonneveld, and P. Phillipsen.
1986.
Centromeric DNA from Saccharomyces uvarum is functional in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Chromosoma
94:162-168[CrossRef].
|
| 25.
|
Hyland, K.,
J. Kingsbury,
D. Koshland, and P. Hieter.
1999.
Ctf19p: a novel kinetochore protein in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and a potential link between the kinetochore and mitotic spindle.
J. Cell Biol.
145:15-28[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Iborra, F., and M. M. Ball.
1994.
Kluyveromyces marxianus small DNA fragments contain both autonomous replicative and centromeric elements that also function in Kluyveromyces lactis.
Yeast
10:1621-1629[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 27.
|
Jiang, W., and P. Phillipsen.
1989.
Purification of a protein binding to the CDEI subregion of Saccharomyces cerevisiae centromere DNA.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
9:5585-5593[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 28.
|
Kaiser, C.,
S. Michaelis, and A. Mitchell.
1994.
Methods in yeast genetics.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 29.
|
Kim, S. Y.,
J. Mellor,
A. J. Kingsman, and S. M. Kingsman.
1988.
An AT rich region of dyad symmetry is a promoter element in the yeast TRP1 gene.
Mol. Gen. Genet.
211:472-476[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 30.
|
Kitada, K.,
E. Yamaguchi, and M. Arisawa.
1995.
Cloning of the Candida glabrata TRP1 and HIS3 genes, and construction of their disruptant strains by sequential integrative transformation.
Gene
165:203-206[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 31.
|
Kitada, K.,
E. Yamaguchi, and M. Arisawa.
1996.
Isolation of a Candida glabrata centromere and its use in construction of plasmid vectors.
Gene
175:106-108.
|
| 32.
|
Kitada, K.,
E. Yamaguchi,
K. Hamada, and M. Arisawa.
1997.
Structural analysis of a Candida glabrata centromere and its functional homology to the Saccharomyces cerevisiae centromere.
Curr. Genet.
31:122-127[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 33.
|
Koshland, D., and P. Hieter.
1987.
Visual assay for chromosome ploidy.
Methods Enzymol.
155:351-372[Medline].
|
| 34.
|
Kuras, L., and D. Thomas.
1995.
Identification of the yeast methionine biosynthetic genes that require the centromere binding factor 1 for their transcriptional activation.
FEBS Lett.
367:15-18[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 35.
|
Lechner, J., and J. Carbon.
1991.
A 240 kd multisubunit protein complex, CBF3, is a major component of the budding yeast centromere.
Cell
64:717-725[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 36.
|
Lechner, J., and J. Ortiz.
1996.
The Saccharomyces cerevisiae kinetochore.
FEBS Lett.
389:70-74[CrossRef][Medline]. (Minireview.)
|
| 37.
| Mannarelli, B. M., and C. P. Kurtzman.
1998. Rapid identification of Candida albicans and other
human pathogenic yeasts by using short oligonucleotides in a PCR.
36:1634-1641.
|
| 38.
|
Mardis, E. R.
1994.
High-throughput detergent extraction of M13 subclones for fluorescent DNA sequencing.
Nucleic Acids Res.
22:2173-2175[Free Full Text].
|
| 39.
|
Mellor, J.,
W. Jiang,
M. Funk,
J. Rathjen,
C. A. Barnes,
J. H. Hinz, and P. Phillippsen.
1990.
CPF1, a yeast protein which functions in centromeres and promoters.
EMBO J.
9:4017-4026[Medline].
|
| 40.
|
Meluh, P. B., and D. Koshland.
1995.
Evidence that the MIF2 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae encodes a centromere protein with homology to the mammalian centromere protein CENP-C.
Mol. Biol. Cell
6:793-807[Abstract].
|
| 41.
|
Mulder, W.,
A. A. Winkler,
I. H. J. M. Scholten,
B. J. M. Zonneveld,
J. de Winde,
H. J. de Steensma, and L. A. Grivell.
1994.
Centromere promoter factors (CPF1) of the yeasts Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Kluyveromyces lactis are functionally exchangeable, despite low overall homology.
Curr. Genet.
26:198-207[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 42.
|
Nakayama, H.,
M. Izuta,
S. Nagahashi,
E. Y. Sihta,
Y. Sato,
T. Yamazaki,
M. Arisawa, and K. Kitada.
1998.
A controllable gene-expression system for the pathogenic fungus Candida glabrata.
Microbiology
144:2407-2415[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 43.
|
Niedenthal, R.,
R. Stoll, and J. H. Hegemann.
1991.
In vivo characterization of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae centromere DNA element I, a binding site for the helix-loop-helix protein CPF1.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
11:3545-3553[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 44.
|
Ng, R., and J. Carbon.
1987.
Mutational and in vitro protein-binding studies on centromere DNA from Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
7:4522-4534[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 45.
|
Oechsner, U., and B. Bandlow.
1996.
Interaction of the yeast centromere and promoter factor, Cbf1p, with the cytochrome c1 upstream region and functional implications on regulated gene expression.
Nucleic Acids Res.
24:2395-2403[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 46.
|
Ortiz, J.,
O. Stemmann,
S. Rank, and J. Lechner.
1999.
A putative protein complex consisting of Ctf19, Mcm21, and Okp1 represents a missing link in the budding yeast kinetochore.
Genes Dev.
13:1140-1155[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 47.
|
Pfaller, M. A.,
S. A. Messer,
R. J. Hollis,
R. N. Jones,
G. V. Doern,
M. E. Brandt, and R. A. Hajjeh.
1999.
Trends in species distribution and susceptibility to fluconazole among blood stream isolates of Candida species in the United States.
Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.
33:217-222[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 48.
|
Poddar, A.,
N. Roy, and P. Sinha.
1999.
MCM21 and MCM22, two novel genes of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae are required for chromosome transmission.
Mol. Microbiol.
31:349-360[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 49.
|
Porcher, C.,
E. C. Lia,
Y. Fujiwara,
L. I. Zon, and S. H. Orkin.
1999.
Specification of hematopoietic and vascular development by the bHLH transcription factor SCL without direct DNA binding.
Development
126:4603-4615[Abstract].
|
| 50.
|
Roman, H.
1956.
Studies of gene mutation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol.
21:175-185.
|
| 51.
|
Sambrook, J.,
E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis.
1989.
Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 52.
|
Sanglard, D.,
F. Ischer,
D. Calabrese,
P. A. Majcherczyk, and J. Bille.
1999.
The ATP binding cassette transporter gene CgCDR1 from Candida glabrata is involved in the resistance of clinical isolates to azole antifungal agents.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
43:2753-2765[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 53.
|
Sorger, P. K.,
G. Ammerer, and D. Shore.
1989.
Identification and purification of sequence-specific DNA-binding proteins, p. 199-223.
In
T. E. Creighton (ed.), Protein function, a practical approach. IRL Press at Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom.
|
| 54.
|
Spencer, F.,
S. L. Gerring,
C. Connelly, and P. Hieter.
1990.
Mitotic chromosome transmission fidelity mutants in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Genetics
124:237-249[Abstract].
|
| 55.
|
Staden, R.
1996.
The Staden sequence analysis package.
Mol. Biotechnol.
5:233-241[Medline].
|
| 56.
|
Stoler, S.,
K. C. Keith,
K. E. Curnick, and M. Fitzgerald-Hayes.
1995.
A mutation in CSE4, an essential gene encoding a novel chromatin-associated protein in yeast, causes chromosome nondisjunction and cell cycle arrest at mitosis.
Genes Dev.
9:573-586[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 57.
|
Stoyan, T.,
R. Eck,
J. Lechner,
P. Hemmerich,
W. Kuenkel, and S. Diekmann.
1999.
Cloning of a centromere binding factor 3D (CBF3D) gene from Candida glabrata.
Yeast
15:793-798[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 58.
|
Strunnikov, A. V.,
J. Kingsbury, and D. Koshland.
1995.
CEP3 encodes a centromere protein of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
J. Cell Biol.
128:749-760[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 59.
|
Van Den Bossche, H.,
F. Dromer,
I. Improvisi,
M. Lozano-Chiu,
J. H. Rex, and D. Sanglar.
1998.
Antifungal drug resistance in pathogenic fungi.
Med. Mycol.
36(Suppl. I):119-128.
|
| 60.
|
Vinson, C. R.,
K. L. LaMarco,
P. F. Johnson,
W. H. Landschulz, and S. L. McKnight.
1988.
In situ detection of sequence-specific DNA binding activity specified by a recombinant bacteriophage.
Genes Dev.
2:801-806[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 61.
|
Wieland, G.,
P. Hemmerich,
M. Koch,
T. Stoyan,
J. Hegemann, and S. Diekmann.
2001.
Determination of the binding constants of the centromere protein Cbf1 to all 16 centromere DNAs of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Nucleic Acids Res.
29:1054-1060[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 62.
|
Zhou, P.,
M. S. Szczypka,
R. Young, and D. J. Thiele.
1994.
A system for gene cloning and manipulation in the yeast Candida glabrata.
Gene
142:135-140[CrossRef][Medline].
|
Molecular and Cellular Biology, August 2001, p. 4875-4888, Vol. 21, No. 15
0270-7306/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/MCB.21.15.4875-4888.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Stoyan, T., Carbon, J.
(2004). Inner Kinetochore of the Pathogenic Yeast Candida glabrata. Eukaryot Cell
3: 1154-1163
[Abstract]
[Full Text]