Previous Article | Next Article 
Molecular and Cellular Biology, March 2001, p. 1484-1490, Vol. 21, No. 5
0270-7306/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/MCB.21.5.1484-1490.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Dach1 Mutant Mice Bear No Gross Abnormalities in Eye,
Limb, and Brain Development and Exhibit Postnatal Lethality
Richard J.
Davis,1
Weiping
Shen,2
Yakov I.
Sandler,3
Mehran
Amoui,4
Patricia
Purcell,5
Richard
Maas,5
Ching-Nan
Ou,1
Hannes
Vogel,1
Arthur L.
Beaudet,6 and
Graeme
Mardon1,3,6,7,8,*
Departments of
Pathology,1
Neuroscience,3
Ophthalmology,6 and Molecular
and Human Genetics7 and Program in
Developmental Biology,8 Baylor College of
Medicine, and Department of Pathology, M. D. Anderson
Cancer Center,2 Houston, Texas 77030;
Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Health Sciences
Center, University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, New
York 117944; and Genetics Division,
Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard
Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 021155
Received 13 November 2000/Accepted 27 November 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
Drosophila dachshund is necessary and sufficient for
compound eye development and is required for normal leg and brain
development. A mouse homologue of dachshund, Dach1, is
expressed in the developing retina and limbs, suggesting functional
conservation of this gene. We have generated a loss-of-function
mutation in Dach1 that results in the abrogation of the
wild-type RNA and protein expression pattern in embryos. Homozygous
mutants survive to birth but exhibit postnatal lethality associated
with a failure to suckle, cyanosis, and respiratory distress. The
heart, lungs, kidneys, liver, and skeleton were examined to identify
factors involved in postnatal lethality, but these organs appeared to
be normal. In addition, blood chemistry tests failed to reveal
differences that might explain the lethal phenotype. Gross examination
and histological analyses of newborn eyes, limbs, and brains revealed
no detectable abnormalities. Since Dach1 mutants die
shortly after birth, it remains possible that
Dach1 is required for postnatal development of these
structures. Alternatively, an additional Dach homologue may
functionally compensate for Dach1 loss of function.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The control of retinal determination
(RD) in Drosophila requires eyeless, sine oculis, eyes
absent, and dachshund, which function together as
components of a network (1, 6, 30, 33). These genes are
expressed prior to photoreceptor differentiation and are required for
retinal morphogenesis (2, 7, 25, 31). Moreover,
eyeless, eyes absent, and dachshund are
sufficient for inducing retinal fates, as targeted misexpression
results in ectopic eye formation from nonneuronal tissues.
eyeless is a member of the Pax gene family of
transcription factors (9). sine oculis encodes
a protein possessing a homeodomain motif with DNA-binding activity
(17). eyes absent and dachshund
encode novel nuclear proteins lacking DNA-binding motifs but have been proposed to act as transcription cofactors (2, 6, 25). The
relationships between the RD genes cannot be summarized completely by a
simple, linear pathway. Although Eyeless activates transcription of
eyes absent and sine oculis, which in turn appear
to activate dachshund, there is evidence of extensive
cross-regulation between the RD genes (1, 6, 14, 30, 33).
For example, misexpression of Dachshund induces ectopic eyeless,
eyes absent, and sine oculis expression (6,
33). Together these findings suggest that the
Drosophila RD genes cooperate as components of a network to control cell fate decisions by regulating target gene expression.
Vertebrate homologues of eyeless (Pax6), eyes absent (Eya1
to Eya3), sine oculis (Six3 and Six6), and
dachshund (Dach) that are expressed in the developing eye
have been identified (3, 4, 10, 11, 15, 20, 21, 29, 31, 37,
41). Evidence of a functional role for some of these genes
during eye development has also been demonstrated. Mutations in
Pax6 and PAX6 result in the Small eye
phenotype in mice and ANIRIDIA in humans, respectively (12, 13, 19, 31, 35, 36). Furthermore, misexpression of
Pax6 results in ectopic eye formation in Xenopus
(8). Similarly, Six3 misexpression leads to
ectopic lens and retina formation in the teleost Medaka
(24, 28). Finally, reminiscent of the regulatory
relationship between eyes absent and eyeless in
Drosophila (14), expression of mouse
Eya1 and Eya2 in the lens placode is dependent on
Pax6 (41). These data suggest that the
Drosophila RD network has been conserved in vertebrates.
However, it is not known whether all vertebrate homologues of the
Drosophila RD genes function during eye development and if
these genes operate in the same or parallel pathways.
A mouse homologue of dachshund, Dach (hereafter referred to
as Dach1), has been cloned, and its embryonic expression
pattern has been characterized (4, 11, 15, 21, 25).
Comparison of Dachshund and Dach1 sequences reveals the presence of two
highly conserved sequences, Dachshund domain 1 (DD1) and DD2
(11). The Dachshund N terminus, including DD1,
autonomously activates transcription in yeast, and DD2 has been shown
to physically interact with Eyes absent, suggesting that Dachshund
regulates gene expression through protein-protein interactions
facilitated by DD1 and DD2 (6). Expression analysis of
Dach1 demonstrates that it is expressed in the developing
retina, limbs, and nervous system, which is analogous to the expression
pattern of Drosophila dachshund (4, 11, 15,
25). As dachshund mutant flies lack eyes, have
truncated limbs, and display defects in brain development, the
structural and expression similarities shared between Dach1
and dachshund suggest a similar role for Dach1
during vertebrate development (22, 25, 26).
Here we present the construction of a Dach1 knockout allele
and characterize the effect of this mutation on Dach1
expression and mouse development. Despite the abrogation of the
wild-type embryonic expression pattern, gross and histological analyses of the homozygous mutant eyes, limbs, and brains revealed no detectable malformations. At the time of birth, the frequency of the homozygous mutant and wild-type alleles are roughly Mendelian. However, this mutation is associated with postnatal lethality, a failure to suckle,
and respiratory distress, although additional analyses failed to reveal
a cause for this phenotype.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Generation of a Dach1 knockout allele.
A 600-bp
SmaI-EcoRI fragment of human DACH cDNA
clone 381801RG (Research Genetics) was used to screen a 129/SvEv
genomic phage library. Three Dach1 genomic clones were
isolated and mapped relative to each other and Dach1 cDNA
sequences. The genomic clones contained the first coding exon: 218 bp
of 5' untranslated region, the putative translational start codon, 827 bp of open reading frame, and a splice site that is conserved between
mouse Dach1 and Drosophila dachshund
(11). These sequences encode amino acids 1 to 276, a
region which includes most (98 of 107 amino acids) of the conserved DD1
domain. Dach1 genomic fragments flanking exon 1 were
subcloned into pUSEFUL for assembly of a targeting vector (Allan
Bradley, Baylor College of Medicine). Specifically, a 5' recombination arm (3.7-kb SalI-SacI fragment) and a 3'
recombination arm (5.0-kb KpnI-SalI fragment)
were subcloned into pUSEFUL flanking PGK-Hprt sequences (see
Fig. 1A). The targeting vector was linearized with NotI and
electroporated into the embryonic stem (ES) cell line AB2.1. Since
homologous replacement abolishes a SacI site upstream of
exon 1 (see Fig. 1A), SacI-digested
Hprt+/herpes simplex virus thymidine
kinase-negative AB2.1 colony DNA was screened by Southern analysis
using 5' and 3' probes (flanking the recombination arms and not
included in the targeting vector). As a consequence of recombination,
PGK-Hprt sequences replace 319 bp upstream of exon 1, Dach1 exon 1, and approximately 2 kb of intron 1 (see Fig.
2A). From separate electroporations, two independent replacement events
were isolated (ES cell lines B and G). In addition to the expected
replacement, additional sequences derived from the targeting vector
were inserted at the Dach1 locus (see Fig. 1A). A PCR-based
assay was also developed for detecting the Dach1 mutant
allele. Primers pl (5'-ACATGCACATACGCACACTTT) and p3
(5'-AAGAGGTCAAGACAGGAACATCA) amplify a 265-bp product from the wild-type allele, and primers p3 and p2
(5'-AGGCCACTTGTGTAGCGCCAA) produce a 381-bp amplicon from
the mutant allele. The positions of these primers are shown in Fig. 1A.
In situ hybridization.
A Dach1 riboprobe was
prepared as previously described (11). A Dachl
EcoRI cDNA fragment (amino acid 365 to the stop codon and 386 bp
of 3' untranslated region) was cloned into the EcoRI site of
pBluescript KS(+). These cDNA sequences are downstream of exon 1 and
therefore are not deleted in the Dachl mutant allele. An
antisense riboprobe was synthesized using T7 RNA polymerase. In situ
hybridization of whole-mount embryos was performed as described
elsewhere (32). Digoxigenin-labeled tissues were
detected using antidigoxigenin antibody (FAb fragments;
Boehringer Mannheim) coupled to alkaline phosphatase and nitroblue
tetrazolium-5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolylphosphate development
(Boehringer Mannheim).
Immunohistochemistry.
Dach1 cDNA sequences
encoding amino acids 461 to 538 (11) were subcloned into
pGEX4T to create a glutathione S-transferase (GST)-Dach1
expression construct. GST-Dach1 fusion protein was purified from
Escherichia coli using glutathione-agarose beads and
injected into rabbits (Cocalico Biologicals, Inc.). The serum isolated
from rabbits was then used for immunohistochemistry. Embryos were fixed
in 4% paraformaldehyde-phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 3 h
at 4°C. After several washes in PBS, the embryos were equilibrated in
30% sucrose-PBS and transferred to OCT embedding medium. Tissue
sections (8 to 10 µM) were incubated in blocking solution (1% goat
serum, 0.1% Triton X-100, PBS) for at least 30 min, washed briefly in
PBS, and then incubated with 1/500 dilution of anti-Dach1 antiserum in
blocking solution overnight at 4°C. The sections were then washed
several times in PBS and incubated with Cy3 secondary antibody in
blocking solution for 1 h at room temperature. Sections were then
washed, mounted on slides, and visualized.
Histology.
Embryos and tissues were dissected, washed in
cold PBS, and fixed in fresh 4% paraformaldehyde-PBS overnight at
4°C with gentle agitation. For central nervous system histology,
newborn heads and necks were fixed in 10% formalin followed by
decalcification in 10% formic acid. Tissues were washed twice in PBS
for 30 min and then dehydrated with a PBS-distilled
dH2O-ethanol (EtOH) series. In preparation for paraffin
embedding, dehydrated tissues were washed once in 1:1 xylene-EtOH for
15 min and once in xylene for 30 min. Tissues were immediately washed
in a 1:1 mixture of xylene and molten (59°C) paraffin (Paraplast
tissue embedding medium; Oxford Labware) for 15 min, washed three times
in molten paraffin for 2 h and then embedded in paraffin using
Biopsy Uni-Cassettes (Tissue Tek). Embedded tissues were sectioned
using a Leica RM2165 microtome, stained with hematoxylin and eosin
(H & E), and mounted.
Skeleton preparations.
Skin and internal organs were
carefully removed from euthanized newborn mice. Carcasses were fixed
overnight in 95% EtOH and then stained with 0.015% alcian blue-20%
acetic acid (Sigma) overnight. The samples were washed in 95% EtOH for
at least 3 h and transferred to 2% KOH for 24 h, and any
remaining soft tissue was removed carefully with forceps. Skeletons
were stained overnight in 0.005% alizarin red sodium sulfate-1% KOH
(Sigma) and then cleared in 1% KOH-20% glycerol for at least 2 days.
Skeletons were subsequently stored in a 1:1 mixture of glycerol and
95% EtOH and photographed.
Blood analysis.
Serum was isolated from decapitated newborn
mice using Microtainer serum separator tubes (Becton Dickinson). These
samples were taken from pups with no obvious milk in their stomachs.
Samples were processed and analyzed using a Vitros 950 chemistry
analyzer (Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics, Johnson & Johnson), except for
the analysis of blood glucose levels (see below). Averages and standard deviations are shown in Table 1. Measurements of sodium and potassium were performed on individual samples from three separate homozygous mutant and heterozygous newborns. To make these measurements, serum (8 to 10 µl) was diluted 1/11 in urine diluent. In control experiments,
measurements of serial dilutions demonstrated values that were linearly
proportional to the dilution factor. Measurements of alanine
aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, blood urea nitrogen, calcium,
and triglycerides were performed on two different pooled samples from a
total of 15 homozygous mutant and 19 heterozygous newborns diluted
1/2.5 in 0.9% NaCl. Measurements of creatine and phosphate were
performed on two pools of four homozygous mutant and three pools for
four heterozygous newborns. Measurements of glucose levels were
performed on five individual homozygous mutant and 15 heterozygous
newborns within 10 min of birth, using an Accu-Chek glucometer (Roche).
Abdomens of newborn pups (less than 12 h old) were examined for
the presence of milk. Approximately twofold higher levels of
triglycerides were present in heterozygotes with milk than without milk.
 |
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
Generation of Dach1 mutant mice.
Utilizing a
standard homologous knockout strategy, we generated a mutation in
Dach1 by replacing exon 1 and flanking genomic sequences
with PGK-Hprt (Fig. 1A).
Southern blot analysis using a 3' genomic probe was used to
identify two independent replacement events in ES cell lines and follow
the Dach1 mutant alleles during the establishment of mouse
lines B and G (Fig. 2A, right).
Consistent with a homologous replacement event, an exon 1-specific
probe demonstrated that exon 1 is deleted in the homozygous mutant
newborns by Southern analysis (Fig. 2A, left). Associated with the
replacement event was the insertion of additional sequences from
the targeting construct at the Dach1 locus in lines B
and G (Fig. 1A). However, the inserted sequences are not associated
with a dominant phenotype, as heterozygotes appear indistinguishable
from wild-type littermates. We also developed a PCR assay to genotype
embryos, newborns, and adults (Fig. 1B). Genotype analysis of 151 2-h-old newborns from 21 intercrosses demonstrated that the frequency
of the wild-type, heterozygote, and mutant homozygote genotypes were
roughly Mendelian (Fig. 1C). These results demonstrate that there is no
pronounced embryonic or fetal lethal phenotype associated with the
Dach1 mutant allele.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Dach1 knockout strategy and genotype
analysis. (A) Dach1 targeting strategy. The top line shows
the wild-type 5' Dach1 region with exon 1 (white box) and
intron 1 sequences (thin line) flanked by 5' and 3' recombination arms
(grey boxes). The middle line shows the Dach1 knockout
construct designed for homologous replacement of a SacI
site, exon 1, and a 5' portion of intron 1 with PGK-Hprt
sequences. The resultant Dach1 mutant allele is illustrated
on the bottom line. Positions of genotyping primers p1, p2, and p3 are
shown as arrows below the wild-type and mutant allele diagrams. The
line below the asterisk represents additional sequences, derived from
the targeting vector, inserted at the Dach1 locus which were
associated with two independently isolated homologous replacement
events (Materials and Methods). pBS, pBluescript; HSV
tk, herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase gene. (B) PCR genotype
analysis of tail DNA. An ethidium bromide-stained agarose gel
containing amplification products from wild-type (+/+), heterozygote
(+/ ), and homozygote ( / ) tail DNA is shown. Primer combination
p1-p3 detects wild-type alleles, while primers p2 and p3 detect mutant
alleles (Materials and Methods). (C) Genotype analysis of newborn mice.
Tail DNA was collected from 151 newborn mice (21 intercross litters)
and analyzed by PCR. The numbers and corresponding percentages of
wild-type (+/+), heterozygote (+/ ), and homozygote ( / ) mutant
animals are shown. Tails from these mice were taken less than 2 h
after birth. Homozygotes may be slightly underrepresented since they
may be eaten prior to detection.
|
|

View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Targeted disruption of Dach1 exon1
is associated with abrogated RNA and protein expression. (A) Southern
analysis of the Dach1 locus. Wild-type (+/+), heterozygote
(+/ ), and homozygote ( / ) newborn tail DNA was digested with
SacI, subjected to gel electrophoresis, and transferred to a
nylon membrane. The filter was hybridized to a Dach1 exon 1 probe (Fig. 1A), washed, and exposed to film. Subsequently, the filter
was stripped and hybridized to a 3' Dach1 probe
(Materials and Methods). (B and C) Whole-mount in situ hybridization of
E10 wild-type and homozygous mutant embryos. A Dach1
antisense riboprobe hybridizes to transcripts in the eye, limbs,
neural tube, and brain in wild-type embryos (B), while this pattern is
not detected in homozygous mutants (C) (11). This
riboprobe corresponds to coding sequences located downstream of exon 1 and therefore is not deleted in the mutant allele. Tails were removed
from the animals for PCR genotyping after color development. (D and E)
Immunohistochemical analysis of E12.5 wild-type and homozygous mutant
eye sections. A Dach1 antibody demonstrates protein expression within
the peripheral retina, retinal pigmented epithelium, and developing
cornea in wild-type eyes (D), while Dach1 staining is reduced to
background levels in the homozygous mutant eyes (E). Lens and
surface ectoderm staining is due to background staining of the
secondary antibody.
|
|
Dach1 expression analysis in mutant embryos.
To
determine the effect of the knockout mutation on Dach1 RNA
expression, whole-mount in situ hybridization analysis was performed. Embryos were hybridized in batch to a Dach1 antisense
riboprobe and processed together through the color development step.
PCR analysis of embryo tail DNA was then performed to compare genotypes with hybridization patterns (Fig. 2B). Unlike wild-type embryos that
demonstrated expression in the brain, retina, and developing limbs, the
Dach1 expression pattern in the homozygous mutants was
dramatically reduced to background levels. Since the Dach1 antisense riboprobe used in these experiments is derived from coding
sequences downstream of exon 1, the absence of Dach1
transcripts reflects changes in gene expression, presumably due to
premature termination of nascent transcripts within PGK-hprt
or the deletion of necessary regulatory elements.
We next performed immunohistochemistry using Dach1 antiserum to
determine the effect of the mutation on protein expression levels.
Antiserum raised against peptides encoded by sequences not deleted by
the mutation was incubated with embryonic day 12.5 (E12.5) wild-type
and homozygous mutant eye sections. In wild-type samples, the antiserum
stained nuclei within the peripheral retina, which has been reported
for Dach1 transcripts at this stage (4). Sporadic nuclear staining detected in the developing cornea is consistent with the reported expression of Dach1 RNA in
mesoderm surrounding the eye (4). Finally, the antiserum
demonstrated staining of retinal pigmented epithelial nuclei. Previous
RNA studies did not demonstrate expression in the retinal pigmented epithelium at E12.5, most likely due to the presence of cytoplasmic pigment granules that could obscure the detection of staining. In
homozygous mutants, Dach1 staining in the retina, cornea, and retinal
pigmented epithelium is reduced to background levels. Taken together,
the data show that the wild-type Dach1 RNA and protein are
not detectable in a variety of tissues, at different stages of
embryogenesis in Dach1 mutant embryos, indicating that we
have generated a severe loss-of-function allele of Dach1.
Analysis of newborn Dach1 mutant mice.
Observations of newborn litters demonstrated postnatal lethality
associated with the Dach1 mutant allele (see below). To
characterize phenotypes prior to death, we focused our analysis on
progeny less than 2 h old, when lethality was infrequent. Although
20% of these newborns were homozygous mutant (Fig. 1C), the external anatomy of the newborns appeared to be indistinguishable from that of
control littermates (see below). This was also observed in intercrosses
between Dach1 mutant lines B and G in 129/SvEv and
129/SvEv/C57BL/6J backgrounds. In addition, comparison of the weights
and lengths of wild-type, heterozygote, and homozygous mutant newborns
revealed no differences, consistent with the absence of a pronounced
developmental phenotype (Table 1 and data
not shown, respectively).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 1.
Analysis of heterozygote and Dach1 homozygote
physiological parameters, determined as described in Materials and
Methods
|
|
Drosophila dachshund mutant flies lack eyes, have truncated
limbs, and exhibit brain abnormalities (22, 25, 26).
Given the structural and expression similarities between
Drosophila dachshund and mouse Dach1, we
hypothesized that Dach1 mutant mice would exhibit
defects in eye, limb, and/or brain development. However, an examination
of the external anatomy of the heads and limbs of homozygous mutant
newborns failed to reveal any detectable malformations (data not
shown). We next inspected homozygous mutant and control sibling
tissues for more subtle differences. H&E staining of eye sections
revealed the presence of a normal immature retina, retinal pigmented
epithelium, lens, optic nerve, cornea, and ciliary margin in newborn
homozygous mutants (Fig. 3A and B).
Although the retina is not fully differentiated in newborns, wild-type and homozygous mutant retinas exhibited similar degrees of retinal thickness and cell layering (Fig. 3C and D). We also tested newborn wild-type and homozygous mutant retinas for the expression of Pax6 and
found no detectable differences (data not shown).

View larger version (136K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Gross and histological analyses of newborn wild-type
(+/+) and Dach1 homozygous mutant ( / ) mice. (A and B)
H&E staining of eye sections. The retina, optic nerve, lens, retinal
pigmented epithelium, cornea, and ciliary margin are present and appear
to be normal in newborn Dach1 homozygous mutant eyes. (C and
D) High magnification of H&E-stained retinas. Dach1 mutant
retinas exhibit a similar degree of layering and cell numbers as
newborn wild-type retinas. (E and F) The external dimensions and
morphology of wild-type and Dach1 mutant legs and digits are
similar. (G and H) Alcian blue-alizarin red staining of wild-type and
homozygous mutant skeletons does not reveal any detectable differences
in either bone or cartilage morphology. The homozygote right forelimb
was detached to reveal the structure of the limb. (I and J) H&E-stained
coronal sections of newborn brains showing cortical layers, hippocampi,
and trigeminal ganglia (arrow) in both wild-type and homozygous mutant
animals. (K and L) High magnification of H&E-stained neocortex from
newborn mice. The marginal zone, cortical plate, subplate, and
intermediate zone of the cortex can be seen in newborn Dach1
mutant brains. (M and N) Lungs of wild-type and homozygous mutant
newborn animals do not show any detectable differences in airway
branching, alveolar septation, spacing, and cellular composition. (O
and P) Whole-mount in situ hybridization of newborn lungs using a Clara
cell-specific riboprobe, CC10. Epithelial cells lining the terminal
bronchioles with similar branching patterns are found in both wild-type
and homozygous mutant lungs.
|
|
Analysis of limbs also revealed that the external dimensions of
wild-type and Dach1 mutant limbs and digits appeared to be indistinguishable (Fig. 3E and F). In particular, the
anterior-posterior, dorsal-ventral, and proximal-distal axes of the
homozygous mutant limbs were normal. Similarly, the limb skeletal
anatomy was not detected to be abnormal in newborn homozygous mutants
(Fig. 3G and H). Since Dach1 is expressed in a perichondral
pattern in the developing hand plate (11), we examined
H&E-stained newborn paws and found no evidence of soft tissue
malformations (data not shown).
As Dach1 is expressed in the nervous system, we performed
histological analysis of serial coronal or axial sections through the
cerebra and brainstem. Comparison of cerebral cortex, hippocampi, subcortical gray matter, brainstem cranial nerve nuclei, cerebellum, and trigeminal ganglia between homozygous mutant and wild-type controls
did not reveal any abnormalities (Fig. 3I-L). In addition, terminal
deoxynucleotidyltransferase-mediated dUTP-biotin nick end labeling
staining showed no differences in numbers of apoptotic cells in the
central nervous system and cranial nerve ganglion between wild-type and
homozygous mutants (data not shown).
Despite the absence of Dach1 expression during early eye,
limb, and brain development, these tissues are established and
patterned normally. There are several explanations for a lack of a
developmental phenotype in Dach1 mutant mice. First, because
Dach1 mutants die after birth, we cannot rule out that
Dach1 is required for postnatal development. For example,
since differentiation of retinal progenitors continues for about 2 weeks after birth (5), Dach1 may be required for maturation rather than the establishment of the neuroretina. Similarly, Dach1 may be required for postnatal neurogenesis
in the brain (16). The creation of tissue-specific
knockouts could lead to the rescue of the Dach1 lethal
phenotype and thereby the determination of a role for Dach1
in the maturation of the neuroretina and/or the brain.
A second possibility is that an additional Dach homologue
compensates for Dach1 loss of function. Indeed, we have
isolated mouse cDNA sequences encoding a protein showing greater amino acid identity with chick Dach2 than with chick Dach1 (G. Mardon, unpublished data) (18). Perhaps by making
Dach1/Dach2 double-mutant mice, an eye-, limb-, or
brain-specific function can be attributed to the vertebrate homologues
of dachshund in the future. A similar situation exists for
determining the role of vertebrate eyes absent (Eya1 to Eya3) genes during eye development.
Although Eya1 knockout mice exhibit kidney and ear
developmental abnormalities, no gross eye abnormalities were reported
(40). Eya2 and Eya3 are
expressed during eye development making it possible that either
of these genes compensate for the loss of Eya1 function
(41).
Another reason for the absence of developmental phenotypes in the
Dach1 mutants may be that we have not created a null allele. This is a formal possibility, as we have not deleted the entire coding
region. However, deletion of exon 1 results in the abrogation of the
wild-type Dach1 RNA and protein expression patterns.
Furthermore, this deletion removes most (98 of 107 amino acids) of the
DD1 domain. Since DD1 demonstrates a high level of conservation (78% identity) between insects and vertebrates and is the most conserved domain in the entire protein, the possibility that DD1 is dispensable for Dach1 function in multiple tissues seems unlikely
(11).
The Dach1 mutant allele is associated with postnatal
lethality.
Genotype analysis of intercross progeny revealed that
Dach1 mutant homozygotes did not survive to weaning.
Postnatal lethality was observed in intercrosses between
Dach1 mutant lines B and G in 129/SvEv and 129/SvEv/C57BL/6J
backgrounds. Analysis of 2 h-old litters demonstrated that 93% (29 of
31) of homozygous mutants were alive (Fig. 1C). Thus, most
Dach1 mutants die between this time and 3 weeks of age.
To better estimate the age of lethality, cages were checked for
deliveries and deaths five times a day, the time of either event was
noted, and genotyping was performed on dead and weaned animals. From
the progeny of 11 intercrosses, we genotyped 12 wild-type, 42 heterozygotic, and 14 homozygous mutant newborns. Among the dead
animals, 1 was wild type, 3 were heterozygotes, and 14 were
homozygotes. Nine of the 14 mutants demonstrated a minimum age range of
4 to 16 h and maximum age range of 16 to 32 h; the remaining
5 were dead when the litters were first discovered. These litters were,
at most, 8 h old. Thus, the Dach1 mutant allele is
associated with postnatal lethality, and homozygous mutants fail to
survive beyond the first day.
In Dach1 intercross litters with at least one suckling, we
found a strong correlation between the homozygous mutant genotype and
the absence of milk in the stomach (Table 1). This phenotype is
consistent with a failure to suckle and in other knockout mice has been
associated with postnatal death due to malnutrition (23). Since body weights of homozygous mutant and heterozygous newborn pups
are similar, the maternal supply of nutrients and fetal metabolism is
likely to be normal for homozygous mutants (Table 1). Similarly, blood
glucose and triglyceride levels determined after birth were similar for
homozygous mutants and heterozygotes (Table 1). These data suggest that
the physiological state of homozygotes may be normal before and just
after birth, but a failure to suckle may contribute to the lethal phenotype.
A second characteristic associated with the homozygous mutant genotype
was cyanosis and respiratory distress. We observed that 10% (3 of 31)
of 2-h-old homozygotes were cyanotic (Fig. 1C). Cyanosis was
accompanied by respiratory distress in one of these mutants. In older
mutants, we have observed the two phenomena occurring together,
although the frequencies of these phenotypes have not been determined
(http://www.bcm.tmc.edu/pathology/db/Mardon/). The respiratory
abnormality is characterized by a gaping mouth and exaggerated
diaphragmatic contractions, which in some animals continued for several
hours before the pup expired. It is unclear if all homozygotes
demonstrate cyanosis and respiratory distress.
Abnormal lung development may explain a predilection for a
cyanosis/respiratory distress phenotype. For example, epidermal growth
factor receptor-deficient mice were found to demonstrate a
variable incidence of cyanosis and breathing difficulties associated with abnormal branching and alveolar septation of the lungs
(27). In further support of this hypothesis,
Dach1 expression has been detected in embryonic lung
mesoderm (Mardon, unpublished). However, gross and histological
analyses of the lungs showed no abnormalities in lobe formation, airway
branching, alveolar septation, or cellular architecture (Fig. 3M and
N). In addition, whole-mount in situ hybridization of wild-type and
homozygous mutant lungs revealed no detectable differences in staining
of surfactant protein B and CC10, type II alveolar cell and Clara cell
markers, respectively (34, 38) (data not shown and Fig. 3O
and P). Gross examination of homozygous mutants diaphragms revealed no
structural defects that might serve as a precondition for the
respiratory behavior (data not shown). Although a malformed skeleton
may restrict breathing, we did not identify any skeletal abnormalities
that would explain the respiratory distress phenotype (Fig. 3G and H).
To identify any other anatomical or functional abnormalities, we
examined major organs for malformations and measured several blood
chemistry parameters in noncyanotic newborns. Examination of the
Dach1 homozygous mutant hearts and major vessels by gross and histological analyses revealed no apparent defects in structure (data not shown). Similarly, histological analysis of livers and liver-related functional tests, alanine aminotransferase and alkaline phosphatase, did not reveal any significant differences between wild-type and homozygous mutants (data not shown and Table 1). Dach1 expression has been detected in the kidneys,
suggesting that the lethal/cyanotic phenotype may be related to an
inability to regulate electrolyte concentrations and/or eliminate
metabolic waste products (21). Histological analysis of
the kidney did not reveal any structural defects between wild-type and
mutant animals (data not shown). Furthermore, analysis of serum
blood- urea- nitrogen, calcium, creatinine, potassium, and
phosphate also did not reveal any significant differences
(Table 1). We observed a small difference in sodium levels, although it
is not clear if this is sufficient to explain the Dach1
lethal phenotype. Finally, as Dach1 is expressed in the
nervous system, a neurologic defect may explain lethality, a failure to
suckle, cyanosis, and respiratory distress (11).
Histological analysis of brain sections revealed no differences in the
cerebral cortex, hippocampi, subcortical gray matter, brainstem cranial
nerve nuclei, cerebellum, and trigeminal ganglia between homozygous
mutant and wild-type controls (Fig. 3I to L).
In this work, we focused our histological and blood analyses on animals
that were noncyanotic and did not display respiratory distress. A
single factor that would satisfactorily serve as a precondition for the
homozygous lethal phenotype has not been identified. Our data indicate
that homozygous mutants die within the first 24 h and fail to
suckle. Brn-3a and NMDA e2 receptor knockout mice
exhibit similar phenotypes (23, 39). However, impaired
suckling in these mutants was also associated with both a decreased
number of neurons in the trigeminal ganglion and the absence of a
suckling response. This contrasts with the Dach1 phenotype,
where homozygote mutant trigeminal ganglia appear to be normal and the
newborns do have a suckling response (data not shown). Other possible
causes include rejection of the pup by the mother, defects in a
pheromone response to the mother, an inability to compete for food,
mechanical problems with swallowing, and a failure of the stomach to
accommodate milk.
Although homozygous mutants fail to suckle, starvation may not be the
only mechanism of death. In particular, some mutant pups have been
observed to die when their littermates have not suckled. Since mutants
have glucose and triglyceride levels similar to those of unfed
littermates, it is unlikely that starvation is responsible for
lethality soon after birth. Furthermore, cyanosis or respiratory
distress is not an expected outcome of starvation. There may be a
single or multiple underlying defects that interact with a rapidly
changing newborn physiology to produce variation in the timing and
mechanism of death. In the future, generation of tissue-specific
conditional mutations may provide the means to determine which tissue
is responsible for postnatal lethality. This would also serve as a way
to rescue the lethal phenotype and to determine if Dach1 is
required for developmental processes beyond birth.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank John M. Hicks for help in the histological analysis of
the Dach1 mutants, Jeffery Whitsett for supplying the CC10 riboprobe construct, and Maricella Ortiz for technical assistance during generation of the Dach1 knockout lines.
A.L.B. was supported by Mutants for Cell Adhesion Molecules Merit Award
R37 AI32177. R.J.D. and Y.I.S. were supported by NIH grants from the
National Eye Institute. This work was supported by funds awarded to
G.M. from the National Eye Institute, Baylor Mental Retardation
Research Center, Retina Research Foundation, and Moran Foundation.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Pathology, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030. Phone: (713) 798-8731. Fax: (713) 798-3359. E-mail:
gmardon{at}bcm.tmc.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Bonini, N. M.,
Q. T. Bui,
G. L. Grayboard, and J. M. Warrick.
1997.
The Drosophila eyes absent gene directs ectopic eye formation in a pathway conserved between flies and vertebrates.
Development
124:4819-4826[Abstract].
|
| 2.
|
Bonini, N. M.,
W. M. Leiserson, and S. Benzer.
1993.
The eyes absent gene: genetic control of cell survival and differentiation in the developing Drosophila eye.
Cell
72:379-395[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Bovolenta, P.,
A. Mallamaci,
L. Puelles, and E. Boncinelli.
1998.
Expression pattern of cSix3, a member of the Six/Sine oculis family of transcription factors.
Mech. Dev.
70:201-203[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Caubit, X.,
R. Thangarajah,
T. Theil,
J. Wirth,
H. G. Nothwang,
U. Ruther, and S. Krauss.
1999.
Mouse Dac, a novel nuclear factor with homology to Drosophila dachshund shows a dynamic expression in the neural crest, the eye, the neocortex, and the limb bud.
Dev. Dyn.
214:66-80[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Cepko, C. L.,
C. P. Austin,
X. J. Yang, and M. Alexiades.
1996.
Cell fate determination in the vertebrate retina.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:589-595[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Chen, R.,
M. Amoui,
Z. H. Zhang, and G. Mardon.
1997.
Dachshund and Eyes Absent proteins form a complex and function synergistically to induce ectopic eye development in Drosophila.
Cell
91:893-903[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Cheyette, B. N.,
P. J. Green,
K. Martin,
H. Garren,
V. Hartenstein, and S. L. Zipursky.
1994.
The Drosophila sine oculis locus encodes a homeodomain-containing protein required for the development of the entire visual system.
Neuron
12:977-996[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Chow, R. L.,
C. R. Altmann,
R. A. Lang, and A. Hemmati-Brivanlou.
1999.
Pax6 induces ectopic eyes in a vertebrate.
Development
126:4213-4222[Abstract].
|
| 9.
|
Dahl, E.,
H. Koseki, and R. Balling.
1997.
Pax genes and organogenesis.
Bioessays
19:755-765[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Davis, J. A., and R. R. Reed.
1996.
Role of Olf-1 and Pax-6 transcription factors in neurodevelopment.
J. Neurosci.
16:5082-5094[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Davis, R. J.,
W. Shen,
T. A. Heanue, and G. Mardon.
1999.
Mouse Dach, a homologue of Drosophila dachshund, is expressed in the developing retina, brain and limbs.
Dev. Genes Evol.
209:526-536[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Glaser, T.,
D. S. Walton, and R. L. Maas.
1992.
Genomic structure, evolutionary conservation and Aniridia mutations in the human PAX6 gene.
Nat. Genet.
2:232-239[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Grindley, J. C.,
D. R. Davidson, and R. E. Hill.
1995.
The role of Pax-6 in eye and nasal development.
Development
121:1433-1442[Abstract].
|
| 14.
|
Halder, G.,
P. Callaerts,
S. Flister,
U. Walldorf,
U. Kloter, and W. J. Gehring.
1998.
Eyeless initiates the expression of both sine oculis and eyes absent during Drosophila compound eye development.
Development
125:2181-2191[Abstract].
|
| 15.
|
Hammond, K. L.,
I. M. Hanson,
A. G. Brown,
L. A. Lettice, and R. E. Hill.
1998.
Mammalian and Drosophila dachshund genes are related to the Ski proto-oncogene and are expressed in eye and limb.
Mech. Dev.
74:121-131[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Hatten, M. E.
1999.
Central nervous system neuronal migration.
Annu. Rev. Neurosci.
22:511-539[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Hazbun, T. R.,
F. L. Stahura, and M. C. Mossing.
1997.
Site-specific recognition by an isolated DNA-binding domain of the Sine oculis protein.
Biochemistry
36:3680-3686[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Heanue, T. A.,
R. Reshef,
R. J. Davis,
G. Mardon,
G. Oliver,
S. Tomarev,
A. B. Lassar, and C. J. Tabin.
1999.
Synergistic regulation of vertebrate muscle development by Dach2, Eya2, and Six1, homologs of genes required for Drosophila eye formation.
Genes Dev.
13:3231-3243[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Hill, R. E.,
J. Favor,
B. L. Hogan,
C. C. Ton,
G. F. Saunders,
I. M. Hanson,
J. Prosser,
T. Jordan,
N. D. Hastie, and V. van Heyningen.
1991.
Mouse Small eye results from mutations in a paired-like homeobox-containing gene.
Nature
354:522-525[CrossRef][Medline]. (Erratum, Nature 355:750, 1992.)
|
| 20.
|
Jean, D.,
G. Bernier, and P. Gruss.
1999.
Six6 (Optx2) is a novel murine Six3-related homeobox gene that demarcates the presumptive pituitary/hypothalamic axis and the ventral optic stalk.
Mech. Dev.
84:31-40[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Kozmik, Z.,
P. Pfeffer,
J. Kralova,
J. Paces,
V. Paces,
A. Kalousova, and A. Cvekl.
1999.
Molecular cloning and expression of the human and mouse homologues of the Drosophila dachshund gene.
Dev. Genes Evol.
209:537-545[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Kurusu, M.,
T. Nagao,
U. Walldorf,
S. Flister,
W. J. Gehring, and K. Furukubo-Tokunaga.
2000.
Genetic control of development of the mushroom bodies, the associative learning centers in the Drosophila brain, by the eyeless, twin of eyeless, and dachshund genes.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
97:2140-2144[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Kutsuwada, T.,
K. Sakimura,
T. Manabe,
C. Takayama,
N. Katakura,
E. Kushiya,
R. Natsume,
M. Watanabe,
Y. Inoue,
T. Yagi,
S. Aizawa,
M. Arakawa,
T. Takahashi,
Y. Nakamura,
H. Mori, and M. Mishina.
1996.
Impairment of suckling response, trigeminal neuronal pattern formation, and hippocampal LTD in NMDA receptor epsilon 2 subunit mutant mice.
Neuron
16:333-344[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Loosli, F.,
S. Winkler, and J. Wittbrodt.
1999.
Six3 overexpression initiates the formation of ectopic retina.
Genes Dev.
13:649-654[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Mardon, G.,
N. M. Solomon, and G. M. Rubin.
1994.
dachshund encodes a nuclear protein required for normal eye and leg development in Drosophila.
Development
120:3473-3486[Abstract].
|
| 26.
|
Martini, S. R.,
G. Roman,
S. Meuser,
G. Mardon, and R. L. Davis.
2000.
The retinal determination gene, dachshund, is required for mushroom body cell differentiation.
Development
127:2663-2672[Abstract].
|
| 27.
|
Miettinen, P. J.,
D. Warburton,
D. Bu,
J. S. Zhao,
J. E. Berger,
P. Minoo,
T. Koivisto,
L. Allen,
L. Dobbs,
Z. Werb, and R. Derynck.
1997.
Impaired lung branching morphogenesis in the absence of functional EGF receptor.
Dev. Biol.
186:224-236[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 28.
|
Oliver, G.,
F. Loosli,
R. Koster,
J. Wittbrodt, and P. Gruss.
1996.
Ectopic lens induction in fish in response to the murine homeobox gene Six3.
Mech. Dev.
60:233-239[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 29.
|
Oliver, G.,
A. Mailhos,
R. Wehr,
N. G. Copeland,
N. A. Jenkins, and P. Gruss.
1995.
Six3, a murine homologue of the sine oculis gene, demarcates the most anterior border of the developing neural plate and is expressed during eye development.
Development
121:4045-4055[Abstract].
|
| 30.
|
Pignoni, F.,
B. Hu,
K. H. Zavitz,
J. Xiao,
P. A. Garrity, and S. L. Zipursky.
1997.
The eye-specification proteins So and Eya form a complex and regulate multiple steps in Drosophila eye development.
Cell
91:881-891[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 31.
|
Quiring, R.,
U. Walldorf,
U. Kloter, and W. J. Gehring.
1994.
Homology of the eyeless gene of Drosophila to the Small eye gene in mice and Aniridia in humans.
Science
265:785-789[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 32.
|
Riddle, R. D.,
R. L. Johnson,
E. Laufer, and C. Tabin.
1993.
Sonic hedgehog mediates the polarizing activity of the ZPA.
Cell
75:1401-1416[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 33.
|
Shen, W., and G. Mardon.
1997.
Ectopic eye development in Drosophila induced by directed dachshund expression.
Development
124:45-52[Abstract].
|
| 34.
|
Stripp, B. R.,
P. L. Sawaya,
D. S. Luse,
K. A. Wikenheiser,
S. E. Wert,
J. A. Huffman,
D. L. Lattier,
G. Singh,
S. L. Katyal, and J. A. Whitsett.
1992.
cis-acting elements that confer lung epithelial cell expression of the CC10 gene.
J. Biol. Chem.
267:14703-14712[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 35.
|
Ton, C. C.,
H. Hirvonen,
H. Miwa,
M. M. Weil,
P. Monaghan,
T. Jordan,
V. van Heyningen,
N. D. Hastie,
H. Meijers-Heijboer,
M. Drechsler, et al.
1991.
Positional cloning and characterization of a paired box- and homeobox-containing gene from the Aniridia region.
Cell
67:1059-1074[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 36.
|
Ton, C. C.,
H. Miwa, and G. F. Saunders.
1992.
Small eye (Sey): cloning and characterization of the murine homolog of the human Aniridia gene.
Genomics
13:251-256[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 37.
|
Walther, C., and P. Gruss.
1991.
Pax-6, a murine paired box gene, is expressed in the developing CNS.
Development
113:1435-1449[Abstract].
|
| 38.
|
Weaver, T. E.,
V. K. Sarin,
N. Sawtell,
W. M. Hull, and J. A. Whitsett.
1988.
Identification of surfactant proteolipid SP-B in human surfactant and fetal lung.
J. Appl. Physiol.
65:982-987[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 39.
|
Xiang, M.,
L. Gan,
L. Zhou,
W. H. Klein, and J. Nathans.
1996.
Targeted deletion of the mouse POU domain gene Brn-3a causes selective loss of neurons in the brainstem and trigeminal ganglion, uncoordinated limb movement, and impaired suckling.
Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA
93:11950-11955[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 40.
|
Xu, P. X.,
J. Adams,
H. Peters,
M. C. Brown,
S. Heaney, and R. Maas.
1999.
Eya1-deficient mice lack ears and kidneys and show abnormal apoptosis of organ primordia.
Nat. Genet.
23:113-117[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 41.
|
Xu, P. X.,
I. Woo,
H. Her,
D. R. Beier, and R. L. Maas.
1997.
Mouse Eya homologues of the Drosophila eyes absent gene require Pax6 for expression in lens and nasal placode.
Development
124:219-231[Abstract].
|
Molecular and Cellular Biology, March 2001, p. 1484-1490, Vol. 21, No. 5
0270-7306/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/MCB.21.5.1484-1490.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Silver, S. J., Rebay, I.
(2005). Signaling circuitries in development: insights from the retinal determination gene network. Development
132: 3-13
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kida, Y., Maeda, Y., Shiraishi, T., Suzuki, T., Ogura, T.
(2004). Chick Dach1 interacts with the Smad complex and Sin3a to control AER formation and limb development along the proximodistal axis. Development
131: 4179-4187
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Wu, K., Yang, Y., Wang, C., Davoli, M. A., D'Amico, M., Li, A., Cveklova, K., Kozmik, Z., Lisanti, M. P., Russell, R. G., Cvekl, A., Pestell, R. G.
(2003). DACH1 Inhibits Transforming Growth Factor-{beta} Signaling through Binding Smad4. J. Biol. Chem.
278: 51673-51684
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Panganiban, G., Rubenstein, J. L. R.
(2002). Developmental functions of the Distal-less/Dlx homeobox genes. Development
129: 4371-4386
[Abstract]
[Full Text]