Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Molecular and Cellular Biology, May 2002, p. 3327-3338, Vol. 22, No. 10
0270-7306/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/MCB.22.10.3327-3338.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Institut für Klinische und Molekulare Virologie, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany,1 Laboratory of Molecular Microbiology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-04602
Received 10 May 2001/ Returned for modification 5 July 2001/ Accepted 18 January 2002
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 (HTLV-1) causes an aggressive and fatal disease of CD4+ T lymphocytes termed adult T-cell leukemia (ATL) and a neurodegenerative disease called HTLV-1-associated myelopathy or tropical spastic paraparesis. The leukemogenic properties of the virus are accompanied by its capacity to stimulate the growth of normal human lymphocytes in nonleukemogenic patients as well as in vitro (7, 12, 16, 19, 20). Observations made with HTLV-1-transformed cells indicate an abnormal regulation of the cell cycle. Compared to HTLV-1-negative CD4+ T cells, HTLV-1-transformed cells express decreased amounts of cyclin D3 and increased levels of the cyclin kinase inhibitor p21CIP (2, 8); interleukin 2 (IL-2)-independent HTLV-1-transformed cells display constitutive cyclinE/CDK2 activity accompanied by the depletion of the cyclin kinase inhibitor p27KIP from these kinase complexes (9).
Several lines of evidence indicate that the HTLV-1 regulatory protein p40tax is responsible for the leukocyte-transforming and oncogenic features of the virus (1, 15, 17). The growth of primary human lymphocytes conditionally immortalized by Tax depends on tax expression, demonstrating that this protein is necessary and sufficient for transformed cell growth. Moreover, the proliferation of these cells is reversibly arrested in the G1 phase when tax transcription is suppressed, thus verifying the role of Tax in the G1- to S-phase transition of immortalized T lymphocytes (42). Finally, singular expression of Tax can induce various tumors (including leukemia) in transgenic mice (17).
The mechanism by which Tax influences the growth and G1- to S-phase transition of transformed primary human T cells is not fully understood. Different Tax functions may cooperate to influence cellular growth. In addition to its function as a modulator of cellular transcription, Tax may play a role in the stimulation of host cell proliferation, since this protein affects the expression of several genes relevant to growth. It activates genes encoding proto-oncogenes, the
chain of the IL-2 receptor, cytokines (52), cyclin D2 (21, 41), and the CDK inhibitor p21CIP (8, 11). The Tax protein also represses the expression of DNA polymerase ß, an enzyme important for DNA repair (23), p18INK-4C (49), and Bax (5).
Tax directly interferes with the functions of cell cycle regulatory proteins (24). It inhibits the transactivating function of the tumor suppressor p53 (33, 36), and it binds to p16INK-4A (28, 48) as well as to cyclin D1/cyclin D3 (34). In the presence of Tax, the CDKs CDK4 and CDK6 are activated (35, 42), suggesting that this viral protein is involved in CDK4/CDK6 stimulation. Since CDK4 activity is required to respond to IL-2 (30), it could be crucial for the IL-2 responsiveness of Tax-transformed T cells. Therefore, this CDK4 stimulation may essentially contribute to mitogenic and immortalizing Tax effects. CDK activation may be explained in part by the direct binding of Tax to p16INK-4A (28, 48), an inhibitor of the CDKs CDK4 and CDK6. However, this cannot be the sole mechanism by which Tax activates CDKs, since this protein also enhances kinase activity in cells null for p16INK-4A expression (27, 34).
Many viral proteins can directly activate cellular kinases. We thus investigated whether Tax might activate CDKs through a direct physical interaction. Here we show that Tax, through its N-terminal sequences, specifically binds CDK4 in vitro and in HTLV-1-infected cells. Furthermore, we found that the association of Tax with the CDK4 holoenzyme resulted in enhanced kinase activity. Because binding-deficient Tax mutants failed to enhance CDK4 activity, we concluded that the stimulation of kinase function requires direct physical contact.
|
|
|---|
Human cyclin D3 cDNA was donated by A. Arnold, Boston, Mass. (4). A fragment containing the entire coding sequence of human cyclin D3 was isolated by PCR and cloned into the BamHI site of the pcDNA3 vector (Invitrogen, Groningen, The Netherlands). The cDNAs for CDK4, cyclin D2, and the expression construct for p21CIP were obtained from J. O. Funk, Erlangen, Germany, and P. Jansen-Dürr, Heidelberg, Germany, and inserted into pcDNA3. The CDK6 expression vector was donated by J. U. Jung, Southborough, Mass., and the CDK2 and CDK1 expression vectors were donated by H. Stöppler, National Institutes of Health. For the production of glutathione S-transferase (GST) fused to pRb, we used an expression vector that contains the Rb coding region from codons 379 to 928 and that was supplied by J. U. Jung (24). The Tax mutants were previously described (44, 47). GST-Tax mutants were constructed with pGEX vectors. The purification of proteins from Escherichia coli, including GST column chromatography, was performed according to the column manufacturer's instructions (Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden).
Rabbit antibodies to Tax were prepared against full-length recombinant Tax protein. Rabbit antibodies to CDK4, CDK6, CDK2, cyclin D2, and p21CIP were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., Santa Cruz, Calif.; the mouse antibody to cyclin D3 was obtained from Transduction Laboratories, San Diego, Calif.; and mouse antibodies to Tax were derived from the hybridoma cell lines 168B17-46-34 and 168B17-46-50 (provided by B. Langton through the AIDS Research and Reference Reagent Program, Division of AIDS, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases).
Protein binding assays. To produce an S tag-Tax-His tag fusion protein, Tax cDNA was cloned via PCR into the pET29b vector (Novagen, Darmstadt, Germany). An E. coli BL21 culture containing pET29b Tax was grown to an A600 of 0.5, and protein expression was induced for 3 h with 0.5 mM isopropyl-1-thio-ß-D-galactopyranoside. Cells were harvested by centrifugation and resuspended in 10 ml of lysis puffer (6 M guanidinium hydrochloride, 10 mM Tris [pH 8.0]) overnight at 4°C. The insoluble fraction was removed by centrifugation. The supernatant was loaded into a nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid-agarose-column (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), which subsequently was washed twice with buffer containing 8 M urea and 10 mM Tris (pH 6.0). The bound protein was removed from the agarose with elution buffer (8 M urea, 10 mM Tris [pH 8.0]), which contained increasing amounts of imidazole (50 mM to 1 M), and was collected in fractions. The fractions containing the highest Tax concentrations were incubated with S protein-agarose (Novagen) for 2 h at 4°C. Following binding, elution buffer was exchanged with radioimmunoprecipitation (RIPA) buffer (10 mM Tris [pH 7.4], 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, 1% Nonidet P-40, 0.5% desoxycholate, 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate [SDS]).
35S-methionine-labeled proteins were generated by in vitro translation with rabbit reticulocyte lysates (TnT transcription and translation kit; Promega). For affinity chromatography, comparable amounts of the in vitro translated proteins were added to 700 µl of RIPA buffer supplemented with 3% bovine serum albumin and 5 µl of S protein-agarose-bound Tax protein. The reaction mixtures were incubated at 4°C for 1 h. Bound proteins were precipitated by centrifugation, washed four times with RIPA buffer at 4°C, and recovered by boiling the beads in 25 µl of 2x loading buffer (20 mM Tris [pH 6.8], 2% SDS, 10% ß-mercaptoethanol, 20% glycerol, 0.2% bromophenol blue). Proteins were sized on an SDS-15% polyacrylamide gel, quantitated by using a phosphorimager, and visualized by autoradiography.
Transfection, coimmunoprecipitation, and immune complex kinase assay. Human 293T cells were transfected with plasmids by using Lipofectamine PLUS reagents (Life Technologies, Bethesda, Md.). For coimmunoprecipitation, the cells were lysed in buffer containing 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 10 µg of aprotinin ml-1; frozen; thawed; and clarified by centrifugation (10,000 x g for 15 min at 4°C). The protein supernatant (0.5 to 1 mg) was immunoprecipitated with 1 µg of the corresponding antibody by incubation for 1 h at 4°C, and the immune complexes were collected by using either protein A-Sepharose CL-4B (Pharmacia) beads for monoclonal antibodies or Pansorbin (Calbiochem, San Diego, Calif.) for polyclonal antibodies (1 h at 4°C). Subsequently, the beads with the precipitated proteins were washed four times with lysis buffer. For the detection of protein complexes, the immunoprecipitates were separated on SDS-12% polyacrylamide gels and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Immobilon-P; Millipore, Bedford, Mass.) by using 2.5 mM Tris-19.2 mM glycine buffer. To block nonspecific binding, the membranes were incubated with 5% nonfat dry milk in phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.2% Tween 20 before antibodies were added. After being washed with phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.2% Tween 20, the membranes were incubated with a 1:2,500 dilution of anti-mouse or anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G-horseradish peroxidase conjugate (Amersham, Freiburg, Germany). Bound antibodies were visualized with an enhanced chemiluminescence detection system (Amersham). For the immune complex kinase assay, the cells were lysed in buffer consisting of 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 2.5 mM EGTA, 0.1% Tween 20, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 µg of aprotinin ml-1, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, and 5 mM NaF. The lysates were treated as described above. In order to precipitate the kinase complexes, either the anti-CDK4 antibody or one of the monoclonal anti-Tax antibodies was used together with protein A-Sepharose. The kinase reaction was performed as previously described (42).
Generation of Tax deletion mutants. All Tax deletion mutants were generated via PCR (37). In order to introduce the internal deletion, five different primers were used, two outside 28-mer oligonucleotides spanning the 5' and 3' ends of the Tax open reading frame (Taxs and Taxas) and three chimeric oligonucleotides designed to carry the 5' and 3' sequences flanking the deleted regions. After three rounds of PCR with Pwo polymerase (Roche, Mannheim, Germany), deletion clones TD99, TD150, and TD254 were created. To engineer the N-terminal TD1 and C-terminal TD319 deletion clones, one round of PCR was performed by using an internal 5' primer or 3' primer in combination with the corresponding outside primer. The resulting PCR products were digested with BamHI and KpnI and ligated via these sites into the pcDNA3.1.Amyc expression vector (Invitrogen). The resulting clones were verified by nucleotide sequencing.
Oligonucleotides. The oligonucleotide sequences were as follows: Taxs, 5'-ATTTAAGGATCCACCATGGCCCACTTC-3' (outer primer); Taxas, 5'-ATTTAGGGTACCGACTTCTGTTTC-3' (outer primer); TD1s, 5'-ATTTAAGGATCCATGGCCCGCCTACATC-3' ; TD99s, 5'-CCATCGGTAAATGTCCAGGCCCCTGTGGTAAGGG-3' ; TD150s, 5'-CAATCACTCATACAACCCTGTACACCCTCTGGGG-3' ; TD254s, 5'-GGACATTTACCGATGGCCCCTCATTTTTACTCTC-3' ; and TD319as, 5'-ATTTCGGGTACCAGAAATGGGGATGTTG-3' .
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (34K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Tax stimulates the activity of CDK4. 293T cells were cotransfected with 500 ng of CDK4, cyclin D3, and Tax expression vectors in different combinations. All transfections were equalized for the amount of total DNA by addition of the empty vector (pcDNA3). CDK4 complexes were precipitated by using specific polyclonal antibodies. Kinase activity was assessed in vitro by using recombinant pRb as the substrate. The radioactivity incorporated into the substrate was quantified by phosphorimaging. (A) Immunoblots of the lysates used for immunoprecipitation (IP). (B) Representative autoradiograph of the phosphorylated Rb substrate. (C) Relative (Rel.) CDK4 activities in three independent experiments (mean and standard deviation).
|
![]() View larger version (23K): [in a new window] |
FIG.2. CDK4 and CDK6, but not CDK1 and CDK2, are specifically bound by Tax. For coimmunoprecipitation experiments, Tax was coexpressed with various CDKs in 293T cells. (A, left panel) The cell extracts were precipitated with a monoclonal anti-Tax antibody and analyzed in separate immunoblots with antibodies directed individually against Tax, CDK4, CDK6, CDK2, or hemagglutinin-tagged CDK1. IP, immunoprecipitation. (B, left panel) CDK-associated Tax protein was also detected in the reverse experiment with specific anti-CDK antibodies for immunoprecipitation. (A and B, right panels) The presence of CDKs and Tax in the lysates was determined by immunoblot analysis. (C) GST pull-down assays probing a Jurkat cell lysate (lane 1) with either GST alone (lane 2) or GST-Tax (lane 3). After equilibration with Jurkat cell lysate, each column was extensively washed, and bound proteins were eluted. Eluates were analyzed by Western blotting with anti-CDK4 or anti-CDK2 antibodies.
|
Next, the Tax/CDK interaction in HTLV-1-transformed cells (HuT-102) and Tax-transformed T cells (Taxi-1 and Tesi) was investigated. As a control, we used Tax-negative Jurkat cells. HuT-102, Tesi, and Taxi-1 cells express physiological amounts of Tax and CDKs. Coimmunoprecipitation results obtained with these cells reaffirmed the specific CDK4/Tax interaction documented above in cotransfection experiments (Fig. 3). In these T-lymphocytic backgrounds, CDK6 rather than CDK1 was also observed to bind Tax (data not shown).
![]() View larger version (34K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Tax binds CDK4 in Tax-transformed HTLV-1-infected human T cells. For coimmunoprecipitations, Tax-immortalized cells (Tesi and Taxi-1), the HTLV-1-infected cell line HuT-102, and a negative control (Jurkat cells) were used. Immunoprecipitation (IP) was performed with anti-CDK4 antibodies and 1 mg of protein from the whole-cell lysate. The upper panels show the precipitated Tax and CDK4 proteins detected by Western blot analysis. The lower panels show the endogenous expression levels of these proteins in the different cell lines used for immunoprecipitation.
|
![]() View larger version (35K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Tax directly interacts with CDK4 and cyclin D2. For these affinity chromatography experiments, equal amounts of recombinant Tax protein bound to S protein-agarose were incubated with the following in vitro translated 35S-labeled proteins: CDK4 (lane 1), CDK2 (lane 2), CDK1 (lane 3), cyclin D2 (lane 4), cyclin E (lane 5), and p21CIP1 (lane 6). (A) Tax-bound proteins were sized on an SDS-polyacrylamide gel and visualized by autoradiography. (B) Quantitative evaluations of three independent experiments. Error bars show standard deviations. (C) Autoradiogram showing 5% of the in vitro translated proteins used for one of the binding experiments. The quantitative evaluation of these proteins served to even out slight differences in the amounts of labeled proteins used in the in vitro interaction assays.
|
![]() View larger version (53K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Tax binds to the holoenzyme cyclin D/CDK4 complex in HTLV-1-infected T cells derived from ATL patients. Precipitations with the Tax protein were performed with long-term-cultured IL-2-independent HTLV-1-infected cell lines (HuT-102 and MT-2), IL-2-dependent cultures derived from ATL patients (StEd and JuanaW) (40), and the T-cell line Jurkat as a negative control. For the immunoprecipitation (IP) experiments, a monoclonal anti-Tax antibody was used to bind Tax from 1 mg of protein from the whole-cell lysate. Precipitated Tax and associated cyclin D2, cyclin D3, CDK4, and the inhibitor p21CIP1 were detected by Western blot analysis. The panels on the right show the endogenous expression levels of the Tax-bound proteins in the cell lines used for coimmunoprecipitation experiments.
|
![]() View larger version (32K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Tax-associated proteins can phosphorylate the CDK4 substrate, Rb. Tax and associated proteins were immunoprecipitated from cell extracts with a monoclonal anti-Tax antibody and tested for kinase activity with GST-Rb as a substrate. The upper panels show the levels of Tax present in the investigated cell lines, the middle panels show an immune complex kinase assay (autoradiography), and the lower panels show the quantified results. The lower panels depict the mean and standard deviation of three independent experiments. IP, immunoprecipitation; Rel., relative. Lanes: 1, Jurkat; 2, Taxi-1; 3, HuT-102; 4, C91PL; 5, MT-2; 6 and 7, Tesi cells containing a tetracycline-repressible Tax gene. Tesi cells were cultured in either the absence (lane 6) or the presence (lane 7) of tetracycline (tet) (1 µg/ml) for 1 week, lysed, and subjected to an immune complex kinase assay.
|
![]() View larger version (35K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. N-terminal Tax sequences are essential for the interaction with CDK4/cyclin D complexes. (A) Schematic representation of the point and deletion mutants used in the following experiments; structural features of the Tax protein are indicated. MOD, modulator domain; Acid D., acidic domain. (B) Coimmunoprecipitation experiment with the Tax deletion mutants. For the experiments, 293T cells were transfected with 500 ng of wild type Tax or 800 ng of five different Tax deletion mutants and 500 ng of a cyclin D2 expression construct. The blots on the upper left represent precipitation with polyclonal anti-cyclin D2 antibodies. The same antibodies were used for cyclin D2 Western blot analysis. In order to detect Tax and the mutant proteins, a rabbit anti-Tax serum was used. The blots on the upper right show a triple transfection with Tax, cyclin D2, and CDK4 (500 ng) constructs. The precipitation and the subsequent Western blot analysis were done with polyclonal anti-CDK4 antibodies. The lower panels (lysate control) depict the expression of wild-type Tax and the deletion mutants in the lysates prepared for the coimmunoprecipitation experiments. IP, immunoprecipitation. (C) Coimmunoprecipitation experiment with the Tax point mutants. Cells were cotransfected with 500 ng of expression constructs for Tax point mutants, cyclin D3, and CDK4. Tax was immunoprecipitated from whole-cell lysates with a monoclonal anti-Tax antibody. Coprecipitated proteins were detected with a monoclonal anti-cyclin D3 antibody and a polyclonal anti-CDK4 antibodies. Precipitated proteins are shown on the left. Corresponding lysate controls are shown on the right.
|
3-6, TaxC23S, and Tax
41-43) but bound well to the two Tax mutants with changes in the C terminus (TaxS274A and TaxL320G). The minor differences in the amounts of proteins detected with Coomassie blue-stained protein electrophoresis gels (Fig. 8B) cannot explain the phenotypic differences between wild-type Tax and N-terminal and C-terminal mutants. For instance, although wild-type Tax was used at the lowest abundance, it resulted in a high yield of CDK4 binding. In contrast, mutant Tax
3-6, which was expressed at a relatively high level, did not bind any CDK4. No differences in amounts of proteins were detectable between the binding-deficient N-terminal mutant C23S and the binding-competent C-terminal mutant L320G. This result does fully agree with a requirement for an intact Tax N terminus for binding to CDK4, even in the presence of competing T-cell proteins at physiological concentrations.
![]() View larger version (36K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 8. N-terminal Tax mutants do not bind CDK4 from Jurkat cell lysates. (A) CDK4 binds to Tax mutated in the C terminus but not to counterpart proteins mutated in the N terminus. Jurkat cell lysates were equilibrated with columns saturated with GST alone (negative control, lane 2), GST-Rb (positive control, lane 3), GST-Tax (lane 4), or several GST-Tax mutants (lanes 5 to 9). Proteins retained on columns were eluted and analyzed by immunoblotting with anti-CDK4 antibodies. (B) Visualization of Tax mutant and control proteins used to construct the GST columns. GST alone, GST-Rb, GST-Tax, and GST-Tax mutant proteins were purified and electrophoresed on a denaturing SDS gel, followed by Coomassie blue staining.
|
![]() View larger version (33K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 9. N-terminal mutations affect the capacity of Tax to enhance kinase activity. 293T cells were cotransfected with expression constructs for cyclin D3, CDK4, and different Tax mutants as described in the legend to Fig. 7. The CDK/Tax complexes were precipitated and subjected to kinase assays with GST-Rb as a substrate. (A) Association of CDK activity with Tax point mutants. Tax and associated proteins were precipitated with monoclonal anti-Tax antibodies. The upper panels show a representative autoradiograph of phosphorylated pRb. The results of three individual experiments were quantified; the lower panel shows the mean and standard deviation. (B) Stimulation of CDK4 kinase activity by Tax deletion mutants. Tax/CDK complexes were precipitated with an anti-CDK4 antibody. The upper panels show Rb phosphorylation in a representative autoradiograph. The lower panel shows the relative (Rel.) kinase activities quantified by phosphorimaging. IP, immunoprecipitation. Error bars show standard deviations. The upper panels of panels A and B also show Western blot analysis with a rabbit anti-Tax serum verifying that equal amounts of Tax wild type and point mutants were expressed.
|
Tax stimulates the association of CDK4 and cyclin D and counteracts the inhibitory activity of p21CIP1. In HTLV-1-infected cells, the p21CIP1 repressor of CDK is markedly upregulated (2, 8). To address the question of whether Tax can stimulate CDK4 even in the presence of the inhibitor, we determined Tax-mediated stimulation in the presence of large amounts of p21 in transfected 293T cells (Fig. 10). CDK4, cyclin D2, p21CIP1, Tax or, as negative controls, the binding-deficient Tax mutants M7 and TD1 were coexpressed in various combinations. CDK4 activity was determined. The results showed that even in the presence of p21CIP1, Tax was able to stimulate Rb kinase activity (Fig. 10, compare eighth and ninth lanes). The level of CDK4 activity was the same as the activity measured without the inhibitor (Fig. 10, compare seventh and eighth lanes). The CDK4-repressing activity of p21CIP1 could be demonstrated (Fig. 10, compare second and ninth lanes). The ability to counteract the p21 repressive activity was dependent on the capacity of Tax to bind CDK4, since the binding-deficient mutants could not stimulate CDK4 activity (Fig. 10, third and fourth lanes). In summary, this experiment showed that p21 bound to Tax-associated CDK/cyclin complexes is inefficient in repressing kinase activity. This finding provides an explanation of how Tax can stimulate CDK activation in the presence of large amounts of p21CIP1. This finding also explains the Rb kinase activity of CDK4/cyclin D2/Tax/p21CIP1 complexes isolated from HTLV-1-infected cells.
![]() View larger version (38K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 10. Tax counteracts the inhibition of CDK activity by p21CIP1 through binding to the CDK complex. For immune complex kinase assays, various amounts of Tax and binding-deficient Tax mutants were coexpressed with cyclin D2, CDK4, and p21CIP1 in 293T cells. CDK4 complexes were precipitated, and kinase activity was assessed in vitro with pRb as a substrate. The upper panels show the levels of expression of the relevant proteins in the lysates used for immunoprecipitation (IP), the GST-Rb panel shows pRb substrate phosphorylation (autoradiograph), and the lower panel shows the relative (Rel.) CDK4 activities in three different experiments (mean and standard deviation).
|
![]() View larger version (36K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 11. Tax promotes the assembly of CDK4/cyclin D complexes in fibroblasts. 293T cells were cotransfected with 500 ng of expression constructs for cyclin D2, CDK4, and p21CIP1 and various amounts of Tax expression plasmids. (Left panels) Cyclin D2-associated complexes were precipitated with a specific polyclonal antiserum from a cell lysate containing 700 µg of protein. The compositions of the complexes were analyzed by immunoblotting. IP, immunoprecipitation. (Right panels) Western blots of the corresponding lysate controls.
|
|
|
|---|
Tax binds CDK4 and CDK6 (18) but neither CDK2 nor CDK1, suggesting preferential affinity and specificity for the former set of cyclin-dependent kinases. The CDK4 and CDK6 kinases are closely related (
70%) (29) and have similar functions in the G1 phase of the cell cycle. Therefore, one might deduce that Tax binds to a region conserved between CDK4 and CDK6 (although we have yet to directly investigate this point). Our binding experiments with mutated Tax proteins did reveal that association with CDK4 is mediated by the N terminus of Tax. The N-terminal domain contains a putative Zn finger motif (43), which has been suggested to play a role in protein-protein interactions.
We also found Tax associated with cyclin D3 and cyclin D2. These findings reaffirm earlier observations that Tax can bind cyclins D3 and D1 (34). The domain required for cyclin binding also was located in the N terminus of Tax. This finding implies that the binding sites within Tax for CDK4, CDK6, and D cyclins are adjacent. The possibility that binding to one of them mediates an indirect interaction with the other can be ruled out, since Tax directly contacts in vitro each of the proteins in the absence of the other. In addition, the following observations corroborate the idea that the binding of Tax to CDK4 is not mediated by a bridging function of endogenous cyclin D: (i) abundant coexpression of transfected Tax and CDK4 resulted in a high degree of binding, despite a low level of endogenous cyclin D in the cells, and (ii) the resulting immunoprecipitated CDK/Tax complexes were inactive, indicating the probable absence of the cyclin component. On the other hand, in transient overexpression settings and in HTLV-1-infected cells, Tax could be precipitated simultaneously with both the kinase and the cyclin. One interpretation of these findings is that Tax can indeed sufficiently bind CDK4 and CDK6 kinases; however, such binding in the absence of associated cyclins results in an ineffective interaction. In contrast, the binding of Tax to a CDK4/cyclin complex results in activation of the latter. The in vitro binding assays suggested that within a complex of Tax, CDK4 or CDK6, and cyclin D, Tax could provide independent contact sites for both CDK4 or CDK6 and cyclin D. Furthermore, because the Tax-bound cyclin D/CDK complex potently activates Rb phosphorylation, one can conclude that Tax binding does not interfere with the binding of CDK to cyclin. Moreover, as coimmunopreciptations have shown, Tax seems to stimulate the association of CDK with cyclin. Hence, we favor the idea that two closely proximal binding sites exist within the N terminus of Tax for cyclin D and CDK4 or CDK6. Such adjacent binding sites are not without precedent. For instance, separate binding sites for cyclin and CDK sequences lie in close proximity in p21CIP1 and p27KIP, wherein a relatively short N-terminal peptide of about 70 amino acids is sufficient to form a stable interaction with both components of the CDK complex (31, 32). Like Tax, p21CIP1 has been reported to stimulate the association of CDK and cyclin (26).
We do not favor the idea that a ternary complex of Tax, CDK4 or CDK6, and cyclin D might be mediated through surreptitious Tax binding to p16INK-4A (28, 48) for the following reasons. First, since both p16INK-4A and cyclin bind to the same site within CDK4 (10), p16INK-4A binding to CDK is known to interfere with CDK binding to cyclin. Second, we have observed that a CDK mutant that is not repressible by p16INK-4A can be stimulated by Tax (data not shown). Finally, the Tax region relevant for binding CDK4/cyclin D tightly correlates with the same region needed for CDK activation. This observation is most readily explained by Tax activation of the kinase through direct contact with the holoenzyme complex. The requirement of the CDK4 interaction for Tax-mediated transformation is suggested by the observation that the binding-deficient Tax mutant M7 is incapable of transforming T cells (39). The capacity of mutant M47 to transform correlates well with its potential to bind and activate CDK4 (38).
While it has been reported that Tax stimulates the cyclin D2 promoter (2, 21, 41) when attached to a reporter gene, the intracellular impact of this observation on cyclin D2 protein expression is difficult to detect in human lymphocytes conditionally immortalized by Tax (42). It is possible that the upregulation may vary from cell type to cell type and that it has an additional stimulatory effect in some cell lines by increasing the amounts of CDK4/cyclin D2 complexes which can be activated by Tax. In Tax-transformed human lymphocytes, the levels of none of the other major regulatory proteins involved in G1 control (CDK4, CDK6, cyclin D3, and p16INK-4A) are strongly affected by the presence or absence of Tax (42). Thus, in view of our current results and suggestions raised elsewhere (34), we propose that protein-protein posttranslational effects rather than transcriptional modulatory roles of Tax in gene expression play the predominant physiological role in CDK activation. A mechanism explaining how an association of Tax with the CDK4 complex could affect kinase function is the possible stimulation of CDK and cyclin assembly. In addition, Tax acting as a shuttle protein (6) could bind to cytoplasmic CDK/cyclin complexes and mediate their nuclear transport. The presence of Tax in the complexes overcomes the inhibitory effect of large amounts of the p21CIP protein.
In addition to HTLV-1, other viruses also developed different mechanisms to activate cyclin/CDK, for instance, the E1A protein of adenovirus, the large T antigen of SV40, and the E7 protein of human papillomavirus type 16 (22). Notably, E7 and E1A interact with cyclin E/CDK2 complexes. Additionally, some transforming herpesviruses even encode viral homologues of cellular D cyclins which form stable complexes with CDK4 and CDK6. In contrast to their cellular counterparts, these viral cyclins are completely resistant to inhibition by CKIs (25, 50). Interestingly, the capacity of DNA tumor viruses to stimulate the G1- to S-phase progression is frequently complemented by a p53-inactivating function (22). Similarly, HTLV-1 Tax was shown here to promote the activation of CDK/cyclins important for the G1-to-S phase transition and has been shown elsewhere to inactivate p53 function as well (36, 51). Together, these independent effects serve to subvert G1 arrest and the induction of apoptosis as a response to genotoxic damage. This strategy appears to be shared by many diverse viruses and potentially contributes to the oncogenic nature of these viruses.
We thank Brigitte Biesinger, Sabine Lang, and Tobias Ruckes for helpful discussions. The technical assistance of Domenica Saul is appreciated.
|
|
|---|
B pathway and is dependent on p53 phosphorylation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:3377-3386.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2010 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»