Molecular and Cellular Biology, November 2001, p. 7807-7816, Vol. 21, No. 22
0270-7306/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/MCB.21.22.7807-7816.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Biology and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Jefferson Institute of Molecular Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, and Jefferson Medical College,1 and F. M. Kirby Center for Molecular Ophthalmology, Scheie Eye Institute, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine,2 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Received 18 April 2001/Returned for modification 4 June 2001/Accepted 16 August 2001
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Specific mRNA degradation mediated by double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) interference (RNAi) is a powerful way of suppressing gene expression in plants, nematodes, and fungal, insect, and protozoan systems. However, only a few cases of RNAi have been reported in mammalian systems. Here, we investigated the feasibility of the RNAi strategy in several mammalian cells by using the enhanced green fluorescent protein gene as a target, either by in situ production of dsRNA from transient transfection of a plasmid harboring a 547-bp inverted repeat or by direct transfection of dsRNA made by in vitro transcription. Several mammalian cells including differentiated embryonic stem (ES) cells did not exhibit specific RNAi in transient transfection. This long dsRNA, however, was capable of inducing a sequence-specific RNAi for the episomal and chromosomal target gene in undifferentiated ES cells. dsRNA at 8.3 nM decreased the cognate gene expression up to 70%. However, RNAi activity was not permanent because it was more pronounced in early time points and diminished 5 days after transfection. Thus, undifferentiated ES cells may lack the interferon response, similar to mouse embryos and oocytes. Regardless of their apparent RNAi activity, however, cytoplasmic extracts from mammalian cells produced a small RNA of 21 to 22 nucleotides from the long dsRNA. Our results suggest that mammalian cells may possess RNAi activity but nonspecific activation of the interferon response by longer dsRNA may mask the specific RNAi. The findings offer an opportunity to use dsRNA for inhibition of gene expression in ES cells to study differentiation.
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Frequently, inhibition of gene expression has been caused not only by antisense mRNA but also, in some cases, by expression of sense mRNA which has been used as a control. Moreover, this gene silencing by sense mRNA was shown to be sequence specific for the homologous gene. These initially confusing observations have now been attributed to gene silencing by the production of a minute amount of double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) generated by transcription of the sense mRNA by its promoter and the antisense mRNA by a cryptic promoter within the construct (reviewed in references 3, 6, 11, 26, 27, and 33). The term RNA interference (RNAi) was defined after the discovery that injection of dsRNA into the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans led to specific silencing of the gene homologous to the delivered RNA (12). RNAi was also observed in fruit flies, zebra fish, and other animals, including mice (7, 17, 30, 34, 35). The posttranscriptional gene silencing of C. elegans (18, 19, 28) is closely linked to the mechanism of cosuppression in plants and quelling in fungi (14, 21-23, 29).
Unlike other organisms, accumulation of very small amounts of dsRNA in
mammalian cells results in the interferon response. This leads to an
overall block of translation by inactivation of an elongation factor by
protein kinase. In addition, dsRNA activates a latent
2',5'-oligoadenylate synthase and increases synthesis of a
2',5'-oligonucleotide, causing activation of RNase L and nonspecific
mRNA degradation. These events result in the onset of apoptosis in
mammalian cells (13, 16). The natural function of RNAi and
cosuppression appears to be protection of the host genome against
invasion by mobile genetic elements such as transposons and viruses,
which produce dsRNA in host cells (14, 18, 20, 27). Such
considerations have discouraged investigators from using RNAi in
mammals. Recently, however, RNAi has been reported in several mammalian
systems. Transfection of a plasmid carrying the full-length pro-
1(I)
collagen gene into rodent fibroblasts decreased the endogenous
pro-
1(I) collagen mRNA up to 90% (1). RNAi activity
was also reported in CHO cells, although the amount of dsRNA required
for interference was 2,500 times more than in Drosophila S2
cells (32). Sequence-specific RNAi has been demonstrated
in the preimplantation mouse embryo and oocytes by direct injection of
dsRNA (30, 35). When dsRNA corresponding to an active
green fluorescent protein (GFP) gene was injected into mouse zygotes,
dsRNAi was effective throughout the blastocyst stage and implantation
until embryos reached 6.5 days of development, corresponding to a 40- to 50-fold increase in cell mass (35). With these
findings, it becomes critical to determine whether RNAi can be applied
in mammalian tissue culture for gene silencing.
The hallmark of RNAi is its specificity. The dsRNA triggers a specific degradation of homologous mRNA only within the region of identity with the dsRNA (37). The ability of a few molecules of dsRNA to eliminate a much larger pool of endogenous mRNA suggests a catalytic or amplification component to the RNAi mechanism. Results from studies of RNAi in plants suggested a mechanism, in which an RNA-primed RNA polymerase can spread gene silencing by dsRNA (28). Another model involves a catalytic RNA degradation generated by the dsRNA molecule and as yet unknown protein components. Recently, dsRNAs were shown to be processed to small 21- to 22-bp sizes in Drosophila embryo extracts (10, 36, 37), cultured S2 cells (2, 15), and C. elegans (24), making it likely that such RNAs serve as the specificity determinants in the RNAi reaction. These results suggest that dsRNA molecules are initially activated by a process that does not require interactions with their cognate mRNA target. Activation would appear to be a limiting step in RNAi, as the reaction is saturated at relatively low levels of dsRNA in vivo (12), potentiated by preincubation with dsRNA (31), and inhibited by excess unrelated dsRNAs (36).
Here, we investigated the feasibility of the RNAi strategy for gene silencing in several mammalian cell lines by using the enhanced GFP (EGFP) gene as a target. Our results show that undifferentiated mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells exhibit a sequence-specific RNAi at a dsRNA concentration similar to that needed in Drosophila S2 cells.We also compared the ability of different mammalian cell types to degrade dsRNA into small pieces of 21 to 22 bp, which is the initial step on RNAi activity.
| |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Plasmids.
With pEGFP-C1 (Clontech, Palo Alto, Calif.) as the
template, a 547-bp fragment encoding a portion of the EGFP gene
beginning from the ATG start codon was amplified by PCR with the
primers 5'-GCC GTC GAC GGT ACC TCT AGA ACG CGT GCC ATG GTG AGC AAG
GGC GAG GAG-3' and 5'-GCC GCG GCC GCG GCC CTA TTA GCC CTC
GAG TAC ATG GTC GGC GAG CTG CAC GCT-3'. A set of restriction
sites, SalI, XbaI, and
MluI at the 5' end and EcoRI and
NotI at the 3' end, were incorporated in each primer.
After PCR amplification, the 547-bp fragment was digested with
NotI and self-ligated. The dimer of the 547-bp fragment
was isolated from the agarose gel, purified, ligated to the pGEMT Easy
vector (Promega, Madison, Wis.), and used to transform
Escherichia coli DH5
(Gibco-BRL, Rockville, Md.)
competent cells. The resulting colonies were screened for inverted
repeats by restriction enzyme analysis. The sequence of the plasmid
harboring an inverted repeat (pGEMT-dsEGFP) was confirmed by DNA sequencing.
In vitro transcription of dsRNA. The pGEMT-dsEGFP construct with an inverted repeat containing a portion of the EGFP gene was linearized with PstI at a unique site located at the 3' end of the inverted repeat. Using the RiboMax large-scale RNA production system-T7 (Promega, Madison, Wis.), the transcription reaction was performed at 37°C for 3 h, according to the manufacturer's specifications.
Radiolabeled dsRNA was generated by incorporation of [
-32P]UTP during in vitro transcription.
After performing the in vitro transcription reaction, RNase-free DNase
(Promega, Madison, Wis.) was added to the reaction mixture at 1 U/µg
of the template DNA and incubated for 15 min at 37°C. The transcript
was further purified by extraction in phenol-chloroform-isoamyl alcohol
(25:24:1) and ethanol precipitation. The pellet was washed with 70%
ethanol, dried at room temperature, and resuspended in TE buffer (10 mM Tris [pH 7.5] and 1 mM EDTA). To determine the folded structure of
the dsRNA, an aliquot of the RNA sample was digested using a mixture of
RNase A and T1 (Ambion, Austin, Tex.) at 37°C
for 30 min and analyzed on 5% nondenaturing and denaturing
polyacrylamide gels containing 40% formamide and 7 M urea. For dsRNA
of the lacZ gene, plasmid containing either the sense or
antisense lacZ fragment was linearized by restriction enzyme
SalI, located downstream of the multiple cloning site. The
sense and antisense RNAs were generated separately by in vitro
transcription and annealed to generate a 740-bp dsRNA fragment.
Cell culture.
Drosophila S2 cells (generous gift
from G. J. Hannon) were maintained at 27°C in 90% Schneider's
insect medium (Gibco-BRL, Rockville, Md.) and 10% heat-inactivated
fetal bovine serum (FBS). Cells were split every 2 to 3 days to
maintain exponential growth. BsrT7/5 (4), a derivative of
BHK-21 cells that express the T7 RNA polymerase (generous gift from M. Schnell), were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium
(DMEM) supplemented with 10% FBS and penicillin-streptomycin. CHO-K1
cells were maintained in F-12 medium with 10% heat-inactivated FBS.
Mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells AB2.2 (Stratagene, La Jolla, Calif.)
were maintained in DMEM supplemented with 1,250 U of leukemia
inhibitory factor (LIF) (Chemicon, Temecula, Calif.) per ml 15% FBS, 2 mM glutamine, 100 mM
-mercaptoethanol, and 1× nonessential amino
acids. Mouse embryonic fibroblast STO cells (American Type Culture
Collection, Rockville, Md.) were grown in DMEM with 10% FBS. The STO
feeder cells were plated on dishes coated with 0.1% (wt/vol) gelatin, treated with mitomycin C (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.) at a concentration of
10 µg/ml for 2.5 h at 37°C, and washed three times with
phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). ES AB2.2 cells were plated onto
mitomycin C-treated STO feeder cells and passaged every 2 days with a
daily change of culture medium. For all experiments, ES cells were kept
between 17 and 19 passages, counted from the time of isolation of ES
cells from the inner cell mass of the blastocysts.
Transfection.
The day before transfection, S2 cells were
plated in a 12-well plate (106 cells per well).
Various amounts of the PstI-linearized pGEMT-dsEGFP plasmid
or dsRNA generated by in vitro transcription were combined with 1 µg
of the target plasmid encoding EGFP (pEGFP-C1) and 1 µg of the
plasmid encoding the T7 RNA polymerase (pSC6-T7-Neo). In all
transfection experiments, a constant amount of total DNA, 5 µg, was
maintained by addition of the unrelated pUC19 plasmid. DNA was
transfected to S2 cells by the calcium phosphate method. The plasmid
encoding
-galactosidase, pCMV-lacZ, was used as a control. CHO-K1
and STO feeder cells were plated in a 12-well plate
(105 cells per well) the day before transfection.
Various amounts of the PstI-linearized pGEMT-dsEGFP plasmid
or in vitro-transcribed dsRNA was combined with 1 µg of the target
plasmid encoding EGFP (pEGFP-C1) and 1 µg of the plasmid encoding the
T7 RNA polymerase (pSC6-T7-Neo). The DNA mixture was transfected to
cells by addition of 7.5 µg of Lipofectamine (Gibco-BRL, Rockville,
Md.). The same transfection protocol was used for BsrT7/5 cells except
the pSC6-T7-Neo plasmid was not added, as BsrT7/5 already expresses the
T7 RNA polymerase (4).
Quantitation of EGFP and
-galactosidase activities.
All
adherent cells were harvested 72 h after transfection by washing
with PBS and scraping cells into 100 µl of ice-cold lysate buffer
(91.5 mM K2HPO4, 85 mM
KH2PO4, and 1 mM
dithiothreitol [DTT]). The harvested cells were then subjected to a
dry-ice/ethanol freezing and thawing at 37°C for three cycles and
centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 5 min at 4°C. The supernatant was
stored at
70°C until use. For ES cells with feeders, 72 h
after transfection, cells were trypsinized for 5 min and pipetted
extensively. After addition of 5 volumes of ES medium, cells were put
back in the incubator for 45 min to allow the STO cells to attach to
the plate. After this procedure, ES cells constituted more than 95% of
the cells in suspension. ES cells were transferred to a tube,
centrifuged, and processed the same way as other cells. The protein
concentration of cell lysates was measured with the Pierce reagent
(Pierce, Rockford, Ill.) in a 96-well plate. For each lysate, the same amount of protein was used for the fluorescence and chemiluminescence measurements. Fluorescence was measured in relative light units (RLUs)
using a 96-well black flat-bottomed plate (Corning Costar, Cambridge,
Mass.) and an FL 600 microplate reader (Bio-Tek Instrument, Winooski,
Vt.) with KC4 data reduction software on an external personal computer,
which controls the reader function and data capture. Excitation was at
485 nm with a 20-nm band-pass filter, and emission was at 530 nm with a
25-nm band-pass filter. To account for the background, each
fluorescence reading was subtracted from that of the untransfected cell
lysate. The fluorescence reading of each lysate was normalized to that
of the lysate prepared from cells transfected without dsRNA, either
pGEMT-dsEGFP plasmid or in vitro-transcribed dsRNA.
-Galactosidase activity was measured by histochemical staining and
chemiluminescence. Cells were fixed with 1% glutaraldehyde and stained
with X-Gal staining solution [0.1 M sodium phosphate (pH 8.0), 1.3 mM
MgCl2, 3 mM
K4Fe(CN)6, 3 mM
K3Fe(CN)6, and 0.4 mg of
X-Gal (5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-
-D-galactopyranoside) in N,N-dimethyl formamide] for 4 h. For
chemiluminescence measurements, cell lysates were prepared using the
Luminescent
-Galactosidase Genetic Reporter System II kit (Clontech,
Palo Alto, Calif.). Lysates were analyzed in triplicate by
chemiluminescence using the Lumat LB 9507 luminometer (EG&G Berthold,
Bad Wildbad, Germany). To account for the background, the
chemiluminescence reading was subtracted from that of the untransfected
cell lysate. The RLUs of each lysate were normalized to that of the
lysate prepared from cells transfected without dsRNA, either
pGEMT-dsEGFP plasmid or in vitro-transcribed dsRNA.
Fluorescence microscopy of S2 and ES cells. For fluorescence microscopy, S2 cells (2 × 106 S2 cells/well of a six-well plate) were plated and transfected with 2.5 µg of pIZ/US9-GFP and an increasing amount, 0, 1.5, or 3.0 µg, of the in vitro-transcribed dsRNA by the calcium phosphate method. ES cells (6 × 105 cells/well of a six-well plate) were mixed with 2.5 µg of pEGFP-C1 plasmid and increasing amounts, 0, 1, and 2 µg, of the in vitro-transcribed dsRNA and plated on the STO feeder cells as described above. Fluorescence micrographs were taken 72 h after transfection.
Analysis of RNA by Northern blotting in ES cells.
ES cells
were transfected by three plasmids as described above. Total RNA was
purified by the RNAeasy Mini kit (Qiagen, Valencia, Calif.) and
quantitated by UV absorbance at 260 nm. A total of 25 µg of RNA was
loaded into each lane in a 0.8% formaldehyde denaturing agarose gel,
and the Northern blotting was performed using the NorthernMax kit
(Ambion, Austin, Tex.). The EGFP probe was a 0.7-kb fragment generated
by NheI and BglII restriction enzyme digestions
of plasmid pEGFP-C1, and the lacZ probe was a 2.5 kb
fragment prepared by PvuII digestion of the pCMV-lacZ plasmid. The probes were labeled by
[
-32P]dCTP using the Megaprime DNA labeling
system (Amersham, Piscataway, N.J.). A cDNA probe corresponding to the
mouse
-actin coding sequence was hybridized as a control.
Generation of ES cells with integrated EGFP gene, transfection with dsRNA, and FACS analysis. To produce ES cells with an integrated EGFP transgene, 2.5 × 106 AB2.2 cells were transfected with 6 µg of linearized pcDNA3-EGFP by M9 lipofection. G418 (275 µg/ml) selection was started 24 h after transfection. After 10 days of selection with G418, the surviving ES colonies were examined by fluorescence microscopy. Fluorescent colonies were picked and expanded according to established techniques. The number of integrated copies of pcDNA3-EGFP was determined by Southern blot analysis using the EGFP coding region as a probe. Several ES clones with a single copy of the EGFP gene were chosen for use in this study. ES cells were seeded at 105 cells/well of six-well plate in the presence and absence of the feeder layer and transfected with 3 µg of in vitro-transcribed dsRNA-EGFP or dsRNA-lacZ using 1.5 µg of Lipofectamine 2000 (Gibco-BRL, Rockville, Md.). The transfected cells were maintained with daily changes of medium and harvested at various time points to measure GFP fluorescence. Cells were trypsinized, centrifuged, suspended in chilled PBS, and subjected to fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis using a FACScan flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, Calif.). Instrument settings were adjusted to separate live from dead cells, and fluorescence intensity data for 20,000 live cells were collected for each experimental time point. The relative levels of fluorescence for different samples were compared using the geometric means. Instrument settings were kept constant for all samples within each experiment. Data were analyzed using Cell Quest Software (Becton Dickinson).
Generation of small RNA fragments from dsRNA.
Cytoplasmic
extracts were isolated as described previously (8).
Extracts were prepared from cells in the log phase of growth, and
cytoplasmic proteins were extracted in a buffer containing 10 mM HEPES
(pH 7.9), 1.5 mM MgCl2, 10 mM KCl, 0.2 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF; Sigma, Saint Louis, Mo.), and 0.5 mM DTT (Sigma, Saint Louis, Mo.). The final dialysis was performed for
12 h in an excess volume of dialysis buffer (20 mM HEPES [pH
7.9], 20% glycerol, 100 mM KCl, 0.2 mM EDTA, 0.2 mM PMSF, and 0.5 mM
DTT). The protein concentration was measured by the Bradford assay. Cytoplasmic extracts (10 to 50 µg) were incubated with 30 nmol of
radiolabeled dsRNA for 1 h at 30°C for S2 cells or 37°C for mammalian cells. The standard reaction was carried out in a 20-µl reaction buffer containing 20 mM HEPES, 2 mM magnesium acetate, 2 mM
DTT, 1 mM ATP, 40 mM creatine phosphate, and 100 µg of creatine phosphokinase and 1 U of RNasin (Ambion, Austin, Tex.) per ml. After
the reaction, samples were treated with proteinase K (1 mg/ml)-0.5%
sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and purified by phenol-chloroform extraction. The size of the dsRNA was examined by a 12% denaturing acrylamide gel. After completion of electrophoresis, the gel was stained with ethidium bromide. The gel was then fixed in a 30% methanol-7% acetic acid solution, dried, and exposed to X-ray film at
80°C.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Generation of dsRNA for EGFP gene.
To generate dsRNA in
mammalian cells in situ, we cloned an inverted repeat of a portion of
the EGFP gene, extending from the ATG codon to nucleotide 547, under
the control of the T7 RNA polymerase (pGEMT-dsEGFP). Using this
plasmid, we investigated the feasibility of the RNAi strategy for gene
silencing in several mammalian cells by using the EGFP gene as a
target. Two strategies were used: (i) in situ production of dsRNA by
transient transfection of three plasmids, the target plasmid encoding
the EGFP gene (pEGFP-C1), the plasmid harboring a 547-bp inverted
repeat of the EGFP gene under control of the T7 promoter
(pGEMT-dsEGFP), and the plasmid containing the T7 RNA polymerase cDNA
under the control of the CMV promoter (pSC6-T7-Neo) (Fig.
1A), and (ii) direct transfection of in
vitro-transcribed dsRNA (547 bp) and the target plasmid pEGFP-C1 (Fig.
1B).
|
Sequence-specific gene silencing by production of dsRNA in situ in
S2 cells.
To investigate whether production of a dsRNA in situ by
pGEMT-dsEGFP plasmid is sufficient to induce RNAi, we transfected S2
cells with three plasmids: pEGFP-C1, pSC6-T7-Neo, and increasing amounts of pGEMT-dsEGFP. When this plasmid is cotransfected with the
gene encoding the T7 RNA polymerase under the control of the CMV
promoter, it is expected to make dsRNA of 547 bp in mammalian cells. To
test the specificity of RNAi, the plasmid encoding the
-galactosidase, pCMV-lacZ, was added instead of pEGFP-C1 in the control experiment, where all other reagents were kept the same.
-galactosidase
expression was not affected by addition of the pGEMT-dsEGFP plasmid,
demonstrating the sequence-specific RNAi. The CMV promoter was not as
strong as the Drosophila promoters actin or OpIE2 in S2
cells (data not shown). However, a sufficient amount of protein was
generated to measure the EGFP and
-galactosidase activities. S2
cells were also used to compare the efficiency between the in situ
production of dsRNA and the direct transfection of dsRNA made by in
vitro transcription. Transfection of pIZ/US9-EGFP (the plasmid encoding
EGFP under the control of the Drosophila promoter OpIE2) and
an increasing amount of dsRNA, ranging from 0 to 3.0 µg, resulted in
sequence-specific and dose-dependent inhibition of EGFP expression
(Fig. 2B). Again,
-galactosidase expression was not affected by
dsRNA (Fig. 2C). These results demonstrate that production of dsRNA in
situ by the pGEMT-dsEGFP plasmid is sufficient to produce RNAi in S2
cells.
|
Several mammalian cells do not exhibit sequence-specific RNAi
activity.
We investigated the feasibility of the RNAi strategy for
gene silencing in several mammalian cells by using the EGFP gene as a
target and transient transfection of three plasmids, pEGFP-C1, pSC6-T7-Neo, and pGEMT-dsEGFP. For most experiments,
105 cells were plated on a 12-well plate and
transfected with 1 µg of pEGFP-C1, 1 µg of pSC6-T7-Neo, and an
increasing amount of pGEMT-dsEGFP, ranging from 0.25 to 2 µg. Because
BsrT7/5 cells already express the T7 RNA polymerase (4),
transfection was carried out under identical conditions except that the
pSC6-T7-Neo plasmid was omitted. Two cell lines, BsrT7/5 cells and
mouse fibroblasts (STO), showed a non-sequence-specific inhibition by
dsRNA, indicated by reduction of both EGFP and
-galactosidase
activities as increasing amounts of pGEMT-dsEGFP were added (Fig.
3A and 3B). The CHO-K1 cells did not
exhibit any inhibition by dsRNA in cognate (EGFP) or noncognate
-galactosidase genes (Fig. 3C). In all experiments, we detected no
apparent cytotoxicity, as measured by cell numbers and morphology (data
not shown).
|
Undifferentiated ES cells exhibit sequence-specific RNAi activity. Recently, sequence-specific RNAi has been demonstrated in the preimplantation mouse embryo and mouse oocytes by direct injection of dsRNA (30, 35). However, dsRNA in transgenic blastocysts injected as zygotes produced gene silencing for only up to six rounds of cell division (35). These results suggest that undifferentiated cells may have RNAi activity that disappears as the cells differentiate. Here, we investigated whether undifferentiated ES cells respond to dsRNA for gene silencing.
Transfection of pGEMT-dsEGFP plasmid into undifferentiated ES cells maintained on the STO feeder layer showed a sequence-specific and dose-dependent inhibition of EGFP expression, while
-galactosidase expression was not affected (Fig. 4A). In
contrast, differentiated ES cells maintained without STO feeder cells
showed nonspecific inhibition (Fig. 4B). These cells progressively lost
refractive boundaries and flattened to form a patch of giant
trophoblastlike cells (data not shown), while undifferentiated ES cells
remain as small cells packed tightly in nests (Fig.
5). Direct transfection of the in
vitro-transcribed EGFP dsRNA, ranging from 0 to 1.0 µg, also resulted
in a dose-dependent and sequence-specific inhibition of EGFP, shown by
the fluorescence measurement of cell lysate (Fig. 5A) and by
fluorescence microscopy of transfected cells (Fig. 5B). In contrast,
-galactosidase expression was not affected, as measured by either
chemiluminescence (Fig. 5A) or histochemical staining (Fig. 5C).
|
|
-galactosidase mRNA, as measured by Northern blot analysis of ES cells transfected under identical conditions, in which the protein activity was measured
(Fig. 6). These results confirm
degradation of cognate EGFP mRNA but not
-galactosidase mRNA.
|
|
dsRNA is processed to 21 to 22 nucleotides in mammalian cells.
Small RNAs are associated with a dsRNA-dependent nuclease purified from
cultured cells (15), making it likely that such RNAs serve
as the specificity determinants in the RNAi reaction. Here, we
investigated whether such dsRNA degradation activity may reflect the
different RNAi activities among different mammalian cells. The dsRNA
degradation activity was detected by the in vitro reaction in which a
radiolabeled dsRNA was incubated with cytoplasmic extracts made from
various cell types (Fig. 8).
Drosophila S2 cells showed the highest activity, which was
saturated between 10 and 50 µg of cytoplasmic protein (data not
shown). Small RNA fragments were generated by all mammalian cell types
tested: cells with a sequence-specific RNAi (undifferentiated ES
cells), cells that showed no effect at all (CHO-K1), and cells that
showed a nonspecific decrease in gene expression (differentiated ES,
STO, and BsrT7/5 cells).
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Posttranscriptional gene silencing by dsRNAi is a new tool for studying gene function in many organisms (3, 11, 26, 27, 33). However, only a few cases of RNAi have been reported in mammalian cells (1, 30, 32, 35). Here, we investigated the feasibility of the RNAi strategy for gene silencing in several mammalian cells by using the EGFP gene as a target, either by in situ production of dsRNA from a transient transfection of the plasmid harboring a 547-bp inverted repeat or by direct transfection of dsRNA made by in vitro transcription. In both cases, the dsRNA is generated as a hairpin structure that is resistant to RNase degradation. We reasoned that transient transfection may produce a large amount of stable dsRNA in the cytoplasm because it introduces a high copy number of the plasmid in the cytoplasm, which would then be transcribed by the T7 RNA polymerase. Using transient transfection, we show that undifferentiated ES cells have a sequence-specific RNAi activity that disappears as ES cells differentiate. This long dsRNA also inhibited its cognate gene expression in undifferentiated ES cells with a single integrated copy of the EGFP gene. Thus, both episomal and chromosomal target genes in undifferentiated ES cells were inhibited by the long dsRNA in a sequence-specific manner. Furthermore, the amount of dsRNA effective for RNAi activity in undifferentiated ES cells was similar to the amounts which caused gene silencing in Drosophila S2 cells and showed no apparent toxicity.
Several mammalian cell lines did not exhibit the sequence-specific gene silencing by dsRNA. Two cell lines, BsrT7/5 and mouse embryonic fibroblasts (STO), showed non-sequence-specific inhibition by dsRNA, while CHO-K1 did not exhibit any inhibition by dsRNA on either the cognate or noncognate gene, EGFP or lacZ. When transient cotransfection of plasmid DNA and dsRNA was carried out in several mammalian cells, 293 and NIH 3T3 cells showed no effect at all, while BHK cells showed a nonspecific decrease in gene expression (5). RNAi has been reported in CHO cells, although the amount of dsRNA required for interference was 2,500 times more than in Drosophila S2 cells (32). Because we tested RNAi under identical conditions in S2 and CHO cells, the amount of dsRNA needed to produce RNAi in the S2 cells used in our experiment may not be sufficient to produce RNAi in CHO cells. Recently, a longer dsRNA was shown to induce some sequence-specific silencing in addition to the nonspecific inhibition in mammalian cells (9). It is possible that the reporter system in this study is not sensitive enough to distinguish specific RNAi from the nonspecific inhibition. In all experiments, we detected no apparent cytotoxicity as measured by cell numbers and morphology.
Sequence-specific RNAi has been demonstrated in the preimplantation mouse embryo and mouse oocytes by direct injection of dsRNA (30, 35). The dsRNA in mammalian cells typically activates a protein kinase that phosphorylates and inactivates eIF2a (16). The ensuing inhibition of protein synthesis ultimately results in apoptosis. This sequence-independent response may reflect a form of primitive immune response, since the presence of dsRNA is a common feature of many viral life cycles. Mouse oocytes, however, clearly lack this response, as the oocytes injected with dsRNAs resume meiosis and mature to metaphase II (30). The preimplantation mouse embryo also lacks the response, as embryos injected with dsRNAs develop to the blastocyst stage (35). Specific RNAi activity present in undifferentiated ES cells suggests that undifferentiated ES cells may also lack an interferon response, similar to mouse embryos and oocytes (30, 35). However, RNAi activity was not permanent, since it was more pronounced at early time points and diminished as undifferentiated ES cells replicated, presumably due to dilution of dsRNA per cell.
Posttranscriptional gene silencing by dsRNA requires at least two steps, conversion of the dsRNA into an active species and subsequent targeting of the mRNA for inhibition by these sequence-specific active species. Recent biochemical studies (2, 10, 15, 31, 36, 37) have indicated that RNAi is accomplished by a multicomponent nuclease that targets cognate mRNA for degradation. The specificity of this complex was derived from the incorporation of a small guide sequence that is homologous to the mRNA substrate. These small 21- to 22-nucleotide RNAs, originally identified in plants with active RNAi (14), have also been observed in Drosophila embryos (10, 36, 37) and S2 cells (2, 15). We investigated whether such dsRNA degradation activity may reflect the different RNAi activities among different mammalian cells.
Although Drosophila S2 cells showed the most prominent product of 21 to 22 bp, all mammalian cells tested produced distinct RNA products of the same size. Thus, mammalian cells have the ability to generate 21- to 22-nucleotide fragments from long dsRNA regardless of their apparent RNAi activity. While our manuscript was being reviewed, Tuschl's group reported that 21-nucleotide short interfering RNA (siRNA) was capable of gene silencing in several mammalian cells in which longer dsRNA failed to produce RNAi (9). The apparent lack of RNAi by longer dsRNA in mammalian cells was attributed to nonspecific activation of the interferon response by dsRNA longer than 30 bp, masking the specific RNAi. Therefore, our findings that mammalian cells can generate siRNA regardless of their apparent RNAi activity provide an insight in gene silencing of mammalian cells by siRNA. It would be interesting to compare the extent of gene silencing by siRNA and longer dsRNA in cells that do not show nonspecific inhibition.
ES cells and other stem cells are valuable tools for the study of cell and tissue differentiation and for the creation of animal models of disease. These findings offer an opportunity to use dsRNAi for inhibition of gene expression in ES cells to study differentiation. Stem cells also have the potential for therapeutic use, including the development of replacement tissues if regulation of their differentiation can be understood. The results presented here indicate that RNAi can be used to inhibit gene expression in mouse ES cells and thus may be a useful approach for investigations of stem cell biology in general.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We are grateful to Olga Igoucheva for in vitro RNA degradation study and discussion, Romaica Omaruddin and Haiching Ma for assistance with ES cell culture, Gregory Hannon for Drosophila cells and plasmids, and Scott Diamond for M9 peptides. We thank Tom Tuschl and John Klement for discussion and critical reading of the manuscript.
This work was supported in part by grants from the National Institutes of Health (GM61942, AR38923, and AR44350) to K.Y. and EY12910, the Rosanne H. Silbermann Foundation, and Research to Prevent Blindness to E.A.P.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Biology, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Jefferson Institute of Molecular Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, and Jefferson Medical College, 233 South 10th Street, Philadelphia, PA 19107. Phone: (215) 503-5434. Fax: (215) 503-5788. E-mail: kyonggeun.yoon{at}mail.tju.edu.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Bahramian, M. B., and H. Zarbl.
1999.
Transcriptional and posttranscriptional silencing of rodent 1(I) collagen by a homologous transcriptionally self-silenced transgene.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19:274-283 |
| 2. | Bernstein, E., A. A. Caudy, S. M. Hammond, and G. J. Hannon. 2001. Role for a bidentate ribonuclease in the initiation step of RNA interference. Nature 409:363-366[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 3. | Bosher, J. M., and M. Labouesse. 2000. RNA interference: genetic wand and genetic watchdog. Nat. Cell Biol. 2:E31-E36[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 4. |
Buchholz, U. J.,
S. Finke, and K. K. Conzelmann.
1999.
Generation of bovine respiratory syncytial virus (BRSV) from cDNA: BRSV NS2 is not essential for virus replication in tissue culture, and the human RSV leader region acts as a functional BRSV genome promoter.
J. Virol
73:251-259 |
| 5. | Caplen, N. J., J. Fleenor, A. Fire, and R. A. Morgan. 2000. dsRNA-mediated gene silencing in cultured Drosophila cells: a tissue culture model for the analysis of RNA interference. Gene 252:95-105[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 6. | Catalanotto, C., G. Azzalin, G. Macino, and C. Cogoni. 2000. Gene silencing in worms and fungi. Nature 404:245[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 7. |
Clemens, J. C.,
C. A. Worby,
N. Simonson-Leff,
M. Muda,
T. Maehama,
B. A. Hemmings, and J. E. Dixon.
2000.
Use of double-stranded RNA interference in Drosophila cell lines to dissect signal transduction pathways.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
97:6499-6503 |
| 8. |
Dignam, J. D.,
R. M. Lebovitz, and R. G. Roeder.
1983.
Accurate transcription initiation by RNA polymerase II in a soluble extract from isolated mammalian nuclei.
Nucleic Acids Res.
11:1475-1489 |
| 9. | Elbashir, S. M., J. Harborth, W. Lendeckel, A. Yalcin, K. Weber, and T. Tuschl. 2001. Duplexes of 21-nucleotide RNAs mediate RNA interference in cultured mammalian cells. Nature 411:494-498[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 10. |
Elbashir, S. M.,
W. Lendeckel, and T. Tuschl.
2001.
RNA interference is mediated by 21- and 22-nucleotide RNAs.
Genes Dev.
15:188-200 |
| 11. | Fire, A. 1999. RNA-triggered gene silencing. Trends Genet. 15:358-363[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 12. | Fire, A., S. Xu, M. K. Montgomery, S. A. Kostas, S. E. Driver, and C. C. Mello. 1998. Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 391:806-811[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 13. |
Grant, C. E.,
M. Z. Vasa, and R. G. Deeley.
1995.
cIRF-3, a new member of the interferon regulatory factor (IRF) family that is rapidly and transiently induced by dsRNA.
Nucleic Acids Res.
23:2137-2146 |
| 14. |
Hamilton, A. J., and D. C. Baulcombe.
1999.
A species of small antisense RNA in posttranscriptional gene silencing in plants.
Science
286:950-952 |
| 15. | Hammond, S. M., E. Bernstein, D. Beach, and G. J. Hannon. 2000. An RNA-directed nuclease mediates posttranscriptional gene silencing in Drosophila cells. Nature 404:293-296[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 16. |
Kaufman, R. J.
1999.
Double-stranded RNA-activated protein kinase mediates virus-induced apoptosis: a new role for an old actor.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
96:11693-11695 |
| 17. | Kennerdell, J. R., and R. W. Carthew. 1998. Use of dsRNA-mediated genetic interference to demonstrate that frizzled and frizzled 2 act in the wingless pathway. Cell 95:1017-1026[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 18. | Ketting, R. F., T. H. Haverkamp, H. G. van Luenen, and R. H. Plasterk. 1999. Mut-7 of C. elegans, required for transposon silencing and RNA interference, is a homolog of Werner syndrome helicase and RNase D. Cell 99:133-141[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 19. | Ketting, R. F., and R. H. Plasterk. 2000. A genetic link between cosuppression and RNA interference in C. elegans. Nature 404:296-298[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 20. |
Malinsky, S.,
A. Bucheton, and I. Busseau.
2000.
New insights on homology-dependent silencing of I factor activity by transgenes containing ORF1 in Drosophila melanogaster.
Genetics
156:1147-1155 |
| 21. | Meins, F., Jr. 2000. RNA degradation and models for posttranscriptional gene-silencing. Plant Mol. Biol 43:261-273[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 22. | Mette, M. F., W. Aufsatz, J. van der Winden, M. A. Matzke, and A. J. Matzke. 2000. Transcriptional silencing and promoter methylation triggered by double-stranded RNA. EMBO J. 19:5194-5201[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 23. | Muskens, M. W., A. P. Vissers, J. N. Mol, and J. M. Kooter. 2000. Role of inverted DNA repeats in transcriptional and posttranscriptional gene silencing. Plant Mol. Biol. 43:243-260[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 24. | Parrish, S., J. Fleenor, S. Xu, C. Mello, and A. Fire. 2000. Functional anatomy of a dsRNA trigger: differential requirement for the two trigger strands in RNA interference. Mol. Cell 6:1077-1087[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 25. | Radecke, F., P. Spielhofer, H. Schneider, K. Kaelin, M. Huber, C. Dotsch, G. Christiansen, and M. A. Billeter. 1995. Rescue of measles viruses from cloned DNA. EMBO J. 14:5773-5784[Medline]. |
| 26. |
Sharp, P. A.
2001.
RNA interference 2001.
Genes Dev.
15:485-490 |
| 27. |
Sharp, P. A., and P. D. Zamore.
2000.
Molecular biology: RNA interference.
Science
287:2431-2433 |
| 28. | Smardon, A., J. M. Spoerke, S. C. Stacey, M. E. Klein, N. Mackin, and E. M. Maine. 2000. EGO-1 is related to RNA-directed RNA polymerase and functions in germ-line development and RNA interference in C. elegans. Curr. Biol. 10:169-178[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 29. | Stam, M., R. de Bruin, R. van R. Blokland. A. van der Hoorn, J. N. Mol, and J. M. Kooter. 2000. Distinct features of posttranscriptional gene silencing by antisense transgenes in single copy and inverted T-DNA repeat loci. Plant J. 21:27-42. |
| 30. | Svoboda, P., P. Stein, H. Hayashi, and R. M. Schultz. 2000. Selective reduction of dormant maternal mRNAs in mouse oocytes by RNA interference. Development 127:4147-4156[Abstract]. |
| 31. |
Tuschl, T.,
P. D. Zamore,
R. Lehmann,
D. P. Bartel, and P. A. Sharp.
1999.
Targeted mRNA degradation by double-stranded RNA in vitro.
Genes Dev.
13:3191-3197 |
| 32. | Ui-Tei, K., S. Zenno, Y. Miyata, and K. Saigo. 2000. Sensitive assay of RNA interference in Drosophila and Chinese hamster cultured cells using firefly luciferase gene as target. FEBS Lett. 479:79-82[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 33. | Vaucheret, H., and M. Fagard. 2001. Transcriptional gene silencing in plants: targets, inducers and regulators. Trends Genet. 17:29-35[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 34. | Wargelius, A., S. Ellingsen, and A. Fjose. 1999. Double-stranded RNA induces specific developmental defects in zebrafish embryos. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 263:156-161[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 35. | Wianny, F., and M. Zernicka-Goetz. 2000. Specific interference with gene function by double-stranded RNA in early mouse development. Nat. Cell Biol. 2:70-75[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 36. | Yang, D., H. Lu, and J. W. Erickson. 2000. Evidence that processed small dsRNAs may mediate sequence-specific mRNA degradation during RNAi in Drosophila embryos. Curr. Biol. 10:1191-1200[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 37. | Zamore, P. D., T. Tuschl, P. A. Sharp, and D. P. Bartel. 2000. RNAi: double-stranded RNA directs the ATP-dependent cleavage of mRNA at 21 to 23 nucleotide intervals. Cell 101:25-33[CrossRef][Medline]. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| ||||||||