Department of Biochemistry and Molecular
Biology (M/C 536), University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago,
Illinois 60612
Received 22 February 2001/Returned for modification 10 May
2001/Accepted 19 July 2001
The damaged-DNA binding protein DDB consists of two subunits, DDB1
(127 kDa) and DDB2 (48 kDa). Mutations in the DDB2 subunit have been
detected in patients suffering from the repair deficiency disease
xeroderma pigmentosum (group E). In addition, recent studies suggested
a role for DDB2 in global genomic repair. DDB2 also exhibits
transcriptional activity. We showed that expression of DDB1 and DDB2
stimulated the activity of the cell cycle regulatory transcription
factor E2F1. Here we show that DDB2 is a cell cycle-regulated protein.
It is present at a low level in growth-arrested primary fibroblasts,
and after release the level peaks at the G1/S boundary. The
cell cycle regulation of DDB2 involves posttranscriptional mechanisms.
Moreover, we find that an inhibitor of 26S proteasome increases the
level of DDB2, suggesting that it is regulated by the
ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. Our previous study indicated that the
cullin family protein Cul-4A associates with the DDB2 subunit. Because
cullins are involved in the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway, we
investigated the role of Cul-4A in regulating DDB2. Here we show that
DDB2 is a specific target of Cul-4A. Coexpression of Cul-4A, but not
Cul-1 or other highly related cullins, increases the ubiquitination and
the decay rate of DDB2. A naturally occurring mutant of DDB2 (2RO),
which does not bind Cul-4A, is not affected by coexpression of Cul-4A.
Studies presented here identify a specific function of the Cul-4A gene,
which is amplified and overexpressed in breast cancers.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The DDB2 subunit (also referred to
as p48 or p48DDB) of the damaged-DNA binding protein DDB is
mutated in xeroderma pigmentosum (group E, XP-E). Several naturally
occurring mutants of DDB2 have been identified and characterized
(36, 37, 41). These mutants are deficient in damaged-DNA
recognition (17, 36, 37). One of these mutants, referred
to as 2RO, also fails to associate with the DDB1 subunit (also referred
to as p127 or p127DDB) (42); a patient harboring
this mutation developed malignant skin cancer and died at the age of 14 (7). Another mutant, 82TO, is able to associate with the
DDB1 subunit but is impaired in its ability to stimulate nuclear
localization of DDB1 (42). A patient harboring the
82TO mutation exhibited severe sun sensitivity (25). In addition, a nonsense mutation in the DDB2 gene was correlated with the
development of multiple skin neoplasia (18a). The incidence of tumors
in patients with DDB2 mutations suggests a role for DDB2 in the pathway
of tumor suppression. The damaged-DNA binding function of DDB2
suggested a role in DNA repair, which was supported by several lines of
evidence. First, fibroblasts, isolated from the XP-E patients harboring
mutations in the DDB2 gene, exhibited reduced DNA repair activity
(17, 21, 41). In addition, microinjection of the wild-type
protein could complement the deficiency in cells harboring mutant DDB2
(21, 41). Recent studies suggested that DDB is involved in
global genomic repair (17, 18, 47). Furthermore, it was
shown that DDB2 is downstream of p53 and that its mRNA level is
increased by p53 (18).
DDB2 also associates with cell cycle-regulatory proteins. We showed
that DDB2 could interact with the cell cycle transcription factor E2F1
(12, 42). Moreover, in conjunction with the DDB1 subunit,
DDB2 cooperates with E2F1 to stimulate transcription from E2F-regulated
promoters in transient-transfection assays. While DDB1 has been
implicated in transcription from other promoters (26), the
transcriptional stimulatory function of DDB2 is specific for
E2F-regulated promoters (12). The DDB1 subunit of DDB is also a target of viral proteins. The hepatitis B virus X protein interacts with DDB1, and this interaction is important for the establishment of infection and the life cycle of the virus (27, 34a, 45, 46). The V protein encoded by the paramyxovirus simian
virus 5 also associates with DDB1, and this interaction is correlated
with a retardation of cell cycle progression (28, 29). We
showed that DDB2 binds to the cullin family member Cul-4A (43). Binding to Cul-4A is interesting because a recent
study indicated that the Cul-4A gene is overexpressed and amplified in
breast cancer (3).
Cullins represent a family of proteins that are components of E3
ubiquitin ligases (see reference 51 for a review). The E3
ubiquitin ligases are believed to be involved in selecting target
proteins for ubiquitination. Cullins associate with the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2 and with the target proteins to enhance selective ubiquitination. Caenorhabditis elegans
encodes five cullins: Cul-1, Cul-2, Cul-3, Cul-4, and Cul-5
(24). Mammalian cells express six cullins, since they
encode two distinct but highly homologous cullin 4 proteins, Cul-4A and
Cul-4B (24). Cullins are also found in yeast. The yeast
cdc53 gene product, which is involved in the ubiquitination of
p40sic and G1 cyclins, is related to
Cul-1 (10, 33, 50). In addition, the APC2 gene product,
which is involved in the ubiquitination of the mitotic cyclins in yeast
and humans, is homologous to the cullin proteins (53). The
five C. elegans cullins and the six human cullins possess
extensive sequence homology, suggesting that they use similar
mechanisms to ubiquitinate target proteins. All six human cullins were
shown to be modified by NEDD8, a small ubiquitin-like polypeptide
(14). For Cul-1, the NEDD8 modification has been
correlated with nuclear localization (11). In addition, the cullins associate with a Ring finger domain containing small polypeptide ROC1 or Rbx1 (23, 40). Apc2, which is involved in the ubiquitination of cyclin B, associates with a ring
finger-containing protein, Apc11. The interaction with the Ring
finger-containing protein is essential for the ubiquitin-ligase
activity (references 48 and 51 and references
therein). Despite the similarities, there are also differences in the
mechanism by which cullins select targets. For example, Cul-1
associates with the target proteins through F-box-containing proteins
whereas Cul-2 does not bind the F-box-containing proteins (2,
51). Instead it is believed that the SOCS box-containing
proteins serve as functional partners of Cul-2 (22, 30).
For the other cullins, it is unclear how they select the targets or
substrates for ubiquitination.
Cul-1 is the best-characterized cullin with regard to function. Several
target proteins have been identified for Cul-1. Interestingly, many of
the Cul-1 targets are cell cycle regulatory proteins. For example, the
stability of the cell cycle-inhibitory proteins p27Kip1 and
p21Cip1 is regulated by Cul-1 (references 51
and 52 and references therein). A recent study indicated
that the c-Myc protein induces the expression of Cul-1 to then cause
proteolysis of p27Kip1 (39). Other studies
have shown that cyclin A (34, 51), cyclin E (6, 44,
49), cyclin D (52), and E2F1 (32) are
also targeted for ubiquitination by the Cul-1 pathway. The Skp1 protein
bridges the interaction between Cul-1 and the F-box-containing proteins, which associates with the target proteins (see reference 51 for a review). There are multiple F-box proteins, which
is consistent with the observation that Cul-1 is involved in the ubiquitination of several proteins. Very little is known about the
function of Cul-2. A recent study indicated that the hypoxia-induced transcription factor is a target of ubiquitination by Cul-2 and that
it also involves the VHL tumor suppressor protein (19, 30,
39). The only known target for Cul-3 is cyclin E. Cul-3 associates with cyclin E and induces its ubiquitination
(44). It is unclear whether the interaction between Cul-3
and cyclin E is mediated by another protein.
Here we show that Cul-4A targets DDB2 for ubiquitination. DDB2 is a
cell cycle-regulated protein. Its level peaks at the G1/S boundary and decreases in S phase. We did not detect any decrease in
the mRNA levels of DDB2. On the other hand, addition of a proteasome inhibitor increased the level of the DDB2 protein, suggesting that DDB2
is regulated by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. We also show that
DDB2 is a specific target of Cul-4A. Cul-4B, which has 82% sequence
identity to Cul-4A, failed to induce the ubiquitination of DDB2. The
basis of the specificity lies in the N-terminal unique region of
Cul-4A. The results provide an insight into the cell cycle regulation
of DDB2 and establish a specific cellular function of Cul-4A.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Cell culture.
HeLa cells were grown in spinner culture using
suspension-minimal essential medium (S-MEM; GIBCO BRL) plus 5%
calf serum. Monolayer cultures of human primary fibroblasts (IMR-90),
HeLa calls, and human 293 cells were maintained in Dulbecco modified Eagle medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum.
Cell synchronization and cell cycle analysis.
HeLa cells
were arrested at the G1/S boundary by the
thymidine-aphidicolin double-block method described by Heintz et al. (13). Human primary fibroblasts were grown to 70%
confluence and then maintained in medium without serum for 72 h.
The synchronized cells were stimulated with 10% fetal bovine serum.
The cells were harvested at different time points to assay the levels
of various proteins and RNA.
RNase protection assay.
Antisense RNA probes were generated
by in vitro transcription of linearized templates by using T3 RNA
polymerase in the presence of [32P]UTP. DDB2 probe was
synthesized from a XhoI-linearized Bluescript II KS(+)
template containing a HindIII-EcoRI fragment
of the DDB2 cDNA. Cyclophilin probe was synthesized using T3 RNA
polymerase from a BamHI-linearized pTRI-cyclophilin-human
antisense control template (Ambion) in which the cyclophilin fragment
has been inserted into the KpnI-EcoRI
sites of an Ambion pTRIPLEscript vector. Total RNA from the cells was
isolated by using Trizol (GIBCO BRL) as specified by the manufacturer.
To detect the mRNA levels of DDB2 and cyclophilin, antisense RNA probes
were hybridized with 20 or 10 µg of total RNA, respectively.
Hybridization was performed for 16 h at 45°C in 5 µl of
hybridization buffer containing 80% formamide, 40 mM
piperazine-N,N'-bis(2-ethanesulfonic acid)
(PIPES, pH 6.4), 400 mM sodium acetate, and 1 mM EDTA. Next day, 330 µl of the RNase I buffer (Promega) containing 10 U of RNase I
(Promega) was added to the hybridization mix, and the digestion was
allowed to continue for 1 h at 37°C. Following the digestion, 40 µl of ammonium acetate was added to the samples and the protected
mRNAs were precipitated with ethanol, resuspended in formamide dye, denatured at 100°C for 3 min, and loaded onto a 4.5% denaturing sequencing gel. Protected bands were visualized by autoradiography.
Expression plasmids.
The cullin cDNAs were subcloned in
pcDNA3.1/V5-His vector (Invitrogen) in frame with the V5-epitope. The
cDNAs were amplified by PCR. The following primers were used to carry
out the PCR: for Cul-1, upstream primer,
CCCGGATCCCACCATGTCGTCAACCCGGAGC; downstream primer,
CCCGCGGCCGCGCCAAGTAACTGTAGGTGTC; for Cul-2, upstream primer, CCCGGATCCCACCATGTCTTTGAAACCAAGA; downstream primer,
CCCGGGCCCCGCGACGTAGCTGTATTCATC; for Cul-3, upstream primer,
CCCGGTACCCACCATGTCGAATCTTAGCAAA; downstream primer,
CCCGGGCCCTGCTACATATGTGTATACTTT; for Cul-4B, upstream primer, CCCGGATCCACCATGATTGATCCGGATTTTGCA; downstream primer,
CCCGGGCCCTGCAATATAGTTGTACTGGTT; and for Cul-5, upstream
primer, GGGGGATCCCACCATGGCGACGTCTAATCTGTTA; downstream
primer, GGGTCTAGATGCCATATATATGAAAGTGTT. The mouse Cul-4A cDNA was subcloned in two steps. The XhoI-XbaI
fragment encoding the first 300 residues of Cul-4A was subcloned in the
same sites of the pcDNA3.1/V5-His vector. The remaining part of the
cDNA (starting from the XbaI site at position 797 relative
to the first coding ATG) was amplified by PCR (upstream primer,
GGGTCTAGAAGAGGAAGCAGA; downstream primer,
GGGTCTAGATGCCACGTAGTGGTACTG) and subsequently subcloned into
the same vector at the XbaI site. The Cul4A deletion mutant
was generated by PCR amplification of the mouse Cul4A cDNA from
position 156 relative to the first coding ATG up to the 3' end of the
cDNA (upstream primer, GGGCTCGAGGCCATGGGGCTGCCTGACAACTACACT; downstream primer, CCGGGCCCTGCCACGTAGTGGTACTG) and
subcloned into the pcDNA3.1/V5-His vector at the XhoI and
ApaI sites. All cullin clones were confirmed by DNA sequencing.
Transfection in mammalian cells.
Transient transfections
were carried out by the calcium phosphate coprecipitation method as
previously described (12). The total concentration of the
DNA for transfection was maintained at 20 µg/100-mm-diameter plate by
adding empty vector DNA.
Preparation of nuclear extracts.
Cytosolic and nuclear
extracts were prepared from the synchronized cells at various times of
the cell cycle by the method described by Dignam et al.
(8). Briefly, the harvested cells were washed with
phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and suspended in 2 volumes of hypotonic
buffer, and membranes were disrupted by 30 strokes of a Kontes 2-ml
tissue grinder. The nuclei were pelleted by centrifugation at
3,000 × g for 5 min. The nuclear pellet was extracted
with high-salt buffer (0.5 M KCl). Extracted nuclear proteins were
obtained by centrifugation at 13,000 × g for 10 min.
Immunoprecipitation and Western blot analysis.
Cells were
harvested after DNA transfection. The harvested cells were washed twice
with PBS, and cell extracts were prepared by incubation in a lysis
buffer (PBS containing 10 mM CHAPS, 2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride,
1 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM sodium vanadate, 1 mM sodium fluoride, 5 µg
of aprotinin per ml, and 5 µg of leupeptin per ml) for 30 min at
4°C. For immunoprecipitation of the ubiquitinated proteins, cells
harvested 40 h posttransfection were treated with MG 132 (final
concentration, 10 mM) for 5 h and N-ethylmaleimide (5 µM) was included in the lysis buffer instead of dithiothreitol. The
extracts (1 mg) were subjected to immunoprecipitation either with V5
antibody (2 h with primary antibody and 2 h with protein G beads
at 4°C) or with agarose beads covalently linked to T7 antibodies for
2 h at 4°C. The immunoprecipitates were extensively washed with the
lysis buffer, and the bound proteins were eluted with gel-loading
buffer at room temperature for 10 min, boiled, and subjected to Western
blot assay. Western blot analyses were performed by using anti-rabbit
and anti-mouse Fab fragments conjugated to horseradish peroxidase
(Amersham) and ECL Western blot detection reagents (Amersham) as
specified by the manufacturer. V5 antibodies were purchased from
Invitrogen, and T7 antibodies were obtained from Novagen. Antibodies
against cyclin E, cyclin A, cdk2, and ubiquitin were from Santa Cruz
Biotechnology, and those against
-tubulin were from Neomarkers.
 |
RESULTS |
Cul-4A associates with DDB2 depending on its N-terminal unique
sequences.
In a recent study, we observed an endogenous
interaction between Cul-4A and DDB2 (43). However, it was
not clear whether the other members of the cullin family could also
bind DDB2. Cul-4B is particularly interesting because it has extensive
sequence identity to Cul-4A. Human Cul-4B (also known as KIAA0695) has 82% sequence identity to mouse Cul-4A. The mouse Cul-4A cDNA clone was
characterized by Ohta et al. (40), and it encodes a
759-amino-acid aa polypeptide. The published human Cul-4A cDNA
(3), however, encodes a 659-aa polypeptide which lacks 100 N-terminal residues encoded by the mouse clone. It is possible that
these are products of differential splicing because the human clone has
95% identity to the mouse clone. The human clone produced a protein
that is much smaller than the major form of Cul-4A in HeLa cells and
human primary fibroblasts and that failed to bind DDB2 (data not
shown). The size of the protein encoded by the mouse clone is very
similar (about 85 kDa) to that of the endogenous Cul-4A protein in
human cells. Moreover, the protein encoded by the mouse cDNA clone, like the endogenous human Cul-4A protein, bound DDB2. Therefore, in
this study we used the mouse clone to characterize the function of the
mammalian Cul-4A.
To compare the cullins, we subcloned the cullin cDNAs in a mammalian
expression vector in frame with the V5 epitope tag. The V5-tagged
cullin cDNA clones were transfected into human 293 cells along with a
plasmid expressing T7 epitope-tagged DDB2. An aliquot of the
transfected cell extract was analyzed for expression of the DDB2 and
cullin proteins using T7 and V5 antibodies in Western blot assays (Fig.
1, lower panels). To assay for an
interaction between the cullins and DDB2, the extracts of the
transfected cells were immunoprecipitated with V5 antibody to
immunoprecipitate the cullins and the immunoprecipitates were subjected
to Western blot analysis using the T7 antibody to detect DDB2. We
observed that only Cul-4A could bind DDB2, since there was no
detectable coprecipitation of DDB2 with the other cullins. Because of
the variations in expression of DDB2 and the cullins, this experiment was performed several times using two or three cullins at one time
(results not shown). Consistently, only Cul-4A exhibited binding to
DDB2. The main difference between Cul-4A and Cul-4B lies in their
N-terminal region. Because Cul-4B failed to coprecipitate DDB2, we
suspected that the N-terminal sequences of Cul-4A might be critical for
binding to DDB2. A deletion mutant of Cul-4A lacking the N-terminal 52 residues was generated. This mutant did not show any interaction with
DDB2 [Fig. 1, lane Cul-4A(dl 1-52)], suggesting that the N-terminal
unique region in the Cul-4A protein is essential for binding to DDB2.
This result also explained why Cul-4B, a highly homologous cullin, is
unable to bind DDB2. It is noteworthy that Cul-4B and the deletion
mutant of Cul-4A, unlike the other cullins, migrated as a single band
(Fig. 1). It is possible that these two polypeptides failed to undergo
NEDD8 modification, which might also explain why they did not bind
DDB2. Therefore, we cannot rule out the possibility that the N-terminal
sequences of Cul-4A are important for its modification by NEDD8 and
that the NEDD8 modification of Cul-4A supports its binding to DDB2. In
any event, of the five cullins that migrated as double bands, only
Cul-4A was able to associate with DDB2.

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
DDB2 specifically binds Cul-4A. Plasmids expressing
V5-tagged cullins (19 µg of cullin 1, 2, 3, or 5; 3 µg of the
wild-type or mutant cullin 4A; or 6 µg of cullin 4B DNA) were
transfected in human 293 cells along with a plasmid expressing
T7-tagged DDB2 (1 µg). Total DNA was made up to 20 µg with empty V5
vector where necessary. The transfected cells were washed with PBS, and
cell extracts were prepared as described in Materials and Methods. The
extracts were subjected to immunoprecipitation with V5 antibody. The
immunoprecipitates were eluted with gel-loading buffer at room
temperature for 10 min, boiled, and subjected to a Western blot assay.
The blot was probed with T7 antibody to assay for the presence of
coimmuoprecipitated DDB2.
|
|
DDB2 is a cell cycle-regulated protein, and its level is regulated
by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway.
Because DDB2 could associate
with the cell cycle transcription factor E2F1 (12, 42), we
sought to investigate whether DDB2 is also a cell cycle-regulated
protein. We used synchronized primary human fibroblasts for this
purpose. Young primary fibroblasts are synchronized to the
G0/G1 phases of the cell cycle by being maintained in medium containing no serum for 72 h. The cells were then stimulated by replenishing the medium with 10% fetal bovine serum. They were harvested at different time points after serum stimulation and used for both protein and RNA analyses (Fig.
2). DDB2
is mainly a nuclear protein and is undetectable in the cytosol (31, 42). To improve the analysis, we prepared nuclear
extracts by the procedure of Dignam et al. (8). The
extracts were subjected to Western blot analysis using peptide
antibodies specific for DDB2 and Cul-4A. In addition, relevant parts of
the Western blot were probed for cyclin E and cdk2. The level of cdk2
does not change significantly during the cell cycle, and therefore it
also serves as a loading control. Results of this analysis indicate that DDB2 is a cell cycle-regulated protein (Fig. 2). Its level is low
in growth-arrested cells but increases after serum stimulation and
peaks at the G1/S boundary, as indicated by the level of
cyclin E and flow cytometry. Moreover, there was a clear decline in the level of DDB2 in cells enriched for S phase. To determine whether the
change in the DDB2 protein level is a result of an altered mRNA level,
total RNA from the synchronized cells was analyzed for DDB2-mRNA by an
RNase protection assay. The RNase protection analysis did not reveal
any significant change in the steady-state level of the DDB2 mRNA
during cell cycle progression (Fig. 2A, lower panel). The band
intensities for the DDB2 mRNA and protein were quantified by
densitometric scanning, and the relative intensities are shown in Fig.
2B. The results suggest that DDB2 is regulated during the cell cycle at
least partly by a posttranscriptional mechanism.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
DDB2 is regulated during the cell cycle by a
posttranscriptional mechanism. (A) Human primary fibroblasts were
synchronized by serum starvation for 72 h followed by stimulation with
10% FBS. At the indicated time points, cells were harvested and
nuclear extracts were prepared and subjected to Western blot analysis
(with 250 µg of nuclear extract) for DDB2, Cul-4A, cyclin E, and
cdk2. The Lower panel shows the changes in the levels of DDB2 and
cyclophilin mRNA at various time points of the cell cycle. Total RNA
from the cells was subjected to RNase protection assays using antisense
RNA probes corresponding to DDB2 and cyclophilin as described in
Materials and Methods. (B) Plot showing the relative levels of the DDB2
protein and mRNA during the progression of the cell cycle. Band
intensities were determined by densitometric scanning of the films
corresponding to the Western blot and RNase protection assays. After
normalization, the relative intensities were plotted.
|
|
Cell cycle regulation of DDB2 was also observed in HeLa cells. HeLa
cells were synchronized at the G1/S phase boundary by a
double thymidine-aphidicolin block (13). After release
from the block, the cells were harvested at different time points and nuclear extracts were analyzed for DDB2. Immediately after release from
the block, there was an increase in the level of DDB2 (Fig. 3). The increase in the level of DDB2 was
followed by a decrease in the level during S phase. Later, at the 23-h
time point (Fig. 3) there was a second peak of both DDB2 and cyclin A,
which corresponded to a new cycle. These results are consistent with
what we observed in primary fibroblasts. Because DDB2 associates with
Cul-4A, which is believed to be a component of E3 ubiquitin ligase, we
sought to determine whether the level of DDB2 protein is regulated by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. HeLa cells were treated for 5 h with MG 132, which is a specific inhibitor of the 26S
proteasome. Nuclear extracts were prepared from MG 132-treated or
dimethyl sulfoxide treated cells. Equal amounts of the extracts were
subjected to Western blot assays for the DDB2 protein. As can be seen
in Fig. 3 (lower panel), treatment with MG 132 increased the level of
DDB2, suggesting that it is a target of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway.

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
DDB2 accumulates in the nucleus at the G1/S
boundary in synchronized population of HeLa cells, and its level is
regulated by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. HeLa cells were arrested
at the G1/S boundary by a thymidine-aphidicolin double
block. The cells were harvested at indicated time points, and nuclear
extracts were prepared as described in Materials and Methods and
analyzed for the levels of DDB2 (100 µg of extract), cyclin A (50 µg), and cdk2 (50 µg) by a Western blot assay. The lower panel
shows the effect of proteasome inhibitor on the level of DDB2. For
this, HeLa suspension culture cells were treated with either MG 132 (10 µM) or equal volume of dimethyl sulfoxide for 5 h. Cells were
harvested, and 100 µg of nuclear extracts was analyzed for DDB2.
|
|
Coexpression of Cul-4A specifically increases the decay rate of the
DDB2 polypeptide.
Cul-4A belongs to a family of E3 ubiquitin
ligases, and it associates with DDB2. Moreover, we consistently
observed that the expression of Cul-4A reduced the steady-state levels
of the DDB2 subunit, whereas the steady-state levels of the DDB1
subunit were essentially unaltered in the same experiments (data not
shown). Therefore, we sought to determine whether Cul-4A expression
increases the decay rate of DDB2. A Cul-4A expression plasmid was
cotransfected with plasmids that express T7 epitope-tagged DDB1 and
DDB2 into HeLa cells. Five plates were transfected for each set of
experiments. To compensate for the variations in the transfection
efficiencies in different plates, cells from the same set were
harvested by trypsinization at 16 h after transfection, pooled,
and divided equally among five plates. At 24 h after replating,
the cells were treated with cycloheximide (20 µg/ml). At various time
points following the cycloheximide addition, the cells were harvested for analysis of the DDB proteins. Equal amounts of the transfected cell
extracts were subjected to Western blot analysis. The blots were probed
with T7 antibody, which detects both DDB1 and DDB2 expressed by the
transfected plasmids. During these analyses, we observed that the DDB2
polypeptide decayed at a much higher rate in cells that were also
transfected with Cul-4A than in cells that were cotransfected with
empty vectors (Fig. 4). The DDB1 polypeptide, however, did not exhibit any change in the decay rate by
the coexpression of Cul-4A (Fig. 4). These results are consistent with
the notion that Cul-4A specifically reduces the half-life of the DDB2
polypeptide. To further investigate the specificity, we compared Cul-1,
Cul-4A, Cul-4B, and the deletion mutant Cul-4A (dl 1-52) for their
ability to enhance the decay rate of DDB2 (Fig.
5). Cul-1, Cul-4B, and Cul-4A (dl 1-52)
had very little effect on the decay rate of DDB2. Cul-4A, on the other hand, reduced the half-life of DDB2 from much greater than 3 h to
less than 2 h (Fig. 5B). This is consistent with the notion that
DDB2 is targeted for proteolysis specifically by Cul-4A.

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Coexpression of Cul-4A specifically reduces the
half-life of DDB2. Five plates (10-cm-diameter dish) of HeLa cells were
transfected with plasmids that express T7 epitope-tagged DDB1 and DDB2
in the presence or absence of a plasmid expressing V5-tagged Cul-4A. At
16 h posttransfection, the cells were trypsinized and the cells
from the same set were pooled and replated on five plates. After
24 h, cycloheximide was added to the medium at a final
concentration of 20 µg/ml and the cells were harvested at the
indicated time points. Total-cell extracts were prepared as described
in Materials and Methods. Then 100-µg portions of the transfected
cell extracts were analyzed by Western blot assays. The blot was probed
with antibodies against the T7 epitope.
|
|

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
(A) The decay rate of DDB2 is specifically enhanced by
the expression of Cul-4A. Five plates of HeLa cells were transfected
with plasmids that express T7 epitope-tagged DDB2 alone or with
plasmids expressing V5-tagged Cul-4A or V5-Cul-1 or V5-Cul-4A (dl
1-52) or Cul-4B. At 16 h posttransfection, the cells from same
set were trypsinized, pooled, and replated on five plates. After
24 h, the cells were treated with cycloheximide (20 µg/ml) and
harvested at the indicated time points. Then 100-µg portions of the
transfected cell extracts were analyzed by Western blot assays. The
blot was probed with antibodies against the T7 epitope. (B) Plot
showing the decay rate of DDB2 in the presence of different cullins.
The band intensities were determined by densitometric scanning. For
each plot, the band intensity corresponding to the zero hour time point
was taken as 100% and the relative intensities of the bands at various
time points were plotted. Symbols: , DDB2; , DDB2 + Cul-1;
, DDB2 + Cul4A; ×, DDB2 + Cul-4B; *, DDB2 + Cul-4A (dl
1-52).
|
|
Cul-4A induces ubiquitination of DDB2.
An increase in
the decay rate of DDB2 by Cul-4A also predicts that DDB2 is its
ubiquitination target because Cul-4A is an E3 ubiquitin ligase. We
investigated whether Cul-4A induces ubiquitination of DDB2. HeLa cells
were transfected with plasmids expressing Cul-4A, T7-tagged DDB2, or a
naturally occurring mutant of DDB2 (2RO) that does not bind Cul-4A
(43), along with a plasmid expressing His-tagged
ubiquitin. The transfection mixture also contained the plasmid
expressing T7-tagged DDB1. At 40 h after transfection, one set of
the transfected cells was treated for 5 h with MG 132, which is a
specific inhibitor of the 26S proteasome. For many proteins, the
polyubiquitinated forms are rapidly degraded by the 26S proteasome and
inhibition of the proteasome activity is necessary to detect the
polyubiquitinated forms. Extracts of the transfected cells were
immunoprecipitated with T7 antibody to immunoprecipitate the DDB
polypeptides. The immunoprecipitates were thoroughly washed and
subjected to Western blot analysis. The blot was probed with a
monoclonal antibody against ubiquitin (see Materials and Methods). As
can be seen in Fig. 6, ubiquitinated DDB
was detected only in MG 132-treated cells, and that clearly depended on
the expression of Cul-4A. A mutant DDB2 (2RO) which does not bind
Cul-4A did not exhibit any significant increase in ubiquitination by
the coexpression of Cul-4A. The mutant DDB2 was also cotransfected with
T7-DDB1. The lack of increase in ubiquitination, therefore, also
confirms the notion that DDB1 is not ubiquitinated by Cul-4A.

View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
(A) Cul-4A induces ubiqitination of DDB2. HeLa cells
were transfected with plasmids expressing T7-DDB2 (4 µg), T7-DDB1 (6 µg), T7-2RO (4 µg), His-tagged ubiquitin (U6) (1 µg), and
V5-Cul-4A (9 µg) in the indicated combinations. At 40 h after
transfection, the cells were treated with MG 132 for 5 h. The
cells were washed and lysed as described in Materials and Methods.
Equal amount of extracts (1 mg) were immunoprecipitated (IP) with T7
antibodies (ab) covalently linked to agarose beads, and the
immunoprecipitates were subjected to Western blot assay. The blot was
probed with monoclonal antibodies against ubiquitin. (B) Western blot
of the extracts (100 µg) probed with T7 antibody (ab) to assay for
the expression levels of DDB2 in the above extracts.
|
|
To further confirm that DDB2 itself, but not a DDB2-associated protein,
is ubiquitinated by Cul-4A, the immunoprecipitation was carried out
after treating the extracts with sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS). HeLa
cells were transfected with plasmids expressing T7-DDB2 and V5-DDB1 in
the presence and absence of the Cul-4A expression plasmid. Transfected
cells were treated with MG 132 for 5 h before being harvested for
protein extraction. Extracts were treated with 2% SDS at 37°C for 10 min. The SDS-treated extracts were diluted 10-fold and then subjected
to immunoprecipitation with T7 antibody. The SDS treatment disrupted
the interaction between the two DDB subunits, since we did not detect
any coprecipitation of DDB1 with DDB2 (Fig.
7A). In the absence of SDS treatment, DDB1 always coprecipitates with DDB2 (42). During DDB2
purification, DDB1 is the only protein that copurified with it
(20), suggesting that DDB1 is the most tightly associated
protein; therefore, the disruption of the DDB1-DDB2 interaction serves
as a good reference. When aliquots of the same immunoprecipitates were
probed for the ubiquitinated protein by Western blot assays with the
ubiquitin antibody, we could easily detect ubiquitinated proteins
coprecipitating with DDB2 (Fig. 7B). Taken together, this result
confirms the notion that DDB2 itself is ubiquitinated by Cul-4A.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
DDB2 itself is ubiquitinated by Cul-4A. HeLa cells were
transfected with plasmids expressing T7-tagged DDB2 and V5-tagged DDB1
in the presence and absence of the Cul-4A expression plasmid. At
40 h after transfection, the cells were treated with MG 132 for
5 h. Total-cell extracts were prepared as described in Materials
and Methods. Equal amount of the transfected cell extracts were treated
with 2% SDS (final concentration) at 37°C for 10 min to disrupt
protein-protein interactions. The SDS-treated extracts were diluted
10-fold and then subjected to immunoprecipitation (IP) with T7 antibody
covalently linked to agarose beads. The immunoprecipitates were
subjected to Western blot assay by using monoclonal antibodies against
T7 for DDB2 and V5 for DDB1 (A) and ubiquitin (Ub ab) for ubiquitinated
proteins (B).
|
|
To investigate the specificity of Cul-4A-mediated ubiquitination of
DDB2, we compared Cul-1, Cul-4A, Cul-4B, and the deletion mutant Cul-4A
(dl 1-52) for their ability to ubiquitinate DDB2. Plasmids expressing
these cullins were transfected into HeLa cells along with T7-DDB2 and
His-tagged ubiquitin expression plasmids. Transfected cells were
harvested after treatment with MG 132. The extracts were treated with
2% SDS before immunoprecipitation, as in the previous experiment. They
were then diluted and subjected to immunoprecipitation with T7
antibody, and the immunoprecipitates were probed for ubiquitinated DDB2
by using the monoclonal antibody against ubiquitin. These experiments
demonstrated that the ubiquitination, like the binding, is specific for
Cul-4A, since there was no detectable increase in DDB2 ubiquitination
by the expression of the other cullins (Fig.
8). Taken together, these results suggest
that DDB2 is a specific target for ubiquitination by Cul-4A.

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 8.
DDB2 is a specific ubiquitination target of Cul-4A. (A)
Cells were transfected with plasmids expressing T7-DDB2 or His-tagged
ubiquitin in combination with empty vector, V5-Cul-1, V5-Cul-4A,
V5-Cul-4A(dl 1-52), or V5-Cul-4B. At 40 h after transfection, the
cells were treated with MG 132 for 5 h. Total-cell extracts were
prepared as described in Materials and Methods. Equal amount of
extracts were treated with 2% SDS at 37°C for 10 min. The
SDS-treated extracts were diluted 10-fold and then subjected to
immunoprecipitation (IP) with T7 antibodies and Western blot assay with
monoclonal antibodies against ubiquitin (Ub-ab). (B) Level of
expression of T7-DDB2 in the extracts. Transfected cell extracts (100 µg) were probed with T7- antibody in a Western blot to assay for DDB2
expression.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Several lines of evidence suggested a role for DDB2 in DNA
repair (1, 5, 9, 15-18, 20, 36, 37). DDB2 in combination with DDB1 functions as a damaged-DNA recognition factor. It was also
shown that DDB2 is a p53-inducible gene. Using an inducible system, it
was shown that an increase in the p53 activity correlated with
increased expression of the DDB2-mRNA (18). In our cell cycle experiments with growth-arrested primary human fibroblasts, we
did not detect any significant change in the steady-state level of the
DDB2 mRNA during a 24-h serum stimulation period, which approximately
corresponded to one round of the cell cycle. However, there was some
increase in DDB2 mRNA following 30 h of serum stimulation. The
protein level of DDB2, however, exhibited a significant change during
the first 24 h. A significant increase was detected during the
early G1 phase, and the level remained high until the
G1/S boundary, after which the level dropped to an
undetectable level. A similar result was obtained with HeLa cells that
were synchronized at the G1/S boundary by a double
thymidine-aphidicolin block. There was an increase in the protein level
of DDB2 immediately after release, followed by a decrease as the cells
progressed through the S phase. These observations clearly suggest that
DDB2 functions during early G1 to the G1/S
boundary. This is also the period when the checkpoint proteins are
expected to scan the genome for DNA damage. DDB2 is essential for the
damaged-DNA binding activity of DDB. Therefore, the DDB2 expression
profile during the cell cycle will be consistent with a checkpoint
function of this protein.
The cell cycle changes in the expression of DDB2 will also be
consistent with a role of DDB2 in progression into the S phase. Our
previous studies indicated that DDB2 in conjunction with DDB1 could
function as a transcriptional partner of E2F1 in transient-transfection assays. We also observed evidence for an endogenous interaction between
DDB2 and E2F1. E2F1 is a member of the E2F family of transcription factors (E2Fs), which are believed to play a role in progression into
the S phase. E2Fs play a critical role in the expression of genes that
are essential for entry and progression through the S phase
(35). The E2F-regulated genes are expressed between mid-G1 and early S phase (35), and the DDB2
protein is also expressed at a higher level during that time. However,
it is also possible that DDB2 associates with a specific member of the
E2F family (such as E2F1) to carry out a function distinct from
transcription of the cell cycle genes. A role for the DDB-E2F1 complex
in DNA repair cannot be ruled out, and that would also be consistent with the tumor suppression function of E2F1 (35).
Results described here also identify at least one function of the
mammalian Cul-4A gene. Lower organisms such as C. elegans carry one cullin 4 gene, while mammalian cells contain genes encoding both Cul-4A and Cul-4B. It is noteworthy that DDB2 homologous sequence
was not found in lower organisms, including C. elegans and
Drosophila melanogaster (54). DDB1, on the
other hand, is highly conserved (54). It will be
interesting to determine whether the divergence of the cullin 4 gene
and the appearance of the DDB2 gene occurred at about the same time
during evolution. The absence of these genes in lower eukaryotes also
suggests that Cul-4A and DDB2 function in the complex regulatory
circuits that are typically found in higher organisms. By coexpressing
all six mammalian cullins with DDB2, we observed that only Cul-4A could coimmunoprecipitate DDB2. Moreover, only Cul-4A increased the ubiquitination and the decay rate of DDB2. The specificity is interesting when Cul-4A and Cul-4B are compared because they have 82%
sequence identity. These two cullins diverge mainly in the sequences in
their N termini. We show that the N-terminal sequences of Cul-4A are
critical for binding to DDB2. The sequence in the N-terminal region of
Cul-4A is not found in any other cullins, and that explains why DDB2
coimmunoprecipitated only with Cul-4A. It is, however, also possible
that Cul-4B and the N-terminal deletion mutant of Cul-4A lack proper
modification (such as NEDD8 conjugation), and this might be responsible
for their inactivity. Further studies of NEDD8 modification and its
effect on DDB2 binding are necessary to resolve this matter.
Nevertheless, the results are consistent with a substrate-specific E3
ligase activity of Cul-4A.
A recent screen on a genomewide scale for human genes that are
upregulated at the G1/S boundary, using high-density
oligonucleotide arrays, showed that Cul-4A mRNA is cell cycle regulated
and is more abundant in cells at the G1/S boundary
(4). We observed a modest increase in the nuclear levels
of the Cul-4A protein at the G1/S boundary (Fig. 2).
Therefore, it is likely that Cul-4A functions at the G1/S
boundary. It is noteworthy that the increase in the level of Cul-4A
also somewhat correlates with the decrease in the level of DDB2, which
is consistent with our observation that Cul-4A increases ubiquitination
and the decay rate of DDB2. Unlike DDB2, Cul-4A is detectable in
quiescent cells. It is possible that Cul-4A is there to ensure a low
level of DDB2 or that there are other substrates that are targeted by
Cul-4A in quiescent cells. Clearly, further work is necessary to
establish these possibilities. Cul-4A has also been implicated in
tumorigenesis. The Cul-4A gene was shown to be amplified in 16% of
breast cancers and overexpressed in 47% of breast cancers
(3). The same study also indicated the possibility of
overexpression of Cul-4A in other cancers. This is interesting because
mutations in DDB2 correlated with malignancies of the skin (7,
18a). Our model is that overexpression of Cul-4A would eliminate
DDB2 more efficiently by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway, and the net
result would be similar to DDB2 mutations. The model predicts that
overexpression of Cul-4A might be sufficient for an oncogenic
phenotype. The model also predicts that DDB2 is a critical target of
Cul-4A. The specificity of the Cul-4A-DDB2 interaction would support
that notion. It is quite likely that the elimination of the DNA repair,
damaged-DNA recognition, or apoptotic function of DDB2 by Cul-4A
overexpression would predispose cells for the accumulation of mutations.
We thank Y. Xiong (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)
and R. Stearman (National Institute of Health) for the cullin cDNA
clones. We also thank the Kazusa DNA Research Institute (Japan) for the
cullin-4B clone, which is designated KIAA0695. We thank D. Bohmann
(European Molecular Biology Laboratory) for the His-Ub expression plasmid.
This work is supported by a grant (CA77637 and CA88863) from the NCI to
P.R.
| 1.
|
Abramic, M.,
A. S. Levine, and M. Protic.
1991.
Purification of an ultraviolet-inducible, damage-specific DNA-binding protein from primate cells.
J. Biol. Chem.
266:22439-22500.
|
| 2.
|
Bai, C.,
P. Sen,
N. Mathias,
K. Hofmann,
M. Goebl,
J. W. Harper, and S. J. Elledge.
1996.
SKP1 connects cell cycle regulation to ubiquitin proteolysis machinery through a novel motif, the F-box.
Cell
86:263-274[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Chen, L.-C.,
S. Manjeshwar,
Y. Lu,
D. Moore,
B.-M. Ljung,
W.-L. Kuo,
S. H. Dairkee,
M. Wernick,
C. Colins, and H. S. Smith.
1998.
The human homologue for the Caenorhabditis elegans Cul-4 gene is amplified and overexpressed in primary breast cancers.
Cancer Res.
58:3677-3683[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Cho, R. J.,
M. Huang,
M. J. Campbell,
H. Dong,
L. Steinmetz,
L. Sapinoso,
G. Hampton,
S. J. Elledge,
R. W. Davis, and D. J. Lockhart.
2001.
Transcriptional regulation and function during the human cell cycle.
Nat. Genet.
27:48-54[Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Chu, G., and E. Chang.
1988.
Xeroderma pigmentosum group E cells lack a nuclear factor that binds to damaged DNA.
Science
242:564-567[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Dealy, M. J.,
K. V. T. Nguyen,
J. Lo,
M. Gstaiger,
W. Krek,
D. Elson,
J. Arbeit,
E. Kipreos, and R. S. Johnson.
1999.
Loss of Cul1 results in early embryonic lethality and dysregulation of cyclin E.
Nat. Genet.
23:245-248[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 7.
|
de Weerd-Kastelein, E. A.,
W. Keijzer, and D. Bootsma.
1974.
A third complementation group in xeroderma pigmentosum.
Mutat. Res.
22:87-91[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Dignam, J. D.,
R. M. Lebovitz, and R. Roeder.
1983.
Accurate transcription initiation by RNA polymerase II in a soluble extract from isolated mammalian nuclei.
Nucleic Acids Res.
11:1475-1489[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Dualan, R.,
T. Brody,
S. Keeney,
A. F. Nichols,
A. Admon, and S. Linn.
1995.
Chromosomal localization and cDNA cloning of the genes (DDB1 and DDB2) for the p127 and p48 subunits of a human damage-specific DNA binding protein.
Genomics
29:62-69[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Feldman, R. M. R.,
C. C. Correll,
K. B. Kaplan, and R. J. Deshaies.
1997.
A complex of Cdc4p, Skp1p, and Cdc53p/Culin catalyzes ubiquitination of the phosphorylated CDK inhibitor Sicp.
Cell
91:221-230[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Furukawa, M.,
Y. Zhang,
J. McCarville,
T. Ohta, and Y. Xiong.
2000.
The CUL1 C-terminal sequence and ROC1 are required for efficient nuclear accumulation, NEDD8 modification, and ubiquitin ligase activity of CUL1.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20:8185-8197[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Hayes, S.,
P. Shiyanov,
X. Chen, and P. Raychaudhuri.
1998.
DDB, a putative DNA repair protein, can function as a transcriptional partner of E2F1.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:240-249[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Heintz, N.,
H. L. Sive, and R. G. Roeder.
1983.
Regulation of human histone gene expression: kinetics of accumulation and changes in the rate of synthesis and in the half-lives of individual histone mRNAs during HeLa cell cycle.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
3:539-550[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Hori, T.,
F. Osaka,
T. Chiba,
C. Miyamoto,
K. Okabayashi,
N. Shimbara,
S. Kato, and K. Tanaka.
1999.
Covalent modification of all members of human cullin family proteins by NEDD8.
Oncogene
18:6829-6834[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Hwang, B. J., and G. Chu.
1993.
Purification and characterization of a human protein that binds to damaged DNA.
Biochemistry
32:1657-1666[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Hwang, B. J.,
J. C. Liao, and G. Chu.
1996.
Isolation of a cDNA encoding a UV-damaged DNA binding factor defective in xeroderma pigmentosum group E cells.
Mutat. Res.
362:105-117[Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Hwang, B. J.,
S. Toering,
U. Francke, and G. Chu.
1998.
p48 activates a UV-damaged-DNA binding factor and is defective in xeroderma pigmentosum group E cells that lack binding activity.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:4391-4399[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Hwang, B. J.,
J. M. Ford,
P. C. Hanawalt, and G. Chu.
1998.
Expression of p48 xeroderma pigmentosum gene is p53-dependent and is involved in global genomic repair.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
96:424-428[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18a.
|
Itoh, T.,
T. Mori,
H. Ohkubo, and M. Yazaizumi.
1999.
A newly identified patient with clinical xeroderma pigmentosum phenotype has a non-sense mutation in the DDB2 gene and incomplete repair in (6-4) photoproducts.
J. Investig. Dermatol.
113:251-257[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Kaelin, W. G.,
O. Iliopoulos,
K. M. Lonergan, and M. Ohh.
1998.
Functions of the von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor protein.
J. Intern. Med.
243:535-539[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Keeney, S.,
G. J. Chang, and S. Linn.
1993.
Characterization of a human DNA damage binding protein implicated in xeroderma pigmentosum E.
J. Biol. Chem.
268:21293-21300[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
Keeney, S.,
A. P. Eker,
T. Brody,
W. Vermeulen,
D. Bootsma,
J. H. Hoeijmakers, and S. Linn.
1994.
Correction of the DNA repair defect in xeroderma pigmentosum group E by injection of a DNA damage-binding protein.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
91:4053-4056[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Kamura, T.,
S. Sato,
D. Haque,
L. Liu,
W. G. Kaelin, Jr.,
R. C. Conway, and J. W. Conway.
1998.
The Elongin BC complex interacts with conserved SOCS-box motif present in members of the SOCS, ras, WD-40 repeat, and ankyrin repeat family.
Genes Dev.
12:3872-3881[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Kamura, T.,
D. M. Koepp,
M. N. Conrad,
D. Skowyra,
R. J. Moreland,
O. Iliopoulos,
W. S. Lane,
W. G. Kaelin, Jr.,
S. J. Elledge, and R. C. Conaway.
1999.
Rbx1, a component of the VHL tumor suppressor complex and SCF ubiquitin ligase.
Science
284:657-661[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
Kipreos, E. T.,
L. E. Lander,
J. P. Wing,
W. W. He, and E. M. Hedgecock.
1996.
cul-1 is required for cell cycle exit in C. elegans and identifies a novel gene family.
Cell
85:829-839[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 25.
|
Kondo, S. J.,
S. Fukuro,
A. Mamada,
A. Kawada, and Y. Satoh.
1988.
Assignment of three patients with xeroderma pigmentosum to complementation group E and their characteristic.
J. Investig. Dermat.
90:152-157[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 26.
|
Krishnamoorthy, R. R.,
T. H. Lee,
J. S. Butel, and H. K. Das.
1997.
Apolipoprotein B gene regulatory factor-2 (BRF-2) is structurally and immunologically highly related to hepatitis B virus X associated protein-1 (XAP-1).
Biochemistry
36:960-969[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 27.
|
Lee, T.-H.,
S. J. Elledge, and J. S. Butel.
1995.
Hepatitis B virus X protein interacts with a probable cellular DNA repair protein.
J. Virol.
69:1107-1114[Abstract].
|
| 28.
|
Lin, G. Y.,
R. G. Paterson,
C. D. Richardson, and R. A. Lamb.
1998.
The V protein of the paramyxovirus SV5 interacts with damage-specific DNA binding protein.
Virology
249:189-200[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 29.
|
Lin, G. Y., and R. A. Lamb.
2000.
The paramyxovirus simian virus 5V protein slows progression of the cell cycle.
J. Virol.
74:9152-9166[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
Lisztwan, J.,
G. Imbert,
C. Wirbelauer,
M. Gstaiger, and W. Krek.
1999.
The Von-Hippel Lindau tumor suppressor protein is a component of an E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase activity.
Genes Dev.
13:1822-1833[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 31.
|
Liu, W.,
A. F. Nichols,
J. A. Graham,
R. Dualan,
A. Abbas, and S. Linn.
2000.
Nuclear transport of human DDB protein induced by ultraviolet light.
J. Biol. Chem.
275:21429-21434[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 32.
|
Marti, A.,
C. Wirbelauer,
M. Scheffner, and W. Krek.
1999.
Interaction between ubiquitin-protein ligase SCF-skp2 and E2F1 underlies the regulation of E2F1 degradation.
Nat. Cell Biol.
1:14-20[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 33.
|
Mathias, N.,
S. J. Johnson,
M. Winey,
A. E. M. Adams,
L. Goetsch,
J. R. Pringle,
B. Byers, and M. G. Goebl.
1996.
Cdc53p acts in concert with Cdc4p and Cdc34p to control the G1-to-S phase transition and identifies a conserved family of proteins.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16:6634-6643[Abstract].
|
| 34.
|
Michel, J., and Y. Xiong.
1998.
Human Cul-1, but not other cullin family members, selectively interacts with Skp1 to form a complex with Skp2 and cyclin A.
Cell Growth Differ.
9:439-445.
|
| 34a.
| Nag, A., A. Datta, K. Yoo, D. Bhattacharyya, A. Chakrabortty, X. Wang, B. L. Slagle, R. H. Costa, and P. Raychandhuri. DDB2 induces nuclear accumulation of the hepatitis B
virus X protein independently of binding to DDB1. J. Virol., in press.
|
| 35.
|
Nevins, J. R.
1998.
Towards an understanding of the functional complexity of the E2F and retinoblastoma families.
Cell Growth Differ.
9:585-593[Medline].
|
| 36.
|
Nichols, A. F.,
P. Ong, and S. Linn.
1996.
Mutations specific to the xeroderma pigmentosum group E Ddb- phenotype.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:24317-24320[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 37.
|
Nichols, A. F.,
T. Itoh,
J. A. Graham,
W. Liu,
M. Yamaizumi, and S. Linn.
2000.
Human damage-specific DNA-binding protein p48.
J. Biol. Chem.
275:21422-21428[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 38.
|
O'Hagan, R. C.,
M. Ohh,
G. David,
I. M. de Alboran,
F. W. Alt,
W. G. Kaelin, Jr., and R. A. DePinho.
2000.
Myc-enhanced expression of Cul1 promotes ubiquirin-dependent proteolysis and cell cycle progression.
Genes Dev.
14:2185-2191[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 39.
|
Ohh, M.,
C. W. Park,
M. Ivan,
M. A. Hoffman,
T. Y. Kim,
L. E. Huang,
N. Pavletic,
V. Chau, and W. G. Kaelin, Jr.
2000.
Ubiquitination of hypoxia-inducible factor requires direct binding to the beta-domain of the von Hippel-Lindau protein.
Nat. Cell Biol.
2:423-427[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 40.
|
Ohta, T.,
J. J. Michel,
A. J. Schottelius, and Y. Xiong.
1999.
ROC1, a homolog of APC11, represents a family of cullin partners with an associated ubiquitin ligase activity.
Mol. Cell
3:535-541[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 41.
|
Otrin, V. R.,
I. Kuraoka,
T. Nardo,
M. McLenigan,
A. P. M. Eker,
M. Stefanini,
A. S. Levine, and R. D. Wood.
1998.
Relationship of the xeroderma pigmentosum group E DNA repair defect to the chromatin and DNA binding proteins UV-DDB and replication protein A.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:3182-3190[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 42.
|
Shiyanov, P.,
S. A. Hayes,
M. Donepudi,
A. F. Nichols,
S. Linn,
B. L. Slagle, and P. Raychaudhuri.
1999.
The naturally occurring mutants of DDB are impaired in stimulating nuclear import of the p125 subunit and E2F1-activated transcription.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19:4935-4943[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 43.
|
Shiyanov, P.,
A. Nag, and P. Raychaudhuri.
1999.
Cullin-4A associates with the UV-damaged DNA-binding protein DDB.
J. Biol. Chem.
274:35309-35312[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 44.
|
Singer, J. D.,
M. Gurian-West,
B. Clurman, and J. M. Roberts.
1999.
Cullin-3 targets cyclin E for ubiquitination and controls S phase in mammalian cells.
Genes Dev.
13:2375-2387[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 45.
|
Sitterlin, D.,
F. Bergarnetti,
P. Tiollais,
B. C. Tennant, and C. Transy.
2000.
Correct binding of viral X protein to UVDDB-p127 cellular protein is critical for efficient infection by hepatitis B viruses.
Oncogene
19:4427-4431[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 46.
|
Sitterlin, D.,
F. Bergarnetti, and C. Transy.
2000.
UVDDB p127-binding modulates activities and intracellular distribution of hepatitis B virus X protein.
Oncogene
19:4417-4426[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 47.
|
Tang, J. Y.,
B. J. Hwang,
J. M. Ford,
P. C. Hanawalt, and G. Chu.
2000.
Xeroderma pigmentosum p48 gene enhances global genomic repair and suppresses UV-induced mutagenesis.
Mol. Cell.
5:737-744[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 48.
|
Tyers, M., and A. R. Willems.
1999.
One ring to rule a superfamily of E3 ubiquitin ligases.
Science
284:601[Free Full Text], 603-604.
|
| 49.
|
Wang, Y.,
S. Penfold,
X. Tang,
N. Hattori,
P. Riley,
J. W. Harper,
J. C. Cross, and M. Tyers.
1999.
Deletion of the Cul1 gene in mice causes arrest in early embryogenesis and accumulation of cyclin E.
Curr. Biol.
9:1191-1194[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 50.
|
Willems, A. R.,
S. Lanker,
E. E. Patton,
K. L. Craig,
T. F. Nason,
N. Mathias,
R. Kobayashi,
C. Wittenberg, and M. Tyers.
1996.
Cdc53 targets phosphorylated G1 cyclins for degradation by the ubiquitin proteolytic pathway.
Cell
86:453-463[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 51.
|
Winston, J. T.,
C. Chu, and J. W. Harper.
1999.
Culprits in the degradation of cyclin E apprehended.
Genes Dev.
13:2751-2757[Free Full Text].
|
| 52.
|
Yu, Z.-K.,
J. L. M. Gervais, and H. Zhang.
1998.
Human Cul1 associates with the SKP1/SKP2 complex and regulates p21CIP1/WAF1 and cyclin D proteins.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
95:11324-11329[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 53.
|
Zachariae, W.,
A. Shevchenko,
P. D. Andrews,
R. Ciosk,
M. Galova,
M. J. Stark,
M. Mann, and K. Nasmyth.
1998.
Mass spectrometric analysis of the anaphase-promoting complex from yeast: identification of a subunit related to Cullins.
Science
279:1216-121[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 54.
|
Zolezzi, F., and S. Linn.
2000.
Studies of the murine DDB1 and DDB2 genes.
Gene
245:151-159[CrossRef][Medline].
|