Previous Article | Next Article 
Molecular and Cellular Biology, February 2001, p. 1155-1163, Vol. 21, No. 4
0270-7306/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/MCB.21.4.1155-1163.2001
Acetylation of a Specific Promoter Nucleosome Accompanies
Activation of the
-Globin Gene by
-Globin Locus Control
Region HS2
Chang-Yun
Gui and
Ann
Dean*
Laboratory of Cellular and Developmental
Biology, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney
Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-2715
Received 4 October 2000/Returned for modification 20 November
2000/Accepted 28 November 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
On stably replicating episomes, transcriptional activation of the
-globin promoter by the
-globin locus control region HS2 enhancer
is correlated with an increase in nuclease sensitivity which is limited
to the TATA-proximal nucleosome (N1). To elucidate what underlies
this increase in nuclease sensitivity and the link between
chromatin modification and gene expression, we examined the
nucleoprotein composition and histone acetylation status of transcriptionally active and inactive promoters. Micrococcal nuclease digestion of active promoters in nuclei released few nucleosome-like nucleoprotein complexes containing N1 sequences in comparison to
results with inactive promoters. We also observed that N1 DNA fragments
from active promoters are of a subnucleosomal length. Nevertheless,
chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments indicate that histones H3
and H4 are present on N1 sequences from active promoters, with H3 being
dramatically hyperacetylated compared with that from inactive
promoters and vector sequences. Strikingly, H3 in the adjacent
upstream nucleosome (N2) does not appear to be differentially
acetylated in active and inactive promoters, indicating that the
nucleosome modification of the promoter that accompanies
transactivation by HS2 is highly directed and specific. However, global
acetylation of histones in vivo by trichostatin A did not activate
transcription in the absence of HS2, suggesting that HS2 contributes
additional activities necessary for transactivation. N1 sequences
from active promoters also contain reduced levels of linker histone
H1. The detection of a protected subnucleosomal sized N1
DNA fragment and the recovery of N1 DNA sequences in immunoprecipitations using anti-acetylated H3 and H4
antibodies argue that N1 is present, but in an altered conformation, in
the active promoters.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Alterations of chromatin structure
accompany the activation of gene transcription in vivo during
development and in response to hormones and other stimuli. In the
erythroid lineage, the five DNase I hypersensitive sites (HSs) (HS1 to
-5), which comprise the locus control region (LCR) of the
-globin
gene cluster, appear early in embryogenesis before transcription
of the globin genes commences (19, 23, 41). The
formation of these sites is temporally correlated with chromatin
changes over the entire locus in erythroid cells characterized by an
increase in general sensitivity to DNase I and a change in replication
timing from early to late in S phase (17). Moreover,
high-level expression of the individual members of the
-globin gene
family during the process of development depends upon the LCR
(3). During the developmental stages when the individual
globin genes are being actively transcribed, a DNase I HS is detected
in the promoter (21).
The appearance of DNase I HSs at the promoters of transcribed genes is
indicative of altered chromatin structure associated with the binding
of transcription factors to these regions (13). However,
the alterations in chromatin structure at such sites may not be
identical in every case. An early study of the chick
-globin gene
showed that a short histone-free restriction fragment could be
released from the promoter of the actively transcribing gene
(30). In contrast, histones are present at the DNase I HSs of the induced mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) promoter (7, 40) and transcription factors and nucleosomes occupy the active albumin enhancer simultaneously (11). These observations
raise the possibility that DNase I HSs are not necessarily devoid of nucleosomes (37).
An abundance of data implicates histone modification as a critical
component in the control of gene expression through localized and
higher-order alterations in chromatin structure. For example, there is
a marked coincidence of hyperacetylation, as revealed by
anti-acetyl-lysine antibodies, and nuclease sensitivity within the
domain of the transcriptionally active chick
-globin locus (22). Other recent reports describe histone
modification that is more localized. Hyperacetylated histones may
be confined to the promoters of yeast genes activated by the
acetyltransferase Gcn5, and increased H3 and H4 acetylation attributed
to CREB-binding protein (CBP) (also called p300) was found in a region
that could accommodate two or three nucleosomes surrounding the induced
beta interferon promoter (26, 31). Conversely,
deacetylation of H4 within a region potentially spanning two
promoter nucleosomes accompanies repression of certain yeast genes
(25, 27, 34). It is likely that modification of
histones alters their interaction with each other and with DNA in
vivo as it does in vitro, providing at least part of the basis for
nuclease sensitivity (46).
Previous work in our laboratory using minichromosomes
stably maintained in human cells indicated a series of positioned
nucleosomes over the
-globin gene. Transcription activation by the
LCR HS2 enhancer alters the chromatin structure of the TATA-proximal N1 nucleosome in the promoter of the gene, creating a nuclease-sensitive site (20). However, the mechanism by which HS2 produces
these effects has not been elucidated. To ask whether the
promoter-proximal nucleosome is absent or altered under conditions of
active transcription, we employed nucleoprotein electrophoresis and
chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays for linker histone H1
and for core histones H3 and H4 along with their acetylated
variants. We also investigated the effect of trichostatin A
(TSA)-mediated global histone acetylation on transcriptional
activity of the
-globin gene. These experiments indicate that
N1 nucleoprotein complexes likely have altered properties, have reduced H1 levels compared to those of inactive promoters, and
contain a subnucleosome-sized DNA component. Furthermore, a very
specific and directed acetylation of H3 in the TATA-proximal nucleosome
accompanies transcriptional activation. This modification requires a
functional enhancer. Acetylation of H4 appears to be more widespread
and is detected at two promoter nucleosomes spanning almost 400 bp of
the 5'
-globin flanking sequence. Global histone acetylation in
the absence of the HS2 enhancer is not sufficient for transcriptional
activation, suggesting that enhancer function includes the recruitment
of a specific acetylase activity responsible for high-level
modification of H3 at the proximal promoter.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Minichromosome construction, cell culture conditions, and
transfection.
The construction of minichromosomes
carrying the
-globin gene with or without HS2 has been described
elsewhere (20). The
-globin gene was a 3.7-kb
genomic EcoRI fragment (GenBank accession no.
U01317, coordinates 17482 to 21233). LCR HS2 was a 374-bp HindIII-to-XbaI fragment (GenBank accession
no. U01317, coordinates 8486 to 8860). Clustered point mutations were
introduced into HS2 to eliminate binding of NF-E2. These mutations, the
transfection conditions, the growth of K562 cells, and individual
clones carrying minichromosomes have been described
(20,29). A representative clone of each type was studied
in this work. The minichromosome copy numbers were as
follows: 20 for
, 8 for
HS2, and 24 for
HS2(mut).
-Globin
RNA from the endogenous chromosomes was detected in all clones.
Minichromosomal
-globin RNA was detected only in the
HS2 clone.
Preparation of nuclei and nuclease digestion.
Nuclei of K562
cell clones (1 × 108 to 1.5 × 108
cells) were prepared as described elsewhere (20). The
purified nuclei were suspended in 0.3 to 0.5 ml of wash buffer and
digested with 0 or 200 U of micrococcal nuclease (MNase; Worthington
Biochemical Corporation) per ml for 5 min at room temperature. EDTA was
added to a final concentration of 10 mM, and the samples were
centrifuged at 16,000 × g for 10 min at 4°C. Part of the
supernatant (equivalent to 4 × 107 nuclei) was
electrophoresed on a 1.5% agarose gel, and the nucleoproteins were
transferred to Nytran by the Turboblot method (Schleicher & Schuell). A
portion of the remaining supernatant was treated with proteinase K
overnight at 37°C, and genomic DNA was purified using routine
methods. The purified DNA was separated on an agarose gel and
transferred to Nytran membranes. Southern blot hybridization was
performed using Quickhyb solution (Stratagene). The probes were an
-globin 197-bp BamHI-to-PvuII fragment
(for N1) and a 263-bp XbaI-to-EcoRV fragment (for
N2 and N3). Probes were labeled with [32P]dCTP by the
random priming method. For restriction enzyme cleavage analyses, nuclei
from 108 cells were incubated with restriction enzymes as
indicated in the text and figures (0 to 800 U/ml of each enzyme) at
37°C for 30 min and the supernatant was collected as for the MNase digestions.
ChIP.
Immunoprecipitations were performed using
modifications of published methods (22, 32). K562 cells
(3 × 107) containing various
minichromosomes were harvested and washed twice with
phosphate buffered saline (PBS; pH 7.4), and the cell pellets were
suspended in MN buffer {10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.4], 10 mM NaCl, 3 mM
MgCl2, 1 mM CaCl2, 0.4% NP-40, 10 mM butyrate, 0.1 mM benzamidine, 0.4 mM [4(2-aminoethyl)-benzene sulfonyl
fluoride] hydrochloride [AEBSF]} for lysis. Following incubation
on ice for 5 min, nuclei were digested with MNase (200 U/ml) at 37°C for 10 min. The digestion was stopped by adding 1/10 volume of stop
solution (0.5 M NaCl, 50 mM EDTA), and the samples were placed on ice.
The suspension was then centrifuged at 16,000 × g 30 s, and the supernatant (S1) was retained. The pellet was suspended in
0.5 times the original volume of MN buffer and incubated on ice for 5 min, followed by addition of a 1/20 volume of stop solution and
centrifugation. The second supernatant (S2) was combined with S1.
Aliquots of the combined supernatants were incubated at 4°C with
buffer only or with 15 µg of specific antibodies, including anti-histone H4, anti-histone H3, anti-diacetylated histone
H3, and anti-tetra-acetylated H4 antibodies (Upstate Biotechnology, Lake Placid, N.Y.). Each of the antibodies was raised against the
N-terminal peptide of the corresponding histone. After 2 h of
constant rocking at 4°C, 40 µl of protein A/G PLUS-agarose beads
(Santa Cruz Biotechnology) was added and the rocking continued overnight. The immunocomplexes were collected by centrifugation (700 × g for 2 min), and the pellets were washed five times with 1 ml of washing buffer (50 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.4], 10 mM
sodium butyrate, 5 mM EDTA). The bound material was released by
resuspending the pellets in 150 µl of washing buffer containing 1.5%
sodium dodecyl sulfate, followed by incubation at room temperature for
15 min and separation by centrifugation. The released chromatin was
treated with RNase for 30 min at 37°C, followed by proteinase K
digestion for 1 h at 37°C. DNA was further purified by standard extraction and precipitation procedures. When chromatin
immunoprecipitation (ChIP) was performed using anti-histone H1
(Upstate Biotechnology), nuclei were prepared as described above,
cross-linked with paraformaldehyde, digested with 100 u of MNase
per ml for 5 min at room temperature, and fractionated on a CsCl
gradient before immunoprecipitation was performed (12).
Analysis of coimmunoprecipitated DNA.
The concentration of
the coimmunoprecipitated DNA was determined using a Fluorescent DNA
Quantitation Kit (Bio-Rad). For PCR amplification, 2.5 to 5 ng of
immunoprecipitated DNA was used as the template for a number of
amplification cycles chosen to be in the linear response range. The PCR
conditions were 94°C for 5 min (one cycle); 94°C for 30 s,
60°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 20 s (23 to 25 cycles); and
72°C for 7 min (one cycle). The primers for N1 were 5'-CACAG
GTCAG CCTTG ACCAA TGACT-3' (sense) and 5'-TTATT CTTTA CTGCC
GAAGT TCTGG-3' (antisense) and amplified a 75-bp region between
the TATA box and the CACCC site. The primers for N2 (82-bp region) were
5'-TGAGA TTTGC TCCTT TATAT GAGGC-3' (sense) and 5'-A
CCCTC TTCAT CATCT TCCAA-3' (antisense). The control primers
amplified a 58-bp region in oriP of the
minichromosome backbone. The sequences were 5'-GCACT
CCCAA CTCTA CTACT GGGTA-3' (sense) and 5'-TGCTA TCCTC ATGCA
TATAC AGTC-3' (antisense). The primers which amplified a 183-bp
region of the ampicillin resistance gene were 5'-AGTGT TATCA CTCAT
GGTTA TGGCA-3' (sense) and 5'-AGTTC TGCTA TGTGG CGCGG
TATTA-3' (antisense). One primer of every primer pair was
-32P labeled, and a trace amount of hot primer (0.1 µCi) was added to each PCR mixture. The amplification products were
electrophoresed on 10% native polyacrylamide gels, and the signals of
the amplified bands were quantitated with a PhosphorImager (Molecular
Dynamics) using ImageQuant software.
TSA treatment, RNase protection assay, and histone
analysis.
A K562 clone carrying
minichromosomes
was treated with TSA (150 ng/ml; Wako Chemicals), and RNA was prepared
from 5 × 106 cells at various time points up to
48 h using PUREscript (Gentra). The episomal copy of the
-globin gene is marked by a mutation in the 5' untranslated region
to distinguish its RNA transcripts from the endogenous
-globin
transcripts (20). RNase digestion and gel analyses were
performed as suggested by the manufacturer of the reagents (Ambion).
Histones were prepared at various time points during TSA treatment by
modification of published methods (42). Cells
(107) were harvested and washed twice with PBS, and the
cells were lysed in PTB buffer (PBS containing 0.5 % Triton X-100, 10 mM sodium butyrate, and 0.4 mM AEBSF) on ice for 10 min. The lysate was
centrifuged at 4°C at 16,000 × g for 10 min, and the
pellet was resuspended in extraction buffer (0.4 N HCl, 10 mM
dithiothreitol, 0.4 mM AEBSF, 10 mM sodium butyrate) and incubated
overnight at 4°C. The acid extract was centrifuged at 16,000 × g at 4°C for 10 min, and the supernatant was retained.
Histones were precipitated with 12 volumes of acetone. Following
centrifugation at 1,200 × g and 4°C for 2 min, the
pellets were washed twice with acetone-100 mM HCl (6:1) and three
times with acetone. The histone preparation was vacuum dried and
dissolved in water. Protein concentration was determined with Bio-Rad
reagents by using commercial histones as the standard.
Acid-extracted proteins were separated on sodium dodecyl sulfate-15%
polyacrylamide gels and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes.
Histones were detected with the same anti-histone antibodies used
for ChIPs (Upstate Biotechnology) and enhanced chemiluminesence (Amersham).
 |
RESULTS |
We previously reported the apparent loss or disruption of the
TATA-proximal nucleosome (N1) in the human
-globin gene when the
gene was transcriptionally activated by the
-globin LCR HS2 on
stably replicating minichromosomes in human erythroid K562 cells (20). To ascertain the fate of histones
within promoter nucleosomes in vivo, we analyzed
minichromosomes with and without functional HS2 linked to
the
-globin gene. Figure 1 illustrates the three minichromosomes used in these experiments,
,
HS2, and
HS2(mut).
HS2 was constructed with the wild-type
-globin LCR HS2 fragment, while in
HS2(mut) the two NF-E2
binding sites in HS2 were destroyed by clustered point mutations. These
NF-E2 sites are critical for the enhancer activity of HS2.
Minichromosomes with the
-globin gene alone, or with the NF-E2 sites
of HS2 mutated, neither transcribe the gene nor remodel the N1
nucleosome (20). However, when HS2 is linked to the gene,
the promoter-proximal nucleosome (N1) is altered such that it
becomes sensitive to MNase, DNase I, and cleavage by NcoI
and AvaII (20). The nucleosome positions in
nontranscribed and actively transcribed minichromosomes, as
determined by indirect end-labeling experiments, are shown in Fig.
2.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
-Globin insertions into minichromosomes.
Three constructs were inserted into the episomal vector p220.2 by
blunt-end ligation into the unique SalI site
(47). Each contained the 3.7-kb EcoRI human
genomic -globin fragment. Coding regions of the gene are
indicated by filled boxes. In addition, HS2 contained HS2 of the
-globin LCR. In HS2(mut) the tandem duplicated NF-E2 binding
sites in HS2 have been mutated to destroy enhancer activity (×). The
transcription start site and direction of transcription of the gene are
indicated by a horizontal arrow. In the absence of a functional HS2,
the -globin gene is not transcribed.
|
|

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Structure of the -globin promoter and locations of
positioned nucleosomes. Nucleosome positions in the region of the
-globin promoter were previously determined by indirect
end-labeling experiments (20). The dotted nucleosome is
altered when the -globin gene is transcriptionally
activated. An expanded view of the sequences underlying N1 illustrates
regulatory sites within the promoter (shaded boxes), nuclease cleavage
sites in actively transcribing promoters (large arrowheads), and
restriction enzyme recognition sites (small arrowheads). Southern blot
probes used in the experiments are indicated at the top by open bars
over the corresponding sequences. The positions of amplified PCR
products are indicated by filled bars.
|
|
Nucleoprotein complexes at N1.
To investigate whether
mononucleosomal nucleoprotein complexes could be isolated
from particular nucleosomes in the proximal promoter region of the
-globin promoter, nuclei from cell clones carrying different
minichromosomes were digested with MNase or with
BamHI plus PvuII, whose cutting sites are near
the boundaries of N1 (197-bp expected fragment) (Fig. 2). Soluble
chromatin obtained from 4 × 107 nuclei for each of
the cell clones was electrophoresed on a 1% agarose gel, transferred
to a nylon membrane, and hybridized with the N1 probe, indicated as an
open bar over the nucleosome map in Fig. 2. Figure
3A shows the relevant portion of the
ethidium bromide-stained gel, and Fig. 3B shows the hybridization
pattern. There is a marked decrease in recovery of nucleoprotein
complexes from the proximal promoter region (N1) of actively
transcribing
-globin genes linked to wild-type HS2, compared to that
from inactive promoters either without HS2 or linked to a
nonfunctional mutated HS2. However, naked DNA of mononucleosomal length
is not visualized. Digestion of nuclei with the restriction enzymes
BamHI plus NcoI (113-bp fragment) similarly
failed to reveal nucleoprotein complexes or naked DNA of the predicted
size from
HS2 (not shown).

View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Altered N1 nucleoprotein structure correlates with
transcriptional activity. Nuclei from K562 clones containing the
indicated minichromosomes were digested with 0 or 200 U of
MNase per ml or with 800 U of BamHI and PvuII per
ml. Soluble, recovered nucleoprotein was analyzed by agarose gel
electrophoresis and Southern blotting. The probe used corresponded to
sequences within N1 (Fig. 2). (A) Ethidium bromide-stained agarose gel.
(B) Southern blot of the gel shown in panel A. (C) A part of each
sample was deproteinized and analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis
and Southern blotting. The membrane was successively hybridized with
the N1 (C) and N2-N3 (D) probes indicated in Fig. 2.
|
|
To ascertain the lengths of DNA fragments after MNase or restriction
enzyme digestion and to confirm that enzymatic digestion had proceeded
to completion, we treated the soluble chromatin fraction with
proteinase K and purified the DNA. This DNA was electrophoresed on an
agarose gel and Southern blotted to visualize DNA fragments from the
proximal promoter region. Despite the apparent absence of MNase and
restriction enzyme digestion products in nucleoprotein preparations of
HS2 nuclei (Fig. 3B), hybridization of extracted DNA with the N1
probe indicated cleavage of the expected 197-nucleotide
BamHI-to-PvuII fragment in all three
minichromosomes (Fig. 3C). Quantitatively more fragment was
cleaved from the active promoter, commensurate with its greater
accessibility to restriction enzymes (20). However, while
MNase cleavage released a mononucleosome-sized DNA fragment from the
minichromosomes when transcription was inactive (
,
HS2mut), a subnucleosome-sized product was released from
HS2,
which actively transcribes the
-globin gene. This result is
consistent with the cleavage sites for MNase mapped by indirect labeling (Fig. 2). The absence of full-length mononucleosomal fragments
from N1 suggests that virtually all
HS2 episomal promoters undergo
remodeling. Recovery of mononucleosome-sized fragments for all three
minichromosome was observed when the blot was
rehybridized with the N2-N3 probe, which does not detect the
BamHI-PvuII product (Fig. 3D).
These results indicate that wild-type HS2 alters the chromatin
structure of the N1 nucleosome of the
-globin promoter such that
internal cleavage by MNase occurs. There is also diminished recovery of
N1 mononucleosomal nucleoprotein complex under the conditions of MNase
digestion we employed. The 2.5- to 3-fold-lower copy number (see
Materials and Methods) of
HS2 compared to those of
and
HS2(mut) is insufficient to explain this result. It is unclear
why we failed to detect either nucleoprotein complexes or naked DNA
from the N1 region in crude preparations from
HS2 nuclei.
Conceivably, the chromatin alterations at N1 resulted in complexes that
were not sufficiently stable to survive electrophoresis (6). It is also possible that N1 of
HS2 was retained in
large chromatin remodeling or transcription complexes and migrated
poorly into the gel since we consistently observed some material
hybridizing to the N1 probe in or near the wells of the gel.
Histones H3 and H4 at promoter-proximal nucleosomes.
Although
the MNase-resistant N1 DNA fragments released from
HS2 are not of
canonical nucleosome length, much of the N1 sequence is clearly
protected from MNase digestion. We hypothesized that such protection
might occur if histones remained associated with the N1 DNA even
after promoter remodeling and transcription activation. Therefore, we
probed the nature of the N1 nucleoprotein complex, performing ChIPs
with anti-histone H3 and H4 antibodies and antibodies to their
acetylated forms. Soluble chromatin released by MNase digestion of
nuclei from clonal cell lines carrying the different minichromosome constructs was precipitated with antibody
and protein A/G-agarose beads. The resultant DNA was amplified by PCR
with labeled primers and analyzed on acrylamide gels. Identical amounts of DNA were amplified for each of the primer pairs, and the number of
PCR cycles was within the linear range of amplification. The positions
of the amplified PCR fragments within particular nucleosomes are
indicated above the nucleosome map in Fig. 2. A control primer pair
amplified vector sequences within the Epstein-Barr virus origin of
replication (oriP) in the minichromosome
backbone, a region where the histone content and modification
status is not expected to vary with the presence or absence of the HS2 enhancer.
Figure 4A and B depict representative
examples of the results for H3 and H4, respectively. Similar exposures
are presented, and the resultant amplified products were quantitated on
a PhosphorImager. The ratios of amplified product obtained with
anti-acetylated-H3 and anti-H3 antibodies (Fig. 4A) or with
anti-acetylated-H4 and anti-H4 antibodies (Fig. 4B) were
calculated for at least three independent experiments, and the results
are presented in the accompanying bar graphs (± standard errors of the
means [SEM]). As predicted, these ratios were very similar for the
different minichromosomes when a primer pair amplifying
oriP sequences was used. However, we observed that the ratio
of acetylated H3 or acetylated H4 to total H3 or H4 was markedly
elevated (H3, more than 20-fold; H4, 15-fold) in the TATA-proximal N1
for wild-type
HS2 minichromosomes in comparison with
that in the same nucleosome in inactive promoters. Increased
acetylation of H4 was seen in the adjacent upstream nucleosome (N2) of
active promoters as well. However, N2 did not display differential
levels of H3 acetylation in active and inactive promoters, indicating
that the modification of H3 that accompanies transactivation by HS2 is
highly directed and specific.

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
HS2 increases acetylation of H3 and H4 at N1. (A) Nuclei
of K562 cells containing various minichromosomes were
digested with MNase under conditions which yield primarily
mononucleosomes (see Materials and Methods). The chromatin was
immunoprecipitated with no added antibody ( lanes) or with antibodies
to either H3 or acetylated H3 ( -H3 or -ac-H3), and equal masses
of the recovered, purified DNA was amplified by PCR for 23 cycles under
identical conditions. The locations of sequences which are amplified by
the N1 and N2 primer pairs are indicated by filled bars in Fig. 2.
Representative PCR results are shown. The data from at least three
independent experiments were quantitated on a PhosphorImager, and the
ratios of signal obtained with anti-acetylated-H3 and anti-H3
antibodies were determined. The mean results of three or four
experiments are plotted in the bar graph at the right of the panel.
Error bars represent the SEM. (B) Nuclei of K562 cells were treated as
described above except that immunoprecipitations were performed with
anti-H4 or anti-acetylated-H4 antibody. PCR conditions and analysis
were as described above.
|
|
Global histone acetylation does not activate an enhancerless
-globin gene.
To ask whether histone acetylation is
sufficient to transcriptionally activate the
-globin promoter, we
used the general deacetylase inhibitor TSA. K562 cell clones carrying
the
-globin minichromosome without HS2 are
transcriptionally inactive (20). We therefore
treated such a clone with 150 ng of TSA per ml over a time course
of 48 h. RNA was prepared from equal numbers of cells for
each time point and analyzed using a ribonuclease protection assay.
-Globin transcripts from the episomal copy of the gene can be
distinguished from endogenous transcripts because they are marked by a
mutation in the 5' untranslated region, resulting in a protected
fragment(s) which is shorter than that from the endogenous transcripts
(Fig. 5A, lane
HS2) (20).
The results in Fig. 5A show that TSA
treatment does not activate transcription of the minichromosomal
-globin gene in the absence of HS2. To ascertain that H3 and H4
became acetylated under the TSA conditions we used, bulk histones
were isolated from cells at each time point and separated by
electrophoresis and Western blots were prepared. The blots were
probed sequentially with either anti-acetylated-H3 and anti-H3 or
anti-acetylated-H4 and anti-H4 antibodies (Fig. 5B). Acetylation
of bulk H3 and H4 occurred rapidly and reached a maximum of two to five
times the untreated level at 6 h. By 12 h of incubation,
acetylated H3 and H4 had returned to pre treatment levels, in agreement
with the time course of histone acetylation in TSA-treated HeLa
cells (8). Investigation of the acetylation status of H3
and H4 at N1 after TSA treatment for 6 h revealed a similar twofold
increase in the ratio of amplified product from immunoprecipitation
with anti-acetylated-H3 and anti-H3 antibodies or anti-acetylated-H4
and anti-H4 antibodies (Fig. 5C). These results suggest that HS2 may be
required to recruit a specific acetylase activity to achieve high-level
H3 and H4 acetylation at N1 and to result in remodeling and
transcription activation of the
-globin promoter. It also might be
that specific acetylated lysines or combinations of acetylated lysines
on the same or different histones are required (38).

View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Global histone acetylation in the absence of HS2 is
insufficient to activate the -globin gene. (A) RNase protection. A
K562 clone carrying minichromosomes was treated with
TSA (150 ng/ml) for 48 h. RNA was prepared at various time points
and analyzed by an RNase protection assay as described in Materials and
Methods. The position of a band protected by endogenous -globin RNA
transcripts in K562 cell RNA is indicated, as are the positions of
bands protected by minichromosomal -globin RNA in HS2 RNA. Actin
RNA served as the load control. (B) Western analysis. Histones were
acid extracted from the cells treated for 0 to 48 h with 150 ng of
TSA per ml, and 2.5 µg of the acid-extracted proteins was
electrophoresed on an acrylamide gel, transferred to a nitrocellulose
membrane, and sequentially probed with either anti-H3 and
anti-acetylated-H3 antibodies ( -H3 and -ac-H3, respectively) or
anti-H4 and anti-acetylated-H4 antibodies ( -H4 and -ac-H4,
respectively). (C) ChIP. After treatment of K562 cells containing minichromosomes with 150 ng of TSA per ml for 6 h,
nuclei were prepared and digested with MNase and immunoprecipitation
was carried out with anti-H3 and anti-acetylated-H3 antibodies or with
anti-H4 and anti-acetylated-H4 antibodies as described in the legend to
Fig. 4. Coprecipitated DNA was detected by PCR amplification using the
N1 primers (Fig. 2).
|
|
Histone H1 on
-globin sequences.
The detection of N1 DNA
sequences in ChIPs using anti-acetylated-H3 and anti-acetylated-H4
antibodies argues that N1 is present but in an altered conformation at
the active promoters. Since the linker histone H1 is thought to
contribute to nucleosome stability and facilitate the formation of
higher-order chromatin structures (46), removal of H1 may
contribute to an altered and less stable N1 nucleosome. To examine
whether H1 was associated with N1, K562 cells containing different
minichromosomes were formaldehyde fixed and their nuclei
were digested with MNase. Soluble chromatin was immunoprecipitated with
an anti-H1 antibody, followed by PCR amplification of N1 and N2
sequences. As controls, oriP and ampicillin sequences in the
vector backbone were amplified. We predicted that the ampicillin region, which is inactive in mammalian cells, would contain H1 but that
the oriP region might be relatively depleted of H1. In these
vector sequences the H1 status was not expected to vary among the
different minichromosomes.
Figure 6 depicts representative examples
of the results. Similar exposures are presented, and the amplified
products were quantitated on a PhosphorImager. The results with the N1,
N2, and oriP primers were normalized to the results
with the ampicillin region primers and are shown in the bar
graphs (± SEM). Actively transcribed
HS2 had H1 levels
at both N1 and N2 which were comparable to those in oriP and
which were reduced compared to those in the ampicillin region. In the
minichromosomes where
-globin was not transcribed H1
levels at N1 and N2 were two- to fourfold higher. The relative
depletion of H1 at N1 for actively transcribing wild-type
HS2
was in agreement with previous observations demonstrating depletion of H1 on transcriptionally active MMTV promoters
(7).

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
H1 is depleted at N1 and N2 of transcriptionally active
-globin minichromosomes. Nuclei of K562 cells containing
various minichromosomes were cross-linked with
paraformaldehyde and digested with MNase (see Materials and Methods).
The soluble chromatin was mock immunoprecipitated ( lanes) or was
immunoprecipitated with antibodies to H1, and the recovered, purified
DNA was amplified by PCR for 25 cycles with primer pairs which amplify
N1, N2, or oriP sequences. Amplification of ampicillin
sequences served as a control. Representative PCR amplifications are
shown. The results were quantitated on a PhosphorImager, and the ratio
of signal obtained with each of the test primer pairs to the ampicillin
signal was determined. The mean results of three or four experiments
are plotted in the bar graph on the right of the panel. Error bars are
the SEM.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Transcriptional activation of the
-globin gene by HS2 is
accompanied by a chromatin structural change which is limited to the N1
nucleosome that overlies the TATA box. The altered structure is
reflected in the increased sensitivity of N1 to nucleases and the
generation of a DNase I HS, although the mechanism underlying this
structural transition is unknown. We now find that at least some N1
sequences in promoters activated for transcription are still associated
with histones H3 and H4 and are highly enriched for the acetylated
forms of these histone proteins, particularly for H3. This
specific, directed modification at the TATA-proximal nucleosome is
consistent with a mechanism in which the acetylation of histones
makes promoter sequences available to transcription factors that are
necessary for high-level activity of the gene (27, 44).
However, we find that global histone acetylation at the levels
attainable in our experiments is insufficient to transcriptionally
activate the
-globin promoter in the absence of HS2. Transcription
activation appears to require targeted modification of N1 mediated by
the distant HS2 enhancer and perhaps other HS2-dependent activities as well.
Chromatin structure of a DNase I HS.
We previously reported
that a functional HS2 enhancer was required for transcriptional
activation of the
-globin gene and the appearance of a DNase I HS at
N1 (20). The presence of DNase HSs in genetic regulatory
elements has often been assumed to indicate a region of
histone-free DNA (45). An early study reported that a
114-bp restriction enzyme fragment of the chick
-globin promoter could be released from red blood cell nuclei as naked DNA
(30). Using similar methodology, we were unable to detect
naked DNA released from the N1 region of the actively transcribed human
-globin promoter in K562 cell nuclei, even though N1 is more sensitive to nuclease digestion than in inactive promoters. However, when purified DNA was analyzed, MNase digestion revealed that a
subnucleosome-sized N1 DNA fragment was released from actively transcribed promoters, while digestion of inactive promoters produced DNA fragments of nucleosomal length. Subnucleosomal fragments have been
observed after hormone activation of the MMTV promoter in vivo
(2). In our ChIP experiments, we readily detected N1 DNA
from active promoters in association with H3 and H4, indicating that
nuclease hypersensitivity can occur in the presence of histones. In
contrast, we were unable to immunoprecipitate chromatin from HS2 using
this methodology (data not shown). The differences among the
-globin
promoter, HS2, and the chick
-globin gene in nuclease digestion
experiments support the notion that DNase I HSs may differ from one
another in the extent of nucleosome disruption or the structure of the
nucleoprotein complex.
Histone acetylation at a developmentally regulated promoter.
A
number of activities have been demonstrated to be involved in
nucleosome disruption and chromatin remodeling events, including the
binding of transcription factors (15), histone
acetylation or other posttranslational modifications, and ATP-dependent
remodeling complexes such as SWI-SNF of Saccharomyces
cerevisiae and NURF of Drosophila melanogaster
(46). During development, transcriptional activation of
globin genes is associated with the appearance of a DNase I HS at each
promoter (21). Our data indicate that the increase in
nuclease sensitivity of the transcriptionally activated
-globin gene
is associated with histone hyperacetylation, a situation which
parallels that of the endogenous locus (see below). Others have also
reported histone modification that is localized around promoters.
Hyperacetylated histones are associated with the promoters of yeast
genes activated by the acetyltransferase Gcn5, and increased H3 and H4
acetylation attributed to CBP was found in a region that could
accommodate two or three nucleosomes surrounding the induced
beta-interferon promoter (26, 31). We observe that hyperacetylation at the N1 nucleosome depends on linkage to a functional HS2 enhancer. The immunoglobulin H heavy-chain enhancer also
mediates acetylation of histones in the promoter region of an
episomal c-myc gene, although the effects are more
widespread, extending over substantial distances up- and downstream
from the promoter (28). Hence, enhancers may function at
least in part by directing promoter histone acetylation.
Interestingly, the ratio of acetylated H3 to H3 at the active
-globin promoter N1 nucleosome was much higher than the ratio of
acetylated H4 to H4. In addition, we found increased H4 acetylation, but not H3 acetylation, in the adjacent upstream N2 nucleosome. Others
have recently made complementary observations of the human globin
locus. While general histone acetylation was observed across the
open locus, hyperacetylation of H3 was found specifically at the LCR
and at the
-globin gene.
-Globin promoter activity, which is LCR
dependent, correlated with the localized H3 acetylation (35). In other studies, the transcriptionally active mb-1
promoter and the induced beta interferon promoter also showed a
preferential acetylation of H3 relative to that of H4 (18,
31). Thus, an association exists between promoter chromatin
remodeling, hyperacetylation of H3, and transcription activation. Our
data along with that from the human globin locus and elsewhere (see
above) indicate that H3 hyperacetylation may be targeted to highly
restricted regions, in some cases as small as a single nucleosome.
Global histone acetylation and transcription activation.
TSA is a general inhibitor of histone deacetylases, and their
inhibition results in elevated acetylation of histones in nuclear chromatin and altered expression of a variety of genes (43, 48). TSA treatment of cells carrying minichromosomes
with the
-globin gene alone resulted in a three- to fivefold
increase in acetylated H3 and H4 as detected by Western blot analysis
of bulk histones. ChIP assays revealed that acetylation of H3 and H4 at N1 increased by similar amounts. However, our studies indicate that treatment with TSA was insufficient to activate
-globin transcription from minichromosomes in the absence of an
enhancer. Interestingly, in the immunoglobulin H enhancer study cited
above, global histone acetylation by TSA mimicked the effect of the
enhancer on only one of the two c-myc promoters
(28). H4 hyperacetylation via deacetylase inhibitors,
while insufficient on its own, appeared to be a prerequisite for an
additional signal necessary for activation of the chromosomal
c-fos gene (1). These observations suggest that, while generalized histone acetylation may contribute to the
regulation of transcription, additional regulatory events or targeted
histone modifications are also likely to be necessary for the
control of gene expression.
Accumulating evidence suggests that acetylation of the amino-terminal
tails of H3 and H4 may be a principal regulator of transcription factor
access to nucleosomal DNA (44). The N1 nucleosome spans recognition motifs for CACCC- and CCAAT-binding factors, the TATA box,
and a GATA-1 site. Hence, acetylation of N1 H3 and H4 tails may play a
key role in regulating the establishment of a transcription complex at
the promoter. The role of the HS2 enhancer may be to recruit activities
which are responsible for high-level, directed histone acetylation
at N1. Such recruitment may occur via association with the
transcriptional machinery, an erythroid-cell-specific transcriptional
activator, or an activity independent of acetylation which is otherwise
needed for transcriptional activation (33, 39). CBP is one
candidate acetylase which plays important roles in hematopoietic cell
differentiation (4). CBP has been shown to interact with
the HS2-binding transcriptional activator NF-E2, with GATA-1, and with
the human RNA polymerase II complex (5, 9, 10).
Depletion of histone H1 at remodeled N1.
Our experiments
also reveal a relationship between a functional enhancer and promoter
H1 content. Histone H1 binds to the linker region between nucleosome
cores and is thought to limit nucleosome translational mobility and
contribute to higher-order chromatin folding (16).
However, little is known about how H1 affects transcription. Although
H1 can be detected on an actively transcribing Balbiani ring gene, it
also reduces the transcriptional efficiency of specific templates in
vivo and transcription factor binding in vitro (14, 24,
36). Thus, depletion of H1 may facilitate both transcription
initiation and elongation. We were able to detect H1 bound to active as
well as inactive promoters. However, our ChIP experiments also
indicated that H1 is depleted from N1 (and N2) sequences when
transcription of the
-globin gene is active. Furthermore, while the
active promoter had H1 levels comparable to those of the replication
origin oriP, the inactive promoters had H1 levels comparable
to or slightly higher than those of the inactive ampicillin region. The
depletion of H1 in combination with elevated H3 acetylation at N1 in
active promoters might contribute to destabilization of the N1
nucleosome, perhaps as reflected in decreased detection of N1
nucleoprotein complexes (Fig. 2A). The data are consistent with a
report that H1 is bound to the repressed MMTV promoter and depleted
after hormone stimulation (7).
Protection of a subnucleosomal DNA fragment and detection of N1 DNA
sequences in immunoprecipitations using anti-H3 and -H4 antibodies,
combined with the diminished recovery of nucleoprotein complexes
containing N1, argue that N1 is present but in an altered conformation
in at least some of the active promoters. These results are consistent
with a number of models: (i) the depletion of H1, H3 and H4 acetylation
result in an N1 nucleosome that is packaged into chromatin but in such
a way that it is no longer fully protected from nuclease attack, (ii)
interaction of transcriptional activators and/or the transcriptional
machinery with N1 DNA sequences result in loosening of histone-DNA
contacts such that the resultant complex is not stable in
electrophoresis, and (iii) histones at N1 are associated with other
components of the transcription machinery and dynamically interact with
N1 sequences. These possibilities are not mutually exclusive.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank David Clark, Jurrien Dean, David Jackson, and Sharon
Roth for discussions and critical review of the manuscript and Mark
Groudine for communicating results before publication.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Laboratory of
Cellular and Developmental Biology, NIDDK, NIH, Building 6, Room B1-08, 6 Center Dr., MSC 2715, Bethesda, MD 20892-2715. Phone: (301) 496-6068. Fax: (301) 496-5239. E-mail: anndean{at}helix.nih.gov.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Alberts, A. S.,
O. Geneste, and R. Treisman.
1998.
Activation of SRF-regulated chromosomal templates by Rho-family GTPases requires a signal that also induces H4 hyperacetylation.
Cell
92:475-487[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Belikov, S.,
B. Gelius,
G. Almouzni, and O. Wrange.
2000.
Hormone activation induces nucleosome positioning in vivo.
EMBO J.
19:1023-1033[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Bender, M. A.,
M. Bulger,
J. Close, and M. Groudine.
2000.
-Globin gene switching and DNase I sensitivity of the endogenous -globin locus in mice do not require the locus control region.
Mol. Cell
5:387-393[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Blobel, G. A.
2000.
CREB-binding protein and p300: molecular integrators of hematopoietic transcription.
Blood
95:745-755[Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Blobel, G. A.,
T. Nakajima,
R. Eckner,
M. Montminy, and S. H. Orkin.
1998.
CREB-binding protein cooperates with transcription factor GATA-1 and is required for erythroid differentiation.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
95:2061-2066[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Boyes, J.,
J. Omichinski,
D. Clark,
M. Pikaart, and G. Felsenfeld.
1998.
Perturbation of nucleosome structure by the erythroid transcription factor GATA-1.
J. Mol. Biol.
279:529-544[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Bresnick, E. H.,
M. Bustin,
V. Marsaud,
H. Richard-Foy, and G. L. Hager.
1992.
The transcriptionally-active MMTV promoter is depleted of histone H1.
Nucleic Acids Res.
20:273-278[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Chen, W. Y., and T. M. Townes.
2000.
Molecular mechanism for silencing virally transduced genes involves histone deacetylation and chromatin condensation.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
97:377-382[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Cheng, X.,
M. J. Reginato,
N. C. Andrews, and M. A. Lazar.
1997.
The transcriptional integrator CREB-binding protein mediates positive cross talk between nuclear hormone receptors and the hematopoietic bZip protein p45/NF-E2.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17:1407-1416[Abstract].
|
| 10.
|
Cho, H.,
G. Orphanides,
X. Sun,
X. J. Yang,
V. Ogryzko,
E. Lees,
Y. Nakatani, and D. Reinberg.
1998.
A human RNA polymerase II complex containing factors that modify chromatin structure.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:5355-5363[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Cirillo, L. A., and K. S. Zaret.
1999.
An early developmental transcription factor complex that is more stable on nucleosome core particles than on free DNA.
Mol. Cell
4:961-969[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Cohen-Kaminsky, S.,
L. Maouche-Chretien,
L. Vitelli,
M. A. Vinit,
I. Blanchard,
M. Yamamoto,
C. Peschle, and P. H. Romeo.
1998.
Chromatin immunoselection defines a TAL-1 target gene.
EMBO J.
17:5151-5160[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Elgin, S. C. R.
1995.
The formation and function of DNase I hypersensitive sites in the process of gene activation.
J. Biol. Chem.
263:19259-19262[Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Ericsson, C.,
U. Grossbach,
B. Bjorkroth, and B. Daneholt.
1990.
Presence of histone H1 on an active Balbiani ring gene.
Cell
60:73-83[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Fascher, K. D.,
J. Schmitz, and W. Horz.
1990.
Role of trans-activating proteins in the generation of active chromatin at the PHO5 promoter in S. cerevisiae.
EMBO J.
9:2523-2528[Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Felsenfeld, G., and J. D. McGhee.
1986.
Structure of the 30 nm chromatin fiber.
Cell
44:375-377[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Forrester, W. C.,
E. Epner,
M. C. Driscoll,
T. Enver,
M. Brice,
T. Papayannopoulou, and M. Groudine.
1990.
A deletion of the human -globin locus activation region causes a major alteration in chromatin structure and replication across the entire -globin locus.
Genes Dev.
4:1637-1649[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Forrester, W. C.,
L. A. Fernandez, and R. Grosschedl.
1999.
Nuclear matrix attachment regions antagonize methylation-dependent repression of long-range enhancer-promoter interactions.
Genes Dev.
13:3003-3014[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Forrester, W. C.,
C. Thompson,
J. T. Elder, and M. Groudine.
1986.
A developmentally stable chromatin structure in the human -globin gene cluster.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
83:1359-1363[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Gong, Q. H.,
J. C. McDowell, and A. Dean.
1996.
Essential role of NF-E2 in remodeling of chromatin structure and transcriptional activation of the -globin gene in vivo by 5' hypersensitive site 2 of the -globin locus control region.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16:6055-6064[Abstract].
|
| 21.
|
Groudine, M.,
T. Kohwi-Shigematsu,
R. Gelinas,
G. Stamatoyannopoulos, and T. Papayannopoulou.
1983.
Human fetal to adult hemoglobin switching: changes in chromatin structure of the -globin gene locus.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
80:7551-7555[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Hebbes, T. R.,
A. L. Clayton,
A. W. Thorne, and C. Crane-Robinson.
1994.
Core histone hyperacetylation co-maps with generalized DNase I sensitivity in the chicken beta-globin chromosomal domain.
EMBO J.
13:1823-1830[Medline].
|
| 23.
|
Jimenez, G.,
S. D. Griffiths,
A. M. Ford,
M. F. Greaves, and T. Enver.
1992.
Activation of the -globin locus control region precedes commitment to the erythroid lineage.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
89:10618-10622[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
Juan, L. J.,
R. T. Utley,
M. Vignali,
L. Bohm, and J. L. Workman.
1997.
H1-mediated repression of transcription factor binding to a stably positioned nucleosome.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:3635-3640[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Kadosh, D., and K. Struhl.
1998.
Targeted recruitment of the Sin3-Rpd3 histone deacetylase complex generates a highly localized domain of repressed chromatin in vivo.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:5121-5127[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Kuo, M. H.,
J. Zhou,
P. Jambeck,
M. E. Churchill, and C. D. Allis.
1998.
Histone acetyltransferase activity of yeast Gcn5p is required for the activation of target genes in vivo.
Genes Dev.
12:627-639[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 27.
|
Lee, D. Y.,
J. J. Hayes,
D. Pruss, and A. P. Wolffe.
1993.
A positive role for histone acetylation in transcription factor access to nucleosomal DNA.
Cell
72:73-84[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 28.
|
Madisen, L.,
A. Krumm,
T. R. Hebbes, and M. Groudine.
1998.
The immunoglobulin heavy chain locus control region increases histone acetylation along linked c-myc genes.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:6281-6292[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 29.
|
McDowell, J. C., and A. Dean.
1999.
Structural and functional cross-talk between a distant enhancer and the epsilon-globin gene promoter shows interdependence of the two elements in chromatin.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19:7600-7609[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
McGhee, J. D.,
W. I. Wood,
M. Dolan,
J. D. Engel, and G. Felsenfeld.
1981.
A 200 base pair region at the 5' end of the chicken adult beta-globin gene is accessible to nuclease digestion.
Cell
27:45-55[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 31.
|
Parekh, B. S., and T. Maniatis.
1999.
Virus infection leads to localized hyperacetylation of histones H3 and H4 at the IFN-beta promoter.
Mol. Cell
3:125-129[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 32.
|
Pikaart, M. J.,
F. Recillas-Targa, and G. Felsenfeld.
1998.
Loss of transcriptional activity of a transgene is accompanied by DNA methylation and histone deacetylation and is prevented by insulators.
Genes Dev.
12:2852-2862[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 33.
|
Ptashne, M., and A. Gann.
1997.
Transcriptional activation by recruitment.
Nature
386:569-577[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 34.
|
Rundlett, S. E.,
A. A. Carmen,
N. Suka,
B. M. Turner, and M. Grunstein.
1998.
Transcriptional repression by UME6 involves deacetylation of lysine 5 of histone H4 by RPD3.
Nature
392:831-835[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 35.
|
Schubeler, D.,
C. Francastel,
D. M. Cimbora,
A. Reik,
D. I. Martin, and M. Groudine.
2000.
Nuclear localization and histone acetylation: a pathway for chromatin opening and transcriptional activation of the human beta-globin locus.
Genes Dev.
14:940-950[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 36.
|
Sera, T., and A. P. Wolffe.
1998.
Role of histone H1 as an architectural determinant of chromatin structure and as a specific repressor of transcription on Xenopus oocyte 5S rRNA genes.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:3668-3680[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 37.
|
Steger, D. J., and J. L. Workman.
1996.
Remodeling chromatin structures for transcription: what happens to the histones?
Bioessays
18:875-884[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 38.
|
Strahl, B. D., and C. D. Allis.
2000.
The language of covalent histone modifications.
Nature
403:41-45[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 39.
|
Struhl, K.
1998.
Histone acetylation and transcriptional regulatory mechanisms.
Genes Dev.
12:599-606[Free Full Text].
|
| 40.
|
Truss, M.,
J. Bartsch,
A. Schelbert,
R. J. Hache, and M. Beato.
1995.
Hormone induces binding of receptors and transcription factors to a rearranged nucleosome on the MMTV promoter in vivo.
EMBO J.
14:1737-1751[Medline].
|
| 41.
|
Tuan, D.,
W. Solomon,
Q. Li, and I. M. London.
1985.
The "beta-like-globin" gene domain in human erythroid cells.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
82:6384-6388[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 42.
|
Turner, B. M., and G. Fellows.
1989.
Specific antibodies reveal ordered and cell-cycle-related use of histone-H4 acetylation sites in mammalian cells.
Eur. J. Biochem.
179:131-139[Medline].
|
| 43.
|
Van Lint, C.,
S. Emiliani, and E. Verdin.
1996.
The expression of a small fraction of cellular genes is changed in response to histone hyperacetylation.
Gene Expr.
5:245-253[Medline].
|
| 44.
|
Vitolo, J. M.,
C. Thiriet, and J. J. Hayes.
2000.
The H3-H4 N-terminal tail domains are the primary mediators of transcription factor IIIA access to 5S DNA within a nucleosome.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20:2167-2175[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 45.
|
Wallrath, L. L.,
Q. Lu,
H. Granok, and S. C. Elgin.
1994.
Architectural variations of inducible eukaryotic promoters: preset and remodeling chromatin structures.
Bioessays
16:165-170[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 46.
|
Wolffe, A. P., and J. J. Hayes.
1999.
Chromatin disruption and modification.
Nucleic Acids Res.
27:711-720[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 47.
|
Yates, J. L.,
N. Warren, and B. Sugden.
1985.
Stable replication of plasmids derived from Epstein-Barr virus in various mammalian cells.
Nature
313:812-815[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 48.
|
Yoshida, M.,
S. Horinouchi, and T. Beppu.
1995.
Trichostatin A and trapoxin: novel chemical probes for the role of histone acetylation in chromatin structure and function.
Bioessays
17:423-430[CrossRef][Medline].
|
Molecular and Cellular Biology, February 2001, p. 1155-1163, Vol. 21, No. 4
0270-7306/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/MCB.21.4.1155-1163.2001
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Francis, J., Babu, D. A., Deering, T. G., Chakrabarti, S. K., Garmey, J. C., Evans-Molina, C., Taylor, D. G., Mirmira, R. G.
(2006). Role of Chromatin Accessibility in the Occupancy and Transcription of the Insulin Gene by the Pancreatic and Duodenal Homeobox Factor 1. Mol. Endocrinol.
20: 3133-3145
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Wen, J., Huang, S., Rogers, H., Dickinson, L. A., Kohwi-Shigematsu, T., Noguchi, C. T.
(2005). SATB1 family protein expressed during early erythroid differentiation modifies globin gene expression. Blood
105: 3330-3339
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Park, S. W., Huq, M. D. M., Loh, H. H., Wei, L.-N.
(2005). Retinoic Acid-Induced Chromatin Remodeling of Mouse {kappa} Opioid Receptor Gene. J. Neurosci.
25: 3350-3357
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kim, A., Dean, A.
(2004). Developmental stage differences in chromatin subdomains of the {beta}-globin locus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
101: 7028-7033
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Gui, C.-Y., Ngo, L., Xu, W. S., Richon, V. M., Marks, P. A.
(2004). Histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor activation of p21WAF1 involves changes in promoter-associated proteins, including HDAC1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
101: 1241-1246
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kim, A., Dean, A.
(2003). A Human Globin Enhancer Causes both Discrete and Widespread Alterations in Chromatin Structure. Mol. Cell. Biol.
23: 8099-8109
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Gui, C.-y., Dean, A.
(2003). A major role for the TATA box in recruitment of chromatin modifying complexes to a globin gene promoter. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
100: 7009-7014
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Singal, R., vanWert, J. M., Ferdinand, L. Jr
(2002). Methylation of alpha -type embryonic globin gene alpha pi represses transcription in primary erythroid cells. Blood
100: 4217-4222
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Shen, J., Montecino, M., Lian, J. B., Stein, G. S., van Wijnen, A. J., Stein, J. L.
(2002). Histone Acetylation in Vivo at the Osteocalcin Locus Is Functionally Linked to Vitamin D-dependent, Bone Tissue-specific Transcription. J. Biol. Chem.
277: 20284-20292
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
He, G., Margolis, D. M.
(2002). Counterregulation of Chromatin Deacetylation and Histone Deacetylase Occupancy at the Integrated Promoter of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV-1) by the HIV-1 Repressor YY1 and HIV-1 Activator Tat. Mol. Cell. Biol.
22: 2965-2973
[Abstract]
[Full Text]