Previous Article | Next Article 
Molecular and Cellular Biology, May 2001, p. 3037-3046, Vol. 21, No. 9
0270-7306/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/MCB.21.9.3037-3046.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
A Novel Yeast U2 snRNP Protein, Snu17p, Is Required
for the First Catalytic Step of Splicing and for Progression of
Spliceosome Assembly
Alexander
Gottschalk,1,
Cornelia
Bartels,1
Gitte
Neubauer,2
Reinhard
Lührmann,1 and
Patrizia
Fabrizio1,*
Department of Cellular Biochemistry,
Max-Planck-Institute of Biophysical Chemistry, D-37077
Göttingen,1 and EMBL, D-69117
Heidelberg,2 Germany
Received 6 November 2000/Returned for modification 8 December
2000/Accepted 8 February 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
We have isolated and microsequenced Snu17p, a novel yeast protein
with a predicted molecular mass of 17 kDa that contains an RNA
recognition motif. We demonstrate that Snu17p binds specifically to the
U2 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein (snRNP) and that it is part of the
spliceosome, since the pre-mRNA and the lariat-exon 2 are
specifically coprecipitated with Snu17p. Although the SNU17 gene is not essential, its knockout leads to a slow-growth phenotype and to a pre-mRNA splicing defect in vivo. In addition, the first step
of splicing is dramatically decreased in extracts prepared from the
snu17 deletion (snu17
) mutant. This defect
is efficiently reversed by the addition of recombinant Snu17p. To
investigate the step of spliceosome assembly at which Snu17p acts, we
have used nondenaturing gel electrophoresis. In Snu17p-deficient
extracts, the spliceosome runs as a single slowly migrating complex. In wild-type extracts, usually at least two distinct complexes are observed: the prespliceosome, or B complex, containing the U2 but not
the U1 snRNP, and the catalytically active spliceosome, or A complex,
containing the U2, U6, and U5 snRNPs. Northern blot analysis and
affinity purification of the snu17
spliceosome showed that it contains the U1, U2, U6, U5, and U4 snRNPs. The unexpected stabilization of the U1 snRNP and the lack of dissociation of the U4
snRNP suggest that loss of Snu17p inhibits the progression of
spliceosome assembly prior to U1 snRNP release and after [U4/U6.U5] tri-snRNP addition.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Nuclear pre-mRNA splicing occurs
via a two-step transesterification reaction that is catalyzed by a
multicomponent complex termed the spliceosome (25). The
spliceosome is built by the ordered association of the U1, U2, U4, U5,
and U6 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particles (snRNPs) and
extrinsic protein factors with the pre-mRNA (reviewed in
references 19, 25, 40, and 46). Each individual snRNP
contains a unique set of particle-specific proteins and seven common Sm
proteins, while the U6 snRNP contains a unique set of Sm-like (Lsm)
proteins. The U5, U4, and U6 snRNPs form a trimeric complex in
which the U4 and U6 snRNAs are extensively base paired.
The spliceosome is a highly dynamic molecular machine, forming anew on
each pre-mRNA substrate in an ordered manner (4, 40). First, the U1 snRNP binds the pre-mRNA by
interacting with the 5' splice site (34, 38), leading to
the formation of commitment complexes in yeast (33, 38)
and the E complex in mammals (24). The U2 snRNP, which
interacts with the pre-mRNA branchpoint region, is then added
in an ATP-dependent step, resulting in the formation of the
prespliceosome (reviewed in reference 25). Finally, U4, U5, and U6 snRNPs, preassembled in a single particle, join the prespliceosome to form the mature spliceosome, in which the
pre-mRNA splicing reaction occurs. Several rearrangements then
take place that activate the spliceosome for the two catalytic steps of
splicing. For example, U1 and U4 are destabilized and the spliceosome
is activated for catalysis (4). The first splicing
reaction creates two intermediates, a cleaved upstream exon and an
intron-downstream exon in a branched "lariat" configuration. The
second splicing reaction results in the ligation of the exons and
excision of the lariat-intron. The spliceosome then disassembles, and
the products of the reaction are released.
As mentioned above, at the molecular level the assembly pathway
involves rearrangements of RNA-RNA interactions, many of which must be
disrupted to allow the formation of others (27, 40). After
the 5' splice site is recognized by U1 through base pairing (37,
39, 49), this interaction must be replaced by a mutually exclusive interaction with U6 (15, 18, 21, 36, 44). Similarly, the base-pairing interaction between U4 and U6 must be
disrupted to allow the U2-U6 interaction, which comprises a major
element of the spliceosome's catalytic core (23). These rearrangements are thought to be critical for activating the
spliceosome for the catalytic steps of splicing. Notably, the DEAD-box
ATPase Prp28p was identified as a potential mediator of the U1-to-U6 switch, perhaps by unwinding either the U1-5' splice site duplex or the
U4-U6 duplex (41). In addition, a mutation in U4
snRNA, which blocks U4-U6 unwinding as well as U1 release, can be
suppressed by a specific mutation in the U5 snRNP protein Prp8p
(20).
These and other data indicate that snRNP proteins play a key role
in triggering the activation of the spliceosome and in spliceosome assembly (8). Some of these proteins were identified
genetically in yeast, while others were characterized biochemically in
various systems. Using these tools, the yeast U1 snRNP and the
[U4/U5.U6] tri-snRNP recently have been extensively
characterized (11, 12, 26, 32, 42). In contrast, our
knowledge of the yeast U2 snRNP is less comprehensive, since a
distinct U2 snRNP equivalent to the human U2 snRNP could only
be partially purified from yeast (6). This led to the
identification of a novel essential splicing factor, Rse1p/Snu154p, the
yeast ortholog of the human protein SAP130, which is one of the
subunits of the heteromeric U2 snRNP-associated splicing factor
SF3b (6, 11). The human U2 snRNP contains nine
characterized specific proteins besides the seven common Sm proteins
(2). Sequence analysis revealed that homologs of all these
proteins exist in yeast (5, 35, 43). Yib9p and Lea1p are
the orthologs of metazoan U2B" and U2A', respectively (5,
43). Cus2p is also a yeast U2 snRNP-associated protein but
apparently does not have a human counterpart that associates with the
human U2 snRNP (48). Based on several criteria, the PRP9, PRP11, and PRP21 gene products are homologs of the mammalian SF3a
subunits; Hsh49p, Cus1p, and ySAP155, together with Rse1p (Snu154p),
are homologs of the mammalian SF3b subunits (14, 28, 30, 31, 45,
47).
Although considerable progress has been made in identifying the
critical RNA-RNA and RNA-protein interactions required for splicing,
little is understood about the factors mediating the structural
dynamics. While characterizing the yeast [U4/U6.U5] tri-snRNP
proteins, we identified several U1 and U2 snRNP-specific proteins
in our tri-snRNP preparations, which probably were due to the small
amounts of copurifying U1 and U2 snRNPs (11). Here, we
describe the characterization of one of these proteins with a predicted
molecular mass of 17 kDa encoded by open reading frame YIR005w. This protein, named Snu17p, contains an RNA
recognition motif (RRM). We show that Snu17p is specifically associated
with the U2 snRNP and is an intrinsic component of prespliceosomes and spliceosomes, even after the first catalytic step of splicing has
occurred. Deletion of the SNU17 gene leads to a slow-growth phenotype and to a splicing defect in vivo and in vitro. We demonstrate that the in vitro splicing defect is due to the lack of Snu17p since it
can be specifically reversed by addition of recombinant protein.
Analysis of spliceosomal complexes shows that in extracts lacking
Snu17p an unusual complex accumulates that contains U1, U2, U4, U5, and
U6 snRNPs. Thus, deletion of Snu17p traps the prespliceosome and
allows the [U4/U6.U5] tri-snRNP to bind to this intermediate.
However, progression to a more mature form of the spliceosome is inhibited.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Yeast strains and plasmids.
A yeast strain expressing the
Snu17p protein with a C-terminal protein A tag was created using a
PCR-based strategy as previously described (11, 29). The
SNU17 3' untranslated region (3'-UTR) was amplified from
yeast genomic DNA using oligonucleotides B1 and B2. This construct was
ligated to the protA-TRP1 cassette from plasmid pBS1173,
cleaved with XhoI, and filled in with Klenow fragment. The
DNA cassette encoding the protein A tag and carrying the
TRP1 marker gene and the SNU17 3'-UTR was then
amplified by PCR from the ligation mixture using oligonucleotide B3,
which is homologous to the 3'-end of the SNU17 coding region
and eliminates the stop codon, and oligonucleotide B2. The PCR product
was transformed into strain TR2 (MATa trp1-
1
his3-
ura3-52 lys2-801 ade2-101) to give rise to strain AGY9.
The SNU17 gene was deleted by a PCR-based strategy,
replacing the entire coding region with the HIS3-marker
gene. First, the 5'- and 3'-UTRs were amplified from yeast genomic DNA
using primers SNU17 5'-up and SNU17 5'-low as
well as SNU17 3'-up and SNU17 3'-low. The
HIS3 marker gene was amplified using primers HIS3 up BsrGI and HIS3 low AatII, which are homologous to the
5'-UTR and 3'-UTR of SNU17, respectively. The 5'-UTR product
was then fused by PCR to the HIS3 gene using primers
SNU17 5'-up and HIS3 low AatII. The resulting
product was purified and then fused by PCR to the 3'-UTR product using
primers SNU17 5'-up and SNU17 3'-low. The final
5'-UTR-HIS3-3'-UTR cassette was then transformed into strain TR1.
Integrants were selected on medium lacking histidine, giving rise to
strain AGY17. These cells were then sporulated, and tetrads were
dissected. All four spores were viable, although the two spores
containing the HIS3 marker grew slower. Thus, a haploid
snu17
strain was isolated (AGY21) (trp1-
1
his3-
ura3-52 lys2-801 ade2-101
snu17
::HIS3).
Expression and purification of GST-Snu17p fusion protein.
The coding region of SNU17 was amplified by PCR from yeast
genomic DNA using oligonucleotides SNU17 up BamHI and
SNU17 low XhoI. The PCR product was cut with
BamHI and XhoI and ligated into vector pGEX-4T1
(Amersham-Pharmacia) between the respective restriction sites. This
plasmid was transformed into Escherichia coli strain BL21.
Glutathione S-transferase (GST)-Snu17p fusion protein was
overexpressed and purified as specified by the manufacturer (Amersham-Pharmacia). It was subsequently dialyzed against buffer D150
(20 mM HEPES-KOH [pH 7.9], 150 mM KCl, 8% glycerol, 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol) and stored in
small aliquots at
80°C.
Immunoprecipitation, Northern analysis, and primer
extension.
Splicing extracts were prepared from strain AGY9,
essentially as described previously (22). A 20-µl volume
of immunoglobulin G (IgG)-agarose (Sigma) was washed with buffer NET-2
75 (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 75 mM NaCl, 0.05% NP-40) and used to
precipitate Snu17p-ProtA from 50 µl of extract for 1.5 h at
4°C. The beads were then washed three times with 1.5 ml of NET-2 75. Parallel precipitations were washed with NET-2 buffers containing 150, 225, 300, or 375 mM NaCl. As control, extract from the isogenic strain
TR2 was precipitated with IgG beads. The beads were then incubated with
proteinase K for 15 min at 37°C. The copreciptated snRNAs were
subsequently extracted with phenol-chloroform-isoamyl alcohol (50:49:1)
and separated by electrophoresis on a denaturing gel containing 6 M
urea and 8% polyacrylamide. After the gels were blotted to a nylon
membrane (Quiagen), which was UV irradiated for 3 min, Northern
analysis with uniformly radiolabeled DNA probes specific for the U1,
U2, U4, U5, and U6 snRNAs was performed. In vivo accumulation of
unspliced pre-U3A and pre-U3B RNA transcripts was assayed by
primer extension, as described previously (11).
In vitro splicing complementation with recombinant Snu17p,
precipitation of splicing-reaction products, nondenaturing gels, and
affinity purification of spliceosomes.
Splicing reactions were
performed as described previously (22), generally using
actin pre-mRNA transcribed in the presence of
[
-32P]UTP. When splicing extracts were complemented
with recombinant GST-Snu17p protein, 50 ng of protein (1.2 pmol) in 0.5 µl of buffer D150 per 5 µl of reaction mixture was used. As a
control, only 0.5 µl of buffer D150 was added.
Precipitation of Snu17p-protA and associated pre-mRNA or
derived mRNA species from in vitro splicing-reaction mixtures was
performed as previously described (
11), using the AGY9
extract
and radiolabeled transcripts of actin or U3 pre-mRNA. A
30-µl
volume of extract was incubated with 150,000 cpm of
32P-labeled pre-mRNA (specific activity, 10,000 cpm/fmol) for 40
min under splicing conditions. We kept 1/15 of the
mixture for
analysis of the splicing reaction, while the remaining
splicing
mixture was precipitated using 20 µl of IgG-agarose (Sigma)
in
NET-2 150 buffer for 1.5 h at 4°C. Coprecipitated
pre-mRNA and
splicing products were extracted from the washed
IgG-agarose beads
and analyzed by denaturing gel electrophoresis
followed by autoradiography.
Nondenaturing gel electrophoresis was
performed as described previously
(
7), except that the
EDTA concentration used to block spliceosome
assembly in A1 was 8 mM
instead of 5 mM. Oligonucleotide d1, used
to destroy U6 snRNA, is
described in reference
10. For affinity
purification of
spliceosomes, actin pre-mRNA was transcribed in
the presence of
biotin-16-UTP (Boehringer) with UTP/biotin-16-UTP
ratio of 20:1.
Standard splicing-reaction mixtures (125 µl) containing
50 µl
extract and 640 fmol of biotinylated actin pre-mRNA were
incubated for 20 min at 23°C, treated with 2 µg of heparin per
µl
of extract, and then sedimented on a 2.4-ml 10 to 30% glycerol
gradient in buffer D containing 100 mM KCl. The gradients were
run for
3 h at 55,000 rpm in a Beckman TL-100 ultracentrifuge.
After
fractionation of the gradient into 15 fractions of 160 µl,
four-fifths of each fraction was used for affinity purification
by
addition of 15 µl of streptavidin agarose in 450 µl of NET-2
buffer
containing 100 mM NaCl, for 1.5 h at 4°C. The precipitates
were
washed extensively with NET-2 100, and RNAs were extracted
from the
beads and analysed by Northern blot
analysis.
Oligonucleotides used in this work.
The following
oligonucleotides were used: B1 (5'-ATAATTTTTTCTTTCATC-3'),
B2 (5'-GCTACTGCCGTGCAAAAA-3'), B3
(5'-AAGAACAATGCTGAGAAACTCATTTTGGCTAAAAAGGACCAACCACCTCCGCTGGAGCTCAAAAC-3'), SNU17 5'-up (5'-GAAGAGCTGAAGCAATGA-3'),
SNU17 5'-low
(5'-TTCTAGATGTACACCGCCGAATTGCACGCTGCACTT-3'), SNU17 3'-up
(5'-TCGATACGACGTCCCGCCGAACAATGCTGAGAAACTC-3'),
SNU17 3'-low (5'-AGCTTTAGCTGGAGGCGT-3'),
HIS3 up BsrGI
(5'-GGCGGTGTACATCTAGAAAGAGCTTGGTG-3'), HIS3 low
AatII (5'-GGCGGGACGTCGTATCGAGTTCAAGAGAA-3'),
SNU17 up BamHI
(5'-GGCGGGGATCCAACAAAATTCAGCAAATC-3'), and SNU17
low XhoI (5'-GGCGGCTCGAGTTAATTTGGTTGGTCCTT-3').
 |
RESULTS |
Snu17p contains an RRM.
We have recently isolated the yeast
[U4/U6.U5] tri-snRNP using two affinity chromatography steps
(11). Subsequently, by glycerol gradient centrifugation we
could partially separate the [U4/U6.U5] tri-snRNP from
contaminating U1 and U2 snRNPs. Thirty-four protein bands with
molecular masses ranging from ca. 10 to 200 kDa and comigrating with
the U4, U5, and U6 snRNAs were identified. Peptides generated
proteolytically from these bands were analyzed by mass spectrometry and
database searching. Twenty-eight distinct proteins were shown to be
specifically associated with the [U4/U6.U5] tri-snRNP. Two of the
remaining proteins were identified as U2-specific proteins, Hsh49p
(14) and Rse1p (6, 11). Both are subunits of
the heteromeric, U2 snRNP-associated splicing factor SF3b. In
addition to the proteins of the [U4/U6.U5] tri-snRNP and these two U2 snRNP proteins, we identified a novel protein which we named Snu17p. This protein contains an RNA recognition
motif or RRM (Fig. 1) (3).

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Sequence alignment of S. cerevisiae Snu17p
with homologous proteins. (A) Snu17p is aligned with a homolog from
H. sapiens (AF078865). Identical residues are boxed in
black, and similar residues are boxed in grey. The amino acid positions
are indicated by numbers. (B) Snu17p is aligned with an H. sapiens cDNA product from EST186153 AA314241. The position of the
Snu17p RRM is indicated above the sequences by a shaded box.
|
|
A BLAST search in the protein database (
1) with Snu17p
identified homologous proteins, which could potentially be
orthologs,
in
Drosophila melanogaster (accession
number AAP53845),
Arabidopsis thaliana (
AL133292),
Caenorhabditis elegans (
U23450),
Schizosaccharomyces pombe (
AL033388),
Plasmodium
falciparum (
AL034559), and
Homo sapiens
(
AF078865); these proteins exhibited a high degree
of homology to
Snu17p (50% identity in a region spanning the first
120 amino acids
[Fig.
1A and data not shown]). All of these proteins
share an RRM
which spans positions 21 to 109 of Snu17p (
3)
(Fig.
1A and
data not shown). All of these homologs, with the
exception of the
Drosophila protein, are much longer at their
C terminus than
is Snu17p. However, homology to Snu17p is not
confined solely to their
RRMs, since additional short regions
of homology were also detected in
the flanking N-terminal and
C-terminal regions (Fig.
1A). Since all of
these proteins had
alignment scores higher than 100, they may be
possible orthologs
of Snu17p. Several other homologous proteins with
lower alignment
scores (ca. 60 to 40) emerged during the search, but
since their
homology to Snu17p is restricted exclusively to their RRMs,
they
are most probably putative RNA binding proteins, functionally
unrelated to Snu17p. A TBLASTN search in the human expressed sequence
tag (EST) database revealed that beside the ESTs encoding the
human
protein shown in Fig.
1A (alignment score, 124), several
more ESTs
exist that encode a product homologous to Snu17p. Interestingly,
among
these is EST
AA314241 (alignment score, 53), which encodes
a 14-kDa
protein, named p14, that is associated with both U2 and
U11-U12
snRNPs (C. L. Will, C. Schneider, A. M. MacMillan, N.
Katopodis, G. Neubauer, M. Wilm, R. Lührmann, and C. C. Query,
submitted for publication). Although this protein shows only
36%
identity and 53% similarity to Snu17p in a region spanning 96
amino acids from positions 30 to 125, it is similar in length
(Fig.
1B). Since similar length may be an important parameter
to conclude
whether two proteins are genuine orthologs and, most
importantly,
considering that there is experimental evidence that
p14 is associated
with U2 snRNPs in HeLa cells (Will et al., submitted),
p14, and not
the protein shown in Fig.
1A, may be the bona fide
human counterpart of
Snu17p.
Snu17p is a U2 snRNP protein.
To investigate whether
Snu17p is stably associated with one of the snRNP particles, we
added a cassette coding for two IgG binding units of
Staphylococcus aureus protein A (29) downstream of the SNU17 coding sequence in vivo. Splicing extracts were
prepared and used in immunoprecipitation experiments.
Immunoprecipitation reactions were performed with extracts containing
protein A-tagged Snu17p (Snu17p-protA) and control extracts obtained
from an isogenic strain containing untagged protein and then washed at
increasing salt concentrations. Subsequently, the precipitated
snRNAs were identified by Northern blot analysis. The U2 snRNA
coprecipitated with Snu17p in a specific manner (Fig.
2). The amount of coprecipitated U2
snRNP only slightly decreased, increasing the NaCl concentration from 75 to 375 mM KCl. Only background U1 snRNA was coprecipitated (Fig. 2, compare with the control extract [No tag] and with the total
RNA [lane 11]). Also, very small amounts of U5L, U5S, U4, and U6
snRNAs were coprecipitated at all salt concentrations tested. This
is most probably due to the interaction of the U2 snRNP with the
tri-snRNP (11, 16). This experiment demonstrates that Snu17p is stably and specifically associated with the U2 snRNP even
at high salt concentrations. Therefore, we have named this protein
Snu17p, for the "snurp" protein of 17 kDa.

View larger version (78K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Snu17p is a yeast U2 snRNP protein. DNA coding for a
tandem repeat of S. aureus protein A was fused 3' to
SNU17. Extracts (50 µl) from the resulting strain
(Snu17p-tag), as well as from the parental wild-type strain (No tag),
were immunoprecipitated using IgG-agarose and then washed at various
NaCl concentrations, as indicated above the lanes. The snRNA
content of the precipitates was assayed by Northern blot analysis
(snRNAs are indicated). Total refers to the total RNAs from 4 µl
of extract (8% of the total input) before immunoprecipitation.
|
|
Snu17p is associated with the spliceosome during splicing in
vitro.
To learn more about Snu17p interactions, we investigated
whether Snu17p is associated with the spliceosome during the course of
a splicing reaction in vitro. We therefore used the Snu17p-protA extract and the untagged control extract to perform in vitro splicing with labeled actin and U3 pre-mRNAs (Fig.
3). Aliquots of the splicing-reaction
mixtures were removed after 20 and 40 min and analyzed for
splicing activity. After 40 min the remaining splicing-reaction mixture
was immunoprecipitated using IgG-agarose beads (Fig. 3). Significant
amounts of the pre-mRNA were coprecipitated from the extracts
containing Snu17p-protA (Fig. 3, lanes 6 and 12) but not from the
control extract containing untagged Snu17p (lanes 3 and 9). Using
either of the two precursors, significant amounts of the lariat-exon 2 intermediate were also coprecipitated (lanes 6 and 12). This suggests
that Snu17p, as part of the U2 snRNP, associates with the
pre-mRNA in the prespliceosome. Moreover, Snu17p is also part
of the catalytically active spliceosome, since it is associated with
the lariat-exon 2 intermediate, which is formed during the first step
of the pre-mRNA splicing reaction (lanes 6 and 12). Since
Snu17p associates with spliceosomes assembled on at least two
precursors, actin and U3 pre-mRNAs, this indicates that it is a
general splicing factor.

View larger version (72K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Pre-mRNA and the lariat-intron intermediate
coprecipitate with Snu17p under in vitro splicing conditions. Splicing
reactions using either extracts containing Snu17p without tag (lanes 1 to 3 and 7 to 9) or protein-A tagged Snu17p (lanes 4 to 6 and 10 to 12)
were incubated under splicing conditions with 32P-labeled
actin pre-mRNA (lanes 1 to 6) or U3 pre-mRNA (lanes 7 to 12) for 20 or 40 min at 25°C. Then 93% of the 40-min reaction
volume was precipitated with IgG agarose. For each time point, 7% of
the total reaction mixtures (lanes 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 10, and 11) and
the precipitate from the remaining 93% of the reaction mixtures (IP;
lanes 3, 6, 9 and 12) were assayed for the presence of
pre-mRNA, splicing intermediates, and products. Indicated on
the left and on the right are the identities of the labeled RNA
species: intron-lariat-exon 2 intermediate, excised lariat-intron,
pre-mRNA, mature mRNA, and cleaved exon 1 intermediate.
|
|
Deletion of SNU17 confers a slow-growth phenotype.
In view of the results obtained above, we were interested in
determining whether Snu17p is essential for cell viability. We performed a genetic knockout of the SNU17 gene in a diploid
strain by replacing its coding sequence with the HIS3 marker
gene. After sporulation and tetrad dissection of this strain at 25°C,
we observed that all four spores were viable, demonstrating that this
gene is not essential for vegetative cell growth (data not
shown). However, we noticed that two spores in each tetrad grew slower (data not shown). These spores carried the HIS3 marker,
indicating that the strains lacking SNU17
(snu17
) were viable but impaired for vegetative growth
at 25°C. We then isolated haploid cells carrying
snu17
and tested their growth ability at 17, 30, and 37°C. The slow-growth phenotype of these cells was not apparently exacerbated by increasing or lowering the temperature, compared to that
of an isogenic wild-type strain grown at the same temperature. At each
temperature, the snu17
::HIS3 cells
grew about 1.3-fold slower than the wild-type cells did (data not
shown). An identical phenotype was observed by Entian et al., who
systematically studied S. cerevisiae genes of unknown
function (9). After deletion of YIR005w ORF,
which corresponds to SNU17, they observed a reduced growth
rate on glucose and on several other fermentable carbon sources and alterations in the cell cycle, with an increased proportion of cells with 1n DNA content compared to the wild type
(9). Although Snu17p is not essential for vegetative
cell growth, we have shown that it is present in the spliceosome
during the course of the splicing reaction at least prior to the
second step of splicing (Fig. 3; also see above). It was therefore
interesting to determine whether the deletion of SNU17 had
an effect on splicing in vivo and in vitro.
Deletion of SNU17 leads to a pre-mRNA splicing
defect in vivo and to inhibition of splicing prior to the first
catalytic step in vitro.
We determined whether SNU17 is
required for pre-mRNA splicing in vivo by measuring the levels
of unspliced U3A and U3B transcripts in cells grown at 25 and 37°C,
respectively. Figure 4A shows the results
of a primer extension analysis of U3 transcripts from wild-type and
snu17
cells. A slight but higher than background accumulation of unspliced pre-U3A and pre-U3B transcripts was found (Fig. 4A, lane 3) (snu17
), in comparison to the
parental control (lane 1). The splicing defect was exacerbated after
the cells were switched for 2 and 4 h from 25 to 37°C (compare
lane 2 with lanes 4 and 5). Thus, although deletion of SNU17
does not lead to a discernible temperature-sensitive phenotype, it does cause a splicing defect which is intensified by increasing the temperature.

View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Snu17p is required for efficient splicing in vivo and in
vitro. (A) RNA was extracted from wild-type (WT) and
snu17 cells grown at 25°C (lanes 1 and 3) and after the
switch to 37°C for 2 h (lane 4) and 4 h (lanes 2 and 5).
Primer extension analysis was performed to measure the levels of
unspliced pre-U3A and pre-U3B transcripts, indicated on the
right. (B) Splicing reactions were performed at 25°C using the
wild-type (lanes 1 to 8) and snu17 (lanes 9 to 16)
extracts for the time indicated above each lane. To restore splicing,
1.2 pmol of recombinant GST-Snu17p was added to the reaction mixtures
prior to addition of the actin precursor (lanes 5 to 8 and 13 to 16).
Indicated on the left is the identity of the 32P-labeled
RNA species (from top to bottom): intron-lariat-exon 2 intermediate,
excised lariat-intron, pre-mRNA, mature mRNA, and cleaved
exon 1 intermediate.
|
|
To study whether the deletion of
SNU17 has an influence on
the splicing reaction, we prepared splicing extract from the
snu17
strain and compared its ability to carry out
splicing in vitro
with that of a wild-type extract. We performed in
vitro splicing
reactions at 25°C and withdrew aliquots of the
reaction mixtures
at 1, 5, 15, and 25 min. (Figure
4B). The deletion of
SNU17 led
to a dramatic decrease in splicing prior to the
first step (Fig.
4B, compare lanes 9 to 12 with lanes 1 to 4). To
determine whether
this reduction was due specifically to the lack of
Snu17p, we
tested whether the splicing activity of the extract lacking
Snu17p
could be restored by adding recombinant GST-Snu17p to the
splicing-reaction
mixture. We therefore performed splicing in the
presence of GST-Snu17p,
which was preincubated with the wild-type and
snu17
extracts
prior to the addition of the
pre-mRNA. With the
snu17
extract,
the addition of
recombinant Snu17p efficiently reversed the splicing
defect (Fig.
4B,
lanes 13 to 16). Addition of recombinant Snu17p
to the wild-type
extract did not have any detectable effect (lanes
5 to 8). We conclude
that the in vitro splicing defect is due
to the specific loss of
Snu17p and not to an indirect effect,
such as loss of another factor in
addition to Snu17p or instability
and degradation of the U2
snRNA.
Deletion of SNU17 leads to accumulation of an unusual
spliceosomal complex.
To investigate the step of spliceosome
assembly at which Snu17p acts, we separated spliceosomal complexes by
electrophoresis on nondenaturing polyacrylamide gels. Spliceosomal
complexes were assembled at 30°C on 32P-labeled
actin pre-mRNA, using wild-type and snu17
extracts (Fig. 5A). Interestingly, the
lack of SNU17 led to the formation of a single, slowly
migrating complex, which we named complex X (Fig. 5A, lanes 5 and 6).
This complex had already accumulated after 10 min of incubation. Under
the same conditions, at least two distinct complexes were formed in
wild-type extracts: the B and A complexes. A third complex, A1, was
usually less abundant (lanes 2 and 3). Previous analysis of the B
complex (7) showed that it contains the U2 snRNP but
not the U1 snRNP, which is only loosely bound and is lost from
complex B due to heparin treatment (7, 17). The A complex
(named A2-1 and A2-2 at early and later incubation times, respectively)
and the A1 complex usually contain the U2 and [U4/U6.U5] snRNPs
or the U2, U6, and U5 snRNPs, respectively (Fig. 5B gives a
summary).

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Deletion of SNU17 leads to accumulation of an
unusual spliceosomal complex. (A) Spliceosomes were assembled on a
32P-labeled actin pre-mRNA by incubation in
mock-treated wild-type (WT) and snu17 extracts at 30°C.
Aliquots were withdrawn after 0, 10, and 20 min and treated with a
buffer containing heparin. Nondenaturing gels were run for 5 h
(7). The identities of the complexes are indicated on the
left. The unusual, slow-migrating complex seen only in
snu17 extracts is designated complex X. (B) Yeast
spliceosome assembly, as in reference 7. RNase H-mediated
digestion of U6 snRNA ( U6) blocks spliceosome assembly at the B
complex stage, whereas addition of 5 to 8 mM EDTA blocks spliceosome
assembly at the A1 complex stage.
|
|
We noticed that complex X exhibits migration behavior similar to that
of complex A1. To analyze whether the deletion of
SNU17 leads to accumulation of complex A1, we studied the RNA composition
of
complex X by Northern blot analysis (Fig.
6). Spliceosomal
complexes were assembled
on unlabeled actin precursor at 30°C.
After 0, 5, and 20 min,
aliquots of the reaction mixture were
incubated on ice and a solution
containing heparin was added.
The complexes were separated on a native
gel, blotted, and then
hybridized with probes for the actin precursor
and subsequently
for the U1, U2, U4, U5, and U6 snRNAs (Fig.
6a to
f). Hybridization
with the actin and the U2 probes revealed the
position and composition
of complexes B, A, and A1 in the wild-type
extract (Fig.
6a and
b, lanes 2 and 3). To increase the signal of the
A1 complex in
this experiment, we added EDTA to the splicing-reaction
mixture.
As shown previously (
7), addition of EDTA blocked
spliceosome
assembly, leading to accumulation of complex A1, which, as
anticipated,
contained the U2 snRNP but not the U1 snRNP (Fig.
6b and c, lanes
8 and 9, respectively). Surprisingly, analysis of
complex X showed
that it contained not only the U2 snRNP but also
the U1 snRNP
(Fig.
6b and c, lanes 11 and 12, respectively). In
addition, we
noticed that in extracts deficient in Snu17p the U2
snRNP (U2*
snRNP) ran aberrantly (Fig.
6b, lanes 10 to 15),
forming a diffuse,
slower-migrating band (compare with the wild-type U2
snRNP), indicating
that its structure is somehow compromised.

View larger version (85K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
RNA composition of complex X. Spliceosomes were
assembled on unlabeled actin pre-mRNA. Splicing reactions were
performed using wild-type (WT) or snu17 extracts at
30°C, either mock treated, treated to destroy U6, or treated with 8 mM EDTA as indicated above each lane. Aliquots were withdrawn after 0, 5, and 20 min, blocked on ice, and treated with a buffer containing
heparin. Nondenaturing gels were run, blotted, and sequentially
hybridized with probes for the actin precursor (Actin) (a) and
subsequently for the U2 (b), U1 (c), U6 (d), U5 (e), and U4 (f)
snRNAs. The complexes are indicated on the left. Complex X is an
unusual slow-migrating complex seen only in snu17
extracts.
|
|
To determine whether the [U4/U6.U5] tri-snRNP is part of complex
X, the blot was hybridized with the U6, U5, and U4 probes.
U6 and U5
were identified in the wild-type A and A1 complexes
(Fig.
6d and e,
lanes 2 and 3 and lanes 8 and 9). As expected,
U4 was identified only
in the A but not in the A1 complexes (Fig.
6f, lanes 2 and 3 and lanes
8 and 9). As shown in Fig.
6d to f,
lanes 11 and 12, complex X also
contained the U6, U5, and U4 snRNPs.
The controls show that in the
wild-type extract, deletion of U6
by oligonucleotide-directed RNase H
cleavage blocked the binding
of the tri-snRNP and led to the
accumulation of complex B, which,
as expected, contained the substrate
and the U2 snRNP but not
the U1 snRNP (Fig.
6a to c, lanes 5 and 6). Digestion of U6 in
wild-type extracts led to nearly complete
disappearance of the
U6, U5, and U4 signals (Fig.
6d to f, lanes 5 and
6), suggesting
that, normally, deletion of U6 blocks the entry of the
[U4/U6.U5]
tri-snRNP. When the
snu17
extract was
treated to destroy U6,
the latter completely disappeared from complex X
(Fig.
6d, lanes
14 and 15). However, U5 still appeared to be present
(Fig.
6e,
lanes 14 and
15).
Since the U5 and U4 snRNP were never clearly detected by this
method, as an independent assay to support the existence of
the
[U4/U6.U5] tri-snRNP in complex X, we have purified
spliceosomes
that were assembled onto biotinylated
pre-mRNA in vitro. Splicing-reaction
mixtures were
incubated with biotinylated unlabeled substrate
using either
wild-type or
snu17
extracts (Fig.
7). Spliceosomal
complexes were then
fractionated by centrifugation on a 10 to
30% glycerol gradient, and
their RNA composition was analyzed
following precipitation with
streptavidin beads (Fig.
7, lanes
2 and 4). The snRNAs present in
gradient-fractionated spliceosomes
precipitated with streptavidin (the
ca. 40S region of the gradient
[lanes 2 and 4]), as well as the input
of the total snRNPs before
incubation and fractionation, were
assayed by Northern blot analysis
(lanes 1 and 3). The
snu17
spliceosome contained large amounts
of U1, U2, and
U5 but smaller amounts of U4 and U6 snRNAs (lane
4). Note that the
U4 and U6 snRNA were in general not well represented
in both
extracts. One reason may be that the U6 and U4 probes
had a lower
specific activity than the U1, U2, and U5 probes in
some of our
experiments. The snRNA composition of the wild-type
spliceosome
indicates that it contains in proportion slightly
less U2 but much less
U1 than the
snu17
spliceosome (Fig.
7,
compare lane 2 with lane 4). Importantly, the wild-type spliceosome
has released U4,
since the U4 snRNA is not detectable (lane 2).
However, the
snu17
spliceosome does contain detectable levels
of U4
(lane 4). The controls show that the total snRNA contents
of the
wild-type and
snu17
extracts before spliceosome assembly,
gradient fractionation, and affinity purification are practically
indistinguishable, including the lower levels of the U4 and U6
snRNAs (compare lane 1 with lane 3). In summary, the conclusion
that complex X, the
snu17
spliceosome, contains all of
the snRNPs
is supported and strengthened by this independent
experiment.
From the combination of these experiments, we conclude that
complex
X contains the U2, U6, U5, and U4 snRNPs and, unusually, a
U1
snRNP that is stably associated with the complex even after
treatment
with heparin. The unexpected stabilization of the U1
snRNP and
the lack of release of the U4 snRNP in spliceosomes
lacking Snu17p
suggest that deletion of Snu17p inhibits the progression
of spliceosome
assembly prior to U1 snRNP release and after
[U4/U6.U5] tri-snRNP
addition.

View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
Deletion of SNU17 inhibits the dissociation
of U1 and U4 from the spliceosome. Splicing-reaction mixtures were
incubated with actin pre-mRNA that was transcribed in the
presence of biotinylated UTP to incorporate an affinity label. The
reaction mixtures were incubated for 20 min at 23°C. Then 5 µl was
withdrawn and kept for analysis of total RNAs (Total; lanes 1 and 3).
The remaining 120 µl was treated with heparin and then sedimented by
centrifugation on a 10 to 30% glycerol gradient. rRNAs from yeast were
run on a parallel gradient as sedimentation markers. Fifteen fractions
(160 µl each) were collected, and four-fifths of each fraction was
affinity purified with streptavidin-agarose (AP = affinity
purification of a fraction of the 40S region of the gradient
corresponding to fraction 15, the spliceosome [lanes 2 and 4]). After
extensive washing, precipitated snRNAs were assayed by Northern
blotting.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
In this work, we have presented the isolation and characterization
of a novel yeast U2 snRNP protein, Snu17p. Using affinity purification experiments performed during the course of the splicing reaction, we showed that Snu17p coprecipitates unspliced precursor and
spliced lariat-exon 2 intermediate. This demonstrates that Snu17p is a
component of the spliceosome at least until prior to the second
catalytic step of splicing. In addition, extracts prepared from the
knockout strain exhibited a dramatic reduction in splicing prior to the
first catalytic step. Notably, the splicing inhibition was reversed by
addition of recombinant Snu17p (Fig. 4B). This indicates that, similar
to the in vivo situation, Snu17p is required in vitro to sustain
efficient splicing and that the splicing reduction is directly due to
the lack of Snu17p. To exclude the possibility that deletion of Snu17p
inhibits splicing due to an indirect effect, such as reduced levels of
the U2 snRNA, we have analyzed the U2 snRNP lacking Snu17p by
glycerol gradient centrifugation followed by Northern blot analysis.
These experiments showed that the level of U2 snRNPs appears
normal, if not increased, in the knockout strain (data not shown). In
addition, the sedimentation behavior of the mutant U2 snRNP is
indistinguishable from that of the wild type (data not shown). An
alternative but highly likely indirect effect which would explain the
reversion of the splicing defect after addition of recombinant
Snu17p is an impaired structure or conformation of the U2
snRNP lacking Snu17p (Fig. 6b, U2* snRNP). A partially
inactive U2 snRNP due to the presence of an altered structure
could be reversed to normal after the addition of recombinant Snu17p,
and as a result, pre-mRNA splicing may also be restored. This
would explain why the deletion of Snu17p has a less drastic effect in
vivo than in vitro. In vivo, an aberrant conformation of the U2
snRNP due to the lack of Snu17p may be stabilized and compensated
by other factors which are found in an in vivo environment (physiological salt, pH, temperature, etc.). In vitro, the conformation of the weakened U2* snRNP may not be sufficiently stabilized to support a splicing reaction under the limiting assay conditions used in
the test tube.
When the products of a splicing reaction performed in
snu17
extract are analyzed on a non-denaturing gel, the
spliceosome runs as a single slowly migrating complex, complex X, which
contains the U2, U6, U5, and U4 snRNPs and a heparin-resistant U1
snRNP. A possible explanation for the formation of complex X is,
again, misfolding of the U2 snRNP in the absence of Snu17p. Figure
6b shows that the migration range of the U2 snRNP lacking Snu17p (U2* snRNP) is considerably larger than that of the wild-type U2
snRNP. It may be possible that the unexpected stabilization of the
U1 snRNP in the spliceosome after deletion of SNU17 is due to an indirect effect on the U2 snRNP, rather than to a
direct role of Snu17p in the U1-pre-mRNA interaction. If, for
example, Snu17p contributes to the correct positioning of the U2
snRNP at the branchpoint, deletion of Snu17p may lead to an
aberrant conformation of the U2-pre-mRNA structure which
is unable to displace U1. This aberrant
U1.U2-pre-mRNA complex (a pseudo-prespliceosome) would
nevertheless be capable of integrating the [U4/U6.U5] tri-snRNP; however, further rearrangements would be inhibited or greatly slowed
such that the complex does not progress to a catalytic form. Whether
the aberrant conformation of the U2* snRNP is reversed to normal
after the addition of recombinant Snu17p has not been analyzed.
However, addition of recombinant Snu17p to snu17
extracts, prior to addition of pre-mRNA, efficiently reverses
the splicing defect (Fig. 4B). When the reconstitution experiment with
recombinant Snu17p is performed and the reaction product is analyzed on
a nondenaturing gel, complex X is replaced, at least in part, by a
faster-migrating complex, which must be the active form of the spliceosome since splicing is restored (Fig. 4B and data not shown). Only further experiments may clarify this point.
It is interesting that the phenotype of the Snu17p deletion strain is
unique. In extracts prepared from strains lacking other U2 proteins,
like LEA1 and/or Y1B9/U2B", spliceosome assembly is blocked prior to the addition of the U2 snRNP (5).
In addition, strains lacking LEA1 and/or
Y1B9/U2B" contain reduced levels of U2 snRNA, while the
U2 snRNA present in extracts lacking Snu17p seems to be even more
abundant than the U2 snRNA found in the wild type (Fig. 6b). Since
we used the same amounts of wild-type and snu17
extracts
in our experiments (ca. 25 µg of proteins/2 µl of extract), we can
conclude that the levels of U2 snRNP are even increased upon
deletion of SNU17. The reason for this increase remains to
be determined.
A surprising feature of complex X is the apparent lack of stepwise
assembly. Even after a very short (5-min [Fig. 6]) incubation of
pre-mRNA in snu17
extracts, only a single complex
is detected. The formation of complex X is slow, appearing first after
2 min of incubation (data not shown). This complex already contains the
U1 and U2 snRNPs, with only very small amounts of U4-U6 and U5
snRNPs detectable. Most probably, it is very difficult, if not
impossible, to resolve the U1.U2 complex from the U1.U2.[U4/U6.U5] or
U1.U2-U6.U5 complexes in these low-resolution gels. Moreover, we do not
know what factors govern the mobility of these complexes in
electrophoresis. Likewise, the fact that complex X does not run faster
in the gel even after digestion of U6 (Fig. 6a to c, lanes 14 and 15)
may also not be surprising. On digestion of U6, the tri-snRNP
does not enter the wild-type spliceosome, and complex B, the
prespliceosome containing only the U2 snRNP, accumulates. After
digestion of U6, complex X apparently still runs in the same position.
This may be because the resulting complex contains U1 in addition to U2
and also some U5 (Fig. 6e, lanes 14 and 15). Loss of a snRNP does
not always lead to a faster-migrating behavior of splicing complexes.
For example, the yeast complex A2-1, which contains U2, U4-U6, and U5
(Fig. 5B), runs faster in nondenaturing gels than does complex A1,
which contains only U2, U6, and U5. This is presumably due to
conformational changes that are coupled with the dissociation of U4
during the transition from the A2-1 to the A1 complex (7).
We do not know which type of conformational rearrangement occurs in
complex X. However, our results provide good evidence that the
[U4/U6.U5] tri-snRNP joins the U1.U2 complex. Although the U1
snRNP appears to be hyperstabilized, the tri-snRNP nevertheless
is able to bind. Complex X appears to be similar to the "U1-hyper"
splicing intermediate observed by Staley and Guthrie (41),
where U1 and U2 remain bound in the spliceosome along with U4-U6 and U5
only when the U1:5' splice site interaction is hyperstabilized, leading
to a concomitant block of U1 and U4 dissociation. Meanwhile, Kuhn et
al. showed that U4-U6 unwinding and U1 release are both inhibited by
the mutant U4 snRNA U4-cs1 (20). Similar to these
mutations, loss of Snu17p traps U1 in the spliceosome, still allowing
the tri-snRNP to bind but blocking the release of U4. These data
also provide evidence that the [U4/U6.U5] tri-snRNP is bound to
pre-mRNA at the prespliceosome step of assembly. This was also
observed by Staley and Guthrie using a cold-sensitive mutant of Prp28p,
prp28-1. These authors showed that at 15°C
prp28-1 extracts trapped the prespliceosome and
allowed the [U4/U6.U5] snRNP to bind, although weakly, to
this intermediate (41).
Snu17p contains an RRM spanning approximately 60% of its length. Since
RRMs are found in a wide variety of proteins across species, this
complicates the search for its genuine orthologs. In our search we
found proteins homologous to Snu17p which are evolutionarily
highly conserved not only in their central region, which contains an
RRM, but also in the N-terminal part. However, since all but one are
much longer than Snu17p in their C-terminal part, we cannot
conclusively establish, without additional experimental information,
whether they are functionally related to Snu17p. The p14 protein,
the product of EST AA314241, may be the functional counterpart of
Snu17p in the human spliceosome for reasons we find very convincing:
experiments show that p14 is a human U2 snRNP-associated
protein that is also found in the U11-U12 snRNP of the minor
spliceosome (Will et al., submitted).
Since Snu17p is unequivocally a U2 snRNP protein and has an RRM, we
performed initial immunoprecipitation experiments to determine whether
it binds directly to the U2 snRNA. However, we could not reproducibly show that Snu17p binds directly to in vitro-transcribed U2
snRNA, to one of the other spliceosomal snRNAs, or to the
pre-mRNA. This suggests that Snu17p binds the U2 snRNP via
protein-protein interactions. Considering possible pre-mRNA
contacts of Snu17p, all of the human SF3a components, as well as the
SF3b subunits SAP49, SAP145, and SAP155, cross-link to the
pre-mRNA close to the branch point (13). Although
we have not analyzed whether Snu17p cross-links to the
pre-mRNA, it is worth mentioning that in human splicing
extracts, p14 can be cross-linked to the pre-mRNA at the branch
point adenosine (Will et al., submitted). Since Snu17p may be
functionally related to p14, it is conceivable that it also
directly contacts the branch point sequence.
To summarize, we have identified a novel yeast U2 snRNP protein,
Snu17p, which, despite its discernible in vitro phenotype, is not
essential in vivo. However, its genetic deletion leads to a slow-growth
phenotype and to a pre-mRNA splicing defect in vivo. Our in
vitro studies suggest that Snu17p may play a role in the
maturation of the spliceosome, since extracts lacking Snu17p accumulate an unusual splicing complex containing all five snRNPs: U1, U2, U4, U5, and U6. Loss of Snu17p, in contrast to other U2 snRNP proteins analyzed (5), allows not only the
addition of the U2 snRNP to the prespliceosome but also the
addition of the [U4/U6.U5] tri-snRNP, inhibiting the progression
of spliceosome assembly before U1 release and after tri-snRNP
addition. This phenotype is peculiar, and deletion of SNU17
can be used as a tool to isolate fully assembled spliceosomes stalled
prior to the first catalytic step of splicing and to learn more about
their protein composition.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank Cindy L. Will for helpful discussions and communication
of results prior to publication. For critical reading of the manuscript
we are grateful to Klaus Hartmuth, Reinhard Rauhut, and Cindy L. Will.
We also thank Marion Killian for expert technical assistance.
This work was supported by the Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Program and a
grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB 397, A7) to P.F and
R.L.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Cellular Biochemistry, Max-Planck-Institute of Biophysical Chemistry, Am Fassberg 11, D-37077 Göttingen, Germany. Phone: 49 551 201 1415. Fax: 49 551 201 1197. E-mail: pfabriz1{at}gwdg.de.
Present address: Department of Biology, University of California,
San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0349.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Altschul, S. F.,
W. Gish,
W. Miller,
E. W. Myers, and D. J. Lipman.
1990.
Basic local alignment search tool.
J. Mol. Biol.
215:403-410[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Behrens, S. E.,
K. Tyc,
B. Kastner,
J. Reichelt, and R. Lührmann.
1993.
Small nuclear ribonucleoprotein (RNP) U2 contains numerous additional proteins and has a bipartite RNP structure under splicing conditions.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13:307-319[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Burd, C. G., and G. Dreyfuss.
1994.
Conserved structures and diversity of functions of RNA-binding proteins.
Science
265:615-621[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Burge, C. B.,
T. Tuschl, and P. A. Sharp.
1999.
Splicing of precursors to mRNAs by the spliceosomes, p. 525-560.
In
R. F. Gesteland, T. R. Cech, and J. F. Atkins (ed.), The RNA world, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 5.
|
Caspary, F., and B. Séraphin.
1998.
The yeast U2A'/U2B complex is required for pre-spliceosome formation.
EMBO J.
17:6348-6358[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Caspary, F.,
A. Shevchenko,
M. Wilm, and B. Séraphin.
1999.
Partial purification of the yeast U2 snRNP reveals a novel yeast pre-mRNA splicing factor required for pre-spliceosome assembly.
EMBO J.
18:3463-3474[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Cheng, S. C., and J. Abelson.
1987.
Spliceosome assembly in yeast.
Genes Dev.
1:1014-1027[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Collins, C. A., and C. Guthrie.
2000.
The question remains: Is the spliceosome a ribozyme?
Nat. Struct. Biol.
7:850-854[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Entian, K. D.,
T. Schuster,
J. H. Hegemann,
D. Becher,
H. Feldmann,
U. Guldener,
R. Gotz,
M. Hansen,
C. P. Hollenberg,
G. Jansen,
W. Kramer,
S. Klein,
P. Kotter,
J. Kricke,
H. Launhardt,
G. Mannhaupt,
A. Maierl,
P. Meyer,
W. Mewes,
T. Munder,
R. K. Niedenthal,
M. Ramezani Rad,
A. Rohmer,
A. Romer,
A. Hinnen, et al.
1999.
Functional analysis of 150 deletion mutants in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by a systematic approach.
Mol. Gen. Genet.
262:683-702[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Fabrizio, P.,
D. S. McPheeters, and J. Abelson.
1989.
In vitro assembly of yeast U6 snRNP: a functional assay.
Genes Dev.
3:2137-2150[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Gottschalk, A.,
G. Neubauer,
J. Banroques,
M. Mann,
R. Lührmann, and P. Fabrizio.
1999.
Identification by mass spectrometry and functional analysis of novel proteins of the yeast [U4/U6.U5] tri-snRNP.
EMBO J.
18:4535-4548[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Gottschalk, A.,
J. Tang,
O. Puig,
J. Salgado,
G. Neubauer,
H. V. Colot,
M. Mann,
B. Séraphin,
M. Rosbash,
R. Lührmann, and P. Fabrizio.
1998.
A comprehensive biochemical and genetic analysis of the yeast U1 snRNP reveals five novel proteins.
RNA
4:374-393[Abstract].
|
| 13.
|
Gozani, O.,
R. Feld, and R. Reed.
1996.
Evidence that sequence-independent binding of highly conserved U2 snRNP proteins upstream of the branch site is required for assembly of spliceosomal complex A.
Genes Dev.
10:233-243[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Igel, H.,
S. Wells,
R. Perriman, and M. Ares, Jr.
1998.
Conservation of structure and subunit interactions in yeast homologues of splicing factor 3b (SF3b) subunits.
RNA
4:1-10[Abstract].
|
| 15.
|
Kandels-Lewis, S., and B. Séraphin.
1993.
Involvement of U6 snRNA in 5' splice site selection.
Science
262:2035-2039[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Konarska, M. M., and P. A. Sharp.
1988.
Association of U2, U4, U5, and U6 small nuclear ribonucleoproteins in a spliceosome-type complex in absence of precursor RNA.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
85:5459-5462[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 17.
|
Konarska, M. M., and P. A. Sharp.
1986.
Electrophoretic separation of complexes involved in the splicing of precursors to mRNAs.
Cell
46:845-855[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Konforti, B. B.,
M. J. Koziolkiewicz, and M. M. Konarska.
1993.
Disruption of base pairing between the 5' splice site and the 5' end of U1 snRNA is required for spliceosome assembly.
Cell
75:863-873[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Krämer, A.
1996.
The structure and function of proteins involved in mammalian pre-mRNA splicing.
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
65:367-409[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Kuhn, A. N.,
Z. Li, and D. A. Brow.
1999.
Splicing factor Prp8 governs U4/U6 RNA unwinding during activation of the spliceosome.
Mol. Cell
3:65-75[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Lesser, C. F., and C. Guthrie.
1993.
Mutations in U6 snRNA that alter splice site specificity: implications for the active site.
Science
262:1982-1988[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Lin, R. J.,
A. J. Newman,
S. C. Cheng, and J. Abelson.
1985.
Yeast mRNA splicing in vitro.
J. Biol. Chem.
260:14780-14792[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Madhani, H. D., and C. Guthrie.
1992.
A novel base-pairing interaction between U2 and U6 snRNAs suggests a mechanism for the catalytic activation of the spliceosome.
Cell
71:803-817[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Michaud, S., and R. Reed.
1991.
An ATP-independent complex commits pre-mRNA to the mammalian spliceosome assembly pathway.
Genes Dev.
5:2534-2546[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Moore, M. J.,
C. C. Query, and P. A. Sharp.
1993.
Splicing of precursors to mRNA by the spliceosome, p. 303-357.
In
A. Gesteland (ed.), RNA world. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 26.
|
Neubauer, G.,
A. Gottschalk,
P. Fabrizio,
B. Séraphin,
R. Lührmann, and M. Mann.
1997.
Identification of the proteins of the yeast U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein complex by mass spectrometry.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:385-390[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 27.
|
Nilsen, T. W.
1994.
RNA-RNA interactions in the spliceosome: unraveling the ties that bind.
Cell
78:1-4[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 28.
|
Pauling, M. H.,
D. S. McPheeters, and M. Ares, Jr.
2000.
Functional Cus1p is found with Hsh155p in a multiprotein splicing factor associated with U2 snRNA.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20:2176-2185[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 29.
|
Puig, O.,
B. Rutz,
B. G. Luukkonen,
S. Kandels-Lewis,
E. Bragado-Nilsson, and B. Séraphin.
1998.
New constructs and strategies for efficient PCR-based gene manipulations in yeast.
Yeast
14:1139-1146[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 30.
|
Rain, J. C.,
A. M. Tartakoff,
A. Kramer, and P. Legrain.
1996.
Essential domains of the PRP21 splicing factor are implicated in the binding to PRP9 and PRP11 proteins and are conserved through evolution.
RNA
2:535-550[Abstract].
|
| 31.
|
Reed, R.
2000.
Mechanisms of fidelity in pre-mRNA splicing.
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
12:340-345[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 32.
|
Rigaut, G.,
A. Shevchenko,
B. Rutz,
M. Wilm,
M. Mann, and B. Séraphin.
1999.
A generic protein purification method for protein complex characterization and proteome exploration.
Nat. Biotechnol.
17:1030-1032[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 33.
|
Rosbash, M., and B. Séraphin.
1991.
Who's on first? The U1 snRNP-5' splice site interaction and splicing.
Trends Biochem. Sci.
16:187-190[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 34.
|
Ruby, S. W., and J. Abelson.
1988.
An early hierarchic role of U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein in spliceosome assembly.
Science
242:1028-1035[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 35.
|
Salgado-Garrido, J.,
E. Bragado-Nilsson,
S. Kandels-Lewis, and B. Séraphin.
1999.
Sm and Sm-like proteins assemble in two related complexes of deep evolutionary origin.
EMBO J.
18:3451-3462[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 36.
|
Sawa, H., and J. Abelson.
1992.
Evidence for a base-pairing interaction between U6 small nuclear RNA and 5' splice site during the splicing reaction in yeast.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
89:11269-11273[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 37.
|
Séraphin, B.,
L. Kretzner, and M. Rosbash.
1988.
A U1 snRNA:pre-mRNA base pairing interaction is required early in yeast spliceosome assembly but does not uniquely define the 5' cleavage site.
EMBO J.
7:2533-2538[Medline].
|
| 38.
|
Séraphin, B., and M. Rosbash.
1989.
Identification of functional U1 snRNA-pre-mRNA complexes committed to spliceosome assembly and splicing.
Cell
59:349-358[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 39.
|
Siliciano, P. G., and C. Guthrie.
1988.
5' splice site selection in yeast: genetic alterations in base-pairing with U1 reveal additional requirements.
Genes Dev.
2:1258-1267[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 40.
|
Staley, J. P., and C. Guthrie.
1998.
Mechanical devices of the spliceosome: motors, clocks, springs, and things.
Cell
92:315-326[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 41.
|
Staley, J. P., and C. Guthrie.
1999.
An RNA switch at the 5' splice site requires ATP and the DEAD box protein Prp28p.
Mol. Cell
3:55-64[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 42.
|
Stevens, S. W., and J. Abelson.
1999.
Purification of the yeast U4/U6.U5 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particle and identification of its proteins.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
96:7226-7231[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 43.
|
Tang, J.,
N. Abovich, and M. Rosbash.
1996.
Identification and characterization of a yeast gene encoding the U2 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particle B" protein.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16:2787-2795[Abstract].
|
| 44.
|
Wassarman, D. A., and J. A. Steitz.
1992.
Interactions of small nuclear RNA's with precursor messenger RNA during in vitro splicing.
Science
257:1918-1925[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 45.
|
Wells, S. E.,
M. Neville,
M. Haynes,
J. Wang,
H. Igel, and M. Ares, Jr.
1996.
CUS1, a suppressor of cold-sensitive U2 snRNA mutations, is a novel yeast splicing factor homologous to human SAP 145.
Genes Dev.
10:220-232[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 46.
|
Will, C. L., and R. Lührmann.
1997.
Protein functions in pre-mRNA splicing.
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
9:320-328[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 47.
|
Yan, D., and M. Ares, Jr.
1996.
Invariant U2 RNA sequences bordering the branchpoint recognition region are essential for interaction with yeast SF3a and SF3b subunits.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16:818-828[Abstract].
|
| 48.
|
Yan, D.,
R. Perriman,
H. Igel,
K. J. Howe,
M. Neville, and M. Ares, Jr.
1998.
CUS2, a yeast homolog of human Tat-SF1, rescues function of misfolded U2 through an unusual RNA recognition motif.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:5000-5009[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 49.
|
Zhuang, Y., and A. M. Weiner.
1986.
A compensatory base change in U1 snRNA suppresses a 5' splice site mutation.
Cell
46:827-835[CrossRef][Medline].
|
Molecular and Cellular Biology, May 2001, p. 3037-3046, Vol. 21, No. 9
0270-7306/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/MCB.21.9.3037-3046.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Brooks, M. A., Dziembowski, A., Quevillon-Cheruel, S., Henriot, V., Faux, C., van Tilbeurgh, H., Seraphin, B.
(2009). Structure of the yeast Pml1 splicing factor and its integration into the RES complex. Nucleic Acids Res
37: 129-143
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Trowitzsch, S., Weber, G., Luhrmann, R., Wahl, M. C.
(2008). An Unusual RNA Recognition Motif Acts as a Scaffold for Multiple Proteins in the Pre-mRNA Retention and Splicing Complex. J. Biol. Chem.
283: 32317-32327
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hausmann, S., Zheng, S., Costanzo, M., Brost, R. L., Garcin, D., Boone, C., Shuman, S., Schwer, B.
(2008). Genetic and Biochemical Analysis of Yeast and Human Cap Trimethylguanosine Synthase: FUNCTIONAL OVERLAP OF 2,2,7-TRIMETHYLGUANOSINE CAPS, SMALL NUCLEAR RIBONUCLEOPROTEIN COMPONENTS, PRE-mRNA SPLICING FACTORS, AND RNA DECAY PATHWAYS. J. Biol. Chem.
283: 31706-31718
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Balzer, R. J., Henry, M. F.
(2008). Snu56p Is Required for Mer1p-Activated Meiotic Splicing. Mol. Cell. Biol.
28: 2497-2508
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Wang, Q., He, J., Lynn, B., Rymond, B. C.
(2005). Interactions of the Yeast SF3b Splicing Factor. Mol. Cell. Biol.
25: 10745-10754
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Spingola, M., Armisen, J., Ares, M. Jr
(2004). Mer1p is a modular splicing factor whose function depends on the conserved U2 snRNP protein Snu17p. Nucleic Acids Res
32: 1242-1250
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Wang, Q., Rymond, B. C.
(2003). Rds3p Is Required for Stable U2 snRNP Recruitment to the Splicing Apparatus. Mol. Cell. Biol.
23: 7339-7349
[Abstract]
[Full Text]