Molecular and Cellular Biology, May 2001, p. 3037-3046, Vol. 21, No. 9
0270-7306/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/MCB.21.9.3037-3046.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Department of Cellular Biochemistry, Max-Planck-Institute of Biophysical Chemistry, D-37077 Göttingen,1 and EMBL, D-69117 Heidelberg,2 Germany
Received 6 November 2000/Returned for modification 8 December 2000/Accepted 8 February 2001
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We have isolated and microsequenced Snu17p, a novel yeast protein
with a predicted molecular mass of 17 kDa that contains an RNA
recognition motif. We demonstrate that Snu17p binds specifically to the
U2 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein (snRNP) and that it is part of the
spliceosome, since the pre-mRNA and the lariat-exon 2 are
specifically coprecipitated with Snu17p. Although the SNU17 gene is not essential, its knockout leads to a slow-growth phenotype and to a pre-mRNA splicing defect in vivo. In addition, the first step
of splicing is dramatically decreased in extracts prepared from the
snu17 deletion (snu17
) mutant. This defect
is efficiently reversed by the addition of recombinant Snu17p. To
investigate the step of spliceosome assembly at which Snu17p acts, we
have used nondenaturing gel electrophoresis. In Snu17p-deficient
extracts, the spliceosome runs as a single slowly migrating complex. In wild-type extracts, usually at least two distinct complexes are observed: the prespliceosome, or B complex, containing the U2 but not
the U1 snRNP, and the catalytically active spliceosome, or A complex,
containing the U2, U6, and U5 snRNPs. Northern blot analysis and
affinity purification of the snu17
spliceosome showed that it contains the U1, U2, U6, U5, and U4 snRNPs. The unexpected stabilization of the U1 snRNP and the lack of dissociation of the U4
snRNP suggest that loss of Snu17p inhibits the progression of
spliceosome assembly prior to U1 snRNP release and after [U4/U6.U5] tri-snRNP addition.
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Nuclear pre-mRNA splicing occurs via a two-step transesterification reaction that is catalyzed by a multicomponent complex termed the spliceosome (25). The spliceosome is built by the ordered association of the U1, U2, U4, U5, and U6 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particles (snRNPs) and extrinsic protein factors with the pre-mRNA (reviewed in references 19, 25, 40, and 46). Each individual snRNP contains a unique set of particle-specific proteins and seven common Sm proteins, while the U6 snRNP contains a unique set of Sm-like (Lsm) proteins. The U5, U4, and U6 snRNPs form a trimeric complex in which the U4 and U6 snRNAs are extensively base paired.
The spliceosome is a highly dynamic molecular machine, forming anew on each pre-mRNA substrate in an ordered manner (4, 40). First, the U1 snRNP binds the pre-mRNA by interacting with the 5' splice site (34, 38), leading to the formation of commitment complexes in yeast (33, 38) and the E complex in mammals (24). The U2 snRNP, which interacts with the pre-mRNA branchpoint region, is then added in an ATP-dependent step, resulting in the formation of the prespliceosome (reviewed in reference 25). Finally, U4, U5, and U6 snRNPs, preassembled in a single particle, join the prespliceosome to form the mature spliceosome, in which the pre-mRNA splicing reaction occurs. Several rearrangements then take place that activate the spliceosome for the two catalytic steps of splicing. For example, U1 and U4 are destabilized and the spliceosome is activated for catalysis (4). The first splicing reaction creates two intermediates, a cleaved upstream exon and an intron-downstream exon in a branched "lariat" configuration. The second splicing reaction results in the ligation of the exons and excision of the lariat-intron. The spliceosome then disassembles, and the products of the reaction are released.
As mentioned above, at the molecular level the assembly pathway involves rearrangements of RNA-RNA interactions, many of which must be disrupted to allow the formation of others (27, 40). After the 5' splice site is recognized by U1 through base pairing (37, 39, 49), this interaction must be replaced by a mutually exclusive interaction with U6 (15, 18, 21, 36, 44). Similarly, the base-pairing interaction between U4 and U6 must be disrupted to allow the U2-U6 interaction, which comprises a major element of the spliceosome's catalytic core (23). These rearrangements are thought to be critical for activating the spliceosome for the catalytic steps of splicing. Notably, the DEAD-box ATPase Prp28p was identified as a potential mediator of the U1-to-U6 switch, perhaps by unwinding either the U1-5' splice site duplex or the U4-U6 duplex (41). In addition, a mutation in U4 snRNA, which blocks U4-U6 unwinding as well as U1 release, can be suppressed by a specific mutation in the U5 snRNP protein Prp8p (20).
These and other data indicate that snRNP proteins play a key role in triggering the activation of the spliceosome and in spliceosome assembly (8). Some of these proteins were identified genetically in yeast, while others were characterized biochemically in various systems. Using these tools, the yeast U1 snRNP and the [U4/U5.U6] tri-snRNP recently have been extensively characterized (11, 12, 26, 32, 42). In contrast, our knowledge of the yeast U2 snRNP is less comprehensive, since a distinct U2 snRNP equivalent to the human U2 snRNP could only be partially purified from yeast (6). This led to the identification of a novel essential splicing factor, Rse1p/Snu154p, the yeast ortholog of the human protein SAP130, which is one of the subunits of the heteromeric U2 snRNP-associated splicing factor SF3b (6, 11). The human U2 snRNP contains nine characterized specific proteins besides the seven common Sm proteins (2). Sequence analysis revealed that homologs of all these proteins exist in yeast (5, 35, 43). Yib9p and Lea1p are the orthologs of metazoan U2B" and U2A', respectively (5, 43). Cus2p is also a yeast U2 snRNP-associated protein but apparently does not have a human counterpart that associates with the human U2 snRNP (48). Based on several criteria, the PRP9, PRP11, and PRP21 gene products are homologs of the mammalian SF3a subunits; Hsh49p, Cus1p, and ySAP155, together with Rse1p (Snu154p), are homologs of the mammalian SF3b subunits (14, 28, 30, 31, 45, 47).
Although considerable progress has been made in identifying the critical RNA-RNA and RNA-protein interactions required for splicing, little is understood about the factors mediating the structural dynamics. While characterizing the yeast [U4/U6.U5] tri-snRNP proteins, we identified several U1 and U2 snRNP-specific proteins in our tri-snRNP preparations, which probably were due to the small amounts of copurifying U1 and U2 snRNPs (11). Here, we describe the characterization of one of these proteins with a predicted molecular mass of 17 kDa encoded by open reading frame YIR005w. This protein, named Snu17p, contains an RNA recognition motif (RRM). We show that Snu17p is specifically associated with the U2 snRNP and is an intrinsic component of prespliceosomes and spliceosomes, even after the first catalytic step of splicing has occurred. Deletion of the SNU17 gene leads to a slow-growth phenotype and to a splicing defect in vivo and in vitro. We demonstrate that the in vitro splicing defect is due to the lack of Snu17p since it can be specifically reversed by addition of recombinant protein. Analysis of spliceosomal complexes shows that in extracts lacking Snu17p an unusual complex accumulates that contains U1, U2, U4, U5, and U6 snRNPs. Thus, deletion of Snu17p traps the prespliceosome and allows the [U4/U6.U5] tri-snRNP to bind to this intermediate. However, progression to a more mature form of the spliceosome is inhibited.
| |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Yeast strains and plasmids.
A yeast strain expressing the
Snu17p protein with a C-terminal protein A tag was created using a
PCR-based strategy as previously described (11, 29). The
SNU17 3' untranslated region (3'-UTR) was amplified from
yeast genomic DNA using oligonucleotides B1 and B2. This construct was
ligated to the protA-TRP1 cassette from plasmid pBS1173,
cleaved with XhoI, and filled in with Klenow fragment. The
DNA cassette encoding the protein A tag and carrying the
TRP1 marker gene and the SNU17 3'-UTR was then
amplified by PCR from the ligation mixture using oligonucleotide B3,
which is homologous to the 3'-end of the SNU17 coding region
and eliminates the stop codon, and oligonucleotide B2. The PCR product
was transformed into strain TR2 (MATa trp1-
1
his3-
ura3-52 lys2-801 ade2-101) to give rise to strain AGY9.
strain was isolated (AGY21) (trp1-
1
his3-
ura3-52 lys2-801 ade2-101
snu17
::HIS3).
Expression and purification of GST-Snu17p fusion protein.
The coding region of SNU17 was amplified by PCR from yeast
genomic DNA using oligonucleotides SNU17 up BamHI and
SNU17 low XhoI. The PCR product was cut with
BamHI and XhoI and ligated into vector pGEX-4T1
(Amersham-Pharmacia) between the respective restriction sites. This
plasmid was transformed into Escherichia coli strain BL21.
Glutathione S-transferase (GST)-Snu17p fusion protein was
overexpressed and purified as specified by the manufacturer (Amersham-Pharmacia). It was subsequently dialyzed against buffer D150
(20 mM HEPES-KOH [pH 7.9], 150 mM KCl, 8% glycerol, 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol) and stored in
small aliquots at
80°C.
Immunoprecipitation, Northern analysis, and primer extension. Splicing extracts were prepared from strain AGY9, essentially as described previously (22). A 20-µl volume of immunoglobulin G (IgG)-agarose (Sigma) was washed with buffer NET-2 75 (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 75 mM NaCl, 0.05% NP-40) and used to precipitate Snu17p-ProtA from 50 µl of extract for 1.5 h at 4°C. The beads were then washed three times with 1.5 ml of NET-2 75. Parallel precipitations were washed with NET-2 buffers containing 150, 225, 300, or 375 mM NaCl. As control, extract from the isogenic strain TR2 was precipitated with IgG beads. The beads were then incubated with proteinase K for 15 min at 37°C. The copreciptated snRNAs were subsequently extracted with phenol-chloroform-isoamyl alcohol (50:49:1) and separated by electrophoresis on a denaturing gel containing 6 M urea and 8% polyacrylamide. After the gels were blotted to a nylon membrane (Quiagen), which was UV irradiated for 3 min, Northern analysis with uniformly radiolabeled DNA probes specific for the U1, U2, U4, U5, and U6 snRNAs was performed. In vivo accumulation of unspliced pre-U3A and pre-U3B RNA transcripts was assayed by primer extension, as described previously (11).
In vitro splicing complementation with recombinant Snu17p,
precipitation of splicing-reaction products, nondenaturing gels, and
affinity purification of spliceosomes.
Splicing reactions were
performed as described previously (22), generally using
actin pre-mRNA transcribed in the presence of
[
-32P]UTP. When splicing extracts were complemented
with recombinant GST-Snu17p protein, 50 ng of protein (1.2 pmol) in 0.5 µl of buffer D150 per 5 µl of reaction mixture was used. As a
control, only 0.5 µl of buffer D150 was added.
Oligonucleotides used in this work. The following oligonucleotides were used: B1 (5'-ATAATTTTTTCTTTCATC-3'), B2 (5'-GCTACTGCCGTGCAAAAA-3'), B3 (5'-AAGAACAATGCTGAGAAACTCATTTTGGCTAAAAAGGACCAACCACCTCCGCTGGAGCTCAAAAC-3'), SNU17 5'-up (5'-GAAGAGCTGAAGCAATGA-3'), SNU17 5'-low (5'-TTCTAGATGTACACCGCCGAATTGCACGCTGCACTT-3'), SNU17 3'-up (5'-TCGATACGACGTCCCGCCGAACAATGCTGAGAAACTC-3'), SNU17 3'-low (5'-AGCTTTAGCTGGAGGCGT-3'), HIS3 up BsrGI (5'-GGCGGTGTACATCTAGAAAGAGCTTGGTG-3'), HIS3 low AatII (5'-GGCGGGACGTCGTATCGAGTTCAAGAGAA-3'), SNU17 up BamHI (5'-GGCGGGGATCCAACAAAATTCAGCAAATC-3'), and SNU17 low XhoI (5'-GGCGGCTCGAGTTAATTTGGTTGGTCCTT-3').
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Snu17p contains an RRM.
We have recently isolated the yeast
[U4/U6.U5] tri-snRNP using two affinity chromatography steps
(11). Subsequently, by glycerol gradient centrifugation we
could partially separate the [U4/U6.U5] tri-snRNP from
contaminating U1 and U2 snRNPs. Thirty-four protein bands with
molecular masses ranging from ca. 10 to 200 kDa and comigrating with
the U4, U5, and U6 snRNAs were identified. Peptides generated
proteolytically from these bands were analyzed by mass spectrometry and
database searching. Twenty-eight distinct proteins were shown to be
specifically associated with the [U4/U6.U5] tri-snRNP. Two of the
remaining proteins were identified as U2-specific proteins, Hsh49p
(14) and Rse1p (6, 11). Both are subunits of
the heteromeric, U2 snRNP-associated splicing factor SF3b. In
addition to the proteins of the [U4/U6.U5] tri-snRNP and these two U2 snRNP proteins, we identified a novel protein which we named Snu17p. This protein contains an RNA recognition
motif or RRM (Fig. 1) (3).
|
Snu17p is a U2 snRNP protein.
To investigate whether
Snu17p is stably associated with one of the snRNP particles, we
added a cassette coding for two IgG binding units of
Staphylococcus aureus protein A (29) downstream of the SNU17 coding sequence in vivo. Splicing extracts were
prepared and used in immunoprecipitation experiments.
Immunoprecipitation reactions were performed with extracts containing
protein A-tagged Snu17p (Snu17p-protA) and control extracts obtained
from an isogenic strain containing untagged protein and then washed at
increasing salt concentrations. Subsequently, the precipitated
snRNAs were identified by Northern blot analysis. The U2 snRNA
coprecipitated with Snu17p in a specific manner (Fig.
2). The amount of coprecipitated U2
snRNP only slightly decreased, increasing the NaCl concentration from 75 to 375 mM KCl. Only background U1 snRNA was coprecipitated (Fig. 2, compare with the control extract [No tag] and with the total
RNA [lane 11]). Also, very small amounts of U5L, U5S, U4, and U6
snRNAs were coprecipitated at all salt concentrations tested. This
is most probably due to the interaction of the U2 snRNP with the
tri-snRNP (11, 16). This experiment demonstrates that Snu17p is stably and specifically associated with the U2 snRNP even
at high salt concentrations. Therefore, we have named this protein
Snu17p, for the "snurp" protein of 17 kDa.
|
Snu17p is associated with the spliceosome during splicing in
vitro.
To learn more about Snu17p interactions, we investigated
whether Snu17p is associated with the spliceosome during the course of
a splicing reaction in vitro. We therefore used the Snu17p-protA extract and the untagged control extract to perform in vitro splicing with labeled actin and U3 pre-mRNAs (Fig.
3). Aliquots of the splicing-reaction
mixtures were removed after 20 and 40 min and analyzed for
splicing activity. After 40 min the remaining splicing-reaction mixture
was immunoprecipitated using IgG-agarose beads (Fig. 3). Significant
amounts of the pre-mRNA were coprecipitated from the extracts
containing Snu17p-protA (Fig. 3, lanes 6 and 12) but not from the
control extract containing untagged Snu17p (lanes 3 and 9). Using
either of the two precursors, significant amounts of the lariat-exon 2 intermediate were also coprecipitated (lanes 6 and 12). This suggests
that Snu17p, as part of the U2 snRNP, associates with the
pre-mRNA in the prespliceosome. Moreover, Snu17p is also part
of the catalytically active spliceosome, since it is associated with
the lariat-exon 2 intermediate, which is formed during the first step
of the pre-mRNA splicing reaction (lanes 6 and 12). Since
Snu17p associates with spliceosomes assembled on at least two
precursors, actin and U3 pre-mRNAs, this indicates that it is a
general splicing factor.
|
Deletion of SNU17 confers a slow-growth phenotype.
In view of the results obtained above, we were interested in
determining whether Snu17p is essential for cell viability. We performed a genetic knockout of the SNU17 gene in a diploid
strain by replacing its coding sequence with the HIS3 marker
gene. After sporulation and tetrad dissection of this strain at 25°C,
we observed that all four spores were viable, demonstrating that this
gene is not essential for vegetative cell growth (data not
shown). However, we noticed that two spores in each tetrad grew slower (data not shown). These spores carried the HIS3 marker,
indicating that the strains lacking SNU17
(snu17
) were viable but impaired for vegetative growth
at 25°C. We then isolated haploid cells carrying
snu17
and tested their growth ability at 17, 30, and 37°C. The slow-growth phenotype of these cells was not apparently exacerbated by increasing or lowering the temperature, compared to that
of an isogenic wild-type strain grown at the same temperature. At each
temperature, the snu17
::HIS3 cells
grew about 1.3-fold slower than the wild-type cells did (data not
shown). An identical phenotype was observed by Entian et al., who
systematically studied S. cerevisiae genes of unknown
function (9). After deletion of YIR005w ORF,
which corresponds to SNU17, they observed a reduced growth
rate on glucose and on several other fermentable carbon sources and alterations in the cell cycle, with an increased proportion of cells with 1n DNA content compared to the wild type
(9). Although Snu17p is not essential for vegetative
cell growth, we have shown that it is present in the spliceosome
during the course of the splicing reaction at least prior to the
second step of splicing (Fig. 3; also see above). It was therefore
interesting to determine whether the deletion of SNU17 had
an effect on splicing in vivo and in vitro.
Deletion of SNU17 leads to a pre-mRNA splicing
defect in vivo and to inhibition of splicing prior to the first
catalytic step in vitro.
We determined whether SNU17 is
required for pre-mRNA splicing in vivo by measuring the levels
of unspliced U3A and U3B transcripts in cells grown at 25 and 37°C,
respectively. Figure 4A shows the results
of a primer extension analysis of U3 transcripts from wild-type and
snu17
cells. A slight but higher than background accumulation of unspliced pre-U3A and pre-U3B transcripts was found (Fig. 4A, lane 3) (snu17
), in comparison to the
parental control (lane 1). The splicing defect was exacerbated after
the cells were switched for 2 and 4 h from 25 to 37°C (compare
lane 2 with lanes 4 and 5). Thus, although deletion of SNU17
does not lead to a discernible temperature-sensitive phenotype, it does cause a splicing defect which is intensified by increasing the temperature.
|
strain and compared its ability to carry out
splicing in vitro with that of a wild-type extract. We performed in
vitro splicing reactions at 25°C and withdrew aliquots of the
reaction mixtures at 1, 5, 15, and 25 min. (Figure 4B). The deletion of
SNU17 led to a dramatic decrease in splicing prior to the
first step (Fig. 4B, compare lanes 9 to 12 with lanes 1 to 4). To
determine whether this reduction was due specifically to the lack of
Snu17p, we tested whether the splicing activity of the extract lacking
Snu17p could be restored by adding recombinant GST-Snu17p to the
splicing-reaction mixture. We therefore performed splicing in the
presence of GST-Snu17p, which was preincubated with the wild-type and
snu17
extracts prior to the addition of the
pre-mRNA. With the snu17
extract, the addition of
recombinant Snu17p efficiently reversed the splicing defect (Fig. 4B,
lanes 13 to 16). Addition of recombinant Snu17p to the wild-type
extract did not have any detectable effect (lanes 5 to 8). We conclude
that the in vitro splicing defect is due to the specific loss of
Snu17p and not to an indirect effect, such as loss of another factor in
addition to Snu17p or instability and degradation of the U2 snRNA.
Deletion of SNU17 leads to accumulation of an unusual
spliceosomal complex.
To investigate the step of spliceosome
assembly at which Snu17p acts, we separated spliceosomal complexes by
electrophoresis on nondenaturing polyacrylamide gels. Spliceosomal
complexes were assembled at 30°C on 32P-labeled
actin pre-mRNA, using wild-type and snu17
extracts (Fig. 5A). Interestingly, the
lack of SNU17 led to the formation of a single, slowly
migrating complex, which we named complex X (Fig. 5A, lanes 5 and 6).
This complex had already accumulated after 10 min of incubation. Under
the same conditions, at least two distinct complexes were formed in
wild-type extracts: the B and A complexes. A third complex, A1, was
usually less abundant (lanes 2 and 3). Previous analysis of the B
complex (7) showed that it contains the U2 snRNP but
not the U1 snRNP, which is only loosely bound and is lost from
complex B due to heparin treatment (7, 17). The A complex
(named A2-1 and A2-2 at early and later incubation times, respectively)
and the A1 complex usually contain the U2 and [U4/U6.U5] snRNPs
or the U2, U6, and U5 snRNPs, respectively (Fig. 5B gives a
summary).
|
|
extract was
treated to destroy U6, the latter completely disappeared from complex X
(Fig. 6d, lanes 14 and 15). However, U5 still appeared to be present
(Fig. 6e, lanes 14 and 15).
Since the U5 and U4 snRNP were never clearly detected by this
method, as an independent assay to support the existence of the
[U4/U6.U5] tri-snRNP in complex X, we have purified
spliceosomes that were assembled onto biotinylated
pre-mRNA in vitro. Splicing-reaction mixtures were
incubated with biotinylated unlabeled substrate using either
wild-type or snu17
extracts (Fig.
7). Spliceosomal complexes were then
fractionated by centrifugation on a 10 to 30% glycerol gradient, and
their RNA composition was analyzed following precipitation with
streptavidin beads (Fig. 7, lanes 2 and 4). The snRNAs present in
gradient-fractionated spliceosomes precipitated with streptavidin (the
ca. 40S region of the gradient [lanes 2 and 4]), as well as the input
of the total snRNPs before incubation and fractionation, were
assayed by Northern blot analysis (lanes 1 and 3). The
snu17
spliceosome contained large amounts of U1, U2, and
U5 but smaller amounts of U4 and U6 snRNAs (lane 4). Note that the
U4 and U6 snRNA were in general not well represented in both
extracts. One reason may be that the U6 and U4 probes had a lower
specific activity than the U1, U2, and U5 probes in some of our
experiments. The snRNA composition of the wild-type spliceosome
indicates that it contains in proportion slightly less U2 but much less
U1 than the snu17
spliceosome (Fig. 7, compare lane 2 with lane 4). Importantly, the wild-type spliceosome has released U4,
since the U4 snRNA is not detectable (lane 2). However, the
snu17
spliceosome does contain detectable levels of U4
(lane 4). The controls show that the total snRNA contents of the
wild-type and snu17
extracts before spliceosome assembly, gradient fractionation, and affinity purification are practically indistinguishable, including the lower levels of the U4 and U6 snRNAs (compare lane 1 with lane 3). In summary, the conclusion that complex X, the snu17
spliceosome, contains all of
the snRNPs is supported and strengthened by this independent
experiment. From the combination of these experiments, we conclude that
complex X contains the U2, U6, U5, and U4 snRNPs and, unusually, a
U1 snRNP that is stably associated with the complex even after
treatment with heparin. The unexpected stabilization of the U1
snRNP and the lack of release of the U4 snRNP in spliceosomes
lacking Snu17p suggest that deletion of Snu17p inhibits the progression
of spliceosome assembly prior to U1 snRNP release and after
[U4/U6.U5] tri-snRNP addition.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In this work, we have presented the isolation and characterization of a novel yeast U2 snRNP protein, Snu17p. Using affinity purification experiments performed during the course of the splicing reaction, we showed that Snu17p coprecipitates unspliced precursor and spliced lariat-exon 2 intermediate. This demonstrates that Snu17p is a component of the spliceosome at least until prior to the second catalytic step of splicing. In addition, extracts prepared from the knockout strain exhibited a dramatic reduction in splicing prior to the first catalytic step. Notably, the splicing inhibition was reversed by addition of recombinant Snu17p (Fig. 4B). This indicates that, similar to the in vivo situation, Snu17p is required in vitro to sustain efficient splicing and that the splicing reduction is directly due to the lack of Snu17p. To exclude the possibility that deletion of Snu17p inhibits splicing due to an indirect effect, such as reduced levels of the U2 snRNA, we have analyzed the U2 snRNP lacking Snu17p by glycerol gradient centrifugation followed by Northern blot analysis. These experiments showed that the level of U2 snRNPs appears normal, if not increased, in the knockout strain (data not shown). In addition, the sedimentation behavior of the mutant U2 snRNP is indistinguishable from that of the wild type (data not shown). An alternative but highly likely indirect effect which would explain the reversion of the splicing defect after addition of recombinant Snu17p is an impaired structure or conformation of the U2 snRNP lacking Snu17p (Fig. 6b, U2* snRNP). A partially inactive U2 snRNP due to the presence of an altered structure could be reversed to normal after the addition of recombinant Snu17p, and as a result, pre-mRNA splicing may also be restored. This would explain why the deletion of Snu17p has a less drastic effect in vivo than in vitro. In vivo, an aberrant conformation of the U2 snRNP due to the lack of Snu17p may be stabilized and compensated by other factors which are found in an in vivo environment (physiological salt, pH, temperature, etc.). In vitro, the conformation of the weakened U2* snRNP may not be sufficiently stabilized to support a splicing reaction under the limiting assay conditions used in the test tube.
When the products of a splicing reaction performed in
snu17
extract are analyzed on a non-denaturing gel, the
spliceosome runs as a single slowly migrating complex, complex X, which
contains the U2, U6, U5, and U4 snRNPs and a heparin-resistant U1
snRNP. A possible explanation for the formation of complex X is,
again, misfolding of the U2 snRNP in the absence of Snu17p. Figure
6b shows that the migration range of the U2 snRNP lacking Snu17p (U2* snRNP) is considerably larger than that of the wild-type U2
snRNP. It may be possible that the unexpected stabilization of the
U1 snRNP in the spliceosome after deletion of SNU17 is due to an indirect effect on the U2 snRNP, rather than to a
direct role of Snu17p in the U1-pre-mRNA interaction. If, for
example, Snu17p contributes to the correct positioning of the U2
snRNP at the branchpoint, deletion of Snu17p may lead to an
aberrant conformation of the U2-pre-mRNA structure which
is unable to displace U1. This aberrant
U1.U2-pre-mRNA complex (a pseudo-prespliceosome) would
nevertheless be capable of integrating the [U4/U6.U5] tri-snRNP; however, further rearrangements would be inhibited or greatly slowed
such that the complex does not progress to a catalytic form. Whether
the aberrant conformation of the U2* snRNP is reversed to normal
after the addition of recombinant Snu17p has not been analyzed.
However, addition of recombinant Snu17p to snu17
extracts, prior to addition of pre-mRNA, efficiently reverses
the splicing defect (Fig. 4B). When the reconstitution experiment with
recombinant Snu17p is performed and the reaction product is analyzed on
a nondenaturing gel, complex X is replaced, at least in part, by a
faster-migrating complex, which must be the active form of the spliceosome since splicing is restored (Fig. 4B and data not shown). Only further experiments may clarify this point.
It is interesting that the phenotype of the Snu17p deletion strain is
unique. In extracts prepared from strains lacking other U2 proteins,
like LEA1 and/or Y1B9/U2B", spliceosome assembly is blocked prior to the addition of the U2 snRNP (5).
In addition, strains lacking LEA1 and/or
Y1B9/U2B" contain reduced levels of U2 snRNA, while the
U2 snRNA present in extracts lacking Snu17p seems to be even more
abundant than the U2 snRNA found in the wild type (Fig. 6b). Since
we used the same amounts of wild-type and snu17
extracts
in our experiments (ca. 25 µg of proteins/2 µl of extract), we can
conclude that the levels of U2 snRNP are even increased upon
deletion of SNU17. The reason for this increase remains to
be determined.
A surprising feature of complex X is the apparent lack of stepwise
assembly. Even after a very short (5-min [Fig. 6]) incubation of
pre-mRNA in snu17
extracts, only a single complex
is detected. The formation of complex X is slow, appearing first after
2 min of incubation (data not shown). This complex already contains the
U1 and U2 snRNPs, with only very small amounts of U4-U6 and U5
snRNPs detectable. Most probably, it is very difficult, if not
impossible, to resolve the U1.U2 complex from the U1.U2.[U4/U6.U5] or
U1.U2-U6.U5 complexes in these low-resolution gels. Moreover, we do not
know what factors govern the mobility of these complexes in
electrophoresis. Likewise, the fact that complex X does not run faster
in the gel even after digestion of U6 (Fig. 6a to c, lanes 14 and 15)
may also not be surprising. On digestion of U6, the tri-snRNP
does not enter the wild-type spliceosome, and complex B, the
prespliceosome containing only the U2 snRNP, accumulates. After
digestion of U6, complex X apparently still runs in the same position.
This may be because the resulting complex contains U1 in addition to U2
and also some U5 (Fig. 6e, lanes 14 and 15). Loss of a snRNP does
not always lead to a faster-migrating behavior of splicing complexes.
For example, the yeast complex A2-1, which contains U2, U4-U6, and U5
(Fig. 5B), runs faster in nondenaturing gels than does complex A1,
which contains only U2, U6, and U5. This is presumably due to
conformational changes that are coupled with the dissociation of U4
during the transition from the A2-1 to the A1 complex (7).
We do not know which type of conformational rearrangement occurs in
complex X. However, our results provide good evidence that the
[U4/U6.U5] tri-snRNP joins the U1.U2 complex. Although the U1
snRNP appears to be hyperstabilized, the tri-snRNP nevertheless
is able to bind. Complex X appears to be similar to the "U1-hyper"
splicing intermediate observed by Staley and Guthrie (41),
where U1 and U2 remain bound in the spliceosome along with U4-U6 and U5
only when the U1:5' splice site interaction is hyperstabilized, leading
to a concomitant block of U1 and U4 dissociation. Meanwhile, Kuhn et
al. showed that U4-U6 unwinding and U1 release are both inhibited by
the mutant U4 snRNA U4-cs1 (20). Similar to these
mutations, loss of Snu17p traps U1 in the spliceosome, still allowing
the tri-snRNP to bind but blocking the release of U4. These data
also provide evidence that the [U4/U6.U5] tri-snRNP is bound to
pre-mRNA at the prespliceosome step of assembly. This was also
observed by Staley and Guthrie using a cold-sensitive mutant of Prp28p,
prp28-1. These authors showed that at 15°C
prp28-1 extracts trapped the prespliceosome and
allowed the [U4/U6.U5] snRNP to bind, although weakly, to
this intermediate (41).
Snu17p contains an RRM spanning approximately 60% of its length. Since RRMs are found in a wide variety of proteins across species, this complicates the search for its genuine orthologs. In our search we found proteins homologous to Snu17p which are evolutionarily highly conserved not only in their central region, which contains an RRM, but also in the N-terminal part. However, since all but one are much longer than Snu17p in their C-terminal part, we cannot conclusively establish, without additional experimental information, whether they are functionally related to Snu17p. The p14 protein, the product of EST AA314241, may be the functional counterpart of Snu17p in the human spliceosome for reasons we find very convincing: experiments show that p14 is a human U2 snRNP-associated protein that is also found in the U11-U12 snRNP of the minor spliceosome (Will et al., submitted).
Since Snu17p is unequivocally a U2 snRNP protein and has an RRM, we performed initial immunoprecipitation experiments to determine whether it binds directly to the U2 snRNA. However, we could not reproducibly show that Snu17p binds directly to in vitro-transcribed U2 snRNA, to one of the other spliceosomal snRNAs, or to the pre-mRNA. This suggests that Snu17p binds the U2 snRNP via protein-protein interactions. Considering possible pre-mRNA contacts of Snu17p, all of the human SF3a components, as well as the SF3b subunits SAP49, SAP145, and SAP155, cross-link to the pre-mRNA close to the branch point (13). Although we have not analyzed whether Snu17p cross-links to the pre-mRNA, it is worth mentioning that in human splicing extracts, p14 can be cross-linked to the pre-mRNA at the branch point adenosine (Will et al., submitted). Since Snu17p may be functionally related to p14, it is conceivable that it also directly contacts the branch point sequence.
To summarize, we have identified a novel yeast U2 snRNP protein, Snu17p, which, despite its discernible in vitro phenotype, is not essential in vivo. However, its genetic deletion leads to a slow-growth phenotype and to a pre-mRNA splicing defect in vivo. Our in vitro studies suggest that Snu17p may play a role in the maturation of the spliceosome, since extracts lacking Snu17p accumulate an unusual splicing complex containing all five snRNPs: U1, U2, U4, U5, and U6. Loss of Snu17p, in contrast to other U2 snRNP proteins analyzed (5), allows not only the addition of the U2 snRNP to the prespliceosome but also the addition of the [U4/U6.U5] tri-snRNP, inhibiting the progression of spliceosome assembly before U1 release and after tri-snRNP addition. This phenotype is peculiar, and deletion of SNU17 can be used as a tool to isolate fully assembled spliceosomes stalled prior to the first catalytic step of splicing and to learn more about their protein composition.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank Cindy L. Will for helpful discussions and communication of results prior to publication. For critical reading of the manuscript we are grateful to Klaus Hartmuth, Reinhard Rauhut, and Cindy L. Will. We also thank Marion Killian for expert technical assistance.
This work was supported by the Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Program and a grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB 397, A7) to P.F and R.L.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Cellular Biochemistry, Max-Planck-Institute of Biophysical Chemistry, Am Fassberg 11, D-37077 Göttingen, Germany. Phone: 49 551 201 1415. Fax: 49 551 201 1197. E-mail: pfabriz1{at}gwdg.de.
Present address: Department of Biology, University of California,
San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0349.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Altschul, S. F., W. Gish, W. Miller, E. W. Myers, and D. J. Lipman. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215:403-410[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 2. |
Behrens, S. E.,
K. Tyc,
B. Kastner,
J. Reichelt, and R. Lührmann.
1993.
Small nuclear ribonucleoprotein (RNP) U2 contains numerous additional proteins and has a bipartite RNP structure under splicing conditions.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13:307-319 |
| 3. |
Burd, C. G., and G. Dreyfuss.
1994.
Conserved structures and diversity of functions of RNA-binding proteins.
Science
265:615-621 |
| 4. | Burge, C. B., T. Tuschl, and P. A. Sharp. 1999. Splicing of precursors to mRNAs by the spliceosomes, p. 525-560. In R. F. Gesteland, T. R. Cech, and J. F. Atkins (ed.), The RNA world, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. |
| 5. | Caspary, F., and B. Séraphin. 1998. The yeast U2A'/U2B complex is required for pre-spliceosome formation. EMBO J. 17:6348-6358[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 6. | Caspary, F., A. Shevchenko, M. Wilm, and B. Séraphin. 1999. Partial purification of the yeast U2 snRNP reveals a novel yeast pre-mRNA splicing factor required for pre-spliceosome assembly. EMBO J. 18:3463-3474[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 7. |
Cheng, S. C., and J. Abelson.
1987.
Spliceosome assembly in yeast.
Genes Dev.
1:1014-1027 |
| 8. | Collins, C. A., and C. Guthrie. 2000. The question remains: Is the spliceosome a ribozyme? Nat. Struct. Biol. 7:850-854[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 9. | Entian, K. D., T. Schuster, J. H. Hegemann, D. Becher, H. Feldmann, U. Guldener, R. Gotz, M. Hansen, C. P. Hollenberg, G. Jansen, W. Kramer, S. Klein, P. Kotter, J. Kricke, H. Launhardt, G. Mannhaupt, A. Maierl, P. Meyer, W. Mewes, T. Munder, R. K. Niedenthal, M. Ramezani Rad, A. Rohmer, A. Romer, A. Hinnen, et al. 1999. Functional analysis of 150 deletion mutants in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by a systematic approach. Mol. Gen. Genet. 262:683-702[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 10. |
Fabrizio, P.,
D. S. McPheeters, and J. Abelson.
1989.
In vitro assembly of yeast U6 snRNP: a functional assay.
Genes Dev.
3:2137-2150 |
| 11. | Gottschalk, A., G. Neubauer, J. Banroques, M. Mann, R. Lührmann, and P. Fabrizio. 1999. Identification by mass spectrometry and functional analysis of novel proteins of the yeast [U4/U6.U5] tri-snRNP. EMBO J. 18:4535-4548[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 12. | Gottschalk, A., J. Tang, O. Puig, J. Salgado, G. Neubauer, H. V. Colot, M. Mann, B. Séraphin, M. Rosbash, R. Lührmann, and P. Fabrizio. 1998. A comprehensive biochemical and genetic analysis of the yeast U1 snRNP reveals five novel proteins. RNA 4:374-393[Abstract]. |
| 13. |
Gozani, O.,
R. Feld, and R. Reed.
1996.
Evidence that sequence-independent binding of highly conserved U2 snRNP proteins upstream of the branch site is required for assembly of spliceosomal complex A.
Genes Dev.
10:233-243 |
| 14. | Igel, H., S. Wells, R. Perriman, and M. Ares, Jr. 1998. Conservation of structure and subunit interactions in yeast homologues of splicing factor 3b (SF3b) subunits. RNA 4:1-10[Abstract]. |
| 15. |
Kandels-Lewis, S., and B. Séraphin.
1993.
Involvement of U6 snRNA in 5' splice site selection.
Science
262:2035-2039 |
| 16. |
Konarska, M. M., and P. A. Sharp.
1988.
Association of U2, U4, U5, and U6 small nuclear ribonucleoproteins in a spliceosome-type complex in absence of precursor RNA.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
85:5459-5462 |
| 17. | Konarska, M. M., and P. A. Sharp. 1986. Electrophoretic separation of complexes involved in the splicing of precursors to mRNAs. Cell 46:845-855[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 18. | Konforti, B. B., M. J. Koziolkiewicz, and M. M. Konarska. 1993. Disruption of base pairing between the 5' splice site and the 5' end of U1 snRNA is required for spliceosome assembly. Cell 75:863-873[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 19. | Krämer, A. 1996. The structure and function of proteins involved in mammalian pre-mRNA splicing. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 65:367-409[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 20. | Kuhn, A. N., Z. Li, and D. A. Brow. 1999. Splicing factor Prp8 governs U4/U6 RNA unwinding during activation of the spliceosome. Mol. Cell 3:65-75[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 21. |
Lesser, C. F., and C. Guthrie.
1993.
Mutations in U6 snRNA that alter splice site specificity: implications for the active site.
Science
262:1982-1988 |
| 22. |
Lin, R. J.,
A. J. Newman,
S. C. Cheng, and J. Abelson.
1985.
Yeast mRNA splicing in vitro.
J. Biol. Chem.
260:14780-14792 |
| 23. | Madhani, H. D., and C. Guthrie. 1992. A novel base-pairing interaction between U2 and U6 snRNAs suggests a mechanism for the catalytic activation of the spliceosome. Cell 71:803-817[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 24. |
Michaud, S., and R. Reed.
1991.
An ATP-independent complex commits pre-mRNA to the mammalian spliceosome assembly pathway.
Genes Dev.
5:2534-2546 |
| 25. | Moore, M. J., C. C. Query, and P. A. Sharp. 1993. Splicing of precursors to mRNA by the spliceosome, p. 303-357. In A. Gesteland (ed.), RNA world. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. |
| 26. |
Neubauer, G.,
A. Gottschalk,
P. Fabrizio,
B. Séraphin,
R. Lührmann, and M. Mann.
1997.
Identification of the proteins of the yeast U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein complex by mass spectrometry.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:385-390 |
| 27. | Nilsen, T. W. 1994. RNA-RNA interactions in the spliceosome: unraveling the ties that bind. Cell 78:1-4[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 28. |
Pauling, M. H.,
D. S. McPheeters, and M. Ares, Jr.
2000.
Functional Cus1p is found with Hsh155p in a multiprotein splicing factor associated with U2 snRNA.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20:2176-2185 |
| 29. | Puig, O., B. Rutz, B. G. Luukkonen, S. Kandels-Lewis, E. Bragado-Nilsson, and B. Séraphin. 1998. New constructs and strategies for efficient PCR-based gene manipulations in yeast. Yeast 14:1139-1146[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 30. | Rain, J. C., A. M. Tartakoff, A. Kramer, and P. Legrain. 1996. Essential domains of the PRP21 splicing factor are implicated in the binding to PRP9 and PRP11 proteins and are conserved through evolution. RNA 2:535-550[Abstract]. |
| 31. | Reed, R. 2000. Mechanisms of fidelity in pre-mRNA splicing. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 12:340-345[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 32. | Rigaut, G., A. Shevchenko, B. Rutz, M. Wilm, M. Mann, and B. Séraphin. 1999. A generic protein purification method for protein complex characterization and proteome exploration. Nat. Biotechnol. 17:1030-1032[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 33. | Rosbash, M., and B. Séraphin. 1991. Who's on first? The U1 snRNP-5' splice site interaction and splicing. Trends Biochem. Sci. 16:187-190[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 34. |
Ruby, S. W., and J. Abelson.
1988.
An early hierarchic role of U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein in spliceosome assembly.
Science
242:1028-1035 |
| 35. | Salgado-Garrido, J., E. Bragado-Nilsson, S. Kandels-Lewis, and B. Séraphin. 1999. Sm and Sm-like proteins assemble in two related complexes of deep evolutionary origin. EMBO J. 18:3451-3462[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 36. |
Sawa, H., and J. Abelson.
1992.
Evidence for a base-pairing interaction between U6 small nuclear RNA and 5' splice site during the splicing reaction in yeast.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
89:11269-11273 |
| 37. | Séraphin, B., L. Kretzner, and M. Rosbash. 1988. A U1 snRNA:pre-mRNA base pairing interaction is required early in yeast spliceosome assembly but does not uniquely define the 5' cleavage site. EMBO J. 7:2533-2538[Medline]. |
| 38. | Séraphin, B., and M. Rosbash. 1989. Identification of functional U1 snRNA-pre-mRNA complexes committed to spliceosome assembly and splicing. Cell 59:349-358[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 39. |
Siliciano, P. G., and C. Guthrie.
1988.
5' splice site selection in yeast: genetic alterations in base-pairing with U1 reveal additional requirements.
Genes Dev.
2:1258-1267 |
| 40. | Staley, J. P., and C. Guthrie. 1998. Mechanical devices of the spliceosome: motors, clocks, springs, and things. Cell 92:315-326[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 41. | Staley, J. P., and C. Guthrie. 1999. An RNA switch at the 5' splice site requires ATP and the DEAD box protein Prp28p. Mol. Cell 3:55-64[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 42. |
Stevens, S. W., and J. Abelson.
1999.
Purification of the yeast U4/U6.U5 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particle and identification of its proteins.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
96:7226-7231 |
| 43. | Tang, J., N. Abovich, and M. Rosbash. 1996. Identification and characterization of a yeast gene encoding the U2 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particle B" protein. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:2787-2795[Abstract]. |
| 44. |
Wassarman, D. A., and J. A. Steitz.
1992.
Interactions of small nuclear RNA's with precursor messenger RNA during in vitro splicing.
Science
257:1918-1925 |
| 45. |
Wells, S. E.,
M. Neville,
M. Haynes,
J. Wang,
H. Igel, and M. Ares, Jr.
1996.
CUS1, a suppressor of cold-sensitive U2 snRNA mutations, is a novel yeast splicing factor homologous to human SAP 145.
Genes Dev.
10:220-232 |
| 46. | Will, C. L., and R. Lührmann. 1997. Protein functions in pre-mRNA splicing. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 9:320-328[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 47. | Yan, D., and M. Ares, Jr. 1996. Invariant U2 RNA sequences bordering the branchpoint recognition region are essential for interaction with yeast SF3a and SF3b subunits. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:818-828[Abstract]. |
| 48. |
Yan, D.,
R. Perriman,
H. Igel,
K. J. Howe,
M. Neville, and M. Ares, Jr.
1998.
CUS2, a yeast homolog of human Tat-SF1, rescues function of misfolded U2 through an unusual RNA recognition motif.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:5000-5009 |
| 49. | Zhuang, Y., and A. M. Weiner. 1986. A compensatory base change in U1 snRNA suppresses a 5' splice site mutation. Cell 46:827-835[CrossRef][Medline]. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||