Previous Article | Next Article 
Molecular and Cellular Biology, October 2001, p. 6440-6449, Vol. 21, No. 19
0270-7306/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/MCB.21.19.6440-6449.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Translational Silencing of Ceruloplasmin Requires
the Essential Elements of mRNA Circularization: Poly(A) Tail,
Poly(A)-Binding Protein, and Eukaryotic Translation Initiation
Factor 4G
Barsanjit
Mazumder,1
Vasudevan
Seshadri,1
Hiroaki
Imataka,2
Nahum
Sonenberg,2 and
Paul
L.
Fox1,*
Department of Cell Biology, The Lerner
Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
44195,1 and Department of Biochemistry
and McGill Cancer Center, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
H3G 1Y62
Received 13 March 2001/Returned for modification 2 May
2001/Accepted 6 July 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
Ceruloplasmin (Cp) is a glycoprotein secreted by the liver and
monocytic cells and probably plays roles in inflammation and iron
metabolism. We showed previously that gamma interferon (IFN-
) induced Cp synthesis by human U937 monocytic cells but that the synthesis was subsequently halted by a transcript-specific
translational silencing mechanism involving the binding of a cytosolic
factor(s) to the Cp mRNA 3' untranslated region (UTR). To investigate
how protein interactions at the Cp 3'-UTR inhibit translation
initiation at the distant 5' end, we considered the "closed-loop"
model of mRNA translation. In this model, the transcript termini are
brought together by interactions of poly(A)-binding protein (PABP) with both the poly(A) tail and initiation factor eIF4G. The effect of these
elements on Cp translational control was tested using chimeric reporter
transcripts in rabbit reticulocyte lysates. The requirement for poly(A)
was shown since the cytosolic inhibitor from IFN-
-treated cells
minimally inhibited the translation of a luciferase reporter upstream
of the Cp 3'-UTR but almost completely blocked the translation of a
transcript containing a poly(A) tail. Likewise, a requirement for
poly(A) was shown for silencing of endogenous Cp mRNA. We considered
the possibility that the cytosolic inhibitor blocked the interaction of
PABP with the poly(A) tail or with eIF4G. We found that neither of
these interactions were inhibited, as shown by immunoprecipitation of
PABP followed by quantitation of the poly(A) tail by reverse
transcription-PCR and of eIF4G by immunoblot analysis. We considered
the alternate possibility that these interactions were required for
translational silencing. When PABP was depleted from the reticulocyte
lysate with anti-human PABP antibody, the cytosolic factor did not
inhibit translation of the chimeric reporter, thus showing the
requirement for PABP. Similarly, in lysates treated with anti-human
eIF4G antibody, the cytosolic extract did not inhibit the translation of the chimeric reporter, thereby showing a requirement for eIF4G. These data show that translational silencing of Cp requires
interactions of three essential elements of mRNA circularization,
poly(A), PABP, and eIF4G. We suggest that Cp mRNA circularization
brings the cytosolic Cp 3'-UTR-binding factor into the proximity of the translation initiation site, where it silences translation by an
undetermined mechanism. These results suggest that in addition to its
important function in increasing the efficiency of translation, transcript circularization may serve as an essential structural determinant for transcript-specific translational control.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Ceruloplasmin (Cp) is a 132-kDa,
copper-containing glycoprotein secreted primarily by the liver, but
also by monocyte/macrophages (42). Hepatic synthesis of Cp
is induced during acute and chronic inflammatory processes
(10). An important role in iron metabolism has been
assumed for a long time (31) and was recently established by the finding of debilitating iron overload in patients with hereditary Cp deficiency (29) and in mice with targeted Cp
gene disruption (14). Recently, we reported that gamma
interferon (IFN-
) induced the synthesis of Cp by U937 monocytic
cells (26). However, synthesis was halted about 16 h
after IFN-
treatment by a mechanism involving transcript-specific
translational silencing (25). The inhibition of
translation most probably occurred at the initiation step since the
24-h treatment with IFN-
caused a shift of Cp mRNA from the
polyribosomes to the nonpolyribosomal fraction. Translational silencing
was accompanied by the binding of a cytosolic factor in IFN-
-treated
cells to the Cp mRNA 3' untranslated region (UTR), as shown by
detection of a binding complex by RNA gel shift analysis and by
restoration of in vitro translation by a synthetic 3'-UTR cRNA added as
a "decoy." Deletion mapping of the Cp 3'-UTR indicated an internal
100-nucleotide (nt) region of the Cp 3'-UTR that was required for
complex formation as well as for silencing of translation
(25).
Efficient mRNA translation and its control depend on a temporally and
spatially complex orchestration of multiple protein-protein, protein-RNA, and RNA-RNA interactions. All structural elements of the
transcript, including the 5'-cap (m7GpppN), 5'-UTR, 3'-UTR,
and poly(A) tail, appear to be involved in the initiation of mRNA
translation. Although several of these elements are involved in
transcript-specific translational control, there is accumulating
evidence for a special role of the 3'-UTR. Regulatory sequences in the
3'-UTR profoundly influence cell development and fate by regulating
three key events in transcript processing: intracellular localization,
stability, and translation initiation (47, 50, 54). For
example, mRNA stability is regulated by the interaction of specific
trans-acting RNA-binding proteins to cognate
cis-acting sequences in the 3'-UTR of tumor necrosis factor
alpha (22, 36), vascular endothelial growth factor (35, 46), inducible nitric oxide synthase
(40), elastin (15), and the transferrin
receptor (21). In eukaryotes, initiation is the
rate-limiting step of translation under most circumstances and is often
the target of both global and transcript-specific translational control
(44). trans-acting factors that bind the 3'-UTR
repress the initiation of translation of multiple transcripts including
15-lipoxygenase (33), MEF-2A (1),
-F1
ATPase (18), p53 (7), and amyloid precursor
protein (27). The mechanism by which the binding of a
factor(s) to a 3'-UTR alters the initiation of translation at the
distant 5'-UTR is not clearly understood, but recent studies of the
structure of the initiation complex and the protein-protein
interactions of mRNA-binding proteins are beginning to shed light on
this important process.
Most eukaryotic transcripts are polyadenylated by a nuclear process at
the 3' terminus (5). Multiple functions of the tail have
been demonstrated, including mRNA stabilization, increased translational efficiency, and facilitation of transport of the processed mRNA from the nucleus to the cytoplasm (43, 53). Recently, the poly(A) tail has been shown to regulate translationally coupled mRNA turnover (12). Poly(A) shortening or removal
initiates mRNA turnover in yeast and in somatic metazoan cells. In
addition, translational silencing of maternal mRNAs during oocyte
maturation and embryogenesis occurs following the removal of poly(A)
(39). The poly(A) tract of most transcripts is coated with
multiple copies of poly(A)-binding protein (PABP), a 70-kDa protein
with four highly conserved RNA recognition motifs (13). In
yeast cell extracts, PABP that was bound to poly(A) also bound to the translation initiation factor eIF4G (48). eIF4G in turn
interacts with cap-binding protein eIF4E, effectively circularizing the mRNA via end-to-end complex formation (Fig.
1A). This complex has been reconstituted
in vitro using purified components and visualized by atomic force
microscopy (43, 52). Transcript circularization is poly(A)
dependent, and translation is enhanced by the presence of a
PABP-poly(A) complex, most probably by enhancing recruitment of the 40S
ribosomal subunit (49). Circularization of mRNA may
improve translation efficiency by facilitating the utilization or
recycling of 40S ribosomes (9, 24). Alternatively, a
proofreading function of circularization has been suggested in which
the recognition of correctly processed mRNA is improved (52). Several laboratories have speculated that regulatory
proteins that bind to the 5'- or 3'-UTR may function by disrupting or
enhancing circularization (9, 52); however, a role for
transcript circularization in translational control has not yet been
shown. Here we provide experimental evidence that the presence of
poly(A), PABP, and eIF4G, the central elements of mRNA circularization,
are essential for translational silencing of Cp in IFN-
-treated
monocytic cells.

View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Models for translational silencing of Cp. (A)
"Circular" or "closed-loop" mRNA model showing circularization
mediated by PABP binding to both the poly(A) tail and eIF4G of the
initiation complex. (B) Inhibition of Cp mRNA translation by disruption
of Cp mRNA circularization. Indicated are two potential mechanisms by
which the translational inhibitor of Cp (CpTI) may block translation:
1, disruption of PABP interaction with poly(A); 2, disruption of PABP
interaction with eIF4G. (C) Inhibition of Cp mRNA translation by a
mechanism dependent on mRNA circularization. In this proposed mechanism
(mechanism 3), circularization of the transcript brings the
3'-UTR-bound CpTI into the proximity of the 5'-translation initiation
complex, where it exerts its inhibitory activity. Abbreviations: eIF4A,
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4A; eIF4E, eukaryotic
translation initiation factor 4E; eIF3, eukaryotic translation
initiation factor 3; ORF, open reading frame.
|
|
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Reagents.
Rabbit reticulocyte lysate, methionine-minus amino
acid mixture, and RNasin were purchased from Promega (Madison, Wis.).
Human IFN-
, RNase H, and Superscript were purchased from Life
Technologies (Gaithersburg, Md.). [35S]methionine
(translation grade) was purchased from NEN-DuPont (Boston, Mass.) for
in vitro translation. All other assay reagents were from Sigma.
Antibodies.
Monoclonal antibodies (as ascites fluids)
against human PABP and Sp2/O were gifts from Gideon Dreyfuss,
University of Pennsylvania (13). Polyclonal rabbit
antisera against a glutathione S-transferase (GST) fusion
protein of the PABP-binding site of eIF4G were prepared as described by
Wakiyama et al. (51). Polyclonal rabbit anti-human Cp
antibody was from Accurate (Westbury, N.Y.).
cRNA constructs.
Luciferase (Luc) cRNA was made by in vitro
transcription of pGEM-Luc (Promega). Cloning of the human Cp 3'-UTR was
described previously (25). A construct containing Luc
upstream of the human Cp 3'-UTR (Luc-Cp 3'-UTR) was prepared by cloning
the 247-nt Cp 3'-UTR into the StuI-SacI site of
pGEM-Luc. A construct containing Luc upstream of the Cp 3'-UTR and
followed by a poly(A) tail [Luc-Cp 3'-UTR-poly(A)] was prepared by
cloning the BamHI-SacI restriction fragment of
pGEM-Luc-Cp 3'-UTR into the appropriate site in PSP64 poly(A) (Promega).
Epitope mapping of monoclonal anti-human PABP.
Regions of
PABP were expressed as chimeric, Flag-tagged proteins from vectors
expressing the N-terminal 376 amino acids of PABP
[pcDNA3-Flag-PABP(1-376)] and the C-terminal 257 amino acids [pcDNA3-Flag-PABP(377-633)] (17). The
pcDNA3-Flag empty vector was used as control. HeLa cells were infected
with vaccinia virus vTF7-3 and then subjected to transient transfection with the plasmids using Lipofectamine (Gibco-BRL). After 20 h, cell extracts containing 10 µg of protein were resolved by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) (10%
polyacrylamide). Immunoblot analysis was done with monoclonal anti-human PABP and anti-Flag (Sigma) antibodies.
In vitro transcription of chimeric luciferase-Cp 3'-UTR
constructs.
pGEM-Luc and pGEM-Luc-Cp 3'-UTR constructs were
linearized using SfiI, and PSP64 Luc-Cp 3'-UTR-poly(A) was
linearized using PvuII. Linearized constructs were subjected
to in vitro transcription with Sp6 polymerase using the MegaScript kit
(Ambion, Austin, Tex.). The cRNA transcripts were capped by the
addition of the cap analog m7G(5')ppp(5')G and GTP in the
ratio of 4:1 (Message Machine; Ambion). Capped T7 gene 10 transcript
was made by in vitro transcription of pGEMEX-2 by T7 polymerase using
Message Machine. Full-length cRNA transcripts were purified by
electrophoresis on a 5% acrylamide gel containing 8 M urea.
Preparation of cytosolic extracts from U937 cells.
Human
U937 monocytic cells (American Type Culture Collection, Rockville, Md.;
CRL 1593.2) were preincubated for 3 h in serum-free RPMI 1640 medium (108 cells per 50 ml), and then IFN-
(500 U/ml)
was added for 8 or 24 h. The cells were harvested by scraping and
suspended in 50 mM Tris (pH 7.6)-50 mM NaCl-1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl
fluoride (PMSF)-1 mM dithiothreitol. The suspension was subjected to
three freeze-thaw cycles, passaged several times through a 26-gauge needle, and ultracentrifuged at 100,000 × g for 30 min. The protein concentration of the supernatant was adjusted to 1 mg/ml, and 4 µg was used in the in vitro translation reaction.
In vitro translation of Cp mRNA and cRNA by a reticulocyte
lysate.
To measure translation of endogenous (or deadenylated) Cp
mRNA, total RNA from 108 U937 cells was isolated by two
rounds of Trizol extraction. An aliquot (100 µg) was subjected to in
vitro translation by addition to 35 µl of rabbit reticulocyte lysate,
20 µM methionine-free amino acid mixture, 40 U of RNasin, 20 µCi of
translation grade [35S]methionine, and 4 µg of cell
extract in a total volume of 50 µl for 1 h at 30°C. To isolate
Cp, an aliquot of the translation reaction mixture (45 µl) was
subjected to immunoprecipitation using rabbit anti-human Cp antibody
and protein A-Sepharose in buffer containing 50 mM Tris (pH 7.6), 150 mM NaCl, 0.5% Triton X-100, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, and
1 mM PMSF. The immunoprecipitated protein was resolved by SDS-PAGE (7%
polyacrylamide). The gel was fixed, soaked in Amplify, dried, and used
to expose Kodak MR film. To evaluate the total pool of newly
synthesized proteins, a 5-µl aliquot that was not subjected to
immunoprecipitation was similarly subjected to SDS-PAGE (7%
polyacrylamide) and fluorography.
To measure translation of purified cRNA, the in vitro-synthesized
transcript was gel purified and the eluted transcript (200
ng) was
subjected to in vitro translation as above. A 10-µl aliquot
of the
reaction mixture was resolved by SDS-PAGE (7% polyacrylamide).
The gel
was fixed, treated with Amplify (Amersham), dried, and
used to expose
Kodak MR
film.
Removal of the poly(A) tail of cellular Cp mRNA.
U937 cells
(5 × 108) were treated with IFN-
(500 U/ml) for
8 h. Poly(A)-containing mRNA was isolated from 100 µg of total RNA by poly(A) selection using the oligo-Tex mRNA kit (Qiagen, Chatsworth, Calif.). The poly(A) tail was removed by incubating mRNA
with 2 µg of oligo(dT) (20-mer) for 30 min at 37°C in a 20-µl reaction solution containing 20 mM HEPES-KOH (pH 8.0), 50 mM KCl, 10 mM
MgCl2, 2 mM dithiothreitol, and 20 U of RNasin (Promega). Double-stranded regions containing DNA-RNA hybrids were digested by
incubation with 20 U of RNase H (Life Technology) for an additional 60 min at 37°C. The reaction was terminated by addition of 10 mM EDTA,
and deadenylated mRNA was isolated by Trizol extraction and ethanol
precipitation. To assess Cp mRNA shortening, aliquots were fractionated
on a 1% agarose-formaldehyde gel and transferred to Nytran membranes
(Schleicher & Schuell, Keene, N.H.). The blot was hybridized with a
randomly primed, 32P-labeled 646-bp human Cp cDNA probe (nt
984 to 1629 in the open reading frame). To verify the removal of the
poly(A) tail, aliquots of RNase H-treated and untreated cellular mRNA
were subjected to reverse transcription using oligo(dT) and Superscript
(Life Technology), followed by PCR amplification using primers
encompassing the full-length Cp 3'-UTR.
Quantitation of binding of PABP to poly(A) of chimeric Cp 3'-UTR
cRNA in reticulocyte lysate and to endogenous transcript in U937
cells.
A capped Luc-Cp 3'-UTR-poly(A) cRNA construct [or the
same construct lacking poly(A) as control] was prepared by in vitro transcription. The product was treated with RNase-free DNase I (Ambion)
followed by acidic phenol extraction, ethanol precipitation, and gel
purification. To permit binding of PABP in the reticulocyte lysate to
the poly(A) tail, purified transcript (200 ng) was incubated at 30°C
for 1 h with 35 µl of rabbit reticulocyte lysate and 40 U of
RNasin in the presence of cytosolic extracts from IFN-
-treated U937
cells. PABP was collected by immunoprecipitation using 3 µl of
monoclonal anti-human PABP (or monoclonal antibody Sp2/O as control)
and protein A-Sepharose in buffer containing 50 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, 0.5% Triton X-100, and 1 mM PMSF (pH 7.6). The monoclonal
anti-human PABP antibody was previously shown to recognize rabbit PABP
(13). PABP-bound RNA was isolated from the
immunoprecipitate by Trizol (Life Technologies) extraction of the beads
and ethanol precipitation. The amount of chimeric cRNA bound to PABP
was quantitated by reverse transcription using Superscript and an
antisense primer to the extreme 3' terminus of the Cp 3'-UTR followed
by PCR amplification of the Cp 3'-UTR using gene-specific primers. To
determine the binding of PABP to poly(A) in cells, cytosolic extracts
(400 µg of protein) from IFN-
-treated U937 cells were subjected to
immunoprecipitation with anti-human PABP antibody (and control
antibody). Polyadenylated, PABP-bound mRNA was isolated and subjected
to reverse transcription with oligo(dT) followed by PCR amplification
with Cp 3'-UTR-specific primers. The linearity of the
amplification was confirmed by PCR cycle dependence.
Determination of eIF4G-PABP interaction by immunoprecipitation of
PABP followed by eIF4G immunoblot analysis.
An in vitro
translation reaction mixture containing rabbit reticulocyte lysate,
cRNA, and unlabeled methionine was incubated with 3 µl of monoclonal
anti-PABP antibody (or monoclonal antibody Sp2/O as control) in a total
volume of 50 µl. Immune complexes were precipitated by addition of
protein A-Sepharose in buffer containing 50 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, and
0.5% Triton X-100. The immunoprecipitated protein was subjected to
SDS-PAGE (5% polyacrylamide) using Protogel (National Diagnostics,
Atlanta, Ga.) and was transferred by a semidry method to an Immobilon-P
membrane (Millipore, Bedford, Mass.). The membrane was incubated with
polyclonal rabbit anti-human eIF4G (1:10,000) as primary antibody and
then with peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (1:10,000)
(Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis, Ind.). The blot was visualized by
chemiluminescense using ECL Plus (Amersham, Arlington Heights, Ill.)
and BioMax-MR film (Kodak, Rochester, N.Y.).
Statistical analysis.
All key experiments have been done at
least three times with similar results, and results of representative
experiments are shown. In some cases, results of replicate experiments
have been normalized to the controls and reported as mean values ± standard error of the mean.
 |
RESULTS |
Translational silencing of Cp requires the 3'-UTR and poly(A)
tail.
The translational silencing activity of U937 cell cytosolic
extracts was examined in a rabbit reticulocyte lysate system. U937
cells were incubated with IFN-
for 8 or 24 h. Total cellular RNA was isolated from the cells treated with IFN-
for 8 h. This treatment induces Cp mRNA and protein expression and also provides an
RNA template for efficient Cp translation by a rabbit reticulocyte lysate (25). The RNA was subjected to in vitro translation
in the presence of cytosolic extracts from the IFN-
-treated cells. The specific translation of Cp mRNA was determined by
immunoprecipitation of the translation reaction product using
polyclonal anti-human Cp antibody. In agreement with our earlier report
(25), the extract made from cells treated with IFN-
for
24 h completely inhibited the translation of Cp mRNA whereas the
extract made from cells treated for 8 h did not inhibit
translation (Fig. 2A). The translated Cp
was a full-length product since it comigrated with an authentic human
Cp standard. A band of approximately 100 kDa that appeared to be
coregulated with Cp was seen in some experiments. It may be a premature
translation termination product of Cp mRNA or a proteolysis product of
Cp. Its variable appearance may be due to differences in commercial
rabbit reticulocyte lysates used in these studies. An important role of
the Cp 3'-UTR in translational silencing was shown by performing a
decoy experiment. Cp translation was completely restored by
preincubating the inhibitory extract with a competitor consisting of a
synthetic, full-length Cp 3'-UTR cRNA. As a control for specificity,
the 3'-UTR of 15-lipoxygenase, shown to be required for translational
control of that transcript (33, 34), was found to lack
decoy activity. The amount of competitors added was estimated to be
greatly in excess of the amount of endogenous Cp mRNA; assuming that
the low-expressing, endogenous Cp transcript is less than 1% of the
total mRNA, then the molar excess of competitor was at least 150-fold.
As a control for target transcript specificity, the effect of the
cytosolic inhibitor on the translation of other proteins was
determined. Cytosolic extracts from IFN-
-treated U937 cells did not
inhibit the translation of other cellular mRNAs, as shown by analysis of the total in vitro translation product, i.e., lysates not subjected to immunoprecipitation (Fig. 2B). Thus, the 3'-UTR is necessary for
transcript-specific translational silencing of Cp.

View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Role of 3'-UTR and the poly(A) tail in translational
silencing of Cp in IFN- -activated U937 cells. (A) U937 cells (5 × 108) were treated with IFN- (500 U/ml) for 8 or
24 h. For the translation template, total RNA was extracted from
cells treated with IFN- for 8 h. The mRNA from 100 µg of
total RNA was subjected to in vitro translation in a reticulocyte
lysate with [35S]methionine in the presence of cytosolic
extracts (4 µg of protein) from U937 cells treated with IFN- for 8 or 24 h. Some extracts were preincubated with synthetic, unlabeled
Cp 3'-UTR and 15-lipoxygenase (15-LO) 3'-UTR cRNA (0.5 µg) as
competitors before being added to the translation reaction mixture. An
aliquot (45 µl) was subjected to immunoprecipitation (IP) using
rabbit anti-human Cp IgG and translated, and [35S]Cp was
resolved by SDS-PAGE (7% polyacrylamide) and detected by fluorography.
(B) Total in vitro protein synthesis was determined with a 5-µl
aliquot of the same translation reaction mixture described in panel A
that was not subjected to immunoprecipitation. 35S-labeled
protein was resolved by SDS-PAGE and detected by fluorography. (C)
Capped cRNA transcripts cap-Luc, cap-Luc-Cp 3'-UTR, and cap-Luc-Cp
3'-UTR-poly(A) were gel purified and subjected (200 ng of each) to in
vitro translation at 30°C for 60 min in a rabbit reticulocyte lysate
containing [35S]methionine and cytosolic extracts (4 µg
of protein) from U937 cells treated with IFN- for 8 or 24 h. A
capped, gel-purified transcript of T7 gene 10 (100 ng) was added to
each lysate as a loading control. Newly translated,
35S-labeled Luc and T7 gene 10 were resolved by SDS-PAGE
(7% polyacrylamide) and detected by fluorography. (D) The relative
rate of Luc synthesis under each condition was quantitated by
densitometry.
|
|
To test whether the Cp 3'-UTR is sufficient to confer translational
silencing of a transcript, we used chimeric cRNA constructs
containing
Luc as reporter. Capped, chimeric reporter transcripts
containing Luc
alone, Luc upstream of the Cp 3'-UTR (cap-Luc-Cp
3'-UTR), and Luc
upstream of the Cp 3'-UTR and a 30-nt stretch
of poly(A) tail
[cap-Luc-Cp 3'-UTR-poly(A)] were prepared. The
transcripts were
subjected to in vitro translation in a rabbit
reticulocyte lysate in
the presence of the cytosolic inhibitor
from IFN-

-treated U937
cells. cRNA carrying T7 gene 10 was added
to each translation reaction
mixture as a control for loading
as well as for nonspecific inhibition
of translation. As expected,
the extracts made from cells treated with
IFN-

for 8 or 24 h
did not inhibit translation of the Luc cRNA
not containing the
Cp 3'-UTR (Fig.
2C and D). However, the 24-h
extract, which almost
completely inhibited the in vitro translation of
cellular Cp mRNA,
caused only a modest inhibition of translation of the
synthetic
Luc-Cp 3'-UTR transcript. This result suggested that the
3'-UTR
was not sufficient to confer translational silencing to a
heterologous
transcript. Translational silencing of Luc by the 24-h
extract
(but not by the 8-h extract) was seen when poly(A) was present
downstream of the Cp 3'-UTR (Fig.
2C and D). The 24-h extract
inhibited
the translation of Luc-Cp 3'-UTR-poly(A) compared to
Luc-Cp 3'-UTR by
77% ± 6% in four experiments, thus showing a
stringent requirement
for poly(A) for translational control. Similar
expression of the T7
gene 10 product in all lanes showed equal
loading of transcript and
similar global translation efficiency
under all conditions. The minor
35S-labeled bands running below Luc were most probably due
to premature
termination (or internal initiation) of the Luc transcript
since
they followed the same lane-to-lane pattern as full-length Luc.
The presence of a poly(A) tail increased Luc-Cp 3'-UTR translation
by
10 to 30% under basal conditions, i.e., when no cytosolic extract
was
present. The relatively minor dependence of basal translation
on
transcript adenylation is consistent with previous reports
and may be
due to non-rate-limiting amounts of ribosomes and initiation
factors in
rabbit reticulocyte lysate (
2,
28,
38).
We examined whether the poly(A) tail was also required for
translational silencing of the endogenous U937 cell Cp transcript.
mRNA
was isolated from IFN-

-activated U937 cells (8-h treatment),
and the
poly(A) tail was removed by treatment with oligo(dT) and
RNase H. Efficient removal of the tail was shown by Northern blot
analysis, in
which oligo(dT)- and RNase H-treated Cp mRNA had
slightly higher
electrophoretic mobility (Fig.
3A).
Poly(A) tail
removal was confirmed by reverse transcription using
oligo-(dT)
followed by PCR amplification using primers encompassing the
full-length
Cp 3'-UTR; no product was observed when the template mRNA
was
pretreated with oligo(dT) and RNase H (Fig.
3B). Intact and
deadenylated
Cp transcripts were subjected to in vitro translation in
rabbit
reticulocyte lysate in the presence of cytosolic extracts
prepared
from U937 cells treated with IFN-

for 8 or 24 h. Newly
translated
[
35S]Cp was immunoprecipitated with anti-Cp
immunoglobulin G (IgG)
and subjected to SDS-PAGE. The 24-h extract
effectively inhibited
the translation of the intact transcript but only
slightly inhibited
the translation of the deadenylated transcript (Fig.
3C). The
same extract did not inhibit the translation of other
adenylated
or deadenylated cellular transcripts, as shown by
electrophoresis
of an aliquot of the translation reaction mixture not
subjected
to immunoprecipitation (Fig.
3D). The translation rate of
detectable
cellular transcripts was not influenced significantly by the
polyadenylation
state, an observation consistent with the small effect
of poly(A)
on reporter transcript translation shown in Fig.
2C. In
summary,
these results show that the poly(A) tail, in addition to the
3'-UTR,
is an essential element for translational silencing of Cp in
IFN-

-treated
U937 cells.

View larger version (80K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Role of poly(A) tail in translational silencing of
endogenous Cp mRNA. U937 cells (5 × 108) were treated
with IFN- (500 U/ml) for 8 or 24 h. Poly(A)-containing mRNA was
isolated from total RNA (100 µg) extracted from cells treated for
8 h. The poly(A) tail was removed by incubation with oligo(dT)
(18-mer), and then double-stranded regions of DNA-RNA hybrids were
digested by incubation with RNase H. The reaction was terminated by
addition of 10 mM EDTA followed by ethanol precipitation. (A) The Cp
transcript length was determined by Northern blot hybridization using
radiolabeled Cp cDNA as probe. The two major transcripts are indicated
by arrow. (B) To verify the absence of a poly(A) tail, aliquots of
RNase H-treated and untreated cellular mRNA were subjected to reverse
transcription using Superscript and oligo(dT) followed by PCR
amplification using primers encompassing the full-length Cp 3'-UTR. (C)
Intact and deadenylated cellular mRNA were subjected to in vitro
translation in a rabbit reticulocyte lysate with
[35S]methionine in the presence of cytosolic extracts (4 µg of protein) from U937 cells treated with IFN- for 8 or 24 h (the rightmost pair of lanes show the effect of replicate 24-h
extracts on translation of deadenylated RNA). Newly synthesized,
[35S]Cp was immunoprecipitated (IP) with rabbit
anti-human Cp IgG, resolved by SDS-PAGE, and detected by fluorography
(arrow). (D) To show specificity of the translational inhibition by
U937 cell extracts, aliquots of the rabbit reticulocyte lysates that
were not subjected to immunoprecipitation were resolved by SDS-PAGE and
fluorography.
|
|
Effect of the IFN-
-activated translational inhibitor on the
interactions of PABP with the poly(A) tail and with eIF4G.
Studies
indicate that the 3' terminus of a transcript is directly connected to
the 5' terminus of the same transcript by a discrete set of RNA-protein
and protein-protein interactions which cause mRNA circularization
(48, 49, 52). We used this model as the basis of two
potential mechanisms by which a 3'-UTR-binding protein inhibits Cp
translation. According to the first mechanism, the inhibitory cytosolic
factor prevents one or more protein-mRNA or protein-protein
interactions required for transcript circularization, thereby
inhibiting translation (Fig. 1B). This mechanism of translational control has been suggested by others (9, 52), but
experimental evidence has not been reported. According to the second
mechanism, the silencing activity of the cytosolic factor is not
inhibited by but, rather, requires, protein-mRNA and protein-protein
interactions leading to transcript circularization (Fig. 1C). In this
case, suppression of these interactions, or removal or inactivation of
any of the requisite components, would prevent translational silencing
by the 3'-UTR-binding protein.
In view of the requirement of the poly(A) tail for translational
silencing of Cp and the importance of the interaction of
PABP with
poly(A) in translational initiation, we considered the
possibility that
the cytosolic factor from IFN-

-treated cells
blocked this
interaction (Fig.
1B, mechanism 1). To measure this
interaction, we
used a strategy in which a monoclonal antibody
against human PABP was
used to immunoprecipitate PABP-bound cRNA
from reticulocyte lysate and
the specific chimeric transcript
quantitated by reverse
transcription-PCR. The epitope was mapped
to determine whether antibody
binding was likely to interfere
with critical PABP interactions.
Flag-tagged N- and C-terminal
regions of PABP were expressed by
transfection of HeLa cells with
pcDNA3-Flag-PABP
(1-376)
and pcDNA3-Flag-PABP
(377-633),
respectively
(
17). Empty pcDNA3-Flag vector was used as a control.
Immunoblot analysis of HeLa cell extracts showed that monoclonal
anti-PABP antibody recognizes the full-length PABP and
PABP
(377-633) but not PABP
(1-376) (Fig.
4A, left panel). Equal expression
of N-
and C-terminal regions was shown by immunoblotting with
anti-Flag
antibody (right panel). From these data it is expected
that the
anti-PABP (C terminus) antibody should not disrupt the
binding of PABP
to poly(A) and eIF4G since the four RNA recognition
motifs and the
sites of interaction with poly(A) and eIF4G are
present in the
N-terminal region of PABP (
3,
6,
13,
17).

View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Effect of the cytosolic inhibitor on binding of PABP to
polyadenylated chimeric transcript. (A) The recognition site of
anti-human PABP antibody was mapped by expression of Flag-tagged
chimeric plasmids containing N- and C-terminal PABP regions in
Hela cells. Cells were infected with vaccinia virus vTF7-3 and
transiently transfected with pcDNA3-Flag-PABP(1-376),
pcDNA3-FLAG-PABP(377-633), or with pcDNA3-Flag as
control. At 20 h after transfection, cell extracts (10 mg protein)
were resolved by SDS-PAGE (10% polyacrylamide) and subjected to
immunoblot analysis with anti-human PABP antibody (left) or anti-Flag
antibody (right). (B) (Upper panel) Gel-purified transcripts cap-Luc-Cp
3'-UTR and cap-Luc-Cp 3'-UTR-poly(A) (200 ng of each) were incubated
with rabbit reticulocyte lysates for 15 min in the presence of
cytosolic extracts from U937 cells treated with IFN- for 8 or
24 h. PABP was immunoprecipitated (IP) by addition of monoclonal
anti-human PABP (3 µl) and protein A-Sepharose. PABP-bound RNA was
extracted by Trizol and subjected to reverse transcription using a
primer for the extreme 3' end of Cp 3'-UTR followed by PCR
amplification with primers for the extreme 5' and 3' ends of the
full-length Cp 3'-UTR (the 17 cycles used gave a product in the linear
range of the assay [not shown]). The leftmost lane is a DNA ladder
containing a series of DNA fragments at multiples of 100-bp (Life
Technologies). The predicted position of the amplified product is
indicated by an arrow. (Lower panel) Same as in the upper panel but
without the addition of reverse transcriptase (RT) to the reverse
transcription reaction. (C) (Upper panel) The binding of PABP to
endogenous Cp transcript in U937 cells was determined. U937 cells were
incubated with IFN- for 8 or 24 h, and lysates (400 µg of
protein) were subjected to immunoprecipitation using anti-human PABP
antibody. PABP-bound mRNA was extracted and subjected to reverse
transcription using an oligo(dT) primer. The cDNA was subjected to 12 or 16 cycles of PCR amplification using primers for the extreme 5' and
3' ends of the full-length Cp 3'-UTR. (Lower panel) Same as in the
upper panel but without the addition of reverse transcriptase.
|
|
The chimeric cRNA cap-Luc-Cp 3'-UTR-poly(A) construct and the same
construct lacking a poly(A) tail were incubated with reticulocyte
lysates (as a source of PABP) in the presence of cytosolic extracts
from IFN-

-treated U937 cells. PABP was immunoprecipitated from
the
lysate using anti-PABP antibody (or control antibody). The
amount of
chimeric transcript bound to PABP was quantitated by
reverse
transcription-PCR amplification using primers encompassing
the
full-length Cp 3'-UTR. Substantial binding of cap-Luc-Cp
3'-UTR-poly(A)
to PABP was observed (Fig.
4B). Binding specificity was
shown
by the absence of signal when the lysate was immunoprecipitated
with a control antibody (Fig.
4B, upper panel) or when reverse
transcriptase was not included in the reaction mixture (lower
panel).
Binding of cap-Luc-Cp 3'-UTR-poly(A) to PABP was not diminished
by
cytosolic extracts from U937 cells treated with IFN-

for either
8 or
24 h (Fig.
4B). Since PABP can bind to nonpolyadenylated
regions
of mRNA [although with lower affinity than it binds to
the poly(A)
tail] (
9), we examined the interaction of PABP
with the
cRNA construct lacking poly(A) (cap-Luc-Cp 3'-UTR). Only
a very small
amount of amplicon was detected (and not in all experiments),
suggesting specificity for binding to poly(A) in the chimeric
construct
used. These results suggest that the cytosolic inhibitor
does not
silence Cp translation by blocking the binding of PABP
to
poly(A).
The above experiment tested the effect of the cytosolic inhibitor on
the interaction of PABP with a synthetic, poly(A)-containing
transcript
in rabbit reticulocyte lysates. We extended these results
to the
interaction of PABP with endogenous Cp mRNA in U937 cells.
U937 cells
were treated with IFN-

for 8 or 24 h, and lysates
were
subjected to immunoprecipitation with anti-human PABP antibody.
After
RNA extraction, PABP-bound Cp transcript was semiquantitatively
determined by reverse transcription with oligo(dT) followed by
PCR
amplification using Cp 3'-UTR-specific primers. The same amount
of
PABP-bound Cp mRNA was found in lysates made from U937 cells
treated
with IFN-

for 8 and 24 h (Fig.
4C, upper panel). Similar
results at two levels of PCR amplification showed response linearity
under these conditions. The specificity of the amplified product
was
shown by its absence in lysates immunoprecipitated with SP2/O
control
antibody or when reverse transcriptase was omitted (Fig.
4C, lower
panel). Therefore, PABP binding to endogenous Cp mRNA
is not inhibited
by a 24-h treatment of U937 cells with IFN-

.
The cytosolic inhibitor could silence translation by blocking the
interaction of PABP with eIF4G, a requirement for mRNA circularization
(
9,
49) (Fig.
1B, mechanism 2). PABP-bound eIF4G was
determined
by immunoprecipitation of PABP from reticulocyte lysates
followed
by immunoblot analysis using anti-eIF4G antibody. As shown
above,
the epitope recognized by the monoclonal anti-PABP antibody is
not near the eIF4G interaction site. Cytosolic extracts from
IFN-

-treated
U937 cells did not decrease the amount of PABP-bound
eIF4G (Fig.
5). The specificity of the
interaction was shown by the complete
absence of eIF4G in the
immunoprecipitate prepared using monoclonal
antibody Sp2/O as control.
Since the binding between eIF4G and
PABP may be facilitated by mRNA
containing both translation initiation
sites and a poly(A) tail, this
experiment was also done in the
presence of the poly(A)-containing
chimeric reporter cRNA, cap-Luc-Cp
3'-UTR-poly(A). There was only a
very small inhibition of the
PABP-eIF4G interaction by the 24-h
extract; this inhibition was
not considered to be specific since the
8-h extract showed a similar
inhibition. We were unable to determine
the effect of IFN-

treatment
on the PABP-eIF4G interaction in U937
cells because, under all
conditions tested, eIF4G became highly
degraded during lysate
preparation from monocytic cells (data not
shown). Together, these
experiments indicate that the cytosolic
inhibitor factor in IFN-

-treated
U937 cells does not block the
interaction of PABP with either
the poly(A) tail or eIF4G, thus arguing
against the mechanism
in Fig.
1B. The fact that these interactions
occur, even in the
presence of the cytosolic inhibitor, supports the
alternate mechanism
in which interactions at the 5' and 3' termini are
required for
translational control of Cp (Fig.
1C).

View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Effect of the cytosolic inhibitor on binding of PABP to
eIF4G. Reticulocyte lysates (50 µl) were incubated with cytosolic
extracts (4 µg of protein) from U937 cells treated with IFN- for 8 or 24 h. To one set of lysates was added cap-Luc-Cp
3'-UTR-poly(A) cRNA (200 ng). PABP was immunoprecipitated (IP) with
monoclonal anti-human PABP antibody (Ab) (or with monoclonal antibody
[mAb] Sp2/O as a control) and protein A-Sepharose beads. The beads
were washed and boiled with Laemmli buffer, and the samples were
subjected to SDS-PAGE (5% polyacrylamide). The resolved proteins were
transferred to Immobilon-P and subjected to immunoblot analysis using
polyclonal rabbit anti-human eIF4G antibody. The rightmost lane
contained untreated reticulocyte lysate (1 µl) as an eIF4G
standard.
|
|
Requirement for PABP and initiation factor eIF4G in translational
silencing of Cp.
We further examined the alternate mechanism of
translational silencing of Cp by determining whether the essential
elements of the interaction of the 5' and 3' termini were required. We first tested the requirement for PABP in translational silencing of Cp.
Rabbit reticulocyte lysates were preincubated for 15 min with
monoclonal anti-human PABP (or with monoclonal antibody Sp2/O as a
control). The chimeric cap-Luc-Cp 3'-UTR-poly(A) transcript was used
as a template for in vitro translation in the presence of the cytosolic
extracts from U937 cells treated with IFN-
for 8 or 24 h. As
shown above, the 24-h cytosolic extract effectively inhibited
translation of the reporter; however, in the presence of anti-PABP
antibody, the inhibitory activity of the extract was greatly diminished
(Fig. 6). In three repetitions of this experiment, reporter translation in the presence of the 24-h extract was 33% ± 5% of that of the untreated control, and anti-PABP
antibody restored translation to 87% ± 5% of that of the control.
Specificity was shown by the absence of any restorative activity after
treatment of the reticulocyte lysate with the control monoclonal
antibody, Sp2/O. The effect of PABP inactivation on basal translation
was small, averaging about 10% inhibition in multiple experiments, suggesting only a marginal requirement for PABP for basal translation by reticulocyte lysates, a finding consistent with previous
observations. Translation of T7 gene 10 cRNA was not altered by any
treatment (Fig. 6). Given that the epitope recognized by anti-PABP
antibody is distinct from the sites of eIF4G and poly(A) interaction,
the restoration of Luc translation by this antibody merits
consideration. It is possible that the antibody inhibits the
interaction of proteins known to bind the C terminus of PABP, e.g.,
eRF3, Paip-1 and Paip-2, and Pbp1p, which may contribute to transcript
structure or circularization (11, 16, 20, 23).
Alternatively, binding of the antibody to the C terminus of PABP may
sterically hinder protein-protein or protein-mRNA interactions at the N
terminus, thereby preventing or altering transcript circularization.

View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Requirement for PABP in transcript-specific
translational silencing of the polyadenylated chimeric reporter
transcript. (Upper panel) Rabbit reticulocyte lysates were preincubated
for 15 min with 3 µl of monoclonal anti-human PABP or with monoclonal
antibody (mAb) Sp2/O as a control. Gel-purified cRNA transcript
cap-Luc-Cp 3'-UTR-poly(A) (100 ng) was subjected to in vitro
translation by reticulocyte lysates for 60 min at 30°C in the
presence of [35S]methionine and cytosolic extracts (4 µg of protein) from IFN- -treated U937 cells. A cRNA transcript
encoding T7 gene 10 (100 ng) was added as a control. Newly synthesized,
35S-labeled Luc and T7 gene 10 were resolved by SDS-PAGE,
and the radiolabeled bands were detected by fluorography. (Lower panel)
The relative amount of Luc synthesis was quantitated by densitometry
and normalized by division by T7 gene 10 synthesis under each
condition.
|
|
To investigate the requirement for eIF4G, we took advantage of an
antibody made against the N-terminal sequence of human eIF4G,
which is
responsible for PABP binding (
17). Rabbit reticulocyte
lysates were preincubated with polyclonal rabbit antiserum against
a
GST fusion protein of the PABP-binding site of eIF4G (or with
rabbit
antiserum against GST as a control). Chimeric cap-Luc-Cp
3'-UTR-poly(A) was added to the lysate as a template for in vitro
translation in the presence of the cytosolic extracts from U937
cells
treated with IFN-

for 8 or 24 h. At the amount of anti-eIF4G
used, basal translation of both cap-Luc-Cp 3'-UTR-poly(A) and
T7 gene
10 control cRNA was partially inhibited (Fig.
7). Therefore,
to determine the specific
translational inhibition of Luc, the
ratio of translation of Luc
relative to that of T7 gene 10 was
calculated. The 24-h (but not the
8-h) cytosolic extract inhibited
the translation of the reporter cRNA
by 75% (the range of inhibition
was between 50 and 75% in all
experiments). The inhibitory activity
of the 24-h extract was
completely abrogated by anti-eIF4G (translation
was restored to between
100 and 105% of control values in replicate
experiments) but not by
the control anti-GST antibody. We stress
that while the anti-eIF4G
antibody slightly inhibits basal translation
of Cp, it greatly
stimulates Cp translation in the presence of
the cytosolic inhibitor.
Therefore our results suggest a requirement
of eIF4G for translation
silencing in the presence of the cytosolic
inhibitor (as well as for
optimal translation in the absence of
the inhibitor). Together, the
results indicate that in addition
to the requirement for a poly(A) tail
and PABP, a third element
of mRNA circularization, eIF4G, is required
for translational
silencing of Cp mRNA.

View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
Requirement for eIF4G in the transcript-specific
translational silencing of the polyadenylated chimeric reporter
transcript. (Upper panel) A capped transcript containing luciferase
upstream of the Cp 3'-UTR and a 30-nt poly(A) tail [cap-Luc-Cp
3'-UTR-poly(A)] was prepared by in vitro transcription in the
presence of the cap analog, m7G(5')ppp(5')G. Rabbit
reticulocyte lysates were preincubated for 15 min with 1 µl of
polyclonal rabbit antiserum against human eIF4G or rabbit anti-GST
antiserum as a control. Gel-purified cRNA transcript (100 ng) was
subjected to in vitro translation in the presence of
[35S]methionine and cytosolic extracts (4 mg of protein)
from IFN- -treated U937 cells for 60 min at 30°C. A cRNA transcript
encoding T7 gene 10 (100 ng) was simultaneously translated as a
control. Newly synthesized, 35S-labeled luciferase and T7
gene 10 were resolved by SDS-PAGE, and the radiolabeled bands were
detected by fluorography (indicated by arrows). (Lower panel) The
relative rate of Luc synthesis was quantitated by densitometry and
normalized by division by T7 gene 10 synthesis under each condition.
Ab, antibody.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Interactions between trans-acting RNA-binding proteins
and cis-acting elements in a transcript UTR can markedly
influence the global and transcript-specific translational efficiency
(9, 45). Given the proximity of elements in the 5'-UTR to
the translation initiation site, it is at least conceptually
straightforward that 5'-UTR-binding proteins can influence initiation.
A recognized paradigm of this class of translational control is the
binding of the iron-responsive element-binding protein to the cognate element in the ferritin 5'-UTR (30, 41). More recent
studies suggest that trans-acting proteins bind to elements
in the 3'-UTR of several mRNAs and that this binding strongly
influences (usually represses) translation initiation (1, 7, 18,
27, 33). The mechanism by which binding of a protein(s)
to the 3'-UTR influences translation initiation at the distant 5'-UTR
is not clearly understood. An attractive framework is provided by
recent studies suggesting that mRNA may be circularized (9,
37) by protein-protein and protein-mRNA interactions at the 5'
and 3' termini (48, 49). Circularized mRNA has been
observed directly by atomic force microscopy (52).
However, there is little evidence that transcript circularization is
important in translational control mechanisms.
Poly(A) tail and translational control.
There is limited
information about the mechanisms of 3'-UTR-mediated translational
control, and specifically on the requirement for the poly(A) tail.
Several recent studies have provided clues to these regulatory
mechanisms. In Drosophila, a gender-specific translational
control mechanism regulates dosage compensation by hypertranscription
of genes on the single male X chromosome (8).
Hypertranscription is mediated by a complex containing male-specific-lethal (msl) gene products
including MSL-2. Expression of msl-2 is translationally
silenced in females by binding of the female-specific RNA-binding
protein Sex-lethal to binding sites in the msl-2 5'- and
3'-UTRs. The cooperative binding of msl-2 to both UTRs
suggests that circularization may be required for this translational
control mechanism. However, unlike the results of our own studies,
translational silencing of msl-2 was found to be poly(A)
tail independent (8). It is not known whether msl-2 participates in transcript circularization or if other
factors e.g., Drosophila homologues of PABP and eIF4G, are
required for circularization (and translational control). A second
example of translational control studied in depth is sex determination in the Caenorhabditis elegans hermaphrodite. The female
development gene tra-2 is translationally repressed by
binding of GLD-1, a germ line-specific RNA-binding protein, to the
TGE element present in the tra-2 3'-UTR; this
silencing is required for the onset of spermatogenesis (4, 19,
50). A recent study suggests that tra-2 mRNA requires
a poly(A) tail for translational silencing by GLD-1 (50).
The studies also show that binding of GLD-1 to the TGE element causes
rapid removal of the poly(A) tail (50). In our own
studies, we show that the poly(A) tail is required for translational
silencing of Cp mRNA in IFN-
-treated U937 cells. We have shown this
for endogenous cellular Cp mRNA as well as for chimeric RNA transcripts
containing Luc upstream of the Cp 3'-UTR. These studies extend those
with C. elegans to show the importance of poly(A) in
translational control in a mammalian system. We suggest that
translational control should be added to the assemblage of well-known
regulatory functions of poly(A), i.e., mRNA stabilization, translation
efficiency, and transport (12, 43, 53).
Mechanisms of 3'-UTR-mediated translational control.
We have
considered two mechanisms by which cytosolic extracts from
IFN-
-treated U937 cells could inhibit Cp mRNA translation. Several
avenues of evidence argue against the first mechanism, i.e., that the
inhibitory factor blocks transcript circularization, thereby inhibiting
Cp translation (Fig. 1B). First, we showed experimentally that the
inhibitory extract does not block the binding of PABP to either poly(A)
or eIF4G. Furthermore, the fact that the chimeric Luc-Cp 3'-UTR cRNA
construct is translated at a high rate, even in the absence of a
poly(A) tail, indicates that transcript circularization is not required
for efficient translation (in reticulocyte lysates). A corollary to
this observation is that mere disruption of transcript circularization
is unlikely to substantially inhibit Cp translation in reticulocyte
lysates. According to the second proposed mechanism, the inhibitory
factor does not block circularization but, rather, requires it. All of the experiments described here are consistent with this mechanism. First, PABP interacts with the poly(A) tail of Luc-Cp 3'-UTR and with
eIF4G, even in the presence of the inhibitory cytosolic factor. Second,
three elements required for transcript circularization, i.e., the
poly(A) tail, PABP, and eIF4G, are all required for translational
silencing of Cp by IFN-
. To our knowledge, this is the first
demonstration of a translational control system that requires these elements.
Our experiments do not shed light on the specific translation events
which may be negatively affected by the Cp translation
inhibitor. Our
previous work indicated that translation initiation
was blocked by
IFN-

since Cp mRNA shifted from the polyribosomes
to the
nonpolyribosomal fraction (
25). Together, our data suggest
that transcript circularization brings the inhibitory Cp 3'-UTR-binding
protein(s) into the vicinity of the initiation complex, where
it may
negatively influence complex assembly by competitive interactions
with
a specific initiation factor or by steric hindrance (Fig.
1C).
Alternatively, transcript circularization may bring the inhibitor
near
the initiation codon and prevent assembly of the 60S and
40S ribosomal
subunits into a translation-competent 80S ribosome.
The latter
mechanism has been recently described for silencing
of 15-lipoxygenase
translation (
32). In that study, a silencing
complex bound
to the 15-lipoxygenase 3'-UTR was shown to permit
40S ribosomal subunit
recruitment and scanning to the AUG codon;
however, formation of a
competent 80S ribosome was blocked. The
requirement for the poly(A)
tail, PABP, or eIF4G in translational
control of 15-lipoxygenase was
not investigated, so it is not
clear whether the inhibition of this
mRNA and Cp utilize similar
control points. Additional studies are
necessary to identify the
specific
cis elements and
trans factors involved in the translational
silencing of Cp
and to identify the specific 5'-terminal factors
targeted. Studies of
other systems will show whether our observations
of Cp regulation can
be extended to other translational control
systems. In that case,
transcript circularization may have evolved
not only to increase the
rate of global translation initiation
but also as an essential
structural determinant for transcript-specific
translational
control.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
This work was supported by Public Health Service grants HL-29582
and HL-52692 from the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute, National
Institutes of Health (to P.L.F.), and by a Scientist Development Grant
from the American Heart Association, National Affiliate (to B.M.).
We gratefully acknowledge Gideon Dreyfuss and Naoyuki Kataoka of Howard
Hughes Medical Institute, University of Pennsylvania, for providing
monoclonal antibody made against human PABP and for providing
monoclonal antibody Sp2/O; we also thank Matthias Hentze of the
European Molecular Biology Laboratory for providing the 15-lipoxygenase
3'-UTR construct.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Cell Biology, The Lerner Research Institute/NC10, Cleveland Clinic
Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave., Cleveland, OH 44195. Phone: (216)
444-8053. Fax: (216) 444-9404. E-mail: foxp{at}ccf.org.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Black, B. L.,
J. Lu, and E. N. Olson.
1997.
The MEF2A 3' untranslated region functions as a cis-acting translational repressor.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17:2756-2763[Abstract].
|
| 2.
|
Borman, A. M.,
Y. M. Michel, and K. M. Kean.
2000.
Biochemical characterisation of cap-poly(A) synergy in rabbit reticulocyte lysates: the eIF4G-PABP interaction increases the functional affinity of eIF4E for the capped mRNA 5'-end.
Nucleic Acids Res.
28:4068-4075[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Burd, C. G.,
E. L. Matunis, and G. Dreyfuss.
1991.
The multiple RNA-binding domains of the mRNA poly(A)-binding protein have different RNA-binding activities.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
11:3419-3424[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Clifford, R.,
M. H. Lee,
S. Nayak,
M. Ohmachi,
F. Giorgini, and T. Schedl.
2000.
FOG-2, a novel F-box containing protein, associates with the GLD-1 RNA binding protein and directs male sex determination in the C. elegans hermaphrodite germline.
Development
127:5265-5276[Abstract].
|
| 5.
|
Colgan, D. F., and J. L. Manley.
1997.
Mechanism and regulation of mRNA polyadenylation.
Genes Dev.
11:2755-2766[Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Deo, R. C.,
N. Sonenberg, and S. K. Burley.
2001.
X-ray structure of the human hyperplastic discs protein: an ortholog of the C-terminal domain of poly(A)-binding protein.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
98:4414-4419[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Fu, L., and S. Benchimol.
1997.
Participation of the human p53 3'UTR in translational repression and activation following -irradiation.
EMBO J.
16:4117-4125[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Gebauer, F.,
D. F. Corona,
T. Preiss,
P. B. Becker, and M. W. Hentze.
1999.
Translational control of dosage compensation in Drosophila by Sex-lethal: cooperative silencing via the 5' and 3' UTRs of msl-2 mRNA is independent of the poly(A) tail.
EMBO J.
18:6146-6154[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Gingras, A. C.,
B. Raught, and N. Sonenberg.
1999.
eIF4 initiation factors: effectors of mRNA recruitment to ribosomes and regulators of translation.
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
68:913-963[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Gitlin, J. D.
1988.
Transcriptional regulation of ceruloplasmin gene expression during inflammation.
J. Biol. Chem.
263:6281-6287[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Gray, N. K.,
J. M. Coller,
K. S. Dickson, and M. Wickens.
2000.
Multiple portions of poly(A)-binding protein stimulate translation in vivo.
EMBO J.
19:4723-4733[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Grosset, C.,
C. Y. Chen,
N. Xu,
N. Sonenberg,
H. Jacquemin-Sablon, and A. B. Shyu.
2000.
A mechanism for translationally coupled mRNA turnover: interaction between the poly(A) tail and a c-fos RNA coding determinant via a protein complex.
Cell
103:29-40[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Görlach, M.,
C. G. Burd, and G. Dreyfuss.
1994.
The mRNA poly(A)-binding protein: Localization, abundance, and RNA-binding specificity.
Exp. Cell Res.
211:400-407[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Harris, Z. L.,
A. P. Durley,
T. K. Man, and J. D. Gitlin.
1999.
Targeted gene disruption reveals an essential role for ceruloplasmin in cellular iron efflux.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
96:10812-10817[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Hew, Y.,
C. Lau,
Z. Grzelczak, and F. W. Keeley.
2000.
Identification of a GA-rich sequence as a protein-binding site in the 3'-untranslated region of chicken elastin mRNA with a potential role in the developmental regulation of elastin mRNA stability.
J. Biol. Chem.
275:24857-24864[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Hoshino, S.,
M. Imai,
T. Kobayashi,
N. Uchida, and T. Katada.
1999.
The eukaryotic polypeptide chain releasing factor (eRF3/GSPT) carrying the translation termination signal to the 3'-poly(A) tail of mRNA. Direct association of erf3/GSPT with polyadenylate-binding protein.
J. Biol. Chem.
274:16677-16680[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 17.
|
Imataka, H.,
A. Gradi, and N. Sonenberg.
1998.
A newly identified N-terminal amino acid sequence of human eIF4G binds poly(A)-binding protein and functions in poly(A)-dependent translation.
EMBO J.
17:7480-7489[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Izquierdo, J. M., and J. M. Cuezva.
1997.
Control of the translational efficiency of -F1-ATPase mRNA depends on the regulation of a protein that binds the 3' untranslated region of the mRNA.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17:5255-5268[Abstract].
|
| 19.
|
Jan, E.,
C. K. Motzny,
L. E. Graves, and E. B. Goodwin.
1999.
The STAR protein, GLD-1, is a translational regulator of sexual identity in Caenorhabditis elegans.
EMBO J.
18:258-269[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Khaleghpour, K.,
A. Kahvejian,
G. D. Crescenzo,
G. Roy,
Y. V. Svitkin,
H. Imataka,
M. O'Connor-McCourt, and N. Sonenberg.
2001.
Dual interactions of the translational repressor Paip2 with the poly(A) binding protein.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
21:5200-5213[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
Klausner, R. D.,
T. A. Rouault, and J. B. Harford.
1993.
Regulating the fate of mRNA: the control of cellular iron metabolism.
Cell
72:19-28[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Lai, W. S.,
E. Carballo,
J. R. Strum,
E. A. Kennington,
R. S. Phillips, and P. J. Blackshear.
1999.
Evidence that tristetraprolin binds to AU-rich elements and promotes the deadenylation and destabilization of tumor necrosis factor alpha mRNA.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19:4311-4323[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Mangus, D. A.,
N. Amrani, and A. Jacobson.
1998.
Pbp1p, a factor interacting with Saccharomyces cerevisiae poly(A)-binding protein, regulates polyadenylation.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:7383-7396[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
Mathews, M. B.,
N. Sonenberg, and J. W. Hershey.
1996.
Origins and targets of translational control, p. 1-29.
In
J. W. B. Hershey, M. B. Mathews, and N. Sonenberg (ed.), Translational control. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Plainview, N.Y.
|
| 25.
|
Mazumder, B., and P. L. Fox.
1999.
Delayed translational silencing of ceruloplasmin transcript in gamma interferon-activated U937 monocytic cells: role of 3' untranslated region.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19:6898-6905[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Mazumder, B.,
C. K. Mukhopadhyay,
A. Prok,
M. K. Cathcart, and P. L. Fox.
1997.
Induction of ceruloplasmin synthesis by IFN- in human monocytic cells.
J. Immunol.
159:1938-1944[Abstract].
|
| 27.
|
Mbongolo Mbella, E. G.,
S. Bertrand,
G. Huez, and J. N. Octave.
2000.
A GG nucleotide sequence of the 3' untranslated region of amyloid precursor protein mRNA plays a key role in the regulation of translation and the binding of proteins.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20:4572-4579[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 28.
|
Michel, Y. M.,
D. Poncet,
M. Piron,
K. M. Kean, and A. M. Borman.
2000.
Cap-poly(A) synergy in mammalian cell-free extracts. Investigation of the requirements for poly(A)-mediated stimulation of translation initiation.
J. Biol. Chem.
275:32268-32276[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 29.
|
Miyajima, H.,
Y. Nishimura,
K. Mizoguchi,
M. Sakamoto,
T. Shimizu, and N. Honda.
1987.
Familial apoceruloplasmin deficiency associated with blepharospasm and retinal degeneration.
Neurology
37:761-767[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
Muckenthaler, M.,
N. K. Gray, and M. W. Hentze.
1998.
IRP-1 binding to ferritin mRNA prevents the recruitment of the small ribosomal subunit by the cap-binding complex eIF4F.
Mol. Cell
2:383-388[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 31.
|
Osaki, S.,
D. A. Johnson, and E. Frieden.
1966.
The possible significance of the ferrous oxidase activity of ceruloplasmin in normal human serum.
J. Biol. Chem.
241:2746-2751[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 32.
|
Ostareck, D. H.,
A. Ostareck-Lederer,
I. N. Shatsky, and M. W. Hentze.
2001.
Lipoxygenase mRNA silencing in erythroid differentiation: the 3'UTR regulatory complex controls 60S ribosomal subunit joining.
Cell
104:281-290[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 33.
|
Ostareck, D. H.,
A. Ostareck-Lederer,
M. Wilm,
B. J. Thiele,
M. Mann, and M. W. Hentze.
1997.
mRNA silencing in erythroid differentiation: hnRNP K and hnRNP E1 regulate 15-lipoxygenase translation from the 3' end.
Cell
89:597-606[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 34.
|
Ostareck-Lederer, A.,
D. H. Ostareck,
N. Standart, and B. J. Thiele.
1994.
Translation of 15-lipoxygenase mRNA is inhibited by a protein that binds to a repeated sequence in the 3' untranslated region.
EMBO J.
13:1476-1481[Medline].
|
| 35.
|
Pages, G.,
E. Berra,
J. Milanini,
A. P. Levy, and J. Pouysségur.
2000.
Stress-activated protein kinases (JNK and p38/HOG) are essential for vascular endothelial growth factor mRNA stability.
J. Biol. Chem.
275:26484-26491[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 36.
|
Piecyk, M.,
S. Wax,
A. R. Beck,
N. Kedersha,
M. Gupta,
B. Maritim,
S. Chen,
C. Gueydan,
V. Kruys,
M. Streuli, and P. Anderson.
2000.
TIA-1 is a translational silencer that selectively regulates the expression of TNF- .
EMBO J.
19:4154-4163[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 37.
|
Preiss, T., and M. W. Hentze.
1999.
From factor to mechanism: translation and translational control in eukaryotes.
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
9:515-521[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 38.
|
Proweller, A., and J. S. Butler.
1997.
Ribosome concentration contributes to discrimination against poly(A) mRNA during translation initiation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:6004-6010[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 39.
|
Richter, J. D.
1996.
Dynamics of poly(A) addition and removal during development, p. 481-503.
In
J. W. B. Hershey, M. B. Mathews, and N. Sonenberg (ed.), Translational control. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Plainview, N.Y.
|
| 40.
|
Rodriguez-Pascual, F.,
M. Hausding,
I. Ihrig-Biedert,
H. Furneaux,
A. P. Levy,
U. Forstermann, and H. Kleinert.
2000.
Complex contribution of the 3'-untranslated region to the expressional regulation of the human inducible nitric-oxide synthase gene. Involvement of the RNA-binding protein HuR.
J. Biol. Chem.
275:26040-26049[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 41.
|
Rouault, T. A.,
M. W. Hentze,
S. W. Caughman,
J. B. Harford, and R. D. Klausner.
1988.
Binding of a cytosolic protein to the iron-responsive element of human ferritin messenger RNA.
Science
241:1207-1210[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 42.
|
Rydé, L.
1984.
Ceruloplasmin, p. 37-100.
In
R. Lontie (ed.), Copper proteins and copper enzymes, vol. III. CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, Fla.
|
| 43.
|
Sachs, A. B.,
P. Sarnow, and M. W. Hentze.
1997.
Starting at the beginning, middle, and end: translation initiation in eukaryotes.
Cell
89:831-838[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 44.
|
Sachs, A. B., and G. Varani.
2000.
Eukaryotic translation initiation: there are (at least) two sides to every story.
Nat. Struct. Biol.
7:356-361[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 45.
|
Standart, N., and R. J. Jackson.
1994.
Regulation of translation by specific protein/mRNA interactions.
Biochimie
76:867-879[Medline].
|
| 46.
|
Stein, I.,
A. Itin,
P. Einat,
R. Skaliter,
Z. Grossman, and E. Keshet.
1998.
Translation of vascular endothelial growth factor mRNA by internal ribosome entry: implications for translation under hypoxia.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:3112-3119[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 47.
|
St Johnston, D.
1995.
The intracellular localization of messenger RNAs.
Cell
81:161-170[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 48.
|
Tarun, S. Z., and A. B. Sachs.
1996.
Association of the yeast poly(A) tail binding protein with translation initiation factor eIF-4G.
EMBO J.
15:7168-7177[Medline].
|
| 49.
|
Tarun, S. Z.,
S. E. Wells,
J. A. Deardorff, and A. B. Sachs.
1997.
Translation initiation factor eIF4G mediates in vitro poly(A) tail-dependent translation.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:9046-9051[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 50.
|
Thompson, S. R.,
E. B. Goodwin, and M. Wickens.
2000.
Rapid deadenylation and poly(A)-dependent translational repression mediated by the Caenorhabditis elegans tra-2 3' untranslated region in Xenopus embryos.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20:2129-2137[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 51.
|
Wakiyama, M.,
H. Imataka, and N. Sonenberg.
2001.
Interaction of eIF4G with poly(A)-binding protein stimulates translation and is critical for Xenopus oocyte maturation.
Curr. Biol.
10:1147-1150.
|
| 52.
|
Wells, S. E.,
P. E. Hillner,
R. D. Vale, and A. B. Sachs.
1998.
Circularization of mRNA by eukaryotic translation initiation factors.
Mol. Cell
2:135-140[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 53.
|
Wickens, M.,
P. Anderson, and R. J. Jackson.
1997.
Life and death in the cytoplasm: messages from the 3' end.
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
7:220-232[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 54.
|
Wickens, M.,
J. Kimble, and S. Strickland.
1996.
Translational control of developmental decisions, p. 411-450.
In
J. W. B. Hershey, M. B. Mathews, and N. Sonenberg (ed.), Translational control. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Plainview, N.Y.
|
Molecular and Cellular Biology, October 2001, p. 6440-6449, Vol. 21, No. 19
0270-7306/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/MCB.21.19.6440-6449.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Vyas, K., Chaudhuri, S., Leaman, D. W., Komar, A. A., Musiyenko, A., Barik, S., Mazumder, B.
(2009). Genome-Wide Polysome Profiling Reveals an Inflammation-Responsive Posttranscriptional Operon in Gamma Interferon-Activated Monocytes. Mol. Cell. Biol.
29: 458-470
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Abaza, I., Gebauer, F.
(2008). Trading translation with RNA-binding proteins. RNA
14: 404-409
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Sears, J. E., Hoppe, G.
(2005). Triamcinolone Acetonide Destabilizes VEGF mRNA in Muller Cells under Continuous Cobalt Stimulation. IOVS
46: 4336-4341
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Subramaniam, K., Chen, K., Joseph, K., Raymond, J. R., Tholanikunnel, B. G.
(2004). The 3'-Untranslated Region of the {beta}2-Adrenergic Receptor mRNA Regulates Receptor Synthesis. J. Biol. Chem.
279: 27108-27115
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Grosset, C., Boniface, R., Duchez, P., Solanilla, A., Cosson, B., Ripoche, J.
(2004). In Vivo Studies of Translational Repression Mediated by the Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-stimulating Factor AU-rich Element. J. Biol. Chem.
279: 13354-13362
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Sampath, P., Mazumder, B., Seshadri, V., Fox, P. L.
(2003). Transcript-Selective Translational Silencing by Gamma Interferon Is Directed by a Novel Structural Element in the Ceruloplasmin mRNA 3' Untranslated Region. Mol. Cell. Biol.
23: 1509-1519
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
KAHVEJIAN, A., ROY, G., SONENBERG, N.
(2001). The mRNA Closed-loop Model: The Function of PABP and PABP-interacting Proteins in mRNA Translation. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol
66: 293-300
[Abstract]