Previous Article | Next Article 
Molecular and Cellular Biology, November 2001, p. 7576-7586, Vol. 21, No. 22
0270-7306/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/MCB.21.22.7576-7586.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Overproduction of PDR3 Suppresses Mitochondrial
Import Defects Associated with a TOM70 Null Mutation
by Increasing the Expression of TOM72 in
Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Julie Y.
Koh,
Petr
Hájek,
and
David M.
Bedwell*
Department of Microbiology, University of
Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
Received 28 February 2001/Returned for modification 11 April
2001/Accepted 21 August 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
Most mitochondrial proteins are synthesized with cleavable
amino-terminal targeting signals that interact with the mitochondrial import machinery to facilitate their import from the cytosol. We
previously reported that the presequence of the F1-ATPase
subunit precursor (pre-F1
) acts as an intramolecular
chaperone that maintains the precursor in an import-competent
conformation prior to import (P. Hajek, J. Y. Koh, L. Jones, and
D. M. Bedwell, Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:7169-7177, 1997).
We also found that a mutant form of pre-F1
with a minimal targeting signal (
1,2
pre-F1
) is inefficiently imported into
mitochondria because it rapidly folds into an import-incompetent
conformation. We have now analyzed the consequences of reducing the
pre-F1
targeting signal to a minimal unit in
more detail. We found that
1,2 pre-F1
is
more dependent upon the Tom70p receptor for import than WT
pre-F1
is, resulting in a growth defect on a
nonfermentable carbon source at 15°C. Experiments using an in vitro
mitochondrial protein import system suggest that Tom70p functions to
maintain a precursor containing the
1,2
pre-F1
import signal in an import-competent
conformation. We also identified PDR3, a transcriptional
regulator of the pleiotropic drug resistance network, as a multicopy
suppressor of the mitochondrial import defects associated with
1,2
pre-F1
in a tom70
strain. The
overproduction of PDR3 mediated this effect by increasing the import of
1,2 pre-F1
into
mitochondria. This increased the mitochondrial ATP synthase activity to
the extent that growth of the mutant strain was restored under the
selective conditions. Analysis of the transcription patterns of
components of the mitochondrial outer membrane import machinery
demonstrated that PDR3 overproduction increased the
expression of TOM72, a little studied TOM70
homologue. These results suggest that Tom72p possesses overlapping
functions with Tom70p and that the pleiotropic drug resistance network
plays a previously unappreciated role in mitochondrial biogenesis.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The vast majority of mitochondrial
proteins are directed to their final subcellular location with great
specificity. Most proteins targeted to the mitochondrial matrix contain
a cleavable amino-terminal presequence with basic and hydroxylated
amino acids interspersed throughout their length (14, 15, 28, 29, 40, 56). The ability of these presequences to form an
amphiphilic alpha-helical structure is thought to be a prime
determinant of mitochondrial targeting (6, 47, 48, 58).
Mitochondrial targeting signals facilitate efficient protein
translocation across the outer mitochondrial membrane by mediating
interactions with cytosolic cofactors and the translocase of the outer
membrane (TOM) complex (1, 2, 4, 7, 11, 42). In
Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the multisubunit TOM complex is
thought to consist of a core comprised of Tom40p, Tom5p, Tom6p, and
Tom7p. In addition, at least four outer membrane proteins,
Tom20p-Tom22p and Tom70p-Tom37p, make up two receptor systems with
partially overlapping specificity for precursor binding (2, 4,
18, 23, 26, 33, 38, 39).
Upon their synthesis on cytosolic polysomes, many precursors must be
maintained in an extended conformation to be imported efficiently. It
was previously shown that the presequence of the F1-ATPase
subunit precursor
(pre-F1
) acts as an intramolecular chaperone
by maintaining the preprotein in an import-competent state
(21). The precursor may also be maintained in an
import-competent conformation by molecular chaperones such as Hsp70 and
Ydj1. A unique molecular chaperone, mitochondrial import stimulating
factor (MSF), has been purified from reticulocyte lysate and shown to selectively bind mitochondrial precursors (3, 19).
However, a yeast homologue has not been identified. Current models
hypothesize that the MSF-precursor complex specifically docks with the
Tom70p-Tom37p receptor complex in an ATP-dependent manner. The
precursor is then sequentially delivered to Tom20p-Tom22p and the core
TOM complex (7, 23, 27). After crossing the outer
mitochondrial membrane, the targeting signal is inserted into the inner
mitochondrial membrane in a 
-dependent manner (15, 37,
41). It then interacts with the translocase of the inner
membrane complex, and its transport into the matrix is facilitated by
an ATP-dependent motor formed by mitochondrial Hsp70p, Mge1p, and
Tim44p (35, 41, 46, 53, 55).
Recent studies have sought to delineate the function and specificity of
the receptor components in binding mitochondrial precursor proteins.
Studies with purified cytosolic domains of Tom20p, Tom22p, and Tom70p
indicate that these receptor subunits carry out a division of labor in
binding mitochondrial proteins. In vitro experiments showed that the
cytosolic domains of Tom20p and Tom22p preferentially bind precursors
that contain amino-terminal targeting signals. In contrast, Tom70p
interacts most strongly with precursors that have internal targeting
signals. However, Tom70p has also been reported to stimulate the import
of several precursors with amino-terminal presequences (24,
25). Strains containing knockouts of Tom20p, Tom37p, or Tom70p
are viable but display mild growth defects on nonfermentable carbon
sources. Furthermore, the overexpression of TOM70 can
restore the ability of a tom20
strain to grow on a
nonfermentable carbon source. While the simultaneous disruption of
TOM70 and TOM20 is lethal, growth can be restored
by the overexpression of TOM22 (27). These
results suggest that the proteins encoded by these genes have
overlapping and cooperative roles in mitochondrial binding and import.
The pleiotropic drug resistance (PDR) pathway controls the expression
of a number of genes that mediate resistance to a broad range of
structurally and functionally unrelated compounds. Recently, the PDR
pathway was also reported to play a role in monitoring the functional
status of mitochondria (22). Hallstrom and Moye-Rowley demonstrated that mitochondrial defects arising from the loss of a
nuclear-encoded gene involved in electron transport activity or
maintenance of the mitochondrial genome resulted in the increased expression of PDR3, a transcription factor that regulates
the expression of many genes in the PDR pathway
(22). In some cases, this stimulation of Pdr3p
expression was mediated by the retrograde signaling pathway, which has
been shown to respond to mitochondrial defects through the activation
of several nuclear genes (31, 36). In addition, it was
previously shown that a hyperactivating allele of PDR3
results in an inability to respire on nonfermentable carbon sources
(34). These results suggest a role for Pdr3p in regulating
certain aspects of mitochondrial function.
In the present study, we utilized a well-characterized mutant form of
pre-F1
with a minimal targeting signal to
further examine the function of mitochondrial protein import receptors
(5, 6, 21). Using an in vivo kinetic analysis, we found
that the minimal targeting signal greatly increased the dependence of
the pre-F1
precursor on Tom70p for
mitochondrial import. Experiments using an in vitro mitochondrial
protein import system suggested that this requirement for Tom70p is
related to an inability to maintain this mutant precursor in an
import-competent conformation. The resulting import defect was so
severe that a tom70
strain expressing this mutant
precursor exhibited a cold-sensitive phenotype on a nonfermentable
carbon source. A multicopy suppressor screen revealed that the
overexpression of PDR3 stimulated the import of this
defective precursor and restored growth under these conditions. Our
results indicate that the import of this precursor is increased by the
PDR3-mediated stimulation of TOM72 expression, a
little studied TOM70 homologue.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Strains and growth conditions.
The S. cerevisiae
strains used in this study were SEY6215
(MATa his3-
200
leu2-3,112
ura3-52 trp1-
901
atp2
::LEU2), YDB210
(MAT
his3-
200
leu2-3,112
ura3-52 trp1-
901
tom70
::HIS3 atp2
::LEU2), YDB403
(MATa his3-
200
leu2-3,112
ura3-52 trp1-
901
atp2
::LEU2
tom72
::hisG), and YDB404
(MAT
his3-
200 leu2-3,112
ura3-52 trp1-
901
tom70
::HIS3
atp2
::LEU2
tom72
::hisG). The TOM72
mutant strains were derived from SEY6215 and YDB210 using standard
yeast genetic techniques (54). Yeast transformations were
performed by the alkali cation technique (30, 50) and selected on SD medium (54) containing required supplements.
Gene disruptions.
A gene disruption of TOM70 was
generated from pVH19 by deleting a 948-bp BglII fragment
that included the AUG initiation codon of TOM70. The
resulting 3.6-kb linear plasmid was ligated with a 1.8-kb
BamHI fragment containing HIS3. The resulting
plasmid was digested with BamHI and EcoRI to
generate a 4.2-kb fragment that was transformed into SEY6215 by
one-step gene disruption. Transformants were selected on SD
plates for the histidine auxotrophic marker, and the correct
integration event was verified by Southern blotting. The resulting
strain was designated YDB210 for this study.
A gene disruption of TOM72 was generated from
pGAL-TOM72 that was a generous gift from Trevor Lithgow. The
3.05-kb EcoRI-BamHI fragment containing the
TOM72 structural gene and 788 bp of the 5' untranslated
region was subcloned into pSEY8. The gene disruption was constructed by
deletion of a 799-bp XhoI-BstXI fragment from the
TOM72 gene that included the AUG initiation site for the
structural gene. The linear plasmid was treated with T4 DNA polymerase
to generate blunt ends and religated. A 4.3-kb BamHI insert
containing hisG-URA3-hisG was then ligated into a
BamHI-digested plasmid containing the disruption of
TOM72. The resulting plasmid was then digested with
BamHI and EcoRI, and the 6.5-kb fragment was isolated and purified by Genelute (Bio-Rad) and ethanol precipitation and then transformed into SEY6215 and YDB210 cells. Transformants were
selected for the uracil auxotrophic marker and purified. Genomic DNA
was prepared from each transformant, and the correct integration event
was verified by PCR. The URA3 gene was removed through the
use of 5-fluoro-orotic acid. SEY6215 tom72
was designated YDB403 and YDB210 tom72
was designated YDB404 for these studies.
Construction of plasmids.
The yeast shuttle plasmid pDB425
containing WT (WT) pre-F1
was constructed by
cloning the 2.6-kb EcoRI-HindIII fragment
containing the ATP2 structural gene and its promoter region
into Ycplac22 (16). pDB427 was constructed by replacing
the 1.575-kb HindIII fragment of pDB425 with the
1.539-kb HindIII fragment of pDB51 encoding
1,2
pre-F1
. The 2µm plasmid containing
TOM72, pDB561, was constructed by cloning the 3.020-kb
EcoRI-BamHI fragment from the
pGAL-TOM72 plasmid into the
EcoRI-BamHI sites of pSEY8.
Expression and purification of recombinant proteins.
Plasmids expressing WT pre-F1
-dihydrofolate
reductase (DHFR) (pDB421),
1,2 pre-F1
-DHFR
(pDB423), WT pre-F1
-DHFR* (pDB507), and
1,2 pre-F1
-DHFR* (pDB509) have been
described (21). These precursors were expressed and
purified from the Escherichia coli strain BL21(DE3).
Purified precursors were stored in urea buffer (8 M urea, 20 mM Tris
[pH 7.5], 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) until use
(20).
Mitochondrial protein import assays.
Mitochondria were
prepared from the WT yeast strain D273-10B and the tom70
yeast strain HR1. Strains were grown on YMM (minimal salts supplemented
with 0.1% glucose, 2% DL-lactate, and 0.3% yeast
extract). Import assays were carried out as described previously (20, 21). Import reactions were stopped by a 10-fold
dilution into ice-cold SEM buffer (0.25 mM sucrose, 1 mM EDTA, 10 mM
morpholinepropanesulfonic acid [MOPS] [pH 7.2]) supplemented with
0.5 µg of valinomycin, 20 µg of oligomycin, and 8 µg of antimycin
per ml. The samples were treated with 0.1 mg of proteinase K per ml for
30 min on ice followed by the addition of 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl
fluoride. The samples were analyzed by sodium dodecyl
sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and quantitation
was performed using a PhosphorImager system (Molecular Dynamics). In
control experiments, protease protection was not observed when 0.5 µg of valinomycin per ml and 20 µg of oligomycin per ml were present in
the import reaction or when Triton X-100 was added during protease treatment. This confirmed that the protease-protected precursor proteins had undergone mitochondrial import.
Screening of WT yeast genomic multicopy library.
The WT
yeast genomic library was constructed by insertion of genomic
Sau3a DNA fragments into the Yep24 2µm yeast shuttle vector and was a generous gift from Vytas Bankaitis. The library was
transformed into YDB210 expressing pDB427 and transformants were
screened on SMD plates selective for the auxotrophic markers. Each
transformant was then streaked out on YP lactate plates for single
colonies and incubated at 15°C for 10 days. More than 3,000 transformants were screened, 15 of which grew under the repressive conditions. Plasmids were then rescued, propagated in E. coli, and transformed back into YDB210 expressing pDB427.
Transformants were grown under repressive conditions in order to
confirm that the transforming plasmid conferred suppression of the
growth defect on a nonfermentable carbon source, and 10 were confirmed
to suppress the growth defect. The plasmids containing the
complementing insert were subjected to restriction mapping. The
E. coli transformants were screened for the presence of
either the pDB427 or library plasmid by HindIII enzyme
digests. Those transformants that contained the library plasmid were
then subjected to BamHI and HindIII enzyme digestion. Of the 10 library plasmids screened by restriction mapping,
8 contained inserts with similar or identical restriction digests. The
inserts were then sequenced by automated flourescent sequencing with
primers that anneal to flanking regions of the plasmid insertion site.
The sequences were then used to search the Saccharomyces Genome
Database (Stanford University) by BLAST search to identify the genes
contained within the insert. All eight inserts mapped to chromosome II
between nucleotides 209,089 and 227,504. The library containing the
smallest complementing insert was subjected to further restriction
mapping in order to identify the gene conferring increased growth under
the repressive conditions (see Fig. 2). Each subclone was then
transformed into YDB210 expressing pDB427 to identify which gene
suppressed the growth defect. In order to ultimately define the
suppressive region of the insert, an 8.266-kb
BamHI-EcoRV fragment was subcloned into pSEY8. A
7.7-kb BglII fragment was then subcloned into pSEY8 resulting in the plasmid termed pDB562 and transformed into YDB210 expressing pDB427.
Cell labeling and immunoprecipitation.
The S. cerevisiae strains SEY6215 and YDB210, transformed with pDB425 or
pDB427 and pDB562, were grown in synthetic medium (49)
containing 2% glucose to a cell density of 0.5 to 0.7 A600 units/ml at 30°C. The cells
were resuspended in fresh medium to 4 A600 units/ml and incubated for 15 min
at 30°C with shaking. The labeling reaction was initiated by the
addition of 0.2 mCi of [35S]EXPRESS protein
labeling mix (DuPont NEN). The labeling reaction was terminated by the
addition of either 0.1 mg of cycloheximide per ml and 0.02 mg of
methionine per ml or 0.3% yeast extract per ml, 0.02 mg of methionine
per ml, and 0.02 mg of cysteine per ml. Incubation with the label
termination mix was continued throughout the chase period. To terminate
the chase period, a 0.5-ml aliquot of cells was added directly to
trichloroacetic acid (5% final concentration) and the mixture was
incubated on ice for 30 min. Immunoprecipitations were carried out as
described previously (5). The efficiency of import (mature
F1
[%]) represents mature protein/(total
precursor plus mature protein) × 100.
Immunoassay blots and enzyme assays.
Mitochondria were
prepared from the yeast strains as described previously
(17). Published procedures were used to assay ATPase
activity (44) and protein concentration (8).
For immunoblot analysis of purified mitochondria, mitochondrial
extracts were resuspended in SDS-PAGE sample buffer and boiled for 5 min. Ten micrograms of mitochondrial protein from each sample was
analyzed by SDS-PAGE. Proteins were transferred to Immobilon-P
membranes (Millipore) with a Trans-Blot apparatus (Bio-Rad). Following
a 1-h incubation with 5% nonfat milk in phosphate-buffered
saline-0.5% Tween 20, the blot was incubated with monoclonal antisera
directed against pre-F1
and polyclonal
antisera directed against porin for 2 h at room temperature with
rocking. The blot was then treated for 1 h with rabbit antisera
directed against mouse immunoglobulin G. The signal was then detected
by incubation with 125I-protein A (Amersham)
followed by autoradiography.
Northern blot analysis.
Total cellular RNA was prepared by
SDS-phenol extraction from strains grown on YMM at 30°C and
was harvested at 1.2 to 1.5 A600
units/ml (52). Equal amounts of RNA from each culture (20 µg) were subjected to agarose gel electrophoresis. Following transfer to nitrocellulose, ATP2 mRNA was detected by using a 617-bp
probe that spanned nucleotides 136 to 753 of the coding sequence. The DNA probe was amplified from the ATP2 gene with primers
DB697 (5'-GTTACCGCTGTCATTGGTGCCATT-3') and DB69
(5'-CACTAAGGCGACCTTGGATTCACCTT-3') by PCR and was labeled
with [
-32P]dATP by random hexamer priming.
TOM72 mRNA was detected by a probe corresponding to
nucleotides 71 to 760 of the coding sequence that was amplified from
genomic DNA with primers DB766
(5'-GGACTGCTGCTGTGGGTGCTTATT-3') and DB767
(5'-TGCGAGCCTCTGCCTTCATCCTT-3'). TOM37 mRNA was
detected by a probe coresponding to nucleotides 366 to 797 of the
coding sequence that was amplified from genomic DNA with primers DB764 (5'-TTCCAGACTAACGGACTACCAGC-3') and DB765
(5'-TGAACGGATGCGGTTACCATCAG-3'). TOM22 mRNA was
detected by a probe corresponding to nucleotides 198 to 421 of the
coding sequence that was amplified from genomic DNA with primers DB791
(5'-AGACATTGTCCCCCCAGGTAAGAG-3') and DB792 (5'-TGCAGCATCTTTTTCACCTTGGGC-3'). TOM40 mRNA was
detected by a probe corresponding to nucleotides 53 to 647 of the
coding sequence that was amplified from genomic DNA with primers DB789
(5'-CCCTTTCTCCTTTGACTGCGAAGC-3') and DB790
(5'-CGCTACCGTCAGTTCTGGAGTATA-3'). TOM20 mRNA was
detected by a probe corresponding to nucleotides 5 to 516 of the coding sequence that was amplified from genomic DNA with primers DB787 (5'-CCCAGTCGAACCCTATCTTACTG-3') and DB788
(5'-TCGTTAGCTTCAGCAACCGCATCA-3'). Following hybridization
and washing, the radioactive bands were visualized by autoradiography.
 |
RESULTS |
A tom70
mutant inefficiently imports a derivative of
pre-F1
with a minimal import signal.
We previously
reported that the mitochondrial import signal of
pre-F1
contains redundant targeting
information within its amino-terminal 34 amino acids (5,
6).
1,2 pre-F1
is a mutant precursor
that contains two small nonoverlapping deletions within its targeting
signal, leaving a "minimal targeting signal" capable of
facilitating import into mitochondria in vivo (Fig. 1A). Previous in vivo studies showed that
this reduction to a minimal import signal has little effect on the
steady-state levels of F1
protein (or ATPase
activity) in mitochondria, and
1,2 pre-F1
is normally processed upon entry into the matrix (5).

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Mitochondrial import mediated by WT and 1,2
pre-F1 targeting signals. (A) Amino acid sequences of
the amino termini of WT pre-F1 and 1,2
pre-F1 as predicted from nucleotide sequences (5).
Deletions are indicated by hatched boxes and basic residues are
indicated by plus signs. (B) WT and tom70 cells
expressing either WT or 1,2 pre-F1 were pulse-labeled
for 5 min at 30°C, followed by chase times extending to 5 h.
Cell lysates were subjected to immunoprecipitation with
pre-F1 -specific antiserum as described in Materials and
Methods. (C) In vitro mitochondrial protein import of precursors
containing WT or 1,2 pre-F1 targeting signals fused
to the DHFR or DHFR* passenger proteins. Import reactions were carried
out using WT or tom70 mitochondria as indicated.
|
|
We previously found that
1,2 pre-F1
is
unable to bind to the mitochondrial surface or maintain an unfolded
import-competent conformation as efficiently as WT
pre-F1
(21). Other studies found
that mitochondria isolated from tom70
strains import a subset of precursors, including WT pre-F1
,
less efficiently than WT mitochondria do (24). Moreover,
upon dissipation of the electrochemical potential across the inner
membrane, Tom70p enhanced the binding of pre-alcohol dehydrogenase III
to the surface of mitochondria and maintained the bound precursor in an
import-competent conformation (25). These observations led
us to examine in greater detail the interaction between the redundant
targeting information present in pre-F1
and
how this information influenced its interaction with the Tom70p receptor.
We initially compared the import kinetics of WT
pre-F1
and
1,2
pre-F1
. Upon import into the mitochondrial
matrix, the presequence is rapidly removed from both precursors
(5), thus making it possible to use processing to follow
the rate of import. Cells expressing either WT or
1,2
pre-F1
were pulse-labeled for 5 min at 30°C
with [35S]methionine-cysteine and chased for
various lengths of time in the presence of cycloheximide to prevent
further protein synthesis. The import of WT
pre-F1
in WT cells was extremely efficient, with greater than 95% of precursor protein already processed to its
mature form by the end of the pulse period (Fig. 1B). The initial rate
of import of
1,2 pre-F1
was significantly
lower than that of the WT precursor, suggesting that the loss of much of the targeting signal compromised the ability of the mutant precursor
to efficiently recognize the import machinery (Fig. 1B). In addition,
1,2 pre-F1
import approached a plateau
after the chase period had proceeded for 5 min. In a previous study, we
found that the WT pre-F1
signal acts not only
to engage the import machinery, but also functions as an intramolecular
chaperone to maintain the precursor in an import-competent conformation (21). These results suggest that the mutant precursor may
be able to maintain an import-competent state for only a limited period
of time, with import decreasing as the precursor pool attains a folded state.
The minimal targeting signal present in
1,2
pre-F1
may also be compromised in its ability
to mediate an interaction with cytosolic and/or membrane components of
the mitochondrial import machinery. Since previous studies speculated
that Tom70p acts to maintain precursors in an import-competent
conformation, we next compared the import kinetics of
1,2
pre-F1
in WT and tom70
strains.
Though the rapid import of WT pre-F1
is not
dependent on the presence of Tom70p (Fig. 1B), we found that the import of
1,2 pre-F1
was drastically reduced when
Tom70p was absent. After 30 min of chase, only
10% of the precursor
was imported. A total of only
20% was processed when the chase was
continued for 5 h, suggesting that the majority of this precursor
does not import into mitochondria. These results indicate that
F1
becomes much more dependent on Tom70p for
efficient import when the extended import signal is reduced to this
minimal unit. Tom70p, in association with Tom37p, has previously been
suggested to have a relatively minor role in mediating the import of
precursors with amino-terminal targeting signals. However, our results
indicate that Tom70p can play a much more substantive role in
facilitating import under certain conditions, possibly by maintaining
the precursor in an import-competent conformation until import can occur.
To further test this possibility, we examined the ability of the WT and
1,2 presequences to import purified precursors into isolated WT or
tom70
mitochondria. Since
1,2
pre-F1
is incapable of import into purified
mitochondria (21), we examined the ability of the WT
or
1,2 targeting signals to import fusion proteins containing either
DHFR or a structurally destabilized form of DHFR (referred to
subsequently as DHFR*). DHFR* contains three missense mutations (C7S,
S42C, and D49C) that prevent it from folding into a stable
three-dimensional structure. It has been shown that a construct
containing the presequence of cytochrome oxidase subunit IV fused to
this mutant form of DHFR exhibited an increased susceptibility to
protease digestion and an increased rate of mitochondrial import,
confirming that these mutations destabilized the DHFR moiety
(57). In another study, we used purified
pre-F1
-DHFR and
pre-F1
-DHFR* fusion proteins to demonstrate that the redundant pre-F1
targeting signal
functioned as an intramolecular chaperone that prevents precursor
folding prior to import (21). We found that WT
pre-F1
-DHFR is imported into isolated WT
mitochondria threefold more efficiently than the
1,2
pre-F1
-DHFR construct (Fig. 1C). While the
overall level of import was reduced slightly, we observed a similar
threefold difference in the import of these precursors into
tom70
mitochondria. These results indicate that the
1,2 presequence fused to DHFR exhibits an import defect similar to
the in vivo defect observed with
1,2
pre-F1
. To determine whether this defect is
related to its inability to maintain the precursor in a loosely folded
conformation, we next examined the import of precursors containing the
DHFR* passenger protein. We found that the levels of WT and
1,2
pre-F1
-DHFR* imported into WT and
tom70
mitochondria were similar, indicating that the
import defect associated with the
1,2 signal could be bypassed in
either WT or tom70
mitochondria if precursor folding was prevented.
Genetic screen for multicopy suppressors of the cold-sensitive
growth defect.
F1
is an essential subunit
of the F1-ATPase complex, which carries out the
generation of ATP by oxidative phosphorylation. As a result,
atp2
strains are unable to grow on nonfermentable carbon
sources such as lactate. We next asked whether the low level of
pre-F1
import that occurred in a
tom70
strain led to a growth defect on nonfermentable
carbon sources. A TOM70 strain expressing
1,2
pre-F1
exhibited only a slight growth defect when incubated on YP lactate plates at either 30 or 15°C (Fig. 2A). However, tom70
cells
expressing
1,2 pre-F1
exhibited a much more
severe cold-sensitive phenotype under these conditions (Fig. 2B). This
is presumably due to the inability of the tom70
strain to
assemble enough of the ATP synthase complex to sustain growth at
15°C.

View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Growth defects of yeast strains on a nonfermentable
carbon source at low temperature. (A) WT cells and
tom70 cells expressing either WT or 1,2
pre-F1 were grown on a YP lactate plate for 3 days at
30°C. (B) WT and tom70 cells expressing either WT
or 1,2 pre-F1 were grown on a YP lactate plate for 8 days at 15°C.
|
|
Since a phenotype suitable for a genetic screen had not previously been
obtained with a tom70
mutation, we decided to identify multicopy suppressors of the cold-sensitive growth defect on YP lactate
plates. To do this, a tom70
strain expressing
1,2
pre-F1
was transformed with a WT yeast
multicopy genomic library. Approximately 3,000 transformants were
screened for the ability to grow on YP lactate plates at 15°C. The
plasmids were rescued from 8 of 10 transformants by plasmid rescue and
retransformed into the original mutant strain to confirm that the
plasmid was responsible for suppression. The ends of the inserts were
then sequenced and the insert was identified by BLAST searches against
the S. cerevisiae genome. All eight transformants contained
inserts that mapped to the same region of chromosome II, the smallest
of which contained an 18.4-kb fragment. The insert contained the genes
HIR1, SLA1, and PDR3 and a TY element
(Fig. 3A). Subcloning revealed that only
restriction fragments containing the intact PDR3 gene could complement the growth defect when transformed into the mutant strain
(Fig. 3B). PDR3 is a transcription factor associated with the PDR pathway (12), which regulates the transcription
levels of a wide variety of ATP binding cassette transporters that
facilitate drug efflux. However, PDR3 also regulates the
expression of other genes that are not involved in drug resistance,
such as the hexose transporter genes HXT9 and
HXT11 (43). Since other expected multicopy
suppressors, such as TOM70 and ATP2, were not
obtained in this genetic screen, it is possible that other suppressors of this growth defect remain to be identified.

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Identification of a multicopy suppressor of the growth
defect observed in a tom70 strain expressing 1,2
pre-F1 . (A) Sequencing primers complementary to vector
sequences on either side of the genomic insert were used to generate
partial sequences, and the genes included in the complementing insert
were identified by a BLAST search of the Saccharomyces Genome Database.
Different fragments (indicated by solid black lines under the insert
maps) were then tested for the ability to restore growth of the
tom70 strain expressing 1,2 pre-F1 ,
as determined on YP lactate plates at 15°C. Those clones that
contained complementing inserts are indicated by a positive sign, while
clones that did not complement the cold-sensitive phenotype are
indicated by negative signs. (B) The tom70 strain
expressing 1,2 pre-F1 was streaked on a YP lactate
plate beside the same strain harboring a 2µm plasmid containing
PDR3. The plate was incubated at 15°C for 8 days.
|
|
Multicopy PDR3 or PDR1 stimulates
import of
1,2 pre-F1
in a tom70
strain.
We next examined how the expression of the PDR3
gene from a multicopy plasmid affected the import kinetics of
1,2
pre-F1
in a tom70
strain. Since
Pdr1p is a regulator of Pdr3p and both regulate many PDR genes in
common, we examined the effects of expressing each of these genes from
a multicopy plasmid. tom70
strains expressing
1,2
pre-F1
that carried either the PDR3
or PDR1 genes on a multicopy plasmid were pulse-labeled for
5 min with [35S]methionine-cysteine and then
chased for various lengths of time in the presence of cycloheximide to
prevent further protein synthesis. We found that PDR3 or
PDR1 overexpression resulted in a significant increase in
the amount of
1,2 pre-F1
that was imported
into mitochondria (Fig. 4A). While only
10 to 20% of
1,2 pre-F1
was imported into
mitochondria in the tom70
strain, 40 to 50% of the
precursor protein was imported when multicopy plasmids expressing either PDR3 or PDR1 were present. Shorter chase
times confirmed that this increase in overall yield was accompanied by
an increase in the initial rate of import (data not shown). These
results were not due to the stimulation of ATP2 expression
(which encodes pre-F1
), since Northern blots
of mRNA isolated from strains grown on media containing lactate as
carbon source indicated that the steady state ATP2 mRNA
abundance was not increased in the strain overexpressing
PDR3 (Fig. 4B). Instead, our results indicate that the
overexpression of PDR3 or PDR1 can partially
restore
1,2 pre-F1
import in a
tom70
strain.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Effect of PDR3 and PDR1
overexpression on 1,2 pre-F1 import. (A)
tom70 cells expressing 1,2 pre-F1
and harboring 2µm plasmids containing either PDR3 or
PDR1 were pulse-labeled for 5 min at 30°C and then
chased for times extending to 20 h. Cell lysates were subjected to
immunoprecipitation with a pre-F1 -specific antiserum as
described in Materials and Methods. (B) Northern blots were performed
on mRNA isolated from WT and mutant cells and mutant cells
overexpressing PDR3. The probe was directed against
ATP2 as described in Materials and Methods. Strains were
grown at 30°C in YP lactate medium. The amount of mRNA was normalized
to actin mRNA (n = 3).
|
|
To further examine the effects of PDR3 and PDR1
overexpression, we next measured the steady-state level of
F1
and ATPase activity in mitochondria
isolated from strains grown on lactate as carbon source at 30°C. By
Western blot analysis, we found that the steady-state level of
1,2
pre-F1
in mitochondria isolated from the
tom70
strain was decreased more than 10-fold compared to
the WT strain (Fig. 5A), consistent with
the poor import of
1,2 pre-F1
in this
strain. However, overexpression of PDR3 or PDR1
resulted in steady-state levels of
1,2
pre-F1
that were 60 to 70% that of the WT,
indicating that the overproduction of these transcription factors
increased its import severalfold. We also examined whether the
increased level of F1
was assembled into the
mitochondrial ATPase complex. We found that overexpression of
PDR3 or PDR1 resulted in a twofold increase in
ATPase activity over the original mutant strain (Fig. 5B). This
suggests that only a fraction of the imported
F1
may be assembled into a functional ATPase
complex. However, this level of assembly was apparently sufficient to
increase mitochondrial ATP production enough to restore growth under
the selective conditions.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Steady-state levels of F1 and ATPase
activity following PDR3 and PDR1
overexpression in tom70 cells harboring 1,2
pre-F1 . (A) Mitochondria isolated from WT or mutant
strains harboring control plasmids or plasmids containing
PDR3 or PDR1 were subjected to immunoblot
analysis with F1 -specific monoclonal antibodies. The
steady-state level of mature F1 in mitochondria from
each strain was expressed relative to the level observed in WT
mitochondria. In each case, samples were normalized to the level of
porin measured on parallel blots (n = 3). (B)
Mitochondria freshly isolated from the strains described above were
assayed for mitochondrial ATPase activity. The ATPase specific activity
(Spec. Act.) (micromoles per minute per milligram of protein) in
mitochondria from each strain was expressed relative to the specific
activity measured in WT mitochondria (n = 3).
|
|
PDR3 overexpression increases TOM72
mRNA abundance.
Since
1,2 pre-F1
has
been shown to rapidly fold into an import-incompetent conformation
(5, 6, 21), we next asked whether the overproduction of
these transcription factors stimulate
1,2
pre-F1
import by increasing the expression of
one or more cytosolic molecular chaperones. Recently, a microarray
analysis identified 26 genes whose expression was stimulated by
hyperactivating alleles of PDR1 and PDR3
(13). Most, but not all, of these genes contain a PDR
element (PDRE) in their promoter region that has been shown to mediate
positive control by both of these transcription factors. We performed a
pattern analysis search on the S. cerevisiae genome with the
PDRE sequence (5'-CCGCGG-3') and identified two putative molecular
chaperone genes, XDJ1 and PDR15, that contained upstream PDRE elements. PDR15 encodes a protein with limited
homology to the Hsp70 family, while XDJ1 is a hypothetical
open reading frame whose product has 40% homology with Ydj1p, a
chaperone previously shown to aid precursor binding to the outer
mitochondrial membrane (11). However, Northern blot
analysis indicated that the steady-state mRNA level of these genes was
unaffected by PDR3 overexpression (results not shown).
None of the genes encoding components of the TOM complex contained a
PDRE in their promoter regions. However, since some genes whose
transcription is controlled by PDR1 and PDR3 do
not have an upstream PDRE, we examined the steady-state mRNA levels of most of the TOM subunits by Northern blot analysis. We found that there
was little or no change in the levels of TOM37,
TOM22, TOM40, and TOM20 mRNA levels in
response to the overexpression of PDR3 (results not shown).
However, the steady-state level of TOM72 mRNA was reduced
somewhat in the tom70
strain and subsequently increased
twofold as a result of PDR3 overexpression. This result suggested that an up-regulation of TOM72 may be responsible
for the increased
1,2 pre-F1
import upon
Pdr3p overproduction (Fig. 6A). To test
this possibility, we introduced the TOM72 gene into the
tom70
strain on a multicopy plasmid. We found that Tom72p overproduction resulted in near WT levels of
F1
and ATPase activity in our mutant strain
(Fig. 6B and C). These results indicate that the overexpression of
Tom72p, a little-characterized homologue of Tom70p, can compensate for
the loss of Tom70p in the import of
1,2
pre-F1
.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Effects of TOM72 overexpression in mutant
cells. (A) Northern blots were performed on mRNA isolated from a WT or
mutant strain harboring a control plasmid or a PDR3
plasmid with DNA probes directed against TOM72 as
described in Materials and Methods. Strains were grown on lactate as
carbon source at 30°C. The amount of mRNA was normalized to mRNA
levels of actin (n = 3). (B) Mitochondria isolated
from a WT or mutant strain harboring a control plasmid or
TOM72 on a 2µm plasmid were subjected to immunoblot
analysis with monoclonal antibodies directed against
pre-F1 . Relative steady-state levels show the levels of
mature F1 relative to that of the WT. The mitochondrial
protein concentration was standardized for levels of porin
(n = 3). (C) Mitochondria freshly isolated from the
strains described above were monitored for mitochondrial ATPase
specific activity. Relative activity expresses the ATPase specific
activity of each strain relative to that of the WT
(n = 3).
|
|
We next asked whether increased expression of TOM72 is
required for the stimulation of
1,2 pre-F1
import produced by PDR1 and PDR3 overexpression.
To do this, we constructed a tom70
tom72
double mutant and examined the effect of PDR3 overexpression
on
1,2 pre-F1
import. We found that the
loss of TOM72 expression completely blocked the ability of
PDR3 overproduction to increase the amount of
1,2
pre-F1
in mitochondria (Fig.
7A). In addition, the stimulation of
mitochondrial ATPase activity was also not observed upon
PDR3 overproduction in the absence of TOM72 (Fig. 7B). We conclude from these results that PDR3 (and
presumably PDR1) overproduction increases
1,2
pre-F1
import by increasing the expression of
the Tom72p import receptor.

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
Steady-state levels of F1 and ATPase
activity following PDR3 overexpression in
tom70 or tom70
tom72 cells harboring 1,2 pre-F1 .
(A) Mitochondria isolated from WT and mutant strains and mutant strains
harboring PDR3 or PDR1 on 2µm plasmids
were subjected to immunoblot analysis with F1 -specific
monoclonal antibodies. The steady-state level of mature
F1 in mitochondria isolated from each strain was
expressed relative to the level observed in WT mitochondria. In each
case, samples were normalized to the level of porin measured on
parallel blots (n = 3). (B) Mitochondria freshly
isolated from the strains described above were assayed for
mitochondrial ATPase activity. The ATPase specific activity (micromoles
per minute per milligram of protein) in mitochondria from each strain
was expressed relative to the specific activity measured in WT
mitochondria (n = 3).
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Tom70p stimulates mitochondrial import of a precursor containing a
defective amino-terminal signal.
Mitochondrial targeting signals
are involved in several distinct steps of the mitochondrial protein
import process. This includes interactions with cytosolic factors,
import receptors, components of the TOM and
translocase-of-the-inner-membrane complexes, and chaperones within the
mitochondrial matrix. In our in vivo pulse-chase analysis, we found
that
1,2 pre-F1
, a precursor containing a minimal targeting signal, exhibited a reduced rate of import compared to the WT pre-F1
precursor. We found that the
tom70
mutation greatly exacerbated this import defect,
resulting in a severe decrease in the overall yield of imported
precursor. One possible explanation for this result is that the
increased dependence of the
1,2 targeting signal on the Tom70p
receptor results from a reduced ability of the Tom20p receptor to
efficiently recognize this minimal import signal. To test this
possibility, we examined the ability of the
1,2 targeting signal to
facilitate import into tom70
mitochondria. We previously
reported that the presequence of pre-F1
acts
as an intramolecular chaperone that maintains the precursor in a
loosely folded, import-competent conformation (21). While
the
1,2 pre-F1
import signal imported a
DHFR fusion protein much less efficiently than the WT
pre-F1
signal did, the minimal targeting
signal could import a structurally destabilized form of DHFR (DHFR*)
into isolated mitochondria as well as the WT
pre-F1
import signal could. In the present
study, we found that
1,2 pre-F1
-DHFR* was
also capable of import into tom70
mitochondria as
efficiently as WT pre-F1
-DHFR*. These results demonstrate that the
1,2 import signal retains the ability to mediate efficient import in the absence of the Tom70p receptor and
suggest that the
1,2 pre-F1
targeting
signal retains the ability to interact efficiently with the Tom20p
receptor. Since the only difference between DHFR and DHFR* is the
inability of the latter protein to fold into a stable conformation,
these results suggest that Tom70p acts to maintain this precursor in a
loosely folded conformation prior to import.
It has been suggested that Tom70p participates primarily in the import
of mitochondrial proteins containing internal targeting signals
(9, 10). However, several lines of evidence suggest that
Tom70p also participates in the import of proteins containing amino-terminal signals. First, mitochondrial import defects associated with the deletion of TOM20 can be partially suppressed by
the overexpression of TOM70, indicating that these receptor
subunits have overlapping functions (45). Second, the
disruption of TOM70 or the treatment of isolated WT
mitochondria with antibodies directed against Tom70 inhibits the import
of several mitochondrial proteins containing amino-terminal signals
(24). Third, in vivo experiments show that
tom70
cells import several precursor proteins with amino-terminal signals more slowly than WT cells (25). The
presence of Tom70p has also been shown to accelerate the import of a
wide variety of precursor proteins by enhancing the binding of
precursors to the surface of the mitochondria (25). The
results provided in our study are also consistent with Tom70p playing a
general role of mitochondrial precursors containing amino-terminal signals.
Tom72p functions as a mitochondrial import receptor.
Tom72p is
a poorly characterized protein that is located on the outer
mitochondrial membrane. It shares 53% amino acid identity with Tom70p
and has been shown to be associated with other components of the outer
membrane translocase complex (51). It has also been shown
to cross-link with a 30- to 35-kDa protein that is distinct from the
Tom70p binding partner, Tom37p. Despite its strong homology to Tom70p
and similar subcellular localization, a knockout of the
TOM72 gene was not found to significantly affect the import
of any of the mitochondrial proteins examined. It was also found that
the weak mitochondrial protein import defects observed in a strain
carrying disruptions of both TOM70 and TOM72 were
similar to the defects observed in a strain carrying a
tom70
mutation alone, other than a slightly increased
temperature-sensitive growth defect on a nonfermentable carbon source
(51). Our finding that the overexpression of
TOM72 suppresses the import defect of
1,2
pre-F1
in tom70
cells leads us
to conclude that the functions of Tom70p and Tom72p overlap. We
previously demonstrated that the
1,2 pre-F1
targeting signal was unable to maintain the precursor in an
import-competent conformation (21), and data from our in
vitro experiments described in this study further support that
conclusion. This suggests that both Tom70p and Tom72p bind
mitochondrial precursors and maintain them in an import-competent conformation prior to engaging the downstream components of the TOM
complex, as previously suggested for Tom70p (25). The
genome of S. cerevisiae has undergone a duplication in
recent evolutionary time, and the TOM70 gene (chromosome I)
and TOM72 gene (chromosome VIII) occur on one such
duplicated region of the genome (32). It is presently
unknown whether the duplicated copy of the gene encoding this
mitochondrial protein import receptor is unique for this organism.
The PDR pathway can influence the mitochondrial import
machinery.
The ability of Pdr3p overexpression to suppress defects
in mitochondrial protein import reveals a previously unappreciated role
for the PDR pathway in mitochondrial biogenesis. Our results show that
the overexpression of Pdr3p or Pdr1p can restore the ability of this
strain to grow on a nonfermentable carbon source at 15°C. This
suppression was mediated by an increase in both the rate and yield of
import of this defective precursor. Together, these effects raised the
steady-state level of ATP synthase activity above the threshold
required for growth under the selective conditions. These results
clearly indicate that the PDR pathway can play a previously
unrecognized role in mitochondrial biogenesis. A recent study found
that this pathway is also activated in response to mitochondrial
dysfunction. Hallstrom and Moye-Rowley reported that PDR3
expression is up-regulated in strains containing mutations that
compromise the electron transport chain or the maintenance of the
mitochondrial genome (22). It was shown that the response to mitochondrial dysfunction by Pdr3p in some cases also requires activation by the retrograde signaling pathway, which modulates the
expression of nuclear genes in response to changes in the mitochondrial
status (31, 36). Our results demonstrate that Pdr3p
overproduction can also stimulate the import of precursors that are
incapable of efficient mitochondrial import when a mitochondrial stress
is imposed. In this case, the inability to utilize a nonfermentable carbon source due to limiting ATP synthase activity did not induce TOM72 transcription, suggesting that this stimulus alone
cannot activate the PDR pathway. However, we found that
TOM72 transcription was induced under these conditions when
the PDR3 gene dosage was increased. It is possible that
other forms of mitochondrial stress that provide a stronger activation
of the PDR pathway may stimulate the import of some mitochondrial
proteins by increasing the level of Tom72p. We propose that this
mechanism represents a physiological response that optimizes
mitochondrial biogenesis during mitochondrial stress or dysfunction
(Fig. 8).

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 8.
Model showing that Pdr3p responds to mitochondrial
dysfunction by stimulating mitochondrial protein import.
|
|
Our results indicate that the overproduction of Tom72p can suppress
mitochondrial protein import defects associated with the absence of
Tom70p. We also show that TOM72 is partially regulated by
Pdr3p, since TOM72 mRNA abundance is increased when Pdr3p is overproduced. Other results presented in this study, such as a possible
decrease in the ability to assemble the F1-ATPase
subunits into a functional complex in strains overproducing Pdr3p, also suggest that Pdr3p may affect mitochondrial function by other means.
Additional studies will be required to further characterize this
observation. When taken together, our results demonstrate that Pdr3p
acts to regulate a broader set of genes than previously appreciated,
including at least one gene involved in mitochondrial biogenesis.
Unlike most genes previously shown to be regulated by Pdr3p,
TOM72 does not contain a strictly conserved PDRE in its
promoter region; however, it possesses a degenerate PDRE containing a
single mismatch (5'-CCGCGA-3') almost 300 bp upstream of the initiating codon. This, however, does not negate the possibility that
Pdr3p either directly or indirectly regulates TOM72
expression. A genome microarray analysis of a yeast strain containing a
hyperactivating allele of PDR3 indicated that several genes
regulated by Pdr3p do not contain PDREs in their promoters
(13). Our results provide the first evidence that the PDR
pathway can directly influence the expression of at least one component
of the mitochondrial protein import machinery and provide further
evidence that Pdr3p is involved in the regulation of a wider variety of
genes than previously appreciated.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
This work was supported by grants from the American Heart
Association and the National Institutes of Health.
We thank Vytas Bankaitis, Scott Moye-Rowley, Trevor Lithgow, Wylie
Nichols, and Mike Douglas for their generous gifts of plasmids and strains.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Microbiology, BBRB 432/Box 8, 1530 Third Ave., South, The University of
Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294-2170. Phone: (205) 934-6593. Fax: (205) 975-5482. E-mail: dbedwell{at}uab.edu.
Present address: Division of Biology, California Institute of
Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Abe, Y.,
T. Shodai,
T. Muto,
K. Mihara,
H. Torii,
S. Nishikawa,
T. Endo, and D. Kohda.
2000.
Structural basis of presequence recognition by the mitochondrial protein import receptor Tom20.
Cell
100:551-560[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Ahting, U.,
C. Thun,
R. Hegerl,
D. Typke,
F. E. Nargang,
W. Neupert, and S. Nussberger.
1999.
The TOM core complex: the general protein import pore of the outer membrane of mitochondria.
J. Cell Biol.
147:959-968[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Alam, R.,
N. Hachiya,
M. Sakaguchi,
S. Kawabata,
S. Iwanaga,
M. Kitajima,
K. Mihara, and T. Omura.
1994.
cDNA cloning and characterization of mitochondrial import stimulation factor (MSF) purified from rat liver cytosol.
J. Biochem. (Tokyo)
116:416-425[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Alconada, A.,
M. Kubrich,
M. Moczko,
A. Honlinger, and N. Pfanner.
1995.
The mitochondrial receptor complex: the small subunit Mom8b/Isp6 supports association of receptors with the general insertion pore and transfer of preproteins.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15:6196-6205[Abstract].
|
| 5.
|
Bedwell, D. M.,
D. J. Klionsky, and S. D. Emr.
1987.
The yeast F1-ATPase beta subunit precursor contains functionally redundant mitochondrial protein import information.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
7:4038-4047[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Bedwell, D. M.,
S. A. Strobel,
K. Yun,
G. D. Jongeward, and S. D. Emr.
1989.
Sequence and structural requirements of a mitochondrial protein import signal defined by saturation cassette mutagenesis.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
9:1014-1025[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Bolliger, L.,
T. Junne,
G. Schatz, and T. Lithgow.
1995.
Acidic receptor domains on both sides of the outer membrane mediate translocation of precursor proteins into yeast mitochondria
EMBO J.
14:6318-6326[Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Bradford, M. M.
1976.
A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding.
Anal. Biochem.
72:248-254[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Brix, J.,
K. Dietmeier, and N. Pfanner.
1997.
Differential recognition of preproteins by the purified cytosolic domains of the mitochondrial import receptors Tom20, Tom22, and Tom70.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:20730-20735[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Brix, J.,
S. Rudiger,
B. Bukau,
J. Schneider-Mergener, and N. Pfanner.
1999.
Distribution of binding sequences for the mitochondrial import receptors Tom20, Tom22, and Tom70 in a presequence-carrying preprotein and a non-cleavable preprotein.
J. Biol. Chem.
274:16522-16530[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Caplan, A. J.,
D. M. Cyr, and M. G. Douglas.
1992.
YDJ1.p facilitates polypeptide translocation across different intracellular membranes by a conserved mechanism.
Cell
71:1143-1155[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Delaveau, T.,
A. Delahodde,
E. Carvajal,
J. Subik, and C. Jacq.
1994.
PDR3, a new yeast regulatory gene, is homologous to PDR1 and controls the multidrug resistance phenomenon.
Mol. Gen. Genet.
244:501-511[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 13.
|
DeRisi, J.,
B. van den Hazel,
P. Marc,
E. Balzi,
P. Brown,
C. Jacq, and A. Goffeau.
2000.
Genome microarray analysis of transcriptional activation in multidrug resistance yeast mutants.
FEBS Lett.
470:156-160[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Emr, S. D.,
A. Vassarotti,
J. Garrett,
B. L. Geller,
M. Takeda, and M. G. Douglas.
1986.
The amino terminus of the yeast F1-ATPase beta-subunit precursor functions as a mitochondrial import signal.
J. Cell Biol.
102:523-533[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Gasser, S. M.,
A. Ohashi,
G. Daum,
P. C. Bohni,
J. Gibson,
G. A. Reid,
T. Yonetani, and G. Schatz.
1982.
Imported mitochondrial proteins cytochrome b2 and cytochrome c1 are processed in two steps.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
79:267-271[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Gietz, R. D., and A. Sugino.
1988.
New yeast-Escherichia coli shuttle vectors constructed with in vitro mutagenized yeast genes lacking six-base pair restriction sites.
Gene
74:527-534[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Glaser, S. M., and M. G. Cumsky.
1990.
A synthetic presequence reversibly inhibits protein import into yeast mitochondria.
J. Biol. Chem.
265:8808-8816[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Gratzer, S.,
T. Lithgow,
R. E. Bauer,
E. Lamping,
F. Paltauf,
S. D. Kohlwein,
V. Haucke,
T. Junne,
G. Schatz, and M. Horst.
1995.
Mas37p, a novel receptor subunit for protein import into mitochondria.
J. Cell Biol.
129:25-34[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Hachiya, N.,
T. Komiya,
R. Alam,
J. Iwahashi,
M. Sakaguchi,
T. Omura, and K. Mihara.
1994.
MSF, a novel cytoplasmic chaperone which functions in precursor targeting to mitochondria.
EMBO J.
13:5146-5154[Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Hajek, P., and D. M. Bedwell.
1994.
Characterization of the mitochondrial binding and import properties of purified yeast F1-ATPase beta subunit precursor. Import requires external ATP.
J. Biol. Chem.
269:7192-7200[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
Hajek, P.,
J. Y. Koh,
L. Jones, and D. M. Bedwell.
1997.
The amino terminus of the F1-ATPase beta-subunit precursor functions as an intramolecular chaperone to facilitate mitochondrial protein import.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17:7169-7177[Abstract].
|
| 22.
|
Hallstrom, T. C., and W. S. Moye-Rowley.
2000.
Multiple signals from dysfunctional mitochondria activate the pleiotropic drug resistance pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
J. Biol. Chem.
275:37347-37356[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Haucke, V.,
T. Lithgow,
S. Rospert,
K. Hahne, and G. Schatz.
1995.
The yeast mitochondrial protein import receptor Mas20p binds precursor proteins through electrostatic interaction with the positively charged presequence.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:5565-5570[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
Hines, V.,
A. Brandt,
G. Griffiths,
H. Horstmann,
H. Brutsch, and G. Schatz.
1990.
Protein import into yeast mitochondria is accelerated by the outer membrane protein MAS70.
EMBO J.
9:3191-3200[Medline].
|
| 25.
|
Hines, V., and G. Schatz.
1993.
Precursor binding to yeast mitochondria. A general role for the outer membrane protein Mas70p.
J. Biol. Chem.
268:449-454[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Honlinger, A.,
U. Bomer,
A. Alconada,
C. Eckerskorn,
F. Lottspeich,
K. Dietmeier, and N. Pfanner.
1996.
Tom7 modulates the dynamics of the mitochondrial outer membrane translocase and plays a pathway-related role in protein import.
EMBO J.
15:2125-2137[Medline].
|
| 27.
|
Hönlinger, A.,
M. Kübrich,
M. Moczko,
F. Gärtner,
L. Mallet,
F. Bussereau,
C. Eckerskorn,
F. Lottspeich,
K. Dietmeier,
M. Jacquet, and N. Pfanner.
1995.
The mitochondrial receptor complex: Mom22 is essential for cell viability and directly interacts with preproteins.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15:3382-3389[Abstract].
|
| 28.
|
Horwich, A. L.,
F. Kalousek,
I. Mellman, and L. E. Rosenberg.
1985.
A leader peptide is sufficient to direct mitochondrial import of a chimeric protein.
EMBO J.
4:1129-1135[Medline].
|
| 29.
|
Hurt, E. C.,
D. S. Allison,
U. |