Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Molecular and Cellular Biology, September 2001, p. 6280-6291, Vol. 21, No. 18
DBMS-CNRS UMR 50921
and DBMS-IFR 27 INSERM,2 CEA-Grenoble,
Grenoble, and CNRS UMR 7592, University of Paris VII, Jussieu,
Paris,4 France, and Biology
Department, University of California at San Diego, San Diego,
California3
Received 12 January 2001/Returned for modification 27 February
2001/Accepted 21 June 2001
Our analysis of rotund (rn) null
mutations in Drosophila melanogaster revealed that
deletion of the rn locus affects both spermatid and
retinal differentiation. In the male reproductive system, the absence
of RnRacGAP induced small testes, empty seminal vesicles, short
testicular cysts, reduced amounts of interspermatid membrane, the absence of individualization complexes, and
incomplete mitochondrial condensation. Flagellar growth
continued within the short rn null cysts to produce
large bulbous terminations of intertwined mature flagella.
Organization of the retina was also severely perturbed as evidenced
by grossly misshapen ommatidia containing reduced numbers of
photoreceptor and pigment cells. These morphological phenotypes were
rescued by genomic rnRacGAP transgenes, demonstrating that RnRacGAP function is critical to spermatid and retinal differentiation. The testicular
phenotypes were suppressed by heterozygous hypomorphic mutations in the
Dras1 and drk genes, indicating
cross talk between RacGAP-regulated signaling and that of the Ras
pathway. The observed genetic interactions are consistent
with a model in which Rac signaling is activated by Ras and
negatively regulated by RnRacGAP during spermatid differentiation. RnRacGAP and Ras cross talk also operated during retinal
differentiation; however, while the heterozygous hypomorphic
drk mutation continued to act as a
suppressor of the rn null mutation, the
heterozygous hypomorphic Dras1 mutation induced novel
retinal phenotypes.
Cellular responses to environmental
cues are often manifested by changes in cell shape and cell surface
properties which may themselves influence subsequent developmental and
homeostatic decisions in the organism. Genetic and biochemical studies
of the model RTK-Ras-mitogen-activated protein kinase signal
transduction pathway have been particularly instructive in defining
molecular mechanisms which govern certain of these responses,
underlining the importance of interaction between signaling pathways
and the resulting modulation of their kinetics (48). For
example, membrane and cytoskeleton modifications induced after
mitogenic stimulation are the products of the parallel and synergistic
functions of the Ras and Rho signaling networks. Specifically, the Rho
family proteins regulate the actin cytoskeleton through a GTPase
cascade in which activation of Cdc42 activates Rac, which activates
Rho, to induce membrane filopodia, lammellipodia, and stress fibers, respectively (36). Microinjection of fibroblasts with
oncogenic Ras stimulated membrane ruffling which was inhibited by the
expression of the dominant-negative form of Rac, thereby leading to a
model in which Ras activates Rac to regulate membrane remodeling
through changes in F-actin localization (45). The Ral
subfamily of proteins has also been implicated in this cross talk
through its modulation of the activity of the Cdc42-Rac-Rho pathway in
response to Ras stimulation (29).
Ras and Rho family proteins, like all members of the Ras superfamily,
cycle between active and inactive conformations, finely regulated by
association with proteins modulating GTP or GDP nucleotide binding,
respectively. The GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs) have been defined
in biochemical and cell culture studies as negative regulators of these
proteins (30), stimulating their intrinsic GTPase
activity, thereby leading to GDP binding and downregulation (7). We previously isolated a GAP gene,
rotundRacGAP (rnRacGAP), from
Drosophila melanogaster (1). The
protein product, RotundRacGAP (RnRacGAP), shows high sequence
similarity in C-terminal regions (3) to the RacGAP
protein Bcr (13), the N-chimaerins
(24), and a remarkable overall similarity (60%)
with MgcRacGAP, the product of the human gene male germ cell
RacGAP (52). As expected for a protein regulating Rho
family function, overexpression of rnRacGAP during
development causes modification of the actin cytoskeleton (22); during embryogenesis, for example, ectopic
expression of RnRacGAP in the cellularizing embryo caused polymerized
actin, normally present in the subcortical layer, to redistribute
throughout the apical cell cytoplasm. This change in the
localization of F-actin was correlated with extensive modifications in
cell shape and polarity, abnormally smooth cell membranes, and altered
cell adhesivity.
rnRacGAP is found within the complex
rotund (rn) locus. While no mutations exist which
specifically affect rnRacGAP (2), several rn deletion mutations are available. The resulting
rn null mutants are viable, show a short appendage phenotype
and small, roughened eyes, and are completely male sterile
(3). We determined the testes, and specifically the
primary spermatocytes, to be the major site of
rnRacGAP transcript expression (28). A number of RacGAPs from different species are expressed in the testes,
suggesting that RacGAP proteins may have an evolutionarily conserved
function during spermatogenesis (32, 52). While no
biological function has yet been defined for these RacGAPs, genetic
evidence has now accumulated for the function of diverse signaling
networks during early Drosophila spermatogenesis, and it has
been shown that signals from the germ line can modulate the regulation
of proliferation in the somatic tissue and vice versa. For example, the
diaphanous (dia) gene is expressed in the germ line and
encodes a formin-related protein required for regulation of surrounding
somatic cell proliferation and fate (20). In mouse,
diaphanous-related formins bridge Rho-GTPase and Src tyrosine
kinase during signaling and the regulation of actin dynamics
(51). Conversely, the transforming growth factor Much less is known about the signal cascades operating during spermatid
formation, or spermiogenesis, when germ cells transform from typical
round cells to the highly specialized spermatozoa. In this study, we
used transgenic rescue experiments to demonstrate that RnRacGAP was
necessary to recruit the membrane and direct its deposition during
sperm elongation and individualization; in its absence, the
interspermatid membrane was much reduced and testicular cysts were
dramatically shortened. We also genetically assayed for cross talk
between RacGAP-regulated signaling and the Ras pathway and showed that
hypomorphic mutations in the Dras1 and drk genes
suppressed the morphological defects in the testes of rn
null mutants. This RacGAP-Ras cross talk also operated during eye
differentiation, although the combination of the rn null
mutation with the heterozygous hypomorphic Dras1 mutation
induced novel retinal phenotypes.
Fly strains.
Three null rn mutant strains were
initially employed for both ultrastructural observations and fertility
tests: rn20
pp/rn20
red e, rn17red
e/rn20 red e, and
rn22
red/rn20 red e (see
reference 1 for a fuller description). These alleles contain
large deficiencies covering the entire rn locus and
neighboring genes (cytogenetic locus 84D3,4), and no differences were
seen among them. We also examined
Df(3R)dsxMas+R29, a deletion which covers both
doublesex and rn loci, by the sperm release assay
and found the seminal vesicles to be empty. Data in this paper are
shown for the rn20 mutation, which was
chosen as representative for extended analyses in transgenic rescue
experiments. The original rn20 mutation is
described in Agnel et al. (1): the proximal breakpoint lies between Antennapedia (27) and the
glucose dehydrogenase gene (10); the distal
breakpoint does not include the cluster of four male-sterile genes,
Mst84Da, Mst84Db, Mst84Dc, and
Mst84Dd, described previously (31). To control
for possible effects of genetic background on the sterility of flies
carrying the original rn20 red
e chromosome, the mutant strain was outcrossed over seven generations to a P-insertion line, e(Pc)84DE,
obtained from a w1118 isogenic strain
carrying an insertion close to rn (16).
This outcrossed strain was then tested in the fertility assay described below and found to remain 100% sterile.
0270-7306/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/MCB.21.18.6280-6291.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
RotundRacGAP Functions with Ras during Spermatogenesis and
Retinal Differentiation in Drosophila
melanogaster

and
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
signaling pathway, a potential downstream target of Rac, appears to
operate in the soma to regulate germ cell proliferation through the
action of the genes punt and schnurri
(35).
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
RNA preparation and RT-PCR amplification. Fifty testes were dissected from the indicated strains in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; 130 mM NaCl, 7 mM Na2HPO4 · 2H2O, 3 mM NaH2PO4 · 2H2O, pH 7.0). Total RNA was isolated by the RNA+ method (Quantum) and amplified by reverse transcription (RT)-PCR with the following primers: GAP1, 5'-CTTGCCGTGATCTTCGCTCC, and 1.7.1as, 5'-GGTGAGTACTGCTAAGGTTGAC (28). The reaction products were separated by agarose gel electrophoresis, transferred to a nylon membrane, and probed with a 32P-labeled fragment of rnRacGAP cDNA.
Fertility tests. Male flies (5 to 15) were placed in tubes with an excess of virgin females of the genotype w1118; the white mutation does not affect fertility and allowed detection of any instances of prior insemination by white brothers from the same stock.
Electron microscopic observations. Testes or heads (cut in half) of wild-type, mutant, and transgenic flies were dissected in PBS and immediately fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer, pH 7.2, for 2 h. After subsequent washing, they were postfixed in 1% OsO4 for 1 h and then dehydrated and embedded in Epon. Thin sections (2 µm) stained with toluidine blue were examined by phase-contrast and fluorescence optical microscopy; ultrathin sections (90 nm) stained with heavy metal were examined with a JEOL 1200ExII electron microscope.
Cyst dissection and fluorescence microscopy. Testes were dissected on slides in Ringer's solution or PBS, the testicular envelope was removed with fine tweezers, and the slides were agitated to disperse the cysts. Samples were air dried and rinsed in 70% ethanol, and some were mounted directly in glycerol-Ringer's solution with 4',6'-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI); others were rehydrated for staining with rhodamine-coupled phalloidin. Samples were observed with a Zeiss Axioplan microscope equipped with epifluorescence illumination.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
RnRacGAP dosage is critical to testicular cyst elongation
and actin localization in individualization complexes (ICs).
Dissection of the reproductive systems from rn null mutant
males shows that both the testes and the seminal vesicle, the organ depot for stockage of mature sperm, are smaller than those of the wild
type, and optical microscopy reveals specific internal differences. In
wild-type testes, phase-contrast microscopy revealed striations in the
helicoidal regions reflecting strict alignment of spermatid
flagella (Fig. 1A); in rn
null mutants
(rn20/rn20),
spermatid tails appeared clumped along much of their length (Fig. 1C).
Detachment of wild-type vesicles from the testes released a cloud of
motile sperm (Fig. 1B), while rn null mutant vesicles (Fig.
1D) were completely empty. Gentle teasing apart of the testes revealed
only thin long cysts in the wild type (Fig. 1E), but large round tissue
masses were present in the rn null mutants (Fig. 1F).
Removal of the enveloping testicular membrane allowed visualization of
the individual testicular cysts, each composed of a syncytial network
of 64 developing spermatids surrounded by two somatic cells, the cyst
cells. UV fluorescence microscopy of isolated cysts stained with DAPI
showed no visible changes in the cyst head region, but more distally
the lack of RnRacGAP signaling induced two linked phenotypes: extremely
short cysts and aberrant terminations. Normally, wild-type cysts are
uniform along their 1.8-mm length (Fig.
2A), up to and including the distal extremity (Fig. 2D). In contrast, null mutant cysts were
extremely short with less than 10 to 15% exceeding even a
third of the normal length (Fig. 2B), and these aberrant cysts
terminated in tails several times the normal diameter. Considerable
internal structure was present within these abnormal terminations, and
phase-contrast microscopy revealed a "ball-of-yarn"
configuration suggesting masses of intertwining spermatid
flagella (Fig. 2E) which was confirmed by transmission electron
microscopy of ultrathin sections (Fig. 2F) from regions within the
terminal bulge (such as that situated within Fig. 2E, bracket F).
Sections cut just proximal to the bulge (such as that situated
within Fig. 2E, bracket G) revealed an area of transition in
which variable numbers of flagellar structures were visible (e.g., 197 are visible in Fig. 2G). In this particular view, the membrane of
the cyst cell is traceable over practically the entire field,
confirming the integrity of the somatic cell envelope and the
continuity of the cell contents, thereby ruling out a mechanism
by which the somatic cyst cell and the germ line simply coil up on
themselves to form the characteristic ball-of-yarn structure.
Thus, the absence of RnRacGAP causes premature arrest of cyst
elongation and the uncoupling of flagellar growth from membrane
extension.
|
|
|
RnRacGAP is necessary for spermatid membrane
deposition.
We analyzed the morphological defects induced by the
absence of RnRacGAP by transmission electron microscopy (for
reviews of spermatogenesis, see references 17 and
50). In semithin sections of wild-type testes, germ cells
and spermatocytes filled the apical third of the testes and stained
only lightly with toluidine blue during early stages (Fig.
4A), whereas mature cysts stained progressively darker, appearing in cross section as dense hexagonal structures or longitudinally as long fine parallel fibers. Seminal vesicles were filled with darkly staining mature spermatozoa. The
testes of rn null mutants were distinctive (Fig. 4B),
appearing generally less full and containing large, vacuolated oval
bodies, often densely staining. Fibrous flagella were clearly visible within these giant cysts, indicating that significant spermatid maturation had taken place, but the seminal vesicles were empty and
were identifiable only by their relative position (data not shown). One
copy of the rnRacGAP transgene in the
rn null background substantially rescued these
phenotypes and restored normal internal cyst morphology (Fig.
4C). Seminal vesicles were fuller and released motile sperm (data
not shown). Thus, both independent
rnRacGAP genomic inserts rescued
abnormal cyst morphology and induced the production of motile sperm,
confirming that RnRacGAP function is critical to sperm
differentiation.
|
|
RacGAP-Ras cross talk in the rescue of
rn-induced testicular phenotypes.
Ras has been
described to activate Rac signaling in cells in culture (41, 45,
49), and recently in Drosophila cross talk between
DRacGAP, a Drosophila RnRacGAP
homologue, and Ras has been shown to function during wing
morphogenesis (47). By analogy, the absence of
RnRacGAP as a putative negative regulator of Rac
might be expected to induce hyperactivity of its substrate Rac that
might be restored to more normal levels in rn null flies by
a concomitant decrease in Ras activity. In order to test this hypothesis, we assayed for suppression of the rn-induced
testicular phenotypes by a hypomorphic mutation of the Dras1
gene (Ras1E1B) within the
rn null mutant background. While homozygous
mutation of the Dras1 gene is lethal, heterozygous
Ras1E1B/+ flies are viable and fully
fertile. When introduced into the rn null mutant
background, the hypomorphic heterozygous
Ras1E1B mutation induced a significant
restoration of cyst organization (Fig.
6A) and membrane deposition (Fig.
6C) in the rn null mutants. However, the integrity of
the restored membranes may have been less than that provided by the
rnRacGAP transgene; though
completely surrounding each spermatid, membranes showed an inflated,
irregular outline. We were unable to assay the fertility of the
Ras1E1B
rn20/rn20
flies due to their reduced eclosion and short life span (2 to 3 days).
|
RacGAP-Ras cross talk in the rescue of
rn-induced retinal phenotypes.
The
precise regularity of the wild-type fly eye is due to the precise
packing of about 800 ommatidia into a hexagonal array. Internally, each
wild-type ommatidium is composed of eight photoreceptor cells, four
cone cells, and pigment cells, eight of which are unshared and three of
which are shared with neighboring ommatidia (for review, see reference
33). Each photoreceptor cell projects a dense, actin- and
membrane-enriched, light-gathering structure, the rhabdomere, into the
central core (Fig. 7A). The rhabdomeres appear in transverse section as round organelles, the size and disposition of which are characteristic of each photoreceptor cell
(Fig. 7E). This internal organization of the retina is severely disrupted by the rn null mutation (Fig. 7B and C). A reduced
number of ill-defined ommatidia are randomly dispersed in a
nondescript, vacuolated substance with some dispersed membrane.
The photoreceptor cells are fewer in number, rhabdomeres are
malformed, and some irregularly disposed pigment cells are present
(Fig. 7F). During development, the thickness of the retina is
determined by postmeiotic elongation of the retinal cells. In the
rn null mutant, retinal depth was variably reduced with
ommatidia that spanned the entire distance (Fig. 7C and G).
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The complex rn locus in Drosophila contains two major transcripts, one of which encodes a RacGAP protein expressed principally in the testes (3). We have shown that deletion of the rn locus and neighboring genes induced complete male sterility associated with pleiotropic effects in the male reproductive system. The testes were small and the seminal vesicles empty of sperm. Internally, the testicular cysts, developmental units formed by the association of a syncytial germ line and two enveloping somatic cells, attained only a fraction of their normal 1.8-mm length. In mature spermatids, these global effects were correlated at the cellular level with drastic reduction in interspermatid and cyst membranes, the absence of ICs, and incomplete mitochondrial condensation. All of these morphological phenotypes were substantially rescued by expression of RnRacGAP from genomic rnRacGAP transgenes. Thus, we define RnRacGAP function as critical to spermatid bundle elongation and individualization.
Developmental analyses of rn null mutant phenotypes established that the observed scarcity of membranes in mature mutant cysts was not simply due to degeneration of preexisting membranes, as we observed multiple spermatids developing within a single plasma membrane even in preindividualized cysts. As such, this phenotype is in accord with the putative role of RnRacGAP as a regulator of the Rac and/or Cdc42 proteins (44). The function of these GTPases in remodeling the membrane through specific rearrangements of subcortical actin network has been well documented in cells of diverse origin in culture (for review, see reference 23) and in several in vivo systems: for example, in Drosophila altered forms of Drac1 disrupt the actin cytoskeleton in apical regions of the wing imaginal disk (14) and in the epidermis (25). In cellularizing embryos ectopic expression of RnRacGAP itself displaced F-actin from its normal subcortical position to a uniform apical distribution, inducing abnormally smooth membrane surfaces and altered cell packing at the embryo surface (22).
In both cellularization and spermatogenesis, massive amounts of membrane are needed to isolate the developing cells from their respective syncytia, thereby necessitating precise actin mobilization. In embryonic cellularization, membrane deposition is coordinated with the formation of numerous microvillous projections stabilized by central actin cores (18, 54). In spermatogenesis, membranes also invaginate, progressing tailward from the head region to envelop each of the elongating spermatids, but their deposition must also integrate localized membrane fusion events to generate the intercellular bridges which maintain the syncytium. While the mechanics of membrane fusion are not yet well understood, the formation of actin-filled microvillous projections on apposing membrane surfaces appears as a common strategy (55), with the resulting configuration apparently inducing local stress on the membranes to favor their union (12, 43). Recently, directed actin polymerization was proposed to be the driving force for the development of membrane junctions in epithelial cell-cell adhesion (53). Thus, regulation of localized F-actin accumulation and that of membrane synthesis are likely to be tightly coupled; as RnRacGAP absence affects the level of membrane synthesis during development, it may provide a critical switch in such a regulatory process.
Conversely, at the end of spermatid differentiation, the spermatids must be individualized. Existing cytoplasmic bridges are broken and the membranes are sealed by the passage of actin-rich ICs (50). Preindividualized stages can be identified according to four criteria (15): rudimentary axonemal decoration, light-staining mitochondrial derivatives, enlarged minor mitochondrial derivatives, and the presence of external cytoplasmic ground substance. The rn null cysts clearly present only the last of these characteristics; otherwise, they display highly decorated axonemes; fairly densely staining, though incompletely condensed, mitochondria; and compact minor mitochondrial derivatives. These characteristics are more consistent with the abortive passage of ICs than with their total blockage. Thus, RnRacGAP absence may cause the defective localization of F-actin to ICs, leading to their incomplete function and, presumably, also reduced stability, as we detected no localized actin in rn null mutant cysts. In contrast, morphologically indistinguishable cysts from partially rescued transgenic flies showed actin deposits in their bulbous ends. Thus, in these transgenic tails, RnRacGAP levels were not sufficient to restore the normal phenotype, but they apparently permitted the formation of IC-like structures which may have become trapped as they entered the defective extremities. As such, this function is consistent with dosage-dependent regulation by RnRacGAP of F-actin localization during actin-directed morphogenetic movements (22).
The rn null testicular phenotypes also provided a means to analyze the interdependence of different spermatogenic processes. For example, in the rn mutants flagellar growth became uncoupled from cyst length determination, continuing despite the severely limited membranous compartment and creating massive cyst ends containing intertwined flagella. These flagella apparently reached variable lengths, as we found no strict correlation between cyst length and the diameter of the tail ends, suggesting that the signal for flagellar growth arrest was also deregulated in the rn null mutants. In contrast, coordination of the elongation of the somatic cyst cell and the germ line was complete: however short the germ line remained, extension of its companion cyst cell was equally limited. Developmental analysis further revealed disorganization of microtubules around condensing mitochondria in intermediate stages of rn null mutant spermiogenesis, and this was correlated with incomplete mitochondrial condensation. If actin is indeed the principal target of RnRacGAP-regulated signaling, then actin and microtubule networks may cooperate to guide and/or stabilize mitochondrial fusion and condensation during spermiogenesis.
The total sterility of rn null males was reflected in the observed absence of sperm from the seminal vesicles. We used this phenotype as the basis of a simple and rapid assay to test for partners of RnRacGAP function during sperm differentiation. As Ras activation of Rac signaling had been proposed from previous studies (41, 45, 49) and since cross talk between DRacGAP, a Drosophila RnRacGAP homologue, and Dras has recently been shown to regulate wing morphogenesis (47), we tested for genetic interaction between the rn null mutation and heterozygous hypomorphic mutations in the genes Dras1 and drk. We found that each mutation suppressed the rn null phenotype, causing the characteristic empty vesicles to fill with detectable amounts of motile sperm. Ultrastructural analysis of the testes of these double mutants confirmed an equivalent return to normal cellular morphology. These results defined cross talk between RnRacGAP-regulated signaling and the Ras pathway in the rn null mutants and provided the first demonstration of Ras function in the testes. These data are consistent with a model in which Rac signaling is activated by Ras and negatively regulated by RnRacGAP during spermatid differentiation. Recently, a homologue of RnRacGAP, DRacGAP, has been shown to negatively regulate Drac and Dcdc42 in the wing while itself being negatively regulated by the epidermal growth factor receptor-Ras pathway (47).
As the Ras signaling pathway had been particularly well characterized in the eye (11), we examined the effects of RnRacGAP absence on both external and internal eye differentiation. We found that in addition to causing small, roughened eyes, deletion of the rn locus severely perturbed retinal organization. The external phenotype of rn null mutants was not rescued by the presence of the rnRacGAP transgene, suggesting that this phenotype may be induced by the deletion of another gene uncovered by the rn locus. Dosage sensitivity of rnRacGAP rescue cannot be ruled out, but it would not seem to be due to complete failure of expression of the transgene in the eye tissue as the rnRacGAP transgenes restored a high degree of internal order in these same eyes. This phenotypic rescue defined RnRacGAP function as critical to retinal differentiation.
In a separate study (K. Raymond, E. Bergeret, R. Griffin-Shea, and M.-O. Fauvarque, unpublished data) we obtained results consistent with a model in which RnRacGAP specifically functions in the eye through modulation of Rac activity. Using the UAS-GAL4 system (9), we found that GMRGal4-driven ectopic expression in the eye of wild-type RnRacGAP or its GAP domain induced phenotypes similar to those induced by the dominant-negative mutant form of Rac, DracN17. In addition, phenotypes resulting from the overexpression of Drac were strongly enhanced by a reduction in rnRacGAP dosage. A similar approach was not possible in the testes, as the GAL4-UAS system available at the time of these experiments was not adapted for directed expression in the testes. We also could not employ ectopic expression driven by a heat shock promoter as spermatogenesis is quite sensitive to temperature (4) and we found the wild-type controls to be adversely affected in several protocols involving either constantly elevated temperatures or heat shock pulses.
With respect to Ras signaling in the retina, the observed genetic interactions were partially consistent with a model in which Ras activates Rac. As in spermatogenesis, a heterozygous hypomorphic drk mutation suppressed the effects of putative Rac hyperactivity induced by RnRacGAP absence. However, a heterozygous mutation of the Dras1 gene caused a qualitatively different phenotype, a drastic reduction of retinal deepening and an increase in pigment cell differentiation. These phenotypes remained unchanged when the heterozygous hypomorphic drk mutation was added to the same background. This divergence may simply reflect the fundamentally different natures of the two morphogenetic systems. In Drosophila spermatogenesis, it has been shown that almost all transcription is shut off upon entry into the meiotic divisions (21, 39). Thus, our analysis of postmeiotic spermatid differentiation may have allowed us to dissect the purely cytoskeletal aspects of RacGAP function and cross talk with the Ras pathway from transcriptional considerations. If so, the testes model suggests that at the level of the cytoskeleton, an equivalent signal is produced by a reduction in the quantity of either the upstream activator Drk or that of Ras itself, each presumably reducing Ras activity sufficiently to counteract the absence of RnRacGAP. In contrast, in retinal differentiation, the two proteins also play a critical role in signaling to the nucleus where certain effectors may be sensitive to the actual quantity of Ras, with the resulting imbalances generating novel phenotypes; such effectors being situated downstream of Drk would explain the observed epistatic effect of the Ras mutation over that of drk in the rn null mutants. Furthermore, the reintroduction of the rnRacGAP transgene into Ras1E1B rn20/rn20 flies did not restore the normal phenotype, suggesting that Dras1 may have rnRacGAP-independent interactions, e.g., with another gene uncovered by the rn locus, which might themselves be sensitive to Ras dosage.
However, not all the effects may be exclusively due to transcriptional regulation, as evidence of functional, and even structural, links between cytoskeletal components other than actin and the Ras-Rac pathways is accumulating. These interactions may activate downstream effectors in the morphogenetic processes, leading to retinal deepening, pigment cell differentiation, or rhabdomere formation sensitive to changes in the Ras/RacGAP ratio. For example, retinal deepening depends upon sealing of adherens junctions (AJs) between the photoreceptor membrane and the basal feet of the nonneuronal cone cells that form the retinal floor (33, 56). In epithelial cells, AJ formation and stability depend both upon initial actin localization to punctate structures (53) and complicated Ras-Rac cross talk: in several cell lines, constitutively activated Ras and Rac cooperated to decrease AJ stability (42), whereas in MDCK cells they acted antagonistically, with oncogenic Ras inhibiting enhanced AJ formation induced by activated Rac (40). Furthermore, during retinal deepening, the actin-rich microvilli that constitute the rhabdomeres must increase their surface area substantially (33). While defects in rhabdomere shape and organization in rn null mutants were indeed rescued by the rnRacGAP transgene, a reduction in the dose of Ras in this same genetic background produced significant numbers of folded and fused rhabdomeres. A similar folded phenotype was shown to be due to local collapse along the apical-distal axis in mutants of the Drosophila bifocal gene, which encodes a protein that colocalizes with actin (5). Partial loss-of-function mutations in the canoe locus or overexpression of wild-type Canoe protein induced twisted, branched, and often fused rhabdomeres. Canoe protein, which accumulates in the AJs of rhabdomeres and pigment cells, binds to both F-actin and Ras (34).
Finally, despite the fundamental differences in the sperm and eye morphogenetic systems, we have demonstrated that a hypomorphic heterozygous mutation of drk consistently acted to suppress the rn-induced morphological phenotypes. This suggests that across tissues, certain primary cytoskeletal responses may be coordinated by cross talk between specific upstream components of the Ras signaling pathway and putative downstream targets regulated by RnRacGAP. The simple sperm release assay that we have developed should be of value in testing this hypothesis and identifying other genes that may act at this level.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank Paul Andreassen for technical assistance with the confocal microscope and helpful advice, Philippe Huber for the use of the fluorescence microscope, Jim Fabrizio for informative and enthusiastic discussion, Marie-Claire Joseph for media preparation and stock maintenance, and Marie-Joseph Rabiet for critical reading of the manuscript. We also thank Pierre Vignais and Michel Sartre for the installation and continued support of our group.
This work was supported by grants from the Ministère de la Recherche et de l'Enseignement (ACCSV-4) and from L'Association pour la Recherche Contre le Cancer (no. 9392), as well as a fellowship to A.G. from the Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique (C.F.R).
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: DBMS-CNRS UMR 5092, CEA-Grenoble, 17 Rue des Martyrs, F-38054 Grenoble Cedex 9, France. Phone: 33-4-38-78-30-90. Fax: 33-4-38-78-51-85. E-mail: ruth.griffin-shea{at}cea.fr.
Present address: CNRS-CERMAV, 38041 Grenoble Cedex 9, France.
Present address: ENSAR-INRA, Laboratoire Ecologie et Sciences
Phytosanitaires, CS 84215, F-35042 Rennes Cedex, France.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Agnel, M.,
S. Kerridge,
C. Vola, and R. Griffin-Shea.
1989.
Two transcripts from the rotund region of Drosophila show similar positional specificities in imaginal disc tissues.
Genes Dev.
3:85-95 |
| 2. | Agnel, M., L. Roder, R. Griffin-Shea, and C. Vola. 1992. The spatial expression of Drosophila rotund gene reveals that the imaginal discs are organized in domains along the proximal-distal axis. Roux's Arch. Dev. Biol. 201:284-295[CrossRef]. |
| 3. |
Agnel, M.,
L. Roder,
C. Vola, and R. Griffin-Shea.
1992.
A Drosophila rotund transcript expressed during spermatogenesis and imaginal disc morphogenesis encodes a protein which is similar to human Rac GTPase-activating (racGAP) proteins.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
12:5111-5122 |
| 4. | Ashburner, M. 1989. Drosophila: a laboratory handbook, p. 198. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. |
| 5. | Bahri, S. M., X. Yang, and W. Chia. 1997. The Drosophila bifocal gene encodes a novel protein which colocalizes with actin and is necessary for photoreceptor morphogenesis. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:5521-5529[Abstract]. |
| 6. | Barrett, K., M. Leptin, and J. Settleman. 1997. The Rho GTPase and a putative RhoGEF mediate a signaling pathway for the cell shape changes in Drosophila gastrulation. Cell 91:905-915[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 7. | Boguski, M. S., and F. McCormick. 1993. Proteins regulating Ras and its relatives. Nature 366:643-654[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 8. |
Bonfini, L.,
C. A. Karlovich,
C. Dasgupta, and U. Banerjee.
1992.
The son of sevenless gene product: a putative activator of Ras.
Science
255:603-606 |
| 9. | Brand, A. H., and N. Perrimon. 1993. Targeted gene expression as a means of altering cell fates and generating dominant phenotypes. Development 118:401-415[Abstract]. |
| 10. |
Cavener, D. R.,
D. C. Otteson, and T. C. Kaufman.
1986.
A rehabilitation of the genetic map of the 84B-D region in Drosophila melanogaster.
Genetics
114:111-123 |
| 11. | Chang, H. C., F. D. Karim, E. M. O'Neill, I. Rebay, N. M. Solomon, M. Therrien, D. A. Wassarman, T. Wolff, and G. M. Rubin. 1994. Ras signal transduction pathway in Drosophila eye development. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 59:147-153[Medline]. |
| 12. | Dai, J., and M. P. Sheetz. 1995. Regulation of endocytosis, exocytosis, and shape by membrane tension. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 60:567-571[Medline]. |
| 13. | Diekmann, D., S. Brill, M. D. Garrett, N. Totty, J. Hsuan, C. Monfries, C. Hall, L. Lim, and A. Hall. 1991. Bcr encodes a GTPase-activating protein for p21rac. Nature 351:400-402[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 14. |
Eaton, S.,
P. Auvinen,
L. Luo,
Y. N. Jan, and K. Simons.
1995.
CDC42 and Rac1 control different actin-dependent processes in the Drosophila wing disc epithelium.
J. Cell Biol.
131:151-164 |
| 15. | Fabrizio, J. J., G. Hime, S. K. Lemmon, and C. Bazinet. 1998. Genetic dissection of sperm individualization in Drosophila melanogaster. Development 125:1833-1843[Abstract]. |
| 16. |
Fauvarque, M. O., and J. M. Dura.
1993.
Polyhomeotic regulatory sequences induce developmental regulator-dependent variegation and targeted P-element insertions in Drosophila.
Genes Dev.
7:1508-1520 |
| 17. | Fuller, M. 1998. Genetic control of cell proliferation and differentiation in Drosophila spermatogenesis. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 9:433-444[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 18. | Fullilove, S., and A. Jacobson. 1971. Nuclear elongation and cytokinesis in Drosophila montana. Dev. Biol. 26:560-577[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 19. | Gaul, U., H. Chang, T. Choi, F. Karim, and G. M. Rubin. 1993. Identification of ras targets using a genetic approach. Ciba Found. Symp. 176:85-92[Medline]. |
| 20. | Gonczy, P., and S. DiNardo. 1996. The germ line regulates somatic cyst cell proliferation and fate during Drosophila spermatogenesis. Development 122:2437-2447[Abstract]. |
| 21. | Gould-Somero, M., R. Hardy, and L. Holland. 1974. The Y chromosome and sperm length in D. melanogaster. Exp. Cell Res. 87:397-398[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 22. | Guichard, A., E. Bergeret, and R. Griffin-Shea. 1997. Overexpression of RnRacGAP in Drosophila melanogaster deregulates cytoskeletal organization in cellularising embryos and induces discrete imaginal phenotypes. Mech. Dev. 61:49-62[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 23. |
Hall, A.
1998.
G proteins and small GTPases: distant relatives keep in touch.
Science
280:2074-2075 |
| 24. | Hall, C., C. Monfries, P. Smith, H. H. Lim, R. Kozma, S. Ahmed, V. Vanniasingham, T. Leung, and L. Lim. 1990. Novel human brain cDNA encoding a 34,000 Mr protein n-chimaerin, related to both the regulatory domain of protein kinase C and BCR, the product of the breakpoint cluster region gene. J. Mol. Biol. 211:11-16[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 25. | Harden, N., H. Y. Loh, W. Chia, and L. Lim. 1995. A dominant inhibitory version of the small GTP-binding protein Rac disrupts cytoskeletal structures and inhibits developmental cell shape changes in Drosophila. Development 121:903-914[Abstract]. |
| 26. | Hariharan, I. K., K. Q. Hu, H. Asha, A. Quintanilla, R. M. Ezzell, and J. Settleman. 1995. Characterization of rho GTPase family homologues in Drosophila melanogaster: overexpressing Rho1 in retinal cells causes a late developmental defect. EMBO J. 14:292-302[Medline]. |
| 27. | Hazelrigg, T., W. S. Watkins, D. Marcey, C. Tu, M. Karow, and X. R. Lin. 1990. The exuperantia gene is required for Drosophila spermatogenesis as well as anteroposterior polarity of the developing oocyte, and encodes overlapping sex-specific transcripts. Genetics 126:607-617[Abstract]. |
| 28. | Hoemann, C. D., E. Bergeret, A. Guichard, and R. Griffin-Shea. 1996. Alternative splicing of the Drosophila melanogaster rotundRacGAP gene. Gene 168:135-141[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 29. |
Jullien Flores, V.,
O. Dorseuil,
F. Romero,
F. Letourneur,
S. Saragosti,
R. Berger,
A. Tavitian,
G. Gacon, and J. H. Camonis.
1995.
Bridging Ral GTPase to Rho pathways. RLIP76, a Ral effector with CDC42/Rac GTPase-activating protein activity.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:22473-22477 |
| 30. | Kozma, R., S. Ahmed, A. Best, and L. Lim. 1996. The GTPase-activating protein n-chimaerin cooperates with Rac1 and Cdc42Hs to induce the formation of lamellipodia and filopodia. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:5069-5080[Abstract]. |
| 31. | Kuhn, R., C. Kuhn, D. Borsch, K. H. Glatzer, U. Schafer, and M. Schafer. 1991. A cluster of four genes selectively expressed in the male germ line of Drosophila melanogaster. Mech. Dev. 35:143-151[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 32. |
Leung, T.,
B. E. How,
E. Manser, and L. Lim.
1993.
Germ cell beta-chimaerin, a new GTPase-activating protein for p21rac, is specifically expressed during the acrosomal assembly stage in rat testis.
J. Biol. Chem.
268:3813-3816 |
| 33. | Longley, R. L., Jr., and D. F. Ready. 1995. Integrins and the development of three-dimensional structure in the Drosophila compound eye. Dev. Biol. 171:415-433[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 34. | Matsuo, T., K. Takahashi, S. Kondo, K. Kaibuchi, and D. Yamamoto. 1997. Regulation of cone cell formation by Canoe and Ras in the developing Drosophila eye. Development 124:2671-2680[Abstract]. |
| 35. | Matunis, E., J. Tran, P. Gonczy, K. Caldwell, and S. DiNardo. 1997. punt and schnurri regulate a somatically derived signal that restricts proliferation of committed progenitors in the germline. Development 124:4383-4391[Abstract]. |
| 36. | Nobes, C. D., and A. Hall. 1995. Rho, rac, and cdc42 GTPases regulate the assembly of multimolecular focal complexes associated with actin stress fibers, lamellipodia, and filopodia. Cell 81:53-62[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 37. |
Nolan, K. M.,
K. Barrett,
Y. Lu,
K. Q. Hu,
S. Vincent, and J. Settleman.
1998.
Myoblast city, the Drosophila homolog of DOCK180/CED-5, is required in a Rac signaling pathway utilized for multiple developmental processes.
Genes Dev.
12:3337-3342 |
| 38. | Olivier, J. P., T. Raabe, M. Henkemeyer, B. Dickson, G. Mbamalu, B. Margolis, J. Schlessinger, E. Hafen, and T. Pawson. 1993. A Drosophila SH2-SH3 adaptor protein implicated in coupling the sevenless tyrosine kinase to an activator of Ras guanine nucleotide exchange, Sos. Cell 73:179-191[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 39. | Olivieri, G., and A. Olivieri. 1965. Autoradiographic study of nucleic acid synthesis during spermatogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. Mutat. Res. 2:366-380[Medline]. |
| 40. |
Potempa, S., and A. J. Ridley.
1998.
Activation of both MAP kinase and phosphatidylinositide 3-kinase by Ras is required for hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor-induced adherens junction disassembly.
Mol. Biol. Cell
9:2185-2200 |
| 41. | Qiu, R. G., A. Abo, F. McCormick, and M. Symons. 1997. Cdc42 regulates anchorage-independent growth and is necessary for Ras transformation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:3449-3458[Abstract]. |
| 42. | Quinlan, M. P. 1999. Rac regulates the stability of the adherens junction and its components, thus affecting epithelial cell differentiation and transformation. Oncogene 18:6434-6442[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 43. |
Raucher, D., and M. P. Sheetz.
1999.
Membrane expansion increases endocytosis rate during mitosis.
J. Cell Biol.
144:497-506 |
| 44. | Ridley, A. J. 1994. Signal transduction through the GTP-binding proteins Rac and Rho. J. Cell Sci. Suppl. 18:127-131. |
| 45. | Ridley, A. J., H. F. Paterson, C. L. Johnston, D. Diekmann, and A. Hall. 1992. The small GTP-binding protein rac regulates growth factor-induced membrane ruffling. Cell 70:401-410[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 46. | Simon, M. A., D. D. Bowtell, G. S. Dodson, T. R. Laverty, and G. M. Rubin. 1991. Ras1 and a putative guanine nucleotide exchange factor perform crucial steps in signaling by the sevenless protein tyrosine kinase. Cell 67:701-716[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 47. | Sotillos, S., and S. Campuzano. 2000. DRacGAP, a novel Drosophila gene, inhibits EGFR/Ras signalling in the developing imaginal wing disc. Development 127:5427-5438[Abstract]. |
| 48. | Tan, P. B. O., and S. K. Kim. 1999. Signaling specificity of the RTK/MAP kinase pathway in metazoans. Trends Genet. 15:145-149[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 49. | Tang, Y., Z. Chen, D. Ambrose, J. Liu, J. B. Gibbs, J. Chernoff, and J. Field. 1997. Kinase-deficient Pak1 mutants inhibit Ras transformation of Rat-1 fibroblasts. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:4454-4464[Abstract]. |
| 50. | Tokayasu, K., W. Peacock, and R. Hardy. 1972. Dynamics of spermiogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. 1. Individualization process. Z. Zellforsch 124:479-506[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 51. | Tominaga, T., E. Sahai, P. Chardin, F. McCormick, S. A. Courtneige, and A. S. Alberts. 2000. Diaphanous-related formins bridge Rho GTPase and Src tyrosine kinase signaling. Mol. Cell 5:13-26[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 52. |
Toure, A.,
O. Dorseuil,
L. Morin,
P. Timmons,
B. Jegou,
L. Reibel, and G. Gacon.
1998.
MgcRacGAP, a new human GTPase-activating protein for Rac and Cdc42 similar to Drosophila rotundRacGAP gene product, is expressed in male germ cells.
J. Biol. Chem.
273:6019-6023 |
| 53. | Vasioukhin, V., C. Bauer, M. Yin, and E. Fuchs. 2000. Directed actin polymerization is the driving force for epithelial cell-cell adhesion. Cell 100:209-219[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 54. |
Warn, R. M., and M. Robert-Nicoud.
1990.
F-actin organization during the cellularization of the Drosophila embryo as revealed with a confocal laser scanning microscope.
J. Cell Sci.
96:35-42 |
| 55. | Wilson, N. F., and W. J. Snell. 1998. Microvilli and cell-cell fusion during fertilization. Trends Cell Biol. 8:93-96[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 56. | Zusman, S., Y. Grinblat, G. Yee, F. C. Kafatos, and R. O. Hynes. 1993. Analyses of PS integrin functions during Drosophila development. Development 118:737-750[Abstract]. |
This article has been cited by other articles: