Previous Article | Next Article 
Molecular and Cellular Biology, August 2001, p. 4949-4959, Vol. 21, No. 15
0270-7306/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/MCB.21.15.4949-4959.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Cdc5 Interacts with the Wee1 Kinase in
Budding Yeast
Clinton R.
Bartholomew,
Sung
Ho
Woo,
Yun Shin
Chung,
Carolyn
Jones, and
Christopher F. J.
Hardy*
Department of Cell Biology and Physiology,
Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110
Received 2 April 2001/Returned for modification 25 April
2001/Accepted 3 May 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
Development of a multicellular organism requires that mitosis and
morphogenesis be coordinated. These processes must also be synchronized
during the growth of unicellular organisms. In the yeast
Saccharomyces cerevisiae, mitosis is dependent on the prior
growth of a daughter cell in the form of a bud. Overexpression of
wild-type Polo-like kinase Cdc5 or a catalytically inactive form
resulted in the formation of multinucleate cells in budding yeast. Immunofluorescence analysis of these multinulceate cells showed that mitosis and bud formation were no longer linked.
Others have shown that Swe1 is required for coupling mitosis to bud
formation during a perturbed cell cycle. When the normal pathway of bud formation is perturbed, Swe1 functions to delay mitosis through negative regulation of Clb/Cdk. In cells lacking Swe1, multinucleate cells are formed in response to delays in bud formation. Affinity purification, two-hybrid analysis, and mutant characterization results
suggested that Cdc5 and Swe1 interact. From these results, we conclude
that multinucleate formation in response to Cdc5 overexpression is
linked to titration of Swe1 function. These results also suggest that
Cdc5 may be a negative regulator of Swe1.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The onset of mitosis in eukaryotic
cells requires the activation of mitosis-promoting factor (MPF)
(12). MPF is comprised of a cyclin-dependent kinase (Cdk)
and B-type cyclin regulatory subunit (Clb/Cdk), and it is maintained in
an inactive state during interphase through phosphorylation of Tyr15 on
Cdk by the Wee1 kinase. MPF is activated in response to activation of
the Tyr15 phosphatase Cdc25 and inactivation of the Tyr15 kinase Wee1
at the transition between G2 and mitosis
(G2/M).
In addition to Clb/Cdk, Polo kinases are also key promoters of mitosis
and have been implicated in coordinating the activation of Clb/Cdk. In
vitro studies in Xenopus indicate that Cdc25 is activated
when it binds to and is phosphorylated by the Polo kinase, Plx1
(23, 37). More recently, phosphorylation by the Polo kinase, Plk1, of a critical serine residue in the nuclear export signal
sequence of cyclin B1 promotes accumulation of Clb/Cdk activity in the
nucleus of vertebrate prophase cells (46). In Schizosaccharomyces pombe (3, 34),
Drosophila (29), and vertebrate (15,
16) cells, Polo kinases have been localized to
microtubule-organizing centers at the G2/M transition.
Mutant studies in these systems show that Polo kinases play key roles in spindle pole duplication and formation of the bipolar spindle (15).
In Saccharomyces cerevisiae daughter cells originate as buds
at the beginning of S phase (27). Bud formation is
regulated by Cdc28, the yeast Cdk, in combination with the
G1 (Cln) and mitotic (Clb) cyclins. The Cln-Cdc28 complex
activates initiation of bud formation late in G1, while the
Clb-Cdc28 complex inhibits rebudding later in the cell cycle (2,
25, 26, 40). Perturbations of the actin cytoskeleton prevent the
normal pathway of bud formation and result in delayed mitosis through
negative regulation of Clb/Cdk by the Wee1 family kinase member Swe1
(33). In response to bud formation, Swe1 is negatively
regulated by the Nim1-like kinase Hsl1 (5, 24, 30, 31,
32). Swe1 is targeted to the bud neck after bud formation, and
the neck localization requires Hsl1 and its interacting factor, Hs17
(30, 42; S. H. Woo and C. F. J. Hardy,
unpublished data). In this manner, morphogenesis is linked to cell
proliferation in budding yeast.
Previous studies have shown that Swe1 overexpression prevents spindle
pole body (SPB) separation but not duplication (28). This
suggests that Swe1 plays a role at SPBs. Endogenous Cdc5 is also
present at SPBs before they separate (Woo and Hardy, unpublished), consistent with it playing a role similar to other Polo kinases in
regulating spindle pole separation (see above). In this study, we have
found that overproduction of either wild-type Cdc5 or a catalytically
inactive form uncouples mitosis from bud formation. This results in the
formation of multinucleate cells. Cdc5 interacts with the N-terminal
region of Swe1, and overproduction of the catalytically inactive form
of Cdc5 suppresses Swe1-dependent phenotypes associated with
unregulated Swe1. In response to Cdc5 overproduction, Swe1 is modified
and localized to SPBs. Taken together, our results suggest that
multinucleate formation in response to Cdc5 overexpression is linked to
titration of Swe1 function. The results in this report also suggest
that Cdc5 may be a negative regulator of Swe1, possibly playing a role
in regulating Swe1 function at SPBs prior to SPB separation.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Strains.
Yeast strains and sources are listed in Table
1. Plasmid DNA was transformed into yeast
by the lithium acetate method as described (19). The open
reading frame of the endogenous SWE1 was disrupted with
LEU2 by transforming strains with the integrating plasmid
pSWE1-10g restricted with XbaI (a gift from R. Booher) (6). The open reading frame of the endogenous
SWE1 was placed under control of the GAL1
promoter by transforming strains with the integrating plasmid pSWE1-41
restricted with PstI and BamHI (a gift from R. Booher) (6). Yeast strains were grown in YPD at 30°C
unless noted otherwise in the text.
Two-hybrid analysis.
Two-hybrid analysis was performed as
described by James et al. (20) by using strain PJ69-4a,
with the following variation. Following transformation of the reporter
strain with the yeast library plasmids, the cells were washed and then
resuspended into liquid synthetic complete medium (SC) lacking the
amino acids histidine, uracil, and leucine but containing adenine; 200 µl of this solution was spread on 100-mm agar plates containing SC lacking histidine, uracil, leucine, and adenine. The extra initial adenine was essential to obtain transformants on the selective plates.
Immunofluorescence.
Indirect immunofluorescence was carried
out as described (49). Yeast cells were grown to early log
phase and prepared for immunofluorescence microscopy. For localization
of hemagglutinin (HA)-tagged Cdc5, cell were fixed for 5 min. The cells
were first incubated with affinity-purified anti-HA antibody (BAbCo)
and then with rhodamine-conjugated donkey anti-mouse secondary
antibody. For localization of Tub1, the cells were fixed for 30 min.
The cells were first incubated with mouse anti-Tub1 and then with rhodamine-conjugated donkey anti-mouse secondary antibody. Green fluorescent protein gene (GFP)-TUB1 fusions were
obtained by transforming strain C895 (cdh1/hct1 swe1) with
pAFS92, which integrates, at the ura3 locus, a
GFP fusion to the
-tubulin gene, TUB1, under control of the MET3 promoter. Tub1-GFP was induced by
growing cells for 1 h in SC lacking methionine. Digital images were
taken with a 100× objective on an Olympus microscope.
Generation of fusion proteins in yeast.
PCR was carried out
to generate Swe1-protein A (ProA) and Swe1-GFP fusion sequences. The
oligonucleotides are available on request. The ProA gene and
adjacent HIS3 and URA3 markers were amplified by
PCR using pProA-HIS3-URA3 (a gift from Mike Rout and John Aitchison)
(1). GFP and the adjacent HIS3
marker were amplified by PCR using pYGFP3 (a gift from Brendan Cormack)
(10). The codons in the mutant GFP (pYGFP3)
were optimized for expression in Candida. The resulting PCR
constructs contained SWE1 sequences fused in frame with
sequence encoding GFP or ProA at their C-terminal ends. Strains were
transformed with the resulting PCR products to generate a yeast strain
expressing the desired fusion protein under its endogenous promoter. A
strain expressing Spc42-GFP was previously obtained from J. Kilmartin
(11). Strains lacking HSL1 produce elongated
buds in a SWE1-dependent manner. We determined that buds in
hsl1 SWE1-GFP and hsl1 SWE1-ProA strains are
elongated and therefore the Swe1-ProA and Swe1-GFP constructs are functional.
Purification of GST and GST-Swe1 from Escherichia
coli.
E. coli BL21 cells were transformed with
either pGEX-5X or pGEX-5X-Swe1 and induced with 0.4 mM
isopropyl-
-D-thiogalactopyranoside for 4 h at
28°C. Bacteria were pelleted and then suspended in NETN buffer (0.5%
NP-40, 20 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.0], 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA) supplemented
with protease inhibitors (Boehringer Mannheim) and were lysed with
sonication. The lysate was clarified by centrifugation, and the
clarified lysate was incubated with glutathione-agarose beads
(Pharmacia) for 1 h at 4°C. Beads were pelleted and then washed
extensively with NETN buffer with protease inhibitors, and bound
proteins were resolved by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and visualized by immunoblotting with anti-glutathione S-transferase (GST) antibodies.
Affinity chromatography.
Cells containing Cdc5 fused to ProA
derived from strain C199 (CDC5-ProA) were pelleted, washed
once in water, and lysed or frozen in liquid nitrogen. Pellets were
resuspended in 0.3 ml of lysis buffer (L buffer) containing 5%
glycerol, 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 1 mM EDTA, 10 mM MgCl2,
0.3 M N2H8SO4, 1 mM dithiotheitol, 1 mM benzamidine, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride 5 mg of leupeptin per ml, 2 mM pepstatin A, 50 mM NaF, 10 mM sodium pyrophosphate, and
0.5 mM NaVO4. Cells were lysed by adding 0.5 ml of
acid-washed glass beads and vortexing in pulses until 90% lysis was
achieved; 0.35 ml of immunoprecipitation buffer (1 M LiCl, 2% Triton
X-100, 10% glycerol, 0.5 mM NaVO4, protease inhibitors as
described for L buffer) was added, and the mixture was vortexed 1 min.
The lysate was spun for 10 min at 3,000 rpm, and the supernatant was
aliquoted and frozen in liquid nitrogen. Protein concentrations were
determined with the Bio-Rad protein assay. Four hundred milligrams of
lysate was incubated with 0.1 ml of GST and GST-Swe1 beads prepared as described above. After 2 h of incubation, beads were washed
extensively with L buffer, and the bound proteins were resolved by
SDS-PAGE and analyzed by immunoblotting.
Other methods.
YEP medium contained 1% yeast extract and
2% Bacto Peptone. Carbon sources (glucose, raffinose, and galactose)
were all used at a 2% final concentration.
-Factor and hydroxyurea
were obtained from Sigma and were used at final concentrations of 0.2 µM and 200 mM, respectively. Nocodazole was obtained from Aldrich and was added to medium from a 20-mg/ml stock solution in dimethyl sulfoxide. It was used at a final concentration of 20 µg/ml in 1%
dimethyl sulfoxide as described by Jacobs et al. (19). The DNA content of cells was measured on a Becton Dickinson (San Jose, Calif.) FACSsan as described by Epstein and Cross (13).
Movies were collected as described elsewhere (48).
Briefly, mid-logarithmic-phase cells were placed on a slide with a thin
agarose pad. A Z series of eight focal planes was collected over 8 s
and projected onto a single two-dimensional image. Z series were
collected every 5 min for 0.5 to 3 h. NIH image 1.62 (written by
Wayne Rasband) was used for image acquisition. Cells were also
visualized by differential interference contrast microscopy (DIC).
 |
RESULTS |
Cells overproducing Cdc5 or cdc5N209A are multinucleate.
HeLa
cells overproducing wild-type or catalytically inactive Plk1 are
multinucleate (37). In an effort to further understand these results, we examined whether budding yeast became multinucleate in response to overproduction of Cdc5. To conduct the experiment, a
strain expressing wild-type CDC5 from the inducible
GAL1 promotor, GAL1-CDC5, was analyzed. The
4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI)-stained nuclei in
GAL1-CDC5 cells were counted after inducing CDC5
expression for 4 h through addition of galactose. Strikingly,
2.5% of the cells were multinucleate (Fig.
1A; Table 2). In
addition, 0.9% of cells overexpressing a mutant version of
CDC5 that lacks kinase activity (cdc5-N209A) were
multinucleate (Fig. 1B; Table 2). In contrast, the multinucleate
phenotype occurs very infrequently in wild-type cells (Table 2). To
visualize the spindles, a GFP-tagged version of Tub1, the major
-tubulin, was expressed. Strikingly, elongated spindles were
observed in unbudded and small budded cells coincident with Cdc5 (data
not shown) or cdc5-N209A (Fig. 1B) overproduction. The advanced stage
of the cell cycle relative to bud growth in these cells suggested that
mitosis had become uncoupled from bud formation.

View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Cells overexpressing CDC5 or
cdc5N209A are multinucleate. To induce Cdc5 (A) or
cdc5-N209A (B), 2% galactose was added to mid-logarithmic-phase
cultures of strains JC256 (GAL-CDC5) and C1039
(GAL-cdc5N209A GFP-TUB1) for the indicated times. To induce
GFP-Tub1 expression, the same cells were then resuspended in
SC-methionine plus galactose for 2 h. The cells were fixed and
stained with DAPI to visualize nuclei. It should be noted that the
frequency of multinucleate cells as visualized here does not reflect
the true distribution in these cultures. Rather, these particular
fields were chosen in order to demonstrate the variety of multinucleate
cells in the culture. Bars, 10 µm.
|
|
Cdh1/Hct1 is a cofactor of the anaphase-promoting complex (APC) and is
required for the ubiquitin-mediated destruction of the mitotic cyclins
Clb1 and Clb2 at the end of mitosis (39, 47). In
cdh1/hct1 null cells, Clb1 and Clb2 inappropriately accumulate during G1 and S (39, 47). We
discovered that 1.8% of cdh1/hct1 mutant cells are
multinucleate (Table 2). Strikingly, the frequency of multinucleate
cells in a culture of cdh1/hct1 cells significantly
increased in response to Cdc5 (21.4%) or cdc5N209A (15.0%)
overproduction (Table 2).
Cdc5 and Swe1 interact.
Because overexpression of either
catalytically active or inactive Cdc5 resulted in multinucleate cells,
we predicted that this phenotype might be due to titration of a
Cdc5-interacting factor. We carried out a two-hybrid screen using Cdc5
as bait to isolate potential interacting factors (20). One
of the positives contained an in-frame fusion to an open reading frame
encoding the C-terminal region of Swe1 (amino acid residues 173 to 819) (Fig. 2A) (6). Further
two-hybrid experiments showed that a C-terminal region of Cdc5 (between
amino acids 340 and 705) is sufficient for interaction with Swe1 (Fig.
2A). This Swe1 interaction region in Cdc5 is distinct from the Cdc5
kinase domain (residues 82 to 337). Likewise, the region of Swe1
(between amino acids 173 and 400) that is sufficient for interaction
with Cdc5 is distinct from the Swe1 kinase domain (residues 444 to
789). The Cdc5-Swe1 protein-protein interaction was confirmed by an
affinity chromatography strategy (Fig. 2B). Cdc5 has also been
independently isolated by another group in a two-hybrid screen using
Swe1 as the bait (J. Harrison and D. Lew, personal communication).

View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Cdc5 interacts with Swe1. (A) Two-hybrid assay performed
with pDB-Cdc5(1-705), pDB-Cdc5(340-705), pAD-Swe1(173-819),
and pAD-Swe1(400-819). pDB (Ga14 DNA binding domain [DB]
fusion vector) and pAD (Ga14 activation domain [AD] fusion vector)
were used as negative controls. The HIS3 and ADE2
reporter strain PJ69-4a was used, and transformants were tested for
growth on medium lacking uracil, leucine, histidine, and adenine. + and indicates growth and no growth, respectively, after 5 days
at 30°C. (B) GST and GST-Swe1 were incubated with yeast extract
containing Cdc5 fused to ProA, derived from strain C199
(CDC5-ProA). After 2 h of incubation, beads were washed
extensively and the bound proteins (lanes B) were resolved by SDS-PAGE
and analyzed by immunoblotting; 10% of the extract added to each
incubation was loaded in the input lane (I).
|
|
cdh1/hct1 swe1 double mutants have a high frequency of
multinucleate cells resulting from an uncoupling of bud formation and
mitosis.
Previous studies have concluded that Swe1 does not play a
role during an unperturbed cell cycle (6). In agreement
with these results, the frequency of multinucleate swe1
cells was very similar to that observed in wild-type cells (Table
3). However, altering the levels of
Clb/Cdk affected the accumulation of multinucleate swe1
cells. Examination of cdh1/hct1 swe1 double-mutant cells by DAPI staining revealed greater than 17% with multiple nuclei (Table
3). A representative image is shown in Fig.
3A. In contrast, swe1 and
cdh1/hct1 single-mutant cultures were only 0.06 and
1.8% multinucleate, respectively (Table 3). Interestingly, a genetic interaction between CDH1/HCT1 and SWE1 was
established based on the slower growth of the cdh1/hct1 swe1
double mutant compared to either single mutant at 37°C (Fig. 3B).
Furthermore, overexpression of the mitotic cyclin Clb2
(GAL-CLB2) in swe1 null cells resulted in 10.8%
multinucleate cells, compared to only 0.08% multinucleate GAL-CLB2 SWE1 cells (Table 3). The overexpression of the
Clb/Cdc28 inhibitor Sic1 (2µm-SIC1 cdh1/hct1 swe1)
or deletion of CLB2 (cdh1/hct1 swe1 clb2)
partially suppressed the cdh1/hct1 swe1 multinucleate phenotype (Table 3).

View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Mitosis is unlinked from bud formation in
cdh1/hct1 swe1 cells. (A) Visualization of elongated and
disassembled spindles in unbudded and small-budded multinucleate
cdh1/hct1 swe1 cells. Cultures of C968 (cdh1/hct1 swe1
MET3-GFP-TUB1) were grown to mid-log phase in YPD and transferred
to SC lacking methionine for 1 h to induce GFP-Tub1. Arrows mark a
multinucleate unbudded cell with an elongated spindle (i), a
multinucleate small-budded cell with a disassembled spindle (ii), and a
cell undergoing a normal mitosis (iii). (Inset) A rare cell type (0.1%
of cdh1/hct1 swe1 GFP-TUB1 cells) in which the mother and
its attached daughter are both undergoing mitosis. (B) The
cdh1/hct1 swe1 double mutant grows slower than the single
mutants at 37°C. Strains C895 (cdh1/hct1 swe1), C798
(swe1), C810 (cdh1/hct1), and W303a (wild type
[WT]) were streaked on YPD plates and incubated at 30 or 37°C for 5 days. (C) Video sequence of spindle elongation and disassembly during
mitosis in strain C968 (cdh1/hct1 swe1 MET3-GFP-TUB1).
Cultures of C968 were grown to mid-log phase in YPD and transferred to
SC lacking methionine for 2 h to induce GFP-Tub1. Following
induction, they were placed on a slide with a thin agarose pad. A Z
series of eight focal planes was collected over 8 s and projected
onto a single two-dimensional image. Z series were collected every 2 min for 3 h. An unbudded cell undergoing spindle elongation
(interval from 34 to 68 min) and disassembly (interval from 68 to 74 min) is shown (middle cell in the cartoon). The cell above and the cell
below the middle cell in the cartoon elongated and aligned their
spindles through the bud neck in a wild-type manner. Bars: (A) 10 µm;
(C) 2.5 µm.
|
|
To test whether mitosis was unlinked from bud formation in
cdh1/hct1 swe1 cells, spindle elongation was observed. In
cdh1/hct1 swe1 GFP-TUB1 cells, we found unbudded cells with
nuclei positioned at the ends of an elongated spindle (Fig. 3A, arrow
i) and small-budded cells with nuclei at the end of a disassembling
spindle (Fig. 3A, arrow ii). Large-budded cells with an elongated
spindle undergoing a normal mitosis were also present (Fig. 3A, arrow
iii). These results were similar to the phenotype for cells
overexpressing cdc5N209A or Cdc5. Live-cell video microscopy was used
to monitor spindle formation in cdh1/hct1 swe1 GFP-TUB1
cells. In Fig. 3C, an unbudded cell undergoing spindle elongation
(interval from 34 to 68 min) and disassembly (interval from 68 to 74 min) is shown. This cell completed mitosis, as indicated by spindle
breakdown at the 74-min time point, and formed a bud at the 100-min
mark (data not shown). In contrast, in most cells that had formed a bud
before elongating their spindle, the spindle was properly oriented
through the neck into the bud (Fig. 3C, cell above and cell below the
center cell in the cartoon). We did observe large-budded cells with
misoriented spindles. However, in these rare cases, both the mother
and daughter cells were undergoing mitosis and each had a separate
spindle (Fig. 3A, inset).
cdc5N209A overproduction suppresses Swe1-dependent
phenotypes.
To test whether cdc5N209A
overexpression inactivates Swe1 function, we investigated whether
overexpression of cdc5N209A in hsl1 or
hsl7 mutant cells would suppress the
SWE1-dependent defects of these mutants. The hsl1
and hsl7 mutants undergo a prolonged period of apical bud
growth during G2 and have Swe1-dependent elongated buds (31). We found that overexpression of
cdc5-N209A suppressed the Swe1-dependent elongated bud
formation in hsl1 (Fig.
4A) and hsl7
cells. The hsl1 cells overexpressing cdc5-N209A were distinctly round. When the hsl1 and hsl7
cells were examined for DNA content by fluorescence-activated cell
sorting (FACS), less than 10% of the hsl1 (Fig. 4A) and
hsl7 cells were 1N. These results confirmed a G2
delay for hsl1 and hsl7 cells, as has been previously reported (31). However, a significant fraction
of the hsl1 and hsl7 cells overexpressing
cdc5-N209A were 1N (Fig. 4A, 3 h after the addition of
galactose). The FACS profiles for the hsl1 cells
overexpressing cdc5-N209A and the hsl1 swe1
mutant cells were very similar (Fig. 4A). We observed that
cdc5-N209A overexpression suppressed the lethality and
the formation of elongated buds in response to Swe1 overproduction
(Fig. 4B). Taken together, these results supported our model that
cdc5-N209A was acting as an inhibitor of Swe1 function. As further
evidence, we also found that the extreme slow growth or lethality of
cdc5(msd2-1) at 30°C was suppressed in a
cdc5(msd2-1) swe1 double mutant (Fig.
4C).

View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
cdc5N209A overproduction suppresses Swe1-dependent
phenotypes. (A) Strains C508 (hsl1 GAL-cdc5N209A [DIC and
FACS]) and C618 (hsl7 GAL-cdc5N209A [FACS only]) were
grown to mid-logarithmic phase in raffinose. Galactose was added to 2%
for the times indicated. Strains MAY1 (hsl1 [DIC and
FACS]), MAY2 (hsl1 swe1 [DIC and FACS]), and W303a (wild
type [WT] [FACS only]) were included for comparison. The cells were
viewed by DIC (top); they were also stained with propidium iodide and
analyzed by FACS (bottom) to evaluate cellular DNA contents. (B)
Constitutive expression of SWE1 is toxic and induces
elongated buds. Both of these phenotypes were suppressed by
cdc5-N209A overproduction. Strains C474
(GAL-Swe1) and C499 (GAL-SWE1 GAL-cdc5-N209A)
were streaked on rich plates containing either 2% glucose (repressing
conditions) or 2% galactose (inducing conditions) for 5 days (left).
Galactose was added to mid-logarithmic-phase cultures of the same
strains for 4 h to induce Swe1 (GAL-SWE1) or Swe1 and
Cdc5 (GAL-SWE1 GAL-cdc5-N209A) and viewed by DIC (right).
(C) Strains C798 (swe1), C745
[cdc5(msd2-1)] and C667 [swe1
cdc5(msd2-1)] were incubated on rich medium at 23 or
30°C for 5 days. (D) Strain JC278 (GAL-cdc5N209A) was
grown to mid-logarithmic phase in raffinose. Galactose was added to 2%
for the times indicated. The cells were viewed by DIC (left); they were
also stained with propidium iodide and analyzed by FACS (middle) to
evaluate cellular DNA contents. The same strain was also streaked on
rich plates containing either 2% glucose (repressing conditions) or
2% galactose (inducing conditions) for 5 days (right). Bars: 10 µm.
|
|
Swe1 is modified and localized to SPBs in response to Cdc5 or
cdc5N209A overproduction.
We found that Swe1 is localized to
the mother bud neck in a strain expressing Swe1-GFP from the endogenous
Swe1 promoter (SWE1-GFP) (Woo and Hardy, unpublished) (Fig.
5A). In contrast, overexpression of
Swe1-GFP from the GAL1 promoter (GAL1-SWE1-GFP)
resulted in Swe1-GFP localization in the nucleus, at SPBs as well
as to the bud neck (Woo and Hardy, unpublished). Interestingly,
we observed that endogenous Swe1-GFP localized to one or two bright
spots in response to overproduction of Cdc5 (GAL1-CDC5-HA
SWE1-GFP) or cdc5-N209A (GAL1-cdc5N209A-HA
SWE1-GFP) (Fig. 5). In addition, Swe1-GFP signal was not observed
at the neck in cells overexpressing CDC5 or
cdc5-N209A. DAPI staining revealed that these spots were on
the nuclear periphery of cells (data not shown).

View larger version (100K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Swe1 is found at one or two distinct spots in cells
overexpressing CDC5 or cdc5N209A. (A) Strain C573
(GAL-CDC5-HA SWE1-GFP) was grown to mid-logarithmic phase in
raffinose. Galactose was added to 2% for 2 h. (B) Strain C572
(GAL-cdc5-N209A-HA SWE1-GFP) was grown to mid-logarithmic
phase in raffinose. Galactose was added to 2% for 2 h. Bars: 10 µm.
|
|
The colocalization of Swe1 and Cdc5 in perinuclear spots suggested that
this locale might correspond to SPBs. Cdc5 is present at SPBs when
expressed under control of its endogenous promoter (41;
Woo and Hardy, unpublished) or when overexpressed from the
GAL1 promoter (43). Indirect immunofluorescence
staining showed that the Swe1-GFP spots colocalized with cdc5-N209A-HA (Fig. 6A) or Cdc5 (data not shown) in
response to overproduction of cdc5-N209A or Cdc5, respectively.
Combined with anti-Tub1 indirect immunofluorescence microscopy, we
determined that Swe1-GFP colocalized to SPBs in response to cdc5N209A
overproduction (Fig. 6B). Swe1-GFP also colocalized with SPBs in
response to Cdc5 overproduction (data not shown).

View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Swe1 is found associated with cdc5-N209A at the SPBs of
cells overexpressing cdc5-N209A. Strain CH572
(GAL-cdc5N209A-HA SWE1-GFP) was grown to mid-logarithmic
phase in raffinose. Galactose was added to 2% for 2 h. The cells
were fixed and stained for cdc5-N209A-HA (A) or Tub1 (B). Swe1-GFP was
visualized by direct fluorescence. Bars: 10 µm.
|
|
To examine whether the level or state of Swe1 was altered in cells
overexpressing Cdc5 or cdc5N209A, cell extracts were analyzed by
immunoblotting. In these experiments, Swe1 was epitope tagged by
a chromosomal in-frame integration of the immunoglobulin G binding
domain of ProA at the sequence for the Swe1 C terminus. Overexpression
of Cdc5 or cdc5N209A resulted in slower electrophoretic mobility
for Swe1-ProA (Fig. 7A). The effect was
less pronounced in cdc5N209A cells. Because localization of Cdc5 and
Swe1 to the mother bud neck is dependent on Hsl1 and Hsl7, Hsl1 and
Hsl7 might serve as potential adapters between Cdc5 and Swe1
(30; Woo and Hardy, unpublished). However, electrophoretic
shift, and presumed modification, of Swe1-ProA in response to Cdc5 or
cdc5N209A overproduction was not dependent on Hsl1 or Hsl7 (Fig. 7B).
Furthermore, the localization of Swe1 to SPBs in response to Cdc5
overproduction was also not dependent on Hsl1 or Hsl7 (data not
shown).

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
Swe1 is modified in response to Cdc5 or cdc5N209A
overproduction. (A) Strains CH473 (GAL-CDC5 SWE1-ProA) and
CH459 (GAL-cdc5N209A SWE1-ProA) were grown in raffinose and
shifted to 2% galactose. Samples for immunoblot analysis were taken
just before ( ) and 3 h after (+) addition of galactose. (B)
Strains CH507 (hsl1 GAL-CDC5) and CH508 (hsl1
GAL-cdc5N209A) were grown in raffinose and shifted to 2%
galactose. Samples for immunoblot analysis were taken just before ( )
and 3 h after (+) addition of galactose. (C) Strain JC256
(GAL-CDC5) was grown to mid-logarithmic phase in raffinose.
Galactose was added to 2% for the times indicated. The cells were
stained with propidium iodide and analyzed by FACS to evaluate cellular
DNA contents.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Multinucleate formation in response to Cdc5 overexpression is
linked to Swe1.
In budding yeast, the Clb/Cdk inhibitor Swe1 does
not play a role in mitotic progression in an unperturbed cell cycle and is not required to link bud formation and mitosis (6). In
contrast, Swe1 is part of the morphogenesis checkpoint and, in response to perturbations that prevent bud formation, inhibits mitotic progression through negative regulation of Clb/Cdk (24).
The results in this paper suggest that the Polo kinase Cdc5
functionally interacts with Swe1. This conclusion is based on multiple
pieces of evidence. Most interestingly, a population of cells
overproducing Cdc5 has an increased, although low (2.5%), frequency of
multinucleate cells. Mitosis appears to be unlinked from bud formation
in response to Cdc5 overproduction (Fig. 1). Bud formation requires the
action of G1 or Cln cyclins and is inhibited by the mitotic
cyclins Clb1 and Clb2, in combination with Cdk (2, 25, 26,
40). Mutants lacking the APC cofactor Cdh1/Hct1 accumulate
Clb1/Cdk and Clb2/Cdk activity in G1 (39, 47).
We find that a population of cdh1/hct1 null cells has a low
frequency of multinucleate cells (1.8%). Strikingly, Cdc5
overproduction or deletion of SWE1 in combination with a
deletion in CDH1/HCT1 results in the formation of
multinucleate cells at a dramatically higher frequency (18 and 20%,
respectively). The cdh1/hct1 swe1 cells undergo mitosis in
the absence of bud formation. Therefore, Swe1 prevents the mitotic
Cdk from triggering mitotic progression in the absence of bud formation.
Interestingly, Wee1 plays a similar role in S. pombe, where
it functions to prevent premature mitosis in cells lacking Ste9, the
homolog of Cdh1/Hct1 (21). The comparable responses of
cdh1/hct1 cells to the deletion of SWE1 or the
overexpression of Cdc5 suggest that Cdc5 overexpression is titrating
Swe1 function in the cdh1/hct1 cells. In agreement with this
proposal, Swe1-dependent phenotypes in hsl1 and
hsl7 mutant cells are suppressed by overexpression of
wild-type Cdc5 or a catalytically inactive form (Fig. 4). Because Cdc5
overproduction by itself triggers the formation of multinucleate cells
whereas deletion of Swe1 does not, Cdc5 overproduction most likely
affects the function of additional factors. It is also possible that
high levels of Cdc5 prevent down-regulation of mitotic Cdks by
means other than down-regulation of Swe1 activity. It will be
interesting to determine whether the interaction between Wee1 and Polo
kinases is conserved in other systems. Intriguingly, overexpression of
the wild-type or catalytically inactive form of the mammalian Polo
kinase Plk1 in HeLa cells results in the formation of multinucleate
cells (35).
Polo is a potential negative regulator of Wee1.
In fission
yeast, Wee1 is negatively regulated by the Nim1 kinase (9, 12,
36, 38, 51). The C-terminal region of Wee1 that forms the
kinase domain is phosphorylated by Nim1 in vitro, resulting in complete
inactivation of the Wee1 kinase activity (9, 36, 51).
However, regulation of Wee1 most likely involves additional
factors, as fission yeast cells lacking Nim1 activity are only
slightly delayed in the G2 phase (38). A
kinase activity in mitotic Xenopus extracts produces a
60-kDa change in the apparent molecular mass of recombinant
fission yeast Wee1 (44). This hyperphosphorylated form of
Wee1 is defective for phosphorylation of Clb/Cdk. In contrast to Nim1,
the phosphorylation catalyzed by the mitotic Xenopus
extracts is restricted to the N-terminal portion of Wee1
(44).
In budding yeast, Swe1 is negatively regulated by the Nim1-like kinase
Hsl1, and there is a decrease in the level of Swe1 phosphorylated forms
in hsl1 mutant cells (42). It is not known what
region of Swe1 is targeted for phosphorylation by Hsl1. Interestingly, we find that Cdc5 interacts with the N-terminal region of Swe1 (Fig.
2). In addition, in cells overproducing Cdc5 or cdc5N209A, Swe1 is
converted to a form with an apparent molecular mass increase of 60 or
30 kDa, respectively (Fig. 7). We have not been able to
immunoprecipitate the modified forms of Swe1 to determine whether the
changes in mobility are due to direct phosphorylation. The largest Swe1
mobility shift to the slowest-migrating form requires Cdc5 kinase
activity. However, a shift is observed in cells overexpressing the
catalytically inactive cdc5N209A. As Swe1 is targeted to SPBs in
response to Cdc5 or cdc5N209A overproduction, other kinases associated
with SPBs may be responsible for modifying Swe1. These include both
Dbf2 and Cdc15 (14, 52); however, interactions between
Swe1 and either Dbf2 or Cdc15 have not been reported.
The inhibitory phosphorylation of the N terminus of Wee1 by the kinase
activity in Xenopus mitotic extracts requires the addition of the phosphatase inhibitor okadaic acid (44).
Okadaic acid is specific for protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A)-like
phosphatases. Interestingly, purification from recombinant
baculovirus systems of active Cdc5 and of Plx1 (the Xenopus
Polo kinase) requires the addition of okadaic acid (23;
Woo and Hardy, unpublished). This correlates with observations that
Polo kinases including Cdc5 are activated by phosphorylation (8,
22, 37, 45). Taken together, these results suggest that Plx
maybe the N-terminal inhibitory kinase for Wee1. Intriguingly, budding
yeast cells that lack the PP2A regulatory subunit Cdc55 are defective
in degradation of Swe1 (53). We speculate that
cdc55 mutant cells maybe defective in Swe1 degradation
because misregulated PP2A targets Cdc5 for inactivation. Alternatively,
the misregulated PP2A may target Swe1 or Hsl1.
Possible role for Cdc5 at SPBs.
Mutant analyses in
Drosophila, S. pombe, and mammals indicate that Polo kinases
play a key role in the formation of bipolar spindles (15).
Does Cdc5 play a role in spindle formation? The characterized mutant
cdc5 alleles have no reported defects in bipolar spindle
formation. However, the cdc5-1 mutant has been linked to
microtubule function. After release of the cdc5-1 mutant from a temperature-induced block, the cdc5-1 cells become
insensitive to the microtubule-depolymerizing drug
methylbenzimidazole-2-yl carbamate (50). In budding
yeast, formation of a short bipolar spindle takes places in S phase,
and this step is inhibited by overexpression of Swe1 (28).
Swe1 expressed from its endogenous promoter is localized to the mother
bud neck (30; Woo and Hardy, unpublished). However, when
overproduced, Swe1 is also found in the nucleus and at SPBs (Woo and
Hardy, unpublished). In this report, we show that Swe1 expressed from
its endogenous promoter is targeted to SPBs in response to Cdc5 or
cdc5N209A overproduction (Fig. 6). Cdc5 is localized to SPBs just prior
to SPB separation, positioning it for a role in Swe1 regulation (Woo
and Hardy, unpublished).
In mammalian cells, Wee1 has been localized to the nucleus but has not
been found at the microtubule-organizing centers or centrosomes
(4, 17). In addition, Wee1 has not been reported to
interact with Polo kinases in other systems. However, it is interesting
that in fission yeast cells with a mutation in the SPB component
Stf1/Cut12, the requirement for Cdc25 is bypassed and Plo1, the Polo
kinase in S. pombe, is prematurely recruited to the SPB
(7). Cdc25 is a tyrosine phosphatase that opposes Wee1
function and activates Cdc2. The stf1/cut12 mutant
cells may bypass Cdc25 by allowing Plo1 to prematurely access and
negatively regulate Wee1.
Polo interacts with multiple regulators of mitotic Cdk
activity.
Plx1, the Polo kinase in Xenopus, was
isolated as a Cdc25-interacting factor, and studies have suggested
that Polo activates Cdc2 by phosphorylating and activating Cdc25
(23, 37). Recently it has been shown that the Polo kinase
Plk1 in vertebrate cells regulates the nuclear localization of cyclin
B1 (46). Plk1 phosphorylates an essential serine residue
in the nuclear export signal sequence of cyclin B1 allowing the
Cdc2-cyclin B1 complex to accumulate in the nucleus during prophase.
Our work shows that Cdc5, the Polo kinase in budding yeast, interacts
with Swe1. Further work will be required to determine the function of
such a Polo-Wee1 interaction. However, combined with these earlier
results, our results lead us to conclude that Polo kinase is a key
coordinator for activation of Cdc2 during G2/M.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank D. Morgan, J. Charles, J. Kilmartin, R. Booher, A. Straight, A. Murray, A. Amon, M. Grunstein, K. Nasmyth, and D. Lew for
strains and plasmids. We thank S. Wente and H. Piwnica-Worms for
critical comments.
This work was supported by a grant from NIH to C.F.J.H.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Cell Biology and Physiology, Washington University School of Medicine, Box 8232, 660 South Euclid Ave., St. Louis, MO 63110. Phone: (314) 747-1808. Fax: (314) 362-7855. E-mail:
chardy{at}genetics.wustl.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Aitchison, J. D.,
M. P. Rout,
M. Marelli,
G. Blobel, and R. W. Wozniak.
1995.
Two novel related yeast nucleoporins Nup170p and Nup157p: complementation with the vertebrate homologue Nup155p and functional interactions with the yeast nuclear pore-membrane protein Pom152p.
J. Cell Biol.
131:1133-1148[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
|
Amon, A.,
S. Irniger, and K. Nasmyth.
1994.
Closing the cell cycle circle in yeast: G2 cyclin proteolysis initiated at mitosis persists until the activation of G1 cyclins in the next cycle.
Cell
77:1037-1050[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Bahler, J.,
A. B. Steever,
S. Wheatley,
Y. Wang,
J. R. Pringle,
K. L. Gould, and D. McCollum.
1998.
Role of polo kinase and Mid1p in determining the site of cell division in fission yeast.
J. Cell Biol.
143:1603-1616[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Baldin, V., and B. Ducommun.
1995.
Subcellular localization of human wee1 kinase is regulated during the cell cycle.
J. Cell Sci.
108:2425-2432[Abstract].
|
| 5.
|
Barral, Y.,
M. Parra,
S. Bidlingmaier, and M. Snyder.
1999.
Nim1-related kinases coordinate cell cycle progression with the organization of the peripheral cytoskeleton in yeast.
Genes Dev.
13:176-187[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Booher, R. N.,
R. J. Deshaies, and M. W. Kirschner.
1993.
Properties of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Wee1 and its differential regulation of p34CDC28 in response to G1 and G2 cyclins.
EMBO J.
12:3417-3426[Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Bridge, A. J.,
M. Morphew,
R. Bartlett, and I. M. Hagan.
1998.
The fission yeast SPB component Cut12 links bipolar spindle formation to mitotic control.
Genes Dev.
12:927-942[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Cheng, L.,
L. Hunke, and C. F. J. Hardy.
1998.
Cell cycle regulation of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Polo-like kinase Cdc5p.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:7360-7370[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Coleman, T. R.,
Z. Tang, and W. G. Dunphy.
1993.
Negative regulation of the wee1 protein kinase by direct action of the nim1/cdr1 mitotic inducer.
Cell
72:919-929[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Cormack, B.,
R. H. Valdivia, and S. Falkow.
1996.
FACS-optimized mutants of the green fluorescent protein (GFP).
Gene
173:33-38[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Donaldson, A. D., and J. V. Kilmartin.
1996.
Spc42: a phosphorylated component of the S. cerevisiae spindle pole body (SPB) with an essential function during SPB duplication.
J. Cell Biol.
132:887-901[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Dunphy, W. G.
1994.
The decision to enter mitosis.
Trends Cell Biol.
4:202-207[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Epstein, C. B., and F. R. Cross.
1992.
CLB5: a novel B cyclin from budding yeast with a role in S phase.
Genes Dev.
6:1695-1706[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Frenz, L.,
S. Lee,
D. Fesquet, and L. Johnston.
2000.
The budding yeast Dbf2 protein kinase localises to the centrosome and moves to the bud neck late in mitosis.
J. Cell Sci.
113:3399-3408[Abstract].
|
| 15.
|
Glover, D. M.,
I. Hagan, and A. A. M. Tavares.
1998.
Polo-like kinases: a team that plays throughout mitosis.
Genes Dev.
12:3777-3787[Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Golsteyn, R. M.,
K. E. Mundt,
A. M. Fry, and E. A. Nigg.
1995.
Cell cycle regulation of the activity and subcellular localization of Plk1, a human protein kinase implicated in mitotic spindle function.
J. Cell Biol.
129:1617-1628[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 17.
|
Heald, R.,
M. McLoughlin, and F. McKeon.
1993.
Human Wee1 maintains mitotic timing by protecting the nucleus from cytoplasmically activated Cdc2 kinase.
Cell
74:463-474[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Ito, H.,
Y. Fukada,
K. Murata, and A. Kimura.
1983.
Transformation of intact yeast cells treated with alkali cations.
J. Bacteriol.
153:163-168[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Jacobs, C. W.,
A. E. M. Adams,
P. J. Szaniszlo, and J. R. Pringle.
1988.
Functions of microtubules in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell cycle.
J. Cell Biol.
107:1409-1426[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
James, P.,
J. Halladay, and E. A. Craig.
1996.
Genomic libraries and a host strain designed for highly efficient two-hybrid selection in yeast.
Genetics
144:1425-1436[Abstract].
|
| 21.
|
Kitamura, K.,
H. Maekawa, and C. Shimoda.
1998.
Fission yeast Ste9, a homolog of Hct1/Cdh1 and fizzy related, is a novel negative regulator of cell cycle progression during G1 phase.
Mol. Biol. Cell.
9:1065-1080[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Kotani, K.,
S. Tugendreich,
M. Fujii,
P. Jorgensen,
N. Watanabe,
C. Hoog,
P. Hieter, and K. Todokoro.
1998.
PKA and MPF-activated Polo-like kinase regulate anaphase promoting complex activity and mitotic progression.
Mol. Cell
1:371-380[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 23.
|
Kumagai, A., and W. Dunphy.
1996.
Purification and molecular cloning of Plx1, a Cdc25-regulatory kinase from Xenopus egg extracts.
Science
273:1377-1380[Abstract].
|
| 24.
|
Lew, D. J.
2000.
Cell-cycle checkpoints that ensure coordination between nuclear and cytoplasmic events in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
10:47-53[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 25.
|
Lew, D. J., and S. I. Reed.
1995.
Cell cycle control of morphogenesis in budding yeast.
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
5:17-23[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 26.
|
Lew, D. J., and S. I. Reed.
1993.
Morphogenesis in the yeast cell cycle: regulation by Cdc28 and cyclins.
J. Cell Biol.
120:1305-1320[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 27.
|
Lew, D. J.,
T. Weinert, and J. R. Pringle.
1997.
Cell cycle control in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, p. 607-696.
In
J. R. Pringle, J. R. Broach, and E. W. Jones (ed.), The molecular and cellular biology of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, vol. 3. Cell cycle and cell biology. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 28.
|
Lim, H. H.,
P.-H. Goh, and U. Surana.
1996.
Spindle pole body separation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae requires dephoshorylation of the tyrosine 19 residue of Cdc28.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16:6385-6397[Abstract].
|
| 29.
|
Logarinho, E., and C. E. Sunkel.
1998.
The Drosophila mitotic kinase Polo localises to the centrosome, centromeres and spindle midzone during mitosis and contributes to the phosphorylation of MPM2 reactive epitopes.
J. Cell Sci.
111:2897-2909[Abstract].
|
| 30.
|
Longtine, M. S.,
C. L. Theesfeld,
J. N. McMillan,
E. Weaver,
J. R. Pringle, and D. J. Lew.
2000.
Septin-dependent assembly of a cell cycle-regulatory module in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20:4049-4061[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 31.
|
Ma, X. J.,
Q. Lu, and M. Grunstein.
1996.
A search for proteins that interact genetically with histone H3 and H4 amino termini uncovers novel regulators of the Swe1 kinase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Genes Dev.
10:1327-1340[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 32.
|
McMillan, J. N.,
M. S. Longtine,
R. A. Sia,
C. L. Theesfeld,
E. S. Bardes,
J. R. Pringle, and D. J. Lew.
1999.
The morphogenesis checkpoint in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: cell cycle control of Swe1p degradation by Hsl1p and Hsl7p.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19:6929-6939[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 33.
|
McMillan, J. N.,
R. A. L. Sia, and D. J. Lew.
1998.
A morphogenesis checkpoint monitors the actin cytoskeleton in yeast.
J. Cell Biol.
142:1487-1499[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 34.
|
Mulvihill, D. P.,
J. Petersen,
H. Ohkura,
D. M. Glover, and I. M. Hagan.
1999.
Plo1 kinase recruitment to the spindle pole body and its role in cell division in Schizosaccharomyces pombe.
Mol. Biol. Cell.
10:2771-2785[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 35.
|
Mundt, K. E.,
R. M. Golsteyn,
H. A. Lane, and E. A. Nigg.
1997.
On the regulation and function of human Polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1): effects of overexpression on cell cycle progression.
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
239:377-385[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 36.
|
Parker, L. L.,
S. A. Walter,
P. G. Young, and H. Piwnica-Worms.
1993.
Phosphorylation and inactivation of the mitotic inhibitor wee1 by the nim1/cdr1 kinase.
Nature
363:736-738[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 37.
|
Qian, Y.,
E. Erikson,
C. Li, and J. L. Maller.
1998.
Activated Polo-Like kinase Plx1 is required at multiple points during mitosis in Xenopus laevis.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:4262-4271[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 38.
|
Russell, P., and P. Nurse.
1987.
The mitotic inducer nim1+ functions in a regulatory network of protein kinase homologs controlling the initiation of mitosis.
Cell
49:569-76[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 39.
|
Schwab, M.,
A. S. Lutum, and W. Seufert.
1997.
Yeast Hct1 is a regulator of Clb2 cyclin proteolysis.
Cell
90:683-693[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 40.
|
Shimada, Y.,
M. Gulli, and M. Peter.
2000.
Nuclear sequestration of the exchange factor Cdc24 by Far1 regulates cell polarity during cell mating.
Nat. Cell Biol.
2:117-124[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 41.
|
Shirayama, M.,
W. Zachariae,
R. Coisk, and K. Nasmyth.
1998.
The Polo-like kinase Cdc5p and the WD-repeat protein Cdc20/fizzzy are regulators and substrates of the anaphase promoting complex in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
EMBO J.
17:1336-1349[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 42.
|
Shulewitz, M. J.,
C. J. Inouye, and J. Thorner.
1999.
Hsl7 localizes to a septin ring and serves as an adapter in a regulatory pathway that relieves tyrosine phosphorylation of Cdc28 protein kinase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19:7123-7137[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 43.
|
Song, S.,
T. Grenfell,
S. Garfield,
R. Erikson, and K. Lee.
2000.
Essential function of the polo box of Cdc5 in subcellular localization and induction of cytokinetic structures.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20:286-298[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 44.
|
Tang, Z.,
T. R. Coleman, and W. G. Dunphy.
1993.
Two distinct mechanisms for negative regulation of the Wee1 protein kinase.
EMBO J.
12:3427-3436[Medline].
|
| 45.
|
Tavares, A.,
D. Glover, and C. Sunkel.
1996.
The conserved mitotic kinase polo is regulated by phosphorylation and has preferred microtubule-associated substrates in Drosophila embryo extracts.
EMBO J.
15:4873-4883[Medline].
|
| 46.
|
Toyoshima-Morimoto, F.,
E. Taniguchi,
N. Shinya,
A. Iwamatsu, and E. Nishida.
2001.
Polo-like kinases phosphorylates cyclin B1 and targets it to the nucleus during prophase.
Nature
410:215-220[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 47.
|
Visintin, R.,
S. Prinz, and A. Amon.
1997.
CDC20 and CDH1: a family of substrate-specific activators of APC-dependent proteolysis.
Science
278:460-463[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 48.
|
Waddle, J. A.,
T. S. Karpova,
R. H. Waterston, and J. A. Cooper.
1996.
Movement of cortical actin patches in yeast.
J. Cell Biol.
132:861-870[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 49.
|
Wente, S. R.,
M. P. Rout, and G. Blobel.
1992.
A new family of yeast nuclear pore complex proteins.
J. Cell Biol.
119:705-723[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 50.
|
Wood, J. S., and L. H. Hartwell.
1982.
A dependent pathway of gene functions leading to chromosome segregation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
J. Cell Biol.
94:718-726[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 51.
|
Wu, L., and P. Russell.
1993.
Nim1 kinase promotes mitosis by inactivating Wee1 tyrosine kinase.
Nature
363:738-741[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 52.
|
Xu, S.,
H. Huang,
P. Kaiser,
M. Latterich, and T. Hunter.
2000.
Phosphorylation and spindle pole body localization of the Cdc15p mitotic regulatory protein kinase in budding yeast.
Curr. Biol.
10:329-332[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 53.
|
Yang, H.,
W. Jiang,
M. Gentry, and R. L. Hallberg.
2000.
Loss of a protein phosphatase 2A regulatory subunit (Cdc55p) elicits improper regulation of Swe1 degradation.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20:8143-8156[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Molecular and Cellular Biology, August 2001, p. 4949-4959, Vol. 21, No. 15
0270-7306/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/MCB.21.15.4949-4959.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Tallada, V. A., Bridge, A. J., Emery, P. A., Hagan, I. M.
(2007). Suppression of the Schizosaccharomyces pombe cut12.1 Cell-Cycle Defect by Mutations in cdc25 and Genes Involved in Transcriptional and Translational Control. Genetics
176: 73-83
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Watanabe, N., Arai, H., Iwasaki, J.-i., Shiina, M., Ogata, K., Hunter, T., Osada, H.
(2005). Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) phosphorylation destabilizes somatic Wee1 via multiple pathways. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
102: 11663-11668
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Yamada, A., Duffy, B., Perry, J. A., Kornbluth, S.
(2004). DNA replication checkpoint control of Wee1 stability by vertebrate Hsl7. J. Cell Biol.
167: 841-849
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
MacIver, F. H., Tanaka, K., Robertson, A. M., Hagan, I. M.
(2003). Physical and functional interactions between polo kinase and the spindle pole component Cut12 regulate mitotic commitment in S. pombe. Genes Dev.
17: 1507-1523
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Bachewich, C., Thomas, D. Y., Whiteway, M.
(2003). Depletion of a Polo-like Kinase in Candida albicans Activates Cyclase-dependent Hyphal-like Growth. Mol. Biol. Cell
14: 2163-2180
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Park, C. J., Song, S., Lee, P. R., Shou, W., Deshaies, R. J., Lee, K. S.
(2003). Loss of CDC5 Function in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Leads to Defects in Swe1p Regulation and Bfa1p/Bub2p-Independent Cytokinesis. Genetics
163: 21-33
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
McMillan, J. N., Theesfeld, C. L., Harrison, J. C., Bardes, E. S. G., Lew, D. J.
(2002). Determinants of Swe1p Degradation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Biol. Cell
13: 3560-3575
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Cid, V. J., Jimenez, J., Molina, M., Sanchez, M., Nombela, C., Thorner, J. W.
(2002). Orchestrating the cell cycle in yeast: sequential localization of key mitotic regulators at the spindle pole and the bud neck. Microbiology
148: 2647-2659
[Full Text]