Previous Article | Next Article 
Molecular and Cellular Biology, March 2001, p. 1810-1818, Vol. 21, No. 5
0270-7306/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/MCB.21.5.1810-1818.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Disruption of the Cockayne Syndrome B Gene Impairs
Spontaneous Tumorigenesis in Cancer-Predisposed Ink4a/ARF
Knockout Mice
Yi
Lu,1
Hanzhou
Lian,1
Prerna
Sharma,2
Nicole
Schreiber-Agus,2,3
Robert
G.
Russell,3,4
Lynda
Chin,5
Gijsbertus T. J.
van
der Horst,6 and
David B.
Bregman1,3,7,*
Departments of
Pathology,1 Molecular
Genetics,2 and Molecular
Pharmacology,7 Comprehensive Cancer
Center,3 and Institute for Animal
Studies,4 Albert Einstein College of Medicine,
Bronx, New York 10461; Department of Adult Oncology, Dana
Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
021155; and Department of Cell
Biology and Genetics, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The
Netherlands6
Received 7 September 2000/Returned for modification 10 October
2000/Accepted 30 November 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
Cells isolated from individuals with Cockayne syndrome (CS) have a
defect in transcription-coupled DNA repair, which rapidly corrects
certain DNA lesions located on the transcribed strand of active genes.
Despite this DNA repair defect, individuals with CS group A (CSA) or
group B (CSB) do not exhibit an increased spontaneous or UV-induced
cancer rate. In order to investigate the effect of CSB deficiency on
spontaneous carcinogenesis, we crossed CSB
/
mice with
cancer-prone mice lacking the p16Ink4a/p19ARF
tumor suppressor locus. CSB
/
mice are sensitive to
UV-induced skin cancer but show no increased rate of spontaneous
cancer. CSB
/
Ink4a/ARF
/
mice developed
60% fewer tumors than Ink4a/ARF
/
animals and
demonstrated a longer tumor-free latency time (260 versus 150 days).
Moreover, CSB
/
Ink4a/ARF
/
mouse embryo
fibroblasts (MEFs) exhibited a lower colony formation rate after
low-density seeding, a lower rate of H-Ras-induced transformation,
slower proliferation, and a lower mRNA synthesis rate than
Ink4a/ARF
/
MEFs. CSB
/
Ink4a/ARF
/
MEFs were also more sensitive to UV-induced
p53 induction and UV-induced apoptosis than were
Ink4a/ARF
/
MEFs. In order to investigate whether the
apparent antineoplastic effect of CSB gene disruption was caused by
sensitization to genotoxin-induced (p53-mediated) apoptosis or by
p53-independent sequelae, we also generated p53
/
and
CSB
/
p53
/
MEFs. The
CSB
/
p53
/
MEFs demonstrated lower
colony formation efficiency, a lower proliferation rate, a lower mRNA
synthesis rate, and a higher rate of UV-induced cell death than
p53
/
MEFs. Collectively, these results indicate that
the antineoplastic effect of CSB gene disruption is at least partially
p53 independent; it may result from impaired transcription or from
apoptosis secondary to environmental or endogenous DNA damage.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Genomic integrity is continuously
threatened by endogenous and exogenous agents that damage DNA and have
immediate and long-term effects on cellular functioning. Replication of
damaged DNA can cause mutations that may ultimately lead to
carcinogenic events or, when occurring in germ cells, to inborn
defects. Immediate effects of DNA damage include a blockage to
transcription which can result in cell death by apoptosis
(22). To minimize the harmful effects of DNA damage,
nature has equipped cells with a sophisticated network of DNA repair
mechanisms. Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is a cut-and-paste repair
mechanism for the removal of a variety of bulky DNA lesions, such as
chemical adducts and UV-induced photolesions (reviewed in references
11 and 16). The NER apparatus utilizes approximately 30 gene products to (i) recognize DNA damage, (ii) introduce
single-stranded nicks 5' and 3' to the lesion, resulting in the removal
of a single-stranded oligonucleotide containing the lesion, and (iii)
restore the integrity of the double helix by gap-filling DNA synthesis
(using the undamaged DNA strand as a template) and strand ligation
(16). NER can be divided into two subpathways that differ
in the molecular mechanism of lesion recognition. The global genome
repair machinery (ggNER), in which damage recognition is performed by
the XPC-HR23B complex (54), can remove lesions located
anywhere in the genome. However, some types of lesions are poorly
recognized by the ggNER apparatus and therefore are inefficiently
repaired. Such lesions, when present in the template strand of active
genes, interfere with transcription and activate the
transcription-coupled repair subpathway of NER (tcNER). In the tcNER
reaction, stalling of RNA polymerase II at bulky lesions serves as the
damage sensor and subsequently recruits the remainder of the NER
apparatus (37, 38, 55, 56).
The importance of NER for genome preservation is illustrated by rare
autosomal recessive disorders like xeroderma pigmentosum (XP), which is
made up of seven complementation groups (XPA through XPG), and Cockayne
syndrome (CS), which is made up of two complementation groups (CSA and
CSB) (5). Both disorders are characterized by
hypersensitivity to solar (UV) light. XP individuals demonstrate an
increased rate of sunlight-induced skin cancer as well as
carcinogen-induced internal tumors (5, 34). Except for XPC
and XPE, where only the ggNER pathway is affected, XP is associated
with a defect in both ggNER and tcNER. Individuals with CS exhibit
small stature, intellectual impairment, cachexia, and sun sensitivity
but no increased incidence of cancer (5, 15, 24). Cells
from CS patients have been shown to be deficient in tcNER only
(11, 16, 26, 57). An important question is why CS
patients, despite their DNA repair deficiency, have not been reported
to develop cancer of the skin or internal organs. A possible
explanation is that CS cells can still perform ggNER, which, even
though some types of lesions may be repaired at lower rates, could
prevent accumulation of mutagenic lesions (15).
Alternatively, since CSA and CSB cells cannot appropriately clear RNA
polymerase II arrested at intragenic DNA lesions (39) and
since stalled RNA polymerase II has been shown to promote intracellular
accumulation of p53 and apoptosis (41, 53, 62), it has
been suggested that in CS patients precancerous cells are more
efficiently eliminated by apoptosis than they are in healthy persons
(24).
Among the growing number of mouse mutants with engineered deletions of
genes involved in cellular responses to DNA damage are mouse models for
XPA (18, 42), CSA (21), and CSB
(59). Totally NER-deficient XPA
/
mice
resemble human XPA patients in their UV-induced skin cancer predisposition (18, 42) and also show elevated frequencies of skin and internal tumors after exposure to chemical carcinogens (17, 18). In contrast to human CS, CSB
/
mice demonstrate an elevated incidence of both UV- and chemically induced skin cancer (59). This difference between CSB
patients and mice might be due to the lack of expression of the
p53-inducible p48 gene, required for ggNER of UV-induced cyclobutane
dimers (and presumably other carcinogen-induced DNA lesions)
(27). Since removal of these types of lesions in rodents
almost totally depends on tcNER, the CSB defect may have a more
dramatic effect in mice than in humans. Alternatively, since UV-induced
skin tumor formation in CSB mice requires a longer latency time than
that required by totally NER-deficient XPA mice (3, 4),
CSB patients may simply not get old enough (average life span, 12.5 years) to develop tumors (43).
Totally NER-deficient XPA mice, like human XP patients, develop
spontaneous internal tumors upon aging (17). With the
observation that, at least in mice, a specific tcNER defect predisposes
to UV- and chemically induced skin cancer, the question of whether CS
is also associated with increased sensitivity to spontaneous tumor
formation arises. Mice with a homozygous disruption of the Ink4a/ARF
locus have proven to be a particularly useful model system for studying
factors (such as Ras and telomerase) contributing to neoplasia
(9, 23, 48, 49). A great deal of evidence indicates that
deletion of this region predisposes to cancer development (reviewed in
references 8, 50, and 51). Humans with lesions in this
genetic locus have an elevated incidence of melanoma, pancreatic
carcinoma, and other neoplasms. Mice with homozygous disruption of the
Ink4a/ARF locus are predisposed to developing spontaneous lymphomas and
fibrosarcomas (49). The Ink4a gene product,
p16Ink4a, helps regulate cellular proliferation by
inhibiting cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6. The ARF gene product,
p19ARF, is encoded by a gene overlapping that of the Ink4a
gene but utilizing an alternative reading frame (ARF).
p19ARF potentiates the function of p53 by antagonizing mdm2
function (52). If left unimpeded, mdm2 inhibits p53
function both by binding and by blocking p53's transcriptional
activation domain as well as by catalyzing p53's ubiquitination, thus
leading to its proteasomal degradation (32).
Cancer-predisposed Ink4a/ARF
/
mice could therefore be
used to investigate the role of the CSB gene product in spontaneous tumorigenesis.
In the present study we have generated CSB
/
Ink4a/ARF
/
mice to study the effect of a CSB deficiency
on spontaneous tumor formation. Surprisingly, since DNA repair genes
are usually considered tumor suppressor genes, we found that
inactivation of the CSB gene reduced spontaneous tumor formation in
Ink4a/ARF
/
mice. Comparison of CSB
/
Ink4a/ARF
/
, CSB
/
,
Ink4a/ARF
/
, and wild-type (WT) mouse embryo fibroblasts
(MEFs) for their colony formation rates after low density seeding,
H-Ras oncogene-mediated transformation rates, proliferation rates, and
mRNA transcription rates revealed that at the cellular level, the CSB
gene deficiency diminished neoplastic potential. Moreover, we show that
the CSB gene deficiency sensitizes Ink4a/ARF
/
MEFs to
UV-induced accumulation of p53 and apoptosis. Similarly, the CSB defect
is shown to reduce the neoplastic potential of p53
/
MEFs. The implications of a CSB deficiency for tumorigenesis are discussed.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Generation of double knockout mice and cell lines.
CSB
/
Ink4a/ARF
/
mice and
CSB
/
p53
/
mice were generated by
crossing CSB
/
mice (knockout mice lacking the CSB gene)
(59) with Ink4a/ARF
/
mice (knockout mice
lacking the p16Ink4a gene as well as the overlapping
p19ARF gene) (49) and p53
/
mice (knockout mice lacking the p53 gene) (30),
respectively. p53
/
mice were obtained from Jackson
Laboratory (Bar Harbor, Maine). All mice had a hybrid C57BL/6J-129/sv
genetic background (28, 49, 59). WT, CSB
/
,
Ink4a/ARF
/
, p53, CSB
/
Ink4a/ARF
/
, and CSB
/
p53
/
MEFs were isolated from embryos derived from
crosses of (di)homozygous parents of the desired genotype according to
published procedures (45). Briefly, mouse embryos at 13.5 days of gestation were isolated in utero and cells were dispersed by
using a razor blade and a syringe with an 18-gauge needle attached.
Resultant cells were cultured and frozen as soon as was practical.
Cells were stored in liquid nitrogen and upon thawing were used within
one to three passages. The presence or absence of p16Ink4a
and p53 protein products was verified by immunoblot analysis (data not
shown). Genotyping of mice and cell lines was performed by PCR, as
described previously (3, 30, 49).
Spontaneous tumor formation.
When tumors were observed in
CSB
/
Ink4a/ARF
/
or
Ink4a/ARF
/
mice, they were fixed in 10% neutral
buffered formalin, processed, and paraffin embedded and then sections
were stained with hematoxylin and eosin according to standard
procedures. Comparisons of tumor-free survival were charted by the
method of Kaplan and Meier (percent survival versus time), and
statistical significance of the curves generated for
CSB
/
Ink4a/ARF
/
versus
Ink4a/ARF
/
mice was established using the log rank test.
Growth rate and colony formation efficiency.
Three MEF lines
were assayed for each genotype. For establishing the growth rate of
each MEF line, 2 × 105 cells were plated in multiple
6-cm-diameter dishes and incubated in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's
medium (DMEM) plus 15% fetal bovine serum (FBS). One dish of cells was
counted every day. Colony formation efficiency was performed as
described elsewhere (49). Briefly, for each MEF line
analyzed, 3.5 × 103 cells were distributed on a total of
10 dishes of 6-cm diameter and incubated in DMEM plus 15% FBS. After 8 days, dishes were stained with crystal violet, and the number of
visible colonies (>1.5 mm in diameter) was scored. Statistical
significance (P value determined by Student's t
test) was calculated using Microsoft Excel.
Ras transformation assay.
Transformed foci could be induced
in Ink4a/ARF
/
MEFs by transfection of an H-Ras
expression construct (49). The assay was performed as
described previously (46). Early-passage MEFs derived from
individual embryos (3 MEF lines per genotype) were seeded (8 × 105 cells) in plates of 10-cm diameter and grown in DMEM
plus 10% FBS overnight. The medium was changed 4 h before
transfections began. Transfections were done by standard
calcium-phosphate procedures with DNA mixtures containing 10 µg of
each of the relevant plasmids plus carrier DNA for a total of 30 µg
of DNA. After 8 h of incubation with the precipitates, the
incubation medium was changed and cultures were fed with fresh medium
every 3 days. At day 14 posttransfection, foci were scored visually
(49).
Flow cytometry analysis.
Assessment of a fraction of cells
in S phase and analysis of apoptosis via a fraction of cells with a
sub-G1 DNA content were performed by the
fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACS) facility of the Albert
Einstein College of Medicine utilizing protocols described elsewhere
(13). Briefly, early-passage MEFs from individual embryos
(three MEF lines per genotype) were plated (106 cells) in
10-cm-diameter plates and incubated in DMEM plus 10% FBS for 24 h. For cell death (percentage of sub-G1) analysis, cells
were subjected to UVC (UV radiation which is predominantly 254 nm in
wavelength) irradiation at 5 or 10 J/m2, incubated another
12 or 24 h, harvested, and fixed with 70% ethanol. UVC
irradiation was from a standard tissue culture germicidal hood; UVC
dose was determined with a UVX radiometer (UVP, Upland, Calif.). The
fixed cells are washed with phosphate-buffered saline and then stained
with propidium iodide in a solution containing Triton X-100 as well as
RNase A. Flow cytometry employed excitation with a blue light and
detection of propidium iodide emission at red wavelengths. Statistical
significance (P value determined by Student's t
test) was calculated using Microsoft Excel.
In situ TUNEL assay.
Apoptosis of MEFs was also assayed via
in situ DNA fragmentation using in situ terminal deoxyribonucleotide
transferase-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling (TUNEL). TUNEL labeling was
performed using the TACS 2 TdT (Fluor) kit (Trevigen, Gaithersburg,
Md.). MEFs grown on glass slides in DMEM plus 15% FBS were UVC
irradiated, incubated for 24 h, fixed, and treated using the
manufacturer's recommended conditions. Percentages of apoptotic cells
were determined by scoring TUNEL-positive (apoptotic) nuclei on a Leica
(model Leitz DMRB) fluorescence microscope and dividing by the total cell number determined by using the microscope's phase-contrast optics.
mRNA synthesis.
The mRNA synthesis rate was measured by a
modification of a method described elsewhere (1).
Early-passage MEFs from individual embryos (three MEF lines per
genotype) were plated (105 cells) onto 35-mm cell culture
dishes and incubated in DMEM plus 10% FBS for 24 h before being
prelabeled with [14C]thymidine for 48 h to provide a
measure of total DNA content for cell normalization. The cells were
then pulse labeled for 1 h with [3H]uridine. Cells
were lysed and poly(A)+ RNA was isolated by using the
Straight A's system following the manufacturer's recommendations
(Novagen, Madison, Wis.). The relative transcription rate was defined
as scintillations of 3H per scintillation of
14C. Statistical significance (P value
determined by Student's t test) was calculated using
Microsoft Excel.
Immunoblot analysis.
For p53 protein analysis, MEFs were
subjected to UVC irradiation (5 J/m2) from a standard
tissue culture germicidal hood. Whole-cell extracts were prepared and
subjected to sodium dodecyl sulfate-8% polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis and immunoblot analysis as described previously (6) with p53 monoclonal antibody (PharMingen, San Diego,
Calif.). Protein bands were visualized via chemiluminescence (Pierce,
Rockford, Ill.) after being blotted with peroxidase-conjugated goat
anti-mouse immunoglobulin G (diluted 1:5,000). Immunoblots for p16
utilized rabbit anti-p16 antibody (M-156) from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, Calif.); the antibody for beta tubulin (H-235) was also
from Santa Cruz Biotechnology.
 |
RESULTS |
Effect of disrupting CSB gene product on tumor formation in
Ink4a/ARF
/
mice.
Both male and female
CSB
/
and Ink4a/ARF
/
(null for both
p16INK4a and p19ARF) mice are viable and
fertile (49, 59). Intercrosses of these two strains
generated colonies of CSB
/
Ink4a/ARF
/
mice in a hybrid C57BL/6J-129/sv genetic background. The size, behavior, fertility, and viability of CSB
/
Ink4a/ARF
/
animals were not significantly different
from those of age-matched CSB
/
,
Ink4a/ARF
/
, or WT controls. To assess the effect of CSB
gene disruption on cancer susceptibility, a cohort of 4- to 6-week-old
CSB
/
Ink4a/ARF
/
mice and age-matched
Ink4a/ARF
controls (n = 25 for each
group) were monitored for spontaneous tumor development over a 9-month
period. Tumor-free survival was significantly greater in the
CSB
/
Ink4a/ARF
/
mice than in
Ink4a/ARF
/
animals (Fig.
1a; P < 0.0001).
Although the tumor spectrum was similar, consisting primarily of
fibrosarcomas and lymphomas (Fig. 1b), tumor incidence in the
CSB
/
Ink4a/ARF
/
cohort was
significantly lower than in the Ink4a/ARF
/
control (32 versus 80%, respectively). Moreover, latency to tumor development was
increased from 150 days in the control to 260 days in the
CSB
/
Ink4a/ARF
/
group (Fig. 1a).


View larger version (68K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Disruption of the CSB gene product reduces tumor
incidence in Ink4a/ARF / mice. (a) Survival data for
Ink4a/ARF / mice (triangles) versus CSB /
Ink4a/ARF / mice (circles). Twenty-five
Ink4a/ARF / mice (4 to 6 weeks old) and 25 CSB / Ink4a/ARF / mice of similar age
were monitored for a total of 300 days. Points on the curve denote
times when animals died or were sacrificed because of tumor formation.
All deaths in this experiment were due to tumor formation. Of the 25 Ink4a/ARF / mice, 20 (80%) developed tumors (75%
lymphomas and 25% fibrosarcomas). Of the 25 CSB /
Ink4a/ARF / mice, 8 (32%) developed tumors (87%
lymphomas and 13% fibrosarcomas). (b) Representative photomicrographs
of the two tumor types (fibrosarcoma and lymphoma) observed in this
experiment. Fibrosarcomas appeared as subcutaneous masses at various
locations, including the shoulder, neck, flank, and legs. The
fibrosarcomas were composed of elongated spindle cells forming whorls
and bundles. Mice with lymphomas showed enlarged spleens, livers, lymph
nodes, and sometimes thymuses. The lymphomas were composed of
lymphoblastic cells, reticulum cells with abundant eosinophilic
cytoplasm, lymphocytic mixed cells, and sometimes pleomorphic lymphoid
cells.
|
|
Proliferation rate of Ink4a/ARF
/
MEFs is reduced by
CSB gene disruption.
To understand how the CSB deficiency
contributed to decreased tumor incidence in Ink4a/ARF
/
mice, we first examined the impact of CSB gene disruption on the cell
proliferation rate of WT, CSB
/
,
Ink4a/ARF
/
, and CSB
/
Ink4a/ARF
/
MEFs. Growth curve determination revealed
that Ink4a/ARF
/
MEFs grew more rapidly than WT MEFs, in
agreement with measurements obtained previously (49). The
CSB deficiency significantly reduced the growth rate of
Ink4a/ARF
/
MEFs (Fig. 2,
compare Ink4a/ARF
/
with CSB
/
Ink4a/ARF
/
; P < 0.05). The
proliferation rate of the CSB
/
MEFs was only slightly
lower than that of the WT MEFs, suggesting that CSB gene disruption is
more detrimental in rapidly growing (e.g., Ink4a/ARF
/
)
cells (see Discussion).

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Cell proliferation analysis of early-passage MEFs
derived from individual embryos. For each genotype, 2 × 105 cells were plated on each of eight 6-cm-diameter dishes
on day zero and incubated in DMEM plus 15% FBS. One dish of cells was
counted per cell line for the next 7 days.
|
|
Another indicator of cellular proliferative capacity is the fraction of
unsynchronized, logarithmically growing cells that
are in S phase at
any given time. MEFs of each of the four genotypes
were assessed via
flow cytometric analysis. The fraction of CSB
/
Ink4a/ARF
/
MEFs in S phase (20.7%) was significantly
lower than the fraction
of Ink4a/ARF
/
MEFs in S phase
(27.1%,
P < 0.05; data not shown). Consistent
with
the growth curves, CSB deficiency did not significantly reduce
the
fraction of WT MEFs in S phase (14.75% for CSB
/
MEFs
as opposed to 15.3% for WT MEFs; data not
shown).
CSB gene disruption reduces total mRNA synthesis rate.
It has
been shown that the rate of mRNA synthesis by RNA polymerase II is
reduced in cells lacking CSB (19, 47). The basal transcription rate of RNA polymerase II is regulated by multiple cellular factors at the levels of initiation and elongation and is
independent of the cellular proliferation rate (7). Under certain physiological conditions (e.g., cardiac hypertrophy), an
enhanced basal transcription rate may be a cause of the increased cellular proliferation rate (1). When total mRNA synthesis rates were compared for WT, CSB
/
,
Ink4a/ARF
/
, and CSB
/
Ink4a/ARF
/
MEFs, the level was significantly lower for
CSB
/
Ink4a/ARF
/
cells than for
Ink4a/ARF
/
cells (Fig. 3)
(P < 0.05).

View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Effect of CSB disruption on mRNA synthesis rate. Cells
were prelabeled with [14C]thymidine for 48 h and
were then pulse labeled with [3H]uridine for 1 h.
Cells were lysed and poly(A)+ RNA was isolated using
Straight A's reagent (Novagen), as described in Materials and Methods.
In addition, a fraction of each lysate was subjected to total DNA
extraction. The relative transcription rate (polyadenylated mRNA) was
calculated as scintillations of 3H per scintillation of
14C. P values were as follows: WT versus
Ink4a/ARF / , P < 0.05;
CSB / Ink4a/ARF / versus
Ink4a/ARF / , P < 0.05;
CSB / versus WT, P > 0.05.
|
|
Disruption of CSB gene diminishes immortalization potential of
Ink4a/ARF
/
MEFs.
In view of the impaired
proliferation observed in CSB
/
Ink4a/ARF
/
MEFs, we sought to determine the colony
formation rates of Ink4a/ARF
/
and CSB
/
Ink4a/ARF
/
MEFs after low-density seeding, a surrogate
assay for immortalization potential (23). As shown in Fig.
4a, CSB deficiency dramatically reduced
the colony formation rate of Ink4a/ARF
/
MEFs
(P < 0.05). A similar trend held true for a
CSB
/
Ink4a/ARF
/
MEF clone compared to a
CSB+/+ Ink4a/ARF
/
MEF clone derived from a
CSB+/
Ink4a/ARF
/
× CSB+/
Ink4a/ARF
/
heterozygous intercross
(data not shown).

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Disruption of the CSB gene product reduces the
immortalization potential of Ink4a/ARF / MEFs. (a)
Colony formation assay. For each genotype, 3,500 cells were plated onto
10 dishes (6-cm diameter) and colonies were visualized by crystal
violet staining after 8 days. The colony frequencies on the histogram
represent the average numbers of colonies (larger than 3 mm) per plate
compiled from three colony formation assays. (b) H-Ras transformation
assay. Early-passage MEFs derived from individual embryos of the
indicated genotype were seeded (8 × 105 cells) on two
plates of 10-cm diameter. Transfections were performed with the
indicated H-Ras or control (vector) constructs the next day. At day 14 posttransfection, foci were scored visually. The histogram presents
mean numbers of colonies per plate from two experiments.
|
|
Consistent with their reduced proliferative and immortalization
potentials, CSB gene deficiency was found to render
Ink4a/ARF
/
MEFs more resistant to neoplastic
transformation in vitro, correlating
with reduced tumor incidence in
vivo. Specifically, Ink4a/ARF
/
MEFs were efficiently
transformed by activated H-Ras alone, as
previously shown
(
49). Focus formation was reduced by 65% in
CSB
/
Ink4a/ARF
/
MEFs compared to
Ink4a/ARF
/
MEFs (Fig.
4b,
P < 0.05).
CSB gene disruption sensitizes cells to UV-induced apoptosis.
Previous studies have shown that CSB gene disruption renders cells more
sensitive to apoptosis induced by UV radiation as well as ionizing
radiation and oxidizing agents (36, 39, 40). To
investigate the effect of CSB gene disruption upon UV-induced cell
death in Ink4a/ARF
/
MEFs, we examined the
sub-G1 fraction of MEFs of each of the four genotypes (WT,
CSB
/
, Ink4a/ARF
/
, and
CSB
/
Ink4a/ARF
/
) after various doses of
UVC radiation (10, 5, or 0 J/m2). Consistent with previous
observations, we found that the CSB deficiency sensitized both WT and
Ink4a/ARF
/
MEFs to UVC-induced cell death (Fig.
5). Specifically, at a dose of 5 J/m2 we observed a 23.9% apoptosis rate in
CSB
/
Ink4a/ARF
/
MEFs compared to 8.7%
in Ink4a/ARF
/
cells (Fig. 5).

View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Effect of CSB gene disruption on UV-induced cell death.
MEFs of the indicated genotypes were subjected to UVC radiation (0, 5, or 10 J/m2) and permitted to grow for another 24 h. The
histogram shows data tabulated from average percentages of
sub-G1 values for MEFs of each of the indicated genotypes
(P value after 5 J/m2 for CSB /
Ink4a/ARF / versus Ink4a/ARF / was
<0.05).
|
|
In a separate experiment, we demonstrated that a UV dose as low as 2.5 J/m
2 was sufficient to induce significant apoptosis in
CSB
/
Ink4a/ARF
/
MEFs (but not in
Ink4a/ARF
/
MEFs). By scoring for TUNEL-positive nuclei
we observed 19% apoptotic
nuclei in CSB
/
Ink4a/ARF
/
MEFs 24 h after 2.5 J/m
2
versus 1% in Ink4a/ARF
/
MEFs (data not
shown).
CSB gene disruption sensitizes cells to UV-mediated p53
induction.
An important mediator of genotoxin-induced apoptosis is
p53 through its ability to induce the transcription of proapoptotic factors, such as bax (reviewed in reference 2). It
has been shown that CSB gene disruption leads to p53
induction (increased steady-state level) at lower doses of UVC
radiation than in WT cells, presumably because the CSB-deficient cells
cannot clear stalled RNA polymerase II from UVC-induced lesions, which
appear to stimulate p53 induction (35, 41). We therefore
compared the sensitivity of WT, CSB
/
,
Ink4a/ARF
/
, and CSB
/
Ink4a/ARF
/
MEFs for p53 induction after exposure to 5 J/m2 of UVC radiation (Fig.
6). As shown in Fig. 6, CSB deficiency enhanced p53 induction in WT and Ink4a/ARF
/
MEFs.
Together these data suggest that UVC-induced apoptosis in this context
is likely mediated by p53.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
CSB gene disruption sensitizes MEFs to UV induction of
p53. MEFs of each of the indicated genotypes were plated on 6-cm dishes
and subjected to UVC radiation (5 J/m2) as indicated, and
whole-cell extracts were prepared 3, 6, 12, or 24 h later.
Cellular extracts from equivalent numbers of cells were subjected to
immunoblot analysis with a monoclonal anti-p53 antibody (see Materials
and Methods for details). An immunoblot with anti-tubulin antibody was
performed to verify that equal amounts of protein were loaded (data not
shown).
|
|
CSB gene disruption reduces proliferative and immortalization
potential of p53
/
cells.
Since
CSB
/
Ink4a/ARF
/
cells demonstrated
sensitization to UV-induced p53 accumulation, we wished to determine to
what extent the diminution of neoplastic properties caused by CSB gene
disruption was p53 dependent. To address this question we crossed
p53
/
mice (30) with CSB
/
mice to generate CSB
/
p53
/
mice.
p53
/
and CSB
/
p53
/
MEF
lines were generated from embryos obtained from
p53
/
× p53
/
mice and
CSB
/
p53
/
× CSB
/
p53
/
mice intercrosses, respectively.
In line with previous reports (
25), we observed that
p53
/
MEFs proliferated more rapidly than WT MEFs (data
not shown). In
addition, CSB
/
p53
/
MEFs
proliferated at a lower rate than p53
/
MEFs (Fig.
7). CSB
/
p53
/
MEFs also demonstrated a lower fraction of cells
in S phase compared
to p53
/
MEFs, as shown by FACS
analysis of nonsynchronized, logarithmically
growing samples of each
genotype (23.0 versus 31.6%,
P < 0.05;
data not
shown). CSB gene disruption reduced the basal mRNA transcription
rate
of p53
/
cells (Fig.
8)
(
P < 0.05), as it did for Ink4a/ARF
/
cells (Fig.
3). The transcription rate of p53
/
cells,
like that of Ink4a/ARF
/
cells, was greater than that of
WT cells. CSB
/
p53
/
MEFs also
demonstrated a significantly reduced rate of colony
formation after
low-density seeding (Fig.
9)
(
P < 0.05). It had
previously been reproducibly
demonstrated that WT and CSB
/
MEFs form almost no
colonies after low-density seeding (Fig.
4a).

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
CSB gene disruption leads to reduced proliferation in
p53 / MEFs. For each genotype, 2 × 105
aliquots of cells were plated in each of seven 6-cm-diameter dishes on
day zero and incubated in DMEM plus 15% FBS. One dish of cells was
counted per cell line every day thereafter. Each data point represents
the mean cell number calculated from a MEF line of the indicated
genotype on the indicated day (repeated three times) (P < 0.05).
|
|

View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 8.
CSB gene disruption reduces mRNA synthesis rate in
p53 / MEFs. The relative transcription rate
(polyadenylated mRNA) was calculated as for Fig. 3. Each bar represents
measurements obtained from two independent experiments (P < 0.05).
|
|

View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 9.
CSB gene disruption reduces the colony formation rate of
MEFs lacking the p53 tumor suppressor gene. For each genotype, 3,500 cells were plated onto 6-cm dishes, and colonies were scored by crystal
violet staining after 8 days as for Fig. 4. Each bar in the histogram
represents the average number of colonies (larger than 3 mm) per plate
from 10 plates from each of the indicated genotypes (repeated three
times).
|
|
CSB gene disruption increases rate of UV-induced cell death.
p53
/
and CSB
/
p53
/
MEFs
were UVC irradiated (10, 5, or 0 J/m2), and the apoptotic
rate was measured by FACS analysis, as for Fig. 5 (13).
Interestingly, there is a small but statistically significant increase
in the rate of apoptosis after irradiation with 5 or 10 J/m2 (P < 0.05) (Fig.
10). This is consistent with other
studies that indicate that p53-independent mechanisms of UV-induced
apoptosis exist (44, 58).

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 10.
CSB gene disruption increases UV-induced apoptosis rate
in p53 / MEFs. MEFs of the indicated genotypes were
subjected to UVC radiation (5 or 10 J/m2) and assayed for
apoptosis 24 h later via flow cytometry (% sub-G1) as
described in Materials and Methods. The histogram represents data
obtained from two independent experiments (P < 0.05
for p53 / versus CSB /
p53 / after irradiation with both 5 and 10 J/m2).
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
In the present study we have shown that inactivation of the CSB
gene reduces the predisposition of Ink4a/ARF knockout mice to develop
spontaneous tumors. Consistent with this observation, MEFs derived from
CSB
/
Ink4a/ARF
/
animals were shown to
possess a decreased neoplastic potential compared to animals with
Ink4a/ARF
/
MEFs, as is evident from the reduced colony-
and focus-forming abilities after low-density seeding or transfection
with an H-Ras expression construct, respectively. Similarly, the
neoplastic potential of p53
/
cells is reduced by
inactivation of the CSB gene, suggesting that the antineoplastic effect
of the CSB deficiency is generally applicable and is at least partially
p53 independent. These findings appear to be in agreement with the
absence of clear tumorigenic events in human CS, although the fact that
the short life span of patients (10 to 12 years on average) masks a
potential cancer predisposition at older ages cannot be excluded
(15, 43). At the same time, however, the reduction in
carcinogenic potential due to CSB inactivation seems inconsistent with
the function of DNA repair genes as tumor suppressor genes as well as
with the skin cancer predisposition of CSB mice following exposure to
UV light and chemical carcinogens (3, 59). Several
properties of the CSB gene product may help to explain the decreased
neoplastic potential of CSB
/
mice and MEFs and the
apparently opposing effects of CSB gene disruption on spontaneous
and induced carcinogenesis.
First, the CSB protein is most closely associated with
transcription-coupled repair of UV- and chemically induced lesions. Transcription-coupled repair may take place because the CSB gene product, along with the CSA protein and an RNA polymerase II molecule stalled at a DNA lesion, efficiently recruits the NER apparatus to the
damage in the transcribed strand in a manner that remains to be clearly
understood (3, 16, 56, 60). Evidence is accumulating that
base excision repair (BER) (responsible for repair of damaged
nucleotide bases), like NER, can also be subdivided into a global
genome and a transcription-coupled subpathway and that the CSB protein
is required for transcription-coupled BER (tcBER) (12, 36,
39). In addition (or perhaps, instead), the CSB gene product
could play a role in displacing or removing the stalled RNA polymerase
molecule from transcription-blocking lesions so that repair can take
place and transcription can resume, a phenomenon that is distinct from
rapid recruitment of the NER (and presumably the BER) apparatus
(reviewed in reference 61). When subjected to exogenous
mutagens (i.e., UV radiation), skin tumorigenesis is elevated in
CSB
/
mice, indicating that tcNER acts as a
tumor-suppressing mechanism by removing mutagenic lesions. However,
since CSB
/
mice do not show increased frequencies of
internal tumors and since inactivation of the CSB gene decreases rather
than increases the spontaneous tumorigenesis rate in cancer-prone
Ink4a/ARF
/
mice, loss of tcNER or tcBER does not appear
to significantly promote spontaneous carcinogenesis (at least in mice).
Instead, CSB
/
Ink4a/ARF
/
mice are less
prone to develop spontaneous tumors than
Ink4a/ARF
/
mice, which suggests that a functional CSB
protein somehow assists (nonrepair) functions that promote rather than
suppress cancer development.
One such function could relate to the essential process of
transcription. The CSB defect has been shown to negatively affect the
rate of mRNA synthesis, leading to the proposition that CSB is an
auxiliary transcription elongation factor (19, 47). Further supporting this idea are studies showing a physical association of CSB with elongating RNA polymerase II (10, 56, 60). It has been suggested that the CS phenotype (including short stature and
intellectual impairment) results from the inability of CS cells to
transcribe their genome at rates sufficient to meet the metabolic
and/or synthetic demands of highly active cells (e.g., myelin synthesis
in the nervous system) (14, 15, 20, 24, 29, 61).
Ink4a/ARF
/
and p53
/
cells are highly
proliferative cell types and accordingly require a very active
metabolism. Thus, it is conceivable that a reduction of transcription
competence by the CSB defect as observed in CSB
/
Ink4a/ARF
/
and CSB
/
p53
/
cells (Fig. 3 and 8) contributes to the decrease
in the proliferative capacity of these cells, and thus to the reduction
of neoplastic potential.
Moreover, CSB-deficient cells are known to undergo apoptosis at
lower doses of UV radiation, ionizing radiation, or the oxidizing agent
hydrogen peroxide than WT cells (12, 39, 40). It has been
demonstrated that RNA polymerase II persistently stalled at UV- or
other genotoxin-induced DNA lesions is responsible for the elevated
apoptosis rate (40). In accordance with these data, we
have shown that inactivation of the CSB gene also increases the
sensitivity of CSB
/
Ink4a/ARF
/
or
CSB
/
p53
/
MEFs to UV-induced cell death
(Fig. 5 and 10). Thus, it is possible that the reduced number of tumors
in CSB
/
Ink4a/ARF
/
mice and the reduced
neoplastic potential demonstrated by CSB
/
Ink4a/ARF
/
MEFs result from an increased rate of
spontaneous apoptosis of precancerous cells. As these animals and cells
have not been exposed to UV or other environmental agents, the latter
process must be triggered by DNA damage produced by endogenous
genotoxins. Recently, it was shown that DNA lesions (i.e.,
8-oxo-guanine and thymine glycol) caused by reactive oxygen species
continuously generated by cellular metabolic processes or upon exposure
to environmental agents can also block transcription by RNA polymerase
II (39). We hypothesize that the CSB defect in
CSB
/
Ink4a/ARF
/
mice may make
precancerous cells vulnerable to clearance by apoptosis for the
following reasons. (i) Transformation of normal cells into highly
proliferative (pre)cancerous cells is assumed to up-regulate cellular
metabolism, which is expected to produce increased levels of oxidative
DNA damage. (ii) CSB
/
cells cannot repair 8-oxo-guanine
and thymine glycol in a transcription-coupled manner (12,
36). (iii) Stalled RNA polymerase II is a powerful signal for
apoptosis (40).
In the present study we have provided strong evidence for the
antineoplastic potential of the CSB defect in the background of
p16Ink4a/p19ARF or p53 tumor suppressor
deficiency. Yet, when CSB
/
mice are challenged with
exogenous DNA-damaging agents, like UV light and the chemical
carcinogen dimethyl benzanthracine (designated DMBA), a mild but
obvious skin cancer predisposition is observed (3, 59).
Although the CSB defect results in an enhanced sensitivity to apoptosis
triggered by transcription-blocking lesions which is likely to reduce
neoplastic susceptibility (40), apoptotic elimination of
precancerous cells in carcinogen-exposed CSB
/
animals
is apparently insufficient to counteract the increased mutagenesis
originating from the tcNER defect. UV-induced tumor formation depends
not only upon the initiation of neoplastic cells (determined by the
rate of UV-induced mutagenesis, which is a function of UV-induced DNA
lesion repair versus UV-induced apoptosis) but also on the ability of
such cells to continue to proliferate and avoid apoptosis (tumor
progression). It is noteworthy that although UV-exposed
CSB
/
mice develop a fair number of early neoplastic
lesions (benign papillomas), these lesions infrequently develop into
invasive carcinomas (3). Thus, it seems that the decreased
transcription rate and/or increased sensitivity to spontaneous
apoptosis characteristic of the CSB
/
genotype is
particularly detrimental to tumor progression.
Despite the role of mdm2 in maintaining low basal levels of p53 and the
known function of p19ARF in antagonizing mdm2, ionizing
radiation and actinomycin D can still induce elevated p53 levels in
ARF
/
cells (31, 33). Hence, the
genotoxin-induced stabilization of p53 has not been thought to involve
up-regulation of ARF. Similarly, in the absence of functional
p19ARF, UV radiation could still induce elevated levels of
p53 in CSB
/
Ink4a/ARF
/
cells (Fig. 6,
lane 15). It is likely that the increased UV-induced apoptotic rate in
CSB
/
Ink4a/ARF
/
cells (compared to
Ink4a
/
cells) directly relates to increased p53
induction. Nevertheless, CSB
/
p53
/
cells still demonstrated a slight but statistically significant elevation in UV-induced apoptosis compared to p53
/
cells, indicating that persistently stalled RNA polymerase II may
activate the apoptotic machinery to at least some degree in a
p53-independent manner (Fig. 10). However, the rate of UV-induced cell
death was far lower in p53
/
than in p53+/+
cells (compare Fig. 5 and 10). On a CSB
/
background,
the Ink4a/ARF deficiency appeared to partially, but significantly,
decrease the rate of UV-induced apoptosis (Fig. 5, compare
CSB
/
MEFs to CSB
/
Ink4a/ARF
/
MEFs). Moreover, p53 induction by 5 J of UVC
radiation per m2 was found to be delayed and/or reduced in
CSB
/
Ink4a/ARF
/
MEFs compared to
CSB
/
MEFs (Fig. 6, lanes 3 through 5 versus lanes 13 through 15). A possible explanation is that the lack of
p19ARF to antagonize mdm2 leads to decreased p53 expression.
In conclusion, we provide the first experimental evidence
supporting an antineoplastic effect of CSB deficiency, which may explain the absence of cancer susceptibility in patients with CS.
Moreover, our data suggest that the CSB gene could be considered an
anticancer target. Inactivating this gene product may impede tumor
cells and/or render them more susceptible to killing by chemo- or
radiotherapeutic agents, many of which function by damaging DNA. On the
other hand, such DNA lesions might potentially be mutagenic; thus, CSB
inactivation could represent a very dangerous double-edged sword.
However, human cells possess a potent back-up DNA repair pathway in the
ggNER apparatus, which should remove many of the residual DNA lesions
that might otherwise be converted into DNA mutations. Experiments under
way support the idea that targeting the CSB gene product with antisense
oligonucleotides can inhibit human cancer cells.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We are grateful to Jianhua Zheng for managing the mouse colonies
as well as to Diane Gaertner, Director of the Institute for Animal
Studies of the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, and to David
Gebhard of the FACS facility for advice and assistance. We acknowledge
Ronald A. Depinho for providing Ink4a/ARF
/
mice.
This work was supported by grant 96-59 from the James S. McDonnell
Foundation New Investigator Program, an intramural grant from the
Albert Einstein College of Medicine Department of Pathology, and grant
RO1 CA80171-01 from the NCI (to D.B.B.). Services provided by the
Institute for Animal Studies and the FACS facility of the Albert
Einstein College of Medicine were supported by the Cancer Center Core
National Institutes of Health grant 5-P30-CA13330-26. Work performed at
Erasmus University was supported by grants from the Dutch Cancer
Society (EUR-1774, EUR-2004), NIH (grant AG17242-02), The Netherlands
Organization for Scientific Research NWO (SPINOZA award), and the
European Community (proposal no. QLRT-1999-02002).
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Pathology F514A, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Ave., Bronx, NY 10461. Phone: (718) 430-2222. Fax: (718) 430-8541. E-mail: bregman{at}aecom.yu.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Abdellatif, M.,
S. E. Packer,
L. H. Michael,
D. Zhang,
M. J. Charng, and M. D. Schneider.
1998.
A Ras-dependent pathway regulates RNA polymerase II phosphorylation in cardiac myocytes: implications for cardiac hypertrophy.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:6729-6736[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
|
Agarwal, M. L.,
W. R. Taylor,
M. V. Chernov,
O. B. Chernova, and G. R. Stark.
1998.
The p53 network.
J. Biol. Chem.
273:1-4[Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Berg, R. J.,
H. Rebel,
G. T. van der Horst,
H. J. van Kranen,
L. H. Mullenders,
W. A. van Vloten, and F. R. de Gruijl.
2000.
Impact of global genome repair versus transcription-coupled repair on ultraviolet carcinogenesis in hairless mice.
Cancer Res.
60:2858-2863[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Berg, R. J.,
H. J. Ruven,
A. T. Sands,
F. R. de Gruijl, and L. H. Mullenders.
1998.
Defective global genome repair in XPC mice is associated with skin cancer susceptibility but not with sensitivity to UVB induced erythema and edema.
J. Investig. Dermatol.
110:405-409[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Bootsma, D.,
K. H. Kraemer,
J. E. Cleaver, and J. H. J. Hoeijmakers.
1998.
Nucleotide excision repair syndromes: xeroderma pigmentosum, Cockayne syndrome, and trichothiodystrophy, p. 245-274.
In
B. Vogelstein, and K. W. Kinzler (ed.), The genetic basis of human cancer. McGraw-Hill, New York, N.Y.
|
| 6.
|
Bregman, D. B.,
R. Halaban,
A. J. van Gool,
K. A. Henning,
E. C. Friedberg, and S. L. Warren.
1996.
UV-induced ubiquitination of RNA polymerase II: a novel modification deficient in Cockayne syndrome cells.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:11586-11590[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Bregman, D. B.,
R. G. Pestell, and V. J. Kidd.
2000.
Cell cycle regulation and RNA polymerase II.
Front. Biosci.
5:D244-D257[Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Chin, L.,
J. Pomerantz, and R. A. DePinho.
1998.
The INK4a/ARF tumor suppressor: one gene two products two pathways.
Trends Biochem. Sci.
23:291-296[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Chin, L.,
J. Pomerantz,
D. Polsky,
M. Jacobson,
C. Cohen,
C. Cordon-Cardo,
J. W. N. Horner, and R. A. DePinho.
1997.
Cooperative effects of INK4a and ras in melanoma susceptibility in vivo.
Genes Dev.
11:2822-2834[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Citterio, E.,
S. Rademakers,
G. T. van der Horst,
A. J. van Gool,
J. H. Hoeijmakers, and W. Vermeulen.
1998.
Biochemical and biological characterization of wild-type and ATPase-deficient Cockayne syndrome B repair protein.
J. Biol. Chem.
273:11844-11851[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Citterio, E.,
W. Vermeulen, and J. H. Hoeijmakers.
2000.
Transcriptional healing.
Cell.
101:447-450[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Cooper, P. K.,
T. Nouspikel,
S. G. Clarkson, and S. A. Leadon.
1997.
Defective transcription-coupled repair of oxidative base damage in Cockayne syndrome patients from XP group G.
Science
275:990-993[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Darzynkiewicz, Z., and G. Juan.
1997.
Analysis of DNA content and DNA strand breaks for detection of apoptotic cells, p. 7.4.1-7.4.8.
In
J. P. Robinson (ed.), Current protocols in cytometry. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, N.Y.
|
| 14.
|
de Boer, J., and J. H. Hoeijmakers.
1999.
Cancer from the outside, aging from the inside: mouse models to study the consequences of defective nucleotide excision repair.
Biochimie
81:127-137[Medline].
|
| 15.
|
de Boer, J., and J. H. Hoeijmakers.
2000.
Nucleotide excision repair and human syndromes.
Carcinogenesis
21:453-460[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
de Laat, W. L.,
N. G. Jaspers, and J. H. Hoeijmakers.
1999.
Molecular mechanism of nucleotide excision repair.
Genes Dev.
13:768-785[Free Full Text].
|
| 17.
|
de Vries, A.,
C. T. van Oostrom,
P. M. Dortant,
R. B. Beems,
C. F. van Kreijl,
P. J. Capel, and H. van Steeg.
1997.
Spontaneous liver tumors and benzo[a]pyrene-induced lymphomas in XPA-deficient mice.
Mol. Carcinog.
19:46-53[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 18.
|
de Vries, A.,
C. T. van Oostrom,
F. M. Hofhuis,
P. M. Dortant,
R. J. Berg,
F. R. de Gruijl,
P. W. Wester,
C. F. van Kreijl,
P. J. Capel,
H. van Steeg, et al.
1995.
Increased susceptibility to ultraviolet-B and carcinogens of mice lacking the DNA excision repair gene XPA.
Nature
377:169-173[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Dianov, G. L.,
J.-F. Houle,
N. Iyer,
V. A. Bohr, and E. C. Friedberg.
1997.
Reduced RNA polymerase II transcription in extracts of Cockayne syndrome and xeroderma pigmentosum/Cockayne syndrome cells.
Nucleic Acids Res.
25:3636-3642[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Friedberg, E. C.
1996.
Cockayne syndrome a primary defect in DNA repair, transcription, both or neither?
Bioessays
18:731-738[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Friedberg, E. C., and L. B. Meira.
2000.
Database of mouse strains carrying targeted mutations in genes affecting cellular responses to DNA damage. Version 4.
Mutat. Res.
459:243-274[Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Friedberg, E. C.,
G. C. Walker, and W. Siede.
1995.
DNA repair and mutagenesis.
ASM Press, Washington, D.C.
|
| 23.
|
Greenberg, R. A.,
L. Chin,
A. Femino,
K. H. Lee,
G. J. Gottlieb,
R. H. Singer,
C. W. Greider, and R. A. DePinho.
1999.
Short dysfunctional telomeres impair tumorigenesis in the INK4a(delta2/3) cancer-prone mouse.
Cell
97:515-525[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Hanawalt, P. C.
2000.
DNA repair. The bases for Cockayne syndrome.
Nature
405:415-416[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 25.
|
Harvey, M.,
A. T. Sands,
R. S. Weiss,
M. E. Hegi,
R. W. Wiseman,
P. Pantazis,
B. C. Giovanella,
M. A. Tainsky,
A. Bradley, and L. A. Donehower.
1993.
In vitro growth characteristics of embryo fibroblasts isolated from p53-deficient mice.
Oncogene
8:2457-2467[Medline].
|
| 26.
|
Henning, K. A.,
L. Li,
I. Narayan,
L. D. McDaniel,
M. S. Reagan,
R. Legerski,
R. A. Schultz,
M. Stefanini,
A. R. Lehmann,
L. V. Mayne, and E. C. Friedberg.
1995.
The Cockayne syndrome group A gene encodes a WD repeat protein that interacts with CSB protein and a subunit of RNA polymerase II TFIIH.
Cell
82:555-564[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 27.
|
Hwang, B. J.,
S. Toering,
U. Francke, and G. Chu.
1998.
p48 activates a UV-damaged-DNA binding factor and is defective in xeroderma pigmentosum group E cells that lack binding activity.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:4391-4399[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 28.
|
Ioffe, E.,
Y. Liu,
M. Bhaumik,
F. Poirier,
S. M. Factor, and P. Stanley.
1995.
WW6: an embryonic stem cell line with an inert genetic marker that can be traced in chimeras.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92:7357-7361[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 29.
|
Iyer, N.,
M. S. Reagan,
K. J. Wu,
B. Canagarajah, and E. C. Friedberg.
1996.
Interactions involving the human RNA polymerase II transcription/nucleotide excision repair complex TFIIH, the nucleotide excision repair protein XPG, and Cockayne syndrome group B (CSB) protein.
Biochemistry
35:2157-2167[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 30.
|
Jacks, T.,
L. Remington,
B. O. Williams,
E. M. Schmitt,
S. Halachmi,
R. T. Bronson, and R. A. Weinberg.
1994.
Tumor spectrum analysis in p53-mutant mice.
Curr. Biol.
4:1-7[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 31.
|
Kamijo, T.,
E. van de Kamp,
M. J. Chong,
F. Zindy,
J. A. Diehl,
C. J. Sherr, and P. J. McKinnon.
1999.
Loss of the ARF tumor suppressor reverses premature replicative arrest but not radiation hypersensitivity arising from disabled atm function.
Cancer Res.
59:2464-2469[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 32.
|
Kamijo, T.,
J. D. Weber,
G. Zambetti,
F. Zindy,
M. F. Roussel, and C. J. Sherr.
1998.
Functional and physical interactions of the ARF tumor suppressor with p53 and Mdm2.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
95:8292-8297[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 33.
|
Kamijo, T.,
F. Zindy,
M. F. Roussel,
D. E. Quelle,
J. R. Downing,
R. A. Ashmun,
G. Grosveld, and C. J. Sherr.
1997.
Tumor suppression at the mouse INK4a locus mediated by the alternative reading frame product p19ARF.
Cell
91:649-659[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 34.
|
Kraemer, K. H.,
M. M. Lee, and J. Scotto.
1984.
DNA repair protects against cutaneous and internal neoplasia: evidence from xeroderma pigmentosum.
Carcinogenesis
5:511-514[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 35.
|
Lakin, N. D., and S. P. Jackson.
1999.
Regulation of p53 in response to DNA damage.
Oncogene
18:7644-7655[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 36.
|
Leadon, S. A., and P. K. Cooper.
1993.
Preferential repair of ionizing radiation-induced damage in the transcribed strand of an active human gene is defective in Cockayne syndrome.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
90:10499-10503[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 37.
|
Leadon, S. A., and D. A. Lawrence.
1991.
Preferential repair of DNA damage on the transcribed strand of the human metallothionein genes requires RNA polymerase II.
Mutat. Res.
255:67-78[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 38.
|
Leadon, S. A., and D. A. Lawrence.
1992.
Strand-selective repair of DNA damage in the yeast GAL7 gene requires RNA polymerase II.
J. Biol. Chem.
267:23175-23182[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 39.
|
Le Page, F.,
E. E. Kwoh,
A. Avrutskaya,
A. Gentil,
S. A. Leadon,
A. Sarasin, and P. K. Cooper.
2000.
Transcription-coupled repair of 8-oxoguanine: requirement for XPG, TFIIH, and CSB and implications for Cockayne syndrome.
Cell
101:159-171[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 40.
|
Ljungman, M., and F. Zhang.
1996.
Blockage of RNA polymerase as a possible trigger for u. v. light-induced apoptosis.
Oncogene
13:823-831[Medline].
|
| 41.
|
Ljungman, M.,
F. Zhang,
F. Chen,
A. J. Rainbow, and B. C. McKay.
1999.
Inhibition of RNA polymerase II as a trigger for the p53 response.
Oncogene
18:583-592[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 42.
|
Nakane, H.,
S. Takeuchi,
S. Yuba,
M. Saijo,
Y. Nakatsu,
H. Murai,
Y. Nakatsuru,
T. Ishikawa,
S. Hirota,
Y. Kitamura, et al.
1995.
High incidence of ultraviolet-B- or chemical-carcinogen-induced skin tumours in mice lacking the xeroderma pigmentosum group A gene.
Nature
377:165-168[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 43.
|
Nance, M. A., and S. A. Berry.
1992.
Cockayne syndrome: review of 140 cases.
Am. J. Med. Genet.
42:68-84[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 44.
|
Nip, J.,
D. K. Strom,
B. E. Fee,
G. Zambetti,
J. L. Cleveland, and S. W. Hiebert.
1997.
E2F-1 cooperates with topoisomerase II inhibition and DNA damage to selectively augment p53-independent apoptosis.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17:1049-1056[Abstract].
|
| 45.
|
Pomerantz, J.,
N. Schreiber-Agus,
N. J. Liegeois,
A. Silverman,
L. Alland,
L. Chin,
J. Potes,
K. Chen,
I. Orlow,
H.-W. Lee,
C. Cordon-Cardo, and R. A. DePinho.
1998.
The Ink4a tumor suppressor gene product, p19ARF, interacts with MDM2 and neutralizes MDM2's inhibition of p53.
Cell
92:713-723[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 46.
|
Schreiber-Agus, N.,
L. Chin,
K. Chen,
R. Torres,
G. Rao,
P. Guida,
A. I. Skoultchi, and R. A. DePinho.
1995.
An amino-terminal domain of Mxil mediates anti-Myc oncogenic activity and interacts with a homolog of the yeast transcriptional repressor SIN3.
Cell
80:777-786[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 47.
|
Selby, C. P., and A. Sancar.
1997.
Cockayne syndrome group B protein enhances elongation by RNA polymerase II.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:11205-11209[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 48.
|
Serrano, M.
2000.
The INK4a/ARF locus in murine tumorigenesis.
Carcinogenesis
21:865-869[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 49.
|
Serrano, M.,
H. Lee,
L. Chin,
C. Cordon-Cardo,
D. Beach, and R. A. DePinho.
1996.
Role of the INK4a locus in tumor suppression and cell mortality.
Cell
85:27-37[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 50.
|
Sharpless, N. E., and R. A. DePinho.
1999.
The INK4A/ARF locus and its two gene products.
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
9:22-30[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 51.
|
Sherr, C. J.
1998.
Tumor surveillance via the ARF-p53 pathway.
Genes Dev.
12:2984-2991[Free Full Text].
|
| 52.
|
Sherr, C. J., and J. D. Weber.
2000.
The ARF/p53 pathway.
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
10:94-99[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 53.
|
Sugano, T.,
M. Nitta,
H. Ohmori, and M. Yamaizumi.
1995.
Nuclear accumulation of p53 in normal human fibroblasts is induced by various cellular stresses which evoke the heat shock response, independently of the cell cycle.
Jpn. J. Cancer Res.
86:415-418[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 54.
|
Sugasawa, K.,
J. M. Ng,
C. Masutani,
S. Iwai,
P. J. van der Spek,
A. P. Eker,
F. Hanaoka,
D. Bootsma, and J. H. Hoeijmakers.
1998.
Xeroderma pigmentosum group C protein complex is the initiator of global genome nucleotide excision repair.
Mol. Cell
2:223-232[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 55.
|
Sweder, K. S., and P. C. Hanawalt.
1992.
Preferential repair of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers in the transcribed strand of a gene in yeast chromosomes and plasmids is dependent on transcription.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
89:10696-10700[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 56.
|
Tantin, D.,
A. Kansal, and M. Carey.
1997.
Recruitment of the putative transcription-repair coupling factor CSB/ERCC6 to RNA polymerase II elongation complexes.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17:6803-6814[Abstract].
|
| 57.
|
Troelstra, C.,
A. van Gool,
J. de Wit,
W. Vermeulen,
D. Bootsma, and J. H. Hoeijmakers.
1992.
ERCC6, a member of a subfamily of putative helicases, is involved in Cockayne's syndrome and preferential repair of active genes.
Cell
71:939-953[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 58.
|
Uberti, D.,
D. Schwartz,
N. Almog,
N. Goldfinger,
A. Harmelin,
M. Memo, and V. Rotter.
1999.
Epithelial cells of different organs exhibit distinct patterns of p53-dependent and p53-independent apoptosis following DNA insult.
Exp. Cell Res.
252:123-133[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 59.
|
van der Horst, G. T.,
H. van Steeg,
R. J. Berg,
A. J. van Gool,
J. de Wit,
G. Weeda,
H. Morreau,
R. B. Beems,
C. F. van Kreijl,
F. R. de Gruijl,
D. Bootsma, and J. H. Hoeijmakers.
1997.
Defective transcription-coupled repair in Cockayne syndrome B mice is associated with skin cancer predisposition.
Cell
89:425-435[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 60.
|
van Gool, A. J.,
E. Citterio,
S. Rademakers,
R. van Os,
W. Vermeulen,
A. Constantinous,
J.-M. Egly,
D. Bootsma, and J. H. J. Hoeijmakers.
1997.
The Cockayne syndrome B protein, involved in transcription-coupled DNA repair, resides in an RNA polymerase II-containing complex.
EMBO J.
16:5955-5965[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 61.
|
van Gool, A. J.,
G. T. J. van der Horst,
E. Citterio, and J. H. J. Hoeijmakers.
1997.
Cockayne syndrome: defective repair of transcription?
EMBO J.
16:4155-4162[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 62.
|
Yamaizumi, M., and T. Sugano.
1994.
U.V.-induced nuclear accumulation of p53 is evoked through DNA damage of actively transcribed genes independent of the cell cycle.
Oncogene
9:2775-2784[Medline].
|
Molecular and Cellular Biology, March 2001, p. 1810-1818, Vol. 21, No. 5
0270-7306/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/MCB.21.5.1810-1818.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Imam, S. Z., Indig, F. E., Cheng, W.-H., Saxena, S. P., Stevnsner, T., Kufe, D., Bohr, V. A.
(2007). Cockayne syndrome protein B interacts with and is phosphorylated by c-Abl tyrosine kinase. Nucleic Acids Res
35: 4941-4951
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Yang, G., Curley, D., Bosenberg, M. W., Tsao, H.
(2007). Loss of Xeroderma Pigmentosum C (Xpc) Enhances Melanoma Photocarcinogenesis in Ink4a-Arf-Deficient Mice. Cancer Res.
67: 5649-5657
[Abstract]
[Full Text]