Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Molecular and Cellular Biology, June 2002, p. 3803-3819, Vol. 22, No. 11
0270-7306/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/MCB.22.11.3803-3819.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Biochemistry,1 Second Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Hiroshima University, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734-8551,2 The Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science and CREST, Japan Science and Technology Corporation, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8613,3 Department of Life Science (Biology),4 CREST Project, University of Tokyo, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153-8902, Japan5
Received 20 September 2001/ Returned for modification 13 November 2001/ Accepted 1 February 2002
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It is well known that during animal development, the Wnt signaling pathway plays crucial roles in cell adhesion and cell fate determination (7, 63). Defects in this pathway result in abnormalities of physiological events ranging from early developmental processes to oncogenesis. Wnt proteins constitute a large family of cysteine-rich secreted ligands. In unstimulated cells, free cytoplasmic ß-catenin is destabilized by a multiprotein complex containing Axin, GSK-3ß, and adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) protein (21, 27, 31). Axin functions as a scaffold protein in this complex by directly binding to GSK-3ß, ß-catenin, and APC. The interaction of GSK-3ß with Axin in the complex facilitates efficient phosphorylation of ß-catenin by GSK-3ß. Phosphorylated ß-catenin forms a complex with Fbw1 (ßTrCP/FWD1), a member of the F-box protein family, resulting in the degradation of ß-catenin in the ubiquitin and proteasome pathways (13, 32). Indeed, Axin inhibits Wnt-dependent accumulation of ß-catenin (29). In addition, APC and Axin are also phosphorylated by GSK-3ß in the Axin complex. Phosphorylation of APC enhances its binding to ß-catenin (52), whereas phosphorylation of Axin stabilizes it, in contrast to phosphorylation of ß-catenin (64).
When cells are stimulated by Wnt, Dvl, a cytoplasmic protein, antagonizes the action of GSK-3ß (6, 9). Dvl binds to the Axin complex and inhibits GSK-3ß-dependent phosphorylation of ß-catenin (30). Once the phosphorylation of ß-catenin is reduced, it dissociates from the Axin complex, and ß-catenin is no longer degraded, resulting in its accumulation in the cytoplasm. Stabilized ß-catenin is translocated into the nucleus, where it binds to T-cell factor (Tcf)/lymphoid-enhancer factor (Lef), a transcription factor (2, 40), and serves as a coactivator of Tcf to stimulate transcription of the Wnt target genes, including c-myc, fra, jun, cyclin D1, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
(PPAR
), and matrilysin (3, 63). Thus, the Wnt signal stabilizes ß-catenin by inhibiting its phosphorylation and ubiquitination, thereby regulating the expression of various genes.
The small ubiquitin-related modifier (SUMO) modification (sumoylation) pathway resembles the ubiquitin conjugation pathway, but the enzymes involved in the two processes are distinct (18, 43, 66). There are three mammalian SUMOs, SUMO-1, SUMO-2, and SUMO-3, and one budding yeast homolog, Smt3. SUMO-1 has been most extensively studied. SUMO-1 is activated for conjugation by the E1 enzyme AOS/Uba2, subsequently transferred to the E2 conjugation enzyme Ubc9, and finally conjugated to target proteins by the E3 ligase PIAS (protein inhibitor of activated STAT) (22, 24, 53, 54). The genes encoding all key proteins of the modification process are essential in budding yeast, and the conjugation machinery is well conserved. Sumoylation is likely to be an important protein modification, as well as phosphorylation and ubiquitination. Sumoylation plays roles in (i) protein localization, (ii) protein stabilization, and (iii) transcriptional activation. Conjugation to RanGAP1 targets the cytoplasmic protein to the nuclear pore complex (37, 39), and modification of PML by SUMO-1 directs it to subnuclear structures termed PML bodies (44, 59). Sumoylation of I
B
or Mdm2 prevents its ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation (5, 8). Modification of p53 by SUMO-1 enhances its transcriptional activity (12, 50). In contrast, the target proteins of SUMO-2 and SUMO-3 have not yet been identified, and the physiological roles of modification with SUMO-2 and SUMO-3 are not known.
Sumoylation is reversible, and there are several SUMO-specific proteases in yeast and mammals (18, 43, 66). A single and essential Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene product, ubiquitin-like protein-specific protease 1 (Ulp1), catalyzes two critical functions via an encoded cysteinyl protease activity (35). Ulp1 processes the Smt3 C-terminal sequence (-GGATY) to its mature form (-GG) and deconjugates Smt3 from the lysine
-amino group of the target protein. These functions are required for G2/M cell cycle progression in yeast (35). Three mammalian SUMO-specific proteases, SENP1, SUSP1, and SMT3IP1, have been identified, and all have a conserved C-terminal region, even though their sizes differ (11, 28, 47). The similarity between yeast Ulp1 and mammalian SUMO-specific proteases is confined to the C-terminal region of
200 amino acids, with an
90-residue segment forming a core structure which is common to these cysteine proteases (42, 66). However, the physiological roles of SUMO-specific proteases in mammalian cells are not known.
We have recently identified a novel Axin-binding protein and designated it Axam (for Axin-associating molecule) (23). Axam induces the degradation of ß-catenin in SW480 cells (human colon cancer cells) and inhibits axis formation in Xenopus embryos. Therefore, Axam functions as a negative regulator of the Wnt signaling pathway. However, how Axam inhibits the Wnt signaling pathway is not clear. Here, we show that Axam has the catalytic activity to remove SUMO-1 from sumoylated proteins and that its mutant without this activity is less able to downregulate ß-catenin and to inhibit axis formation of Xenopus embryos. These results demonstrate that Axam functions as a desumoylation enzyme to downregulate ß-catenin in mammalian cells and suggest that sumoylation is involved in the regulation of the Wnt signaling pathway.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
/ß-cateninSA were provided by M. Nakao and A. Nagafuchi (Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan), respectively. Wnt-3a-producing L cells were provided by S. Takada (Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan) (57). The anti-GST and anti-importin
-P1 antibodies were supplied by M. Nakata (Sumitomo Electronics, Yokohama, Japan) and Y. Yoneda (Osaka University, Suita, Japan), respectively. Leptomycin B was provided by M. Yoshida (University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan) (34). GST-Ulp-1 was purified as described previously (28). Other GST fusion proteins and His6-tagged proteins were purified from Escherichia coli according to the manufacturer's instructions (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Little Chalfont, United Kingdom, and Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Calif.). L cells stably expressing wild-type hemagglutinin (HA)-Axam (L/Axam) were generated by selection with G418 as described previously (29). The anti-Myc antibody was prepared from 9E10 cells. The anti-GSK-3ß and anti-ß-catenin antibodies, anti-green fluorescent protein (GFP) antibody, anti-SUMO-1 antibody, anti-Flag (M2) antibody, anti-p53 antibody (DO-7), and anti-histone H1 antibody were purchased from Transduction Laboratories, Molecular Probes, Inc., Zymed, Novocastra Laboratories Ltd. (Newcastle, United Kingdom), Sigma-Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany), and Santa Cruz Biotechnology, respectively. Lipofectamine and Lipofectamine 2000 (Life Technologies Inc.) were used for transfection of L cells and of COS and SW480 cells, respectively. Lactacystin was purchased from PEPTIDE Institute, Inc. (Osaka, Japan). Other materials were from commercial sources. Plasmid construction. pBJ-Myc/rAxin, pCGN/Dvl-1, pGEX-4T/Axam-(72-588), pEGFP-C2/Axam-(1-113), pEGFP-C2/Axam-(72-588), pGEX-2T/Axam-(1-113), pGEX-2T/Axam, pEGFP-C1/Axam, pEGFP-C2/Axam-(72-400), and pSP64T/Myc-Axam were constructed as described previously (23). Standard recombinant DNA techniques were used to construct the following plasmids: pEGFP-C3/Axam-(381-588), pEGFP-C2/AxamC547S, pEGFP-C2/Axam-(72-588)C547S, pGEX-KG/Axam-(82-382), pGEX-KG/Axam-(381-588), pGEX-2T/AxamC547S, pGEX-4T/Axam-(72-588)C547S, pSP64T/Myc-AxamC547S, pSP64T/Myc-Axam-(72-400), pEF-BOS-HA/Axam, pGEX-2TK/SUMO-1(GG), pRSETA/Ubc-9, pGEX-6P-1/SUMO-1-Myc, and pAcGHLT/p53. In these plasmids, some constructs were made by digesting the original plasmids with restriction enzymes and inserting the fragments into the vectors. The other constructs were obtained by inserting fragments generated by the Expand High Fidelity PCR system (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany) into the vectors. The entire PCR products were sequenced, and the structures of all plasmids were confirmed by restriction analysis.
Immunofluorescence study.
SW480, COS, and L cells (3.5-cm-diameter dish) transfected with pEGFP-derived and pBJ-Myc-derived plasmids and pUC/EF-1
/ß-cateninSA were grown on coverslips and fixed for 20 min in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 4% paraformaldehyde. The cells were washed three times with PBS and then permeabilized with PBS containing 0.2% Triton X-100 and 2 mg of bovine serum albumin/ml for 2 to 12 h. They were washed and incubated for 1 h with the anti-SUMO-1, anti-ß-catenin, anti-Axam, anti-histone H1, anti-Myc, or anti-GFP antibody. To examine the specificity of the anti-Axam antibody, 3 µg of anti-Axam antibody was incubated with 25 pmol of GST-Axam-(72-588) or GST immobilized on glutathione-Sepharose 4B in 200 µl of PBS at 4°C for 1 h. After incubation, the mixture was centrifuged, and the supernatant was used as the antibody source. After being washed with PBS, the cells were further incubated for 1 h with Alexa 488-labeled goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G or Alexa 594-labeled goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin G. The nuclei were counterstained with 4',6-diamidine-2-phenylindole (DAPI). The coverslips were washed with PBS, mounted on glass slides, and viewed with a confocal laser scanning microscope (LSM510; Carl-Zeiss, Jena, Germany). In some experiments, the cells were directly viewed with the confocal microscope to detect GFP-Axam and its mutants. For multichannel imaging, each fluorescence was imaged sequentially to eliminate cross talk between the channels. When necessary, COS cells expressing GFP-Axam-(72-400) or GFP-Axam-(381-588) were grown on coverslips and treated with leptomycin B (20 ng/ml) or 0.2% ethanol (a solvent control) for 30 min. The cells were fixed and incubated with primary and secondary antibodies. To inhibit the proteasomal degradation of ß-catenin, the cells were treated with 10 µM lactacystin for 10 h.
Enzyme assay. To examine the hydrolase activity of Axam, 7 µg of GST-SUMO-1-Myc was incubated with 3 µg of GST-Axam, GST-Axam-(1-113), or GST-Ulp-1 in 30 µl of reaction mixture (100 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.0], 2 mM dithiothreitol [DTT], 1 mM EDTA, and 5% glycerol) at 30°C for 1 or 3 h. After incubation, the mixtures were subjected to sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) followed by Coomassie brilliant blue staining. To prepare sumoylated GST-p53 (GST-SUMO-1-GST-p53), 0.5 µg of GST-AOS/His6-Uba2 (E1), 2.5 µg of His6-Ubc9 (E2), 10 µg of GST-SUMO-1(GG), and 2.5 µg of GST-p53 were incubated in 50 µl of reaction mixture (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 2 mM DTT, 1 mM MgCl2, and 5 mM ATP) at 25°C for 3 h. After incubation, the mixtures were probed with the anti-p53 or anti-SUMO-1 antibody. For analysis of cleavage of GST-SUMO-1-GST-p53 by Axam, GST-SUMO-1-GST-p53 was incubated with 100 ng of GST-Axam or its mutants in 50 µl of reaction mixture (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 1 mM DTT, 20 mM EDTA, and 150 mM NaCl) for 30 min at 30°C. After incubation, the mixtures were probed with the anti-p53 antibody. To show desumoylation activity of Axam in intact cells, Flag-SUMO-1(GG) was expressed with GFP-Axam or GFP-AxamC547S in COS cells (3.5-cm-diameter dish). After the cells were lysed in 200 µl of Laemmli's sample buffer (65 mM Tris-HCl [pH 6.8], 3.3% SDS, 5.3% glycerol, and 2% 2-mercaptoethanol), the lysates were probed with the anti-Flag and anti-GFP antibodies.
Wnt-3a treatment. To collect Wnt-3a-conditioned medium from cultures of Wnt-3a-producing L cells, the cells were seeded at a density of 106 in a 10-cm-diameter dish containing a 1:1 mixture of Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium and Ham F-12 medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum and cultured for 4 days (57). Then the conditioned medium was harvested, centrifuged at 1,000 x g for 10 min, and filtered through a nitrocellulose membrane. As a control, conditioned medium was prepared from L cells that had been transfected with only pGKneo and cultured under the same conditions described above. L cells (3.5-cm-diameter dish) grown on coverslips for 24 h were transfected with pEGFP-derived plasmids and incubated for an additional 12 h. After removal of the culture medium, Wnt-3a-conditioned medium was added (29). After a further 12-h incubation, the cells were fixed and stained with the anti-GFP or anti-ß-catenin antibody.
Xenopus injections and analysis of phenotypes. Myc-tagged Axam mutants were subcloned into pSP64T (33). Sense mRNA was obtained by in vitro transcription of linearized templates using an SP6-mMESSAGE mMACHINE kit (Ambion, Austin, Tex.). Fertilized eggs were dejellied using 4.5% L-cysteine hydrochloride monohydrate, and mRNAs were injected into the equatorial region of dorsal or ventral blastomeres at the four-cell stage. After injection, the embryos were cultured for 3 days and scored with the dorso-anterior index (DAI) (26). To carry out reverse transcription (RT)-PCR, total RNAs of embryos at stage 10.5 were isolated. Oligo(dT)-primed cDNAs were synthesized using 10 µg of total RNA from five embryos. PCR analyses (29 cycles) were performed with ExTaq DNA polymerase (TAKARA). The primers for PCR of the genes were as follows: siamois (5'-AAG ATA ACT GGC ATT CCT GAG C-3' and 5'-GGT AGG GCT GTG TAT TTG AAG G-3') and ornithine decarboxylase (5'-GCC ATT GTG AAG ACT CTC TCC ATT C-3' and 5'-TTC GGG TGA TTC CTT GCC AC-3').
Other. Protein concentrations were determined with bovine serum albumin as a standard (4). Detection of downregulation of ß-catenin in SW480 and L cells by immunoblotting was carried out as described previously (23, 29). The phosphorylation status of Axin and complex formation of Axam with Axin were examined as described previously (23).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Subcellular localization of Axam.
To clarify the subcellular localization of Axam, DLD-1 cells, human colon cancer cells, were stained with the anti-Axam antibody, because DLD-1 cells showed a high level of Axam expression by immunoblot analysis among various cell lines, including COS, SW480, L, 293, PC12, F9, RCN9, and DLD-1 cells (23). Endogenous Axam was found mainly in the nucleus and partly in the cytoplasm with the anti-Axam antibody but not with the antibody incubated with GST-Axam-(72-588) (Fig. 2A, a and b). The specificity of this Axam antibody was also confirmed by immunoblot analysis (Fig. 2A, c). When GFP-tagged Axam was expressed in SW480 cells (human colon cancer cells), it was also observed mainly in the nucleus and partly in the cytoplasm (Fig. 2A, d). GFP-Axam-(1-113) was localized in the nucleus, while GFP-Axam-(72-588) and GFP-Axam-(381-588) were present throughout the cytoplasm and nucleus (Fig. 2A, e, f, and h). The region containing amino acids 1 to 113 has the basic amino acid clusters KRRR31 and KRPR52. These are typical NLSs which bind to importin
(20). Importin
recognizes the NLS and mediates the selective transport of karyophilic proteins to the nuclei (67). Indeed, Axam-(1-113) but not Axam-(72-588) formed a complex with endogenous importin
in COS cells (data not shown). Therefore, these results suggest that the N-terminal region of Axam is mainly responsible for its nuclear localization by binding to importin
. GFP-Axam-(72-400) was clearly found in the cytoplasm (Fig. 2A, g). To examine whether the region containing amino acids 72 to 400 is localized in the cytoplasm in a Crm1-dependent manner, COS cells expressing GFP-Axam-(72-400) were treated with leptomycin B, which is known to be a specific inhibitor of Crm1-mediated export (34). Leptomycin B suppressed the cytoplasmic localization of GFP-Axam-(72-400) but had no effect on the subcellular distribution of GFP-Axam-(381-588) (Fig. 2B). As it is unknown whether Axam has nuclear export signal, these results suggest that the subcellular localization of Axam-(72-400) is regulated by Crm1 directly or indirectly. Taken together, it is likely that importin
and Crm1 regulate the subcellular localization of Axam.
|
Enzymatic activity of Axam.
Yeast Ulp1 and human SUSP1 have two enzymatic activities (28, 35). One is the hydrolase activity to cleave the carboxyl side of the C-terminal Gly-Gly residues of SUMO-1 precursor to produce the mature form, and the other is the isopeptidase activity to deconjugate SUMO-1 from the lysine
-amino group of the target protein. To examine whether Axam has these activities, various deletion mutants of Axam were purified as GST fusion proteins (Fig. 3A). GST-Axam digested GST-SUMO-1-Myc in a time-dependent manner, as did yeast Ulp1 (Fig. 3B, lanes 4 to 9). However, GST-Axam-(1-113) did not digest GST-SUMO-1-Myc (Fig. 3B, lanes 1 to 3). We then examined whether Axam might be capable of releasing SUMO-1 from sumoylated proteins. To this end, a SUMO-1-modified p53 was prepared. We used GST-SUMO-1(GG), which is the mature form, in this experiment. When GST-p53 and GST-SUMO-1(GG) were incubated with GST-AOS/His6-Uba2 and His6-Ubc9, a 120-kDa protein recognized by the anti-p53 antibody appeared (Fig. 3C, lane 2). In the absence of GST-SUMO-1(GG), this band was not observed (Fig. 3C, lane 1). The 120-kDa protein was also detected by the anti-SUMO-1 antibody (Fig. 3C, lanes 3 and 4), suggesting that this higher-molecular-mass form of p53 is sumoylated. GST-Axam removed SUMO-1 from sumoylated p53 in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 3C, lanes 5 to 9). These results indicate that Axam has a desumoylation activity. Among the deletion mutants, GST-Axam-(72-588) and GST-Axam-(381-588) removed SUMO-1 from sumoylated p53, but GST-Axam-(1-113) and GST-Axam-(82-382) did not (Fig. 3D). Axam has a catalytic triad (His, Asp, and Cys) that is conserved in other desumoylation enzymes (42, 66). On substitution of Ser for Cys547 in GST-Axam and GST-Axam-(72-588), the SUMO-1 protease activity was lost (Fig. 3D). Altogether, Axam possesses SUMO-1 C-terminal hydrolase activity and isopeptidase activity capable of releasing SUMO-1 from SUMO-1 conjugates. Furthermore, the C-terminal 200 amino acids of Axam possess the desumoylation activity.
|
|
Involvement of desumoylation activity of Axam in downregulation of ß-catenin. Although it became clear that Axam has desumoylation activity, we do not know the specificity of Axam on the target proteins. To clarify the specific function of Axam as a desumoylation enzyme, we asked whether the desumoylation activity of Axam is involved in the downregulation of ß-catenin, because Axam induces the downregulation of ß-catenin (23). ß-Catenin was accumulated in both the cytoplasm and nucleus of SW480 cells due to the C-terminal truncation of APC. Immunoblot analysis showed that expression of GFP-Axam in SW480 cells reduces the amount of ß-catenin protein and that GFP-AxamC547S does not (Fig. 5A). Immunohistochemical analysis also showed that GFP-Axam reduces the ß-catenin staining (23) but that GFP-AxamC547S does not (Fig. 5B). These results suggest that the desumoylation activity of Axam is involved in downregulation of ß-catenin in SW480 cells.
|
|
We previously showed that Axam does not affect the binding of ß-catenin and GSK-3ß to Axin but inhibits that of Dvl to Axin (23). These activities of AxamC547S were examined. The binding activity of GFP-AxamC547S to Myc-rAxin was less than that of GFP-Axam to Myc-rAxin (Fig. 7, lanes 1 to 8). Although AxamC547S did not affect the complex formation of ß-catenin and GSK-3ß with Myc-rAxin (Fig. 7, lanes 1 to 8), the activity of GFP-AxamC547S to inhibit the interaction of HA-Dvl-1 with Myc-rAxin was less than that of GFP-Axam (Fig. 7, lanes 9 to 15). These results suggest that sumoylation may inhibit the interaction of Axam with Axin. Alternatively, conformational change by the mutation of Cys547 to Ser may affect the binding activity of Axam to Axin. When the phosphorylation status of Axin was examined on an SDS gel, Myc-rAxin migrated faster by expression of HA-Dvl-1 (23) (Fig. 7, lanes 9 and 10). GFP-Axam and GFP-AxamC547S reversed the mobility shift of Myc-rAxin induced by HA-Dvl-1 with similar efficiencies (Fig. 7, lanes 11 and 12). At present, we do not know the relationship between the phosphorylation of Axin induced by Axam and a role of Axam in the downregulation of ß-catenin.
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although the functions of mammalian desumoylation enzymes are not known, budding yeast Ulp1 is essential for G2/M transition, and the same phenotype is observed for the Ubc9 mutation in yeast (56). These observations suggest that the modification and removal of Smt3 are required for the dynamic regulation of cell cycle progression in yeast. Although it has been shown that sumoylation regulates the intracellular localization, stability, and function of the target proteins in mammals (18, 43, 66), whether desumoylation enzymes affect these cellular functions has not yet been clarified. We have demonstrated for the first time that desumoylation is involved in the degradation of ß-catenin in SW480 cells and L cells. Although expression of Axam in these cells leads to a decrease in the protein level of ß-catenin, removal of the catalytic domain from Axam [Axam-(72-400), the Axin-binding domain alone] removes its activity to downregulate ß-catenin, and substitution of Ser for Cys547 (a catalytic inactive mutant) reduces the activity. These results are shown by biochemical and immunohistochemical assays. In addition, we have shown by three different assays using Xenopus embryos that the desumoylation activity of Axam is involved in axis formation regulated by the Wnt signaling pathway. First, AxamC547S shows weak ventralizing activity in comparison with Axam, and Axam-(72-400) does not induce ventralization. Second, AxamC547S also exhibits less activity to suppress Dvl-1- and ß-catenin-dependent axis duplication than Axam, and Axam-(72-400) loses the activity. Third, although Axam suppresses expression of siamois, AxamC547S shows less activity, and Axam-(72-400) does not affect expression of siamois. Taken together, these results indicate that the desumoylation activity of Axam is important for the downregulation of ß-catenin and for the negative regulation of the Wnt signaling pathway. However, the desumoylation activity is not sufficient for the downregulation of ß-catenin, because the catalytic domain alone shows weak activity to degrade ß-catenin. In a prior study (23), we showed that Axam competes with Dvl for binding to Axin and suggested that this competition may be the mechanism of ß-catenin downregulation. The activity of AxamC547S to inhibit the interaction of Dvl with Axin is less than that of Axam. Therefore, loss of desumoylation activity of Axam leads to sumoylation of the target proteins, and the enhancement of sumoylation may inhibit the interaction of Axam with Axin. Alternatively, conformational change by the mutation of Cys547 to Ser may affect the binding activity of Axam to Axin. Therefore, two activities of Axam, to inhibit the binding of Dvl to Axin and to remove SUMO, are important for the activity to degrade ß-catenin. Members of the family of desumoylation enzymes share the C-terminal catalytic domain but differ in the N-terminal region. Therefore, the N-terminal region may regulate subcellular localization and substrate specificity. It is intriguing to speculate that Axam recognizes the substrates by binding to Axin.
Our study has shown that expression of Axam deconjugates SUMO-1 from most of its target proteins. Since Axam is present not only in the nucleus but also in the cytoplasm, it may have broad substrate specificity. However, Axam could be specifically directed to components of the Wnt signaling pathway under physiological conditions, because the catalytic domain of Axam alone is not sufficient for the downregulation of ß-catenin. What is the substrate of sumoylation among the components of Wnt signaling? Axam induces the downregulation of ß-catenin in SW480 cells, where the accumulated ß-catenin is neither phosphorylated nor ubiquitinated due to the C-terminal truncation of APC (17). Therefore, Axam may stimulate the phosphorylation and ubiquitination of ß-catenin. In that case, removal of SUMO-1 from the molecule(s) in the Axin complex would enhance the phosphorylation and ubiquitination of ß-catenin. This is supported by our previous observation that the activity of Axam to suppress ß-cateninSA-induced duplication of the axis in Xenopus embryos is less than that to suppress wild-type ß-catenin-induced duplication (23). Furthermore, we have shown in this study that Axam does not downregulate ß-cateninSA. In our preliminary experiments, ß-catenin and Axin were sumoylated in vitro (data not shown). It has been shown that (I/L)K(Q/T)E is a consensus sequence for sumoylation (66), and ß-catenin and Axin indeed possess the sequence. It is intriguing to speculate that ß-catenin is sumoylated and that the sumoylation blocks the phosphorylation or ubiquitination of ß-catenin. This is the case for the degradation of I
B
and Mdm2 (5, 8). Ubiquitin and SUMO-1 share the same conjugation site on I
B
and Mdm2, and sumoylation blocks their ubiquitin-dependent degradation. Axin enhances the GSK-3ß-dependent phosphorylation of ß-catenin (21). If sumoylation of Axin inhibits this activity, the desumoylation of Axin would promote the phosphorylation of ß-catenin by GSK-3ß. However, since it is hard to detect the sumoylation of ß-catenin and Axin in intact cells, other molecules may be sumoylated. Axin forms a complex with GSK-3ß, Dvl, APC, and protein phosphatase 2A in addition to ß-catenin. We are now examining whether they are sumoylated. It has recently been reported that Siah-1 induces the degradation of ß-catenin through APC in response to p53 (36, 38). This new mechanism of ß-catenin degradation requires the formation of a complex of Siah-1 with the C-terminal region of APC. Therefore, it is unlikely that desumoylation by Axam is involved in this pathway, because Axam is able to downregulate ß-catenin in SW480 cells, where the C-terminal half of APC is truncated. The target protein(s) of sumoylation might be a protein other than those directly involved in the regulation of the stability of ß-catenin in the Wnt signaling pathway. It has been shown that Lef-1 is sumoylated and that PIASy stimulates the sumoylation (53). Furthermore, PIASy inhibits ß-catenin-dependent Lef-1 activation, suggesting that sumoylation regulates the Wnt signaling pathway negatively (53). Therefore, it is intriguing to speculate that sumoylation and desumoylation regulate this signaling pathway at multiple steps.
Axin is present in the cytoplasm, and ß-catenin is degraded in the Axin complex (45, 62). Although Axam is mainly localized to the nucleus, it is also present in the cytoplasm. We have shown that Axam forms a complex with Axin in the cytoplasm. As it is conceivable that nuclear ß-catenin is exported to the cytoplasm, where it is degraded, the mode of action of Axam may be to stimulate the export of ß-catenin and make it accessible to Axin. Therefore, the subcellular localization of Axam may be functionally regulated. ß-Catenin is exported in APC-dependent and -independent manners (15, 51, 62). APC has NLS and nuclear export signal, and its subcellular localization determines the stability of ß-catenin (45). The molecule regulating the nuclear export of ß-catenin and Axam may be also a candidate for sumoylation.
During the preparation of the manuscript, it was reported that Axam2, an Axam homolog, is still capable of downregulating ß-catenin without desumoylation activity, and it was concluded that the desumoylation activity of Axam2 is not involved in the downregulation of ß-catenin (46). This result is consistent with our observations that AxamC547S still has the activity to downregulate ß-catenin, although the activity is less than that of Axam. But, it is opposite to our conclusion that the desumoylation activity of Axam is important for inducing the degradation of ß-catenin. Although we do not know the reasons for this discrepancy, Axam2 may have different substrate specificity than Axam as a desumoylation enzyme, because Axam2 is lacking the N-terminal region in Axam and is mainly present in the cytoplasm. Further experiments will be necessary to clarify the physiological significance of sumoylation in the Wnt signaling pathway and to understand the functions of Axam.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This work was supported by grants-in-aid for scientific research (B) and for scientific research on priority areas (C) from the Ministry of Education, Science, and Culture, Japan (2000 and 2001), and by grants from the Yamanouchi Foundation for Research on Metabolic Disorders (2000 and 2001).
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Behrens, J., J. P. von Kries, M. Kühl, L. Bruhn, D. Wedlich, R. Grosschedl, and W. Birchmeier. 1996. Functional interaction of ß-catenin with the transcription factor LEF-1. Nature 382:638-642.[CrossRef][Medline]
3. Bienz, M., and H. Clevers. 2000. Linking colorectal cancer to Wnt signaling. Cell 103:311-320.[CrossRef][Medline]
4. Bradford, M. M. 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 72:248-254.[CrossRef][Medline]
5. Buschmann, T., S. Y. Fuchs, C. G. Lee, Z. Q. Pan, and Z. Ronai. 2000. SUMO-1 modification of Mdm2 prevents its self-ubiquitination and increases Mdm2 ability to ubiquitinate p53. Cell 101:753-762.[CrossRef][Medline]
6. Cook, D., M. J. Fry, K. Hughes, R. Sumathipala, J. R. Woodgett, and T. C. Dale. 1996. Wingless inactivates glycogen synthase kinase-3 via an intracellular signalling pathway which involves a protein kinase C. EMBO J. 15:4526-4536.[Medline]
7. Dale, T. C. 1998. Signal transduction by the Wnt family of ligands. Biochem. J. 329:209-223.
8.
Desterro, J. M., M. S. Rodriguez, and R. T. Hay. 1998. SUMO-1 modification of I
B
inhibits NF-
B activation. Mol. Cell 2:233-239.[CrossRef][Medline]
9.
Ding, V. W., R. H. Chen, and F. McCormick. 2000. Differential regulation of glycogen synthase kinase 3ß by insulin and Wnt signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 275:32475-32481.
10.
Funayama, N., F. Fagotto, P. McCrea, and B. M. Gumbiner. 1995. Embryonic axis induction by the armadillo repeat domain of ß-catenin: evidence for intracellular signaling. J. Cell Biol. 128:959-968.
11.
Gong, L., S. Millas, G. G. Maul, and E. T. Yeh. 2000. Differential regulation of sentrinized proteins by a novel sentrin-specific protease. J. Biol. Chem. 275:3355-3359.
12. Gostissa, M., A. Hengstermann, V. Fogal, P. Sandy, S. E. Schwarz, M. Scheffner, and G. Del Sal. 1999. Activation of p53 by conjugation to the ubiquitin-like protein SUMO-1. EMBO J. 18:6462-6471.[CrossRef][Medline]
13. Hart, M., J.-P. Concordet, I. Lassot, I. Albert, R. de los Santos, H. Durand, C. Perret, B. Rubinfeld, F. Margottin, R. Benarous, and P. Polakis. 1999. The F-box protein ß-TrCP associates with phosphorylated ß-catenin and regulates its activity in the cell. Curr. Biol. 9:207-210.[CrossRef][Medline]
14. He, X., J.-P. Saint-Jeannet, J. R. Woodgett, H. E. Varmus, and I. B. Dawid. 1995. Glycogen synthase kinase-3 and dorsoventral patterning in Xenopus embryos. Nature 374:617-622.[CrossRef][Medline]
15. Henderson, B. R. 2000. Nuclear-cytoplasmic shuttling of APC regulates ß-catenin subcellular localization and turnover. Nat. Cell Biol. 2:653-660.[CrossRef][Medline]
16.
Hino, S.-I., S. Kishida, T. Michiue, A. Fukui, I. Sakamoto, S. Takada, M. Asashima, and A. Kikuchi. 2001. Inhibition of the Wnt signaling pathway by Idax, a novel Dvl-binding protein. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21:330-342.
17.
Hinoi, T., H. Yamamoto, M. Kishida, S. Takada, S. Kishida, and A. Kikuchi. 2000. Complex formation of adenomatous polyposis coli gene product and Axin facilitates glycogen synthase kinase-3ß-dependent phosphorylation of ß-catenin and downregulates ß-catenin. J. Biol. Chem. 275:34399-34406.
18. Hochstrasser, M. 2000. Evolution and function of ubiquitin-like protein-conjugation systems. Nat. Cell Biol. 2:E153-E157.[CrossRef][Medline]
19. Honda, R., and H. Yasuda. 1999. Association of p19ARF with Mdm2 inhibits ubiquitin ligase activity of Mdm2 for tumor suppressor p53. EMBO J. 18:22-27.[CrossRef][Medline]
20. Hurt, E. C. 1993. The nuclear pore complex. FEBS Lett. 325:76-80.[CrossRef][Medline]
21. Ikeda, S., S. Kishida, H. Yamamoto, H. Murai, S. Koyama, and A. Kikuchi. 1998. Axin, a negative regulator of the Wnt signaling pathway, forms a complex with GSK-3ß and ß-catenin and promotes GSK-3ß-dependent phosphorylation of ß-catenin. EMBO J. 17:1371-1384.[CrossRef][Medline]
22. Johnson, E. S., I. Schwienhorst, R. J. Dohmen, and G. Blobel. 1997. The ubiquitin-like protein Smt3p is activated for conjugation to other proteins by an Aos1p/Uba2p heterodimer. EMBO J. 16:5509-5519.[CrossRef][Medline]
23.
Kadoya, T., S. Kishida, A. Fukui, T. Hinoi, T. Michiue, M. Asashima, and A. Kikuchi. 2000. Inhibition of Wnt signaling pathway by a novel Axin-binding protein. J. Biol. Chem. 275:37030-37037.
24. Kahyo, T., T. Nishida, and H. Yasuda. 2001. Involvement of PIAS1 in the sumoylation of tumor suppressor p53. Mol. Cell 8:713-718.[CrossRef][Medline]
25.
Kamitani, T., H. P. Nguyen, and E. T. Yeh. 1997. Preferential modification of nuclear proteins by a novel ubiquitin-like molecule. J. Biol. Chem. 272:14001-14004.
26. Kao, K. R., and R. P. Elinson. 1988. The entire mesodermal mantle behaves as Spemann's organizer in dorsoanterior enhanced Xenopus laevis embryos. Dev. Biol. 127:64-77.[CrossRef][Medline]
27. Kikuchi, A. 1999. Roles of Axin in the Wnt signalling pathway. Cell. Signal. 11:777-788.[CrossRef][Medline]
28.
Kim, K. I., S. H. Baek, Y. J. Jeon, S. Nishimori, T. Suzuki, S. Uchida, N. Shimbara, H. Saitoh, K. Tanaka, and C. H. Chung. 2000. A new SUMO-1-specific protease, SUSP1, that is highly expressed in reproductive organs. J. Biol. Chem. 275:14102-14106.
29. Kishida, M., S. Koyama, S. Kishida, K. Matsubara, S. Nakashima, K. Higano, R. Takada, S. Takada, and A. Kikuchi. 1999. Axin prevents Wnt-3a-induced accumulation of ß-catenin. Oncogene 18:979-985.[CrossRef][Medline]
30.
Kishida, S., H. Yamamoto, S.-I. Hino, S. Ikeda, M. Kishida, and A. Kikuchi. 1999. DIX domains of Dvl and Axin are necessary for protein interactions and their ability to regulate ß-catenin stability. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19:4414-4422.
31.
Kishida, S., H. Yamamoto, S. Ikeda, M. Kishida, I. Sakamoto, S. Koyama, and A. Kikuchi. 1998. Axin, a negative regulator of the Wnt signaling pathway, directly interacts with Adenomatous Polyposis Coli and regulates the stabilization of ß-catenin. J. Biol. Chem. 273:10823-10826.
32. Kitagawa, M., S. Hatakeyama, M. Shirane, M. Matsumoto, N. Ishida, K. Hattori, I. Nakamichi, A. Kikuchi, K.-I. Nakayama, and K. Nakayama. 1999. An F-box protein, FWD1, mediates ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis of ß-catenin. EMBO J. 18:2401-2410.[CrossRef][Medline]
33.
Kreig, P. A., and D. A. Melton. 1984. Functional messenger RNAs are produced by SP6 in vitro transcription of cloned cDNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 12:7057-7070.
34. Kudo, N., B. Wolff, T. Sekimoto, E. P. Schreiner, Y. Yoneda, M. Yanagida, S. Horinouchi, and M. Yoshida. 1998. Leptomycin B inhibition of signal-mediated nuclear export by direct binding to CRM1. Exp. Cell Res. 242:540-547.[CrossRef][Medline]
35. Li, S. J., and M. Hochstrasser. 1999. A new protease required for cell-cycle progression in yeast. Nature 398:246-251.[CrossRef][Medline]
36. Liu, J., J. Stevens, C. A. Rote, H. J. Yost, Y. L. Hu, R. L. White, and N. Matsunami. 2001. Siah-1 mediates a novel ß-catenin degradation pathway linking p53 to the adenomatous polyposis coli protein. Mol. Cell 7:927-936.[CrossRef][Medline]
37. Mahajan, R., C. Delphin, T. Guan, L. Gerace, and F. Melchior. 1997. A small ubiquitin-related polypeptide involved in targeting RanGAP1 to nuclear pore complex protein RanBP2. Cell 88:97-107.[CrossRef][Medline]
38. Matsuzawa, S.-I., and J. C. Reed. 2001. Siah-1, SIP, and Ebi collaborate in a novel pathway for ß-catenin degradation linked to p53 responses. Mol. Cell 7:915-926.[CrossRef][Medline]
39.
Matunis, M. J., E. Coutavas, and G. Blobel. 1996. A novel ubiquitin-like modification modulates the partitioning of the Ran-GTPase-activating protein RanGAP1 between the cytosol and the nuclear pore complex. J. Cell Biol. 135:1457-1470.
40. Molenaar, M., M. van de Wetering, M. Oosterwegel, J. Peterson-Maduro, S. Godsave, V. Korinek, J. Roose, O. Destrée, and H. Clevers. 1996. XTcf-3 transcription factor mediates ß-catenin-induced axis formation in Xenopus embryos. Cell 86:391-399.[CrossRef][Medline]
41. Moon, R. T., and D. Kimelman. 1998. From cortical rotation to organizer gene expression: toward a molecular explanation of axis specification in Xenopus. Bioessays 20:536-545.[CrossRef][Medline]
42. Mossessova, E., and C. D. Lima. 2000. Ulp1-SUMO crystal structure and genetic analysis reveal conserved interactions and a regulatory element essential for cell growth in yeast. Mol. Cell 5:865-876.[CrossRef][Medline]
43. Müller, S., C. Hoege, G. Pyrowolakis, and S. Jentsch. 2001. SUMO, ubiquitin's mysterious cousin. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2:202-210.[CrossRef][Medline]
44. Müller, S., M. J. Matunis, and A. Dejean. 1998. Conjugation with the ubiquitin-related modifier SUMO-1 regulates the partitioning of PML within the nucleus. EMBO J. 17:61-70.[CrossRef][Medline]
45. Neufeld, K. L., F. Zhang, B. R. Cullen, and R. L. White. 2000. APC-mediated downregulation of ß-catenin activity involves nuclear sequestration and nuclear export. EMBO Rep. 1:519-523.[CrossRef][Medline]
46.
Nishida, T., F. Kaneko, M. Kitagawa, and H. Yasuda. 2001. Characterization of a novel mammalian SUMO-1/Smt3-specific isopeptidase, a homologue of rat Axam, which is an Axin-binding protein promoting ß-catenin degradation. J. Biol. Chem. 276:39060-39066.
47. Nishida, T., H. Tanaka, and H. Yasuda. 2000. A novel mammalian Smt3-specific isopeptidase 1 (SMT3IP1) localized in the nucleolus at interphase. Eur. J. Biochem. 267:6423-6427.[Medline]
48. Okuma, T., R. Honda, G. Ichikawa, N. Tsumagari, and H. Yasuda. 1999. In vitro SUMO-1 modification requires two enzymatic steps, E1 and E2. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 254:693-698.[CrossRef][Medline]
49. Polakis, P. 1999. The oncogenic activation of ß-catenin. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 9:15-21.[CrossRef][Medline]
50. Rodriguez, M. S., J. M. Desterro, S. Lain, C. A. Midgley, D. P. Lane, and R. T. Hay. 1999. SUMO-1 modification activates the transcriptional response of p53. EMBO J. 18:6455-6461.[CrossRef][Medline]
51. Rosin-Arbesfeld, R., F. Townsley, and M. Bienz. 2000. The APC tumour suppressor has a nuclear export function. Nature 406:1009-1012.[CrossRef][Medline]
52. Rubinfeld, B., I. Albert, E. Porfiri, C. Fiol, S. Munemitsu, and P. Polakis. 1996. Binding of GSK3ß to the APC-ß-catenin complex and regulation of complex assembly. Science 272:1023-1026.[Abstract]
53.
Sachdev, S., L. Bruhn, H. Sieber, A. Pichler, F. Melchior, and R. Grosschedl. 2001. PIASy, a nuclear matrix-associated SUMO E3 ligase, represses LEF1 activity by sequestration into nuclear bodies. Genes Dev. 15:3088-3103.
54. Saitoh, H., D. B. Sparrow, T. Shiomi, R. T. Pu, T. Nishimoto, T. J. Mohun, and M. Dasso. 1998. Ubc9p and the conjugation of SUMO-1 to RanGAP1 and RanBP2. Curr. Biol. 8:121-124.[CrossRef][Medline]
55. Sakamoto, I., S. Kishida, A. Fukui, M. Kishida, H. Yamamoto, S.-I. Hino, T. Michiue, S. Takada, M. Asashima, and A. Kikuchi. 2000. A novel ß-catenin-binding protein inhibits ß-catenin-dependent Tcf activation and axis formation. J. Biol. Chem. 275:32871-32878.