Previous Article | Next Article 
Molecular and Cellular Biology, April 2001, p. 2384-2392, Vol. 21, No. 7
0270-7306/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/MCB.21.7.2384-2392.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Establishment and Maintenance of DNA Methylation
Patterns in Mouse Ndn: Implications for Maintenance of
Imprinting in Target Genes of the Imprinting Center
Meredith L.
Hanel and
Rachel
Wevrick*
Department of Medical Genetics, University of
Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Received 17 July 2000/Returned for modification 17 August
2000/Accepted 22 November 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
Ndn is located on chromosome 7C, an imprinted region
of the mouse genome. Imprinting of Ndn and adjacent
paternally expressed genes is regulated by a regional imprinting
control element known as the imprinting center (IC). An IC also
controls imprint resetting of target genes in the region of conserved
synteny on human chromosome 15q11-q13, which is deleted or rearranged
in the neurodevelopmental disorder Prader-Willi syndrome. Epigenetic
modifications such as DNA methylation, which occur in gametes and can
be stably propagated, are presumed to establish and maintain the
imprint in target genes of the IC. While most DNA becomes substantially
demethylated by the blastocyst stage, some imprinted genes have regions
that escape global demethylation and may maintain the imprint. We have
now analyzed the methylation of 39 CpG dinucleotide sequences in the 5'
end of Ndn by sodium bisulfite sequencing in gametes and
in preimplantation and adult tissues. While sperm DNA is completely unmethylated across this region, oocyte DNA is partially methylated. A
distinctive but unstable maternal methylation pattern persists until
the morula stage and is lost in the blastocyst stage, where low levels
of methylation are present on most DNA strands of either parental
origin. The methylation pattern is then substantially remodeled, and
fewer than half of maternally derived DNA strands in adult brain
resemble the oocyte pattern. We postulate that for Ndn,
DNA methylation may initially preserve a gametic imprint during
preimplantation development, but other epigenetic events may maintain
the imprint later in embryonic development.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
DNA methylation is an important form
of gene regulation during mammalian development and has been implicated
in such diverse processes as genomic imprinting (18),
X-inactivation (4), and differential gene expression
(9). Imprinting is a form of gene regulation whereby
certain genes are restricted in expression to only one parental allele
(32). Molecular control of imprinting requires an
epigenetic modification of DNA in the haploid genome, leading to
hemizygous expression in the diploid embryo. The initial mark which
differentiates the two parental alleles likely originates in the
gametes when the two alleles are still separate. After zygote
formation, the parental alleles maintain their identity so that one
allele eventually becomes preferentially expressed. Methylation of CpG
dinucleotides is proposed to be one mechanism for differentially
marking the parental chromosomes, since methylation can be stably
inherited in somatic cells yet can be removed and reset in the next
generation according to the parent of origin (15, 25).
The developmental stages prior to blastocyst formation are of
particular importance in genomic imprinting (28).
Genome-wide, oocyte DNA tends to be hypomethylated while sperm DNA
tends to be hypermethylated (21). During preimplantation
development, the overall level of methylation decreases. Most
methylation moieties present on the original parental chromosomes are
removed from the DNA by the morula stage, giving rise to a
predominantly unmethylated genome which remains this way at least
through blastulation. A wave of de novo methylation follows, leading to
an overall increase in genome methylation levels as the newly implanted
embryo develops and differentiates. In imprinted genes, gamete-derived
methylated CpG sequences are predicted to be preserved during
preimplantation development and must therefore be specifically
recognized and protected from the global, generalized demethylation
that takes place at these stages (24, 34). Allelic
differences present in germ cells could be rapidly expanded during
preimplantation development and therefore serve as a primary imprinting
signal. Such methylated sites may or may not be retained in all somatic cells as a marker of parental identity.
All imprinted genes analyzed to date have displayed allele-specific DNA
methylation patterns (22, 25). For some of these genes,
differentially methylated regions (DMRs) in the gametes precede
allele-specific methylation differences in adult tissues. However,
studies of methylation in early embryogenesis have been limited to a
small number of imprinted genes (3, 7, 10, 20, 27, 29, 34,
38). The interpretation of these studies is complicated because
the DMRs have been implicated in imprinting control of other genes. For
example, the DMR upstream of H19 is implicated in reciprocal
imprinting of Igf2 (3, 5, 13, 31), and the
upstream region of Snrpn contains an essential regional imprinting element (39). Although DNA
methylation is essential for normal development, its exact role
in imprinting at all developmental stages remains controversial, and
other epigenetic events have been invoked to explain the development of
the final imprinted expression pattern (15, 32). For genes
that are not involved in the imprinting of other genes but are the
target of an imprinting center (IC), it is not known whether the
establishment of allele-specific methylation in the gametes is required
for allele-specific expression of genes. For these genes, it is also not known whether maintenance of gamete-specific methylation patterns throughout development is necessary for proper imprinted gene expression.
To better understand the role of DNA methylation in the maintenance of
imprinted gene expression, we have analyzed allele-specific DNA
methylation patterns in the imprinted Ndn gene.
Ndn is an ideal gene for imprinting study because it has a
simple, intronless gene structure and is a target of the IC rather than
being intimately involved in imprinting other genes. The Ndn
gene product, necdin, is a protein expressed in terminally
differentiated neurons and is proposed to have a role in neuronal
development (40).
Ndn is located on mouse chromosome 7 in a region of
conserved synteny with human 15q11-q13, the region commonly deleted in Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) (23). PWS results from the
loss of expression of genes, including the human Ndn
orthologue NDN, which are normally active on the paternal
copy of chromosome 15q11-q13 (16, 19). Imprinting in the
PWS region is controlled by the IC, located in the 5' end of the
SNRPN gene, about 1 Mb from the NDN locus.
Ndn is also paternally expressed and under the control of an
IC (39).
Ndn contains a CpG-rich region that extends from immediately
upstream of the transcription start site into the first half of the
open reading frame. In this study, we have analyzed the developmental
and adult methylation profiles of 39 individual CpG sites in the 5' end
of the Ndn gene by sodium bisulfite sequencing (SBS)
(11). This technique enables methylation analysis of
individual DNA strands even in limited tissue samples. Our results show
that while the completely unmethylated pattern seen in sperm becomes partially methylated during development, a distinctive oocyte pattern
persists in the majority of clones at least until the morula stage and
is lost in many of the blastocyst clones. In adult tissues, the gametic
methylation patterns are rarely discernible. This suggests that gametic
methylation patterns are lost around the time of implantation, although
some DNA strands apparently escape global demethylation and persist in
adult tissues. The heterogeneous nature of the maternal methylation
pattern after the morula stage suggests that for Ndn,
methylation may be important for early stages of imprint establishment.
However, a second process, perhaps involving more dispersed methylation
or other epigenetic modification, is likely to be important in imprint
maintenance in somatic cells.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Collection of oocytes, early embryos, and sperm.
Early
embryos and gametes were collected from C57BL/6 mice essentially as
described previously (14). Some of the blastocysts were
derived from crosses between C57BL/6 females and Mus spretus (SPRET) males. Five-week-old C57BL/6 females were superovulated with
pregnant mare's serum and human chorionic gonadotropin and were mated
with 2- to 7-month-old males. Oocytes; 2-cell, 4-cell, and 8-cell
embryos; and morulae were collected from the oviducts by flushing out
through the infundibulum. Oocytes were washed with careful inspection
to remove maternal cells, and 2-cell, 4-cell, and 8-cell embryos were
collected around 32, 38, and 56 h postcoitum (p.c.), respectively.
Morulae were collected at about 62 h p.c. Blastocysts either were
collected around 3.5 days p.c. by flushing out the uterus or were
collected at the morula stage (2.5 to 3 days) and were cultured for
24 h. Sperm was collected from the epididymus of 5-month-old males.
DNA extraction.
Liver, heart, brain, and testes were
dissected from 6-week-old F1 progeny of a cross
between C57BL/6 females and SPRET males or between C57BL/6 females and
Mus musculus castaneus (CAST) males. Tissues were crushed
under liquid nitrogen, and DNA was extracted by proteinase K-sodium
dodecyl sulfate (SDS) digestion, phenol-chloroform extraction, and
ethanol precipitation (1). To extract DNA from the oocytes
and embryos, 30 to 200 cells were suspended in ~3 µl of Dulbecco
modified Eagle medium (DMEM). Approximately 40 oocytes and 3 to
37 early embryos were combined for each DNA preparation, with the
number of embryos pooled being inversely proportional to the age of the
embryo because total cell number increases with age. The cell
suspension was made up to 18 µl with a 1 mM SDS-280-µg/ml proteinase K solution containing 1 or 2 µg of salmon sperm carrier DNA in phosphate-buffered saline. This mixture was covered in mineral
oil and was incubated at 37 or 50°C for 30 to 90 min and then at
98°C for 15 min. Sperm was first treated with 10 mM EDTA, 100 mM
NaCl, 2% SDS, 20 µg of proteinase K/ml, and 10 mM Tris-Cl (pH 8)
overnight at 37°C to digest the nonsperm cells. The sperm sample was
centrifuged at 600 × g for 10 min at room temperature, and the supernatant was removed. Sperm was then processed as for tissues with the addition of 39 mM dithiothreitol to the proteinase K-SDS extraction buffer.
SBS.
Early embryo and oocyte DNA samples were denatured by
the addition of 2 µl of fresh 3 M NaOH, were incubated for 20 to 30 min at 42°C and then for 3 min at 95°C, and were placed on ice. DNA
from adult tissues or sperm (200 ng) was added to 2 µg of salmon
sperm carrier, was denatured in 0.3 M NaOH at 42°C for 30 min and
then at 95°C for 3 min, and was placed on ice. Salmon sperm carrier
DNA (1 or 2 µg) was added to early embryo samples and oocyte samples.
To all samples, 255 µl of 40.5% (wt/vol) sodium bisulfite at pH 5, 15 µl of 20 mM hydroquinone, and up to 300 µl of
H2O were added. The samples were covered in
mineral oil and were incubated at 55°C for ~16 h. The treated DNA
was mixed with 100 µl of a purification buffer containing 50 mM KCl,
10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.8), 1.5 mM MgCl2, and 0.1%
Triton X-100, followed by 1 ml of a resin containing 4 M guanidine
thiocyanate, 20 mM EDTA, 20 g of diatomaceous earth (Sigma
D-5384)/liter, and 50 mM Tris-Cl (pH 7.5). Samples were centrifuged
through a Wizard Miniprep column (Promega, Inc.) and were eluted in 50 µl of H2O. To complete the reaction, fresh 3 M
NaOH was added until reaching a concentration of 0.3 M, and the
samples were incubated at 37°C for 20 min and placed on ice. The DNA
was precipitated in 3 M ammonium acetate and 3 volumes of 95% ethanol
at 4°C for 15 min to 1 h or at
20°C overnight and was then
centrifuged at 4°C at 20,000 × g in a
microcentrifuge for 10 min. DNA pellets were washed twice with 70%
ethanol and resuspended in 30 µl of H2O. For
early oocytes and early embryos, an additional 1 or 2 µg of salmon
sperm carrier DNA was added at the ethanol precipitation step.
PCR.
Primers to amplify the region of study from C57BL/6,
SPRET, and CAST mice for detection of polymorphisms were as follows: NEC11F, 5'TCATTCTCCAGGACCTTCAC; and NEC12R,
5'CTTCGGATCAGAGCAGGAC. PCR was performed in 1.5 mM
MgCl2 as follows: 5 min at 94°C; 30 s at
94°C, 30 s at 50°C, and 30 s at 72°C cycled 30 times;
and 10 min at 72°C, yielding a 401-bp PCR product. Nested PCR was used to amplify a 560-bp Ndn product from sodium
bisulfite-treated DNA. For the majority of clones, the first-round PCR
forward primer was NEC43F,
5'TTTTGTGTTATATAGGAGATTAGGAAATTT/GTTTATA. T/G indicates that
the primer was degenerate at this position, where T represents the
C57BL/6 sequence and G represents the SPRET sequence. The reverse
primer was NEC45R, 5'TCTAACCTACTCCAAAACCTCCCTATATC. For some
samples the first-round PCR was done with the forward primer NEC78F,
5'TATTTAGTTTTGTGTTATATAGGAGATTAGG, and the reverse primer NEC79R, 5'ATTTCTTATAACTACCCATAACCTCTTTCA. Second-round
nested primers were NEC41F, 5'TTTTTTAGATTTTAGTGGTTGGGTTTTG,
and NEC48R, 5'CACCTTCTACACCAACTAAACAAAAGT. First-round PCR
was performed in 1.5 mM MgCl2 as follows: 5 min
at 94°C; 2 min at 94°C, 2 min at 58°C, and 2 min at 72°C cycled
2 times; 30 s at 94°C, 30 s at 58°C, and 1 min at 72°C
cycled 35 times; and 10 min at 72°C. Second-round PCR was performed
in 1.5 mM MgCl2 as follows: 5 min at 94°C;
30 s at 94°C, 30 s at 58°C, and 1 min at 72°C cycled 35 times; and then 10 min at 72°C. For some of the samples, a seminested
PCR was used under the reaction conditions described above. The first- and second-round PCR forward primer was NEC53F,
5'ATATTTAATTTGATTTTGTTTAAATTTAGTGTG. The reverse primers
were NEC47R, 5'CATTCCAAACCACACCCTCTC, for the first round
and NEC48R for the second round. A 709-bp product resulted. In some
seminested PCRs the first- and second-round forward PCR primer was
NEC62F, 5'TTATTTAGTTTTGTGTTATATAGGAGATTAGGG, resulting in a
615-bp product. Control primers amplified a 544-bp product from
H19 region B, a CpG-rich region located 2.6 kb upstream of
the transcription start site (38). The first-round PCR was performed in 2 mM MgCl2 as follows: 5 min at
94°C; 30 s at 94°C, 30 s at 55°C, and 1 min at 72°C
cycled 35 times; and then 10 min at 72°C. The second-round PCR was
performed in 2 mM MgCl2 as follows: 5 min at
94°C; 30 s at 94°C, 30 s at 58°C, and 1 min at 72°C
cycled 35 times; and then 10 min at 72°C.
Cloning and sequencing.
PCR products were electrophoresed on
2% agarose gels, gel purified using the QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit
(Qiagen Inc.), and cloned into the pGEM-T vector (Promega Corp.).
Plasmid DNA was prepared by alkaline lysis (26).
Recombinant clones were sequenced using an Amersham kit with
fluorescently labeled M13 forward and reverse primers and were analyzed
on a LiCor automated sequencer.
Genomic structure analysis.
The mouse sequence (GenBank
accession number AC026388) corresponds to the working draft sequence of
M. musculus chromosome 7 clone RP23-426B15. The human
sequence (GenBank accession number AC006596) corresponds to the
complete sequence of human chromosome 15 PAC clone pDJ181P7.
Repeatmasker
(http://ftp.genome.washington.edu/cgi-bin/RepeatMasker) was
used to annotate the sequences for murine and human repeats. The
PipMaker gene analysis program (http://nog.cse.psu.edu/pipmaker/) was
used to compare the sequences of the genomic regions surrounding Ndn and NDN and to detect regions of high CpG content.
 |
RESULTS |
Identification of repetitive elements in CpG-rich
regions.
The mouse and human Ndn and NDN
genes are both composed of single exons containing small open reading
frames encoding 325 and 321 amino acids, respectively. The genomic
sequence of a 15,522-bp region surrounding Ndn and of a
104-kb region surrounding NDN was retrieved from GenBank. We
first analyzed the genomic sequence surrounding Ndn (15,522 bp) and NDN (20,000 bp) for the presence of repetitive
elements using RepeatMasker Web-based software (Fig. 1). With the repeat-masked sequence as
input, we used PipMaker Web-based software to compute the percentage of
identity between mouse and human Ndn and NDN
(Fig. 1). As expected, significant nucleotide identity extends through
the open reading frame. Short regions immediately flanking the open
reading frame and isolated regions several kilobases on either side
of the gene which may correspond to gene regulatory elements also show
some sequence similarity.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
PipMaker sequence alignments. (A) Sequence (15,522 bp)
surrounding mouse Ndn was compared to sequence (20 kb)
surrounding human NDN. (B) Twenty kilobases of sequence
surrounding human NDN was compared to
Ndn. The arrow and full-height box indicate the position
of Ndn and NDN, with the open reading
frame shaded black and the untranslated regions shaded gray.
Half-height boxes outside Ndn and NDN
indicate repetitive elements. Low boxes within Ndn and
NDN indicate CpG-rich regions, within which white
shading indicates a CpG/GpC ratio of 0.60 and gray shading indicates
a CpG/GpC ratio of 0.75. On the plot below each sequence schematic,
regions of homology are shown by black dashes and percent nucleotide
identity is indicated on the right. See
http://nog.cse.psu.edu/pipmaker/ for details of mouse and human repeat
types. UTR, untranslated region; LTR, long terminal repeat.
|
|
PipMaker analysis indicated the locations of CpG islands, defined as
having a CpG/GpC ratio greater than or equal to 0.6.
PipMaker analysis
also distinguished denser CpG islands with a
ratio of at least 0.75 from islands meeting the 0.60 criterion.
Two CpG islands, located in
equivalent positions in human and
mouse
Ndn and
NDN, were found (Fig.
1). The 5' CpG island begins
in the
putative promoter and extends into the open reading frame,
while a 3'
CpG island is located in the 3' portion of the open
reading frame. We
predicted that if a gamete-specific methylation
imprint exists in
Ndn, then the 5' CpG island represents the most
probable
location for the imprint. This prediction is based on
two recent
gene-targeting experiments that created null mutations
of
Ndn in the mouse (
12,
35). In both cases, the
lacZ gene
replaced the
Ndn gene starting at the
BamHI site located between
CpG positions 23 and 24 (Fig.
2) and terminating at the stop codon.
Mice inheriting the deleted allele maintain proper parent-of-origin
gene expression of the reporter gene and, in one case, show an
imprinted phenotype due to loss of necdin gene expression on germ
line
transmission (
12). This implies that the region downstream
of the
BamHI site in the open reading frame is not necessary
for
proper imprinting of
Ndn.

View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Map of the region of mouse necdin analyzed for CpG
methylation status. The gene structure is shown at the top, where the
black box represents the open reading frame and the +1 and ATG are the
transcriptional and translational start sites, respectively. CpG
dinucleotides are shown as vertical bars below the map. The arrowhead
points to the BamHI restriction site used to insert the
lacZ gene into the Ndn knockout mouse.
The relative positions of the primers used for nested PCR are shown,
and the second set of primers (NEC41F-NEC48R) is in boldface. The
560-bp region analyzed covers CpG sites 1 to 39 and is underlined in
the C57BL/6 type sequence. For some of the samples, other primers were
used to amplify the same region (see Materials and Methods).
Single-nucleotide polymorphisms between C57BL/6 and SPRET and between
C57BL/6 and CAST are indicated by an asterisk and are as
follows: a, CAST, CGGTC; and b, SPRET and CAST,
CGCGT. A 5-bp insertion was found in SPRET at c,
SPRET CGCATCGCATCG. The changes from
the C57BL/6 sequence are in boldface. CpG dinucleotides are
underlined.
|
|
Strategy for SBS.
To analyze the developmental pattern of CpG
methylation within the 5' CpG island, we used SBS, a sensitive
technique for single CpG dinucleotide methylation analysis. Sodium
bisulfite treatment of DNA converts all unmethylated cytosines to
uracil. Upon DNA sequencing of cloned PCR products, bases appear as
cytosine only if they were methylated in the original DNA sample and
were thus protected from bisulfite-moderated conversion. Brain, liver,
heart, and testis samples were prepared from 6-week-old interspecific F1 mice. Gametes and early embryos were isolated
from C57BL/6 mice and F1 interspecific crosses.
DNA isolated from all samples was then processed for sodium bisulfite
treatment. Bisulfite-modified DNA was amplified by nested PCR, and
cloned products were sequenced from both ends. Because of previous
reports of difficulties in obtaining complete conversion of sodium
bisulfite-treated DNA, particularly with samples derived from small
numbers of cells, we performed control experiments using primers
specific to the H19 gene (38). We amplified
sodium bisulfite-treated DNA from sperm and adult brain with
H19 region B primers and sequenced the cloned PCR products.
These experiments demonstrated that we had obtained a high conversion
efficiency (>99%), based on the complete conversion of C residues not
present in CpG dinucleotides. In addition, we replicated the
observation that sperm DNA is almost completely methylated at each CpG
in H19 region B. We also sequenced seven adult brain clones
that were completely unmethylated throughout region B and were presumed
to be maternally derived, consistent with the previous observation that
maternally derived clones are mostly unmethylated in this region. These
experiments validated the SBS in our hands.
Ndn methylation analysis in adult tissues.
PCR
primers were designed to amplify the 5' CpG-rich region in
Ndn (Fig. 2). Single-site polymorphisms among C57BL/6,
SPRET, and CAST mice were determined by direct sequencing of PCR
products generated from genomic DNA. All experiments on adult tissues
were done on samples from F1 interspecific mice,
and the single-site polymorphisms were used to identify the parent of
origin of cloned PCR products in these experiments.
We analyzed the methylation patterns in
Ndn by PCR
amplification of sodium bisulfite-treated DNA and sequencing of
individual
PCR clones. In the 5' CpG island, we assayed 39 CpG
dinucleotides.
The CpG sites are approximately evenly distributed over
this interval.
The predicted transcriptional start site is between CpG
sites
10 and 11, and the translational start site is between CpG sites
16 and 17. DNA samples were derived from adult brain, in which
Ndn is transcribed, and from liver and heart, in which
Ndn is
not active. In order to obtain a representative
sample, at least
seven clones from each parental allele were sequenced.
We noted
a parental bias in the distribution of clones obtained, with
maternally
derived alleles appearing about five times more frequently
than
paternally derived clones. A similar bias in parental alleles
had
also been noted in studies of
xist (
20), but in
our case
the presence of an interspecies polymorphism under the forward
primer for the first round of PCR may be the cause of the bias.
To
enrich for paternally derived clones, some PCRs were performed
with a
first-round forward primer that contained only the SPRET
(paternal)
allele of this
polymorphism.
SBS analysis of adult brain revealed a mosaic pattern of DNA
methylation on both parental alleles (Fig.
3). Additional clones
derived from PCR
products that contained only CpG dinucleotides
1 to 20 were also
included in subsequent analysis (data not shown).
Most sites showed
variable methylation between clones, and no
sites were consistently
methylated, although a few sites (numbered
1, 12, and 39) were
unmethylated in all or almost all clones on
both parental alleles. The
average level of methylation was 22%
in the maternal clones and 17%
in the paternal clones. The average
level of methylation in liver and
heart was much lower. For example,
the average levels of methylation in
maternal and paternal heart
clones were 10% and 0.4%, respectively.

View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Heterogeneity in methylation analysis of adult brain.
The CpG dinucleotides are numbered across the bottom. Each row
represents a single clone derived from a (C57BL/6 × CAST)F1 mouse or a (C57BL/6 × SPRET)F1
mouse. Black boxes represent methylated CpG sites, white boxes are
unmethylated CpG sites, and gray boxes were ambiguous in the sequence
analysis. In cases where clones with the same profile appeared more
than once, the number of times that it was found is indicated at the
left. Paternally derived clones are at the top, with maternally derived
clones below, as determined by polymorphism analysis. The clones are
ordered by the percent methylation for each clone, shown to the
right.
|
|
The proportion of clones methylated at each individual CpG dinucleotide
in heart and brain was calculated for each parental
allele (Fig.
4). In the adult brain, paternally
inherited CpG
sites 1 to 17 were hypomethylated compared to the
maternal allele
sites, while in sites 18 through 39, methylation levels
were more
equivalent (Fig.
4A). In the adult heart (Fig.
4B) and liver
(data
not shown), the maternal allele was more highly methylated than
the paternal alleles throughout the region studied.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Methylation profile of 39 CpG dinucleotides in adult
brain and heart. The percentage of clones methylated at each CpG
dinucleotide position was calculated and plotted against the CpG
position (1 to 39). Profiles are of maternal and paternal clones from
adult brain (A) and of maternal and paternal clones from adult heart
(B).
|
|
Developmental analysis of Ndn methylation.
We
next performed SBS analysis on gametes and early embryos. The parental
origin of the cloned PCR products from blastocysts was inferred from
interspecific polymorphisms, although analysis of earlier stages was
performed on inbred C57BL/6 crosses where the parent of origin could
not be determined. Because of previous reports that individual PCRs may
not contain clones that adequately represent the initial DNA strands
when amplifying from limited starting material (38),
multiple PCRs were carried out with each sample. We sequenced between 6 and 25 clones from at least two PCRs from each of the gamete samples
and from each developmental stage. The only exception was the morula
data, which came from a single PCR.
The sperm and oocyte methylation patterns define the initial
methylation patterns, which are subsequently remodeled in the
early
embryo. In sperm, all 39 CpG sites within the region were
unmethylated
in all clones (Fig.
5). In testis, which
contains
a substantial proportion of germ cells, we detected clones
that
were completely unmethylated, with both maternally and paternally
derived alleles represented (data not shown). The lack of partially
methylated clones is either because the somatic cell DNA is
unmethylated
or because, in the sample of clones sequenced, there were
no somatic
cell DNA clones represented. In contrast, oocyte DNA did not
display
a single pattern of methylated CpG sites. Furthermore, there
were
no CpG sites consistently methylated in all oocyte clones. Two
of
the 45 oocyte clones were completely unmethylated and were
distinct
from the other clones. This may represent a true diversity
in the
oocyte population; alternatively, these clones may represent
contamination from adhering maternal cells, despite precautions
taken
to eliminate those cells. If these two clones are excluded,
the only
methylated site conserved among the remaining 43 oocyte
clones is at
position 19. Other CpG sites that are methylated
in a consistent
pattern in most clones are at positions 13 and
14, 15 to 17, 22, 23, 32, and 35 to 39.

View larger version (75K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Methylation in gametes and embryos. The presentation is
the same as in Fig. 3, with the CpG dinucleotides numbered across the
top. Paternal (p) and maternal (m) designations are given in the clone
sets that came from interspecific crosses. (A) The clones are grouped
according to the tissue source. CpG sites 1 to 39 are numbered along
the top. (B) Clones from blastocysts derived from (C57BL/6 × M. spretus) crosses.
|
|
Analysis of 2-cell, 4-cell, and 8-cell, morula, and blastocyst DNA
derived from C57BL/6J inbred crosses was then performed.
The sites
noted as consistently methylated in most oocyte clones
were in general
highly methylated at all stages up to the morula
in the presumed
maternally derived clones. Overall, methylation
at CpG positions 13 to
17 was found at all stages except for the
blastocyst stage (Fig.
5).
Methylation at positions 15 to 17 was
found in blastocysts, and
methylation at positions 35 to 38 was
found in all early developmental
stages. Completely or almost
completely unmethylated clones were
present in the 2-cell, 4-cell,
morula, and blastocyst stages. These
likely represent paternal
clones since they are unmethylated as in the
male gametes. It
is also possible that some unmethylated maternal DNA
strands exist
at these embryonic stages. Many clones with low levels of
methylation
could not be assigned a putative parent of origin because
they
could be derived from either de novo methylation of the paternal
allele or demethylation of the maternal
allele.
The overall methylation levels were low in the blastocyst samples, and
the putative maternal alleles retained less of the
oocyte-specific
methylation than in the earlier developmental
stages. To gain more
information on the parent of origin of the
partially methylated clones,
we next analyzed blastocysts from
a C57BL/6J × SPRET cross (Fig.
5B). Maternal and paternal clones
were both sparsely methylated,
indicating that de novo methylation
occurs in the paternal allele and
that demethylation occurs in
the maternal allele, leading to equivalent
levels of methylation
in both parental alleles. No single CpG
dinucleotide was consistently
methylated in all preimplantation
stages.
 |
DISCUSSION |
In this study, we have analyzed the developmental patterns of CpG
methylation in the imprinted murine Ndn gene. Previous
analysis of nonimprinted genes by restriction enzyme analysis
(17) or SBS (37) suggested that partial
removal of gametic methylation was found by the morula stage and that
little methylation is detectable by the blastocyst stage. During this
time frame, allele-specific methylation of a core DMR 4 kb upstream of
the imprinted H19 gene remains distinct until the blastocyst
stage and is only somewhat remodeled in midgestation embryos
(33). The promoter-proximal region of H19
showed more variability in methylation levels and a lack of
differential methylation at the blastocyst stage. A similar study
investigated preimplantation embryos only to the 8-cell stage but did
not assess remodeling during the critical 8-cell-to-blastocyst interval
(38).
Our studies found that the 5' CpG-rich region of Ndn is
unmethylated in sperm but that the paternal allele becomes gradually methylated, resulting in partial mosaic methylation of the majority of
DNA strands in adult tissues. The maternal allele is partially methylated in the majority of oocytes and remains at about the same
level of methylation, at least to the morula stage. A reduced level of
methylation of the maternal allele is seen in blastocysts, and de novo
methylation occurs, subsequently resulting in a mosaic pattern of
methylation in adult tissues. Analysis of the maternally derived adult
brain clones reveals that about 35% have methylation patterns the same
as or similar to the major pattern in oocytes, with overall higher
levels of methylation at positions 19, 32, and 38 (Fig. 3). Many
paternal clones are also highly methylated in positions 19 to 38. The
distinction between overall parental methylation levels is confined to
sites 1 to 17 in the more 5' region. However, no well-defined pattern
emerges to suggest that CpG methylation of either allele is the signal
that carries the imprint through from the blastocyst stage to adult
tissues. Thus, the methylation patterns seen in Ndn resemble
the H19 promoter-proximal region in that no core region of
differential methylation is maintained to the blastocyst stage.
Differential methylation at a distant but linked site may play an
important role in the imprinting of necdin.
Other DNA modifications, such as histone acetylation and CpG binding
proteins, may be involved in imprinting, although when these other
modifications come into play is not yet known. One interpretation of
our data is that the DNA methylation patterns originating in the oocyte
are important early in imprinting but that these methylation patterns
are required only to initiate a series of additional epigenetic events
leading to the silencing of the maternal allele. Interestingly, the
most prominent oocyte pattern, the methylation of CpG sites 13 through
22, covers 115 bp of DNA, in two segments of 36 bp (CpG sites 13 to 17)
and 39 bp (CpG sites 19 to 22), with an intervening, unmethylated space of 40 bp. Hypermethylation on the maternal allele in preimplantation embryos may block binding of a transiently expressed transcriptional activator or chromatin remodeling factor, which is free to bind to the
unmethylated paternal allele and maintain an active chromatin state
(Fig. 6B). Alternatively, a methylated
maternal allele in the early embryo may bind methyl-CpG binding
proteins and promote subsequent epigenetic events (Fig. 6A). Methyl-CpG
binding proteins have been shown to preferentially bind methylated CpG
sites and recruit histone deacetylases (36). If the two
prominently methylated oocyte DNA segments were located on the outer
part of the nucleosome as it winds around the core particle twice, the
methylated DNA could potentially be a recognizable structural target
for subsequent epigenetic events (Fig. 6C). Alternatively, the
positions that consistently lack methylation may reflect specific
DNA-protein contact points. Studies of chromatin structure in early
embryos are limited by difficulties in obtaining sufficient
experimental material but would help to prove or disprove this
hypothesis.

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Models for imprinting of target genes. The gametic
methylation represents a simplified version of the average methylation
seen at these stages. Black and white lollipops represent methylated
and unmethylated CpG dinucleotides, respectively. (A) The remodeling of
the maternal allele to a closed chromatin conformation may involve
methyl binding proteins (MBPs) that recognize a target of densely
methylated CpG sites, which then recruit histone deacetylases (HDAC).
Since the closed chromatin conformation is maintained by a
methylation-independent mechanism, the methylation state seen in the
adult tissues can be variable. ORF, open reading frame; mat, maternal;
pat, paternal. (B) The hypermethylation on the maternal allele blocks
the binding of a transiently expressed transcriptional activator (TA)
which binds only to the paternal allele. The TA keeps the paternal
allele in a transcriptionally permissive state and allows transcription
factors (TFs) to bind. In the absence of this TA, the maternal allele
is remodeled to a closed chromatin state. (C) The positions of
methylated CpG sites 13 to 22 found in the early embryo samples may
become closely situated on the surface of a nucleosome and act as a
target for MBPs.
|
|
Most imprinted genes studied so far have the same allele-specific
methylation pattern in all tissues irrespective of gene expression. In
Ndn, we noted tissue-specific differences. Mainly, relative
hypermethylation of the maternal allele in the first 17 CpG
dinucleotides is apparent in brain, where Ndn is expressed. In liver and heart, which do not express Ndn, the maternal
allele is relatively hypermethylated compared to the paternal allele throughout the region analyzed and overall methylation levels are much
lower than in brain. The paternal allele has become methylated to about
the same level as the maternal allele in brain DNA, in the 3' end of
the region analyzed. This suggests that there may be tissue-specific
hypermethylation of Ndn in the brain, with the 5' end (CpG
dinucleotides 1 to 17) being protected from this hypermethylation on
the expressed paternal allele. The paternal allele-specific
hypomethylation of the 5' region may be a consequence of transcription.
Alternatively, hypermethylation on the maternal allele may be a remnant
of the initial gametic pattern or a reflection of other allele-specific
factors, such as chromatin structure. Finally, the methylation
differences between tissues may be due to the binding of
tissue-specific repressors and/or differences in chromatin structure
between tissues which may change accessibility to methyltransferases.
Our study contrasts with previous studies of the Snrpn and
H19 upstream DMRs in which maintenance of differential DNA
methylation is proposed to be important throughout development. For
Ndn, no other CpG-rich clusters are found upstream or
downstream of the region analyzed over a distance of about 15 kb,
although it is possible that isolated CpG sites outside the region
studied may play a role in the imprinting process. As for
Snrpn and H19, their DMRs are presumed to have a
direct role in the imprinting process, rather than being a target of a
separate IC (2). In addition, the Snrpn IC and
its human equivalent have recently been shown to be important in
imprint maintenance as well as in establishment, which could explain
why they show a stable differential methylation throughout development
(6). Another imprinted gene, Mash2, was found
to be unaffected by loss of methylation in mice deficient for the DNA
methyltransferase gene (Dnmt) (8, 30) and, like Ndn, is not known to contain an IC for other genes.
Mash2 and Ndn may fall into a category of genes
whose imprinting is maintained not by methylation but by some other
imprinting control mechanism, such as allele-specific chromatin
structure. In support of this hypothesis, Ndn gene
expression does not respond to demethylation during treatment of
androgenetic and parthenogenetic mouse fibroblasts with aza-cytidine
(C. Stewart, personal communication). Further developmental
characterization of imprinted genes that are targets of ICs will be an
important step towards understanding the role of DNA methylation in
imprinting and how genes under the control of an IC are regulated.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
This work was supported by a grant from the Canadian Institutes
of Health Research (CIHR). R.W. is a Scholar of the CIHR and of the
Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research (AHFMR). M.L.H. is
supported by a Studentship from the AHFMR.
We also thank Peter Dickie for advice and assistance with the mouse
embryo collection, Mark Kelly and Jocelyn Carroll for technical help,
David Rodenhiser for advice on primer design and SBS, and Colin Stewart
for helpful discussions.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Medical Genetics, 8-42 Medical Sciences Building, University of
Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2H7. Phone: (780) 492-7908. Fax: (780) 492-1998. E-mail: rachel.wevrick{at}ualberta.ca.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Ausubel, F. M.,
R. Brent,
R. E. Kingston,
J. G. Seidman,
J. A. Smith, and K. Struhl.
1993.
Current protocols in molecular biology, vol. 1.
Greene Publishing Associates and Wiley-Interscience, New York, N.Y.
|
| 2.
|
Barlow, D. P.
1997.
Competition a common motif for the imprinting mechanism?
EMBO J.
16:6899-6905[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Bartolomei, S. M.,
A. L. Webber,
M. E. Brunkow, and S. M. Tilghman.
1993.
Epigenetic mechanisms underlying the imprinting of the mouse H19 gene.
Genes Dev.
7:1663-1673[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Beard, C.,
E. Li, and R. Jaenisch.
1995.
Loss of methylation activates Xist in somatic but not in embryonic cells.
Genes Dev.
9:2325-2334[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Bell, A. C., and G. Felsenfeld.
2000.
Methylation of a CTCF-dependent boundary controls imprinted expression of the Igf2 gene.
Nature
405:482-485[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Bielinska, B.,
S. M. Blaydes,
K. Buiting,
T. Yang,
M. Krajewska-Walasek,
B. Horsthemke, and C. I. Brannan.
2000.
De novo deletions of SNRPN exon 1 in early human and mouse embryos result in a paternal to maternal imprint switch.
Nat. Genet.
25:74-78[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Birger, Y.,
R. Shemer,
J. Perk, and A. Razin.
1999.
The imprinting box of the mouse Igf2r gene.
Nature
397:84-88[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Caspary, T.,
M. A. Cleary,
C. C. Baker,
X. J. Guan, and S. M. Tilghman.
1998.
Multiple mechanisms regulate imprinting of the mouse distal chromosome 7 gene cluster.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:3466-3474[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Eden, S., and H. Cedar.
1994.
Role of DNA methylation in the regulation of transcription.
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
4:255-259[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Feil, R.,
J. Walter,
N. D. Allen, and W. Reik.
1994.
Developmental control of allelic methylation in the imprinted mouse Igf2 and H19 genes.
Development
120:2933-2943[Abstract].
|
| 11.
|
Frommer, M.,
L. E. McDonald,
D. S. Millar,
C. M. Collis,
F. Watt,
G. W. Grigg,
P. L. Molloy, and C. L. Paul.
1992.
A genomic sequencing protocol that yields a positive display of 5-methylcytosine residues in individual DNA strands.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
89:1827-1831[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Gerard, M.,
L. Hernandez,
R. Wevrick, and C. L. Stewart.
1999.
Disruption of the mouse necdin gene results in early post-natal lethality.
Nat. Genet.
23:199-202[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Hark, A. T.,
C. J. Schoenherr,
D. J. Katz,
R. S. Ingram,
J. M. Levorse, and S. M. Tilghman.
2000.
CTCF mediates methylation-sensitive enhancer-blocking activity at the H19/Igf2 locus.
Nature
405:486-489[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Hogan, B.,
R. Beddington,
F. Costanini, and E. Lacy.
1994.
Manipulating the mouse embryo.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Plainview, N.Y.
|
| 15.
|
Jaenisch, R.
1997.
DNA methylation and imprinting: why bother?
Trends Genet.
13:323-329[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Jay, P.,
C. Rougeulle,
A. Massacrier,
A. Moncla,
M. G. Mattei,
P. Malzac,
N. Roeckel,
S. Taviaux,
J. L. Lefranc,
P. Cau,
P. Berta,
M. Lalande, and F. Muscatelli.
1997.
The human necdin gene, NDN, is maternally imprinted and located in the Prader-Willi syndrome chromosomal region.
Nat. Genet.
17:357-361[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Kafri, T.,
M. Ariel,
M. Brandeis,
R. Shemer,
L. Urven,
J. McCarrey,
H. Cedar, and A. Razin.
1992.
Developmental pattern of gene-specific DNA methylation in the mouse embryo and germ line.
Genes Dev.
6:705-714[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Li, E.,
C. Beard, and R. Jaenisch.
1993.
Role for DNA methylation in genomic imprinting.
Nature
366:362-365[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 19.
|
MacDonald, H. R., and R. Wevrick.
1997.
The necdin gene is deleted in Prader-Willi syndrome and is imprinted in human and mouse.
Hum. Mol. Genet.
6:1873-1878[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
McDonald, L. E.,
C. A. Paterson, and G. F. Kay.
1998.
Bisulfite genomic sequencing-derived methylation profile of the Xist gene throughout early mouse development.
Genomics
54:379-386[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Monk, M.,
M. Boubelik, and S. Lehnert.
1987.
Temporal and regional changes in DNA methylation in the embryonic, extraembryonic and germ cell lineages during mouse embryo development.
Development
99:371-382[Abstract].
|
| 22.
|
Neumann, B.,
P. Kubicka, and D. P. Barlow.
1995.
Characteristics of imprinted genes.
Nat. Genet.
9:12-13[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 23.
|
Nicholls, R. D.
2000.
The impact of genomic imprinting for neurobehavioral and developmental disorders.
J. Clin. Investig.
105:413-418[Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Olek, A., and J. Walter.
1997.
The pre-implantation ontogeny of the H19 methylation imprint.
Nat. Genet.
17:275-276[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 25.
|
Razin, A., and H. Cedar.
1994.
DNA methylation and genomic imprinting.
Cell
77:473-476[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 26.
|
Sambrook, J.,
E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis.
1989.
Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 27.
|
Shemer, R.,
Y. Birger,
A. D. Riggs, and A. Razin.
1997.
Structure of the imprinted mouse Snrpn gene and establishment of its parental-specific methylation pattern.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:10267-10272[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 28.
|
Solter, D.
1998.
Imprinting.
Int. J. Dev. Biol.
42:951-954[Medline].
|
| 29.
|
Stoger, R.,
P. Kubicka,
C. G. Liu,
T. Kafri,
A. Razin,
H. Cedar, and D. P. Barlow.
1993.
Maternal-specific methylation of the imprinted mouse Igf2r locus identifies the expressed locus as carrying the imprinting signal.
Cell
73:61-71[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 30.
|
Tanaka, M.,
M. Puchyr,
M. Gertsenstein,
K. Harpal,
R. Jaenisch,
J. Rossant, and A. Nagy.
1999.
Parental origin-specific expression of Mash2 is established at the time of implantation with its imprinting mechanism highly resistant to genome-wide demethylation.
Mech. Dev.
87:129-142[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 31.
|
Thorvaldsen, J. L.,
K. L. Duran, and M. S. Bartolomei.
1998.
Deletion of the H19 differentially methylated domain results in loss of imprinted expression of H19 and Igf2.
Genes Dev.
12:3693-3702[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 32.
|
Tilghman, S. M.
1999.
The sins of the fathers and mothers: genomic imprinting in mammalian development.
Cell
96:185-193[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 33.
|
Tremblay, K. D.,
K. L. Duran, and M. S. Bartolomei.
1997.
A 5' 2-kilobase-pair region of the imprinted mouse H19 gene exhibits exclusive paternal methylation throughout development.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17:4322-4329[Abstract].
|
| 34.
|
Tremblay, K. D.,
J. R. Saam,
R. S. Ingram,
S. M. Tilghman, and M. S. Bartolomei.
1995.
A paternal-specific methylation imprint marks the alleles of the mouse H19 gene.
Nat. Genet.
9:407-413[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 35.
|
Tsai, T. F.,
D. Armstrong, and A. L. Beaudet.
1999.
Necdin-deficient mice do not show lethality or the obesity and infertility of Prader-Willi syndrome.
Nat. Genet.
22:15-16[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 36.
|
Wade, P. A.,
A. Gegonne,
P. L. Jones,
E. Ballestar,
F. Aubry, and A. P. Wolffe.
1999.
Mi-2 complex couples DNA methylation to chromatin remodelling and histone deacetylation.
Nat. Genet.
23:62-66[Medline].
|
| 37.
|
Warnecke, P. M., and S. J. Clark.
1999.
DNA methylation profile of the mouse skeletal -actin promoter during development and differentiation.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19:164-172[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 38.
|
Warnecke, P. M.,
J. R. Mann,
M. Frommer, and S. J. Clark.
1998.
Bisulfite sequencing in preimplantation embryos: DNA methylation profile of the upstream region of the mouse imprinted H19 gene.
Genomics
51:182-190[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 39.
|
Yang, T.,
T. E. Adamson,
J. L. Resnick,
S. Leff,
R. Wevrick,
U. Francke,
N. A. Jenkins,
N. G. Copeland, and C. I. Brannan.
1998.
A mouse model for Prader-Willi syndrome imprinting-centre mutations.
Nat. Genet.
19:25-31[Medline].
|
| 40.
|
Yoshikawa, K.
2000.
Cell cycle regulators in neural stem cells and postmitotic neurons.
Neurosci. Res.
37:1-14[CrossRef][Medline].
|
Molecular and Cellular Biology, April 2001, p. 2384-2392, Vol. 21, No. 7
0270-7306/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/MCB.21.7.2384-2392.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Boumil, R. M., Ogawa, Y., Sun, B. K., Huynh, K. D., Lee, J. T.
(2006). Differential Methylation of Xite and CTCF Sites in Tsix Mirrors the Pattern of X-Inactivation Choice in Mice.. Mol. Cell. Biol.
26: 2109-2117
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Fujimoto, A., Mitalipov, S.M., Clepper, L.L., Wolf, D.P.
(2005). Development of a monkey model for the study of primate genomic imprinting. Mol Hum Reprod
11: 413-422
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lau, J. C. Y., Hanel, M. L., Wevrick, R.
(2004). Tissue-specific and imprinted epigenetic modifications of the human NDN gene. Nucleic Acids Res
32: 3376-3382
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ruddock, N. T., Wilson, K. J., Cooney, M. A., Korfiatis, N. A., Tecirlioglu, R. T., French, A. J.
(2004). Analysis of Imprinted Messenger RNA Expression During Bovine Preimplantation Development. Biol. Reprod.
70: 1131-1135
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Schumacher, A., Doerfler, W.
(2004). Influence of in vitro manipulation on the stability of methylation patterns in the Snurf/Snrpn-imprinting region in mouse embryonic stem cells. Nucleic Acids Res
32: 1566-1576
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lucifero, D., Chaillet, J.R., Trasler, J. M.
(2004). Potential significance of genomic imprinting defects for reproduction and assisted reproductive technology. Hum Reprod Update
10: 3-18
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lopes, S., Lewis, A., Hajkova, P., Dean, W., Oswald, J., Forne, T., Murrell, A., Constancia, M., Bartolomei, M., Walter, J., Reik, W.
(2003). Epigenetic modifications in an imprinting cluster are controlled by a hierarchy of DMRs suggesting long-range chromatin interactions. Hum Mol Genet
12: 295-305
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Yatsuki, H., Joh, K., Higashimoto, K., Soejima, H., Arai, Y., Wang, Y., Hatada, I., Obata, Y., Morisaki, H., Zhang, Z., Nakagawachi, T., Satoh, Y., Mukai, T.
(2002). Domain Regulation of Imprinting Cluster in Kip2/Lit1 Subdomain on Mouse Chromosome 7F4/F5: Large-Scale DNA Methylation Analysis Reveals That DMR-Lit1 Is a Putative Imprinting Control Region. Genome Res
12: 1860-1870
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Reik, W., Dean, W., Walter, J.
(2001). Epigenetic Reprogramming in Mammalian Development. Science
293: 1089-1093
[Abstract]
[Full Text]