Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Molecular and Cellular Biology, November 2001, p. 7150-7162, Vol. 21, No. 21
Imperial Cancer Research Fund Laboratories,
Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital,
University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DS,1
and ICRF Clare Hall Laboratories, South Mimms, Herts. EN6
3LD,2 United Kingdom
Received 27 February 2001/Returned for modification 11 April
2001/Accepted 27 July 2001
Deletion of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae TOP3
gene, encoding Top3p, leads to a slow-growth phenotype
characterized by an accumulation of cells with a late S/G2
content of DNA (S. Gangloff, J. P. McDonald, C. Bendixen, L. Arthur, and R. Rothstein, Mol. Cell. Biol. 14:8391-8398, 1994). We have investigated the function of TOP3 during
cell cycle progression and the molecular basis for the cell cycle delay
seen in top3 DNA topoisomerases play
several important roles in DNA metabolism (61, 62, 67).
These enzymes catalyze the interconversion of topological isomers of
DNA and are required for the resolution of torsional stress in DNA and
for the unlinking of topologically intertwined molecules. Budding
yeasts express three topoisomerases, designated topoisomerases I, II,
and III, all of which are highly conserved in mammalian cells. The role
of yeast topoisomerase III (Top3p) in DNA metabolism has remained
enigmatic, partly because this enzyme possesses only a very weak DNA
relaxation activity on negatively supercoiled DNA and is therefore
thought unlikely to participate in the maintenance of DNA supercoiling
homeostasis (25, 61). It has been suggested that Top3p
performs a nonessential role in the segregation of newly replicated DNA
in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, although there is no direct
evidence to support this proposal (61). Strains of
S. cerevisiae that lack Top3p (top3 One feature of the phenotypic effects of loss of Top3p function that
has aroused considerable interest is the ability of the slow-growth and
hyperrecombination phenotypes of S. cerevisiae top3 Cells respond to DNA damage or to an inhibition of DNA replication by
delaying cell cycle progression in order to permit time to resolve the
resulting abnormal DNA structures. These cell cycle checkpoint pathways
are highly conserved in different eukaryotic species and act to
preserve both genome integrity and cell viability (32, 36, 43,
47, 50, 65). The genetic and biochemical composition of a
particular checkpoint pathway is determined, at least in part, by the
point in the cell cycle at which the perturbation of DNA structure or
function occurs. Entry into S phase is inhibited if cells incur DNA
damage in G1, such as through UV irradiation, and
this G1/S DNA damage checkpoint is dependent, among others, upon the RAD9, RAD17,
RAD24, MEC1, MEC3, DDC1,
and RAD53 (also called MEC2, SAD1, or
SPK1) genes in S. cerevisiae (2, 33, 34,
52-55). These genes, in conjunction with PDS1, are
also required for the G2/M checkpoint, which acts
to inhibit entry into anaphase when DNA damage has not been repaired
(66, 71). An additional DNA damage checkpoint that has
been identified in budding yeast, termed the intra-S checkpoint,
functions to slow the rate of progression through S phase in the
presence of DNA damage (45). The majority of the
G1/S and G2/M checkpoint genes play a minor role, at least in budding yeast, in the intra-S checkpoint (46, 47). Two exceptions to this are
MEC1 and RAD53, which are essential genes and are
required for checkpoint pathways that operate in all phases of the cell
cycle (2, 48, 52, 66). In addition to the "dedicated"
checkpoint genes that play a role in S phase, there are certain gene
products that function in S phase as part of the DNA replication
machinery while also performing some as-yet-unidentified role in
checkpoint surveillance of the genome. These include Pri1p (the
catalytic subunit of DNA primase) and Rfc5p, which act in the intra-S
checkpoint (39, 56), and replication protein A (RPA),
which is a target for Mec1p in the cellular response to both DNA
replication blockade and DNA damage (4).
In addition to subdividing checkpoints on the basis of the phase of the
cell cycle in which they act, it is possible to categorize individual
checkpoint proteins on the basis of whether they function in a DNA
damage or abnormal structure "sensory" role, as signal transducers,
or as targets of the signaling cascade (37). Thus, loss of
a DNA damage sensor, such as Rad9p or Rad24p, causes failure to
transduce the signal required for arrest of the cell cycle (26). Part of the signal transduction cascade that is
absent in this class of mutants is the MEC1-dependent
phosphorylation of Rad53p (7, 32, 37, 57, 65).
We have investigated the function of Top3p in S. cerevisiae.
We show that deletion of TOP3 causes sensitivity to a
variety of DNA-damaging agents. While top3 Yeast strains.
All experiments were performed in the YP1
strain background except where stated. The following yeast strains were
used: YP1 background, RKC1a (MATa
leu2
0270-7306/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/MCB.21.21.7150-7162.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Topoisomerase III Acts Upstream of Rad53p in the
S-Phase DNA Damage Checkpoint
and
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
strains. We show that top3
mutants exhibit a RAD24-dependent delay in the
G2 phase, suggesting a possible role for Top3p
in the resolution of abnormal DNA structures or DNA damage
arising during S phase. Consistent with this notion,
top3
strains are sensitive to killing by a variety of
DNA-damaging agents, including UV light and the alkylating agent methyl
methanesulfonate, and are partially defective in the intra-S-phase
checkpoint that slows the rate of S-phase progression following
exposure to DNA-damaging agents. This S-phase checkpoint defect is
associated with a defect in phosphorylation of Rad53p, indicating that,
in the absence of Top3p, the efficiency of sensing the existence of DNA
damage or signaling to the Rad53 kinase is impaired. Consistent with a
role for Top3p specifically during S phase, top3
mutants
are sensitive to the replication inhibitor hydroxyurea, expression of
the TOP3 mRNA is activated in late
G1 phase, and DNA damage checkpoints operating
outside of S phase are unaffected by deletion of TOP3. All
of these phenotypic consequences of loss of Top3p function are at least
partially suppressed by deletion of SGS1, the yeast
homologue of the human Bloom's and Werner's syndrome genes. These
data implicate Top3p and, by inference, Sgs1p in an S-phase-specific
role in the cellular response to DNA damage. A model proposing a role
for these proteins in S phase is presented.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
) show
hyperrecombination in repetitive sequences and a severe slow-growth phenotype, which is due to an accumulation of cells in the late S/G2 phase of the cell cycle (15).
In the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, the
top3+ gene is essential for viability, and
in that organism there is direct evidence that top3
mutants display abnormal nuclear division (17, 38). The
bacterial Top3p enzyme shows catalytic properties in vitro very
similar to those of its eukaryotic counterparts and has been
implicated in the unlinking of DNA strands during DNA replication to
permit nascent chain elongation and the separation of daughter
molecules (21). There are at least two homologues of the
TOP3 gene product in vertebrates (18,
24), one of which (Topo III
) has been shown to be essential
for embryonic development in mice (30).
Drosophila Topo III
has been shown to efficiently relax
hypernegatively supercoiled DNA (68), but the
physiological role of this activity remains unclear.
mutants to be suppressed by mutation of SGS1
(15). This genetic interaction is conserved in S. pombe, in which loss of the RecQ helicase, Rqh1, suppresses
deletion of top3+ (17, 38).
The SGS1 gene encodes the sole member of the RecQ subfamily
of DExH box-containing helicases in budding yeast, and deletion of
SGS1 leads to hyperrecombination (15, 63) and defects in chromosome segregation and sporulation (40,
64). Of the five known homologues of SGS1 that exist
in human cells, three are linked to disease conditions; mutations in
the BLM gene give rise to the cancer-prone condition
Bloom's syndrome (9); mutations in WRN lead to
the premature-ageing condition Werner's syndrome (72);
and mutations in RECQ4 give rise to Rothmund-Thomson syndrome (27), which is associated with cancer
predisposition as well as skin and skeletal abnormalities
(58). Mutation of any one of the SGS1,
BLM, WRN, and RECQ4 genes leads to
genomic instability and an abnormally high rate of genetic
recombination events and/or chromosomal rearrangements (reviewed
in references 5 and 23).
mutants show
proficiency in checkpoint responses to DNA perturbations occurring
outside of S phase, they fail to adequately delay S-phase transit in
the presence of DNA damage. This is the first indication that a
eukaryotic topoisomersase is required for protection of cells against
DNA-damaging agents. We present a revised version of the checkpoint
response cascade that links the processing of DNA structural
abnormalities to DNA repair.
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
his4-R ura3-52 lys2 ade2-101 top3::LEU2), JMK22d (MATa
leu2
his4-R ura3-52 lys2 ade2-101 sgs1::LYS2), JMK253 (MATa
leu2
his4-R ura3-52 lys2 ade2-101 rad24::LYS2), JMK469 (MATa
leu2
his4-R ura3-52 lys2 ade2-101 rad24::LYS2 top3::LEU2), RKC1c
(MATa leu2
his4-R ura3-52 lys2 ade2-101 sgs1::LYS2 top3::LEU2), and RKC
1d (MATa leu2
his4-R ura3-52
lys2 ade2-101); A364a background, RKC 31a (MATa ura3 his3 trp1 leu2), RKC 31b (MATa
ura3 his3 trp1 leu2
top3::G418R), AG1
(MAT
ura3 his3 trp1 leu2
sgs1::G418R), JMK245
(MATa ura3 his3 trp1 leu2
rad24::G418R), DLY264
(MATa ura3 his3 trp1 leu2
mec2-1::URA3 [44]), and DLY 285 (MATa ura3 his3 trp1 leu2
mec1-1::HIS3 [44]).
was also confirmed genetically in
all cases by the ability of an sgs1
mutation to rescue
the slow growth of the top3
strains (15).
Flow cytometric analyses.
Cells were grown in yeast
extract-peptone-dextrose (YPD) medium, collected by
centrifugation, and resuspended in 70% ethanol. The cells were then
washed in 50 mM sodium citrate, pH 7.0, and resuspended in the same
buffer containing 0.25 mg of RNase A/ml. The cells were sonicated and
then incubated at 50°C for 60 min. Proteinase K was added to a final
concentration of 1 mg/ml, and the cells were incubated at the same
temperature for a further 60 min. The cells were then allowed to cool,
and propidium iodide was added to a concentration of 8 µg/ml. Samples
were analyzed using a Becton Dickinson FACScan machine incorporating
LYSIS2 software. We confirmed that the peak shifting seen in flow
cytometric analyses was a reflection of chromosomal DNA synthesis. The
shift in the flow cytometric histograms from the
G1 to the G2/M position was
inhibited by
-factor, which induces a G1
arrest, and by hydroxyurea (HU), which inhibits DNA synthesis.
Cell cycle blockade and irradiation procedures.
All
experiments were performed in YPD medium. For cell cycle blockade
experiments, cultures were grown to early log phase (optical density,
at 600 nm, 0.3 or 0.4). G1 arrest was
induced by adding
-factor to a final concentration of 20 µg/ml,
and G2/M arrest was achieved by adding nocodazole
to a final concentration of 20 µg/ml. After the appropriate time
intervals, the cells were checked microscopically and by flow cytometry
to confirm the appropriate arrest phenotype. The method for UV
irradiation (254 nm) has been described previously (1).
Cell cycle delay during S phase was analyzed as described by Paulovich
and Hartwell (45). Irradiation of nocodazole-arrested
cells was done with 80 J of UV light/m2
before the cells were washed and returned to drug-free medium for 90 min.
Determination of population doubling time and viability. The strains were grown overnight in YPD medium, diluted, and grown for several hours at 30°C. At time zero and at various times after dilution, the number of cells was determined with a Coulter Counter following brief sonication of the culture. To determine viability, a specific number of cells (usually 200 to 800) were spread on YPD agar, and the resulting colonies were counted after 3 days of incubation at 30°C.
Survival curves. (i) MMS. Cells were grown as described above before addition of methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) to concentrations of 0.005 to 0.03% for 60 min. The MMS was then inactivated by the addition of sodium thiosulfate to 5%, and the percent survival was determined in relation to untreated controls.
(ii) UV irradiation. Cells were grown to log phase, diluted at different concentrations in distilled H2O, and spread on YPD agar. The plates were irradiated at the indicated doses with 254-nm-wavelength UV light, and 72 h later surviving colonies were counted. The percent survival was compared to that of an unirradiated control.
(iii) HU. Early-log-phase liquid cultures of the appropriate strains grown in minimal medium were exposed to 0.2 M HU for various times. The percent survival compared to that at time zero was determined by plating different dilutions of the culture on YPD agar and counting the resulting colonies 72 h later.
Northern blot analysis. Total cellular RNA was isolated using an RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen). RNA was separated on glyoxal gels, transferred to nylon membranes (Hybond-N), hybridized, and probed as described previously (1). Northern blots were quantitated (PhosphorImager; Molecular Dynamics Ltd.), and the values were normalized to an ACT1 loading control.
Preparation of yeast extracts and Western blot analysis. Total cellular protein extracts were prepared using a trichloroacetic acid extraction technique (10) and separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) using 6.5% acrylamide gels prepared at an 80:1 acrylamide-bisacrylamide ratio. A rabbit polyclonal antiserum to Rad53p (NLO16 [7]) was used at a final dilution of 1:10,000 in 1% fat-free milk in phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.02% Tween 20, with a primary incubation period of 12 h. Horseradish peroxidase-linked secondary antibody (Sigma) was used at 1:10,000 with a 60-min incubation period. Chemiluminescent detection was performed with an ECL kit (Amersham).
Chromosome preparation and electrophoretic separation. Intact yeast chromosomal-DNA samples were prepared from log-phase or arrested cells, as described previously (35). Briefly, samples representing approximately 107 cells were applied to a 1% agarose gel slab, and the chromosomes were separated using a Bio-Rad contour-clamped homogenous electric field apparatus. Separation was achieved in 24 h, with initial and final switching times of 60 and 90 s, respectively, at 200 V. The running buffer used was 0.5× Tris-borate-EDTA, which was maintained at a temperature of 11°C by rapid recirculation while the gel was run at an ambient temperature of 4°C. The DNA was then transferred to nylon membranes, and chromosome IV was detected with an HO gene probe, using standard protocols.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
top3
cells demonstrate a cell cycle delay
at G2/M.
The cell cycle transit time of S. cerevisiae top3
mutants is approximately double that of
isogenic wild-type strains (60). Previous microscopic
studies of asynchronous top3
cultures revealed an
accumulation of large-budded cells (
70% of the total population) containing a single nucleus close to the neck of the mother cell (15), suggesting a delay in the cell cycle in the late
S/G2 phase. In order to characterize this arrest phenotype in more detail, we performed flow cytometric analyses of wild-type and top3
cells at timed intervals following release from
G1 cell cycle arrest induced by the
-factor
mating pheromone. Figure 1a shows that
following release from this arrest, top3
cells progressed
through S phase at a rate similar to that of wild-type cells but then
delayed in the cell cycle at a point where they had a 2C content
of DNA. Consistent with previous studies (15), we
calculated that the extended cell cycle time in top3
strains was fully accounted for by this late S/G2 delay. Analysis of
cell size using contour plots indicated that top3
cells
showed a marked and progressive increase in size during the late S/G2
delay period, indicating that while cell division was blocked in
top3
mutants, cellular growth (increase in mass)
continued (Fig. 1c). It should be noted that the top3
cells emerged from an
-factor arrest about 10 min earlier than did
wild-type cells, as assessed microscopically by the appearance of
small-budded cells (data not shown). This probably reflects the
larger size of the G1-arrested top3
cells, which would influence the rate at which cells pass the cell size restriction point before Start (49). Synchrony experiments
(not shown) confirmed previous results (15) showing that
deletion of SGS1 in a top3
background
completely corrected the cell cycle defect associated with mutation of
TOP3.
|
cells that is sufficient to induce a late
S-phase delay. To determine whether the late S/G2-arrested cells had
completed DNA replication, intact chromosomes of log-phase cells were
separated by pulsed field gel electrophoresis (Fig. 1b). In this assay, only fully replicated DNA enters the gel, whereas incompletely replicated DNA is retarded in the wells (20). As controls,
wild-type cells were treated with HU (which blocks in S phase),
-factor (which blocks in G1), or methyl
benzimidazol-Zyl-carbamate (MBC) (which blocks in M). As
expected, DNA from HU-treated cells failed to enter the gel, whereas
the majority of the fully replicated DNA in
-factor- or MBC-treated
cells entered the gel. In common with the findings for wild-type cells,
the majority of DNA from log-phase top3
cells entered the
gel (70.0% ± 5.1% of total DNA for wild-type cells versus 82.3% ± 4.2% for top3
cells). The latter figure was consistently
greater than the percentage of both large-budded cells and cells with a
2C DNA content. We conclude that top3
cells are able to
complete bulk DNA replication and arrest at a point in the cell cycle
after S phase but prior to the onset of anaphase.
The progressive increase in cell size when top3
mutants
attain a 2C content of DNA (Fig. 1c) would be consistent with
activation of the G2/M DNA damage checkpoint. To
analyze this, we deleted separately the RAD24 and
RAD9 DNA damage checkpoint genes in a top3
background and determined the cell cycle distribution of the resulting
double mutants. An asynchronous population of rad24
top3
double mutant cells showed a marked reduction in the
proportion of cells with a 2C content of DNA compared to an equivalent
population of top3
cells (Fig. 1c). The proportions of
cells gated for a 2C content of DNA were 61% (top3
) and
40.9% (rad24
top3
). The double-mutant
cells with a 2C content of DNA were of a more uniform size than those
of the top3
single mutant, also indicating that the
double-mutant cells were progressing more rapidly through G2/M (Fig. 1c). Similar results were seen with a
rad9 top3 double mutant (data not shown). Analysis of cell
size and morphology by microscopy, coupled with DAPI
(4',6'-diamidino-2-phenylindole) staining of nuclear DNA, confirmed
that following release from
-factor arrest, top3 rad24
double mutants were smaller and of a more uniform size than
top3 mutant cells (data not shown). Taken together, these
data suggest that the cell cycle delay in top3
cells is
dependent on RAD24 and RAD9 and, by inference, on
the G2/M DNA damage checkpoint. Consistent with
this suggestion, the cell synchronization experiment shown in Fig. 1c
confirmed that deletion of RAD24 in a top3
background had the effect of shortening the G2/M
phase. Thus, at 60 min following release from
-factor arrest, the
rad24
top3
cells had begun to progress into
the next cell cycle, whereas the top3
cells were still
largely held at G2/M even at the 100-min time
point. These results were confirmed in two independent strain backgrounds.
Given that deletion of RAD24 had the effect of shortening
the period of G2 arrest in top3
cells, we analyzed the effects that this had on growth rate and
viability. We considered the possibility that the
G2/M checkpoint arrest that occurs in every cell
cycle in top3
mutants could be important for their
continued survival. Consistent with the fluorescence-activated cell
sorter data presented above, top3 rad24 double mutants
showed a shorter doubling time than top3
mutants (120 min
for top3 rad24 cells compared to 210 min for top3
cells). However, this more rapid proliferation did not appear to
adversely affect survival, since top3 rad24 double mutants
and top3 single mutants showed comparable levels of overall
cell viability (approximately 25%).
top3
cells are sensitive to DNA-damaging
agents.
One explanation for the above-mentioned results is that
top3
cells accumulate abnormal DNA structures in either S
phase or G2/M as a consequence of a defect in the
processing and/or repair of DNA structural abnormalities. We therefore
tested whether top3
mutants are sensitive to killing by
DNA-damaging agents. top3
cells were found to be
sensitive to the DNA-damaging agents MMS and UV light (Fig.
2a and b) and, to a lesser extent
(approximately 1.5-fold), to
-irradiation (data not shown). These
results were confirmed in three independent strain backgrounds. The
sensitivity of top3
strains to DNA-damaging agents was
substantially suppressed by deletion of SGS1 (Fig. 2a and b)
or by ectopic expression of a wild-type TOP3 gene (Fig. 2c).
|
top3
cells are defective in the intra-S
checkpoint but not in the G1/S or G2/M DNA
damage checkpoints.
The intra-S checkpoint acts to slow the rate
of DNA synthesis when DNA is damaged during S phase, and it is
dependent upon the products of a number of genes, including
MEC1, RAD53, RFC-5, PRI-1,
RAD24, and RAD17 (45, 65). The data
in Fig. 3a show that when
top3
cells were released from an
-factor-induced
G1 arrest into medium containing 0.03% MMS, most
cells achieved a 2C content of DNA after 120 to 150 min, whereas
wild-type cells treated similarly progressed through S phase much more
slowly and still had not attained a 2C content of DNA by 240 min.
Indeed, wild-type cells had still not fully completed DNA replication by 360 min (data not shown). Control experiments showed that wild-type cells and top3
mutants each progressed through S phase in
approximately 60 min in the absence of MMS (data not shown). To analyze
this apparent intra-S checkpoint defect in top3
mutants
further, the rate of S-phase progression in the presence of MMS in
top3 cells was compared directly to the previously reported
partial defect of rad17
mutants and the complete defect
of mec1 mutants in arresting S phase in the presence of MMS
(45). As shown in Fig. 3a, the magnitude of the intra-S
checkpoint defect in top3
cells was comparable to and
consistently a little more severe than that observed in a
rad17
mutant (and in rad24
cells [not
shown]) but less severe than that seen in a mec1 mutant. In
contrast, both sgs1
and sgs1
top3
mutants behaved essentially as wild type, indicating
that deletion of SGS1 in a top3
background
restores a largely functional intra-S checkpoint.
|
-factor-arrested top3
cells were UV irradiated and
then released into fresh medium, they showed a marked delay in the rate
of progression through the G1/S phase transition
compared to nonirradiated controls. The cell cycle delay seen in
top3
strains after UV irradiation in
G1 was dependent upon functional RAD24
(data not shown). Hence, we conclude that the
G1/S DNA damage checkpoint is intact in
top3
mutants. The data presented in Fig. 1 indicate that
top3
cells delay transiently at a
G2/M checkpoint in the absence of exogenously added DNA-damaging agents. Consistent with this, when
top3
cells were arrested in G2/M
with nocodazole and then UV irradiated, the extents of subsequent delay
in the cell cycle following removal of nocodazole were comparable in
wild-type and top3
cells (data not shown). This confirms
that the G2/M DNA damage checkpoint is intact in
top3
mutants.
Rad53p phosphorylation is defective in top3
mutants following DNA damage in S phase in top3
cells.
Checkpoint proteins can be categorized on the basis of
whether they function as sensors of abnormal DNA structures, signal transducers, or targets of the signaling apparatus (37,
65). Loss of sensory function might be expected to result in an
absence of all downstream responses following DNA damage or replication inhibition, including a failure to phosphorylate Rad53p.
cells following release from
G1 arrest into medium containing MMS. Figure
4a shows that phosphorylation of Rad53p
(as indicated by the appearance of slower-migrating species on
SDS-PAGE) was significantly impaired in top3
cells following exposure to MMS. Indeed, the phosphorylation of Rad53p in
top3
cells was quantitatively and qualitatively different from that seen in wild-type cells. In MMS-treated wild-type cells, all
of the Rad53p was fully phosphorylated within 100 min, as evidenced by
the Rad53 species running with a substantially slower migration than
the unphosphorylated Rad53p extracted from untreated cells. In
contrast, in top3
cells, only a small fraction
(approximately 25%) of the total Rad53p was phosphorylated, and the
degree to which this modified Rad53 had a retarded migration was far
less marked that that seen in wild-type cells. These data indicate that
Top3p acts at an early step in the checkpoint cascade, upstream of
Rad53p, and that in the absence of Top3p there is a diminution in
signal transduction. Consistent with the observed restoration of the
intra-S checkpoint by deletion of SGS1 in a
top3
background (Fig. 3), an sgs1 top3 double
mutant showed an apparently normal degree of Rad53p phosphorylation
following MMS treatment in S phase (Fig. 4a).
|
mutants did not show a general
defect in signaling during a check point-mediated cell cycle arrest, we
studied Rad53 phosphorylation during a G2/M
checkpoint arrest induced after UV irradiation of nocadazole-treated
cells (Fig. 4b). Figure 4c shows that comparable levels of Rad53p
phosphorylation were seen in wild-type and top3
strains
following irradiation, confirming that signaling to Rad53 in the
G2/M DNA damage checkpoint is intact in
top3
strains.
Genetic interactions between top3 and other
checkpoint-deficient mutants.
The MEC1 and
RAD53 genes encode essential proteins involved in the signal
transduction pathway that is activated during S phase by inhibition of
DNA replication and during all phases of the cell cycle by DNA damage
(2, 52, 66). Combination of a top3
mutation
in the A364a strain with alleles of MEC1 (mec1-1) and RAD53 (mec2-1) resulted in synthetic
lethality (either microcolonies that could not be propagated or no
visible colony) after sporulation of the appropriate heterozygous
diploids (in each case, at least 40 tetrads were dissected). In an
effort to characterize genetic interactions between top3
and other mutations that disable potential targets of the Mec1/Rad53
signal transduction pathway, we examined the effect of combining
deletion of TOP3 with conditional mutations in
RFA2, which encodes the 34-kDa subunit of the heterotrimeric single-stranded DNA binding protein RPA, and PRI1, which
encodes the large subunit of DNA primase. Rfa2p has roles in both DNA replication and DNA repair in budding yeast. Rfa2p is phosphorylated in
a MEC1-dependent manner in response to DNA replication block or DNA
damage (4). Combination of top3
with either
of two independent rfa2 alleles (rfa2-1 and
rfa2-2) resulted in synthetic lethality, either at the
permissive temperature for top3
rfa2-1 double
mutants (25°C; n = 20 tetrads dissected) or at the
semipermissive temperature for top3
rfa2-2
double mutants (30°C; n = 20). Similarly, combination
of a top3
mutation with the pri1-M4 mutation,
which itself leads to a defect in S-phase checkpoint responses to DNA damage (39), resulted in synthetic lethality at the
permissive temperature for the pri1-M4 strain (25°C;
n = 20). One interpretation of these data is that
deletion of TOP3 is lethal in combination with any mutation
that perturbs DNA replication. However, this proved not to be the case,
since a combination of top3 with pol2-12 (42) produced viable spore colonies for the double mutant
(dissection of 40 tetrads).
Further evidence for an S-phase role for Top3p.
Thus far, our
data implicate Top3p in an S-phase-specific role in response to DNA
perturbations. To gain further evidence to substantiate this
suggestion, we studied whether top3
strains are sensitive
to the ribonucleotide reductase inhibitor HU, which inhibits DNA
replication, and whether the pattern of TOP3 gene expression
was indicative of a role in S phase. Figure
5a shows that top3
mutants
are highly sensitive to killing by HU compared to wild-type control
cells and that this sensitivity is substantially suppressed by deletion
of SGS1. To assess cell cycle regulation of TOP3
gene expression, wild-type cells were arrested in
G1 with
-factor and then released into fresh
medium. RNA samples were prepared at timed intervals for Northern blot
analysis, and the cell cycle position was assessed in parallel by
analysis of both the budding index and DNA content by flow cytometry.
In the representative experiment shown in Fig. 5b, synchrony was
maintained until the middle of the second cycle. The level of
TOP3 mRNA peaked 20 min after release from
-factor arrest
at a level 11-fold higher than that in the arrested cells (Fig. 5c).
This time point coincided with the onset of the decline of
G1 cells, as measured by flow cytometry, but was
prior to the appearance of budded cells. In the second cycle, the peak
in TOP3 mRNA levels was coincident with the rise in the
proportion of G1 cells. We estimated the size of
the TOP3 transcript to be
2.5 kb. This pattern of
transcription was confirmed in a second strain background, and the
2.5-kb transcript was undetectable in RNA derived from
top3
cells (data not shown). Thus, it appears that
TOP3 transcripts are few in early G1,
appear abruptly around Start, and then decline during late
S/G2.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We have shown that S. cerevisiae top3
mutants are
sensitive to DNA-damaging agents and HU and have an abrogated intra-S
checkpoint response to DNA damage. These defects can be rescued by
deletion of the SGS1 gene. In contrast, top3
mutants are proficient in DNA damage checkpoint responses that operate
in the G1 or G2 phase of
the cell cycle. We have also provided evidence that Top3p lies upstream
of the Mec1-Rad53-dependent signal transduction cascade in the cellular
response to DNA structural perturbations occurring within S phase.
top3
strains are defective in cell cycle
progression in the absence of exogenous DNA-damaging agents.
Previous work has shown that the extended doubling time of
top3
strains is a result of an accumulation of cells in
the late S/G2 phase of the cell cycle (15). We have shown
here that these cells have completed bulk DNA replication and are
arrested at the G2/M DNA damage checkpoint. The
most economical explanation for these findings is that some form of
abnormal DNA structure and/or DNA lesion is generated during the
process of DNA replication and that while this is not sufficient to
prevent completion of DNA synthesis, it nevertheless is recognized by
the G2/M DNA damage checkpoint machinery as
abnormal. Although top3
strains delay at the
G2/M checkpoint for an extended period, when this
checkpoint is disabled by deletion of RAD24, the
already-reduced viability of top3
strains is not further
decreased. Indeed, the doubling time of the double mutant is
shortened compared to that of top3
mutants. This might
indicate that a substantial fraction of the DNA lesions that lead to
induction of the G2/M checkpoint arrest in
top3
mutants are either irreparable, at least in
G2/M, or can be tolerated in subsequent cell cycles.
top3
strains are sensitive to several classes of
DNA-damaging agents and replication inhibitors.
Mutations in a
wide variety of genes encoding DNA repair enzymes or checkpoint
proteins confer sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents. For example,
mutation of nucleotide excision repair genes leads to sensitivity to UV
light, while mutation of recombinational repair genes confers
sensitivity primarily to ionizing radiation and MMS. top3
mutants are unusual in being sensitive to MMS and UV light, but not
markedly to
rays, suggesting that the Top3 protein probably does
not play a dedicated role in one of the major pathways for the repair
of specific DNA lesions but instead operates more generally in the
cellular response to DNA damage. To our knowledge, this represents the
first evidence in eukaryotes that a topoisomerase can protect cells
from the cytotoxic effects of DNA-damaging agents. Given the intact
nature of DNA damage checkpoint responses occurring in
G1 and G2, but a failure to adequately invoke the intra-S DNA damage checkpoint, it would appear
that DNA damage arising during S phase presents the most (or possibly
only) serious challenge to top3
mutants. A major goal for
the future is to identify the abnormal DNA structures that might occur
during progression through S phase in these mutants. It is known that
aberrant replicative structures resembling recombination intermediates
or late Cairns-type structures can be observed on two-dimensional gels
following drug-mediated inactivation of topoisomerase I or II in
budding yeast (29). However, we have shown that DNA samples derived from asynchronous cultures of wild-type and
top3
strains exhibit no consistent differences on
two-dimensional gels (our unpublished data). We conclude that any
putative abnormal replication intermediates that might arise in
top3
strains either fall outside the group of structures
detectable by this method or are accumulated at levels below the
detection limit. We have shown that top3
strains are
highly sensitive to the ribonucleotide reductase inhibitor HU. This
sensitivity is suppressed by deletion of SGS1. Some of the
genes required for protection against HU, such as MEC1 and
RAD53, are required to prevent mitosis from occurring during
arrest in S phase (loss of the so-called S/M checkpoint) (7, 32,
37, 57, 65). Our recent work indicates that HU-treated
top3
cells do not obviously enter mitosis directly from
an early S-phase arrest, as evidenced by the fact that there is no
progressive elongation of the mitotic spindle. Nevertheless, during
exposure to HU, top3
strains do show a progressive
increase in the percentage of cells displaying aberrant nuclear DNA
staining, including cells with marked DNA fragmentation (unpublished
data). Further work will be required to characterize the terminal
phenotype of HU-treated top3 mutants.
TOP3 is a putative new member of the SCB
box-containing family of genes.
The proposal that Top3p has a role
in S phase is supported by our data showing that TOP3
transcript levels are cell cycle regulated, arising in
G1 and declining in late S/G2. A genome-wide transcript analysis also indicated that the TOP3 mRNA is
induced in G1 (6). A number of genes
are transcribed exclusively in the late G1 phase
or at the G1/S boundary, including the
G1 cyclins and certain genes required for DNA
synthesis (reviewed in reference 51). These
late-G1-activated genes can be classified into
two groups on the basis of cis-acting sequences found within
their promoter sequences. The first group of genes includes the DNA metabolism genes (e.g., RFA1-3, POL1-3, and
DBF4) and the CLB5 and CLB6 cyclin
genes, and the promoter regions of these genes contain an element
similar to the Mlu1 cell cycle box (MCB element). The second group of
genes, including CLN1, CLN2, and
HCS26, contain a promoter motif, termed the SCB element,
which acts as a late-G1-specific upstream
activating sequence and binds the Swi4-Swi6 complex (44). Following S phase, transcription of both of these groups of genes is
down-regulated. In this context, we have identified a potential SCB
element in the 5' flanking region of TOP3 (CGCGAAA, at
positions
130 to
124 from the ATG start codon), suggesting that
TOP3 is a new member of the group of genes regulated by the
Swi4-Swi6 complex. While this finding would be consistent with the
G1 activation of TOP3 gene expression,
it should be noted that the minimal promoter region and the positions
of any potential transcription start sites in the TOP3 gene
have yet to be characterized.
How does loss of Top3p activity result in loss of checkpoint
proficiency?
The TOP3 gene shows genetic
interactions with SGS1, and biochemical analyses have
shown that the products of these genes physically associate (3,
15). Moreover, we and others have shown that topoisomerase
III
and BLM also physically interact in human cells, confirming that
the association between the topoisomerase III and RecQ helicase enzymes
is highly conserved (22, 69). It is not unreasonable to
assume, therefore, that Sgs1p and Top3p act in concert while performing
many, if not all, of their cellular functions. However, in contrast to
top3
mutants, cells lacking Sgs1p show only a modest
growth defect, are only slightly more sensitive to DNA-damaging agents
than are wild-type cells, and are reported to have only a minor intra-S
checkpoint defect (see the discussion below). How can the
above-mentioned findings be incorporated into a model that explains the
role of Top3p during normal DNA replication or when replication is
perturbed by DNA damage? Following DNA damage, replication forks can
stall, and we suggest that Sgs1p-Top3p is involved in the processing of
the resulting abnormal DNA structures or lesions (Fig.
6). The suggestion that the enzymatic
activity of Top3p is required for function is consistent with the
finding that the sensitivity of top3
mutants to
DNA-damaging agents cannot be corrected by expression of Top3p which
has been mutated at its catalytic active site (our unpublished data).
The Sgs1p-Top3p complex could serve two functions, which are not
mutually exclusive, in the cellular response to S-phase perturbation.
First, it could act in the generation of DNA structures that are a
necessary intermediate in the activation of the checkpoint cascade.
Second, it could prepare the damaged DNA for the DNA repair machinery.
Specifically, we propose that during S phase this repair could exploit
the availability of the genetic information on the intact sister
chromatid and therefore proceed via the Rad52-dependent recombinational-repair pathway. Murray et al. (41) have
suggested a similar role for fission yeast
rqh1+ in preparing DNA lesions at
blocked replication forks for the recombinational repair machinery.
Consistent with this proposal, we have shown recently that Sgs1p
interacts with the Rad51 recombinase (70). This model
would also be consistent with the proposed role of the RecQ protein,
the Escherichia coli homologue of Sgs1p, which in
concert with RecA can initiate homologous recombination and disrupt
joint molecules formed by aberrant recombination (19). In
further support of this general concept are the observations that
recombination intermediates (Holliday junctions) can be detected in
yeast during S phase and that perturbation of replication leads to an
elevation in their frequency (73).
|
mutants, including the intra-S
checkpoint defect. One explanation for this could be that the phenotype
of top3
mutants relates primarily to a deregulation of
Sgs1p enzymatic activity. Such deregulated activity could interfere,
either directly or indirectly, with the checkpoint machinery.
Alternatively, deletion of SGS1 could permit the utilization
of a redundant pathway that could lead to activation of the S-phase
checkpoint. It has been suggested previously that a key role for
checkpoint proteins is to process certain DNA structural abnormalities
in readiness for their repair by dedicated repair proteins (reviewed in
reference 65). If Top3p were to participate in such a
role, one implication would be that some degree of lesion processing by
the Sgs1p-Top3p complex is required in order for a robust S-phase
checkpoint response to be invoked. This putative role would likely
require the catalytic activity of Top3p to resolve structures created
by the Sgs1 helicase. Evidence in support of the concept that some
processing of lesions is required to invoke certain checkpoint
responses comes from the finding that in DNA repair-deficient
rad14 mutants, the UV-induced G1/S
checkpoint is not RAD9 dependent, as it is in wild-type
cells (53). Whether Top3 performs roles independent of
Sgs1 will require additional studies. This suggestion is not
unreasonable, however, given that sgs1 top3 mutants grow
more slowly and are more UV/MMS sensitive than are sgs1 mutants.
Recent data indicate that deletion of SGS1 leads to a
partial defect in the intra-S checkpoint, which is not associated with an alteration in phosphorylation of Rad53p after DNA damage (12, 13). However, in combination with deletion of RAD24,
loss of Sgs1 function leads to some attenuation in the extent of Rad53 modification. Further, Sgs1p and Rad53p have been shown to colocalize in S-phase-specific foci (12). Our results are consistent
with those of Frei and Gasser (12) in that we have shown
that Top3p acts upstream of Rad53 in the S-phase response to DNA
damage. However, our data show that top3 mutants have a much
more severe S-phase checkpoint defect than do sgs1 mutants
and, moreover, that deletion of SGS1 has the effect of
strongly suppressing the defects in top3 mutants. Indeed, at
least in the strain background that we analyzed, any effects of an
sgs1 mutation alone or the combination of an sgs1
and a top3 mutation on intra-S checkpoint proficiency and
Rad53 phosphorylation were not obvious. A second DNA helicase in
S. cerevisiae, Srs2p, is required for normal activation of
Rad53p during S phase, and srs2
strains show a defect in
the intra-S checkpoint (31). In combination with deletion
of SGS1 or TOP3, srs2
strains show
very low viability, which is apparently associated with an accumulation
of aberrant genetic recombination structures (8, 16, 28).
Interestingly, recent data indicate that defects in a recently
identified protein, Tof1p, which was first identified through
interactions with topoisomerase I, have phenotypic consequences similar
to those reported here for top3
strains.
(11). These similarities include sensitivity to
DNA-damaging agents and HU and an S-phase-specific defect in DNA damage
checkpoint signaling to Rad53p. Further work will be required to assess
whether Top1p is functionally connected with Sgs1-Top3p
In summary, we have shown that functional topoisomerase III is required
for the normal response of S. cerevisiae cells to DNA-damaging agents. A recent report indicated that expression of a
truncated form of human topoisomerase III
can partially reverse
certain phenotypes associated with ataxia telangiectasia cells, which
are defective in the response to DNA damage (14). Since
the expression of hTOP3
was shown to correct both radio-resistant DNA synthesis (analogous to the intra-S checkpoint in yeast) and hyperrecombination, it is possible that the general model described here is also applicable in certain circumstances to higher eukaryotes.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank R. Rothstein, J. Wang, T. Weinert, C. Santocanale, and M. Foiani for providing yeast strains, plasmids, and antibodies. We also thank C. Norbury and L. Wu for helpful comments on the manuscript and J. Pepper for preparation of the manuscript.
Funding was provided by the Imperial Cancer Research Fund and the Medical Research Council. R.K.C. was a Medical Research Council Clinical Training Fellow.
R.K.C., J.M.K., and T.J.O. contributed equally to the work.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Imperial Cancer Research Fund Laboratories, Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DS, United Kingdom. Phone: (44) 1865 222417. Fax: (44) 1865 222431. E-mail: hickson{at}icrf.icnet.uk.
Present address: Department of Biochemistry, National University of
Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Aboussekhra, A., J. E. Vialard, D. E. Morrison, M.-A. de la Torre-Ruiz, L. Cernakova, F. Fabre, and N. F. Lowndes. 1996. A novel role for the budding yeast RAD9 checkpoint gene in DNA damage dependent transcription. EMBO J. 15:3912-3922[Medline]. |
| 2. |
Allen, J. B.,
Z. Zhou,
W. Siede,
E. C. Friedberg, and S. J. Elledge.
1994.
The SAD1/RAD53 protein kinase controls multiple checkpoints and DNA damage-induced transcription in yeast.
Genes Dev.
8:2401-2428 |
| 3. |
Bennett, R. J.,
M. F. Noirot-Gros, and J. C. Wang.
2000.
Interaction between yeast sgs1 helicase and DNA topoisomerase III.
J. Biol. Chem.
275:26898-26905 |
| 4. |
Brush, G. S.,
D. M. Morrow,
P. Hieter, and T. J. Kelly.
1996.
The ATM homologue MEC1 is required for phosphorylation of replication protein A in yeast.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:15075-15080 |
| 5. | Chakraverty, R. K., and I. D. Hickson. 1999. Defending genome integrity during DNA replication: a proposed role for RecQ family helicase. Bioessays 21:286-294[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 6. | Cho, R. J., M. J. Campbell, E. A. Winzeler, L. Steinmetz, A. Conway, L. Wodicka, T. G. Wolfsberg, A. E. Gabrielian, D. Landsman, D. J. Lockhart, and R. W. Davis. 1998. A genome-wide transcription analysis of the mitotic cell cycle. Mol. Cell 2:65-73[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 7. | de la Torre-Ruiz, M.-A., C. M. Green, and N. F. Lowndes. 1998. RAD9 and RAD24 define two additive, interacting branches of the DNA damage checkpoint pathway in budding yeast normally required for Rad53 modification and activation. EMBO J. 9:2687-2698[CrossRef]. |
| 8. | Duno, M., B. Thomsen, O. Westergaard, L. Krejci, and C. Bendixen. 2000. Genetic analysis of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sgs1 helicase defines an essential function for the Sgs1-Top3 complex in the absence of SRS2 or TOP1. Mol. Gen. Genet. 264:89-97[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 9. | Ellis, N. A., J. Groden, T.-Z. Ye, J. Straughen, D. J. Lennon, S. Ciocci, M. Proytcheva, and J. German. 1995. The Bloom's syndrome gene product is homologous to RecQ helicases. Cell 83:655-666[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 10. |
Foiani, M.,
F. Marini,
D. Gamba,
G. Lucchini, and P. Plevani.
1994.
The B subunit of the DNA polymerase alpha-primase complex in Saccharomyces cerevisiae executes an essential function at the initial stages of DNA replication.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14:923-933 |
| 11. |
Foss, E. J.
2001.
Tof1p regulates DNA damage responses during S phase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Genetics
157:567-577 |
| 12. |
Frei, C., and S. M. Gasser.
2000.
The yeast Sgs1p helicase acts upstream of Rad53p in the DNA replication checkpoint and colocalizes with Rad53p in S-phase-specific foci.
Genes Dev.
14:81-96 |
| 13. | Frei, C., and S. M. Gasser. 2000. RecQ-like helicases: the DNA replication checkpoint connection. J. Cell Sci. 113:2641-2646[Abstract]. |
| 14. |
Fritz, E.,
S. H. Elsea,
P. I. Patel, and S. Meyn.
1997.
Overexpression of a truncated human topoisomerase III partially corrects multiple aspects of the ataxia telangiectasia phenotype.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:4538-4542 |
| 15. |
Gangloff, S.,
J. P. McDonald,
C. Bendixen,
L. Arthur, and R. Rothstein.
1994.
The yeast type I topoisomerase Top3 interacts with Sgs1, a DNA helicase homolog: a potential eukaryotic reverse gyrase.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14:8391-8398 |
| 16. | Gangloff, S., C. Soustelle, and F. Fabre. 2000. Homologous recombination is responsible for cell death in the absence of the Sgs1 and Srs2 helicases. Nat. Genet. 25:192-194[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 17. |
Goodwin, A.,
S.-W. Wang,
T. Toda,
C. Norbury, and I. D. Hickson.
1999.
Topoisomerase III is essential for accurate nuclear division in Schizosaccharomyces pombe.
Nucleic Acids Res.
27:4050-4058 |
| 18. |
Hanai, R.,
P. R. Caron, and J. C. Wang.
1996.
Human TOP3: a single-copy gene encoding DNA Top3p.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:3653-3657 |
| 19. |
Harmon, F. G., and S. C. Kowalczykowski.
1998.
RecQ helicase, in concert with RecA and SSB proteins, initiates and disrupts DNA recombination.
Genes Dev.
12:1134-1144 |
| 20. |
Hennessy, K. M.,
A. Lee,
E. Chen, and D. Botstein.
1991.
A group of interacting yeast DNA replication genes.
Genes Dev.
5:958-969 |
| 21. |
Hiasa, H., and K. J. Marians.
1994.
Top3p, but not Topoisomerase I, can support nascent chain elongation during theta-type DNA replication.
J. Biol. Chem.
269:32655-32659 |
| 22. |
Johnson, F. B.,
D. B. Lombard,
N. F. Neff,
M. A. Mastrangelo,
W. Dewolf,
N. A. Ellis,
R. A. Marciniak,
Y. Yin,
R. Jaenisch, and L. Guarente.
2000.
Association of the Bloom syndrome protein with topoisomerase IIIalpha in somatic and meiotic cells.
Cancer Res.
60:1162-1167 |
| 23. | Karow, J. K., L. Wu, and I. D. Hickson. 2000. RecQ family helicases: roles in cancer and aging. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 10:32-38[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 24. |
Kawasaki, K.,
S. Minoshima,
E. Nakato,
K. Shibuya,
A. Shintani,
J. L. Schmeits,
J. Wang, and N. Shimizu.
1997.
One-megabase sequence analysis of the human Immunoglobulin gene locus.
Genome Res.
7:250-261 |
| 25. |
Kim, R. A., and J. C. Wang.
1992.
Identification of the yeast TOP3 gene product as a single strand-specific DNA topoisomerase.
J. Biol. Chem.
267:17178-17185 |
| 26. | Kiser, G. L., and T. A. Weinert. 1996. Distinct roles of yeast MEC and RAD checkpoint genes in transcriptional induction after DNA damage and implications for function. Mol. Biol. Cell 7:703-718[Abstract]. |
| 27. | Kitao, S., A. Shimamoto, M. Goto, R. W. Miller, W. A. Smithson, N. M. Lindor, and Y. Furuichi. 1999. Mutations in RECQL4 cause a subset of cases of Rothmund-Thomson syndrome. Nat. Genet. 22:82-84[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 28. |
Lee, S. K.,
R. E. Johnson,
S. L. Yu,
L. Prakash, and S. Prakash.
1999.
Requirement of yeast SGS1 and SRS2 genes for replication and transcription.
Science
286:2339-2342 |
| 29. | Levac, P., and T. Moss. 1996. Inactivation of topoisomerase I or II may lead to recombination or aberrant replication on both SV40 and yeast 2µm DNA. Chromosoma 105:250-260[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 30. |
Li, W., and J. C. Wang.
1998.
Mammalian DNA Top3p is essential in early embryogenesis.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
95:1010-1013 |
| 31. | Liberi, G., I. Chiolo, A. Pellicioli, M. Lopes, P. Plevani, M. Muzi-Falconi, and M. Foiani. 2000. Srs2 DNA helicase is involved in checkpoint response and its regulation requires a functional Mec1-dependent pathway and cdk1 activity. EMBO J. 19:5027-5038[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 32. | Longhese, M. P., M. Foiani, M. Muzi-Falconi, G. Lucchini, and P. Plevani. 1998. DNA damage checkpoint in budding yeast. EMBO. J. 17:5525-5528[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 33. | Longhese, M. P., R. Fraschini, P. Plevani, and G. Lucchini. 1996. Yeast pip3/mec3 mutants fail to delay entry into S-phase and to slow replication in response to DNA damage, and they define a functional link between Mec3 and DNA primase. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:3235-3244[Abstract]. |
| 34. | Longhese, M. P., V. Paciotti, R. Fraschini, R. Zaccarini, P. Plevani, and G. Lucchini. 1997. The novel DNA damage checkpoint protein Ddc1p is phosphorylated periodically during the cell cycle and in response to DNA damage in budding yeast. EMBO J. 16:5216-5226[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 35. | Louis, E. J., and J. E. Haber. 1990. The Subtelomeric Y' repeat family in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: an experimental system for repeated sequence evolution. Genetics 124:533-545[Abstract]. |
| 36. | Lowndes, N. F., and J. R. Murguia. 2000. Sensing and responding to DNA damage. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 10:17-25[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 37. | Lydall, D., and T. Weinert. 1996. From DNA damage to cell cycle arrest and suicide: a budding yeast perspective. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 5:12-16. |
| 38. |
|