Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Molecular and Cellular Biology, August 2002, p. 5527-5538, Vol. 22, No. 15
0270-7306/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/MCB.22.15.5527-5538.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Experimental Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, 20141 Milan,1 The FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology, 20139 Milan, Italy,2 Department of Molecular and Cell Biology and Center for Biomedical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands3
Received 15 January 2002/ Returned for modification 15 February 2002/ Accepted 25 April 2002
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Mdm4 is structurally related to Mdm2, binds to p53, and inhibits transactivation in vitro, but unlike Mdm2, is unable to induce p53 degradation (11, 30-32). Mdm4 and Mdm2 form stable heterodimers through their C-terminal Ring finger domains, and this interaction results in a substantial increase in the steady-state levels of Mdm2 (29, 34). Ectopic expression of Mdm4 (or Hdm4) interferes with Mdm2-mediated p53 degradation, resulting in increased p53 protein levels. Recently, it has been proposed that Mdm4 stabilizes Mdm2 and p53 through distinct mechanisms (18, 33). Mdm4 expression reverses Mdm2-mediated p53 nuclear export and leads to accumulation of ubiquitylated, nuclear p53 without significantly affecting Mdm2-mediated ubiquitylation of p53. In contrast, Mdm4 stabilizes Mdm2 by inhibiting its self-ubiquitylation (33). The biological significance of these activities remains to be elucidated.
Mutation of Mdm4 has been recently reported to cause p53-dependent embryonic lethality in mice, essentially due to severe proliferation defects (25). The absence of apoptosis in these mutants led to the hypothesis that Mdm4 selectively inhibits the ability of p53 to induce growth arrest; Mdm2 would, instead, regulate the apoptotic function of p53. We report here another Mdm4 mutant generated by insertional mutagenesis, which also leads to a p53-dependent embryonic lethality, but with striking phenotypic differences such as later embryonic lethality and evidence of massive apoptosis in the developing central nervous system (CNS). These data support a direct role for Mdm4 in regulating both apoptotic and cell cycle arrest functions of p53. Furthermore, we present evidence suggesting that deletion of Mdm4 has no additional effect on cell proliferation or cell cycle control when p53 is absent.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (31K): [in a new window] |
FIG.1. A gene trap event in the Mdm4 locus leads to a null Mdm4 mutation and early embryonic lethality in mice. (A) The structure and size of the retroviral construct along with the structures of the wild-type and mutated alleles and the positions of the oligonucleotides used for the PCR-based strategy are depicted. Exons (black vertical bars) and the long terminal repeats (LTRs) of the viral vector (white boxes) are indicated. SA and SD are the splicing acceptor site and donor site, respectively; neor, neomycin resistance gene. (B) Mdm4 wild-type and mutant embryos (homozygous) at different stages of embryonic development (E10.5 and E11.5). (C) Mdm4/Trp53 wild-type and mutant (heterozygous and homozygous) embryos at different stages of embryonic development (E10.5 and E12.5). (D) PCR analysis of embryos with the indicated genotypes. The positions of the three primers a, b, and c are indicated. (E) Western blotting analysis of Mdm4 protein expression. NIH 3T3 cells (as a control) or mouse brain protein extracts from wild-type (Mdm4+/+ Trp53+/+) or mutant (Mdm4+/- Trp53+/+, Mdm4+/- Trp53+/-, and Mdm4-/- Trp53-/-) embryos were immunoprecipitated with the anti-Mdm4 rabbit polyclonal antibodies p55, p56, and SI23 (anti-X [ -X]) or with preimmune (PI) serum. Mdm4 was detected by Western blot analysis using a mixture of monoclonal antibodies 6B1A and 11F4D.
|
Histology. For sectioning, embryos were fixed in 4% paraformaldhehyde-1x phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) overnight, embedded in paraffin, sectioned, and stained in hematoxylin and eosin.
In situ hybridization (ISH), 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine (BrdU), and immunohistochemistry.
RNA in situ hybridization was carried out essentially as previously described (1), using [
-32P]-UTP-labeled antisense cRNA probed transcribed from plasmids containing murine cDNA fragments of Mdm4, Cyclin E, and p21Waf1.
For BrdU experiments, pregnant females were injected intraperitoneally with 100 µg of BrdU/g of body weight and sacrificed 2 h later.
The following antisera were used: biotinylated anti-proliferating cell nuclear antigen (anti-PCNA) (1/200; Pharmingen), anti-BrdU (1/200; Boehringer Mannheim), anti-cleaved caspase 3 (1/200; Cell Signaling), and anti-phosphorylated histone H3 (PH3) (1/200; Upstate). Except for the PCNA staining, an appropriate biotinylated secondary antibody immunoglobulin G was then applied to the slides. Avidin-conjugated peroxidase (ABC and DAB kits from Vector Laboratories) was used for immunostaining.
Immunoprecipitation and Western blotting. Adult brains of the appropriate genotype were smashed through a cell strainer (70-µm pore size; Becton Dickinson) in ice-cold PBS. Cells were washed twice in 1x PBS. The cells were lysed in a solution containing 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 2.5 mM EGTA, 2 mM dithiothreitol, 0.1% Tween 20, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 0.4 U of aprotinin per ml, 10 mM ß-glycerophosphate, 1 mM NaF, and 0.1 mM NaVO4. The cells were sonicated three times for 10 s with a sonicator (ultrasonic processor XL; Heat Systems) (12 to 14% power). Immunoprecipitation experiments were performed on 2 mg of brain extract using rabbit polyclonal anti-Mdm4 antibodies p55 and p56 raised against full-length recombinant Mdm4 and SI23 raised against two peptides chosen in the central portion of the protein (amino acids 142 to 156 and 268 to 281). Mdm4 was detected using a 1/3 dilution mixture of the hybridoma supernatants 6B1A (recognizing an epitope in the central portion of the protein) and 11F4D (recognizing an epitope in the Ring finger domain of Mdm4) (25, 33). This particular combination of antibodies ensures detection of all possible Mdm4 protein variants.
For direct Western blotting analysis, mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) were prepared and lysed as described above. The protein concentration was determined by Bradford assay, and 75 µg of each extract was fractionated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to nitrocellulose. The antibodies used were as follows: anti-p53 sheep polyclonal Ab-7 (1/500; Oncogene), anti-p21 rabbit polyclonal F5 (1/500; Santa Cruz), antivinculin mouse monoclonal antibody, clone hVIN-1, (1/1,000; Sigma) for normalization.
Immunofluorescence. For immunofluorescence staining, cells were plated on glass coverslips in 12-well dishes and fixed 10 min in 4% paraformaldhehyde-1x PBS. Fixed coverslips were washed twice in PBS, permeabilized in 0.15% Triton X-100 for 5 min, and incubated in blocking buffer (PBS with 2% bovine serum albumin) for 30 min. Cells were then incubated in blocking buffer containing primary antibody (anti-p53 rabbit polyclonal antibody CM5; Novocastra Laboratories, Ltd.) for 1 h and then washed extensively in PBS before incubation with the appropriate fluorochrome-conjugated secondary antibody. Stained cells were mounted on glass slides and examined by standard immunofluorescence microscopy.
Tissue culture assays. Cells were maintained in Dulbecco modified Eagle medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Gibco). Mouse embryonic fibroblasts were prepared from embryos at embryonic day 10.5 (E10.5). The head and organs were dissected, and fetal tissue samples were rinsed in PBS, minced, and trypsinized for10 min at 37°C, and subsequently dissociated in medium. The cells were then plated out into 12- or 6-well plates. These cells were considered passage 1 MEFs.
For growth curves, 2.5 x 10 4 or 5 x 10 5 cells were either plated in duplicate into 12-well plates or 10-cm-diameter dishes, respectively. At various time points, cells were trypsinized and counted.
To examine the relative plating efficiencies, passage 3 MEFs were plated at 1 x 10 3, 2 x 10 3, and 4 x 10 3 cells per plate onto 10-cm-diameter plates, cultured for about 10 days, and then washed twice with PBS, fixed, and stained for 5 min (1% crystal violet in 35% methanol). Colonies containing >50 cells were counted.
To compare the survival of the various genotypes, MEFs following treatment with DNA-damaging agents, duplicate plates of two different lines of wild-type, Trp53-/- Mdm4+/+, Trp53-/- Mdm4+/-, or Trp53-/- Mdm4-/- cells were plated onto 10-cm-diameter dishes at low density (104 cells per plate). Twenty-four hours after the cells were plated, they were exposed to increasing UV radiation with a UV stratalinker (Stratagene). Ten days after exposure, the cells were fixed and stained for 5 min (1% crystal violet in 35% methanol). Colonies containing >50 cells were counted.
Cell cycle studies. For analysis of the Mdm4-/- cells, 105 cells were seeded 24 h on glass coverslips in 12-well dishes prior to treatment to prevent contact inhibition. The cultures were pulse-labeled with 10 µM BrdU (Sigma) for 1 h, the coverslips were then fixed for10 min in 4% paraformaldhehyde-1x PBS. For the G1/S cell cycle progression assay, cells were synchronized at G 0 by culturing in medium supplemented with 0.1% FBS for 96 h. Cells were then trypsinized and seeded on glass coverslips at a low density in 12-well dishes (2.5 x 10 4 cells per well) in normal growth medium supplemented with 10 µM BrdU (Sigma). After 24 h of BrdU labeling, cells were fixed 10 min in 4% paraformaldhehyde-1x PBS. The BrdU-positive cells were identified by indirect immunofluorescence essentially as described above, except that the primary antibody (anti-BrdU mouse monoclonal antibody; Sigma) was diluted in blocking buffer containing 3 mM MgCl 2 plus 100 U of DNase I (Boehringer) per ml. The secondary antibody was a fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated anti-mouse antibody.
For the cell cycle analysis of the double p53/Mdm4-deficient cells, 1.2 x 10 6 MEFs, passage 3, were plated onto 10-cm-diameter dishes 24 h prior treatment. Cultures were either left untreated or treated with 8 Gy of gamma irradiation (137Cs source at a rate of 0.86 Gy/min). After 48 h, the cultures were pulse-labeled with 10 µM BrdU for 1 h, harvested by trypsinization, and fixed in 70% ethanol. Alternatively, cells were synchronized at G 0 by culturing in medium supplemented with 0.1% FBS for 96 h. MEFs were either untreated or treated with 8 Gy of gamma irradiation, cultured for 24 h in normal growth medium supplemented with 10 µM BrdU (Sigma), harvested by trypsinization, and fixed in 70% ethanol. DNA synthesis and DNA content were analyzed by flow cytometry as previously described (12). In brief, BrdU-labeled cells fixed in 70% ethanol were treated with 2 N HCl (20 min at room temperature [RT]) followed by addition of 2 volumes of 0.1 M sodium borate (pH 8.5). The cells were incubated (1 h at RT) with an anti-BrdU mouse monoclonal antibody, washed, and incubated (1 h at RT) with fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated anti-mouse antibody. Cells were counterstained overnight with 5 µg of propidium iodide per ml containing 40 µg of RNase per ml. The stained cells were analyzed with a FACscan (Becton-Dickinson) using a cellQuest program.
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Genotyping analysis of progeny from Mdm4 heterozygous intercrosses
|
![]() View larger version (84K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. ISH analysis of an E11.5 mouse embryo with an Mdm4 antisense probe. Abbreviations: F, forebrain; M, midbrain; Hi, hindbrain; H, heart.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Genotypes of mice from Mdm4+/- p53+/- x Mdm4+/- p53+/- crosses
|
Failure in cell proliferation in Mdm4 mutants. To study the effect of the Mdm4 mutation on cellular proliferation, we measured in situ incorporation of BrdU and expression levels of Cyclin E1 and proliferating cell nuclear antigen by ISH or immunohistochemistry, respectively. For each of these proliferation markers, signal was markedly reduced in the whole Mdm4 mutant embryos (shown for Cyclin E1 in Fig. 3A and B). This was particularly notable around E12 in the fetal liver, a site of intense cell proliferation due to the massive expansion of committed erythroid lineage cells (shown for Cyclin E1 and BrdU incorporation in Fig. 3). Together, these results suggest a generalized failure in cell proliferation in the Mdm4 mutants, thus providing an explanation for the reduced size and the paleness of the Mdm4 mutant embryos.
![]() View larger version (62K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Impaired cellular proliferation in Mdm4 mutant embryos. (A and B) Decreased Cyclin E1 expression in Mdm4-/- embryos compared to wild-type littermates as determined by ISH analysis; the whole embryos (A) and close-up of the fetal livers (B) are shown. (C) Analysis of proliferation of the fetal liver hematopoietic progenitors. Embryos were stained with an antibody to detect in vivo BrdU incorporation and counterstained using hematoxylin and eosin. Very few BrdU-positive cells are found in the fetal liver of Mdm4 homozygous mutant embryos. (D) Increased p21 expression in Mdm4-/- embryos compared to wild-type littermates as determined by ISH analysis.
|
![]() View larger version (29K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. (A to D) Impaired proliferation of Mdm4-null fibroblasts in cultures. (A) Growth curves for Mdm4+/+, Mdm4+/-, Mdm4-/-, and Mdm4-/- Trp53-/- MEF cultures at passage 2. A total of 2.5 x 10 4 cells were plated into 12-well plates. Cultures were harvested at daily intervals,and the total number of cells were determined and normalized to the number of cells at day 0 (20 h after plating) (relative number [Nb] of cells). The numbers refer to the mean values of two independently derived MEF cultures of each genotype. (B) Level of BrdU incorporation by asynchronously growing passage 2 Mdm4+/- Trp53+/- and Mdm4-/- Trp53+/- MEFs. (C) Quantitative analysis of the percentage of S-phase cells after serum stimulation for 24 h of G 0-synchronized Mdm4+/+, Mdm4+/-, and Mdm4-/- MEF cultures. The BrdU-labeled MEFs were analyzed by indirect immunofluorescence, and the S-phase cells were determined by staining with anti-BrdU antibody. (D) Photomicrographs of MEFs at passage 2. Mdm4-null MEFs were growth arrested; Mdm4+/+ MEFs were not growth arrested. (E) Constitutive high levels of p21 protein expression in Mdm4-/- MEFs at passage 1. Western blotting analysis from Mdm4+/+ cell lysates, two independent Mdm4+/-, and Mdm4-/- MEF cultures at passage 1. Vinculin serves as loading control. (F and G) Constitutive high levels of p53 protein expression in Mdm4-/- MEFs at passage 3. (F) p53 protein levels determined by Western blotting analysis using the sheep polyclonal antibody Ab-7 from Mdm4+/- and Mdm4-/- MEF cell lysates. Vinculin serves as a loading control. (G) p53 protein (red) levels examined by indirect immunofluorescence using the rabbit polyclonal antibody CM5 in Mdm4+/- and Mdm4-/- MEF cultures. The DNA (blue) is stained with 4',6'-diamidino-2-phenylindole (Dapi). The absence of signal in Mdm4+/- Trp53-/- MEF cultures demonstrates the specificity of the antibody.
|
E10.5 Mdm4-/- MEFs showed a dramatic reduction of their proliferation rate compared to Mdm4+/+ cells, whereas MEFs from heterozygous embryos had an intermediate behavior (Fig. 4A). BrdU incorporation experiments showed a marked reduction of cycling cells in the Mdm4-/- cells, suggesting an S-phase defect (see Fig. 4B for BrdU incorporation values of Trp53+/- Mdm4+/- and Trp53+/- Mdm4-/- MEFs). Cultured Mdm4-/- MEFs showed morphological (cytoplasmic enlargement and flattening of the cells [Fig. 4D]) and functional (unresponsiveness to growth factors [Fig. 4C]) properties of premature senescence, as early as after two passages of culture. The reduced proliferation potential of Mdm4-/- MEFs was entirely p53 dependent, since it was completely rescued in the absence of p53 (Fig. 4A). Cells lacking both Mdm4 and p53 proliferated even faster than wild-type cells (Mdm4+/+) (Fig. 4A), to an extent comparable with p53-null cells (Fig. 5A).
![]() View larger version (34K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. (A and B) Proliferation of embryonic fibroblasts (A) Growth rates of fibroblasts that are either wild type, heterozygous, or nullizygous for Mdm4 and nullizygous for p53. Cell numbers at each point represent an average of two separate lines of cells, two plates of cells for each line. (B) Colony formation of wild-type, heterozygous, or nullizygous for Mdm4 and p53 MEFs grown in conditions of low cell density (103 cells per 10-cm-diameter plate). Values given represent an average of two plates each of two lines of cells. Bars indicating standard deviation values are shown. A total of 2 x 10 3 cells were plated (10-cm-diameter dishes), cultured, fixed, and stained. Representative dishes are shown over the bars for the corresponding genotypes. (C) Colony formation following DNA damage. Wild-type MEFs or MEFs heterozygous or nullizygous for Mdm4 and p53 were plated at low density (104 cells per 10-cm-diameter dish) following treatment with increasing UV irradiation (2, 5, and 10 J/m2). Two independent experiments were performed, and the mean values with standard deviations (error bars) are presented. (D, E, and F) Cell cycle analysis on embryonic fibroblasts determined by FACScan analysis. The S-phase cells (BrdU-positive cells) are revealed by staining with anti-BrdU antibody, and DNA content is revealed with propidium iodide. (D) G1/S ratio of MEFs that are wild type, heterozygous, or nullizygous for Mdm4 and p53. (E) Effects of gamma irradiation on the cell cycles of MEFs that are wild type, heterozygous, or nullizygous for Mdm4 and p53. The G1/S ratio is given compared to untreated G1/S values. (F) S-phase entry following serum stimulation and gamma irradiation of synchronized MEFs that are wild type, heterozygous, or nullizygous for Mdm4 and p53. The percentages of cells in the S phase of the cell cycle immediately after starvation, cells grown for 24 h in growth medium (not treated [NT]), or cells that had undergone gamma irradiation (X-Ray).
|
No critical role for Mdm4 in cell proliferation and cell cycle control independently of p53. To determine whether Mdm4 can modulate cell cycling in a p53-independent manner, we examined a number of in vitro growth properties of p53- and Mdm4/Trp53-deficient MEFs. For each experiment, we used passage 3 fibroblasts from two separate lines of each genotype.
MEFs were prepared and counted at various time points following initial plating. As expected, Trp53-/- fibroblasts have a higher rate of cell proliferation than Trp53+/- or Trp53+/+ fibroblasts (not shown) (9). There was, however, no significant difference in the proliferative rates or saturation densities of Trp53-/- Mdm4+/+ fibroblasts and Trp53-/- Mdm4+/- or Trp53-/- Mdm4-/- fibroblasts (Fig. 5A).
We then investigated the ability of MEFs to survive and proliferate when plated at very low densities (colony formation at clonal densities) (Fig. 5B). As previously reported, 10 times more colonies were present on plates seeded with p53-deficient cells compared to wild-type cells (13). However, no significant difference was detected for Trp53-/- fibroblasts that were wild type, heterozygous, or nullizygous for functional Mdm4.
Cells were then plated at low densities and treated with increasing doses of UV, and colonies were counted 10 days after treatment (UV radiation survival assay; Fig. 5C). As previously reported for the Trp53-/- MEFs (13), this treatment led to decreased survival of cells from all four genotypes. Although a difference in the survival of wild-type and p53-deficient cells was particularly evident at higher dose points, no difference was detected in the survival of p53-deficient cells and cells deficient for both p53 and Mdm4 at any dose.
To unravel a putative role of Mdm4 in promoting cell cycle progression independently of p53, MEFs were pulsed with BrdU for 1 h and the numbers of cells present in the G1 and S phases of the cell cycle were determined using flow microfluorometry analysis (Fig. 5D). As expected, the G1/S ratio of p53-deficient cells was decreased relative to wild-type cells (9). However, there was no difference in the G1/S ratio of Trp53-/- Mdm4+/+, Trp53-/- Mdm4+/-, and Trp53-/- Mdm4-/- fibroblasts.
Cells were then gamma irradiated (8 Gy), and the ratio of cells in the G1 and S phases of the cell cycle were compared with untreated G1/S ratio values (Fig. 5E). Irradiation of wild-type cells, but not p53-deficient cells, resulted in increased relative number of G1 cells, consistent with the notion that p53 is required to block progression of cells into S phase following DNA damage. Irradiated Trp53-/- Mdm4+/- and Trp53-/- Mdm4-/- fibroblasts exhibited the same G1/S phase ratio as the p53-deficient cells. In the same lines, MEFs synchronized at G 0 by serum starvation were treated with 0 or 10 Gy of gamma irradiation, released into serum-containing medium, and evaluated for BrdU incorporation (Fig. 5F). Irrespective of the presence of functional Mdm4, the percentages of BrdU-positive cells were comparable for all p53-deficient cells, while there was more than 50% reduction of S-phase cells in wild-type MEFs following gamma irradiation. Together these data suggest that Mdm4 does not affect the ability to enter S phase following DNA damage through a p53-independent pathway.
Finally, to determine whether the absence of Mdm4 affects the rate of spontaneous immortalization of p53-deficient cells, MEFs were passaged in culture following the classical 3T3 protocol. Once again, no difference was observed in growth properties of the various cell lines, suggesting that the absence of Mdm4 does not alter the induction of immortality in p53-deficient cells during long-term passage in culture (not shown).
Spontaneous apoptosis in the CNS of Mdm4 mutants. To determine if the growth deficit of Mdm4 mutant embryos could also be accounted by an excess of apoptosis, serially sectioned E9.5 to E11.5 embryos were analyzed by immunohistochemistry using an antibody specific to the cleaved form of caspase 3 (21). This analysis revealed extensive cell death in the developing CNS, particularly evident at the latest stages of embryonic development (E11.5) (Fig. 6A). Interestingly, this phenotype was specific to neural tissue, not being found in any other cell types of the mutant embryos (not shown), and directly p53 dependent, since it was not detected in the Trp53-/- Mdm4-/- brain (Fig. 6B). As a consequence of cell death, the telencephalic wall was thinner and lateral ventricles were larger than those of the control. Closer inspection of the hindbrain and spinal cord neuroepithelium revealed apoptosis predominantly in cells of the mantle (or intermediate) zone, while the PCNA-positive, highly proliferating, neuronal precursor cells of the ventricular zone appeared largely protected (Fig. 6A). Although reduced in numbers, these PCNA-positive neuroblasts were present in the Mdm4 mutant embryos. They also appeared mainly p21 negative by ISH (Fig. 6A), suggesting that p53 function is tightly regulated in these cells.
![]() View larger version (111K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. (A) Analysis of proliferation, apoptosis, and p21 expression levels in the developing CNS (hindbrain and spinal cord) of Mdm4-/- and Mdm4+/+ embryos 12 days postcoitum. We stained wild-type and Mdm4 mutant embryos with antibody recognizing PCNA to detect cell proliferation and with antibody directed against the activated form of caspase 3 to detect apoptosis. The p21 expression pattern in the same regions of the CNS was determined by ISH. Dark field (red signal) view of sections counterstained with Hoechst (blue signal). Positive cells are indicated by the arrows. vl, ventricular lumen. (B) Absence of apoptosis in the developing CNS of E11.5 Mdm4-/- p53-/- embryos. Mdm4+/+ p53+/-, Mdm4-/- p53+/-, Mdm4-/- p53-/-, and Mdm4+/+ p53-/- embryos were stained with antibody directed against the activated form of caspase 3 to detect apoptosis. The ventricular zone (vz) is indicated.
|
|
|
|---|
Absence of Mdm4 expression leads to increased p53 protein stability and, although not formally demonstrated here biochemically, to p53 constitutive activation. As a consequence, one of the p53-responsive genes, p21CIP1/WAF1, was found dramatically and quasi ubiquitously up-regulated in our Mdm4-deficient embryos. Since p21 is involved in the inhibition of G1-to-S-phase cell cycle progression, this may account for the growth defect observed in the Mdm4 mutant embryos. Similarly, increased p21 protein levels in Mdm4-deficient cells (MEFs) could account for their proliferative defects, including slower proliferation, inefficient cell cycle G1/S progression and unresponsiveness to growth factors. We are currently testing this possibility by transferring the Mdm4 mutation into a p21-null background.
However, why some cells undergo cell cycle arrest (fetal liver hematopoietic cells, for instance) and others show a p53 apoptotic response (neuronal cells) remains unanswered (for a review, see reference 36). One possible explanation is that the profile of genes transcriptionally regulated by p53 differs in different cell populations or under different physiological conditions, such as growth. This mouse model may then provide a useful tool for the identification of modulators and/or effectors of the cell fate following p53 activation. It would, for instance, be of interest to study in greater detail the expression pattern of newly identified p53-responsive genes or new putative p53 regulators such as the ASPP proteins in Mdm4-deficient embryos (28).
Regardless of molecular mechanisms, the consequences of massive apoptosis in the Mdm4-null embryos are dramatic for brain development, confirming that tight regulation of p53 is essential for neural development (for reviews, see references 8 and 19). The brain mantle of Mdm4-deficient embryos was thinner and the lateral ventricles were larger than in control embryos, and readily apparent hydrocephalus was frequently found. Notably, this phenotype is reminiscent of that reported for mice treated with X-rays at early gestational stages (2). In wild-type embryos, p53 protein is detectable only in the developing nervous system (8 and 10 days postcoitum), in particular in the mantle layer of the spinal cord, and the observed protein is transcriptionally active (17). Additional evidence supporting a role for p53 in neural progenitor cell development came from studies of mice lacking the pRb tumor suppressor protein which demonstrated the existence, in neural precursors, of an intrinsic p53-dependent apoptotic pathway involved in the elimination of cells that fail to differentiate properly (for a review, see reference 19). In addition, activation of the p53 protein following ionizing irradiation results in marked neuronal cell death (17). Similarly, lack of Mdm4 expression, as in our mutant mice, results in constitutive p53 activation and extensive p53-dependent apoptosis in the CNS.
The data in this report strongly indicate that the predominant role of Mdm4, as proposed for Mdm2 earlier (13), is to inactivate p53 function. First, the absence of p53 rescues the embryonic lethal phenotype of Mdm4-deficient mice and the double nullizygous Mdm4/p53 mice are viable. This observation indicates that any non-p53-mediated functions possessed by Mdm4 are not critical for embryonic development and survival. Second, we did not observe any differences in the rate of proliferation, immortalization frequency, survival after genotoxic insult, or cycling of cells that were deficient for p53 or both p53 and Mdm4. We are currently analyzing the rate and the spectrum of tumor formation in p53-deficient and Mdm4/p53-deficient mice. However, based on the results presented here, one might expect these mice to exhibit similar incidence and spectrum of spontaneous tumor formation in vivo.
A recent report has documented the ability of Mdm4 to inhibit the transcriptional activity of ectopically expressed SMAD proteins (SMAD1, SMAD2, SMAD3, and SMAD4) (37). These proteins play a key role in the transforming growth factor ß signal transduction pathway and have therefore been implicated in the control of cell proliferation in many cell types. Moreover, Mdm4 has been implicated in the regulation of the transcriptional activity of the p53-related protein, p63 (14) and interaction between p73
and Mdm4 has also been reported (24). Based on our observations, it is difficult to envision a critical role for Mdm4 in the regulation of the activity of these transcription factors. However, since Mdm2 has also been shown to negatively regulate the same factors, it is possible that, in contrast to the regulation of p53, Mdm2 and Mdm4 regulate the transcriptional abilities of these proteins in a redundant manner. We are currently testing this possibility by generating mice that lack functional p53 and both Mdm2 and Mdm4. Alternatively, Mdm4 may only interfere with the activities of these proteins upon overexpression.
Finally, one of the major implications of this work is that Mdm4, like Mdm2, is a critical negative regulator of p53 function in vivo, thereby suggesting a role for Mdm4 in tumorigenesis. Hdm2 is frequently amplified and/or overexpressed in a number of human tumors, many of which lack mutations in Trp53 (for a review, see reference 5). Interestingly, increased Hdm4 levels were found in a significant fraction of tumor cell lines, and in general, Hdm4 expression in these cells correlates with the presence of wild-type p53 (26). Moreover, we have recently obtained preliminary evidence suggesting that increased Mdm4 levels cause inactivation of p53 function in tissue culture. It will be, therefore, of interest to determine whether Hdmx overexpression occurs in human neoplastic cells.
We thank S. Minucci and M. Faretta for many helpful discussions and/or critically reviewing this manuscript.
This work was supported in part by grants from AIRC and EC. J.-C. Marine is a recipient of a fellowship from European Community (Marie Curie Fellowship). E.L.D. is a recipient of a fellowship from The FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology.
* Corresponding author. Mailing address for Jean-Christophe Marine: Department of Experimental Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, 435 Via Ripamonti, 20141 Milan, Italy. Phone: 39 0257489834. Fax: 39 0257489851. E-mail address for Jean-Christophe Marine: cmarine{at}lar.ieo.it. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»