Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Molecular and Cellular Biology, December 2001, p. 8007-8021, Vol. 21, No. 23
Division of Biology, California Institute of
Technology, Pasadena, California 91125,1 and
Renal Unit, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston,
Massachusetts 021152
Received 6 June 2001/Accepted 6 September 2001
The N-end rule relates the in vivo half-life of a protein to the
identity of its N-terminal residue. In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the UBR1-encoded ubiquitin ligase
(E3) of the N-end rule pathway mediates the targeting of substrate
proteins in part through binding to their destabilizing N-terminal
residues. The functions of the yeast N-end rule pathway include
fidelity of chromosome segregation and the regulation of peptide
import. Our previous work described the cloning of cDNA and a gene
encoding the 200-kDa mouse UBR1 (E3 Many biological processes are
regulated by circuits that involve conditionally or constitutively
short-lived proteins. Features of proteins that confer metabolic
instability are called degradation signals, or degrons (16, 36,
72). The essential component of one degradation signal, termed
the N-degron, is a destabilizing N-terminal residue of a protein
(3, 71). A set of amino acid residues that are
destabilizing in a given cell yields a rule, called the N-end rule,
which relates the in vivo half-life of a protein to the identity of its
N-terminal residue. Variants of the underlying proteolytic system,
called the N-end rule pathway, are present in all organisms examined,
from mammals and plants to fungi and prokaryotes (51, 71).
In eukaryotes, an N-degron consists of two determinants: a
destabilizing N-terminal residue and an internal lysine of a substrate protein (4, 29, 66). The recognition of N-degron by the targeting machinery involves stochastic selection of second-determinant Lys residues from among the substrate's sterically suitable lysines (4, 29, 66). This Lys residue is the site of formation of
a substrate-linked multiubiquitin (multi-Ub) chain (10, 48, 78). The N-end rule pathway is, thus, one pathway of the Ub system (15, 20, 24-26, 57). Ub is a 76-residue protein
whose covalent conjugation to other proteins plays a role in a vast range of biological processes, including cell growth, division, differentiation, and responses to stress (24, 26, 49, 74). In most of these processes, Ub acts through routes that involve processive degradation of Ub-protein conjugates by the 26S proteasome, an ATP-dependent protease (14, 52, 75).
The N-end rule has a hierarchic structure. In the yeast
Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Asn and Gln are tertiary
destabilizing N-terminal residues in that they function through their
deamidation, by the NTA1-encoded N-terminal amidase
(Nt-amidase), to yield the secondary destabilizing N-terminal residues
Asp and Glu (6, 63). The destabilizing activity of
N-terminal Asp and Glu requires their conjugation, by the
ATE1-encoded Arg-tRNA-protein transferase (R-transferase),
to Arg, one of the primary destabilizing residues (7, 40,
71) (Fig. 1). These latter
residues are bound directly by UBR1 (N-recognin), the E3 (recognition)
component of the N-end rule pathway. S. cerevisiae UBR1 is a
225-kDa E3 which binds to potential N-end rule substrates through its
type 1 and type 2 substrate-binding sites. The type 1 site binds the
basic N-terminal residues Arg, Lys, and His. The type 2 site binds the
bulky hydrophobic N-terminal residues Phe, Leu, Trp, Tyr, and Ile
(34, 71) (Fig. 1). S. cerevisiae UBR1 also
contains a third substrate-binding site which targets proteins such as
CUP9 and GPA1 through their internal (non-N-terminal) degrons (9,
56, 68). The UBR1-encoded E3, in a complex with the
RAD6-encoded E2 (Ub-conjugating) enzyme, catalyzes the
synthesis of a substrate-linked multi-Ub chain (17, 71)
and may also mediate the delivery of substrates to the 26S proteasome
(80). UBR1 contains a functionally essential RING-H2 domain (79), a feature of many otherwise distinct E3s
(28, 70, 78).
0270-7306/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/MCB.21.23.8007-8021.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Construction and Analysis of Mouse Strains Lacking the
Ubiquitin Ligase UBR1 (E3
) of the N-End Rule Pathway

![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
). Here we show that mouse UBR1,
in the presence of a cognate mouse ubiquitin-conjugating (E2) enzyme, can rescue the N-end rule pathway in ubr1
S.
cerevisiae. We also constructed
UBR1
/
mouse strains that lacked the UBR1
protein. UBR1
/
mice were viable and
fertile but weighed significantly less than congenic +/+ mice. The
decreased mass of UBR1
/
mice stemmed at
least in part from smaller amounts of the skeletal muscle and adipose
tissues. The skeletal muscle of UBR1
/
mice apparently lacked the N-end rule pathway and exhibited abnormal regulation of fatty acid synthase upon starvation. By contrast, and
despite the absence of the UBR1 protein,
UBR1
/
fibroblasts contained the N-end
rule pathway. Thus, UBR1
/
mice are
mosaics in regard to the activity of this pathway, owing to
differential expression of proteins that can substitute for the
ubiquitin ligase UBR1 (E3
). We consider these UBR1-like proteins and
discuss the functions of the mammalian N-end rule pathway.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

View larger version (32K):
[in a new window]
FIG. 1.
(A) The N-end rule pathway in mammals (12, 32,
33). N-terminal residues are indicated by single-letter
abbreviations for amino acids. The ovals denote the rest of a protein
substrate. The Asn-specific N-terminal amidase
(NtN-amidase) NTAN1 converts N-terminal Asn into Asp
(19, 32). N-terminal Gln is deamidated by a distinct
NtQ-amidase, NTAQ1, which remains to be characterized. In
mammals, the secondary destabilizing N-terminal residues Asp, Glu, and
Cys are arginylated by the Arg-tRNA-protein transferases
(R-transferases) encoded by ATE1 (33 and
Y. T. Kwon, A. Kashina, and A. Varshavsky, unpublished data). The
set of primary destabilizing N-terminal residues
Arg, Lys, His, Phe,
Leu, Trp, Tyr, and Ile
is recognized in mammals by at least three
distinct E3 enzymes of similar binding specificities, including the
UBR1-encoded E3
and UBR2 (see Discussion). N-terminal
Ala, Ser, and Thr are primary destabilizing residues in mammals but are
stabilizing residues in S. cerevisiae (18,
22). An E3 that recognizes these N-terminal residues remains to
be characterized. In mammals, either of the two highly similar
Ub-conjugating (E2) enzymes, HR6A and HR6B (E214K), can be
a component of E2-E3 complexes (Ub ligases) that mediate ubiquitylation
of N-end rule substrates. The term "Ub ligase" is used to denote
either an E2-E3 complex or its specific E3 component. A targeted,
multi-Ub chain-bearing substrate is degraded by the 26S proteasome. (B)
The N-end rule pathway in the yeast S. cerevisiae
differs from its mammalian counterpart by the presence of a single
Nt-amidase, NTA1, which mediates deamidation of N-terminal Asn or Gln
(6) by Cys being a stabilizing residue; by the absence of
E3 that recognizes N-terminal Ala, Ser, and Thr; and by the presence of
a single E3, UBR1, that recognizes other primary destabilizing
N-terminal residues (71).
The term Ub ligase denotes either an E2-E3 complex or its E3 component. The numerous proteolytic pathways of the Ub system have in common their dependence on Ub conjugation and the proteasome and differ largely through their utilization of distinct E2-E3 complexes. The RAD6-UBR1 (E2-E3) Ub ligase of the N-end rule pathway is one example of such a complex. Specific E3s recognize (bind to) specific degrons of their protein substrates. The diversity of E3s underlies the enormous range of substrates that are recognized and destroyed by the Ub system in ways that are regulated both temporally and spatially. There are dozens of E3s in S. cerevisiae and possibly hundreds of distinct E3s in mammals (78).
In contrast to yeast, where N-terminal Asn and Gln are deamidated by a
single Nt-amidase, in mammals there are two enzymes, NtN-amidase and
NtQ-amidase, which are specific for N-terminal
Asn and Gln, respectively (19, 32, 64) (Fig. 1). In
vertebrates, the set of secondary destabilizing residues contains not
only Asp and Glu but also Cys, the latter being a stabilizing residue
in the yeast N-end rule (11, 18). The two known species of
mammalian R-transferase, ATE1-1 and ATE1-2, are produced through
alternative splicing of ATE1 pre-mRNA (33). The
substrate specificities of ATE1-1 and ATE1-2 are similar to those of
the ATE1-encoded R-transferase of S. cerevisiae
in that they can arginylate N-terminal Asp and Glu but cannot
arginylate N-terminal Cys (33). However, recent work
revealed that mouse ATE1
/
cells are
incapable of arginylating any of the three secondary destabilizing
N-terminal residues
Asp, Glu, and Cys (Y. T. Kwon, A. Kashina, I. Davydov, and A. Varshavsky, unpublished data).
The known functions of the N-end rule pathway include the control of peptide import in S. cerevisiae through the conditional degradation of CUP9, a transcriptional repressor of the peptide transporter PTR2 (1, 9, 68). It remains to be determined whether the N-end rule pathway has similar import-regulating functions in prokaryotes and multicellular eukaryotes. The S. cerevisiae N-end rule pathway is also essential for chromosome stability, through degradation, at the metaphase-anaphase transition, of a fragment of cohesin complexes that hold together sister chromatids (51). Given the evolutionary conservation of separase and cohesin (76), this function of the yeast N-end rule pathway may be relevant to other eukaryotes as well.
Besides CUP9 and SCC1, several other proteins were also found to be
substrates of the N-end rule pathway. These proteins include Sindbis
virus RNA polymerase (and homologous polymerases of other alphaviruses)
(13), HIV integrase (45), a bacterial
protein, p60, which is secreted by Listeria monocytogenes
into the cytosol of infected mammalian cells (59), the
mammalian GTPase-accelerating (GAP) proteins RGS4 and RGS16
(12), the S. cerevisiae GPA1-encoded G
protein (43, 56), and the encephalomyocarditis (EMC) virus 3C protease (37). Physiological functions, if any, of the
degradation of these proteins by the N-end rule pathway are either
unknown or have not been established definitively.
In yeast only one E3, encoded by UBR1, mediates the
recognition of substrates by the N-end rule pathway (8,
71). Studies of the Ub-dependent proteolysis in rabbit
reticulocyte extracts suggested that the same may be true in mammalian
cells, since only one E3 of the N-end rule pathway, called E3
, was
apparent in these extracts (23). However, the cloning of
cDNA and genes encoding mouse UBR1 (E3
) indicated the
existence of at least two UBR1 homologs in the mouse (and
human) genome, termed UBR2 and UBR3
(35). The sequences of UBR2 and UBR3
cDNAs and genes (Y. T. Kwon, T. Tasaki, and A. Varshavsky,
unpublished data) suggested that at least mouse UBR2 may functionally
overlap with UBR1. To address this and related questions, we initiated
genetic and biochemical dissection of the UBR protein family in the
mouse. In the present study, the first in a projected series, we
constructed and analyzed mouse strains lacking UBR1.
| |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Strains and plasmids.
The S. cerevisiae strains
used were JD52 (MATa ura3-52 his3-
200
leu2-3,112 trp1-
63 lys2-801) (30) and the
ubr1
strain AVY107 (MATa ura3-52
his3-
200 leu2-3,112 trp1-
63 lys2-801
ubr1
::myc3) (H. Rao and A. Varshavsky, unpublished data). Cells were grown in rich medium
(yeast-peptone-dextrose) or in synthetic glucose-containing
medium (standard-dextrose [SD]) (58). The pUB23-X
plasmids (X = Arg, Leu, or Met) (3) were used for expressing Ub-X-
-galactosidase (
gal) proteins from the
galactose-inducible PGAL promoter.
Transformation of S. cerevisiae was performed using the
lithium acetate method (2).
Construction of mouse strains lacking UBR1.
BAC3, a BAC
clone containing the mouse UBR1 gene (35), was
the source of homology arms. The 7.0-kb ClaI-NsiI
fragment of BAC3 (encompassing exons 3 and 4) and the 1,670-bp
PvuII-NsiI fragment (encompassing exons 6 to 8)
were used as the long and short homology arms of the targeting vector,
respectively. These fragments were inserted into pPGK-SA containing a
PGK/neo cassette and a PGK/TK cassette (32), yielding
pUBR1-KO (Fig. 2A). The ClaI-linearized targeting vector (Fig. 2A) was
electroporated into CJ7 embryonic stem (ES) cells (derived from the
mouse strain 129/SvJ) (2). Selection with G418 (at 0.4 mg/ml) and 1-(2'-deoxy, 2'fluoro-
-D-arabinofuranosyl)-5-iodouracil
(FIAU; at 0.4 µM) was started 24 h after electroporation.
Correctly targeted ES cells were identified by PCR and Southern
hybridization by using the 5' and 3' probes (Fig. 2A to C). Cells of
the 10 independent ES cell clones were injected into 3.5-days
postcoitum C57BL/6J blastocysts. The resulting male chimeras were bred
with C57BL/6J females to test for germline transmission of the mutated
UBR1 gene. The UBR1+/
mice
resulting from this cross (5 of 10 independent ES clones were found to
populate the germline in these tests) were intercrossed to produce
UBR1
/
mice in the mixed 129/C57 strain
background. Alternatively, the initial male chimeras were mated with
129/SvEv females, yielding, through the analogous procedures,
UBR1
/
mice in the strain 129 background. For genotyping the tail-derived DNA was analyzed by PCR or
digested with either SphI or BamHI and analyzed
by Southern hybridization. The 0.8- and 1.1-kb PCR-produced fragments
(indicated in Fig. 2A) were used as the 5' and 3' Southern hybridization probes, respectively.
|
Cloning of the mouse HR6A cDNA.
We searched
GenBank's expressed sequence tag (EST) database for a close
mouse homolog of the mouse E214K Ub-conjugating
enzyme (m HR6B, accession no. U57690). A putative amino acid sequence deduced from EST clones was 95% identical to that of mouse HR6B (E214K). The corresponding full-length cDNA was
amplified by reverse transcription (RT)-PCR using total RNA isolated
from skeletal muscle (33). First-strand cDNA was
synthesized using Superscript II polymerase (GIBCO, Frederick, Md.),
and PCR was carried out using primers specific for the 5' end
(GGCGGATCCTGAGCCCGCTAAAGCC

Subcloning and expression of mouse UBR1 cDNA in
S. cerevisiae.
Because the mouse UBR1 cDNA
was toxic to all of the tested Escherichia coli strains
(data not shown), we subcloned it directly in S. cerevisiae.
An AnfII (blunt-ended)/ClaI-produced cDNA
fragment containing the 5.3-kb mouse UBR1 ORF in the MR26
plasmid (35) was ligated to
SmaI/ClaI-cut p414-MET25. The ligation mixture was used to transform the ubr1
S. cerevisiae strain
AVY107 on SD plates lacking Trp, followed by incubation at 30°C for 3 to 4 days. Selected transformants were grown in SD (lacking Trp) liquid
medium, followed by isolation of the plasmid DNA and by PCR screening
for the presence of full-length UBR1 ORF. The resulting plasmid, pMET414-mUBR1, expressed the 200-kDa mouse UBR1 in S. cerevisiae.
Assay of
gal activity and pulse-chase analysis in S.
cerevisiae.
For the assay of
gal activity, S. cerevisiae cells in a 5-ml culture
(A600 of ~1) were pelleted by
centrifugation and resuspended in 5 ml of buffer Z (10 mM KCl, 1 mM
MgSO4, 50 mM
-mercaptoethanol, 60 mM
Na2HPO4, 40 mM
NaH2PO4 [pH 7.0]). After
determining the A600 of the
suspension, 50- or 100-µl samples were diluted to 1 ml with buffer Z,
and 0.1% SDS (20 µl) and CHCl3 (50 µl) were then added; the suspension was vortexed for 10 to 15 s and
incubated for 15 min at 30°C, followed by the addition of 0.2 ml of
o-nitrophenyl-
-D-galactopyranoside (ONPG) (4 mg/ml in buffer Z) and incubation at 30°C, until a
medium-yellow color had developed, at which point the reaction was
stopped by the addition of 1 M
Na2CO3 (0.4 ml). The
mixture was centrifuged for 5 min at 1,100 × g, and
A420 and
A500 of the samples were measured. The
ONPG units (UONPG) of
gal activity were
calculated as follows: UONPG = 1,000 × [(A420)
(1.75 × A500)]/(t) × (v) × (A600), where
(t) and (v) were the time of incubation (min) and
the sample volume (ml), respectively.
gal
antibody (Promega, Madison, Wis.).
Overexpression, labeling, and purification of
Ub-X-eK-DHFR-His6 proteins.
A
pT7-UbXeKDHFRhis plasmid (X = Met, Arg, or
Phe) (11) was transformed into E. coli
BL21(DE3) (2). Following the addition of
isopropyl-1-thio-
-D-galactopyranoside (IPTG),
the cells were labeled with
35S-methionine-cysteine
(35S-EXPRESS; New England Nuclear) as described
previously (32). The cells were collected by
centrifugation and disrupted by sonication, and
35S-labeled
Ub-eK-DHFR-His6 (Ub-X-DHFR)
test proteins were purified by affinity chromatography under
nondenaturing conditions by using the Ni-NTA Spin Kit (Qiagen,
Chatsworth, Calif.). The eluted proteins were dialyzed against a
solution containing 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM
dithiothreitol (DTT), 0.1 M Tris-HCl (pH 7.7) and were rapidly frozen
and stored at
80°C in samples that were to be thawed just once. The
specific radioactivity of [35S]Ub-X-DHFR
proteins was 5 × 105 to 10 × 105 cpm/µg.
Extracts of skeletal muscle and embryonic fibroblast (EF)
cells.
To prepare muscle extracts, leg muscles from three to six
+/+ male mice or their littermate (also male)
UBR1
/
counterparts (strain 129 background) were combined and homogenized in 20 mM Tris (pH 7.6)
containing 1 mM
-mercaptoethanol, 1% glycerol, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM
EGTA, 50 µM chymostatin, and 50 µM E64 (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.)
using a rotor-stator homogenizer (Biospec Products, Bartlesville,
Okla.).
80°C in samples that were to
be thawed and used only once. The same procedures were employed to
prepare extracts from +/+ and UBR1
/
EF
cells, except that a Dounce homogenizer was used to disrupt the cells.
In vitro proteolysis and Ub conjugation assays.
Degradation
assays were carried out in samples of 0.1 ml containing the following
components: 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.6), 5 mM MgCl2,
2 mM DTT, ATP-regenerating system (10 µg of creatine phosphokinase and 10 mM creatine phosphate), 1 mM ATP, 25 µg of purified Ub, 50 µM bestatin, a dipeptide at 2 mM (when present), ~0.5 mg of dialyzed whole-cell extract, and a 35S-labeled
X-DHFR (X-eK-DHFR-His6)
test substrate, produced from
Ub-X-eK-DHFR-His6 through
the cleavage by deubiquitylating enzymes (DUBs) in the extract. The
following dipeptides were used: Lys-Ala, Ala-Lys, Phe-Ala, and Ala-Phe
(Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.). Dipeptides were stored at
20°C at 0.5 M in
10 mM K-HEPES, pH 7.5. Bestatin (Sigma) was added to decrease
degradation of dipeptides in the extract (12, 53). Control
experiments (not shown) showed that the addition of bestatin alone did
not significantly inhibit the degradation of test proteins by the N-end
rule pathway. In some experiments the reaction mixtures were incubated
for 10 min without ATP, followed by the addition of ATP and an
ATP-regenerating system. Incubations were carried out at 37°C.
Samples of 10 µl were withdrawn in the course of incubation, and the
degradation of [35S]Ub-X-DHFR proteins was
assessed by measuring 5% trichloroacetic acid (TCA)-soluble
35S as follows:
|
-lactalbumin (~150,000 cpm,
~1 µM) and unlabeled Ub (50 µM) in buffer A (20 mM Tris-HCl [pH
7.6], 20 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 2 mM AMP-PNP, 1 mM
DTT, 30 µM MG132 [Sigma], and 10% glycerol). Samples (20 µl)
were incubated at 37°C for 1 h. The reactions were terminated by the
addition of 5× Laemmli sample buffer (6 µl) (2)
followed by SDS-13% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) and
quantitation by using PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale,
Calif.). To assay Ub conjugation to endogenous muscle proteins,
fraction II (35 µg of protein) was incubated with
125I-Ub (~150,000 cpm, 5 to 10 µM) in buffer
A for 1 h at 37°C, followed by SDS-PAGE analysis as described above.
Purified E214K(C88S), a dominant-negative
inhibitor of UBR1 (E3
) (65), or Lys-Ala, a type 1 dipeptide inhibitor of UBR1 (18), was added to some of the
assays. Human
-lactalbumin was radioiodinated by using the
chloramine T method (61).
Antibodies to mouse UBR1 and immunoblotting
Rabbit polyclonal antibodies to mouse UBR1 were raised against the
synthetic peptides EMDPDLEKQEESVQ (UBR1 residues 54 to 67; antibody
UBR1 [1-1]), HEPGRAGTTKESLH (UBR1 residues 66 to 179; antibody
UBR1 [2-1]), and EYLDRNNKFNFQGYSQDK (UBR1 residues 451 to
468; antibody UBR1 [3-1]). The antibodies were affinity-purified using immobilized peptides. The sequence of the second peptide (antibody UBR1 [2-1]) was in the region of UBR1 that was absent from
the UBR1
allele.
Immortalization of embryonic fibroblasts, transfection, and
pulse-chase analysis.
Primary EFs were isolated from 13.5-day old
(E13.5) +/+ and littermate UBR1
/
embryos of the mixed (129/C57) genetic background as described previously (32, 54). EFs were grown in Dulbecco's
modified Eagle medium-F12 medium (GIBCO) supplemented with 15% fetal
bovine serum, antibiotics, and 2 mM L-glutamine.
Permanent cell lines were established from primary EFs through
crisis-mediated immortalization over 2 months by replating, every 3 days, ~1.5 × 106 cells onto a
10-cm-diameter plate. DNA transfection efficiency was
considerably higher with immortalized EFs than with primary EFs (data
not shown).
/
EF cell
lines were transiently transfected, using Lipofectamine (GIBCO), with
pRC/dhaUbXnsP4
gal (X = Met, Arg, or Phe) expressing the fusion
proteins
DHFRh-UbR48-X-nsP4
gal
(superscript "h" denotes the ha epitope [2])
from the PCMV promoter. These and
analogous Ub/protein/reference (UPR)-based fusions (39,
66) are cotranslationally cleaved in vivo at the Ub-protein
junction, yielding, in the present case, the reference protein
DHFRh-UbR48 (DHFR-Ub) and a
test protein X-nsP4
gal (see Results). Similarly, the transfected
plasmids pcDNA3-flag-DHFR-ha-Ub-X-nsP4-flag (X = Met, Arg, or Tyr)
expressed
fDHFRh-UbR48
(DHFR-Ub) and X-nsP4f (X-nsP4) (full-length nsP4
of the Sindbis virus bearing N-terminal Met, Arg, or Tyr) (superscript
f denotes the flag epitope) (2). The latter plasmids were
produced by subcloning PCR-produced SmaI-XbaI fragments encoding X-nsP4-flag into EheI-XbaI-cut
UPR vector pcDNA3(dEheI)FDHUMCM (J. Sheng and A. Varshavsky,
unpublished data) encoding
fDHFRh-UbR48.
About 24 h after transfection cells were labeled with
35S-methionine-cysteine
(35S-EXPRESS; New England Nuclear), followed by
chases for 0, 1, and 2 h in the presence of cycloheximide,
preparation of extracts, immunoprecipitation, SDS-10% PAGE,
autoradiography, and quantitation using a PhosphorImager, essentially
as described previously (32, 39, 66). Cells expressing
X-
-gal(X-nsP4
gal) tests were labeled for 1 h without a
chase and then processed as above.
Blood plasma measurements.
UBR1
/
mice (in the inbred strain 129 background) and their congenic +/+ littermates (produced through
matings of UBR1+/
mice) were used. The
experiments were performed twice (experiments 1 and 2), with 28 pairs
of animals total. Blood from 12 pairs of mice, with water and chow diet
ad libitum, was collected before fasting. Blood from 8 pairs of mice
was collected after 24 h of food deprivation (from 10 a.m. to
10 a.m., with free access to water). Blood from 8 pairs of mice
was collected after 24 h of fasting followed by 24 h of
refeeding, with chow diet ad libitum. Body weights were determined
before and after fasting and refeeding. Blood was withdrawn by cardiac
puncture (~0.6 ml per animal) and transferred into heparin-coated
tubes. The plasma fraction was prepared by centrifugation immediately
thereafter, quickly frozen, and stored at
70°C before the
measurements. The levels of glucose, triglycerides, and cholesterol,
together with sodium, potassium, chloride, calcium, phosphorus, blood
urea nitrogen, creatine, total protein, albumin, total bilirubin,
aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT),
alkaline phosphatase, and
-glutamyltransferase (GGT) were determined
by the Biomedical Testing Services (San Diego, Calif.) by using a
Vitros 950 chemistry analyzer (Johnson and Johnson, Rochester, N.Y.).
Two independent experiments, 1 and 2, yielded average values that
differed by, at most, 1% of the measured values for sodium, potassium,
and chloride, 6.4% for calcium and phosphorus, 3.2% for glucose,
5.3% for triglycerides and cholesterol, and 13% for albumin, urea
nitrogen, total protein, GGT, AST, and ALT. The level of glucose was
independently determined by the hexokinase/G6PD method, using a
commercial kit (Sigma).
Double-mutant NTAN1
/
UBR1
/
mouse strains.
NTAN1
/
mice (32) of the
129Sv background (129SvJ/129SvEv) and
UBR1
/
mice of the mixed (129SvJ and
C57BL/6) background were mated to produce F1 progeny
heterozygous for both genes. Siblings were then intercrossed to
produce, in particular, the NTAN1
/
UBR1
/
progeny, as determined by using
PCR and tail-derived DNA, with primers specific for NTAN1
(32) and UBR1 (Fig. 2A and B).
Other methods.
For Northern hybridization, total RNA was
isolated from the brain, testis, skeletal muscle, and EF cells of +/+
and UBR1
/
mice as described previously
(32). RNA was fractionated by electrophoresis in
formaldehyde-1% agarose gels, blotted onto Hybond
N+ membranes (Amersham), and hybridized with
32P-labeled cDNA probes (2). The
fasting and refeeding protocols for Northern analysis were identical to
those used for plasma chemistry measurements, except that fasting and
refeeding were carried out for 48 and 24 h, respectively. For
histological examination tissues and organs were fixed in Bouin's
fixative or 10% buffered formalin, paraffin embedded, sectioned, and
either stained with hematoxylin and eosin or assayed for apoptosis by
using the terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase-mediated dUTP-biotin
nick end labeling (TUNEL) technique and an in situ cell death detection
kit (Boehringer Mannheim), with fluorescein-dUTP. For behavioral tests,
the strain 129 UBR1
/
mice and their
congenic +/+ littermates (produced through matings of
UBR1+/
mice) were used. The rotarod,
weight retention, and coat-hanger tests were performed as described
previously (32).
Nucleotide sequence accession number. The nucleotide sequence of mouse HR6A cDNA was submitted to GenBank with accession no. AF383148.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Mouse UBR1, in the presence of cognate mouse E2, rescues the N-end
rule pathway in ubr1
S. cerevisiae
The amino
acid sequence encoded by the mouse UBR1 ORF contained
all 14 sequences of peptide-size UBR1 fragments isolated from two
independently produced preparations of rabbit E3
(35), indicating that mouse UBR1 was, in fact, E3
, the N-recognin of the
N-end rule pathway. To verify directly whether mouse UBR1 could
function as N-recognin in vivo, we asked whether its expression in
ubr1
S. cerevisiae, which lacked the N-end rule
pathway, could rescue the pathway in these cells. Since the full-length
mouse UBR1 cDNA was found to be toxic to E.
coli, we constructed a mouse UBR1-expessing plasmid directly in
S. cerevisiae (see Materials and Methods).
ubr1
S. cerevisiae, which lacked S.
cerevisiae UBR1 but retained RAD6, the UBR1-interacting E2
enzyme of the N-end rule pathway (71), were cotransformed
with a pair of plasmids that expressed mouse UBR1 from the
PMET25 promoter and one of three test
proteins, expressed as Ub-X-
gal fusions (X = Arg, Leu, or Met).
In eukaryotes, Ub fusions are cleaved cotranslationally by DUBs after
the last residue of the Ub moiety (69, 73). With
Ub-X-
gals, this cleavage yielded X-
gal proteins bearing either
Arg, Leu, or Met at their N termini. Arg and Leu are, respectively, type 1 and type 2 primary destabilizing residues in the N-end rule. Met
is a stabilizing residue (71).
gal protein
is a sensitive measure of its metabolic stability (17, 33,
42). The relative levels of X-
gals in S. cerevisiae were determined by measuring the enzymatic activity of
gal in yeast extracts. We found that the activity of Arg-
gal and
Leu-
-gal in extracts from ubr1
cells expressing mouse
UBR1 was reproducibly ~20% lower than that in control
ubr1
extracts, whereas the activity of Met-
gal was not
affected by the presence of mouse UBR1 (Fig. 3A and data not shown). In addition, a
~90-kDa, long-lived
gal cleavage product that is specific for
short-lived X-
gal test proteins (3) was observed in
pulse-chase assays with S. cerevisiae that coexpressed
Arg-
gal and mouse UBR1 but not with Arg-
gal in the absence of
mouse UBR1 (data not shown). The detectable but low N-recognin activity
of mouse UBR1 in S. cerevisiae may be caused by a poor fit
between the yeast RAD6-encoded E2 enzyme and the mouse
counterpart of yeast UBR1. Therefore we asked whether coexpression of
mouse HR6B (E214K), a homolog of S. cerevisiae RAD6, could increase the activity of mouse UBR1 in
yeast without decreasing its specificity. Indeed, coexpression of mHR6B
and mouse UBR1 increased the activity of the N-end rule pathway in ubr1
S. cerevisiae (Fig. 3A). Koken et al.
(31) described a human E2 enzyme, termed HR6A, whose
deduced sequence was 95% identical to that of human HR6B
(E214K). We used RT-PCR to isolate a cDNA encoding the mouse counterpart (mHR6A) of human HR6A. The deduced sequence of mHR6A was 95% identical to that of the mouse HR6B (E214K) enzyme and 99% identical to the sequence
of human HR6A (data not shown). The mouse HR6A E2 enzyme was found to
be indistinguishable from mHR6B (E214K) in its
ability to cooperate with mouse UBR1 in mediating the activity of the
N-end rule pathway in ubr1
S. cerevisiae (Fig. 3A). No
additional enhancement of the N-end rule pathway's activity was
observed upon coexpression of mouse UBR1, mHR6A, and mHR6B (Fig. 3A).
Thus, both mHR6A and mHR6B (E214K) are likely to
be the cognate E2 components of the UBR1-containing Ub ligase.
|
gal concentrations
(Fig. 3A), were in agreement with direct (pulse-chase) assays under the
same conditions: significant degradation of Arg-
gal in ubr1
S. cerevisiae was observed only upon coexpression of mouse UBR1
and a cognate mouse E2 enzyme (Fig. 3C and D). The N-end rule
pathway's activity conferred on ubr1
S. cerevisiae through a combination of mouse UBR1 and a cognate E2 enzyme (mHR6A or
mHR6B) was significant but much lower than the activity of this pathway
in wild-type (UBR1) S. cerevisiae (Fig. 3A). This is not surprising, given the evolutionary distance between fungi and
mammals and the likely presence of substrate targeting steps in the
yeast N-end rule pathway that can be compromised through interactions
with a mammalian version of Ub ligase.
In contrast to yeast, where primary destabilizing residues are either
of type 1 or of type 2 (see the introduction), there are also type 3 N-end rule substrates in mammals. The substrates of this latter class
bear N-terminal Ala, Ser, or Thr (18) and are recognized
by a distinct E3, termed E3
(22). The molecular identity of E3
is unknown. We asked whether mouse UBR1, in the presence of either mHR6A or mHR6B (E214K), could
mediate degradation of the type 3 N-end rule substrates Ala-
gal,
Ser-
gal, or Thr-
gal in ubr1
S. cerevisiae. (These
proteins are long-lived in either wild-type or ubr1
yeast
[71].) The results (Fig. 3B) indicated that mouse UBR1
lacked the activity of E3
Ub ligase.
Construction of UBR1
/
mice.
In
the deletion-2 disruption allele of mouse UBR1, exons
4 to 6 were replaced by a neo cassette (Fig. 2A). Exons 4 to
6 encompassed a region of high sequence conservation between the
S. cerevisiae and mouse UBR1 proteins (35).
Moreover, these exons encompassed amino acid positions that were
previously found to be essential for the integrity of the type 1 substrate-binding site (Gly147 and
Asp150) and the type 2 site
(Asp233 and His236) in
S. cerevisiae UBR1. Specifically, mutations of these
residues greatly impaired the activity of yeast UBR1 in mediating
degradation of either type 1 or type 2 N-end rule substrates (A. Webster, M. Ghislain, and A. Varshavsky, unpublished data). Of the
~1,000 ES cell clones resistant to both G418 and FIAU, 33 clones
contained the expected deletion or disruption (Fig. 2A), as verified by
PCR and Southern analyses (data not shown). Ten of these correctly
targeted ES cell clones were used to generate male chimeras, and in
five of them the UBR1
allele was
transmitted through the germ line. Male chimeras were mated with either
129/SvEv or C57BL/6 females, yielding
UBR1+/
heterozygotes. Intercrosses of
UBR1+/
mice produced
UBR1
/
progeny (Fig.
4B) at the expected Mendelian frequency
of ~25%. In addition, examination of embryos from heterozygous
matings did not suggest a significantly increased embryonic lethality of UBR1
/
mice (data not shown). This,
and the evidence below that UBR1
/
mice
lacked the UBR1 protein, indicated that UBR1 was not required for
either mouse embryonic development or postnatal viability.
|
/
mice was
verified by using both PCR and Southern analysis (Fig. 2B and C).
Northern analysis with a UBR1 cDNA-derived probe containing
exclusively the region deleted in the
UBR1
allele did not detect
UBR1-specific transcripts in the brain, testis, and liver of
UBR1
/
mice (Fig. 2D, gel a). By
contrast, a UBR1 probe that encompassed both the deleted
region and the 3'-flanking (undeleted) region of UBR1 cDNA
detected UBR1-specific transcripts in both +/+ and UBR1
/
tissues (Fig. 2D, gel b). The
latter transcripts were smaller than +/+ ones (Fig. 2D, gel b)
and were presumably the aberrantly spliced RNAs transcribed from the
PUBR1 promoter. To determine whether a
version of UBR1 protein was present in
UBR1
/
tissues, we carried out
immunoblot analyses with different antibodies to mouse UBR1 (see
Materials and Methods). With SDS-PAGE-fractionated extracts from the
liver, skeletal muscle, and EF cells, these antibodies detected the
band of expected (~200 kDa) size in +/+ tissues but not in their
UBR1
/
counterparts (Fig. 2E and Fig.
5B and data not shown), indicating that
UBR1
/
mice (Fig. 4B) lacked the UBR1
protein.
|
Expression of mRNAs encoding components of the N-end rule pathway
and related proteins in UBR1
/
and +/+
mice.
Northern analysis was used to assess the levels of mouse
mRNAs encoding NTAN1, ATE1, mHR6B, UBR1 (E3
), and its homologs UBR2 and UBR3 (Fig. 5A). After a 48-h fast, the level of UBR1
mRNA in the +/+ muscle increased by ~2-fold, returning to
approximately basal levels 24 h after refeeding (Fig. 5A). The
levels of UBR2 and UBR3 mRNAs also increased upon
fasting. Expression of UBR2 mRNA returned to the basal (or
slightly higher) level 24 h after refeeding, but the level of
UBR3 mRNA remained high (Fig. 5A). The level of
UBR2 mRNA was reproducibly higher in the
UBR1
/
muscle under both normal and
fasting conditions (Fig. 5A), suggesting compensatory overexpression of
UBR2 in UBR1
/
mice. The
level of mRNA encoding mHR6B (E214K), one of
UBR1-interacting E2s (see above), changed in parallel with that of
UBR1. As to the N-end rule pathway's components upstream of
Ub ligase, the levels of ATE1 mRNA also increased upon
fasting, in contrast to that of NTAN1 mRNA. A Northern
survey of other tissues showed that the levels of NTAN1,
ATE1, and mHR6B mRNAs in the
UBR1
/
brain, testis, and liver did not
change significantly, except that the testis-specific NTAN1
transcript (1.1 kb) and ATE1 transcript (2 kb) were
decreased in UBR1
/
mice (Fig. 5C).
Extracts of UBR1
/
skeletal muscle
lack the N-end rule pathway, in contrast to +/+ extracts.
Previous
studies with ATP-supplemented extracts from the skeletal muscle of rats
and rabbits demonstrated the presence of the N-end rule pathway in the
muscle and also showed that this pathway was further induced during
muscle atrophy caused by tumors, sepsis, or diabetes (38, 60,
62). To assess the activity of the N-end rule pathway in
skeletal muscles of +/+ and UBR1
/
mice,
we measured the ATP-dependent degradation of model N-end rule
substrates in muscle extracts (Fig. 6).
The substrates used were
35S-labeled, purified Ub-X-DHFR proteins (X = Met, Arg, or Phe) (see Materials and Methods). Ub-X-DHFRs were
rapidly deubiquitylated in a muscle extract by ATP-independent DUBs,
yielding X-DHFR test proteins, similarly to the results with extracts
from other eukaryotic cells (12, 18). Arg-DHFR and
Phe-DHFR are, respectively, a type 1 and type 2 N-end rule substrates
(see the introduction), whereas Met-DHFR is not a substrate of the
N-end rule pathway. Degradation of X-DHFRs in ATP-supplemented +/+ and
UBR1
/
extracts was measured by
determining 5% TCA-soluble 35S. Although the
N-end rule-specific degradation of Arg-DHFR and Phe-DHFR was only
~2-fold above the background of nonspecific degradation (i.e., the
degradation of Met-DHFR), a much lower ratio than the one observed with
rabbit reticulocyte extracts and similar substrates (18, 23,
29), the specific degradation was reproducible in independent
experiments (data not shown). Moreover, the N-end rule specificity of
degradation could be independently verified by adding to an extract
dipeptides bearing either type 1 or type 2 destabilizing N-terminal
residues. These dipeptides act as specific inhibitors of either type 1 or type 2 substrate-binding sites of UBR1 (12, 18, 53).
|
/
muscle (Fig. 6A). Crucially, the
extent of degradation of Phe-DHFR in
UBR1
/
extract was essentially
indistinguishable from the level of background degradation observed
with Met-DHFR (not an N-end rule substrate) in either +/+ or
UBR1
/
extracts (Fig. 6A and data not
shown). Moreover, the addition of Phe-Ala dipeptide to +/+ extract
decreased the degradation of Phe-DHFR to background levels, whereas the
same peptide had no effect on the (already background-level)
degradation of Phe-DHFR in UBR1
/
extract (Fig. 6A). Ala-Phe, a dipeptide of the same composition but
bearing a type 3 destabilizing N-terminal residue, had no effect in
either +/+ or UBR1
/
extracts (Fig. 6D).
Finally, the addition of Lys-Ala dipeptide, bearing a type 1 destabilizing N-terminal residue, to +/+ extract enhanced the
degradation of Phe-DHFR (Fig. 6A), whereas the same dipeptide inhibited
the degradation of Arg-DHFR (Fig. 6B). These findings (Fig. 6A, B, and
D) reproduced, in a muscle extract, the previously observed phenomenon
of type 1 dipeptides enhancing the degradation of type 2 N-end rule
substrates either in vivo (5) or in reticulocyte extract
(18). Note that the addition of type 1 dipeptide to
UBR1
/
extract had no effect on the
(background) levels of degradation of either Arg-DHFR or Phe-DHFR in
this extract, in contrast to the effect of type 1 and type 2 dipeptides
on the same substrates in +/+ extract (Fig. 6A to D and data not shown).
We also measured, in +/+ and UBR1
/
extracts, the conjugation of Ub to 125I-labeled
human
-lactalbumin, a type 1 N-end rule substrate bearing N-terminal
Lys (23, 38). For these experiments, +/+ and
UBR1
/
muscle extracts were fractionated
by DEAE-cellulose chromatography to yield fraction II preparations,
which contained most of the Ub system, including components of the
N-end rule pathway, but lacked free Ub (23, 61). AMP-PNP
was used as the energy source in these assays because it supported the
activation of Ub by the E1 enzyme but could not be utilized by the 26S
proteasome (61). The conjugation of added Ub to
125I-labeled
-lactalbumin in fraction II from
+/+ muscle resulted, upon SDS-PAGE and autoradiography, in a smear of
multiubiquitylated
-lactalbumin derivatives (Fig. 5E, lane 2;
compare with lane 1). Previous work (65) has shown that
E214K(C88S), an active-site mutant of the
E214K (HR6B) Ub-conjugating enzyme, traps Ub in a
stable ester-bond complex (through a reaction mediated by E1 enzyme)
and therefore acts as a dominant-negative inhibitor of the
E3
-containing Ub ligase. Indeed, the addition of either the purified
E214K(C88S) protein or Lys-Ala dipeptide (a type
1 N-end rule inhibitor) to +/+ fraction II abolished the bulk of
-lactalbumin ubiquitylation in this system (Fig. 6E, lanes 4 and 6;
compare with lane 2). By contrast, the addition of Ala-Lys, bearing a type 3 destabilizing N-terminal residue, had no effect on
ubiquitylation of
-lactalbumin (Fig. 6E, lane 8; compare with lane
2). Strikingly, the extent of ubiquitylation of
-lactalbumin in
fraction II from UBR1
/
muscle (Fig. 6E,
lane 3; compare with lane 2) was essentially indistinguishable from
background ubiquitylation in the inhibited +/+ fraction II (Fig. 6E,
lane 3; compare with lanes 4 and 6). Moreover, the background-level
ubiquitylation in UBR1
/
fraction II
remained essentially unchanged upon the addition of either
E214K(C88S) or Lys-Ala, in contrast to the
results with +/+ fraction II (Fig. 6E, lane 3; compare with lanes 5 and 7).
Previous work, which used dipeptide inhibitors and dominant-negative
E214K(C88S) in an attempt to distinguish between
protein ubiquitylation due to the N-end rule pathway and the total
ubiquitylation of endogenous proteins in a fraction II preparation from
a +/+ muscle extract suggested that 60 to 80% of the ATP-dependent
degradation of soluble muscle proteins was mediated by the N-end rule
pathway (62). We assayed the conjugation of
125I-Ub to endogenous proteins in fraction II
preparations from +/+ and UBR1
/
muscle.
This conjugation was found to be 25 to 30% lower in
UBR1
/
fraction II than in +/+ fraction
II (Fig. 6F, lanes 2 and 3; compare with lane 1). Ubiquitylation of
endogenous proteins in both +/+ and
UBR1
/
fraction II preparations was
strongly inhibited by the addition of dominant-negative
E214K(C88S) protein (Fig. 6F, lanes 4 and 5;
compare with lanes 2 and 3).
Thus, both degradation assays with purified N-end rule substrates in
+/+ versus UBR1
/
muscle extracts (Fig.
6A to D) and ubiquitylation assays with 125I-labeled
-lactalbumin in +/+ versus
UBR1
/
fraction II (Fig. 6E) indicated
that the N-end rule pathway was virtually absent from skeletal muscle
extracts of UBR1
/
mice, in contrast to
extracts from +/+ muscle. It remains to be determined whether the N-end
rule pathway is absent from the intact
UBR1
/
muscle.
The N-end rule pathway is active in
UBR1
/
fibroblasts.
We assayed the
degradation of purified, 35S-labeled Phe-DHFR, a
type 2 N-end rule substrate, in ATP-supplemented extracts from +/+ and
UBR1
/
EF cell lines. Met-DHFR, bearing
a stabilizing N-terminal residue, was used as a negative control. In
striking contrast to the findings with
UBR1
/
muscle extracts (Fig. 6), the
N-end-rule-specific degradation of Phe-DHFR not only was retained in
UBR1
/
EF extract but was actually
significantly higher in that extract than in the otherwise identical
extract from +/+ EF cells (Fig. 7A, graph
a). A large fraction of Phe-DHFR degradation in both +/+ and
UBR1
/
EF extracts was mediated by the
N-end rule pathway (Fig. 7A, graph a; compare the decay curves of
Phe-DHFR with those of Met-DHFR, both in the presence and absence of
added ATP). As expected, Phe-Ala, a type 2 dipeptide inhibitor, reduced
the degradation of Phe-DHFR in both +/+ and
UBR1
/
EF extracts (Fig. 7A, graph c).
Ala-Phe (Fig. 7A, graph c) and Ala-Lys (not shown), both of them type 3 dipeptide inhibitors, did not have any effect on either +/+ or
UBR1
/
EF extracts, again as expected.
Strikingly, however, Lys-Ala, a type 1 dipeptide inhibitor, enhanced
the degradation of Phe-DHFR only in +/+ EF extract (see above for a
description of this previously discovered crossover enhancing effect of
type 1 dipeptides on degradation of type 2 N-end rule substrates
[18]). Specifically, whereas the degradation of Phe-DHFR
in +/+ EF extract was enhanced by Lys-Ala (Fig. 7A, graph b), which is
similar to the results with +/+ muscle extracts described above (Fig.
6A and D), the same Lys-Ala dipeptide not only did not enhance
degradation of the same substrate, Phe-DHFR, in
UBR1
/
EF extract but slightly (and
reproducibly) decreased it (Fig. 7A, graph b, and data not shown).
|
/
EF extracts (Fig. 7A, graph a)
despite the absence of the UBR1 protein from UBR1
/
EF cells (Fig. 2E, gel c). The
selective absence of enhancing effect of a type 1 dipeptide on
degradation of type 2 N-end rule substrate in
UBR1
/
EF extract (Fig. 7A, graph b)
suggests that non-UBR1 N-recognins that mediate the N-end rule pathway
in UBR1
/
EF cells lack a structural
feature that underlies the above allosteric effect in the UBR1
N-recognin (E3
).
To examine the in vivo degradation of N-end rule substrates in +/+ and
UBR1
/
EF cells, they were transiently
transfected with plasmids that expressed an X-nsP4
gal test protein
(X = Met, Arg, or Tyr) as part of the
DHFRh-UbR48-X-nsP4
gal
fusion, a UPR construct (39, 66, 68, 69). In this Ub
fusion, the reference moiety
DHFRh-UbR48 contained the
ha epitope-tagged mouse dihydrofolate reductase (DHFRh).
DHFRh-UbR48-X-nsP4
gal is
cotranslationally cleaved by DUBs at the UbR48-X
junction, yielding the long-lived
DHFRh-UbR48 reference
protein and a test protein, X-nsP4
gal (X = Met, Arg, or Tyr).
In the UPR technique, the reference protein serves as an internal
control for the levels of expression, immunoprecipitation yields,
sample volumes, and other sources of sample-to-sample variation,
thereby increasing the accuracy of pulse-chase and related assays
(39, 51, 66, 68, 69). The nsP4
gal moiety of
X-nsP4
gal comprised the first 165 residues of nsP4 (Sindbis virus
polymerase) (13, 69), followed by the E. coli
gal moiety that lacked the first 5 residues of wild-type
gal. Due
to a built-in reference protein in
DHFRh-UbR48-X-nsP4
gals,
it was possible to compare metabolic stabilities of X-nsP4
gals not
only in pulse-chase assays but also in pulse-only assays where we
determined, after a 60-min pulse, the ratio of an X-nsP4
gal protein
to the reference protein
DHFRh-UbR48 (Fig. 7B and
C). Arg-nsP4
gal was metabolically unstable in both +/+ and
UBR1
/
EF cells. Specifically, 44 and
42% of Arg-nsP4
gal (bearing a type 1 destabilizing N-terminal
residue) remained after the 60-min pulse in, respectively, the +/+ and
UBR1
/
EF cells relative to the
long-lived Met-nsP4
gal, whose amount at the end of a 60-min pulse
was taken as 100% (Fig. 7B and C). Remarkably, Phe-nsP4
gal, bearing
a type 2 destabilizing N-terminal residue, was reproducibly more
unstable in UBR1
/
EF cells (42%) than
in +/+ EF cells (64%) (Fig. 7B and C). This in vivo result was in
agreement with the independent observation of enhanced Phe-DHFR
degradation in UBR1
/
versus +/+ EF
extracts (Fig. 7A, graph a).
We carried out pulse-chase assays of N-end rule substrates in +/+ and
UBR1
/
EF cells by using UPR-type
fusions of
fDHFRh-UbR48-X-nsP4f
(X = Met, Arg, or Tyr). In these fusions, the reporter moiety was
X-nsP4f, the full-length 69-kDa X-nsP4 protein
(X = Met, Arg, or Tyr) bearing the C-terminal flag epitope
(2). UPR-based assays with X-nsP4 test proteins in
UBR1
/
and +/+ EF cells employed 10-min
pulse and chase times of 0, 1, and 2 h. The results (Fig. 7D and
E) confirmed that Arg-nsP4 (a type 1 substrate) and Tyr-nsP4 (a type 2 substrate) were short-lived in both
UBR1
/
and +/+ EF cells. Moreover, the
degradation of Arg-nsP4 and Tyr-nsP4 was slightly but reproducibly
faster in UBR1
/
cells (Fig. 7D and E),
in agreement with the findings using 1-h in vivo pulse (Fig. 7B and C)
as well as proteolysis in EF extracts (Fig. 7A). Met-nsP4, bearing a
stabilizing N-terminal residue, was long-lived in both
UBR1
/
and +/+ EF cells (Fig. 7D and E).
In UBR1
/
EF cells, 23% of Arg-nsP4
remained at the end of the 1-h chase, in contrast to 32% Arg-nsP4 in
+/+ EF cells under the same conditions (Fig. 7D and E). Similarly, in
UBR1
/
EF cells 25% of Tyr-nsP4
remained at the end of the 1-h chase, in contrast to 35% of Tyr-nsP4
in +/+ EF cells under the same conditions (Fig. 7D and E). We conclude
that the N-end rule activity was present and, moreover, hyperactive in
UBR1
/
EF cells, which lacked the UBR1
protein (Fig. 7).
Reduced mass and other phenotypes of
UBR1
/
mice.
Most
UBR1
/
mice weighed significantly less
than their +/+ and UBR1+/
littermates of
the same gender (Fig. 4A). The ~20% difference in mass observed at
birth transiently increased to ~32% for males and ~26% for
females at the time of weaning (Fig. 4A, graph c, arrow), when the
pups' nutrition changes from mother's milk to solid food. By 4 months
the mean difference in mass was ~20% (Fig. 7A, graph c) and
decreased to ~12% at 1 year (data not shown). Despite the lower mass
of UBR1
/
mice, their mean body length
(excluding their tails) was nearly indistinguishable from that of
age-matched, same-gender +/+ mice (Fig. 4B and data not shown). The
lengths and weights of bones from UBR1
/
mice were also similar to those of their littermate +/+ controls (data
not shown). The weights of brain, liver, spleen, kidney, and testis of
UBR1
/
mice were ~90% or more of the
corresponding organ weights of either
UBR1+/
or +/+ littermates (Fig. 4C).
However, the average weights of hind leg muscle and the hind leg fat
pad of UBR1
/
mice were, respectively,
~82 and ~61% of their UBR1+/
and +/+
counterparts (Fig. 7C), suggesting that the lower total mass of
UBR1
/
mice stemmed from a
disproportionate decrease in the mass of skeletal muscle and adipose tissues.
/
and +/+ embryos at any stage of
development (data not shown). The body masses of eight E17.5 +/+ male
embryos, fifteen UBR1+/
male embryos, and
six UBR1
/
male embryos were,
respectively, 714 ± 41, 716 ± 39, and 616 ± 58 mg.
Histological examinations of adult
UBR1
/
tissues (small intestine, liver,
pancreas, adrenal gland, thyroid gland, kidney, ovary, heart, spleen,
thymus, skeletal muscle, brain, and sciatic nerve) did not detect
significant abnormalities (data not shown).
UBR1
/
mice appeared to be healthy;
their limb movements and overall behavior were apparently normal; they
oriented to sound and cared for offspring. Several behavioral and motor
coordination tests were also carried out. We used 24 adult
UBR1
/
mice (2 to 4 months old) whose
weights were ~15% lower than those of their control littermates (8 UBR1+/
and 16 +/+ mice). Motor
coordination of UBR1
/
mice was assessed
using rotarod (32). UBR1
/
mice exhibited a slightly lower ability to stay on a rotating horizontal rod than their UBR1+/
and +/+
littermates (data not shown). The cause of this phenotype is likely to
be a reduced motor coordination of
UBR1
/
mice rather than defects in
learning and memory (data not shown). No significant differences
between UBR1
/
mice and their
UBR1+/
or +/+ littermates were observed
in several previously described tests (32), including the
weight retention test (assessment of physical strength), the coat
hanger test (assessment of both physical strength and coordination),
and the hind paw footprint test (assessment of walking patterns). Thus,
despite the 15 to 20% lower mass of
UBR1
/
mice, the above tests detected no
overt behavioral or locomotor impairments in these mice.
Mouse UBR1 (E3
) functions in association with either
E214K (mHR6B) or mHR6A, two highly similar
Ub-conjugating enzymes (Fig. 3). Previous work has shown that mice
lacking E214K (HR6B) are defective in
spermatogenesis (55). We examined whether
UBR1
/
mice exhibited defects in
spermatogenesis. Comparison of various mating combinations [(+/+ × +/+), (+/+ ×
/
), (
/
× +/+), and (
/
×
/
)] revealed
no significant fertility defects in either male or female
UBR1
/
mice, in that
UBR1
/
mice were apparently normal in
copulatory behavior, the size of testes, the number of litters, and the
average litter size (data not shown). Histological examination of
UBR1
/
seminiferous tubules showed no
obvious abnormalities in either the structure of tubules,
differentiation of germ cells (mitotic, meiotic, and postmeiotic), or
morphology of supporting cells, such as Sertoli and Leydig cells (data
not shown). No differences in testicular cell apoptosis was detected
between UBR1
/
and +/+ testes by using
the TUNEL assay (data not shown). Thus, UBR1, in an
otherwise wild-type genetic background, is not required for
fertility-related functions.
Abnormal fat metabolism in UBR1
/
mice.
To address the cause of adipose tissue reduction in
UBR1
/
mice, we used Northern analysis
of RNA from +/+ and UBR1
/
skeletal
muscles, comparing the levels of mRNAs encoding some of the proteins
involved in fat metabolism, specifically gamma interferon, interleukin
1
(IL-1
), IL-6, tumor necrosis factor alpha, glycerol-3-phosphate
transferase, triacyl glycerol lipase, and fatty acid synthase (FAS). No
significant differences between +/+ and
UBR1
/
mice were observed in the levels
of the above mRNAs under normal, fasting, and refeeding conditions
(data not shown), except for the levels of FAS mRNA (Fig.
4D). FAS is a multicatalytic enzyme containing domains for acyl-carrier
peptide and seven enzymatic modules required for the conversion of
acetyl-coenzyme A (CoA) and malonyl-CoA to palmitate. The expression of
FAS is tightly regulated through nutritional, hormonal, and
developmental inputs (41, 77)
/
muscle was ~56% of that in +/+
muscle (Fig. 4D, lanes a and b), suggesting that reduction of adipose
tissue in UBR1
/
mice was caused at
least in part by a decrease in FAS expression. In contrast
to skeletal muscle, the levels of FAS mRNA in growing UBR1
/
and +/+ EF cell lines were nearly
identical (Fig. 4D). After 48 h of fasting, the level of
FAS mRNA in +/+ skeletal muscle was reduced to less than 3%
of its level under normal conditions (Fig. 4D, lanes c and i). In
striking contrast, the level of FAS mRNA in the muscle of
fasting UBR1
/
mice remained nearly
unchanged (Fig. 7D, lanes d and j; compare with lanes c and i). Thus,
whereas under normal conditions the UBR1
/
muscle contained half as much
FAS mRNA as the +/+ muscle, after 48 h of fasting the
level of FAS mRNA became ~14-fold higher in the
UBR1
/
muscle than in the congenic +/+
muscle (Fig. 4D). After 24 h of refeeding, the levels of
FAS mRNA in the UBR1
/
and
+/+ muscles became nearly equal (Fig. 4D, lanes e and f).
Given the above results, several blood plasma parameters were
determined in multiple pairs of 2- to 4-month old +/+ and
UBR1
/
littermates (Table
1). Under normal conditions the plasma
glucose level of UBR1
/
mice was 12%
lower than that of +/+ mice. This difference in glucose levels between
UBR1
/
and +/+ mice increased to 21%
after a 24-h fast and remained nearly unchanged (20%) 24 h after
refeeding (Table 1). These differences were reproducible in independent
measurements (data not shown). Thus,
UBR1
/
mice were mildly hypoglycemic
under normal conditions. The levels of plasma triglycerides, urea
nitrogen, total protein, and albumin were also lower in
UBR1
/
mice, suggesting a state of mild
malnutrition (Table 1). There were no significant differences between
UBR1
/
mice and +/+ littermates in the
levels of plasma cholesterol, as well as sodium, potassium, calcium,
chloride, and phosphorus (Table 1).
UBR1
/
mice were also normal in their
levels of several markers of the liver function, including GGT, AST,
and ALT (data not shown).
|
NTAN1
/
UBR1
/
double knockout mice.
Our previous
work (32) described NTAN1
/
mice which lacked the Asn-specific NtN-amidase, a
component of the N-end rule pathway upstream of UBR1 (see the
introduction). NTAN1
/
mice were viable,
fertile, and of normal size, physical strength, and motor coordination,
but they exhibited altered behaviors, including a socially conditioned
exploratory phenotype (32). NtN-amidase mediates the destabilizing activity
of Asn, 1 of 16 destabilizing residues that are recognized directly or
indirectly by UBR1 (19, 35). In situ hybridization
indicated similar spatial patterns of UBR1 and
NTAN1 expression in embryogenesis (32, 35).
Whereas NTAN1
/
mice completely lacked
NtN-amidase activity (32),
UBR1
/
mice contained proteins that at
least partially complemented the activity of missing UBR1 (present
work). It is unknown whether the function of
NtN-amidase is confined to the N-end rule
pathway. To address the possibility of unexpected interactions between
NTAN1- and UBR1-dependent functions, we produced double mutant
NTAN1
/
UBR1
/
mice through double heterozygous
matings (see Materials and Methods). Adult
NTAN1
/
UBR1
/
mice were fertile and
apparently healthy. Intercrosses between NTAN1+/
UBR1
/
mice or between
NTAN1
/
UBR1+/
mice yielded expected
Mendelian frequencies of
NTAN1
/
UBR1
/
mice, indicating that the absence of
both NTAN1 and UBR1 did not significantly increase embryonic lethality.
NTAN1
/
UBR1
/
mice resembled
UBR1
/
mice in being of lower weight (by
~20%) than their NTAN1+/+
UBR1+/+,
NTAN1+/
UBR1+/+, and NTAN1+/+
UBR1+/
littermates (data not shown), in
contrast to the normal weight of NTAN1
/
mice (32). General behavior, physical strength, and motor
coordination of NTAN1
/
UBR1
/
mice were not overtly abnormal, as
assayed with the previously described (32) rotarod test,
weight retention test, and coat hanger test (data not shown).
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This study is the first in a projected series that aims to decipher, in functional and mechanistic detail, the mammalian N-end rule pathway at the level of the pathway's E3 Ub ligases. It was found that more than one E3 (N-recognin) mediates the mouse N-end rule pathway, in contrast to S. cerevisiae. We report the following results.
(i) The mouse UBR1-encoded 200-kDa N-recognin (E3
)
(35) was shown to rescue the N-end rule pathway in
ubr1
S. cerevisiae that lacked the 225-kDa yeast homolog
of mouse UBR1. The rescue's efficiency was strongly increased in the
presence of a cognate mouse E2 enzyme, either mHR6A or mHR6B
(E214K) (Fig. 3).
(ii) UBR1
/
mouse strains lacking the
UBR1 protein (Fig. 2) were viable, of normal fertility, and outwardly
healthy, but their mass, from birth through adulthood, was
significantly lower than that of their congenic +/+ littermates (on
average, 20% lower at 2 months of age) (Fig. 4). The lower mass of
UBR1
/
mice stemmed at least in part
from reduced mass of skeletal muscle and adipose tissues.
FAS mRNA, encoding FAS, was underexpressed in
UBR1
/
muscle from normally fed
UBR1
/
mice and was strikingly
misregulated after a 48-h fast (Fig. 7C). The growth retardation and
decreased fat content in UBR1
/
mice
were consistent with a lower level of glucose and triglycerides in the
blood plasma of these mice (Table 1).
(ii) Extracts of UBR1
/
skeletal muscle
lacked the N-end rule pathway, in contrast to otherwise identical
extracts from +/+ muscle. This and other evidence (Fig. 6) suggested
that the N-end rule pathway was absent from cells of the
UBR1
/
skeletal muscle. By contrast, the
N-end rule pathway was found to be active and even slightly enhanced
both in UBR1
/
EF cell lines in vivo and
in EF extracts (Fig. 7).
(iv) Double-mutant NTAN1
/
UBR1
/
mice, which lacked both
NtN-amidase (see the introduction) and the
UBR1-encoded E3
Ub ligase, were viable and did not
exhibit phenotypes other than the expected ones.
The main finding of this work is that the recognition of type 1 and
type 2 N-end rule substrates by the mammalian N-end rule pathway is
mediated by more than one E3 Ub ligase (N-recognin), in contrast to the
yeast S. cerevisiae, where UBR1 is the only E3 of the N-end
rule pathway. Functionally overlapping, differentially expressed
N-recognins render UBR1
/
mice mosaic in
regard to activity of the N-end rule pathway. The previously identified
mouse UBR2 and UBR3 genes (35)
encode proteins that are, respectively, 47 and 25% identical and 67 and 51% similar to mouse UBR1 (Y. T. Kwon, T. Tasaki, and A. Varshavsky, unpublished data). S. cerevisiae UBR1 is equally
similar (22% identity, 42% similarity) to mouse UBR1 and UBR2.
Although UBR3 is clearly an E3 Ub ligase of the same RING-H2 class as
UBR1 and is a member of the UBR sequence family, it lacks the
N-terminus-proximal residues that have previously been found to be
essential for the integrity of the type 1 and type 2 substrate-binding
sites of S. cerevisiae UBR1 (A. Webster, M. Ghislain, and A. Varshavsky, unpublished data). UBR3 might be the still-unidentified E3
Ub ligase that recognizes N-terminal Ala, Ser, or Thr, the type 3 destabilizing residues of the mammalian N-end rule (18,
22).
In contrast to UBR3, mouse UBR2 is identical in size to mouse UBR1 (200 kDa) and contains the residues identified as essential for the
recognition of type 1 or 2 substrates in S. cerevisiae UBR1
(see above). In addition, the mouse UBR1 and UBR2
genes have identical exon and intron junctions in the first 12 exons
that have been examined in detail (Y. T. Kwon and A. Varshavsky,
unpublished data). Recent in vitro binding assays with model N-end rule
substrates identified mouse UBR2 as a type 1 and 2 N-recognin (Z. Xia,
Y. T. Kwon, F. Du, and A. Varshavsky, unpublished data), making it likely that UBR2 is an E3 that at least partially rescues the N-end
rule pathway in UBR1
/
mice. If so, it
remains to be explained why extracts from the UBR1
/
skeletal muscle, where UBR2 is
apparently expressed, lack the N-end rule pathway, in contrast to
identically prepared extracts from +/+ muscle and also in contrast to
extracts from either UBR1
/
or +/+ EF
cells (see Results). Remarkably, recent results indicated that UBR1 and
UBR2 cannot be the only type 1 or 2 N-recognins in the mouse. The
UBR1
/
UBR2
/
double mutant mice are embryonic
lethals, in contrast to UBR1
/
and
UBR2
/
mice; nevertheless, EF cells
rescued from arrested UBR1
/
UBR2
/
embryos do contain the N-end rule
pathway, albeit of significantly lower activity (Y. T. Kwon, I. Davydov, and A. Varshavsky, unpublished data). The identity of a third
mouse type 1 and 2 N-recognin (E3) is unknown. This N-recognin might be
closer in sequence to that of the plant (Arabidopsis
thaliana) protein PRT1, which is not a member of the UBR sequence
family but shares with it the presence of a RING finger and the ability
to recognize destabilizing N-terminal residues in model substrates
(50). In contrast to UBR1, which binds to both type 1 (basic) and type 2 (bulky hydrophobic) destabilizing N-terminal
residues, plant PRT1 binds to a subset of type 2 N-terminal residues
(A. Bachmair, personal communication), raising the possibility that a
third mouse N-recognin is PRT1-like in that it may be specific for
subsets of N-terminal residues that are recognized by N-recognins such
as UBR1 and UBR2.
The recently constructed UBR2
/
mice are
viable as males but not as females, most of which die as embryos
(Y. T. Kwon and A. Varshavsky, unpublished data).
UBR2
/
EF cells contain the N-end rule
pathway, as would be expected given the presence of UBR1 (E3
) in
UBR2
/
mice.
UBR2
/
males are of normal weight and
appearance but are infertile owing to death, through apoptosis, of
meiotic spermatocytes in UBR2
/
testes
(Y. T. Kwon and A. Varshavsky, unpublished data). The death of
meiotic spermatocytes in UBR2
/
mice may
be caused by the lack of UBR1 (E3
) expression in these cells, a
conjecture to be verified.
Several studies utilized dipeptides as inhibitors of the N-end rule pathway in metazoan cells. The reported results include the inhibition of mammalian cell differentiation (27, 47), the inhibition of apoptosis in human lymphocytes (44), and the inhibition of limb regeneration in newts (67) by dipeptides bearing destabilizing N-terminal residues. In contrast to S. cerevisiae, where dipeptides added to the growth medium are strong in vivo inhibitors of the N-end rule pathway (5), the same dipeptides are, at most, weak inhibitors of the N-end rule pathway in mammalian cells (F. Lévy and A. Varshavsky, unpublished data). Moreover, if the design of S. cerevisiae UBR1 is relevant to mammalian N-recognins, it is clear that dipeptides can also activate rather than inhibit a substrate-binding site of N-recognin that recognizes internal degrons in a subset of its substrates (68). Given this issue alone, the discovery of circuits controlled by the N-end rule pathway in multicellular eukaryotes will require genetic analyses as well as identification of the pathway's physiological substrates.
Four functions of the N-end rule pathway have been identified so far:
its essential roles in the control of peptide import (68)
and chromosome stability (51) in S. cerevisiae
(see the introduction), its essential role in mammalian spermatogenesis (the phenotype of UBR2
/
mice described
above [Y. T. Kwon and A. Varshavsky, unpublished data]), and its
requirement for cardiogenesis and angiogenic remodeling during mouse
embryogenesis (Y. T. Kwon, A. Kashina, and A. Varshavsky, unpublished data). The latter function was discovered through the
construction of ATE1
/
mouse strains
that lacked R-transferase (see the introduction). In contrast to the
two roles of the N-end rule pathway in yeast, where both the relevant
circuits and physiological substrates of UBR1 are partially understood
(51, 68), we do not know, as yet, the identity of proteins
whose metabolic stabilization underlies the observed phenotypes of
UBR1
/
,
UBR2
/
, and
ATE1
/
mouse strains. The
UBR1
/
mice and cells of the present
work will be essential for further advances in the understanding of the
N-end rule pathway.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We are grateful to members of the Caltech Transgenic and Knockout Core Facility, especially to S. Pease, B. Kennedy, and A. Granados for their care of mice and expert technical help. We thank B. Kennedy for his assistance with mouse weighing, W. Rivas for help with the cardiac puncture procedure, and Greg Cope for assistance with the Northern analysis. We are grateful to H. P. Roest (Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands) for a gift of plasmid 44.83 and to members of the Varshavsky laboratory for helpful discussions and support. We also thank T. Tasaki and F. Du for their comments on the manuscript.
A.V. gratefully acknowledges support by the Fellows Program of the International Institute for Advanced Studies (Kyoto, Japan). This work was supported by grants GM31530 and DK39520 from the National Institutes of Health to A.V.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Division of Biology, 147-75, Caltech, 1200 East California Blvd., Pasadena, CA 91125. Phone: (626) 395-3785. Fax: (626) 440-9821. E-mail: avarsh{at}caltech.edu.
Present address: IGEN International, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD 20877.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Alagramam, K., F. Naider, and J. M. Becker. 1995. A. Recognition component of the ubiquitin system is required for peptide transport in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Microbiol. 15:225-234[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 2. | Ausubel, F. M., R. Brent, R. E. Kingston, D. D. Moore, J. A. Smith, J. G. Seidman, and K. Struhl (ed.). 2000. Current protocols in molecular biology. Wiley-Interscience, New York, N.Y. |
| 3. |
Bachmair, A.,
D. Finley, and A. Varshavsky.
1986.
In vivo half-life of a protein is a function of its amino-terminal residue.
Science
234:179-186 |
| 4. | Bachmair, A., and A. Varshavsky. 1989. The degradation signal in a short-lived protein. Cell 56:1019-1032[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 5. |
Baker, R. T., and A. Varshavsky.
1991.
Inhibition of the N-end rule pathway in living cells.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
87:2374-2378 |
| 6. |
Baker, R. T., and A. Varshavsky.
1995.
Yeast N-terminal amidase. A new enzyme and component of the N-end rule pathway.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:12065-12074 |
| 7. |
Balzi, E.,
M. Choder,
W. Chen,
A. Varshavsky, and A. Goffeau.
1990.
Cloning and functional analysis of the arginyl-tRNA-protein transferase gene ATE1 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
J. Biol. Chem.
265:7464-7471 |
| 8. | Bartel, B., I. Wünning, and A. Varshavsky. 1990. The recognition component of the N-end rule pathway. EMBO J. 9:3179-3189[Medline]. |
| 9. | Byrd, C., G. C. Turner, and A. Varshavsky. 1998. The N-end rule pathway controls the import of peptides through degradation of a transcriptional repressor. EMBO J. 17:269-277[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 10. |
Chau, V.,
J. W. Tobias,
A. Bachmair,
D. Marriott,
D. J. Ecker,
D. K. Gonda, and A. Varshavsky.
1989.
A multiubiquitin chain is confined to specific lysine in a targeted short-lived protein.
Science
243:1576-1583 |
| 11. | Davydov, I. V., D. Patra, and A. Varshavsky. 1998. The N-end rule pathway in Xenopus egg extracts. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 357:317-325[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 12. |
Davydov, I. V., and A. Varshavsky.
2000.
RGS4 is arginylated and degraded by the N-end rule pathway in vitro.
J. Biol. Chem.
275:22931-22941 |
| 13. |
deGroot, R. J.,
T. Rümenapf,
R. J. Kuhn, and J. H. Strauss.
1991.
Sindbis virus RNA polymerase is degraded by the N-end rule pathway.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
88:8967-8971 |
| 14. |
DeMartino, G. N., and C. A. Slaughter.
1999.
The proteasome, a novel protease regulated by multiple mechanisms.
J. Biol. Chem.
274:22123-22126 |
| 15. | Deshaies, R. J. 1999. SCF and cullin/RING-H2-based ubiquitin ligases. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 15:435-467[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 16. | Dohmen, R. J. 2000. Primary destruction signals, p. 188-205. In W. Hilt, and D. Wolf (ed.), Proteasomes: the world of regulatory proteolysis. R. G. Landes Biosciences, Georgetown, Tex. |
| 17. |
Dohmen, R. J.,
K. Madura,
B. Bartel, and A. Varshavsky.
1991.
The N-end rule is mediated by the UBC2(RAD6) ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
88:7351-7355 |
| 18. |
Gonda, D. K.,
A. Bachmair,
I. Wünning,
J. W. Tobias,
W. S. Lane, and A. Varshavsky.
1989.
Universality and structure of the N-end rule.
J. Biol. Chem.
264:16700-16712 |
| 19. |
Grigoryev, S.,
A. E. Stewart,
Y. T. Kwon,
S. M. Arfin,
R. A. Bradshaw,
N. A. Jenkins,
N. G. Copeland, and A. Varshavsky.
1996.
A mouse amidase specific for N-terminal asparagine. The gene, the enzyme, and their function in the N-end rule pathway.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:28521-28532 |
| 20. | Haas, A. J., and T. J. Siepman. 1997. Pathways of ubiquitin conjugation. FASEB J. 11:1257-1268[Abstract]. |
| 21. | Harlow, E., and D. Lane (ed.). 1999. Using antibodies: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. |
| 22. |
Heller, H., and A. Hershko.
1990.
A ubiquitin-protein ligase specific for type III protein substrates.
J. Biol. Chem.
265:6532-6535 |
| 23. | Hershko, A., and A. Ciechanover. 1998. The ubiquitin system. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 76:425-479[CrossRef]. |
| 24. | Hershko, A., A. Ciechanover, and A. Varshavsky. 2000. The ubiquitin system. Nat. Med. 10:1073-1081. |
| 25. | Hicke, L. 2001. Protein regulation by monoubiquitin. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2:195-201[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 26. | Hochstrasser, M. 1996. Ubiquitin-dependent protein degradation. Annu. Rev. Genet. 30:405-439[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 27. | Hondermarck, H., J. Sy, R. A. Bradshaw, and S. M. Arfin. 1992. Dipeptide inhibitors of ubiquitin-mediated protein turnover prevent growth factor-induced neurite outgrowth in rat pheochromocytoma PC12 cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 30:280-288. |
| 28. |
Joazeiro, C. A. P., and T. Hunter.
2000.
Ubiquitination: more than two to tango.
Science
289:2061-2062 |
| 29. | Johnson, E. S., D. K. Gonda, and A. Varshavsky. 1990. Cis-trans recognition and subunit-specific degradation of short-lived proteins. Nature 346:287-291[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 30. |
Johnson, E. S.,
P. C. Ma,
I. M. Ota, and A. Varshavsky.
1995.
A proteolytic pathway that recognizes ubiquitin as a degradation signal.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:17442-17456 |
| 31. |
Koken, M. H.,
P. Reynolds,
I. Jaspers-Dekker,
L. Prakash,
S. Prakash,
D. Bootsma, and J. H. Hoeijmakers.
1991.
Structural and functional conservation of two human homologs of the yeast DNA repair gene RAD6.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
88:8865-8869 |
| 32. |
Kwon, Y. T.,
S. A. Balogh,
I. V. Davydov,
A. S. Kashina,
J. K. Yoon,
Y. Xie,
A. Gaur,
L. Hyde,
V. H. Denenberg, and A. Varshavsky.
2000.
Altered activity, social behavior, and spatial memory in mice lacking the NTAN1p amidase and the asparagine branch of the N-end rule pathway.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20:4135-4148 |
| 33. |
Kwon, Y. T.,
A. S. Kashina, and A. Varshavsky.
1999.
Alternative splicing results in differential expression, activity, and localization of the two forms of arginyl-tRNA-protein transferase, a component of the N-end rule pathway.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19:182-193 |
| 34. |
Kwon, Y. T.,
F. Levy, and A. Varshavsky.
1999.
Bivalent inhibitor of the N-end rule pathway.
J. Biol. Chem.
274:18135-18139 |
| 35. |
Kwon, Y. T.,
Y. Reiss,
V. A. Fried,
A. Hershko,
J. K. Yoon,
D. K. Gonda,
P. Sangan,
N. G. Copeland,
N. A. Jenkins, and A. Varshavsky.
1998.
The mouse and human genes encoding the recognition component of the N-end rule pathway.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
95:7898-7903 |
| 36. | Laney, J. D., and M. Hochstrasser. 1999. Substrate targeting in the ubiquitin system. Cell 97:427-430[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 37. |
Lawson, T. G.,
D. L. Gronros,
P. E. Evans,
M. C. Bastien,
K. M. Michalewich,
J. K. Clark,
J. H. Edmonds,
K. H. Graber,
J. A. Werner,
B. A. Lurvey, and J. M. Cate.
1999.
Identification and characterization of a protein destruction signal in the encephalomyocarditis virus 3C protease.
J. Biol. Chem.
274:9871-9880 |
| 38. | Lecker, S. H., V. Solomon, S. R. Price, Y. T. Kwon, W. E. Mitch, and A. L. Goldberg. 1999. Ubiquitin conjugation by the N-end rule pathway and mRNAs for its components increase in muscles of diabetic rats. J. Clin. Investig. 104:1411-1420[Medline]. |
| 39. |
Lévy, F.,
N. Johnsson,
T. Rumenapf, and A. Varshavsky.
1996.
Using ubiquitin to follow the metabolic fate of a protein.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:4907-4912 |
| 40. | Li, J., and C. M. Pickart. 1995. Binding of phenylarsenoxide to Arg-tRNA-protein transferase is independent of vicinal thiols. Biochemistry 34:15829-15837[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 41. |
Loftus, T. M.,
D. E. Jaworsky,
G. L. Frehywot,
C. A. Townsend,
G. V. Ronnett,
M. D. Lane, and F. P. Kuhajda.
2000.
Reduced food intake and body weight in mice treated with fatty acid synthase inhibitors.
Science
288:2379-2381 |
| 42. |
Madura, K.,
R. J. Dohmen, and A. Varshavsky.
2054.
1993. N-recognin/Ubc2 interactions in the N-end rule pathway.
J. Biol. Chem.
268:12046-12051 |
| 43. |
Madura, K., and A. Varshavsky.
1994.
Degradation of G by the N-end rule pathway.
Science
265:1454-1458 |
| 44. | Masdehors, P., S. Glaisner, Z. Maciorowski, H. Magdelenat, and J. Delic. 2000. Ubiquitin-dependent protein processing controls radiation-induced apoptosis through the N-end rule pathway. Exp. Cell Res. 257:48-57[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 45. |
Mulder, L. C. F., and M. A. Muesing.
2000.
Degradation of HIV-1 integrase by the N-end rule pathway.
J. Biol. Chem.
275:29749-29753 |
| 46. |
Mumberg, D.,
R. Muller, and M. Funk.
1994.
Regulatable promoters of Saccharomyces cerevisiae comparison of transcriptional activity and their use for heterologous expression.
Nucleic Acids Res.
22:5767-5768 |
| 47. |
Obin, M.,
E. Mesco,
X. Gong,
A. L. Haas,
J. Joseph, and A. Taylor.
1999.
Neurite outgrowth in PC12 cells. Distinguishing the roles of ubiquitylation and ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis.
J. Biol. Chem.
274:11789-11795 |
| 48. | Pickart, C. M. 1997. Targeting of substrates to the 26S proteasome. FASEB J. 11:1055-1066[Abstract]. |
| 49. | Plemper, R. K., and D. H. Wolf. 1999. Retrograde protein translocation: ERADication of secretory proteins in health and disease. Trends Biochem. Sci. 24:266-270[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 50. |
Potuschak, T.,
S. Stary,
P. Schlogelhofer,
F. Becker,
V. Nejinskaia, and A. Bachmair.
1998.
PRT1 of Arabidopsis thaliana encodes a component of the plant N-end rule pathway.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
95:7904-7908 |
| 51. | Rao, H., F. Uhlmann, K. Nasmyth, and A. Varshavsky. 2001. Degradation of a cohesin subunit by the N-end rule pathway is essential for chromosome stability. Nature 410:955-960[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 52. | Rechsteiner, M. 1998. The 26S proteasome, p. 147-189. In J. M. Peters, J. R. Harris, and D. Finley (ed.), Ubiquitin and the biology of the cell. Plenum Press, New York, N.Y. |
| 53. |
Reiss, Y.,
D. Kaim, and A. Hershko.
1988.
Specificity of binding of N-terminal residues of proteins to ubiquitin-protein ligase. Use of amino acid derivatives to characterize specific binding sites.
J. Biol. Chem.
263:2693-2698 |
| 54. | Robertson, E. J. 1987. Embryo-derived stem cell lines, p. 71-112. In E. J. Robertson (ed.), Teratocarcinomas and embryonic stem cells: a practical approach. IRL Press, Oxford, United Kingdom. |
| 55. | Roest, H. P., J. van Klaveren, J. de Wit, C. G. van Gurp, M. H. Koken, M. Vermey, J. H. van Roijen, J. W. Hoogerbrugge, J. T. Vreeburg, W. M. Baarends, D. Bootsma, J. A. Grootegoed, and J. H. Hoeijmakers. 1996. Inactivation of the HR6B ubiquitin-conjugating DNA repair enzyme in mice causes male sterility associated with chromatin modification. Cell 86:799-810[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 56. | Schauber, C., L. Chen, P. Tongaonkar, I. Vega, and K. Madura. 1998. Sequence elements that contribute to the degradation of yeast G-alpha. Genes Cells 3:307-319[Abstract]. |
| 57. | Scheffner, M., S. Smith, and S. Jentsch. 1998. The ubiquitin conjugation system, p. 65-98. In J.-M. Peters, J. R. Harris, and D. Finley (ed.), Ubiquitin and the biology of the cell. Plenum Press, New York, N.Y. |
| 58. | Sherman, F. 1991. Getting started with yeast. Methods Enzymol. 194:3-21[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 59. |
Sijts, A. J.,
I. Pilip, and E. G. Pamer.
1997.
The Listeria monocytogenes-secreted p60 protein is an N-end rule substrate in the cytosol of infected cells. Implications for major histocompatibility complex class I antigen processing of bacterial proteins.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:19261-19268 |
| 60. |
Solomon, V.,
V. Baracos,
P. Sarraf, and A. Goldberg.
1998.
Rates of ubiquitin conjugation increase when muscles atrophy, largely through activation of the N-end rule pathway.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
95:12602-12607 |
| 61. |
Solomon, V., and A. L. Goldberg.
1996.
Importance of the ATP-ubiquitin-proteasome pathway in the degradation of soluble and myofibrillar proteins in rabbit muscle extracts.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:26690-26697 |
| 62. |
Solomon, V.,
S. H. Lecker, and A. L. Goldberg.
1998.
The N-end rule pathway catalyzes a major fraction of the protein degradation in skeletal muscle.
J. Biol. Chem.
273:25216-25222 |
| 63. | Stewart, A. 1995. Trends in genetics nomenclature guide. Elsevier Science, Ltd., Cambridge, United Kingdom. |
| 64. |
Stewart, A. E.,
S. M. Arfin, and R. A. Bradshaw.
1995.
The sequence of porcine protein NH2-terminal asparagine amidohydrolase. A new component of the N-end rule pathway.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:25-28 |
| 65. | Sung, P., S. Prakash, and L. Prakash. 1991. Stable ester conjugate between the S. cerevisiae RAD6 protein and ubiquitin has no biological activity. J. Mol. Biol. 221:745-749[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 66. | Suzuki, T., and A. Varshavsky. 1999. Degradation signals in the lysine-asparagine sequence space. EMBO J. 18:6017-6026[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 67. | Taban, C. H., H. Hondermarck, R. A. Bradshaw, and B. Boilly. 1996. Effect of a dipeptide inhibiting ubiquitin-mediated protein degradation on nerve-dependent limb regeneration in the newt. Experientia 52:865-870[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 68. | Turner, G. C., F. Du, and A. Varshavsky. 2000. Peptides accelerate their uptake by activating a ubiquitin-dependent proteolytic pathway. Nature 405:579-583[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 69. |
Turner, G. C., and A. Varshavsky.
2000.
Detecting and measuring cotranslational protein degradation in vivo.
Science
289:2117-2120 |
| 70. | Tyers, M., and P. Jorgensen. 2000. Proteolysis and the cell cycle: with this RING I do thee destroy. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 10:54-64[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 71. |
Varshavsky, A.
1996.
The N-end rule: functions, mysteries, uses.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:12142-12149 |
| 72. | Varshavsky, A. 1991. Naming a targeting signal. Cell 64:13-15[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 73. | Varshavsky, A. 2000. Ubiquitin fusion technique and its descendants. Methods Enzymol. 327:578-593[Medline]. |
| 74. | Varshavsky, A. 1997. The ubiquitin system. Trends Biochem. Sci. 22:383-387[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 75. | Voges, D., P. Zwickl, and W. Baumeister. 1999. The 26S proteasome: a molecular machine designed for controlled proteolysis. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 68:1015-1068[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 76. | Waizenegger, I. C., S. Hauf, A. Meinke, and J.-M. Peters. 2000. Two distinct pathways remove mammalian cohesin from chromosome arms in prophase and from centromeres in anaphase. Cell 103:399-410[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 77. | Wakil, S. J. 1989. Fatty acid synthase, a proficient multifunctional enzyme. Biochemistry 28:4523-4530[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 78. | Weissman, A. M. 2001. Themes and variations on ubiquitylation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2:169-178[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 79. | Xie, Y., and A. Varshavsky. 1999. The E2-E3 interaction in the N-end rule pathway: the RING-H2 finger of E3 is required for the synthesis of multiubiquitin chain. EMBO J. 18:6832-6844[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 80. |
Xie, Y., and A. Varshavsky.
2000.
Physical association of ubiquitin ligases and the 26S proteasome.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
97:2497-2502 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»