Previous Article | Next Article 
Molecular and Cellular Biology, November 2001, p. 7277-7286, Vol. 21, No. 21
0270-7306/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/MCB.21.21.7277-7286.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Molecular Basis for Telomere Repeat Divergence in
Budding Yeast
Klaus
Förstemann and
Joachim
Lingner*
Swiss Institute for Experimental Cancer
Research (ISREC), CH-1066 Epalinges, Switzerland
Received 24 April 2001/Returned for modification 15 June
2001/Accepted 2 August 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
Telomerase is a ribonucleoprotein enzyme that adds repetitive
sequences to the ends of linear chromosomes, thereby counteracting nucleotide loss due to incomplete replication. A short region of the
telomerase RNA subunit serves as template for nucleotide addition onto
the telomere 3' end. Although Saccharomyces cerevisiae contains only one telomerase RNA gene, telomere repeat sequences are
degenerate in this organism. Based on a detailed analysis of the
telomere sequences specified by wild-type and mutant RNA templates in
vivo, we show that the divergence of telomere repeats is due to
abortive reverse transcription in the 3' and 5' regions of the template
and due to the alignment of telomeres in multiple registers within the
RNA template. Through the interpretation of wild-type telomere
sequences, we identify nucleotides in the template that are not
accessible for base pairing during substrate annealing. Rather, these
positions become available as templates for reverse transcription only
after alignment with adjacent nucleotides has occurred, indicating that
a conformational change takes place upon substrate binding. We also
infer that the central part of the template region is reverse
transcribed processively. The inaccessibility of certain template
positions for alignment and the processive polymerization of the
central template portion may serve to reduce the possible repeat
diversification and enhance the incorporation of binding sites for
Rap1p, the telomere binding protein of budding yeast.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Telomeres protect the ends of the
linear eukaryotic chromosomes from end-to-end fusions and serve as
buffer zones against sequence loss due to incomplete replication
(1). They are maintained by the ribonucleoprotein enzyme
telomerase, a cellular reverse transcriptase that uses a specific
region of its RNA subunit as template for DNA synthesis (16, 17,
32, 58). The template region of the RNA is copied repeatedly
onto the 3' ends of the chromosomes, thus specifying the telomere
repeats. The ability to maintain telomeres is a prerequisite to undergo
unlimited rounds of replication (33), and reactivation of
telomerase is seen in more than 80% of human tumors (23).
In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the RNA subunit of
telomerase is encoded by TLC1 (49) and the
catalytic protein subunit is encoded by EST2 (8,
32). EST1 and EST3 encode other
telomerase-associated proteins essential for telomere maintenance in
vivo but dispensable for telomerase activity in vitro (4, 22, 28,
31, 33, 45).
Several organisms, including some protozoa, fungi, slime molds, and
plants, have irregular telomere repeat sequences (56). The
degeneracy is most pronounced in S. cerevisiae
and Schizosaccharomyces pombe with the telomere consensus
sequences (TG)1-4G2-3 (5, 48, 52, 54) and
GGTTACA(G)1-4, respectively (21). Several models have been put forward to explain the
synthesis of variable telomeric repeats with only one RNA template
(6). Slippage of the template in a stretch of four G/C
base pairs was proposed to account for the synthesis of poly(dG)
observed in vitro with Tetrahymena thermophila telomerase,
whereas a high frequency of nucleotide misincorporation at a specific
template position appears responsible for the mixed synthesis of
T2G4 and T3G3 repeats in
Paramecium tetraurelia (39). The diversity of S. cerevisiae telomere repeats was proposed to be
due to multiple possible alignment registers between telomere and
template as well as abortive reverse transcription (49).
This hypothesis is tested here.
Telomerases from different species differ in their repeat addition
processivity, i.e., their ability to add multiple telomere repeats to
the substrate in a single binding event. Enzymes isolated from human
and hamster cells, T. thermophila, Euplotes
aediculatus, and Saccharomyces castellii have
processive polymerization characteristics, whereas the telomerases from
S. cerevisiae, Kluyveromyces lactis, and S. pombe add maximally one telomere repeat
per binding event in vitro (4, 10, 15, 18, 19, 27, 35,
51). The mechanisms causing the observed differences remain to
be elucidated. A Tetrahymena telomerase catalytic subunit
mutant with a leucine-to-tyrosine substitution close to the active site
showed increased processivity, suggesting an important role for the
catalytic core in processive synthesis (2).
The telomerase RNA serves as a passive template for substrate annealing
and reverse transcription but also appears to play an active role in
catalysis (6). Certain nucleotides in the template region
can be substituted without affecting enzymatic activity in vitro
(11, 42, 44, 55) or in vivo (24, 38-40, 43, 49, 50,
58), whereas other substitutions lead to loss of telomerase
activity (39, 43, 57) or repeat addition processivity (11, 12, 55). In addition, S. cerevisiae telomerase RNAs functionally interact in enzyme
multimers containing two different template RNA molecules
(42). The molecular basis for this interaction is not understood.
Telomere length in yeast is negatively regulated by the double-stranded
telomere binding protein Rap1p (7, 20, 26, 34, 37). Short
telomeres that have few Rap1 molecules bound are more efficiently
extended by telomerase than are longer telomeres that have reached
their equilibrium length (36). Upon clonal expansion, the
sequence of a given telomere remains constant in the
centromere-proximal region but diverges within the last 80 to 100 nucleotides (nt) at its distal end (9, 54). Divergence is
dependent on telomerase activity (9), and therefore, this region demarcates the dynamic zone where telomere shortening and telomerase-mediated extension occur. Since in the absence of telomerase only 3 to 5 nt are lost per generation, which is considerably less than
the region of repeat divergence, telomerase does not extend a given
telomere in every cell cycle. Instead, S. cerevisiae telomeres appear to be elongated during short
periods of efficient extension separated by a number of replication
cycles with gradual telomere shortening. Alternatively, extensive
nucleolytic processing of the telomere may depend on the presence of telomerase.
The length of artificially shortened telomeres increased initially by,
on average, 15 nt in the first generation (36). Taking into account the sequence losses due to incomplete replication, this
suggests that S. cerevisiae telomerase can add at
least 18 to 20 nt to a telomere in one cell cycle. Since the entire
TLC1 template region contains only 16 nt, either multiple
repeats are added in a processive fashion by a single telomerase enzyme
or single repeats are added in successive binding events by multiple telomerases during telomere elongation in vivo. In vitro, S. cerevisiae telomerase does not show repeat addition
processivity. It adds maximally the number of nucleotides present
between the position of alignment and the 5' boundary of the template.
The extended substrate oligonucleotide then stays associated with the
telomerase enzyme in a stable manner (42).
In this study, we elucidate the mechanisms by which yeast telomerase
specifies divergent telomere repeats in vivo. To this end, we
transformed tlc1-
cells with plasmids encoding mutant TLC1 RNA templates and subsequently analyzed the induced
changes in the telomere sequence patterns. This analysis indicated that redundant alignment possibilities within the template RNA and abortive
reverse transcription events both contribute to the synthesis of
divergent repeats as hypothesized previously (49). The
analysis of the mutants allowed us to deduce the template utilization
by yeast telomerase and in turn to interpret wild-type (WT) telomere sequences, which serve as written traces of the enzyme's action in
vivo. We determined the alignment probabilities along the WT template
region and found that positions 479C to
477C of the template are inaccessible for
substrate binding but subsequently become available for base pairing
during reverse transcription. In addition, we infer that the enzyme
shows abortive reverse transcription in the 3' and 5' parts of the
template region but does not allow product dissociation during copying
of the central part of the template.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
TLC1 mutagenesis.
The
NcoI-NsiI fragment of TLC1 containing
the template region was PCR amplified from pSD107 (derived from pRS314
by inserting a genomic fragment containing the TLC1 gene;
obtained from D. Gottschling) with a sense primer containing a
BspHI site instead of the NcoI site and an
antisense primer. Ligation of the
BspHI-NsiI-digested PCR product into the
compatible ends of NcoI-NsiI-digested pSD107 led
to destruction of the original NcoI site in the
TLC1 gene, thus simplifying identification of mutant clones.
The sequence of the sense primer was
5'-TAATTATCATGAGAAGCCTACCATCCATCACCACACCCACACACAAATGTTAC-3'. The underlined sequence corresponds to the TLC1 template
region. It was changed according to Fig. 1B to introduce the various
mutations. The sequence of the antisense primer was
5'-TATCTAAATGCATCGAAGGCATTAG-3' with the
NsiI site indicated in italics. All constructs were
sequenced to confirm the presence of the desired mutations. The
plasmids coding for the different mutations were named pKF5 (WT
template but
NcoI, i.e., 455G
A),
pKF6 (484ACA482
UUU + 455G
A), pKF7
(483CAC481
UUU + 455G
A), pKF8 (469A
U + 455G
A), pKF9 (469A
U + 482A
U + 455G
A), pKF10
(484ACA482
CAC + 455G
A), pKF11
(473CAC471
ACA + 455G
A), and pKF12
(484ACA482
CAC + 473CAC471
ACA + 455G
A).
Telomere mutagenesis and sequence analysis.
The plasmids
pKF5 to pKF12 and pSD107 were transformed into yeast strain YKF19
(ade2 his3-11 can1
leu2 trp1 ura3-52 DIA5-1 [ADE2 telomere VR] tlc1::HIS3
rad52::LEU2) as the cells underwent senescence. The colonies obtained after rescue were restreaked once,
and telomere VR was amplified, cloned, and sequenced as described
previously (9). The following telomere clones were obtained: pKF5, pktel 56, 57, 58, 59, 61, 62, 63, 159b, 160, 161, 162, and 163 (12 clones); pKF6, pktel 103, 104, 106, 107, 151, 153, 174, 175, and 176 (9 clones); pKF7, pktel 166, 169, 170, 171, 172, 176, 177, 178, 179, and 180 (10 clones); pKF8, pktel 83, 84, 86, 135, 136, and
138 (6 clones); pKF9, pktel 81, 95, 96, 100, 101, 131, and 134 (7 clones); pKF10, pktel 159a, 178, and 179 (3 clones); pKF11, pktel 55 and 56 (2 clones); and pKF12, pktel 51, 52, and 148 (3 clones).
To identify newly incorporated sequences, the telomeres were
aligned with a telomere cloned from an earlier passage of strain YKF19
(pktel120) with the GCG software and sequences distal to the point of
divergence from pktel120 were analyzed as described in Results. The
2 analysis for the spacer length
distributions was performed with Microsoft Excel. Telomere sequences
from the Saccharomyces Genome Database
(http://genome-www.stanford.edu/Saccharomyces/) were retrieved for
telomeres IL, IR, IIR, IIIL, IIIR, IVL, VIR, VIIL, VIIIL, VIIIR, IXL,
IXR, XL, XR, XIL, XIR, XIIL, XIIIL, XIIIR, XIVR, XVL, and XVR.
Telomerase preparation and in vitro assay.
S.
cerevisiae telomerase was prepared essentially as described
previously (4, 43). Briefly, cells from 500-ml overnight cultures in synthetic medium lacking tryptophan were harvested at an
optical density at 600 nm of 1 and lysed in 2 ml of buffer L (20 mM
Tris-HCl [pH 8.0], 500 mM NaAc, 1.1 mM MgCl2,
0.1 mM EDTA, 1.5 mM dithiothreitol [DTT], 0.1% Triton X-100, 0.2%
NP-40, 10% glycerol, 1 mM phenymethylsulfonyl fluoride [PMSF], 60 U
of RNAguard [Pharmacia]) by grinding them for 5 min with dry ice in a
coffee grinder (MioStar) as described previously (41). After centrifugation at 5,500 × g for 2 min, the
supernatant was collected and the protein concentration was adjusted to
10 mg/ml with TMG-500 (10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.0], 500 mM NaAc, 1.1 mM
MgCl2, 0.1 mM EDTA, 1.5 mM DTT, 0.1% Triton
X-100, 10% glycerol, 0.1 mM PMSF). The extract (20 to 50 mg of total
protein) was batch adsorbed during 30 min at 4°C to 1 ml of
DEAE-Sepharose Fast Flow (Pharmacia) equilibrated in TMG-500. The resin
was pelleted by centrifugation at 400 × g for 20 s and washed three times with 13 ml of TMG-500. After the last wash, 2 ml of TMG-900 (10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.0], 900 mM NaAc, 1.1 mM
MgCl2, 0.1 mM EDTA, 1.5 mM DTT, 0.1% Triton
X-100, 10% glycerol, 0.1 mM PMSF) was added to the resin. After 15 min
of agitation at 4°C, the resin was pelleted by centrifugation at
5,500 × g for 5 min. The supernatant was loaded onto a
Sephadex G-25 desalting column (2-ml bed volume) equilibrated with
TMG-30 (10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.0], 30 mM NaAc, 1.1 mM
MgCl2, 0.1 mM EDTA, 1.5 mM DTT, 0.1% Triton
X-100, 10% glycerol, 0.1 mM PMSF) and eluted into a centrifugal
microconcentrator device (Ultrafree 4; Millipore; molecular mass
cutoff, 30 kDa). The telomerase preparation was concentrated to 40 µl, mixed with an equal volume of glycerol, and stored in aliquots at
70°C. The amount of TLC1 RNA contained in the different
preparations was determined by Northern hybridization.
Telomerase reactions were carried out in 10-µl reaction mixtures with
final concentrations of 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0); 25
mM NaCl; 1 mM DTT;
1 mM spermidine; 1 mM MgCl
2; 1 U of RNAguard;
50 µM dATP, dCTP, and dGTP; 5 µM dTTP; 10 µCi of
[

-
32P]dTTP (Amersham; 3,000 mCi/mmol); and
up to 50% (vol/vol) of
telomerase fraction. The reaction mixture was
incubated at 30°C
for 45 min and stopped by addition of 200 µl of
proteinase K buffer
(20 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.0], 1 mM EDTA, 0.5% sodium
dodecyl sulfate,
250 ng of proteinase K/µl). Trace amounts of a
labeled oligonucleotide
(32 nt) were added to control for precipitation
efficiency and
gel loading. After digestion at 30°C for 60 min, the
samples were
extracted with phenol-chloroform and precipitated with
ethanol
in the presence of 2.5 M NH
4Ac and 30 µg of glycogen (Roche Molecular
Biochemicals) as carrier. After two
washes with 70% ethanol, the
pellets were dried and subsequently
dissolved in 5 µl of formamide
loading buffer. The reaction products
were analyzed on 14% acrylamide-urea
sequencing gels.
Quantification of the bands was performed on
a Fuji BAS
PhosphorImager.
Nucleotide sequence accession number.
The telomere clone
sequences were submitted to GenBank, and their accession numbers are
AF371374 to AF371439.
 |
RESULTS |
Repeating sequence in baker's yeast telomeres.
The
S. cerevisiae telomerase RNA is predicted to
specify the synthesis of the sequence 5'-TGTGTGGGTGTGGTG-3'
if a substrate were to anneal with its 3' end at position 483 and
if reverse transcription occurred from position 482 to 468 (Fig.
1A). However, yeast telomeres do not
consist of perfect tandem arrays of this sequence. Rather, a consensus
can be defined as
(TG)1-4G2-3 (48, 52,
54). Examination of yeast telomere sequences determined in this
study and present in the public database (Table
1) revealed additional constraints that
could be included in the consensus definition. The heptanucleotide
5'-TGGGTGT-3' sequence is present at an average spacing of
11 nt. With this core sequence, approximately 90% of the telomere
sequences can be broken up into individual repeats [Table 1, columns
TGGGTGTGGT and
TGGG(TG)nT]. Most of the remaining
sequences can be attributed to three additional repeat types [Table 1,
columns TGGTGGGT, GGGG, and
TGG(TG)nTGGT]. The analysis revealed
that the [TGGGTGT] core sequence is preceded by a variable number of
TG dinucleotides (Table 2) and followed in 50% of all cases by a GG dinucleotide as predicted from the telomerase RNA template [Table 1, columns TGGGTGTGGT
and TGGG(TG)n T].
Thus, a more precise consensus for S. cerevisiae
telomere sequences is
5'-[(TG)0-6TGGGTGTG(G)]n-3'
(Fig. 1A).

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
(A) The telomere consensus sequence does not correspond
to perfect repeats of the sequence specified by the TLC1
template RNA. (B) TLC1 template mutants used in this
study. Mutant nucleotides are highlighted. In order to facilitate the
cloning, the NcoI restriction site 3' of the template
was destroyed in the mutants by ligation with compatible
BspHI ends. This results in a single
455A G nucleotide change.
|
|
In the following, we first define the templating function of various
nucleotides and present a model for the molecular events
responsible
for
S. cerevisiae telomere sequence divergence.
Second,
we will use the model to interpret WT telomere sequences. We
infer
substrate alignment probabilities for most template positions
and
identify template regions where product dissociation can occur
as well
as template portions that are reverse transcribed
processively.
Incorporation of GG dinucleotides and GGG trinucleotides depends on
reverse transcription of specific template positions.
To elucidate
the templating function of TLC1, several mutant
tlc1 alleles (Fig. 1B) were generated on centromeric
plasmids and introduced at the onset of senescence into yeast cells
carrying a deletion of the chromosomal TLC1 and
RAD52 genes. All plasmids rescued the cells from senescence
with comparable efficiency (data not shown). Telomeres were amplified
and cloned by telomere PCR (9). The newly incorporated
sequences were identified by their divergence from the original WT
telomere sequence.
Telomeres cloned from cells carrying a
473CAC
471
ACA mutant
tlc1 allele (Fig.
1B), which lacks a CC dinucleotide in the
template
sequence, were devoid of GG dinucleotides (Table
1). On the
other
hand, in the mutant
482ACA
480
CAC +
473CAC
471
ACA, where a CC
dinucleotide is present at positions 480 to 479,
GG dinucleotides were
again incorporated into telomeres (Table
1). These results indicate
that the telomeric GG sequence is
specified by the CC dinucleotide,
corresponding to positions
470C and
471C in the WT template. It is not generated by
product dissociation
during the reverse transcription of the
477CCC
475 trinucleotide.
In cells expressing
469A

U mutant
tlc1 or the
469A

U +
482A

U double mutant, the incorporated adenine
nucleotides were found only adjacent
to GG dinucleotides and never
adjacent to a GGG trinucleotide.
Thus, the incorporation of GGG
trinucleotides is most likely generated
by reverse transcription of
template positions
477CCC
475 rather than
through slippage during the copying of positions
471CC
470. This validates
the use of the TGGGTGT core sequence to define
individual
telomeric repeats, as the GGG trinucleotide can be
incorporated only
once per substrate binding
event.
Multiple alignment registers contribute to the length variability
of telomeric repeats.
The 3' portion of the template region
consists of a stretch of CA dinucleotides (Fig. 1A), and it has been
proposed elsewhere that it may allow multiple alignment possibilities
for telomeres ending with -GTG-3', the predicted product of a
complete extension cycle (49) (see also Fig. 3). Such
variable alignment may give rise to the variable length of the
(TG)n spacer found between either a GG
dinucleotide and the following GGG trinucleotide or two adjacent GGG
trinucleotides. To test this hypothesis, we constructed mutant
tlc1 alleles (Fig. 1B) that were predicted to reduce the
number of possible alignments within the 3' region of the template
(484ACA482
UUU,
483CAC481
UUU, and
484ACA482
CAC) and
determined the sequence of the specified telomeric repeats.
Reverse transcription of template positions
471C
470C is responsible for
the incorporation of GG dinucleotides into the telomeres.
The
(TG)
n spacer between a GG dinucleotide and the
following
GGG trinucleotide therefore contains maximally one TG
dinucleotide
contributed by the 5' end of the template region
(positions
469A
468C).
Telomere repeats that do not contain the GG dinucleotide are
caused by
product dissociation before reverse transcription of
template position
470C (see below). The
(TG)
n spacer between adjacent GGG
trinucleotides
can therefore contain up to two TG dinucleotides
contributed by the
region 5' of
475C (positions
474A to
471C). To avoid
this ambiguity of the origin of the TG dinucleotides,
we restricted our
analysis to telomeric repeats that contain the
GG dinucleotide. Spacer
lengths of more than four TG dinucleotides
occurred at a frequency of
only 3% in WT telomeres and were therefore
omitted.
Restricting the predicted alignment possibilities by changing
484ACA
482 into UUU resulted
in a trend toward shorter spacing of telomeric
repeats (Table
2; not
significant at the present sample size).
Telomeres cloned from
483CAC
481
UUU mutant
cells showed a pronounced shift toward a closer spacing
of telomeric
repeats (Table
2). The most dramatic effect on the
spacer length was
achieved with the
484ACA
482
CAC mutation.
In a strain carrying this mutant
tlc1 allele, the
number of
base pairs formed between the GG dinucleotide containing
telomeric 3'
ends and the template RNA is increased compared to
that in the WT.
Telomere sequences recovered from
484ACA
482
CAC mutant
cells showed an almost complete loss of spacer length
variability, with
17 of 19 telomere repeats showing a spacing
of one TG dinucleotide as
predicted from the most stable alignment
(Table
2). In summary, the
data strongly support the notion that
multiple alignment registers in
the 3' part of the
TLC1 template
region contribute to the
length heterogeneity of the (TG)
n spacer.
Abortive reverse transcription of the template 5' region in
vivo.
In WT cells, only half of the telomeric TGGGTGT
core sequences were followed by a GG dinucleotide as predicted
from TLC1 template positions
471C470C (Table 1 and Fig.
1A). The frequent absence of GG dinucleotides from telomeric repeats
could be explained by premature abortion of reverse transcription,
degradation of longer primary products, or frequent slippage of the
telomerase enzyme while copying the template positions
C471C470, thus converting
the GG sequence into a GGG sequence (already ruled out above). In order
to address this issue, we directly measured the incorporation
efficiency of the 5'-terminal region of the template in vivo. To this
end, a mutant tlc1 allele carrying a
469A
U substitution was generated. This mutant
was predicted to specify adenosine adjacent to a GG dinucleotide. The
tlc1 469A
U allele encoded on a plasmid
rescued senescing tlc1-
cells as efficiently as did WT
TLC1 (data not shown) and gave rise to a similar telomere
length (Table 1). However, in telomeres recovered from
469A
U cells, we found that only 12% (10 of
86) of the telomeric repeats contained the specified adenosine
nucleotide (WT 0 of 68). Therefore, the two most 5'-terminal
template positions were rarely reverse transcribed by the mutant
telomerase into telomeric DNA in vivo.
Since telomeres with an incorporated adenine nucleotide should be
compromised in their ability to base pair with the template
in
subsequent elongation cycles, we also tested a
469A

U +
482A

U double
mutant that was predicted to partially restore the
base pairing in the
3' region of the template. However, the incorporation
frequency of
adenine nucleotides increased only slightly, to 16%
(12 of 73). This
suggests that abortive reverse transcription
rather than degradation
due to impaired alignment is responsible
for the low incorporation rate
of the mutant nucleotides. Unexpectedly,
about half of the telomeric
adenosines incorporated via the
469A

U mutation
were found in the sequence GGATGT (6 of 10 in
469A

U mutants and 5 of 12 in
469A

U +
482A

U
mutants), which indicates the occurrence of 3'-terminal mismatches
or
template skipping upon incorporation of an adenosine base.
Such events
were not detected with WT telomerase, as the sequence
GGTTGT
was never
observed.
Abortive reverse transcription of the template 3' region in
vivo.
As indicated in Fig. 1A, alignment of a telomeric 3' end
with the sequence -TGGTG-3' with positions
484A483C in WT
TLC1 will result in the incorporation of three TG
dinucleotides. This is, therefore, the maximal spacer length that
can be generated with a single alignment event. Strikingly, in WT cells
as well as in cells expressing mutant tlc1 alleles, we
detected spacer lengths that exceed this maximal length (Table 2). This
indicates that dissociation of partially extended products and
realignment occurred before reverse transcription of positions
477C to 475C.
Nonabortive reverse transcription in the central part of the
template.
The prevalence of the 5'-TGGGTGT-3' telomeric
core sequence could be explained by continuous reverse transcription
from template positions 478A to
472A. The telomere sequence analysis suggests
that, during reverse transcription of at least part of this region,
product dissociation never occurs. This conclusion is based on the
observation that telomeres cloned from cells carrying the
473CAC471
ACA mutant
tlc1 allele (which lacks a CC template sequence) lacked GG
dinucleotides. If product dissociation occurred after reverse transcription of template position 476C, GG
dinucleotides should have become incorporated.
Alternatively, if after dissociation at position
476C, which generates a telomeric 3' end with the
sequence -TGG-3', realignment
always occurred again at position
476C, dissociation at this position may be
undetectable in the incorporated
telomere sequences (see Fig.
3).
However, in
469A

U mutant telomerase, reverse
transcription up to position
470C also generates
a telomeric 3' end with the sequence -GTGTGG-3'
(Fig.
2). At this point, extension may be
either continued (Fig.
2, upper right) or aborted, followed by product
dissociation and
realignment at different positions (Fig.
2, bottom
left and right).
The different events can be distinguished in
469A

U mutant cells based on the incorporated
sequences (indicated
in Fig.
2). Reannealing of the sequence
-GTGTGG-3' at position
476C is
predicted to form six base pairs and to convert the GG dinucleotide
into a GGG trinucleotide after reverse transcription of position
475C (Fig.
2, bottom left). However, alignment
often occurred at
other positions (e.g., Fig.
2, bottom right) because
a substantial
number of GG dinucleotides were incorporated into the
telomeric
repeats that were not followed by adenine as specified by the
469A

U mutation. This indicates that telomeres
ending in -TGTGG-3'
do not necessarily anneal at template position
476C.

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
At template position 470C, the reverse
transcription can be continued (upper right) or aborted (bottom). With
the 469A U mutant telomerase, the different possibilities
can be distinguished based on the incorporated telomere sequence
(indicated below the TLC1 template sequence; newly
incorporated nucleotides are highlighted). For reasons of simplicity,
all 5'-TGGGTGTGGGT-3' sequences were attributed to alignment
at position 476C (bottom left). However, product
dissociation at position 473C followed by realignment with
479C would also result in the incorporation of the same
telomeric sequence. Therefore, the number given on the bottom left is
probably an overestimate of the alignment frequency at
476C. The number of events indicated for alignment 3' of
position 479C (bottom right) comprises both position
483C and position 481C. Only the latter is
represented in the scheme. Repeats not listed in the figure resulted
from product dissociation 3' of position 470C.
|
|
Positions 479C to 477C and 473C
to 471C are inaccessible for substrate alignment.
Above, we have presented evidence that GG dinucleotides in telomeric
repeats result from reverse transcription of template positions
471C470C and that the
consecutive number of TG dinucleotides is principally specified by the
position of alignment. Thus, the length of the TG dinucleotide spacer
between a GG dinucleotide and the subsequent GGG element (Table 2) can
be used to infer the approximate position of alignment between
484A and 479C in vivo (Fig.
3). Ambiguity for the exact alignment
positions, however, remained (underlined in Fig. 3) because, for GG
dinucleotide-containing telomeric repeats, reverse transcription may
have aborted at 470C, 469A,
or 468C. The different theoretical alignment
possibilities along the WT TLC1 template and the resulting
telomere sequences are shown in Fig. 3, along with the inferred
alignment probability from all pooled WT telomere sequences (genome
database, WT TLC1 and tlc1
NcoI
telomeres, 205 interpretable repeats). While these values represent
only the GG dinucleotide-containing telomeric 3' ends, we detected no
major differences from non-GG dinucleotide-containing repeats (data not
shown). Alignment events that took place 5' of template position
471C remained undetectable and could therefore
not be included in the calculation. Also, the alignment of substrates
ending in -TGG-3' at position 476C leads to
conversion of the GG dinucleotide into a GGG trinucleotide (see above).
Therefore, we could not determine the alignment probability for
position 476C.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Alignment possibilities for telomeric 3' ends containing
a GG dinucleotide along the WT template region. The alignment positions
within TLC1 are indicated on the left. Underlined
nucleotides indicate positions of ambiguity for the alignment (see
text). Incorporated telomere sequences resulting from the alignment
indicated on the left are highlighted in the middle. Relative
frequencies of the indicated telomere sequence in the pooled WT
telomeres (genome sequence, WT TLC1, and
tlc1 NcoI) are indicated on the right.
n.d., not determined.
|
|
Alignment occurred in 79% of all interpretable cases 3' of position
479C (Fig.
2). Strikingly, the sequence
5'-TGGTGGG-3' (Fig.
3), which
is predicted to be generated
by annealing at positions
479C to
477C, was almost completely absent. Also, the
sequence 5'-TGGGG-3',
predicted to be generated by annealing of
telomeres ending in
-TGG-3' with position
477C,
is found at a very low frequency (Fig.
3). Thus, base pairing
is
suppressed for substrates ending in -TGG-3' with
479C or
477C, for
substrates ending in -TGGT-3' with
479C and
478A, and for substrates ending in -TGGTG-3' with
479C
478A
477C.
It appears that these three bases are shielded during substrate
binding. The sequence TGGTGGT was never observed, indicating
that
a second portion of the template
(
473CAC
471) is masked for
alignment (Fig.
3).
Abortive reverse transcription of WT and mutant telomerases in
vitro.
Since the catalytic properties of telomerase can be
influenced by the template RNA sequence (11, 12, 43, 55),
we examined whether our mutations grossly perturbed the in vitro
properties of the corresponding telomerases. We employed an
oligonucleotide substrate that ended with the sequence -TGGG-3' to
ensure that annealing of the 3' end always occurred with template
position 475C. Thus, 7 nt could be added before
the template 5' boundary was reached. All mutant telomerases were
active in vitro (Fig. 4A) and catalyzed
extension of the primer substrate up to the 5' boundary of the
template. Like WT telomerase, none of the mutant enzymes showed
significant addition of more than one repeat to the substrate primer.
Consistent with earlier studies that described frequent stalling of the
telomerase enzyme in vitro (4, 32, 43), we detected
stalling of the WT and mutant telomerase enzyme at every position. It
was most pronounced at position 470C (Fig. 4A,
filled arrowhead). This was not due to limiting dTTP concentrations or
a specific product length (data not shown).

View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Telomerase assays using WT and mutant telomerases in
vitro. Reaction mixtures contained equal amounts of TLC1
RNA. 5'-GTGTGTGTGGG-3' was used as a substrate. (A) Lane 1, substrate extended with [ -32P]ddATP using terminal
deoxynucleotidyltransferase; lane 2, telomerase reaction from WT cells
pretreated with RNase A; and lanes 3 to 11, reactions performed with
mutant telomerases as indicated in panel B. The open arrowhead
indicates the position of a labeled 32-mer oligonucleotide that served
as control for precipitation efficiency and gel loading. The filled
arrowhead indicates extension to position 470C. (B)
Relative amounts of +1 to +4 products. The different numbers of
incorporated radioactive nucleotides were taken into account.
|
|
Reverse transcription has to proceed at least to position
470C in order to generate a GGGTGTGG
sequence. Therefore, the premature
stalling observed in vitro
could explain the in vivo incorporation
rate of this repeat type of
only 50% (Table
1, column TGGGTGTGGT).
For a quantitative
comparison, the band intensities of the in
vitro reactions were
corrected for the specific activity of the
products (number of
incorporated labeled nucleotides), and the
sum of +1 to +4 products,
corresponding to stalling events before
template position
470C, was calculated (Fig.
4B). Certain mutants
(WT
NcoI,
469A

U, and
484ACA
482
CAC) showed no
increased stalling relative to WT, whereas other
mutants
(
469A

U +
482A

U,
484ACA
482
UUU,
483CAC
481
UUU,
473CAC
471
ACA, and
484ACA
482
UUU +
473CAC
471
ACA) had an
increased tendency for premature termination. However,
a higher rate of
abortive reverse transcription in vitro did not
always cause a
decreased incorporation rate of GG dinucleotide-containing
repeats in
vivo. Furthermore, even for WT
TLC1, the frequency
of
products stalled before template position
470C
was higher than the incorporation rate of telomere repeats lacking
GG
dinucleotides (Table
1). Thus, telomerase has a higher nucleotide
addition processivity in vivo than in
vitro.
 |
DISCUSSION |
Telomere sequences have been previously exploited to predict a
template sequence for S. cerevisiae telomerase
RNA before it was cloned (25). Also, telomere sequences
were previously characterized in vivo upon expression of
tlc1 mutant alleles in the context of TLC1/tlc1
diploids (43). This earlier study delineated the telomerase RNA template, but because the analysis was done in WT-mutant
heterozygotes, the mechanism of telomere repeat divergence could not be
systematically addressed. In this paper, we present evidence that
repeat diversity in S. cerevisiae telomere
sequences arises from the use of multiple alignment registers between
the telomere 3' end and the telomerase RNA template as well as from frequent incomplete reverse transcription of the RNA template, supporting a previously proposed model (49). In addition,
we present evidence for the masking of template positions
479C to 477C and
473C to 471C during
substrate annealing. Finally, we show that processive nucleotide
addition occurs during the reverse transcription of the central part of
the template (minimally position 476C).
A framework for the interpretation of S.
cerevisiae telomere sequences.
Results gained from
in vitro assays of budding yeast telomerase are difficult to extend to
the in vivo situation. Three gene products known to be essential for
telomere maintenance are dispensable in vitro (4, 31), and
the nucleotide addition processivity is lower in vitro than in vivo
(this study). Based on the identification of individual template
positions for the specification of certain nucleotides in the telomeric
repeat (i.e., 470CC471 for
GG and 475CCC478 for GGG),
we were able to analyze WT telomere sequences and derive functional
characteristics of telomerase, such as the alignment probabilities
along the template region and the enzyme's propensity to abort reverse
transcription at certain positions. Telomere sequence analysis can
therefore contribute to the functional analysis of S. cerevisiae telomerase.
Structural changes of the template RNA occur during the telomerase
reaction cycle.
Strikingly, sequences resulting from alignment of
the substrate at positions 479C to
477C and 473C to
471C were almost completely absent from the
recovered telomeres. This indicates that these bases are not available
for alignment. However, after substrate annealing has occurred 3' of
position 479C, base pairing with
479C to 477C and
473C to 471C becomes
possible during reverse transcription. We propose that a conformational
change of these positions is induced upon substrate binding. For
example, formation of a helix between the template RNA and the
substrate may induce a strain on the RNA backbone, thus forcing the
bases out of a shielded position and allowing them to serve as
templates for reverse transcription.
As an alternative to the inaccessibility of positions
479C to
477C during the
alignment, the low rate of incorporation of GGTGGG
and GGGG
sequences into telomeres could be caused by specific
sequence loss, for
example, due to an inability of these sequences
to recruit telomerase.
This appears unlikely, since in a previous
study (
25) de
novo telomere repeat addition in vivo was found
adjacent to various
GT-rich elements, including the sequence GGTGGG.
Furthermore, GGTGGG-containing sequences are bound by Cdc13p
with
the same affinity as are natural yeast telomeric repeats
(
30).
The central portion of the RNA template is reverse
transcribed processively in vivo.
The occurrence of TG
spacer lengths that cannot be explained by a single substrate binding
event suggests that some dissociation of partially extended products
occurs during the reverse transcription of the template 3' region in
vivo. This abortive mode of polymerization is also found in the
template 5' region as evidenced by the absence of the GG dinucleotide
from 50% of all telomeric repeats. However, since the telomeres cloned
from 473CAC471
ACA mutant
cells did not contain any GG dinucleotides, it appears that product
dissociation does not occur after reverse transcription of position
476C.
Certain template mutations adversely affect telomerase function in
vivo.
A straightforward extrapolation from telomerases with mutant
templates to the WT enzyme is not possible in all cases. For example,
the 469A
U mutation also led to the
incorporation of 5'-GGATG-3' sequences, indicating that the alignment
and/or translocation capacities of the mutant enzyme were changed
relative to those of the WT enzyme. On the other hand, yeast cells
carrying the 469A
U mutation grew normally and
maintained their telomeres at lengths similar to that of the WT (Table
1). Reverse transcription of the template 5' end is therefore not
essential in budding yeast. This is clearly different in P. tetraurelia. Mutation of the template position adjacent to
the 5' boundary abolished telomerase activity in this organism unless
it was combined with a compensating mutation in the 3' part of the
template (57). A second functional alteration was detected
in telomeres recovered from
473CAC471
ACA and
484ACA482
CAC + 473CAC471
ACA mutant
cells. In addition to the specified
TGGGTT(GT)n repeats, they
occasionally contained TGGGTTT(GT)n
repeats (not listed in Table 1). These repeats may arise due to
template slippage at the mutant position 473A.
The corresponding event in WT telomerase should lead to the incorporation of 5'-GGGTGGT-5' sequences, which were never
detected. Slippage of the mutant enzyme is most likely limited to
position 473A, since expansions of the GGG
triplet were not detected.
The possibilities for repeat divergence are restricted.
The
function of telomere repeat divergence has not been elucidated. It is
pronounced in both fission yeast and budding yeast, organisms in which
homologous recombination pathways are very efficient. We propose that
the divergence of telomere sequences may protect the organism from
rampant telomere-telomere recombination events, which would lead to
stochastic telomere length changes by intra- and intertelomeric
recombination (29). The recent finding that homologous
recombination between the divergent telomeres in WT cells is inhibited
by the mismatch repair machinery (47) supports a role of
telomere repeat divergence for suppressing unwanted recombination events.
However, telomere repeat divergence must be limited to allow the
efficient binding of proteins involved in end protection
and end
replication. The masking of positions
479C to
477C for substrate annealing and the processive
synthesis of the
following GGG trinucleotide reduce the degeneracy of
budding yeast
telomeric repeats and enhance the incorporation of
5'-TGTGGGT-3'
sequences into telomeres. This sequence is
part of telomeric Rap1p
consensus binding sites (
3,
13,
14), and the GGG trinucleotide
was recently shown to be involved
in multiple base-specific protein-DNA
interactions in cocrystals
of Rap1p with telomeric DNA (
53).
Thus, the synthesis of
variable repeat sequences is restrained
by two mechanisms which
together enhance the incorporation of
Rap1p binding sites into
telomeres. This may represent the best
compromise between the need to
let the telomere sequences diverge
in order to prevent recombination
and the opposing need to ensure
the binding of the proteins that
recognize and protect the
telomere.
While this paper was in review, Ray and Runge (
46)
published a study of the occurrence of different theoretically possible
Rap1 binding sites in telomeres from WT,
yku70-
, and
tel1-
cells.
They concluded that certain motifs are found
at lower frequencies
than would be expected if the sequences were
generated randomly
with the same nucleotide composition as the
TLC1 template region.
Furthermore, they also found an
incorporation rate of the GG dinucleotide
of around 50%.
The S. cerevisiae telomerase reaction
cycle.
Based on the results presented in this study, we propose
the following working model for S. cerevisiae
telomerase (Fig. 5). The telomere 3' end
aligns at one of several possible sites in the 3' part of the
TLC1 template region (Fig. 5, state 1). Positions 479C to 477C and
473C to 471C are
inaccessible for alignment. Upon substrate binding, a conformational change occurs which enables these positions to serve as templates for
reverse transcription (Fig. 5, state 2). Dissociation of partially extended products may occur during reverse transcription of positions 484A to 478A. However,
since stretches of four and more TG dinucleotides are found at moderate
frequency, processive polymerization is favored over product
dissociation. Once the active site has reached position
476C, product dissociation is prevented and
reverse transcription occurs at least to position
475C (Fig. 5, state 3). In most cases,
polymerization may continue processively until position
472A to guarantee synthesis of the telomeric
5'-TGGGTGT-3' core sequence. As reverse transcription
approaches the 5' end of the template, telomerase has the tendency to
abort the reaction and only 50% of the products are extended to
position 470C or beyond (Fig. 5, state 4). At the
end of an extension cycle, the rate-limiting step in vivo may be the
unwinding of the DNA product from the RNA template. Upon unwinding
(Fig. 5, from state 4 to 1 or from state 2 to 1), the template RNA
reverses the conformational switch that occurred during substrate
binding. Then, the telomeric substrate may either translocate back to
the template 3' end or dissociate from the telomerase enzyme and allow
access and extension by a different active site (42).

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Model of the S. cerevisiae
telomerase reaction cycle. (State 1) Telomerase before substrate
binding. Template positions 479CAC477 and
473CAC471 are not accessible for alignment.
(State 2) Upon substrate binding, a conformational change occurs and
all template positions are available for base pairing during reverse
transcription. Dissociation of a partially extended telomere occurs
with moderate frequency. (State 3) The central part of the
TLC1 template region is reverse transcribed
processively. The results presented in this paper exclude product
dissociation at position 476C. However, the region of
processive reverse transcription may cover template positions
478A to 472A to favor incorporation of the
telomeric 5'-TGGGTGT-3' core sequence. (State 4) Template
positions close to the 5' boundary are reverse transcribed with
moderate frequency. Only half of the products are extended beyond
template position 471C.
|
|
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank Pierre Page for sequencing telomeres, members of the
Lingner and Nabholz labs for helpful discussions and critical reading
of the manuscript, Arthur Zaug for suggesting the TLC1 mutagenesis strategy, and Dan Gottschling for sharing reagents.
This work was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation, the
Human Frontier Science Program, and a Ph.D. fellowship of the
Boehringer Ingelheim Fonds awarded to K.F.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Correspondent footnote. Mailing address: Swiss
Institute for Experimental Cancer Research (ISREC), Chemin des
Boveresses 155, CH-1066 Epalinges, Switzerland. Phone: 41-21-6925912. Fax: 41-21-6526933. E-mail:
joachim.lingner{at}isrec.unil.ch.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Bertuch, A., and V. Lundblad.
1998.
Telomeres and double-strand breaks trying to make ends meet.
Trends Cell Biol.
8:339-342[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Bryan, T. M.,
K. J. Goodrich, and T. R. Cech.
2000.
A mutant of Tetrahymena telomerase reverse transcriptase with increased processivity.
J. Biol. Chem.
275:24199-24207[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Buchman, A.,
N. Lue, and R. Kornberg.
1988.
Connections between transcriptional activators, silencers, and telomeres as revealed by functional analysis of a yeast DNA-binding protein.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
8:5086-5099[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Cohn, M., and E. H. Blackburn.
1995.
Telomerase in yeast.
Science
269:396-400[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Cohn, M.,
M. J. McEachern, and E. H. Blackburn.
1998.
Telomeric sequence diversity within the genus Saccharomyces.
Curr. Genet.
33:83-91[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Collins, K.
1999.
Ciliate telomerase biochemistry.
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
68:187-218[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Conrad, M.,
J. Wright,
J. Wolf, and V. Zakian.
1990.
RAP1 protein interacts with yeast telomeres in vivo: overproduction alters telomere structure and decreases chromosome stability.
Cell
63:739-750[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Counter, C. M.,
M. Meyerson,
E. N. Eaton, and R. A. Weinberg.
1997.
The catalytic subunit of yeast telomerase.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:9202-9207[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Forstemann, K.,
M. Hoss, and J. Lingner.
2000.
Telomerase-dependent repeat divergence at the 3' ends of yeast telomeres.
Nucleic Acids Res.
28:2690-2694[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Fulton, T. B., and E. H. Blackburn.
1998.
Identification of Kluyveromyces lactis telomerase: discontinuous synthesis along the 30-nucleotide-long templating domain.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:4961-4970[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Gilley, D., and E. H. Blackburn.
1996.
Specific RNA residue interactions required for enzymatic functions of Tetrahymena telomerase.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16:66-75[Abstract].
|
| 12.
|
Gilley, D.,
M. S. Lee, and E. H. Blackburn.
1995.
Altering specific telomerase RNA template residues affects active site function.
Genes Dev.
9:2214-2226[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Gilson, E.,
M. Roberge,
R. Giraldo,
D. Rhodes, and S. Gasser.
1993.
Distortion of the DNA double helix by RAP1 at silencers and multiple telomeric binding sites.
J. Mol. Biol.
231:293-310[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Graham, I., and A. Chamber.
1994.
Use of selection technique to identify the diversity of binding sites for the yeast RAP1 transcription factor.
Nucleic Acids Res.
22:124-130[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Greider, C. W.
1991.
Telomerase is processive.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
11:4572-4580[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Greider, C. W., and E. H. Blackburn.
1985.
Identification of a specific telomere terminal transferase activity in Tetrahymena extracts.
Cell
43:405-413[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Greider, C. W., and E. H. Blackburn.
1989.
A telomeric sequence in the RNA of Tetrahymena telomerase required for telomere repeat synthesis.
Nature
337:331-337[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Haering, C. H.,
T. M. Nakamura,
P. Baumann, and T. R. Cech.
2000.
Analysis of telomerase catalytic subunit mutants in vivo and in vitro in Schizosaccharomyces pombe.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
97:6367-6372[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Hammond, P. W., and T. R. Cech.
1997.
dGTP-dependent processivity and possible template switching of euplotes telomerase.
Nucleic Acids Res.
25:3698-3704[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Hardy, C. F.,
L. Sussel, and D. Shore.
1992.
A RAP1-interacting protein involved in transcriptional silencing and telomere length regulation.
Genes Dev.
6:801-814[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
Hiraoka, Y.,
E. Henderson, and E. H. Blackburn.
1998.
Not so peculiar: fission yeast telomere repeats.
Trends Biochem. Sci.
23:126[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Hughes, T. R.,
S. K. Evans,
R. G. Weilbaecher, and V. Lundblad.
2000.
The est3 protein is a subunit of yeast telomerase.
Curr. Biol.
10:809-812[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 23.
|
Kim, N. W.,
M. A. Piatyszek,
K. R. Prowse,
C. B. Harley,
M. D. West,
P. L. Ho,
G. M. Coviello,
W. E. Wright,
S. L. Weinrich, and J. W. Shay.
1994.
Specific association of human telomerase activity with immortal cells and cancer.
Science
266:2011-2015[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
Kirk, K. E.,
B. P. Harmon,
I. K. Reichardt,
J. W. Sedat, and E. H. Blackburn.
1997.
Block in anaphase chromosome separation caused by a telomerase template mutation.
Science
275:1478-1481[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Kramer, K. M., and J. E. Haber.
1993.
New telomeres in yeast are initiated with a highly selected subset of TG1-3 repeats.
Genes Dev.
7:2345-2356[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Kyrion, G.,
K. Boake, and J. Lustig.
1992.
C-terminal truncation of RAP1 results in the deregulation of telomere size, stability, and function in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
12:5159-5173[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 27.
|
Lee, M. S., and E. H. Blackburn.
1993.
Sequence-specific DNA primer effects on telomerase polymerization activity.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13:6586-6599[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 28.
|
Lendvay, T. S.,
D. K. Morris,
J. Sah,
B. Balasubramanian, and V. Lundblad.
1996.
Senescence mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae with a defect in telomere replication identify three additional EST genes.
Genetics
144:1399-1412[Abstract].
|
| 29.
|
Li, B., and A. J. Lustig.
1996.
A novel mechanism for telomere size control in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Genes Dev.
10:1310-1326[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
Lin, Y. C.,
C. L. Hsu,
J. W. Shih, and J. J. Lin.
2001.
Specific binding of single-stranded telomeric DNA by Cdc13p of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
J. Biol. Chem.
276:24588-24593[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 31.
|
Lingner, J.,
T. R. Cech,
T. R. Hughes, and V. Lundblad.
1997.
Three Ever Shorter Telomere (EST) genes are dispensable for in vitro yeast telomerase activity.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:11190-11195[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 32.
|
Lingner, J.,
T. R. Hughes,
A. Shevchenko,
M. Mann,
V. Lundblad, and T. R. Cech.
1997.
Reverse transcriptase motifs in the catalytic subunit of telomerase.
Science
276:561-567[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 33.
|
Lundblad, V., and J. W. Szostak.
1989.
A mutant with a defect in telomere elongation leads to senescence in yeast.
Cell
57:633-643[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 34.
|
Lustig, A.,
S. Kurtz, and D. Shore.
1990.
Involvement of the silencer and UAS binding protein Rap1 in regulation of telomere length.
Science
250:549-553[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 35.
|
Maine, I. P.,
S. F. Chen, and B. Windle.
1999.
Effect of dGTP concentration on human and CHO telomerase.
Biochemistry
38:15325-15332[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 36.
|
Marcand, S.,
V. Brevet, and E. Gilson.
1999.
Progressive cis-inhibition of telomerase upon telomere elongation.
EMBO J.
18:3509-3519[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 37.
|
Marcand, S.,
E. Gilson, and D. Shore.
1997.
A protein-counting mechanism for telomere length regulation in yeast.
Science
275:986-990[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 38.
|
Marusic, L.,
M. Anton,
A. Tidy,
P. Wang,
B. Villeponteau, and S. Bacchetti.
1997.
Reprogramming of telomerase by expression of mutant telomerase RNA template in human cells leads to altered telomeres that correlate with reduced cell viability.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17:6394-6401[Abstract].
|
| 39.
|
McCormick-Graham, M.,
W. J. Haynes, and D. P. Romero.
1997.
Variable telomeric repeat synthesis in Paramecium tetraurelia is consistent with misincorporation by telomerase.
EMBO J.
16:3233-3242[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 40.
|
McEachern, M. J., and E. H. Blackburn.
1995.
Runaway telomere elongation caused by telomerase RNA gene mutations.
Nature
376:403-409[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 41.
|
Peterson, S.,
A. Stellwagen,
S. Diede,
M. Singer,
Z. Haimberger,
C. Johnson,
M. Tzoneva, and D. Gottschling.
2001.
The function of a stem-loop in telomerase RNA is linked to the DNA repair protein Ku.
Nat. Genet.
27:64-67[Medline].
|
| 42.
|
Prescott, J., and E. H. Blackburn.
1997.
Functionally interacting telomerase RNAs in the yeast telomerase complex.
Genes Dev.
11:2790-2800[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 43.
|
Prescott, J., and E. H. Blackburn.
1997.
Telomerase RNA mutations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae alter telomerase action and reveal nonprocessivity in vivo and in vitro.
Genes Dev.
11:528-540[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 44.
|
Prescott, J. C., and E. H. Blackburn.
2000.
Telomerase RNA template mutations reveal sequence-specific requirements for the activation and repression of telomerase action at telomeres.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20:2941-2948[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 45.
|
Qi, H., and V. A. Zakian.
2000.
The Saccharomyces telomere-binding protein Cdc13p interacts with both the catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase alpha and the telomerase-associated Est1 protein.
Genes Dev.
14:1777-1788[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 46.
|
Ray, A., and K. W. Runge.
2001.
Yeast telomerase appears to frequently copy the entire template in vivo.
Nucleic Acids Res.
29:2382-2394[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 47.
|
Riziki, A., and V. Lundblad.
2001.
Defects in mismatch repair promote telomerase-independent proliferation.
Nature
411:713-716[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 48.
|
Shampay, J.,
J. Szostak, and E. Blackburn.
1984.
DNA sequences of telomeres maintained in yeast.
Nature
310:154-157[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 49.
|
Singer, M. S., and D. E. Gottschling.
1994.
TLC1: template RNA component of Saccharomyces cerevisiae telomerase.
Science
266:404-409[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 50.
|
Smith, C. D., and E. H. Blackburn.
1999.
Uncapping and deregulation of telomeres lead to detrimental cellular consequences in yeast.
J. Cell Biol.
145:203-214[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 51.
|
Sun, D.,
C. C. Lopez-Guajardo,
J. Quada,
L. H. Hurley, and D. D. Von Hoff.
1999.
Regulation of catalytic activity and processivity of human telomerase.
Biochemistry
38:4037-4044[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 52.
|
Szostak, J., and E. Blackburn.
1982.
Cloning yeast telomeres on linear plasmid vectors.
Cell
29:245-255[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 53.
|
Taylor, H. O.,
M. O'Reilly,
A. G. Leslie, and D. Rhodes.
2000.
How the multifunctional yeast Rap1p discriminates between DNA target sites: a crystallographic analysis.
J. Mol. Biol.
303:693-707[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 54.
|
Wang, S., and V. Zakian.
1990.
Sequencing of Saccharomyces telomeres cloned using T4 DNA polymerase reveals two domains.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
10:4415-4419[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 55.
|
Ware, T. L.,
H. Wang, and E. H. Blackburn.
2000.
Three telomerases with completely non-telomeric template replacements are catalytically active.
EMBO J.
19:3119-3131[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 56.
|
Wellinger, R. J., and D. Sen.
1997.
The DNA structures at the ends of eukaryotic chromosomes.
Eur. J. Cancer
33:735-749.
|
| 57.
|
Ye, A.,
W. Haynes, and D. Romero.
1999.
Expression of mutated Paramecium telomerase RNAs in vivo leads to templating errors that resemble those made by retroviral reverse transcriptase.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19:2887-2894[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 58.
|
Yu, G. L.,
J. D. Bradley,
L. D. Attardi, and E. H. Blackburn.
1990.
In vivo alteration of telomere sequences and senescence caused by mutated Tetrahymena telomerase RNAs.
Nature
344:126-132[CrossRef][Medline].
|
Molecular and Cellular Biology, November 2001, p. 7277-7286, Vol. 21, No. 21
0270-7306/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/MCB.21.21.7277-7286.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Box, J. A., Bunch, J. T., Zappulla, D. C., Glynn, E. F., Baumann, P.
(2008). A Flexible Template Boundary Element in the RNA Subunit of Fission Yeast Telomerase. J. Biol. Chem.
283: 24224-24233
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ji, H., Adkins, C. J., Cartwright, B. R., Friedman, K. L.
(2008). Yeast Est2p Affects Telomere Length by Influencing Association of Rap1p with Telomeric Chromatin. Mol. Cell. Biol.
28: 2380-2390
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hershman, S. G., Chen, Q., Lee, J. Y., Kozak, M. L., Yue, P., Wang, L.-S., Johnson, F. B.
(2008). Genomic distribution and functional analyses of potential G-quadruplex-forming sequences in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res
36: 144-156
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Chang, M., Arneric, M., Lingner, J.
(2007). Telomerase repeat addition processivity is increased at critically short telomeres in a Tel1-dependent manner in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev.
21: 2485-2494
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lue, N. F., Bosoy, D., Moriarty, T. J., Autexier, C., Altman, B., Leng, S.
(2005). Telomerase can act as a template- and RNA-independent terminal transferase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
102: 9778-9783
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Putnam, C. D., Pennaneach, V., Kolodner, R. D.
(2004). Chromosome healing through terminal deletions generated by de novo telomere additions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
101: 13262-13267
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Underwood, D. H., Zinzen, R. P., McEachern, M. J.
(2004). Template Requirements for Telomerase Translocation in Kluyveromyces lactis. Mol. Cell. Biol.
24: 912-923
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Forstemann, K., Zaug, A. J., Cech, T. R., Lingner, J.
(2003). Yeast telomerase is specialized for C/A-rich RNA templates. Nucleic Acids Res
31: 1646-1655
[Abstract]
[Full Text]