Previous Article | Next Article 
Molecular and Cellular Biology, February 2001, p. 875-883, Vol. 21, No. 3
0270-7306/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/MCB.21.3.875-883.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Critical Role for the Histone H4 N Terminus in
Nucleosome Remodeling by ISWI
Cedric R.
Clapier,1,2
Gernot
Längst,1
Davide F. V.
Corona,2
Peter B.
Becker,1,* and
Karl P.
Nightingale3
Adolf Butenandt-Institut, Molekularbiologie,
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 80336 Munich,1 and International Ph.D.
Programme of the European Molecular Biology Laboratory, 69117 Heidelberg,2 Germany, and Department of
Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1GA, United
Kingdom3
Received 1 August 2000/Returned for modification 6 September
2000/Accepted 1 November 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
The ATPase ISWI can be considered the catalytic core of several
multiprotein nucleosome remodeling machines. Alone or in the context of
nucleosome remodeling factor, the chromatin accessibility complex
(CHRAC), or ACF, ISWI catalyzes a number of ATP-dependent transitions
of chromatin structure that are currently best explained by its ability
to induce nucleosome sliding. In addition, ISWI can function as a
nucleosome spacing factor during chromatin assembly, where it will
trigger the ordering of newly assembled nucleosomes into regular
arrays. Both nucleosome remodeling and nucleosome spacing reactions are
mechanistically unexplained. As a step toward defining the interaction
of ISWI with its substrate during nucleosome remodeling and chromatin
assembly we generated a set of nucleosomes lacking individual histone N
termini from recombinant histones. We found the conserved N termini
(the N-terminal tails) of histone H4 essential to stimulate ISWI ATPase
activity, in contrast to other histone tails. Remarkably, the H4 N
terminus, but none of the other tails, was critical for CHRAC-induced
nucleosome sliding and for the generation of regularity in nucleosomal
arrays by ISWI. Direct nucleosome binding studies did not reflect a
dependence on the H4 tail for ISWI-nucleosome interactions. We conclude
that the H4 tail is critically required for nucleosome remodeling and spacing at a step subsequent to interaction with the substrate.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The assembly of eukaryotic genomes
into chromatin is a highly complex and delicate task; the cell must
efficiently package and condense the DNA into the eukaryotic nucleus
while maintaining specific regions of accessible chromatin to enable
important functions with chromatin substrates. While the chromatin
structure must remain highly dynamic in order to accommodate changes in
the expression of some genes, it also serves to stably maintain the
functional states of other genes through epigenetic mechanisms
(45, 51). Recently, genetic and biochemical analyses have
identified a broad class of multisubunit chromatin remodeling complexes
which are likely to play important roles both in the process of
chromatin opening and in the maintenance of chromatin in a dynamic or
flexible state (26, 48, 53). These complexes remodel or
reorganize nucleosomes in a wide range of in vitro assays which test
for altered accessibility of nucleosomal DNA.
Nucleosome remodeling complexes are modular entities. The nucleosome
remodeling reaction is catalyzed by a dedicated ATPase in concert with
only a subset of associated subunits (24, 37) or even by
the ATPase subunit alone (6). This catalytic core, or
engine, of the remodeling complexes is associated with other subunits,
which are likely to contribute regulatory or targeting roles
(6, 24, 37). Interestingly, some imitation switch (ISWI)-containing nucleosome remodeling complexes are also involved in
the assembly of regular nucleosomal arrays (23, 47). This suggests that the processes of chromatin assembly and nucleosome remodeling may involve a common nucleosomal intermediate which is
stabilized by ISWI-containing factors, thereby facilitating the
interconversion of different chromatin configurations.
Chromatin remodeling complexes can be divided into several broad
classes according to their core ATPase subunit, all of which belong to
the superfamily of SNF2-type ATPases (10). The yeast SWI-SNF and RSC (for remodels the structure of chromatin) complexes and
related machineries in Drosophila melanogaster and mammals are driven by SNF2-SWI2-type ATPases (36). The
chromo-helicase-ATPase-DNA binding group (52)
contains several related ATPases, most prominently the Mi-2
proteins that drive nucleosome remodeling reactions of the so-called
NuRD or NRD complexes (for nucleosome remodeling and deacetylation)
(41, 54, 55). Another family of complexes contains
the ISWI ATPase, including the Drosophila nucleosome remodeling factor (NURF), the ATP-utilizing chromatin assembly and remodeling factor (ACF), and the chromatin accessibility complex (CHRAC) (23, 43, 47), and related chromatin
remodeling complexes have been identified in organisms ranging from
yeast to humans (28, 44).
Nucleosome remodeling ATPases share little sequence similarity beyond
the ATPase domain that originally defined the family. Even the ATPase
domains, the most related parts of these proteins, cannot substitute
for each other (11). These differences also seem to be
reflected in the general mechanism as well as the molecular details of
chromatin remodeling by the three classes of complexes. While all types
of complexes are able to induce nucleosome sliding on DNA (4, 16,
18, 27, 49), stable remodeled intermediates (30,
39) and nucleosome displacement in trans (nucleosome eviction) (31) have so far been described only for
SWI2-SNF2-type complexes. Nucleosome interaction studies, ATPase
assays, and quantitative nucleosome remodeling have been employed to
identify similarities and differences between various nucleosome
remodeling machines, and distinct requirements for free DNA and histone
N termini for substrate recognition have been noted (3, 4, 16).
Ab initio, consideration of the process of nucleosome remodeling
suggested that the histone N-terminal tails constitute obvious contact
points on the surface of the nucleosome that could interact with
chromatin remodeling complexes. These extensions protrude from the
otherwise rather compact particle and reach out beyond the nucleosome
to contact sites in the adjacent chromatin or nonhistone regulators.
They are involved in a variety of important processes as diverse as
gene activation and silencing, nucleosome positioning, and the folding
of the nucleosomal fiber (for reviews, see references 12, 15, and
19). While Mi-2-containing complexes have little or no
requirement for histone tails (3, 4), ISWI activity depends on the integrity of these structures (6, 14).
Nucleosome remodeling by the SWI2-SNF2 complex does not absolutely
require the tail domains (3, 17), although these are
necessary for the catalytic remodeling activity of the SWI-SNF complex,
possibly by playing a role in the release of the complex from remodeled nucleosomes (29).
It is likely that a requirement for histone tails for nucleosome
remodeling reflects the underlying mechanism. However, the four histone
tails are not equivalent, and rather they participate in different
global functions (19). Up to now the influence of histone
tails could be demonstrated only by simultaneous tryptic removal of all
eight tails, precluding an assessment of the importance of each
individual structure. However, recently Luger et al. developed a system
for the expression of histones in bacteria and the reconstitution of
recombinant histone octamers (33, 34). Following these pioneering efforts, we generated a range of altered nucleosomes from
recombinant histones which lack defined, individual histone N termini.
We demonstrate that the histone H4 tails are essential to activate the
ATPase activity of ISWI but that the other histone N-terminal tails are
not required. Without the H4 tails ISWI is unable to induce nucleosome
regularity, and CHRAC is unable to catalyze nucleosome sliding. Since
ISWI interacts equally well with nucleosomes from which individual
tails have been deleted, our data argue for the involvement of the H4
tail at a step subsequent to the interaction of ISWI with the
nucleosomal substrate.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Expression and refolding of Xenopus laevis histones
into octamers.
The expression, purification, and refolding of
histones were performed essentially as described in Luger et al.
(33, 34), with a single modification to the purification
scheme. Briefly, full-length and tailless Xenopus histones
(gH4,
1-19; gH3,
1-26; gH2A,
1-12; gH2B,
1-26) were
expressed in pET-3a vectors in BL21 pLysS cells, and inclusion bodies
were prepared as described. These were subsequently dissolved in
unfolding buffer (guanidine-HCl), and the debris was spun down, but the
resultant supernatant was directly dialyzed three times into 1 liter of
SAU-200 (7 M urea, 20 mM sodium acetate [pH 5.2], 200 mM sodium
chloride, 5 mM
-mercaptoethanol, 1 mM EDTA). The histones were
subsequently loaded onto an SP Sepharose FF column, eluted with SAU-600
(7 M urea, 20 mM sodium acetate [pH 5.2], 600 mM sodium chloride, 5 mM
-mercaptoethanol, 1 mM EDTA), pooled, and dialyzed into water as
described previously (34). The refolding of histone
octamers and their subsequent purification from misfolded histone
aggregates and H3-H4 tetramers by gel filtration were also performed as
described above. The histone preparations were not contaminated with
bacterial protein to any significant extent.
ATPase assay.
ATPase assays were performed under ISWI
remodeling conditions, essentially as previously described
(6). Briefly, recombinant yNAP-1 containing an N-terminal
His tag was expressed in Escherichia coli and purified using
Ni-nitrilotriacetic acid agarose columns (Qiagen). Assays contained 300 ng of plasmid DNA, 450 ng of histones, as specified, and 35 ng of
yNAP-1 in the presence of 150 mM ATP and 0.7 µCi of
[
-32P]ATP (3,000 Ci/mmol) and were incubated at
26°C. Unhydrolyzed ATP and free phosphate were separated after 1 h, within the linear range of ATP hydrolysis, by thin-layer
chromatography using thin-layer chromatography cellulose Ready-Foils
(Scheicher & Schüll). Spots were quantified by FluoroImager and
Aida software.
Nucleosome assembly, mobility assay, and bandshift assay.
Mononucleosomes were reconstituted on a 248-bp DNA fragment
representing sequences between
232 and +16 relative to the mouse ribosomal DNA transcription site (+1) (27). This DNA
fragment was synthesized by PCR and body labeled by incorporating
[
-32P]dATP during PCR. Nucleosome assembly by salt
gradient dialysis was performed in the lid of siliconized Eppendorf
tubes (38). A typical assembly reaction mixture (100 µl)
contained 300 to 500 ng of histones, 500 ng of DNA, and 400 ng of
bovine serum albumin in HI salt buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.6], 2 M
NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM
-mercaptoethanol, 0.05% Nonidet P-40). The
salt concentration was continuously reduced to 50 mM NaCl during 16 to
24 h. The efficiency of nucleosome assembly was monitored by electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) in a 5% polyacrylamide gel
in 0.5× Tris-borate-EDTA. Positioned nucleosomes were isolated for the
mobility assay as described previously (4, 27). The mobility assay contained 60 fmol of positioned nucleosomes, which were
incubated with 0.5 to 3 fmol of CHRAC or 3 to 6 fmol of ISWI for 90 min
at room temperature.
For the EMSA, 5 to 75 fmol of ISWI was incubated with 50 fmol of
nucleosomes for 5 min at room temperature, and the reaction was
directly loaded onto a 5% polyacrylamide gel in 0.5× Tris-borate-EDTA without addition of competitor nucleosomes.
Chromatin assembly, MNase digestion, and supercoiling
analysis.
Chromatin assembly with yNAP-1 was performed under the
conditions of the ATPase assays but without labeled ATP. Reactions were
incubated at 26°C for 4 h. For micrococcal nuclease (MNase) digestion, 300 ng of chromatinized DNA was digested for 20, 50, and 110 s, deproteinized with 50 µg of proteinase K at 55°C for 1 h,
and precipitated prior to separation in a 1.3% Tris-glycine agarose
gel. For supercoiling analysis, 300 ng of chromatinized DNA was
purified in the same way as the MNase samples and was separated in a
1.3% Tris-glycine agarose gel containing 3.3 µM chloroquine, which
was run in Tris-glycine buffer containing 2.8 µM chloroquine at 80 V
for 10 h. For separation in the second dimension, the gel was then
turned 90° and rerun in buffer containing 3.6 µM chloroquine at 80 V for 7 h. The bands were subsequently visualized with ethidium bromide.
 |
RESULTS |
The histone H4 tails are essential for CHRAC-induced nucleosome
sliding.
It was recently reported that CHRAC is able to catalyze
an energy-dependent sliding of intact histone octamers on a small DNA
fragment (27). In order to establish whether any specific histone N terminus was required for induced nucleosome sliding, we
adapted the techniques of Luger et al. (33, 34) to express and refold full-length Xenopus histones or histones lacking
the trypsin-sensitive N termini into a variety of histone octamers in
which one or several of the histone tails were deleted. In short,
full-length or tailless histones were individually expressed in
bacteria, purified under denaturing conditions, mixed in the appropriate stoichiometry, and refolded by slow removal of the denaturant. Properly folded histone octamers were separated from aggregates and subnucleosomal assemblies by gel filtration. Figure 1 shows the protein composition of
various hybrid nucleosomes. In this and in the following figures,
truncated histones lacking N termini are indicated with the prefix
"g" (for globular, in accordance with the nomenclature by Luger et
al. [33]), although the trypsin-sensitive C-terminal
tails of H2A and H2B are still present (e.g., gH4 indicates histone H4
lacking the N terminus).

View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Generation of histone octamers. Histone octamers were
reconstituted from appropriate combinations of full-length and tailless
Xenopus histones (as indicated below the figure), purified
by gel filtration, and separated in a 15% sodium dodecyl sulfate gel
which was stained with Coomassie blue. The mobility of the histones is
indicated on the left of the figure. Tailless histones, of which only
the globular part contributes to the nucleosome, are indicated with the
prefix "g" (e.g., gH4 indicates a tailless H4).
|
|
Intact nucleosomes or nucleosomes lacking individual histone tails were
reconstituted by salt gradient dialysis from appropriate
histone
mixtures on a 248-bp DNA fragment. When the products of
the
reconstitutions were analyzed on a native gel, the two protein-DNA
complexes diagnostic for the two previously characterized translational
positions (
27) were obtained, although the ratio between
the
two positions varied depending on the tail complement of the
histone
octamer (data not shown). Under these conditions, centrally
located
nucleosomes migrate more slowly, and nucleosomes which abut the
two opposite ends comigrate as a single faster mobility band in
the
gel. Previous studies showed that CHRAC could mobilize purified
translationally positioned nucleosomes from fast-migrating end
positions to slow-migrating central positions (
27).
Nucleosomes
abutting the fragment ends were purified and analyzed for
CHRAC-dependent
mobilization (Fig.
2,
top). Nucleosomes composed of all four
intact
histones were induced to slide from the peripheral to the
central
position as a function of CHRAC concentration (Fig.
2 top,
intact).
In the absence of ATP, no nucleosome sliding occurred (Fig.
2 top, intact,

ATP). This is consistent with previous results
(
27)
and confirms that the refolded octamers could
effectively substitute
for native octamers. Subsequent experiments
examined the effect
of CHRAC on nucleosomes in which the histone tails
had been individually
removed. CHRAC was able to induce nucleosome
sliding if the nucleosomal
substrate lacked either the histone H3, H2A,
or H2B tails, although
less efficiently since higher concentrations of
CHRAC were required
(Fig.
2, top). However, deletion of the H4 tails
completely abolished
nucleosome sliding (Fig.
2, top, gH4),
highlighting the importance
of this domain for nucleosome mobilization.

View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
The H4 tail is required for CHRAC-mediated nucleosome
sliding. (Top) End-positioned nucleosomes reconstituted from histone
octamers either containing all four full-length histones (intact) or
with one tail missing (e.g., the H3 tail in the gH3 sample) were
incubated with increasing concentrations of CHRAC, in which the
CHRAC-to-nucleosome ratio was from 1:120 to 1:20. All reactions
contained ATP, except for the one presented in the last panel. The
reaction mixture was separated by native polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis. The position of traces of free DNA is indicated (DNA).
(Bottom) Centrally positioned nucleosomes were mobilized with ISWI, and
the ISWI-to-nucleosome ratio was from 1:20 to 1:10. Nucleosome sliding
was analyzed as described in the legend for the top panel.
|
|
The molecular engine that drives the ability of CHRAC to induce
nucleosome sliding is the ATPase ISWI. We previously observed
that
recombinant ISWI is able to mobilize nucleosomes, however,
with altered
directionality compared to that of CHRAC. ISWI can
induce nucleosome
sliding only from a central to a peripheral
position (
6).
In order to assess the tail dependence of nucleosome
sliding induced by
recombinant ISWI, the centrally positioned
nucleosome was purified and
used as the starting material for
the sliding assay. Nucleosome sliding
by ISWI was abolished if
the H4 N terminus was deleted (Fig.
2,
bottom), as was seen for
CHRAC. However, in contrast to the results
obtained with purified
CHRAC, recombinant ISWI was more sensitive to
the deletion of
the H3 and H2A N termini. Possible reasons for the
observed difference
in the tail requirement between recombinant ISWI
and ISWI in the
context of CHRAC are considered in the
Discussion.
The histone H4 tail is necessary and sufficient to induce ISWI
ATPase activity.
The low level of basal ATPase activity of ISWI is
stimulated by the presence of properly folded nucleosomes but not by
free histones (6). Measuring ATPase activity therefore
allows us to assess nucleosomal features that affect the substrate
recognition by the enzyme. In order to gain further insight into the
role of individual histone tails for ISWI activity, we compared the ATPase activity of ISWI under conditions of nucleosome assembly (see
below) with that of reactions containing only DNA but no histones, thus
establishing the degree of nucleosome-dependent stimulation. Whereas
the degree of stimulation by DNA alone was variable, considerable
stimulation by intact nucleosomes was consistently observed (Fig.
3, panels 1 and 2). In contrast,
nucleosomes in which all of the tails had been removed failed to
stimulate the ATPase above the basal level seen with DNA alone (Fig. 3,
panel 3). We subsequently assessed the contribution of individual
histone tails on ATP hydrolysis by programming the assembly with
histone octamers from which specific tails were absent (Fig. 3, panels 4 to 7). This showed that the removal of the histone H4 tails (Fig. 3,
panel 5) reduced ATPase activity to the level seen with deletion of all
the tails, whereas individual removal of the H2A, H2B, or H3 tails had
no apparent effect on the amount of ATP hydrolyzed. This result clearly
established a requirement for substrate recognition by ISWI. In order
to examine whether the other histone N termini contributed to ISWI
ATPase activity, we reconstituted a histone octamer in which only the
H4 tail was present, the remaining three histone tails being removed.
Remarkably, this octamer induced a level of ATP hydrolysis equivalent
to that of fully intact octamers (Fig. 3, compare panels 2 and 8),
establishing that the ISWI ATPase responds solely to the histone H4
tail. This result highlights the critical role of the H4 N terminus for
ATPase function.

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
ISWI ATPase is activated by the histone H4 tail.
(A) ATPase assays were performed under conditions where ISWI
generates regular nucleosome ladders and contained DNA, the recombinant
histones indicated, and purified yNAP-1 and ISWI. The asterisk
indicates the signal derived from free phosphate during the 1-h
incubation. (B) Quantitation of ISWI ATPase as described for panel A in
the presence of either DNA alone (lane 1) or the indicated histone
octamers. The ATPase activity is displayed as the percentage of ATP
hydrolyzed during the assay. The bars represent the average of three
independent experiments, and the variability is indicated by the error
bars.
|
|
A requirement for the H4 tails for the generation of regular
nucleosomal arrays.
ISWI can also function as a chromatin assembly
factor in the context of both CHRAC and ACF (6, 24, 44).
The establishment of regular nucleosomal arrays by ISWI can be analyzed
in a minimal nucleosome assembly reaction consisting of histones, DNA,
topoisomerase I, and a histone chaperone, NAP-1. Briefly,
NAP-1-mediated transfer of histone octamers onto DNA generates a
polynucleosomal fiber that lacks obvious regularity when analyzed by
MNase cleavage (see below). In the presence of ATP, ISWI induces
regular spacing of nucleosomes in this array, which can be deduced from
the appearance of a ladder of fragments above the general smear upon
MNase digestion (6, 23). The regularity of the array could
be brought about by the repositioning of nucleosomes as a result of
ISWI-induced nucleosome sliding (6), in which case we
would expect to see an effect from deleting the H4, H3, and H2A tails.
However, the ATPase activity of ISWI under assembly conditions is
solely affected by deletion of the H4 tail (Fig. 3). We therefore
examined the tail dependence of the spacing activity of ISWI. If
refolded histones (H2A-H2B dimers and H3-H4 tetramers at this ionic
strength) are introduced into the minimal chromatin assembly reaction,
long, regular nucleosomal arrays are created in the presence of ATP (Fig. 4B) (6).


View larger version (123K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
The H4 tail is required for ISWI to generate regular
chromatin. (A) Two-dimensional supercoiling assay. Nucleosomes were
reconstituted from the indicated mixtures of recombinant histones on
circular plasmids using NAP-1 as a chaperone in the absence ( ) or
presence (+) of ISWI, and the resulting superhelicity was relaxed with
topoisomerase I. The topoisomer distribution in the purified DNA was
visualized by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. (B) MNase digestion.
Histone octamers of the indicated type were assembled into chromatin in
a NAP-1 chromatin assembly system and subjected to MNase digestion. The
resulting DNA fragments were purified and visualized by agarose gel
electrophoresis and ethidium bromide staining. ISWI-generated
regularity of nucleosomal arrays can be evaluated from a comparison of
the patterns without ( ISWI) and with (+ ISWI) ISWI. The marker is a
123-bp DNA ladder.
|
|
A critical parameter in this comparative analysis is the extent of
nucleosome deposition, which can be conveniently assessed
by monitoring
the topology of the resulting minichromosomes. The
assembly of a
nucleosome by the winding of DNA around a histone
octamer introduces
one negative superhelical turn into the plasmid
in the presence of
topoisomerase. Parallel reactions were programmed
with histone
octamers, where either all histones were intact,
all histones had their
N-terminal tails deleted, or mixtures of
histones had individual tails
deleted. Measuring the superhelical
density of the deproteinized DNA by
two-dimensional gel electrophoresis
allowed us to verify that chromatin
assembly with the various
histone mixtures led to equivalent
nucleosomal densities (Fig.
4A). This showed that the deletion of
individual histone tails,
or indeed all tails, did not affect the
efficiency of NAP-1-mediated
nucleosome deposition, whether or not ISWI
was present. Addition
of ISWI correlated with a small increase (2 to 3)
in the number
of supercoils constrained. ISWI-dependent generation of
regularity
was monitored under conditions of equivalent nucleosome
density
by MNase digestion (
6). In the absence of ISWI
(Fig.
4B, upper
panel) MNase digestion generated a continuum (smear) of
fragments,
indicating the random arrangement of histone octamers on the
plasmid
independent of the presence of histone tails. Adding ISWI to a
reaction containing intact histones generated a regular fragment
pattern upon MNase digestion, indicating that the deposited nucleosomes
had formed an ordered array (Fig.
4B, bottom panel 1). This result
is
consistent with earlier observations using native
Drosophila histones, indicating that recombinant histones can substitute
for
native histones in this assay. In contrast, assembly of histone
octamers in which all the tails had been removed did not yield
a
regular nucleosome ladder in the presence of ISWI (Fig.
4B,
panel 2).
Deletion of individual tails affected regularity to
a different extent.
Deletion of the H4 tails prevented the establishment
of regularity
(Fig.
4B, panel 4), while deletion of each of the
other tails had a
much less severe impact (compare the upper and
lower panels of Fig.
4B
for each case). Nucleosomes containing
just the H4 tails gave rise to
better regularity than nucleosomes
from which all the tails had been
deleted, although the regularity
of chromatin reconstituted from intact
histone was not reached
(data not shown). These results further support
our notion that
the N terminus of histone H4 is particularly critical
for ISWI
function. The distinct requirements of the other tails for
nucleosome
sliding and nucleosome spacing may reflect true mechanistic
differences
or the particularities of the
assays.
The H4 tail is required at a step subsequent to substrate
binding.
H4 tails may be required for the interaction of ISWI with
its nucleosomal substrate. We recently established an EMSA to analyze the binding of ISWI to nucleosomes. ISWI-nucleosome interactions can be
visualized if small DNA segments protrude beyond the realm of the
histone octamer but not with nucleosomes reconstituted onto 147-bp
fragments where all DNA is likely to be in contact with histone
(4). ISWI retards nucleosomes with protruding linker DNA
upon gel electrophoresis to give rise to two bands of lower mobility,
presumably representing defined species containing one and two
molecules of ISWI (Fig. 5). Individual
deletion of each of the histone N termini, including, significantly,
the histone H4 tails, did not affect the ability of ISWI to interact
with the nucleosome qualitatively or quantitatively in this assay, whether or not ATP was included in the reaction (Fig. 5 and data not
shown). While this experiment does not rule out a more transient interaction of the H4 tail with ISWI, it argues against a critical role
for the H4 tail in the stable interaction of ISWI with the nucleosomal
substrate.

View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Recombinant ISWI binds to nucleosomes. ISWI (5 to 75 fmol) was incubated with mononucleosomes reconstituted with either four
wild-type recombinant histones (intact) or three wild-type histones and
one lacking the N-terminal tail (e.g., gH3 for globular H3) on a 248-bp
radioactively labeled DNA fragment. Resulting complexes were separated
by native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and visualized by
autoradiography. Nucleosome-ISWI complexes are marked by arrows.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
A critical role for the H4 tail for ISWI functions.
The
nucleosome remodeling ATPase ISWI has been implicated in two prominent
reactions in chromatin, the establishment of an ordered nucleosomal
array during the process of chromatin assembly and the generation of
access to specific DNA sequences once a nucleosomal array has been
established by facilitating nucleosome relocation. Our study highlights
the importance of the first 20 N-terminal amino acids on H4 for both
ISWI functions. Perhaps surprisingly, none of the other histone tails
contributes to the activation of the ISWI ATPase, although their
deletion has additional effects depending on the type of reaction.
Previously, the general importance of the histone N termini for the
ATPase activity of the ISWI-containing NURF had been established
(14), but this study did not address the role of
individual tails. The use of recombinant histone mutants, pioneered by
Richmond, Luger, and colleagues (33, 34), allowed us to
define the functional interactions of a remodeling machine with its
nucleosomal substrate in further detail. Our results point to critical
roles of the histone H4 tail for several ISWI functions which have
important implications in the context of current knowledge of chromatin
structure and regulation (see below).
Whereas nucleosome sliding induced by CHRAC solely required the N
termini of H4, ISWI-induced sliding was also sensitive to
removal of
the H3 and H2A tails (Fig.
2). While this discrepancy
could in theory
be explained by inherent differences in the experiments
(e.g., the
inevitable requirement to use either centrally or peripherally
positioned nucleosomes as starting material), we recently obtained
support for the hypothesis that the association of CHRAC subunits
modulates the properties of ISWI. The interaction of recombinant
ISWI
with recombinant ACF1, a factor associated with ISWI in ACF
(
24) and CHRAC (Ferrari, Eberharter, Längst, and
Becker, unpublished
data), alters the tail requirements for nucleosome
sliding such
that it is no longer sensitive to the deletion of the H3
and H2A
N termini. However, like in purified CHRAC, deletion of the H4
tail still abolishes remodeling activity under those circumstances
(Ferrari et al., unpublished data). Although the different tail
requirements for ISWI-induced nucleosome sliding and spacing might
simply reflect differences in experimental setup (e.g., the presence
of
NAP-1 during nucleosome assembly), the possibility that they
reflect
mechanistic distinctions remains to be
explored.
Multiple functions are integrated at the N terminus of histone
H4.
The histone H4 N terminus reaches well beyond the globular
core of the nucleosome that is represented in the crystal structure (32) but presumably adopts, at least under certain
conditions, an
-helical structure (reviewed in reference
19). The importance of the tail presumably lies in its
ability to reach out to contact other proteins, either histones in
adjacent nucleosomes or nonhistone proteins that determine the
functional state of the nucleosomal fiber (19). The
histone tails contribute to the stabilization of the higher order
folding of chromatin structure, which is associated with
transcriptional repression (13, 20, 42). This is likely to
reflect nucleosome-nucleosome contacts via the tails, possibly as
visualized in the crystal structure of the nucleosome, where a portion
of the H4 tail contacts an exposed surface of the H2A-H2B dimer on an
adjacent nucleosome (32). Genetic experiments in yeast
also revealed a contribution of the H4 tail to both transcriptional activation and repression (8, 25). These phenomena are
presumably mediated by dedicated factors interacting with the H4 N
termini. The bromodomain motif, which is found in a number of
chromatin-associated proteins, including components of histone
acetyltransferases and nucleosome remodeling ATPases, interacts with
specific sites on the H3 and H4 N termini in vitro (7, 35,
50). Tail interactions of the heterochromatin proteins SIR3 and
SIR4 (21) and TUP1-SSn6 (9, 22) are involved
in the silencing of chromosomal domains, but the structural basis for
this remains to be elucidated. Interactions of this kind may well
affect the ISWI-H4 tail interactions, with consequences for the degree
of chromatin fluidity at these sites.
The interaction between ISWI and its substrate, the nucleosome, may be
further modulated by posttranslational modification
of H4. Recently,
the acetylation of conserved lysine residues
in the H4 tail has
received wider attention (
40,
53). In
Drosophila,
H4 isoforms acetylated at individual lysines are
enriched in chromatin
with different functional states
(
46). While acetylation of
lysine 12 characterizes the
transcriptionally inactive, epicentric
heterochromatin, acetylation of
lysine 16 is crucial for the global
activation of transcription from
the male X chromosome (
2).
We recently showed that
acetylation of H4 at lysine 16 by the
acetyltransferase MOF causes
derepression of transcription from
chromatin templates in vitro and in
vivo (
1). It will be interesting
to see whether the
modification status of the H4 tail influences
the substrate recognition
and catalysis of nucleosome sliding
by ISWI. Obviously, the H4 N
terminus integrates a number of distinct
functions. By analyzing more
subtle mutations in the H4 N terminus
in vitro and in vivo it should be
possible to separate the requirements
for remodeling by ISWI from other
functions.
Implications for possible mechanisms of nucleosome remodeling.
The importance of the histone H4 tail for all aspects of ISWI function
in vitro points to significant mechanistic differences to nucleosome
remodeling by the Mi-2 ATPase (3, 4, 16), which does not
require any of the histone N termini. Since both enzymes are capable of
inducing nucleosome sliding, this process may be brought about by
different mechanisms (4). The mechanistic principle
underlying the H4 tail dependence of ISWI function is unclear at
present. A role for H4 tails in substrate recognition by ISWI seems
unlikely, since we observed stable complexes of ISWI with nucleosomes
lacking H4 tails. Clearly, ISWI does not recognize the histone H4 tails
in isolation but requires the context of a nucleosome, since neither
refolded histones nor peptides corresponding to the H4 N terminus
stimulate ATPase activity (6, 14). We also failed to
detect an interaction between ISWI and glutathione
S-transferase-H4 tail fusion proteins in standard pull-down
assays (5, 21; data not shown).
However, more transient interactions between the H4 N terminus and ISWI
may influence a rate-limiting step of the nucleosome
remodeling and ATP
hydrolysis reactions allosterically or may
otherwise be involved in the
mechanics of nucleosome sliding.
Analyzing the remodeling reaction
catalyzed by the SWI-SNF complex,
Logie et al. (
29)
observed that while histone tails were not
important for the remodeling
step itself, they stimulated the
remodeling rate by promoting the
turnover of the enzyme-substrate
complex. A more transient interaction
of histone tails may have
been observed in ATPase assays where the
addition of histone N-terminal
peptides as glutathione
S-transferase fusions diminished the ATPase
activities of
NURF and recombinant ISWI some two- to fourfold
(
6,
14).
However, these analyses did not reveal a specific
effect of the H4
tail.
The ability to create variant nucleosome substrates from recombinant
subunits should greatly facilitate the elucidation of
the sequence of
events that leads to nucleosome remodeling and
to uncover the
relationship between chromatin assembly and nucleosome
remodeling.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank K. Luger and T. Richmond (ETH, Zurich, Switzerland) for
generously providing the Xenopus histone expression plasmids and advice on the procedures involved in expressing and purifying histones.
K.P.N. was supported by EMBO and the Wellcome Trust. We thank M. Mann
for making funds available to support C.R.C. and the EMBL International
Ph.D. Programme, as well as the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, for
continuing support.
C.R.C. and G. L. contributed equally and should be considered
joint first authors.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Adolf
Butenandt-Institut, Molekularbiologie, Schillerstr. 44, 80336 Munich,
Germany. Phone: 49-89-5996-427 (428). Fax: 49-89-5996-425. E-mail:
pbecker{at}mol-bio.med.uni-muenchen.de.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Akhtar, A., and P. B. Becker.
2000.
Activation of transcription through histone H4 acetylation by MOF, an acetyltransferase essential to dosage compensation in Drosophila.
Mol. Cell
5:367-375[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Bone, J. R.,
J. Lavender,
R. Richman,
M. J. Palmer,
B. M. Turner, and M. I. Kuroda.
1994.
Acetylated histone H4 on the male X chromosome is associated with dosage compensation in Drosophila.
Genes Dev.
8:96-104[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Boyer, L. A.,
C. Logie,
E. Bonte,
P. B. Becker,
P. A. Wade,
A. P. Wolffe,
C. Wu,
A. N. Imbalzano, and C. L. Peterson.
2000.
Functional delineation of three groups of the ATP-dependent family of chromatin remodeling enzymes.
J. Biol. Chem.
275:18864-18870[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Brehm, A.,
G. Längst,
J. Kehle,
C. R. Clapier,
A. Imhof,
A. Eberharter,
J. Müller, and P. B. Becker.
2000.
dMi2 and ISWI represent two classes of chromatin remodeling factors characterized by distinct nucleosome binding and mobilization properties.
EMBO J.
19:4332-4341[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Breiling, A.,
E. Bonte,
S. Ferrari,
P. B. Becker, and R. Paro.
1999.
The Drosophila polycomb protein interacts with nucleosomal core particles in vitro via its repression domain.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19:8451-8460[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Corona, D. F. V.,
G. Längst,
C. R. Clapier,
E. J. Bonte,
S. Ferrari,
J. W. Tamkun, and P. B. Becker.
1999.
ISWI is an ATP-dependent nucleosome remodeling factor.
Mol. Cell
3:239-245[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Dhalluin, C.,
J. E. Carlson,
L. Zeng,
C. He,
A. K. Aggarwal, and M. M. Zhou.
1999.
Structure and ligand of a histone acetyltransferase bromodomain.
Nature
399:491-496[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Durrin, L. K.,
R. K. Mann,
P. S. Kayne, and M. Grunstein.
1991.
Yeast histone H4 N-terminal sequence is required for promoter activation in vivo.
Cell
65:1023-1031[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Edmondson, D. G.,
M. M. Smith, and S. Y. Roth.
1996.
Repression domain of the yeast global repressor Tup1 interacts directly with histones H3 and H4.
Genes Dev.
10:1247-1259[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Eisen, J. A.,
K. S. Sweder, and P. C. Hanawalt.
1995.
Evolution of the SNF2 family of proteins: subfamilies with distinct sequences and functions.
Nucleic Acids Res.
14:2715-2723.
|
| 11.
|
Elfring, L. K.,
R. Deuring,
C. M. McCallum,
C. L. Peterson, and J. W. Tamkun.
1994.
Identification and characterization of Drosophila relatives of the yeast transcriptional activator SNF2/SWI2.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14:2225-2234[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Fletcher, T. M., and J. C. Hansen.
1995.
Core histone tail domains mediate oligonucleosome folding and nucleosomal DNA organization through distinct molecular mechanisms.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:25359-25362[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Garcia-Ramirez, M.,
F. Dong, and J. Ausio.
1992.
Role of the histone "tails" in the folding of oligonucleosomes depleted of histone H1.
J. Biol. Chem.
267:19587-19595[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Georgel, P. T.,
T. Tsukiyama, and C. Wu.
1997.
Role of histone tails in nucleosome remodeling by Drosophila NURF.
EMBO J.
16:4717-4726[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Grunstein, M.
1997.
Histone acetylation in chromatin structure and transcription.
Nature
389:349-352[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Guschin, D.,
P. A. Wade,
N. Kikyo, and A. P. Wolffe.
2000.
ATP-dependent histone octamer mobilization and histone deacetylation mediated by the Mi-2 chromatin remodeling complex.
Biochemistry
39:5238-5245[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Guyon, J. R.,
G. J. Narlikar,
S. Sif, and R. E. Kingston.
1999.
Stable remodeling of tailless nucleosomes by the human SWI-SNF complex.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19:2088-2097[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Hamiche, A.,
R. Sandaltzopoulos,
D. A. Gdula, and C. Wu.
1999.
ATP-dependent histone octamer sliding mediated by the chromatin remodeling complex NURF.
Cell
97:833-842[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Hansen, J. C.,
C. Tse, and A. P. Wolffe.
1998.
Structure and function of the core histone N-termini: more than meets the eye.
Biochemistry
37:17637-17641[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Hansen, J. C., and A. P. Wolffe.
1992.
Influence of chromatin folding on transcription initiation and elongation by RNA polymerase III.
Biochemistry
31:7977-7988[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Hecht, A.,
T. Laroche,
S. Strahl-Bolsinger,
S. M. Gasser, and M. Grunstein.
1995.
Histone H3 and H4 N-termini interact with SIR3 and SIR4 proteins: a molecular model for the formation of heterochromatin in yeast.
Cell
80:583-592[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Huang, L.,
W. Zhang, and S. Y. Roth.
1997.
Amino termini of histones H3 and H4 are required for a1- 2 repression in yeast.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17:6555-6562[Abstract].
|
| 23.
|
Ito, T.,
M. Bulger,
M. J. Pazin,
R. Kobayashi, and J. T. Kadonaga.
1997.
ACF, an ISWI-containing and ATP-utilizing chromatin assembly and remodeling factor.
Cell
90:145-155[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Ito, T.,
M. E. Levenstein,
D. V. Fyodorov,
A. K. Kutach,
R. Kobayashi, and J. T. Kadonaga.
1999.
ACF consists of two subunits, Acf1 and ISWI, that function cooperatively in the ATP-dependent catalysis of chromatin assembly.
Genes Dev.
13:1529-1539[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Kayne, P. S.,
U. J. Kim,
M. Han,
J. R. Mullen,
F. Yoshizaki, and M. Grunstein.
1988.
Extremely conserved histone H4 N terminus is dispensable for growth but essential for repressing the silent mating loci in yeast.
Cell
55:27-39[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 26.
|
Kingston, R. E., and G. J. Narlikar.
1999.
ATP-dependent remodeling and acetylation as regulators of chromatin fluidity.
Genes Dev.
13:2339-2352[Free Full Text].
|
| 27.
|
Längst, G.,
E. J. Bonte,
D. F. V. Corona, and P. B. Becker.
1999.
Nucleosome movement by CHRAC and ISWI without disruption or trans-displacement of the histone octamer.
Cell
97:843-852[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 28.
|
LeRoy, G.,
G. Orphanides,
W. S. Lane, and D. Reinberg.
1998.
Requirement of RSF and FACT for transcription of chromatin templates in vitro.
Science
282:1900-1904[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 29.
|
Logie, C.,
C. Tse,
J. C. Hansen, and C. L. Peterson.
1999.
The core histone N-terminal domains are required for multiple rounds of catalytic chromatin remodeling by the SWI/SNF and RSC complexes.
Biochemistry
38:2514-2522[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 30.
|
Lorch, Y.,
B. R. Cairns,
M. Zhang, and R. D. Kornberg.
1998.
Activated RSC-nucleosome complex and persistently altered form of the nucleosome.
Cell
94:29-34[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 31.
|
Lorch, Y.,
M. Zhang, and R. D. Kornberg.
1999.
Histone octamer transfer by a chromatin-remodeling complex.
Cell
96:389-392[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 32.
|
Luger, K.,
A. W. Mäder,
R. K. Richmond,
D. F. Sargent, and T. J. Richmond.
1997.
Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 A resolution.
Nature
389:251-260[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 33.
|
Luger, K.,
T. J. Rechsteiner,
A. J. Flaus,
M. M. Waye, and T. J. Richmond.
1997.
Characterization of nucleosome core particles containing histone proteins made in bacteria.
J. Mol. Biol.
272:301-311[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 34.
|
Luger, K.,
T. J. Rechsteiner, and T. J. Richmond.
1999.
Preparation of nucleosome core particle from recombinant histones.
Methods Enzymol.
304:3-19[Medline].
|
| 35.
|
Ornaghi, P.,
P. Ballario,
A. M. Lena,
A. Gonzalez, and P. Filetici.
1999.
The bromodomain of Gcn5p interacts in vitro with specific residues in the N terminus of histone H4.
J. Mol. Biol.
287:1-7[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 36.
|
Peterson, C. L.
1996.
Multiple SWItches to turn on chromatin?
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
6:171-175[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 37.
|
Phelan, M. L.,
S. Sif,
G. J. Narlikar, and R. E. Kingston.
1999.
Reconstitution of a core chromatin remodeling complex from SWI/SNF subunits.
Mol. Cell
3:247-253[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 38.
|
Sandaltzopoulos, R., and P. B. Becker.
1999.
A solid phase approach for the analysis of reconstituted chromatin, p. 195-206.
In
P. B. Becker (ed.), Chromatin protocols. Humana Press, Totowa, N.J.
|
| 39.
|
Schnitzler, G.,
S. Sif, and R. E. Kingston.
1998.
Human SWI/SNF interconverts a nucleosome between its base state and a stable remodeled state.
Cell
94:17-27[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 40.
|
Strahl, B. D., and C. D. Allis.
2000.
The language of covalent histone modifications.
Nature
403:41-45[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 41.
|
Tong, J. K.,
C. A. Hassig,
G. R. Schnitzler,
R. E. Kingston, and S. L. Schreiber.
1998.
Chromatin deacetylation by an ATP-dependent nucleosome remodelling complex.
Nature
395:917-921[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 42.
|
Tse, C.,
T. Sera,
A. P. Wolffe, and J. C. Hansen.
1998.
Disruption of higher-order folding by core histone acetylation dramatically enhances transcription of nucleosomal arrays by RNA polymerase III.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:4629-4638[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 43.
|
Tsukiyama, T.,
C. Daniel,
J. Tamkun, and C. Wu.
1995.
ISWI, a member of the SWI2/SNF2 ATPase family, encodes the 140 kD subunit of the nucleosome remodeling factor.
Cell
83:1021-1026[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 44.
|
Tsukiyama, T.,
J. Palmer,
C. C. Landel,
J. Shiloach, and C. Wu.
1999.
Characterization of the imitation switch subfamily of ATP-dependent chromatin-remodeling factors in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Genes Dev.
13:686-697[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 45.
|
Turner, B. M.
1998.
Histone acetylation as an epigenetic determinant of long-term transcriptional competence.
Cell. Mol. Life Sci.
54:21-31[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 46.
|
Turner, B. M.,
A. J. Birley, and J. Lavender.
1992.
Histone H4 isoforms acetylated at specific lysine residues define individual chromosomes and chromatin domains in Drosophila polytene nuclei.
Cell
69:375-384[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 47.
|
Varga-Weisz, P. D.,
M. Wilm,
E. Bonte,
K. Dumas,
M. Mann, and P. B. Becker.
1997.
Chromatin remodelling factor CHRAC contains the ATPases ISWI and topoisomerase II.
Nature
388:598-602[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 48.
|
Vignali, M.,
A. H. Hassan,
K. E. Neely, and J. L. Workman.
2000.
ATP-dependent chromatin-remodeling complexes.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20:1899-1910[Free Full Text].
|
| 49.
|
Whitehouse, I.,
A. Flaus,
B. R. Cairns,
M. F. White,
J. L. Workman, and T. Owen-Hughes.
1999.
Nucleosome mobilization catalysed by the yeast SWI/SNF complex.
Nature
400:784-787[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 50.
|
Winston, F., and C. D. Allis.
1999.
The bromodomain: a chromatin-targeting module?
Nat. Struct. Biol.
6:601-604[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 51.
|
Wolffe, A. P., and M. A. Matzke.
1999.
Epigenetics: regulation through repression.
Science
286:481-486[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 52.
|
Woodage, T.,
M. A. Basrai,
A. D. Baxevanis,
P. Hieter, and F. S. Collins.
1997.
Characterization of the CHD family of proteins.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:11472-11477[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 53.
|
Workman, J. L., and R. E. Kingston.
1998.
Alteration of nucleosome structure as a mechanism of transcriptional regulation.
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
67:545-579[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 54.
|
Xue, Y.,
J. Wong,
G. T. Moreno,
M. K. Young,
J. Cote, and W. Wang.
1998.
NURD, a novel complex with both ATP-dependent chromatin-remodeling and histone deacetylase activities.
Mol. Cell
2:851-861[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 55.
|
Zhang, Y.,
G. LeRoy,
H. Seelig,
W. S. Lane, and D. Reinberg.
1998.
The dermatosis-specific autoantigen Mi2 is a component of a protein complex containing deacetylase and nucleosome remodeling activities.
Cell
95:279-289[CrossRef][Medline].
|
Molecular and Cellular Biology, February 2001, p. 875-883, Vol. 21, No. 3
0270-7306/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/MCB.21.3.875-883.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Baker, A. M., Fu, Q., Hayward, W., Lindsay, S. M., Fletcher, T. M.
(2009). The Myb/SANT domain of the telomere-binding protein TRF2 alters chromatin structure. Nucleic Acids Res
37: 5019-5031
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Pinskaya, M., Nair, A., Clynes, D., Morillon, A., Mellor, J.
(2009). Nucleosome Remodeling and Transcriptional Repression Are Distinct Functions of Isw1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol.
29: 2419-2430
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Dang, W., Bartholomew, B.
(2007). Domain Architecture of the Catalytic Subunit in the ISW2-Nucleosome Complex. Mol. Cell. Biol.
27: 8306-8317
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Rippe, K., Schrader, A., Riede, P., Strohner, R., Lehmann, E., Langst, G.
(2007). DNA sequence- and conformation-directed positioning of nucleosomes by chromatin-remodeling complexes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
104: 15635-15640
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Fingerman, I. M., Li, H.-C., Briggs, S. D.
(2007). A charge-based interaction between histone H4 and Dot1 is required for H3K79 methylation and telomere silencing: identification of a new trans-histone pathway. Genes Dev.
21: 2018-2029
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Dang, W., Kagalwala, M. N., Bartholomew, B.
(2007). The Dpb4 Subunit of ISW2 Is Anchored to Extranucleosomal DNA. J. Biol. Chem.
282: 19418-19425
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Gangaraju, V. K., Bartholomew, B.
(2007). Dependency of ISW1a Chromatin Remodeling on Extranucleosomal DNA. Mol. Cell. Biol.
27: 3217-3225
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Sherriff, J. A., Kent, N. A., Mellor, J.
(2007). The Isw2 Chromatin-Remodeling ATPase Cooperates with the Fkh2 Transcription Factor To Repress Transcription of the B-Type Cyclin Gene CLB2. Mol. Cell. Biol.
27: 2848-2860
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Dang, W., Kagalwala, M. N., Bartholomew, B.
(2006). Regulation of ISW2 by Concerted Action of Histone H4 Tail and Extranucleosomal DNA.. Mol. Cell. Biol.
26: 7388-7396
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Shogren-Knaak, M., Ishii, H., Sun, J.-M., Pazin, M. J., Davie, J. R., Peterson, C. L.
(2006). Histone H4-K16 Acetylation Controls Chromatin Structure and Protein Interactions. Science
311: 844-847
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Fazzio, T. G., Gelbart, M. E., Tsukiyama, T.
(2005). Two Distinct Mechanisms of Chromatin Interaction by the Isw2 Chromatin Remodeling Complex In Vivo. Mol. Cell. Biol.
25: 9165-9174
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Smith, C. L., Peterson, C. L.
(2005). A Conserved Swi2/Snf2 ATPase Motif Couples ATP Hydrolysis to Chromatin Remodeling. Mol. Cell. Biol.
25: 5880-5892
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Santoro, R., Grummt, I.
(2005). Epigenetic Mechanism of rRNA Gene Silencing: Temporal Order of NoRC-Mediated Histone Modification, Chromatin Remodeling, and DNA Methylation. Mol. Cell. Biol.
25: 2539-2546
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Schwanbeck, R., Xiao, H., Wu, C.
(2004). Spatial Contacts and Nucleosome Step Movements Induced by the NURF Chromatin Remodeling Complex. J. Biol. Chem.
279: 39933-39941
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Nemeth, A., Strohner, R., Grummt, I., Langst, G.
(2004). The chromatin remodeling complex NoRC and TTF-I cooperate in the regulation of the mammalian rRNA genes in vivo. Nucleic Acids Res
32: 4091-4099
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Strohner, R., Nemeth, A., Nightingale, K. P., Grummt, I., Becker, P. B., Langst, G.
(2004). Recruitment of the Nucleolar Remodeling Complex NoRC Establishes Ribosomal DNA Silencing in Chromatin. Mol. Cell. Biol.
24: 1791-1798
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
BECKER, P.B.
(2004). The Chromatin Accessibility Complex: Chromatin Dynamics through Nucleosome Sliding. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol
69: 281-288
[Abstract]
-
Sabet, N., Tong, F., Madigan, J. P., Volo, S., Smith, M. M., Morse, R. H.
(2003). Global and specific transcriptional repression by the histone H3 amino terminus in yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
100: 4084-4089
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Whitehouse, I., Stockdale, C., Flaus, A., Szczelkun, M. D., Owen-Hughes, T.
(2003). Evidence for DNA Translocation by the ISWI Chromatin-Remodeling Enzyme. Mol. Cell. Biol.
23: 1935-1945
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kassabov, S. R., Henry, N. M., Zofall, M., Tsukiyama, T., Bartholomew, B.
(2002). High-Resolution Mapping of Changes in Histone-DNA Contacts of Nucleosomes Remodeled by ISW2. Mol. Cell. Biol.
22: 7524-7534
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Langst, G., Becker, P. B.
(2002). Nucleosome mobilization and positioning by ISWI-containing chromatin-remodeling factors. J. Cell Sci.
114: 2561-2568
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Levenstein, M. E., Kadonaga, J. T.
(2002). Biochemical Analysis of Chromatin Containing Recombinant Drosophila Core Histones. J. Biol. Chem.
277: 8749-8754
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Clapier, C. R., Nightingale, K. P., Becker, P. B.
(2002). A critical epitope for substrate recognition by the nucleosome remodeling ATPase ISWI. Nucleic Acids Res
30: 649-655
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Georges, S. A., Kraus, W. L., Luger, K., Nyborg, J. K., Laybourn, P. J.
(2002). p300-Mediated Tax Transactivation from Recombinant Chromatin: Histone Tail Deletion Mimics Coactivator Function. Mol. Cell. Biol.
22: 127-137
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hamiche, A., Kang, J.-G., Dennis, C., Xiao, H., Wu, C.
(2001). Histone tails modulate nucleosome mobility and regulate ATP-dependent nucleosome sliding by NURF. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
10.1073/pnas.251421398v1
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Loyola, A., LeRoy, G., Wang, Y.-H., Reinberg, D.
(2001). Reconstitution of recombinant chromatin establishes a requirement for histone-tail modifications during chromatin assembly and transcription. Genes Dev.
15: 2837-2851
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hamiche, A., Kang, J.-G., Dennis, C., Xiao, H., Wu, C.
(2001). Histone tails modulate nucleosome mobility and regulate ATP-dependent nucleosome sliding by NURF. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
98: 14316-14321
[Abstract]
[Full Text]