-Primase in Simian Virus 40 DNA Replication
Vladimir N. Podust, Jill E. Clark,,
and Ellen Fanning*
Department of Biological Sciences and Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37232
Received 12 March 2002/ Returned for modification 15 April 2002/ Accepted 20 May 2002
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-primase (pol-prim) is a heterotetramer with DNA polymerase and primase activities. The polymerase (p180) and primase (p48 and p58) subunits synthesize primers and extend them, but the function of the remaining subunit (p68) is poorly understood. Genetic studies in yeast suggested an essential role for the p68 ortholog in early S phase prior to the hydroxyurea-sensitive step, possibly a regulatory role in initiation of DNA replication, but found no evidence for an essential function of p68 later in S phase. To investigate whether the human p68 subunit has an essential role in DNA replication, we examined the ability of a purified trimeric human pol-prim lacking p68 to initiate simian virus 40 DNA replication in vitro and to synthesize and elongate primers on single-stranded DNA in the presence of T antigen and replication protein A (RPA). Both activities of trimeric pol-prim were defective, but activity was recovered upon addition of separately purified p68. Phosphorylation of p68 by cyclin A-dependent protein kinase also inhibited both activities of pol-prim. The data strongly suggest that the p68 subunit is required for priming activity of pol-prim in the presence of RPA and T antigen, both during initiation at the origin and during lagging strand replication. | INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-primase (pol-prim) is a key event in the assembly of functional replication complexes in eukaryotic cells. pol-prim initiates DNA replication by synthesizing short RNA primers on the leading and lagging strand templates and then elongating them into hybrid primers of about 35 nucleotides (3, 21, 25, 56, 62, 65). pol-prim is composed of four subunits that appear to be conserved in all eukaryotes. The human pol-prim subunits are named according to their apparent molecular weights: p180, p68, p58, and p48. The largest subunit contains the polymerase activity, and the smallest subunit contains the primase activity. Interactions of p68 with p180 and of p58 with p48 facilitate expression and nuclear import of the catalytic subunits (41, 42). In addition, the p58 subunit physically links p48 to p180 and regulates the length of primers synthesized by the primase (3, 4, 7, 10).
The role of pol-prim in initiation of mammalian DNA replication has been investigated in the cell-free simian virus 40 (SV40) DNA replication system. In this model system, synthesis of RNA primers at the viral origin of replication requires only SV40 T antigen, the single-stranded DNA binding protein replication protein A (RPA), pol-prim, and topoisomerase I (23, 62). T antigen assembles on the viral origin, unwinds the parental DNA, and recruits the required cellular proteins to the replication fork. The single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) generated by T antigen is sequestered by RPA, and pol-prim synthesizes the first primers on the leading and lagging strand templates. Subsequently, pol-prim is displaced from the primer-template by the clamp-loader replication factor C (RFC), the PCNA sliding clamp, and DNA polymerase
, which extends the primers of both the leading and lagging strands (62, 69). Several lines of evidence suggest that T antigen interacts specifically with pol-prim, constituting a simple primosome, and that these interactions are critical in the recruitment and activity of pol-prim on ssDNA in the presence of RPA. T antigen stimulates the primase and polymerase activities of pol-prim through its physical association with all four subunits of pol-prim (8, 9, 12-14, 24, 66). The primase activity of pol-prim is markedly inhibited on RPA-saturated ssDNA, and T antigen relieves this inhibition (9, 37). Antibodies against T antigen that block its interactions with either RPA or pol-prim disrupt its ability to facilitate priming in the presence of RPA (66, 67). However, the precise requirements for activity of this simple primosome, in particular whether p68 is required, remain poorly understood.
In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the p68 ortholog, known as p86 or the B subunit, is required for cell viability and executes an essential function in early S phase prior to the hydroxyurea-sensitive step, suggesting a possible role in initiation of DNA replication (19). However, no essential function of the B subunit was detected later in S phase (19). The B subunit was also dispensable for in vitro reconstitution of an enzymatically active complex of the other three subunits (7), suggesting that it may perform a regulatory function in initiation of replication. Consistent with this idea, the B/p68 subunit is phosphorylated in a cell cycle-dependent manner in both yeast and human cells (18, 20, 49, 60). Hypophosphorylated pol-prim isolated from human cells at G1/S supports efficient initiation of SV40 DNA replication in vitro, but hyperphosphorylated pol-prim from G2/M cells has minimal activity (60). Phosphorylation of p68 by cyclin A/cdk2 or cdk1 in vitro targets the same sites that are phosphorylated in vivo in G2/M and inhibits pol-prim activity in initiation of SV40 replication (60). However, the mechanism through which p68 phosphorylation regulates SV40 DNA replication remains unclear.
In this study, a trimeric form of human DNA pol-prim lacking p68 was used to investigate the possible functions of p68 in DNA replication using the SV40 model system. The trimer exhibited enzymatic activity in several simple assays in the absence of other replication proteins. However, the trimer was defective in initiation of SV40 DNA replication, as well as in priming and elongation on RPA-coated ssDNA. Addition of separately purified p68 restored activity in both of these assays, indicating that p68 is required for primosome activity in the presence of RPA. Several speculative models for the function of p68 during viral and chromosomal DNA replication are discussed.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Recombinant human pol-prim prephosphorylated with purified cyclin A/cdk2 was prepared as described previously (60). Mock-phosphorylated pol-prim was prepared using exactly the same protocol, except that cyclin A/cdk2 was omitted from the prephosphorylation reaction (60).
Purification of other proteins. The baculovirus-expressed histidine (his)-tagged p68 subunit of human pol-prim was purified by nickel affinity chromatography from extracts of Hi-5 insect cells infected with a recombinant baculovirus as described previously (51). For bacterial expression, cDNAs encoding p68, p68 residues 1 to 240, and p68 residues 241to 598 (8) were cloned into pET28a (Novagen, Madison, Wis.). The his-tagged p68 polypeptides were expressed in Escherichia coli BL21(DE3) and purified by Ni-nitrilotriacetic acid affinity chromatography (51). SV40 T antigen was purified by immunoaffinity chromatography from extracts of Hi-5 insect cells infected with a recombinant baculovirus exactly as described previously (51). Bacterially expressed recombinant human RPA (22), E. coli ssDNA binding protein (SSB) (28), and calf thymus topoisomerase I (43) were purified as described elsewhere.
Nuclease detection assay. Increasing amounts of purified pol-prim (50 to 500 ng) were incubated with 5 pmol of 5'-32P-end-labeled oligodeoxyribonucleotide (5'CAGGGCCCGGGCCAAGCACAGAATGCTTGTGTTCTCGCCGGTTC) in 30 mM HEPES (pH 7.9), 7 mM magnesium acetate, 1 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), 4 mM ATP, 40 mM creatine phosphate, and 0.04 mg of creatine kinase/ml for 1 h at 37°C. Reaction products were adjusted to 0.05% (wt/vol) bromophenol blue, 0.05% (wt/vol) xylene cyanol, and 2.5% (wt/vol) Ficoll 400, and loaded on 8.0% polyacrylamide gels. Radiolabeled DNA fragments were resolved by electrophoresis in 45 mM Tris, 45 mM boric acid, 1 mM EDTA for 1.5 h at 100 V. The gel was dried and the radiolabeled DNA was detected by autoradiography. The results of this analysis revealed no evidence of nuclease contamination (data not shown).
DNA polymerase activity assay.
The polymerase activities of the trimer and tetramer were tested on a randomly primed poly(dA)-oligo(dT) (20:1) template (Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, N.J.). Reaction mixtures (20 µl) were assembled on ice and contained 0.5 µg of DNA in reaction buffer (50 mM bis-Tris-HCl [pH 6.5], 1 mM DTT, 10 mM KCl, 7 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mg of bovine serum albumin/ml, 0.02 mM dTTP), 0.1 µCi of [
-32P]dTTP (3,000 Ci/mmol) (Amersham Biosciences), and pol-prim as indicated in the figure legends. After incubation for 10 min at 37°C, reaction products were precipitated with cold 10% (vol/vol) trichloroacetic acid (TCA) and spotted on glass fiber filters (GF/C; Whatman, Clifton, N.J.). The filters were washed five times with wash buffer (120 mM Na2H2P2O7, 1.2 M HCl) and once with 100% ethanol and dried at room temperature. Radioactivity was analyzed by scintillation counting.
DNA primase activity assay.
The primase activities of the pol-prim trimer and tetramer were tested on single-stranded M13 DNA. Primase reaction mixtures (20 µl) contained 50 to 500 ng of pol-prim, 100 ng of M13 DNA in reaction buffer (30 mM HEPES-KOH [pH 7.9], 1 mM DTT, 7 mM magnesium acetate, 4 mM ATP, 0.2 mM UTP, 0.2 mM GTP, 0.01 mM CTP), and 20 µCi of [
-32P]CTP (3,000 Ci/mmol; Dupont NEN, Boston, Mass.). Reactions were assembled on ice and incubated at 37°C for 90 min. Reaction products were precipitated with 2% NaClO4 in acetone, washed with acetone, and dried. The products were dissolved in formamide loading buffer (45% [vol/vol] formamide, 5 mM EDTA, 0.08% [wt/vol] xylene cyanol, 0.08% [wt/vol] bromophenol blue) at 65°C for 10 min and resolved by denaturing 20% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) for 4 to 5 h at 500 V. The reaction products were visualized by autoradiography.
Stimulation of priming and elongation by T antigen.
Reaction mixtures (20 µl) contained 25 ng of single-stranded M13 DNA, 30 ng of pol-prim tetramer or 60 ng of trimer, and 250 ng of T antigen in elongation buffer (30 mM HEPES-KOH [pH 7.9], 7 mM magnesium acetate, 0.01 mM ZnCl2, 1 mM DTT, 4 mM ATP, 0.2 mM GTP, 0.2 mM UTP, 0.2 mM CTP, 0.02 mM dATP, 0.1 M dGTP, 0.1 mM dTTP, 0.1 mM dCTP, 40 mM creatine phosphate, 0.04 mg of creatine kinase/ml) supplemented with 3 µCi of [
-32P]dATP (3,000 Ci/mmol) (Amersham Biosciences). Reaction mixtures were incubated at 37°C for 45 min and then digested with 0.1 mg of proteinase K/ml in the presence of 1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and 1 mM EDTA for 30 min at 37°C. Reaction products were purified over Sephadex G-50 columns (Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis, Ind.) and then precipitated with 2% NaClO4 in acetone. The products were washed, dried, resuspended in alkaline loading buffer (60 mM NaOH, 2 mM EDTA [pH 8.0], 20% [wt/vol] Ficoll, 0.10% [wt/vol] bromophenol blue, 0.10% [wt/vol] xylene cyanol), and electrophoresed on 1.5% agarose gels in running buffer (30 mM NaOH, 1 mM EDTA) for 2 h at 50 V. The gels were fixed in 10% TCA and dried. The reaction products were visualized by autoradiography. A sample of the radiolabeled products from each reaction was acid precipitated and analyzed by scintillation counting.
Singly primed M13 DNA elongation reactions.
Reaction mixtures (20 µl) contained 25 ng of singly primed M13 DNA and 25 to 250 ng of pol-prim in reaction buffer (30 mM HEPES-KOH [pH 7.9], 7 mM magnesium acetate, 1 mM DTT, 0.02 mM dATP, 0.10 mM dGTP, 0.10 mM dTTP, 0.10 mM dCTP, 40 mM creatine phosphate, and 0.04 mg of creatine kinase/ml) supplemented with 3 µCi of [
-32P]dATP (3,000 Ci/mmol) (Amersham Biosciences). Reaction mixtures were incubated at 37°C for 90 min and then digested with 0.1 mg of proteinase K/ml in the presence of 1% SDS and 1 mM EDTA for 30 min at 37°C. Radiolabeled DNA was purified over Sephadex G-50 columns (Boehringer Mannheim) and then precipitated with 2% NaClO4 in acetone. The products were washed, dried, resuspended in alkaline loading buffer (see above), and electrophoresed on 1.5% agarose gels in running buffer (30 mM NaOH, 1 mM EDTA) for 2 h at 50 V. The reaction products were visualized by autoradiography. In addition, a sample of the radiolabeled products from each reaction was acid precipitated and analyzed by scintillation counting.
Initiation of SV40 DNA replication assay. Initiation reactions were carried out with purified T antigen, RPA, topoisomerase I, and 50 to 400 ng of pol-prim in the presence of radiolabeled ribonucleotides exactly as described elsewhere (51).
Assay for SV40 initiation coupled with elongation.
Monopolymerase (17, 36, 48) reaction mixtures (20 µl) were identical to SV40 initiation reaction mixtures except that the amounts of RPA and T antigen were increased to 1,000 ng and 1,200 ng, respectively, and 0.02 mM dATP, 0.10 mM dGTP, 0.10 mM dTTP, 0.10 mM dCTP, and 3 µCi of [
-32P]dATP (3,000 Ci/mmol; Amersham Biosciences) were present. Reaction mixtures were assembled on ice, incubated at 37°C for 90 min, and then digested with 0.1 mg of proteinase K/ml in the presence of 1% SDS and 1 mM EDTA for 30 min at 37°C. Radiolabeled reaction products were purified over Sephadex G-50 columns (Boehringer Mannheim) and then precipitated with 2% NaClO4 in acetone. The products were washed, dried, resuspended in alkaline loading buffer, and electrophoresed on 1.5% agarose gels in running buffer (30 mM NaOH, 1 mM EDTA) for 2 h at 50 V. The gels were fixed in 10% TCA and dried. The reaction products were visualized by autoradiography. A sample of the radiolabeled products from each reaction was acid precipitated and analyzed by scintillation counting.
Primer synthesis and elongation in the presence of RPA.
Reaction mixtures (20 µl) containing 25 ng of single-stranded M13 DNA were assembled at 4°C and preincubated with 250 to 1,250 ng of RPA in elongation buffer (see above) at 4°C for 20 min. The reactions were then supplemented with 3 µCi of [
-32P]dATP (3,000 Ci/mmol) (Amersham Biosciences), 450 ng of pol-prim tetramer or 900 ng of trimer, and 300 to 600 ng of T antigen as indicated in the figure legends, incubated at 37°C for 45 min, and then digested with 0.1 mg of proteinase K/ml in the presence of 1% SDS and 1 mM EDTA for 30 min at 37°C. Radiolabeled reaction products were processed and analyzed as described above for the SV40 monopolymerase assay.
Immunoblotting. Immunoblotting with monoclonal antibodies 1CT102 and 2CT25, specific for the p180 subunit of pol-prim, and 9D5, specific for the p68 subunit, was performed as described previously (12, 60).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Physical interactions of SV40 T antigen with human pol-prim, in particular with the p68 subunit, stimulate both priming and primer elongation activities of pol-prim (8, 9, 46), raising the question of whether T antigen could stimulate the activities of the trimer. To address this question, tetramer and trimer complexes of equal primase activity (i.e., about twice as many moles of trimer as tetramer) were incubated with unprimed single-stranded M13 DNA in the presence of unlabeled ribo- and deoxyribonucleotides and a radiolabeled deoxynucleoside triphosphate, with or without T antigen. Reaction products were resolved by alkaline agarose electrophoresis and quantitated by phosphorimaging. At the higher amount of primase activity, T antigen stimulated both the trimer and the tetramer about sixfold (Fig. 2D), but with half the amount of primase activity, stimulation of the tetramer was greater than that of the trimer. Addition of p68 to the trimer reaction did not further enhance the level of stimulation (data not shown). These results indicate that, at least qualitatively, T-antigen-mediated stimulation of pol-prim does not require p68.
The p68 subunit of DNA pol-prim is essential for initiation of SV40 DNA replication. The initial characterization of the pol-prim trimer demonstrated polymerase and primase activities and showed that these activities could be stimulated by T antigen, suggesting that p68 was dispensable. On the other hand, the p68 subunit could be required for coordinated interactions of pol-prim with other replication proteins, such as RPA and T antigen, in viral DNA replication. If so, one would expect the trimer to be unable to support initiation of SV40 DNA replication, but the p68 subunit may be able to restore its activity. This prediction was tested using in vitro replication assays containing supercoiled SV40 origin DNA, topoisomerase I, RPA, T antigen, and pol-prim tetramer or trimer in the presence of radiolabeled ribonucleotides. Reactions containing the pol-prim tetramer generated easily detectable labeled RNA products of 7 to 14 nucleotides in length (Fig. 3A, lanes 1 to 3). However, the trimer (lanes 4 to 6) did not synthesize products above the background level. This result suggests that p68 is required for the initiation of replication at the viral origin. To confirm this interpretation, a fivefold molar excess of recombinant p68 purified from either baculovirus-infected insect cells (lane 7) or bacterial extracts (lane 8) was added to the trimer reaction mixtures. The initiation activity of the trimer was substantially restored by p68 (lanes 7 and 8). The initiation activity of the trimer was not restored by addition of the amino-terminal domain (N) of p68, which binds to T antigen (8), the carboxy-terminal domain (C), which binds to p180 (8, 40, 41), or a mixture of the N and C domains (Fig. 3A, lanes 9 and 10; data not shown). No product was synthesized in control reactions containing p68 but lacking pol-prim, demonstrating that the restoration of activity was not caused by possible contaminants in the p68 preparations (lanes 11 to 14).
|
The p68 subunit of pol-prim is required for priming and elongation on RPA-saturated single-stranded template. In vitro SV40 replication assays have demonstrated that the p68 subunit of pol-prim is essential to initiate replication, but its role in initiation is unclear. The p68 requirement for primer synthesis and elongation at the SV40 origin could be origin specific, reflecting pol-prim enhancement of T-antigen assembly on the origin, effects on T-antigen-mediated unwinding of duplex DNA, or origin-specific loading of pol-prim by T antigen. Alternatively, p68 could be more generally required for T-antigen-mediated priming by pol-prim on RPA-coated ssDNA (8, 9, 37, 46, 47). For instance, the species-specific requirement for primate pol-prim in SV40 DNA replication is apparent during initiation of DNA replication at the viral origin, but not during T-antigen-mediated priming on RPA-coated ssDNA (54).
To assess whether p68 plays a role in T-antigen-mediated priming by pol-prim in the presence of RPA, we tested the activities of the pol-prim trimer and tetramer in priming-coupled DNA synthesis on RPA-saturated ssDNA (Fig. 4). Single-stranded M13 DNA was first incubated with or without RPA, and then pol-prim tetramer or trimer was added to the reaction mixture, either with or without T antigen. In the absence of RPA, the pol-prim tetramer synthesized primers and extended them into radiolabeled DNA products of 0.4 to 4 kb (Fig. 4A, lane 1). Preincubation of the template with increasing amounts of RPA reduced the amount of reaction product by more than 10-fold (lanes 2 and 3). This inhibition was partially relieved in the presence of T antigen (Fig. 4A, lanes 4 and 5), consistent with previous reports (9, 37, 51).
|
Although several different SSBs inhibit priming by pol-prim tetramer, T antigen relieves only the inhibition by mammalian RPA, correlating with its ability to bind mammalian RPA but not other SSBs (37, 50, 54). To test whether the T-antigen-mediated priming and elongation reaction was dependent on specific protein-protein interactions of T antigen with RPA and the pol-prim trimer, the experiment in Fig. 4B was repeated using single-stranded M13 DNA saturated with bacterial SSB instead of RPA (Fig. 4C). SSB inhibited priming and elongation by the pol-prim trimer (Fig. 4C, compare lanes 2 to 5 with lane 1), but activity was not recovered in the presence of T antigen (lane 6). Moreover, neither p68 nor a mixture of p68 and T antigen restored activity of the pol-prim trimer in the presence of SSB (compare lanes 8 and 9 with lane 7). Taken together, the results of these experiments argue strongly that p68 is required for T-antigen-mediated priming and elongation by pol-prim on RPA-saturated ssDNA.
Phosphorylation of the p68 subunit by cyclin A/cdk2 inhibits priming-coupled elongation activity of pol-prim in the presence of RPA. The initiation of SV40 DNA replication in vitro is regulated by phosphorylation of pol-prim by cyclin/cdk (11, 49, 55, 60, 61). Phosphorylation of pol-prim by cyclin A/cdk2 on specific N-terminal residues of the p68 subunit, followed by purification of the pol-prim away from the kinase, resulted in a 10-fold inhibition of primer synthesis at the SV40 origin compared with mock-phosphorylated pol-prim (60, 61). These results raised the question of whether phosphorylation of p68 regulated the initiation activity of pol-prim only at the origin, or whether it might also inhibit its ability to synthesize and elongate primers during lagging strand DNA replication. To investigate this question, we prepared prephosphorylated and mock-phosphorylated purified human pol-prim and compared their properties with those described previously (60, 61). Both preparations were composed of the expected four subunits (Fig. 5A, lanes 1 and 2) and displayed DNA polymerase and primase activities in simple enzyme assays (60, 61). The mobility of the p68 subunit in the phosphorylated pol-prim was slightly retarded compared to that of the mock-phosphorylated p68, as reported previously for hyperphosphorylated p68 (60). Immunoblotting of both pol-prim preparations with a monoclonal antibody specific for p68 confirmed the identity of the p68 bands (Fig. 5B). Lastly, to confirm that the activity of the prephosphorylated pol-prim in initiation of SV40 DNA replication was effectively inhibited, both preparations were tested for SV40 origin-dependent initiation coupled with primer elongation (Fig. 5C). Mock-phosphorylated pol-prim synthesized primers and elongated them into easily detectable products (Fig. 5C, lanes 1 to 4), while the activity of the prephosphorylated pol-prim was inhibited about 10-fold (lanes 5 to 8). These results confirm and extend earlier observations that phosphorylation of pol-prim by cyclin A/cdk2 inhibits initiation of SV40 DNA replication (60, 61).
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The p68 subunit is required for primer synthesis by human pol-prim in the presence of RPA and T antigen. Trimeric pol-prim was essentially unable to initiate SV40 DNA replication, but its activity was significantly restored upon addition of purified intact p68 that had been expressed in either insect cells or bacteria (Fig. 3). Moreover, the activity of pol-prim trimer in T-antigen-mediated primer synthesis and elongation on RPA-saturated ssDNA template was also markedly reduced, but it could be largely rescued by addition of purified p68 (Fig. 4). Phosphorylation of p68 by cyclin A/cdk2 caused tetrameric pol-prim to behave much like trimeric pol-prim lacking p68 (Fig. 6). The data argue that p68 is critical both for initiation and for primer synthesis and elongation by pol-prim in the presence of RPA and T antigen, and that phosphorylation of p68 regulates both of these activities.
How does p68 promote pol-prim activity in the presence of T antigen and RPA? The p68 subunit interacts physically with the p180 subunit through its C terminus (40, 41) and with T antigen through its N terminus (8). Thus, one model is that the p68 subunit tethers the pol-prim complex to T antigen, which encircles the DNA as a processive DNA helicase, thereby promoting primer synthesis and elongation by pol-prim. Consistent with this idea, a monoclonal antibody against a C-terminal region of T antigen blocked pol-prim binding to T antigen, as well as stimulation of pol-prim activity by T antigen (9, 54, 66, 67). However, since T antigen binds to all four subunits of pol-prim (14, 24, 67), and since the activity of the trimer was stimulated by T antigen (Fig. 2D), p68 appears to be dispensable for this tethering. Thus, tethering is not fully satisfactory as an explanation for the p68 requirement, but it could represent part of the mechanism.
A second possible model is that p68 enhances the accessibility of the primase active site in the presence of RPA. It is intriguing that in the absence of RPA, the primase specific activity of the trimer on M13 ssDNA was about half that of the tetramer (Fig. 2B), while its primer elongation activity on M13 DNA was maintained (Fig. 2C). This observation suggests the possibility, that without p68, the polymerase active site of the trimer might be more accessible than the primase site. We speculate that this bias in favor of the polymerase active site may be exacerbated in the presence of RPA, so that p68 would be needed to sequester the p180 subunit and facilitate priming on RPA-saturated ssDNA.
A third possible model to explain the p68 requirement might be that coordinated T antigen binding to pol-prim and to RPA-saturated ssDNA orients pol-prim properly on the template for primer synthesis (6, 8, 9, 12-14, 67). As a hexamer, T antigen could conceivably bind simultaneously to RPA and to all four subunits of pol-prim (24, 66). T antigen was recently shown to modulate the binding mode of RPA on ssDNA, a functional interaction that may facilitate T-antigen-mediated priming by pol-prim on RPA-saturated ssDNA (51; R. D. Ott, T. Sidorova, L. Douthitt, Y. Wang, V. N. Podust, and E. Fanning, unpublished data). Since T antigen and primase bind to overlapping sites in RPA70 (6, 13, 50, 64), it is attractive to speculate that primase competes with T antigen for binding to the modified RPA-coated ssDNA. With the other subunits of pol-prim tethered to the T-antigen hexamer, p68 may be required as a loading factor to position pol-prim correctly, or to sequester the p180 active site as in the second model described above, to promote primer synthesis. This temporally and spatially coordinated binding of T antigen to RPA and pol-prim may allow RPA and pol-prim to switch places on the ssDNA, poising primase for action.
Does p68 regulate pol-prim activity in chromosomal DNA replication?
In yeast, the B subunit appears to execute an essential function before the hydroxyurea-sensitive step, but not later during S phase (19). Assuming that the B subunit serves a similar function in yeast and SV40 DNA replication, one might have expected defects in both initiation and elongation of yeast DNA replication after a shift to the nonpermissive temperature. Perhaps this mutant B subunit was defective only prior to its assembly in replication forks, where pol-prim interacts with other fork proteins, e.g., DNA polymerase
(Pol
), Dpb11, Cdc45, Sld2, and Sld3 (1, 2, 26, 27, 34, 35, 38, 39, 68). In that case, analysis of additional B subunit alleles might reveal defects in both initiation and elongation. On the other hand, chromosomal replication forks differ from those in SV40 replication. Pol
is required for chromosomal DNA replication (15, 16, 45, 56, 63), but not for SV40 DNA replication (53, 70). Moreover, in viral DNA replication, T antigen assumes the roles of multiple cellular initiation proteins, including origin recognition and DNA unwinding (5). Thus, our analysis of the functions of p68 in SV40 replication may not accurately reflect those in chromosomal replication.
In spite of the differences between SV40 and chromosomal replication, regulation of p68/B subunit activity by cdk phosphorylation shows some similarity in the two systems. Phosphorylation of p68/B subunit by cyclin-dependent kinases is observed in yeast and human cells at the G1/S transition and increases with progression to G2/M (11, 18, 20, 49, 52, 60). However, B-subunit phosphorylation is delayed in yeast during the intra-S-phase checkpoint response in a Rad53-dependent manner (52). If cdk phosphorylation of yeast pol-prim blocks its primosome activity in the presence of RPA, as observed with human pol-prim, then preventing pol-prim phosphorylation at stalled replication forks probably contributes to Rad53-dependent stabilization of the forks after DNA damage (31, 57). The notion that primosome activity of yeast pol-prim is regulated in response to DNA damage is supported by the finding that RPA70 and p48 primase mutants are defective in responding to Rad53-dependent checkpoint signals (29, 30, 33).
Human pol-prim appears to be associated with a phosphatase, as well as with cyclin A/cdk2, in human cells (11), raising the question of whether phosphate turnover may regulate pol-prim activity during S phase. We speculate that as cyclin A/cdk2 activity rises during S phase, modification of the clustered phosphorylation sites in human p68 may increase progressively, shutting down pol-prim activity as DNA replication is completed. Activation of the intra-S-phase checkpoint in human cells (32, 44), if it prevents phosphorylation of pol-prim p68 as in yeast, would prolong the window of pol-prim primosome activity, presumably at origins of replication and during lagging strand replication. Indeed, if the genomic instability associated with SV40 infection activates the intra-S-phase checkpoint, it would be expected to enhance viral DNA replication.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
The financial support of NIH grant GM52948 and Vanderbilt University is gratefully acknowledged.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Present address: Wilramstr. 25, D-81669 Munich, Germany. ![]()
Present address: 1727 Todd Dr., Johnson City, TN 37604. ![]()
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Aparicio, O. M., D. M. Weinstein, and S. P. Bell. 1997. Components and dynamics of DNA replication complexes in S. cerevisiae: redistribution of MCM proteins and Cdc45p during S phase. Cell 91:59-69.[CrossRef][Medline]
3. Arezi, B., and R. D. Kuchta. 2000. Eukaryotic DNA primase. Trends Biochem. Sci. 25:572-576.[CrossRef][Medline]
4. Arezi, B., B. W. Kirk, W. C. Copeland, and R. D. Kuchta. 1999. Interactions of DNA with human DNA primase monitored with photoactivatable cross-linking agents: implications for the role of the p58 subunit. Biochemistry 38:12899-12907.[CrossRef][Medline]
5. Baker, T. A., and S. P. Bell. 1998. Polymerases and the replisome: machines within machines. Cell 92:295-305.[CrossRef][Medline]
6. Braun, K. A., Y. Lao, Z. He, C. J. Ingles, and M. S. Wold. 1997. Role of protein-protein interactions in the function of replication protein A (RPA): RPA modulates the activity of DNA polymerase alpha by multiple mechanisms. Biochemistry 36:8443-8454.[CrossRef][Medline]
7. Brooke, R. G., and L. B. Dumas. 1991. Reconstitution of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA primase-DNA polymerase protein complex in vitro. The 86 kDa subunit facilitates but is not required for complex formation. J. Biol. Chem. 266:10093-10098.
8. Collins, K. L., A. A. Russo, B. Y. Tseng, and T. J. Kelly. 1993. The role of the 70 kDa subunit of human DNA polymerase alpha in DNA replication. EMBO J. 12:4555-4566.[Medline]
9. Collins, K. L., and T. J. Kelly. 1991. Effects of T antigen and replication protein A on the initiation of DNA synthesis by DNA polymerase alpha-primase. Mol. Cell. Biol. 11:2108-2115.
10. Copeland, W. C., and T. S. F. Wang. 1993. Enzymatic characterization of the individual mammalian primase subunits reveals a biphasic mechanism for initiation of DNA replication. J. Biol. Chem. 268:26179-26189.
11. Dehde, S., G. Rohaly, O. Schub, H.-P. Nasheuer, W. Bohn, J. Chemnitz, W. Deppert, and I. Dornreiter. 2001. Two immunologically distinct human DNA polymerase
-primase subpopulations are involved in cellular DNA replication. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21:2581-2593.
12. Dornreiter, I., A. Hoss, A. K. Arthur, and E. Fanning. 1990. SV40 T antigen binds directly to the large subunit of purified DNA polymerase alpha. EMBO J. 9:3329-3336.[Medline]
13. Dornreiter, I., L. F. Erdile, I. U. Gilbert, D. von Winkler, T. J. Kelly, and E. Fanning. 1992. Interaction of DNA polymerase alpha-primase with cellular replication protein A and SV40 T antigen. EMBO J. 11:769-776.[Medline]
14. Dornreiter, I., W. C. Copeland, and T. S. F. Wang. 1993. Initiation of simian virus 40 DNA replication requires the interaction of a specific domain of human DNA polymerase alpha with large T antigen. Mol. Cell. Biol. 13:809-820.
15. Dua, R., D. Levy, and J. L. Campbell. 1999. Analysis of the essential functions of the C-terminal protein/protein interaction domain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae pol
and its unexpected ability to support growth in the absence of the DNA polymerase domain. J. Biol. Chem. 274:22283-22288.
16. D'Urso, G., and P. Nurse. 1997. Schizosaccharomyces pombe cdc 20+ encodes DNA polymerase
and is required for chromosomal replication but not for the S phase checkpoint. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:12491-12496.
17. Eki, T., T. Matsumoto, Y. Murakami, and J. Hurwitz. 1992. The replication of DNA containing the simian virus 40 origin by the monopolymerase and dipolymerase systems. J. Biol. Chem. 267:7284-7294.
18. Ferrari, M., G. Lucchini, P. Plevani, and M. Foiani. 1996. Phosphorylation of the DNA polymerase
-primase B subunit is dependent on its association with the p180 polypeptide. J. Biol. Chem. 271:8661-8666.
19. Foiani, M., F. Marini, D. Gamba, G. Lucchini, and P. Plevani. 1994. The B subunit of the DNA polymerase alpha-primase complex in Saccharomyces cerevisiae executes an essential function at the initial stage of DNA replication. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14:923-933.
20. Foiani, M., G. Liberi, G. Lucchini, and P. Plevani. 1995. Cell cycle-dependent phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of yeast DNA polymerase alpha-primase B subunit. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15:883-891.[Abstract]
21. Foiani, M., G. Lucchini, and P. Plevani. 1997. The DNA polymerase
-primase complex couples DNA replication, cell-cycle progression and DNA-damage response. Trends Biochem. Sci. 22:424-427.[CrossRef][Medline]
22. Henricksen, L. A., C. B. Umbricht, and M. S. Wold. 1994. Recombinant replication protein A: expression, complex formation, and functional characterization. J. Biol. Chem. 269:11121-11132.
23. Herendeen, D., and T. J. Kelly. 1996. SV40 DNA replication, p. 29-65. In J. J. Blow (ed.), Eukaryotic DNA replication. Oxford University Press, New York, N.Y.
24. Huang, S.-G., K. Weisshart, I. Gilbert, and E. Fanning. 1998. Stoichiometry and mechanism of assembly of simian virus 40 T antigen complexes with the viral origin of DNA replication and DNA polymerase
-primase. Biochemistry 37:15345-15352.[CrossRef][Medline]
25. Huebscher, U., H.-P. Nasheuer, and J. E. Syvaoja. 2000. Eukaryotic DNA polymerases, a growing family. Trends Biochem. Sci. 25:143-147.[CrossRef][Medline]
26. Kamimura, Y., H. Masumoto, A. Sugino, and H. Araki. 1998. Sld2, which interacts with Dpb11 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, is required for chromosomal DNA replication. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18:6102-6109.
27. Kamimura, Y., Y.-S. Tak, A. Sugino, and H. Araki. 2001. Sld3, which interacts with Cdc45 (Sld4), functions for chromosomal DNA replication in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 20:2097-2107.[CrossRef][Medline]
28. Lohman, T. M., J. M. Green, and R. S. Beyer. 1986. Large scale overproduction and rapid purification of the Escherichia coli ssb gene product. Expression of the ssb gene under
PL control. Biochemistry 25:21-25.[CrossRef][Medline]
29. Longhese, M. P., H. Neecke, V. Paciotti, G. Lucchini, and P. Plevani. 1996. The 70 kDa subunit of replication protein A is required for the G1/S and intra-S DNA damage checkpoints in budding yeast. Nucleic Acids Res. 24:3533-3537.
30. Longhese, M. P., R. Fraschini, P. Plevani, and G. Lucchini. 1996. Yeast pip3/mec3 mutants fail to delay entry into S phase and to slow DNA replication in response to DNA damage, and they define a functional link between Mec3 and DNA primase. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:3235-3244.[Abstract]
31. Lopes, M., C. Cotta-Ramusino, A. Pellicioli, G. Liberi, P. Plevani, M. Muzi-Falconi, C. S. Newlon, and M. Foiani. 2001. The DNA replication checkpoint response stabilizes stalled replication forks. Nature 412:557-561.[CrossRef][Medline]
32. Mailand, N., J. Falck, C. Lukas, R. G. Syljuasen, M. Welcker, J. Bartek, and J. Lukas. 2000. Rapid destruction of Cdc25A in response to DNA damage. Science 288:1425-1429.
33. Marini, F., A. Pellicioli, V. Paciotti, G. Lucchini, P. Plevani, D. F. Stern, and M. Foiani. 1997. A role for DNA primase in coupling DNA replication to DNA damage response. EMBO J. 16:639-650.[CrossRef][Medline]
34. Masumoto, H., A. Sugino, and H. Araki. 2000. Dpb11 controls the association between DNA polymerase
and
and the autonomously replicating sequence region of budding yeast. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:2809-2817.
35. Masumoto, H., S. Muramatsu, Y. Kamimura, and H. Araki. 2002. S-Cdk-dependent phosphorylation of Sld2 essential for chromosomal DNA replication in budding yeast. Nature 415:651-655.[CrossRef][Medline]
36. Matsumoto, T., T. Eki, and J. Hurwitz. 1990. Studies on the initiation and elongation reactions in the simian virus 40 DNA replication system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87:9712-9716.
37. Melendy, T., and B. Stillman. 1993. An interaction between replication protein A and T antigen appears essential for primosome assembly during SV40 DNA replication. J. Biol. Chem. 268:3389-3395.
38. Mimura, S. T. Masuda, T. Matsui, and H. Takisawa. 2000. Central role for Cdc45 in establishing an initiation complex of DNA replication in Xenopus egg extracts. Genes Cells 5:439-452.[Abstract]
39. Mimura, S., and H. Takisawa. 1998. Xenopus Cdc45-dependent loading of DNA polymerase
onto chromatin under the control of S-phase cdk. EMBO J. 17:5699-5707.[CrossRef][Medline]
40. Mizuno, T., K. Yamagishi, H. Miyazawa, and F. Hanaoka. 1999. Molecular architecture of the mouse DNA polymerase
-primase complex. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19:7886-7896.
41. Mizuno, T., N. Ito, M. Yokoi, A. Kobayashi, K. Tamai, H. Miyazawa, and F. Hanaoka. 1998. The second-largest subunit of the mouse DNA polymerase
-primase complex facilitates both production and nuclear translocation of the catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase
. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18:3552-3562.
42. Mizuno, T., T. Okamoto, M. Yokoi, M. Izumi, A. Kobayashi, T. Hachiya, K. Tamai, T. Inoue, and F. Hanaoka. 1996. Identification of the nuclear localization signal of mouse DNA primase: nuclear transport of p46 subunit is facilitated by interaction with p54 subunit. J. Cell Sci. 109(2):627-2636.
43. Moarefi, I. F., D. Small, I. Gilbert, M. Hoepfner, S. K. Randall, A. A. Russo, U. Ramsperger, A. K. Arthur, H. Stahl, T. J. Kelly, and E. Fanning. 1993. Mutation of the cyclin-dependent kinase phosphorylation site in simian virus 40 (SV40) large T antigen specifically blocks SV40 origin DNA unwinding. J. Virol. 67:4992-5002.
44. Molinari, M., C. Mercurio, J. Dominguez, F. Goubin, and G. F. Draetta. 2000. Human Cdc25A inactivation in response to S phase inhibition and its role in preventing premature mitosis. EMBO Rep. 1:71-79.[CrossRef][Medline]
45. Morrison, A., H. Araki, A. B. Clark, R. K. Hamatake, and A. Sugino. 1990. A third essential DNA polymerase in S. cerevisiae. Cell 62:1143-1151.[CrossRef][Medline]
46. Murakami, Y., and J. Hurwitz. 1993. Functional interactions between SV40 T antigen and other replication proteins at the replication fork. J. Biol. Chem. 268:11008-11017.
47. Murakami, Y., and J. Hurwitz. 1993. DNA polymerase
stimulates the ATP-dependent binding of simian virus 40 tumor T antigen to the SV40 origin of replication. J. Biol. Chem. 268:11018-11027.
48. Murakami, Y., T. Eki, and J. Hurwitz. 1992. Studies on the initiation of simian virus 40 replication in vitro: RNA primer synthesis and its elongation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89:952-956.
49. Nasheuer, H.-P., A. Moore, A. F. Wahl, and T. S. F. Wang. 1991. Cell cycle-dependent phosphorylation of human DNA polymerase alpha. J. Biol. Chem. 266:7893-7903.
50. Nasheuer, H.-P., D. von Winkler, C. Schneider, I. Dornreiter, I. Gilbert, and E. Fanning. 1992. Purification and functional characterization of bovine RP-A in an in vitro SV40 DNA replication system. Chromosoma 102:S52-S59.[CrossRef][Medline]
51. Ott, R. D., Y. Wang, and E. Fanning. 2002. Mutational analysis of the primosome activities of SV40 T antigen in viral DNA replication. J. Virol. 76:5121-5130.
52. Pellicioli, A., C. Lucca, G. Liberi, F. Marini, M. Lopes, P. Plevani, A. Romano, P. P. Di Fiore, and M. Foiani. 1999. Activation of Rad53 kinase in response to DNA damage and its effect in modulating phosphorylation of the lagging strand DNA polymerase. EMBO J. 18:6561-6572.[CrossRef][Medline]
53. Pospiech, H., I. Kursula, W. Abdel-Aziz, L. Malkas, L. Uitto, M. Kastelli, M. Vihinen-Ranta, S. Eskelinen, and J. E. Syvaoja. 1999. A neutralizing antibody against human DNA polymerase
inhibits cellular but not SV40 DNA replication. Nucleic Acids Res. 27:3799-3804.
54. Schneider, C., K. Weisshart, L. A. Guarino, I. Dornreiter, and E. Fanning. 1994. Species-specific functional interactions of DNA polymerase
-primase with simian virus 40 (SV40) T antigen require SV40 origin DNA. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14:3176-3185.
55. Schub, O., G. Rohaly, R. W. P. Smith, A. Schneider, S. Dehe, I. Dornreiter, and H.-P. Nasheuer. 2001. Multiple phosphorylation sites of DNA polymerase
-primase cooperate to regulate the initiation of DNA replication in vitro. J. Biol. Chem. 276:38076-38083.
56. Sugino, A. 1995. Yeast DNA polymerases and their role at the replication fork. Trends Biochem. Sci. 20:319-323.[CrossRef][Medline]
57. Tercero, J. A., and J. F. X. Diffley. 2001. Regulation of DNA replication fork progression through damaged DNA by the Mec1/Rad53 checkpoint. Nature 412:553-557.[CrossRef][Medline]
58. Tsurimoto, T., and B. Stillman. 1991. Replication factors required for SV40 DNA replication in vitro. I. DNA structure-specific recognition of a primer-template junction by eukaryotic DNA polymerases and their accessory proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 266:1950-1960.
59. Tsurimoto, T., and B. Stillman. 1991. Replication factors required for SV40 DNA replication in vitro. II. Switching of DNA polymerase
and
during initiation of leading and lagging strand synthesis. J. Biol. Chem. 266:1961-1968.
60. Voitenleitner, C., C. Rehfuess, M. Hilmes, L. O'Rear, P. C. Liao, D. A. Gage, R. Ott, H.-P. Nasheuer, and E. Fanning. 1999. Cell cycle-dependent regulation of human DNA polymerase
-primase activity by phosphorylation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19:646-656.
61. Voitenleitner, C., E. Fanning, and H.-P. Nasheuer. 1997. Phosphorylation of DNA polymerase alpha-primase by cyclin A-dependent kinases regulates initiation of DNA replication in vitro. Oncogene 14:1611-1615.[CrossRef][Medline]
62. Waga, S., and B. Stillman. 1998. The DNA replication fork in eukaryotic cells. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 67:721-751.[CrossRef][Medline]
63. Waga, S., T. Masuda, H. Takisawa, and A. Sugino. 2001. DNA polymerase
is required for coordinated and efficient chromosomal DNA replication in Xenopus egg extracts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:4978-4983.
64. Walther, A. P., M. J. Bjerke, and M. S. Wold. 1999. A novel assay for examining the molecular reactions at the eukaryotic replication fork: activities of replication protein A required during elongation. Nucleic Acids Res. 27:656-664.
65. Wang, T. S. F. 1996. Cellular DNA polymerases, p.461-493. In M. L. DePamphilis (ed.), DNA replication in eukaryotic cells. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Plainview, N.Y.
66. Weisshart, K., H. Forster, E. Kremmer, B. Schlott, F. Grosse, and H.-P. Nasheuer. 2000. Protein-protein interactions of the primase subunits p58 and p48 with simian virus 40 T antigen are required for efficient primer synthesis in a cell-free system. J. Biol. Chem. 275:17328-17337.
67. Weisshart, K., P. Taneja, and E. Fanning. 1998. The replication protein A binding site in simian virus 40 (SV40) T antigen and its role in the initial steps of SV40 DNA replication. J. Virol. 72:9771-9781.
68. Wong, H., and S. J. Elledge. 1999. DRC1, DNA replication and checkpoint protein 1, functions with DPB11 to control DNA replication and the S-phase checkpoint in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:11791-11795.
69. Yuzhakov, A., Z. Kelman, J. Hurwitz, and M. O'Donnell. 1999. Multiple competition reactions for RPA order the assembly of the DNA polymerase
holoenzyme. EMBO J. 18:6189-6199.[CrossRef][Medline]
70. Zlotkin, T., G. Kaufmann, Y. Jiang, M. Y. W. T. Lee, L. Uitto, J. Syväoja, I. Dornreiter, E. Fanning, and T. Nethanel. 1996. DNA polymerase epsilon may be dispensable for SV40 but not for cellular DNA replication. EMBO J. 15:2298-2305.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles: