Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Molecular and Cellular Biology, November 2001, p. 7481-7494, Vol. 21, No. 21
Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Genetics,
Harvard Medical School,1 and Department
of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Brigham and
Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School,2
Boston, Massachusetts 02115, and Department of Pathology and
Laboratory Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G
1X53
Received 5 June 2001/Returned for modification 11 July
2001/Accepted 31 July 2001
The Drosophila neuralized gene shows genetic
interactions with Notch, Enhancer of split, and
other neurogenic genes and is thought to be involved in cell fate
specification in the central nervous system and the mesoderm. In
addition, a human homologue of the Drosophila neuralized
gene has been described as a potential tumor suppressor gene in
malignant astrocytomas. We have isolated a murine homologue of the
Drosophila and human Neuralized genes and, in
an effort to understand its physiological function, derived mice with a
targeted deletion of this gene. Surprisingly, mice homozygous for the
introduced mutation do not show aberrant cell fate specifications in
the central nervous system or in the developing mesoderm. This is in
contrast to mice with targeted deletions in other vertebrate homologues
of neurogenic genes such as Notch, Delta, and
Cbf-1. Male Neuralized null mice, however, are
sterile due to a defect in axoneme organization in the spermatozoa that leads to highly compromised tail movement and sperm immotility. In
addition, female Neuralized null animals are defective in
the final stages of mammary gland maturation during pregnancy.
The Drosophila
neuralized gene has been identified in screens for embryonic
lethal mutations with defective lateral specification (5,
24). Hypomorphic neuralized mutations cause neuronal hyperplasia, which is characteristic of neurogenic genes, suggesting that neuralized is involved in cell fate specifications in
the neurectoderm. Genetic interaction analysis suggests that
neuralized appears to act upstream of Notch and
E(spl) since increased Notch or E(spl)
expression can partially rescue the neuralized phenotype (9). The Drosophila neuralized gene encodes a
C3HC4 ring finger protein and is expressed
throughout the ectoderm during neuronal cell fate specification,
consistent with its proposed role in this process (6, 33).
As with other neurogenic mutants, mesodermal cell fates also appear to
be defective in Drosophila carrying a neuralized
mutation (4, 27). neuralized mutant files
produce an excess number of cells expressing the MyoD homologue,
nautilus, at the expense of surrounding mesodermal cells,
indicating aberrant cell fate specifications in this tissue
(8).
A human homologue of the Drosophila neuralized gene has been
identified in a region of chromosome 10q24-25 which shows frequent alterations in malignant astrocytomas (28). Like the
Drosophila gene, the human Neuralized gene
encodes a C3HC4 ring finger-containing protein
of 574 amino acids. Interestingly, while the expression of human
Neuralized is high in normal human brain tissue, expression is very low or absent in astrocytomas and multiple glioma cell lines.
It has been postulated that human Neuralized, like the Drosophila gene, is involved in cell fate specifications or
maintenance in the central nervous system and that loss of
Neuralized expression is an important step in the
development of malignant transformation in the central nervous system (CNS).
The Notch signaling pathway has been implicated in cell fate decisions
in a variety of developmental contexts in Drosophila, Caenorhabditis elegans, and vertebrates (2, 16, 44).
Notch encodes a transmembrane receptor that binds to the
membrane-bound ligands Delta and Serrate. On ligand binding, Notch is
cleaved by a Presenilin-dependent mechanism (13, 40) and
an intracellular portion of the molecule translocates, together with
the Suppressor of Hairless [Su(H)] gene
product, to the nucleus, where the protein complex acts as a
transcriptional activator (22, 39). As in Drosophila, Notch signaling in vertebrates is involved in
specifying cell fates in a variety of developmental processes. Targeted
disruption of Notch expression or disruption of its
downstream targets in mice leads to embryonic death by about
midgestation. Notch null embryos have a variety of
developmental defects including severe disruption of development of the
CNS and somites (7, 10, 41). Constitutive activation of
Notch signaling by expression of hypermorphic Notch alleles
or downstream targets of Notch interferes with cell fate
specifications during neurogenesis and myogenesis in vitro as well as
in vivo (30, 31, 37, 43). In addition to its
well-established role in cell fate specification during development,
recent evidence suggests that Notch signaling might be involved in the
maintenance and homeostasis of differentiated cells. Neurite outgrowth
of cortical neurons appears to be regulated by Notch signaling,
indicating that Notch might be involved in maintenance or
plasticity in the CNS (36).
In this study, we report the isolation and characterization of a murine
homologue of the Drosophila neuralized gene. Our analysis indicates that expression of Neuralized is not essential for
development and survival in vertebrates since Neuralized
knockout mice are fully viable. Neuralized null mice,
however, have defects in mammary gland development leading to deficient
lactation. In addition, defects in the axonemes of spermatozoa isolated
from Neuralized null mice result in immotile spermatozoa and
male sterility. The axonemal and spermatid abnormalities seen in
Neuralized null mice in part mimic the defects seen
in many human spermatogenic disorders (32, 45, 46).
Isolation of the murine Neuralized gene.
Degenerate PCR primers were designed based on the alignment of
Drosophila melanogaster and D. virilis neuralized
sequence. Primers were designed to the amino acid sequence AITFS and
FWAKA, respectively, and PCR was performed using a mouse skeletal
muscle cDNA library (Clontech) as template. The resulting 200-bp mouse Neuralized fragment was used to screen mouse skeletal muscle
and brain cDNA libraries (Stratagene) by standard procedures
(3). To obtain a full-length cDNA clone, 3' rapid
amplification of cDNA ends was performed using murine brain and
skeletal muscle libraries (Marathon-ready cDNA; Clontech) and Advantage
cDNA polymerase mix (Clontech). The gene-specific primer used in this
reaction was 5'-GCT GTC CTT CGG GGT CAC CAC GTG TGA GGC-3'.
Northern blot analysis.
Total cytoplasmic RNA was isolated
from murine tissues using RNA STAT (Tel-Test Inc.). For the expression
analysis in adult mouse tissues, 2 µg of poly(A) RNA was loaded on a
1% agarose gel containing formaldehyde, transferred onto GeneScreen
Plus membranes (NEN), and hybridized to a mouse Neuralized
cDNA fragment using standard procedures. For the expression analysis in
Neuralized null animals, 10 µg of total cytoplasmic RNA
isolated from brain and skeletal muscle of Neuralized null
adult mice and wild-type littermate controls was used. An 820-bp
Neuralized cDNA fragment corresponding to amino acids 1 to
209 was used as a 5' probe, a 1-kbp Neuralized cDNA fragment
corresponding to amino acids 210 to 557 was used as a 3' probe. A
murine glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase full-length cDNA probe
was used for the loading control. For the expression analysis in human
tissues, a human RNA master blot (Clontech) was hybridized with a
full-length human Neuralized cDNA probe.
Expression constructs.
The full-length human
Neuralized coding sequence was PCR amplified from a cloned
human Neuralized cDNA using nrzF1 (GAA GCT TCC GAA GAT
GGG GGG ACA GAT CAC CCG G) and nrzR1 (CGG TGG ATC CCG GGA
GCT GCG GTA GGT CTT GAT GAT). The PCR product was cloned into
pCMV-EGFP using HindIII and BamHI restriction
sites creating an in-frame fusion between human Neuralized and enhanced
green fluorescent protein. This construct was used to monitor
subcellular localization in various cell lines by fluorescence microscopy.
0270-7306/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/MCB.21.21.7481-7494.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Isolation of a Murine Homologue of the Drosophila
neuralized Gene, a Gene Required for Axonemal Integrity in
Spermatozoa and Terminal Maturation of the
Mammary Gland

![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
Cell lines and tissue culture. PC-12 (mouse pheochromocytoma) cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM; Gibco-BRL) containing 10% fetal calf serum, 3 mM L-glutamine, 100 U of penicillin per ml, and 100 µg of streptomycin per ml. PC-12 cells were differentiated on polylysine-treated tissue culture dishes by adding 50 ng of nerve growth factor (NGF) (2.5 S NGF; Promega) per ml For infection of PC-12 cells with retrovirus, the cells were allowed to reach 60 to 70% confluency. They were fed prior to infection, and Polybrene was added to a final concentration of 80 µg/ml. C2C12 cells (mouse myoblast cells; American Type Culture Collection) were cultured in DMEM containing 20% fetal calf serum, 3 mM L-glutamine, 100 U of penicillin per ml, and 100 µg of streptomycin per ml. C2C12 cells were differentiated into myocytes by cultivating cells DMEM containing 10% horse serum, 3 mM L-glutamine, 100 U of penicillin per ml, and 100 µg of streptomycin per ml.
Retroviral stocks were prepared in Phoenix cells by a procedure adapted from that of Cepko and Pear (3).Targeted disruption of mouse Neuralized in ES cells and generation of Neuralized null mice. A murine genomic fragment was isolated by screening a mouse 129/SvEv genomic BAC library (Genome Systems) using the 200-bp partial cDNA fragment described above. From the isolated BAC clone containing murine Neuralized sequence, two NotI fragments of 15 kbp (G) and 6 kbp (K) were subcloned into pBluescript. A NotI-XbaI 1.4-kbp Neuralized genomic fragment isolated from K was inserted into pOSdupdel (a kind gift from Oliver Smithies) digested with NotI and XbaI. The resulting plasmid was digested with PmlI and an 8.8-kbp NotI genomic fragment isolated from G was inserted. An IRES-green fluorescent protein (GFP) cassette was constructed by digesting pIRES-neo (Gibco BRL) with XbaI and SmaI, which removes the neo cassette. Into this vector, a GFP cDNA fragment isolated by PCR from the vector pLantern GFP (Gibco BRL) was cloned to yield pIRES-GFP. pIRES-GFP was digested with SalI and XhoI, and the IRES-GFP cassette was cloned into the targeting vector at the XhoI site, yielding pNRZKO-1.
TC1 embryonic stem cells (ES cells) derived from 129/SvEv mice (11) were electroporated with NotI-linearized pNRZKO-1 and selected with G418 and 1-(2-deoxy-2-fluoro-1-
-D-abino-furanosyl)-5-iodouracil as described previously (12). Genomic DNA from G418- and
FIAU-resistant clones was isolated as described previously
(12) and screened for targeting by digestion with
BamHI followed by Southern blot analysis. The blots were
hybridized with an 800-bp BamHI-EcoRV genomic
fragment located 5' to the genomic region used for targeting vector
construction and isolated from a BAC subclone. Two positive ES cell
clones were microinjected into C57BL/J6 blastocysts, which were
transferred into pseudopregnant Swiss Webster foster mothers (Taconic).
High-grade chimeras judged by agouti coat color of the offspring were
mated to 129/SvEv mice (Taconic), and germ line transmission was
confirmed by Southern blot analysis. Heterozygous offspring from this
F1 cross were intercrossed to derive the mouse colony.
PCR genotyping was performed on genomic DNA using primers nrzF
(5'-GAC AGC GAG CTG GTG CTG CCC GAC TG-3'), nrzR
(5'-GAA GAT GGT TTC GGC CAC GCG CAC AGG CCG-3'), and nrzIRES
(5'-GGA CGC GGC CAC CCT CAA AGG CAT C-3'). The wild-type
allele (product nrzF-nrzR) was expected to give a PCR product of 367 bp, and the mutant allele (product nrzF-nrzIRES) was expected to give a
PCR product of 190 bp.
In situ hybridizations. Embryos were dissected from pregnant wild-type animals (FVB, Taconic) at various time points of pregnancy (8.5, 9.5, 10.5, and 12.5 days postcoitum (p.c.) and fixed overnight in 4% paraformaldehyde at 4°C. After incubation overnight in methanol, the embryos were rehydrated in a series of methanol-Tris-buffered saline with Tween 20 (PBT), bleached with 6% hydrogen peroxide, treated with 10 µg of proteinase K (Boehringer Mannheim) per ml for 15 min at room temperature, and washed with 2 mg of glycine per ml in PBT for 10 min at room temperature. The embryos were then postfixed with 4% paraformaldehyde-0.2% glutaraldehyde in PBT for 10 min and prehybridized in 50% formamide-5× SSC (pH 4.5) (1× SSC in 0.15 NaCl plus 0.015 sodium citrate)-1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-50 µg of yeast RNA (Boehringer Mannheim) per ml-50 µg of heparin per ml for at least 1 h at 70°C.
Mouse Neuralized riboprobes (a 1,326-bp partial mouse Neuralized cDNA fragment; 1 µg per reaction) were digoxigenin DIG-labeled using T7 and T3 RNA polymerases (DIG RNA labeling kit; Boehringer Mannheim) and purified using ethanol precipitation. The embryos were then hybridized in 50% formamide-5× SSC (pH 4.5)-1% SDS-50 µg of yeast RNA per ml-50 µg of heparin per ml overnight at 70°C. After hybridization, the embryos were washed in 50% formamide-5×SSC (pH 4.5)-1% SDS and blocked in 10% sheep serum-TBST, and the transcript was detected using an anti-DIG antibody (Boehringer Mannheim) and nitroblue tetrazolium-5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolylphosphate (NBT-BCIP) staining.Histology. For histological analysis, tissues were fixed in Omnifix (Zymed), dehydrated in a graded alcohol series, and embedded in paraffin. Sections 4 to 6 µm thick were stained with hematoxylin and eosin using standard procedures.
For analysis of brain and pituitary, tissues were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and embedded in paraffin. Sections 4 to 5 µm thick were stained with hematoxylin and eosin as well as by the Gordon-Sweet silver method to demonstrate the reticulin fiber network. Immunocytochemical stains to localize adenohypophysial hormones were performed using the avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex method. Primary antibodies against the following antigens were used at the specific dilutions: adrenocorticotropin (ACTH), 1:15; growth hormone, 1:2,500; prolactin, 1:2,500;
-thyroid-stimulating hormone, 1:3,000;
-follicle-stimulating hormone (
-FSH) 1:6,000; and luteinizing
hormone (LH) 1:2,500. All antibodies were donated by the National
Hormone and Pituitary Program (NHPP), National Institute of Diabetes
and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institute of Child Health
and Human Development (Bethesda, Md.) except for the ACTH antibody
which was purchased from Dako Corp. (Carpinteria, Calif.). Primary
antibodies were incubated at 4°C for 24 h prior to detection.
For skeletal staining, animals were euthanized with CO2 and
the skin was removed. The animals were then eviscerated, fixed in 95%
ethanol, and stained with Alizarin red S and Alcian blue.
Fertility and analysis of sperm motility. Male Neuralized null animals aged between 12 weeks and 9 months were housed with 129/SvEv (Taconic), NIH Black Swiss (Taconic), or Neuralized heterozygous females, and the females were analyzed for the presence of vaginal plugs each morning. Sperm was isolated by flushing the epididymidis with Tyrode's solution (0.15 M NaCl, 3 mM KCl, 2 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM NaHCO3, 5 mM glucose). Sperm motility was assessed by light microscopy in Tyrode's solution after incubation at 30°C for at least 30 min to allow dissociation of spermatozoa.
Electron microscopy. Testes and epididymides were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in cacodylate buffer (0.2 M sodium cacodylate [pH 7.6]) at 4°C for ca. 12 h. The fixed tissues were dehydrated through a graded series of alcohols and finally embedded in Spurr's low-viscosity embedding medium. Thick (1-µm) and ultrathin (60 to 80-nm) sections were cut on an LKB MarkIII ultramicrotome. Thick sections were stained with 1% toluidine blue for routine light microscopic examination. Contrast was enhanced in ultrathin sections by sequential staining with a saturated uranyl acetate solution in 50% ethanol-25% methanol for 10 min followed by incubation in lead citrate. Ultrathin sections were examined under a Zeiss 10 electron microscope. Sperm abnormalities were quantified by analyzing sections of the cauda epididydimis at a magnification of ×10,000. The frequency of abnormalities was obtained by counting the incidence of flagellar structural defects in 100 cross-sections of the flagellum for both Neuralized knockout and wild-type mice.
Nucleotide sequence accession number. The complete mouse neuralized cDNA sequence was deposited in GenBank under accession number AF401228.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Isolation of a murine homologue of the Drosophila
neuralized gene.
We have identified a murine homologue of
the Drosophila and human Neuralized genes with a
cDNA sequence of 3.63 kbp and an open reading frame of 1,674 bp. The
gene encodes a protein of 557 amino acids and a predicted
molecular mass of 59.9 kDa (Fig. 1A). The sequence
identity between the mouse and human Neuralized proteins is 93%, and
the sequence identity between the mouse and Drosophila
Neuralized proteins is 34% (28, 33). The murine Neuralized gene isolated here is syntenic to the human
Neuralized gene isolated previously (28) and
thus is very likely to be the mouse ortholog. The only detectable
protein motif is a C3HC4-type ring finger at
the carboxy terminus of the protein. In addition to the ring finger,
Neuralized proteins contain two regions of approximately 160 amino
acids, each of which appears to be composed of tandem repeats although
the sequence identity between the two repeats in each protein is
limited (Fig. 1A). These regions have previously been termed neuralized
homology repeats (NHR), and their function has not yet been
established. Sequence similarity searches in the database using the
BLAST algorithm revealed significant sequence homology in the ring
finger domain between Neuralized proteins and proteins of the IAP
(inhibitor of apoptosis) family (Fig. 1B). No sequence similarity
between Neuralized and IAP proteins was detected outside the ring
finger domain, suggesting that they belong to distinct protein
families.
|
|
Neuralized is not localized to the nucleus. We expressed a full-length human Neuralized cDNA-GFP fusion construct under the control of the CMV promoter in a variety of human and mouse cell lines including HeLa, C2C12, COS, and NIH 3T3. In all cell lines, the human Neuralized-GFP fusion was excluded from the nucleus, with perinuclear, Golgi-like staining detectable in many cells (Fig. 2E). Our results are consistent with those of Yeh et al. (48), who reported a function of Drosophila Neuralized outside the nucleus. Cotransfection with constructs encoding constitutively active forms of Notch 1 did not change this cellular localization (data not shown). However, these constitutive alleles of Notch 1 did activate Cbf-1-dependent reporter gene transcription in a Notch reporter assay (data not shown), indicating that the Notch constructs are functionally active. These data suggest that cellular localization of Neuralized is not regulated by Notch signaling.
Targeted disruption of Neuralized in ES cells and
generation of Neuralized null mice.
A targeting
strategy for the mouse Neuralized locus was designed that
inserts PGK-neo and IRES-GFP cassettes into the exon encoding NHR2 (Fig. 3A). The IRES-GFP
cassette includes transcriptional termination sequences 3' to the GFP
coding sequence. The insertion of the targeting cassette is therefore
expected to disrupt the expression of all portions of the gene encoding
the NHR2 domain and the ring finger, thus eliminating the majority of
the coding sequence from the transcript.
|
|
Neuralized null mice do not show aberrant cell fate specifications in the CNS and somites. Notch null mice die during embryogenesis with severe defects in neurogenesis. On histological analysis of the CNS, we did not detect any differences between brains derived from Neuralized knockout mice and wild-type controls (data not shown). All major brain structures and cell types were present, and the cortex showed correct layering.
Notch signaling has been implicated in cell fate specifications during somitogenesis, and targeted deletion of Notch or genes involved in Notch signaling leads to aberrant somite development (7, 23). Since Neuralized is expressed in developing somites, we investigated whether loss of Neuralized expression interferes with skeletal or myocyte differentiation. On histological analysis, we found that skeletal muscle from Neuralized null animals showed clearly developed myotubes and we failed to detect any differences between skeletal muscle from Neuralized null animals and wild-type controls (data not shown). Likewise, the skeletons of Neuralized null animals appeared to be identical to skeletons derived from wild-type controls after staining with Alizarin red S and Acian blue (data not shown). These observations indicate that loss of Neuralized expression does not interfere with cell fate specifications during somitogenesis.Ectopic expression of Neuralized does not interfere
with differentiation of PC-12 or C2C12 cells in vitro.
The PC-12
cell line has been extensively studied in vitro as a model for neuronal
differentiation and neurotropin signaling. Stimulation of PC-12 cells
with NGF induces neuronal differentiation, with differentiated cells
expressing neuronal markers and forming long neurite extensions from
the cell bodies. Activation of Notch signaling blocks the
differentiation of neuronal precursor cells during development of the
CNS in vivo and the Notch target Hes-1 modulates
the differentiation of PC-12 cells in vitro (38). To
assess whether ectopic expression of Neuralized was able to block neuronal differentiation of PC-12 cells in a similar manner, PC-12 cells were infected with Neuralized-expressing IRES
alkaline phosphatase virus and differentiated by stimulation with NGF. After treatment of infected cells with NGF, neurite extensions were
clearly detectable in virus-infected cells after staining for the viral
marker alkaline phosphatase and no difference compared to cells
infected with the empty virus (pLIA) or uninfected cells could be
detected (Fig. 5), indicating that
ectopic expression of Neuralized does not interfere with
neuronal differentiation in PC12 cells. In addition,
Neuralized-expressing cells still required NGF for neuronal
differentiation (data not shown). These observations are consistent
with our observed lack of defects in neuronal differentiation in
Neuralized null mice, suggesting that, in contrast to
Drosophila, Neuralized is not necessary for the regulation
of neuronal differentiation in vertebrates.
|
Male Neuralized null animals are sterile and have defective spermatozoa. Male Neuralized null animals failed to fertilize females in matings with either 129/SvEv wild-type mice, NIH Black Swiss wild-type mice, or Neuralized heterozygous littermates. Of 10 male homozygote Neuralized animals aged between 12 weeks and 9 months, none gave rise to a pregnancy in matings with NIH BI/SW females, while matings of Neuralized heterozygous males or wild-type control males yielded pregnancies and litters of normal sizes.
Surprisingly, standard histological analysis of male reproductive organs failed to reveal significant differences between Neuralized null animals and wild-type controls. When analyzed by histological staining, testes derived from Neuralized null animals showed proper spermatogenesis and the appearance of mature sperm in the seminiferous tubules (Fig. 6A and B). In addition, no defect in the histology of the prostate could be detected (data not shown).
|
|
Neuralized null females fail to lactate and
successfully nurse their pups and have defective mammary gland
development during lactation.
In analyzing the fertility of
Neuralized female mice, we observed that pups born from
Neuralized null females in matings with either wild-type
control or Neuralized heterozygous males failed to survive
beyond day 3 after birth. In addition, litters from Neuralized null females were often scattered throughout the
cage and we failed to detect milk in the stomachs of the pups, whereas pups in control litters were clearly nursing and had milk in their stomachs. This suggests that Neuralized female mice were
fully fertile and able to support pregnancies to full term but had
defects in lactation or maternal behavior, leading to defective
nursing. Since pups of all genotypes are able to actively nurse and
survive until adulthood when born from heterozygous or wild-type
mothers, this observed nursing defect was clearly maternal. We
therefore analyzed the mammary glands of Neuralized null
females on day 1 of lactation (L1). Mammary glands from
Neuralized null females were clearly defective on L1, with
significantly less alveolar structures penetrating the mammary fat pad
compared to the glands from wild-type control animals at the same stage
of lactation (Fig. 8B and C). In
addition, some samples from Neuralized null females showed
defective lipid production in the ducts (Fig. 8D). This result shows
that the failure to properly nurse their pups and the observed death
early after birth is clearly related to a severely underdeveloped
mammary gland at lactation in Neuralized female animals.
|
Neuralized heterozygous and null animals do not develop malignancies at a significantly higher frequency than wild-type controls. Human Neuralized is localized on chromosome 10q24-25, a region showing frequent deletion in malignant astrocytomas, leading to the hypothesis that the Neuralized gene is involved in the formation of malignant tumors of the CNS in humans (28). In addition, loss of Neuralized transcript has been found in astrocytoma tissue derived from human patients and in glioblastoma cell lines, suggesting that loss of Neuralized transcription might be associated with malignant transformation (28). Therefore, we analyzed Neuralized null animals for the development of tumors, particularly in the CNS. The oldest animals in our colony are now older than 1 year. Neuralized null animals did not appear to become moribund at a rate significantly higher than their wild-type littermates, and we failed to detect CNS malignancies at a rate above background. Of 15 Neuralized null animals analyzed by histological examination, 1 showed a pituitary adenoma that invaded upwards from the sella turcica into the base of the brain. This tumor was characterized as a gonadotroph adenoma with nuclear immunoreactivity for steroidogenic factor 1 and cytoplasmic staining for FSH and LH. Since this is a tumor occasionally found in older wild-type animals (34), we are unable to definitively conclude that Neuralized null animals show a predisposition to tumor development in the CNS. The proposed link between loss of Neuralized expression and tumor formation in humans is therefore not yet supported by our mouse model.
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In this study, we report the isolation and characterization of a murine homologue of the Drosophila neuralized gene. The gene isolated is syntenic to the human neuralized gene isolated recently and encodes a protein which is almost identical to human Neuralized.
Sequence similarity searches in the database using the BLAST algorithm revealed significant sequence homology in the ring finger domain between Neuralized proteins and proteins of the IAP family. IAP proteins were initially identified in baculoviruses, and the related viral and mammalian proteins all contain RING finger domains at their carboxy terminus (14). Expression of IAP proteins inhibits the induction of apoptosis by various stimuli in vitro (25, 42). Interestingly, ectopic expression of Neuralized appears to induce rapid cell death in a variety of different cell lines in vitro, suggesting a role of vertebrate Neuralized in apoptosis (K. Fitzgerald, unpublished observations). However, the sequence homology between Neuralized and IAP proteins is limited to the ring finger, suggesting that these two groups of proteins are distinct. Recent evidence indicates that ring finger-containing proteins can mediate ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme-mediated ubiquitination of receptor protein tyrosine kinases, leading to termination of signaling through protein degradation (20, 21, 26). Interestingly, IAP proteins have now also been shown to catalyze their own ubiquitination in response to apoptotic stimuli, an activity that requires the presence of the ring finger domain (47). Further experiments will be needed to establish if Neuralized has ubiquitin protein ligase activity.
Targeted deletion of the murine Neuralized gene reveals that expression of murine Neuralized is not essential for development and survival of the animal. In contrast, Notch null mice die around midgestation with severe defects in development, as do mice with null mutations in most other components of the Notch signaling pathway (10, 17, 18, 41). In addition, we failed to detect any aberrant cell fate specifications in Neuralized null animals during neurogenesis and somitogenesis, two processes where Notch signaling has been shown to be involved. This evidence suggests that the murine Neuralized isolated in this study is not an essential component of the Notch signaling cascade, at least during most developmental processes. However, two other possibilities must be considered. (i) Neuralized function is essential for Notch signaling, as suggested from genetic evidence in Drosophila, but other vertebrate Neuralized homologues or unrelated proteins compensate for loss of the Neuralized gene isolated here. A search of sequence databases using the BLAST algorithm did not reveal sequences showing significant homology to the gene described in this report. However, since the mouse genome sequence is not complete, this possibility cannot be ruled out. (ii) The Neuralized allele produced by targeting the exon encoding NHR-2 is a hypomorph, but not a complete null. Our targeting strategy removes sequence encoding most of the protein including domains highly conserved between Drosophila and vertebrates and the ring finger, which is thought to be a crucial component of a functional Neuralized protein. Since we have shown here that our targeting does result in the expected changes in Neuralized transcript, we think that this possibility is highly unlikely.
The human Neuralized homologue was isolated from a region at chromosome 10q24-25 that shows frequent alterations in malignant astrocytomas. In addition, loss of Neuralized transcription has been described in human astrocytoma tissue and glioma cell lines (28). The postulated link between loss of Neuralized transcription and neoplastic transformation in the CNS in humans is particularly interesting since Notch signaling is involved in cell fate specification during development of the CNS but has not, at least so far, been linked to the development of CNS tumors. Thus far, our Neuralized null mice have failed to develop any gliablastomas or astrocytomas. This observation questions the proposed link between loss of Neuralized transcription and malignant transformation in the CNS.
Neuralized null females failed to nurse their pups and support a litter. We show here that this is caused by defective lobular development of the mammary gland during pregnancy, leading to an insufficiently developed mammary gland at the end of pregnancy. However, we did not detect any clear differences between virgin Neuralized null animals and wild-type controls at the end of sexual maturation or during early stages of pregnancy. These observations suggest a role of Neuralized in later stages of mammary gland maturation during pregnancy. Whether the effect of Neuralized on mammary gland differentiation is cell autonomous or is caused by a defective hormonal environment during pregnancy in Neuralized null animals awaits the results of transplantation experiments. Interestingly, transgenic mice expressing constitutive active alleles of the Notch receptor also fail to lactate, with lobular development being retarded during late stages of pregnancy (15, 19). However, unlike these transgenic mice, Neuralized null animals do not develop mammary gland tumors.
While male Neuralized null mice were sterile and appeared to
have normal reproductive organs when analyzed by standard histological techniques, spermatozoa isolated from these mice were immobile or
displayed only residual motility. Electron microscopy clearly revealed
structural abnormalities in the flagella of epididymal spermatozoa from
Neuralized null animals. The most common defect observed was
in the axoneme, which displayed missing microtubular doublets. The
defects ranged from loss of one doublet to the deletion of up to half
of the axonemal complex. These defects in the structural integrity of
the axoneme would directly compromise the motility of the affected
spermatozoa, leading to the observed infertility of male
Neuralized null mice. Normal 9+2 doublet structures of the axoneme consist mainly of 
-tubulin polymers as well
as microtubule-associated proteins. However, the molecular
events required for proper assembly of axonemal microtubule structures
have not yet been identified. Indeed, this is the first evidence that
Neuralized functions in this process. Interestingly, results
from C. elegans indicate that the presenilin family member
spe-4 is involved in tubulin localization during
spermatogenesis (1). Since presenilins are thought to be
regulators of Notch and amyloid precursor protein processing,
this result provides a link between signal transduction events and
microtubule assembly during spermatogenesis.
The severity of the observed axonemal defects identified in Neuralized null animals suggests that the structural alterations occur during spermiogenesis. This observation is confirmed by the fact that similar flagellar defects were detected in testicular spermatozoa in the lumen of the seminiferous tubules. Analysis of spermatid maturation in testes of Neuralized null mice showed that the structure of both the proximal and distal centrioles appeared normal. In addition, alignment and orientation of the centrioles with proper migration to the posterior pole of the nucleus appeared to be normal during initial development of the flagellum. It is therefore likely that the observed defects in axonemal structure occurred during subsequent growth and formation of the nascent flagellum. A striking feature of the morphology of spermatozoa from Neuralized null mice was the fact that axonemal abnormalities occurred as localized defects along the length of the axoneme. Longitudinal sections of flagella observed under the electron microscope displayed regions containing normal axonemal structures followed by a region where the axonemal complex was clearly disrupted. This observation suggests that proper construction of the 9+2 microtubular structure during spermiogenesis involves the presence of local regulatory factors along the length of the flagellum.
Defects in spermatogenesis account for more than 50% of human male infertility (29). The axonemal and spermatid abnormalities seen in Neuralized null mice in part mimic the defects seen in many human spermatogenic disorders (32, 45, 46). Thus, Neuralized null mice may thus be a valid model to study human infertility syndromes and to gain a better understanding of male infertility.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank H. Nakamura for providing the full-length human Neuralized cDNA clone, Charles Murtaugh and Andrew Lassar for providing the constitutive active Notch allele, Diana Hayward for providing the CBF1-luciferase reporter constructs, and Rachel Neve for providing the PC-12 cell line. We also thank Jan Pinkas for help with the analysis of the mammary gland phenotype, Frank Kuo for advice on the initial analysis of the pituitary glands, Kelvin So (Toronto) for histological analysis of the pituitaries, Richard V. Pierce for advice in the early stages of spermatozoa analysis, and members of the Leder laboratory and the HMS Department of Genetics for helpful comments and suggestions throughout the project.
| |
ADDENDUM IN PROOF |
|---|
While this paper was in proof, Ruan et al. reported the isolation of a mouse Neuralized homolog and described the phenotype of the knockout mouse (Y. Ruan, L. Tecott, M. M. Jiang, L. Y. Jan, and Y. N. Jan, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:9907-9912, 2001). The gene described in this report is identical to the gene described in our study with the exception of the amino-terminal 28 amino acids. We postulated in our study the existence of two splice variants of the mouse Neuralized gene, and comparison of the two sequences clearly suggests that this is the case. Two differences between our observations and those of Ruan et al. are noteworthy. First, Ruan et al. failed to detect any expression of mouse Neuralized in adult skeletal muscle and did not show convincingly expression in the developing somites. We believe that this is due to the fact that Ruan et al. used a probe from the very 5' end of the cDNA in these experiments, thus presumably detecting only one splice variant, while our probe is expected to detect both splice variants. Second, Ruan et al. report normal reproductive behavior in both male and female mice. This is clearly distinct from our observations, and the cause for this discrepancy is currently unknown. However, strain differences or differences in the targeting strategy could account for these different observations. Further analysis is required to clarify these issues.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, 200 Longwood Ave., Boston, MA 02115. Phone: (617) 432-7667. Fax: (617) 432-7944. E-mail: leder{at}rascal.med.harvard.edu.
Present address: Merck Research Laboratories, West Point, PA 19486.
Present address: Bristol Myers Squibb, Pennington, NJ 08530.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Arduengo, P. M., O. K. Appleberry, P. Chuang, and S. W. L'Hernault. 1998. The presenilin protein family member SPE-4 localizes to an ER/Golgi derived organelle and is required for proper cytoplasmic partitioning during Caenorhabditis elegans spermatogenesis. J. Cell Sci. 111:3645-3654[Abstract]. |
| 2. |
Artavanis-Tsakonas, S.,
K. Matsuno, and M. E. Fortini.
1995.
Notch signaling.
Science
268:225-232 |
| 3. | Ausubel, F. M., R. Brent, R. E. Kingston, D. D. Moore, J. G. Seidman, J. A. Smith, and K. Struhl (ed.). 1997. Current protocols in molecular biology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, N.Y. |
| 4. | Bate, M., E. Rushton, and M. Frasch. 1993. A dual requirement for neurogenic genes in Drosophila myogenesis. Dev. Suppl. 1993:149-161. |
| 5. |
Bier, E.,
H. Vaessin,
S. Shepherd,
K. Lee,
K. McCall,
S. Barbel,
L. Ackerman,
R. Carretto,
T. Uemura,
E. Grell, et al.
1989.
Searching for pattern and mutation in the Drosophila genome with a P-lacZ vector.
Genes Dev.
3:1273-1287 |
| 6. | Boulianne, G. L., A. de la Concha, J. A. Campos-Ortega, L. Y. Jan, and Y. N. Jan. 1991. The Drosophila neurogenic gene neuralized encodes a novel protein and is expressed in precursors of larval and adult neurons. EMBO J. 10:2975-2983[Medline]. |
| 7. | Conlon, R. A., A. G. Reaume, and J. Rossant. 1995. Notch1 is required for the coordinate segmentation of somites. Development 121:1533-1545[Abstract]. |
| 8. | Corbin, V., A. M. Michelson, S. M. Abmayr, V. Neel, E. Alcamo, T. Maniatis, and M. W. Young. 1991. A role for the Drosophila neurogenic genes in mesoderm differentiation. Cell 67:311-323[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 9. |
de la Concha, A.,
U. Dietrich,
D. Weigel, and J. A. Compos-Ortega.
1988.
Functional interactions of neurogenic genes of Drosophila melanogaster.
Genetics
118:499-508 |
| 10. | de la Pompa, J. L., A. Wakeham, K. M. Correia, E. Samper, S. Brown, R. J. Aguilera, T. Nakano, T. Honjo, T. W. Mak, J. Rossant, and R. A. Conlon. 1997. Conservation of the Notch signalling pathway in mammalian neurogenesis. Development 124:1139-1148[Abstract]. |
| 11. | Deng, C., A. Wynshaw-Boris, F. Zhou, A. Kuo, and P. Leder. 1996. Fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 is a negative regulator of bone growth. Cell 84:911-921[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 12. |
Deng, C. X.,
A. Wynshaw-Boris,
M. M. Shen,
C. Daugherty,
D. M. Ornitz, and P. Leder.
1994.
Murine FGFR-1 is required for early postimplantation growth and axial organization.
Genes Dev.
8:3045-3057 |
| 13. | De Strooper, B., W. Annaert, P. Cupers, P. Saftig, K. Craessaerts, J. S. Mumm, E. H. Schroeter, V. Schrijvers, M. S. Wolfe, W. J. Ray, A. Goate, and R. Kopan. 1999. A presenilin-1-dependent gamma-secretase-like protease mediates release of Notch intracellular domain. Nature 398:518-522[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 14. |
Deveraux, Q. L., and J. C. Reed.
1999.
IAP family proteins suppressors of apoptosis.
Genes Dev.
13:239-252 |
| 15. |
Gallahan, D.,
C. Jhappan,
G. Robinson,
L. Hennighausen,
R. Sharp,
E. Kordon,
R. Callahan,
G. Merlino, and G. H. Smith.
1996.
Expression of a truncated Int3 gene in developing secretory mammary epithelium specifically retards lobular differentiation resulting in tumorigenesis.
Cancer Res.
56:1775-1785 |
| 16. |
Greenwald, I.
1998.
LIN-12/Notch signaling: lessons from worms and flies.
Genes Dev.
12:1751-1762 |
| 17. | Hamada, Y., Y. Kadokawa, M. Okabe, M. Ikawa, J. R. Coleman, and Y. Tsujimoto. 1999. Mutation in ankyrin repeats of the mouse Notch2 gene induces early embryonic lethality. Development 126:3415-3424[Abstract]. |
| 18. |
Ishibashi, M.,
S. L. Ang,
K. Shiota,
S. Nakanishi,
R. Kageyama, and F. Guillemot.
1995.
Targeted disruption of mammalian hairy and Enhancer of split homolog-1 (HES-1) leads to up-regulation of neural helix-loop-helix factors, premature neurogenesis, and severe neural tube defects.
Genes Dev.
9:3136-3148 |
| 19. |
Jhappan, C.,
D. Gallahan,
C. Stahle,
E. Chu,
G. H. Smith,
G. Merlino, and R. Callahan.
1992.
Expression of an activated Notch-related int-3 transgene interferes with cell differentiation and induces neoplastic transformation in mammary and salivary glands.
Genes Dev.
6:345-355 |
| 20. | Joazeiro, C. A., and A. M. Weissman. 2000. RING finger proteins: mediators of ubiquitin ligase activity. Cell 102:549-552[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 21. |
Joazeiro, C. A.,
S. S. Wing,
H. Huang,
J. D. Leverson,
T. Hunter, and Y. C. Liu.
1999.
The tyrosine kinase negative regulator c-Cbl as a RING-type, E2-dependent ubiquitin-protein ligase.
Science
286:309-312 |
| 22. |
Kidd, S.,
T. Lieber, and M. W. Young.
1998.
Ligand-induced cleavage and regulation of nuclear entry of Notch in Drosophila melanogaster embryos.
Genes Dev.
12:3728-3740 |
| 23. | Kusumi, K., E. S. Sun, A. W. Kerrebrock, R. T. Bronson, D. C. Chi, M. S. Bulotsky, J. B. Spencer, B. W. Birren, W. N. Frankel, and E. S. Lander. 1998. The mouse pudgy mutation disrupts Delta homologue DII3 and initiation of early somite boundaries. Nat. Genet. 19:274-278[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 24. | Lehmann, R., F. Jimenez, U. Dietrich, and J. A. Campos-Ortega. 1983. On the phenotype and development of mutants of early neurogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. Roux's Arch. Dev. Biol. 192:62-74[CrossRef]. |
| 25. | Liston, P., N. Roy, K. Tamai, C. Lefebvre, S. Baird, G. Cherton-Horvat, R. Farahani, M. McLean, J. E. Ikeda, A. MacKenzie, and R. G. Korneluk. 1996. Suppression of apoptosis in mammalian cells by NAIP and a related family of IAP genes. Nature 379:349-353[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 26. |
Lorick, K. L.,
J. P. Jensen,
S. Fang,
A. M. Ong,
S. Hatakeyama, and A. M. Weissman.
1999.
RING fingers mediate ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme (E2)-dependent ubiquitination.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
96:11364-11369 |
| 27. | Martin-Bermudo, M. D., A. Carmena, and F. Jimenez. 1995. Neurogenic genes control gene expression at the transcriptional level in early neurogenesis and in mesectoderm specification. Development 121:219-224[Abstract]. |
| 28. | Nakamura, H., M. Yoshida, H. Tsuiki, K. Ito, M. Ueno, M. Nakao, K. Oka, M. Tada, M. Kochi, J. Kuratsu, Y. Ushio, and H. Saya. 1998. Identification of a human homolog of the Drosophila neuralized gene within the 10q25.1 malignant astrocytoma deletion region. Oncogene 16:1009-1019[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 29. | Namiki, M. 2000. Genetic aspects of male infertility. World J. Surg. 24:1176-1179[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 30. | Nofziger, D., A. Miyamoto, K. M. Lyons, and G. Weinmaster. 1999. Notch signaling imposes two distinct blocks in the differentiation of C2C12 myoblasts. Development 126:1689-1702[Abstract]. |
| 31. |
Nye, J. S.,
R. Kopan, and R. Axel.
1994.
An activated Notch suppresses neurogenesis and myogenesis but not gliogenesis in mammalian cells.
Development
120:2421-2430 |
| 32. | Palmblad, J., B. Mossberg, and B. A. Afzelius. 1984. Ultrastructural, cellular, and clinical features of the immotile-cilia syndrome. Annu. Rev. Med. 35:481-492[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 33. | Price, B. D., Z. Chang, R. Smith, S. Bockheim, and A. Laughon. 1993. The Drosophila neuralized gene encodes a C3HC4 zinc finger. EMBO J. 12:2411-2418[Medline]. |
| 34. | Sano, T., K. Kovacs, L. Stefaneanu, S. L. Asa, and D. L. Snyder. 1989. Spontaneous pituitary gonadotroph nodules in aging male Lobund-Wistar rats. Lab. Investig. 61:343-349[Medline]. |
| 35. | Sassoon, D., G. Lyons, W. E. Wright, V. Lin, A. Lassar, H. Weintraub, and M. Buckingham. 1989. Expression of two myogenic regulatory factors myogenin and MyoD1 during mouse embryogenesis. Nature 341:303-307[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 36. |
Sestan, N.,
S. Artavanis-Tsakonas, and P. Rakic.
1999.
Contact-dependent inhibition of cortical neurite growth mediated by notch signaling.
Science
286:741-746 |
| 37. | Shawber, C., D. Nofziger, J. J. Hsieh, C. Lindsell, O. Bogler, D. Hayward, and G. Weinmaster. 1996. Notch signaling inhibits muscle cell differentiation through a CBF1-independent pathway. Development 122:3765-3773[Abstract]. |
| 38. |
Strom, A.,
P. Castella,
J. Rockwood,
J. Wagner, and M. Caudy.
1997.
Mediation of NGF signaling by post-translational inhibition of HES-1, a basic helix-loop-helix repressor of neuronal differentiation.
Genes Dev.
11:3168-3181 |
| 39. | Struhl, G., and A. Adachi. 1998. Nuclear access and action of notch in vivo. Cell 93:649-660[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 40. |
Struhl, G., and I. Greenwald.
2001.
Presenilin-mediated transmembrane cleavage is required for Notch signal transduction in Drosophila.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
98:229-234 |
| 41. |
Swiatek, P. J.,
C. E. Lindsell,
F. F. del Amo,
G. Weinmaster, and T. Gridley.
1994.
Notch1 is essential for postimplantation development in mice.
Genes Dev.
8:707-719 |
| 42. |
Uren, A. G.,
M. Pakusch,
C. J. Hawkins,
K. L. Puls, and D. L. Vaux.
1996.
Cloning and expression of apoptosis inhibitory protein homologs that function to inhibit apoptosis and/or bind tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factors.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:4974-4978 |
| 43. | Wang, S., A. D. Sdrulla, G. diSibio, G. Bush, D. Nofziger, C. Hicks, G. Weinmaster, and B. A. Barres. 1998. Notch receptor activation inhibits oligodendrocyte differentiation. Neuron 21:63-75[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 44. | Weinmaster, G. 1997. The ins and outs of notch signaling. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 9:91-102[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 45. | Williamson, R. A., J. K. Koehler, W. D. Smith, and M. A. Stenchever. 1984. Ultrastructural sperm tail defects associated with sperm immotility. Fertil. Steril. 41:103-107[Medline]. |
| 46. |
Wilton, L. J.,
P. D. Temple-Smith, and D. M. de Kretser.
1992.
Quantitative ultrastructural analysis of sperm tails reveals flagellar defects associated with persistent asthenozoospermia.
Hum. Reprod.
7:510-516 |
| 47. |
Yang, Y.,
S. Fang,
J. P. Jensen,
A. M. Weissman, and J. D. Ashwell.
2000.
Ubiquitin protein ligase activity of IAPs and their degradation in proteasomes in response to apoptotic stimuli.
Science
288:874-877 |
| 48. | Yeh, E., L. Zhou, N. Rudzik, and G. L. Boulianne. 2000. Neuralized functions cell autonomously to regulate drosophila sense organ development. EMBO J. 19:4827-4837[CrossRef][Medline]. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»