Molecular and Cellular Biology, December 2001, p. 8189-8196, Vol. 21, No. 23
0270-7306/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/MCB.21.23.8189-8196.2001
Laboratory of Mammalian Genes and Development, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, Maryland 20892
Received 23 May 2001/Returned for modification 19 July 2001/Accepted 28 August 2001
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The closely linked H19 and Igf2 genes show highly similar patterns of gene expression but are reciprocally imprinted. H19 is expressed almost exclusively from the maternally inherited chromosome, while Igf2 expression is mostly from the paternal chromosome. In humans, loss of imprinting at this locus is associated with tumors and with developmental disorders. Monoallelic expression at the imprinted Igf2/H19 locus occurs by at least two distinct mechanisms: a developmentally regulated silencing of the paternal H19 promoter, and transcriptional insulation of the maternal Igf2 promoters. Both mechanisms of allele-specific silencing are ultimately dependent on a common cis-acting element located just upstream of the H19 promoter. The coordinated expression patterns and some experimental data support the idea that positive regulatory elements are also shared by the two genes. To clarify the organization and function of positive and negative regulatory elements at the H19/Igf2 locus, we analyzed two mouse mutations. First, we generated a deletion allele to localize enhancers used in vivo for expression of both H19 and Igf2 in mesodermal tissues to sequences downstream of the H19 gene. Coincidentally, we demonstrated that some expression of Igf2 is independent of the shared enhancer element. Second, we used this new information to further characterize an ectopic H19 differentially regulated region and the associated insulator. We demonstrated that its activity is parent-of-origin dependent. In contrast to recent results from Drosophila model systems; we showed that this duplication of a mammalian insulator does not interfere with its normal function. Implications of these findings for current models for monoallelic gene expression at this locus are discussed.
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Igf2 and H19
are closely linked and reciprocally imprinted genes located on the
distal end of mouse chromosome 7 (48) (Fig. 1a). The regulation of the two genes has
been intensively studied both as a model system for understanding
mechanisms of genomic imprinting and because dysregulation of
IGF2 in humans is associated with the developmental disorder
Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome and with many types of tumors
(33). The two genes are part of a large cluster of
imprinted genes whose organization and monoallelic expression patterns
are well conserved between mice and humans (30, 31).
H19 represents one limit of this imprinted cluster, as the
next known genes, Nctc1 and L23mrp, are both
biallelically expressed (19, 49).
|
Both H19 and Igf2 are highly expressed during
fetal and early postnatal development and show essentially identical
spatial and temporal specificities. In fact, as suggested by their
close linkage, their reciprocal imprinting, and their overlapping
expression patterns, the two genes share transcriptional regulatory
elements. The paternal silencing of H19 and maternal
repression of Igf2 both depend on a common
cis-acting element, here called the H19ICE (for
H19 imprinting control element), located upstream of
the H19 promoter (Fig. 1a) (20, 42). The
boundaries of the ICE are not entirely precise, as they
differ depending on the specific assay used. Sequences to kb
7
(relative to the start site of the H19 mRNA transcript) are
sufficient to imprint single-copy H19 transgenes
(20). If sequences to only kb
3.8 are used, only
transgenes inserted as multiple copies are imprinted, and even then
paternally inherited H19 transgenes are expressed in occasional pups (32). Deletion of endogenous sequences
between kb
3.8 and 2.0 (or between kb
7 and
0.8) on the maternal
chromosome results in the loss of imprinting of the paternal
H19 allele. Significantly, the same deletion inherited
through the maternal germline results in activation of the normally
silent maternal Igf2 allele (36, 42). The
ICE includes DNA sequence domains, centered at kb
2.4 and
3.8, that show nuclease hypersensitivity specifically on the maternal
chromosome (16, 23, 39). These regions of hypersensitivity
were identified in somatic tissue and lie within a 2-kb domain of DNA
showing hypermethylation specific to the paternal chromosome (4,
8, 14, 29, 43, 44). This differentially methylated region
(H19DMR) is hypermethylated on the paternal chromosome at
all stages of development and has been demonstrated to have both
silencing and insulating activities (7, 9, 17, 20, 21). On
the unmethylated maternal chromosome, the H19ICE functions
as a transcriptional insulator and blocks activation of the
Igf2 promoters by distal enhancer elements. On the paternal
chromosome, the methylation imprint at the H19DMR acts to
disrupt insulator function and thereby allows expression of
Igf2 on that chromosome. Several labs have recently
demonstrated that CTCF, a known enhancer-blocking protein, selectively
binds to nonmethylated CpG-containing sequences within the
H19DMR, thus providing a molecular basis for
parent-of-origin-specific activity of the insulator (7, 17, 22,
38). Other studies, however, indicate that this model does not
explain all aspects of Igf2 monoallelism and that elements
in addition to the H19DMR are required for imprinting of
Igf2 (1, 12).
The insulator model for Igf2 monoallelic expression demands that all H19 and Igf2 enhancers be located downstream of the H19DMR or its associated insulator, while the coexpression of Igf2 and H19 suggests that these enhancer elements are shared. In fact, much of the endoderm-specific expression of both genes is dependent on shared enhancers that must lie between 7.2 and 13 kb downstream of the H19 promoter and about 80 kb downstream of the Igf2 promoter (26). However, the location of regulatory elements required to drive expression in mesodermal tissues is less clear. Transgenic mouse and in vitro transfection studies together indicate that enhancers capable of directing expression of H19 in skeletal muscle are located at between kb +25 and +28 (18, 20). Transgenic studies also suggest that additional enhancer elements that can direct H19 expression in several tissues, including cardiac muscle, may lie downstream of kb +35 (2, 20). However, neither the necessity of these elements for expression of the H19 gene in its normal chromosomal location nor their role in the expression of Igf2 has yet been tested.
In addition to its role in regulating activity of the insulator
element, the paternal imprint at the H19DMR has a second, genetically distinct function of blocking transcription of the paternal
H19 allele by directing CpG methylation of the paternal H19 promoter and gene body sequences. Once established, this
promoter methylation and associated epigenetic changes are capable of
silencing the H19 promoter independently of the
H19DMR (36). We have previously generated a
mutant allele, CRK10, in which the sequences from kb
10 to
0.8 that encompass the H19DMR were inserted at the kb
+10.7 position (Fig. 1b) (20). As predicted by the
insulator model, transcription of H19 in skeletal muscle was
blocked while expression in liver was unaffected. We also demonstrated
that CpGs in the inserted DMR element were methylated only
when paternally inherited. However, it could not be determined whether
this methylation was capable of blocking insulator activity or whether
the hypermethylation from the exogenous H19DMR could spread
to neighboring sequences.
In this study, we generated a 24-kb chromosomal deletion of sequences that included the presumptive mesodermal enhancers, and we further analyzed the CRK10 insertion mutation to clarify the organization and function of regulatory elements at the Igf2/H19 locus. First, by deletion of the putative mesodermal enhancer elements, we demonstrated that normal expression of H19 and Igf2 in both the tongue and limb muscle is dependent on these sequences. However, expression in mesodermal cells in other organs is dependent on additional enhancers downstream of kb +36. We demonstrated the latter point by using the CRK10 allele of chromosome 7 in which the H19ICE has been moved to kb +10.7. In a second set of experiments, we further analyzed the function of this exogenously located ICE/H19DMR/Igf2-insulator. We showed that while the insulator function remained parent-of-origin dependent, in its new location it could not direct methylation of neighboring sequences as it does the H19 promoter. We also demonstrated that insertion of this second H19DMR element had no effect on expression of Igf2 from the maternal chromosome. Thus, the insertion of a second active insulator element did not interfere with silencing of the maternal Igf2 gene. Implications of this finding for possible mechanisms of transcriptional insulation are discussed. Finally and parenthetically, we demonstrated that the mouse Nctc1 gene is not required for normal mouse development or fertility.
| |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Generation of VM3 mutant mice. For the structure of the flanking sequences used to direct homologous recombination, see Fig. 1b. The targeting vector was linearized and transfected into RI mouse embryonic stem cells. To identify VM3neo clones, DNAs from G418-resistant colonies were digested with BamHI and probed with a 1.2-kb BamHI-SalI fragment from just outside the 5' flank to identify a 11.3-kb band in wild-type cells and an additional 10-kb band in targeted lines. Likewise, digestion with HindIII and probing with a 4-kb HindIII-XbaI fragment from just outside the 3' flank identified a 15-kb band in wild-type cells and an additional 5.5-kb band in correctly targeted clones. Two independently derived lines were injected into C57/BL6-J blastocysts to generate chimeric founders. Founder males were mated with mice carrying the EIIa-cre transgene (25) to excise neomycin resistance-encoding sequences. Successful excision of the neomycin resistance gene was assayed by digestion with XbaI and hybridization to a 2.0-kb internal XbaI-EcoRI fragment which displays 3.1-, 2.4-, and 4.3-kb bands for the VM3, wild-type, and VM3neo alleles, respectively.
RNA analysis. Tissues were homogenized in TRIZOL reagent (Life Technologies) by using a power homogenizer, and the RNA was isolated according to the manufacturer's protocol. Expression levels were analyzed by Northern blotting. Probes used to quantitate H19, Igf2, and EF2a RNAs were described previously (20). cDNA from p6 skeletal muscle was amplified using L23mrp-specific primers (5'-ATGTGTTGTACCCCCTTTACC-3' and 5'-TGGTCCAAATCCTGCTGTC-3') to obtain a 455-bp probe or using Tnnt3-specific primers (5'-AGAAGAGAGGAGGAGGATG-3' and 5'-GTGCAGAGCTGGAATAAG-3') to obtain a 475-bp probe. Expression levels were quantified with the Molecular Dynamics Storm PhosphorImaging System.
Allele-specific expression of Igf2. Mice carrying the CRK10 mutation were crossed with Dis7CAS mice as described in the legend to Fig. 5. Dis7CAS mice are mostly Mus domesticus but are homozygous M. castaneous across the H19/Igf2 locus (15). Allele-specific expression of Igf2 was analyzed using the single-nucleotide primer extension (SNuPE) assay (36, 40).
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A shared skeletal muscle enhancer for H19 and Igf2. In vivo transgenic analyses indicated that enhancers capable of driving transcription of H19 in skeletal muscle lie between kb +13 and +36 (3, 10, 18, 20, 32). This region includes six short sequence elements that are well conserved between mice and humans and therefore are potentially important regulatory sites (18). In vitro transfection studies confirmed the presence of at least one set of skeletal muscle-specific enhancers in sequences centered between kb +22 and +28 (20). This 6-kb region includes one of the conserved sequence elements which had also been assayed by transient transgenesis and shown to drive expression of reporter constructs in midgestation embryos (18). To examine directly the requirement of these enhancer sequences for directing in vivo expression of H19 and Igf2 in skeletal muscle and in other mesodermal tissues, a 24-kb targeted deletion of sequences between kb 10.7 and 34.7 was constructed as shown in Fig. 1b. This VM3 allele was constructed in two steps so that the selection marker encoding resistance to neomycin sulfate was removed prior to quantitation of H19 and Igf2 expression levels.
To determine whether the deleted elements are required for expression of H19, RNAs from pups inheriting the deletion via the maternal chromosome were analyzed by Northern blotting (Fig. 2a). Multiple samples from two mutant strains generated from independently derived cells lines were analyzed. H19 levels in liver, heart, lung, gut, and kidney tissues were unaffected. In contrast, expression of H19 in skeletal muscle and tongue tissue was reduced five- to sixfold compared with that of wild-type littermates. Thus, we concluded that the enhancer elements identified in transgene and transfection studies are, in fact, functional and necessary for expression of the H19 gene in its normal chromosomal context. These enhancers are not required for all mesodermal expression but are specific to skeletal muscle.
|
Nctc1 is not essential for normal mouse development. Nctc1 is a skeletal-muscle-specific transcript that like H19 is unlikely to encode a peptide product (19). The VM3 mutation deletes the entire mRNA coding region for Nctc1. Since mice homozygous for the VM3 mutation are viable as well as fertile and appear and behave normally, we concluded that Nctc1 gene activity is not essential for normal mouse development. Although we consider it unlikely, we cannot rule out the possibility of a requirement for Nctc1 transcription for activation of H19 and Igf2 in cis.
VM3 allele and L23mrp expression. The gene encoding the L23 (mitochondrion)-related protein (L23mrp or Rpl23), located 40 kb from the imprinted H19 gene (Fig. 1a), is biallelically and ubiquitously expressed at low levels relative to embryonic H19. Targeted deletion of the endodermal enhancers located downstream of H19 has no effect on L23mrp expression, suggesting that the latter gene is functionally insulated from H19 (49). Likewise, we saw that mice homozygous for the VM3 mesodermal enhancer deletion exhibited no loss of L23mrp expression in skeletal muscle, nor was there any increase in L23mrp transcription in fetal liver tissue (data not shown). Thus, the VM3 deletion, which removes sequences to within 4 kb of the L23mrp transcriptional start site, has no effect on the mechanism insulating L23mrp from the H19/Ig2 endodermal enhancers or on the mechanisms driving expression of L23mrp in muscle tissue.
VM3 and TNNT3 expression. The gene encoding the faster-migrating isoform of skeletal muscle troponin-T (TNNT3) is located 55 kb from L23MRP (47). The linkage of Tnnt3 to H19 is conserved in mice (27). Tnnt3 is biallelically expressed and shows expression parallel to that of H19 in different adult skeletal muscle types, which led to the suggestion that H19 and TNNT3 have common enhancer elements (47). However, mice homozygous for the VM3 enhancer deletion exhibited no change in Tnnt3 expression levels (data not shown).
Additional mesodermal enhancer sequences downstream of kb +35. Endoderm-specific enhancer elements shared by H19 and Igf2 were identified by deletion of sequences between kb +7.2 and +13 (26), while experiments described above demonstrated that some shared mesoderm-specific enhancer elements map to sequences centered at kb +26. Comparison of expression patterns of mice carrying YAC (3) and BAC (20) H19 transgenes extending to about kb +36 and +140, respectively, suggested that additional enhancers capable of driving high levels of mesoderm-specific expression of H19 in several tissues, including the gut, heart, lung, and kidney, are likely to lie downstream of kb +35. To test directly whether such enhancer elements play a role in expression of H19 in its normal chromosomal context, we examined the effect of maternal-chromosome-based inheritance of the CRK10 allele. The CRK10 mutation is an insertion of a 9.2-kb element, including the H19DMR/Igf2-insulator, +10.7 kb downstream of the H19 promoter (Fig. 1a).
As previously demonstrated, there was no loss of expression in the liver, consistent with the location of the endodermal enhancers upstream of the inserted insulator (Fig. 3a). As previously demonstrated for limb muscle, expression in the tongue was almost completely lost (Fig. 3a). This loss of expression in skeletal muscle is consistent with our above-described demonstration that transcription of H19 in these tissues is dependent on enhancer elements downstream of the insulator insertion site as defined by the VM3 deletion.
|
Parent-of-origin-specific activity of the CRK10 insertion. Having demonstrated directly that Igf2 shares the downstream mesoderm-specific enhancers necessary for expression in skeletal muscle, the effect of a paternal-chromosome-based inheritance of the CRK10 insertion could be discerned by examining Igf2 expression. The ability of the inserted insulator to block activation of Igf2 by the distal skeletal muscle enhancers was studied. In contrast to its effect on H19 upon maternal inheritance, the insulator did not have the ability to block transcription of the paternal Igf2 allele (Fig. 3b). Rather, the paternal Igf2 promoters continued to be expressed at high levels in skeletal muscle despite the presence in cis of the CRK10 insertion separating them from the skeletal muscle enhancers. Thus, we concluded that the inserted insulator is not active on the paternal chromosome and therefore must be subject to the same parent-of-origin-specific modulation of its insulator function as is postulated in its normal location. These results are consistent with and perhaps were predicted by our previous finding that the ectopic insulator is specifically hypermethylated when inherited via the paternal chromosome (20).
Methylation activity of the CRK10 insertion.
In its normal
location, the H19DMR not only functions as a transcriptional
insulator that blocks activation of the maternal Igf2
promoter but also acts to direct methylation of cytosine residues in
the paternal H19 promoter. These epigenetic modifications are presumed to then be directly responsible for monoallelic repression of H19. To determine whether the inserted sequences act as a
nucleation center for developmentally regulated modification of
adjacent sequences, the methylation status of DNA located immediately
downstream of the CRK10 insertion was examined. Genomic DNAs
were prepared from pups inheriting the CRK10
insertion and from their wild-type littermates. These DNAs were
subjected to restriction digestion with enzymes sensitive to
methylation. Whether inherited via the maternal or paternal chromosome,
endogenous sequences adjacent to the inserted H19DMR
remained unaffected; there was no apparent increase in CpG methylation
of the downstream sequences (Fig. 4).
Rather, the sequences in this region appear to be largely unmethylated.
|
Effect of insulator activity on Igf2 regulation.
In light of
recent data suggesting that insulators work in tandem to "loop out"
genetic loci into regulatory domains (see Discussion), we next examined
the effect of the CRK10 mutation on maternal transcriptional
regulation of Igf2 in the liver and also in skeletal muscle.
The relative contribution of the maternal Igf2 allele was
quantitated by SNuPE assay (24, 35). On the CRK10 chromosome, the enhancer responsible for expression in
the liver is flanked by insulator elements and is separated from the Igf2 promoter by a single insulator, just as it is on the
wild-type chromosome. As expected, we saw no expression of maternal
Igf2 from the CRK10 chromosome in liver tissue
(Fig. 5). However, we also did not detect
any activation of maternal Igf2 from the CRK10 chromosome in skeletal muscle (Fig. 5), in which the relevant enhancer
is separated from the promoter by a paired set of functional insulators. Thus, as discussed below, pairing of insulators did not
result in their inactivation in this mammalian system.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Transcriptional regulation of the Igf2 and H19 genes has been intensively studied because of the association of dysregulation at this locus with several human diseases and also as a primary model system for investigating mechanisms of genomic imprinting. The currently favored model for imprinting of the two genes posits that monoallelic expression of each gene depends on a common cis-acting element, the ICE, located just upstream of the H19 promoter (Fig. 1) (34, 41). Sequences within this region are hypermethylated specifically on the paternal chromosome. This DNA methylation is postulated to enable expression of the Igf2 gene by inactivating a transcriptional insulator. The paternal-chromosome-specific DNA methylation also induces developmentally programmed epigenetic changes at the H19 promoter which silence it. This popular model requires that the enhancers for both H19 and Igf2 must be located downstream of the H19 gene, while the coordinate expression patterns of the two genes suggest that these enhancers are likely to be shared.
Previous studies have demonstrated the corequirement of a common set of endodermal enhancer elements located downstream of H19 (26). Here we examined a mouse with a targeted deletion of a region downstream of the H19 gene which had previously been shown to have enhancer activity in vitro (20) and in transgenic lines (18, 20), and we directly demonstrated that the deleted sequences included the primary enhancer element important for skeletal muscle expression of both H19 and Igf2. Northern analysis demonstrated that both the H19 and Igf2 RNA levels in the liver, heart, gut, lung, and kidney were unaffected by the deletion. In contrast, the H19 and Igf2 RNA levels were reduced 5.5- and 3.5-fold, respectively, in skeletal muscle. The nonequivalent reduction in expression of the two genes suggests that expression of Igf2 may also be driven by other mesodermal enhancers which are not utilized by H19. This hypothesis could explain recent reports demonstrating that monoallelic expression of Igf2 requires sequences in addition to the Igf2 insulator at the ICE/H19DMR (1, 12).
With verification that H19 and Igf2 both utilize
skeletal muscle enhancers downstream of the insertion site at +10.7 kb,
the parent-of-origin activity of the CRK10 allele could be
defined further. We first looked at paternal-chromosome inheritance and demonstrated that the CRK10 insertion mutation has no effect
on transcriptional regulation of Igf2. Just as in its normal
location upstream of the H19 gene, the insulator activity is
parent-of-origin specific. Consistent with this finding, we had
previously shown that the ectopic insulator remains unmethylated on the
maternal chromosome but is specifically hypermethylated on paternal
inheritance (20). Our results are in contrast with those
obtained in a recent study by Hark and coworkers, in which the
insulator activity of an ectopic H19ICE element was
determined not to be parent-of-origin specific (17). In
the latter study, the activity of a smaller insert encompassing only
sequences between kb
3.8 and
0.8 was tested by using randomly
integrated transgenic constructs. We are presently testing whether we
were able to see maternal-chromosome-specific transcriptional
insulation in our system because the genetic context of mouse distal
chromosome 7 supplies crucial information or because of the additional
sequences included in the CRK10 insertion (i.e., sequences
in addition to the H19DMR).
Further analysis of the CRK10 allele revealed that the inserted DMR lacks the ability to affect the methylation status of adjacent sequences. Our experiments cannot distinguish between a requirement for particular target sequences, such as the relatively CpG-rich H19 promoter, and a deficiency in the ectopic element's function.
Insertion of the H19DMR between the liver and skeletal-muscle enhancer elements located downstream of H19 has confirmed the presence of downstream enhancer elements required for transcription of H19 in the mesoderm. Interestingly, the CRK10 mutation almost completely abolished H19 expression in the lung and kidney. Previous transgenic and deletion analyses have shown that endodermal enhancers required for both genes are located around kb 8 (10, 26). Deletion of this region caused a complete loss of H19 expression in the lung and kidney. Similarly, the insertion of an insulator at kb +10 caused an almost complete loss of H19 expression in those tissues. Together these results suggest that there are at least two required sets of enhancer elements necessary for the transcription of H19 in these tissues. Although these enhancers are very distant on the chromosome, their effects are extremely synergistic. This model explains the puzzling inability of the proximal endodermal enhancers to direct high levels of expression in kidney and lung tissues in transgenic mice (10, 32, 45) even while their necessity in these same tissues was demonstrated through deletion mutations. Future studies will examine the nature of the synergism to determine whether this is a mechanism for specifically directing the enhancers to H19 and Igf2 to the exclusion of other genes within striking distance of the enhancers.
Insulators are thought to play an important role in gene regulation. At least two models for insulator action have been proposed. In one case, the insulator is predicted to block the progress of a positive signal that moves from the enhancer toward the promoter. In a second model, insulators regulate gene activity by organizing loci into transcriptionally active and transcriptionally inactive domains (5, 37). Very recent studies examining the effect of paired insulator elements in Drosophila support the notion that insulators regulate enhancer-promoter interactions through the formation of chromatin loops (11, 28). In these experiments, an enhancer flanked by the Su(Hw) insulator was unable to interact with its promoter. However, when an enhancer was separated from its promoter by a paired set of insulators, the enhancer retained the ability to activate that promoter. It was proposed that two insulators work in tandem to loop out any intervening DNA between them and leave the enhancer and promoter elements, which remain in a single active domain, thus allowing the enhancer-promoter interactions. (See also a review by Bell et al. [6].)
To examine this model in a mammalian system, we returned to the CRK10 chromosome, whose organization relative to the Igf2 promoter mirrors that of the transgenic constructs used in the Drosophila experiments (Fig. 1a). The analysis was designed not to determine the minimal sequences required for insulator function but rather to determine a possible role for functional insulators in organizing the locus into independent arrays. On a maternal CRK10 chromosome, the endodermal enhancer sequences that drive expression of Igf2 and H19 in the liver are flanked by two functional insulator elements, but only a single insulator lies between the enhancer sequences and the Igf2 promoter. However, the skeletal-muscle-specific enhancer is separated from the Igf2 promoter by paired insulator elements. We examined expression of Igf2 specifically from the maternal CRK10 chromosome because we already knew from examination of H19 expression that the enhancers and the insulators were all functioning. In contrast to results demonstrated in Drosophila for the Su(Hw) insulator, the maternal Igf2 promoter remained silent not only in the liver but also in skeletal muscle. Thus, in the mammalian Igf2-insulator system, we do not see evidence for looping; instead, the very large distances over which the insulators and enhancers work in this system may be more supportive of alternate models for insulator function (5, 13).
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: 9000 Rockville Pike, Building 6B, Room 2B206, NICHD, Bethesda, MD 20892. Phone: (301) 402-0676. Fax: (301) 402-0543. E-mail: kpfeifer{at}helix.nih.gov.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Ainscough, J. F., R. John, S. Barton, and M. Surani. 2000. A skeletal muscle-specific mouse Igf2 repressor lies 40 kb downstream of the gene. Development 127:3923-3930[Abstract]. |
| 2. | Ainscough, J. F., L. Dandola, and M. A. Surani. 2000. Appropriate expression of the mouse H19 gene utilises three or more distinct enhancer regions spread over more than 130 kb. Mech. Dev. 91:365-368[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 3. | Ainscough, J. F., T. Koide, M. Tada, S. Barton, and M. A. Surani. 1997. Imprinting of Igf2 and H19 from a 130 kb YAC transgene. Development 124:3621-3632[Abstract]. |
| 4. |
Bartolomei, M. S.,
A. L. Webber,
M. E. Brunkow, and S. M. Tilghman.
1993.
Epigenetic mechanisms underlying the imprinting of the mouse H19 gene.
Genes Dev.
7:1663-1673 |
| 5. | Bell, A., and G. Felsenfeld. 1999. Stopped at the border: boundaries and insulators. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 9:191-198[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 6. |
Bell, A.,
A. West, and G. Felsenfeld.
2001.
Insulators and boundaries: versatile regulatory elements in the eukaryotic genome.
Science
291:447-450 |
| 7. | Bell, A. C., and G. Felsenfeld. 2000. Methylation of a CTCF-dependent boundary controls imprinted expression of the Igf2 gene. Nature 405:482-485[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 8. | Brandeis, M., T. Kafri, M. Ariel, J. R. Chaillet, J. McCarrey, A. Razin, and H. Cedar. 1993. The ontogeny of allele-specific methylation associated with imprinted genes in the mouse. EMBO J. 12:3669-3677[Medline]. |
| 9. |
Brenton, J. D.,
R. A. Drewell,
S. Viville,
K. J. Hilton,
S. C. Barton,
J. F. Ainscough, and M. A. Surani.
1999.
A silencer element identified in Drosophila is required for imprinting of H19 reporter transgenes in mice.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
96:9242-9247 |
| 10. |
Brunkow, M. E., and S. M. Tilghman.
1991.
Ectopic expression of the H19 gene in mice causes prenatal lethality.
Genes Dev.
5:1092-1101 |
| 11. |
Cai, H., and P. Shen.
2001.
Effects of cis arrangements of chromatin insulators on enhancer-blocking activity.
Science
291:493-495 |
| 12. | Constancia, M., W. Dean, S. Lopes, T. Moore, G. Kelsey, and W. Reik. 2000. Deletion of a silencer element in Igf2 results in loss of imprinting independent of H19. Nat. Genet. 26:203-206[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 13. | Dorsett, D. 1999. Distant liaisons: long-range enhancer-promoter interactions in Drosophila. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 9:505-514[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 14. | Ferguson-Smith, A. C., H. Sasaki, B. M. Cattanach, and M. A. Surani. 1993. Parental-origin-specific epigenetic modifications of the mouse H19 gene. Nature 362:751-755[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 15. |
Gould, T. D., and K. Pfeifer.
1998.
Imprinting of mouse Kvlqt1 is developmentally regulated.
Hum. Mol. Genet.
7:483-487 |
| 16. |
Hark, A. T., and S. M. Tilghman.
1998.
Chromatin conformation of the H19 epigenetic mark.
Hum. Mol. Genet.
7:1979-1985 |
| 17. | Hark, A. T., C. J. Schoenherr, D. J. Katz, R. S. Ingram, J. M. Levorse, and S. M. Tilghman. 2000. CTCF mediates methylation-sensitive enhancer blocking activity at the H19/Igf2 locus. Nature 405:486-489[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 18. |
Ishihara, K.,
N. Hatano,
H. Furuumi,
R. Kato,
T. Iwaki,
K. Miura,
Y. Jinno, and H. Sasaki.
2000.
Comparative genomic sequencing identifies novel tissue-specific enhancers and sequence elements for methylation-sensitive factors implicated in Igf2/H19 imprinting.
Genome Res.
10:664-671 |
| 19. | Ishihara, K., R. Kato, H. Furuumi, M. Zubair, and H. Sasaki. 1998. Sequence of a 42-kb mouse region containing the imprinted H19 locus: identification of a novel muscle-specific transcription unit showing biallelic expression. Mamm. Genome 9:775-777[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 20. |
Kaffer, C. R.,
M. Srivastava,
K. Park,
E. Ives,
S. Hsieh,
J. Batlle,
A. Grinberg,
S. P. Huang, and K. Pfeifer.
2000.
A transcriptional insulator at the imprinted H19/Igf2 Locus.
Genes Dev.
14:1908-1919 |
| 21. | Kanduri, C., C. Holmgren, M. Pilartz, G. Franklin, M. Kanduri, L. Liu, V. Ginjala, E. Ulleras, R. Mattsson, and R. Ohlsson. 2000. The 5'-flanking of the murine H19 gene in unusual chromatin conformation unidirectionally blocks enhancer-promoter communication. Curr. Biol. 10:449-457[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 22. | Kanduri, C., V. Pant, D. Loukinov, E. Pugacheva, C. Qi, A. Wolffe, R. Ohlsson, and V. Lobanenkov. 2000. Functional association of CTCF with the insulator upstream of the H19 gene is parent-of-origin specific and methylation-sensitive. Curr. Biol. 10:853-856[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 23. |
Khosla, S.,
A. Aitchison,
R. Gregory,
N. D. Allen, and R. Feil.
1999.
Parental allele-specific chromatin configuration in a boundary-imprinting-control element upstream of the mouse H19 gene.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19:2556-2566 |
| 24. |
Kuppuswamy, M. N.,
J. W. Hoffmann,
C. K. Kasper,
S. G. Spitzer,
S. L. Groce, and S. P. Bajaj.
1991.
Single nucleotide primer extension to detect genetic diseases: experimental application to hemophilia B (factor IX) and cystic fibrosis.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
88:1143-1147 |
| 25. |
Lasko, M.,
J. Picher,
J. Gorman,
B. Sauer,
Y. Okamoto,
E. Lee,
F. Alt, and H. Westphal.
1996.
Efficient in vivo manipulation of mouse genomic sequences at the zygote stage.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:5860-5865 |
| 26. |
Leighton, P. A.,
J. R. Saam,
R. S. Ingram,
C. L. Stewart, and S. M. Tilghman.
1995.
An enhancer deletion affects both H19 and Igf2 expression.
Genes Dev.
9:2079-2089 |
| 27. | Misener, V., A. Wielowieyski, L. Brennan, G. Beebakhee, and J. Jongstra. 1998. The mouse Lsp1 and Tnnt3 genes are 4.3 kb apart on distal mouse chromosome 7. Mamm. Genome 9:846-848[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 28. |
Muravyova, E.,
A. Golovnin,
E. Gracheva,
A. Parshikov,
T. Belenkaya,
V. Pirrotta, and P. Georgiev.
2001.
Loss of insulator activity by paired Su(Hw) chromatin insulators.
Science
291:495-498 |
| 29. | Olek, A., J. Walter, B. Horsthemke, B. Dittrich, and K. Buiting. 1997. The pre-implantation ontogeny of the H19 methylation imprint. Nat. Genet. 17:275-276[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 30. |
Onyango, P.,
W. Miller,
J. Lehoczky,
C. Leung,
B. Birren,
S. Wheelan,
K. Dewar, and A. Feinberg.
2000.
Sequence and comparative analysis of the mouse 1-megabase region orthologous to the human 11p15.5 imprinted domain.
Genome Res.
10:1697-1710 |
| 31. | Paulsen, M., K. R. Davies, L. M. Bowden, A. J. Villar, O. Franck, M. Fuermann, W. L. Dean, K. R. Moore, N. Rodrigues, K. E. Davies, R.-J. Hu, A. P. Feinberg, E. R. Maher, W. Reik, and J. Walter. 1998. Syntenic organization of the mouse distal chromosome 7 imprinting cluster and the Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome region in chromosome 11p15.5 Hum. Mol. Genet. 7:1149-1159. |
| 32. |
Pfeifer, K.,
P. A. Leighton, and S. M. Tilghman.
1996.
The structural H19 gene is required for transgene imprinting.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:13876-13883 |
| 33. | Reik, W., M. Constancia, W. Dean, K. Davies, L. Bowden, A. Murrell, R. Feil, J. Walter, and G. Kelsey. 2000. Igf2 imprinting in development and disease. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 44:145-150[Medline]. |
| 34. | Reik, W., and A. Murrell. 2000. Genomic imprinting. Silence across the border. Nature 405:408-409[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 35. |
Singer-Sam, J.,
V. Chapman,
J. M. LeBon, and A. D. Riggs.
1992.
Parental imprinting studies by allele-specific primer extension after PCR: paternal X chromosome-linked genes are transcribed prior to preferential paternal X chromosome inactivation.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
89:10469-10473 |
| 36. |
Srivastava, M.,
S. Hsieh,
A. Grinberg,
L. Williams-Simon,
S.-P. Huang, and K. Pfeifer.
2000.
H19 and Igf2 monoallelic expression is regulated in two distinct ways by a shared cis acting element.
Genes Dev.
14:1186-1195 |
| 37. | Sun, F., and S. Elgin. 1999. Putting boundaries on silence. Cell 99:459-462[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 38. | Szabo, P., S. Tang, A. Rentsendorj, G. Pfeifer, and J. R. Mann. 2000. Maternal-specific footprints at putative CTCF sites in the H19 imprinting control region give evidence for insulator function. Curr. Biol. 10:607-610[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 39. |
Szabo, P. E.,
G. P. Pfeifer, and J. R. Mann.
1998.
Characterization of novel parent-specific epigenetic modifications upstream of the imprinted mouse H19 gene.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:6767-6776 |
| 40. |
Szabo, P. E., and J. R. Mann.
1995.
Biallelic expression of imprinted genes in the mouse germ line: implications for erasure, establishment, and mechanisms of genomic imprinting.
Genes Dev.
9:1857-1868 |
| 41. |
Thorvaldsen, J., and M. S. Bartolomei.
2000.
Mothers setting boundaries.
Science
288:2145-2146 |
| 42. |
Thorvaldsen, J. L.,
K. L. Duran, and M. S. Bartolomei.
1998.
Deletion of the H19 differentially methylated domain results in loss of imprinted expression of H19 and Igf2.
Genes Dev.
12:3693-3702 |
| 43. | Tremblay, K. D., K. L. Duran, and M. S. Bartolomei. 1997. A 5' 2-kilobase-pair region of the imprinted mouse H19 gene exhibits exclusive paternal methylation throughout development. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:4322-4329[Abstract]. |
| 44. | Tremblay, K. D., J. R. Saam, R. S. Ingram, S. M. Tilghman, and M. S. Bartolomei. 1995. A paternal-specific methylation imprint marks the alleles of the mouse H19 gene. Nat. Genet. 9:407-413[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 45. | Webber, A., R. I. Ingram, J. Levorse, and S. M. Tilghman. 1998. Location of enhancers is essential for imprinting of H19 and Igf2. Nature 391:711-715[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 46. |
Yoo-Warren, H.,
V. Pachnis,
R. S. Ingram, and S. M. Tilghman.
1988.
Two regulatory domains flank the mouse H19 gene.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
8:4707-4715 |
| 47. |
Yuan, L.,
N. Qian, and B. Tycko.
1996.
An extended region of biallelic gene expression and rodent-human synteny downstream of the imprinted H19 gene on chromosome 11p15.5.
Hum. Mol. Genet.
5:1931-1937 |
| 48. | Zemel, S., M. S. Bartolomei, and S. M. Tilghman. 1992. Physical linkage of two mammalian imprinted genes. Nat. Genet. 2:61-65[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 49. | Zubair, M., K. Hilton, J. Saam, M. Surani, S. Tilghman, and H. Sasaki. 1997. Structure and expression of the mouse L23mrp gene downstream of the imprinted H19 gene: biallelic expression and lack of interaction with H19 enhancers. Genomics 45:290-296[CrossRef][Medline]. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| J. Bacteriol. | J. Virol. | Eukaryot. Cell |
|---|
| Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. | Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | All ASM Journals |
|---|