Division of Basic Science, Fox Chase Cancer
Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19111,1 and
Oncology Research Unit, The Children's Hospital at Westmead,
Westmead, New South Wales 2145, Australia2
Received 26 October 2000/Returned for modification 11 December
2000/Accepted 9 May 2001
The dynamic regulation of focal adhesions is implicated in cellular
processes of proliferation, differentiation, migration, and apoptosis.
The focal adhesion-associated docking protein HEF1 is cleaved by
caspases during both mitosis and apoptosis. Common to both of these
cellular processes is the loss of focal adhesions, transiently during
mitosis and permanently during apoptosis. The proteolytic processing of
HEF1 during both mitosis and apoptosis therefore posits a general role
for HEF1 as a sensor of altered adhesion states. In this study, we find
that HEF1 undergoes proteolytic processing specifically in response to
cellular detachment, while HEF1 proteolysis is prevented by specific
integrin receptor ligation and focal adhesion formation. We show that
overexpression of a C-terminal caspase-derived 28-kDa HEF1 peptide
causes cellular rounding that is demonstrably separable from apoptosis.
Mutation of the divergent helix-loop-helix motif found in 28-kDa HEF1
significantly reduces the induction of apoptosis by this peptide, while
deletion of the amino-terminal 28 amino acids of 28-kDa HEF1 completely abrogates the induction of apoptosis. Conversely, these mutations have
no effect on the rounding induced by 28-kDa HEF1. Finally, we detect a
novel focal adhesion targeting domain located in the C terminus of HEF1
and show that this activity is necessary for HEF1-induced cell
spreading. Together, these data suggest that proteolytic and other
posttranslational modifications of HEF1 in response to loss of adhesion
serve to modulate the disassembly of focal adhesions.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Focal adhesions possess a dual
function as points of structural linkage between the extracellular
matrix (ECM), transmembrane integrin receptors, and the internal
cytoskeleton and as sensors of the extracellular environment that
transduce signals controlling cellular decisions to proliferate,
differentiate, or undergo apoptosis. Dynamic regulation of focal
adhesion components is required for a number of different cellular
functions. For example, at the approach to the mitotic phase of the
cell cycle, cells round up and decrease adhesion to the ECM, with
replacement of attachments synchronized to the process of cytokinesis
and reentry into G1. During migration, cells must
rapidly break down and reform adhesions with the ECM (31).
The formation of novel integrin/ECM interactions can specify cellular
differentiation by activating specific signaling cascades, culminating
in the induction of differentiation-promoting transcription factors and
in parallel enforcing removal from the cell cycle (7). The
importance of attachments for normal function of primary cells is
emphasized by the fact that in many cell types, sustained loss of
adhesion is a sufficient stimulus to induce apoptosis, in a process
known as anoikis (13). Hence, one frequent effect of
oncogenic transformation is the circumvention of the adhesion-viability
coupling, leading to acquisition by cancer cells of the ability to grow
in an anchorage-independent manner (50). Based on these
diverse biological roles, there has been considerable research directed
at elucidating the role of focal adhesions in integrin-mediated
adhesion (49). Presently, the issue of how modulation of
focal adhesion components may differentially signal to the nucleus in
cases of transient versus permanent loss of adhesion is of particular interest.
One mechanism that seems likely to play an important role in
communicating cellular adhesion status to the nucleus is the transient
or permanent posttranslational modification of focal adhesion
components. A particularly well-studied example is that of focal
adhesion kinase (FAK). The in vitro data suggesting that regulation of
FAK activity controls apoptosis (15, 22, 57) has an
intriguing in vivo corollary in the observation that FAK is cleaved by
caspases during the process of terminal detachment occurring in
apoptosis (36, 55). Caspase cleavage separates two FAK
functional domains, the kinase domain and the C-terminal focal adhesion
targeting (FAT) domain. In normally growing adherent cells, exogenously
expressed FAK C-terminal peptides corresponding to the caspase cleavage
products act as dominant negatives on the full-length FAK molecule by
inhibiting phosphorylation of FAK (16). The fact that this
peptide causes cell rounding (36, 58, 59) and apoptosis
(3, 58) suggests that the FAK cleavage products produced
in apoptosis may play an active role in advancing the process of cell
death by promoting focal adhesion disassembly. In particular, an
interaction between FAK and one or more molecules which interact with
the polyproline motif is essential for prevention of apoptosis
(3). To date, only Cas proteins and Graf (49) have been identified as interacting with the FAK polyproline motifs, potentially implicating them in this control process. Finally, during
more transient disruptions of cell attachment, such as occur in cell
cycle progression, phosphorylation of FAK on serine and threonine
residues has been identified and proposed to prevent the interaction of
FAK with other signaling molecules during the cell rounding that
accompanies mitosis (60). In sum, these results indicate
that discrete modes of FAK modulation can result in either reversible
or irreversible focal adhesion loss.
The Cas family proteins, p130Cas (47), Efs/Sin (2,
25), and HEF1/CasL (32, 41), are a family of
docking proteins which, among other roles, serve as important
intermediates in creating signaling complexes at sites of focal
adhesion (46). These proteins have a conserved overall
domain structure consisting of an amino-terminal Src homology 3 (SH3)
domain utilized for interaction with polyproline-containing partners, a
substrate domain containing multiple tyrosine residues that upon
phosphorylation mediate interaction with SH2 domain-containing
proteins, and a highly conserved C terminus that has been proposed to
mediate homo- and heterodimerization among the family members
(46) and may mediate interaction with other molecules
(48). Cas proteins can localize to focal adhesions via
interactions between their amino-terminal SH3 domains and a polyproline
stretch in the C terminus of FAK (43). However, it has
further been reported that a region in the C terminus of p130Cas
contributes to the localization of p130Cas at focal adhesions in
transformed cells (43). FAK coexpression with a truncation
of p130Cas lacking the SH3 domain results in apoptosis
(3). Combined with the report that mutation of the FAK
polyproline motif mediating interaction with Cas proteins generates an
apoptotic response, it appears that regulation of the FAK-Cas
association is essential for cellular viability.
Finally, recent observations that a number of adhesion complex
components undergo caspase-mediated cleavage during apoptosis suggest
that this may be a common mechanism for the down-regulation of
adhesion-mediated signals and may actively promote the progression of
cell death. Caspase cleavage targets at adhesion complexes include
adherens junctions proteins (5, 20), Cbl and Src (56), and the Cas proteins p130Cas (5, 28,
33) and HEF1 (33). Strikingly, HEF1 is not only
cleaved during apoptosis but also at mitosis in a reaction targeting
two distinct caspase-sensitive sites (a DLVD motif at amino acids
[aa] 360 to 363 and a DDYD motif at aa 627 to 630), and the
processing of the peptides released following caspase cleavage differs
in mitosis and apoptosis. Caspase cleavage of HEF1 in mitosis produces
a stable 55-kDa N-terminal peptide that localizes to the mitotic
spindle (35) and unstable 65- and 28-kDa C-terminal
peptides that are rapidly degraded (33, 35). In apoptosis,
the 28-kDa peptide is stabilized and is proposed to contribute to the
apoptotic progression, based on the identification of a potent activity
in inducing cell death associated with exogenous production of the
species in normally growing cells (33). At present, the
pathways controlling the alternative processing of HEF1 in mitosis and
apoptosis are unknown, as is the method of 28-kDa HEF1 in inducing its
phenotypes. However, one particularly interesting possibility is that
the promotion of cell death by this species may be integrally
associated with induction of cellular detachment.
Considering the role of HEF1 at focal adhesions (46),
cleavage of HEF1 during mitosis (35) and apoptosis
(33), and the induction of apoptosis in cell lines
constructed to overexpress inducible HEF1 (33), we have
explored the control of HEF1 proteolysis in response to changes in
cellular adhesive status. Additionally, we have probed the relationship
between cell-rounding effects and apoptosis related to 28-kDa HEF1
expression. We find that HEF1 is dephosphorylated and proteolytically
cleaved following culture of MCF7 cells in serum-free medium (SFM),
under conditions that inhibit cell attachment. HEF1 is protected from
this cleavage by attachment to solid support prior to serum removal and
by stimulation of integrin receptors via binding to either fibronectin
or laminin attached to a solid matrix but not by treatment of suspended
cells with soluble integrin ligands. Cleavage of HEF1 is preceded by loss of hyperphosphorylated HEF1. HEF1 cleavage is demonstrated to
occur in the absence of detectable apoptosis, therefore separating the
two processes. Further, we show here that cell rounding induced by
overexpression of the 28-kDa HEF1 occurs even in the presence of the
apoptosis inhibitor z-VAD-fmk, providing additional support for the
idea that HEF1-dependent rounding and death are separable. Finally, we
demonstrate that discrete mutations of the 28-kDa peptide can be
generated which differently impact rounding and apoptosis. Mutation of
a predicted divergent helix-loop-helix (dHLH) domain in the C terminus
of HEF1 (33) significantly reduces apoptosis induction,
while deletion of the amino-terminal 28-aa residues of 28-kDa HEF1
completely abrogates apoptosis induction, yet none of these mutations
affect rounding. We further show that the region of 28-kDa HEF1 that
stimulates rounding is located in the C-terminal end of the peptide. We
identify a novel focal adhesion localizing activity in the C-terminal
region corresponding to 28-kDa HEF1; deletion of this region prevents
HEF1-mediated cell spreading. Based on these findings, we propose that
regulation of the posttranslational modification of HEF1 results in
production of a complex mixture of HEF1 isoforms which collaborate to
control cell morphology, attachment, and viability.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Cell lines, antibodies, and materials.
Except where
indicated, MCF7 breast carcinoma cells were cultured in Dulbecco's
modified Eagle medium (DMEM) with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) at
37°C with 5% CO2. The anti-HEF1 rabbit
polyclonal antibody has been previously described (anti-HEF1-SB)
(32). Other antibodies used include anti-p130Cas (here
labeled anti-HEF1/2, as the antibody cross-reacts with the
carboxy-terminal domain of both HEF1 and p130Cas; see Fig. 4B);
antipaxillin antibodies from Transduction Laboratories (San Diego,
Calif.); antiphosphotyrosine clone 4G10 from Santa Cruz (Santa Cruz,
Calif); anti-
1 integrin antibody clone P4C10 from Gibco BRL
(Rockville, Md.); rhodamine-conjugated goat anti-mouse antibodies from
Molecular Probes (Eugene, Oreg.); and anti-mouse immunoglobulin and
anti-rabbit immunoglobulin horseradish peroxidase conjugates from
Amersham Pharmacia Biotech (Piscataway, N.J.). Fibronectin,
poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (poly-HEMA), laminin,
poly-L-lysine, protein A-Sepharose, and
4',6'-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) were purchased from Sigma (St.
Louis, Mo.). Transfection reagent Lt1 was obtained from Mirus (Madison,
Wis.).
Expression constructs.
The vector pEGFP-C4 (Clontech, Palo
Alto, Calif.) was used to create fusion protein expression constructs
consisting of green fluorescent protein (GFP) fused to the amino
terminus of HEF1 peptides (see Fig. 4A). Expression constructs encoding
full-length HEF1 (pGFP.HEF1, aa 1 to 834) and the 28-kDa HEF1 peptide
(pGFP.28, aa 626 to 834) have been previously described
(33). Additional HEF1 mutant constructs containing
lysine-to-proline amino acid substitutions in the first helix (pGFP.H1
[aa 626 to 834, L722P]) and in the second helix (pGFP.H2 [aa 626 to
834, L751P]) and encoding peptides corresponding to truncated forms of
28-kDa HEF1 (pGFP.M654 [aa 654 to 834],
pGFP.28
CT [aa 626 to 693], pGFP.M654
CT
[aa 654 to 693], and pGFP.28
NH2 [aa 695 to 834]) were prepared
by subcloning EcoRI-XhoI cDNA inserts from
previously described clones (34) into
EcoRI-XhoI-digested pEGFP-C4 vector. The
construct containing mutations in both helices, pGFP.H1H2, was
created using pGFP.H1 as the template and standard protocols for
mutational PCR to create the second mutation. The presence of both
mutations was confirmed by DNA sequence analysis and the resulting PCR
fragment, constructed to contain 5' EcoRI and 3'
XhoI sites, was ligated with
EcoRI-XhoI-digested pEGFP-C4 DNA. Finally, a
mutant construct in which the C-terminal region corresponding to
the 28-kDa peptide was deleted (pGFP.HEF1
CT, aa 1 to 653) was
created by carrying out PCR on a full-length HEF1 template with primers
that correspond to the start site of HEF1 and the sequence located at
KELLIKENI653 followed by an in-frame stop codon.
Again, PCR was designed to create 5' EcoRI and 3'
XhoI sites. The PCR fragment was therefore ligated with
EcoRI-XhoI-digested pEGFP, and the resulting
clones were confirmed by DNA sequence analysis. Expression by
constructs of proteins of an appropriate molecular weight was confirmed
by Western blotting. Relative levels of fusion protein expression were
determined by visual examination with a fluorescence microscope and by
scoring GFP-positive cells for fluorescence (scale, 1+ to 4+, with 4+
representing strongest signal). Values reported represent the
percentage of cells scored with each level of fluorescence.
Plating cells on different extracellular matrices.
To test
the effects of integrin receptor ligation, cells were plated on tissue
culture dishes coated with different ECM components. Dishes (100-mm
diameter) were coated with 2 µg of
fibronectin/cm2 diluted in 5 ml of
phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), 2.5 µg of laminin/cm2 diluted in 5 ml of PBS, and 7 µg of
poly-L-lysine/cm2 in 5 ml of
distilled water. After 5 min, plates were rinsed with distilled water,
3 µg of anti-
1 integrin antibodies/cm2 kept
in 1 ml of PBS at 4°C overnight, and 80 µg/cm2 poly-HEMA diluted in 5 ml of 95%
ethanol. All coated plates were air dried overnight and rinsed twice
with PBS before use. For suspension cultures, 5 ml of media was
supplemented with either 150 µg of fibronectin or 200 µg of
laminin. Prior to plating, MCF7 cells were grown to ~80% confluence.
Cells were then detached by treatment with 3 mM EDTA in PBS and
collected by centrifugation. Pelleted cells were resuspended in either
DMEM containing 10% FBS or in unsupplemented DMEM (SFM), and ECM
components were added as indicated.
Immunoprecipitation.
Cell lysates (250-µg aliquots) were
incubated with 2 µg of antipaxillin antibodies for 2 h at 4°C.
Next, 20 µl of a 50% slurry of protein A-Sepharose prepared in A-PTY
buffer (50 mM HEPES [pH 7.5], 50 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 1% Triton
X-100, 50 mM NaF, and 10 mM
Na4P2O7
supplemented immediately before use with 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 0.01-mg/ml aprotinin, 0.01-mg/ml leupeptin, and 1 mM Na3VO4) was added, and
reaction mixtures were incubated overnight at 4°C. On the following
day, protein A-Sepharose beads were collected by centrifugation at
20,000 × g for 15 s and were washed three times
with A-PTY lysis buffer, and immunoprecipitated proteins were released
from the beads by boiling in sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis loading buffer for 10 min.
Preparation of cell lysates and Western blot analysis.
Cell
lysates were prepared by extraction with A-PTY buffer. For adherent
cultures, only those cells adhering to the plate were extracted. For
cells grown on poly-HEMA-coated dishes, suspended cells were collected
by centrifugation of the media and were then extracted with A-PTY
buffer. Total protein concentrations were determined using the
bicinchoninic acid protein determination kit (Pierce), and equivalent
concentrations of proteins were separated by sodium dodecyl
sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Western blots were probed
with anti-HEF1 antibodies at a dilution of 1/100, and all other
antibodies were used at the manufacturer's recommended dilutions.
Chemiluminescence detection was performed as described elsewhere
(35). We note that expression of each HEF1-derived
construct was confirmed by Western analysis and that each construct was
shown to produce a protein of the predicted size. Because of the
differing capacity of the constructs to induce apoptosis, resulting in
very different apparent transfection efficiencies, it was difficult to
effectively normalize expression levels between populations.
Transfection, caspase inhibition, and immunofluorescence.
MCF7 cells for transfection were plated onto microscope coverslips in
6-well tissue culture dishes 24 h prior to transfection. Cells
were then transfected with plasmid DNA (at a concentration of 0.1 µg/µl) in OptiMEM (Mirus) as described by the manufacturer. The
caspase inhibitor z-VAD-fmk was added at a concentration of 25 µM
following aspiration of the transfection complexes and remained in the
culture medium for the duration of the incubation period. Approximately
18 h after a change to DMEM plus 10% FBS, cells were fixed with
4% paraformaldehyde in PBS, permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100 in
PBS with 0.5% bovine serum albumin, and stained with 0.1 µg of
DAPI/ml in PBS with 0.5% bovine serum albumin. Detection of focal
adhesions by immunofluorescence analysis was carried out on MCF7 cells
grown on coverslips for 24 h in the presence of serum or SFM as
indicated. Cells were fixed and permeabilized as above and were then
stained with antipaxillin antibodies (1/800 dilution). Bound antibodies
were detected by probing with rhodamine-labeled anti-mouse secondary
antibodies. Images were prepared using a fluorescence microscope (Nikon
TE800) and charge-coupled device camera or by using the Bio-Rad 600 laser scanning confocal microscope.
Analysis of cell rounding and apoptosis.
Images of
GFP-positive cells were captured with a charge-coupled device camera
attached to a fluorescent microscope (Nikon TE800) under the 20×
objective. The area (reported in pixels) of imaged cells was calculated
for an average of 100 cells per transfection, which was carried out in
triplicate for each construct, using ISee software (Inovision)
to outline the perimeter of cells and calculate the area within the
perimeter. Data are expressed as the mean ± the standard error of
the mean. To determine the rate of apoptosis, transfected cells stained
with DAPI were viewed under the 40× objective of a fluorescence
microscope (Nikon TE800). Transfected cells, indicated by green
fluorescence, were then scored for the presence of apoptotic nuclei,
evidenced by small, condensed nuclei brightly stained with DAPI. The
number of apoptotic nuclei is expressed as a percentage of the total
nuclei scored; approximately 200 GFP-positive cells were scored per
transfection. Values shown are the mean from six separate
transfections ± standard error of the mean. Statistical
significance between means was calculated using the Student
t test.
 |
RESULTS |
HEF1 undergoes cleavage and is differentially phosphorylated in the
absence of focal adhesions.
Full-length HEF1 exists during
interphase as two isoforms that are approximately 105 and 115 kDa and
localizes to focal adhesions in adherent cells. The 115-kDa HEF1
protein is a hyperphosphorylated form of the 105-kDa protein
(35), with the hyperphosphorylation induced by integrin
engagement and other stimuli (46). In contrast to this
profile of HEF1 expression in interphase cells, it has previously been
shown that endogenous HEF1 is cleaved by a caspase-like activity during
mitosis (35), as well as during apoptosis induced by tumor
necrosis factor alpha treatment of MCF7 cells or induced by
antibody cross-linking of WEHI 231 B-cells (33), at two
caspase consensus sites, DLVD (aa 360 to 363) and DDYD (aa 627 to 630) (Fig. 1). During both mitosis and
apoptosis, cells round up and decrease contact with the ECM (that is,
have reduced focal adhesions), potentially indicating a convergent
control mechanism in these two processes. This suggests that HEF1 may
be cleaved under conditions where there is focal adhesion disassembly,
functioning as an indicator or mediator of the cellular detachment
process. To date, the processing of HEF1 in response to transient
cellular detachment has been unexamined.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Posttranslational modifications of HEF1 produce multiple
HEF1 isoforms. Shown is a schematic representation of the HEF1
isoforms, based on work presented elsewhere (32, 34, 35).
Indicated domains of HEF1 include an SH3 domain, a substrate binding
domain (SD) that includes numerous tyrosine residues that upon
phosphorylation mediate interaction with SH2 proteins, a serine-rich
region (SRR), and a conserved carboxy terminus encompassing a dHLH
domain. The antibody anti-HEF1 reacts with an epitope in the SD, while
the antibody anti-HEF1/2 reacts with an epitope in the carboxy-terminal
dHLH domain. *, it is not known whether cleavage to produce 65-kDa
HEF1 must precede production of 28-kDa HEF1 or whether 28-kDa HEF1 can
be produced by cleavage from other, full-length HEF1 isoforms.
Molecular masses are shown at left.
|
|
In light of the known cross talk between signals derived through
integrin receptors and growth factor receptors (17), we chose to examine HEF1 posttranslational modifications, including phosphorylation and cleavage status, under conditions that allow the
discrimination between these two signaling pathways. Initially, cleavage of endogenous HEF1 was assessed in MCF7 cells plated on
uncoated tissue culture dishes in SFM. MCF7 cells plated under these
conditions attached loosely but did not spread and form focal
adhesions, evidenced by a rounded, light-refractory appearance under
phase microscopy and by reduction in paxillin-positive focal adhesions
as determined by immunofluorescence microscopy (Fig. 2A). Proteolysis of HEF1 was next
examined by Western blot analysis of lysates from cells grown in SFM.
HEF1 cleavage peptides are detected at 4 h after plating in SFM
and continue to be detectable for at least 24 h (Fig. 2B), thereby
confirming the proteolytic processing of HEF1 under SFM conditions.


View larger version (78K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
HEF1 cleavage correlates with the absence of focal
adhesions. (A) MCF7 cells plated in FBS or SFM were fixed and probed
with antipaxillin antibodies. Examples of focal adhesions are indicated
with arrows. (B) MCF7 cells were detached (0 h) and replated in SFM and
maintained for the times indicated. (C) MCF7 cells were detached and
replated in SFM or in the presence of FBS, allowed to attach and spread
(~5 h), and then washed repeatedly with SFM and incubated in SFM
(noted in figure as FBS pretreated). All lysates were extracted at the
indicated times, and antibodies used to detect the proteins are listed
on the right side. Molecular masses of proteins are indicated on the
left side in kilodaltons.
|
|
To discriminate the possibility that HEF1 cleavage was induced by lack
of serum growth factors from the possibility that it was induced by
reduction in focal adhesions, we next tested HEF1 cleavage in SFM under
conditions in which the cells were first allowed to form focal
adhesions. This was achieved by initially plating cells on uncoated
dishes in the presence of serum. When the majority of the cells were
spread, correlating with the formation of focal adhesions (~5 h after
plating), they were washed repeatedly with SFM and were then incubated
in SFM for the indicated times. In contrast to control cells plated
directly in SFM, there is no production of HEF1 cleavage products in
the population of cells that were allowed to first form focal adhesions
and were then grown in SFM (Fig. 2C, FBS pretreated). The absence of
HEF1 cleavage products is maintained throughout continued incubation of
preattached cells in SFM for up to 72 h (results not shown). We
note that the serum-pretreated cells remained attached and spread on
the surface of the tissue culture plate despite the absence of serum. Thus, prevention of HEF1 cleavage correlates specifically with the
presence of multiple focal adhesions and a spread phenotype, rather
than with the continued presence of serum in growth medium.
Separately, examination of MCF7 cell lysates shows an altered pattern
of HEF1 phosphorylation in response to SFM. Lysates prepared
immediately upon detachment from the tissue culture dish display both
the 105- and 115-kDa isoforms (Fig. 2B, time zero). Following growth
under SFM conditions, there is an early loss of hyperphosphorylated
115-kDa HEF1 (~2 h after plating), while the 105-kDa HEF1 form is
detectable up to 24 h after treatment (Fig. 2B). Notably, loss of
hyperphosphorylated 115-kDa HEF1 preceded cleavage (Fig. 2B). In
contrast, there is maintenance of the hyperphosphorylated HEF1 115-kDa
form in the cells that were allowed to first form focal adhesions by
pretreatment with FBS (Fig. 2C). These results suggest that in the
absence of focal adhesions, there is firstly a loss of HEF1
hyperphosphorylation followed by cleavage of HEF1. While it is possible
that preferential cleavage of the hyperphosphorylated HEF1 form
accounts for the early loss of this species, this seems unlikely, given
that at 2 h after plating in SFM there is no detectable 115-kDa
HEF1, while few or no corresponding HEF1 cleavage products are
detectable (Fig. 2B and C). It is likely, therefore, that the 105-kDa
HEF1 form may represent the preferred caspase substrate.
In sum, these results suggest that HEF1 cleavage is a consequence of
focal adhesion reduction and that under these conditions there is an
accumulation of the 105-kDa HEF1 isoform and of the caspase cleavage products.
Integrin receptor ligation prevents HEF1 cleavage.
It has been
demonstrated that both HEF1 (40) and p130Cas
(45) undergo phosphorylation in response to integrin
receptor ligation. Therefore, in light of the above data suggesting
that the cleavage of HEF1 correlates with absence of the
hyperphosphorylated form and focal adhesions, we decided to test
whether integrin receptor stimulation could prevent the cleavage of
HEF1. In a fashion similar to the experiments reported by Nojima et al.
(45), employing SFM conditions facilitates adding back
individual matrix components to assess the contribution of integrin
receptor ligation to HEF1 proteolysis (45). Since MCF7
cells are epithelial, the effects of fibronectin and laminin, two
matrix components reported to be bound by the integrin receptors on
epithelial cells (53) and shown to stimulate HEF1
(39, 40) and p130Cas (45) phosphorylation, were studied. MCF7 cells were therefore plated in SFM on tissue culture
dishes coated with fibronectin and laminin or on control plates coated
with polylysine, which allows cell adherence via a
non-integrin-mediated mechanism, and on uncoated plates, as described
in the preceding section.
Growth of cells on either fibronectin or laminin reduced the production
of HEF1 cleavage products compared with that of cells grown on control
uncoated and polylysine-coated dishes (Fig.
3A). The detection of HEF1 cleavage
products in cells grown on polylysine-coated plates indicates that the
observed protective effects of fibronectin and laminin do not simply
reflect nonspecific protection brought about by cellular adhesion but
instead indicate that the protective effects are due to specific
integrin receptor ligation. Additionally, following the observation
that maintenance of hyperphosphorylated HEF1 correlates with absence of
HEF1 cleavage, cell lysates were examined to determine whether this was
also true following specific integrin receptor ligation. Under each
treatment condition showing reduced HEF1 cleavage, there is maintenance
of the 115-kDa HEF1 hyperphosphorylated form, albeit to a lesser extent
in the cells grown on laminin than in those grown on fibronectin (Fig.
3A). To confirm that those cells displaying reduced HEF1 cleavage and maintenance of the 115-kDa hyperphosphorylated HEF1 isoform did indeed
have focal adhesions, we assayed for phosphorylation status of
paxillin, as paxillin phosphorylation has been shown to correlate with
focal adhesion formation (9). In all treatments where there is little HEF1 cleavage, there is strong paxillin tyrosine phosphorylation (Fig. 3B). Conversely, under those conditions in which
HEF1 cleavage products are detected, namely on uncoated dishes in SFM
conditions and on dishes coated with polylysine, there is little
detectable tyrosine phosphorylation in the immunoprecipitated paxillin
(Fig. 3B). The lower levels of 115-kDa HEF1 in the cells grown on
laminin additionally correlate with a lower level of paxillin tyrosine
phosphorylation in these cells. Therefore, integrin receptor ligation
by binding to either fibronectin or laminin and by formation of focal
adhesions as detected by paxillin phosphorylation appears to prevent
the cleavage of HEF1 in the absence of serum. The fact that cleavage
occurs in cells grown on polylysine suggests that the protection is
specific to integrin ligation, rather than a by-product of
non-integrin-mediated adhesion. To further confirm that the observed
effects were due to integrin-mediated interactions with the ECM, we
next stimulated the integrin receptors with immobilized anti-
1
integrin antibody, previously reported to cause receptor aggregation
and activation (42). Plating MCF7 cells in SFM on immobilized anti-
1 integrin antibodies reduced the production of
HEF1 cleavage products compared with that of cells grown on uncoated
dishes in SFM (Fig. 3C), confirming that protection against HEF1
cleavage is integrin mediated.

View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Integrin receptor ligation prevents HEF1 cleavage. (A)
MCF7 cells were plated as follows: untreated control (con.), in FBS, in
SFM, and in SFM on plates coated with fibronectin (FN), laminin (lam.),
and polylysine (poly-Lys). (B) Antipaxillin immunoprecipitates (I.P.)
of cell lysates shown in panel A. P-Tyr, phosphotyrosine. (C) MCF7
cells were plated in SFM onto dishes coated with anti- 1 integrin
antibody ( 1) or onto uncoated dishes in the presence (FBS) or
absence (SFM) of serum as indicated. (D) MCF7 cells were plated on
dishes coated with poly-HEMA to prevent attachment, in FBS, SFM, and in
SFM plus FN or lam. Extracts were also prepared from control cells
grown on uncoated dishes in FBS (con.). (E) Antipaxillin
immunoprecipitates of cell lysates shown in panel C. All cells were
grown under indicated conditions for 24 h prior to extraction.
Immunoblots were probed with antibodies indicated on the right side
(I.B.). Molecular masses of proteins are indicated on the left side.
|
|
It is clear that occupancy and clustering of integrin receptors can be
functionally separated (42). From the above results it is
not possible to determine whether HEF1 cleavage is prevented by simple
receptor occupancy or whether it in fact requires the integrin receptor
clustering that accompanies the formation of focal adhesions. To
address this question, we treated cells in suspension with soluble
matrix proteins, thereby preventing the formation of focal adhesions
but allowing integrin receptor and ligand interaction. MCF7 cells were
grown in dishes coated with poly-HEMA to prevent adhesion using
established protocols (1, 13, 24); in media containing
FBS; in SFM; or in SFM plus either fibronectin or laminin. Focusing on
the 55- and 28-kDa HEF1 species to which we have previously ascribed
mitotic (35) or apoptotic (33) functions, we
determined that HEF1 is not cleaved to 55-kDa HEF1 in control cells
grown in suspension in FBS-containing media, although we note that
there is 28-kDa HEF1 evident under these conditions (Fig. 3D). In
contrast, 55- and 28-kDa HEF1 cleavage products are detected in
suspension cultures grown in SFM, despite the addition of soluble
fibronectin and laminin (Fig. 3D). Again, we assessed levels of
paxillin tyrosine phosphorylation and found corresponding loss of
paxillin tyrosine phosphorylation in treatments resulting in production
of the HEF1 cleavage products (Fig. 3E). We note that there is also
some tyrosine phosphorylation of paxillin from cells grown in
suspension in FBS, correlating with the lack of cleavage products
detected in these lysates. Prevention of HEF1 cleavage in suspension
cultures grown in the presence of serum may be stimulated by growth
factors present in the serum. Alternatively, there may be cooperation
between ligand binding of the integrin receptors to soluble ECM factors
in the serum and binding to serum-derived growth factors.
Interestingly, a recent report has suggested that survival signaling
from the ECM may operate through distinct pathways to survival signals
derived from serum (3). Finally, although a formal
possibility for the failure of soluble fibronectin to control HEF1
cleavage in cells grown in plates coated with poly-HEMA is the failure
of this fibronectin to bind the MCF7 cells, this is unlikely for several reasons. In particular, previous studies have noted that soluble fibronectin binding to suspended cells occurs significantly at
concentrations of 2.5 µg/ml (24); the present studies
were performed in significant excess of this quantity. Together, these results indicate that under SFM conditions, integrin-ligand binding is
not sufficient to prevent the cleavage of HEF1; rather, integrin clustering and the formation of focal adhesions are required.
Finally, we have previously shown that HEF1 is cleaved during cellular
apoptosis (33). As maintenance of cells in SFM in the
absence of integrin ligation may be a proapoptotic stimulus (23), it was important to determine whether or not all
cases of HEF1 cleavage were accompanied by apoptosis. To assess
apoptosis, MCF7 cells grown on ECM-coated coverslips were stained with
DAPI and the numbers of apoptotic nuclei were assessed. Cultures were fixed and stained 24 h after plating, and no significant levels of
apoptotic nuclei were detected under any plating condition (percentages
of apoptotic nuclei: SFM [2.5% ± 0.8%], FBS [1.4% ± 0.5%],
fibronectin [1.9% ± 0.4%], laminin [2.3% ± 1.2%], and poly-L-lysine [3.0% ± 0.7%]), suggesting that the
cells were not undergoing apoptosis. This correlates with our
observations that cells grown under SFM conditions for 24 h can be
stimulated to grow upon the readdition of FBS (results not shown). The
observation that HEF1 is cleaved to different extents on surfaces
coated with fibronectin and laminin versus cells grown in FBS and cells
grown on dishes coated with polylysine (Fig. 3A) in the absence of
apoptosis suggests that HEF1 cleavage may be separable from apoptosis.
Together these data support the speculation that HEF1 cleavage is not
simply a reflection of the apoptotic status of the cell but may
independently be correlated with the adhesion status of the cell. We
note that the continued abundance of the full-length HEF1 form (p105)
(see, for example, Fig. 2B) in these experiments, in contrast to the loss of full-length HEF1 observed in mitosis and apoptosis (33, 35), further suggests that the cells remain in active growth, continuing to synthesize full-length HEF1 to replace a limited population cleaved in response to detachment from matrix. These results
indicate that in the case of deadhesion, HEF1 exists as a mixed
population of full-length and truncated protein within the cell, in
contrast to the situation observed in apoptosis.
The C-terminal 28-kDa peptide of HEF1 causes cell rounding in cells
blocked for apoptosis.
We have previously shown that exogenous
expression of the 28-kDa HEF1 cleavage product efficiently induces
apoptosis (33). The conclusion that cleavage of endogenous
HEF1 could be segregated from an apoptotic program led us to
investigate functions of this peptide in control of adhesion versus
apoptosis. We first examined MCF7 cells transiently transfected with a
cDNA construct encoding the 28-kDa HEF1 peptide, pGFP.28 (Fig.
4A and B). During scrutiny of transfected
cells, it was noted that at 18 h following transfection, pGFP.28
transfectants appear smaller and more rounded than cells transfected
with the GFP vector alone (Fig.
5A).
Further, paxillin costaining of these cells demonstrated that they had
a reduced number of focal adhesions when compared with
pGFP.HEF1-transfected cells (Fig. 5B) and vector control-transfected
cells (data not shown). In order to allow quantitation of the rounding
induced by transfected cDNAs, images of GFP-positive cells were
captured and computer-assisted determination of the area (expressed in pixels) of the two-dimensional cell images was performed.
Calculation of the cell image area confirmed that cells transfected
with 28-kDa HEF1 are rounder, with 67% of the mean area of cells
transfected with vector alone (Fig. 5C). We confirmed that pGFP.28 was
inducing apoptosis in these cells, by DAPI staining followed by
quantitation under UV light of shrunken and condensed apoptotic nuclei
(Fig. 5D).


View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
HEF1 derivatives and sequence elements. (A) Schematic
representation of GFP-HEF1 fusion constructs. Indicated are positions
of the caspase cleavage sites (DLVD and DDYD), the first (H1) and
second (H2) helices of the predicted dHLH motif, positions of
leucine-to-proline mutations in these helices (P*), and the methionine
residues (M immediately preceding the caspase cleavage site
[MDDYD] at aa 626 and downstream at aa 654). Clone names and
lengths in amino acids corresponding to the position in the wild-type
sequence are indicated on the right. Relative expression of GFP
fluorescence (scored in a range from 1+ to 4+, with 4+ reflecting the
highest level of expression) is indicated for each construct in the
right panel. Numbers represent the percentage of total cells scored
exhibiting each level of fluorescence. =, no transfectants scored with
the indicated levels of GFP fluorescence. (B) Detailed map of
the cDNA sequence encoding 28-kDa HEF1. Shown is the caspase cleavage
site, DDYD, which additionally constitutes part of the site of FAK
phosphorylation and Src protein binding site. The approximate location
of the anti-HEF1/2 antibody epitope is located between the two
methionine residues, and the helices of the predicted helix-loop-helix
motif are shown.
|
|




View larger version (222K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
The 28-kDa HEF1 causes cell rounding separable from
apoptosis. (A) MCF7 cells transfected with pGFP.28 or pGFP vector
alone. Shown are fluorescence (GFP) and phase contrast images of
transfected cells. pGFP.28-transfected cells are indicated with arrows.
(B) MCF7 cells transfected with either pGFP.28 or pGFP.HEF1 were
coimmunostained with antipaxillin antibodies. Note the reduced number
of paxillin-positive focal adhesions in the cells transfected with
pGFP.28. (C) MCF7 cells were transfected with pGFP.28, pGFP.28 in the
presence of z-VAD-fmk, or pGFP. The cell area (in pixels) of
GFP-positive transfectants was calculated as described in Materials and
Methods. As the pGFP.28 transfectants are round, the quantitation of a
reduced area compared to the area of vector control transfectants is
referred to as "rounding." (D) The same transfectants were assessed
for apoptosis by examining the DAPI-stained nuclei of GFP-positive
cells. Numbers of apoptotic nuclei are expressed as a percentage of the
total nuclei examined, and data points were calculated as described in
Materials and Methods.
|
|
To determine whether pGFP.28-induced rounding was simply a by-product
of apoptosis or whether pGFP.28 action in promoting rounding could be
separated from its role in cell death induction, we performed the
rounding analysis in the presence of the cell-permeating caspase
inhibitor z-VAD-fmk, a treatment reported to prevent apoptosis in MCF7
cells (26). As shown, there is no change in
pGFP.28-induced rounding in the presence or absence of the z-VAD-fmk
inhibitor (Fig. 5C). Treatment with the z-VAD-fmk caspase inhibitor
reduced the percentage of apoptotic nuclei to the same level as is
observed in vector control-transfected cells, indicating efficacy of
the inhibitor (Fig. 5D). Intriguingly, previous reports have noted that
fibroblasts transfected with the C-terminal FAT domain of FAK (also
fused to GFP) experienced similar cell rounding, even in the presence
of z-VAD-fmk (23), supporting the idea that the process is
generally attributable to focal adhesion loss. Thus, it appears that
while p28 HEF1 causes induction of rounding and apoptosis, the rounding
phenotype is separable and is likely a direct consequence of HEF1
action. The rounded appearance of the cells implies a loss of focal
adhesions, a belief which is supported by the reduced staining with
paxillin in these cells, and raises the possibility that 28-kDa HEF1
may be contributing to the process of apoptosis by stimulating loss of
focal adhesions, for example, by preventing the formation of signaling
complexes at focal adhesions, as has been suggested for FAK peptides
(3).
p28 mutations that differentially affect apoptosis and
rounding.
The sequence encompassed within the 28-kDa region of
HEF1 (aa 631 to 834) is particularly highly conserved among all members of the Cas protein family (32; see Fig. 11) and hence
appears likely to be required for essential functions of Cas proteins. Recently we characterized a sequence motif within the 28-kDa HEF1 peptide that resembles a dHLH motif (34). This motif,
which is conserved with p130Cas, mediates homo- and heterodimerization between the Cas family proteins HEF1 and p130Cas and also between HEF1
and a limited number of HLH-containing transcription factors (34). The dimerization activity conferred by this motif
could be inhibited by single amino acid substitutions that disrupted the two putative helices, suggesting a specific and potentially important biological function. The role of the dHLH sequence in rounding and/or apoptosis was examined by assaying cells transfected with constructs carrying mutations in the motif. These included pGFP.H1, containing an L722P mutation in the first helix; pGFP.H2, containing an L751P mutation in the second helix; and pGFP.H1H2, containing both mutations. MCF7 cells transfected with the dHLH mutant
constructs versus pGFP.28 were first assessed for rounding. All
constructs promoted rounding to a comparable degree, with scored areas
of 694.4 ± 53.1 (pGFP.28); 691 ± 11.5 (pGFP.H1); 756 ± 25.2 (pGFP.H2); and 722 ± 75.8 (pGFP.H1H2)
(Fig. 6A), indicating that an intact dHLH
does not appear to be essential for 28-kDa HEF1-induced cell rounding.

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
The dHLH motif is dispensable for rounding but plays a
role in apoptosis. (A) Cell surface area of MCF7 cells transfected with
the indicated dHLH mutant constructs (Fig. 4A) was calculated (in
pixels) as described in Materials and Methods. (B) MCF7 cells
transfected with the dHLH mutant constructs were assessed for apoptosis
by examining the DAPI-stained nuclei of GFP-positive cells. The number
of apoptotic nuclei is expressed as a percentage of the total nuclei
examined, and data points are calculated as described in Materials and
Methods. Bars marked with an asterisk represent values that are
significantly different from values for pGFP.28 transfectants
(P < 0.05) as determined using Student's
t test. Note that the values for GFP.H1, GFP.H2, and
GFP.H1H2 were calculated to have no significant difference from each
other (P < 0.05).
|
|
Next, the effect of the dHLH mutations on apoptosis induction was
calculated (Fig. 6B). Interestingly, all mutants showed significantly
(t test; P < 0.05) decreased apoptosis when
compared with pGFP.28 transfectants. The frequency of pycnotic nuclei
in GFP-positive cells observed following DAPI staining was
22.6 ± 1.1 for intact pGFP.28 versus 16.8 ± 1.5 (pGFP.H1),
12.8 ± 2.4 (pGFP.H2), and 17.0 ± 1.2 (pGFP.H1H2).
Importantly, mutation of the dHLH did not reduce apoptosis to the basal
level observed in cells transfected with pGFP vector alone (7.5 ± 1.3). These results indicate that an intact dHLH contributes to
apoptosis but also suggests that other regions located in the 28-kDa
HEF1 molecule promote this process.
In earlier experiments characterizing the HEF1 C terminus, it was
proposed that there is a critical domain located at the extreme N
terminus of the 28-kDa sequence, between residues 626 and 654 (34). In consideration of the above data suggesting that
disrupting the dHLH only partially inhibits apoptosis induction, we
next examined the effects of expression of a clone that has the
putative critical region deleted, pGFP.M654 (Fig.
4A). While this clone contains neither the predicted DDYD caspase
cleavage site required to generate p28 nor the reported site for FAK
phosphorylation of HEF1 (52), it retains the dHLH motif.
Quantitation of apoptotic nuclei in pGFP.M654
transfectants shows that deletion of the region immediately preceding
M654 completely abrogates the induction of
apoptosis, reducing the levels of apoptotic nuclei to those observed in
cells transfected with pGFP vector alone (Fig.
7A). Examination of cells transfected
with pGFP.M654 for cell rounding demonstrates
that GFP.M654 transfection causes cell rounding
equivalent to that seen with pGFP.28 (Fig. 7B). Consequently the region
of 28-kDa HEF1 encompassed by pGFP.M654 is
sufficient to induce cell rounding, while the area upstream of
M654 is apparently dispensable for cell rounding.
Together these results implicate the region immediately upstream of
M654 as required for apoptosis induction and the
region downstream of M654 as sufficient to induce
rounding.

View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
Deletion of the N terminus of 28-kDa HEF1 abrogates
apoptosis but has no effect on rounding. (A) Assessment of apoptosis in
pGFP.M654 transfectants, a construct that is deleted for
the N terminus of 28-kDa HEF1 (Fig. 4A), compared with pGFP.28 and pGFP
transfectants. The number of apoptotic nuclei is expressed as a
percentage of the total nuclei examined, and data points are calculated
as described in Materials and Methods. (B) Cell area (in pixels) of the
pGFP.M654, pGFP.28, and pGFP transfectants is calculated as
described in Materials and Methods.
|
|
Finally, to map the minimal determinant within the HEF1 C terminus
necessary to induce rounding, we analyzed a series of HEF1/p28 derivatives previously described in reference 34. The
constructs tested represent a deletion of the C terminus of 28-kDa HEF1
(pGFP.28
CT), a deletion of both the C terminus and the extreme N
terminus (pGFP.M654
CT), and a deletion of the
N terminus (pGFP.28
NH2) (see Fig. 4, and Materials and Methods). In
contrast to the results obtained with the point mutants or
pGFP.M654 truncation, these constructs produced different phenotypes for rounding (Fig.
8). A construct with the N terminus of
28-kDa HEF1 deleted promoted rounding comparable to that observed
with the pGPF.28 construct, with scored areas of 633 ± 17 (pGFP.28
NH2) and 607 ± 24 (pGFP.28),
respectively. However, the two constructs containing deletions of the
C-terminal region of 28-kDa HEF1 did not cause rounding, with scored
areas of 926 ±50 (pGFP.28
CT) and 925 ± 29 (pGFP.M654
CT), but had areas equivalent to
those observed with cells transfected with vector alone, 1,033 ± 40 (pGFP). Together, these results suggest that the region encoded by
pGFP.28
NH2 but not the dHLH within this region
is required for the induction of rounding. Characterization of the
levels of GFP expression demonstrated that there is a range of fusion
protein expression between transfectants. However, the range of
expression is similar for all constructs, and further, the GFP
expression levels show no correlation with different cellular phenotypes (Fig. 4). Therefore, the observed phenotypes resulting from
mutant and truncated peptide overexpression are unlikely to be due to
differing levels of fusion protein expression.

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 8.
Truncated derivatives of the 28-kDa C-terminal peptides
do not confer rounding. MCF7 cells were transfected with the indicated
constructs, and area was calculated (in pixels) as described in
Materials and Methods.
|
|
FAT determinants in the C-terminal peptide of HEF1.
While the
experiments with pGFP.M654 were being carried
out, it was noted that the encoded protein localized to the limited number of focal adhesions residual in the transfected cells (Fig. 9A), as indicated by costaining with
paxillin (Fig. 9A'). This raised the possibility that binding of this
truncated form of HEF1 to focal adhesions might be displacing part of
the population of endogenous Cas family members, thus contributing to
focal adhesion destabilization. Alternatively, since it has previously
been demonstrated that the C terminus of HEF1 can mediate
homodimerization (34), it also seemed possible that
pGFP.M654 might be localizing to the focal
adhesions via dimerization with either HEF1 or p130Cas. While prior
studies have reported the SH3 domain of Cas family proteins to be
essential for their localization at focal adhesions, some data indicate
that additional localizing determinants reside in the C terminus of
p130Cas (19, 43), making these points of interest to
investigate. We found that while the C-terminal GFP-fused HEF1
derivatives with point mutations in the dHLH pGFP.H1 and pGFP.H2
induced rounding (Fig. 6A), neither of these proteins localized to
focal adhesions following transfection into MCF7 cells (Fig. 9B, B', C,
and C'). Similarly, the pGFP.
NH2 construct induces rounding (Fig. 8)
but does not localize to focal adhesions (data not shown). We conclude,
based on these data, that HEF1 truncations do not require localization
to focal adhesions to induce cell rounding. Additionally, the
pGFP.28
CT and pGFP.M654
CT HEF1 derivatives
did not localize to focal adhesions (results not shown). These data
support the idea that integrity of the dHLH, in conjunction with
additional sequences encoded between aa 654 and 695, contribute to
focal adhesion retention.

View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 9.
The C terminus of HEF1 contains a FAT domain. Shown are
confocal sections of MCF7 cells transfected with pGFP.M654
(A), pGFP.H1 (B), pGFP.H2 (C), pGFP.HEF1 (D), and pGFP.HEF1 CT (E).
The same cell sections are shown immunostained with paxillin antibodies
(A' to E', respectively). GFP-fused proteins localized to the small
remaining focal adhesions in cells transfected with
pGFP.M654 are indicated with arrows (A).
|
|
In complementary experiments, to determine whether the HEF1 C terminus
is necessary for localization of HEF1 to focal adhesions, we
prepared a construct with the C terminus deleted in the context of
the full-length molecule, pGFP.HEF1
CT. When expressed in MCF7 cells,
this truncated form of HEF1 does not localize to focal adhesions (Fig.
9E and E'), in contrast to cells transfected with pGFP.HEF1 (Fig. 9D
and D') or pGFP.M654 (Fig. 9A and A'). Together with earlier findings, these results indicated that an intact C-terminal domain is necessary and sufficient for effective
localization of HEF1 to focal adhesions.
Finally, we examined the effect of deleting the HEF1 C terminus on the
rounding and apoptosis of MCF7 cells. As expected, cells transfected
with pGFP.HEF1
CT did not display the rounding phenotype that is
observed in cells transfected with pGFP.28 (compare Fig. 9E and 5A).
Similarly, this construct did not induce apoptosis. Only 5.8% ± 1.0% apoptotic nuclei were observed in cells transfected with
pGFP.HEF1
CT, versus 7.5% ± 1.3% (pGFP transfectants) and 22.6% ± 1.1% (pGFP.28) (Fig. 5C). Other work from our laboratory has
shown that overexpression of HEF1 in MCF7 cell lines constructed to
express inducible HEF1 results in increased cell area when compared
with vector control transfectants (S. J. Fashena, M. B. Einarson, G. M. O'Neill, C. Patriotis, and E. A. Golemis, unpublished data). Consequently, we compared the area of cells
transfected with pGFP.HEF1
CT and pGFP.HEF1 and found that cells
transfected with the deletion construct have an area that is
significantly smaller (t test; P < 0.05)
than that of cells transfected with pGFP.HEF1 (Fig.
10; compare Fig. 9D and E) but
comparable to that of cells transfected with GFP only. Considering that
we have defined the C terminus of HEF1 as containing FAT determinants,
it seems likely that full-length HEF1 must be able to interact at focal adhesions to induce cell spreading and that the HEF1 SH3 domain is
insufficient to confer adequate association for this purpose.

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 10.
Deletion of the C terminus prevents HEF1-mediated
increases in cell area. MCF7 cells were transfected with pGFP.HEF1,
pGFP.HEF1 CT, and pGFP, and cell surface area was calculated (in
pixels) as described in Materials and Methods. Bars marked with an
asterisk represent values that are significantly different
(P < 0.05) from values obtained with pGFP.HEF1, as
determined using Student's t test.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Regulation of focal adhesion dynamics is vital to the control of
cellular functions determined by cell-ECM interaction. The results
presented in this study provide the first evidence that proteolytic
cleavage of HEF1 is a product of and may promote focal adhesion
disassembly and that functions of HEF1 in cellular detachment can be
separated from previously described roles of HEF1 in apoptosis (33). Data in support of this model are as follows: first,
loss of hyperphosphorylated full-length HEF1 followed by cleavage of HEF1 correlates with focal adhesion loss. Second, HEF1 cleavage can be
prevented by specific integrin receptor-ligand binding and receptor
cross-linking in the absence of additional growth factors. Third,
overexpression of the 28-kDa HEF1 cleavage product promotes cell
rounding under conditions that prohibit apoptosis. Fourth,
structure-function analyses indicate that discrete regions of 28-kDa
HEF1 contribute to induction of apoptosis versus cell rounding. Fifth,
discrete C-terminally encoded residues are required for localization of
HEF1 C-terminal peptides to focal adhesions. Further, some C-terminal
HEF1-derived peptides which are unable to localize to (residual) focal
adhesions still induce cell rounding but show reduced activity in
promoting apoptosis. Finally, an overexpressed form of HEF1 lacking
C-terminal p28-equivalent sequences fails to localize to focal
adhesions and does not induce the spreading observed following
overexpression of full-length HEF1. In sum, these data indicate that
activity contained in the highly conserved carboxy-terminal region of
HEF1 is critical in mediating discrete roles of HEF1 in control of
attachment and cell death.
Many focal adhesion molecules are now known to be caspase (5, 16,
28, 35, 55, 56) or calpain substrates (6, 11, 30).
Just as altered phosphorylation in response to integrin receptor
ligation is a commonly observed mechanism in integrin signaling
(17), integrin receptor control of protein cleavage may
also prove to be generally applicable in this process. The observation
that HEF1 is cleaved by caspases during mitosis (35) and
apoptosis (33) has led us to propose that HEF1 integrity may generally reflect the adhesive state of the cell. In this context,
it is intriguing to consider recent findings that misexpression of FAK
C-terminally derived sequences also induces cell rounding (see above),
as this suggests that cleavage of other focal adhesion components may
contribute to focal adhesion disassembly. The data presented in this
paper imply that HEF1 cleavage is also downstream of focal adhesion
loss, based on its dependence on loss of integrin engagement and
receptor cross-linking, and that the generation of HEF1-derived
peptides in turn contributes to further focal adhesion destabilization.
We propose that the observed effects on apoptosis and cell rounding
following the overexpression of HEF1-derived peptides simulate the
phenotypic consequences of detachment-induced focal adhesion
disassembly and the resultant caspase-produced peptides. We note that
gelsolin cleavage in apoptosis is reportedly upstream of cellular
rounding in apoptosis (29), and we have found that HEF1
cleavage occurs in advance of gelsolin cleavage in apoptosis
(33), suggesting that production of HEF1 fragments may
constitute an upstream component of the cell-rounding process.
We have previously proposed that HEF1 is an apoptotic mediator at focal
adhesions (33). As integrin receptor ligation plays a key
role in the prevention of apoptosis mediated by focal adhesions (14), it is possible that p28HEF1 may promote apoptosis by
stimulating focal adhesion disassembly. Notably, p28HEF1-induced
rounding can be separated from apoptosis induction and multiple
specific p28HEF1 domains are required for induction of apoptosis. In
particular, the sequences between aa 626 and 654 and the dHLH motif
found in the C terminus of Cas family proteins contribute to apoptosis induction by 28-kDa HEF1, but mutation or deletion of these sequences has no effect on the induction of rounding. It is suggestive that the
identified apoptosis-promoting 28-aa stretch between aa 626 and 654 encompasses at least part of the FAK phosphorylation motif and may
therefore compete with full-length HEF1 for phosphorylation by FAK. As
the pGFP.M654 construct lacks this site, it may
not compete for FAK phosphorylation and therefore cannot be
proapoptotic. We note that pGFP.28 is not expressed at higher levels
than any of the other constructs tested herein, and it is therefore
unlikely that the observed differences are due to differences in
expression level. Further, treatment with inhibitors of the proteasome
(data not shown) demonstrates that the overexpressed 28-kDa peptide undergoes degradation similar to that seen with the native peptide (33; see discussion below), suggesting that the action of
this peptide is physiological. Based on the requirement for
dimerization-associated sequences, 28-kDa HEF1 may exert its apoptotic
effects via dHLH-mediated dimerization with HEF1 or p130Cas and/or
physical prevention of HEF1 association with downstream signaling
molecules, similar to the manner in which preventing p130Cas
interaction with cognate partners is reported to interfere with
survival signaling (3). Alternatively, it may act as a
dominant negative molecule, titrating other HEF1-interactive partners
from functions required to promote cellular viability.
Candidate Cas family C-terminus-interacting-molecules that may
transduce Cas signals include the CHAT/NSP3 orthologs that interact
with both HEF1 and p130Cas C termini and stimulate the Jun N-terminal
kinase signaling pathway (48) and the BCAR3/NSP2/AND-34 proteins that interact with the C terminus of p130Cas (10,
38). AND-34 acts as a guanine nucleotide exchange factor for Ral
GTPase, and coexpression with p130Cas causes a significant reduction in the guanine nucleotide exchange factor activity of AND-34 towards Ral
(18). Presently, it is unknown whether 28-kDa HEF1
interacts with additional protein partners capable of inducing
apoptosis. It will be interesting to see whether this peptide and the
p130Cas C-terminal peptide specifically interact with protein partners unique from the full-length molecule.
In contrast to requirements for apoptosis, a more limited set of
sequence elements is required for HEF1 effects on rounding. Of all the
C-terminal derivative constructs examined, only those which lack the
extreme C-terminal sequences of the protein (pGFP.28
CT and
pGFP.M654
CT) do not induce rounding.
Separately, analysis of dHLH mutations indicates that this motif is not
required for rounding. The C-terminally encoded FAT sequences that we
identify are nonidentical to sequence requirements for rounding: only
HEF1- or p28-derived proteins that contain both the aa-626-to-695
sequences and the dHLH sequences localize to focal adhesions; the
majority of constructs tested did not localize to focal adhesions.
Intriguingly, our observations that some constructs do not localize to
the focal adhesions but still cause cell rounding demonstrate that the
28-kDa HEF1 effects on cell rounding do not require localization to
focal adhesions. It is also unlikely that 28-kDa HEF1 causes rounding by homodimerizing with HEF1 and p130Cas, thus titrating them away from
focal adhesions, as it has been previously shown that the dHLH
mutations tested here prevent dimerization (34). As yet, the mechanistic basis of the rounding effect remains unknown. However,
studies of the C-terminal region of p130Cas have indicated that
deletion of the site of FAK phosphorylation and Src binding prevented
localization at focal adhesions (43), while a recent study
has shown the sufficiency of the p130Cas C terminus for FAT
(19). Deletion of the p130Cas C terminus inhibits Src
activation by p130Cas (8), and Src activity has been
implicated in cell spreading (27). The cell-rounding
phenotype induced by FAK C-terminal caspase peptides is accompanied by
decreased tyrosine phosphorylation of focal adhesion components
(16), which is likely attributable to the fact that these
peptides inhibit FAK interaction with its downstream partners
(3), including Cas family members. The observations
presented here provide some mechanistic insight into these findings,
although the exact sequence of events remains to be determined.
The C terminus of HEF1 is highly homologous to the C terminus of
p130Cas (75% sequence conservation from residues 626 to 834 in HEF1
versus 661 to 870 in human p130Cas). The C-terminal domain of p130Cas
is also targeted by caspases during apoptosis (5, 28, 33)
(Fig. 11). We note that p130Cas and
HEF1 are cleaved at different sites: p130Cas is cleaved at
D651SPD (28), while HEF1 is cleaved
at D627DYD (33) and lacks a DXXD
motif in a position comparable to the DSPD of p130Cas. The predicted
HEF1 cleavage site D627DYD comprises part of the
highly conserved FAK phosphorylation motif that subsequently binds Src
proteins (52). It is not clear which tyrosine residue in
the DDYDYVHL sequence of HEF1 is phosphorylated by FAK. Therefore,
whether cleavage by caspases after the aspartic acid residue in
position 4 of DDYD bisects the FAK phosphorylation motif is not known.
Unequivocally, cleavage of p130Cas at D651SPD
produces a C-terminal peptide with the YDYVHL FAK phosphorylation motif
intact. DDYD is positionally conserved in the human, mouse, and swine
homologs of HEF1, while DSPD is positionally conserved between the
human, rat and mouse homologs of p130Cas (Fig. 11), suggesting that the
different localization of cleavage sites may reflect an evolutionarily
conserved and potentially different function for the two peptides.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 11.
Caspase cleavage sites are positionally conserved among
orthologs of HEF1 and p130Cas. Amino acid alignments of partial
sequences from the human (HEF1, aa 599 to 654), mouse (MEF1), and swine
(SEF1) orthologs of enhancer of filamentation and the human (hp130Cas,
aa 635 to 689), rat (rp130Cas), and mouse (mp130Cas) orthologs of
p130Cas are shown. The swine sequence was obtained from an expressed
sequence tag in the GenBank database (accession number, BE233552).
Positionally conserved DXXD caspase consensus motifs are shown in the
two small boxes (one of which is within the shaded area), the reported
site for FAK phosphorylation (YDYDVHL) is underlined, and tyrosine
residues are marked with an asterisk. The RPLP polyproline motif of
p130Cas is in italics, and M654 of HEF1 is in boldface.
Identical residues are indicated with a dot. The region of
greatest similarity between the HEF1 and p130Cas sequences is indicated
by the large, shaded box. Dashes (-) indicate where the sequence has
been adjusted to facilitate alignment.
|
|
Correspondingly, overexpression of full-length p130Cas results in
increased migration and survival in response to collagen binding to
integrin receptors (12). This contrasts with the reported
consequences of full-length HEF1 overexpression, which initially
stimulates migration (21; Fashena et al., unpublished) but
culminates in the induction of apoptosis (33). Relatedly, a p130Cas/FAK interaction is required for survival signaling and FAK
C-terminal peptides competent for interaction with p130Cas are
sufficient to maintain the survival signal (3).
Exogenously expressed p130Cas C-terminal peptides that include the
bipartite Src binding motif (encompassing the RPLP polyproline motif
and the Src SH2 binding site [Fig. 11]) can activate Src, with this interaction sufficient to stimulate survival pathways (8). The p130Cas peptide studied, however, contains extra sequence N-terminal to the predicted caspase cleavage site of p130Cas and includes both the RPLP polyproline motif of p130Cas upstream of the
predicted caspase cleavage site and the Src SH2 binding motif located
downstream (44). Given that the polyproline region of p130Cas is absolutely required for interaction with Src
(8), it seems likely that the p130Cas caspase-derived
C-terminal peptide would be unable to bridge the interaction and
maintain the survival signal. To date, the significance of the altered
sites of cleavage between HEF1 and p130Cas remains to be determined.
Finally, an interesting implication of this study is that if HEF1
cleavage occurs under conditions in which there is sustained reduction
of focal adhesions but no apoptosis, there should nevertheless be
caspases active under the same conditions. While it is well established
that caspases are active during apoptosis, only recently has it become
clear that caspases are also active during proliferation and
development (54). There is, as yet, no direct evidence to support a role for increased caspase activity during mitosis. However,
expression of the caspase-inhibitory molecule survivin is cell cycle
regulated, with peak expression during mitosis (37). This
indirectly suggests that there may be a requirement for increased control of caspase activity during mitosis, potentially restricting the
extent of cleavage of substrates, such as HEF1. Intriguingly, it has
very recently been demonstrated that overexpression of FAK correlates
with increased survivin expression (51). In contrast, uninhibited caspase activity during apoptosis could contribute to the
permanent disassembly of focal adhesions. We have earlier reported that
HEF1 cleavage products appear to be degraded by the proteasome
(33). It is noteworthy, therefore, that there is increased
proteasome activity in proliferating cells (4) and that
the proteasome localizes to the periphery during the G2/M phase of the cell cycle. Proteasomal
activity may further ensure that the loss of focal adhesions during
mitosis is not permanent, by destabilizing the proapoptotic 28-kDa peptide.
In conclusion, the results presented in this paper support an important
role for HEF1 in focal adhesion disassembly. Exact definition of the
manner in which HEF1 acts in concert with other structural and
signaling molecules at focal adhesions to achieve this function will be
a fascinating target of future study.
We are grateful to Elizabeth Henske, Maureen Murphy, and members
of the Golemis laboratory (in particular Margret Einarson) for helpful
discussions of the manuscript. We thank Jonathon Boyd from the imaging
facility at Fox Chase Cancer Center and Vera Terry from the Oncology
Research Unit at Children's Hospital at Westmead for help with
microscopy studies and thank Alaina Ammit from the University of
Pennsylvania for help with statistical analyses.
This study was supported by ACS grant CB121 and NIH RO1 CA63366 (to
E.A.G.) and NIH core grant CA-06927 (to Fox Chase Cancer Center).
G.O. was a W. J. Avery Fellow of the Connelly Foundation while at
Fox Chase Cancer Center and subsequently recipient of a Howard Florey
Centenary Research Fellowship from the National Health and Medical
Research Council of Australia (grant 147117).