Department of Cell and Molecular Biology,
Medical Nobel Institute, Karolinska Institutet, S-171 77 Stockholm,
Sweden
The molecular chaperone complex hsp90-p23 interacts with the dioxin
receptor, a ligand-dependent basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH)/Per-Arnt-Sim domain transcription factor. Whereas biochemical and genetic evidence indicates that hsp90 is important for maintenance of a high-affinity ligand binding conformation of the dioxin receptor, the role of hsp90-associated proteins in regulation of the dioxin receptor function
remains unclear. Here we demonstrate that the integrity of the hsp90
complex characterized by the presence of the hsp90-associated cochaperone p23 and additional cochaperone proteins is important for
regulation of the intracellular localization of the dioxin receptor by
two mechanisms. First, in the absence of ligand, the dioxin
receptor-hsp90 complex was associated with the immunophilin-like protein XAP2 to mediate cytoplasmic retention of the dioxin receptor. Second, upon exposure to ligand, the p23-associated hsp90 complex mediated interaction of the dioxin receptor with the nuclear import receptor protein pendulin and subsequent nuclear translocation of the
receptor. Interestingly, these two modes of regulation target two
distinct functional domains of the dioxin receptor. Whereas the nuclear
localization signal-containing and hsp90-interacting bHLH domain of the
receptor regulates ligand-dependent nuclear import, the interaction of
the p23-hsp90-XAP2 complex with the ligand binding domain of the dioxin
receptor was essential to mediate cytoplasmic retention of the
ligand-free receptor form. In conclusion, these data suggest a novel
role of the hsp90 molecular chaperone complex in regulation of the
intracellular localization of the dioxin receptor.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The 90-kDa heat shock protein
(hsp90) is a highly conserved and abundant molecular chaperone
representing up to 2% of total cellular protein (4). A
significant fraction of hsp90 exists in association with other proteins
such as hsp70, p60, immunophilins, and p23 (41). A large
number of hsp90 substrate proteins are involved in regulation of
diverse cellular signaling processes. These substrate proteins include
various kinases such as receptor tyrosine kinases, the v-src
family of nonreceptor tyrosine kinases (19, 57), and the
Raf-1 Ser/Thr kinases (44). Moreover, nuclear hormone
receptors such as the glucocorticoid and progesterone receptors are
well-characterized substrates of hsp90-mediated chaperoning processes
(41). In addition to steroid hormone receptors, a
distinct, ligand-dependent transcription factor, the dioxin (aryl
hydrocarbon) receptor, is also regulated by hsp90 and its associated proteins.
The dioxin receptor mediates induction of a battery of genes encoding
drug metabolizing enzymes and belongs to the rapidly growing family of
basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH)/Per-Arnt-Sim domain (PAS) proteins. This
family includes the neurodevelopmental factors Sim, hypoxia-inducible
transcription factors, and circadian rhythmicity regulatory proteins
such as Clock. All these factors utilize bHLH/PAS Arnt proteins as
common dimerization partners (10, 15, 18). bHLH-PAS
proteins are characterized by two conserved domains, the N-terminal
bHLH DNA binding domain and the PAS domain, which spans two hydrophobic
repeats termed PAS-A and PAS-B. In the case of the dioxin receptor, the
minimal ligand binding domain harbors the PAS-B motif
(52). In the absence of ligand, the latent dioxin receptor
form is associated with hsp90 (55), the hsp90-interacting protein p23 (23, 34), and the immunophilin-like protein
XAP2, also known as ARA9 or AIP (6, 29, 32). This dioxin
receptor complex is localized predominantly in the cytoplasmic
compartment or evenly distributed in both cytoplasm and cell nucleus
(38, 47). Upon ligand binding, the dioxin receptor rapidly
accumulates in the cell nucleus where it forms a transcriptionally
active complex with Arnt (18). This dimerization event, in
turn, induces the release of hsp90 from the receptor (23,
30).
hsp90 interacts with two spatially distinct motifs of the dioxin
receptor, the ligand binding PAS-B domain and the bHLH domain (1,
52). The interaction of hsp90 with the ligand binding domain of
the dioxin receptor is important for maintaining the receptor in a
high-affinity ligand binding and repressed conformation (7, 40,
53). The functional significance of the interaction of hsp90
with the bHLH domain of the dioxin receptor remains unclear. In analogy
to the dioxin receptor, the high-affinity ligand binding conformation
of the glucocorticoid and progesterone receptors is dependent on the
association of these receptors with hsp90 (3, 36, 48), and
steroid hormone receptor-hsp90 interaction is stabilized by the
cochaperone p23 (14, 49). In a similar fashion,
biochemical studies have indicated that p23 stabilizes the dioxin
receptor-hsp90 complex in a ligand-inducible form (23). XAP2 shares strong homology regions with the immunophilins FKBP12 and
FKBP52 (6, 29, 32). The latter protein has been identified as a component of glucocorticoid and progesterone receptor-hsp90 complexes (41). In analogy to FKBP52, XAP2 contains
tetratricopeptide repeat motifs (26) which are important
for the physical interaction with the C-terminal part of hsp90
(9, 31, 43). Unlike immunophilins, however, XAP2 does not
bind FK506 (8). Based on cellular overexpression studies,
it has recently been observed that XAP2 stabilizes protein levels of
the dioxin receptor and redistributes the receptor to the cytoplasmic
compartment (24, 27, 31). In the present study we show
that XAP2-induced cytoplasmic redistribution of the dioxin receptor was
independent of nuclear export of the receptor. Following exposure to
ligand, nuclear translocation of the dioxin receptor was regulated by
the p23-containing hsp90 molecular chaperone complex by targeting the
nuclear localization signal (NLS)-containing (20) bHLH
domain of the receptor. Thus, these results demonstrate that the
integrity of the p23-XAP2-hsp90 complex is critical for regulation of
the intracellular localization of the dioxin receptor and that this
mode of regulation is mediated by two distinct functional domains of receptor.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Recombinant plasmids.
The pSP72mDR (30),
pCMV/GRDBD/DR83-805 (28), pCMX/DR1-287, pGEX-4T3/hArnt
(39), pCMX SAH/Y145F (22), and pCMX/hGR-GFP (35) vectors have been described previously. Plasmid
pCMV/GRDBD/DR83-805-GFP was constructed by subcloning a
NotI-NheI fragment from pCMX/DR-GFP (kindly
provided by Jacqueline McGuire, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm,
Sweden) into NotI-XbaI-digested
pCMV/GRDBD/DR83-805. For construction of the pCMX/DR1-287/GRLBD, a DNA
fragment encoding the C-terminal region of the human hGR (amino acids
[aa] 503 to 777) and containing XbaI and NheI
restriction sites was generated by PCR (primers:
5'-GCTCTAGAAGCCACTACAGGAGTCTCACAAG-3' and
5'-GCGGCTAGCTTTTGATGAAACAGAAG-3'). Following digestion with
XbaI and NheI, the PCR product was ligated to the
NheI site of pCMX/DR1-287 in frame with DR1-287.
pCMX/DR1-287/hGRLBD-GFP was constructed by replacing a
PstI-NheI fragment of pCMX/DR1-287/hGRLBD (containing the glucocorticoid receptor) with a
PstI-NheI fragment from pCMX/hGR-GFP. The
pGEM/XAP2 expression vector encoding a full-length human XAP2
(25) was a generous gift from Edward Seto (University of
South Florida, Tampa, Florida). Plasmid pSG5/XAP2 was constructed by
subcloning an EcoRI fragment of XAP2 from pGEM/XAP2 into
EcoRI-digested pSG5 (Stratagene). For construction of
pCMV2/FLAG-XAP2, a cDNA fragment encoding full-length XAP2 and
containing HindIII and NheI restriction sites
was generated by PCR using pGEM/XAP2 as a template (primers:
5'-CGAAGCTTATGGCGGATATCATCGCAAG-3' and 5'-GCGCTAGCTATGGGAGAAGATCC-3') and was inserted into
HindIII-XbaI-digested pCMV2/FLAG (Kodak) in frame
with the FLAG epitope. The glutathione S-transferase
(GST)-dioxin receptor fusion protein expressing vector was kindly
provided by Pilar Carrero (Karolinska Institutet). pGEX-3X/pendulin was
kindly provided by Mary Prieve (University of California, Irvine).
pSP72/pendulin was constructed by subcloning a
BamHI-EcoRI fragment of pGEX-3X/pendulin into
BamHI-EcoRI-restricted pSP72.
Protein expression and immunoprecipitation.
In vitro
translation of wild-type and mutant dioxin receptors, pendulin, and
XAP2 was performed using coupled transcription-translation reactions in
rabbit reticulocyte lysate (Promega Biotech). Bacterial expression of
GST-tagged Arnt has been described in detail elsewhere (39). Immunoprecipitations of 35S-labeled in
vitro-translated proteins using anti-p23 (JJ3) (generously provided by
David O. Toft, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.), anti-p60 (F5) (kindly
provided by David F. Smith, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Ariz.), anti-hsp90
3G3 (Affinity Bioreagents, Inc.) or anti-dioxin receptor
(52) antibodies were performed as described earlier (23). The ATP regeneration system used in some experiments
consisted of 5 mM ATP (Sigma), 50 U of creatine phosphokinase
(Sigma)/ml, and 15 mM phosphocreatinine (Sigma).
Cell culture and transfections.
Human HepG2, HeLa, and COS7
cells were routinely propagated in Dulbecco's minimum essential medium
supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, L-glutamine (2 mM), penicillin (100 U/ml), and streptomycin (100 U/ml) at 37°C at
5% CO2. For reporter assays, the XRE-thymidine kinase-luciferase reporter plasmid pTXIXI has been described previously (2). A secreted alkaline phosphatase reporter gene,
pCMV/SAF (5), was used as an internal transfection
control. HepG2 cells were seeded in six-well plates at a density of
105 cells and grown for 24 h. Cells were transfected
with 0.5 µg of pTXIXI luciferase reporter gene construct and 0.1 µg
of pCMV/SAF using Lipofectamine (Life Technologies, Inc.) according to
the manufacturer's recommendations. After 6 h of transfection,
the medium was replaced with Dulbecco's minimum essential medium-10% fetal calf serum. Twelve hours following transfection, cells were treated with geldanamycin (Life Technologies) and
2,3,7,8,tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) (Chemsyn, Lenexa,
Kans.) as described in detail below. Cells were collected in
phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) by scraping, and extracts were analyzed
for luciferase activities.
In vitro DNA and ligand binding assays.
Nuclear extracts
from HepG2 cells were prepared as described elsewhere
(39). Dioxin receptor-dependent DNA binding activities were analyzed by an electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) performed essentially as described earlier (39). Briefly,
DNA binding reaction mixtures were assembled with 8 to 10 µg of
nuclear extract protein in 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.9)-5% (vol/vol)
glycerol-0.5 mM dithiothreitol-2.5 mM MgCl2-1 mM
EDTA-0.08% (wt/vol) Ficoll. A 32P-3'-end-labeled,
double-stranded 36-bp oligonucleotide spanning a xenobiotic-responsive
element (XRE) of the rat cytochrome P-450 1A1 gene was added to the
reactions as a specific probe in the presence of 1 µg of poly(dI-dC).
Reaction mixtures were incubated for 30 min at 4°C, and protein-DNA
complexes were resolved on 4% native polyacrylamide
(acrylamide/bisacrylamide ratio, 29:1) gels at 30 mA and 4°C using a
Tris-glycine-EDTA buffer. The [3H]TCDD binding activity
of in vitro-translated dioxin receptor was assayed as previously
described (23).
Cell extracts and immunoblot assays.
For in vivo
immunoprecipitation experiments, COS7 cells were grown in
10-cm-diameter dishes. The GST-tagged dioxin receptor and FLAG-tagged
XAP2 were transiently expressed in the absence or presence of
geldanamycin as indicated in the figure legends. To prepare whole-cell
extracts, cells were washed twice with cold PBS, collected by
centrifugation, and resuspended in lysis buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl [pH
7.4], 1 mM MgCl2, 0.2% Tween 20, 10 mM
Na2MoO4) supplemented with a protease inhibitor
cocktail (Complete-Mini; Roche), 25 µM MG132 (Calbiochem), and 1 mM
dithiothreitol. Cell suspensions were sonicated by two 4-s bursts.
Lysates were cleared by centrifugation for 30 min at 13,000 × g at 4°C. Total cellular protein (600 to 800 µg) was
incubated with anti-GST (Amersham-Pharmacia Biotech) antibodies at
4°C for 2 to 3 h. Immunocomplexes were precipitated by adding 40 µl of a 50% slurry of protein A-Sepharose (Amersham-Pharmacia
Biotech) followed by incubation at 4°C under slow rotation for 90 min. After rapid centrifugation was carried out, the resulting pellets
were washed four times with 1 ml of cold lysis buffer. Precipitated
proteins and whole-cell extracts were analyzed by sodium dodecyl
sulfate-12% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-12% PAGE) and
transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. Immobilized proteins were
incubated for 2 h at 25°C with primary rabbit anti-dioxin
receptor (Biomol; dilution, 1:500) or murine anti-FLAG (Sigma;
dilution, 1:1,000) and anti-p23 (JJ3; dilution, 1:1,000) antibodies in
blocking solution (5% nonfat milk in PBS). Horseradish
peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit (Dako) or anti-mouse
(Amersham-Pharmacia Biotech) immunoglobulins were used as a secondary
antibody diluted 1:500 to 1:1,000 in blocking solution. After being
extensively washed in PBS-0.2% Tween 20, immunocomplexes were
visualized using enhanced chemiluminescence reagents
(Amersham-Pharmacia Biotech) according to the manufacturer's recommendations.
Visualization of intracellular localization of GFP-tagged
proteins in living cells.
HeLa cells were grown on 20- by 20-mm
glass coverslips in 30-mm dishes. Transient transfections were
performed by introducing 0.5 to 1 µg of plasmids encoding green
fluorescent protein (GFP)-fused dioxin receptor, glucocorticoid
receptor, various receptor chimeras, or XAP2 into cells by using
Lipofectamine. After transfection, cells were grown for 24 to 30 h
and treatments with geldanamycin, TCDD, and dexamethasone (Sigma) or
combinations thereof were performed as described in the figure legends.
Intracellular localization of GFP-fused proteins was examined by using
a Nikon LABOPHOT microscope equipped with a fluorescein isothiocyanate
filter set and a photo camera. Quantitative evaluations of green
fluorescent cells were performed as described before (22,
58). Briefly, green fluorescent cells were classified into four
categories according to the intracellular localization of GFP fusion
proteins: C > N, for predominantly cytoplasmic fluorescence;
C = N, when fluorescing proteins were equally distributed in the
cell cytoplasm and nucleus; C < N, for nucleus-dominant
fluorescence; and N, for exclusive nuclear fluorescence. On average,
200 fluorescing cells were evaluated on each coverslip.
 |
RESULTS |
Destabilization of the hsp90 complex impairs the ligand-dependent
activation response of the dioxin receptor.
We and others have
recently observed that the dioxin receptor is associated with both
hsp90 and the cochaperone p23 (23, 34). Biochemical
studies have indicated that p23 stabilizes the interaction between the
dioxin receptor and hsp90 and thus regulates in vitro the ability of
the receptor to dimerize with the bHLH/PAS factor Arnt
(23). To further investigate the role of the
p23-containing hsp90 complex in regulation of dioxin receptor function
we have used the ansamycin antibiotic geldanamycin. This compound is
known to specifically bind to the ATP-binding site of hsp90
(50) and thereby block the ATP-dependent maturation process of hsp90-dependent complexes in an intermediate state characterized by the presence of the hsp90 organizer factor p60, also
known as HOP. This intermediate complex fails to recruit the
cochaperone p23, which has been shown to stabilize the interaction between hsp90 and hsp90-regulated proteins (21, 49, 54). In initial experiments, we monitored the effect of geldanamycin on
dioxin receptor-mediated activation of gene transcription. To this end,
human HepG2 hepatoma cells were transiently transfected with a
luciferase reporter construct, pTXIXI, under the control of two
tandemly positioned XRE sequences fused to the minimal herpes simplex
virus thymidine kinase promoter (2). As schematically outlined in Fig. 1A, the cells were
pretreated for 1 h with the indicated concentrations of
geldanamycin prior to incubation of the cells in the absence or
presence of 10 nM dioxin (TCDD). In the absence of geldanamycin, we
observed robust induction of reporter gene activity by TCDD. However,
pretreatment of the cells with geldanamycin significantly reduced the
ligand-dependent activation response in a dose-dependent manner (Fig.
1A).

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Ligand-dependent activation of the dioxin receptor
is impaired by geldanamycin. (A) HepG2 cells were transfected with 0.5 µg of the XRE-driven pTXIXI luciferase reporter construct. Following
transfection, cells were allowed to recover for 12 h before
treatment with the indicated geldanamycin (GA) concentrations for
1 h. Subsequently, as schematically outlined at the top of the
panel, GA was withdrawn by changing the medium and the cells were
cultured for 12 h prior to reporter gene analysis. Reporter gene
activities are expressed relative to the luciferase activity obtained
from cells treated with vehicle (DMSO) only. Results of a
representative experiment are shown. (B) HepG2 cells were treated with
0.25 µg of GA/ml or vehicle alone for 1 h followed by a wash and
subsequent incubation of the cells for an additional 1 h in the
absence or presence of 10 nM TCDD. Nuclear extracts (NE) were prepared
and specific 32P-labeled XRE-binding activity was analyzed
by EMSA as described in Materials and Methods. The position of the
specific dioxin receptor-Arnt complex is indicated (DR/Arnt). (C and D)
Whole-cell (C) and nuclear (D) extracts were prepared from HepG2 cells
following treatment for 1 h with TCDD (10 nM), geldanamycin, or
both compounds, as indicated. To monitor dioxin receptor protein
levels, the extracts were analyzed by immunoblotting using anti-dioxin
receptor antibodies. The positions of the dioxin receptor (DR) and
protein molecular weight markers are indicated. (E)
[35S]methionine-labeled dioxin receptor was in
vitro-translated in reticulocyte lysate (RL) in the presence of 5 µg
of GA/ml (RL+GA) or vehicle alone (RL+DMSO). Reaction mixtures were
immunoprecipitated using specific (S) monoclonal anti-p23 ( -p23) or
anti-hsp90 ( -hsp90) antibodies and unspecific control (C) antibodies
as described in Materials and Methods. Immunocomplexes were separated
on an SDS-7.5% PAGE gel. Lanes 5 and 6 show 25% of the input (Inp.)
material. (F) Dioxin receptor was in vitro-translated in the presence
of 5 µg of GA/ml or vehicle alone and was incubated with 10 nM
[3H]TCDD for 1 h at room temperature. Subsequently,
an aliquot from each reaction mixture was assayed for dioxin receptor
(DR) levels by immunoblot analysis (inserted panel), whereas the
remaining sample was fractionated on a linear 10 to 40% sucrose
density gradient. The individual fractions were assayed for
radioactivity. The top of the sucrose gradient is indicated.
|
|
To identify the target of regulation by geldanamycin within the
stepwise activation process of the dioxin receptor, we next examined if
the ligand-inducible DNA binding activity of the receptor was affected
by geldanamycin. In these experiments HepG2 cells were incubated with
0.25 µg of geldanamycin/ml or vehicle (dimethyl sulfoxide [DMSO])
alone for 1 h prior to further incubation in the absence or
presence of 10 nM TCDD for an additional 1 h. Nuclear extracts
were prepared and the XRE-binding activity was monitored by EMSA.
Interestingly, formation of the ligand-inducible dioxin receptor-Arnt
XRE- binding complex was completely abolished upon exposure of the
cells to geldanamycin (Fig. 1B, compare lanes 3 and 4 where indicated
by the arrow). In control experiments, immunoblot analysis of
whole-cell extracts which were prepared in parallel with the nuclear
extracts showed no significant changes in dioxin receptor protein
levels under the indicated treatment conditions (Fig. 1C). In nuclear
extracts immunoblot analysis demonstrated a dioxin-induced
increase in dioxin receptor protein levels, consistent with
ligand-dependent nuclear accumulation of the protein (Fig. 1D, compare
lanes 1 and 3). However, geldanamycin treatment of the cells produced a
dose-dependent decrease in receptor levels in the nuclear extracts
(Fig. 1D), indicating that nuclear translocation of the receptor
protein may be negatively affected by geldanamycin.
We next examined the effect of geldanamycin on the formation of the
dioxin receptor-hsp90-p23 complex. To study this effect, we expressed
the dioxin receptor by in vitro translation in rabbit reticulocyte
lysate in the absence or presence of 5 µg of geldanamycin/ml. Treatment of the lysate with geldanamycin did not affect dioxin receptor expression levels, as assessed by SDS-PAGE and fluorometric analysis of the [35S]methionine-labeled translation
products (Fig. 1E, compare lanes 5 and 6). This material was further
characterized by immunoprecipitation experiments using monoclonal
anti-p23 and anti-hsp90 antibodies. As shown in Fig. 1E, we were able
to coprecipitate both p23 (lane 2) and hsp90 (lane 8) together with the
labeled dioxin receptor. However, the interaction of the dioxin
receptor with p23 was disrupted upon geldanamycin treatment (compare
lanes 2 and 4), whereas no effect by geldanamycin was observed on the
interaction between the receptor and hsp90 (compare lanes 8 and 10). It
is noteworthy that the ability of geldanamycin to disrupt the
interaction between p23 and the hsp90-dioxin receptor complex was less
prominent following the addition of geldanamycin to a form of the
dioxin receptor which was already synthesized in reticulocyte lysate
(data not shown). Thus, these data suggest that geldanamycin targets
one or multiple steps in the assembly of the nonactivated receptor complex.
In the case of steroid hormone receptors, release of p23 by
geldanamycin treatment correlates with inhibition of ligand binding activity by the glucocorticoid, progesterone, androgen, and estrogen receptors (45, 49, 54). We therefore decided to test
whether geldanamycin-induced release of p23 from the dioxin receptor
complex affected its ligand binding activity. For this purpose we in
vitro translated the dioxin receptor both in the presence and absence of 5 µg of geldanamycin/ml as schematically outlined in Fig. 1E. The
reaction mixtures were subsequently incubated with 10 nM
[3H]TCDD for 2 h at 25°C and fractionated on a 10 to 40% linear sucrose density gradient as described previously
(23). Following sucrose gradient centrifugation, the
individual fractions were assayed for radioactivity. As shown in Fig.
1F, both geldanamycin-treated and -nontreated dioxin receptors showed
similar [3H]TCDD binding profiles. To assess the amounts
of the receptor loaded onto each gradient we analyzed an aliquot from
each translation reaction mixture by Western blot (see Fig. 1F). This
result indicates that, in contrast to steroid hormone receptors, the
ligand binding activity of the dioxin receptor was not affected upon
geldanamycin treatment. In excellent agreement with these data, we have
recently observed that dissociation of p23 from the dioxin
receptor-hsp90 complex during prolonged sucrose gradient fractionation
does not affect the ligand binding activity of the receptor
(23).
Ligand-dependent nuclear translocation of the dioxin receptor is
inhibited by geldanamycin.
To examine in closer detail if
disruption of the p23-hsp90-dioxin receptor complex by geldanamycin
affected the nuclear import of the ligand-occupied dioxin receptor, we
used dioxin receptor fusion proteins spanning GFP. The dioxin
receptor-GFP fusion protein was transiently expressed in HeLa cells for
24 to 30 h prior to exposure to 0.25 µg of geldanamycin/ml or
vehicle (DMSO) alone for 1 h, followed by washing and incubation
in the absence or presence of 10 nM TCDD for up to 6 h
(schematically outlined in Fig.
2A). The intracellular
localization of the receptor was monitored by fluorescence microscopy.
Representative images of fluorescent cells and a statistical evaluation
of the ligand-dependent nuclear translocation dynamics by the dioxin
receptor-GFP are presented in Fig. 2A and B, respectively. For
quantitative purposes (Fig. 2B), about 200 fluorescent cells were
classified into four categories, as defined at the end of Materials and
Methods: C > N, C = N, C < N, and N (22,
58). In untreated cells, the dioxin receptor-GFP fusion protein
was evenly distributed in both the cytoplasmic and nuclear compartments
of the cell. However, following 1 h of ligand treatment, we
observed a clear accumulation of the fusion protein in the nuclear
compartment of the cell (Fig. 2A), with the half-maximal nuclear
localization occurring within about 30 to 40 min of ligand treatment
(Fig. 2B). Interestingly, the ligand-inducible nuclear import of the
dioxin receptor-GFP was strikingly impaired in cells treated with
geldanamycin (Fig. 2). Importantly, no detectable changes in either
total fluorescence intensity by the GFP-dioxin receptor or cell
morphology were observed upon treatment with geldanamycin. In addition,
in control experiments, no geldanamycin-dependent effect was observed
on the subcellular distribution of the GFP protein alone (data not
shown). These data suggest that nuclear import of the dioxin receptor
may be regulated by the hsp90-p23 molecular chaperone complex and is
impaired by geldanamycin treatment.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Ligand-inducible nuclear accumulation of the dioxin
receptor is inhibited by geldanamycin. (A) pCMX/DR-GFP (0.5 to 1.0 µg) (schematically represented at the top of the panel) was
transiently transfected into HeLa cells, and the cells were treated
with or without 0.25 µg of geldanamycin (GA)/ml, followed by washing
of the cells and subsequent incubation in the presence of 10 nM TCDD or
vehicle (DMSO) alone up to 6 h (as summarized in the experimental
scheme). Intracellular localization of dioxin receptor-GFP was
examined by fluorescence microscopy. Experiments were repeated three to
five times with almost identical results. Representative images of the
dioxin receptor-GFP-expressing cells are shown following the different
treatments. (B) Dioxin receptor-GFP-expressing cells were classified
into four categories as described in Materials and Methods. Following
treatments, one representative experiment was used to display the
dynamics of nuclear accumulation of the dioxin receptor-GFP fusion
protein, presented as a percentage of the cells belonging to the C < N and N categories.
|
|
Interaction between the dioxin receptor and pendulin (importin-
)
is dependent on the integrity of the hsp90 complex.
A functional
bipartite NLS motif has recently been identified in the N-terminal
region of the dioxin receptor (20). In the same study,
colocalization experiments indicated that the dioxin receptor may
interact with nuclear transport receptors such as PTAC58 (importin-
)
and PTAC97 (importin-
). We therefore investigated if the dioxin
receptor could physically interact with the mouse importin-
homologue pendulin (42). In vitro-translated dioxin receptor was incubated for 1 h with in vitro-translated
[35S]methionine-labeled pendulin in the presence or
absence of 10 nM TCDD and bacterially expressed Arnt, followed by
immunoprecipitation using anti-dioxin receptor antibodies. As shown in
Fig. 3A, the dioxin receptor interacted
with pendulin in a clearly ligand-dependent manner (compare lanes 1 and
2). The ligand dependency of this interaction indicates the involvement
of ligand-induced unmasking of the NLS motif of the receptor.
Interestingly, dioxin receptor-pendulin interaction was inhibited in
the presence of Arnt (lane 3). Given the background that Arnt is a
constitutively nuclear protein and that recruitment of Arnt is required
for the dioxin receptor to generate XRE-binding activity
(51), these results suggest a unidirectional mechanism of
interaction between pendulin and the dioxin receptor.

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Ligand-dependent interaction with the nuclear import
receptor pendulin and the maturation of the dioxin receptor complex are
inhibited upon release of p23. (A) In vitro-translated dioxin receptor
was incubated with in vitro-translated
[35S]methionine-labeled pendulin in the presence or
absence of 10 nM TCDD and about 10 ng of bacterially expressed Arnt for
1 h at 25°C. Immunocomplexes were precipitated with anti-dioxin
receptor ( -DR) or control (C) antibodies and separated on an
SDS-10% PAGE gel. (B) Under experimental conditions identical to
those described for panel A, the dioxin receptor was in vitro
translated in the presence and absence of 5 µg of geldanamycin
(GA)/ml. Following immunoprecipitation, proteins were separated on an
SDS-7.5% PAGE gel. (C) In vitro-translated
[35S]methionine-labeled dioxin receptor-GFP was incubated
with and without 20 nM TCDD for 90 min at 25°C. Reaction mixtures
were transferred to concentrated reticulocyte lysate (3 volumes)
supplemented with an ATP regeneration system and were incubated in the
presence of 25 µg of GA/ml or vehicle (DMSO) alone for 30 min at
30°C. To detect dioxin receptor association with chaperone proteins,
the receptor was immunoprecipitated with monoclonal anti-p23 ( -p23)
and anti-p60 ( -p60) antibodies as indicated. Unspecific
immunoglobulin G antibodies were used in control reactions (C).
Immunocomplexes were separated on an SDS-7.5% PAGE gel. To compare
dioxin receptor-GFP input levels, aliquots from the individual reaction
mixtures were analyzed on the separate SDS-PAGE gel shown at the bottom
of the panel.
|
|
We next examined the effect of geldanamycin on the interaction between
the dioxin receptor and pendulin. The dioxin receptor was in vitro
translated in the presence or absence of geldanamycin (5 µg/ml) and
subsequently incubated with in vitro translated [35S]methionine-labeled pendulin in the presence or
absence of 10 nM TCDD for 1 h. Strikingly, ligand-dependent
interaction of the dioxin receptor with pendulin was completely
inhibited by geldanamycin treatment (Fig. 3B, compare lanes 2 and 5).
These experiments suggest that the ligand-induced interaction between
the dioxin receptor and pendulin is regulated by the hsp90-p23
chaperone complex in a geldanamycin-sensitive manner.
Maturation of the dioxin receptor-hsp90 complex is inhibited by
geldanamycin treatment.
In studies on steroid hormone receptors
such as the glucocorticoid and progesterone receptors, it has been
demonstrated that these receptors are arrested by geldanamycin
treatment in an intermediate, p60-hsp70-associated state of
heterocomplex formation (11, 49). Our studies of the
subcellular localization of the dioxin receptor-GFP suggest that
certain geldanamycin-induced effects occur in the cytoplasmic
compartment of the cell where the maturation of the latent dioxin
receptor complex takes place with resulting inhibition of nuclear
accumulation. Therefore, we compared the effects of geldanamycin on
properties of either the ligand-bound or ligand-free dioxin receptor
forms. Since the assembly of an hsp90-substrate protein complex
represents a dynamic ATP-dependent process (17, 33), we
supplemented our translation mixtures with an ATP regeneration system.
In vitro-translated [35S]methionine-labeled GFP-tagged
dioxin receptor was first incubated in the absence or presence of 10 nM
TCDD for 90 min. Subsequently, both ligand-bound and ligand-free
receptor forms were transferred to aliquots of concentrated rabbit
reticulocyte lysate supplemented with an ATP regeneration system and
were incubated in the presence of 25 µg of geldanamycin/ml or vehicle
(DMSO) alone for 30 min. In immunoprecipitation experiments using
anti-p23 and anti-p60 antibodies, the dioxin receptor-GFP fusion
protein was efficiently recovered in a complex with p23 in both the
absence and the presence of TCDD (Fig. 3C, compare lanes 1, 2, and 4),
demonstrating that the GFP moiety itself does not affect the
interaction of the receptor with p23. Moreover, in agreement with
earlier observations (23), this experiment demonstrates
that ligand does not disrupt the association of the dioxin receptor
with p23. In the presence of geldanamycin, however, p23 is completely
released from both ligand-bound and ligand-free receptors (Fig. 3C,
lanes 2 to 5). Interestingly, interaction between the dioxin receptor
and p60 was inversely correlated to dioxin receptor-p23 interaction:
treatment with geldanamycin resulted in a significant increase in
material precipitated by the p60 antibodies (Fig. 3C, compare lanes 7 to 10), regardless of the presence of TCDD in the reaction mixtures.
Identical results were obtained in immunoprecipitation experiments
using in vitro-translated wild-type dioxin receptor in lieu of the GFP
fusion protein (data not shown). These data indicate that geldanamycin
treatment caused an arrest of the dioxin receptor hsp90 complex in an
intermediate, p23-free complex which does not permit interaction with pendulin.
Evidence that the hsp90 complex regulates nuclear import of the
dioxin receptor via interaction with the bHLH domain.
hsp90 is
associated with two distinct functional domains of the dioxin receptor:
the bHLH DNA binding-dimerization domain and the ligand binding PAS-B
domain (1, 52). In agreement with these data, we observed
in immunoprecipitation experiments that both the bHLH and PAS-B domains
of the dioxin receptor interacted efficiently with p23 (data not
shown). To characterize the roles of the distinct hsp90- and
p23-interaction domains of the dioxin receptor in the nuclear
translocation process, we generated chimeric dioxin-glucocorticoid
receptor proteins fused to GFP. In the GRDBD/DR83-805-GFP chimeric
construct (28), the bHLH domain of the dioxin receptor was
replaced with a fragment of the glucocorticoid receptor spanning the
DNA binding domain and N-terminal structures but lacking the N-terminal
AF-1 transactivation domain (schematically represented in Fig.
4A). This N-terminal fragment of the
glucocortocoid receptor contains the NLS motif (NL1) located at the
immediate C-terminal end of the DNA binding domain (37).
In transient transfection experiments, this chimeric receptor protein
was localized in both the cytoplasm and the nucleus in the absence of
ligand (Fig. 4A) despite the presence of the potent NLS signal of the
glucocorticoid receptor. These data suggest that dioxin receptor
structures, possibly the ligand and hsp90 binding PAS-B domain, mediate
cytoplasmic retention of chimeric protein. In line with this model,
deletion of the PAS-B domain results in constitutive nuclear
accumulation of the dioxin receptor (24).

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Effect of geldanamycin on ligand-dependent nuclear
accumulation of GRDBD/DR83-805-GFP. (A) Expression of the
GRDBD/DR83-805-GFP fusion protein in HeLa cells and cell treatment
conditions were identical to those described in the Fig. 2 legend.
Representative images of the intracellular localization of
GRDBD/ DR83-805-GFP-expressing cells are shown, following the
indicated treatments. (B) For quantitative evaluation, GFP fusion
protein-expressing cells were classified into four categories as
described in Materials and Methods. The dynamics of the nuclear
accumulation of GRDBD/DR83-805-GFP upon various treatments are
presented as the summarized percentage of the cells belonging to
categories C < N and N.
|
|
Upon TCDD treatment, GRDBD/DR83-805-GFP accumulated in the cell
nucleus with translocation kinetics comparable to those of wild-type
dioxin receptor-GFP (Fig. 4B). Although ligand-dependent nuclear import
of GRDBD/DR83-805-GFP was initially inhibited by geldanamycin, it was
rapidly reestablished after further incubation of cells in
TCDD-containing but geldanamycin-free medium (Fig. 4B). These results
indicate that the bHLH domain (which is missing in the
GRDBD/DR83-805-GFP fusion construct) rather than the PAS-B domain is
regulated by the hsp90 chaperone complex in the dioxin receptor nuclear
translocation process. If this is the case, it remains to be
investigated whether the initial geldanamycin-induced delay in nuclear
import of the chimeric receptor protein is caused by an early trapping
of the GRDBD/DR-hsp90 complex in a p60-containing intermediate configuration.
To further examine the putative roles of hsp90 and the bHLH domain of
the dioxin receptor in the nuclear translocation event, we constructed
DR1-287/GRLBD-GFP by fusing the N-terminal region of the dioxin
receptor (aa 1 to 287) containing the bHLH and PAS-A motifs of the
dioxin receptor but lacking the ligand binding PAS-B domain to the
C-terminal portion of the glucocorticoid receptor containing the
hsp90-interacting ligand binding domain (GRLBD, aa 503 to 777) (Fig.
5A). For comparison, we
also used a wild-type glucocorticoid receptor-GFP fusion protein in our
experiments. Interestingly, in the absence of the ligand
(dexamethasone), DR1-287/GRLBD-GFP was localized exclusively in the
cytoplasmic compartment of the cell (Fig. 5A), in contrast to the
wild-type dioxin receptor-GFP construct which shows a diffuse
localization throughout the cell (Fig. 2A). The reason for this
discrepancy is unclear but may reflect that the two different receptor
proteins utilize alternative cytoplasmic retention mechanisms. Upon
exposure to dexamethasone, DR1-287/GRLBD-GFP rapidly translocated to
the nucleus (Fig. 5A) with translocation kinetics (Fig. 5B) similar to
those of wild-type glucocorticoid-GFP (Fig. 5C). Following treatment
with geldanamycin, however, ligand-dependent nuclear import of
DR1-287/GRLBD-GFP was completely inhibited (Fig. 5 A and B). In
contrast, the nuclear import kinetics of the wild-type glucocorticoid
receptor-GFP were affected only initially by treatment with
geldanamycin (Fig. 5C) and, under these conditions, were very similar
to those of geldanamycin-treated GRDBD/DR83-805-GFP (Fig. 4B). Taken
together, these data strongly support the model that geldanamycin
targets the hsp90-interacting N-terminal region of the dioxin receptor
for regulation of its ligand-dependent nuclear import.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
The bHLH domain-dependent nuclear accumulation of a
chimeric dioxin-glucocorticoid receptor is inhibited by geldanamycin.
(A) Expression and treatment conditions of the chimeric protein
DR1-287/GRLBD-GFP were the same as described in the Fig. 2 legend
except that 100 nM of dexamethasone (Dex) was used as a ligand.
Representative images of the intracellular distribution of the
chimeric protein are shown, following the indicated treatments. (B)
Quantitative evaluation by categorization of the intracellular
distribution of DR1-287/GRLBD-GFP was performed as described in
Materials and Methods. The dynamics of the nuclear accumulation of
DR1-287/GRLBD-GFP are presented as described in the legend to Fig. 2.
(C) Dynamics of nuclear accumulation of the GFP-fused wild-type
glucocortiocid receptor. The experimental conditions were identical to
those described above.
|
|
Role of the hsp90 chaperone complex in cytoplasmic retention of the
dioxin receptor.
It has recently been shown that the 38-kDa
immunophilin-like protein XAP2, as well as its mouse homologue ARA9,
interacts with the dioxin receptor via the ligand and hsp90 binding
PAS-B domain (8, 31). Interestingly, we have observed that
overexpression of XAP2 induces cytoplasmic retention of the dioxin
receptor in both the absence and presence of ligand (24).
To address the question whether XAP2 produced this effect by enhancing
nuclear export of the receptor, we coexpressed the GFP-dioxin receptor and XAP2 in HeLa cells followed by incubation in the absence or presence of leptomycin B, a known inhibitor of CRM1-mediated nuclear export (34a, 56). Interestingly, in cells expressing
GFP-dioxin receptor alone, treatment with leptomycin B induced a
prominent shift towards the nucleus (Fig.
6), suggesting that the dioxin receptor
protein is actively shuttling between the nucleus and cytoplasm.
However, in the presence of coexpressed XAP2, leptomycin B treatment
was inefficient to induce nuclear accumulation of the dioxin receptor,
arguing against the involvement of the CRM1-mediated nuclear export
pathway in XAP2-induced cytoplasmic retention of the dioxin receptor.

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
XAP2 mediates cytoplasmic retention of the dioxin
receptor via a leptomycin B-independent pathway. HeLa cells were
transiently transfected with 0.5 µg of pCMX/DR-GFP in the absence or
presence of 0.5 µg of pCMV2/FLAG-XAP2 or 0.5 µg of empty expression
vector. Cells were subsequently treated with 50 ng of leptomycin B
(LMB)/ml or vehicle (DMSO) alone for 1 and 2 h, as indicated. The
intracellular localization of the dioxin receptor-GFP construct was
monitored by fluorescence microscopy as described above. (A)
Representative images of green fluorescent cells after 2 h of
treatment are shown. (B) Following the various treatments of the cells,
the categorization and quantitative evaluation of the intracellular
localization pattern of the dioxin receptor-GFP fusion protein were
performed as described in Materials and Methods. The percentage of
cells belonging to each of the four categories, C > N, C = N, C < N, and N, is shown.
|
|
In order to address whether the integrity of the hsp90-dependent
chaperone complex is required to mediate XAP2 association with the
dioxin receptor in living cells, we transiently expressed in COS7 cells
FLAG-tagged XAP2 in the presence of GST-tagged dioxin receptor or GST
alone. The cells were subsequently incubated with 0.25 µg of
geldanamycin/ml or vehicle (DMSO) for 1 h. The expression levels
of the constructs were assessed by immunoblot analysis of whole-cell
extracts (Fig. 7A, lanes 1 to 3).
Immunoprecipitation assays using anti-GST antibodies resulted in
recovery of very similar levels of dioxin receptor, as assessed by
immunoblot analysis employing anti-dioxin receptor antibodies (Fig. 7A,
compare lanes 5 and 6). In the absence of geldanamycin, both XAP2 and
p23 were specifically recovered in a complex with the GST-dioxin
receptor (Fig. 7A, compare lanes 4 and 5). Treatment of cells with
geldanamycin resulted in dissociation of both XAP2 and p23 from the
dioxin receptor complex (Fig. 7A, compare lanes 5 and 6), indicating that geldanamycin disrupts the integrity of the p23-XAP2-hsp90-dioxin receptor complex in vivo.

View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
The integrity of the p23-containing hsp90-dioxin
receptor complex is critical for XAP2-dependent cytoplasmic
accumulation of GRDBD/DR83-805. (A) GST-dioxin receptor (lanes 2 and 3)
or carrier vector alone (lane 1) were expressed in COS7 cells by
transient transfection. The cells were treated with 0.25 µg of
geldanamycin (GA)/ml or vehicle alone (DMSO) for 1 h. Whole-cell
extracts (WCE) were prepared as described in Materials and Methods, and
600 µg of protein was analyzed in immunoprecipitation experiments
using anti-GST antibodies ( -GST Ippt.). GST-dioxin receptor
(GST-DR), FLAG-tagged XAP2 (F-XAP2), and endogenous p23 levels were
monitored in the crude whole-cell extracts (left) or in the
immunoprecipitated material (right) by immunoblot analysis using
anti-dioxin receptor, anti-FLAG, and anti-p23 antibodies, respectively.
The positions of the protein molecular weight markers and an unspecific
immunoreactivity (asterisk) are indicated. (B) In vitro-translated
[35S]methionine-labeled XAP2 was incubated together with
[35S]methionine-labeled GRDBD/DR83-805 or with an equal
amount of the unprogrammed reticulocyte lysate for 1 h at 25°C.
Subsequently, reaction mixtures were transferred to a concentrated
reticulocyte lysate (3 volumes) supplemented with an ATP regeneration
system and were incubated in the presence of 25 µg of geldanamycin
(GA)/ml or vehicle alone for 30 min at 30°C. Complexes were
immunoprecipitated with monoclonal anti-hsp90 ( -hsp90) antibodies as
indicated. Unspecific immunoglobulin M antibodies were used in control
(C) immunoprecipitation reactions. Immunocomplexes were separated on an
SDS-12% PAGE gel. To compare GRDBD/DR83-805 and XAP2 input levels,
aliquots from the individual reaction mixtures were analyzed on the
separate SDS-PAGE gel shown in the bottom panel. (C) HeLa cells were
transiently transfected with 0.5 µg of pCMV/GRDBD/DR83-805-GFP
together with 0.5 µg of pSG5/XAP2 or with the same amount of empty
expression vector. Cells were treated with 0.1 µg of GA/ml or vehicle
alone in the presence or absence of 10 nM TCDD for 1 h.
Intracellular localization of the GRDBD/DR83-805-GFP construct was
monitored by fluorescence microscopy as described above. Representative
images of green fluorescent cells are shown. (D) Categorization and
quantitative evaluation of the intracellular localization pattern of
the GRDBD/DR83-805-GFP fusion protein were performed as described in
Materials and Methods. The percentage of cells belonging to each of the
four categories, C > N, C = N, C < N, and N, following
the various treatments of the cells is shown.
|
|
As outlined above, our data strongly support the model that
geldanamycin targets the hsp90-interacting N-terminal bHLH domain of
the dioxin receptor to regulate ligand-dependent nuclear import of the
receptor. In addition to the NLS motif, the bHLH domain of the dioxin
receptor harbors a functional nuclear export signal (NES)
(20). Since XAP2 interacts with the ligand binding PAS-B domain of the dioxin receptor (8, 31), we used in
subsequent experiments the GRDBD/DR83-803 chimeric receptor protein to
avoid any interference in our assays from the NES-containing,
hsp90-interacting bHLH domain of the dioxin receptor. To examine the
ability of GRDBD/DR83-805 to interact with XAP2 we coincubated in
vitro-translated [35S]methionine-labeled XAP2 together
with [35S]methionine-labeled GRDBD/DR83-805 or
unprogrammed reticulocyte lysate alone for 1 h. Aliquots of the
reaction mixtures were subsequently transferred to a concentrated
reticulocyte lysate supplemented with an ATP regeneration system and
incubated in the presence of 25 µg of geldanamycin/ml or vehicle
(DMSO) alone for 30 min. Equal amounts of the reaction mixtures
containing similar levels of [35S]methionine-labeled
GRDBD/DR83-805 and [35S]methionine-labeled XAP2 (Fig. 7B,
bottom panel) were used for immunoprecipitation experiments using
anti-hsp90 and control antibodies. XAP2 was specifically recovered in a
complex with hsp90 in the presence of GRDBD/DR83-805 (Fig. 7B, lanes 1, 2, and 4). Upon treatment with geldanamycin, the GRDBD/DR83-805 chimera
still remained in a complex with hsp90 whereas interaction with XAP2 was disrupted (Fig. 7B, compare lanes 2 and 3). In conclusion, these
results demonstrate that the bHLH domain was not required to establish
a stable interaction between the receptor and XAP2 and that the
integrity of this complex, in analogy to that of the wild-type dioxin
receptor (Fig. 7A), was disrupted upon geldanamycin treatment.
Since geldanamycin was able to disrupt the interaction of the dioxin
receptor not only with p23 but also with XAP2, we investigated whether
geldanamycin would have any effect on XAP2-dependent cytoplasmic retention of a GFP fusion protein spanning GRDBD/DR83-805. We transiently coexpressed GRDBD/DR83-805-GFP together with XAP2 in HeLa
cells and treated the cells for 1 h with or without 0.1 µg of
geldanamycin/ml in the absence or presence of 10 nM TCDD. GRDBD/DR83-805-GFP was redistributed to an exclusively cytoplasmic localization when coexpressed together with XAP2 (Fig. 7C and D). This
result demonstrates that the NES-containing bHLH domain of the dioxin
receptor was not required for XAP2-mediated cytoplasmic accumulation of
the receptor. Importantly, in the presence of geldanamycin, the
intracellular distribution pattern of GRDBD/DR83-805-GFP was
dramatically shifted toward the cell nucleus (Fig. 7C), resulting in
approximately 50% of the analyzed cells falling within category C = N and more than 20% of the cells falling within categories C < N and N (Fig. 7D). This result supports the model that XAP2-induced cytoplasmic accumulation of the dioxin receptor is primarily dependent on interaction between XAP2 and the hsp90 complex. Thus, following disruption of XAP2 from the dioxin receptor complex, the NLS present in
the DNA binding domain of the glucocorticoid receptor within the
GRDBD/DR83-805-GFP construct is able to mediate nuclear accumulation in the presence of geldanamycin. In the presence of overexpressed XAP2,
ligand treatment was not as efficient as geldanamycin treatment to
induce nuclear import of the receptor, resulting in about 50% of the
analyzed cells being homogeneously distributed in both the cell
cytoplasm and nucleus (category, C = N), while the remaining cells
were showing the exclusively cytoplasmic fluorescence. Consistent with
these observations, ligand-inducible nuclear accumulation of the dioxin
receptor is delayed upon overexpression of XAP2 (24).
Taken together these results suggest a role for the hsp90 complex in
mediating cytoplasmic retention of the dioxin receptor by XAP2.
 |
DISCUSSION |
Role of the hsp90 chaperone complex in regulation of the
intracellular localization of the dioxin receptor.
Nuclear import
of the dioxin receptor is mediated through a bipartite NLS motif
located in the bHLH domain of the receptor (20). In the
present study we have observed that ligand-dependent nuclear
translocation of the dioxin receptor is inhibited when cells are
exposed to geldanamycin, an agent that specifically interacts with the
ATP binding pocket located in the N terminus of hsp90
(50). The interaction between hsp90 and geldanamycin induces a failure of the hsp90 complex to mature, resulting in accumulation of an intermediate form that is characterized by the
presence of p60 and the absence of p23. Our results suggest a
regulatory role by the hsp90-p23 chaperones acting at very early steps
in the dioxin receptor activation pathway determining the intracellular
localization pattern of the dioxin receptor. Here we show that the
p23-containing hsp90 complex interacted with two distinct functional
domains of the dioxin receptor: the ligand binding PAS-B domain and the
bHLH DNA binding-dimerization domain.
Using chimeric dioxin-glucocorticoid receptor-GFP fusion proteins, we
were able to identify the bHLH domain of the receptor as a main target
for chaperone-dependent regulation of the nuclear translocation
process. We therefore propose that the interaction of hsp90 with the
bHLH domain of the dioxin receptor, possibly stabilized by p23, is
critical to maintain the receptor in a conformation enabling the NLS
motif to interact with common nuclear import machinery components such
as importins. In agreement with this hypothesis,
immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrated that ligand-dependent interaction of the dioxin receptor with
the mouse importin-
homologue pendulin was inhibited following
geldanamycin-induced destabilization of the dioxin receptor-hsp90-p23
complex. In addition, the ligand-dependent mode of the dioxin receptor
interaction with pendulin suggests that the ligand-bound PAS-B domain
of the dioxin receptor communicates with the NLS-containing bHLH domain
through the hsp90-regulated NLS unmasking mechanism.
We and others (24, 27) have recently observed that
transient overexpression of XAP2 induces cytoplasmic redistribution of
the dioxin receptor complex. We detected this effect of XAP2 in the
absence of ligand, where the dioxin receptor is redistributed from
being localized in both the cytoplasm and the nucleus to almost
exclusively cytoplasmic compartmentalization. Moreover, the
redistribution effect was observed in the presence of ligand, where
ligand-induced nuclear import of the receptor is significantly delayed
by XAP2 (24). XAP2 interaction with the dioxin receptor complex has been mapped to the PAS domain of the receptor, including the ligand binding PAS-B domain and the region between the PAS-A and
PAS-B motifs (8, 31). Recent studies in our laboratory show that a dioxin receptor-deletion mutant which lacks the ligand binding domain is constitutively localized in the cell nucleus and is
not affected in terms of intracellular localization by overexpression
of XAP2 (24). These findings indicate that the XAP2-dependent cytoplasmic retention mechanism is mediated by the
ligand binding domain of the dioxin receptor. Importantly, geldanamycin-dependent disruption experiments indicate that the physical interaction of XAP2 with the dioxin receptor as well as its
ability to anchor the receptor in the cytoplasm are strictly dependent
on the integrity of the dioxin receptor-hsp90 complex. Thus, binding of
geldanamycin to hsp90 disturbs the integrity of this complex and leads
to failure of the dioxin receptor to interact with XAP2.
The molecular mechanisms underlying XAP2-mediated cytoplasmic retention
of the dioxin receptor are still unclear. Experiments using the
inhibitor of CRM1-mediated nuclear export, leptomycin B, indicated that
the mechanism of cytoplasmic retention did not involve any effect on
the export of the receptor. It is noteworthy that XAP2 shares strong
homology with the steroid hormone receptor-associated immunophilin
FKBP52 (6, 29, 32). The exact role of immunophilins in
steroid signaling remains to be elucidated (41).
Intriguingly, FKBP52 has been shown to regulate the nuclear import of
the glucocorticoid receptor (12). This immunophilin has
been shown to be localized in cytoskeletal structures by immunostaining
techniques (13, 16). Moreover, it interacts with
cytoplasmic dynein in vitro (46). FKBP52 has been reported
to fail to interact with the dioxin receptor (8). Given
the structural similarities between XAP2 and FKBP52 it is a plausible
and testable scenario that XAP2 mediates interaction between the
hsp90-dioxin receptor complex and infrastructures of the cell, such as
the cytoskeleton, providing a mechanism of cytoplasmic retention.
Role of the hsp90 complex in ligand-dependent activation of the
dioxin receptor.
The present data indicate that the integrity of
the p23-hsp90-dioxin receptor complex is of critical importance in
regulation of the dioxin receptor activation process. More
specifically, as summarized in the model in Fig.
8, the heteromeric complex of dioxin
receptor associated with hsp90, p23, and XAP2 probably represents the
mature, ligand-inducible form of the receptor. In this context, hsp90
appears to play a central role in chaperoning a ligand-responsive
conformation of the receptor, presumably by folding of the ligand
binding domain, as assessed by both biochemical and yeast genetic
methods. It has been shown that dioxin receptor can also interact with
molecular chaperones other than hsp90: hsp70, p60, and p48 (Hip)
(34). These proteins are known to be involved in rather
well-characterized protein folding processes acting at early steps in
the maturation of substrate proteins such as steroid hormone receptors
(41). However, the role of the hsp70-p60 complex in
folding of the dioxin receptor complex remains to be elucidated. It is
noteworthy that binding of geldanamycin to the ATP binding pocket of
hsp90 and subsequent disruption of the p23-containing dioxin-hsp90
receptor complex by geldanamycin treatment has been reported to result
in an increased population of the receptor bound to the hsp70-p60
complex (34). In the present study geldanamycin-induced
entrapment of the dioxin receptor in a p60-associated complex in vitro
correlates with both geldanamycin-dependent inhibition of the
interaction of the dioxin receptor with pendulin in vitro and
ligand-induced nuclear translocation of the dioxin receptor in vivo.
Our results suggest that the p60-associated form of dioxin receptor
represents an intermediate or immature form of the receptor which fails
to interact with the cellular import machinery.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 8.
Model of the regulation of dioxin receptor function by
hsp90-mediated chaperoning mechanisms. In early steps of the formation
of the dioxin receptor chaperone complex, the receptor associates with
chaperone proteins such as hsp70 (34) and p60. Following
the ATP-dependent maturation process, the dioxin receptor-hsp90 complex
is stabilized by interaction with p23. The integrity of the
p23-containing hsp90-dioxin receptor complex is a prerequisite to
recruit XAP2 to the complex and thus redistribute the complex to the
cytoplasmic compartment of the cell. Upon exposure to ligand,
association of the hsp90 complex with the dioxin receptor is required
to maintain the bHLH domain of the dioxin receptor in a conformation
that facilitates interaction of the NLS motif with import machinery
components (such as importins), resulting in nuclear import of the
dioxin receptor complex.
|
|
The process of maturation of the dioxin receptor complex into a
ligand-responsive form is poorly characterized. With
immunoprecipitation assays we have observed that the presence of an ATP
regeneration system in the reaction mixtures significantly increases
recovery of the dioxin receptor in a complex with p23 (unpublished
observations), suggesting that the p23-containing hsp90-dioxin receptor
complex is formed by an ATP-dependent mechanism. In studies of steroid hormone receptors, it has been demonstrated that p23 stabilizes the
hsp90-receptor complex, thereby conferring a high-affinity ligand
binding conformation (41). On the other hand, the ligand binding activity of the dioxin receptor appears to be solely dependent on association with hsp90, since it can bind ligand even in the absence
of p23 (23) (Fig. 1F). However, the hsp90-dioxin receptor complex is markedly destabilized in the absence of p23, resulting in
ligand-independent DNA binding activity in the presence of the Arnt DNA
binding partner factor (23). In conclusion, the hsp90-XAP2-p23 chaperone complex appears to regulate the activation process of the dioxin receptor by two modes: in the absence of ligand,
it functions as a repressing mechanism, inhibiting constitutive activation of the dioxin receptor, and in the presence of ligand, it
plays a role in regulation of nuclear compartmentalization of the
receptor. Thus, the dioxin receptor system provides an interesting
model substrate for studying hsp90-mediated mechanisms of conditional
regulation of transcription factor function, involving a complex
functional interplay with p23 and the immunophilin-like protein XAP2.
It will now be critical to develop reconstituted model systems to
understand these chaperoning processes in closer detail.
We thank David O. Toft (Mayo Clinic) for kindly providing
anti-p23 (JJ3) antibodies, David F. Smith (Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale) for
anti-p60 (F5) antibodies, Mary Prieve (University of California, Irvine) for pendulin cDNA, Edward Seto (University of South Florida) for XAP2 cDNA, and Barbara Wolff-Winiski (Novartis) and Minoru Yoshida
(Tokyo University) for leptomycin B. We are also grateful to Jacqueline
McGuire (Karolinska Institute) for the dioxin receptor-GFP expression
plasmid and Pilar Carrero (Karolinska Institute) for the GST-DR
expression vector.
I.P. was supported by the Swedish Medical Research Council. This work
was supported by the Swedish Cancer Society and the European Union.
| 1.
|
Antonsson, C.,
M. L. Whitelaw,
J. McGuire,
J.-Å. Gustafsson, and L. Poellinger.
1995.
Distinct roles of the molecular chaperone hsp90 in modulating dioxin receptor function via the basic helix-loop-helix and PAS domains.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15:756-765[Abstract].
|
| 2.
|
Berghard, A.,
K. Gradin,
I. Pongratz,
M. Whitelaw, and L. Poellinger.
1993.
Cross-coupling of signal transduction pathways: the dioxin receptor mediates induction of cytochrome P-450IA1 expression via a protein kinase C-dependent mechanism.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13:677-689[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Bresnick, E. H.,
F. C. Dalman,
E. R. Sanchez, and W. B. Pratt.
1989.
Evidence that the 90-kDa heat shock protein is necessary for the steroid binding conformation of the L cell glucocorticoid receptor.
J. Biol. Chem.
264:4992-4997[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Buchner, J.
1999.
Hsp90 & Co. a holding for folding.
Trends Biochem. Sci.
24:136-141[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Carrero, P.,
K. Okamoto,
P. Coumailleau,
S. O'Brien,
H. Tanaka, and L. Poellinger.
2000.
Redox-regulated recruitment of the transcriptional coactivators CREB-binding protein and SRC-1 to hypoxia-inducible factor 1 .
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20:402-415[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Carver, L. A., and C. A. Bradfield.
1997.
Ligand-dependent interaction of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor with a novel immunophilin homolog in vivo.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:11452-11456[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Carver, L. A.,
V. Jackiw, and C. A. Bradfield.
1994.
The 90-kda heat shock protein is essential for Ah receptor signaling in a yeast expression system.
J. Biol. Chem.
269:30109-30112[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Carver, L. A.,
J. J. LaPres,
S. Jain,
E. E. Dunham, and C. A. Bradfield.
1998.
Characterization of the Ah receptor-associated protein, ARA9.
J. Biol. Chem.
273:33580-33587[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Chen, S.,
W. P. Sullivan,
D. O. Toft, and D. F. Smith.
1998.
Differential interactions of p23 and the TPR-containing proteins Hop, Cyp40, FKBP52 and FKBP51 with Hsp90 mutants.
Cell Stress Chaperones
3:118-129[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Crews, S. T.
1998.
Control of cell lineage-specific development and transcription by bHLH-PAS proteins.
Genes Dev.
12:607-620[Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Czar, M. J.,
M. D. Galigniana,
A. M. Silverstein, and W. B. Pratt.
1997.
Geldanamycin, a heat shock protein 90-binding benzoquinone ansamycin, inhibits steroid-dependent translocation of the glucocorticoid receptor from the cytoplasm to the nucleus.
Biochemistry
36:7776-7785[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Czar, M. J.,
R. H. Lyons,
M. J. Welsh,
J. M. Renoir, and W. B. Pratt.
1995.
Evidence that the FK506-binding immunophilin heat shock protein 56 is required for trafficking of the glucocorticoid receptor from the cytoplasm to the nucleus.
Mol. Endocrinol.
9:1549-1560[Abstract].
|
| 13.
|
Czar, M. J.,
J. K. Owens-Grillo,
A. W. Yem,
K. L. Leach,
M. R. Deibel, Jr.,
M. J. Welsh, and W. B. Pratt.
1994.
The hsp56 immunophilin component of untransformed steroid receptor complexes is localized both to microtubules in the cytoplasm and to the same nonrandom regions within the nucleus as the steroid receptor.
Mol. Endocrinol.
8:1731-1741[Abstract].
|
| 14.
|
Dittmar, K. D.,
D. R. Demady,
L. F. Stancato,
P. Krishna, and W. B. Pratt.
1997.
Folding of the glucocorticoid receptor by the heat shock protein (hsp) 90-based chaperone machinery. The role of p23 is to stabilize receptor.hsp90 heterocomplexes formed by hsp90.p60.hsp70.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:21213-21220[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Dunlap, J. C.
1999.
Molecular basis for circadian clocks.
Cell
96:271-290[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Galigniana, M. D.,
J. L. Scruggs,
J. Herrington,
M. J. Welsh,
C. Carter-Su,
P. R. Housley, and W. B. Pratt.
1998.
Heat shock protein 90-dependent (geldanamycin-inhibited) movement of the glucocorticoid receptor through the cytoplasm to the nucleus requires intact cytoskeleton.
Mol. Endocrinol.
12:1903-1913[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 17.
|
Grenert, J. P.,
B. D. Johnson, and D. O. Toft.
1999.
The importance of ATP binding and hydrolysis by hsp90 in formation and function of protein heterocomplexes.
J. Biol. Chem.
274:17525-17533[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Gu, Y.-Z.,
J. B. Hogenesch, and C. A. Bradfield.
2000.
The PAS superfamily: sensors of environmental and developmental signals.
Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol.
40:519-561[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Hartson, S. D., and R. L. Matts.
1994.
Association of Hsp90 with cellular Src-family kinases in a cell-free system correlates with altered kinase structure and function.
Biochemistry
33:8912-8920[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Ikuta, T.,
H. Eguchi,
T. Tachibana,
Y. Yoneda, and K. Kawajiri.
1998.
Nuclear localization and export signals of the human aryl hydrocarbon receptor.
J. Biol. Chem.
273:2895-2904[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
Johnson, J. L., and D. O. Toft.
1995.
Binding of p23 and hsp90 during assembly with the progesterone receptor.
Mol. Endocrinol.
9:670-678[Abstract].
|
| 22.
|
Kallio, P. J.,
K. Okamoto,
S. O'Brien,
P. Carrero,
Y. Makino,
H. Tanaka, and L. Poellinger.
1998.
Signal transduction in hypoxic cells: inducible nuclear translocation and recruitment of the CBP/p300 coactivator by the hypoxia-inducible factor-1 .
EMBO J.
17:6573-6586[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 23.
|
Kazlauskas, A.,
L. Poellinger, and I. Pongratz.
1999.
Evidence that the co-chaperone p23 regulates ligand responsiveness of the dioxin (aryl hydrocarbon) receptor.
J. Biol. Chem.
274:13519-13524[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
Kazlauskas, A.,
L. Poellinger, and I. Pongratz.
2000.
The immunophilin-like protein XAP2 regulates ubiquitination and subcellular localization of the dioxin receptor.
J. Biol. Chem.
275:41317-41324[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Kuzhandaivelu, N.,
Y. S. Cong,
C. Inouye,
W. M. Yang, and E. Seto.
1996.
XAP2, a novel hepatitis B virus X-associated protein that inhibits X transactivation.
Nucleic Acids Res.
24:4741-4750[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Lamb, J. R.,
S. Tugendreich, and P. Hieter.
1995.
Tetratrico peptide repeat interactions: to TPR or not to TPR?
Trends Biochem. Sci.
20:257-259[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 27.
|
LaPres, J. J.,
E. Glover,
E. E. Dunham,
M. K. Bunger, and C. A. Bradfield.
2000.
ARA9 modifies agonist signaling through an increase in cytosolic aryl hydrocarbon receptor.
J. Biol. Chem.
275:6153-6159[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 28.
|
Lindebro, M. C.,
L. Poellinger, and M. L. Whitelaw.
1995.
Protein-protein interaction via Pas domains. Role of the PAS domain in positive and negative regulation of the bHLH/PAS dioxin receptor-Arnt transcription factor complex.
EMBO J.
14:3528-3539[Medline].
|
| 29.
|
Ma, Q., and J. P. Whitlock.
1997.
A novel cytoplasmic protein that interacts with the Ah receptor, contains tetratricopeptide repeat motifs, and augments the transcriptional response to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:8878-8884[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
McGuire, J.,
M. L. Whitelaw,
I. Pongratz,
J.-Å. Gustafsson, and L. Poellinger.
1994.
A cellular factor stimulates ligand-dependent release of hsp90 from the basic helix-loop-helix dioxin receptor.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14:2438-2446[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 31.
|
Meyer, B. K., and G. H. Perdew.
1999.
Characterization of the AhR-hsp90-XAP2 core complex and the role of the immunophilin-related protein XAP2 in AhR stabilization.
Biochemistry
38:8907-8917[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 32.
|
Meyer, B. K.,
M. G. Pray-Grant,
J. P. Vanden Heuvel, and G. H. Perdew.
1998.
Hepatitis B virus X-associated protein 2 is a subunit of the unliganded aryl hydrocarbon receptor core complex and exhibits transcriptional enhancer activity.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:978-988[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 33.
|
Morishima, Y.,
P. J. M. Murphy,
D.-P. Li,
E. R. Sanchez, and W. B. Pratt.
2000.
Stepwise assembly of a glucocorticoid receptor-hsp90 heterocomplex resolves two sequential ATP-dependent events involving first hsp70 and then hsp90 in opening of the steroid binding pocket.
J. Biol. Chem.
275:18054-18060[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 34.
|
Nair, S. C.,
E. J. Toran,
R. A. Rimerman,
S. Hjermstad,
T. E. Smithgall, and D. F. Smith.
1996.
A pathway of multi-chaperone interactions common to diverse regulatory proteins: estrogen receptor, Fes tyrosine kinase, heat shock transcription factor Hsf1, and the aryl hydrocarbon receptor.
Cell Stress Chaperones
1:237-250[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 34a.
|
Nishi, K.,
M. Yoshida,
D. Fujiwara,
M. Nishikawa,
S. Horinouchi, and T. Beppu.
1994.
Leptomycin B targets a regulatory cascade of crm1, a fission yeast nuclear protein, involved in control of higher order chromosome structure and gene expression.
J. Biol. Chem.
269:6320-6324[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 35.
|
Okamoto, K.,
H. Tanaka,
H. Ogawa,
Y. Makino,
H. Eguchi,
S. Hayashi,
N. Yoshikawa,
L. Poellinger,
K. Umesono, and I. Makino.
1999.
Redox-dependent regulation of nuclear import of the glucocorticoid receptor.
J. Biol. Chem.
274:10363-10371[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 36.
|
Picard, D.,
B. Khursheed,
M. J. Garabedian,
M. G. Fortin,
S. Lindquist, and K. R. Yamamoto.
1990.
Reduced levels of hsp90 compromise steroid receptor action in vivo.
Nature
348:166-168[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 37.
|
Picard, D., and K. R. Yamamoto.
1987.
Two signals mediate hormone-dependent nuclear localization of the glucocorticoid receptor.
EMBO J.
6:3333-3340[Medline].
|
| 38.
|
Pollenz, R. S.,
C. A. Sattler, and A. Poland.
1994.
The aryl hydrocarbon receptor and aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator protein show distinct subcellular localizations in Hepa 1c1c7 cells by immunofluorescence microscopy.
Mol. Pharmacol.
45:428-438[Abstract].
|
| 39.
|
Pongratz, I.,
C. Antonsson,
M. L. Whitelaw, and L |